Cancer incidence among US Medicare ESRD patients receiving hemodialysis, 1996-2009

Impact of dialysis on intravesical recurrence and survival outcomes in upper tract urothelial cancer patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy

BACKGROUND

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) presents a significant recurrence risk following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Patients on dialysis may experience unique clinical trajectories due to uremic states and altered immune responses.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of dialysis on intravesical recurrence and survival outcomes in patients with UTUC undergoing RNU, and to identify predictive factors influencing prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study analyzed 402 patients with non-metastatic UTUC treated with RNU between 2001 and 2014. Patients were stratified into dialysis (n = 66) and non-dialysis (n = 336) groups. Survival and recurrence outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Dialysis patients were predominantly female, younger, and exhibited less advanced pathological tumor stages. Dialysis was associated with higher intravesical recurrence rates (p = 0.009), which were largely attributable to a history of bladder cancer (42.4% vs. 26.5%; p = 0.009). After adjustment for bladder cancer history, dialysis was not an independent predictor of bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS). Advanced pT stages (HR: 3.9, p = 0.012) and prior bladder cancer were the primary factors influencing BRFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Dialysis does not independently worsen surgical outcomes or BRFS in UTUC patients post-RNU when accounting for prior bladder cancer. Prognostic models should integrate these findings to enhance individualized surveillance and treatment strategies.

Dialysis and the risk of early urological cancer: A nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are predisposed to a higher risk of developing malignancies. This study aimed to explore the association between chronic dialysis with ESRD treated and the subsequent development of urothelial cell carcinoma or renal cell carcinoma (UC/RCC). Data spanning 13 years were retrieved from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 11,820 patients with ESRD undergoing maintenance dialysis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2013, and 35,460 controls matched for sex, age, and index year, were identified. After adjusting for confounding factors, Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to compare the risk of UC/RCC during the 13-year follow-up period, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the cumulative UC/RCC incidence between the ESRD and non-ESRD cohorts. The average time before developing UC/RCC was 4.18 years after dialysis initiation in the ESRD group compared to 5.39 years in the control group. After adjusting for sex, age, monthly income, urbanization level, geographic region, and comorbidities, the hazard ratio for UC/RCC was 1.186 (95% confidence interval, 1.071-1.448; P = .005). Stratified by age, the odds ratios (ORs) for developing UC/RCC were 2.105, 1.498, 1.371, and 0.925 among patients with ESRD aged 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and ≥ 70 years, respectively. Stratification by comorbidities revealed ORs of 1.204, 1.179, 1.186,1.172, 1.211, and 1.210 for patients without diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, obesity, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hematuria, respectively. The mean time to UC/RCC occurrence was 4.18 years after dialysis. Furthermore, younger male patients undergoing dialysis with fewer comorbidities were at higher risk of developing UC/RCC. Early or more intensive surveillance for urological cancers post-dialysis initiation is recommended for patients undergoing dialysis with longer life expectancies or a higher likelihood of undergoing renal transplantation.

Incidence of major urological cancers in patients on dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated an elevated risk of urological malignancies in individuals undergoing dialysis, which consequently leads to unfavorable prognoses and diminished quality of life for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Nevertheless, the absence of standardized recommendations for cancer screening and limited utilization of conventional screening methods within the dialysis population remain prevalent issues.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted on cohort studies published prior to June 2024, aiming to quantify the cancer risk among individuals undergoing dialysis. Random-effects meta-analyses were employed to combine standardized incidence rates (SIRs) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals, considering a p-value of less than 0.05 or an I² value exceeding 50%. Subgroup analyses, heterogeneity tests, and sensitivity analyses were performed as well.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies, consisting of 12 cohort studies, were ultimately identified, encompassing a collective patient population of 1,362,196 individuals. Compared to the general population, the pooled SIRs for all cancers except non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), major urological cancers (MUCs), cancers of the kidney/renal pelvis, bladder cancers and prostate cancers were 1.40 (95% CI: 1.28-1.54), 1.76 (95% CI: 1.45-2.14), 4.73 (95% CI: 3.96-5.64), 1.89 (95% CI: 1.61-2.21) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.79-1.11), respectively. The cancer risk was notably elevated in specific subgroups of women, younger patients (age at first dialysis, 0-34 years), during the initial year of dialysis, and among Asian patients. SIRs differed when considering different primary renal diseases. However, high heterogeneity was observed among the studies investigating cancers during dialysis, while this heterogeneity did not have a substantial impact on the pooled SIRs for overall cancer, as determined through sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the general population, the dialysis population had a significantly increased risk of developing urological malignancies, particularly cancers of the kidney/renal pelvis. Our findings indicate a substantial increase in risks among female, young, Asian patients, during the first year of dialysis and highlight variations in SIRs based on primary renal disease. These results suggest the potential for adopting a more personalized approach to cancer screening in chronic dialysis patients. Given the considerable heterogeneity observed, further rigorous investigations are warranted to enhance our understanding in this area.

Testis and penile cancers in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review of epidemiology, treatment options and oncological outcomes by the EAU-YAU Penile and Testis Cancer Working Group

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant (KT) recipients are at an elevated risk of developing de novo cancers. However, penile (PeCa) and testis cancers have received limited attention in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the epidemiology, treatment options, and oncological outcomes of penile and testis cancer in KT recipients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a systematic review of prospective, retrospective and national transplant registries studies published up to December 2023. Data on the incidence of penile and testis cancers among KT recipients, diagnostic protocols, screening recommendations, and therapeutic strategies tailored for KT recipients were collected. The risk of bias (RoB) of included studies was determined using the Newcastle and Ottawa scale.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 21 studies involving 67924 KT male recipients were included. PeCa was diagnosed in 33 patients, yielding an incidence ranging from 0.04% to 0.3%. Additionally, 67 cases of testicular cancer were recorded, with an incidence ranging from 0.03% to 0.55%. Most tumors were localized, and histology variants were uncommon. While the surgical treatment of the primary tumor remains consistent with that of the general population, the use of radiotherapy and cytotoxic treatments are less frequently reported in this setting. These therapies should be considered on an individualized basis to minimize the risk of graft injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Penile and testis cancers are relatively uncommon among KT recipients. General screening protocols and deviation from current treatment guidelines are not recommended in localized diseases. Given the risk of graft damage, any non-cytotoxic option should be preferred in locally advanced cases.

Renal cell carcinoma and upper tract urothelial carcinoma in kidney transplant recipients

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common solid-organ malignancy in Western countries, and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is the most common malignancy in Asian countries. The management of RCC/UTUC in kidney transplant recipients is complex and clinically challenging due to post-transplant modifications associated with immunosuppressive treatment. This retrospective study evaluated the incidence, risk factors, treatment outcomes, and oncological implications of RCC and UTUC in kidney transplant recipients from 2008 to 2023. Data were collected from clinical records, and follow-up calls for 20 patients diagnosed with RCC and UTUC among 2,283 kidney transplant recipients, revealing an incidence rate of 0.78% for RCC (18 patients) and 0.087% (two patients) for UTUC. Most patients presented localized disease at diagnosis. Surgical interventions included radical nephrectomy for the native kidney's RCC, radical or partial nephrectomy for allograft RCC, and radical nephroureterectomy for UTUC in the native kidney and allograft. Oncological outcomes indicated a mean follow-up of 51.29 months, during which five patients (25%) developed metastases, which achieved prolonged survival through surgical management, adjuvant therapy, and immunosuppression adjustments. The study highlights the increased cancer risk in this population and underscores the necessity for established screening protocols and individualized treatment strategies to optimize patient outcomes while preserving kidney function. These findings contribute to the ongoing research on managing malignancies in transplant recipients, with implications for further research and clinical guidelines.

Combination Treatment With Intravenous and Oral Calcimimetics for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Hemodialysis Patients Who Decline Parathyroidectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common and serious complication in patients on hemodialysis (HD), leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Parathyroidectomy (PTx) is an established treatment for refractory SHPT, but many patients refuse this surgical option. This study evaluates the efficacy of combination treatment using intravenous and oral calcimimetics in managing SHPT in patients who decline PTx. This study aimed to assess the impact of combination calcimimetic treatment on plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, mineral metabolism, and clinical outcomes in patients on hemodialysis with SHPT who refuse PTx.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved seven patients on HD with refractory SHPT who declined PTX. They were treated with various combinations of intravenous (etelcalcetide or upacicalcet), oral (cinacalcet or evocalcet) calcimimetics, and vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs), with or without denosumab. Clinical outcomes, including changes in plasma PTH levels, mineral metabolism, and adverse events, were monitored over a period ranging from 10 to 100 months.

RESULTS

Combination treatment significantly reduced plasma PTH levels in all patients (median reduction from 379 pg/mL to 193 pg/mL). No gastrointestinal complications were reported, confirming the tolerability of the regimen. However, two patients developed renal cancer, and one patient died from cardiovascular disease, highlighting the complex comorbidities in this population. These findings underscore the effectiveness of combination calcimimetics in managing SHPT in patients who refuse surgery, although careful monitoring for adverse events is necessary.

CONCLUSION

The combination of intravenous and oral calcimimetics is an effective therapeutic option for managing SHPT in patients on HD who refuse PTX. While promising, the long-term safety and potential risks of this approach, including the occurrence of malignancies, warrant further investigation in larger prospective studies.

Multiple metabolic analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with kidney disease

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with kidney disease by using multiple metabolic parameters.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of 182 kidney disease patients and 32 controls was conducted. Patients were categorized into acute kidney disease (AKD), AKI on CKD (A/C), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) groups, further divided by CKD stage and disease etiology. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn in renal cortex, liver, aorta, and lesions. SUVmax and SUVmean were measured, and ratios of renal cortex SUVmax to liver and blood pool SUVmean were calculated.

Results

Abnormal FDG uptake was observed in 84.6 % of patients, with significantly higher SUVmax in malignant versus benign lesions. Common malignancies included multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and lung cancer. PET/CT had 89.5 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity for tumor detection. SUVs differed significantly among AKD, A/C, CKD, and normal groups. Significant differences in SUVmax and SUVmean were also found between CKD stages and primary versus secondary kidney diseases. In CKD, increased SUVmax and SUVmean correlated with lower serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, and increased eGFR.

Conclusion

For patients with kidney disease, [18F]FDG PET/CT can be used to systematically screen tumors and inflammatory lesions. And the [18F]FDG uptake of renal cortex may distinguish different types of kidney diseases and is correlated with renal function.

Risk Factors Predictive of Contralateral Recurrence of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Include Chronic Kidney Diseases and Postoperative Initiation of Dialysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the impact of dialysis on patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who are undergoing surgical intervention, as well as to identify predictive factors linked to contralateral recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for non-metastatic UTUC at our institution from 2000 to 2013. The contralateral recurrence rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to examine the relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and contralateral recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 593 patients were included in this analysis, of which 31 (5.8%) experienced metachronous recurrence on the contralateral side. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a statistically significant reduction in the contralateral recurrence-free survival rate among female patients (p = 0.040), those with a prior history of bladder cancer (p < 0.001), individuals presenting with multiple tumors (p = 0.011), patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p < 0.001), and those requiring postoperative dialysis (p < 0.001). In contrast, preoperative hemodialysis status did not show a significant correlation with contralateral recurrence (p = 0.08). The multivariate analysis identified a history of bladder cancer (hazard ratio (HR), 3.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-8.4; p = 0.018), the necessity for new hemodialysis postoperatively (HR, 5.34; 95% CI, 1.3-25.6; p = 0.034), and advanced CKD (HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.4-4.9; p = 0.021) as independent risk factors associated with an increased rate of contralateral recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, advanced CKD, a history of bladder cancer, and the initiation of new dialysis following surgery were identified as independent prognostic indicators for contralateral recurrence in patients with initial unilateral UTUC undergoing RNU. It is recommended that patients exhibiting these three adverse characteristics undergo rigorous monitoring of the contralateral upper urinary tract throughout the follow-up period.

Perioperative Considerations in Older Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: A Review

With the growth of the older adult population, the number of older adults waitlisted for and undergoing kidney and liver transplantation has increased. Transplantation is an important and definitive treatment for this population. We present a contemporary review of the unique preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative issues that patients older than 65 y face when they undergo kidney or liver transplantation. We focus on geriatric syndromes that are common in older patients listed for kidney or liver transplantation including frailty, sarcopenia, and cognitive dysfunction; discuss important considerations for older transplant recipients, which may impact preoperative risk stratification; and describe unique challenges in intraoperative and postoperative management for older patients. Intraoperative challenges in the older adult include using evidence-based best anesthetic practices, maintaining adequate perfusion pressure, and using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Postoperative concerns include controlling acute postoperative pain; preventing cardiovascular complications and delirium; optimizing immunosuppression; preventing perioperative kidney injury; and avoiding nephrotoxicity and rehabilitation. Future studies are needed throughout the perioperative period to identify interventions that will improve patients' preoperative physiologic status, prevent postoperative medical complications, and improve medical and patient-centered outcomes in this vulnerable patient population.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Management of kidney cancer

OBJECTIVE

To update the French recommendations for the management of kidney cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted for the period from 2014 to 2024. The most relevant articles concerning the diagnosis, classification, surgical treatment, medical treatment, and follow-up of kidney cancer were selected and incorporated into the recommendations. The recommendations have been updated specifying the level of evidence (strong or weak).

RESULTS

Kidney cancer following prolonged occupational exposure to trichloroethylene should be considered an occupational disease. The reference examination for the diagnosis and staging of kidney cancer is the contrast-enhanced thoraco-abdominal CT scan. PET scans are not indicated in the staging of kidney cancer. Percutaneous biopsy is recommended in situations where its results will influence therapeutic decisions. It should be used to reduce the number of surgeries for benign tumors, particularly avoiding unnecessary radical nephrectomies. Kidney tumors should be classified according to the pTNM 2017 classification, the WHO 2022 classification, and the ISUP nucleolar grade. Metastatic kidney cancers should be classified according to IMDC criteria. Surveillance of tumors smaller than 2cm should be prioritized and can be offered regardless of patient age. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is the reference surgical treatment for T1 tumors. Ablative therapies and surveillance are options for elderly patients with comorbidities for tumors larger than 2cm. Stereotactic radiotherapy is an option to discuss for treating localized kidney tumors in patients not eligible for other treatments. Radical nephrectomy is the first-line treatment for locally advanced localized cancers. Pembrolizumab is recommended for patients at high risk of recurrence after surgery for localized kidney cancer. In metastatic patients, cytoreductive nephrectomy can be immediate in cases of good prognosis, delayed in cases of intermediate or poor prognosis for patients stabilized by medical treatment, or as "consolidation" in patients with complete or major partial response at metastatic sites after systemic treatment. Surgical or local treatment of metastases can be proposed for single lesions or oligometastases. Recommended first-line drugs for metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma are combinations of axitinib/pembrolizumab, nivolumab/ipilimumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib, and lenvatinib/pembrolizumab. Patients with non-clear cell metastatic kidney cancer should be presented to the CARARE Network and prioritized for inclusion in clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

These updated recommendations are a reference that will enable French and French-speaking practitioners to optimize their management of kidney cancer.

Thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgical treatment with the same incisions in a patient with uremia complicated with large thymoma and right upper lobe lung cancer: a case report

A 41 year old female with stage 5 chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis was admitted to the hospital. Chest CT scan revealed a large mass lesion of approximately 6.0 × 3.5x4.9 cm in size in the anterior superior mediastinum and a ground glass nodule in the upper lobe of the right lung, which increased in size from 9 × 7 mm 1 year and 9 months ago to 11mmx9mm before surgery. We designed a localization method to accurately locate the pulmonary nodule and successfully performed thoracoscopic minimally invasive resection of both thymoma and lung cancer through a subxiphoid approach with the same incision for this patient. With the support of perioperative hemodialysis, the patient's outcome is good. The pathological diagnosis of the anterior mediastinal mass is thymoma (b1 type), and the pathological diagnosis of the right upper lobe nodule is invasive lung adenocarcinoma (acinar type). This report describes the diagnosis and treatment process of the case.

Is End-Stage Renal Disease Tumor Suppressive? Dispelling the Myths

The prevalence of end-stage renal disease is increasing worldwide. Malignancies accompanying end-stage renal disease are detected in approximately 120 individuals per 10,000 person-years. Most studies have suggested that end-stage renal disease causes carcinogenesis and promotes tumor development; however, this theory remains questionable. Contrary to the theory that end-stage renal disease is predominantly carcinogenic, recent findings have suggested that after controlling for biases and sampling errors, the overall cancer risk in patients with end-stage renal disease might be lower than that in the general population, except for renal and urothelial cancer risks. Additionally, mortality rates associated with most cancers are lower in patients with end-stage renal disease than in the general population. Several biological mechanisms have been proposed to explain the anticancer effects of end-stage renal disease, including premature aging and senescence, enhanced cancer immunity, uremic tumoricidal effects, hormonal and metabolic changes, and dialysis therapy-related factors. Despite common beliefs that end-stage renal disease exacerbates cancer risk, emerging evidence suggests potential tumor-suppressive effects. This review highlights the potential anticancer effects of end-stage renal disease, proposing reconsideration of the hypothesis that end-stage renal disease promotes cancer development and progression.

The risk of solid organ tumors in patients with chronic kidney disease: A narrative review of literature

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been correlated with certain pathological conditions such as cardiovascular diseases and other renal-related dysfunctions. Some other reports suggested an association between CKD and the development of certain solid cancers. Therefore, we aimed to generate this narrative review to present the available literature on the risk of solid cancer development in CKD patient populations. We explored the associations between CKD, organ transplantation, and the development of specific solid organ tumors such as kidney, thyroid, lung, breast, bladder, gastric, and prostate cancers. In conclusion, the previous reports showed an increase in the risk of certain solid cancers such as kidney, lung, bladder, and possibly breast cancer in CKD patients and transplant recipients. On the other hand, thyroid, gastric, and prostate cancers showed unclear association with CKD. Despite the suggested impact of smoking and immunosuppression on the development of cancers in CKD patients, more studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism and the risk factors that might be related to the development of cancer in CKD patients.

Systemic oncological therapy in breast cancer patients on dialysis

The advancement of renal replacement therapy has significantly enhanced the survival rates of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) over time. However, this prolonged survival has also been associated with a higher likelihood of cancer diagnoses among these patients including breast cancer. Breast cancer treatment typically involves surgery, radiation, and systemic therapies, with approaches tailored to cancer type, stage, and patient preferences. However, renal replacement therapy complicates systemic therapy due to altered drug clearance and the necessity for dialysis sessions. This review emphasizes the need for optimized dosing and administration strategies for systemic breast cancer treatments in dialysis patients, aiming to ensure both efficacy and safety. Additionally, challenges in breast cancer screening and diagnosis in this population, including soft-tissue calcifications, are highlighted.

Chronic kidney disease and risk of kidney or urothelial malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent, affecting approximately 11% of US adults. Multiple studies have evaluated a potential association between CKD and urinary tract malignancies. Summary estimates of urinary tract malignancy risk in CKD patients with and without common co-existing conditions may guide clinical practice recommendations.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched for original cohort studies evaluating the association between CKD and urinary tract cancers (kidney cancer and urothelial carcinoma) through 25 May 2023, in persons with at least moderate CKD and no dialysis or kidney transplantation. Quality assessment was performed for studies meeting inclusion criteria using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed for unadjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) as well as adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for confounding conditions (diabetes, hypertension and/or tobacco use), shown to have association with kidney cancer and urothelial carcinoma. Sub-analysis was conducted for estimates associated with CKD stages separately.

RESULTS

Six cohort studies with 8 617 563 persons were included. Overall, the methodological quality of the studies was good. CKD was associated with both higher unadjusted incidence and adjusted hazard of kidney cancer (IRR 3.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.32-4.88; aHR 2.04, 95% CI 1.77-2.36) and urothelial cancer (IRR 3.96, 95% CI 2.44-6.40; aHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.22-1.50) compared with persons without CKD. Examining incident urinary tract cancers by CKD severity, risks were elevated in stage 3 CKD (kidney aHR 1.89, 95% CI 1.56-2.30; urothelial carcinoma aHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.20-1.52) as well as in stages 4/5 CKD (kidney cancer aHR 2.30, 95% CI 2.00-2.66; urothelial carcinoma aHR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Even moderate CKD is associated with elevated risk of kidney cancer and urothelial carcinoma. Providers should consider these elevated risks when managing individuals with CKD, particularly when considering evaluation for the presence and etiology of hematuria.

Are patients with primary glomerular disease at increased risk of malignancy?

Over the past decade, several observational studies and case series have provided evidence suggesting a connection between glomerular diseases and the development of malignancies, with an estimated risk ranging from 5 to 11%. These malignancies include solid organ tumours as well as haematologic malignancies such as lymphoma and leukaemia. However, these risk estimates are subject to several sources of bias, including unmeasured confounding from inadequate exploration of risk factors, inclusion of glomerular disease cases that were potentially secondary to an underlying malignancy, misclassification of glomerular disease type and ascertainment bias arising from an increased likelihood of physician encounters compared with the general population. Consequently, population-based studies that accurately evaluate the cancer risk in glomerular disease populations are lacking. While it is speculated that long-term use of immunosuppressive medications and glomerular disease activity measured by proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate may be associated with cancer risk in patients with glomerular disease, the independent role of these risk factors remains largely unknown. The presence of these knowledge gaps could lead to a lack of awareness of cancer as a potential chronic complication of glomerular disease, underutilization of routine screening practices in clinical care that allow early diagnosis and treatment of malignancies and underrecognition of modifiable risk factors to decrease the risk of de novo malignancies over time. This review summarizes the current evidence on the risk of cancer in patients with glomerular diseases, explores the limitations of prior studies and discusses methodological challenges and potential solutions for obtaining accurate estimates of cancer risk and identifying modifiable risk factors unique to GN populations.

Case report: Treatment with Phesgo® in a patient receiving hemodialysis

Introduction

Patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer have multiple therapeutic options. However, most are not studied in the renal replacement therapy (RRT) setting.

Case report

We report the use of Phesgo® (subcutaneous fixed-dose combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab) combined with exemestane as a first-line treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in a hemodialysis patient with multiple comorbidities. Partial response was attained, with disease progression after 8 months without evidence of significant toxicity.

Discussions

This case report is, to our knowledge, the first published case documenting the use of Phesgo® in a hemodialysis patient. No new safety signs were seen, and activity was documented, adding support to the use of this drug combination in such a patient population.

Lack of Association Between Immunotherapy and Improvement of Survival for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Hemodialysis: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The number of patients undergoing hemodialysis continues to increase globally, and the incidence of cancer is high among these patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are widely used in patients with advanced cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, their effectiveness in hemodialysis patients is poorly documented.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from a nationwide database. Patients diagnosed with NSCLC, undergoing hemodialysis, and who started chemotherapy between September 2008 and January 2023 were included. In the intention to treat (ITT) analysis, patients were divided into immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and conventional chemotherapy group, and in the chronological analysis, patients were divided into 2 groups before and after ICI approval. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards analyses. A propensity score approach was applied to address confounding factors, and analyses were performed by weighting each patient with the inverse of the estimated propensity score.

RESULTS

We identified 322 and 389 patients in the ITT and chronological analyses respectively. In both analyses, there were no notable difference of OS between 2 groups (P values by log-rank test 0.933 and 0.248, respectively). The hazard ratios for OS were 0.980 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.678-1.415) in the ITT analysis and 0.805 (95% CI: 0.531-1.219) in the chronological analysis.

CONCLUSION

The ICI treatment and approval were not significantly associated with improvement of survival in patients with NSCLC undergoing hemodialysis.

Removal rate of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in patients on hemodialysis: a report of two cases of colorectal cancer patients with end-stage renal failure

PURPOSE

Hyperammonemia is a serious adverse effect of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) administration. Hemodialysis can be used for its management, but detailed data on the concentrations and removal rate of 5FU and its metabolites during hemodialysis remain unclear. Here, we present two cases of hemodialysis patients with end-stage renal disease who received concurrent 5FU infusion.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from the hemodialysis circuit before and after the dialyzer during day 2 hemodialysis sessions, and from the internal shunt just before and after day 4 hemodialysis sessions. The serum levels of 5FU and its metabolites-α-fluoro-β-alanine (FBAL) and monofluoroacetate (FA)-were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Seven sets of blood samples were collected for case 1; the removal rates (mean ± standard deviation) of 5FU and FBAL by the dialyzer were 81.2 ± 23.2% and 96.1 ± 8.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Three sets of blood samples were collected for case 2; the removal rates of 5FU and FBAL were 81.7 ± 3.9% and 94.8 ± 2.7%, respectively (p = 0.03). Twenty-seven sets of blood samples were collected for case 1; reductions in blood FBAL and FA levels were 49.3 ± 8.8% (p < 0.001) and 64.2 ± 30.3% (p = 0.04), respectively. Bayesian estimation yielded similar results. Three sets of blood samples were collected for case 2; reductions in the blood FBAL and FA levels were 49.9 ± 6.9% and 50.6 ± 33.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this study, 5FU and its metabolite FBAL were directly removed from the blood by approximately 90% during hemodialysis, and the blood levels of FBAL and FA were reduced by approximately 50% with a single hemodialysis session.

Current Trends and Future Directions of Malignancy After kidney Transplantation: A 1970-2022 Bibliometric Analysis

BACKGROUND Malignancy after kidney transplantation (MKT) remains a leading cause of death in transplant recipients and over the past few decades there have been many reports on this topic. However, the task of extracting crucial information from intricate events poses a significant challenge in guiding clinical work. Hence, bibliometrics was employed to summarize and predict the future in this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS Reviews and articles on MKT were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and were analyzed by the software VOSviewer, CiteSpace, Scimago Graphica, and R package Bibliometrix for bibliometric analysis. RESULTS The analysis considered 5700 publications from 28 647 authors and 4924 institutions across 100 countries, spanning the years 1970-2022. Reference co-citation analysis showed that "renal cell carcinoma", "skin cancer", "post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder" and "COVID-19 vaccine" were research hotspots. Keywords that co-occurred early were "immunosuppressant", "cancer", "Epstein-Barr virus", "squamous cell carcinoma", and "infection", etc., while "impact","risk factor", "outcomes", "mortality", "management" frequently co-occurred later. From 2020 to 2022, newly emerging keywords such as "SARS-CoV-2" and "COVID-19", together with citation bursts for "immune checkpoint inhibitors" and "ipilimumab," were observed. CONCLUSIONS The focus of MKT-related studies has evolved from exploring the spectrum, risk factors, and outcomes of MKT, to examining the pathogenesis, individualized screening, prevention, and treatment, including appropriate use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Reports of renal transplant recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 have also gained attention since 2019. These suggest that individualized management remains a frontier for research and a future direction in MKT topics.

Chapter 4: CKD treatment in cancer survivors, from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Kidney Injury During Anticancer Drug Therapy 2022

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most disabling disorders with significant comorbidity and mortality. Incidence and prevalence of CKD in cancer survivors are remarkably high in both adults and pediatric patients. The reasons for this high incidence/prevalence are multifold but kidney damage by cancer itself and cancer treatment (pharmacotherapy/surgery/radiation) are the main reasons. Since cancer survivors commonly have significant comorbidities, risk of cancer recurrence, limited physical function or life expectancy, special attentions should be paid when considering the treatment of CKD and its complications. Especially, shared decision-making should be considered when selecting the renal replacement therapies with as much information/facts/evidence as possible.

Chapter 1: Evaluation of kidney function in patients undergoing anticancer drug therapy, from clinical practice guidelines for the management of kidney injury during anticancer drug therapy 2022

The prevalence of CKD may be higher in patients with cancer than in those without due to the addition of cancer-specific risk factors to those already present for CKD. In this review, we describe the evaluation of kidney function in patients undergoing anticancer drug therapy. When anticancer drug therapy is administered, kidney function is evaluated to (1) set the dose of renally excretable drugs, (2) detect kidney disease associated with the cancer and its treatment, and (3) obtain baseline values for long-term monitoring. Owing to some requirements for use in clinical practice, a GFR estimation method such as the Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, CKD-EPI, and the Japanese Society of Nephrology's GFR estimation formula has been developed that is simple, inexpensive, and provides rapid results. However, an important clinical question is whether they can be used as a method of GFR evaluation in patients with cancer. When designing a drug dosing regimen in consideration of kidney function, it is important to make a comprehensive judgment, recognizing that there are limitations regardless of which estimation formula is used or if GFR is directly measured. Although CTCAEs are commonly used as criteria for evaluating kidney disease-related adverse events that occur during anticancer drug therapy, a specialized approach using KDIGO criteria or other criteria is required when nephrologists intervene in treatment. Each drug is associated with the different disorders related to the kidney. And various risk factors for kidney disease associated with each anticancer drug therapy.

Clinical outcomes between elderly ESKD patients under peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: a national cohort study

With ageing populations, new elderly end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) cases rise. Unlike younger patients, elderly ESKD patients are less likely to undergo kidney transplant, and therefore the decision of receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) is more crucial. A total of 36,852 patients, aged more than 65, who were newly diagnosed with ESKD and initiated renal replacement therapy between 2013 and 2019 were identified. These patients were categorized into two groups: the PD group and the HD group according to their long-term renal replacement treatment. After propensity score matching, the PD group (n = 1628) displayed a lower incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (10.09% vs. 13.03%, hazard ratio (HR): 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.83), malignancy (1.23% vs. 2.14%, HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.40-0.76), and MACCE-associated mortality (1.35% vs. 2.25%, HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.84) compared to the HD group (n = 6512). However, the PD group demonstrated a higher rate of infection (34.09% vs. 24.14%, HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.20-1.37). The risks of all-cause mortality and infection-associated mortality were not different. This study may provide valuable clinical information to assist elderly ESKD patients to choose HD or PD as their renal replacement therapy.

Comparison of the risks of renal cell carcinoma or urothelial cancer between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients

PURPOSE

This study is to compare risks of developing renal cell carcinoma or urothelial cancer between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

METHODS

The age-, sex-, and index year-matched patients with newly diagnosed end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis [HD (N = 22,587) or PD (N = 11,547)] from 2000 to 2015 in Taiwan were identified. Patients were followed until the development of renal cell carcinoma or urothelial cancer, renal transplantation, death, or the end of follow-up (December 31, 2017). The hazard ratio (HR), and sub-hazards ratio (SHR), in which death was considered as a competing risk, of developing renal cell carcinoma or urothelial cancer were compared between the HD and PD patients.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of renal cell carcinoma was higher in the PD group than in age-, sex-, and index year-matched HD group (11.5 versus 5.52 per 10,000 person-years), with an adjusted HR of 2.15 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.59, 2.92), and an adjusted SHR of 1.97 (95% CI = 1.46, 2.67). The incidence rate of urothelial cancer was also higher in the PD group than in corresponding HD group (40.3 and 34.0 per 10,000 person-years), with an adjusted HR of 1.15 (95% CI = 1.00, 1.33) and an adjusted SHR of 1.08 (95% CI = 0.94, 1.25). These findings were further validated in propensity score-matched dialysis cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

ESKD patients undergoing PD are at a higher risk of developing renal cell carcinoma than those on HD, but risks of developing urothelial cancer are similar among the two groups.

Chronic kidney diseases and the risk of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

We conducted this review to offer a comprehensive search and up-to-date overview of the currently available information about the probability risk of colorectal cancer among chronic kidney disease patients.

Method

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) and meta-analysis guidelines. We identified, reviewed, and extracted from Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, and Komaki Databases for research publications on chronic kidney disease and colorectal cancer published between February 2016 and January 2023. We meta-analyzed the prevalence of colorectal cancer with chronic kidney disease. We ran a random effect meta-regression. Risk-of-bias assessment was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023400983).

Results

The risk of CRC in chronic kidney diseases was reported in 50 research studies, which included 4,337,966 people from 16 different countries. SIR of CRC was obtained from 14 studies and showed a significant relationship between CRC with CKD patients, with a pooled SIR of 1.33; 95% CI (1.30-1.36), with higher heterogeneity (Q = 121.82, P < 0.001, and I2 = 86.9%). Metaregression showed that there was no significant correlation between the risk of CRC and the proportion of males or age.

Conclusion

Overall, this study shows that patients with chronic kidney disease have a significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer. More studies with larger sample sizes, and robust surveillance are needed.

Association between Serum C-Reactive Protein Concentrations and Risk of Cancer-Related Mortality in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: 10-Year Outcomes of the Q-Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Cancer constitutes a major source of morbidity and mortality among people undergoing hemodialysis (HD). A systemic inflammatory response is associated with the incidence and prognosis of cancer in the general population. However, the effect of systemic inflammation on cancer-related mortality in patients undergoing HD remains unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed 3,139 patients registered in the Q-Cohort Study, which is a multicenter, observational cohort study of patients on hemodialysis in Japan. The primary outcome was cancer-related mortality during a 10-year follow-up. The covariate of interest was serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations at baseline. The patients were divided into tertiles based on their serum CRP concentrations at baseline (tertile [T] 1: ≤0.07; T2: 0.08-0.24; and T3: ≥0.25). The association between serum CRP concentrations and cancer-related mortality was calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model and the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards model with non-cancer-related death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

During the 10-year follow-up, 216 patients died of cancer. In the multivariable analysis, the risk of cancer-related mortality in the highest tertile (T3) of serum CRP concentrations was significantly higher than that in the lowest tertile (T1) (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.68 [1.15-2.44]). This association remained consistent in the competing risk model, in which the subdistribution hazard ratio was 1.47 and the 95% confidence interval was 1.00-2.14 for T3 compared with T1.

CONCLUSION

Higher serum CRP concentrations are associated with an increased risk of cancer-related mortality in patients undergoing maintenance HD.

Meta-analysis of cancer risk among end stage renal disease undergoing maintenance dialysis

Currently, there is no consensus on whether maintenance dialysis increases cancer risk in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Therefore, this study was to systematically evaluate the risk of cancer among ESRD patients undergoing maintenance dialysis. Related studies on the impact of maintenance dialysis on cancer risk were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other databases from their respective inceptions to 19 February 2021. ESRD patients receiving maintenance dialysis were classified into cancer including non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and cancer excluding NMSC. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated to assess cancer risk. Fourteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of cancer in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis (with or without NMSC) was significantly higher than controls both in cancer including NMSC (SIR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.27-1.49, P < 0.001) and cancer excluding NMSC (SIR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.23-1.47, P < 0.001). Subgroup results identified the higher risk of cancer incidence in both men and women receiving maintenance dialysis. Meanwhile, elevated excess risks were observed among patients with younger age and shorter follow-up time (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the combined SIR of bladder, cervix, colorectum, kidney, liver, thyroid, tongue, and other cancers were all increased (P < 0.05). ESRD patients undergoing dialysis has higher risk of cancer.

Genomic features of renal cell carcinoma developed during end-stage renal disease and dialysis

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or receiving dialysis have a much higher risk for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but carcinogenic mechanisms and genomic features remain little explored and undefined. This study's goal was to identify the genomic features of ESRD RCC and characterize them for associations with tumor histology and dialysis exposure. In this study, we obtained 33 RCCs, with various histological subtypes, that developed in ESRD patients receiving dialysis and performed whole-genome sequencing and transcriptome analyses. Driver events, copy-number alteration (CNA) analysis and mutational signature profiling were performed using an analysis pipeline that integrated data from germline and somatic SNVs, Indels and structural variants as well as CNAs, while transcriptome data were analyzed for differentially expressed genes and through gene set enrichment analysis. ESRD related clear cell RCCs' driver genes and mutations mirrored those in sporadic ccRCCs. Longer dialysis periods significantly correlated with a rare mutational signature SBS23, whose etiology is unknown, and increased mitochondrial copy number. All acquired cystic disease (ACD)-RCCs, which developed specifically in ESRD patients, showed chromosome 16q amplification. Gene expression analysis suggests similarity between certain ACD-RCCs and papillary RCCs and in TCGA papillary RCCs with chromosome 16 gain identified enrichment for genes related to DNA repair, as well as pathways related to reactive oxygen species, oxidative phosphorylation and targets of Myc. This analysis suggests that ESRD or dialysis could induce types of cellular stress that impact some specific types of genomic damage leading to oncogenesis.

Appraisal of lung cancer survival in patients with end-stage renal disease

INTRODUCTION

The survival outcome of lung cancer patients with end-stage renal disease has been poorly studied in the literature. In this study, we evaluated the effect of end-stage renal disease on lung cancer survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter, matched-cohort study of lung cancer patients with end-stage renal disease under renal replacement therapy (WITH-ESRD) and without end-stage renal disease (WITHOUT-ESRD) was performed. One WITH-ESRD patient was matched to four WITHOUT-ESRD patients.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics did not differ statistically significantly after matching between the WITH-ESRD and WITHOUT-ESRD groups. WITH-ESRD included 133 patients and WITHOUT-ESRD included 532 patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated no significant difference in median overall survival between WITH-ESRD patients and WITHOUT-ESRD patients (7.36 months versus 12.25 months, respectively, p = 0.133). Lung cancer WITH-ESRD patients receiving medical treatment had a median overall survival of 5.98 months (95% CI: 4.34-11.76) compared to 14.13 months (95% CI: 11.30-16.43) for WITHOUT-ESRD patients, p = 0.019. Although patients receiving surgical treatment compared to those receiving medical treatment had an improvement of survival by 46% (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.19-1.53, p = 0.243), the difference did not reach statistical significance. Cox regression analysis revealed that male gender and stage IIIA-IV were independent factors associated with poor outcome for WITH-ESRD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our limited experience, the survival for lung cancer with ESRD is not inferior to lung cancer patients without ESRD. The reasons for poor survival for the WITH-ESRD medical treatment group and late diagnosis despite frequent medical visits merit further investigation.

Durable effect of pyrotinib plus capecitabine in HER-2+ breast cancer patient undergoing peritoneal dialysis: A case report and literature review

For patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) are important renal replacement treatments. Patients on dialysis usually have a high incidence rate of malignant tumors. In 2020, breast cancer has become the malignant tumor with the highest incidence rate in the world. Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive (HER-2+) breast cancer accounts for 20%-30% of the total breast cancer patients. It is highly invasive and has a poor prognosis. Anti-HER-2 treatment is an important therapy for this type of cancer. There are few case reports of anti-HER2-targeted therapy in dialysis patients. We report a 56-year-old Chinese woman with breast cancer (cT3N1MX, Her-2+/HR-). She underwent peritoneal dialysis for 11 years since she had suffered end-stage renal disease. The clinician prescribed the regimen (pyrotinib 320mg qd + capecitabine 1g bid D1-D14 Q3W). The tumor was significantly reduced after 1 month of single administration of pyrotinib, and partially relieved after 2 months of pyrotinib + capecitabine. The main side effects were grade II hand foot syndrome and grade II diarrhea. This case shows that the combination of pyrotinib and capecitabine has potential therapeutic benefits in HER-2+ breast cancer patients with end-stage renal disease.

Cancer Mortality in People Receiving Dialysis for Kidney Failure: An Australian and New Zealand Cohort Study, 1980-2013

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Cancer is a significant cause of morbidity in the population with kidney failure; however, cancer mortality in people undergoing dialysis has not been well described. We sought to compare cancer mortality in people on dialysis for kidney failure with cancer mortality in the general population.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study using linked health-administrative and dialysis registry data.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

All people receiving dialysis represented in the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplantation Registry, 1980-2013.

EXPOSURE

Dialysis; hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD).

OUTCOME

Death and underlying cause of death ascertained using health administrative data and classified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) codes.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Indirect standardization on age at death, sex, year, and country to estimate standardized mortality ratios (SMR).

RESULTS

Over 269,598 person years of observation, 34,100 deaths occurred among 59,648 people on dialysis, including 3,677 cancer deaths. The relative risk of all-site cancer death in dialysis was twice (SMR, 2.4 [95% CI, 2.33-2.49]) that of the general population and highest for oral and pharynx cancers (SMR, 24.3 [95% CI, 18.0-31.5]) and multiple myeloma (SMR, 22.5 [95% CI, 20.3-23.9]). Women on dialysis had a significantly higher risk of all-site cancer mortality (SMR, 2.7 [95% CI, 2.59-2.89]) compared with men (SMR, 2.3 [95% CI, 2.17-2.36]) (P < 0.001). People on HD (SMR, 2.2 [95% CI, 2.11-2.30]) experienced greater excess deaths from all-site cancer compared with people on PD (SMR, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.23-1.44]). Excess deaths have gradually decreased over time for all-site, multiple myeloma, and kidney cancers (P < 0.001) but have not kept up with improvements in the general population. By contrast, among people receiving dialysis, excess deaths increased for colorectal and lung cancers (P < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

Confirmation of cancer diagnoses and population incidence data were not available; inability to exclude pre-existing cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

People on dialysis experience excess all-site and site-specific cancer mortality compared with the general population. Mortality differs by modality type, age, and sex. Understanding the role of kidney failure and other morbidities in the treatment of cancer is important for shared decision-making regarding cancer treatments and identifying potential approaches to improve outcomes.

Whole-exome sequencing identified mutational profiles of urothelial carcinoma post kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation is a lifesaving option for patients with end-stage kidney disease. In Taiwan, urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common de novo cancer after kidney transplantation (KT). UC has a greater degree of molecular heterogeneity than do other solid tumors. Few studies have explored genomic alterations in UC after KT. We performed whole-exome sequencing to compare the genetic alterations in UC developed after kidney transplantation (UCKT) and in UC in patients on hemodialysis (UCHD). After mapping and variant calling, 18,733 and 11,093 variants were identified in patients with UCKT and UCHD, respectively. We excluded known single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and retained genes that were annotated in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC), in the Integrative Onco Genomic cancer mutations browser (IntOGen), and in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database of genes associated with bladder cancer. A total of 14 UCKT-specific genes with SNPs identified in more than two patients were included in further analyses. The single-base substitution (SBS) profile and signatures showed a relative high T > A pattern compared to COMSIC UC mutations. Ingenuity pathway analysis was used to explore the connections among these genes. GNAQ, IKZF1, and NTRK3 were identified as potentially involved in the signaling network of UCKT. The genetic analysis of posttransplant malignancies may elucidate a fundamental aspect of the molecular pathogenesis of UCKT.

Immunotherapy and the Spectrum of Kidney Disease: Should We Individualize the Treatment?

The new targeted cancer therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been demonstrated to improve the survival of oncological patients, even in cases of metastatic cancer. In the past 5 years, several studies have revealed that ICI can produce several immune-mediated toxicities involving different organs, such as the skin, the gastrointestinal tract, the liver, and, of course, the kidney. The most frequent lesion of immunotoxicity in the kidney is acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), although other nephropathies have also been described as a consequence of the use of ICI, such as glomerulonephritis and acute thrombotic microangiopathy, among others. In addition, kidney rejection has also been reported in kidney transplant patients treated with ICI. Normally randomized clinical trials with ICI exclude patients with end-stage kidney disease, namely, patients undergoing dialysis and kidney transplant patients. Several important questions need to be addressed in relation to immunotherapy and patients with kidney disease: (a) when to start corticosteroid therapy in a patient with suspected acute kidney injury (AKI) related to ICI, (b) the moment of nephrologist referral and kidney biopsy indication, (c) management of ICI in patients undergoing dialysis, and (d) the effect of ICI in kidney transplantation, immunosuppressive personalized treatment, and risk of allograft rejection in kidney transplant patients. The objective of this review was to summarize the recently published literature on a wide spectrum of kidney disease patients with cancer and ICI. This review will address three main important groups of individuals with kidney disease and cancer immunotherapy, AKI associated with ICI, patients undergoing dialysis, and kidney transplant recipients. We believe that the information provided in this review will enlighten the personalized ICI treatment in individuals with a broader spectrum of kidney diseases.

Update on imaging in chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder: promising role of functional imaging

Disorders of mineral metabolism and bone disease are common complications in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Bone biopsies, bone scintigraphy, biochemical markers, and plain films have been used to assess bone disorders and bone turnover. Of these, functional imaging is less invasive than bone/marrow sampling, more specific than serum markers and is therefore ideally placed to assess total skeletal metabolism. ¹⁸F-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/CT is an excellent bone-seeking agent superior to conventional bone scan in CKD patients due to its high bone uptake, rapid single-pass extraction, and minimal binding to serum proteins. Due to these properties, ¹⁸F-NaF can better assess the skeletal metabolism on primary diagnosis and following treatment in CKD patients. With the increased accessibility of PET scanners, it is likely that PET scanning with bone-specific tracers such as ¹⁸F-NaF will be used more regularly for clinical assessment and quantitation of bone kinetics. This article describes the pattern of scintigraphic/functional appearances secondary to musculoskeletal alterations that might occur in patients with CKD.

Renal Cell Carcinoma in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Review and Update

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) occurring in the setting of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) shows unique clinicopathological characteristics. The two most frequent types of ESRD-associated RCC are acquired cystic kidney disease-associated renal cell carcinoma (ACKD-RCC) and clear-cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (ccpRCC). Other types of RCC also occur in ESRD, albeit with different frequencies from the non-ESRD general population. The histological features of RCC do not vary in the setting of ESRD vs. non-ESRD, yet other findings, such as multifocality and multiple tumor types, are more frequent in ESRD. Studies have generated novel and important knowledge of the etiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, immunophenotype, and molecular characteristics of ESRD-associated RCC. Knowledge of these data is important for both pathologists and other physicians who may encounter ESRD patients with RCC. This review presents a comprehensive summary and update of the literature on RCC in ESRD, with a focus on the two most frequent types, ACKD-RCC and ccpRCC.

The Effect of Statins in Cancer Risk Reduction in Patients on Dialysis: A Population-Based Case-Control Study

Simple Summary

The lifetime risk of several cancers is elevated in patients receiving dialysis following kidney failure compared with the general population. Using a large dataset available in Taiwan, we conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study to delineate the relationship between statin use and cancer risk in patients on dialysis. Our study provides an association that statins reduce the risk of malignancy in patients on dialysis, especially with a longer treatment duration, and irrespective of the type of statin prescription. The use of statins in patients on dialysis was associated with significantly lower incidences in developing respiratory, soft tissue and connective tissue, breast, gynecological, prostate, central nervous system, and lymphatic and hematopoietic cancer.

Abstract

Background: To realize whether statins reduce the risk of cancer in susceptible dialysis populations, this study analyzed the relationship between statin use and cancer risk in patients on dialysis. Methods: Patients having a history of chronic kidney disease with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis and receiving statin prescriptions or not were enrolled. The main outcome was cancer diagnosis. This study used univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Results: In total, 4236 individuals in the statin group and 8472 individuals in the statin nonuser group were included in the study. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that statin users are significantly less likely to develop cancer than statin nonusers (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–0.90). Subgroup analyses revealed that statin cumulative defined daily doses >365 were associated with a significantly decreased risk of cancer incidence (adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45–0.87), and statin users have a reduced risk of respiratory, soft tissue and connective tissue, breast, gynecological, prostate, central nervous system, and lymphatic and hematopoietic cancer than nonusers. Conclusions: Our population-based cohort study provides an association that statins reduce the risk of malignancy in patients on dialysis, especially with a longer treatment duration, and certain types of cancer.

Treatment Strategy for Dialysis Patient with Urothelial Carcinoma

To investigate postoperative complications and oncologic outcomes of prophylactic nephroureterectomy and/or cystectomy in dialysis patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC), we retrospectively reviewed the records of dialysis patients with UC and a final status of complete urinary tract extirpation (CUTE, i.e., the removal of both kidneys, ureters, and bladder) between January 2004 and December 2015. Patients undergoing dialysis after initial radical nephroureterectomy and/or cystectomy were excluded. Eighty-four and 27 dialysis patients, undergoing one-stage and multi-stage CUTE, were enrolled in this study, respectively. Demographic, medical, perioperative, and pathologic features were collected to determine variables associated with oncologic outcomes. Although there was no significant difference in mortality between the 2 groups (p = 0.333), all 5 (4.5%) patients with Clavien-Dindo grade 5 complications were from the one-stage CUTE group. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, advanced age (p = 0.042) and high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (p = 0.000) were related to postoperative major complications. Compared with multi-stage CUTE, one-stage CUTE had no overall, cancer-specific, and recurrence-free survival benefits (all p > 0.05). According to multivariate analysis with Cox regression, age > 70 years (HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.2-6.12; p = 0.017), CCI ≥ 5 (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.01-4.63; p = 0.048), and bladder cancer stage ≥ 3 (HR 12.4, 95% CI 1.82-84.7; p = 0.010) were independent, unfavorable prognostic factors for the overall survival. One-stage CUTE is not associated with superior oncologic outcomes, and all perioperative mortalities in our series occurred in the one-stage CUTE group. Our data do not support prophylactic nephroureterectomy and/or cystectomy for uremic patients with UC.

Pretherapeutic screening for Dihydropyrimidine deshydrogenase deficiency in measuring uracilemia in dialysis patients leads to a high rate of falsely positive results

BACKGROUND

Pretherapeutic screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is recommended prior to the administration of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. However, the best strategy to identify DPD deficiency in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients is unknown.

METHODS

We assessed the characteristics of both DPD phenotypes and DPYD genotypes in 20 dialyzed patients before and after dialysis session. The extent to which the concentrations of uracil [U] and dihydrouracil [UH₂] were affected by dialysis was evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean [U] was 14 ± 3.3 ng/ml before the dialysis session, and 7.9 ± 2.7 ng/ml after. Notably, mean [U] in 119 non-ESRD patients during the same timeline was 8.7 ± 3.9 ng/ml, which is similar to [U] values after dialysis session (p = 0.38). [U] values > 16 ng/ml were measured in 4 ESRD patients (20%), whereas the rate was 3.3% in the non-ESRD cohort. Whole gene sequencing did not reveal DPYD deleterious allelic variants in the 4 ESRD patients with [U] values > 16 ng/ml. The profile of [UH2] values during dialysis was similar to that of [U]: 385 ± 86 ng/ml before, and 185 ± 62 ng/ml after (mean reduction rate 42.5%). Thus, [UH2]:[U] ratio remained unaffected by dialysis, and was similar to the values in non-ESRD patients (22.4 ± 7.1).

CONCLUSION

Phenotyping based on measuring plasma [U] before a dialysis sessions in ESRD patients is associated with an unacceptable high rate of false positives. The optimal strategy for the identification of patients with DPD deficiency in this population would be the monitor the [UH₂]:[U] ratio, which remains unaffected.

Cancer Screening in End-Stage Kidney Disease

The incidence of cancer is higher in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) than among the general population. Despite this, screening for cancer is generally not cost-effective and may worsen quality of life in these patients. This is due to high mortality rates (patients are not living long enough to reap the benefits of screening), the inaccuracy of cancer screening tests, and the increased risks associated with therapy in patients with ESKD. Specific groups of patients with ESKD who have a longer-than-expected life expectancy or higher-than-expected cancer risk may benefit from screening. These groups include patients on peritoneal dialysis, patients on home hemodialysis, Black and Asian-American patients, transplant-eligible patients, and those at higher risk of cancer including patients with acquired cystic kidney disease, those who have been previously exposed to cytotoxic agents or aristolochic acid, and patients with a genetic predisposition to cancer. In this narrative review, we will examine the prevalence of and risk factors for cancer in patients with ESKD and the effectiveness of cancer screening, and discuss specific situations in which cancer screening may be effective.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in patients with end-stage kidney disease: an analysis of reported cases and literature review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), immunomodulatory antibodies that are used to enhance the immune system, have substantially improved the prognosis of patients with advanced malignancy. As the use of ICI therapy becomes increasingly widespread across different types of cancer, their use in patients receiving dialysis is likely to increase. In this review we summarize the current literature on the use of ICIs in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients and provide aggregate data from reported cases and series. Based on available pharmacological information, ICIs require no dosing adjustment in ESKD patients. Analysis of the reported cases in the literature demonstrates a similar incidence of immune-related adverse events in patients with ESKD receiving dialysis as compared with the general population (49%). Severe reactions graded as 3 and 4 have been seen in 15 patients (16%). As such, it is important that these patients are monitored very closely for immune-related adverse events; however, the risk of these adverse events should not preclude patients on dialysis from receiving these therapies. Cancer remission (complete and partial) was seen in close to 30% of patients, stable disease was seen in 28% and progression of disease in ∼36%. One-third of the patients died. Urothelial and renal cell cancer represented approximately half of all treated cancers and accounted for ∼50% of all deaths reported. Additional data in the dialysis population with the use of ICIs and involvement in prospective studies are needed to better assess outcomes, particularly within specific cancer types.

Risk of Kidney Failure in Patients With Cancer: A South Korean Population-Based Cohort Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Reduced kidney function is associated with an increased risk of cancer; however, it is unclear if cancer increases the risk of kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT). We assessed the risk of KFRT among patients with various types of cancer collectively and with specific types of cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective population-based cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2,473,095 participants with (n = 824,365) or without (n = 1,648,730) cancer registered in the Korean National Health Insurance Service database.

PREDICTORS

Cancer and cancer subtypes defined using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification, codes.

OUTCOMES

Primary outcome was KFRT defined as the initiation of hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis or kidney transplantation.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

For each patient with cancer, 2 controls matched for age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, and hypertension were included. To address the competing risk of death, a competing risk survival analysis was conducted using the Fine and Gray method.

RESULTS

Occurrence of KFRT was higher in patients with cancer than in controls without cancer (incidence rates of 1.07 vs 0.51 cases per 1,000 person-years). Competing risk analysis showed that cancer was significantly associated with an increased risk of KFRT after adjusting for other potential predictors (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.29 [95% CI, 2.20-2.39]). Multiple myeloma, leukemia, lymphoma, and kidney, ovarian, and liver cancer were most significantly associated with an increased KFRT risk, with multiple myeloma conferring the highest risk across age and sex groups. All subgroups of patients with cancer (based on age, sex, smoking, alcohol, exercise, obesity, and comorbid conditions) exhibited a higher risk of KFRT.

LIMITATIONS

Causal association between cancer and kidney outcomes could not be confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cancer, particularly those with multiple myeloma, exhibited an increased risk of KFRT after accounting for the competing risk of death.

Short-term Outcomes of Liver Resection in Patients With Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

The number of patients with hemodialysis is increasing increased yearly. Few reports are available on hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal surgery in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 222 patients who underwent partial liver resection or segmentectomy in our hospital between January 2015 and September 2019 were included in this study. Patients were divided into the hemodialysis group (n=9) and non-hemodialysis group (n=213).

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in postoperative complications between the hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis group. The hemodialysis group had a significantly higher infectious complication rates than the non-hemodialysis group (33.3% vs. 8.0%, p=0.009). In logistic regression analysis, hemodialysis was only a significant risk factor for postoperative infectious complications (OR=5.61, 95% CI=1.12-28.20, p=0.036).

CONCLUSION

Liver resections, at least segmentectomy or smaller, is acceptable in patients on hemodialysis. However, these patients may have a higher risk of postoperative infectious complications than other patients.

Tumor Recurrence and Graft Survival in Renal Transplant Recipients with a History of Pretransplant Malignancy: A Matched Pair Analysis

Organ scarcity demands critical decision-making regarding eligible transplant candidates and graft allocation to ensure best benefit from renal transplantation (RTx). Among the controversial relative contraindications is a history of pretransplant malignancy (PTM). While oncological outcomes of PTM-RTx recipients are well described, data on graft-specific outcome are scarce. A retrospective double case control matched pair analysis (60 months follow-up) was carried out and RTx-recipients were stratified for history of PTM. First, PTM-RTx recipients were matched according to age, sex and duration of immunosuppressive therapy. Next, PTM-RTx recipients were matched 1:1 for age, sex and cause of end-stage renal disease. Five-year patient and graft survival as well as oncological outcomes were analyzed. A total of 65 PTM-RTx recipients were identified. Post-RTx recurrence rate was 5%, while 20% developed second de novo malignancy, comparable to 14% in the control group. PTM-RTx recipients had a noticeable lower five-year death-censored as well as overall graft survival and Cox proportional hazard modeling showed a correlation between PTM and inferior graft survival. Although underlying reasons remain not fully understood, this study is the first to show inferior graft survival in PTM-RTx recipients and advocates necessity to focus on more meticulous graft monitoring in PTM recipients in addition to heightened surveillance for cancer recurrence.

Ramipril and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: The ARCADIA Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD. We evaluated the cardioprotective effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

In this phase 3, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, parallel, multicenter trial, we recruited patients on maintenance hemodialysis with hypertension and/or left ventricular hypertrophy from 28 Italian centers. Between July 2009 and February 2014, 140 participants were randomized to ramipril (1.25-10 mg/d) and 129 participants were allocated to non-RAS inhibition therapy, both titrated up to the maximally tolerated dose to achieve predefined target BP values. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Secondary end points included the single components of the primary end point, new-onset or recurrence of atrial fibrillation, hospitalizations for symptomatic fluid overload, thrombosis or stenosis of the arteriovenous fistula, and changes in cardiac mass index. All outcomes were evaluated up to 42 months after randomization.

RESULTS

At comparable BP control, 23 participants on ramipril (16%) and 24 on non-RAS inhibitor therapy (19%) reached the primary composite end point (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.64; P=0.80). Ramipril reduced cardiac mass index at 1 year of follow-up (between-group difference in change from baseline: -16.3 g/m2; 95% confidence interval, -29.4 to -3.1), but did not significantly affect the other secondary outcomes. Hypotensive episodes were more frequent in participants allocated to ramipril than controls (41% versus 12%). Twenty participants on ramipril and nine controls developed cancer, including six gastrointestinal malignancies on ramipril (four were fatal), compared with none in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Ramipril did not reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

ARCADIA, NCT00985322 and European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database number 2008-003529-17.

Monographic consultation of onconephrology. Rationale and implementation

The increase in demand for medical care for renal complications associated with neoplastic diseases is a reality in most nephrology departments. In response to this overall situation, the creation of healthcare models such as monographic consultations and develop training programs in Onconephrology could improve the care of these patients. Through an exploratory and descriptive study, we identified current situation of kidney involvement in cancer patients. The objective of the present study is to establish the criteria for specific assistance in the field of Onconephrology. For this, we have reviewed key aspects and analyzed the current situation in our country, through a survey addressed to all nephrologists through the Spanish Society of Nephrology., together with the experience of two Spanish centers. From this information, we have established some requirements and recommendations for the start-up of these consultations.

Prognosis of hemodialysis patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer: Results of a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the survival outcomes of and predictive factors for survival in hemodialysis patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective study from 9 institutions to investigate the survival outcomes of 75 hemodialysis patients with gastric cancer. Patient characteristics included demographic data, hemodialysis- and gastric cancer-related variables. Multivariate Cox hazards models were applied to determine independent predictors of poor overall survival and non-gastric cancer related death.

RESULTS

Stage I disease was predominant (58.7%) in our series. The overall morbidity and the 30-day mortality rates were 25.3% and 1.3%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with pStages I, II, III, and IV disease were 59.2%, 42.9%, 32.3%, and 0%, respectively. Eleven (14.7%) patients died of gastric cancer, whereas many more (40.0%) died owing to causes other than gastric cancer. Non-gastric cancer-related death was especially prevalent in patients with pStages I (95.2%) and II (75.0%) disease. Multivariable analysis revealed advanced age, long duration of hemodialysis (> 5 years), total gastrectomy, and pStage IV disease to be independently associated with poor overall survival. Notably, advanced age, long duration of hemodialysis, and the presence of cardiovascular disease were all independent predictors of non-gastric cancer-related death. Patients with all 3 factors had very poor survival outcomes (3-year overall survival; 14.3%).

CONCLUSION

The survival outcomes of hemodialysis patients with gastric cancer, especially those with early-stage gastric cancer, were clearly poor, largely owing to the increased risk of non-gastric cancer-related death. Preoperative comorbidities and hemodialytic features were useful for predicting long-term outcomes of this vulnerable population.