Familial dilated cardiomyopathy: from clinical presentation to molecular genetics

Familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Clinical and genetic characteristics

Familial dilated cardiomyopathy (F-DCM) describes a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of diseases, mostly inherited as autosomal dominant traits, having idiopathic left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction as a common phenotype. The age of onset, rate of progression, disease complications, as well as overall prognosis and outcome vary both amongst and within families. Clinical traits, both cardiac and extracardiac, may recur in association with the DCM phenotype. The former include conduction defects, structural abnormalities such as left ventricular noncompaction, of right ventricular involvement, and recurrence of atrial or ventricular arrhythmias; the latter commonly affect the musculoskeletal (myopathies/dystrophies, both clinically overt and subclinical), ocular, auditory, nervous, and integument systems. These traits may help guide genetic testing. In parallel to the clinical heterogeneity, F-DCM also shows genetic heterogeneity: more than 40 genes have been causally linked to F-DCM, with mutations recurring more commonly in a few known genes, and less frequently in rare, less commonly known genes. Based on the known prevalence of mutations in disease genes, more than 50% of F-DCM cases can be regarded as still genetically orphan, implying that further disease genes have to be discovered. Family screening and genetic testing are now established as the gold standard for diagnosis, care, and prevention in F-DCM. Diagnostic tests are performed using Sanger-based sequencing. Furthermore, new biotechnology tools, based on next-generation sequencing, are now being implemented in the research setting and will dramatically modify the future of the nosology of F-DCM.

Diagnostic work-up and risk stratification in X-linked dilated cardiomyopathies caused by dystrophin defects

OBJECTIVES

We sought to describe the diagnostic work-up, phenotype, and long-term evolution of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) associated with Dystrophin (DYS) defects.

BACKGROUND

X-linked DCM associated with DYS defects can be clinically indistinguishable from other types of DCM.

METHODS

The series comprises 436 consecutive male patients diagnosed with DCM. Patients underwent endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). Genetic testing employed multiplex polymerase chain reaction and multiple ligation dependent probe assay for deletions and direct sequencing of the 79 exons and flanking regions of the gene for point mutations or small rearrangements.

RESULTS

We identified DYS defects in 34 of 436 patients (7.8%) (onset age 34 ± 11 years, age range 17 to 54 years); 30 had proven X-linked inheritance. The 2 phenotypes included DCM with mild skeletal myopathy and/or increased serum creatine phosphokinase (n = 28) or DCM only (n = 6). The EMB showed defective dystrophin immunostain. The DYS defects consisted of 21 in-frame deletions and 11 out-of-frame deletions as well as 1 stop and 1 splice-site mutation. During a median follow-up of 60 months (interquartile range: 11.25 to 101.34 months) we observed 17 events, all related to heart failure (HF) (median event-free survival: 83.5 months). Eight patients (23%) underwent transplantation, and 9 (26%) died of HF while waiting for transplantation. Eight patients received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, although none had device intervention during a median follow-up of 14 months (interquartile range: 5 to 25 months). No patient died suddenly, suffered syncope, or developed life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

DYS-related DCM should be suspected in male patients with increased serum creatine phosphokinase (82%) and X-linked inheritance. The disease shows a high risk of end-stage HF but a lower risk of life-threatening arrhythmias.

Clinical and genetic issues in dilated cardiomyopathy: a review for genetics professionals

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), usually diagnosed as idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC), has been shown to have a familial basis in 20-35% of cases. Genetic studies in familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) have shown dramatic locus heterogeneity with mutations identified in >30 mostly autosomal genes showing primarily dominant transmission. Most mutations are private missense, nonsense or short insertion/deletions. Marked allelic heterogeneity is the rule. Although to date most DCM genetics fits into a Mendelian rare variant disease paradigm, this paradigm may be incomplete with only 30-35% of FDC genetic cause identified. Despite this incomplete knowledge, we predict that DCM genetics will become increasingly relevant for genetics and cardiovascular professionals. This is because DCM causes heart failure, a national epidemic, with considerable morbidity and mortality. The fact that early, even pre-symptomatic intervention can prevent or ameliorate DCM, coupled with more cost-effective genetic testing, will drive further progress in the field. Ongoing questions include: whether sporadic (IDC) disease has a genetic basis, and if so, how it differs from familial disease; which gene-specific or genetic pathways are most relevant; and whether other genetic mechanisms (e.g., DNA structural variants, epigenetics, mitochondrial mutations and others) are operative in DCM. We suggest that such new knowledge will lead to novel approaches to the prevention and treatment of DCM.

Cardiac arrhythmias and sudden death in infancy: implication for the medicolegal investigation

Genetically transmitted diseases are an important cause of juvenile sudden cardiac death (SCD). In a considerable proportion of individuals in which a medicolegal investigation is performed, structural heart disease is absent, and the medical examiner fails to discover an adequate cause of death. In such cases, an inherited arrhythmogenic disease should be considered, which manifests with life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or SCD. Molecular diagnosis is progressively becoming an important tool for these questions. Therefore, postmortem genetic testing ("molecular autopsy") should be considered as a part of the comprehensive medicolegal investigation in SCD cases without apparent structural heart disease. It will have implications not only for the deceased individual but also for living family members in preventing (further) cardiac events by expert counseling, appropriate lifestyle adjustment, and adequate treatment, if available.

Mutation screening in dilated cardiomyopathy: prominent role of the beta myosin heavy chain gene

AIMS

Familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDCM) is associated with mutations in more than 10 genes, but genes mutation frequencies and associated clinical features remain largely unknown. Here, we performed a mutation analysis of four genes involved in FDCM in a population of idiopathic DCM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A SSCP and sequencing mutation screening of all the exons coding for beta myosin heavy chain (MYH7 gene), cardiac T troponin (TNNT2 gene), phospholamban (PLN gene), and the cardio-specific exon of metavinculin (VCL gene) were performed in 96 independent patients (54 familial and 42 sporadic). It led to the identification of eight heterozygous mutations, seven new ones in MYH7, and the already described R141W mutation in TNNT2. MYH7 mutations (in five familial and two sporadic cases) substitute residues located either in the head (I201T, T412N, A550V) or tail domains (T1019N, R1193S, E1426K, R1634S) of the protein. DCM was not associated with skeletal myopathy or conduction defects in any patients. Contrasting clinical features were observed between MYH7 and TNNT2 mutations carriers. In MYH7 vs. TNNT2, mean age at diagnosis was late (P<0.03), penetrance was incomplete in adults (56 vs. 100%), and mean age at major cardiac event was higher (P<0.04).

CONCLUSION

We have identified seven mutations in MYH7, one in TNNT2, and none in PLN or in the VCL cardio-specific exon. MYH7 appears as the most frequently mutated gene in our FDCM population (approximately 10%), and mutation carriers present with delayed onset, in contrast to TNNT2.

Familial cardiomyopathies: significant causes of heart failure

Familial dilated cardiomyopathies (FDCMs) account for about one third of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathies, yet clinicians under-appreciate their prevalence. Among the inherited cardiomyopathies, FDCMs account for the greatest burden of heart failure and its associated morbidities. This paper summarizes significant molecular-genetic data, and discusses clinical manifestations of the major inherited cardiomyopathies, and the importance of clinical and genetic screening. Suggestions are provided as to how to proceed with screening. The purpose of this paper is to update clinicians about this rapidly growing scientific field, and to encourage application of current evidence to their practices.

[Familial dilated cardiomyopathy in patients transplanted for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence, clinical features, and pattern of inheritance of familial dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in heart transplant patients.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Patients with idiopathic DCM who had undergone heart transplantation were invited to participate. Patients with alcohol abuse were excluded. A clinical evaluation, 12-lead ECG, echocardiogram, blood tests, and DNA extraction were performed in patients and relatives. Familial DCM was defined as the presence of at least one relative with idiopathic DCM. Possible familial DCM was considered when at least one relative had left ventricular enlargement (LVE) (> 112% predicted LVEDD).

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-nine relatives of 43 families were studied. DCM was familial in 11 probands (25.6%) and possibly familial in 11 (25.6%). Fifteen relatives had DCM (7.5%), 26 (13.1%) LVE, and 5 (2.5%) hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The pattern of inheritance was autosomal dominant in most families. Five probands (3 with familial DCM) had antecedents of consanguinity and possible recessive inheritance. Six probands (14%, 1 with familial DCM) had relatives with conduction system defects. Creatine kinase was moderately increased in 9 relatives (4.5%), 3 of them with LVE. Fifteen patients had at least moderate alcohol intake. Three of them had familial DCM (relatives without alcohol abuse) and 6 had possible familial DCM.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of familial DCM is high in patients who undergo heart transplant. Left ventricular enlargement, conduction system abnormalities, and elevated creatine kinase may be early markers of familial disease. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is present in some relatives of patients with idiopathic DCM. Familial DCM is present in patients with a previous diagnosis of alcoholic DCM.

Difficult cases in heart failure: familial dilated cardiomyopathy

While originally thought to be uncommon, familial dilated cardiomyopathy may occur quite often. Aside from symptoms of heart failure, these forms of dilated cardiomyopathy may be associated with arrhythmias and sudden death. The case detailed describes such a patient and emphasizes the importance of a careful family history. Also discussed is the importance of screening of first- and second-degree relatives of these patients. (c)2001 by CHF, Inc.