A randomized, double-blind crossover study of tamsulosin and controlled-release doxazosin in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Effect of alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists on sexual function. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonists or alpha-blockers are used in the treatment of hypertension, in the therapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia and in medical expulsive treatment of ureteral stones. These agents may affect the sexual function, with differences between drugs within the same class, depending on their selectivity for receptor subtypes. The aim of this review was to analyze the effects of alpha-blockers on sexual function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, EMBASE and other databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting sexual adverse effects in patients treated with alpha-blockers. Odds ratios for sexual dysfunction were calculated using random effects Mantel-Haenszel statistics.

RESULTS

Out of 608 records retrieved, 75 eligible RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, alphablockers were associated with increased odds of ejaculatory disorders both in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (OR: 7.53, 95% CI: 3.77-15.02, Z = 5.73, p < 0.00001, I2 = 55%) and in patients with ureteral stones (OR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.50-5.44, Z = 3.19, p < 0.001, I2 = 31%). Uroselective alpha-blockers showed higher odds of ejaculatory disorders. Conversely, nonselective alpha-blockers were not associated with higher odds of ejaculatory dysfunction. Silodosin was associated with increased odds of ejaculatory dysfunction compared with tamsulosin (OR: 3.52, 95% CI: 2.18-5.68, 15 series, 1512 participants, Z = 5.15, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Naftopidil and alfuzosin showed lower odds of ejaculatory dysfunction compared to uroselective alpha-blockers.No statistically significant differences in the odds of erectile dysfunction were observed when alpha-blockers were compared to placebo.

Efficacy and tolerability of doxazosin gastro-intestinal therapeutic system versus tamsulosin in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists (α1-blockers) are first-line drugs for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and tamsulosin belong to the 2 most frequently prescribed α1-blockers. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of these 2 α1-blockers.

METHODS

A systematic review of published randomized controlled trials in English or Chinese language was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and Vip databases. After data extraction and quality assessment, the meta-analysis was performed to compare clinical parameters (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] total [IPSS-T], storage [IPSS-S], voiding [IPSS-V], maximum urine flow [Qmax], and postvoid residual) and adverse events (AEs) that changed after first drug intake.

RESULTS

After the screening, 8 eligible randomized controlled trials with 1316 patients were identified. Doxazosin-GITS showed a significantly higher efficacy compared with tamsulosin (IPSS-T P < .001, IPSS-S P < .001, and IPSS-V P < .001). There were no significant differences between the 2 drugs for changes in Qmax (P = .477) or postvoid residual (P = .739). The overall AEs were significantly lower in the doxazosin-GITS group (risk ratio: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.54-1.08; P = .036). However, dizziness (P = .387), headache (P = .745), asthenia (P = .693), postural hypotension (P = .114), and retrograde ejaculation (P = .187) were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicates that doxazosin-GITS has significantly higher efficacy and lower AEs than tamsulosin in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostate hyperplasia.

A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Tolterodine Combined with Tamsulosin or Doxazosin in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Background

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a common disease in men over age 50 years, often causes bladder outlet obstruction and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Alpha blockers in combination with muscarinic receptor antagonists may have the potential to improve symptoms. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of doxazosin or tamsulosin combined with tolterodine extend release (ER) in patients with BPH and LUTS.

Material/Methods

In a prospective, randomized, open-label study (ChiCTR-IPR-15005763), 220 consecutive men with BPH and LUTS were allocated to receive doxazosin 4 mg and tolterodine ER 4 mg per day (doxazosin group) or tamsulosin 0.2 mg and tolterodine ER 4 mg per day (tamsulosin group). Treatment lasted 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the international prostatic symptom score (IPSS). Secondary endpoints were quality of life (QoL) and maximum flow rate (Q_max), which were evaluated at 0, 6, and 12 weeks, and urodynamic parameters assessed at 0 and 12 weeks.

Results

A total of 192 patients completed the trial. Baseline measurements showed no differences between the groups. After 6 weeks, IPSS improved in both groups and QoL was significantly better in the doxazosin group (P=0.01). After 12 weeks, Q_max, IPSS, QoL, intravesical pressure (Pves), and bladder compliance (BC) in the doxazosin group were significantly better than in the tamsulosin group (P=0.03, P<0.001, P<0.001, P=0.027, and P=0.044, respectively).

Conclusions

Administration of alpha blockers combined with muscarinic receptor blocker for 12 weeks improved LUTS in men with BPH.

Twelve-week, prospective, open-label, randomized trial on the effects of an anticholinergic agent or antidiuretic agent as add-on therapy to an alpha-blocker for lower urinary tract symptoms

Purpose

The effects of an anticholinergic or antidiuretic agent as add-on therapy to an alpha-blocker for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) according to a voiding diary in 3 days are unknown. We prospectively investigated the efficacy of an anticholinergic or antidiuretic agent as add-on therapy for nocturia in men previously treated with an alpha-blocker for LUTS.

Subjects and methods

Patients were randomly subdivided into two groups. All patients had a 4-week washout. Group A had alpha-blocker for 4 weeks, then an alpha-blocker plus an anticholinergic agent for 4 weeks, and, finally, 4 weeks of an alpha-blocker plus an antidiuretic agent. Group B had an alpha-blocker for 4 weeks, then an alpha-blocker plus an antidiuretic agent for 4 weeks, and, finally, 4 weeks of an alpha-blocker plus an anticholinergic agent. In both groups, patients were subdivided into nocturnal polyuria, decreased nocturnal bladder capacity (NBC), or nocturia by both causes subgroups. A 3-day voiding diary, total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS sub-scores, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, uroflowmetry, and post-void residual urine volume, were assessed at baseline, and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

Results

A total of 405 patients completed the study. During treatment, the changes from baseline in total IPSS and IPSS sub-scores were significantly decreased at 4 weeks and were maintained for 12 weeks. In the nocturnal polyuria subgroup of Groups A and B, the number of episodes of nocturia in 3 days, nocturnal urine volume, and nocturnal index were significantly decreased using an alpha-blocker plus an antidiuretic agent. In the decreased NBC subgroup of Groups A and B, IPSS storage sub-score, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, number of episodes of nocturia in 3 days, number of episodes of urgency in 3 days, and NBC index were all significantly decreased using an alpha-blocker plus an anticholinergic agent.

Conclusion

An anticholinergic agent or antidiuretic agent as an add-on therapy in men previously treated with an alpha-blocker improves nocturia including LUTS.

Multicentre prospective crossover study of the 'prostatic urethral lift' for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical effect of the 'prostatic urethral lift' (PUL) on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) through a crossover design study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Men aged ≥ 50 years with an International Prostate Symptom Score of ≥ 13, a maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) of ≤ 12 mL/s, and a prostate of 30-80 mL were enrolled into a crossover study after completing a prospective, randomised, controlled, 'blinded' pivotal study in which they were control subjects receiving a sham procedure. Patients were followed for 1 year after crossover PUL at 19 centres in the USA, Canada and Australia. The sham procedure involved rigid cystoscopy with simulated active treatment sounds. PUL involved placing permanent UroLift® (NeoTract, Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA) implants into the lateral lobes of the prostate to enlarge the urethral lumen. Urinary symptom relief, health-related quality of life (HRQL) impact, urinary flow parameters, sexual function, and adverse events were assessed and compared between the sham and PUL using paired statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Symptom, flow, HRQL and sexual function assessments showed response improvements from baseline results, similar to results from other published studies, and most parameters were markedly improved after PUL vs the sham procedure in the same patients. Symptom, flow, and HRQL improvements were durable over the 12 months of the study. Adverse events associated with the procedure were typically transient and mild to moderate; one patient (2%) required re-intervention with transurethral resection of the prostate in the first year. There were no occurrences of de novo, sustained ejaculatory or erectile dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

The PUL can be performed under local anaesthesia, causes minimal associated perioperative complications, allows patients to quickly return to normal activity, provides rapid and durable improvement in symptoms, and preserves sexual function.

Hemodynamic Interaction Between a Daily Dosed Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor, Tadalafil, and the α-Adrenergic Blockers, Doxazosin and Tamsulosin, in Middle-Aged Healthy Male Subjects

The hemodynamic interaction between tadalafil (5 mg/d) and doxazosin or tamsulosin was investigated in 2 randomized, double-blind, crossover phase 1 studies. Healthy men (n = 45) received tadalafil or placebo for 28 days and increasing doses of doxazosin (1, 2, and 4 mg/d) for the last 21 days of treatment. In the second study, participants (n = 39) received tadalafil or placebo for 14 days and tamsulosin (0.4 mg/d) for the last 7 days of treatment. Similar mean maximum postbaseline changes in standing systolic blood pressure were observed in subjects given tadalafil or placebo with 4 mg of doxazosin (-0.5 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -4 to 3.1 mm Hg) or with tamsulosin (0.9 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -1.4 to 3.2 mm Hg). Standing systolic blood pressure less than 85 mm Hg (blood pressure outlier) occurred in 1 subject treated with 4 mg of doxazosin plus tadalafil but was not reported in subjects treated with tamsulosin and tadalafil. Three subjects experienced moderate hypotensive events lasting less than 2 hours, 2 with syncope (after tadalafil alone or with 4 mg of doxazosin) and 1 without (after 4 mg of doxazosin with placebo). The incidence of hypotension was low in healthy men given increasing doses of doxazosin with chronically dosed tadalafil or placebo. Administration of tadalafil with tamsulosin was well tolerated in healthy men.

Experience with the combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin in the long-term management of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) commonly affect older men. These bothersome symptoms can lead to a decreased quality of life. Currently, two classes of drugs - α-adrenergic blockers and 5α-reductase inhibitors - are prescribed to treat LUTS secondary to BPH. Due to their different mechanisms of action, these medications work in a synergistic manner. Trials of combination therapy have been conducted to assess its effect compared with monotherapy. Current data support combination therapy in men with moderately enlarged prostates and moderate to severe symptoms.

Comparative rapid onset of efficacy between doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system and tamsulosin in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms from benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicentre, prospective, randomised study

AIMS

To compare the rapidity of improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) for the doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and tamsulosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients.

METHODS

A total of 207 patients were randomised to one of two groups for a 12-week daily treatment with doxazosin-GITS 4 mg or tamsulosin 0.2 mg. The primary end-point was to compare the early onsets of efficacy between the two drugs. This was assessed by analysing the changes from baseline in the total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in the early period of treatment. Secondary aims were to compare improvements in obstructive/irritative subscore and quality of life (QoL) score between the two groups, and to evaluate the adverse events (AEs) with the drugs.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks of treatment, both groups showed significant improvements in IPSS scores (total, obstructive and irritative subscores, QoL score) from baseline (p < 0.0001). However, the doxazosin-GITS group showed significantly greater improvements in total IPSS and obstructive subscore than the tamsulosin group in the early period (p < 0.05). Improvements in irritative subscore (within 4 weeks) and QoL score (during 12 weeks) were not significantly different between the groups. The incidences of AEs were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In this study, doxazosin-GITS showed significantly more rapid onset of efficacy and similar AEs compared with tamsulosin in BPH patients with LUTS. We believe this will probably improve patient compliance. Future studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up period will be required to confirm this.

Effect of combination treatment on patient-related outcome measures in benign prostatic hyperplasia: clinical utility of dutasteride and tamsulosin

BACKGROUND

Benign prostatic hyperplasia, the fourth most commonly diagnosed medical condition in the elderly, is a major underlying cause of lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Medical therapy is usually the first therapeutic option. Combination therapy is increasingly used for better symptom relief and outcome.

METHODS

We searched the literature using the MEDLINE database for the efficacy of combination therapy in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia in terms of symptom improvement and impact on quality of life.

RESULTS

Combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin not only provides better symptom improvement and improved urinary flow rate, but is also associated with a more favorable impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction with treatment than monotherapy. Combination therapy also reduces the risk of events related to disease progression, such as acute urinary retention and benign prostatic hyperplasia-related surgery.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin is highly efficacious as medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms.

Effects of dietary flaxseed lignan extract on symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia

A flaxseed lignan extract containing 33% secoisolariciresinol diglucoside (SDG) was evaluated for its ability to alleviate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in 87 subjects with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with repeated measurements was conducted over a 4-month period using treatment dosages of 0 (placebo), 300, or 600 mg/day SDG. After 4 months of treatment, 78 of the 87 subjects completed the study. For the 0, 300, and 600 mg/day SDG groups, respectively, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) decreased -3.67 +/- 1.56, -7.33 +/- 1.18, and -6.88 +/- 1.43 (mean +/- SE, P = .100, < .001, and < .001 compared to baseline), the Quality of Life score (QOL score) improved by -0.71 +/- 0.23, -1.48 +/- 0.24, and -1.75 +/- 0.25 (mean +/- SE, P = .163 and .012 compared to placebo and P = .103, < .001, and < .001 compared to baseline), and the number of subjects whose LUTS grade changed from "moderate/severe" to "mild" increased by three, six, and 10 (P = .188, .032, and .012 compared to baseline). Maximum urinary flows insignificantly increased 0.43 +/- 1.57, 1.86 +/- 1.08, and 2.7 +/- 1.93 mL/second (mean +/- SE, no statistical significance reached), and postvoiding urine volume decreased insignificantly by -29.4 +/- 20.46, -19.2 +/- 16.91, and -55.62 +/- 36.45 mL (mean +/- SE, no statistical significance reached). Plasma concentrations of secoisolariciresinol (SECO), enterodiol (ED), and enterolactone (EL) were significantly raised after the supplementation. The observed decreases in IPSS and QOL score were correlated with the concentrations of plasma total lignans, SECO, ED, and EL. In conclusion, dietary flaxseed lignan extract appreciably improves LUTS in BPH subjects, and the therapeutic efficacy appeared comparable to that of commonly used intervention agents of alpha1A-adrenoceptor blockers and 5alpha-reductase inhibitors.

Pharmacokinetics of Doxazosin Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System after Multiple Administration in Korean Healthy Volunteers

Doxazosin mesylate is a selective alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonist for the treatment of hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia. A simple high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed and validated for the quantitative determination of doxazosin in plasma. A reversed phase C18 column was used for the separation of doxazosin and prazosin (internal standard) with a mobile phase composed of water, acetonitrile, triethylamine (68:32:0.2 v/v, pH 5.0) at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The fluorescence detector was operated at 246 (excitation) and 389 nm (emission). Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy were acceptable for all quality control samples including the lower limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL. Recovery of doxazosin from human plasma was greater than 93.4%. Doxazosin was stable in human plasma under various storage conditions. This method was used successfully for a pharmacokinetic study in plasma after oral administration of multiple 4-mg dose of doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system formulation to 16 healthy volunteers. At steady state the mean area under the curve for a dosing interval and elimination half-life were calculated to be 367.0 +/- 63.5 ng x hr/mL and 29.2 +/- 4.5 hr, respectively. There was no difference in pharmacokinetic parameters between male and female.

Evidence-based guidelines for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms related to uncomplicated benign prostatic hyperplasia in Italy: updated summary

BACKGROUND AND SCOPE

Despite the high prevalence and huge socio-economic impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in Italy, no national guidelines have been produced so far. This is a summary of the first Italian guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to uncomplicated BPH, prepared by a multidisciplinary panel under the auspices of the Italian Association of Urologists and introduced in Italy in 2003. An update compiled by the authors is also included.

METHODS

Relevant papers published from 1998 to 2003 (updated to 2006) were identified through a structured literature review and the quality of evidence presented therein was graded according to the Centre for the Evaluation of Effectiveness in Health Administration (CeVEAS) system. Recommendations were based on evidence from the literature, but also on feedback from practitioners and specialists. MAIN FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS: Given the prevalence of BPH, all men aged > or = 50 years of age should be asked about LUTS and informed about disease characteristics and therapeutic options, while sexual function should always be assessed in patients with severe and long-standing LUTS. Initial assessment should include medical history (including drug and co-morbidity history), digital rectal examination, urinalysis, International Prostate Symptom Score-Quality of Life (IPSS-QoL) and a voiding diary, while prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and measurement of prostate volume by suprapubic ultrasonography are indicated in fully informed patients with a life expectancy of > or = 10 years in whom BPH progression could influence treatment choices. QoL considerations should dictate whether to start active treatment. When QoL is not affected by LUTS, watchful waiting is indicated if symptoms are mild, acceptable if they are moderate. When QoL is affected, medical therapy with alpha1-blockers or 5alpha-reductase inhibitors (the latter indicated in patients with increased prostate volume) is appropriate. Combined therapy with alpha1-blockers + 5alpha-reductase inhibitors should only be considered in patients at high risk for progression (prostate volume > 40 mL or PSA > 4 ng/mL), since the incremental cost of combination therapy vs. monotherapy with alpha1-blockers or finasteride is prohibitive. Selection of the type of surgery should be based on the surgeon's experience, the presence of co-morbid conditions and the size of the prostate. Open prostatectomy and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are recommended in patients with acute or chronic retention of urine, and acceptable in obstructed patients with moderate/severe symptoms and worsened QoL. Transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) is acceptable when prostate volume is < or = 30 mL. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) may be proposed to motivated patients where expert surgeons are available. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) or transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) may be proposed to motivated patients who prefer to avoid surgery and/or do not respond to medical treatment. The possible effects of medical or surgical treatments on sexual function should always be discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines are intended to provide a framework for health professionals involved in BPH management in order to facilitate decision-making in all areas and at all levels of healthcare.

Finasteride and doxazosin alone or in combination for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Benign prostatic hyperplasia is an increasingly prevalent condition affecting > 50% of men > 65 years of age. Although it is a condition that is unlikely to be life threatening, it can significantly affect quality of life with distressing lower urinary tract symptoms. Increasingly, medical therapy is being used as first-line treatment for men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms. Two main pharmacological classes of drugs are used: 5alpha-reductase inhibitors and alpha-1 selective blockers. Both these classes of drugs have shown good tolerability and clinical efficacy. This article examines the potential benefit of the use of combination therapy. In particular, what is the evidence for using doxazosin and finasteride therapy together?

Doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system versus tamsulosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a study in Chinese patients

AIM

The efficacy and safety profiles of two alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists, doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system, a controlled-release formulation of doxazosin, and tamsulosin, were compared in Chinese men with confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia.

METHODS

After a 2-week placebo run-in phase, 117 patients were randomized to daily treatment with doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (4 mg doxazosin) (n = 60) or 0.2 mg tamsulosin (n = 57) for 6 weeks with no titration of study medications. Efficacy was measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume, and quality-of-life score from the International Prostate Symptom Score. Adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Both drugs significantly improved the International Prostate Symptom Score (total, irritative subscore and obstructive subscore) and maximum urinary flow rate. Doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system reduced postvoid residual urine volume significantly more than tamsulosin (-25 +/- 5 mL vs 2 +/- 5 mL, P = 0.041) in patients with residual volume >0 mL at baseline. Other differences between groups were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system and tamsulosin were effective and well tolerated for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Chinese men.

Prise en charge médicale de l'hypertrophie bénigne de la prostatenoncompliquée

Management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is currently undergoing profound changes. Medical treatment is not only symptomatic, but may also seek to modify the natural history of the disease, especially by reducing the risk of acute urinary retention. Medical treatment is no longer limited to a single drug: the combination of 2 different drugs from different treatment categories appears superior to single-drug treatment in some patients. Two instrumental techniques - microwave or radiofrequency thermotherapy, previously proposed as alternatives to surgery - are more appropriate as alternatives to medical treatment. These various items make it possible to construct a decision algorithm that is based at each stage on a decision shared with the patient. This algorithm to provide decision aid in management of uncomplicated symptomatic HBP takes initial disease indicators and other patient indicators into account together with its course under treatment, which has not previously been considered by international guidelines.

Controlled‐Release Doxazosin as Combination Therapy in Hypertension: The GATES Study

Doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) or placebo was added to the antihypertensive therapy of uncontrolled hypertensive patients in a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients received doxazosin GITS 4 mg/d (n=89) or placebo (n=86) for 6 weeks in addition to entry antihypertensive medication. Doxazosin GITS was increased to 8 mg/d after 2 or 4 weeks if patients did not respond (sitting blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg and 10/10-mm Hg decrease from baseline). Reductions from baseline in sitting and standing blood pressures were greater with doxazosin GITS than placebo at all time points (p</=0.017) except Week 1 sitting systolic pressure (p=0.068). The response rate was greater in the doxazosin GITS group (37.3%) than the placebo group (10.7%; p<0.001). With the exception of postural hypotension (7% compared with 0.0%), the frequency of adverse events was similar for doxazosin GITS and placebo. Doxazosin GITS was effective as combination antihypertensive therapy with the major classes of antihypertensive agents.

The Efficacy of Drugs for the Treatment of LUTS/BPH, A Study in 6 European Countries

OBJECTIVES

This paper profiles the usage and effectiveness of various LUTS/BPH drugs in real-life practice.

METHOD

The TRIUMPH study recorded the treatment and outcomes of 2351 newly-presenting LUTS/BPH patients in 6 European countries over a 1-year follow-up period. At each visit the clinician recorded the treatment, co-morbidities, complications and drugs prescribed, and the patient completed an IPSS questionnaire. The results were analysed using change in IPSS as the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Over the study period 74.9% of patients were prescribed medication, the majority (83% of those medicated) were prescribed only a single drug. Tamsulosin was the most commonly prescribed drug in all countries (38% of medicated cases), although with national variation from 24% in Poland to 70% in Italy. The alpha-blockers were the most effective, with a mean reduction of 6.3 IPSS points. Finasteride was slightly less effective (4.1 points). Significant improvements were seen in 43% of patients on phytotherapy with Serenoa repens or Pygeum africanum compared to 57% of those on finasteride and 68% on alpha-blockers. The only combination therapy found to produce a statistically significant improvement over the use of individual drugs was finasteride+tamsulosin (8.1 points compared to 6.7 for tamsulosin alone and 4.2 for finasteride alone).

CONCLUSIONS

All drug treatments showed some improvement over watchful-waiting for most patients over the study period: the alpha-blockers were found to be the most effective. There were marked national differences in prescribing patterns, both in individual drug choice and in the use of combination therapies.

A randomised, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release doxazosin and tamsulosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Brazil

Brazilian patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomised in a 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy study to receive doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) 4 mg q.i.d. (n = 82) or tamsulosin 0.4 q.i.d. (n = 83). Primary endpoints were the absolute and percentage change from baseline in symptoms measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Secondary endpoints included IPSS, quality-of-life (QOL) question from the IPSS, and questions 6 and 7 of the Sexual Function Abbreviated Questionnaire (SFAQ) at weeks 4 and 12. Doxazosin GITS and tamsulosin improved IPSS with no significant differences between groups at week 12. During weeks 4-8, tamsulosin-treated patients demonstrated a slower improvement (p < 0.001) in IPSS than doxazosin GITS-treated patients. The proportion of satisfied patients was observed earlier with doxazosin GITS (p = 0.006) vs. tamsulosin. At week 12, the proportion of patients with little or no difficulty at ejaculation (Q6 of SFAQ) was higher in the doxazosin GITS group (p = 0.019). Both treatments were well tolerated.

Use of sympathetic alpha antagonists in the management of pediatric urologic disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To update the physician regarding the use of alpha-adrenergic antagonists in the management of various pediatric urologic problems.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of alpha-adrenergic antagonist for the treatment of pediatric urologic disorders has expanded greatly over the past decade. This review summarizes the current use of these medications in the treatment of pediatric voiding dysfunction, neurogenic bladder, chronic lower urinary tract symptomatology, idiopathic urethritis, and the passage of ureteral calculi.

SUMMARY

Currently alpha antagonist therapy although not useful in the primary treatment of voiding dysfunction is equivalent in potency to biofeedback therapy for the treatment of recalcitrant voiding dysfunction. In the management of neurogenic bladder and chronic lower urinary tract symptomatology, alpha antagonists working alone or in conjunction with anticholinergic medications will improve clinical symptoms, increase bladder compliance, and decrease detrusor instability. In addition, alpha antagonists may decrease the intensity and duration of symptoms in patients with idiopathic urethritis. Compared with placebo, alpha-adrenergic antagonists will also aid significantly in the spontaneous passage of distal ureteral calculi, thereby reducing the need for surgical intervention and analgesia. The findings noted above significantly expand the clinical usefulness of alpha antagonist therapy within the field of pediatric urology.

Management of non-complicated BPH: proposition of a renewed decision tree

Nowadays the management of benign prostatic hypertrophia (BPH) is undergoing striking changes. The standard medical treatments are represented by three families which are the phytotherapy, the alpha-blockers and the 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors. These treatments were deemed as symptomatic and used only as monotherapy. Recent numerous studies bring new assessments on BPH: the medical treatment is able to modify the natural history of BPH especially by reducing the risk of acute urinary retention. Furthermore the association of two different therapeutic classes seems to be more efficient than the use of a monotherapy in some cases. Similarly the place of two instrumental techniques, the thermotherapy by microwaves or by radiofrequencies, previously proposed as alternatives to the surgical treatment seems to find their way rather as alternatives to the medical treatment. These different elements allow building a renewed decision tree which decisions are shared with the patient at each stage. This decision tree of the management of patients having non-complicated BPH symptoms must include initial clinical characteristics of the patient and its disease and the evolution under treatment which has not been yet considered in the international recommendations. It also considers the possibilities of associations with other therapeutic classes.

Doxazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy: an update

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of alpha 1--blocker doxazosin for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) compatible with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). Fourteen randomized controlled trials enrolled 6261 men, average age 64 years, who had moderately severe LUTS and flow impairment. Compared with baseline measures and placebo effect, doxazosin resulted in a statistically significant improvement in both LUTS and flow. However, when compared with placebo, the average magnitude of symptom improvement (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] improvement < 3 points) typically did not achieve a level detectable by patients. Combined doxazosin and finasteride therapy improved LUTS and reduced the risk of overall clinical progression of BPH compared to each drug separately in men followed over 4 years. Reported mean changes from baseline in the IPSS were -7.4, -6.6, -5.6, and -4.9 points for combination therapy, doxazosin, finasteride, and placebo, respectively. Combination therapy reduced the need for invasive treatment for BPH and the risk of long-term urinary retention. The absolute reductions compared with placebo were less than 4% and primarily seen in men with prostate gland volume > 40 mL or PSA levels > 4 ng/mL. Efficacy was comparable with other alpha 1--blockers. Withdrawals from treatment for any cause were comparable to placebo. Dizziness and fatigue occurred more frequently with doxazosin compared to placebo.

Effects of ??1-Adrenoceptor Antagonists on Male Sexual Function

alpha(1)-Adrenoceptor antagonists such as alfuzosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin and terazosin are first-line agents for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but are only second-line agents (doxazosin and terazosin only) for the treatment of arterial hypertension. Sexual function is complex and includes multiple domains such as sexual desire (libido), erectile function and ejaculatory function. Erectile and ejaculatory functions are frequently reduced in patients with BPH and can impact on their quality of life. Therefore, the treatment of BPH should aim to maintain or even restore sexual function.alpha(1)-Adrenoceptor antagonists lack major effects on sexual desire in placebo-controlled studies. Reports on erectile function are inconsistent, with both beneficial and adverse effects being reported, but impotence can occur in some patients without clear differences between drugs. Ejaculatory dysfunction during treatment may represent (relative) an ejaculation. It occurs more frequently with tamsulosin than with other drugs of this class, but the differences are not big enough to be consistently detectable in directly comparative studies. We propose that such differences between drugs should be weighed against differences in cardiovascular tolerability when choosing the optimal treatment for each patient.

A double-blind placebo-controlled study evaluating the onset of action of doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the onset of improvement in benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms in patients after treatment with doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (DOX GITS) versus placebo.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, baseline values, including International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum urine flow rate (Q(max)), were determined following a 2-week placebo run-in. Patients received DOX GITS 4 mg/d (n = 108) or placebo (n = 105) for 14 days. IPSS was measured on Days 3, 7, and 14; Q(max) on Days 1, 3, 7, and 14; and the patients' perception of improvement was measured on Days 1 and 2 in the evening at home and in the office on Day 14.

RESULTS

Significantly more patients treated with DOX GITS than placebo perceived improvement after Day 1 (60.6% vs. 41.9%) through Day 14 (84.3% vs. 64.1%). On Day 1, improvement in Q(max) with DOX GITS was not significantly different compared with placebo. On Day 3 of the trial (1) IPSS improvement was significantly greater with DOX GITS than with placebo; (2) proportion of patients with > or =30% improvement in IPSS was significantly greater with DOX GITS (49.5%) than placebo (28.4%) and remained so through Day 14; (3) improvement in Q(max) was significantly greater with DOX GITS (3.7 mL/s) than placebo (1.9 mL/s) and remained so through Day 14; (4) proportion of patients with > or =3 mL/s increase in Q(max) was statistically greater with DOX GITS (54.4%) versus placebo (30.8%) and remained so through Day 14.

CONCLUSIONS

DOX GITS significantly improved IPSS and Q(max) by Day 3 of treatment, and these changes were maintained through Day 14. More patients receiving DOX GITS than placebo perceived improvement in symptoms as early as Day 1.

Myogenic bladder decompensation in boys with a history of posterior urethral valves is caused by secondary bladder neck obstruction?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether myogenic bladder decompensation in patients treated for congenital posterior urethral valves (PUV, the most serious cause of infravesical obstruction in male neonates and infants) may be secondary to bladder neck obstruction, as despite prompt ablation of PUV these patients can have dysfunctional voiding during later childhood or adolescence, the so-called 'valve bladder syndrome'.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised 18 boys (mean age 14 years, range 6.2-18.5) who had had successful transurethral ablation of PUV between 1982 and 1996, and had completed a follow-up which included serial assessment of serum creatinine, completion of a standard voiding diary, ultrasonography with measurement of urine before and after voiding, a urodynamic examination with simultaneous multichannel recording of pressure, volume and flow relationships during the filling and voiding phases, coupled with video-cystoscopy at least twice. The mean (range) follow-up was 9.3 (6-17) years.

RESULTS

Urodynamic investigation showed myogenic failure with inadequate bladder emptying in 10 patients; five with myogenic failure also had unstable bladder contractions. On video-cystoscopy the posterior bladder neck lip appeared elevated in all patients but in those with myogenic failure it was strongly suggestive of hypertrophy, with evidence of obstruction. At the last follow-up one patient with myogenic failure who had had bladder neck incision and four others who were being treated with alpha-adrenergic antagonists had a significant reduction of their postvoid residual urine.

CONCLUSION

Despite early valve ablation, a large proportion of boys treated for PUV have gradual detrusor decompensation, which may be caused by secondary bladder neck obstruction leading to obstructive voiding and finally detrusor failure. Surgical or pharmacological intervention to improve bladder neck obstruction may possibly avert this course, but further studies are needed to validate this hypothesis.

The clinical efficacy and tolerability of doxazosin standard and gastrointestinal therapeutic system for benign prostatic hyperplasia

The therapeutic goal of treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) through early detection and effective therapy is to relieve the symptoms, improve patients' quality of life, decrease postvoid residual urine volume, and prevent the associated morbidity when the condition remains untreated. Alpha1-adrenoreceptor antagonists, e.g. doxazosin, terazosin, tamsulosin and alfuzosin, relax the bladder outlet to improve urinary flow, by reducing prostatic smooth muscle tone through the blockade of sympathetic adrenergic receptors. Doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) is a controlled-release formulation developed to enhance the pharmacokinetic profile of the drug while simultaneously minimizing possible adverse effects and reducing the need for dose titration. While both doxazosin standard and GITS are indicated for hypertension, they are also useful in the pharmacologically or naturally normotensive patient with BPH. In a cross-over trial comparing doxazosin GITS and tamsulosin, doxazosin gave a significantly greater improvement from baseline in symptoms. Results from recent trials (e.g. Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms, MTOPS) showed that doxazosin was significantly more effective than the 5alpha-reductase inhibitor finasteride in relieving lower urinary tract symptoms, irrespective of prostate volume. The MTOPS trial showed clearly that over the long term, the combination of doxazosin and finasteride was more effective than either agent alone in significantly improving symptoms and reducing the clinical progression of BPH. Both doxazosin standard and GITS are well-tolerated, long-term therapies that are equally effective in younger and older men, and not associated with causing sexual dysfunction.

After ALLHAT: doxazosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Doxazosin mesylate is an alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist that was used to treat hypertension until a major study (ALLHAT; Antihypertensive and Lipid Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) showed that it increased the risk of progressing to heart failure. Doxazosin is now being used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Noradrenaline acts on alpha1-adrenoceptors to contract the smooth muscle in the prostate and bladder, and by opposing these actions, doxazosin is beneficial in BPH. Doxazosin also increases apoptosis in the prostate. Although the standard preparation is suitable for once-daily dosing in BPH, it has to be titrated through three steps to its final dose. The controlled-release gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation of doxazosin is more convenient to use as it only has to be titrated through one step. In the treatment of BPH, standard doxazosin reduced both obstructive and irritative symptoms and increased peak urinary flow rate. The main side effects with doxazosin are those commonly associated with lowering blood pressure, although doxazosin lowers blood pressure to a lesser extent in normotensives than hypertensives. There is some evidence that in addition to being easier to use, doxazosin GITS may cause less adverse effects than the standard preparations. The benefits of doxazosin and the 5alpha-reductase inhibitor, finasteride, may be additive in BPH especially in men with large prostates. Further trials are necessary in order to determine whether doxazosin GITS is superior to other alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists in BPH.

Clinical ease of using doxazosin in BPH patients with and without hypertension

Clinical studies have demonstrated that doxazosin therapy reduced blood pressure (BP) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who were hypertensive at baseline but not in patients who were physiologically or pharmacologically normotensive at baseline. In patients with BPH and uncontrolled hypertension, despite treatment with other antihypertensive drugs, the addition of doxazosin resulted in improved control with significant reductions in BP. The new formulation, doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS), is initiated at a therapeutic dose, simplifying dose titration. Based on its efficacy and pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles, doxazosin GITS is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for normotensive and hypertensive patients with BPH.

Doxazosin for treating lower urinary tract symptoms compatible with benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review of efficacy and adverse effects

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of doxazosin for treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) compatible with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis if: the study duration was > or = 1 month; the study involved men with symptomatic BPO; and doxazosin was compared with placebo or active controls. Study and patient characteristics and outcome data were extracted in duplicate onto standardized forms using a prospectively developed protocol.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 6033 men with (mean age 64 years) met the inclusion criteria; 10 were placebo-controlled, including two with combined doxazosin/finasteride therapy and finasteride monotherapy arms. Three trials were a comparison with other alpha-blockers. The study duration was 1-54 months. The mean baseline symptom scores and peak urinary flow (PUF) rates were indicative of moderate BPO. Doxazosin gave significant improvements in LUTS, assessed by symptom scores, vs placebo and finasteride in the short- to long-term. Two long-term studies (1 and 4 years) reported mean changes from baseline for the International Prostate Symptom Score of - 8.3 and - 6.6 points (-49% and - 39%) for doxazosin and - 5.7 and - 4.9 points (-33% and - 29%) for placebo, respectively. Doxazosin significantly increased PUF rates vs placebo. In pooled results from three studies, the weighted mean difference in the mean change from baseline vs placebo was 1.6 mL/s (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.1). Efficacy was comparable with other alpha1-blockers. In the long-term (>4 years) doxazosin was no better then finasteride in improving PUF. Combined doxazosin and finasteride significantly reduced the risk of overall clinical progression of BPO vs each drug separately in men followed for >4 years. Absolute risk reductions vs placebo were 11.3%, 6.9% and 6.4% for combined therapy, doxazosin and finasteride, respectively (P < 0.001). Improvements in symptom scores and PUF were also significantly greater with combined than monotherapy, and the former reduced the need for invasive treatment for BPO and the risk of long-term urinary retention, although the absolute reductions in risk vs placebo were small (<4%). Dizziness and fatigue were significantly more common with doxazosin than placebo (11% vs 7%, and 6% vs 3%, respectively). Adverse events reported for combined therapy were similar to those with each monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The evidence indicates that doxazosin is effective and generally well tolerated for improving LUTS and PUF in men with symptomatic BPO. Combined therapy was better than doxazosin alone in reducing the risk of clinical progression of BPO and other long-term complications related to BPO.

Doxazosin Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System

Doxazosin, a well established treatment in patients with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), is available in a new controlled-release formulation, doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS). Doxazosin GITS (Cardura XL, Cardular PP Uro, Diblocin PP Uro) has an altered pharmacokinetic profile, which allows a higher initial dosage to be used than with the standard formulation and less titration steps to reach a clinically effective dosage. In two large, double-blind, randomised studies (one was placebo-controlled) in patients with BPH, doxazosin GITS (4-8 mg once daily) was as effective as the standard formulation (2-8 mg once daily), and both were more effective than placebo, after 13 weeks' treatment in improving symptom scores, health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax). Doxazosin GITS was at least as well tolerated as the standard formulation of doxazosin in clinical studies in patients with BPH.

SURGICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF CLOACAL MALFORMATION CAN ALTER BLADDER FUNCTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH ANORECTAL ANOMALIES

PURPOSE

Patients with cloacal anomalies often suffer bladder dysfunction with recurrent urinary infections and incontinence. We examined the effect of surgical reconstruction by posterior sagittal approach and total urogenital mobilization in either causing or worsening bladder dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between August 2000 and December 2002 all new patients with cloacal anomalies were prospectively studied to assess the effect of surgical reconstruction by posterior sagittal approach and total urogenital mobilization on bladder function. A comparable group of patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) were studied as comparative controls to assess the effect of posterior sagittal approach without urogenital surgery. Structural anatomy was defined by radiology. Natural filling urodynamics via suprapubic catheter were performed in all infants at 0.2 to 9 months (mean 3) before surgical reconstruction. This assessment was repeated 6 to 24 months (mean 14.8) after surgery, and changes in bladder function were determined by comparative statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients with cloacal anomalies (5 with short [less than 3 cm] and 5 with long common channel [greater than 3 cm]) and 20 patients with anorectal malformation were consecutively studied. At presentation bladder dysfunction was present in 9 of 10 patients with cloacal anomalies and in 12 of 20 patients with ARM. After surgery there was significant deterioration in bladder function in half of the cloacal group (5 of 10 patients, p = 0.04) and in 1 of 20 patients with ARM (p = 0.7). Of the 5 patients with cloacal anomalies who had deterioration of bladder function urodynamic pattern of detrusor overactivity changed to inadequate (atonic) bladder in 4, all of whom had a long common channel at presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cloacal malformation have a high incidence of innate bladder dysfunction. However, surgical reconstruction by total urogenital mobilization can cause further deterioration of bladder function, particularly in the group with a long common channel. Urodynamic assessment is necessary to detect bladder dysfunction in these patients.

INTERACTION BETWEEN THE PHOSPHODIESTERASE 5 INHIBITOR, TADALAFIL AND 2 α-BLOCKERS, DOXAZOSIN AND TAMSULOSIN IN HEALTHY NORMOTENSIVE MEN

PURPOSE

Tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, is effective therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED). Men with ED have a high incidence of comorbid conditions including cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Although phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are safe when administered with most medications, sildenafil given with doxazosin and vardenafil given with terazosin evoke orthostatic hypotension in some patients. We examined the hemodynamic interactions of tadalafil with the alpha-blockers doxazosin and tamsulosin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In separate double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized crossover studies (18 patients in each study) we evaluated the hemodynamic effects of doxazosin 8 mg with tadalafil 20 mg, and tamsulosin 0.4 mg with tadalafil 10 and 20 mg. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate were recorded before dosing and for 24 hours after dosing.

RESULTS

Tadalafil 20 mg augmented the hypotensive effect of doxazosin by producing a mean maximal decrease in standing systolic BP (SBP) that was significantly greater than placebo (a mean difference of 9.8 mm Hg). Analysis of BP outliers showed that the number of subjects with a standing SBP of less than 85 mm Hg was greater after doxazosin plus tadalafil (28%) versus doxazosin plus placebo (6%). In subjects on tamsulosin, tadalafil 10 and 20 mg produced mean maximal decreases in standing SBP that were similar to placebo (mean difference of 1.7 and 2.3 mm Hg, respectively). No subject taking tamsulosin had a decrease in standing SBP less than 85 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

Tadalafil augmented the hypotensive effects of doxazosin but had little hemodynamic interaction with tamsulosin. In patients taking tadalafil for ED, tamsulosin 0.4 mg may be given for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Terazosin and Doxazosin in the Treatment of BPH: Results of a Randomized Study with Crossover in Non-Responders

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of the doxazosin and terazosin on total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) in treating patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and compare this effectivity by switching the drugs in the patients who did not benefit from either the first or the second drug.

METHODS

This is a prospective randomized study of the patients with LUTS suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Fifty male patients (mean age 59.4 +/- 7.6 years) received either doxazosin (n = 25) or terazosin (n = 25) once daily every night. The patients were evaluated in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd months of treatment. Minimum 20% improvement in IPSS and Qmax in the 3rd month was considered as improvement. The patients with no improvement in any of the parameters switched the drugs, and they were followed up in the next 3 months. The patients whose only one parameter improved were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Eleven (44%) out of 25 patients using doxazosin and 10 (40%) out of 25 patients using terazosin showed improvement in both IPSS and Qmax at the end of the 3rd month and continued using the drug. After 3 months of treatment, increase in Qmax (p < 0.001) and decrease in IPSS (p < 0.01) was significant for both doxazosin and terazosin. Nineteen patients, who did not show improvement in any of the parameters, switched the drug. Of the patients who switched the drug, 2 (4%) showed improvement both in IPSS and in Qmax, while 2 (4%) showed improvement only in IPSS but not in Qmax. The remaining 15 (30%) patients did not show improvement in any of the parameters.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study suggest that alpha-blockade with either doxazosin or terazosin is effective in males with LUTS. The two alpha-blocking drugs showed equal effectiveness in the treatment of LUTS. If one of the drugs is ineffective in the treatment of LUTS, then the other drug will probably be ineffective.

Doxazosin controlled release vs tamsulosin in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: an efficacy analysis

An analysis is presented to compare the efficacies of the doxazosin gastrointestinal therapeutic system (doxazosin-GITS) and tamsulosin in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), collecting data from a published 20-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Results demonstrated that after 8 weeks of treatment, both doxazosin-GITS and tamsulosin provided significant (p < 0.001) improvement from baseline in total international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and obstructive and irritative subscores. Doxazosin-GITS was more effective than tamsulosin (p = 0.019 between-group difference for total IPSS; p = 0.001 for irritative subscore). Similarly, after the first 4 weeks of treatment, prior to dose titration, both doxazosin-GITS and tamsulosin provided significant (p < or = 0.001) improvement in total IPSS and subscores. Doxazosin-GITS was more effective than tamsulosin (p = 0.045 between-group difference for obstructive subscore). These data confirm that the efficacy of doxazosin is superior to that of tamsulosin in the management of patients with BPH.