The Scope of Telemedicine in Kidney Transplantation: Access and Outreach Services

Real needs of end-stage kidney disease patients awaiting kidney transplantation in China: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the true needs of patients awaiting kidney transplantation in China through the language used by them. We addressed the literature gap concerning this critical aspect of patient care and counselling.

METHODS

We interviewed 32 individuals-22 who were on the waiting list for a kidney transplant and 10 were kidney transplant recipients. The obtained data were analysed using Colaizzi seven-step method.

RESULTS

Four themes encompassing 86 coded statements were identified and crosschecked with each participant for validation.The waiting period needs of the participants fell into four distinct categories: emotional support, informational, medical support, and social support needs.

CONCLUSION

We can determine the needs of patients by interpreting their linguistic cues with a nuanced understanding.Transplant professionals must (1) understand patients' needs from their perspective; (2) recognise the dynamic changes in their emotional support demands; and (3) determine each patient's informational needs, their willingness to receive medical support, and the current state of their social support.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Our results offer insights for transplant professionals to better support patients awaiting kidney transplantation, highlighting the need to routinely attend to their unmet emotional, informational, medical and social support needs. This will enable patients to better prepare for transplantation while anticipating the arrival of a matched kidney.

Health professional experiences of kidney transplantation in regional, rural, and remote Australia

BACKGROUND

Despite the demonstrated improved patient survival and financial benefits for health services with kidney transplantation compared to dialysis, populations outside of urban areas face inequities in access and a more difficult journey to kidney transplantation than their metropolitan counterparts. This study aimed to explore the experiences of Australian kidney transplant health professionals regarding kidney transplantation processes for patients residing in regional, rural, and remote areas, with a focus on improving access to and experiences of transplantation for this patient cohort.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Australian kidney transplant health professionals. Transcripts were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Interview participants (n = 26) consisted primarily of nephrologists from transplanting centres (15%), nephrologists from regional, rural, or remote non-transplanting centres (19%), clinical pharmacists (19%), and nursing staff (19%). Six main themes were identified regarding barriers to transplantation, including ineffective communication and education, overwhelming geographical burden, fighting for equal opportunities, paucity of social support, crushing financial peril, and deprived of adequate local care. Participants also made recommendations for new or modified service delivery models to address identified barriers, including coordination of work-up testing, outreach visits for transplant assessment, increased social and financial support, and increased and earlier provision of transplant education.

CONCLUSIONS

Health professionals described patient-specific and system level barriers to kidney transplantation for regional, rural, and remote populations in Australia that could be addressed or improved by the modification of current processes or implementation of new service delivery models for provision of transplant care.

Hybrid Telemedicine and In-Person Care for Kidney Transplant Follow-Up: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients are immunocompromised and require lifelong follow-up. Recipients face geographic, socioeconomic, and logistical challenges when seeking follow-up that can be alleviated using telemedicine. We aimed to understand patient experiences and preferences regarding telemedicine video visits and highlight insights to advance adopting hybrid telemedicine/in-person transplant care.

METHODS

We conducted qualitative in-depth, semi-structured interviews with kidney transplant recipients between November 18, 2022, and January 11, 2023. Participants had follow-up at ≥12 months post-transplant via telemedicine at a tertiary transplant center. Study enrollment continued until data saturation was reached (n = 20 participants) when no new information emerged from additional interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participants median age was 58 years (IQR, 52-72), and 50% were female, 45% were White, 30% were Black, 15% were Asian, 10% were Hispanic/Other persons, and 30% were out-of-state residents. We identified the following seven themes: (1) reducing travel time, (2) minimizing financial burden (decreasing travel-related expenses and lost wages), (3) engaging patients within their comfort space, (4) establishing rapport with patients, (5) limitations of the virtual physical exam, (6) enhancing access to transplant providers (maximizing adherence to follow-up), and (7) lowering risk of communicable diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating telemedicine with in-person visits enhances post-transplant follow-up care. A hybrid model should leverage the strengths of both modalities, ensuring patient access to care and being patient-centered and flexible. Efforts are needed to advance technological tools in physical examination and human connection, and assess patient outcomes. Policymakers and healthcare systems need to incentivize the adoption and expansion of telemedicine in transplant care.

Self-Management of Kidney Transplant Recipients Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis

Objective

This study analyzes research trends in self-management among kidney transplant recipients to inform future directions.

Methods

Bibliometric analysis was performed on 444 English articles related to self-management of kidney transplant recipients in the Core Collection of Web of Science and Scopus databases using COOC 12.8, R software, Microsoft Excel 2019, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace, with a focus on citation ranking, publication year, journal, country, organization, author, impact factor, and keywords.

Results

Four hundred and forty-four English articles revealed the United States as the leading publisher on kidney transplant recipient self-management. Norway's University of Oslo was the most productive institution, with Mirjam Tielen as the most prolific author and SCHÄFER-KELLER as the most influential. Belgium's research was most cited. Emerging hotspots included medication adherence, quality of life, psychological aspects, telemedicine, and health literacy in self-management research.

Conclusion

This study has identified the most influential articles concerning the self-management of kidney transplant recipients, documented the pivotal journals in the field, and noted the most prolific countries, organizations, and authors contributing to the literature, as well as highlighted upcoming research trends. Going forward, the research in kidney transplant recipient self-management should explore the full potential of interdisciplinary integration, particularly by incorporating telemedicine into self-management education. Future efforts should also be directed towards refining the existing post-transplant follow-up management systems and enhancing lifelong care for kidney transplant recipients. Concurrently, there is a need to improve health literacy and self-management capabilities among these patients, with the ultimate goal of improving their prognosis.

Referral and Beyond: Restructuring the Kidney Transplant Process to Support Greater Access in the United States

Advocates for improved equity in kidney transplants in the United States have recently focused their efforts on initiatives to increase referral for transplant evaluation. However, because donor kidneys remain scarce, increased referrals are likely to result in an increasing number of patients proceeding through the evaluation process without ultimately receiving a kidney. Unfortunately, the process of referral and evaluation can be highly resource-intensive for patients, families, transplant programs, and payers. Patients and families may incur out-of-pocket expenses and be required to complete testing and treatments that they might not have chosen in the course of routine clinical care. Kidney transplant programs may struggle with insufficient capacity, inefficient workflow, and challenging programmatic finances, and payers will need to absorb the increased expenses of upfront pretransplant costs. Increased referral in isolation may risk simply transmitting system stress and resulting disparities to downstream processes in this complex system. We argue that success in efforts to improve access through increased referrals hinges on adaptations to the pretransplant process more broadly. We call for an urgent re-evaluation and redesign at multiple levels of the pretransplant system in order to achieve the aim of equitable access to kidney transplantation for all patients with kidney failure.

Transition of care from pediatric to adult nephrology post-renal transplant: a review

Pediatric renal transplant recipients (RTRs) face heightened risks when they transition from a childhood nephrologist to an adult-centered one. The transition of care usually occurs when an individual is between ages 18 and 21 years, although some change providers earlier or later depending on varying circumstances. Turbulence during this shift can significantly impact daily life and, in severe cases, lead to graft loss. Several modern studies have explored the transition from pediatric to adult-centered nephrology care post-renal transplant. In this review, we first provide an overview of the differences between pediatric and adult renal transplant, highlighting unique challenges faced by pediatric patients such as donor-recipient size disparity, growth impairment, and need for additional immunizations. We then emphasize the criticality of a well-planned transition process, identifying factors that can hinder a smooth transition-such as medical and medication nonadherence, lack of health literacy, patient psychosocial challenges, and systemic shortcomings in coordination between care teams. Furthermore, this review outlines existing protocols and risk assessment tools, in addition to highlighting recent advancements aimed at facilitating smoother transitions such as the RISE protocol, readiness assessment, and the use of multidisciplinary teams. Proper implementation of coordinated, evidence-based transition protocols can improve patient outcomes, promote medication and appointment adherence, and reduce graft rejection rates. Efforts from multidisciplinary teams utilizing technology, risk stratification tools, and open communication between providers and patients are key to optimizing the transition process for pediatric RTRs as they transfer to adult-centered care.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Kidney Transplantation - A 2024 Update

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has led to the death of about 7 million people worldwide. When infected, older individuals and those with diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and compromised immune system are at higher risk for unfavorable outcomes. These comorbidities are prevalent in kidney transplant candidates and recipients making them inherently vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, hence, the significant burden the pandemic has exerted on kidney transplant programs. With the swift discovery and wide-scale availability of vaccines and therapeutics against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the pandemic is currently behind us allowing transplant programs to relieve their restrictions and resume normal pre-COVID-19 operations. In the aftermath of the pandemic, we discuss the implications for immunosuppression and vaccination, COVID-19-induced kidney injury phenotypes and long COVID-19 symptoms. We also discuss some of the operational aspects the pandemic brought about - mainly the utilization of telemedicine - that are now here to stay.

Evaluation and Long-Term Follow-Up of Living Kidney Donors

The evaluation of living kidney donor candidates is a complex and lengthy process. Donor candidates face geographic and socioeconomic barriers to completing donor evaluation. Inequities in access to living donations persist. With a growing demand for kidney transplants and a shortage of living donors, transplant centers are more permissive of accepting less-than-ideal donor candidates. Donors have an increased lifetime risk of kidney failure, but the absolute risk increase is small. Efforts are needed to support donor candidates to complete donor nephrectomy safely and efficiently and receive optimal follow-up care to prevent risk factors for kidney disease and detect complications early. In this article, the authors address key elements of donor kidney evaluation, including current living donation policy requirements and transplant center practices. The authors present a simplified comprehensive practical approach to help guide providers in completing donor evaluation and follow-up care with best outcomes possible.

Seasonal Patterns of Living Kidney Donation in the United States From 1995 to 2019

BACKGROUND

The number of living kidney donors in the United States has declined since 2005, with variations based on the donor-recipient relationship. The reasons for this decline are unclear, and strategies to mitigate declined donations remain elusive. We examined the change in donor number monthly (within-year) versus annually (between-years) to inform potentially modifiable factors for future interventions.

METHODS

In this registry-based cohort analysis of 141 759 living kidney donors between 1995 and 2019, we used linear mixed-effects models for donor number per month and year to analyze between-year and within-year variation in donation. We used Poisson regression to quantify the change in the number of donors per season before and after 2005, stratified by donor-recipient relationship and zip-code household income tertile.

RESULTS

We observed a consistent summer surge in donations during June, July, and August. This surge was statistically significant for related donors (incidence rate ratio [IRR] range: 1.12-1.33) and unrelated donors (IRR range: 1.06-1.16) across donor income tertiles.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate lower rates of living kidney donation in non-summer months across income tertiles. Interventions are needed to address barriers to donation in non-summer seasons and facilitate donations throughout the year. Since the Organ Donor Leave Law provides a solid foundation for supporting year-round donation, extending the law's provisions beyond federal employees may mitigate identified seasonal barriers.

Donor Perceptions and Preferences of Telemedicine and In-Person Visits for Living Kidney Donor Evaluation

Introduction

Living kidney donor evaluation is a lengthy and complex process requiring in-person visits. Access to transplant centers, travel costs, lost wages, and dependent care arrangements are barriers to willing donors initiating evaluation. Telemedicine can help streamline and epedite the evaluation process. We aimed to deeply understand donor experiences and preferences using hybrid telemedicine video/in-person visits to ease access to donor evaluation or counseling.

Methods

We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with donors or donor candidates who completed their evaluation through telemedicine/in-person, or in-person only visits at a tertiary transplant center between November 27, 2019 and March 1, 2021. Enrollment continued until data saturation was reached (interviews with 20 participants) when no new information emerged from additional interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Eight themes were identified as follows: (i) reducing financial and logistical burdens (minimizing travel time and travel-related expenses), (ii) enhancing flexibility with scheduling (less time off work and child or family caregiver arrangements), (iii) importance of a walkthrough and establishing shared understanding, (iv) supporting information with technology and visual aids, (v) key role of the coordinator, (vi) preferred visit by provider role (meeting donor surgeon in-person to create rapport and engaging primary care provider in donor evaluation/follow-up), (vii) comparing modality differences in human connection, and (viii) opportunity for family and support network engagement (allowing loved ones to be involved in telemedicine visits irrespective of geographic locations and pandemic restrictions).

Conclusion

Telemedicine/in-person hybrid model can make donor evaluation more accessible and convenient. Our findings help inform about determinants that influence the adoption of telemedicine to initiate donor evaluation to motivate willing donors. In addition, our results call for policy and legislation that support telemedicine services for living donor kidney transplantation across states.

Expanding the access to kidney transplantation: Strategies for kidney transplant programs

Kidney transplantation is the most successful kidney replacement therapy available, resulting in improved recipient survival and societal cost savings. Yet, nearly 70 years after the first successful kidney transplant, there are still numerous barriers and untapped opportunities that constrain the access to transplant. The literature describing these barriers is extensive, but the practices and processes to solve them are less clear. Solutions must be multidisciplinary and be the product of strong partnerships among patients, their networks, health care providers, and transplant programs. Transparency in the referral, evaluation, and listing process as well as organ selection are paramount to build such partnerships. Providing early culturally congruent and patient-centered education as well as maximizing the use of local resources to facilitate the transplant work up should be prioritized. Every opportunity to facilitate pre-emptive kidney transplantation and living donation must be taken. Promoting the use of telemedicine and kidney paired donation as standards of care can positively impact the work up completion and maximize the chances of a living donor kidney transplant.

The impact of COVID-19 on kidney transplant care

The SARS-CoV-2 virus precipitated the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which placed considerable strain on healthcare systems and necessitated immediate and rapid alterations in the delivery of healthcare. In the transplant population, COVID-19 directly impacts an inherently vulnerable population in the setting of immunosuppression and co-morbidities, but also further complicates the clinical evaluation and management of kidney transplant candidates and recipients in a strained healthcare environment being challenged by the pandemic. Many transplant centers around the world saw mortality rate spikes in organ recipients related to COVID-19, and changes in care delivery abound. This review evaluates the care of the kidney transplant patient through all phases of the process including pre-operative evaluations, perioperative care, post-transplantation considerations, and how the global pandemic has changed the way we care for our patients.

Changing landscape of living kidney donation and the role of telemedicine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There has been a decline in living kidney donation over the last two decades. Donors from low-income families or racial/ethnic minorities face greater disproportionate geographic, financial, and logistical barriers to completing lengthy and complex evaluations. This has contributed to the decreased proportion of these subgroups. The authors view telemedicine as a potential solution to this problem.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the initial decline of donors in 2005, biologically related donors have experienced a lack of growth across race/ethnicity. Conversely, unrelated donors have emerged as the majority of donors in recent years across race/ethnicity, except for unrelated black donors. Disparities in access to living kidney donation persist. Telemedicine using live-video visits can overcome barriers to access transplant centers and facilitate care coordination. In a U.S. survey, nephrologists, surgeons, coordinators, social workers, and psychologists/psychologists across transplant centers are favorably disposed to use telemedicine for donor evaluation/follow-up beyond the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. However, with the waning of relaxed telemedicine regulations under the Public Health Emergency, providers perceive payor policy and out-of-state licensing as major factors hindering telemedicine growth prospects.

SUMMARY

Permanent federal and state policies that support telemedicine services for living kidney donation can enhance access to transplant centers and help overcome barriers to donor evaluation.

Telemedicine services for living kidney donation: A US survey of multidisciplinary providers

Individuals considering living kidney donation face geographic, financial, and logistical challenges. Telemedicine can facilitate healthcare access/care coordination. Yet difficulties exist in telemedicine implementation and sustainability. We sought to examine centers' practices and providers' attitudes toward telemedicine to improve services for donors. We surveyed multidisciplinary providers from 194 active adult US living donor kidney transplant centers; 293 providers from 128 unique centers responded to the survey (center representation rate = 66.0%), reflecting 83.9% of practice by donor volume and 91.5% of US states/territories. Most centers (70.3%) plan to continue using telemedicine beyond the pandemic for donor evaluation/follow-up. Video was mostly used by nephrologists, surgeons, and psychiatrists/psychologists. Telephone and video were mostly used by social workers, while video or telephone was equally used by coordinators. Half of respondent nephrologists and surgeons were willing to accept a remote completion of physical exam; 68.3% of respondent psychiatrists/psychologists and social workers were willing to accept a remote completion of mental status exam. Providers strongly agreed that telemedicine was convenient for donors and would improve the likelihood of completing donor evaluation. However, providers (65.5%) perceived out-of-state licensing as a key policy/regulatory barrier. These findings help inform practice and underscore the instigation of policies to remove barriers using telemedicine to increase living kidney donation.