Control of rat glomerular microcirculation by juxtaglomerular adenosine A1 receptors

Concurrent activation of multiple vasoactive signaling pathways in vasoconstriction caused by tubuloglomerular feedback: a quantitative assessment

Tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) describes the negative relationship between (a) NaCl concentration at the macula densa and (b) glomerular filtration rate or glomerular capillary pressure. TGF-induced vasoconstriction of the afferent arteriole results from the enhanced effect of several vasoconstrictors with an effect size sequence of adenosine = 20-HETE > angiotensin II > thromboxane = superoxide > renal nerves > ATP. TGF-mediated vasoconstriction is limited by the simultaneous release of several vasodilators with an effect size sequence of nitric oxide > carbon monoxide = kinins > adenosine. The sum of the constrictor effects exceeds that of the dilator effects by the magnitude of the TGF response. The validity of the additive model used in this analysis can be tested by determining the effect of combined inhibition of some or all agents contributing to TGF. Multiple independent contributors to TGF are consistent with the variability of TGF and of the factors contributing to TGF resetting.

Renal autoregulation in health and disease

Intrarenal autoregulatory mechanisms maintain renal blood flow (RBF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) independent of renal perfusion pressure (RPP) over a defined range (80-180 mmHg). Such autoregulation is mediated largely by the myogenic and the macula densa-tubuloglomerular feedback (MD-TGF) responses that regulate preglomerular vasomotor tone primarily of the afferent arteriole. Differences in response times allow separation of these mechanisms in the time and frequency domains. Mechanotransduction initiating the myogenic response requires a sensing mechanism activated by stretch of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and coupled to intracellular signaling pathways eliciting plasma membrane depolarization and a rise in cytosolic free calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)]i). Proposed mechanosensors include epithelial sodium channels (ENaC), integrins, and/or transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. Increased [Ca(2+)]i occurs predominantly by Ca(2+) influx through L-type voltage-operated Ca(2+) channels (VOCC). Increased [Ca(2+)]i activates inositol trisphosphate receptors (IP3R) and ryanodine receptors (RyR) to mobilize Ca(2+) from sarcoplasmic reticular stores. Myogenic vasoconstriction is sustained by increased Ca(2+) sensitivity, mediated by protein kinase C and Rho/Rho-kinase that favors a positive balance between myosin light-chain kinase and phosphatase. Increased RPP activates MD-TGF by transducing a signal of epithelial MD salt reabsorption to adjust afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction. A combination of vascular and tubular mechanisms, novel to the kidney, provides for high autoregulatory efficiency that maintains RBF and GFR, stabilizes sodium excretion, and buffers transmission of RPP to sensitive glomerular capillaries, thereby protecting against hypertensive barotrauma. A unique aspect of the myogenic response in the renal vasculature is modulation of its strength and speed by the MD-TGF and by a connecting tubule glomerular feedback (CT-GF) mechanism. Reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide are modulators of myogenic and MD-TGF mechanisms. Attenuated renal autoregulation contributes to renal damage in many, but not all, models of renal, diabetic, and hypertensive diseases. This review provides a summary of our current knowledge regarding underlying mechanisms enabling renal autoregulation in health and disease and methods used for its study.

Purinergic signalling in the kidney in health and disease

The involvement of purinergic signalling in kidney physiology and pathophysiology is rapidly gaining recognition and this is a comprehensive review of early and recent publications in the field. Purinergic signalling involvement is described in several important intrarenal regulatory mechanisms, including tuboglomerular feedback, the autoregulatory response of the glomerular and extraglomerular microcirculation and the control of renin release. Furthermore, purinergic signalling influences water and electrolyte transport in all segments of the renal tubule. Reports about purine- and pyrimidine-mediated actions in diseases of the kidney, including polycystic kidney disease, nephritis, diabetes, hypertension and nephrotoxicant injury are covered and possible purinergic therapeutic strategies discussed.

Methylxanthines and the kidney

This chapter describes the effects of the natural methylxanthines caffeine and theophylline on kidney function. Theophylline in particular was used traditionally to increase urine out put until more potent diuretics became available in the middle of the last century. The mildly diuretic actions of both methylxanthines are mainly the result of inhibition of tubular fluid reabsorption along the renal proximal tubule. Based upon the use of specific adenosine receptor antagonists and the observation of a complete loss of diuresis in mice with targeted deletion of the A1AR gene, transport inhibition by methylxanthines is mediated mainly by antagonism of adenosine A1 receptors (A1AR) in the proximal tubule. Methylxanthines are weak renal vasodilators, and they act as competitive antagonists against adenosine-induced preglomerular vasoconstriction. Caffeine and theophylline stimulate the secretion of renin by inhibition of adenosine receptors and removal of the general inhibitory brake function of endogenous adenosine. Since enhanced intrarenal adenosine levels lead to reduced glomerular filtration rate in several pathological conditions theophylline has been tested for its therapeutic potential in the renal impairment following administration of nephrotoxic substances such as radiocontrast media, cisplatin, calcineurin inhibitors or following ischemia-reperfusion injury. In experimental animals functional improvements have been observed in all of these conditions, but available clinical data in humans are insufficient to affirm a definite therapeutic efficacy of methylxanthines in the prevention of nephrotoxic or postischemic renal injury.

Adenosine A2A receptor activation attenuates tubuloglomerular feedback responses by stimulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase

Adenosine A(2) receptors have been suggested to modulate tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) responses by counteracting adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated vasoconstriction, but the mechanisms are unclear. We tested the hypothesis that A(2A) receptor activation blunts TGF by release of nitric oxide in the juxtaglomerular apparatus (JGA). Maximal TGF responses were measured in male Sprague-Dawley rats as changes in proximal stop-flow pressure (ΔP(SF)) in response to increased perfusion of the loop of Henle (0 to 40 nl/min) with artificial tubular fluid (ATF). The maximal TGF response was studied after 5 min intratubular perfusion (10 nl/min) with ATF or ATF + A(2A) receptor agonist (CGS-21680; 10(-7) mol/l). The interaction with nitric oxide synthase (NOS) isoforms was tested by perfusion with a nonselective NOS inhibitor [N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME); 10(-3) mol/l] or a selective neuronal NOS (nNOS) inhibitor [N(ω)-propyl-L-arginine (L-NPA); 10(-6) mol/l] alone, and with the A(2A) agonist. Blood pressure, urine flow, and P(SF) at 0 nl/min were similar among the groups. The maximal TGF response (ΔP(SF)) with ATF alone (12.3 ± 0.6 mmHg) was attenuated by selective A(2A) stimulation (9.5 ± 0.4 mmHg). L-NAME enhanced maximal TGF responses (18.9 ± 0.4 mmHg) significantly more than L-NPA (15.2 ± 0.7 mmHg). Stimulation of A(2A) receptors did not influence maximal TGF response during nonselective NOS inhibition (19.0 ± 0.4) but attenuated responses during nNOS inhibition (10.3 ± 0.4 mmHg). In conclusion, adenosine A(2A) receptor activation attenuated TGF responses by stimulation of endothelial NOS (eNOS), presumably in the afferent arteriole. Moreover, NO derived from both eNOS and nNOS in the JGA may blunt TGF responses.

Adenosine A(2) receptors modulate tubuloglomerular feedback

Adenosine can mediate the tubuloglomerular (TGF) response via activation of A(1) receptors on the afferent arteriole, but both adenosine A(1) and A(2) receptors can regulate preglomerular resistance. We tested the hypothesis that adenosine A(2) receptors offset the effect of A(1) receptors and modulate the TGF. Maximal TGF responses were measured in male Sprague-Dawley rats as changes in proximal stop-flow pressure (DeltaP(SF)) in response to increased perfusion of the loop of Henle (0 to 40 nl/min) with artificial tubular fluid (ATF). The maximal TGF response was studied after 5 min of intratubular perfusion (10 nl/min) with ATF alone, or with ATF plus the A(2A) receptor antagonist (ZM-241385; 10(-7) or 10(-5) mol/l), A(1) receptor antagonist (PSB-36; 10(-8) mol/l), or with a combination of A(1) (PSB-36; 10(-8) mol/l) and A(2A) (ZM-241385; 10(-7) mol/l) antagonists. The maximal TGF response (DeltaP(SF)) with ATF alone was 11.7 +/- 1.0 mmHg. Specific A(2) inhibition (low dose) enhanced the maximal TGF response (15.7 +/- 0.8 mmHg; P < 0.01), whereas a high dose (unspecific inhibition) attenuated the response (5.0 +/- 0.4 mmHg; P < 0.001). A(1) inhibition alone led to a paradoxical TGF response, with an increase in P(SF) of 3.1 +/- 0.5 mmHg (P < 0.05). Simultaneous application of A(1) and A(2) antagonists abolished the TGF response (DeltaP(SF): 0.4 +/- 0.3 mmHg). In conclusion, adenosine A(2) receptors modulate the TGF response by counteracting the effects of adenosine A(1) receptors.

ATP, P2 receptors and the renal microcirculation

Purinoceptors are rapidly becoming recognised as important regulators of tissue and organ function. Renal expression of P2 receptors is broad and diverse, as reflected by the fact that P2 receptors have been identified in virtually every major tubular/vascular element. While P2 receptor expression by these renal structures is recognised, the physiological functions that they serve remains to be clarified. Renal vascular P2 receptor expression is complex and poorly understood. Evidence suggests that different complements of P2 receptors are expressed by individual renal vascular segments. This unique distribution has given rise to the postulate that P2 receptors are important for renal vascular function, including regulation of preglomerular resistance and autoregulatory behaviour. More recent studies have also uncovered evidence that hypertension reduces renal vascular reactivity to P2 receptor stimulation in concert with compromised autoregulatory capability. This review will consolidate findings related to the role of P2 receptors in regulating renal microvascular function and will present areas of controversy related to the respective roles of ATP and adenosine in autoregulatory resistance adjustments.

Enhanced tubuloglomerular feedback in mice with vascular overexpression of A1 adenosine receptors

Adenosine 1 receptors (A1AR) in the kidney are expressed in the vasculature and the tubular system. Pharmacological inhibition or global genetic deletion of A1AR causes marked reductions or abolishment of tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) responses. To assess the function of vascular A1AR in TGF, we generated transgenic mouse lines in which A1AR expression in smooth muscle was augmented by placing A1AR under the control of a 5.38-kb fragment of the rat smooth muscle alpha-actin promoter and first intron (12). Two founder lines with highest expression in the kidney [353 +/- 42 and 575 +/- 43% compared with the wild type (WT)] were used in the experiments. Enhanced expression of A1AR at the expected site in these lines was confirmed by augmented constrictor responses of isolated afferent arterioles to administration of the A1AR agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine. Maximum TGF responses (0-30 nl/min flow step) were increased from 8.4 +/- 0.9 mmHg in WT (n = 21) to 14.2 +/- 0.7 mmHg in A1AR-transgene (tg) 4 (n = 22; P < 0.0001), and to 12.6 +/- 1.2 mmHg in A1AR-tg7 (n = 12; P < 0.02). Stepwise changes in perfusion flow caused greater numerical TGF responses in A1AR-tg than WT in all flow ranges with differences reaching levels of significance in the intermediate flow ranges of 7.5-10 and 10-15 nl/min. Proximal-distal single-nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR) differences (free-flow micropuncture) were also increased in A1AR-tg, averaging 6.25 +/- 1.5 nl/min compared with 2.6 +/- 0.51 nl/min in WT (P = 0.034). Basal plasma renin concentrations as well as the suppression of renin secretion after volume expansion were similar in A1AR-tg and WT mice, suggesting lack of transgene expression in juxtaglomerular cells. These data indicate that A1AR expression in vascular smooth muscle cells is a critical component for TGF signaling and that changes in renal vascular A1AR expression may determine the magnitude of TGF responses.

Rolofylline: a selective adenosine 1 receptor antagonist for the treatment of heart failure

BACKGROUND

Co-existent cardiac and renal dysfunction is increasingly recognized as both a predictor and mediator of poor outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure. Novel therapies, including adenosine receptor antagonists, are currently under development for the treatment of 'cardiorenal syndrome'.

OBJECTIVES

To review the pathophysiologic rationale for using rolofylline, a selective adenosine 1 receptor antagonist, in patients with cardiorenal syndrome; and to provide a critical overview of safety and efficacy data from clinical studies.

METHODS

We reviewed published data on the pharmacology of rolofylline, and used this to inform a comprehensive summary of preclinical and clinical trials. Cardiac and renal effects, and safety data with a particular reference to seizures, are highlighted.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Rolofylline facilitates diuresis and preserves renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and renal dysfunction. Pilot data also suggest beneficial effects on symptoms and short-term outcomes. The risk of seizures may be minimized by excluding high-risk patients.

Adenosine receptors and the kidney

The autacoid, adenosine, is present in the normoxic kidney and generated in the cytosol as well as at extracellular sites. The rate of adenosine formation is enhanced when the rate of ATP hydrolysis prevails over the rate of ATP synthesis during increased tubular transport work or during oxygen deficiency. Extracellular adenosine acts on adenosine receptor subtypes (A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3)) in the cell membranes to affect vascular and tubular functions. Adenosine lowers glomerular filtration rate by constricting afferent arterioles, especially in superficial nephrons, and thus lowers the salt load and transport work of the kidney consistent with the concept of metabolic control of organ function. In contrast, it leads to vasodilation in the deep cortex and the semihypoxic medulla, and exerts differential effects on NaCl transport along the tubular and collecting duct system. These vascular and tubular effects point to a prominent role of adenosine and its receptors in the intrarenal metabolic regulation of kidney function, and, together with its role in inflammatory processes, form the basis for potential therapeutic approaches in radiocontrast media-induced acute renal failure, ischemia reperfusion injury, and in patients with cardiorenal failure.

Tubuloglomerular feedback and renin secretion in NTPDase1/CD39-deficient mice

Studies in mice with null mutations of adenosine 1 receptor or ecto-5'-nucleotidase genes suggest a critical role of adenosine and its precursor 5'-AMP in tubulovascular signaling. To assess whether the source of juxtaglomerular nucleotides can be traced back to ATP dephosphorylation, experiments were performed in mice with a deficiency in NTPDase1/CD39, an ecto-ATPase catalyzing the formation of AMP from ATP and ADP. Urine osmolarity and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were indistinguishable between NTPDase1/CD39(-/-) and wild-type (WT) mice. Maximum tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) responses, as determined by proximal tubular stop flow pressure measurements, were reduced in NTPDase1/CD39(-/-) mice compared with controls (4.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 10.5 +/- 1.2 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.0002). Residual TGF responses gradually diminished after repeated changes in tubular perfusion flow averaging 2.9 +/- 0.9 (on response) and 3.5 +/- 1.1 (off response) mmHg after the second and 2.2 +/- 0.5 (on response) and 1.5 +/- 0.8 (off response) mmHg after the third challenge, whereas no fading of TGF responsiveness was observed in WT mice. Macula densa-dependent and pressure-dependent inhibition of renin secretion, as assessed by acute salt loading and phenylephrine injection, respectively, were intact in NTPDase1/CD39-deficient mice. In summary, NTPDase1/CD39-deficient mice showed a markedly compromised TGF regulation of GFR. These data support the concept of an extracellular dephosphorylation cascade during tubular-vascular signal transmission in the juxtaglomerular apparatus that is initiated by a regulated release of ATP from macula densa cells and results in adenosine-mediated afferent arteriole constriction.

Adenosine and kidney function: potential implications in patients with heart failure

Therapy of heart failure is more difficult when renal function is impaired. Here, we outline the effects on kidney function of the autacoid, adenosine, which forms the basis for adenosine A(1) receptor (A(1)R) antagonists as treatment for decompensated heart failure. A(1)R antagonists induce a eukaliuretic natriuresis and diuresis by blocking A(1)R-mediated NaCl reabsorption in the proximal tubule and the collecting duct. Normally, suppressing proximal reabsorption will lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) through the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism (TGF). But the TGF response, itself, is mediated by A(1)R in the preglomerular arteriole, so blocking A(1)R allows natriuresis to proceed while GFR remains constant or increases. The influence of A(1)R over vascular resistance in the kidney is augmented by angiotensin II while A(1)R activation directly suppresses renin secretion. These interactions could modulate the overall impact of A(1)R blockade on kidney function in patients taking angiotensin II blockers. A(1)R blockers may increase the energy utilized for transport in the semi-hypoxic medullary thick ascending limb, an effect that could be prevented with loop diuretics. Finally, while the vasodilatory effect of A(1)R blockade could protect against renal ischaemia, A(1)R blockade may act on non-resident cells to exacerbate reperfusion injury, where ischaemia to occur. Despite these uncertainties, the available data on A(1)R antagonist therapy in patients with decompensated heart failure are promising and warrant confirmation in further studies.

Adenosine and Kidney Function

In this review we outline the unique effects of the autacoid adenosine in the kidney. Adenosine is present in the cytosol of renal cells and in the extracellular space of normoxic kidneys. Extracellular adenosine can derive from cellular adenosine release or extracellular breakdown of ATP, AMP, or cAMP. It is generated at enhanced rates when tubular NaCl reabsorption and thus transport work increase or when hypoxia is induced. Extracellular adenosine acts on adenosine receptor subtypes in the cell membranes to affect vascular and tubular functions. Adenosine lowers glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by constricting afferent arterioles, especially in superficial nephrons, and acts as a mediator of the tubuloglomerular feedback, i.e., a mechanism that coordinates GFR and tubular transport. In contrast, it leads to vasodilation in deep cortex and medulla. Moreover, adenosine tonically inhibits the renal release of renin and stimulates NaCl transport in the cortical proximal tubule but inhibits it in medullary segments including the medullary thick ascending limb. These differential effects of adenosine are subsequently analyzed in a more integrative way in the context of intrarenal metabolic regulation of kidney function, and potential pathophysiological consequences are outlined.

Paracrine factors in tubuloglomerular feedback: adenosine, ATP, and nitric oxide

The tubuloglomerular feedback response, the change in afferent arteriolar tone caused by a change in NaCl concentration at the macula densa, is likely initiated by the generation of a vasoactive mediator within the confines of the juxtaglomerular apparatus. Substantial progress has been made in identifying the nature of this mediator and the factors that modulate its effect on vascular tone. In support of earlier studies using P1 purinergic antagonists, the application of the knockout technique has shown that adenosine 1 receptors are absolutely required for eliciting TGF responses. The background level of angiotensin II appears to be an important cofactor determining the efficiency of A1AR-induced vasoconstriction, probably through a synergistic interaction at the level of the G protein-dependent transduction mechanism. The source of the adenosine is still unclear, but it is conceivable that adenosine is generated extracellularly from released ATP through a cascade of ecto-nucleotidases. There is also evidence that ATP may activate P2 receptors in preglomerular vessels, which may contribute to autoregulation of renal vascular resistance. Nitric oxide (NO), generated by the neuronal isoform of nitric oxide synthase in macula densa cells, reduces the constrictor effect of adenosine, but the regulation of NO release and its exact role in states of TGF-induced hyperfiltration are still unclear.

Effects of a nucleoside transporter inhibitor, dilazep, on renal microcirculation in rats

Adenosine, one of the endogenous modulators in renal hemodynamics, has recently been shown to be a mediator of tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF). Dilazep augments endogenous adenosine actions by blocking its cellular uptake. Our purpose in the present study was to clarify the effects of dilazep on renal microcirculation and the TGF mechanism. Clearance and micropuncture experiments were performed in anesthetized rats. TGF responsiveness was assessed in superficial nephrons by measuring the changes of early proximal flow rate (EPFR) in response to loop perfusion at 0-40 nl/min with artificial tubular fluid (ATF). Under dilazep administration (0.3 mg/kg+0.3 mg/kg/h i.v.) systemic BP and GFR were decreased and renal plasma flow was unaltered; as a result, the filtration fraction tended to decrease (p=0.076). Renal vascular resistance was reduced, but not to a significant degree. The reduction in EPFR by loop perfusion was similar between controls (47 +/- 2%) and rats administered dilazep i.v. (44 +/- 5%). Intraluminal application of dilazep in ATF suppressed TGF-mediated EPFR reduction to by 46 +/- 4%, 43 +/- 7%, and 37 +/- 3% at dilazep concentrations of 10(-6), 10(-5), and 10(-4) mol/l, respectively. TGF suppression with 10(-4) mol/l dilazep was reversed by co-perfusion of 10(-5) mol/l DMPX, a selective adenosine A2 receptor antagonist. DMPX alone did not affect TGF response. In conclusion, these results indicate that systemic dilazep dilates postglomerular arterioles and does not affect TGF, and thus reduces GFR. A pharmacological concentration of dilazep applied to single nephrons clearly attenuates TGF, indicating afferent arteriolar vasodilatation. Extracellular adenosine augmented by dilazep dilates glomerular vessels at both afferent and efferent sites, probably via the activation of A2 receptors.

Pharmacology of adenosine receptors in the vasculature

Adenosine is widely distributed in mammals. One of the primary roles of adenosine within the cardiovascular system is to directly control the functions of both cardiac and vascular tissues. Recently, there has been considerable interest in the subclassification of adenosine receptors. Characterization of a heterogeneous population of receptors for adenosine could provide an opportunity for the development of novel compounds of therapeutic value. Adenosine is released from cells as a result of metabolism, and its release can be increased dramatically from cells that are metabolically stressed. This implies that adenosine can be released from a variety of cells throughout the body, as a result of increased metabolic rates, in concentrations that can have a profound impact on blood vessel function and, consequently, blood flow. It is recognized that the actions of this nucleoside on the vasculature are most prominent when oxygen demand is high and there is a reduction in oxygen tension at the site in question. Therefore, it is not surprising that adenosine has been shown to be an important regulator of blood vessel tone under hypoxic conditions. Furthermore, the activation of adenosine receptors on blood vessels can result in relaxation and/or contractions. The nature of the response subsequent to the activation of adenosine receptors is primarily dependent on the type of blood vessel involved and basal tone. This review will focus on the characterization of subtypes of adenosine receptors in blood vessels, as well as the effect of the stimulation of adenosine receptors on the peripheral circulation.

Effect of the selective adenosine A1-receptor antagonist KW-3902 on tubuloglomerular feedback in radiocontrast-media-induced nephropathy in rats with chronic nitric oxide deficiency

To study the possible mechanism of renoprotective effects of adenosine A1-receptor antagonist against radiocontrast media (RCM)-induced nephropathy, we investigated the effects of adenosine A1-receptor antagonist on tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) activity prior to and following application of RCM in chronic NO-depleted rats. TGF in NO-depleted rats was significantly enhanced compared with that in normal rats. After RCM application, the enhanced TGF was continued. A selective adenosine A1-receptor antagonist, KW-3902 (8-(noradamantan-3-yl)-1,3-dipropylxanthine), inhibited the enhanced TGF. These results suggest that KW-3902 could inhibit TGF in chronic NO-depleted rats. Renoprotective effects by adenosine antagonists could be partly due to an inhibition of TGF via the blockade of the adenosine A1-receptor.

No participation of adenosine A1 receptor in acute nephrotoxicity by 4-pentenoic acid administration in dogs

Intrarenal infusion of 4-pentenoic acid is known to lower renal cortical ATP content and cause a reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The alteration in nucleotide metabolism might augment the production of adenosine, thereby eliciting the fall in GFR. This study was conducted to examine whether 4-pentenoic acid stimulates renal production of adenosine, and if so, to examine the role of adenosine A1 receptor in the reduction of GFR by 4-pentenoic acid. With infusion of 4-pentenoic acid (1 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) into the renal artery of anesthetized dogs, GFR gradually decreased and reached minimum at 60 min with values ranging from 33.9+/-2.2 to 20.2+/-2.8 ml/min. Neither renal blood flow nor mean arterial pressure was affected, but tubular reabsorption of water and sodium was significantly attenuated. Renal venous plasma concentration and urinary excretion of adenosine rose markedly (20-fold) without any change in arterial concentration, suggesting that renal adenosine production was augmented by 4-pentenoic acid. However, KW-3902 (8-(noradamantan-3-yl)-1,3-dipropylxanthine), a selective antagonist of the adenosine A1 receptor, did not affect the action of 4-pentenoic acid on GFR or renal handling of water and sodium. It is concluded that 4-pentenoic acid markedly increases renal adenosine production, but adenosine A1 receptor is not involved in the 4-pentenoic acid-induced nephrotoxicity.