Properties and substrate of slow pathway exposed with a compact node targeted fast pathway ablation in rabbit atrioventricular node

A compact multi-functional model of the rabbit atrioventricular node with dual pathways

The atrioventricular node (AVN) is considered a “black box”, and the functioning of its dual pathways remains controversial and not fully understood. In contrast to numerous clinical studies, there are only a few mathematical models of the node. In this paper, we present a compact, computationally lightweight multi-functional rabbit AVN model based on the Aliev-Panfilov two-variable cardiac cell model. The one-dimensional AVN model includes fast (FP) and slow (SP) pathways, primary pacemaking in the sinoatrial node, and subsidiary pacemaking in the SP. To obtain the direction-dependent conduction properties of the AVN, together with gradients of intercellular coupling and cell refractoriness, we implemented the asymmetry of coupling between model cells. We hypothesized that the asymmetry can reflect some effects related to the complexity of the real 3D structure of AVN. In addition, the model is accompanied by a visualization of electrical conduction in the AVN, revealing the interaction between SP and FP in the form of ladder diagrams. The AVN model demonstrates broad functionality, including normal sinus rhythm, AVN automaticity, filtering of high-rate atrial rhythms during atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter with Wenckebach periodicity, direction-dependent properties, and realistic anterograde and retrograde conduction curves in the control case and the cases of FP and SP ablation. To show the validity of the proposed model, we compare the simulation results with the available experimental data. Despite its simplicity, the proposed model can be used both as a stand-alone module and as a part of complex three-dimensional atrial or whole heart simulation systems, and can help to understand some puzzling functions of AVN.

Three-dimensional computer model of the right atrium including the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes predicts classical nodal behaviours

The aim of the study was to develop a three-dimensional (3D) anatomically-detailed model of the rabbit right atrium containing the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes to study the electrophysiology of the nodes. A model was generated based on 3D images of a rabbit heart (atria and part of ventricles), obtained using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Segmentation was carried out semi-manually. A 3D right atrium array model (∼3.16 million elements), including eighteen objects, was constructed. For description of cellular electrophysiology, the Rogers-modified FitzHugh-Nagumo model was further modified to allow control of the major characteristics of the action potential with relatively low computational resource requirements. Model parameters were chosen to simulate the action potentials in the sinoatrial node, atrial muscle, inferior nodal extension and penetrating bundle. The block zone was simulated as passive tissue. The sinoatrial node, crista terminalis, main branch and roof bundle were considered as anisotropic. We have simulated normal and abnormal electrophysiology of the two nodes. In accordance with experimental findings: (i) during sinus rhythm, conduction occurs down the interatrial septum and into the atrioventricular node via the fast pathway (conduction down the crista terminalis and into the atrioventricular node via the slow pathway is slower); (ii) during atrial fibrillation, the sinoatrial node is protected from overdrive by its long refractory period; and (iii) during atrial fibrillation, the atrioventricular node reduces the frequency of action potentials reaching the ventricles. The model is able to simulate ventricular echo beats. In summary, a 3D anatomical model of the right atrium containing the cardiac conduction system is able to simulate a wide range of classical nodal behaviours.

Integrated rate-dependent and dual pathway AV nodal functions: principles and assessment framework

The atrioventricular (AV) node conducts slowly and has a long refractory period. These features sustain the filtering of atrial impulses and hence are often modulated to optimize ventricular rate during supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. The AV node is also the site of a clinically common reentrant arrhythmia. Its function is assessed for a variety of purposes from its responses to a premature protocol (S1S2, test beats introduced at different cycle lengths) repeatedly performed at different basic rates and/or to an incremental pacing protocol (increasingly faster rates). Puzzlingly, resulting data and interpretation differ with protocols as well as with chosen recovery and refractory indexes, and are further complicated by the presence of built-in fast and slow pathways. This problem applies to endocavitary investigations of arrhythmias as well as to many experimental functional studies. This review supports an integrated framework of rate-dependent and dual pathway AV nodal function that can account for these puzzling characteristics. The framework was established from AV nodal responses to S1S2S3 protocols that, compared with standard S1S2 protocols, allow for an orderly quantitative dissociation of the different factors involved in changes in AV nodal conduction and refractory indexes under rate-dependent and dual pathway function. Although largely based on data from experimental studies, the proposed framework may well apply to the human AV node. In conclusion, the rate-dependent and dual pathway properties of the AV node can be integrated within a common functional framework the contribution of which to individual responses can be quantitatively determined with properly designed protocols and analytic tools.

One-dimensional mathematical model of the atrioventricular node including atrio-nodal, nodal, and nodal-his cells

Mathematical models are a repository of knowledge as well as research and teaching tools. Although action potential models have been developed for most regions of the heart, there is no model for the atrioventricular node (AVN). We have developed action potential models for single atrio-nodal, nodal, and nodal-His cells. The models have the same action potential shapes and refractoriness as observed in experiments. Using these models, together with models for the sinoatrial node (SAN) and atrial muscle, we have developed a one-dimensional (1D) multicellular model including the SAN and AVN. The multicellular model has slow and fast pathways into the AVN and using it we have analyzed the rich behavior of the AVN. Under normal conditions, action potentials were initiated in the SAN center and then propagated through the atrium and AVN. The relationship between the AVN conduction time and the timing of a premature stimulus (conduction curve) is consistent with experimental data. After premature stimulation, atrioventricular nodal reentry could occur. After slow pathway ablation or block of the L-type Ca(2+) current, atrioventricular nodal reentry was abolished. During atrial fibrillation, the AVN limited the number of action potentials transmitted to the ventricle. In the absence of SAN pacemaking, the inferior nodal extension acted as the pacemaker. In conclusion, we have developed what we believe is the first detailed mathematical model of the AVN and it shows the typical physiological and pathophysiological characteristics of the tissue. The model can be used as a tool to analyze the complex structure and behavior of the AVN.

Noncontact three-dimensional mapping guides catheter ablation of difficult atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common supraventricular tachycardia in adulthood. Although selective ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway can cure AVNRT, accidental AV block may occur. The details on the electrophysiologic characteristics, quantitative data on the voltage inside Koch's triangle, and the use of three-dimensional noncontact mapping to facilitate the catheter ablation of AVNRT associated with a high-risk for AV block or other arrhythmias have been limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nine patients (M/F=5/4, 34+/-23 years, range 17-76) with clinically documented AVNRT were included. All patients had undergone previous sessions for slow AV nodal pathway ablation but they had failed, because of repetitive episodes of complete AV block during the RF energy applications. Further, one patient had a complex anatomy and 4 patients were associated with other tachycardias, respectively. The electrophysiologic studies revealed that 4 patients had the slow-fast, 4 the slow-intermediate and one the fast-intermediate form of AVNRT. Noncontact mapping demonstrated two types of antegrade AV nodal conduction, markedly differing sites of the earliest atrial activation during retrograde VA conduction, and a lower range of voltage within Koch's triangle. The lowest border of the retrograde conduction region was defined on the map, and the application of the RF energy was delivered below that border to prevent the occurrence of AV block. The distance between the successful ablation lesions and the lowest border of the retrograde conduction region was significantly shorter in the patients with the slow-intermediate form of AVNRT than in those with the slow-fast form (5.5+/-3.4 vs. 15+/-7.6 mm; p<0.05). After the ablation procedure, either rapid pacing or extrastimulation could not induce any tachycardia, and there was no recurrence during the follow-up (10.3+/-5.4, 2 to 22 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Noncontact mapping could effectively demonstrate the antegrade and retrograde atrionodal conduction patterns, electrophysiologic characteristics of Koch's triangle, and guide the successful catheter ablation in difficult AVNRT cases.

Unified rate-dependent atrioventricular nodal function: Consistent recovery and fatigue properties revealed with S1S2S3 protocols and different recovery indexes

BACKGROUND

Rate-dependent nodal properties are commonly assessed with premature protocols performed at different basic rates. Because characteristics of responses differ with recovery time index, the true nature of nodal rate-dependent properties is elusive.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to reveal consistent nodal rate-dependent properties regardless of selected recovery index.

METHODS

With S(1)S(2)S(3) protocols, we independently varied basic and pretest cycle lengths and thereby distinguished cumulative from noncumulative effects of rate on nodal conduction time in rabbit heart preparations. Nodal responses to 30 basic and pretest cycle length combinations (five with identical basic and pretest cycles as in standard protocols) were analyzed using both atrial (AA) and His-atrial (HA) intervals as recovery index.

RESULTS

AA and HA curves had an identical shape for any of 30 steady-state conditions. When assessed with constant pretest cycle lengths, cumulative effects (fatigue) of shortened basic cycle lengths were also independent of recovery index. Shortening of pretest cycle length at fixed basic rates led to apparent inhibitory and facilitatory effects when assessed with AA and HA curves, respectively. These effects vanished when a single long cycle was inserted after the pretest cycle. In all responses including those obtained with standard protocols, combined effects of basic and pretest cycle lengths set nodal conduction time.

CONCLUSION

S(1)S(2)S(3) protocols reveal consistent nodal recovery and fatigue properties regardless of recovery index used. Changes in nodal function curves arising from the use of different recovery indexes mainly depend on pretest effects. This study provides a new approach to a unified interpretation of nodal recovery and fatigue properties.

Effect of slow pathway ablation in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia on the electrophysiologic characteristics of the inferior atrial inputs to the human atrioventricular node

The inferior atrial extensions of the atrioventricular (AV) node have been related to the anatomic substrate of the slow pathway, but their role in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is unknown. Ten patients with slow-fast AVNRT were studied before and after successful slow pathway ablation. Simultaneous His bundle recordings from the right and left sides of the septum were made during right and left inferoparaseptal pacing. Longer stimulus to His (St-H) intervals were measured during right inferoparaseptal pacing than during left inferoparaseptal pacing (284 +/- 55 vs 246 +/- 46 ms, p = 0.005 for right His recordings and 283 +/- 56 vs 244 +/- 46 ms, p = 0.005 for left His recordings) at similar coupling intervals during AVNRT induction. After ablation, the St-H intervals at the maximum AV nodal conduction decrement were similar during right inferoparaseptal and left inferoparaseptal pacing (217 +/- 32 vs 207 +/- 21 ms, p = 0.10 for right His and 215 +/- 32 vs 206 +/- 20 ms, p = 0.13 for left His) at similar coupling intervals. The difference (DeltaSt-H) between St-H intervals during AVRNT induction or at the maximum conduction decrement and during constant pacing for right His recordings with right inferoparaseptal pacing were significantly greater than DeltaSt-H measured with left His during left inferoparaseptal pacing (173 +/- 64 vs 137 +/- 55 ms, p = 0.005) before ablation, but not after (117 +/- 39 vs 100 +/- 40 ms, p = 0.44). Resetting of AVNRT with delivery of left inferoparaseptal extrastimuli was achieved in 7 of 10 patients. In conclusion, the electrophysiologic characteristics of the right and left inferior atrial inputs to the human AV node in patients with AVNRT and their response to slow pathway ablation provide further evidence that the inferior nodal extensions represent the anatomic substrate of the slow pathway.

Right and left inferior extensions of the atrioventricular node may represent the anatomic substrate of the slow pathway in humans

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the electrophysiologic characteristics of the inferior extensions of the human atrioventricular (AV) node and their possible relationship to slow pathway conduction.

BACKGROUND

The human heart contains right and left inferior extensions of the AV node that relate to right and left atrial inputs.

METHODS

Fourteen patients admitted for catheter ablation of left-sided accessory pathways were studied. Atrial pacing was performed from multiple sites in both atria, and simultaneous His-bundle recordings from right and left sides of the septum were made.

RESULTS

Significant differences of A-H and stimulus to His (St-H) intervals with pacing at various sites were found. St-H intervals were similar during constant pacing from the low right atrium or the left inferoparaseptal area (112 +/- 28 ms vs 112 +/- 26 ms, P = .8, for right His recordings and 114 +/- 23 ms vs 111 +/- 25 ms, P = .9, for left His recordings). At maximum decrement, there were significantly shorter St-H intervals during left inferoparaseptal pacing compared to low right atrial pacing (201 +/- 24 ms vs 218 +/- 44 ms, P = .02, for right His recordings, and 200 +/- 24 ms vs 219 +/- 41 ms, P = .009, for left His recordings). Differences on right His recordings between St-H intervals at maximum decrement and at constant pacing from the low right atrium were significantly higher than corresponding differences on left His recordings during pacing from the left inferoparaseptal area (P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the concept that the right and left inferior extensions of the human AV node may represent the anatomic substrate of the slow pathway as defined electrophysiologically.

Electrophysiology of inducible atrial flutter in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

An association between atrial flutter and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) has been observed, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly defined. This issue was therefore investigated by comparing the electrophysiological properties of AVNRT patients with and without inducible atrial flutter and those of patients with a history of flutter. Twenty-nine patients with clinically documented atrial flutter and 104 with AVNRT were studied. Atrial flutter was induced in 38 (37%) AVNRT patients during standardized electrophysiological testing before radiofrequency ablation. The atrial relative refractory periods in AVNRT patients with inducible flutter (260 +/- 30 ms) were significantly shorter than those of either patients with a history of flutter (282 +/- 30 ms; P = 0.02) or AVNRT patients without inducible flutter (284 +/- 38 ms; P = 0.006). The atrial effective refractory periods in AVNRT patients with inducible flutter (205 +/- 31 ms) were shorter than in AVNRT patients without inducible flutter (227 +/- 40 ms; P = 0.01). The maximum AH interval during premature atrial stimulation in patients with clinical flutter (239 +/- 94 ms) was shorter than in AVNRT patients either with (290 +/- 91 ms; P = 0.04) or without inducible flutter (313 +/- 101 ms; P = 0.002). However, no significant differences were found in the maximum AH interval achieved during incremental atrial pacing among different groups. Our data show that a non-clinical flutter could more often be induced in those who had short atrial refractoriness. Despite their anatomical proximity, the slow pathway conduction of AVNRT and the isthmus slow conduction of flutter may be related to different mechanisms.

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Rabbit Atrioventricular Conduction Axis by Combining Histological, Desmin, and Connexin Mapping Data

BACKGROUND

The 3D structure of the atrioventricular conduction axis incorporating detailed cellular and molecular composition, especially that relating to gap-junctional proteins, is still unclear, impeding mechanistic understanding of cardiac rhythmic disorders.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 3D model of the rabbit atrioventricular conduction axis was reconstructed by combining histological and immunofluorescence staining on serial sections. The exact cellular boundaries, especially those between transitional cells and atrial myocardium, were demarcated by a dense and irregular desmin-labeling pattern in conductive myocardium. The model demonstrates that the atrioventricular conduction axis is segregated into 2 connecting compartments, 1 predominantly expressing connexin45 (compact node and transitional cells) and the other predominantly coexpressing connexin43 and connexin45 (His bundle, lower nodal cells, and posterior nodal extension). The transitional zone shows unique features of spatial complexity, including a bridging bilayer structure (a deep transitional zone connecting with a superficial atrial-transitional overlay) and asymmetrical continuity (wider atrial-transitional interfaces and shorter atrial-axial distances in the hisian portion than in the ostial portion). In the latter compartment, the His bundle, lower nodal cells, and posterior nodal extension form a continual axis and longitudinal transitional-axial interface.

CONCLUSIONS

Key findings of the present study are the demonstration of a distinct anatomical border between transitional and atrial cells, connection between transitional cells and both lower nodal cells and posterior nodal extension, and distinctive connexin expression patterns in different compartments of the rabbit atrioventricular conduction axis. These features, synthesized in a novel 3D model, provide a structural framework for the interpretation of nodal function.

Role of Compact Node and Posterior Extension in Direction-Dependent Changes in Atrioventricular Nodal Function in Rabbit

INTRODUCTION

AV nodal conduction properties differ in the anterograde versus the retrograde direction. The underlying substrate remains unclear. We propose that direction-dependent changes in AV nodal function are the net result of those occurring in the slow and fast pathways.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Anterograde and retrograde AV nodal properties were determined with a premature protocol before and after posterior extension (slow pathway) ablation, and before and after upper compact node (fast pathway) ablation. Each ablation was performed in a different group of six rabbit heart preparations. In control, nodal minimum conduction time (NCTmin) and effective refractory period (ERPN) typically were longer, and maximum conduction time (NCTmax) was shorter in the retrograde compared to the anterograde direction. Posterior extension ablation prolonged anterograde ERPN from 91 +/- 10 ms to 141 +/- 15 ms (P < 0.01) and shortened NCTmax from 150 +/- 13 ms to 82 +/- 7 ms (P < 0.01) but did not affect retrograde conduction. Thus, the posterior extension normally contributes to the anterograde but not retrograde recovery curve. Compact node ablation prolonged anterograde conduction (NCTmin increased from 57 +/- 2 ms to 73 +/- 7 ms, P < 0.01) but did not alter ERPN and NCTmax. This ablation abolished retrograde conduction in two preparations and resulted in retrograde slow pathway conduction in four, the latter being interrupted by posterior extension ablation. Thus, the compact node accounts for the baseline of the recovery curve in both directions. Ablation of the compact node results in anterograde slow pathway conduction over the entire cycle length range and may result in retrograde slow pathway conduction.

CONCLUSION

Direction-dependent properties of the AV node arise from those of the compact node-based fast pathway and posterior extension-based slow pathway. Normal AV node has bidirectional dual pathways.

Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia with multiple AH jumps: electrophysiological characteristics and radiofrequency ablation

This article describes the additional use of incremental atrial burst pacing (A1A1) and double atrial extrastimulation with a predefined fast pathway conducted A2 (A1A2A3), rather than single atrial extrastimulation (A1A2) only, to characterize typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The authors noted an additional 32% of patients had multiple anterograde AV nodal physiology demonstrated when A1A1 or A1A2A3 protocols were deployed compared to more conventional A1A2 protocols. The A2H2max (449 +/- 147 vs 339 +/- 94 ms) and A3H3max (481 +/- 120 vs 389 +/- 85 ms) were higher in 31 patients where multiple jumps in the AV nodal conduction curve were obtained (group 1) compared to 192 patients where only single jump was obtained (group 2) (both P < 0.01). Postablation, the degree of reduction of A2H2max (49%) and A3H3max (50%) in group 1 was greater than in group 2 (38% and 42%, respectively, P < 0.05). In seven of group 1 patients in whom A1A2A3 stimulation was required to reveal multiple jumps, the A2H2max remained unchanged after ablation (237 +/- 89 vs 214 +/- 59, P > 0.05). A3H3max was the only parameter that shortened significantly after ablation. Generally, successful ablation resulted in loss of multiple discontinuities in A1A1/A1H1 or A2A3/A3H3 curves. In conclusion, a combination of A1A2, A1A1, and A1A2A3 are required to fully elucidate AVNRT. Significant shortening of AHmax or loss of multiple jumps after ablation indicates successful elimination of AVNRT in these patients.

Cx43 and dual-pathway electrophysiology of the atrioventricular node and atrioventricular nodal reentry

Fluorescent imaging has revealed that posterior nodal extensions provide the anatomical substrate for the dual-pathway electrophysiology of the atrioventricular (AV) node during normal conduction and reentry. The reentry can be intranodal, or as well as the posterior nodal extensions, it can involve an endocardial layer of atrial/atrial-nodal (A/AN) cells as part of the AV nodal reentry (AVNR) circuit. Using fluorescent imaging with a voltage-sensitive dye and immunolabeling of Cx43, we mapped the electrical activity and structural substrate in 3 types of AVNR induced by premature atrial stimulation in 8 rabbit hearts. In 6 cases, the AVNR pathway involved (1) a fast pathway (FP), (2) the A/AN layer, and (3) a slow pathway (SP). In 4 cases, reentry took the path (1) SP, (2) A/AN layer, and (3) FP. In 2 cases, reentry was intranodal, propagating between the 2 posterior nodal extensions. Immunolabeling revealed that the FP and SP are formed by Cx43-expressing bundles surrounded by tissue without Cx43. Cx43-expressing posterior nodal extensions are the substrate of AVNR during both intranodal and extranodal reentry.