The efficacy and parenchymal consequences of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in infants

Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for infantile nephrolithiasis. Single centre experience from Pakistan

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for small renal stones 1-2 cm in size in infants less than one year.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This descriptive case series was conducted in the department of pediatric urology Institute of Kidney Diseases Peshawar, Pakistan, from March 2019 to March 2022. All the patients underwent mini-PCNL in prone position under GA with 14 Fr access sheath and 10 Fr nephroscope. Stone clearance was assessed by non-contrast CT KUB at 30th postoperative day. Patients with no residual fragments on the non-contrast CT KUB were defined as stone-free. Patients with residual fragments of any size were defined as procedure failure. Safety was determined in terms of intra and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 51 infants were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 9.6 + 1.8 (5-12 month). The mean stone size was 15.8 + 2.7 (10-21) mm in length and 12.3 + 2.2 (8-17) mm in width. PCNL mean operative time was 51.6 ± 7.1 (40-70) minutes. Complete stone clearance at one month was observed in 46 (90.2%) patients. Residual fragments were seen in 5(9.8%) patients with a mean size of 1.6 + 0.4 (0.9-2.0) mm. None of the patients required any additional procedure for clearance of stones. In 7 (13.7%) patients, some post-operative complications were observe, all were grade I complications, including fever in 5(9.8%) and transient hematuria in 2(3.9%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Mini-PCNL is a safe and effective treatment for renal stones in infants measuring 1-2 cm with high SFR and an acceptable complication rate.

Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Cystine Stones in Children: An Observational, Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis

Purpose: Cystinuria is a genetic disorder characterized by a defective reabsorption of cystine and dibasic amino acids leading to development of urinary tract calculi from childhood onward. Cystine lithiasis is known to be resistant to fragmentation. The aim was to evaluate our long-term experience with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) used as first-line urological treatment to treat cystine stones in children. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all children who underwent ESWL for cystine stone. We assessed the 3-month stone-free rate, according to age, younger (group 1) or older (group 2) than 2 years old. Results: Between 2003 and 2016, 15 patients with a median (IQR) age at first treatment of 48 (15-108) months underwent ESWL in monotherapy. Median age was, respectively, 15 and 108 months in each group. The median (IQR) stone burden was 2,620 (1,202-8,265) mm³ in group I and 4,588 (2,039-5,427) mm³ in group II (p = 0.96). Eleven patients had bilateral calculi. ESWL was repeated on average 2.4 times, with a maximum of 4 for patients of group I, and 4.8 times, with a maximum of 9 for group II (p > 0.05). ESWL in monotherapy was significantly more efficient to reach stone-free status for children under 2 years of age: 83% vs. 6.2% (p = 0.040). The median (IQR) follow-up of the study was 69 (42-111) months. Conclusion: ESWL appears as a valid urological option for the treatment of cystine stones, in young children. Even if cystine stones are known to be resistant to fragmentation, we report 83% of stone-free status at 3 months with ESWL used in monotherapy in children under 2 years old with cystinuria. In older children, the success rate is too low to recommend ESWL as a first line approach.

Management of staghorn stones in special situations

Staghorn stones have always been a challenge for urologists, especially in some special situations, such as horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney, paediatric kidney, and solitary kidney. The treatment of these staghorn stones must be aggressive because they can lead to renal function loss and serious complications. The gold-standard management for staghorn stones is surgical treatment with the aim of clearing the stones and preserving renal function. Treatment methods for staghorn stones have developed rapidly, such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and laparoscopy and open surgery. Whether the standard procedures for staghorn stones can also apply to these stones in special situations is still not agreed upon. The decision should be made individually according to the circumstances of the patient. In this review, we evaluates the previous studies and comments on the management of staghorn stones under special situations in the hope of guiding the optimal choice for urologists.

Shockwave lithotripsy for kidney stones as a first-line therapy in children younger than 2 years

BACKGROUND

The incidence of urolithiasis in children has risen worldwide over the last decades with geographical varieties. As pediatric patients begin forming stones earlier in life, they have high risk of recurrence. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is a non-invasive treatment modality that is preferred in the management of pediatric stones. Reports about the safety and efficacy of SWL in patients younger than 24 months are scarce in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of SWL in patients younger than 24 months. The authors also aimed to assess the validity of the Dogan nomogram in predicting stone-free rates.

STUDY DESIGN

Between January 2009 and March 2019, data of 247 patients younger than 24 months at the time of SWL were retrospectively collected. Analysis was performed on 260 renal units. Success was considered in patients who were completely free of stones after the first session.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The female/male ratio was 103/157, with a median age of 15 (5-24) months, a median stone size of 8 (3-30) mm and a median follow-up period of 7 (3-20) months. Multiple stones and lower calyx stones were observed in 19.6% (51/260) and 23.4% (61/260) of patients, respectively. Complications were detected in 5.8% (15/260) of patients (9 with steinstrasse, 3 with UTI, 2 with vomiting, 1 with hematuria). After the first session, 56.9% (148/260) of patients were stone-free. Forty-six of the failed 112 first sessions underwent second session. A total of 5 patients had a third session. The efficacy quotient was 57%. On univariate analysis, younger age (≤16 months), single stone, small stone size (<10 mm), and non-lower pole location were significant predictors of stone clearance. On multivariate analysis, younger age (=<16 months) and single stone remained significant. The Dogan nomogram score lower than 150 was found to be a good cutoff point to predict better stone clearance (Table).

CONCLUSION

Shockwave lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment modality in patients younger than 24 months and could be the first option in this particular age-group in whom the other endourological modalities are not always applicable. The Dogan nomogram is reliable in predicting the stone-free rate in this age-group.

Impact of repeated extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on prepubertal rat kidney

This study aimed to investigate the effects of repeated extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on the kidneys of prepubertal and adult rats. Thirty rats were used: 15 were prepubertal (3 weeks of age) with an average body weight of 72.3 ± 3.3 g, and 15 were adults with of 265 ± 11.3 g. The prepubertal and adult rats were separately and randomly allocated to three groups, each consisting of five rats. Following anesthetization, the left kidney of each rat in each group received shock waves in one, two, or three sessions separated by 72 h. The rats in each group were killed 72 h after the last ESWL session, and both kidneys were harvested; the right kidney was used as the control. Renal injury was examined with histological analysis, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot to detecting the expression of heat-shock protein-70, tumor necrosis factor-alpha-α, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 as markers of renal damage. All of these markers were similarly increased with increased ESWL sessions in both age groups. Histological analysis revealed more serious fibrosis and inflammation in the ESWL-treated kidneys in both groups than in the controls, with the damage increasing with increasing numbers of sessions. ESWL on the kidney increased renal damage according to the number of sessions in both age groups of rats, and the effects of ESWL on renal injury were similar in the two groups. However, there were generally no significant differences in the effects of ESWL on molecular indicators of renal injury between prepubertal and adult rats.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy in children: Predictors of successful outcome

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Although extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the first choice for pediatric renal calculi <2 cm, the success rate after the first session is low. This is in contrast to other minimally invasive procedures like percutanous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), which have higher rates of success. Therefore, the present study sought to identify predictors of success after one session of ESWL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study including 100 children with renal stone burden <2 cm who underwent ESWL at the present institution. The success rate after the first session was analyzed, and the predictors of success were investigated. The success of ESWL monotherapy was defined by absence of any residual fragments after 3 months, on non-contrast spiral computerized tomography (NCCT) scan, without need of any additional intervention.

RESULTS

Between January 2013 and October 2015, 100 children were treated with a Dornier Gemini lithotripter at the present institution. The mean patients age and stone size were 6 years (range: 1.8-14) and 13.1 mm (range: 6-20), respectively. After one session, 47% of patients showed complete clearance 3 months postoperative, those patients versus those who required an additional session or auxiliary procedures were younger in age, with smaller stone size and lower density. On multivariate analysis, only patient age was an independent predictor of success (odds ratio (OR) 0.9; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patient's age was an important predictor for response after ESWL monotherapy: not only did children respond better than adults, but age was also an independent predictor within the pediatric group.

Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Urolithiasis Between Children and Adults: A Single Centre Study

Objective

To retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for urolithiasis and compare the results between children and adults.

Materials and methods

From January 2011 to January 2015 (four years), ESWL was performed in 104 children and 300 adults for urolithiasis. MODULITH^® SLX-F2 lithotripter (Storz Medical AG, Tägerwilen, Switzerland) equipment was used for ESWL. The stone-free rates, the number of ESWL sessions required, complication rates and ancillary procedures used were evaluated in a comparative manner.

Results

The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) of children was 7.84±4.22 years and of adults was a 40.22±1.57 years. Mean ± SD of the stone size was 1.28±61 cm in the adults while 1.08 ± 0.59 cm in the children. In adults, the complications included steinstrasse in six (1.98%) patients, fever in 15 (4.95%), hematuria in 19 (6.28%) and sepsis in six (1.98%) patients. In children, steinstrasse was observed in two (1.9%), mild fever in two (1.9%), hematuria in six (5.7%) and sepsis was seen in four (3.8%) patients. The overall complication rate in the adults and in the children, it was found to be 46/300 (15%) and in the children, it was seen to be 14/104 (13%). No statistical difference was found in post-ESWL complications between children and adults (P>0.05). Ancillary procedures including double J (DJ) stent were used in 13 (12.5%) children and 87 (29%) adults. There was a better stone clearance rate in children i.e. 79% as compared to 68% in adults (X²: P=0.036).

Conclusion

Children can achieve high stone-free rates after ESWL with a lower need for repeat ancillary procedures as compared to adults. However, there is a difference in the post-ESWL complications between these groups.

Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Pediatric Urolithiasis

PURPOSE

Shock wave lithotripsy has been commonly used to treat children with renal and ureteral calculi but recently ureteroscopy has been used more frequently. We examined postoperative outcomes from these 2 modalities in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed linked inpatient, ambulatory surgery and emergency department data from 2007 to 2010 for 5 states to identify pediatric admissions for renal/ureteral calculi treated with shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy. Unplanned readmissions, additional procedures and emergency room visits were extracted. Multivariate logistic regression using generalized estimating equations to adjust for hospital level clustering was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 2,281 admissions (1,087 for shock wave lithotripsy and 1,194 for ureteroscopy). Ages of patients undergoing ureteroscopy and those undergoing shock wave lithotripsy were similar (median 17.0 years for both cohorts, p = 0.001) but patients were more likely to be female (63.4% vs 54.7%, p <0.0001), to be privately insured (69.8% vs 62.2%, p <0.0005) and to have a ureteral stone (81.0% vs 34.8%, p <0.0001). Patients undergoing ureteroscopy demonstrated a lower rate of additional stone related procedures within 12 months (13.6% vs 18.8%, p <0.0007) but a higher rate of readmissions (10.8% vs 6.3%, p <0.0002) and emergency room visits (7.9% vs 4.9%, p <0.0036) within 30 days postoperatively. On multivariable analysis patients undergoing ureteroscopy were nearly twice as likely to visit an emergency room within 30 days of the procedure (OR 1.97, p <0.001) and to be readmitted to inpatient services (OR 1.71, p <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopy is now used more commonly than shock wave lithotripsy for initial pediatric stone intervention. Although repeat treatment rates did not differ between procedures, ureteroscopy patients were more likely to be seen at an emergency room or hospitalized within 30 days of the initial procedure.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in infants less than 12-month old

There is a lack of literature on children compared to adults regarding the long-term effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), specifically in infants. The aim of the present study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of SWL in infants and also evaluate its potential adverse effects in the mid-term. Between May 1999 and December 2013, 36 infants with 39 renal units underwent SWL treatment for kidney stones with an electrohydraulic lithotripter (Dornier MPL 9000/ELMED Multimed Classic). All children were less than 12-month old. The mid-term effects of SWL were examined at the last follow-up by measuring arterial blood pressure, random blood glucose level and ipsilateral kidney size. Evaluation of treatment and its consequences was based on clinical examination, blood tests and conventional imaging (plain abdominal radiography and ultrasound). Overall stone-free rate was 84.6 % after 3-month follow-up without any major complications. Mid-term follow-up was available in 20 of 36 children with a mean follow-up of 3.2 ± 2.8 years (range 0.5-15.3). None of the infants were found to develop new onset of hypertension or diabetes. All treated infant kidneys' sizes were in the normal percentile range. SWL for management of infant kidney stones is effective and safe in the mid-term.

Interleukin-18 and NGAL in assessment of ESWL treatment safety in children with urolithiasis

Urolithiasis is recurrent chronic disease and a complex nephro-urological problem. Currently it is diagnosed in very young children, even infants in the first quarter of life. Until recently the main method of treatment for stones, which for various reasons did not pass spontaneously, was open surgery. At present, the main method replacing open surgery is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Usefulness of common known indicators of the renal function to assess the safety of ESWL procedure is evaluated and verified. The basic markers are serum creatinine, cystatin C, urea, glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria assessment. Unfortunately all these methods show little sensitivity in the case of acute injury processes. There are efforts to use new biomarkers of renal tubular activity, which include among others interleukin 18 (IL-18) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). The aim of the study was to assess the safety of ESWL by means of albumin to creatinine ratio, serum cystatin C levels and concentration of two new markers: IL -18 and NGAL. Albumin to creatinine ratio (p = 0.28) and serum cystatin C (p = 0.63) collected before and 48 hours after ESWL did not show statistically significant differences. Similarly, both new markers (IL -18 and NGAL) showed no significant differences (urine IL -18 p = 0.31; serum NGAL p = 0.11; urine NGAL p = 0.29). In conclusion, serum cystatin C tests, urine albumin to creatinine ratio and new early markers of renal tubular injury confirmed the safety of the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and show that the procedure does not cause any episode of acute renal injury.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy under sedoanalgesia for treatment of kidney stones in infants: a single-center experience with 102 cases

OBJECT

We present the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) therapy administered with sedoanalgesia in infants with kidney stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 102 patients aged 5-24 months who had kidney stones and received SWL therapy under sedoanalgesia using a Siemens Lithostar Modularis device. Patient and stone characteristics, therapy parameters, pain score, complications, discharge time, and follow-ups were registered and evaluated. Pain score was assessed using a Neonatal Infant Pain Score (NIPS). Postanesthetic discharge scoring system (PADSS) was used for the assessments of postprocedural discharge procedure.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 17.2 ± 6.3 months (5-24 months). Mean stone size was 7.9 ± 3.3 mm (5-23 mm). The most common concomitant metabolic disorders were hypercalciuria and hypocitraturia. The stone-free rates of the infants were 70.6, 87.3, and 99.1 % after the first, second, and third sessions of SWL therapy, respectively. The mean NIPS scores procedure during, and at 1 h after SWL procedure were determined as 0.24 ± 0.45 and 0.34 ± 0.47, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between two pain score values (P = 0.114). The mean discharge time of patients after the SWL procedure were 108.6 ± 27.9 min. Forty-two patients (41.1 %) were followed up. The follow-up period varied between 8 and 48 months (mean 19.5 months); none of those patients showed evidence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or renal function impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

SWL therapy under sedoanalgesia is a safe and efficient treatment modality that can be administered with low complication rates and high stone-free rates in the treatment of renal stones in infants.

Long-term effects of pediatric extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on renal function

Introduction

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a well-known and successful treatment modality. In addition, it can be used in premature infants. ESWL is used to treat kidney and ureter stones in children. However, although it is a preferred noninvasive treatment in that setting, there is debate about its long-term effects on growing kidneys in children.

Objectives

To investigate the long-term effects of pediatric ESWL on renal function in light of updated literature.

Methods

PubMed and Medline were searched for studies on ESWL in a pediatric population with keywords including efficacy, child, kidney calculi, ureter calculi, lithotripsy, injury, vascular trauma, and shock waves. The research was limited to the English literature during a period from 1980 to 2014. In total, 3,000 articles were evaluated, but only 151 papers were considered. Only the manuscripts directly related to the reviewed subjects were included in the current study.

Results

However, the acute effects of ESWL in kidney are well-described. Although there are limited studies on the long-term effects of ESWL in children, there is a widespread opinion that ESWL is not affecting renal functions in the long-term.

Conclusion

ESWL is a safe, effective, and noninvasive treatment option in children. Although ESWL can cause some acute effects in the kidney, there is no long-term effect on the growing kidneys of children.

[Urolithiasis in childhood]

Urinary stone disease is relatively rare in children with an overall incidence of 1-2 %; however, it is often associated with metabolic abnormalities that may lead to recurrent stone formation. Stone analysis and subsequent metabolic evaluation is therefore mandatory for this high-risk group after the first stone event. The objectives of stone management in children should be complete stone clearance, prevention of stone recurrence, preservation of renal function, control of urinary tract infections, correction of anatomical abnormalities and correction of the underlying metabolic disorders. The full range of minimally invasive procedures is available if active stone removal is necessary. The majority of stones in children can be managed either with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy which has a higher efficacy in children than in adults, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, ureterorenoscopy or a combination of these modalities while open or laparoscopic surgery is limited to well-selected cases with underlying anatomical abnormalities.

Urinary stone disease in the first year of life: is it dangerous?

PURPOSE

We have evaluated the clinical, radiological and metabolic features of infantile urolithiasis (UL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have reviewed the medical records of 93 children who were diagnosed as having UL before 1 year of age. We recorded patient demographics, the age at diagnosis, presenting symptoms, family history, the localizations and dimensions of stones, urinary metabolic examinations, as well as physical, laboratory, and radiologic findings. Our secondary objective was to compare some features of this group with those of older children with UL followed-up in the same clinic which were previously reported.

RESULTS

We evaluated 93 children referred to our pediatric nephrology clinics. A family history of UL was 56.2 % in the study group. Resolution of stones was observed in 30.1 % of the cases. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) were detected in 65.9 % of females and 46.2 % of males. At least one urinary metabolic abnormality was found in 79.5 % of all the children. Most commonly seen metabolic abnormality was hypercalciuria. In all patients stones were located in kidneys except one infant who had an ureteral stone together with a kidney stone. Fifteen (16.1 %) children had an accompanying systemic disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Among pediatric urinary stone diseases infantile UL can be regarded as a separate clinical entity. Coexistence of systemic disorders and anatomic anomalies at high frequencies may indicate a role of distinct pathogenetic mechanisms. In addition, high rates of UTIs and metabolic abnormalities in this age group justify screening for these parameters during follow-up of these children.

Assessment of risk factors of pediatric urolithiasis in Egypt

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric urolithiasis is a significant medical problem, which has seen an increasing incidence in developing countries. The main objective of the present study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and the most important risk factors that contribute to stone formation in Egyptian children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study was carried out at the outpatient clinics of Cairo university children's hospital as well as October 6 University hospitals, between November 2008 and March 2012. One hundred and fifty children (100 males, 50 females; mean age 3.5 years; range, 1-14 years) suffering from urinary stones were included. The mean follow-up duration; 33.1 months. All patients underwent detailed medical and family histories, dietary habits and physical examination, including Growth percentiles. Laboratory investigations were performed including: complete urine analysis and culture and sensitivity tests, urine collection in 24-h to quantity urinary volume, pH, calcium, uric acid, magnesium, creatinine, oxalate and citrate. Blood samples were obtained to measure (serum creatinine, calcium, phosphorus, uric acid level, and alkaline phosphatase and electrolyte levels, in addition to pH and pCO2 values). Radio-sonographic investigation of the abdomen and pelvis was also performed.

RESULTS

The commonest presentations were abdominal pain in 42 children (28%) and gross hematuria in 35 patients (23%). Urinary tract infection was the most common risk factor, 60 patients (40%) had UTI, 70% of them had recurrent infections. Genito-urinary abnormalities, as a risk factor, were detected in 38 children (25%), with vesico-uretheral refux being the commonest abnormality (18/38). Metabolic risk factors were detected in 34 children (23%) with hypercalciuria and hyperoxaluria being the commonest metabolic abnormalities. Treatments used were, ESWL in 69 patients (46%), endoscopic interventions in 40 children (27%) and open surgery in 15 children (10%). The remaining 26 children (17%) were managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

treatment of pediatric urolithiasis requires stone removal besides a thorough metabolic and environmental evaluation of all patients on an individual basis, entailing the treatment of metabolic abnormalities. Children with a positive family history should be followed up cautiously to avoid stone recurrence.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is effective in treating single melamine induced urolithiasis in infants and young children

PURPOSE

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of single melamine induced urolithiasis in infants and young children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 189 infants and young children with single melamine induced urolithiasis were referred to our center for treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy between March 2009 and July 2010. Location of the calculus was proximal ureteral in 17 patients, mid ureteral in 5, distal ureteral in 26 and kidney in 141. Stone size ranged from 3.8 to 25 mm (mean ± SD 9.79 ± 3.83).

RESULTS

All patients underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the same device with an energy ranging from 8 to 12 kV. Stone-free rate was 97.88%, clinically insignificant residual fragment rate was 1.59% and repeat treatment rate was 2.65%. A total of 180 patients (95.24%) required only 1 lithotripsy session and 5 (2.65%) required 2 sessions. Mean ± SD number of shock waves delivered per session was 580.36 ± 190.69 (range 65 to 950). Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failed to fragment stones in only 1 infant, who had a proximal ureteral stone. A total of 181 specimens were collected and analyzed by infrared spectrum, with results demonstrating that the main composition was uric acid and melamine. All patients were followed for a mean of 28 months (range 20 to 36). No severe complication, such as renal subcapsular hemorrhage, hypertension, kidney rupture or lung injury, was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with low energy can effectively disintegrate melamine induced calculi. This approach has become our preferred method for treating single melamine induced urolithiasis in infants and young children.

The management of staghorn calculi in children

OBJECTIVES

To review reports focusing on the surgical treatment of staghorn stones in children, as despite all the improvements in the surgical treatment of paediatric urolithiasis the management of staghorn calculi still represents a challenging problem in urology practice.

METHODS

To evaluate current knowledge about treating staghorn calculi in children, we searched PubMed for relevant articles published between 1991 and 2011, using a combination of related keywords, i.e. staghorn stone, child, kidney calculi, surgical treatment, electrohydraulic shockwave therapy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and open surgery. Reports relating to the treatment of paediatric stone disease in general (open surgery, PCNL, ESWL) were also searched with the same method. Additional references were obtained from the reference list of full-text reports.

RESULTS

Although open surgery had been widely used in the past for treating such stones in children, currently it has only limited indications in highly selected patients. Current published data clearly indicate that, in experienced hands, both PCNL and ESWL are now effective methods for treating staghorn calculi in children.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to advanced techniques and instrumentation, it is now possible to successfully treat staghorn calculi in children, with very limited safety concerns. Currently, while PCNL is recommended as the first-line surgical treatment, ESWL, open surgery and/or combined methods are valuable but secondary options in the treatment of paediatric staghorn calculi.

Are there long-term effects of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in paediatric patients?

WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is effective for the treatment of paediatric renal stones with favourable short-term safety. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of paediatric renal stones is also safe for the kidney and the child on long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term effects of extracoporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treatment of renal stones in paediatric patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A database of paediatric patients who underwent SWL monotherapy for treatment of renal stones from September 1990 through to January 2009 was compiled. This study included only patients with follow-up for more than 2 years. The long-term effects of SWL were evaluated at the last follow-up with measurement of patients' arterial blood pressure, estimation of random blood sugar and urine analysis. The results of diastolic blood pressure were plotted against a standardized age reference curve. The treated kidney was examined by ultrasonography for measurement of renal length and detection of stones. The measured renal lengths were plotted against age-calculated normal renal lengths in healthy individuals.

RESULTS

The study included 70 patients (44 boys (63%) and 26 girls) with mean age at the time of SWL 6.5 ± 3.6 years (range 1-14). The mean follow-up period was 5.2 ± 3.6 years (range 2.1-17.5). The mean age at last follow-up was 11.7 ± 5.3 years (range 4.4-27.5). No patients developed hypertension or diabetes. Only one treated kidney was smaller than one standard deviation of the calculated length. The cause of this was obstruction by a stone in the pelvic ureter 3 years after SWL.

CONCLUSION

The long-term follow-up after SWL for treatment of renal stones in paediatric patients showed no effect on renal growth and no development of hypertension or diabetes.

Treatment of renal stones in infants: comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in treating renal stones sizing 15-25 mm in infants <3 years. Forty-six infants with renal stones sizing 15-30 mm were treated by either ESWL (22 renal units in 22 infants) using Dornier compact delta lithotripter or MPCNL (25 renal units in 24 infants) using 14F-18F renal access under general anesthesia. The operation time, stone-free rate, re-treatment rate, and complications between the two groups were compared with the χ(2), Mann-Whitney U, and Student's t tests. No significant differences in mean age and stone size were observed between the two groups. The 1- and 3-month postoperative stone-free rates were 84 and 96% in MPCNL group and were 31.8 and 86.4% in ESWL group. The re-treatment and complication rates were significantly higher in ESWL group than in MPCNL group (50 vs. 12%, P = 0.004; 16.0 vs. 45.5%, P = 0.028). The stone recurrence rate was similar between the two groups. No significant changes of serum creatinine (Cr) level and glomerular filtration rate were observed in both groups. In conclusion, MPCNL is an effective and feasible alternative monotherapy for large renal stones (15-25 mm) in infants, with a higher stone-free rate and a lower complication rate when compared with ESWL.

Urolithiasis in infants: evaluation of risk factors

OBJECTIVE

Urolithiasis in infants is not a very rare situation in Turkey, and the incidence has been increasing in recent years. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the clinical characteristics, metabolic and anatomic risk factors for urolithiasis and microlithiasis in infants.

METHODS

The cases of 178 infants (63 girls, 115 boys), who were referred to our department between 1999 and 2009 with urolithiasis, were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age at diagnosis of stone disease was 11.5 months (range, 10 days-24 months). The mean follow-up duration was 33.6 months (1.2-110 months). The major clinical symptoms of our patients were restlessness in 24 children (13.5%) and vomiting in 23 (13%). Thirty-five infants (19.7%) had a urinary tract abnormality; vesico-ureteral reflux was the most common abnormality (12.9%). Hypercalciuria and hyperuricosuria were detected in 46 and 56%, respectively. Stone analysis was performed in 56 infants, and calcium oxalate was determined in 36 patients (64.3%). A family history of urolithiasis, presenting symptoms and underlying metabolic abnormalities were similar for patients with microlithiasis and those with larger stones. However, infants with microlithiasis had higher ratios for history of vitamin D administration and feeding with formula. Surgical treatment was performed in 42 infants and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 30 infants.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that urolithiasis in infants may present nonspecific symptoms and may even be asymptomatic and that a positive family history for urolithiasis, urologic abnormalities, metabolic disorders, urinary tract infections, vitamin D administration and feeding with formula may increase the occurrence of urolithiasis in infants.

Urine cytology to evaluate urinary urothelial damage of shock-wave lithotripsy

Our aim is to study the prospective trial where urine cytology was used to detect the acute urothelial mucosal damage in patients who undergo extracorporeal shock waves lithotripsy (SWL). The study included 48 consecutive patients (28 male, 20 female) with mean age of 49.02 years (range 18-66) who were treated with SWL due to renal stones (30 patients) or upper ureter stones (18 patients). The mean calculi diameter was 12.44 mm (range 5-20). Urinary cytologic examinations were done for all patients immediately before and after SWL therapy and 10 days latter. The average numbers of transitional cells, red blood cells and myocytes were counted under 40 × magnification. In overall patients the average numbers of transitional cells at the cytologic examinations done immediately before and after SWL therapy were 1.6 and 7.53 cell/field, respectively (p = 0.001). The increment in transitional cells at cytologic examination after SWL was significantly influenced only by number of shock waves applied (p = 0.003). No muscle cell was detected in all cytologic examinations. The cytologic examinations which were done after 10 days of SWL therapy showed recovery from all cytologic abnormalities. The acute increment in number of transitional cells after the SWL is not clinically important and it is a temporary change. Urothelial lesion is limited to mucosal layer and there is no evidence of damage to basal membrane or deeper muscle layer. SWL safety on urothelial and muscular layer was demonstrated. However, evaluation of larger series with use of other lithotripters is necessary before reaching any definitive conclusions.

Evaluation of renal function in children undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

PURPOSE

The effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on the growing kidneys of young children has always been a concern. We determined whether shock wave lithotripsy causes renal parenchymal scarring or affects glomerular filtration rate in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 100 children with renal stones who presented to the shock wave lithotripsy unit at our institution between March 2005 and March 2008. A total of 28 children had multiple stones in the same kidney. All children with bilateral renal stones had 1 kidney cleared of stones by percutaneous nephrolithotomy before undergoing shock wave lithotripsy. A total of 138 stones were subjected to shock wave lithotripsy. All children underwent radionuclide scan of the renal parenchyma using dimercapto-succinic acid, and glomerular filtration rate was estimated using diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and 6 months afterward. Children with renal scarring due to previous surgery or vesicoureteral reflux were excluded from the study. The number of shock wave lithotripsy sessions to achieve stone-free status and the dose of shock waves used were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

No patient demonstrated renal parenchymal scarring on dimercapto-succinic acid scan or any statistically significant change in glomerular filtration rate on diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid scan up to 6 months after shock wave lithotripsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Shock wave lithotripsy is a safe modality for treating renal calculous disease in children up to 16 years old, with no impact on long-term kidney function.

[Extracorporeal lithotripsy in children - the efficacy and long-term evaluation of renal parenchyma damage by DMSA-99mTc scintigraphy]

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and possible deleterious effects on renal parenchyma of children subjected to treatment of renal lithiasis, using renal scintigraphy with 99mTc dimercapto-succunic acid (DMSA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2004 to November 2007, 18 children (age 3-10 years) underwent ESWL (Philips-Dornier) for kidney urolithiasis. All patients underwent preoperative evaluation, including physical examination, urine culture, image exams and renal scintigraphy with Tc99-DMSA. Evaluation after treatment consisted of a clinical examination, blood pressure measurement, urine culture, renal ultrasound and Tc99-DMSA, repeated at 3, 6 and 12 months, which were compared to the scans obtained before ESWL to determine possible morphological or functional changes.

RESULTS

Success in the stones fragmentation was achieved in all cases - in 9 patients (50%) with one session of ESWL, in 6 (33%) with two sessions and in 3 patients (17%) with 3 sessions of ESWL. Only one patient (5%), after three sessions of ESWL and 6 months of follow-up showed change in size of right kidney with a decrease in tubular function, without hypertension or other major changes. In the other cases, there was absence of hypertension up to 12 months of follow-up, absence of renal hematomas detected by ultrasound or significant renal scars in scintigraphic examinations.

CONCLUSION

ESWL is effective and safe for treating renal lithiasis in children. Renal parenchyma lesions may occur early after treatment, but these lesions are transients and resolve spontaneously in virtually all cases; generally, there are no irreversible renal lesions associated with ESWL, even after the follow-up period with clinical examination, ultrasound examination and 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prepubertal children: 22-year experience at a single institution with a single lithotriptor

PURPOSE

The sophistication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy challenges the efficacy of ESWL for urolithiasis in prepubertal patients. We evaluated our long-term experience with ESWL in these patients and determined its efficiency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all prepubertal patients who underwent ESWL. We evaluated the need for tubing, the 3-month stone-free rate, the need for additional ESWL, and the effect of stone size and location, and cystinuria on the 3-month stone-free rate.

RESULTS

Between 1986 and 2008, 119 males and 97 females with a mean age of 6.6 years who had urolithiasis underwent ESWL using the Dornier HM3 lithotriptor. We treated 157 children with renal calculi with an average +/- SD diameter of 14.9 +/- 8.9 mm, of whom 66 (42%) required a tube in the urinary system. The 3-month stone-free rate was 80% and 31 patients (19.7%) needed an additional procedure. Stone location did not affect the stone-free rate but stone size did. We treated 59 patients for ureteral stones with an average stone length of 9.5 +/- 4.8 mm, of whom 41 (69%) required tube insertion. The 3-month stone-free rate was 78% and 13 patients (22%) needed an additional procedure. The 3-month stone-free rate did not depend on stone location or size. The rate was 37.5% in patients with cystinuria and 82.5% in all others (p <0.0001). Six patients (2.8%) had complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-month stone-free rate after ESWL in prepubertal patients is 80% and 20% of patients require additional procedures. ESWL is most effective for kidney stones less than 11 mm. ESWL has inferior results for cystine stones compared to other calculi. Complications are rare.

Is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatrics a safe procedure?

Removal of urinary calculi is an essential element in the successful treatment of patients with urinary stone disease. The new generation of lithotriptors allows the treatment without the need for general anesthesia. The patients, often outpatients, have a faster discharge from the hospital with a reduction of hospitalization time and operating costs. Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is currently considered a safe technique for treatment of pediatric urinary lithiasias, with a low percentage of complications and subsequent surgical retreatments. But can we define SWL as a safe procedure in pediatrics? Herein, we will review the literature to justify SWL safety in children, focusing on important parameters as the insertion of preoperative stenting, side effects, and complications after the procedure.

[The lithiasis in the upper urinary tract in children: endourological treatment]

INTRODUCTION

Urolithiasis in the pediatric age is a growing problem. In the developed world they are of calcium oxalate and in the upper urinary tract. It is very similar to the presentation of lithiasis in adults, so we have to make an effort to apply the experience in this age to the children. The shock wave lithotripsy is admitted as the first treatment for this pathology in the pediatric population already. The endourological approach must be use as a common approach in this group. We present our technique and experience.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive study of the children diagnosed of lithiasis in the upper urinary tract that were treated by an endourological technique in our centre between January 1992 and January 2005. We gathered data on: 1.) Preoperative: age, sex, clinical manifestations, size (mm) and position of the lithiasis (we divided the upper urinary tract in: renal, proximal third, medial third and distal third) 2.) Operative variable: endourological technique: percutaneus neprolithotomy or ureteroscopy. Reconversion to open surgery. 3.) Postoperative variables: time since surgery, complications and the current state of the patient (ultrasonography and renal function).

RESULTS

Seven children, 4 boys and 2 girls with an age range of 2,5 to 14 years, underwent operation using an endourological technique. Lumboabdominal pain was the main clinical manifestation (4/7). The lithiasis size was 4-7mm, with the exception of a staghorn calculis. The calculis were: 5 ureteral proximal, 1 ureteral distal and one in the kidney (staghound stone). We performed one percutaneus neprolithotomy for the staghorn calculi. We removed completly the stone and had no complications. The 6 other procedures were ureteroscopies. In 3 of them we removed the calculi (4/7 success rate of 57%). The rest procedures we needed to transform in open surgery. With a following time of 1-13 years all of them are asymptomatic, and with ultrasonography and renal function in the normal limits. We did see no complications.

CONCLUSION

The endourological treatment for urolithiasis in pediatric patients is possible but must be individualized in each case. With the development of new endourological material and more surgical experience this technique will be to the reach of the most of the urologists.

Urolithiasis in infants

There are few publications about urolithiasis of the new born baby and infant (UNI). The UNI represents 20% of the pediatric urolithiasis. The etiologies in this age group are chiefly dominated by the urinary-tract infections and metabolic abnormalities. The purpose of this paper was to investigate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of infant urolithiasis and to define the various treatment modalities adapted to this age group.

Minimally invasive treatment of ureteral calculi in children

A retrospective analysis was done to determine the efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy in the treatment of paediatric ureteral calculi. We reviewed the records of 67 (35 boys, 32 girls) children (71 ureters) admitted to our clinic for treatment of ureteral calculi during 1990-2005. The initial treatment method was SWL in 80.3% (57 ureters), ureteroscopy in 11.3% (eight ureters) and open surgery in 8.5% (six ureters) of the renal units. The mean age of the patients was 10.67 +/- 4.4(1-16) years. The stone-free rates after SWL for upper, middle and lower ureteral calculi were 74.1, 100 and 75.9%, respectively. Increased stone diameter (P = 0.014) and/or burden (P = 0.002) were found to be significant factors that had an adverse affect on the stone-free rate after SWL while the success rates of SWL were independent of location. Including six patients (seven ureters) with failed SWL, a total of 14 patients (15 renal units) subjected to ureteroscopy for lower ureteral calculi yielded a stone-free rate of 93.3%. Thus, the overall stone-free rates after SWL, ureteroscopy and open surgery were found to be 75.4, 93.3 and 100%, respectively. Depending on the stone burden, SWL might be a good option for initial treatment of most ureteral calculi in children. Ureteroscopy offers a high success rate for lower ureteral calculi, including SWL failures.

Treatment of renal stones in children: a comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy

PURPOSE

We compared the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of 1 to 2 cm renal stones in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 166 children with renal stones 1 to 2 cm. A total of 75 patients (82 kidneys) were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy and 91 (93 kidneys) were treated with shock wave lithotripsy. Mean followup was 31 +/- 10 months (range 6 to 84). Both groups were compared regarding stone-free rate, re-treatment rate, complications and incidence of stone recurrence.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable regarding preoperative characteristics. Of the units treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy 4 (4.9%) were associated with minor complications. Stone-free rate after a single session of percutaneous nephrolithotomy was 86.6% (71 units), and the remaining 11 kidneys with residual stones were successfully treated with repeat percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 7 and shock wave lithotripsy in 4. Therefore, a total of 78 units (95%) were stone-free after percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy, and the overall stone-free rate at 3 months was 100%. Of the patients undergoing shock wave lithotripsy 1 (1.1%) had development of steinstrasse and was successfully treated with ureteroscopy. The overall re-treatment rate after shock wave lithotripsy was 55%. A total of 79 units (84.9%) were stone-free after shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy, whereas 7 (7.5%) with no gross response to treatment were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy and 7 with insignificant stones less than 4 mm were followed. Therefore, the overall stone-free rate at 3 months was 92.5%. The differences in stone-free rates and re-treatment rates significantly favored percutaneous nephrolithotomy, while the incidence of complications and stone recurrence at last followup were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For treatment of 1 to 2 cm renal stones in children percutaneous nephrolithotomy is better than shock wave lithotripsy, yielding higher stone-free and lower re-treatment rates.

Surgical management of urolithiasis

Pediatric patients with urolithiasis present unique challenges. Interventional techniques developed for adult patients have been adopted and adapted to facilitate effective and safe treatment in this population. Management must be stratified and individualized, taking into account the many factors described in this article. Long-term follow-up and metabolic evaluation are essential components of the overall treatment strategy. Interventional management will continue to evolve with progressive refinements in instrumentation and techniques.

Stepwise shock wave lithotripsy: Results of initial study for the treatment of urinary stones in childhood

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of stepwise extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary stones in childhood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 1998 and August 2003, 31 patients were treated for renal or ureteric stones. All treatments were performed with Dornier Compact Delta lithotripter. The number of shock wave was limited to maximum 3000 shock waves/session. The voltage was started at 10 kV and increased stepwise to 12.75 kV. Stone clearance was assessed at 3 months. The stone free state was defined as the absence of stone fragments.

RESULTS

Total 31 stones (24 renal and 7 ureteral stones) were treated. The age of the patients was median 8 (min-max: 0.8-12) years. The length of the stones was median 1 (min-max: 0.5-1.5) cm for renal stones and median 0.5 (min-max: 0.5-1) cm for ureteral stones. As an auxiliary procedure, open pyelolithotomy was required for 1 patient. The overall stone free rates for renal and ureter stones were 79% and 100%, respectively. Post-treatment insignificant hematuria was observed in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Stepwise shock wave lithotripsy was an effective procedure for the treatment of urinary calculi in childhood.

Factors affecting the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi in children

The aim of the study was to analyse factors affecting the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in children with renal calculi. We performed a retrospective analysis reviewing records of 85 (40 female, 45 male) children (89 renal units) subjected to ESWL for treatment of renal calculi during 1990-2005 in our department. As 4 patients had bilateral calculi and 19 children (21 renal units) had renal stones at more than one different site, each location was analysed separately for convenience. The mean age of the patients was 10.3+/-4.6 (2-16) years. The stone-free rates for renal pelvis, lower, middle and upper caliceal calculi were 70, 62, 50 and 73%, respectively. A higher rate (33%) of insignificant fragments (< or = 4 mm) was noted for lower pole calculi. Increased stone diameter (P=0.0001) and burden (P=0.04) were found as the most significant factors that adversely affect the stone-free rate for pelvis renalis calculi, whereas an acutely oriented infundibulum and/or a long lower infundibulum (P=0.005) were unfavourable factors for clearance of lower caliceal stones. The stone-free rate in children with multiple calculi was 48%, while 29% of the renal units had retained fragments. ESWL is a good initial option for treatment of most of the renal calculi < 2 cm except in the presence of unfavourable lower caliceal anatomy. Increased stone burden, multiple stones, staghorn calculi, narrow lower infundibulopelvic angle and long lower infundibulum are factors that adversely affect the clearance rate.

Pediatric urolithiasis

Pediatric stone disease is a frequently underestimated entity that can present unique problems in its management. The condition stems from any of a number of underlying, causative factors, and the significant possibility of recurrence must always be borne in mind. The primary care physician should be aware that the condition is readily treatable by an experienced pediatric urologist who has a range of treatment modalities at his or her disposal; however, overall success is governed by a timely referral and subsequent long-term follow-up to ensure the maintenance of a stone-free state.