Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease in the United States: Findings Based on the EMPA-REG Outcome Trial

Cost-utility analysis of empagliflozin on chronic kidney disease progression in Thailand

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Thailand is high and kidney disease progression remains a problem. Empagliflozin has been known to be used to slow CKD progression, but its accessibility remains limited. This study aimed to assess the cost-utility of empagliflozin for CKD progression in Thailand.

METHODS

A state-transition model was developed consisting of eight health states: five eGFR health states (G2, G3a, G3b, G4, and G5), dialysis, kidney transplantation, and death. Empagliflozin 10 mg was assessed as an add-on treatment to standard of care (SoC). The efficacy of empagliflozin was derived from the EMPA-KIDNEY trial, while other inputs were obtained from a comprehensive literature review. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was calculated. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed to explore uncertainties.

RESULTS

Empagliflozin could improve QALYs by 0.62 and 0.71 for patients with CKD without and with diabetes mellitus (DM) compared with SoC, respectively. However, it required higher total lifetime costs of 77,966 Thai baht (THB) and 59,454 THB for patients with CKD without and with DM, respectively. The ICER for CKD without DM was 126,201 THB/QALY, while the ICER for CKD with DM was 83,473 THB/QALY. The PSA indicated that empagliflozin had a 64.00% probability of being cost-effective for CKD without DM and an 89.18% probability for CKD with DM.

LIMITATIONS

An important limitation was that the treatment effects of empagliflozin were derived from the EMPA-KIDNEY, which was conducted in DM patients and assumed to be the same for non-DM patients because of the limited evidence in non-DM patients.

CONCLUSION

At the current willingness-to-pay threshold of 160,000 THB/QALY, empagliflozin was cost-effective for treating patients with CKD without or with DM.

A cost-utility analysis of adding SGLT2 inhibitors for the management of type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease in Thailand

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients is associated with end-stage renal disease and significant economic burden. While sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) show renal benefits in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), their cost-effectiveness in Thailand remains unclear. This study evaluates the cost-utility of adding SGLT2i (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin) to standard of care therapy (SoCT) for T2D patients with CKD in Thailand. A lifetime Markov model assessed economic and clinical outcomes. Data were derived from Thai studies, RCT subgroup analyses, and patient interviews. Sensitivity analysis was performed. Adding SGLT2i increased life expectancy (0.42-0.52 years) and QALYs (3.83- 3.91 vs. 3.50 with SoCT alone), but also increased lifetime costs ($1,275-$1,903). Empagliflozin was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $4,336 per QALY ($3,386/QALY), while dapagliflozin ($5,783/QALY) and canagliflozin ($4,591/QALY) required price reductions. SGLT2i showed potential cost savings for dialysis and kidney transplantation compared to SoCT alone. Adding SGLT2i to SoCT for T2D and CKD patients increases costs but provides significant clinical benefits. Empagliflozin is cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $4,336/QALY, while dapagliflozin and canagliflozin require price reductions to be cost-effective. However, the analysis solely focuses on renal benefits, excluding other advantages like cardiovascular and heart failure protection.

Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in CKD with or without Albuminuria

Key Points

Empagliflozin is cost-effective for the treatment of CKD in patients with an urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 30 mg/g or more. Empagliflozin is not cost-effective for the treatment of CKD in patients with an urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio <30 mg/g.

Background

The Study of Heart and Kidney Protection with Empagliflozin (EMPA-KIDNEY) expanded the CKD population that may benefit from sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in terms of eGFR and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. This enables a cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in subgroups stratified by these two parameters.

Methods

A cost–utility analysis using the Markov model was performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding empagliflozin to the standard treatment for CKD in Japan over 20 years of observation. Each cohort with the initial eGFR (≥45 but <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, ≥30 but <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2, or ≥20 but <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (<30 mg/g, ≥30 but <300 mg/g, or ≥300 mg/g) within the defined ranges was analyzed. The changes in eGFR were determined on the basis of the EMPA-KIDNEY study. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of <¥5,000,000 (approximately $35,500) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was considered cost-effective. One-way deterministic analyses, probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of the results.

Results

The addition of empagliflozin to the standard treatment was associated with lower costs and higher QALYs in the macroalbuminuria or microalbuminuria cohorts while the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in the negative albuminuria cohorts were >¥5,000,000 per QALY, regardless of the initial eGFR. The probabilities of empagliflozin being cost-effective were >84% in the macroalbuminuria or microalbuminuria cohorts but <30% in the negative albuminuria cohorts. Scenario analyses where empagliflozin suppressed the eGFR decline in the negative albuminuria cohorts showed that the drug was cost-effective in CKD stage G3b and G4 cohorts. Empagliflozin was not cost-effective in patients with CKD stage G3a and microalbuminuria with the observation period of 10 years.

Conclusions

In patients meeting the enrollment criteria for the EMPA-KIDNEY trial, the addition of empagliflozin to the standard treatment of CKD was judged as cost-effective for patients with albuminuria but not for those without albuminuria in the Japanese health care system.

Cost-effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy in Japan

AIM

To assess the cost-effectiveness of diabetic nephropathy treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in Japanese clinical practice, considering diabetes-related complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A population-based Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness for people with diabetic nephropathy who initiated pharmacotherapy with an SGLT2 inhibitor plus conventional treatment or conventional treatment alone, based on quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and healthcare costs. The Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation study (CREDENCE) and the Japanese Society for Dialysis Research statistical survey were the primary sources of probability and mortality, while Japanese Health Insurance Claims Data were the cost source. The state transition model included diabetic nephropathy, hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease, dialysis, and death. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to explore model uncertainty.

RESULTS

Using the threshold of JPY 5 000 000 per QALY, SGLT2 inhibitor plus conventional treatment was more cost-effective than conventional treatment alone, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of JPY 654 309 per QALY. Treating 100 000 people, SGLT2 inhibitor plus conventional treatment prevented 2234 deaths and reduced 5793 fewer heart failure cases, 3967 fewer myocardial infarctions and stroke events. Sensitivity analysis affirmed the robustness of these results for patients aged under 70 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The SGLT2 inhibitor treatment appeared to be cost-effective for the overall population of our study and particularly for younger patients (<70 years old). For older patients (≥70 years old), the cost-effectiveness was less clear and may require further evaluation. Decision-makers should consider this age-based heterogeneity when making recommendations about SGLT2 inhibitor treatment.

Health Care Utilization and Costs Associated With Empagliflozin in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

We compared health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for inpatient and outpatient services and dispensed medications in older adults with type 2 diabetes initiating empagliflozin versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The study population included U.S. Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with diabetes (age ≥65 years) initiating empagliflozin or DPP-4is (August 2014 to September 2018). We estimated rate ratios (RRs) for HCRU outcomes using zero-inflated negative binomial regression and per-member per-year (PMPY) cost differences using generalized linear model with gamma distributions, overall and stratified by baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD), after adjusting for 143 baseline covariates using 1:1 propensity score matching.

RESULTS

We identified 23,335 matched pairs (mean age 72 years, 51% with baseline CVD). HCRU rates were lower in empagliflozin versus DPP-4i initiators (number of inpatient days, RR 0.89 [95% CI 0.82, 0.97]; number of emergency department [ED] visits, 0.86 [0.82, 0.91]; number of hospitalizations, 0.86 [0.79, 0.93]; number of office visits, 0.96 [0.95, 0.98]). Inpatient cost (-$713 PMPY [95% CI -847, -579), outpatient cost (-$198 PMPY [-272, -124]), and total cost of care (-$1,109 PMPY [-1,478, -739]) were lower for empagliflozin versus DPP-4is, although diabetes medication cost was higher in empagliflozin initiators ($454 PMPY [95% CI 284, 567]). In the CVD subgroup, total cost was lower for empagliflozin initiators (-$2,005 PMPY [-2,451, -1,337]), while the difference was attenuated in the non-CVD subgroup (-$296 PMPY [-740, 148]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults with diabetes, empagliflozin was associated with a lower number of inpatient days, hospitalizations, ED visits, and office visits and with lower costs of care compared with DPP-4is, especially in those with history of CVD.

Cost-effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a severe, progressive condition with a significant economic burden. We performed a systematic review to assess the cost-effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in treating CKD.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, INAHTA, NHS EED, and relevant websites. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, extracted data, and assessed study quality using CHEERS 2022 and Phillips's checklist.

RESULTS

Thirteen model-based cost-utility studies met the inclusion criteria, evaluating Empagliflozin (n = 3), Canagliflozin (n = 3), and Dapagliflozin (n = 8). Empagliflozin or Dapagliflozin plus standard care (SoC) was cost-effective compared to SoC alone in CKD patients, regardless of type 2 diabetes (T2D) status. In CKD patients with T2D, SGLT2 inhibitors combined with SoC were cost-saving in high-income countries under health system perspective whereas Dapagliflozin was not cost-effective compared to Canagliflozin. No study met all criteria of the CHEERS 2022 checklist, and most did not fully satisfy Phillips's checklist for economic models.

CONCLUSION

Adding SGLT2 inhibitors to SoC is cost-saving for treating CKD with T2D and cost-effective for CKD patients with or without T2D.

REGISTRATION

The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42023469005.

Navigating the Global Economic Landscape of Dialysis: A Summary of Expert Opinions from The 4th International Congress of Chinese Nephrologists

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to be a significant global public health issue. The escalating burden of CKD is probably driven by the aging population and the rising prevalence of diabetes. CKD not only adversely impacts an individual's health and well-being, but also poses significant challenge on the economy of the society.

Summary

Experts from ten countries and regions around the world (Australia, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and United States) convened in the 4th International Congress of Chinese Nephrologists on December 1, 2023 to discuss the global dialysis burden. Although the cost of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) accounts for 2-3% of total healthcare expenditure in developed countries, patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) only represent a small percentage (<0.5%) of the population. Importantly, the economic impact of ESKD is not limited to direct medical costs, but extends to indirect societal costs, such as productivity loss by patients and caregivers. Primary prevention of CKD, early screening and treatment to delay progression to ESKD (where treatment costs rise dramatically), and utilization of home-based dialysis therapy (including peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis) shall be implemented as part of cost-containment strategy. Kidney transplant provides better outcomes than dialysis and is cost-effective in long run, whereas conservative kidney management should be considered for elderly frail patients.

Key Messages

Implementation of preventive measures and cost-effective treatment strategies are the cornerstone to combat the global CKD epidemic.

Cost Offset of Dapagliflozin in the US Medicare Population with Cardio-Kidney Metabolic Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome is highly prevalent in the US Medicare population and is projected to increase further. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors have indications in chronic kidney disease (CKD), heart failure (HF), and type 2 diabetes (T2D), providing protective efficacy across conditions within CKM syndrome. The objective of this study was to develop a model to extrapolate key outcomes observed in pivotal clinical trials to the US Medicare population, and to assess the potential direct cost offsets associated with dapagliflozin therapy.

METHODS

All US 2022 Medicare beneficiaries (≥ 65 years of age) eligible to receive dapagliflozin were estimated according to drug label indication and Medicare enrollment and claims data. Incidence of key outcomes from the dapagliflozin clinical program were modelled over a 4-year time horizon based on patient-level data with CKD, HF, and T2D. Published cost data of relevant clinical outcomes were used to calculate direct medical care cost-offset associated with treatment with dapagliflozin.

RESULTS

In a population of 13.1 million patients with CKM syndrome, treatment with dapagliflozin in addition to historical standard of care (hSoC) versus hSoC alone led to fewer incidents of HF-related events (hospitalization for HF, 613,545; urgent HF visit, 98,896), renal events (kidney failure, 285,041; ≥ 50% sustained decline in kidney function, 375,137), and 450,355 fewer deaths (of which 225,346 and 13,206 incidences of cardiovascular and renal death were avoided). In total this led to medical care cost offsets of $99.3 billion versus treatment with hSoC only (dapagliflozin plus hSoC, $310.3 billion; hSoC, $211.0 billion).

CONCLUSION

By extrapolating data from trials across multiple indications within CKM syndrome, this broader perspective shows that considerable medical care cost offsets may result through attenuated incidence of clinical events in CKD, T2D, and HF populations if treated with dapagliflozin in addition to hSoC over a 4-year time horizon. Graphical abstract available for this article.

Applications of SGLT2 inhibitors beyond glycaemic control

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were initially developed for their glucose-lowering effects and have shown a modest glycaemic benefit in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In the past decade, a series of large, robust clinical trials of these therapies have demonstrated striking beneficial effects for various care goals, transforming the chronic disease therapeutic landscape. Cardiovascular safety studies in people with T2DM demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure. Subsequent trials in participants with heart failure with reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors have beneficial effects on heart failure outcomes. In dedicated kidney outcome studies, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the incidence of kidney failure among participants with or without diabetes. Post hoc analyses have suggested a range of other benefits of these drugs in conditions as diverse as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, kidney stone prevention and anaemia. SGLT2 inhibitors have a generally favourable adverse effect profile, although patient selection and medication counselling remain important. Concerted efforts are needed to better integrate these agents into routine care and support long-term medication adherence to close the gap between clinical trial outcomes and those achieved in the real world.

SGLT2 Inhibitor Use in Chronic Kidney Disease: Supporting Cardiovascular, Kidney, and Metabolic Health

Originally developed for use in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors demonstrated diverse cardiovascular- and kidney-protective effects in large outcome trials. Their subsequent approval as a treatment for chronic kidney disease (CKD) marked a pivotal shift in the landscape of CKD management. Further to this, the approval of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin for use in patients with CKD with and without T2DM afforded new treatment opportunities for this population. SGLT2 inhibitors provide an effective treatment for CKD with a favorable safety profile. However, their uptake has been slow, especially among patients without T2DM, owing perhaps to a lack of certainty and familiarity among health care professionals. As the landscape of CKD management continues to evolve, health care professionals should remain knowledgeable about these changes, and implement new guideline recommendations promptly to avoid therapeutic inertia. SGLT2 inhibitors are recommended for patients with CKD with or without T2DM and are foundational agents to support cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic health. In this review, we provide evidence-based answers to questions that may be asked in the clinic regarding the use of SGLT2 inhibitors to treat CKD.

Effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on heart failure events in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors significantly reduce the risk for hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) in patients with diabetes, and HF; findings in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are not uniform. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis exploring the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on HF events in patients with CKD and across subgroups defined by baseline kidney function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search in major electronic databases was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) providing data on the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on the primary outcome, time to hospitalization or urgent visit for worsening HF in patients with prevalent CKD at baseline or across subgroups stratified by baseline estimated glomerular-filtration-rate (eGFR) were included. Twelve studies (n = 89,191 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. In patients with CKD, treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced the risk for HF events by 32% compared to placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.73]. Reduction in HF events with SGLT-2 inhibitors was more prominent in patients with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.62-0.74) than in those with eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.69-0.83). Subgroup analysis according to type of SGLT-2 inhibitor showed a consistent treatment effect across all studied agents (p-subgroup-analysis = 0.44). Sensitivity analysis including data from studies including only diabetic patients showed an even more pronounced effect in eGFR subgroup <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.54-0.70).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors led to a significant reduction in HF events in patients with CKD. Such findings may change the landscape of prevention of HF events in patients with advanced CKD. PROSPERO Registration number CRD42022382857.

Long-Term Outcomes of Heart Failure With Preserved or Mid-Range Ejection Fraction in the United States

Background

Approximately one-half of all heart failure (HF) consists of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Although several recent trials have investigated treatments for HFpEF/HFmrEF, there is limited insight on the long-term clinical trajectory of this population.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to model clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic (NYHA functional class II-IV) HFpEF/HFmrEF over 10 years.

Methods

We developed a Markov model with stable HF, HF hospitalization, and death states to follow a cohort of patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF treated with standard of care (SoC) recommended by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Failure Society of America. Population characteristics and clinical event probabilities were derived from recent phase 3 HFpEF/HFmrEF trials. We used weighted averages for control and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor outcomes. SoC was informed by baseline treatments reported in clinical trials.

Results

In a cohort of U.S. patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF treated with SoC, our model estimated 0.53 cumulative HF hospitalizations per patient over 10 years. Overall, 37% had at least 1 HF hospitalization, and 26% experienced cardiovascular death. The model estimated 6.1 years of life expectancy from age 72 and total cost of care over this time of $123,900.

Conclusions

HFpEF/HFmrEF is associated with high rates of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality based on contemporary clinical trials in this population. Furthermore, clinical trial results are likely to be more optimistic than real-world outcomes. Continuing to optimize care and treatment may reduce clinical burden and improve population health.

Cost-effectiveness of add-on empagliflozin versus standard of care in management of CKD in Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam - findings from a modelling study assessing an EMPA-KIDNEY eligible population, using CKD progression model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Nearly one in ten individuals in South-East Asia are estimated to be affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD). The burden of end-stage kidney disease is significant and can be heavy on the healthcare system. The recent EMPA-KIDNEY trial demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death in patients with CKD with a broad range of kidney function using add-on empagliflozin versus standard of care (SoC) alone. The objective of this study was to estimate the economic benefit of empagliflozin for patients with CKD in Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam.

METHODS

An individual patient level simulation model with an annual cycle that estimates the progression of kidney function and associated risk-factors was employed. Local costs and mortality rates were estimated from a wide range of published literature. A healthcare perspective was used over a 50-year time horizon.

RESULTS

The use of add-on empagliflozin versus SoC alone was found to be cost-saving in Malaysia and Thailand and cost-effective (ICER: 77,838,407 Vietnam Dong/QALY vs. a willingness to pay threshold of 96,890,026/QALY) in Vietnam. The bulk of the costs avoided over a lifetime is derived from the prevention or delay of dialysis initiation or kidney transplant - the cost offsets were nearly twice the additional treatment cost. The results were similar in patients with and without diabetes and across broad range of albuminuria.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of add-on empagliflozin in a broad population of patients with CKD is expected to be cost-saving in Malaysia and Thailand and cost-effective in Vietnam and will help alleviate the increasing burden of CKD in the region.

Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin as add-on to standard of care for chronic kidney disease management in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVE

The sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor empagliflozin was approved for treatment of adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the basis of its demonstrated ability to slow CKD progression and reduce the risk of cardiovascular death. This analysis was performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin plus standard of care (SoC) vs SoC alone in the treatment of CKD in the UK.

METHODS

A comprehensive, patient-level CKD progression model that simulates the evolution of risk factors for disease progression based on CKD-specific equations and clinical data was used to project a broad range of CKD-related complications. Patient baseline characteristics, distribution across Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) health states, and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin-creatinine ratio (uACR), and other parameters while on treatment were derived from the EMPA-KIDNEY trial. UK cost and utilities/disutilities were sourced from the literature. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Annual discounting of 3.5% was applied on costs and outcomes.

RESULTS

Over a 50-year horizon, SoC resulted in per-patient costs, life years, and QALYs of £95,930, 8.55, and 6.28, respectively. Empagliflozin plus SoC resulted in an incremental gain in life years (+1.04) and QALYs (+0.84), while decreasing per-patient costs by £6,019. Empagliflozin was more effective and less costly (dominant) with a net monetary benefit of £22,849 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000. Although treatment cost was higher for empagliflozin, this was more than offset by savings in kidney replacement therapy. Empagliflozin remained highly cost-effective in patients with and without diabetes, and across scenario and sensitivity analyses.

LIMITATIONS

This analysis is limited by reliance on short-term clinical trial data and by uncertainties in modelling CKD progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Empagliflozin as an add-on to SoC for treatment of adults with CKD represents cost-effective use of UK National Health Service (NHS) resources.

Chronic kidney disease in children: an update

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major healthcare issue worldwide. However, the prevalence of pediatric CKD has never been systematically assessed and consistent information is lacking in this population. The current definition of CKD is based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the extent of albuminuria. Given the physiological age-related modification of GFR in the first years of life, the definition of CKD is challenging per se in the pediatric population, resulting in high risk of underdiagnosis in this population, treatment delays and untailored clinical management. The advent and spreading of massive-parallel sequencing technology has prompted a profound revision of the epidemiology and the causes of CKD in children, supporting the hypothesis that CKD is much more frequent than currently reported in children and adolescents. This acquired knowledge will eventually converge in the identification of the molecular pathways and cellular response to damage, with new specific therapeutic targets to control disease progression and clinical features of children with CKD. In this review, we will focus on recent innovations in the field of pediatric CKD and in particular those where advances in knowledge have become available in the last years, with the aim of providing a new perspective on CKD in children and adolescents.

Fulfillment and Validity of the Kidney Health Evaluation Measure for People with Diabetes

Objective

To evaluate the fulfillment and validity of the kidney health evaluation for people with diabetes (KED) Healthcare Effectiveness Data Information Set (HEDIS) measure.

Patients and Methods

Optum Labs Data Warehouse (OLDW) was used to identify the nationally distributed US population aged 18 years and older, with diabetes, between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017. The OLDW includes deidentified medical, pharmacy, laboratory, and electronic health record (EHR) data. The KED fulfillment was defined in 2017 as both estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio testing within the measurement year. The KED validity was assessed using bivariate analyses of KED fulfillment with diabetes care measures in 2017 and chronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnosis and evidence-based kidney protective interventions in 2018.

Results

Among eligible 5,635,619 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, 736,875 Medicare advantage (MA) beneficiaries, and 660,987 commercial patients, KED fulfillment was 32.2%, 38.7%, and 37.7%, respectively. Albuminuria testing limited KED fulfillment with urinary albumin-creatinine ratio testing (<40%) and eGFR testing (>90%). The KED fulfillment was positively associated with receipt of diabetes care in 2017, CKD diagnosis in 2018, and evidence-based kidney protective interventions in 2018. The KED fulfillment trended lower for Black race, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility status, low neighborhood income, and low education status.

Conclusion

Less than 40% of adults with diabetes received guideline-recommended testing for CKD in 2017. Routine KED was associated with diabetes care and evidence-based CKD interventions. Increasing guideline-recommended testing for CKD among people with diabetes should lead to timely and equitable CKD detection and treatment.

Dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease

Background and Aim: Dapagliflozin and empagliflozin have demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, their comparative monetary value for improving outcomes in CKD patients is unestablished. We examined the cost-per-outcome implications of utilizing dapagliflozin as compared to empagliflozin for prevention of renal and cardiovascular events in CKD patients. Methods: For calculation of preventable events we divided the allocated budget by the cost needed to treat (CNT) for preventing a single renal or cardiovascular event. CNT was derived by multiplying the annualized number needed to treat (aNNT) by the annual therapy cost. The aNNTs were determined based on data from the DAPA-CKD and EMPEROR-KIDNEY trials. The budget limit was defined based on the threshold recommended by the United States' Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. Results: The aNNT was 42 both dapagliflozin (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34-59) and empagliflozin (CI: 33-66). The CNT estimates for the prevention of one primary event for dapagliflozin and empagliflozin were comparable at $201,911 (CI: $163,452-$283,636) and $209,664 (CI: $164,736-$329,472), respectively. However, diabetic patients had a higher CNT with dapagliflozin ($201,911 [CI: $153,837-$346,133]) than empagliflozin ($134,784 [CI: $109,824-$214,656]), whereas non-diabetic patients had lower CNT for dapagliflozin ($197,103 [CI: $149,029-$346,133]) than empagliflozin ($394,368 [CI: $219,648-$7,093,632]). The CNT for preventing CKD progression was higher for dapagliflozin ($427,858 [CI: $307,673-$855,717]) than empagliflozin ($224,640 [CI: $169,728-$344,448]). For preventing cardiovascular death (CVD), the CNT was lower for dapagliflozin ($1,634,515 [CI: $740,339-∞]) than empagliflozin ($2,990,208 [CI: $1,193,088-∞]). Conclusion: Among patients with CKD, empagliflozin provides a better monetary value for preventing the composite renal and cardiovascular events in diabetic patients while dapagliflozin has a better value for non-diabetic patients. Dapagliflozin provides a better monetary value for the prevention of CVD, whereas empagliflozin has a better value for the prevention of CKD progression.

Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: Synopsis of the KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline Update

DESCRIPTION

The KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease is an update of the 2020 guideline from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).

METHODS

The KDIGO Work Group updated the guideline, which included reviewing and grading new evidence that was identified and summarized. As in the previous guideline, the Work Group used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to appraise evidence and rate the strength of recommendations and expert judgment to develop consensus practice points. New evidence led to updating of recommendations in the chapters Comprehensive Care in Patients With Diabetes and CKD (Chapter 1) and Glucose-Lowering Therapies in Patients With T2D and CKD (Chapter 4). New evidence did not change recommendations in the chapters Glycemic Monitoring and Targets in Patients With Diabetes and CKD (Chapter 2), Lifestyle Interventions in Patients With Diabetes and CKD (Chapter 3), and Approaches to Management of Patients With Diabetes and CKD (Chapter 5).

RECOMMENDATIONS

The updated guideline includes 13 recommendations and 52 practice points for clinicians caring for patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). A focus on preserving kidney function and maintaining well-being is recommended using a layered approach to care, starting with a foundation of lifestyle interventions, self-management, and first-line pharmacotherapy (such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes. To this are added additional drugs with heart and kidney protection, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and interventions to control risk factors for CKD progression and cardiovascular events, such as blood pressure, glycemia, and lipids.

Short-term cost-effectiveness analysis of tirzepatide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in the United States

BACKGROUND: Tirzepatide is a novel once-a-week dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist that is used as an addition to diet and exercise to improve blood glucose in adults with type 2 diabetes. It is the first dual glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The SURPASS-2 clinical trial demonstrated superiority of tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg over semaglutide 1 mg in glycated hemoglobin A1c reduction and weight loss from baseline to week 40. Economic analyses to support coverage and access decision-making for tirzepatide are limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tirzepatide 10 mg vs semaglutide 1 mg injection over 52 weeks of treatment regarding A1c reduction and weight loss from the perspective of the US health care payer. METHODS: A decision tree model over a 52-week time horizon was developed to identify incremental treatment-related costs of once-weekly tirzepatide 10 mg vs semaglutide 1 mg injection. Costs were divided by mean reduction in A1c and change in body weight from baseline to week 52 observed in the SURPASS-2 clinical trial. In addition to efficacy, probabilities of adverse events, discontinuation, and need for rescue therapy were derived from the SURPASS-2 study. Drug costs in 2022 US dollars were based on wholesale acquisition cost. Costs associated with adverse events were sourced from the published literature. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Treatment with once-weekly tirzepatide 10 mg injection was associated with a higher cost and larger reduction in A1c and body weight after 52 weeks, compared with once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg injection. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for tirzepatide vs semaglutide was $2,247 per 1% reduction in A1c and $237 per 1 kg weight loss. One-way sensitivity analysis suggested that incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were most sensitive to the drug costs and treatment effect on A1c and weight. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly tirzepatide 10 mg was associated with higher cost and greater reduction in A1c and weight vs semaglutide. Tirzepatide 10 mg is cost-effective compared with semaglutide 1 mg if payers' willingness-to-pay threshold exceeds $2,247 for 1% reduction in A1c level and $237 for 1 kg weight loss.

Cost-Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin as a Treatment for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Health-Economic Analysis of DAPA-CKD

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

CKD imposes a significant burden on patients and health care providers, particularly upon reaching kidney failure when patients may require KRT. The Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in CKD (DAPA-CKD) trial demonstrated that dapagliflozin, with standard therapy, reduced CKD progression and KRT requirement. The study objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin for the treatment of CKD from payer perspectives in the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We constructed a lifetime Markov model to characterize outcomes in patients with CKD on the basis of the DAPA-CKD trial. Health states were defined by eGFR level and KRT type. Direct health care costs and utility values were sourced from published literature and the DAPA-CKD trial, respectively. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% per annum in the United Kingdom and 3% in Germany and Spain.

RESULTS

In patients eligible for the DAPA-CKD trial, treatment with dapagliflozin was predicted to reduce rates of CKD progression, with patients predicted to spend 1.7 (95% credibility interval, 0.8 to 2.4) more years in the eGFR range 15-89 ml/min per 1.73 m2 versus standard therapy alone (12.1; 95% credibility interval, 8.9 to 14.1 versus 10.4; 95% credibility interval, 7.7 to 12.4 years). Life expectancy (undiscounted) was correspondingly predicted to increase by 1.7 (95% credibility interval, 0.7 to 2.5) years (15.5; 95% credibility interval, 11.1 to 18.2 versus 13.8; 95% credibility interval, 9.9 to 16.5 years). This in addition to reduced incidence of adverse clinical outcomes, including hospitalization for heart failure, resulted in modeled quality-adjusted life year (discounted) gains between 0.82 (95% credibility interval, 0.38 to 1.18) and 1.00 (95% credibility interval, 0.46 to 1.41). These gains translated to incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $8280, $17,623, and $11,687 in the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain, respectively, indicating cost-effectiveness at willingness-to-pay thresholds (United Kingdom: $27,510 per quality-adjusted life year; Germany and Spain: $35,503 per quality-adjusted life year).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients meeting the eligibility requirements for the DAPA-CKD trial, dapagliflozin is likely to be a cost-effective treatment within the UK, German, and Spanish health care systems.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in CKD (DAPA-CKD), NCT03036150.

Cost-Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin for Chronic Kidney Disease in Japan

BACKGROUND

The cost-effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been evaluated in Japan, so we analyzed the cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, for CKD stages 3a and 3b.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used the Markov model for CKD to assess the costs and benefits associated with and without dapagliflozin from a health system perspective. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). An ICER <5 million Japanese yen (JPY)/QALY was judged to be cost-effective. The effect of dapagliflozin on renal and cardiovascular events was based on published clinical trials. In patients with CKD stage 3a, the ICER of dapagliflozin over standard treatment was 4.03 million JPY/QALY gained. With a cost-effectiveness threshold of 5 million JPY/QALY gained, the cost-effectiveness probability of dapagliflozin over standard treatment was 52.6%. In patients with CKD stage 3b, the ICER of dapagliflozin over standard treatment was 0.12 million JPY/QALY gained. The cost-effectiveness probability of dapagliflozin over standard treatment was 75.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results seemed to show acceptable cost-effectiveness when dapagliflozin was used for CKD stage 3b. On the other hand, cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin for CKD stage 3a was ambiguous, and further validation is needed.

Executive summary of the KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: an update based on rapidly emerging new evidence

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) represents a focused update of the KDIGO 2020 guideline on the topic. The guideline targets a broad audience of clinicians treating people with diabetes and CKD. Topic areas for which recommendations are updated based on new evidence include Chapter 1: Comprehensive care in patients with diabetes and CKD and Chapter 4: Glucose-lowering therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and CKD. The content of previous chapters on Glycemic monitoring and targets in patients with diabetes and CKD (Chapter 2), Lifestyle interventions in patients with diabetes and CKD (Chapter 3), and Approaches to management of patients with diabetes and CKD (Chapter 5) has been deemed current and was not changed. This guideline update was developed according to an explicit process of evidence review and appraisal. Treatment approaches and guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and appraisal of the quality of the evidence, and the strength of recommendations followed the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) approach. Limitations of the evidence are discussed, and areas for which additional research is needed are presented.

Peter W, Roberts G, Rangaswami J, Mottl A, Kliger AS, Harris RC, Gee PO, Fowler K, Cherney D, Brosius FC, Argyropoulos C, Quaggin SE. Moving from Evidence to Implementation of Breakthrough Therapies for Diabetic Kidney Disease

Diabetic kidney disease is the most frequent cause of kidney failure, accounting for half of all cases worldwide. Moreover, deaths from diabetic kidney disease increased 106% between 1990 and 2013, with most attributed to cardiovascular disease. Recommended screening and monitoring for diabetic kidney disease are conducted in less than half of patients with diabetes. Standard-of-care treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker is correspondingly low. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, and a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist are highly effective therapies to reduce kidney and cardiovascular risks in diabetic kidney disease. However, <20% of eligible patients are receiving these agents. Critical barriers are high out-of-pocket drug costs and low reimbursement rates. Data demonstrating clinical and cost-effectiveness of diabetic kidney disease care are needed to garner payer and health care system support. The pharmaceutical industry should collaborate on value-based care by increasing access through affordable drug prices. Additionally, multidisciplinary models and communication technologies tailored to individual health care systems are needed to support optimal diabetic kidney disease care. Community outreach efforts are also central to make care accessible and equitable. Finally, it is imperative that patient preferences and priorities shape implementation strategies. Access to care and implementation of breakthrough therapies for diabetic kidney disease can save millions of lives by preventing kidney failure, cardiovascular events, and premature death. Coalitions composed of patients, families, community groups, health care professionals, health care systems, federal agencies, and payers are essential to develop collaborative models that successfully address this major public health challenge.