Noninvasive transcutaneous determination of access blood flow rate

Multi-perspective ultrasound evaluation of Carotid Intima-Media thickness in hemodialysis access patients and its possible use to predict clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis (HD) patients present an increased carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and calcified plaques, and studies have demonstrated that CIMT is predictor for cardiovascular death in this patient population; hence, the importance of identifying early non-invasive markers of atherosclerosis. We aim to propose a new three-perspective CIMT measuring method in HD population, and to further investigate the possible use and value of this method to predict outcomes.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted, the CIMT was measured with duplex ultrasound during the perioperative access planning. Software provided maximum CIMT in a 10 mm (mm) width of the common carotid artery. CIMT was measured in Right (R) and Left (L) carotid arteries, both in anterior (a), lateral (l), and posterior (p) view. The sum of these values (Ra+Rl+Rp+La+Ll+Lp) was completed and termed as Sixth Carotid Intimal (SCI) score. We stratified either in low (summation <4) or high (>=4) SCI score groups. Demographics, patency rates, complications, and mortality were collected; chi-square test was used for our analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (mean age 49 years and 56% females) that underwent access creation in the upper arm from 2010 to 2016 were selected and studied. A low SCI score was found 19 patients and 11 had high SCI, no significant difference was observed in demographics, history cardiovascular disease, and clinical outcomes as early thrombosis, and primary, primary-assisted patency at 12 months. Interestingly, during the follow up period of 36 months a significant higher difference in late thrombosis rates occurred (63.6% vs 26.3%, p = .044) and a higher all-cause mortality (54.4% vs 15.7%, p = .025) in patients with SCI score group above 4.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCI score method, might offer a screening tool for traditional cardiovascular risk factors in HD patients. In this study, we demonstrate an increased rate in late thrombosis and mortality in those with high SCI. Further research is necessary to better define the role of CIMT in vascular surgical procedures.

How to carry out monthly blood flow surveillance of fistula in large-scale hemodialysis units: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The important effect of regular blood flow surveillance on arteriovenous fistula maintenance is emphasized. The ultrasonic dilution technique for blood flow surveillance can be performed during hemodialysis, but there are some limitations. Blood flow is traditionally measured by duplex Doppler ultrasound during the nondialysis period. However, the surveillance workload for arteriovenous fistula has increased with the rapid increase in the hemodialysis population size. Efficient methods for blood flow surveillance during hemodialysis are needed.

METHODS

Eighty-four hemodialysis patients with a forearm radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Each received blood flow measurements using ultrasonic dilution technique and duplex Doppler ultrasound during hemodialysis. Duplex Doppler ultrasound measurements included the blood flow of the brachial artery and radial artery. The correlations between these variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficients (r) between flow measured by ultrasonic dilution technique and brachial artery flow measured by duplex Doppler ultrasound, between flow measured by ultrasonic dilution technique and radial artery flow measured by duplex Doppler ultrasound, and between brachial artery flow and radial artery flow measured by duplex Doppler ultrasound were 0.724, 0.784, and 0.749, respectively (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Blood flow measured by ultrasonic dilution technique was positively correlated with blood flow measured by duplex Doppler ultrasound during hemodialysis, suggesting that duplex Doppler ultrasound can be used to monitor the trends in the blood flow of the brachial artery and radial artery for timely intervention to improve patency during hemodialysis.

Spanish Clinical Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis

Vascular access for haemodialysis is key in renal patients both due to its associated morbidity and mortality and due to its impact on quality of life. The process, from the creation and maintenance of vascular access to the treatment of its complications, represents a challenge when it comes to decision-making, due to the complexity of the existing disease and the diversity of the specialities involved. With a view to finding a common approach, the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology [S.E.N.], vascular surgery [SEACV], vascular and interventional radiology [SERAM-SERVEI], infectious diseases [SEIMC] and nephrology nursing [SEDEN]), along with the methodological support of the Cochrane Center, has updated the Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis, published in 2005. These guidelines maintain a similar structure, in that they review the evidence without compromising the educational aspects. However, on one hand, they provide an update to methodology development following the guidelines of the GRADE system in order to translate this systematic review of evidence into recommendations that facilitate decision-making in routine clinical practice, and, on the other hand, the guidelines establish quality indicators which make it possible to monitor the quality of healthcare.

Comparison of Different Techniques of Hemodialysis Vascular Access Flow Evaluation

Measurement of vascular access flow (QVA) has been suggested as a method of choice for vascular access quality (VAQ) monitoring. Besides traditional duplex Doppler, a number of bedside methods based mostly on the Krivitski principle of QVA evaluation from recirculation at reversed needles (RX), have been developed. This work compares ultrasonic dilution (UD), taken as a reference, HD01, Transonic Systems; duplex Doppler (DD); thermodilution (TD), BTM, Fresenius; optodilutional RX measurement (ORX), Critline III, R-mode, HemaMetrics; direct optodilutional QVA evaluation from jumpwise changes in ultrafiltration rate at both normal and reversed needles connection (OABF), Critline III, ABF-mode; and direct transcutaneous optodilutional QVA evaluation (TQA), Critline III TQA.

Firstly, reproducibility of each method was assessed by duplicate measurement at unchanged conditions. This was followed by paired measurement with each method performed at controlled change in relevant measurement condition (two different extracorporeal blood flows in UD and TD, changed sensor position in TQA). Finally paired measurements by each method and the reference method performed at identical conditions were evaluated to assess accuracy of each method. The simple Krivitski formula QVA= QB(1-RX)/RX was used wherever manual QVA calculation was needed.

Very high reproducibility was seen in UD, both for measurement at the same extra corporeal blood flow (QB) (correlation coefficient of duplicate measurement r= 0.9702, n= 58) and for measurement at two different QB (r= 0.9735, n= 24), justifying its current status of a reference method in QVA evaluation. Slightly lower reproducibility of TD measurement at the same QB (r= 0.9197, n= 40) and at two different QB (r= 0.8508, n= 168) can be easily overcome by duplicate measurement with averaging. High correlation of TD vs. UD (r= 0.9543, n= 54) makes TD a viable clinical alternative in QVA evaluation. Consistently different QVA obtained at two different QB should prompt closer investigation of anatomical conditions of the access. Use of the simple Krivitski formula in TD (which measures total recirculation, i.e. sum of access recirculation and cardiopulmonary recirculation) brings about underestimation of QVA, which progressively increases from QVA of about 600 ml/min up. Good correlation, although with significant scatter (r= 0.8691, n= 27) was found between the DD- and UD-based QVA. By far the worst reproducibility at the same QB from among the investigated methods was found in ORX (0.6430, n= 23). Also the correlation of ORX vs. UD was lower than in other methods (r= 0.702, n=33) and general overestimation of QVA by about 25% was noted. Correlation of OABF vs. UD (r= 0.6957, n= 26) was slightly better than that of ORX and it gave less overestimated values. The TQA method showed very high reproducibility (r= 0.9712, n= 85), however only for unchanged sensor position. Correlation of QVA measured at two different sensor positions was much worse (r= 0.7255, n= 22). Correspondence of TQA vs. UD was satisfactory (r= 0.8077, n= 36). Skilled and experienced operators are a must with this method.

Monitoring and Surveillance of Hemodialysis Access

Access surveillance using invasive or noninvasive methods with an objective to improve access patency and decrease hospital admissions for access dysfunction in dialysis population has been promoted, but its success to predict incipient thrombosis and subsequent access failure is a controversial topic. Some studies have shown improvement in access outcomes, while others have failed to demonstrate an ideal method to diagnose access problems. Furthermore, the use of endovascular interventions such as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to timely correct access problem might itself be a promoter of neointimal hyperplasia and restenosis during balloon angioplasty. There are significant costs and efforts associated with routine dialysis surveillance; therefore, it is necessary to understand whether such programs will help improve access-related problems and guarantee adequate dialysis care. It is generally agreed upon that despite the lack of guaranteed success of surveillance, such strategies have helped improve dialysis management, resulted in decreased costs and hospitalizations, and represented clinically relevant indications of failure prior to planning any radiological or surgical intervention. In this study, the authors review monitoring and surveillance measures in place, and their associated merits and limitations to detect stenosis and prevent incidences of vascular access thrombosis.

The rise and fall of access blood flow surveillance in arteriovenous fistulas

Vascular access blood flow (Qa) surveillance has been described as a typical false paradigm, an example of how new tests are sometimes adopted even without good-quality evidence of their benefits. This may be true for grafts, but not necessarily for arteriovenous fistulas. We reviewed the literature on Qa surveillance in fistulas to see whether it complies with the World Health Organization's criteria for screening tests. Measuring Qa has a fairly good reproducibility. Qa shows an excellent-to-good accuracy for stenosis being the only bedside screening test that achieves a very high sensitivity while retaining a fair-to-good positive predictive value for Qa thresholds of 600 ml/minute or higher associated with a >25% drop in Qa, or findings suggesting stenosis on physical examination. The accuracy of Qa in predicting thrombosis is hard to establish because of the heterogeneity of published studies, though a Qa of 300 ml/minute seems the most reliable cutoff. Qa surveillance affords a significant 2- to 3-fold reduction in the risk of thrombosis by comparison with clinical monitoring alone when Qa criteria highly sensitive to stenosis are considered, regardless of the study design (randomized controlled trials, cohort studies with concurrent or historic controls). Using highly sensitive Qa screening criteria also halves the risk of access loss, although this effect is not statistically significant. Our analysis strongly suggests that Qa surveillance is an effective method for screening mature fistulas, though further, appropriately designed studies are needed to fully elucidate its benefits and cost effectiveness.

Physiological monitoring and control in hemodialysis: state of the art and outlook

Medical devices for monitoring and feedback control of physiological parameters of the dialysis patient were introduced in the early 1990s. They have a wide range of applications, aiming at increasing the safety and ensuring the efficiency of the treatment, and at an improved restoration of physiological conditions, leading to an overall reduction in morbidity and mortality. Such devices include sensors for the measurement of temperature, optical parameters and sound speed in blood, and electrical characteristics of the human body, and other parameters. Essential for the development of these devices is a detailed understanding of the pathophysiological background of a therapeutical problem. There is still a large potential to introduce new devices for further therapy improvement and automation. Also, the size of the hemodialysis market appears attractive; however, a new product has to meet several specific requirements in order to also become commercially successful. This review describes the therapeutic and technical principles of several available devices, reports on concepts for possible future devices, and presents a short overview on the market environment.

Dialysis access: an increasingly important clinical issue

Dialysis access, including vascular access for hemodialysis and peritoneal access for peritoneal dialysis, is critical in the clinical care of patients with end-stage renal disease. It is associated with increases in morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. A number of problematic issues are involved, some of which are addressed in this paper with reference to the most recent publications, including: the inappropriately low prevalence of peritoneal dialysis in Western countries, which is relevant to access placement in the pre-dialysis stage; the excessively high use of central venous catheters in incident and prevalent dialysis patients; the diagnosis and treatment of steal syndrome; the advantages and limitations of antiplatelet therapy; and finally, the correct pre-operative evaluation and subsequent surveillance of the vascular access.

A method for monitoring vascular access function during hemodialysis

We tested a new bedside method to determine the function of native arteriovenous fistula in 16 patients performed during hemodialysis without stopping the treatment. We initially measured vascular access flow (Q(a)) in each patient using the Transonic HD01(plus) device. We then measured the pressure in arterial and venous drip chambers at different blood pump flow rates (Q(bset)=0, 50, 100, 250, 300, 350 ml/min). The intravascular blood pressure gradient (P(f)) between arterial and venous puncture sites was estimated by a mathematical model. P(f) was positive for low Q(bset), but became negative when Q(bset) overcame the threshold value (Q(Inv)). Such critical flow showed a high correlation with Q(a), even if it was systemically lower. Computer analysis of fluid dynamics showed that when the blood pump flow overcame the Q(Inv) threshold, a critical transition from laminar flow to vortex circulation took place downstream of the venous needle, causing a dangerous shearstress on the vessel wall. Our results show that Q(Inv) provides an indication of the maximal blood pump flow rate needed to be reached to maximize blood flow supply in order to limit hemodynamic stress on the vascular access.

New Method for Phosphate Kinetics Estimation during Hemodialysis and On-Line Hemodiafiltration with Endogenous Reinfusion

AIM

The purpose of this study was to optimize the operative and analytical methodologies to a more exact determination of intradialytic kinetics of the phosphates (P) tested in hemodialysis (HD) and in on-line hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR - Hemo Filtrate Reinfusion).

METHODS

The mass balance measurements of urea and P were carried out in 18 clinically stable HD patients. The effective blood flow (Qb) was measured with a Transonic monitor. The plasma was deproteinized with 10% trichloroacetic acid to prevent breakdown of the proteins and the consequent pseudohyperphosphatemia. Subsequently the supernatant containing the ultrafiltrable phosphates was made to react with a solution of ammonium molybdate for a spectrophotometric reading.

RESULTS

The mean urea mass transfer in HD was 16.9 g/session and in HFR 15.4 g/session. The mean P mass transfer in HD was 726 mg/session and in HFR 679 mg/session. Nevertheless, in HFR a significant difference was verified between the clearances of P, between the plasma water side (122.4 +/- 30.8 ml/min) and the dialysate side (105.9 +/- 19.4 ml/min).

CONCLUSION

As far as the P mass transfer is concerned, the data obtained is able to be superimposed with that described in the literature during HD, while in HFR it is possible to hypothesize a high efficiency, thanks to an increased output of P in relation to the phenomenon of adsorption which, although is limited, contributes to the transfer of the total mass. Based on this study and re-examining the literature on P kinetics, there is space for methodological improvement both on the operating front with careful determination of the effective Qb, and on the chemical front overcoming the inaccuracy of automatic analyzers in determining the plasma P owing to possible overestimation of phosphatemia and poor sensitivity in measuring the lower levels of P present in the dialysate and/or ultrafiltrate.

Hemodynamics and complications encountered with arteriovenous fistulas and grafts as vascular access for hemodialysis: a review

This review article describes the current state of affairs concerning in vivo, in vitro and in numero studies on the hemodynamics in vascular access for hemodialysis. The use and complications of autogenous and non-autogenous fistulas and catheters and access port devices are explained in the first part. The major hemodynamic complications are stenosis, initiated by intimal hyperplasia development, and thrombosis. The different in literature proposed conceivable causes of intimal hyperplasia development like surgical interventions, compliance mismatch, wall shear stress (WSS) and shear rate, vessel wall thrill and blood pressure are discussed on the basis of in vivo, in vitro and in numero studies.

Access Flow in Arteriovenous Accesses by Optodilutional and Ultrasound Dilution Methods

BACKGROUND

Most large studies evaluating the diagnostic properties of access blood flow (Qa) in arteriovenous (AV) accesses have used the Transonic HD01 (Transonic Systems Inc, Ithaca, NY) device, and recommended thresholds for angiography are based on data from these studies. There has been little exploration of how the use of other devices might affect the feasibility or performance of screening in AV accesses.

METHODS

We compared 2 devices for measuring Qa: the Transonic HD01 and the Crit-Line TQA III (Hemametrics, Salt Lake City, UT). We studied 124 adults with end-stage renal disease and a functioning AV access (fistula or graft). Qa was measured with both devices in immediate succession during a single dialysis treatment. The primary outcome was the technical feasibility of the Qa measurement. We also compared mean Qa values measured by the Crit-Line III and Transonic devices.

RESULTS

Qa measurements were less likely to be technically feasible when the Crit-Line III device was used compared with the Transonic device (86.3% versus 100%; P < 0.001). In patients with valid measurements, mean Qa measured using the Crit-Line III was significantly less than that measured using the Transonic HD01 device (886 +/- 557 versus 1,148 +/- 685 mL/min; P < 0.001). The mean difference was 261 mL/min (95% confidence interval [CI], 117 to 405) and was greater at higher levels of Qa. On average, Qa measured by means of the Crit-Line III device was 73% as high as that measured using the Transonic device (95% CI, 63 to 84). There was poor agreement between devices about whether criteria for angiography were met (kappa < 0.1). The proportion of patients for whom angiography was indicated (based on results from the Crit-Line device) was significantly greater than when only results from the Transonic device were considered (40.3% versus 7.3%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Consideration should be given to device-specific Qa thresholds for angiography or, alternatively, standardization of Qa results between manufacturers. Clinicians should be aware that Qa results cannot be compared directly between different devices, and access monitoring should be performed using a single technique in any given patient. Additional studies are required before the Crit-Line TQA device can be recommended for widespread use.

Vascular access monitoring: methods and procedures--something to standardize?

The article discusses the issue of suitable parameters (pressures, recirculation and access flow) to assess hemodialysis vascular access quality (VAQ), available methods to measure those parameters and the setup of the entire VAQ surveillance system (VAQS) in a dialysis facility. Special attention is paid to factors which need some standardization to enable evaluation of VAQ trends in an individual as well as comparison of data from different patients and different dialysis facilities. The discussed procedures are documented with the authors' own measurement results and the results of the VAQS implemented in their unit. Both dynamic and static pressures exhibit insufficient sensitivity in detecting stenoses in native arteriovenous fistulas. Access recirculation is a late finding because with its non-zero value dialysis quality is already compromised. Timely and reliable detection of a deteriorating access condition is enabled by access flow (QVA) only. No standardization is needed in extracorporeal blood flow used in QVA evaluation by ultrasonic dilution. Multiple measurements may increase the reliability of thermodilutional measurements and are a must in optodilutional ones. Timing of the measurement during dialysis should be standardized. Measurement frequency should take into account access type, QVA value and access history. Shortened intervals are needed in the immediate post-intervention period with regard to risk of re-stenosis incidence and strongly nonlinear QVA decreases in such cases. A significant shift-over from surgical interventions to balloon angioplasties is to be expected with the introduction of a VAQS, and appropriate measures must be taken to ensure their quick availability.

Variable Pump Flow–Based Doppler Ultrasound Method: A Novel Approach to the Measurement of Access Flow in Hemodialysis Patients

Decreasing vascular access flow (Qa) is an important predictor of future access thrombosis and malfunction for hemodialysis (HD) patients. Among all of the methods for determining Qa, the variable pump flow (VPF) Doppler method measures Qa according to the change in Doppler signal between the arterial and the venous needles under different pump flow. After this technique was combined with spectral analysis of Duplex Doppler imaging, the variable pump flow-based Doppler ultrasound method (VPFDUM) for Qa measurement was developed. This study compared the reproducibility and correlation of Qa measurements for three different methods-VPFDUM, ultrasound dilution method (UDM), and conventional Doppler ultrasound method (CDUM)-in 55 HD patients. The mean value of Qa by VPFDUM (870.8 +/- 412.0 ml/min) was close to that by UDM (868.6 +/- 417.9 ml/min) but higher than that by CDUM (either of the above values versus 685.1 +/- 303.6 ml/min; P < 0.005). The mean values of coefficient of variation were similar by VPFDUM (1.6%) and UDM (1.4%) but lower than that by CDUM (either of the above values versus 6.8%; P < 0.01). The correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient of the repeated Qa measurements by VPFDUM (0.985 and 0.993; P < 0.001) were also similar to those by UDM (0.992 and 0.995; P < 0.001) but slightly higher than those by CDUM (0.917 and 0.948; P < 0.005). Either the reproducibility of VPFDUM (r=0.98, P < 0.0001) or the correlation between VPFDUM and UDM (r=0.99, P < 0.0001) in Qa measurements is good. The unassisted patency of vascular access at 6 mo was significantly poorer in patients with Qa <500 ml/min than those with Qa >500 ml/min (13.6% versus 92.2%; P < 0.0001). In conclusion, VPFDUM is a noninvasive, accurate, and reliable procedure for Qa measurement and prediction of the prognosis of vascular access in HD patients.

Comparison of different techniques of hemodialysis vascular access flow evaluation

Measurement of vascular access flow (QVA) has been suggested as a method of choice for vascular access quality (VAQ) monitoring. Besides traditional duplex Doppler, a number of bedside methods based mostly on the Krivitski principle of QVA evaluation from recirculation at reversed needles (RX), have been developed. This work compares ultrasonic dilution (UD), taken as a reference, HD01, Transonic Systems; duplex Doppler (DD); thermodilution (TD), BTM, Fresenius; optodilutional RX measurement (ORX), Critline III, R-mode, HemaMetrics; direct optodilutional QVA evaluation from jumpwise changes in ultrafiltration rate at both normal and reversed needles connection (OABF), Critline III, ABF-mode; and direct transcutaneous optodilutional QVA evaluation (TQA), Critline III TQA. Firstly, reproducibility of each method was assessed by duplicate measurement at unchanged conditions. This was followed by paired measurement with each method performed at controlled change in relevant measurement condition (two different extracorporeal blood flows in UD and TD, changed sensor position in TQA). Finally paired measurements by each method and the reference method performed at identical conditions were evaluated to assess accuracy of each method. The simple Krivitski formula QVA=QB(1-RX)/RX was used wherever manual QVA calculation was needed. Very high reproducibility was seen in UD, both for measurement at the same extra corporeal blood flow (QB) (correlation coefficient of duplicate measurement r=0.9702, n=58) and for measurement at two different QB (r=0.9735, n=24), justifying its current status of a reference method in QVA evaluation. Slightly lower reproducibility of TD measurement at the same QB (r=0.9197, n=40) and at two different QB (r=0.8508, n=168) can be easily overcome by duplicate measurement with averaging. High correlation of TD vs. UD (r=0.9543, n=54) makes TD a viable clinical alternative in QVA evaluation. Consistently different QVA obtained at two different QB should prompt closer investigation of anatomical conditions of the access. Use of the simple Krivitski formula in TD (which measures total recirculation, i.e. sum of access recirculation and cardiopulmonary recirculation) brings about underestimation of QVA, which progressively increases from QVA of about 600 mL/min up. Good correlation, although with significant scatter (r=0.8691, n=27) was found between the DD- and UD-based QVA. By far the worst reproducibility at the same QB from among the investigated methods was found in ORX (0.6430, n 23). Also the correlation of ORX vs. UD was lower than in other methods (r=0.702, n=33) and general overestimation of QVA by about 25% was noted. Correlation of OABF vs. UD (r=0.6957, n=26) was slightly better than that of ORX and it gave less overestimated values. The TQA method showed very high reproducibility (r=0.9712, n=85), however only for unchanged sensor position. Correlation of QVA measured at two different sensor positions was much worse (r=0.7255, n=22). Correspondence of TQA vs. UD was satisfactory (r=0.8077, n=36). Skilled and experienced operators are a must with this method.

Access flow measurement during surveillance and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty intervention

The introduction of routine access flow measurement methodology has enabled accurate identification of problematic accesses and provided a means for follow-up evaluation. These methods have uncovered, in some cases, that interventions are either immediately unsuccessful or that they fail within 3 months to maintain flow above preintervention levels. The purpose of this article is to analyze the main problems that occur at each step in the loop of flow surveillance-intervention-follow-up and to provide suggestions for improving outcomes. Analysis of published access flow data suggests that the main problems lie in the areas of inadequate analysis of flow surveillance data, lack of objective technology for quantifying intervention effectiveness, and lack of follow-up flow measurements in the hemodialysis (HD) unit after the intervention. The following three recommendations may improve surveillance outcomes: 1). using a reliable access flow technology combined with analysis of all hemodynamic data (including mean arterial pressure) before referring patients for angiography to decrease surveillance false positives; 2). performing intra-access blood flow measurement during angioplasty, which may improve outcomes by giving warning of errors before the patient leaves the intervention suite. Success achieved in restoring flow as measured during the intervention usually predicts good immediate outcomes in the HD unit; 3). measuring access flows during the next week after angioplasty. If the results are unsatisfactory, the patient should be further evaluated to avoid a potential thrombotic event.

Improving dialysis access management

Renal replacement therapy requires either placement of a functional hemodialysis vascular access or peritoneal dialysis catheter. Early provision of a dialysis access improves patient care with reduction in morbidity and reduces the economic burden incurred as a result of delayed access placement. Vascular access dysfunctions (thrombosis and infection) pose the greatest burden on the end-stage renal disease population. This article reviews the current literature on the planning of dialysis access, with particular emphasis on issues pertaining to vascular access. Current concepts to maximize access patency and efficiently manage vascular access complications are highlighted.

Surveillance of fistula function by frequent recirculation measurements during high efficiency dialysis

Native fistulae are assumed to remain patent even with low access flows and are likely to cause access recirculation in high efficiency treatments done with high extracorporeal blood flows. We tested whether frequent recirculation measurements could be used to identify fistulae at risk to fail because of low access flow. High efficiency hemodialysis was delivered by 2008H machines equipped with blood temperature monitors (BTM) to measure recirculation within the first hour of every hemodialysis treatment. Access flow was measured when two consecutive BTM recirculation measurements exceeded a threshold of 15%. If access flow was < 500 ml/min, patients were referred for fistula revision. Eighty patients with native AV fistulae were studied for a period of 6 months. Nine of 11 interventions performed during the whole observation period were triggered by a BTM recirculation above the threshold. Two fistulae thrombosed in spite of a BTM recirculation below the threshold. One fistula with a BTM recirculation above the threshold had an access flow of 1,550 ml/min and was not referred for revision. BTM recirculation to detect fistulae for revision is sensitive (81.8%) and specific (98.6%) in the presence of cardiopulmonary recirculation and can be done with minimum intervention and without loss of efficient treatment time.