MR urography: evaluation of different techniques in non-dilated tracts

Quantitative measurement of the ureter on three-dimensional magnetic resonance urography images using deep learning

BACKGROUND

Accurate measurement of ureteral diameters plays a pivotal role in diagnosing and monitoring urinary tract obstruction (UTO). While three-dimensional magnetic resonance urography (3D MRU) represents a significant advancement in imaging, the traditional manual methods for assessing ureteral diameters are characterized by labor-intensive procedures and inherent variability. In the realm of medical image analysis, deep learning has led to a paradigm shift, yet the development of a comprehensive automated tool for the precise segmentation and measurement of ureters in MR images is an unaddressed challenge.

PURPOSE

The ureter was quantitatively measured on 3D MRU images using a deep learning model.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 445 3D MRU scans (443 patients, 52 ± 18 years; 217 female patients) was collected and split into training, validation, and internal testing cohorts. A 3D V-Net model was trained for urinary tract segmentation, and a post-processing algorithm was developed for ureteral measurements. The accuracy of the segmentation was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and volume intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with ground truth segmentations provided by experienced radiologists. The external cohort comprised 50 scans (50 patients, 55 ± 21 years; 30 female patients), and the model-predicted ureteral diameter measurements were compared with manual measurements to assess system performance. The various diameter parameters of ureter among the different measurement methods (ground truth, auto-segmentation with automatic diameter extraction, and manual segmentation with automatic diameter extraction) were assessed with Friedman tests and post hoc Dunn test. The effectiveness of the UTO diagnosis was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and their respective areas under the curve (AUC) between different methods.

RESULTS

In both the internal test and external cohorts, the mean DSC values for bilateral ureters exceeded 0.70. The ICCs for the bilateral ureter volume obtained by comparing the model and manual segmentation were all greater than 0.96 (p  <  0.05), except for the right ureter in the internal test cohort, for which the ICC was 0.773 (p  <  0.05). The mean DSCs for interobserver and intraobserver reliability were all above 0.97. The maximum diameter of the ureter exhibited no statistically significant differences either in the dilated (p = 0.08) or in the non-dilated (p = 0.32) ureters across the three measurement methods. The AUCs of ground truth, auto-segmentation with automatic diameter extraction, and manual segmentation with automatic diameter extraction in diagnosing UTO were 0.988 (95% CI: 0.934, 1.000), 0.961 (95% CI: 0.893, 0.991), and 0.979 (95% CI: 0.919, 0.998), respectively. There was no statistical difference between AUCs of the different methods (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The proposed deep learning model and post-processing algorithm provide an effective means for the quantitative evaluation of urinary diseases using 3D MRU images.

Three-dimensional static-fluid MR urography with gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) at 3.0T: comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance with respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (FSE)

Purpose

To compare the performance of 3D MRU based on a breath-hold gradient- and spin-echo (BH-GRASE) technique with conventional 3D respiratory-triggered FSE (RT-FSE) sequence in patients with urinary tract dilation.

Methods

We prospectively included 90 patients with urinary tract dilation who underwent both 3D BH-GRASE and RT-FSE MRU at 3T. The acquisition time of two MRU sequences was recorded. Three readers blinded to the protocols reviewed the image quality using a five-point scale and assessed the diagnostic performance related to urinary tract dilation. The relative contrast ratio (CR) between the urinary tract and adjacent area was measured quantitatively.

Results

Acquisition time was 14.8 s for BH-GRASE MRU and 213.6 ± 52.2 s for RT-FSE MRU. The qualitative image analysis demonstrated significant equivalence between the two MRU protocols. 3D BH-GRASE MRU better depicted bilateral renal calyces than RT-FSE MRU (p < 0.05). The CR values of the urinary tract were lower on BH-GRASE MRU compared with RT-FSE MRU (p < 0.05). There were excellent agreements in the assessment of urinary tract dilation between BH-GRASE and RT-FSE MRU, including the dilated degree, obstructive level, and obstructive imaging features (inter-sequence κ = 0.924–1).

Conclusion

3D BH-GRASE MRU significantly decreased the acquisition time and achieved comparable image quality, urinary tract visualization, and diagnostic performance with conventional 3D RT-FSE MRU. Breath-hold 3D MRU with GRASE may provide a feasible evaluation of urinary tract dilation.

Graphical abstract

Comparison of static-fluid or excretory magnetic resonance urography with computed tomography urography for visualization of nondilated renal pelvises and ureters in healthy Beagles

OBJECTIVE

To assess the usefulness of magnetic resonance urography (MRU) for the visualization of nondilated renal pelvises and ureters in dogs and to compare our findings for MRU versus CT urography (CTU).

ANIMALS

9 healthy Beagles.

PROCEDURES

Dogs underwent CTU, static-fluid MRU, and excretory MRU, with ≥ 7 days between procedures. Contrast medium was administered IV during CTU and excretory MRU, whereas urine in the urinary tract was an intrinsic contrast medium for static-fluid MRU. For each procedure, furosemide (1 mg/kg, IV) was administered, and reconstructed dorsal plane images were acquired 3 minutes (n = 2) and 7 minutes (2) later. Images were scored for visualization of those structures and for image quality, diameters of renal pelvises and ureters were measured, and results were compared across imaging techniques.

RESULTS

Excretory MRU and CTU allowed good visualization of the renal pelvises and ureters, whereas static-fluid MRU provided lower visualization of the ureters. Distention of the renal pelvises and ureters was good in excretory MRU and CTU. Distention of the ureters in static-fluid MRU was insufficient compared with that in CTU and excretory MRU. Distinct artifacts were not observed in CTU and excretory MRU images. Static-fluid MRU images had several mild motion artifacts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our findings indicated that excretory MRU with furosemide administration was useful for visualizing nondilated renal pelvises and ureters of dogs in the present study. When performing MRU for the evaluation of dogs without urinary tract dilation, excretory MRU may be more suitable than static-fluid MRU.

MR urography (MRU) of non-dilated ureter with diuretic administration: Static fluid 2D FSE T2-weighted versus 3D gadolinium T1-weighted GE excretory MR

•

T2w-MRU with multiple orientations and diuretic is sufficient to identify non-dilated ureter.

•

T2w-MRU offers information on ureteral contractions and could be proposed to detect initial obstruction before hydronephrosis occurs (for instance in cases of endometriosis).

•

T2w-MRU could also be used to evaluate potential renal donors or in patients unable to receive gadolinium.

•

CE-MRU rapidly produces an overdistended bladder with a risk of false positive diagnosis of mild obstruction.

•

CE-MRU is less convenient for patients.

Objective

The goal of this prospective study was to compare the efficiency of two types of MRU after diuretic administration to identify the non-dilated ureter.

Methods

MR pelvic examinations were performed in 126 patients after receiving furosemide. Each patient underwent in addition to their protocol for context, two types of MRU: 2D T2-weighted FSE (T2w-MRU) and 3D Gd T1-weighted GE (CE-MRU). Four segments were checked for each ureter.

For the first part of the analysis, readers evaluated the whole image quality using a four points subjective scale and for the second part, they were asked to score separately each ureteral segment as present or absent.

Results

1008 ureteral segments were checked. For the image quality, readers did not find any significant difference (3.8 ± 0.5 vs 3.6 ± 0.7, p value: 0.13) between MRU methods. The interobserver agreement was excellent with a κ correlation coefficient as high as 0.89 for T2w-MRU and 0.92 for CE-MRU, respectively.

For the detection of the segments and considering the 9 rotations for the T2W MRU, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion

T2-weighted MRU with multiple orientations and diuretic is sufficient to identify the non-dilated ureter. It offers information on ureteral peristaltism. It can be suggested that this sequence is able to detect an initial obstruction before hydronephrosis occurs.

Assessing renal function in children with hydronephrosis - additional feature of MR urography

Background

Magnetic resonance urography (MRU) is one of the most attractive imaging modalities in paediatric urology, providing largest diagnostic information in a single protocol. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic value of MRU in children with urogenital anomalies (especially anomalies of the renal pelvis and ureter) and the renal function using different post-processing functional software.

Patients and methods

Ninety six children (7 days – 18 years old) were examined. In 54 patients of them, a static T₂ MRU was completed by excretory T₁ MRU after gadolinium administration and functional analysis has been performed using two functional analysis softwares “CHOP-fMRU” and “ImageJ” software.

Results

MRU showed suspicious renal and the whole urinary tract anomalies with excellent image quality in all children. In ureteropelvic obstruction, MRU was confirmatory to the other imaging techniques, but it was superior modality concerning the evaluation of end-ureteral anomalies. There was an excellent correlation between the MRU data and diagnosis, determined by surgery. The renal transit times, renal volumes and volumetric differential renal function were assessed separately by “CHOP-fMRU” and “ImageJ” with excellent agreement with 99^mTc-DTPA and among them.

Conclusions

MRU overcomes a lot of limitations of conventional imaging modalities and has a potential to become a leading modality in paediatric uroradiology. Synthesis of both anatomical and functional criteria in MR urography enables to select the best candidates for surgical treatment. Even small kidney dysfunction can be detected by functional analysis software.

Magnetic resonance urography

Excellent contrast resolution and lack of ionizing radiation make magnetic resonance urography (MRU) a promising technique for noninvasively evaluating the entire urinary tract. While MRU currently lags behind CT urography (CTU) in spatial resolution and efficiency, new hardware and sequence developments have contributed to a resurgence of interest in MRU techniques. By combining unenhanced sequences with multiphase contrast-enhanced and excretory phase imaging, a comprehensive assessment of the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and surrounding structures is possible with image quality rivaling that obtained with other techniques. At the same time, formidable challenges remain to be overcome and further clinical validation is necessary before MRU can replace other forms of urography. In this article, we demonstrate the current potential of MRU to demonstrate a spectrum of urologic pathology involving the kidneys, ureters, and bladder while discussing the limitations and current status of this evolving technique.

MR urography: techniques and clinical applications

Magnetic resonance (MR) urography comprises an evolving group of techniques with the potential for allowing optimal noninvasive evaluation of many abnormalities of the urinary tract. MR urography is clinically useful in the evaluation of suspected urinary tract obstruction, hematuria, and congenital anomalies, as well as surgically altered anatomy, and can be particularly beneficial in pediatric or pregnant patients or when ionizing radiation is to be avoided. The most common MR urographic techniques for displaying the urinary tract can be divided into two categories: static-fluid MR urography and excretory MR urography. Static-fluid MR urography makes use of heavily T2-weighted sequences to image the urinary tract as a static collection of fluid, can be repeated sequentially (cine MR urography) to better demonstrate the ureters in their entirety and to confirm the presence of fixed stenoses, and is most successful in patients with dilated or obstructed collecting systems. Excretory MR urography is performed during the excretory phase of enhancement after the intravenous administration of gadolinium-based contrast material; thus, the patient must have sufficient renal function to allow the excretion and even distribution of the contrast material. Diuretic administration is an important adjunct to excretory MR urography, which can better demonstrate nondilated systems. Static-fluid and excretory MR urography can be combined with conventional MR imaging for comprehensive evaluation of the urinary tract. The successful interpretation of MR urographic examinations requires familiarity with the many pitfalls and artifacts that can be encountered with these techniques.

Renal transplant failure due to urologic complications: Comparison of static fluid with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance urography

PURPOSE

Postrenal reasons of renal transplant failure can be assessed by magnetic resonance urography. This study was designed to retrospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of static fluid (T2-)MRU compared to contrast enhanced (CE-)MRU in patients with renal transplant failure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive patients (14 female, 21 men; mean age 48.6 years) with renal transplant failure and sonographically detected hydronephrosis were examined both with T2-MRU as well as CE-MRU resulting in 39 MRU examinations. MRU was performed both using T2-weighted HASTE-sequence (T2-MRU) as well as Gadolinium-enhanced 3D-FLASH-sequence (CE-MRU) on a 1.5-T clinical MRI scanner (Magnetom Vision, Siemens Medical Solutions). Subjective image quality of resulting maximum intensity projection was assessed in consensus by two readers blinded to the final diagnosis, using a five point scale. MRU findings were correlated to sonography, operative results or clinical follow up.

RESULTS

CE-MRU yielded a sensitivity of 85.7% (T2-MRU 76.2%), and a specificity of 83.3% (T2-MRU: 73.7%), however statistical significance was not reached. The subjective image quality was significantly better in CE-MRU.

CONCLUSIONS

Only concerning subjective image quality CE-MRU proved superior to T2-MRU. Yet, there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between T2- and CE-MRU. Thinking of incipient nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, T2-MRU can be used as reliable alternative in patients with decreased renal transplant function due to urological complications.

Does a full bladder aid upper tract visualization in magnetic resonance urography?

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a full bladder improved the visualization of the upper renal tract during magnetic resonance urography (MRU). Twenty volunteers were recruited into the study. The MRU imaging was carried out on a 1.5-T MR system. Imaging was carried out in the coronal plane using a half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo-spin-echo technique. All volunteers were examined in two separate MRU studies to visualize the urinary tract. The first study was carried out with a 'full' bladder followed by a study with an 'empty' bladder, leading to a total of 40 examinations. Two radiologists then reviewed maximum intensity projection images from both 'full' and 'empty' studies independently. Both left and right upper tracts were divided into five segments. A three-point grading system was used to evaluate visualization. Excellent visualization = 3, good visualization = 2 and poor visualization = 1. Maximum score per patient was 30. Results were tabulated and analysed using an Excel database. The average score for visualization for the 'full' bladder group was 22.1/30 (73.8%) and the average score for the empty bladder was 16.2/30 (54%). Overall improvement in visualization was 5.9/30 (19.8%). There was strong interobserver agreement, with a concordance value of 92.5%. The MRU carried out in healthy young adult volunteers with a full bladder allows improved visualization of the upper tracts.

3D excretory MR urography: Improved image quality with intravenous saline and diuretic administration

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of diuretic administration on the image quality of excretory magnetic resonance urography (MRU) obtained following intravenous hydration, and to determine whether intravenous hydration alone is sufficient to produce diagnostic quality studies of nondilated upper tracts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 22 patients with nondilated upper tracts were evaluated with contrast-enhanced MRU. All patients received 250 mL of saline intravenously immediately prior to the examination. A total of 11 patients received 10-20 mg furosemide in addition to saline. Imaging was performed with a three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) breathhold spoiled gradient-echo sequences. Excretory MRU images were acquired five minutes after the administration of 0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium and were independently reviewed by two radiologists, who were blinded to the MRU technique. Readers evaluated the calyces, renal pelvis, and ureters qualitatively for degree of opacification, distention, and artifacts on a four-point scale. Statistical analysis was performed using a permutation test.

RESULTS

There was no significant disagreement between the two readers (P=0.14). Furosemide resulted in significant improvement in calyceal and renal pelvis distention (P<0.005), and significant artifact reduction in all upper tract segments (P<0.001) compared to the effect of saline alone.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous furosemide significantly improves the image quality of excretory MRU studies obtained following intravenous hydration. Intravenous saline alone is insufficient to produce diagnostic quality studies of the non-dilated upper tracts.

Uso de la urografía por resonancia magnética en el estudio del aparato urinario frente a la urografía convencional

Conventional urography (IVU) is an essential examination for the assessment of urinary tract but it is not free of complications, such as adverse reactions to contrast agents used (vasovagal and anaphylactic reactions), neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, as well as the damage due to the ionizing irradiation applied to the patient. For this reason, alternative imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance (MR) urography or uro-resonance have been developed.

OBJECTIVE

We present a case study assessing the diagnostic accuracy, specificity and sensitivity of uro-resonance and IVU as a morphological and functional examination of the urinary tract: and a quality study of the urographic images obtained with MR versus IVU.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

150 patients have submited to a MR study, 63 of them with an IVU study already performed, acquiring high-intensity signals at T2 corresponding to abdominal and retroperitoneal fluid, initially using furosemide at low doses and, in a final study, administering gadolinium at a rate of 0.1 mg/Kg. The test was indicated in patients with antecedents of adverse reactions to iodine contrast, acute or chronic kidney failure, functional cancellation of the kidneys, pregnant patients and those in paediatric age. The capacity of diagnosis of urinary obstruction and the aetiology of this obstruction of both tests was studied, as well as the quality of the images obtained by the urographic study using MR.

RESULTS

High resolution images were obtained of all the upper urinary tracts using MR, especially in the renal pelvis, without artefacts caused by peristalsis or intestinal fluid interposition. In 83.3% of cases, examinations revealed urological pathology. The diagnostic accuracy of the involvement cause of the urinary tract was 83.3%, with a sensitivity of 89.6%, a specificity of 69.2%. a positive predictive value of 86.6% and a negative predictive value of 75%.

CONCLUSION

MR urography is a high sensitive technique for the study of urinary tract, used as an alternative to conventional urography particularly in cases of the contraindication of ionizing radiation or allergy to the contrast agent, as well as in patients with renal failure, and offers a wider morphological and functional study, with a high image quality, able to displace conventional examinations in the short or medium term.

Magnetic resonance urography for the assessment of potential renal donors: comparison of the RARE technique with a low-dose gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance urography technique in the absence of pharmacological and mechanical intervention

The aim of this study was to determine whether magnetic resonance urography without pharmacological (diuretic) stimulation and mechanical compression allows conclusive evaluation of the urinary system in potential renal donors. In 28 consecutive patients magnetic resonance urography (MRU) was performed on a 1.5-T system. Two techniques, rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) and a gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced 3D fast low angle shot (FLASH) sequence were compared in the absence of adjunctive measures. Two reviewers assessed image quality, presence of artifacts and completeness of visualization of the collecting systems and ureters. Among the 53 MR urograms, there was no difference in image quality and presence of artifacts between RARE and Gd-MRU. Despite high image quality, visualization of the urinary collecting system was insufficient. Continuous visualization from the collecting system to the distal ureter was demonstrated bilaterally in only 14% of the RARE and 26% of Gd-enhanced MR urograms, respectively. Overall, Gd-enhanced MRU was superior to the RARE technique in displaying the segments of the urinary collecting system, but this difference was not found to be statistically significant. Neither the RARE technique nor the gadolinium-enhanced MRU technique is accurate enough to allow the evaluation of the collecting system and ureters in potential renal donors in the absence of pharmacological intervention and compression.