Creatinine Versus Cystatin C for Estimating GFR in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis

Impact of the choice of biomarkers and equations to estimate kidney function on the epidemiology of chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The CKD-EPI equations were updated in 2021 to remove the race variable from eGFR estimation. In the same year, the creatinine-based EKFC equation was published, subsequently supplemented by the cystatin C-based EKFC equation. Recent findings suggest that the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) can vary depending on the equation, the biomarker, and the population studied.

RECENT FINDINGS

Using the CKD-EPI2021 equation instead of the CKD-EPI2009 equation results in an increased prevalence of CKD among Black individuals in the U.S. and a decreased prevalence among non-Blacks. The CKD-EPI equations may underestimate the prevalence of CKD in India and in some sub-Saharan African populations. This is corrected by using the EKFC equation and dedicated Q-values. In general, the prevalence of CKD is slightly higher with EKFC than with the CKD-EPI equations. The CKD-EPIcys equation generally leads to a higher CKD prevalence than the CKD-EPIcrea equations. Few epidemiological data are available for EKFCcys.

SUMMARY

The choice of biomarkers and equations has an impact on the prevalence of CKD, with implications that also depend on the characteristics of the population being studied.

KDOQI US Commentary on the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of CKD

The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) convened a work group to review the 2024 KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guideline for the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The KDOQI Work Group reviewed the KDIGO guideline statements and practice points and provided perspective for implementation within the context of clinical practice in the United States. In general, the KDOQI Work Group concurs with several recommendations and practice points proposed by the KDIGO guidelines regarding CKD evaluation, risk assessment, and management options (both lifestyle and medications) for slowing CKD progression, addressing CKD-related complications, and improving cardiovascular outcomes. The KDOQI Work Group acknowledges the growing evidence base to support the use of several novel agents such as sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for several CKD etiologies, and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for type 2 CKD in setting of diabetes. Further, KDIGO guidelines emphasize the importance of team-based care which was also recognized by the work group as a key factor to address the growing CKD burden. In this commentary, the Work Group has also assessed and discussed various barriers and potential opportunities for implementing the recommendations put forth in the 2024 KDIGO guidelines while the scientific community continues to focus on enhancing early identification of CKD and discovering newer therapies for managing kidney disease.

Panel estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): Statistical considerations for maximizing accuracy in diverse clinical populations

Assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is critical for diagnosis, staging, and management of kidney disease. However, accuracy of estimated GFR (eGFR) is limited by large errors (>30% error present in >10-50% of patients), adversely impacting patient care. Errors often result from variation across populations of non-GFR determinants affecting the filtration markers used to estimate GFR. We hypothesized that combining multiple filtration markers with non-overlapping non-GFR determinants into a panel GFR could improve eGFR accuracy, extending current recognition that adding cystatin C to serum creatinine improves accuracy. Non-GFR determinants of markers can affect the accuracy of eGFR in two ways: first, increased variability in the non-GFR determinants of some filtration markers among application populations compared to the development population may result in outlying values for those markers. Second, systematic differences in the non-GFR determinants of some markers between application and development populations can lead to biased estimates in the application populations. Here, we propose and evaluate methods for estimating GFR based on multiple markers in applications with potentially higher rates of outlying predictors than in development data. We apply transfer learning to address systematic differences between application and development populations. We evaluated a panel of 8 markers (5 metabolites and 3 low molecular weight proteins) in 3,554 participants from 9 studies. Results show that contamination in two strongly predictive markers can increase imprecision by more than two-fold, but outlier identification with robust estimation can restore precision nearly fully to uncontaminated data. Furthermore, transfer learning can yield similar results with even modest training set sample size. Combining both approaches addresses both sources of error in GFR estimates. Once the laboratory challenge of developing a validated targeted assay for additional metabolites is overcome, these methods can inform the use of a panel eGFR across diverse clinical settings, ensuring accuracy despite differing non-GFR determinants.

Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) and International Club of Ascites (ICA) joint multidisciplinary consensus meeting

Patients with cirrhosis are prone to developing acute kidney injury (AKI), a complication associated with a markedly increased in-hospital morbidity and mortality, along with a risk of progression to chronic kidney disease. Whereas patients with cirrhosis are at increased risk of developing any phenotype of AKI, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), a specific form of AKI (HRS-AKI) in patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites, carries an especially high mortality risk. Early recognition of HRS-AKI is crucial since administration of splanchnic vasoconstrictors may reverse the AKI and serve as a bridge to liver transplantation, the only curative option. In 2023, a joint meeting of the International Club of Ascites (ICA) and the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) was convened to develop new diagnostic criteria for HRS-AKI, to provide graded recommendations for the work-up, management and post-discharge follow-up of patients with cirrhosis and AKI, and to highlight priorities for further research.

Optimization of Kidney Health in Liver Transplant Candidates: Pretransplant Considerations and Modalities

Patients with decompensated end-stage liver disease (ESLD) are at increased risk for mortality, and only liver transplantation (LT) offers meaningful hope for survival. These patients are at risk for kidney dysfunction through the continuum of care for ESLD including LT. We discuss the role of accurate estimation and measurement of baseline glomerular filtration rate in assessment of kidney dysfunction among those with ESLD. Optimizing kidney function is a vital goal in the management of these patients before LT. In this review, we summarize salient aspects of assessing and optimizing kidney function in this patient population. Precipitating factors and different causes of acute kidney injury are discussed, including hepatorenal syndrome. We further review treatment options for acute kidney injury including volume management. The role of vasopressor therapy, renal replacement therapy, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting are discussed.

Comparison of Glomerular Filtration Rate Equations in a Rural New Mexico Cohort: Results from the COMPASS Study

Rationale and Objective

The NKF-ASN Task Force recommends accurate kidney function estimation avoiding biases through racial adjustments. We explored the use of multiple kidney function biomarkers and hence estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations to improve kidney function calculations in an ethnically diverse patient population.

Study design

Prospective community cohort study.

Setting and Participants

rural New Mexico clinic with patients > 18 yo.

Methods

Markers of kidney function, IDMS-Creatinine (SCr), chemiluminescence Beta-2 Microglobulin (B2M), Nephelometry-calibrated ELISA Cystatin C (CysC), inflammation, glucose tolerance, demographics, BUN/UACR from the baseline visit of the COMPASS cohort, were analyzed by Kernel-based Virtual Machine learning methods.

Results

Among 205 participants, the mean age was 50.1, 62% were female, 54.1% Hispanic American and 30.2% Native American. Average kidney function biomarkers were: SCr 0.9 mg/dl, B2M 1.8 mg/L, and CysC 0.7 mg/dl. The highest agreement was observed between SCr and B2M-based eGFR equations [mean difference in eGFRs: (4.48 ml/min/1.73m2], and the lowest agreement between B2M and CysC-based eGFR equations (-24.75 ml/min/1.73m2). There was no pattern of association between the differences in eGFR measures and gender. In the continuous analyses, the absolute eGFR value (p<2 x 10-16) and serum albumin (p =6.4 x 10-5) predicted the difference between B2M- and SCr-based e-GFR. The absolute eGFR value (p<2 x 10-16) and age (p =7.6 x 10-5) predicted the difference between CysC- and SCr-based e-GFR.

Limitations

Relatively small sample size, elevated inflammatory state in majority of study participants and no inulin excretion rate measurements.

Conclusion

B2M should be strongly considered as a kidney function biomarker fulfilling the criteria for the NKF-ASN. B2M's eGFR equation does not need adjustment for gender or race and showed the highest agreement with SCr-based eGFR equations.

The Impact of Metabolic Health and Obesity on Liver Transplant Candidates and Recipients

Poor metabolic health and obesity have significant impacts on the outcomes of patients suffering from chronic liver disease, particularly those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Patients with such comorbidities who require liver transplant evaluation for advancing liver disease or liver failure require special consideration due to increased risk of cardiovascular disease, renal dysfunction, sarcopenic obesity, and cancer. Those who have had a history of prior bariatric surgery pose specific anatomical constraints and may also be at increased risk of alcohol use disorder. Pre-operative risk assessment as well as strict control of metabolic risk factors are essential to reduce intra-operative and post-liver transplant complications. As immunosuppressive therapy exacerbates metabolic dysfunction and risk for cancer, post-liver transplant care must focus on balancing the need to prevent rejection and the impact of progressive metabolic dysfunction in this unique, but growing, patient population.

Novel indications for referral and care for simultaneous liver kidney transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Kidney dysfunction is challenging in liver transplant candidates to determine whether it is reversible or not. This review focuses on the pertinent data on how to best approach liver transplant candidates with kidney dysfunction in the current era after implementing the simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) allocation policy and safety net.

RECENT FINDINGS

The implementation of the SLK policy inverted the steady rise in SLK transplants and improved the utilization of high-quality kidneys. Access to kidney transplantation following liver transplant alone (LTA) increased with favorable outcomes. Estimating GFR in liver transplant candidates remains challenging, and innovative methods are needed. SLK provided superior patient and graft survival compared to LTA only for patients with advanced CKD and dialysis at least 3 months. SLK can provide immunological protection against kidney rejection in highly sensitized candidates. Post-SLK transplant care is complex, with an increased risk of complications and hospitalization.

SUMMARY

The SLK policy improved kidney access and utilization. Transplant centers are encouraged, under the safety net, to reserve SLK for liver transplant candidates with advanced CKD or dialysis at least 3 months while allowing lower thresholds for highly sensitized patients. Herein, we propose a practical approach to liver transplant candidates with kidney dysfunction.

Executive summary of the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: known knowns and known unknowns

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) updates the KDIGO 2012 guideline and has been developed with patient partners, clinicians, and researchers around the world, using robust methodology. This update, based on a substantially broader base of evidence than has previously been available, reflects an exciting time in nephrology. New therapies and strategies have been tested in large and diverse populations that help to inform care; however, this guideline is not intended for people receiving dialysis nor those who have a kidney transplant. The document is sensitive to international considerations, CKD across the lifespan, and discusses special considerations in implementation. The scope includes chapters dedicated to the evaluation and risk assessment of people with CKD, management to delay CKD progression and its complications, medication management and drug stewardship in CKD, and optimal models of CKD care. Treatment approaches and actionable guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations which followed the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation" (GRADE) approach. The limitations of the evidence are discussed. The guideline also provides practice points, which serve to direct clinical care or activities for which a systematic review was not conducted, and it includes useful infographics and describes an important research agenda for the future. It targets a broad audience of people with CKD and their healthcare, while being mindful of implications for policy and payment.

Evaluation of novel candidate filtration markers from a global metabolomic discovery for glomerular filtration rate estimation

Creatinine and cystatin-C are recommended for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) but accuracy is suboptimal. Here, using untargeted metabolomics data, we sought to identify candidate filtration markers for a new targeted assay using a novel approach based on their maximal joint association with measured GFR (mGFR) and with flexibility to consider their biological properties. We analyzed metabolites measured in seven diverse studies encompasing 2,851 participants on the Metabolon H4 platform that had Pearson correlations with log mGFR and used a stepwise approach to develop models to < -0.5 estimate mGFR with and without inclusion of creatinine that enabled selection of candidate markers. In total, 456 identified metabolites were present in all studies, and 36 had correlations with mGFR < -0.5. A total of 2,225 models were developed that included these metabolites; all with lower root mean square errors and smaller coefficients for demographic variables compared to estimates using untargeted creatinine. Seventeen metabolites were chosen, including 12 new candidate filtration markers. The selected metabolites had strong associations with mGFR and little dependence on demographic factors. Candidate metabolites were identified with maximal joint association with mGFR and minimal dependence on demographic variables across many varied clinical settings. These metabolites are excreted in urine and represent diverse metabolic pathways and tubular handling. Thus, our data can be used to select metabolites for a multi-analyte eGFR determination assay using mass spectrometry that potentially offers better accuracy and is less prone to non-GFR determinants than the current eGFR biomarkers.

From past to present to future: Terlipressin and hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a rare and highly morbid form of kidney injury unique to patients with decompensated cirrhosis. HRS is a physiologic consequence of portal hypertension, leading to a functional kidney injury that can be reversed by restoring effective circulating volume and renal perfusion. While liver transplantation is the only definitive "cure" for HRS, medical management with vasoconstrictors and i.v. albumin is a cornerstone of supportive care. Terlipressin, a V1a receptor agonist that acts on the splanchnic circulation, has been used for many years outside the United States for the treatment of HRS. However, its recent Food and Drug Administration approval has generated new interest in this population, as a new base of prescribers now work to incorporate the drug into clinical practice. In this article, we review HRS pathophysiology and diagnostic criteria, the clinical use of terlipressin and alternative therapies, and identify areas of future research in the space of HRS and kidney injury in cirrhosis.

Association of Cystatin C Level with All-cause Mortality in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Blood cystatin C level has been introduced as a promising biomarker to detect early kidney injury in cirrhotic patients. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the association of blood cystatin C level with allcause mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Embase databases were searched from the inception to November 15, 2022. Observational studies evaluating the value of blood cystatin C level in predicting all-cause mortality in patients with ACS were selected. The pooled hazard risk (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated using a random effect model meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 1983 cirrhotic patients were identified. The pooled adjusted HR of all-cause mortality was 3.59 (95% CI 2.39-5.39) for the high versus low group of cystatin C level. Stratified analysis by study design, characteristics of patients, geographical region, sample size, and length of follow-up further supported the predictive value elevated cystatin C level.

CONCLUSION

Elevated cystatin C level was an independent predictor of poor survival in patients with liver cirrhosis. Detection of blood cystatin C level may provide important prognostic information in cirrhotic patients.

Cystatin C as a GFR Estimation Marker in Acute and Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review

Rationale & Objective

Creatinine-based GFR estimating (eGFRcr) equations may be inaccurate in populations with acute or chronic illness. The accuracy of GFR equations that use cystatin C (eGFRcys) or creatinine-cystatin C (eGFRcr-cys) is not well studied in these populations.

Study Design

A systematic review of original articles identified from PubMed and expert sources. Two reviewers screened articles independently and identified those meeting inclusion criteria.

Setting & Study Populations

Adults and children with acute or chronic illness.

Selection Criteria for Studies

Studies published since 2011 that compared performance of eGFRcr, eGFRcys, and eGFRcr-cys relative to measured GFR (mGFR), used standardized assays for creatinine or cystatin C, and used eGFR equations developed using such assays. Studies of ambulatory clinical populations or research studies in populations with only CKD, kidney transplant recipients, only diabetes, kidney donor candidates, and community-based cohorts were excluded.

Data Extraction

Data extracted from full text.

Analytical Approach

Bias and percentages of estimates within 30% of mGFR (P30) of eGFR compared with mGFR were evaluated.

Results

Of the 179 citations, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria: 24 in adults and 2 in children in clinical populations with cancer (n=5), HIV (n=5), cirrhosis (n=3), liver transplant (n=3), heart failure (n=2), neuromuscular diseases (n=1) critical illness (n=5), and obesity (n=2). In general, eGFRcr-cys had greater accuracy than eGFRcr or eGFRcys equations among study populations with cancer, HIV, and obesity, but did not perform consistently better in cirrhosis, liver transplant, heart failure, neuromuscular disease, and critical illness.

Limitations

Participants were selected because of concern for inaccurate eGFRcr, which may bias results. Most studies had small sample sizes, limiting generalizability.

Conclusions

eGFRcr-cys improves GFR estimation in populations with a variety of acute and chronic illnesses, providing indications for cystatin C measurement. Performance was poor in many studies, suggesting the need for more frequent mGFR.

Plain-Language Summary

Kidney function, specifically glomerular filtration rate (GFR), estimated using creatinine (eGFRcr) is often inaccurate in people with acute and chronic illness. The accuracy of estimates using cystatin C alone (eGFRcys) or together with creatinine (eGFRcr-cys) is not well studied in these populations. We conducted a systematic review to address the knowledge gap. Of the 179 papers reviewed, we identified 26 studies in clinical populations with cancer (n=5); HIV (n=5); cirrhosis (n=3); liver transplant (n=3); heart failure (n=2); neuromuscular disease (n=1); critical illness (n=5); and obesity (n=2). In general, eGFRcr-cys improved the GFR estimation in HIV, cancer, and obesity, providing indications for cystatin C measurement. Performance was poor in many studies, suggesting the need for more frequent measured GFR.

Discrepancies between Cystatin C-Based and Creatinine-Based eGFR

BACKGROUND

Recent guidance suggests clinicians increase use of cystatin C for the estimation of GFR. Discrepant levels of creatinine- versus cystatin C-based eGFR (eGFRcr versus eGFRcys) can occur and might signify inaccurate estimation of GFR using creatinine alone. This study sought to enhance the knowledge of the risk factors and clinical implications of having a large eGFR discrepancy.

METHODS

Participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, a prospective cohort study of US adults, were followed over 25 years. eGFR discrepancy was measured at five clinical visits and defined as eGFRcys either 30% lower or higher than eGFRcr, the current clinical standard of care. The associations between eGFR discrepancies and kidney-related laboratory parameters were assessed using linear and logistic regression and long-term adverse outcomes, including kidney failure, AKI, heart failure, and death, using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among 13,197 individuals (mean age 57 [SD 6] years, 56% women, 25% Black race), 7% had eGFRcys 30% lower than eGFRcr at visit 2 (1990-1992), and this proportion increased over time to 23% by visit 6 (2016-2017). By contrast, the percent with eGFRcys 30% higher than eGFRcr was relatively stable (3%-1%). Independent risk factors for having eGFRcys 30% lower than eGFRcr included older age, female sex, non-Black race, higher eGFRcr, higher body mass index, weight loss, and current smoking. Those with eGFRcys 30% lower than eGFRcr had more anemia and higher uric acid, fibroblast growth factor 23, and phosphate levels as well as higher risk of subsequent mortality, kidney failure, AKI, and heart failure compared with those with similar eGFRcr and eGFRcys values.

CONCLUSIONS

Having eGFRcys lower than eGFRcr was associated with worse kidney-related laboratory derangements and a higher risk of adverse health outcomes.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2023_09_08_CJN0000000000000217.mp3.

AACC/NKF Guidance Document on Improving Equity in Chronic Kidney Disease Care

BACKGROUND

Kidney disease (KD) is an important health equity issue with Black, Hispanic, and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals experiencing a disproportionate disease burden. Prior to 2021, the commonly used estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations incorporated coefficients for Black race that conferred higher GFR estimates for Black individuals compared to non-Black individuals of the same sex, age, and blood creatinine concentration. With a recognition that race does not delineate distinct biological categories, a joint task force of the National Kidney Foundation and the American Society of Nephrology recommended the adoption of the CKD-EPI 2021 race-agnostic equations.

CONTENT

This document provides guidance on implementation of the CKD-EPI 2021 equations. It describes recommendations for KD biomarker testing, and opportunities for collaboration between clinical laboratories and providers to improve KD detection in high-risk populations. Further, the document provides guidance on the use of cystatin C, and eGFR reporting and interpretation in gender-diverse populations.

SUMMARY

Implementation of the CKD-EPI 2021 eGFR equations represents progress toward health equity in the management of KD. Ongoing efforts by multidisciplinary teams, including clinical laboratorians, should focus on improved disease detection in clinically and socially high-risk populations. Routine use of cystatin C is recommended to improve the accuracy of eGFR, particularly in patients whose blood creatinine concentrations are confounded by processes other than glomerular filtration. When managing gender-diverse individuals, eGFR should be calculated and reported with both male and female coefficients. Gender-diverse individuals can benefit from a more holistic management approach, particularly at important clinical decision points.

Assessment of kidney function: clinical indications for measured GFR

In the vast majority of cases, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is estimated using serum creatinine, which is highly influenced by age, sex, muscle mass, body composition, severe chronic illness and many other factors. This often leads to misclassification of patients or potentially puts patients at risk for inappropriate clinical decisions. Possible solutions are the use of cystatin C as an alternative endogenous marker or performing direct measurement of GFR using an exogenous marker such as iohexol. The purpose of this review is to highlight clinical scenarios and conditions such as extreme body composition, Black race, disagreement between creatinine- and cystatin C-based estimated GFR (eGFR), drug dosing, liver cirrhosis, advanced chronic kidney disease and the transition to kidney replacement therapy, non-kidney solid organ transplant recipients and living kidney donors where creatinine-based GFR estimation may be invalid. In contrast to the majority of literature on measured GFR (mGFR), this review does not include aspects of mGFR for research or public health settings but aims to reach practicing clinicians and raise their understanding of the substantial limitations of creatinine. While including cystatin C as a renal biomarker in GFR estimating equations has been shown to increase the accuracy of the GFR estimate, there are also limitations to eGFR based on cystatin C alone or the combination of creatinine and cystatin C in the clinical scenarios described above that can be overcome by measuring GFR with an exogenous marker. We acknowledge that mGFR is not readily available in many centres but hope that this review will highlight and promote the expansion of kidney function diagnostics using standardized mGFR procedures as an important milestone towards more accurate and personalized medicine.

Bacterial infections in cirrhosis: Current treatment

Bacterial infections frequently cause decompensating events in cirrhotic patients and are also the most common factor identified for the development of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). The increase in the prevalence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms has resulted in the reduced effectiveness of empiric antimicrobial treatment. We conducted a PubMed search from the last 20 years using the Keywords cirrhosis; multidrug-resistant; infections; diagnosis; treatment; prophylaxis; monitoring; sepsis; nutrition and antibiotic resistant. We made a review about bacterial infections among cirrhotic patients; we mainly focus on the description of diagnostic tools; biomarkers; clinical scores for diagnosis and prognosis also; we made an analysis concerning the monitoring of cirrhotic patients with sepsis and finally made some recommendations about the treatment; prophylaxis and prevention.

Serum cystatin C as a predictor of 90-day mortality among patients admitted with complications of cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Cystatin C (Cys) is not affected by age, sex, and muscle mass. We evaluated to compare the predictive performance of serum Cys level and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and developed a new model to predict 90-day mortality among patients admitted with cirrhosis complications.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed from December 2018 to December 2019. All cirrhotic patients admitted with acute decompensated liver cirrhosis or acute on chronic liver failure had laboratory values measured within 48 h of admission.

RESULTS

A cohort of 225 patients with cirrhosis was admitted during the study period. Sixty-five patients were eligible for analysis. Twenty-seven of these patients (41.4%) died within 90 days of follow-up. The median of MELD score was 20.5 (15, 24). Serum Cys level of >1.45 mg/L had the highest 90-day mortality prediction with the sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% and 68.4%, respectively. Cys and MELD scores were predictive of 90-day mortality: Cys hazard ratio (HR) = 2.04 (95% CI 1.01-4.14, P = 0.048); MELD score HR = 1.01 (95% CI 0.51-2.01, P = 0.970). C-statistic of Cys, MELD score, model for end-stage liver disease-cystatin C (MELD-Cys) score, combined Cys with MELD-Cys score to predict 90-day mortality were 0.67, 0.58, 0.58, and 0.63, respectively. Adding Cys to the MELD score did not improve the predictive of 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

Serum Cys is superior to MELD score, and the new MELD-Cys model is comparable to the MELD score in predicting mortality among patients with cirrhosis admitted with complications.

A New Panel-Estimated GFR, Including β2-Microglobulin and β-Trace Protein and Not Including Race, Developed in a Diverse Population

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation based on creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRcr-cys) is more accurate than estimated GFR (eGFR) based on creatinine or cystatin C alone (eGFRcr or eGFRcys, respectively), but the inclusion of creatinine in eGFRcr-cys requires specification of a person's race. β2-Microglobulin (B2M) and β-trace protein (BTP) are alternative filtration markers that appear to be less influenced by race than creatinine is.

STUDY DESIGN

Study of diagnostic test accuracy.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Development in a pooled population of 7 studies with 5,017 participants with and without chronic kidney disease. External validation in a pooled population of 7 other studies with 2,245 participants.

TESTS COMPARED

Panel eGFR using B2M and BTP in addition to cystatin C (3-marker panel) or creatinine and cystatin C (4-marker panel) with and without age and sex or race.

OUTCOMES

GFR measured as the urinary clearance of iothalamate, plasma clearance of iohexol, or plasma clearance of [51Cr]EDTA.

RESULTS

Mean measured GFRs were 58.1 and 83.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, and the proportions of Black participants were 38.6% and 24.0%, in the development and validation populations, respectively. In development, addition of age and sex improved the performance of all equations compared with equations without age and sex, but addition of race did not further improve the performance. In validation, the 4-marker panels were more accurate than the 3-marker panels (P < 0.001). The 3-marker panel without race was more accurate than eGFRcys (percentage of estimates greater than 30% different from measured GFR [1 - P30] of 15.6% vs 17.4%; P = 0.01), and the 4-marker panel without race was as accurate as eGFRcr-cys (1 - P30 of 8.6% vs 9.4%; P = 0.2). Results were generally consistent across subgroups.

LIMITATIONS

No representation of participants with severe comorbid illness and from geographic areas outside of North America and Europe.

CONCLUSIONS

The 4-marker panel eGFR is as accurate as eGFRcr-cys without requiring specification of race. A more accurate race-free eGFR could be an important advance.

Cystatin C as a biomarker of chronic kidney disease: latest developments

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common, occurring in over 10% of individuals globally, and is increasing in prevalence. The limitations of traditional biomarkers of renal dysfunction, such as serum creatinine, have been well demonstrated in the literature. Therefore, augmenting clinical assessment with newer biomarkers, such as serum cystatin C, has the potential to improve disease monitoring and patient care.

AREAS COVERED

The present paper assesses the utility and limitations of serum cystatin C as a biomarker for CKD in light of the current literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Serum cystatin C has been well established as an early and accurate biomarker of CKD that is particularly helpful in patients for whom creatinine is an inadequate marker or for whom more cumbersome methods of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement are impractical. Current research questions are no longer focused on if, but rather when and how often cystatin C should be used in the evaluation of CKD patients. However, transition of all reagents and estimated GFR equations to the newly established International Standard is critical for developing generalizable data.

Cystatin C: A Primer for Pharmacists

Pharmacists are at the forefront of dosing and monitoring medications eliminated by or toxic to the kidney. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these medications, accurate measurement of kidney function is paramount. The mainstay of kidney assessment for drug dosing and monitoring is serum creatinine (SCr)-based estimation equations. Yet, SCr has known limitations including its insensitivity to underlying changes in kidney function and the numerous non-kidney factors that are incompletely accounted for in equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Serum cystatin C (cysC) is a biomarker that can serve as an adjunct or alternative to SCr to evaluate kidney function for drug dosing. Pharmacists must be educated about the strengths and limitations of cysC prior to applying it to medication management. Not all patient populations have been studied and some evaluations demonstrated large variations in the relationship between cysC and GFR. Use of eGFR equations incorporating cysC should be reserved for drug management in scenarios with demonstrated outcomes, including to improve pharmacodynamic target attainment for antibiotics or reduce drug toxicity. This article provides an overview of cysC, discusses evidence around its use in medication dosing and in special populations, and describes practical considerations for application and implementation.

Comparison of Performance of Improved Serum Estimators of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) to 99mTc-DTPA GFR Methods in Patients with Hepatic Cirrhosis

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements are critical in patients with hepatic cirrhosis but potentially erroneous when based on serum creatinine. New equations for estimated GFR (eGFR) have shown variable performance in cirrhotics, possibly because of inaccuracies in reference methods for measured GFR (mGFR). The primary objective was to compare the performance of 4 improved eGFR equations with a 1-compartment, 2-sample plasma slope intercept ^99mTc-DTPA mGFR method to determine whether any of the eGFR calculations could replace plasma ^99mTc-DTPA mGFR in patients with cirrhosis. The secondary objective was to test the hypothesis that mGFR using voluntary voided urine collections introduces error compared with plasma-only methods. Methods: Fifty-four patients with hepatic cirrhosis underwent mGFR determinations from 2 plasma samples at 1 and 3 h after intravenous administration of 185 MBq of ^99mTc-DTPA. GFR was also generated by a UV/P calculation derived from blood and urine samples. These mGFRs were compared with the eGFRs generated by 4 estimating equations: MDRD (Modified Diet in Renal Disease), CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration) (serum creatinine [SCr]), CKD-EPI (cystatin [CysC]), and CKD-EPI (CysC+SCr). eGFRs were compared with mGFRs by Pearson correlation, precision, bias, percentage bias, and accuracy (eGFRs varying by <10% [p10], <20% [p20] or <30% [p30] from the corresponding mGFR). Results: All eGFRs showed poorer performance when the UV/P ^99mTc-DTPA mGFR was used as the reference than when the plasma ^99mTc-DTPA mGFR was used. When compared with the plasma ^99mTc-DTPA mGFR method, the performance of all eGFR equations was superior to most published reports. There was a moderately good positive correlation between eGFRs and mGFRs. When compared with plasma ^99mTc-DTPA mGFR, precision of eGFRs was in the range of 14-20 mL/min and showed a negligible bias. Compared with the plasma ^99mTc-DTPA mGFR, CKD-EPI (CysC+SCr) showed the best overall performance and accuracy, at 85.19% (p30), 75.93% (p20), and 42.59% (p10). Conclusion: Estimating equations for measuring eGFR performed better than in most published reports, attributable to use of the plasma ^99mTc-DTPA mGFR method as a reference. CKD-EPI (CysC+SCr) eGFR showed the best overall performance. However, more discriminating methods may be required when accurate GFR measurements are necessary. mGFR measurements using urine collections may introduce error compared with plasma-only methods.

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and cystatin C in cirrhosis and portal hypertension: Relations to organ extraction and dysfunction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Early detection of renal dysfunction in cirrhosis is important, and several renal biomarkers have been put forward. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and cystatin C are markers of renal dysfunction, but relations to splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics and kinetics are sparsely studied in cirrhosis. In patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, we studied plasma levels and renal, hepatic, and peripheral extraction of NGAL and cystatin C and relations to patients characteristics, liver dysfunction, and hemodynamics.

METHODS

Forty-five cirrhotic patients (Child class A/B/C:15/15/15) and 15 controls were evaluated with a full clinical, biochemical, and hemodynamic assessment. Urine and regional plasma concentrations of NGAL and cystatin C were measured.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in circulating or hepatic NGAL or cystatin C between all patients and controls but a trend towards increased levels with increasing Child class. In addition, there was a significant renal but no hepatic or systemic extraction of both NGAL and cystatin C (P < 0.001). Plasma NGAL correlated with glomerular filtration rate (r = -0.56, P < 0.0001), and hepatic venous pressure gradient (r = 0.34,P = 0.02) and urinary NGAL correlated with heart rate (r = 0.58, P= 0.007), blood pressure (r = -0.46, P < 0.05), cardiac output (r = 0.45, P < 0.05), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (r = -0.48, p < 0.05). Plasma cystatin C correlated with hepatic venous pressure gradient (r = 0.45, P < 0.005), blood pressure (-0.40, P < 0.01), and glomerular filtration rate (r = 0.98, P < 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Extractions of NGAL and cystatin C levels seem largely unaffected by the severity of liver disease in cirrhosis with a renal extraction. These biomarkers therefore have the potential of being both valuable in diagnosing renal failure and reflecting the degree of portal hypertension and systemic haemodynamic changes.