Intracoronary beta-radiation to reduce restenosis after balloon angioplasty and stenting; the Beta Radiation In Europe (BRIE) study

Association of Urinary Strontium with Cardiovascular Disease Among the US Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Previous studies have demonstrated the effects of environmental metals on the cardiovascular system. However, the relationship of strontium (Sr) to cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population has not been established. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the association between urinary Sr (U-Sr) and CVD in the US adults using data of 5255 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2016. Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression were performed to assess the association between U-Sr and CVD. After multivariable adjustments, compared to the lowest quartile, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of CVD with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) across the quartiles were 0.65 (0.46, 0.92), 0.87 (0.61, 1.25), and 0.78 (0.55, 1.10). RCS plot revealed a nonlinear relationship between U-Sr levels and CVD (P for nonlinearity = 0.004). Threshold effect analysis identified the inflection point of U-Sr for the curve was 90.18 μg/g urinary creatinine (μg/g UCr). Each 1-unit increase in U-Sr was associated with a 1.1% decrease in CVD (OR 0.989; 95% CI 0.980-0.998) on the left side of the inflection point, but no significant association was observed on the right side of the inflection point. This study suggests a nonlinear association of U-Sr with CVD prevalence in the US general adults. These findings may have positive implications for the determination of appropriate Sr levels for public cardiovascular health. Given the cross-sectional study design, further prospective studies are warranted.

Two decades after coronary radiation therapy: A single center longitudinal clinical study

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the very long‐term clinical outcome after radioactive stent (RS) implantation and intracoronary β radiation brachytherapy (IRBT).

Background

Radioactive stents (RS) and intracoronary β radiation brachytherapy (IRBT) were introduced to prevent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Both techniques were associated with a higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in the short and intermediate‐term follow up as compared to conventional PCI.

Methods

One hundred and thirty‐three patients received radioactive stents (³²P) and 301 patients were treated with IRBT adjunctive to PCI. These groups were propensity matched to respectively 266 and 602 control patients who were treated with routine PCI during the same inclusion period. Endpoints were all‐cause mortality and MACE, defined as all‐cause death, any myocardial infarction or any revascularization.

Results

Median follow‐up duration was 17 years. All‐cause mortality rates were similar in all groups. Adjusted hazard ratios for MACE and mortality in the RS cohort were 1.55 (95% CI 1.20–2.00) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.63–1.34), respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios for MACE and all‐cause mortality in the IRBT cohort were 1.41 (95% CI 1.18–1.67) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.74–1.21), respectively. The difference in MACE rates was predominantly driven by coronary revascularizations in both groups, with a higher MI rate in the IRBT group as well.

Conclusions

Coronary radiation therapy was associated with early increased MACE rates, but the difference in MACE rates decreased beyond 2 years, resulting in a comparable long‐term clinical outcome. Importantly, no excess in mortality was observed.

Ten Years of Advancements in Interventional Cardiology

The past decade has seen the evolution of an exciting technology that has changed forever the treatment of aortic aneurysmal disease. From rather crude homemade stent-grafts constructed in the surgical suite to elegant commercially manufactured devices in a variety of configurations and sizes, the aortic endograft has experienced a meteoric rise in popularity to become a beneficial, minimally invasive therapy that can obviate the risk of rupture and death. There are now 3 approved endovascular devices on the market for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and it is likely that additional and improved devices will become available in the future. This review revisits the developmental history of the aortic endograft, noting the ongoing refinements that have arisen from our experiences with the growing population of stent-graft patients. Although research continues to search for solutions to the problems of endoleak and migration, long-term results even with the earlier second and third-generation devices are better than has been achieved with open surgical repair.

A European multi‐center trial investigating the anti‐restenotic effect of intravascular sonotherapy after stenting of de novo lesions (EUROSPAH: EUROpean Sonotherapy Prevention of Arterial Hyperplasia)

BACKGROUND

Intravascular sonotherapy (IST) reduces neointimal hyperplasia post-stenting in animal studies. Euro-SPAH is a multi-center, double blind, randomized trial investigating the efficacy of IST to reduce in-stent late loss.

METHODS

Patients with angina or silent ischaemia with stented de novo lesions were randomised to sham or IST. The sample size had a 90% power to detect a late loss difference of 0.21 mm at 6 months. The secondary endpoints were MACE at 1, 6, 12 months and neo-intimal hyperplasia on IVUS at 6 months.

RESULTS

At 23 sites in Europe, 403 patients were randomized, with successful treatment with sham or IST in 95.6%. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of baseline demographics or lesion characteristics. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 89%. In-stent late loss was not significantly different. The restenosis rate at 6 months was 23% in the IST group versus 25% in the sham group. The IVUS measurements confirm the absence of effect of IST on neointimal hyperplasia. At one year, the event-free survival did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of sonotherapy following stent implantation in de novo lesions does not reduce intra-stent neointimal hyperplasia, or effect the angiographic restenosis rate compared to sham treatment.

Intracoronary beta-irradiation for the treatment of de novo lesions: 5-year clinical follow-up of the BetAce randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) has been used for the prevention of restenosis. Despite initial positive results, long-term follow-up has shown a progressive loss of benefit in clinical outcome after beta-irradiation. We report the 5-year follow-up of the BetAce trial.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, single-blind trial included 61 patients treated for 64 de novo coronary lesions: 31 patients (33 stenoses) were treated with bare metal stents (control group), and 30 patients (31 stenoses) were treated with intracoronary beta-irradiation at the time of stented angioplasty (VBT group).

RESULTS

Baseline and procedural data were similar between treatment arms. At 6 months, VBT reduced the need for target vessel revascularization (13% vs 35.5%, P = .04), but there was no significant difference in the 6- and 12-month event-free survival when clinical events were ranked. Between 1 and 5 years, an increasing number of target vessel failures was observed in both groups, leading to a similar long-term clinical outcome at 5 years (event-free survival 43% and 45% in the VBT and control groups, respectively, log-rank 0.001, P = .9).

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-irradiation in de novo coronary lesions significantly reduced in-stent recurrences at 6 months compared with standard procedures. However, this initial benefit was not sustained in the long term. The results of this randomized study confirm the delayed and progressive restenotic process after beta-irradiation and stent implantation in de novo lesions.

Long-term clinical outcome of patients treated with β-brachytherapy in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Only limited data exist regarding the long-term efficacy of beta-brachytherapy (beta-VBT) in routine clinical practice and the impact of the prolonged (>6 months) combined antiplatelet therapy after beta-VBT. Our aim is to examine the long-term clinical efficacy of routine beta brachytherapy (beta-VBT) followed by indefinite administration of combined antiplatelet therapy in patients at high restenotic risk.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with 65 lesions [de novo: 41, in-stent restenotic (ISR): 24] underwent intracoronary beta-VBT and were followed prospectively. All patients received indefinite administration of aspirin and clopidogrel, underwent routine angiography 6 months later and were followed-up clinically for 43.7 months (range: 32 to 52 months).

RESULTS

Acute success was achieved in 60/61 (98.4%) patients. Lesion length was 36.1 (+/-17.6) mm for the de novo and 22.0 (+/-9.8) mm for the ISR (p=0.001). Stents were implanted in 35/41 de novo and 7/24 ISR lesions (p<0.01). Six-month binary restenosis after successful beta-VBT was 35.9% (23/64). During follow-up patients with de-novo lesions who received a new stent during index procedure had a higher incidence of major cardiac events than patients with ISR lesions without a new stent (log rank test, p=0.02). Acute and late thrombotic events were reported at 6 patients, all with de novo lesions and stent implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-VBT plus stenting in de novo lesions is related to an unacceptable high rate of thrombotic complications and clinical restenosis despite prolonged administration of combined antiplatelet therapy. Brachytherapy remains a reasonable option for patients with ISR lesions until full data from large randomized trials comparing drug eluting stents with brachytherapy are available.

Feasibility and safety of intra-coronary Beta irradiation with 144Ce/Pr for prevention of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of in-stent restenotic lesions

BACKGROUND

Endovascular brachytherapy is a proven and efficacious treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with established long-term benefit. Owing to its complexity and logistic inconveniences, brachytherapy did not find wide acceptance, especially in the current drug-eluting stents era. We conducted a single center, non-randomized pilot trial with 144Ce/Pr, utilizing a new high-energy Beta emitting source, for prevention of restenosis after percutaneous treatment of in-stent restenotic lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty consecutive patients presenting in-stent restenosis were enrolled in the study. After conventional balloon angioplasty, 144Ce/Pr was applied to the dilated coronary segment at a dose of 21Gy. Technical feasibility, safety and efficacy of 144Ce/Pr at 9 months clinical and angiographic follow-up were tested. Thirty-seven arterial segments were irradiated with 100% technical success and no in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Five MACE were observed (13.5% of the treated segments) during 9 months follow-up, including four target lesion revascularizations and one episode of acute coronary syndrome secondary to sudden late thrombotic occlusion of the irradiated segment.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirmed the safety and the feasibility of the intra-coronary Beta irradiation utilizing the 144Ce/Pr source. It also shows some practical advantages compared to traditional Gamma or other Beta sources. Considering the high-risk restenosis profile of the selected patients (i.e. diffuse in-stent restenosis, bifurcation lesions, small vessels) these results are encouraging in terms of restenosis prevention. Late acute thrombosis remains a problem requiring further improvement.

A Phase II study of external-beam radiotherapy and endovascular brachytherapy with PTA and stenting for femoropopliteal artery restenosis

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and seek evidence of efficacy of combined external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and endovascular brachytherapy in the treatment of stenotic vascular lesions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventeen patients with high risk for restenosis of femoropopliteal arteries were enrolled in this study from February 2000 to August 2002. The external beam radiotherapy regimen consisted of 10 Gy in 5 fractions of 2 Gy, starting on Day 0. This was followed on Day 6 by angiography, stent placement, and intraluminal brachytherapy to a dose of 10 Gy at 1.2 mm from stent surface. The EBRT was continued from the same day to another 10 Gy in 2 Gy daily fractions for 5 days.

RESULTS

The follow up ranged from 33 months to 60 months. At the time of analysis 15 of 17 patients were alive with patent stents. Of these, 10 were symptom-free. Two patients died of unrelated causes.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of EBRT and endovascular brachytherapy provided adequate dose distribution without any geographical miss or "candy wrapper" restenosis. No incidence of aneurysmal dilation of radiated vascular segment was observed. The treatment was feasible, well tolerated, and achieved 88% stenosis free survival.

Percutaneous coronary revascularization in diabetics: from balloon angioplasty to drug-eluting stents

Diabetic patients may have aggressive coronary disease with an excessive rate of restenosis and accelerated atherosclerotic progression. This article reviews the different modalities of percutaneous treatment and their results in the diabetic population, from the early days of balloon angioplasty to the current implementation of drug-eluting stents. As restenosis may be virtually eradicated in the near future, plaque progression remains the cornerstone for interventional cardiologists and the medical community. In this regard, attempts to modify life habits, and a more accurate control of the components of the metabolic syndrome should be the main therapeutic objective.

Intracoronary radiotherapy with a 188Rhenium liquid-filled angioplasty balloon system in in-stent restenosis: a single-center, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind evaluation

BACKGROUND

In cases of in-stent restenosis, intracoronary radiotherapy with beta-emitters and gamma-emitters has been shown to reduce the risk of repeat restenosis. The present randomised, placebo-controlled study addresses the question of whether intracoronary radiotherapy applied by the easy-to-handle Rhenium liquid-filled angioplasty balloon system is also able to reduce the angiographic re-restenosis rate in stents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

At our center, from May 2000 to December 2003, 165 patients (mean age 64+/-10, median 65 years; 127 men, 38 women) with symptomatic in-stent restenosis underwent either intracoronary brachytherapy or sham procedure. Index clinical and angiographic parameters were largely comparable in both groups. Radiation therapy was performed with a standard percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) balloon catheter inflated with liquid Rhenium in the redilated in-stent restenosis for 240-890, mean 384+/-125 s with low pressure (3 atm) in order to reach 30 Gy at 0.5 mm depth of the vessel wall. In 82 patients, intracoronary radiotherapy was carried out without complications, but one of the 83 patients who underwent sham procedure suffered small myocardial infarction. During follow-up, stent thrombosis with subsequent non-Q-wave myocardial infarction occurred in one patient in each group (6 days and 8 months after the procedure, respectively). At 6 months after the index procedure, repeat angiography was performed in 156 of the 164 patients with successful procedure (rate 95%): restenosis (stenosis >50% in diameter) or reocclusion was observed in only 19 of 78 (=24%) patients of the radiation but in 31 of 78 (=40%) patients of the sham procedure group (P=0.04). Event-free survival (free of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) at 1 year was 87% for patients being radiated and 74% for patients having undergone sham procedure (P=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary radiation therapy with the liquid-filled beta-emitting Rhenium balloon is not only easy to perform, safe, and comparably inexpensive but also an effective option to prevent repeat restenosis and the need for target vessel revascularization in cases of in-stent restenosis.

Effect of radioactivity on stent-graft incorporation after endovascular treatment of aneurysms: An animal study

Poor stent-graft (SG) incorporation into the vessel wall, following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR), can lead to endoleaks and SG migration. Low-dose radiation can prevent aneurysm recurrence after coil embolization, and has been associated with a "paradoxical" increase in neointima formation after stenting in a few studies. It was hypothesized that in situ beta radiation emitted from SG could improve its incorporation by preventing the persistence of circulating channels between the implant and the vessel wall and increasing neointima formation around the SG. Phosphorus 32 ((32)P, 200 or 400 kBq per SG (n = 6 each)) was ion implanted on the external surface of balloon-expandable SGs. Twelve radioactive and six non-radioactive SGs were deployed in iliac arteries of nine Mongrel dogs. Neointima formation inside the graft and the persistence of circulating flow through an artificial groove created during the endovascular procedure were assessed by follow-up imaging and by blinded, computerized histomorphometric analysis after animal sacrifice at 3 months. Occlusion occurred in four radioactive SGs. A lesser number of patent grooves was observed along high-activity SGs than along control SGs (1/3 versus 4/4). No difference in neointima formation was observed in radioactive and non-radioactive SGs. Alteration of external graft surface was observed after ion implantation. Ion implantation of (32)P on SGs does not seem to be a viable strategy to improve incorporation and prevent type-I endoleak after EVAR.

Randomized blinded clinical trial of intracoronary brachytherapy with 90Sr/Y beta-radiation for the prevention of restenosis after stent implantation in native coronary arteries in diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

We report a double-blind, randomized clinical trial of intracoronary beta-radiation for prevention of restenosis after stent implantation in native coronary de novo lesions in diabetic patients.

METHODS

After successful stent implantation in native coronary de novo lesions, 106 lesions in 89 diabetic patients were randomly allocated to treatment with beta-radiation with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel depth (n = 53) or placebo treatment (n = 53).

RESULTS

Angiographic analysis at 9 month follow-up revealed a late lumen loss of 0.7+/-0.9 mm in the radiotherapy group versus 1.2+/-0.8 mm in the control group at the injured segment (P = 0.006), 0.9+/-1.0 versus 1.3+/-0.7 mm at the radiated segment (P = 0.02), and 0.9+/-1.0 versus 1.3+/-0.7 mm at the target segment (P = 0.04) (defined as active source length plus 5mm on proximal and distal sites). Binary restenosis rates were significantly lower in the radiation group in all subsegments (injured segment: 10.9 versus 37.3%, P = 0.003; radiated segment: 21.7 versus 49.0%, P = 0.005; target segment: 23.9 versus 49.0%, P = 0.01). Target lesion revascularization for restenosis was required in nine lesions (17.6%) in the radiotherapy group versus 18 (34.0%) in the placebo group (P = 0.05). Late thrombosis occurred in four radiated patients (after premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy in all), resulting in a major adverse clinical event rate of 37.2% in the brachytherapy group versus 38.6% in the placebo group (P = ns).

CONCLUSIONS

In diabetic patients with de novo coronary lesions, intracoronary radiation after stent implantation significantly reduced restenosis. However, this clinical benefit was reduced by the frequent occurrence of late thrombosis.

La radiothérapie des affections bénignes : quelles indications huit ans plus tard ?

The authors present an update version of the indications for radiotherapy in the management of benign diseases. This is based on available randomized trials and recent international meetings. Validated indications remain the prevention of resected heterotopic bone ossifications, keloïds scars and pterygium and also treatment of arteriovenous malformations; the place of radiotherapy for malignant exophtalmia is more and more restricted. Randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of endobrachytherapy in the prevention of restenosis after angioplasty but the use of embedded stent has replaced this indication. Macular degeneration is no more an indication of radiotherapy. Quality requirements for radiotherapy are identical for benign or malignant indications.

Long term outcome after intracoronary beta radiation therapy

OBJECTIVES

To determine the long term outcome after intracoronary beta radiation therapy (IRT).

SETTING

Tertiary referral centre.

METHODS

The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was retrospectively determined in 301 consecutive patients who were treated with IRT. MACE was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or any reintervention. Long term clinical outcome was obtained from an electronic database of hospital records and from questionnaires to the patients and referring physicians. Long term survival status was assessed by written inquiries to the municipal civil registries.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) follow up was 3.6 (1.2) years. The cumulative incidence of MACE at six months was 19.1%, at one year 36.4%, and at four years 58.3%. The target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rate at six months was 12.9%, at one year 28.3%, and at four years 50.4%. From multivariate analysis, dose < 18 Gy was the most significant predictor of TLR. At four years the cumulative incidence of death was 3.8%, of myocardial infarction 13.4%, and of coronary artery bypass surgery 11.3%. Total vessel occlusion was documented in 12.3% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the long term follow up of patients after IRT, there are increased adverse cardiac events beyond the first six months.

Intracoronary β-irradiation prevents excessive in-stent neointimal proliferation in de novo lesions of patients with high plasma ACE levels. The BetAce randomized trial

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated vascular brachytherapy (VBT) as a potent antiproliferative treatment to prevent in-stent restenosis (ISR) after coronary angioplasty of de novo lesions in patients carrying the D allele of the I/D polymorphism of the ACE gene and high ACE plasma levels (>34 U/l).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A prospective randomized trial was designed to detect a 30% improvement in the minimal lumen diameter (MLD) of the stenotic artery, as measured by quantitative coronary analysis (QCA), 6 months following VBT at the time of stented angioplasty. All patients were carriers of the D allele of the ACE gene, with plasma ACE levels >34 U/l.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (33 stenoses) were allocated to stent implantation (control group) and 30 patients (31 stenoses) to VBT and stented angioplasty. After angioplasty, in-stent MLD was similar in the two groups. At 6 months in the control group, in-stent MLD had decreased to 1.74+/-0.8 versus 2.25+/-1.05 mm in the VBT group (P=.04). The mean in-stent diameter was 2.3+/-0.8 mm in the control group versus 2.9+/-1.05 mm after VBT (P=.02), and the restenosis rate was 37.5% versus 17.9%, respectively (P=.08). At 6 months, a higher need for target vessel revascularization (TVR) was observed in the control group: 35.5% versus 13.3% (P=.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized study confirms that patients with high plasma ACE concentrations are exposed to an increased risk for ISR after coronary stenting. The preventive use of VBT in these patients reduced neointimal formation by 65% such that the MLD at follow-up was increased by 29% compared with the control group.

Two-year clinical follow-up results of intracoronary radiation therapy with rhenium-188-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid-filled balloon

We investigated the 2-year clinical follow-up results as well as 6-month angiographic and clinical follow-up results of intracoronary radiation therapy using a rhenium-188-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid ((188)Re-DTPA)-filled balloon system. The study comprised of 161 patients with significant de novo (83%) or in-stent restenosis (17%) lesions. Irradiation to deliver 17.6 Gy at a depth of 1.0 mm into the vessel wall was carried out after successful intervention. At 6-month follow-up, binary restenosis developed with significantly lower frequency in the radiation group than in the control group (24.3% vs. 46.3%; P = 0.009), although target lesion revascularization rate did not show significant benefit. At 2-year follow-up, cumulative target lesion revascularization rate was not significantly different between radiation group (n = 86) and control group (n = 75; 20.0% vs. 26.0%; P = 0.368). The rate of major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization did not show significant difference between two groups either (22.3% vs. 30.1%; P = 0.266). In conclusion, although significant reduction in restenosis rate was noted at 6-month angiographic follow-up, intracoronary radiation therapy mostly in patients with de novo lesion did not show significant clinical benefit in 6-month and 2-year follow-up results. The benefit was noted only in a small subgroup of patients with in-stent restenosis.

Prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite numerous advances in coronary interventional techniques, the frequent occurrence of restenosis continues to plague interventional cardiology. With the widespread use of drug-eluting stents, there is a need to reexamine critically the roles of the various interventional techniques currently available.

RECENT FINDINGS

Drug-eluting stents have dramatically reduced the rates of restenosis and target vessel revascularization in a wide spectrum of patients with varying lesion morphologies. However, when restenosis does occur, it still tends to be dependent on the same factors that predict restenosis with bare metal stenting. The routine use of drug-eluting stents entails high initial costs to the health care system. Debulking as a means to improve outcomes after angioplasty has not lived up to expectations. Gene therapy is rapidly evolving into a viable means to reduce neointimal proliferation after angioplasty.

SUMMARY

Careful patient selection and attention to the procedure of stent deployment optimize the results of angioplasty with drug-eluting stents. Because of cost considerations, drug-eluting stents should be used in patients who are expected to have the greatest absolute benefit. In this context, when judiciously used, conventional balloon angioplasty and bare metal stenting still have a definite role in the management of patients with obstructive coronary artery disease.

Intracoronary Brachytherapy After Stenting De Novo Lesions in Diabetic Patients

OBJECTIVES

We studied the efficacy of intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB) after successful coronary stenting in diabetic patients with de novo lesions.

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary brachytherapy has proven effective in preventing recurrences in patients with in-stent restenosis. However, the role of ICB for the treatment of de novo coronary stenoses remains controversial.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients were randomized to either ICB or no radiation after stenting. Primary end points were in-stent mean neointimal area (primary end point of efficacy) and minimal luminal area of the entire vessel segment (primary end point of effectiveness), as assessed by intravascular ultrasound at six-month follow-up. Quantitative coronary angiography analysis was performed at the target, injured, irradiated, and entire vessel segments.

RESULTS

At follow-up, the in-stent mean neointimal area was 52% smaller in the ICB group (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the minimal luminal area of the vessel segment (4.5 +/- 2.4 mm2 vs. 4.4 +/- 2.1 mm2). Restenosis rates increased progressively by the analyzed segment in the ICB group: target (7.1% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.07), injured (9.5% vs. 20.9%, p = NS), irradiated (14.3% vs. 20.9%, p = NS), and vessel segment (23.8% vs. 25.6%, p = NS). At one year, 1 cardiac death, 6 myocardial infarctions (MIs) (3 due to late stent thrombosis), and 10 target vessel revascularizations (TVRs) (6 due to the edge effect) occurred in the ICB group, whereas in the nonradiation group, there were 11 TVRs and no deaths or MIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary brachytherapy significantly inhibited in-stent neointimal hyperplasia after stenting in diabetic patients. However, clinically this was counteracted by the occurrence of the edge effect and late stent thrombosis.

Direct Stenting Versus Direct Stenting Followed by Centered Beta-Radiation With Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Dosimetry and Long-Term Anti-Platelet Treatment

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the efficacy of vascular brachytherapy (VBT) combined with stenting for the primary prevention of restenosis.

BACKGROUND

Intravascular brachytherapy after stent implantation for de novo lesions has been abandoned for the present. We revisited this procedure by optimizing all procedural steps-the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIa blockers, direct stenting, adequate radiation coverage, avoidance of edge damage, source centering, intravascular ultrasound-guided dosimetry, and continuation of a dual anti-platelet regimen for one year.

METHODS

The Beta-Radiation Investigation with Direct stenting and Galileo in Europe (BRIDGE) study is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating the long-term efficacy of VBT with P-32 (20 Gy at 1 mm in the coronary wall) after direct stenting. The primary end point was angiographic intra-stent late loss; secondary end points were six months binary restenosis and neo-intimal hyperplasia. Patients (n = 112) with de novo lesions (2.5 to 4.0 mm in diameter up to 15 mm long) were randomized to either VBT or no-VBT.

RESULTS

At six months, intra-stent loss was 0.43 and 0.84 mm (p < 0.001) in the irradiated and control groups, respectively. Intra-stent neo-intimal volume was reduced from 36 mm3 to 10 mm3. However, in the irradiated group there were six late occlusions as well as eight restenoses outside the stented and peri-stented area at the fall-off dose edges of the irradiated area. Accordingly, the target vessel revascularization and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events rates at one year in the VBT group (20.4% and 25.9%, respectively) were higher than in the control group (12.1% and 17.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the optimization of pre-, peri-, and post-procedural factors and despite the relative efficacy of the brachytherapy for the prevention of the intra-stent neo-intimal hyperplasia, the clinical outcome of the irradiated group was less favorable than that of the control group.

[In 2003, what are the indications of brachytherapy in coronary arteries?]

Significant results obtained with coated stents in "de novo" coronary lesion treatment, particularly in complex lesions, have substituted brachytherapy indications. However, curitherapy results in diffuse or proliferative in-stent restenosis treatment show a significant reduction (30-50%) of restenosis and major adverse cardiac events. So, without sufficient scientific proofs with active stents in this indication, curitherapy is the only validated and authorized treatment of second diffuse or proliferative in-stent restenosis.

Geographical miss during centered intracoronary beta-radiation with 90Yttrium: incidence and implications for recurrence rates after vascular brachytherapy for de novo lesions

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to determine the incidence and causes of geographical miss (GM) and evaluate its impact on edge restenosis after 'primary', centered, intracoronary beta-radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND

Edge restenosis is a limitation of intracoronary beta-radiation therapy. GM occurs when the radiation source does not fully cover the injured segment and may account for this phenomenon.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-one patients enrolled in the Dose-Finding study were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomized to receive 9, 12, 15 or 18 Gy at 1 mm tissue depth. Using quantitative coronary angiography the effective irradiated segment (EIRS) and both edges were studied prior to and after intervention, and at six-month follow-up. GM was defined as a situation where the effective radiation source length (24 mm) did not fully cover the injured segment. The edges of the EIRS that were injured during the procedure constituted the GM edges. A greater than 50% diameter stenosis at follow-up was considered significant. GM was determined by the simultaneous, electrocardiographically matched, side-by-side projection of the source and balloons in place, in identical projections surrounded by contrast.

RESULTS

In 16% of patients GM was noninterpretable owing to inadequate filming. GM constituted 21.1% of the interpretable edges and 40.1% of the interpretable vessels analyzed. The occurrence of restenosis in the EIRS and the analyzed vessel segment (VS) was similar between procedures with and without GM. In vessels with GM, restenosis was significantly increased from the EIRS to the VS (from 8.77% to 21%, p = 0.05) as opposed to non-GM vessels (from 11.9% to 19%, p = 0.6). GM tended to be associated with a greater incidence of significant stenosis at the edges of the EIRS (8.3% versus 4.0%, p = 0.15) compared with individuals with >50 % stenosis but no GM. This effect was more prominent at the distal edge. The relation of GM and edge restenosis was independent of dosage.

CONCLUSIONS

Since GM does not affect the incidence of restenosis in the EIRS, restenosis in this segment should be considered a treatment failure, probably due to inadequate dosage. GM is related to significant increase in restenosis from the EIRS to the VS. GM tends to be associated with restenosis at the edges of the EIRS. This is a local phenomenon, which is independent of dosage and which has a specific pathophysiology (combination of injury and low-dose radiation). If GM can be eliminated, the results of vascular brachytherapy will be improved.

Catheter-based 32P beta-radiation after stent implantation in porcine coronary arteries: role of source-centering and geographical miss

The present study examined the role of source-centering and geographical miss in vascular brachytherapy. After implantation of 13 mm long stents, 38 coronary arteries in 13 pigs were randomly assigned to centered brachytherapy (n = 13), eccentric brachytherapy (n = 13), or no radiation (n = 12). Geographical miss was avoided by careful placement of a 27 mm (32)P beta-radiation source. Restenosis was quantified by angiography, histomorphometry, and intravascular ultrasound at 28 days. Source-centering led to a significant (P < 0.001) reduction of in-stent area stenosis (centered radiation, 12% +/- 5%; eccentric radiation, 37% +/- 21%; control arteries, 41% +/- 13%). Despite 7 mm coverage of the edge segments, radiation was found to induce edge stenosis due to neointima formation and constrictive vascular remodeling. We conclude that centered radiation was superior to eccentric radiation in reducing in-stent luminal narrowing while radiation-induced edge stenosis was still observed despite extension of the radiation zone to 7 mm beyond the stent edges.

[Brachytherapy for coronary restenosis: state of art in 2003]

Based on therapeutic approach for benign diseases, vascular brachytherapy decreases smooth vascular muscle cells proliferation and multiplication which lead to the formation of the neo-intima. The radioactive positive action affects arterial recoil due to post angioplasty vessel injury. Randomised studies has shown good angiographic results up to 6 months of follow-up, with 50% in-stent restenosis rate decrease and on the analysed segment as well. Decrease on Mace and TLR show statistically significance. Results don't correlate with emitter and bêta emitters had been introduced in France recently. Vascular brachytherapy is actually indicated for in-stent restenosis, there is no evidence to perform this treatment for de novo lesion. Geographic miss, source centering, late thrombosis and pullback procedure may interfere with treatment quality. IVUS allows best target volume determination to a higher quality level. Internationals guidelines such as Eva-Gec-Estro recommendations could increase treatment safety and enable development of an optimal technique.

Geographical miss and restenosis during catheter-based intracoronary beta-radiation for de novo lesions

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the impact of geographical miss (GM) on restenosis rates after intracoronary beta-radiation therapy for de novo lesions.

BACKGROUND

GM is the situation in which injured vessel segments (VSs) are receiving low-dose radiation and is accounted for edge restenosis. Its impact on the overall restenosis rates remains to be determined.

METHODS

We analyzed 330 patients (356 vessels) treated according to the Beta Radiation in Europe (BRIE) and the Dose Finding study protocols. Using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), the effective irradiated segment (EIRS), its edges and the total VS were analysed. The edges of the EIRS that were injured constituted the GM edges. Restenosis was defined as diameter stenosis > 50% at follow-up. GM was determined by the simultaneous electrocardiographic-matched, side-by-side projection of the source and balloons deflated and surrounded by contrast, at the site of injury, in identical angiographic projections.

RESULTS

In 20.5% of the vessels, GM was non-interpretable due to inadequate filming. GM occurred at 30.4% of the interpretable edges and 53% of the interpretable vessels that were analysed. Edge restenosis was significantly increased in the GM compared to non-GM edges (13.16% vs. 4.17%, respectively, P = .001), both in the proximal (P = .03) and the distal (P = .001) edges. GM associated with stent injury significantly increased edge restenosis (P = .006). GM related to balloon injury tended to be associated with increment in edge restenosis (P = .07). The restenosis in the EIRS was similar between vessels with and without GM (17.78% and 14.85%, respectively, P = .6). GM was associated with significant increment in the restenosis at the analyzed VS (31.85% vs. 21.48%, P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

GM is strongly associated with edges and restenosis in the analysed VS. GM does not increase restenosis in the EIRS.