Repeatability of measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness

First trimester examination of fetal anatomy: clinical practice guideline by the World Association of Perinatal Medicine (WAPM) and the Perinatal Medicine Foundation (PMF)

This recommendation document follows the mission of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine in collaboration with the Perinatal Medicine Foundation. We aim to bring together groups and individuals throughout the world for precise standardization to implement the ultrasound evaluation of the fetus in the first trimester of pregnancy and improve the early detection of anomalies and the clinical management of the pregnancy. The aim is to present a document that includes statements and recommendations on the standard evaluation of the fetal anatomy in the first trimester, based on quality evidence in the peer-reviewed literature as well as the experience of perinatal experts around the world.

First-Trimester Abdominal Circumference (Versus Crown Rump Length) Improves Precision in Inter- and Intraobserver Variability

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate inter- and intraobserver variability of first-trimester biometric measurements and crown-rump length (CRL) and to compare the accuracy and precision of CRL with these biometric measurements used in the interpretation of first-trimester nuchal translucency (NT).

METHODS

Women presenting for a first trimester ultrasound were recruited. Both a sonographer, and a maternal fetal medicine specialist individually examined each participant. Each examiner obtained three independent measurements of CRL, a standardized set of biometric measurements (biparietal diameter, occipitofrontal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, humerus length, and femur length), and an NT between 11 0/7 and 13 6/7 weeks of gestation. Biometry-specific expected NT values were calculated using linear and quadratic regression models and were used to convert results into multiples of the median.

RESULTS

Fetal biometric measurements, CRL, and NT measurements were obtained in 356 consecutive pregnancies with singleton fetuses. CRL demonstrated the least intra- and interobserver variability as demonstrated by the smallest coefficient of variance. However, abdominal circumference and head circumference were not statistically different from CRL variance. CRL and abdominal circumference showed the smallest standard deviation when calculating multiples of the median for NT interpretation.

CONCLUSION

First-trimester abdominal circumference demonstrates the most intra- and interobserver precision for dating and calculating NT multiples of the median, which could potentially be useful with obesity and in any setting with technical limitations of sonography.

Down's syndrome screening at 11-14 weeks' gestation using prenasal thickness and nasal bone length

PURPOSE

To perform a multicenter prospective study of ultrasound prenasal thickness (PT), and nasal bone length (NBL) measurement at 11-14 weeks' gestation.

METHODS

Ultrasound PT and NBL determination was performed in 504 normal fetuses and 17 fetuses with Down's syndrome (DS). Measurements were made from mid-sagittal 2D images acquired using a standardized technique during nuchal translucency (NT) examination. PT and NBL values were expressed in multiples of the gestation-specific normal median (MoM) and as the PT/NBL ratio. Information on PT and NBL MoMs was also combined using logistic regression. Results were classified as positive according to whether they were greater than the normal 95th centile for PT, PT/NBL and the DS risk from logistic regression equation or below the 5th centile for NBL.

RESULTS

The median value in DS cases and unaffected controls were: PT 1.26 and 0.996 MoM; and NBL 0.596 and 0.993 MoM. The proportion of DS fetuses with positive results was 41% for PT, 65% for NBL, and 82% for both the PT/NBL ratio and DS risk from the logistic regression equation. PT/NBL levels did not vary according to gestational age.

CONCLUSION

The PT/NBL ratio is a valuable first trimester DS screening marker that can be easily determined concomitant with the NT measurement.

A prospective study to assess the clinical impact of interobserver reliability of sonographic measurements of fetal nuchal translucency and crown-rump length on combined first-trimester screening

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the interobserver variability for fetal biometric parameters and to focus on how this variability affects the combined first-trimester screening test results.

METHODS:

Sixty-four singleton pregnancies who were scheduled for combined first-trimester screening were investigated. Two experienced sonographers performed all examinations at the same visit. The risk calculations of screening were performed according to the each operator’s individual ultrasonographic fetal measurements. Interobserver variability in measurements of fetal nuchal translucency (NT) and crown-rump length (CRL) and the effect of this interobserver variability on the screening results were assessed.

RESULTS:

Interobserver reliabilities for NT and CRL were 0.687 and 0.945 (p<0.001), respectively. Interobserver reliability coefficients for trisomy 21 and trisomy 13/18 were 0.945 and 0.963 (p<0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Our study demonstrated quite high interobserver reliability for CRL measurement, while interobserver agreement for NT was lower. Despite this lower reliability and agreement for NT measurement, interobserver reliability for chromosomal abnormalities was quite high.

Accuracy of nuchal translucency measurement depends on equipment used and its calibration

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of different ultrasound machine-probe combinations on nuchal translucency (NT) measurements and to assess how this impacts on the accuracy of the NT-derived component of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21.

METHODS

Sixteen different ultrasound machine-probe combinations were used for axial measurement of 2.0-, 3.0- and 4.0-mm spaced targets in an ultrasound phantom. Differences between the measured and known values were determined. The mean of the axial measurements was used to calculate adjusted risks for trisomy 21, given specific clinical scenarios.

RESULTS

Differences observed using different machine-probe combinations for the 2.0-mm target ranged from 1.8-2.2 mm; for the 3.0-mm target, 2.7-3.2 mm; and for the 4-mm target, 3.7-4.3 mm, and exceeded those due to intraobserver variability. For a fetal crown-rump length of 50.0 mm and NT measurement of 2.0 mm, the maximum/minimum measurements in the fetus of a 40-year-old woman led to derived risks ranging from 1 in 32 (NT, 2.2 mm) to 1 in 189 (NT, 1.8 mm) and in the fetus of a 20-year-old with an NT of 3.0 mm these ranged from 1 in 102 (NT, 3.2 mm) to 1 in 160 (NT, 2.7 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

We have described the effect of machine-probe combinations on small but very precise ultrasound measurements. Such machine-probe combinations led to greater variability than those ascribed to intraobserver differences, and significantly affected the screening risk for the same fixed measurement. This finding has implications for Down syndrome screening algorithms and audit of ultrasound operators. Furthermore, most ultrasound machines are neither calibrated nor specified for measurements of tenths of a mm.

Repeat measurements of nuchal translucency at 11-14 weeks of gestation: when do we need them?

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have recommended that several repeat measurements of nuchal translucency (NT) be obtained to optimize sensitivity of the screening process. However, truncation is applied within the risk calculation for small NT measurements; therefore, repeating NT measurements in the lower range may be unnecessary. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal number of NT measurements and whether this is dependent on the initial value obtained.

METHODS

We simulated the expected distribution of sets of five repeat NT measurements and their corresponding likelihood ratios (LR) for a variety of crown-rump length (CRL) values at 11-14 weeks' gestation, based on the published mixture model for first-trimester NT measurements and on published data regarding NT measurement variability. The ratio between LR obtained from the highest and the initial measurement in each set were computed, with a ratio of 1 indicating that repeat measurements would have no effect on risk estimation. We calculated NT cut-offs below which a change in estimated LR would occur in fewer than 10% of cases if repeat measurements were obtained, and we tested this approach on a real first-trimester screening dataset.

RESULTS

The simulations performed indicated that repeating NT measurements when the first NT obtained ranged between ≤ 0.9 and ≤ 1.6 mm at CRLs of 45 and 84 mm, respectively, is not useful. When applied to a real dataset, our approach allowed avoiding repetition of measurements in 47/165 cases (28%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is some variability in NT measurements, repeat assessment is not useful to optimize screening performance for the smallest NT measurements due to lower truncation limits that are applied in risk calculation. Our study provides NT cut-off values, in relation to CRL, below which it appears that there is no need to repeat measurements once a good quality image has been obtained.

Non-Invasive Screening Tools for Down's Syndrome: A Review

Down's syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic cause of developmental delay with an incidence of 1 in 800 live births, and is the predominant reason why women choose to undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis. However, as invasive tests are associated with around a 1% risk of miscarriage new non-invasive tests have been long sought after. Recently, the most promising approach for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) has been provided by the introduction of next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies. The clinical application of NIPD for DS detection is not yet applicable, as large scale validation studies in low-risk pregnancies need to be completed. Currently, prenatal screening is still the first line test for the detection of fetal aneuploidy. Screening cannot diagnose DS, but developing a more advanced screening program can help to improve detection rates, and therefore reduce the number of women offered invasive tests. This article describes how the prenatal screening program has developed since the introduction of maternal age as the original "screening" test, and subsequently discusses recent advances in detecting new screening markers with reference to both proteomic and bioinformatic techniques.

Assessment of competency in clinical measurement: comparison of two forms of sequential test and sensitivity of test error rates to parameter choice

OBJECTIVE

To assess clinical measurement competency by two sequential test formulations [resetting sequential probability ratio test (R-SPRT) and learning curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM)].

DESIGN

Numerical simulation and retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Obstetric ultrasound department.

PARTICIPANTS

Cohorts of 10,000 simulated trainees and 62 obstetric sonographers training in nuchal translucency (NT) measurement at the 11-14-week pregnancy scan with limited case availability.

INTERVENTION

Application of LC-CUSUM and R-SPRT to clinical measurement training.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportions of real trainees achieving competency by LC-CUSUM and R-SPRT, proportions of simulated competent trainees not achieving competency (Type I error), proportions of simulated incompetent trainees achieving competency (Type II error), distribution of case number required to achieve competency (run length) and frequency of resets.

RESULTS

For simulated cohorts, significant differences in run-length distribution and true test error rates were found between the R-SPRT and LC-CUSUM tests with equivalent parameters. Increasing the cases available to each trainee reduced the Type I error rate but increased the Type II error rate for both sequential tests for all choices of unacceptable failure rate. Discontinuities in the proportion of trainees expected to be test competent were found at critical values of unacceptable failure rate.

CONCLUSIONS

With equivalent parameters, the R-SPRT and LC-CUSUM formulations of sequential tests produced different outcomes, demonstrating that the choice of test method, as well as the choice of parameters, is important in designing a training scheme. The R-SPRT detects incompetence as well as competence and may indicate need for further training. Simulations are valuable in estimating the proportions of trainees expected to be assessed as competent.

Reliability of manual and semi-automated measurements of nuchal translucency by experienced operators

OBJECTIVE

To compare intra-/inter-operator reliability of manual and semi-automated NT measurement by experienced operators.

METHODS

Images of 103 fetuses at 11 to 13+6weeks were selected. Two operators performed NT measurement independently 3 times each using both manual and semi-automated methods. Intraoperator reliability of the methods was evaluated using ICCs; interoperator reliability was assessed via correlation between the means of the 3 measurements of each operator. Agreement between the 2 methods was evaluated via Bland-Altman plot.

RESULTS

ICCs for the manual method were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73-0.85) for operator 1 and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.87) for operator 2; ICCs for the semi-automated method were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.85) for operator 1 and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.86) for operator 2. Interoperator reliability for both methods was high: correlation coefficients 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.94) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97) for manual and semi-automated methods, respectively. Mean NT measured by manual and semi-automated methods was 1.15mm and 1.28mm, respectively (P<0.001). Agreement between the methods was good.

CONCLUSION

The reliability of semi-automated NT measurements was comparable to that of the manual method. The new method was reproducible and may be used instead of the manual method in the normal range of NT.

Comparative studies of two dimensional and three dimensional ultrasonic nuchal translucency in trisomy assessments

Current two-dimensional (2D) ultrasonic marker measurements are inherent with intra- and inter-observer variability limitations. The objective of this paper is to investigate the performance of conventional 2D ultrasonic marker measurements and proposed programmable interactive three-dimensional (3D) marker evaluation. This is essentially important to analyze that the measurement on 3D volumetric measurement possesses higher impact and reproducibility vis-à-vis 2D measurement. Twenty three cases of prenatal ultrasound examination were obtained from collaborating hospital after Ethical Committee's approval. The measured 2D ultrasonic marker is Nuchal Translucency or commonly abbreviated as NT. Descriptive analysis of both 2D and 3D ultrasound measurement were calculated. Three trial measurements were taken for each method. Both data were tested with One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test and results indicate that markers measurements were distributed normally with significant parametric values at 0.621 and 0.596 respectively. Computed mean and standard deviation for both measurement methods are 1.4495 ± 0.46490 (2D) and 1.3561 ± 0.50994 (3D). ANOVA test shows that computerized 3D measurements were found to be insignificantly different from the mean of conventional 2D at the significance level of 0.05. With Pearson's correlation coefficient value or R = 0.861, the result proves strong positive linear correlation between 2D and 3D ultrasonic measurements. Reproducibility and accuracy of 3D ultrasound in NT measurement was significantly increased compared with 2D B-mode ultrasound prenatal assessment. 3D reconstructed imaging has higher clinical values compare to 2D ultrasound images with less diagnostics information.

Effect of image settings on nuchal translucency thickness measurement by a semi-automated system

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether pre- and post-processing image settings affect NT measurements made by a semi-automatic method (SAM).

METHODS

Different image settings (e.g. gain) were either adjusted one at a time on images that had been obtained during fetal NT scans (post-processing, n = 66), or adjusted one at a time during live scanning and image acquisition of the adult posterior tibial artery (pre-processing group, n = 91). The NT and luminal diameter of the posterior tibial artery, respectively, were measured by SAM on all original and adjusted images.

RESULTS

Alteration of the image settings resulted in a statistically significant effect on the measurements taken by SAM, with an average pair difference ranging from 0.001 mm to 0.139 mm. Most of the differences were small and therefore the clinical impact would be negligible. The pair differences were greatest with a very high contrast setting, or without tissue harmonic imaging (THI); the paired difference in measurement in those with vs those without THI was more than 0.1 mm in over 40% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements made by SAM are affected by image settings.

Semi-automated adjusted measurement of nuchal translucency: feasibility and reproducibility

OBJECTIVE

The variability of nuchal translucency thickness (NT) measurements in the first trimester appears to be associated in part with caliper placement. Methods for obtaining semi-automated adjusted measurements (SAAMs) can provide several NT values (maximum, minimum, mean and median) automatically within a manually set frame in the zone of interest. This study sought to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of these SAAM-NTs.

METHODS

Three readers, two experts and one less experienced, examined archive images of 160 patients and obtained SAAM-NTs from them, on two separate occasions. The intra- and interobserver reproducibility were assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for maximum, mean and median SAAM-NTs, and Bland-Altman plots were constructed.

RESULTS

SAAM-NTs were technically feasible for all 160 images. The range of ICCs for intraobserver reproducibility was 0.76-0.93 for mean SAAM-NT, 0.76-0.95 for median SAAM-NT and 0.74-0.95 for maximum SAAM-NT. Interobserver ICCs were 0.85, 0.85 and 0.84 for mean SAAM-NT, median SAAM-NT and maximum SAAM-NT, respectively. There were no significant differences for intra- and interobserver reproducibility of median, mean and maximum SAAM-NTs.

CONCLUSIONS

SAAM-NT is feasible with a high level of intra- and interobserver reproducibility. This easy-to-use method has the potential to simplify screening during the first trimester. It should be evaluated further and compared with the manual measurement method.

Intra- and interoperator reliability of manual and semi-automated measurement of fetal nuchal translucency by sonographers with different levels of experience

OBJECTIVE

To compare the intra- and interoperator reliability of manual and semi-automated nuchal translucency thickness (NT) measurement by sonographers with different levels of experience.

METHODS

From our digital database we selected retrospectively 70 NT images without measurements and of highest quality according to the guidelines of The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF). Four operators (two experts who were consultants in fetal medicine, one general consultant in obstetrics and gynecology with average knowledge in obstetric ultrasound and one final-year medical student with no experience in ultrasound), having first attended the FMF's online NT measurement course, measured the fetal NT manually according to FMF guidelines and semi-automatically from the inner to inner borders of the two echogenic lines delineating the NT and from the inner border to the middle of the lower NT line. The semi-automatic measurement algorithm identifies the two NT lines within a manually chosen region of interest and standardizes the caliper placement process. Each operator was blinded to any pre-existing measurements. Each measurement was performed twice by each operator. Intraoperator repeatability was assessed by the within-operator SD and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Interoperator reliability was assessed by comparison with the mean manual measurement of the experts, which was considered as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The mean NT measurement of the four sonographers was between 1.9 and 2.0 mm with both the manual and the semi-automated inner-inner NT measurement and it was between 2.2 and 2.3 mm with the semi-automated inner-middle method. The within-operator SDs of the manual measurement for both experts were similar and significantly lower than those of the non-experts, and all four sonographers performed similarly with the semi-automated measurement. Concerning the interoperator biases relative to the manual measurements of the experts taken as the gold standard, the manual measurements of the student and the general consultant were significantly lower, by 0.18 mm and 0.12 mm. The semi-automated inner-inner measurements of all four sonographers were much closer to the gold standard, although there was still a significant underestimation (mean differences from gold standard between 0.04 and 0.06 mm). With the semi-automated inner-middle measurement there was a significant and more pronounced overestimation of fetal NT compared with the gold standard, relative biases ranging from 0.08 to 0.23 mm above it.

CONCLUSION

Semi-automation of NT measurement leads to improved standardization of the NT assessment process. In particular, non-expert operators improve as the variability in their caliper placement can be reduced to the level of experts. However, the most important contributor to the inter- and intraoperator variability of NT assessment is that of image acquisition, which is not affected by semi-automation of NT measurement.

Semi-automated system for measurement of nuchal translucency thickness

OBJECTIVE

To estimate intersonographer and intrasonographer variance components of fetal nuchal translucency (NT) thickness measurement using the traditional manual approach and a new semi-automated system.

METHODS

A semi-automated method was developed for measurement of the NT. In this method, the operator places an adjustable box over the relevant area at the back of the fetal neck. The system draws a line through the center of the nuchal membrane and another line at the edge of the soft tissue overlying the cervical spine. The system then identifies the largest vertical distance between the two lines. The images of 12 fetuses at 11-13 weeks of gestation satisfying the guidelines of The Fetal Medicine Foundation for measurement of NT were selected. They were exported in DICOM format from the ultrasound system, and four versions of each image were stored under different names. The resulting 48 images were presented in random order for electronic assessment. A total of 20 sonographers measured the NT in each set of 48 pictures, twice using the semi-automated system and twice using the manual system, according to a randomized block design. Within- and between-operator variance components were estimated. Relative biases were assessed by comparing the means from the two methods.

RESULTS

The estimated between-operator SD using the semi-automated method was 0.0149 mm compared with 0.109 mm for the manual method. The respective within-operator SD values were 0.05 mm and 0.126 mm. The intraclass correlation coefficients for different sonographers measuring the same images were 0.98 and 0.85 for the semi-automated method and the manual method, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The measurement of fetal NT is more reliable when a semi-automatic approach is used rather than the traditional manual method.

Fetal thickened nuchal soft tissues may first appear in the second trimester in Down syndrome

PURPOSE

To describe a series of cases of late-onset fetal nuchal translucency in Down syndrome.

METHOD

In our practice area, most pregnant women usually undergo 3 different sonographic examinations: a fetal nuchal translucency examination in the 1st trimester and 2 detailed surveys of all fetal organs in the early 2nd trimester and in midpregnancy.

RESULT

During the study period (2003-2008), we detected 11 fetuses with new appearance of severe thickened nuchal soft tissues (>or=6 mm) at 14-16 weeks' gestation after a normal nuchal screening in the 1st trimester. All of these fetuses had trisomy 21. Associated structural anomalies were observed in 10/11 of the cases. In addition, there were 12 fetuses with new appearance of thickened nuchal soft tissues (<4 mm); all these fetuses had a normal karyotype and were normal at delivery.

CONCLUSION

Obstetricians should be aware that a nuchal abnormality may first appear only at 14-16 weeks' gestation. Fetal karyotyping is advocated in these cases because of the high probability of Down syndrome.

Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements

OBJECTIVE

To compare the inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometric measurements utilizing two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging.

METHODS

This prospective study, utilizing three pairs of doctors trained in sonography, evaluated singleton pregnancies in the mid-trimester. Measurements of the biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) were taken in duplicate by each doctor using 2D imaging and then again using 3D volume datasets. Each set of paired doctors evaluated 12 patients. Inter- and intraobserver variation were calculated as the SD of the difference between paired measurements performed by the doctor pairs and by the individual doctors, respectively. Bland-Altman plots were used to visually compare measurement bias and agreement by 2D and 3D methods.

RESULTS

Inter- and intraobserver variation for 2D and 3D ultrasound were small. The intraobserver variation of HC, AC and FL was significantly lower for 3D compared with 2D ultrasound. Interobserver variation was not significantly different when measured with 2D and 3D ultrasound, with the exception of FL, which was lower when measured with 3D ultrasound. The Bland-Altman plots showed that in 95% of the measurements, the percentage difference between 2D and 3D ultrasound techniques was within 5.3%, 4.6%, 9.6% and 9.6% for BPD, HC, AC and FL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

2D and 3D fetal biometric measurements are reproducible. The use of 3D ultrasound significantly reduces intraobserver variation for HC, AC and FL and reduces interobserver variation for FL.

Impact of nuchal cord on measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness

OBJECTIVE

To define the impact of nuchal cord on the measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness (NT).

METHODS

Between December 2004 and June 2006, we examined prospectively 53 fetuses that were observed on routine first-trimester ultrasound examination between 11 + 3 and 13 + 6 weeks of gestation to have nuchal cord causing an indentation in the skin in the nuchal region. The fetuses were re-examined after a median interval of 132 min, when the cord was no longer around the neck and indentation of the skin had resolved. Various NT measurements (highest, lowest, mean) with the cord located around the neck (nuchal cord) were compared with NT measurements in the absence of nuchal cord ('true' NT) in the same fetuses. Measurements were considered to be equal when they were within mean +/- 1.96 SD, defined by our own intraobserver repeatability according to the method of Bland and Altman.

RESULTS

The mean of the largest and the smallest of six measurements in the presence of nuchal cord fell within the mean +/- 1.96 SD of our own intraobserver repeatability, i.e. gave a correct estimate of the true NT, in 80% of fetuses, while the NT was overestimated in 10% and underestimated in 10% of fetuses. The largest and the smallest of six measurements in the presence of nuchal cord gave an underestimate of the true NT in 2% of fetuses and an overestimate in 4% of fetuses, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is a wide scattering of measurements in fetuses with nuchal cord in comparison to the same fetuses in the absence of nuchal cord. This prevents accurate prediction of the true NT, although the largest and smallest of repeat measurements with nuchal cord can allow calculation of the highest and lowest possible risks, respectively. These facts must be taken into consideration in counseling patients.

First-trimester screening

Screening for fetal chromosome abnormalities, particularly for trisomy 21, has made dramatic advances. Better screening demonstrates that "high-risk" patients--particularly over age 35--can have lower risk of defects than younger unscreened women. This has caused reduction of amniocentesis for older patients and made screening available for younger patients who have the universal 2% to 3% risk. This means lower procedural-related losses of normal fetuses, and better resource allocation. The trend toward first-trimester detection of structural defects continues; a normal survey is reassuring and helps exclude major defects. Based on screening results, patients can be triaged into early follow-up and possible amniocentesis as 14 to 16 weeks, or a later detailed anatomic survey at 18 to 20 weeks.

[Down syndrome screening by ultrasound]

The nuchal translucency is the usual subcutaneous space, between the skin and the soft tissues covering the fetus'neck spine, observed by ultrasound during the first trimester of pregnancy. It increases with gestational age. The association between nuchal translucency thickness and risk of Down syndrome was firstly observed in high risk populations as an old maternal age or a history of a previous child affected by Down syndrome. However, these studies are retrospective and only report the issue among pregnancies associated with an abnormal nuchal translucency thickness. Furthermore, as the performance of a screening test is correlated to the prevalence of the disease in the studied population, such results can not be extrapolated to the general population. To date, eleven prospective studies have been published, assessing the performance of the nuchal translucency measurement in a general population, including about 125,000 patients. The global sensitivity of this screening was 70% for a false positive rate of 5%. For an adjusted risk on the maternal age, the detection rate increased up to 77%. Although nuchal translucency measurement is an early and performing screening tool, uncertainties remain nevertheless about its reproducibility in the general population. In order to correctly measure the nuchal translucency, a previous training course is necessary to guarantee adequate and reproducible measurements.

Variability of Nuchal Translucency Measurement

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate intra- and inter-observer variations of nuchal translucency (NT) measurements and study the duration of measurements.

SUBJECTS

One hundred and forty-seven singleton pregnant women with 10-14 weeks of gestation who had attended antenatal clinic during January 1st, 2000-August 31st, 2001 were included.

METHODS

Crown-rump length and NT were measured three times for each woman. Then, another examiner who was unaware of the previous results did the other three measurements. The duration of measurements was recorded. Intra-observer and inter-observer variations were analyzed by repeated ANOVA and paired t test, respectively. The correlation of NT measurements within each observer and between paired observers was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Kappa statistic was calculated for agreement.

RESULTS

Intra-observer variation of all 10 examiners at three institutes was varied from 0.20 +/- 0.27 to 0.33 +/- 0.41 mm. Inter-observer variation at Chiang Mai University was 0.40 +/- 0.37 mm which was the highest value compared with those at Prince of Songkla and Khon Kaen University (p < 0.05). The mean duration of measurements was in range of 8-12 min. The intra-observer repeatability of the first two measurements showed ICCs varying from 0.61 to 0.94. The inter-observer repeatability of paired examiners showed a variation in ICC from 0.28-0.90. The kappa value expressing the intra- and inter-observer repeatability as being >95th or < or = 95th percentile was 0.73 and 0.72, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

NT measurement was reproducible for small variation and good agreement. The duration of measurements was acceptable.

Suivi à long terme des enfants avec clarté nucale augmentée et caryotype normal

The aim of this study was to investigate outcome at the age of two years for infants without known chromosomal anomalies who presented increased nuchal translucency (NT) at first trimester ultrasound examinations. One hundred fifty-one infants with NT measuring 3mm or more, between 12 and 16 weeks gestation, were followed for at least 24 months. A homogeneous pediatric examination was applied. Among these 151 infants, thirteen (8%) had a major isolated malformation. Five infants (3.3%) had chromosomal anomalies which were unrecognized on fetal karyotype owing to tissue mosaic in two and to cryptic chromosomal anomalies in three. At the age of two years, 16 children (10%) presented psychomotor retardation as part of a genetic syndrome, half of them had an associated cardiac malformation. We did not find any specific ultrasound characteristics which could be used to distinguish fetuses with impaired neurological prognosis. Newborns who presented NT at the first trimester ultrasound examination constitute a high risk population, particularly for psychomotor retardation which is not always recognized during the neonatal period. Careful pediatric follow up is required during childhood.

Increased cardiac atrial-to-ventricular length ratio in the fetal four-chamber view: a new marker for atrioventricular septal defects

OBJECTIVES

Atrioventricular septal defects (AVSDs) are the most common cardiac abnormality in fetuses with numerical chromosomal aberrations, in particular trisomy 21. The majority of AVSDs are not detected by routine ultrasound examination in pregnancy. We report two simple cardiac measurements that may substantially improve antenatal detection of AVSDs.

METHODS

Cross-sectional ultrasound images through the fetal thorax demonstrating the four-chamber plane of the heart were obtained in 123 normal fetuses between 10 and 38 weeks of gestation. Heart length was measured at the level of interventricular septum by placing the calipers on the epicardium at the apex of the heart and on the endocardium at the top of the atrium. Ventricular length was measured by shifting the atrial caliper to the crossing point of the ventricular septum and mitral valve. Atrial length was calculated as the difference between the heart length and ventricular length. Based on these measurements, the atrial-to-ventricular length (AVL) ratio was calculated. Data were compared to measurements from 29 consecutive fetuses with AVSD between 13 and 39 weeks of gestation.

RESULTS

In normal fetuses, the AVL ratio did not change with gestation and the mean AVL ratio was 0.47 (95% prediction interval 0.35 to 0.63). In the AVSD group, the mean AVL ratio was 0.77 (range, 0.59-0.99). If a cut-off value for the AVL ratio of 0.6 was chosen, the detection rate of AVSD was 86.2% at a 5.7% false-positive rate. For a 100% detection rate, the false-positive rate was 7.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The AVL ratio can accurately discriminate between hearts with AVSDs and normal cardiac anatomy. Incorporation of the AVL ratio measurement into routine antenatal ultrasonography may substantially improve the ability to diagnose AVSDs antenatally.

Audit on nuchal translucency thickness measurements in Flanders, Belgium: a plea for methodological standardization

OBJECTIVES

To audit nuchal translucency thickness (NT) measurements for fetal aneuploidy screening in Flanders, and to estimate the impact of small variations in NT measurement on the screening result of two first-trimester screening algorithms: maternal age + NT (Algorithm A), and maternal age + NT + pregnancy associated plasma protein-A + free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (Algorithm B).

METHODS

We used the database of first-trimester combined screening, as collected by the General Medical Laboratory AML in Antwerp, Belgium, between 1 January 2001 and 1 April 2004. Audit was performed by establishing a delta-NT distribution curve for one trainee of The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) and for a group of 263 other sonographers, in comparison with the FMF reference values. Risks for fetal aneuploidy were calculated at a cut-off value of 1 : 300 for Algorithm A and 1 : 150 for Algorithm B. These risks were recalculated in both algorithms after a modeled increase of all NT values by 0.1 or 0.2 mm.

RESULTS

In a total of 592 measurements performed by the FMF trainee, the 5th, 50th and 95th percentiles of delta-NT measurements were at -0.41, +0.03 and +0.68 mm, respectively. These values were close to the FMF reference values. The screen-positive rate for this set of data was 4.4% (26/592) in both algorithms. For the 12 555 measurements of the 263 other sonographers, the 5th, 50th and 95th percentiles of delta-NT were at -0.81, -0.14 and +0.73 mm, respectively, which clearly indicates underestimation of NT in the lower range. In this set of data the screen-positive rate was 3.5% for both algorithms (439/12 555 for Algorithm A and 436/12 555 for Algorithm B). Also in this group, 5% (59/1186) of negative screening results at maternal age > or = 35 years in Algorithm A became positive after a modeled 0.1-mm increase in NT, whereas this was only in 1.2% (134/11 369) of tests at maternal age < 35 years (P < 0.0001). The overall increase of screen-positive rate in Algorithm A after an NT modification of +0.1 mm was 1.2% (152/12 555), significantly more than in Algorithm B (86/12 555; 0.7%) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In Flanders, there is a systematic underestimation of NT in comparison with the FMF reference range. Attempts to change these measurements according to the FMF criteria are crucial. This will mainly influence the screening results of women at advanced maternal age and of NT-based algorithms without the use of other parameters.

Ultrasound simulators: experience with the SonoTrainer and comparative review of other training systems

Ultrasound has become indispensable in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound training, however, still lacks proper quality assessment and control. Moreover, most fetal anomalies which must be diagnosed during pregnancy are extremely rare. Ultrasound simulators could provide an opportunity to overcome this dilemma. This review summarizes the potential benefits of simulator-based ultrasound training, briefly describes the properties of a variety of ultrasound simulators that have been developed for various applications including prenatal diagnosis, and presents the SonoTrainer sonography simulation system which makes it possible to run a real-time simulation of a complete prenatal ultrasound examination. We evaluated the system for the training of first- and second-trimester screening for both normal and pathological findings and found that physicians who received theoretical training and were additionally trained with the simulator (T + S) significantly improved their skills in measurements of nuchal translucency thickness (NT) and crown-rump length (CRL) as compared with colleagues who only underwent theoretical instruction (T) [mean +/- SD NT deviation: 0.31 +/- 0.1 mm (T + S) vs. 0.62 +/- 0.2 mm (T), P < 0.05; mean +/- SD CRL deviation: 1.48 +/- 2.0 mm (T + S) vs. 3.27 +/- 2.5 (T), P < 0.05]. Simulator-based training enabled physicians to diagnose rare fetal anomalies in the second trimester with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 100%. In a study in which second-trimester scans including fetal anomalies were presented to physicians, 96% of the participants subjectively estimated their training effect as being good. We therefore conclude that simulator-based training would provide an ideal educational tool to test, improve and monitor a physician's or technician's ultrasound skills in detecting fetal anomalies.

Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities

There is extensive evidence that effective screening for major chromosomal abnormalities can be provided in the first trimester of pregnancy. Prospective studies in a total of 200,868 pregnancies, including 871 fetuses with trisomy 21, have demonstrated that increased nuchal translucency can identify 76.8% of fetuses with trisomy 21, which represents a false-positive rate of 4.2%. When fetal nuchal translucency was combined with maternal serum free-beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in prospective studies in a total of 44,613 pregnancies, including 215 fetuses with trisomy 21, the detection rate was 87.0% for a false-positive rate of 5.0%. Studies from specialist centers with 15,822 pregnancies, which included 397 fetuses with trisomy 21, have demonstrated that the absence of the nasal bone can identify 69.0% of trisomy 21 fetuses, which represents a false-positive rate of 1.4%. It has been estimated that first-trimester screening by a combination of sonography and maternal serum testing can identify 97% of trisomy 21 fetuses, which represents a false-positive rate of 5%, or that the detection rate can be 91%, which represents a false-positive rate of 0.5%. In addition to increased nuchal translucency, important sonographic markers for chromosomal abnormalities, include fetal growth restriction, tachycardia, abnormal flow in the ductus venosus, megacystis, exomphalos and single umbilical artery. Most pregnant women prefer screening in the first, rather than in the second, trimester. As with all aspects of good clinical practice, those care givers who perform first-trimester screening should be trained appropriately, and their results should be subjected to external quality assurance.

The influence of image magnification in first-trimester screening for Down syndrome by fetal nuchal translucency in Asians

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the impact of image magnification in the measurements of crown-rump length (CRL) and nuchal translucency (NT) thickness for first-trimester Down syndrome screening in Asians.

METHODS

Ultrasound measurements of NT and CRL were performed in 561 consecutive Taiwanese unaffected fetuses and 11 cases of Down syndrome fetuses between 12 and 14 weeks of gestation. All sonographic images were measured by one qualified examiner to prospectively undergo first-trimester NT screening for Down syndrome. Fetal CRL and NT thickness were measured on three separated images including the original image, regular image, and the magnified image.

RESULTS

A significant mean difference (0.59 +/- 4.24 mm) of CRL was found between measurements on the original and regular image (p < 0.001). There was a significant mean difference of NT thickness measurements between the regular and magnified image (0.12 +/- 0.25 mm, p < 0.001). Seven out of the 11 cases (63.6%) of Down syndrome with NT thickness > or =2.5 mm was measured on three separated images. A significantly reduced incidence of NT thickness > or =2.5 mm on the magnified image was noted than those of the original and regular image measurements in unaffected cases (p < 0.001). Either using the assessing method by the 95th centile cutoff value of NT thickness or combined risk, our results could achieve observed detection rate of 63.6% measured on three separated images.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that the image magnification could reduce the false-positive rate by using a fixed cutoff value of NT thickness, but would have no influence on the results when using the assessing method either by the 95th centile cutoff value of NT thickness or the combined risk. In order to place the caliper more accurately, a magnified image should be recommended as a standard image in the measurements of the NT thickness.

Intra- and interoperator variability in fetal nasal bone assessment at 11-14 weeks of gestation

OBJECTIVES

Examination of the fetal nasal bones by ultrasound between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation has been proposed as an additional tool in the detection of trisomy 21 in a high-risk population. However the variability in the identification of fetal nasal bones by ultrasound has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of fetal nasal bone identification by ultrasound between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

A total of 1040 consecutive ultrasound examinations were performed at 11-14 weeks of gestation for nuchal translucency (NT) measurement and nasal bone identification by ultrasound. A total of 657 consecutive video-loops were assessed by three experienced operators. Each operator assigned cases to one of three categories, namely present, uncertain or absent nasal bones, and the results were compared between operators. To assess the intraoperator variability each operator reviewed 100 randomly selected videos out of the 657 loops and again used the same classification. Results were compared by pairwise unweighted and weighted Kappa index to evaluate the inter- and intraoperator variability.

RESULTS

Among the 1040 fetuses, there were 51 (4.9%) with an NT measurement above the 95th centile. Nasal bones were identified by ultrasound in 948, not seen in eight and impossible to assess in 84 fetuses. Four fetuses had trisomy 21 including three with absent nasal bones and increased NT and one with present nasal bones and normal NT. The Kappa and weighted Kappa values for interoperator variability between the three operators were between 0.26 and 0.37 and 0.33 and 0.44, respectively. The Kappa and weighted Kappa values for intraoperator variability were between 0.35 and 0.48 and 0.43 and 0.55, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of fetal nasal bones is only fairly reproducible. Although the performance of the test in fetuses at high risk for trisomy 21 has been reported to be good, its implementation as an additional screening technique in the general population must be accompanied by teaching and quality control programs.

Nuchal translucency thickness measurement: repeatability using a virtual ultrasound scanner

AIM

To use a PC-based virtual ultrasound scanner (VirUS) in the investigation of inter- and intraoperator nuchal translucency (NT) thickness measurement repeatability of experienced ultrasound operators.

METHODS

Realistic fetal ultrasound images of defined NT thickness were simulated with VirUS with emulation of scanner gain and time-gain compensation and gain-dependent echo size changes. A set of 50 images was generated with uniformly distributed NT thickness (range, 1-5 mm at 1-mm intervals) and translucency angle (mean +/- standard deviation of +/- 2.52 degrees +/- 1.85 degrees about the horizontal). Operators (n = 13) measured NT thickness in the image set on three occasions separated by at least 1 day, giving 150 measurements per operator (total measurements, 1950).

RESULTS

Inter- and intraoperator repeatabilities were +/- 0.41 mm and +/- 0.22 mm, respectively (at the 95% confidence level). There were significant correlations between repeatability and mean measured NT thickness (r = - 0.72, P = 0.005 at 4-mm interval), between gain and mean measured NT thickness (P </= 0.002, n = 8/13) and between gain and repeatability coefficient (P < 0.01, n = 6/13).

DISCUSSION

VirUS provides a consistent NT audit environment and demonstrates the need to both optimize repeatability vs. mean measured thickness and to set gain consistently. The technique has potential in operator training.

Centre-specific ultrasound nuchal translucency medians needed for Down syndrome screening

Nuchal translucency (NT) measurements were compared between 13 centres participating in a multi-marker Down syndrome screening program. Results from 4765 women were analysed, and there were highly statistically significant between-centre differences after allowing for gestation (P < 0.0001). Examination of maternal serum marker levels, expressed in multiples of the median (MoM) for gestation, showed that this was not due to gestational errors. Regression analysis was carried out to derive an equation with a centre-specific component that could be used to express NT in MoMs. Use of this equation reduced the variance of logNT by 15% compared to a published equation. The equation can be readily modified for use in other centres.

The effect of image size on nuchal translucency measurement

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of altering image size on the absolute nuchal translucency (NT) measurement.

METHODS

NT was measured at three image magnifications (60%, 100% and 200%) in 120 singleton pregnancies.

RESULTS

The mean +/- SD NT measurements were 1.52 +/- 0.57 mm, 1.35 +/- 0.53 mm and 1.18 +/- 0.48 mm at 60%, 100% and 200% magnification, respectively (p = 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of NT decreases significantly with increasing image size. Optimisation of NT as a method of screening will require agreed standardisation of image magnification.

Fetal transabdominal biometry at 11-14 weeks of gestation

OBJECTIVE

To establish comprehensive transabdominal ultrasonographic reference ranges for viable normal singleton human fetuses at 11-14 weeks' gestation.

METHODS

Single transabdominal ultrasound measurements were taken once per pregnancy at a gestational age of between 11+0 and 14+0 weeks (crown-rump length, 45-84 mm), in viable singleton fetuses with nuchal translucency < or = 3 mm and without detectable structural anomalies, using four standard planes: (i) biparietal diameter (BPD) and fronto-occipital diameter (FOD) resulting in head circumference (HC), anterior horn (Va), posterior horn (Vp), and hemisphere (HEM); (ii) transcerebellar diameter (TCD) and cisterna magna (CM); (iii) abdominal anteroposterior (AAP) and abdominal transverse diameter (ATD) resulting in abdominal circumference (AC); and (iv) femur length (FL). The respective ratios Va/HEM, Vp/HEM, HC/AC, BPD/FL, BPD/FOD, FL/CRL, FL/BPD and FL/AC and the estimated weight were derived. Reference ranges were constructed and the mean and 5th and 95th centiles were plotted against gestation.

RESULTS

There was a general increase in biometric parameters with gestation. The ratios for the ventricles vs. hemisphere and BPD/FL ratio decreased while the BPD/FOD and HC/AC ratios remained constant. Analysis of the reference range for BPD/FL was performed in both 167 and 664 fetuses and the results showed almost the identical type of equation, indicating a high degree of accuracy for the growth charts.

CONCLUSIONS

We have established comprehensive reference ranges for first-trimester fetal biometry by transabdominal sonography. These charts may have a role in the diagnosis of early onset symmetrical or asymmetrical growth restriction and in the interpretation of measurements in chromosomally abnormal fetuses, and they may help in the detection of skeletal dysplasias or acrania/anencephaly.

The effect of ethnic origin on nuchal translucency at 10-14 weeks of gestation

INTRODUCTION

Fetal nuchal translucency (NT) increases with gestation and is affected by fetal posture and fetal gender. A recent report suggested that there might also be ethnic differences. We investigated the effect of ethnic origin on NT in an Asian population.

METHODS

NT was measured at 10-14 weeks. The measurements were converted into multiples of the median (MoM) for gestational day. The risk of Down syndrome was calculated by combining NT and maternal age. Cases affected by chromosomal and major structural abnormalities were excluded. NT measurements of different ethnic groups were compared.

RESULTS

Between January 1997 and October 2001, 16 981 pregnancies with known ethnic origin and normal fetal outcome were analysed. Median NT MoM (95% CI) of the Filipinos was 1.07 (1.04-1.11). This was significantly higher than that of the Chinese, 1.01 (1.01-1.02); other Asians (Indians, Pakistanis and Nepalese), 0.96 (0.94-0.99), and Caucasians, 0.98 (0.93-1.06) (p<0.05, respectively; Mann-Whitney U-test). An NT risk cut-off of 1:180 would classify 5% of the Chinese, 4.6% of the Caucasians, 5.6% of the Filipinos and 4.2% of the other Asians as screen-positive. There were no statistically significant differences between these screen-positive rates (p>0.05, Chi-square test).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were statistically significant differences in NT measurements between different ethnic groups, it was clinically insignificant, as reflected by similar screen-positive rates.

Combined ultrasound and biochemical screening for Down's syndrome in the first trimester: a Scottish multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of ultrasound measurements of fetal nuchal translucency (NT) obtained in a routine antenatal clinic setting in combination with appropriate biochemical markers as a first trimester screening test for Down's Syndrome.

DESIGN

Multicentre observational study.

SETTING

Fifteen Scottish maternity units.

POPULATION

Pregnant women (n = 17,229) attending routine antenatal clinics at 10-14 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

NT measurements were attempted in all women along with the measurement of maternal serum free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (F beta hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A). All results were converted to multiples of the appropriate gestational median (MoM) and using a statistical model the risk of an affected pregnancy was derived. No results were given to participating women but all were offered routine second trimester biochemical screening. All cases of Down's Syndrome within the study group were ascertained and the detection rate for each marker was estimated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Success rate of obtaining NT measurements and overall effectiveness of ultrasound and biochemical markers individually and in combination for the detection of Down's Syndrome pregnancies.

RESULTS

NT measurements were obtained in 72.9% of women and blood samples in 98.4%. Forty-five cases of Down's Syndrome were ascertained (2.6/1,000). NT measurements were obtained in 37 cases (median NT 1.65 MoM), blood samples in 42 cases and both NT and blood in 34 cases. In combination with the a priori maternal age risk, observed detection rates at a 5% false positive rate were 20/37 (54%) for NT, 23/42 (55%) for F beta hCG and PAPP-A and 28/34 (82%) for a combination of NT, F beta hCG and PAPP-A using a cutoff risk of 1:250. The effect of failing to obtain NT measurements in all cases reduces the overall detection rate to 62% (i.e. 28/45) if the entire series of affected pregnancies within the study group is considered.

CONCLUSIONS

NT in combination with appropriate serum markers has the potential to detect over 80% of Down's Syndrome fetuses in early pregnancy. However, NT measurement is highly operator-dependent. It requires training, external quality control and adequate time to allow accurate measurement, otherwise suboptimal performance will result.

Increased fetal nuchal translucency at 11-14 weeks

Nuchal translucency (NT) is the sonographic appearance of a subcutaneous collection of fluid behind the fetal neck. The measurement of fetal NT thickness at the 11-14-week scan has been combined with maternal age to provide an effective method of screening for trisomy 21; for an invasive testing rate of 5%, about 75% of trisomic pregnancies can be identified. When maternal serum free-beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (beta-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) at 11-14 weeks are also taken into account, the detection rate of chromosomal defects is about 90%. Increased NT can also identify a high proportion of other chromosomal abnormalities and is associated with major defects of the heart and great arteries, and a wide range of skeletal dysplasias and genetic syndromes. In monochorionic twins, discordancy for increased NT is an early marker of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). As with the introduction of any new technology into routine clinical practice, it is essential that those undertaking the 11-14-week scan are adequately trained and their results are subjected to rigorous audit.

Quality assessment in prospective nuchal translucency screening for Down syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To develop and apply a quality control system in a Down syndrome screening study using nuchal translucency as an interventional marker.

METHODS

In a prospective Down syndrome screening study fetal nuchal translucency thickness was measured in 9236 of the 10 045 examined pregnancies. For quality assessment two models were introduced: firstly, image-scoring evaluation of the nuchal translucency thickness measurements and secondly, establishment of the distributions of nuchal translucency multiples of the median over time and the influence of intervention.

RESULTS

The observer variability in the image-scoring evaluation was high with a kappa value of 0.48 in the overall validation. A revised model showed better interobserver agreement with a kappa value of 0.58; however, comparing the individual criteria the differences were still unsatisfactory, i.e. we found highly significant differences in the criteria "position of the fetus" (P = 0.0026) and "magnification of the image" (P = 0.0001). Regarding the distributions of the nuchal translucency multiples of the median, the median stabilized after a short learning phase representing the practical part of the sonographer's certification to nuchal translucency screening. In groups of medians of 50 nuchal translucency multiples of the median the intergroup standard deviation decreased from 0.100-0.060 after the learning phase to 0.046 after intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

When well-trained certified examiners perform nuchal translucency screening, continuous evaluation of the distribution of the nuchal translucency multiples of the median seems to be a good method to assess the quality for a center and may also be used to identify individual examiners deviating from the mean performance. The image-scoring methods we introduced cannot be recommended for quality control in a nuchal translucency screening program.

Measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness by three-dimensional ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility and repeatability of nuchal translucency thickness measurement using three-dimensional ultrasound.

METHODS

Forty consecutive women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies attending for Down syndrome screening at 11-14 weeks' gestation were included in this prospective crossover trial. Nuchal translucency thickness was measured using both two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound. In each case two three-dimensional volumes were recorded and then examined by using the technique of planar reformatted sections. The initial plane of the first volume always contained a clear image of the nuchal region ('sagittal volume'), whilst the initial plane of the second volume was selected randomly regardless of fetal position ('random volume'). The repeatability of nuchal translucency measurement was examined by constructing a scatter diagram of the difference between the measurements plotted against the mean of two readings.

RESULTS

Nuchal translucency measurements could be repeated in 38/40 (95%) sagittal volumes and 24/40 (60%) random volumes. The mean difference between two-dimensional measurements and those obtained by reslicing of sagittal three-dimensional volumes was -0.097 mm (95% limits of agreement from -0.481 to 0.675) and 0.225 mm (95% limits of agreement from -0.369 to 0.819) when random volumes were examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Reslicing of stored three-dimensional volumes can be used to replicate nuchal translucency measurements only when nuchal skin can also be clearly seen on two-dimensional ultrasound.

Nuchal translucency measurement and pregnancy outcome after assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived twins

BACKGROUND

Nuchal translucency (NT) measurement for Down's syndrome screening or detecting various fetal anomalies is a reliable sonographic marker. This study evaluates the contribution of NT screening in spontaneously conceived and assisted conception twin pregnancies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Maternal age at measurement, chorionicity, ultrasound features, karyotype results and pregnancy outcome were recorded prospectively and compared in 83 assisted reproduction treatment and 91 spontaneously conceived twins. Pregnancy outcome was evaluated according to maternal age, method of conception, NT data and chorionicity. NT measurements (> or =95 centiles of the normal range) were considered screen-positive and mid-pregnancy fetal karyotyping was advised. Complicated pregnancy outcome, which could be signalled by increased NT, was defined as either chromosomal abnormalities, severe structural defects or fetal demise. Based on NT measurements, 16 fetuses (4.6%) were found to be screen-positive. Five of them had chromosomal aneuploidy and selective termination was performed. The parents also opted for this procedure in another five fetuses because of major structural abnormality diagnosed during NT assessment. No other chromosomal or major fetal abnormality were found post-natally. Although no difference was found in NT, crown-rump length and maternal age between spontaneous and assisted reproduction technology twin pregnancies, the former group had a significantly higher rate of screen-positive results (7 versus 2%, P = 0.047), amniocentesis uptake (33 versus 22%, P = 0.014), monochorionic twining (32 versus 4%, P = 0.001) and complicated pregnancy outcome (11 versus 5%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The present study confirms that first trimester target scanning can improve outcome by early detection and management of cases with an anomalous co-twin. It also identifies some differences between spontaneously and artificially conceived twin pregnancies in relation to this area of testing.

First-trimester ultrasound

There has been an increase in the use of fetal ultrasound in the first trimester. This article reviews the published literature with emphasis on fetal nuchal translucency (NT). When measured according to well-defined guidelines, increased NT identifies about 80% of chromosomal anomalies for a false-positive rate of about 5%. Increased NT may indicate the presence of structural defects or genetic disorders, and it is relatively frequently seen in monochorionic pregnancies prone to develop twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

Intra- and interoperator repeatability of the nuchal translucency measurement

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability of nuchal translucency measurement by well-trained sonographers either experienced or inexperienced with the measurement.

METHODS

The nuchal translucency was measured three times by two out of nine operators in 161 pregnant women attending two teaching hospitals. Intra-operator and inter-operator variation was assessed by calculating the standard deviation (SD). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) with a 95% lower confidence limit (95% CL) were calculated for each operator and for pairs of operators. Intra- and inter-operator kappa statistics were calculated, after dichotomising the results into a nuchal translucency smaller or larger than 3 mm.

RESULTS

The SD of intra-operator difference was 0.35 mm. The intra-operator repeatability showed ICCs varying from 0.83 to 0.95 for the experienced operators and from 0.47 to 0.83 for the inexperienced. The SD of inter-operator differences was 0.56 mm, 0.46 mm and 0.44 mm, based on one, two and three measurements, respectively. The inter-operator repeatability showed a variation in ICC from 0.74 to 0.95 in pairs of experienced sonographers to 0.51 in one pair inexperienced with the measurement. The kappa value expressing the intra and inter-operator repeatability as being > 3 mm or < 3 mm was 0.88 and 0.85, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the finding that the nuchal translucency measurement is reproducible, as long as it is performed by sonographers well trained in the technique of this measurement.