High-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy: symptomatic vs urodynamic success

Benign prostatic hyperplasia: current clinical practice

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common benign adenoma in men, affecting nearly all of them. BPH represents a clinically significant cause of bladder outflow obstruction in up to 40% of men. The growing frequency of diagnosis is due to increasing life expectancy and a trend toward seeking medical advice at earlier stages of the disease. The last decade has witnessed a significant shift in emphasis in the management of BPH, with medical therapies and, to a lesser extent, minimally invasive therapies becoming the predominant active therapy choices. The development of effective therapies such as alpha-adrenergic blockers and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors and the possibility of their combined use represent the most significant advance in the treatment of BPH.

Transperineal microwave thermoablation in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia: a phase I clinical study with a new mini-choked microwave applicator

PURPOSE

To evaluate the tolerability and safety of a newly designed probe for trans-perineal microwave thermoablation (TPMT) of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and the in vivo microwave effects on prostatic tissue.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nine patients with obstructive BPH who were candidates for open prostatectomy were selected for this study. Under local anesthesia and transrectal ultrasound monitoring, all patients underwent a single standardized application of TPMT. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) questionnaire were administered to each patient prior to, during, and 1 month after TPMT in order to evaluate pain and quality of life. Then the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaires were administered to each patient at baseline and 1 month after prostatectomy in order to evaluate sexual and urinary function, respectively. Then all patients were divided into three groups and underwent open prostatectomy 7, 15, and 30 days after TPMT, respectively. The prostatic adenomas were then evaluated by a pathologist.

RESULTS

No adverse events from TPMT treatment were noted. In particular, no patients reported local, pelvic, or abdominal pain during the procedure or subsequent alterations of defecation rhythm, ano-rectal/intestinal problems, or hematuria. No differences in quality of life or in sexual function were reported. The diameters of the lesions obtained with TPMT treatment ranged from 16 to 18.1 mm in all patients. Quasi-spheroid lesions with a well-defined area of complete coagulative necrosis were documented in all removed adenomas 7, 15, and 30 days after TMPT.

CONCLUSIONS

The AMICA-PROBE is a safe, well-tolerated, and repeatable method to treat BPH with microwave thermotherapy. The spheroid lesions obtained demonstrated the maximal control over the radial and longitudinal coagulative effects of the therapy. Phase II studies are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of this new probe.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for the treatment of BPH: still a challenger?

Minimally invasive therapies for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) compete with the gold standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Comparisons of efficacy and safety have broadened the knowledge of different treatment modalities. Concerns of quality of life such as unaltered sexual function as well as cost considerations drive the market to develop techniques of lower level invasiveness. Among the competitors the office based transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) provides the broadest scale of scientific data. Numerous manufacturers sell various modifications of this technology. According to different clinical studies TUMT proved to be an effective, safe, and durable therapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH. However, TURP still holds the steadier long-term results and is more effective to reduce obstruction as well as other LUTS.

The long-term cost effectiveness of treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia

INTRODUCTION

Excellent treatment outcomes with long-term durability and few adverse effects are expectations of treatments for chronic conditions. The long-term cost effectiveness of newer treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), including high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) and combination pharmaceutical therapy, has not been sufficiently studied against existing alternatives. The objective of this study was to estimate the incremental cost effectiveness of BPH treatment alternatives.

METHODS

We employed a Markov model over a 20-year time horizon and the payer's perspective to evaluate the cost effectiveness of watchful waiting (WW), pharmaceuticals (alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists [alpha-blockers], 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors [5-ARIs], combination therapy), TUMT and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in treating BPH. Markov states included improvement in symptoms, no improvement in symptoms, adverse effects and death. We used data from the published literature for outcomes, including systematic reviews whenever possible. Costs were estimated using a managed-care claims database and Medicare fee schedules, and were reported in Dollars US, 2004 values. Costs and effectiveness outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. Men (aged > or =45 years) with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms and uncomplicated BPH were included in the analysis, and results were stratified by age and BPH symptom levels. Outcomes included costs, QALYs, incremental cost-utility ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Sensitivity analysis was performed on important parameters, with an emphasis on probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

alpha-Blockers and TUMT were cost effective for treating moderate symptoms using the threshold of Dollars US 50,000 per QALY. For example, at 65 years of age, the cost per QALY was Dollars US 16,018 for alpha-blockers compared with WW and Dollars US 30,204 for TUMT versus alpha-blockers. TURP was the most cost-effective treatment for severe symptoms (Dollars US 5824 per QALY ) versus WW. Model results were robust to changes in costs and sensitive to the assumed probabilities, utility weights, extent of improvement and life expectancy. Nevertheless, acceptability curves consistently demonstrated the same alternatives as most likely to be cost effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model suggests that alpha-blockers and TURP appear to be the most cost-effective alternatives, from a US payer perspective, for BPH patients with moderate and severe symptoms, respectively. TUMT was promising for patients with moderate symptoms and the oldest patients with severe symptoms, but otherwise was dominated. Value of information analysis could be used to determine the net benefit of additional research.

Feedback microwave thermotherapy with the ProstaLund Compact Device for obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia: 12-month response rates and complications

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of the ProstaLund Compact Device in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 38 consecutive patients with a mean age of 72.6+/-8.2 years, 19 with an indwelling catheter, underwent transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) with the ProstaLund Compact Device. Pretreatment evaluation included transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), urodynamics, and cystoscopy for all patients and flow rate (Qmax), postvoiding residual urine volume (PVR), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality-of-life (QoL) assessment for those without a catheter. The mean prostate volume was 63.5+/-30 cc. The Qmax, IPSS, and QoL studies were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months, while urodynamics, cystoscopy, and TRUS were repeated at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

The treatment lasted a mean of 43.1+/-17.1 minutes, achieved a maximal intraprostatic temperature of 58.7+/-7.2 degrees C, and destroyed 18.4+/-14.3 g of prostatic tissue. Twelve months post-treatment, for the patients without a catheter preoperatively, the IPSS was improved from 21.5+/-6.3 to 6.5+/-3.1 (P<0.001), Qmax from 7.2+/-3.1 mL/sec to 18.1+/-7.4 mL/sec (P<0.001), detrusor pressure at Qmax from 87.5+/-15 cm H2O to 48.4+/-16.4 cm H2O (P<0.001), and PVR from 113.2+/-78.2 mL to 34.6+/-36.7 mL (P<0.01). The good-response rates for IPSS (<or=7 or >or=50% improvement), Qmax (>or=15 mL/sec or >or=50% improvement), PVR (<50 mL or >or=50% decrease), and QoL (<or=2) were 73.7%, 84.2%, 73.7%, and 94.7%, respectively. For the patients with a catheter preoperatively, the IPSS improved from 9.5+/-6 at 3 months to 5.1+/-5.3 (P<0.05) at the end of the follow-up period. The Qmax was 13.2+/-6.4 mL/sec at 3 months and remained stable throughout the follow-up period. Patient good-response rates for IPSS (<or=7), PVR (<150 mL), and QoL (<or=2) were 75%, 87.5% and 75%, respectively. Only two patients were unable to void after the treatment. Complications were similar to those presented in the literature, and bladder stone formation was noted as well (five patients).

CONCLUSIONS

ProstaLund thermotherapy is a highly promising alternative treatment for BPH, improving substantially both objective and subjective measures of bladder outflow obstruction.

Long-term treatment outcomes of CoreTherm microwave feedback thermotherapy

The gold standard for definitive management of symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy is transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Despite its efficacy, TURP has significant morbidity/mortality concerns such as hemorrhage and transurethral resection syndrome. This is especially worrisome for the medically high-risk patient, but the high rates of retrograde ejaculation found with TURP also pose a problem for young patients. A minimally invasive, outpatient alternative to TURP that has long-term efficacy, low morbidity/mortality, and provides a cost-effective advantage is in high demand. This review article discusses microwave thermotherapy as such an option and reports the long-term experience with the CoreTherm (CoreTherm Operations AB, Sweden) device.

Application of External Microwave Thermotherapy in Urology: Past, Present, and Future

The excellent clinical results of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) gave to TUMT the leading position among the microwave thermotherapy modalities available for the treatment of different urologic conditions. Research in TUMT has focused on operating software, temperature monitoring, intraprostatic heat distribution, cell-kill calculations, and correlations with clinical variables. Randomized comparisons of TUMT with other established therapies for BPH, including transurethral resection, have facilitated the evaluation of the clinical outcome, durability, morbidity, and costs of the treatment. The applications of microwave thermotherapy in other urologic diseases are also presented in this review.