Obesity is associated with increased transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation

Post-bariatric Surgery Changes in Secondary Esophageal Motility and Distensibility Parameters

INTRODUCTION

Despite the increasing number of bariatric procedures over the recent years, the physiological changes in secondary esophageal motility and distensibility parameters after surgery remain unknown.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center cohort study comparing esophageal planimetry and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) distensibility in post-bariatric surgery patients (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and conversion/revisional patients (DH)) and native-anatomy patients with obesity (NAC). Distensibility refers to the area achieved with a certain amount of pressure, and secondary peristalsis represents the esophageal response to an intended obstruction. Patients with pre-surgical dysmotility symptoms were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

From November 2018 to January 2023, 167 patients were evaluated and eligible for this study (RYGB = 87, SG = 33, NAC = 22, DH = 25). In NAC cohort, 17/22 (77%) patients presented normal motility patterns compared to 35/87 (40%) RYGB, 12/33 (36%) SG, and 5/25 (20%) DH (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The most common abnormal motility pattern for all three bariatric cohorts was absent contractions. DH patients generally had the highest mean maximum distensibility index averages, followed by SG, RYGB, and NAC.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery affects esophageal and GEJ physiology, and it is associated with higher rates of secondary dysmotility. DH patients have even higher rates of dysmotility. Further studies assessing clinical data and their correlation with manometric and pH-metric findings are needed.

Health related quality of life is associated with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in overweight children

OBJECTIVES

The association between obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is well-established in adults; however, data in pediatric population is scarce. Our study aimed to assess the association between GERD and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in overweight children.

METHODS

From April to August of 2020, we included children aged 7-18 years who attended the Endocrinological Outpatient Clinic at the Paediatric Institute, University of Debrecen, Hungary. The participants completed two questionnaires: the Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Questionnaire (PGSQ) and the HRQoL questionnaire (PedsQL). Based on the criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO), the patients were categorized into two groups: an overweight or obese group and a group with normal weight.

RESULTS

A total of 107 children (51 % female, mean age 13.2 years, 46 % overweight or obese) completed the questionnaires. The median PGSQ score was similar in both groups (4.0 (IQR: 1.0-7.8) vs. 3.0 (IQR: 1.0-7.0), p=0.6). However, the total PedsQL score was significantly lower in the children with overweight or obesity compared to those with normal weight (80.1 (71.1-91.0) vs. 88.0 (76.1-94.6), p=0.031). The PedsQL score was lower among overweight patients with GERD symptoms than that of normal-weight patients without GERD symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the importance of raising awareness about GERD to enhance the HRQoL and prevent long-term complications in obese children.

Higher obesity class is associated with more severe esophageal symptoms and reflux burden but not altered motor function or contractile reserve

BACKGROUND

Patients with obesity often report esophageal symptoms, with abnormal reflux and esophageal motility suggested as potential mechanisms. However, prior studies showed varying results, often limited by study design/size and esophageal function/symptom measures utilized. We aimed to examine the relationship between obesity and objective esophageal function testing and patient-reported outcomes, utilizing prospective symptom, manometric and reflux monitoring data with impedance.

METHODS

Adults referred for high-resolution impedance-manometry (HRiM) and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) to evaluate esophageal symptoms were enrolled. Validated symptom and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) instruments were prospectively collected: GERDQ, reflux symptoms index (RSI), dominant symptom intensity (DSI, multiplied 5-point Likert scales for symptom frequency/severity), global symptom severity (GSS, 100-point visual analog scale), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) for HR-QOL. Esophageal function testing measures were compared across body mass index (BMI) categories and correlated with patient-reported outcomes.

KEY RESULTS

Seven hundred and fifty four patients were included (Normal:281/Overweight:253/Class I obesity:137/Class II/III obesity:83). Reflux burden measures on MII-pH (acid exposure time, total reflux episodes, bolus exposure time), conclusive pathologic reflux (Lyon), and hiatal hernia were increased in higher obesity classes compared to normal BMI. Class II/III obesity was associated with more normal/hypercontractile swallows, less ineffective swallows, and better bolus transit on HRiM. BMI correlated positively with GERDQ/RSI/DSI/GSS, and negatively with physical component score (SF-12). Esophageal symptom severity and HR-QOL correlated strongly with MII-pH findings, but not HRiM measures.

CONCLUSIONS/INFERENCES

Obesity is associated with increased esophageal symptom burden and worse physical HR-QOL, which correlate with higher acid/bolus reflux burden but not altered esophageal motility/transit/contractile reserve.

Reflux Symptoms Increase Following Sleeve Gastrectomy Despite Triage of Symptomatic Patients to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Bariatric surgical options in obese patients include sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), which may not be equivalent in risk of postoperative reflux symptoms. We evaluated risk and predictive factors for postbariatric surgery reflux symptoms.

METHODS

Patients with obesity evaluated for bariatric surgery over a 15-month period were prospectively followed with validated symptom questionnaires (GERDQ, dominant symptom index: product of symptom frequency and intensity from 5-point Likert scores) administered before and after SG and RYGB. Esophageal testing included high-resolution manometry in all patients, and ambulatory reflux monitoring off therapy in those with abnormal GERDQ or prior reflux history. Univariate comparisons and multivariable analysis were performed to determine if preoperative factors predicted postoperative reflux symptoms.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients (median age 49.0 years, 84% female, median BMI 46.5 kg/m 2 ) fulfilled inclusion criteria and underwent follow-up assessment 4.4 years after bariatric surgery. Baseline GERDQ and dominant symptom index for heartburn were significantly higher in RYGB patients ( P ≤0.04). Despite this, median GERDQ increased by 2 (0.0 to 4.8) following SG and decreased by 0.5 (-1.0 to 5.0) following RYGB ( P =0.02). GERDQ became abnormal in 43.8% after SG and 18.8% after RYGB ( P =0.058); abnormal GERDQ improved in 12.5% and 37.5%, respectively ( P =0.041). In a model that included age, gender, BMI, acid exposure time, and type of surgery, multivariable analysis identified SG as an independent predictor of postoperative heartburn (odds ratio 16.61, P =0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite preferential RYGB when preoperative GERD was identified, SG independently predicted worsening heartburn symptoms after bariatric surgery.

Mid-term Outcomes of Nissen Fundoplication Versus Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass for Primary Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients With Obesity

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and outcomes of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in patients with obesity is controversial. Specifically, concerns regarding long-term outcomes and recurrence in the setting of obesity has led to interest in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we studied patients with obesity who underwent either LNF or RYGB for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Baseline demographics, clinical variables, operative outcomes, and symptom severity scores were compared.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics, operative outcomes, and quality-of-life scores were similar. Proton pump inhibitor usage, quality-of-life, symptom severity scores, and satisfaction with the operation were similar between groups at mid-term follow-up.

DISCUSSION

RYGB and LNF produced similar improvements in disease-specific quality of life with similar rates of complications, side effects, and need for reoperation. This demonstrates that RYGB and LNF represent possible options for surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in obese patients.

Study of gastroesophageal reflux. Interpretation of functional tests in the obese patient

Overweight and obesity are a public health problem and in 1997 obesity was recognized as a global epidemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). Overweight and obesity affect almost 60% of adults and one in three children in Europe according to the most recent WHO report. Objectively, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as the presence of characteristic esophageal mucosal damage assessed by endoscopy and/or the demonstra-tion of pathological acid exposure by reflux monitoring studies. The prevalence of GERD is increased in obese patients In overweight and obese patients, the clinical symptoms of GERD are especially present in the supine position and this correlates with more frequent episodes of nocturnal reflux in the 24-h pH monitoring, there is also an increase in the number of refluxes with content acid. In the population with symptoms, digestive endoscopy detects data of erosive esophagitis in 50% of patients, while 24-h pH-impedanciometry diagnoses 92% of patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) The presence of persistent GERD in the mucosa affects esophageal motility and patients may develop ineffective esophageal motility-type disorders, so we will review the interpre-tation of the functional tests that determine motility, which is esophageal manometry, and those that determine reflux gastroesophageal, acid and non-acid, which is the pH measure-ment with or without 24-h impedanciometry.

Histopathological Findings in Turkish Patients Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy: Is Histopathologic Examination of Sleeve Gastrectomy Specimens Clinically Important?

PURPOSE

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a widely used surgical method in the treatment of obesity. This study aimed to reveal the histopathological changes in SG materials and to investigate the prevalence of clinically important lesions requiring follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred five patients' data who underwent SG were analyzed. Cases were divided into three groups as normal, chronic inactive gastritis (CIG), and chronic active gastritis (CAG). Age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) of the three groups and the differences in the gastritis parameters of CIG and CAG groups were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (10.8%) were in the normal group, 145 (47.5%) were in the CIG group, and 127 (41.6%) were in the CAG group. Preoperative endoscopic examination was performed in all cases, but Helicobacter pylori (HP) treatment was not applied. HP were detected in 39.3%, atrophy in 3.9%, intestinal metaplasia (IM) in 4.9%, and lymphoid follicle (LF) in 30% of the cases. Inflammation, atrophy, IM, LF, and HP were significantly higher in the CAG group. The proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-related changes were seen in 20 cases and it was more frequent in the CIG group. Intramucosal signet ring cell carcinoma was detected in 1 case. Endocrine cell hyperplasia and dysplasia were present in 7 cases with CAG. Multiple grade 1 neuroendocrine tumors were detected in just 1 case.

CONCLUSION

In our SG specimens, HP and clinically important lesions were significantly higher in the CAG group. Pathological examination should be carefully done as the lesions detected in SG specimens can change patient management.

Role of Preoperative High-Resolution Manometry in the Identification of Patients at High Risk of Postoperative GERD Symptoms 1 Year After Sleeve Gastrectomy

PURPOSE

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most common bariatric procedure, but it is often characterized by the onset of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). High-resolution manometry (HRM) is a useful tool to detect risk factors for GERD. The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative manometric parameters as possible predictors of postoperative GERD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a monocentric retrospective study. We analyzed 164 patients, with preoperative esophagitis/GERD symptoms who underwent preoperative HRM and were submitted to SG (July 2020-February 2022).

RESULTS

Postoperative GERD was observed in 60 patients (36.6%): 41 of them (68%) already had preoperative GERD symptoms, whereas the remaining 19 patients (32%) developed postoperative symptoms. Female patients developed postoperative GERD in a significantly higher fraction of cases as compared to male patients (82% versus 18%; p < 0.001). DCI (distal contractile integral) was identified as the only HRM parameter correlating with the presence of GERD. Patients with DCI ≤ 1623 mmHg*cm*s developed postoperative GERD in 46% of cases (n = 43/94), as compared to 24% of cases (n = 17/70) among patients with DCI > 1623 mmHg*cm*s (p = 0.005). At multivariable analysis, female sex (OR 3.402, p = 0.002), preoperative GERD symptoms (OR 2.489, p = 0.013), and DCI ≤ 1623 mmHg*s*cm (OR 0.335, p = 0.003) were identified as independent determinants of postoperative GERD.

CONCLUSION

All the patients with preoperative risk factors for reflux, such as GERD symptoms or esophagitis on EGDS (esophagogastroduodenoscopy), should be considered for an HRM. Moreover, when a DCI ≤ 1623 mmHg*s*cm is found, a bariatric procedure different from SG might be considered.

Effect of Body Weight and Obesity on Esophageal Function

The incidence of obesity in the population is gradually increasing. Obesity can cause a variety of complications in the digestive system such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, and impacts the integrity of the esophageal mucosal barrier and esophageal motility. However, not many studies have focused on the effect of varying degrees of obesity on the esophagus. A total of 611 participants were included in this study. We divided them into three groups according to their body mass index (BMI): the normal weight group, the overweight group, and the obesity group. We performed a retrospective comparison between groups based on indicators from high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and 24-hour pH impedance monitoring, and did a correlation analysis on multiple indicators such as esophageal mucosal barrier, esophageal motility, and acid reflux. The mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) in the overweight and obesity groups was lower than that in the normal group. The MNBI of the subjects in Z5-Z6 channels in the overweight group was significantly lower than that in the normal group. With respect to Z3-Z6 channels, MNBI values in the obesity group were significantly lower than those in the normal group. 'The acid exposure time (AET), the DeMeester scores (DMS) and 24-hour total reflux episodes was significantly higher in the obesity group than those in the normal and overweight groups. The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) residual pressure, and intrabolus pressure (IBP) in the overweight and obesity groups were significantly higher than those in the normal group. In addition, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure, and esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) in the obesity group were significantly higher than those in the normal group. We found that increase in body weight affected the integrity of esophageal mucosa, and different degrees of increase associated with different degrees and different aspects of changes in esophageal motility.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Obesity: Bariatric Surgery as Both the Cause and the Cure in the Morbidly Obese Population

Gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic, highly prevalent condition in the United States. GERD can significantly impact quality of life and lead to complications including aspiration pneumonia, esophageal stricture, Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal cancer. Obesity is a risk factor for GERD, which often improves with weight loss and bariatric surgery. Though the incidence of bariatric surgery, in particular, minimally invasive sleeve gastrectomy, has risen in recent years, emerging data has revealed that the severity or new onset of GERD may follow bariatric surgery. We performed a literature review to provide a detailed analysis of GERD with an emphasis on bariatric surgery as both the cure and the cause for GERD in the morbidly obese population. We also describe the pathophysiological mechanisms, management approach and treatment strategies of GERD following bariatric surgery.

Health Complications of Obesity: 224 Obesity-Associated Comorbidities from a Mechanistic Perspective

Obesity is associated with a wide range of comorbidities that transverse multiple specialties in clinical medicine. The development of these comorbidities is driven by various mechanistic changes including chronic inflammation and oxidative stress, increased growth-promoting adipokines, insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, direct loading and infiltrative effect of adiposity, heightened activities of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and sympathetic nervous system, impaired immunity, altered sex hormones, altered brain structure, elevated cortisol levels, and increased uric acid production, among others. Some of the comorbidities might develop secondary to one or more other comorbidities. Considering the obesity-associated comorbidities in the context of the mechanistic changes is helpful in understanding these conditions and in guiding treatment and future research.

Comparing Gerd and Non-GERD Patients Regarding Knowledge Level of Acute Myocardial Infarction Symptoms, Risk Factors and Immediate Action Must Be Taken in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION

A major cause of death globally is cardiovascular disease (CVD). Chest pain, nausea, vomiting, and heartburn are common symptoms of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Chest pain is also the main symptom of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Therefore, the differential diagnosis of chest pain can become more challenging when GERD and AMI coincide. This study evaluated and compared the knowledge of the signs, symptoms, and immediate action that must be taken regarding AMI among GERD and non-GERD patients.

METHODOLOGY

An observational cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire was created and published between October and November 2022 to collect data from Saudi males and females 18 or older willing to participate in the study. Participants who were not Saudi had declined to complete the survey or had not fully completed it was excluded. The questionnaire contained three sections; after collecting informed consent, it made inquiries regarding respondents' GERD status, demographic information, and knowledge and attitudes regarding GERD.

RESULTS

This study included 691 responses from 300 non-GERD participants and 391 GERD participants. The study showed a high level of awareness (75.5%) of GERD, with significant differences in the level of awareness according to marital status, education levels, and occupation status. There was no significant difference in the level of awareness according to gender and GERD diagnosis, where the p-value > 0.05. The most common source of information about AMI was the Internet, followed by health care professionals. The most commonly known symptoms of AMI were sudden pain or discomfort in the chest, followed by a sudden shortness of breath. Additionally, there was no significant association between the diagnosis of GERD and known risk factors. The association between GERD and other diseases (chi-square = 46.94, p-value 0.01). Obesity and smoking were the two main risk factors for heart attacks.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that there was no significant difference between GERD and non-GERD participants regarding the knowledge and awareness level of AMI. Moreover, it showed that there was a lack of general knowledge and awareness of AMI in Saudi Arabia. The authors recommend initiating more awareness programs in Saudi Arabia to inform people about AMI and cardiovascular disease. More research is required to determine whether other patients are aware of AMI.

GERD after Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: Assessment of Incidence and Predisposing Factors

BACKGROUND

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective intervention for achalasia, but GERD is a major postoperative adverse event. This study aimed to characterize post-POEM GERD and identify preoperative or technical factors impacting development or severity of GERD.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent POEM at our institution. Favorable outcome was defined as postoperative Eckardt score of 3 or less. Subjective GERD was defined as symptoms consistent with reflux. Objective GERD was based on a DeMeester score greater than 14.7 or Los Angeles grade C or D esophagitis. Severe GERD was defined as a DeMeester score greater than 50.0 or Los Angeles grade D esophagitis Preoperative clinical and objective data and technical surgical elements were compared between those with and without GERD. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify factors associated with each GERD definition.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients underwent POEM. At a mean ± SD follow-up of 21.7 ± 20.7 months, 93.4% achieved favorable outcome. Subjective, objective, and severe objective GERD were found in 38.8%, 50.5%, and 19.2% of patients, respectively. Of those with objective GERD, 24.0% had no reflux symptoms. Women were more likely to report GERD symptoms (p = 0.007), but objective GERD rates were similar between sexes (p = 0.606). The independent predictors for objective GERD were normal preoperative diameter of esophagus (odds ratio [OR] 3.4; p = 0.008) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure less than 45 mmHg (OR 1.86; p = 0.027). The independent predictors for severe objective GERD were LES pressure less than 45 mmHg (OR 6.57; p = 0.007) and obesity (OR 5.03; p = 0.005). The length of esophageal or gastric myotomy or indication of procedure had no impact on the incidence or severity of GERD.

CONCLUSION

The rate of pathologic GERD after POEM is higher than symptomatic GERD. A nonhypertensive preoperative LES is a predictor for post-POEM GERD. No modifiable factors impact GERD after POEM.

Independent association of preoperative Hill grade with gastroesophageal reflux disease 2 years after sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

The sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is associated with postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Higher endoscopic Hill grade has been linked to GERD in patients without metabolic surgery. How preoperative Hill grade relates to GERD after SG is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship between preoperative Hill grade and GERD outcomes 2 years after SG.

SETTING

Academic hospital, United States.

METHODS

All patients (n = 882) undergoing SG performed by 5 surgeons at a single academic institution from January 2015 to December 2019 were included. Complete data sets were available for 360 patients, which were incorporated in analyses. GERD was defined as the presence of a diagnosis in the medical record accompanied by pharmacotherapy. Patients with GERD postoperatively (n = 193) were compared with those without (n = 167). Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to explore independent associations between preoperative factors and GERD outcomes.

RESULTS

The presence of any GERD increased at the postoperative follow-up of 25.2 (3.9) months compared with preoperative values (53.6% versus 41.1%; P = .0001). Secondary GERD outcomes at follow-up included de novo (41.0%), persistent (33.1%), resolved (28.4%), worsened (26.4%), and improved (12.2%) disease. Postoperative endoscopy and reoperation for GERD occurred in 26.4% and 6.7% of the sample. Patients with GERD postoperatively showed higher prevalence of Hill grade III-IV (32.6% versus 19.8%; P = .0062) and any hiatal hernia (HH) (36.3% versus 25.1%; P = .0222) compared with patients without postoperative GERD. Frequencies of gastritis, esophagitis A or B, duodenitis, and peptic ulcer disease were similar between groups. Higher prevalence of preoperative GERD (54.9% versus 25.1%; P < .0001), obstructive sleep apnea (66.8% versus 54.5%; P = .0171), and anxiety (25.4% versus 15.6%; P = .0226) was observed in patients with postoperative GERD compared with those without it. Baseline demographics, weight, other obesity-associated diseases, whether an HH was repaired at index SG, and follow-up length were statistically similar between groups. After adjusting for collinearity, preoperative GERD (odds ratio [OR] = 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-5.7; P < .0001) and Hill grade III-IV (OR [95% CI]: 1.9 [1.1-3.1]; P = .0174) were independently associated with the presence of any GERD postoperatively. The preoperative presence of an HH >2 cm and whether an HH was repaired at index SG showed no independent association with GERD at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 50% of patients experienced GERD 2 years after SG. Preoperative GERD confers the highest risk for GERD postoperatively. Hill grade III-IV is independently associated with GERD after SG. Whether a hiatal hernia repair was performed did not influence GERD outcomes. Preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy should be obtained before SG and Hill grade routinely captured and used to counsel patients about the risk of postoperative GERD after this procedure. Hill grade may help guide the choice of metabolic operation.

Genetic estimation of correlations and causalities between multifaceted modifiable factors and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common gastrointestinal dysfunction that significantly affects the quality of daily life, and health interventions are challenging to prevent the risk of GORD. In this study, we used Mendelian randomization framework to genetically determine the causal associations between multifaceted modifiable factors and the risk of GORD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-six exposures with available instrumental variables (IVs) across 6 modifiable pathways were included in the univariable MR analysis (UVMR). Summary-level genome-wide association studies (GWAS) datasets for GORD were retrieved from the Neale Lab (GORD _Neale , Ncases = 29975, Ncontrols = 390556) and FinnGen (GORD _Finn , Ncases = 13141, Ncontrols = 89695). Using the METAL software, meta-analysis for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from GORD _Neale and GORD _Finn was conducted with an inverse variance weighted (IVW) fixed-effect model. Moreover, we leveraged partition around medoids (PAM) clustering algorithm to cluster genetic correlation subtypes, whose hub exposures were conditioned for multivariable MR (MVMR) analyses. P-values were adjusted with Bonferroni multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Significant causal associations were identified between 26 exposures (15 risk exposures and 11 protective exposures) and the risk of GORD. Among them, 13 risk exposures [lifetime smoking, cigarette consumption, insomnia, short sleep, leisure sedentary behavior (TV watching), body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, whole body fat mass, visceral adipose tissue, waist circumference, hip circumference, major depressive disorder, and anxious feeling], and 10 protective exposures (leisure sedentary behavior (computer use), sitting height, hand grip strength (left and right), birth weight, life satisfaction, positive affect, income, educational attainment, and intelligence) showed novel significant causal associations with the risk of GORD. Moreover, 13 exposures still demonstrated independent associations with the risk of GORD following MVMR analyses conditioned for hub exposures (educational attainment, smoking initiation and BMI). In addition, 12 exposures showed suggestive causal associations with the risk of GORD.

CONCLUSION

This study systematically elucidated the modifiable factors causally associated with the risk of GORD from multifaceted perspectives, which provided implications for prevention and treatment of GORD.

Comparative Outcomes of Anti-Reflux Surgery in Obese Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease1

INTRODUCTION

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been the preferred operation for obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, some patients are hesitant to undergo bypass. Obese patients have a multifactorial predisposition to GERD, including lower esophageal sphincter (LES) dysfunction and aberrant pressure gradients across their diaphragmatic crura. Among non-obese patients, anti-reflux surgery (ARS) with hiatal hernia (HH) repair and LES augmentation has shown excellent long-term results. We aimed to determine whether patient satisfaction and GERD recurrence differed between obese and non-obese patients who underwent ARS.

METHODS

Review of patients who underwent ARS between January 2012 and June 2021 was performed. Perioperative and postoperative characteristics were compared across three BMI groups: BMI < 30 kg/m², 30 kg/m² ≤ BMI < 35 kg/m², and BMI ≥ 35 kg/m².

RESULTS

Four-hundred thirteen patients were identified, of which 294 (71.1%) had BMI < 30 kg/m², 87 (21.1%) were 30 kg/m² ≤ BMI < 35 kg/m², and 32 (7.7%) had a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m². Patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² had higher preoperative manometric and EndoFLIP™ intra-balloon pressure at the LES than those with lower BMIs. This value was increased to a similar level throughout ARS across the three cohorts. Post-operative GERD-specific satisfaction was similar across the three cohorts, as were rates of postoperative reflux and hiatal hernia recurrence on barium swallow; rates of reoperation were low.

CONCLUSIONS

ARS with HH repair and LES augmentation may be appropriate for select patients across a range of BMIs, including those with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² who are hesitant to undergo RYGB.

Role of Non-pharmacological Interventions and Weight Loss in the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Obese Individuals: A Systematic Review

With the increasing prevalence of obesity, the worldwide risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has also increased. Abdominal obesity increases intragastric pressure, disturbing the integrity of the gastroesophageal junction, thus facilitating reflux. Other than obesity, some lifestyle factors also cause GERD, including smoking, consumption of alcohol and caffeine, late-night meals, and high fat intake. This review study aimed to assess the impact of weight loss and lifestyle modifications on GERD. In this systematic review, the databases used were PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Boolean system and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) strategy were used to form suitable keywords. Patients from the pediatric and geriatric populations were excluded from the study and quality assessment was done using different assessment tools. A positive association between obesity and GERD was found. It was also found that the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) causes complications, so lifestyle interventions should be used more than PPIs for treating GERD, especially in obese patients. We concluded that weight loss could lead to the resolution of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and therefore, conservative measures, including dietary modifications such as reducing the consumption of alcohol, caffeine, and chocolate, behavioral changes such as smoking cessation and elevation of the head of the bed, and weight loss, should be used as first-line management for GERD. Although awareness has increased regarding the adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors, future studies are required to assess these negative effects.

Association between the body mass index, waist circumference, and body fat percentage with erosive esophagitis in adults with obesity after sleeve gastrectomy

Background: High anthropometric indexes before sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are associated with an increased risk of erosive esophagitis (EE) in bariatric surgery candidates. Reasons that explain how these indexes influence the development of esophageal pathology after surgery remains unclear. Objectives: To assess the association between the body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and body fat percentage (BFP) with the development of EE in adults with obesity three months after SG. Setting: Clínica Avendaño, Lima, Peru. Methods: Retrospective cohort using a database including adults with obesity who underwent SG during 2017-2020. All the patients included had an endoscopy before and after the surgery. Sociodemographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics were compared according to BMI, WC and BFP, as well as by the development of de novo esophagitis. The association was evaluated by crude and adjusted generalized linear models with the log-Poisson family. Results: From a total of 106 patients, 23 (21.7%) developed EE. We did not find significant differences in sociodemographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics between patients with de novo EE compared to those who did not develop EE. After adjustment, BMI (aRR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.18-1.40), BFP (aRR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.15-1.19) and WC (aRR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.69-1.16) were not associated with the development of EE three months post SG. Conclusions: We found no association between preoperative anthropometric indexes and the development of de novo EE; therefore, morbid obesity should not be a criterion to exclude the patients to undergo SG as primary surgery because of the risk of developing EE.

Objective ambulatory pH monitoring and subjective symptom assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease show type of carbohydrate and type of fat matter

Background

Rising prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in US Veterans is concurrent with increasing excess body weight.

Objective

The objective of this cross-sectional study is to examine relationships between dietary macronutrients, gastrointestinal hormones, and GERD status.

Methods

Ninety-eight veterans with overweight/obesity and empiric proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment were enrolled from the Tennessee Valley Healthcare System. Subjects had esophageal manometry and 24-h pH monitoring. Subjective symptoms were assessed with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERDQ) and Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS). The primary outcomes, total acid exposure time (AET) and number of reflux episodes, enabled categorizing subjects as either pathologic GERD or inconclusive GERD. Data analysis included independent T-tests, Spearman Rho correlations, and multivariable linear regression modeling.

Results

Higher intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (sugar-sweetened tea, soda, and fruit juice) associated with higher AET. Higher saturated-to-unsaturated fat intake is associated with higher AET and number of reflux episodes. Overall, sugar-sweetened beverage intake, saturated-to-unsaturated fat ratio, tomato-based food items, glucagon-like polypeptide 1 (GLP-1) level, time of first meal, and education status accounted for a significant amount of the variability in AET. Pathologic GERD subjects reported more heartburn (p = 0.006), regurgitation (p = 0.01), acid taste (0.001), and nausea severity (p = 0.04). GERDQ score associated with AET (r = 0.31, p = 0.005), but GSAS did not (r = 0.12, p = 0.28).

Conclusion

Of the many foods and nutrients tested, the type (not amount) of carbohydrate (simple sugars) and the type (not amount) of fat (saturated vs unsaturated fat) consumed associated with objective and/or subjective GERD testing. These novel findings contribute to the evidence base guiding specific dietary recommendations in the clinical management of GERD.

Metabolic syndrome is associated with higher rate of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) seriously lowers the quality of life of patients, and its prevalence has gradually increased in recent years. Some studies have showed that metabolic syndrome (MetS) is related to GERD, but the results remain controversial. This study explored the relationship between MetS and GERD through systematic retrieval and analysis of published studies.

METHODS

Retrieve related research from PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Including cohort studies that compare the prevalence of GERD between patients with MetS and patients without, and case-control studies or cross-sectional studies that compare the prevalence of MetS between patients with GERD and patients without. In addition to analyzing the relationship between MetS and GERD, individual metabolic components are also analyzed. Use a random effects model (DerSimmonian and Laird) to merge the odd ratio (OR). Cochran's Q test and Higgins' I-squared statistic were performed to assess heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 103,048 patients from 15 studies were included. The combined results suggest that MetS is a risk factor of GERD (OR: 1.66, 95%CI: 1.38-1.99). Among the individual metabolic components, abdominal obesity (OR: 1.42, 95%CI: 1.22-1.64), hypertriglyceridemia (OR: 1.50, 95%CI: 1.27-1.78), hyperglycemia (OR: 1.31, 95%CI: 1.07-1.61), and hypertension (OR: 1.19, 95%CI: 1.07-1.33) are risk factors of GERD.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

MetS is a risk factor of GERD, and among the abnormal metabolic components that establish the diagnosis of MetS, abdominal obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia, and hypertension are risk factors of GERD.

2020 Seoul Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition in which gastric contents regurgitate into the esophagus or beyond, resulting in either troublesome symptoms or complications. GERD is heterogeneous in terms of varied manifestations, test findings, and treatment responsiveness. GERD diagnosis can be established with symptomatology, pathology, or physiology. Recently the Lyon consensus defined the “proven GERD” with concrete evidence for reflux, including advanced grade erosive esophagitis (Los Angeles classification grades C and or D esophagitis), long-segment Barrett’s mucosa or peptic strictures on endoscopy or distal esophageal acid exposure time > 6% on 24-hour ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring. However, some Asian researchers have different opinions on whether the same standards should be applied to the Asian population. The prevalence of GERD is increasing in Asia. The present evidence-based guidelines were developed using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. In GERD with typical symptoms, a proton pump inhibitor test can be recommended as a sensitive, cost-effective, and practical test for GERD diagnosis.

Based on a meta-analysis of 19 estimated acid-exposure time values in Asians, the reference range upper limit for esophageal acid exposure time was 3.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.7-3.9%) in the Asian countries. Esophageal manometry and novel impedance measurements, including mucosal impedance and a post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave, are promising in discrimination of GERD among different reflux phenotypes, thus increasing its diagnostic yield. We also propose a long-term strategy of evidence-based GERD treatment with proton pump inhibitors and other drugs.

Current status of gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy: Still a long way to go

Obesity is a public health concern that is becoming increasingly more serious around the world. Bariatric surgery has become more prevalent due to the obesity epidemic worldwide. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is one of the most popular procedures which is safe and efficient. Despite all its favorable features, however, there is an increasing evidence from the literature that the long-term incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is likely to represent the Achilles' heel of this procedure. Management of severe reflux after SG usually requires revisional surgery. The relationship between SG and GERD needs to be better ascertained in order to prevent related complications, such as esophageal adenocarcinoma. This review attempts to elucidate the effect of SG on GERD and the postoperative management of reflux disease according to recent literature in the hope of drawing the attention of clinicians to postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and guiding the optimal management strategy associated with this "troublesome complication".

The Effect of Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Obesity is a chronic disease that is becoming increasingly more prevalent and is associated with many health problems, such as metabolic syndrome. The treatment options for obese patients include lifestyle modification, medications, endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs), and surgery. In particular, EBMTs have an excellent therapeutic effect and are less invasive than bariatric surgery. Although it is clear that EBMTs are relatively safe procedures, they can result in several adverse events. Among them, the relationship between EBMTs and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is unclear. Several studies have demonstrated that an intragastric balloon (IGB) may worsen GERD. There are a few studies on the effects of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) on GERD, but the linking evidence is insufficient. However, the conclusion is not simple. Because obesity is an important cause of GERD, and GERD naturally improves with weight loss after EBMTs, it is not easy to evaluate accurately the effect of EBMTs on GERD. This review aimed to discuss the effect of EBMTs on GERD and suggest future research directions.

ESNM/ANMS consensus paper: Diagnosis and management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease

Up to 40% of patients with symptoms suspicious of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) do not respond completely to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The term "refractory GERD" has been used loosely in the literature. A distinction should be made between refractory symptoms (ie, symptoms may or may not be GERD-related), refractory GERD symptoms (ie, persisting symptoms in patients with proven GERD, regardless of relationship to ongoing reflux), and refractory GERD (ie, objective evidence of GERD despite adequate medical management). The present ESNM/ANMS consensus paper proposes use the term "refractory GERD symptoms" only in patients with persisting symptoms and previously proven GERD by either endoscopy or esophageal pH monitoring. Even in this context, symptoms may or may not be reflux related. Objective evaluation, including endoscopy and esophageal physiologic testing, is requisite to provide insights into mechanisms of symptom generation and evidence of true refractory GERD. Some patients may have true ongoing refractory acid or weakly acidic reflux despite PPIs, while others have no evidence of ongoing reflux, and yet others have functional esophageal disorders (overlapping with proven GERD confirmed off therapy). In this context, attention should also be paid to supragastric belching and rumination syndrome, which may be important contributors to refractory symptoms.

Normal acid exposure time in esophageal pH monitoring in Asian and Western populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Esophageal acid exposure time (AET) during 24 h pH monitoring is reproducible and predictive outcomes of treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Several small Asian studies have investigated the normal range of the AET; the range may be different from that in Western populations. We evaluated its normal range in healthy Asian compared to Western subjects.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed for studies that reported pH monitoring parameters in healthy subjects. Studies that reported the AET values of healthy subjects were eligible for the analyses. The upper limit of normal of the AET was obtained from the 95th percentile of the available raw data or calculated as the mean value +2 standard deviations.

KEY RESULTS

Nineteen Asian and 49 Western studies were assessed. The estimated AET values were analyzed using a bootstrapping technique, weighted according to the sample size. The mean AET was 1.1% and 2.9% in the Asian and Western populations, respectively. The upper limit of the reference range was 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-3.9%) and 8.2 (95% CI, 6.7-9.9) in the Asian and Western populations, respectively. The normal AET differed between the Asian and Western populations because the CI of the two groups did not overlap.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The upper limit of normal of the AET in healthy Asian subjects was 3.2% (95% CI, 2.7-3.9%), which was lower than that of healthy Western subjects.

Association between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Elastographic Parameters of Liver Steatosis and Fibrosis: Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurements

AIM

Our aim was to investigate the association among elastographic parameters of liver steatosis and fibrosis, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

In this prospective, cross-sectional study, we have evaluated 937 patients with one or more components of the metabolic syndrome who had an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) due to GERD symptoms. In all patients, a laboratory analysis, an abdominal ultrasound, and FibroScan measurements were done. GERD was defined by EGD.

RESULTS

The mean body mass index (BMI) of the study population was 30.95 ± 5.45 kg/m². The prevalence of increased CAP was 82.6% (774/937). Patients with increased CAP were younger, were more obese, had higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, and had higher values of aminotransferases. Similar results of higher prevalence in patients with elevated CAP were observed with GERD, hiatal hernia, and insufficient cardia (defined as deficient or absent closure of the gastric inlet in relation to the esophagus). Additionally, patients with elevated CAP had a higher prevalence of GERD grades B and C in comparison to those without elevated CAP. Consequently, patients who did not have elevated CAP had a higher prevalence of GERD grade A. Even though we have found an upward trend in the prevalence of GERD, hiatal hernia, and insufficient cardia, there was no significant difference between subjects with fibrosis (F) 1-2 and F3-4 stage of fibrosis or F1 and F2-4. In a binary logistic regression, a significant positive association with GERD was obtained for CAP. Furthermore, a significant positive association with hiatal hernia was obtained for BMI and CAP. Finally, a significant positive association with hiatal hernia was obtained with CAP in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to reveal a positive association between CAP as a surrogate marker of liver steatosis and GERD after adjustments for other clinical variables.

Evaluation of the Esophagogastric Junction on High Resolution Manometry

The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is a complex barrier between the thoracic and abdominal luminal gut compartments, comprised primarily of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm. Although closed at rest, the EGJ relaxes to allow antegrade bolus transit and retrograde venting of air. Abnormal relaxation is the hallmark of achalasia spectrum disorders, while increased frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and/or EGJ disruption are seen in gastroesophageal reflux disease. High resolution manometry (HRM) is the modern day gold standard for assessment of EGJ morphology and function, with better performance characteristics compared with endoscopy and barium esophagography. Conventional LES metrics defining EGJ function include resting LES pressure as well as postswallow residual pressures. Newer HRM-based metrics include EGJ contractile integral, which measures static barrier function at rest, and EGJ morphology, which characterizes the relationship between LES and crural diaphragm. Provocative maneuvers assess dynamic EGJ function during physiological or pharmacologic stress. The most useful of these maneuvers, the rapid drink challenge, assesses for latent obstruction, while multiple rapid swallows evaluate adequacy of deglutitive inhibition. Amyl nitrate and cholecystokinin administration can segregate motor from structural obstruction. Newer provocative tests (straight leg raise maneuver, abdominal compression) and novel diagnostic tools (functional lumen imaging probe) complement HRM evaluation of the EGJ. Although current HRM metrics and maneuvers show promise in identifying clinically relevant EGJ abnormalities, future investigations evaluating management outcomes will improve segregation of normal from abnormal EGJ morphology and function.

Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and constipation: laxative use is common in GERD patients

BACKGROUND

The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and constipation has not yet been examined in Japan. We herein analyzed the use of laxatives by GERD and non-GERD patients to clarify the relationship between GERD and constipation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study designed to examine the use of laxatives by GERD and non-GERD patients. A total of 118 patients (mean age 69.7 years, 50 males) with reflux esophagitis (RE) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) who received maintenance acid-suppressive therapy for more than 1 year were included in the GERD group (83 RE patients, 35NERD patients). Similarly, 61 patients (mean age 69.4 years, 28 males) who received regular acid-suppressive therapy for reasons other than GERD were included in the non-GERD group. We also investigated demographic factors associated with the onset of GERD, including body mass index (BMI), age, and sex.

RESULTS

The frequency of laxative use was significantly higher in the GERD group (38.1%) than in the non-GERD group (21.3%). No significant differences were observed in dose frequencies between the groups. The type of laxative used also did not significantly differ between the groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were noted in sex, age, or BMI between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of laxatives was significantly more common in GERD patients than in non-GERD patients. The present results suggest that a relationship exists between GERD and constipation.

Visceral fat obesity is the key risk factor for the development of reflux erosive esophagitis in 40-69-years subjects

BACKGROUND

Visceral fat obesity can be defined quantitatively by abdominal computed tomography, however, the usefulness of measuring visceral fat area to assess the etiology of gastrointestinal reflux disease has not been fully elucidated.

METHODS

A total of 433 healthy subjects aged 40-69 years (234 men, 199 women) were included in the study. The relationship between obesity-related factors (total fat area, visceral fat area, subcutaneous fat area, waist circumference, and body mass index) and the incidence of reflux erosive esophagitis was investigated. Lifestyle factors and stomach conditions relevant to the onset of erosive esophagitis were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of reflux erosive esophagitis was 27.2% (118/433; 106 men, 12 women). Visceral fat area was higher in subjects with erosive esophagitis than in those without (116.6 cm² vs. 64.9 cm², respectively). The incidence of erosive esophagitis was higher in subjects with visceral fat obesity (visceral fat area ≥ 100 cm²) than in those without (61.2% vs. 12.8%, respectively). Visceral fat obesity had the highest odds ratio (OR) among obesity-related factors. Multivariate analysis showed that visceral fat area was associated with the incidence of erosive esophagitis (OR = 2.18), indicating that it is an independent risk factor for erosive esophagitis. In addition, daily alcohol intake (OR = 1.54), gastric atrophy open type (OR = 0.29), and never-smoking history (OR = 0.49) were also independently associated with the development of erosive esophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Visceral fat obesity is the key risk factor for the development of reflux erosive esophagitis in subjects aged 40-69 years.

Straight leg raise metrics on high-resolution manometry associate with esophageal reflux burden

BACKGROUND

Straight leg raise (SLR) is a provocative maneuver that assesses esophagogastric junction (EGJ) barrier function during high-resolution manometry (HRM). We evaluated the value of SLR in symptomatic reflux patients undergoing ambulatory reflux monitoring.

METHODS

Adult patients being evaluated for reflux symptoms with esophageal physiologic testing off antisecretory therapy over a 12 month period were studied. Demographics, clinical presentation, HRM studies, and reflux monitoring studies were analyzed. Intra-abdominal and intra-esophageal pressures were extracted at baseline and during SLR from HRM studies. Acid exposure time (AET) was derived from reflux monitoring studies, and EGJ morphology and tone from HRM studies. SLR pressure metrics predicting abnormal AET were evaluated.

KEY RESULTS

Of 122 patients, 70 (57.4%) had ≥50% peak intra-abdominal pressure increase during SLR (58.0 ± 1.4 years, 75.7% female). Peak intra-esophageal pressure gradient between baseline and SLR predicted pathologic AET when ≥100% (AUC 0.78, sensitivity 71%, specificity 75%, P < .001), seen in 60.7% with AET > 6%, but only 23.7% with AET < 4% (P = .01). Peak intra-esophageal pressure gradient ≥100% was most discriminative in identifying abnormal acid burden in type 1 EGJ morphology (P = .005) but trended toward significance in type 2 and type 3 morphology (P = .1). Normal and abnormal EGJ contractile integral did not associate with peak intra-esophageal pressure gradient either collectively or when subdivided by EGJ morphology (P ≥ .2).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Analysis of intra-esophageal pressure gradients during SLR, a simple HRM maneuver, may augment evaluation of symptomatic GERD, and provide adjunctive evidence supporting GERD.

Do we understand the pathophysiology of GERD after sleeve gastrectomy?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a prevalent problem among obese individuals, is strongly associated with obesity and weight loss. Hence, bariatric surgery effectively improves GERD for many patients. Depending on the type of bariatric procedure, however, surgery can also worsen or even cause a new onset of GERD. As a consequence, GERD remains a relevant problem for many bariatric patients, and especially those who have undergone sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Affected patients report not only a decrease in physical functioning but also suffer from mental and emotional problems, resulting in poorer social functioning. The pathomechanism of GERD after SG is most likely multifactorial and triggered by the interaction of anatomical, physiological, and physical factors. Contributing factors include the shape of the sleeve, the extent of injury to the lower esophageal sphincter, and the presence of hiatal hernia. In order to successfully treat post-sleeve gastrectomy GERD, the cause of the problem must first be identified. Therapeutic approaches include lifestyle changes, medication, interventional treatment, and/or revisional surgery.

Rethinking gastroesophageal reflux disorder

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common clinical condition for which our understanding has evolved over the past decades. It is now considered a cluster of phenotypes with numerous anatomical and physiological abnormalities contributing to its pathophysiology. As such, it is important to first understand the underlying mechanism of the disease process for each patient before embarking on therapeutic interventions. The aim of our paper is to highlight the mechanisms contributing to GERD and review investigations and interpretation of these results. Finally, the paper reviews the available treatment modalities for this condition, ranging from medical intervention, endoscopic options through to surgery and its various techniques.

The Effect of the Intra-gastric Balloon on Gastric Emptying and the DeMeester Score

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The mechanism of weight loss with the intra-gastric balloon (IGB) is thought to be a decrease in gastric emptying (GE); however the evidence is conflicting. Nausea, abdominal pain, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can cause intolerance resulting in early removal. This is demoralizing for the patient and costly for the healthcare system. The ability to predict which patients will have superior weight loss and tolerance is invaluable. We sought to investigate if the IGB induced weight loss by reducing GE and the effect of the IGB on the DeMeester score.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data for patients undergoing IGB placement at a single hospital. Manometry and pH studies were performed before and with the IGB in place. Weight was measured at baseline, at removal, and 6 months later. Adverse events leading to early removal were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were evaluated. There was a statistically significant decrease in GE for solids with the IGB (117.92 ± 150.23 vs 281.48 ± 206.49 min; p = 0.0048), but not for liquids (54.44 ± 17.97 vs 56.08 ± 43.96 min; p = 0.7228). The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure did not change significantly with placement of the IGB (17.76 ± 7.39 vs 14.74 ± 7.24 mmHg; p = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, increase in DeMeester score was associated with total body weight loss (p = 0.0125) and change in GE (p = 0.038) independently.

CONCLUSION

The IGB delays GE for solids, but not for liquids, and increases the DeMeester score by a mechanism other than a loss of LES pressure.

Perioperative screening, management, and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus in bariatric surgical patients

Obesity is a strong risk factor for Barrett's esophagus (BE), the only proven precursor lesion to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Bariatric surgery is currently the only reliable treatment that achieves long-term sustained weight loss; however, it can markedly affect the development of de novo BE, and the progression or regression of existing BE. Bariatric procedures may also have implications on future surgical management of any consequent EAC. In this review, we examine the current evidence and published guidelines for BE in bariatric surgery. Current screening practices before bariatric surgery vary substantially, with conflicting recommendations from bariatric societies. If diagnosed, the presence of BE may alter the type of bariatric procedure. A selective screening approach prevents unnecessary endoscopy; however, there is poor symptom correlation with disease. Studies suggest that sleeve gastrectomy predisposes patients to gastroesophageal reflux and de novo BE. Conversely, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is associated with decreased reflux and potential improvement or resolution of BE. There are currently no guidelines addressing the surveillance for BE following bariatric surgery. BE is an important consideration in the management of bariatric surgical patients. Evidence-based recommendations are required to guide procedure selection and postoperative surveillance.

Potential involvement of adiponectin in obesity-associated erosive esophagitis

A strong causal relationship between obesity and erosive esophagitis has been proposed. Obesity may affect the pathogenesis of erosive esophagitis through adipokines as well as acid reflux. We evaluated the involvement of adiponectin in obesity-associated erosive esophagitis. In total, 1,902 patients who underwent endoscopy during medical check-ups were selected for study. Variables including the body mass index (BMI) and adiponectin level were compared between subjects with erosive esophagitis and normal controls. The subjects were classified by quartiles (Qs) of adiponectin level. Q4 was the reference group. The median adiponectin level differed by gender (men, 5.3 µg/ml vs women, 9.3 µg/ml; p<0.001). As the severity of erosive esophagitis increased in men, the BMI increased (p<0.001) while the adiponectin level decreased (p = 0.026). The multivariate odds ratio for erosive esophagitis was 1.79 for Q1, 1.73 for Q2, 2.34 for obesity, and 27.40 for hiatal hernia in men. When classified by obesity, the multivariate odds ratio for erosive esophagitis was 1.94 for Q1, 2.10 for Q2, and 18.47 for hiatal hernia only in obese men. In women, there were no trends in BMI, adiponectin levels, or severity of erosive esophagitis. We demonstrated that low adiponectin levels are involved in obesity-associated erosive esophagitis in men but not women.

Higher Esophageal Symptom Burden in Obese Subjects Results From Increased Esophageal Acid Exposure and Not From Dysmotility

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Esophageal motor disorders (EMD) and pathologic reflux are often identified in obese individuals, but it is not clear how obesity contributes to these symptoms. We examined the relationships among symptom burden, EMD, acid exposure time (AET), symptom association probability, and body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 1089 consecutive patients who underwent high-resolution manometry, of which 426 patients also underwent reflux monitoring off acid suppression, over a 2-year period at a tertiary referral center. Symptom burden was assessed by questionnaires to determine dominant symptom intensity (DSI; product of symptom severity, and frequency, on 5-point Likert scales) and global symptom severity (GSS; global esophageal symptoms on 10-cm visual analog scales) at the time of esophageal testing; BMIs were recorded. We compared proportions of patients with EMD and abnormal reflux burden among BMI categories and correlated them with symptom burden.

RESULTS

Four-hundred thirty-three patients (39.8%) met the criteria for EMD. Esophageal outflow obstruction was observed in higher proportions of patients with low BMIs (underweight, 25.9%; normal, 14.1%; overweight, 13.9%; and obese, 9.8%; P = .037), but EMDs were less frequent in obese patients (P = .047), despite higher symptom burden compared with non-obese patients (DSI, 10.5 ± 0.3 vs 9.7 ± 0.2; P = .03 and GSS, 6.5 ± 1 vs 5.9 ± 1; P = .01). Among the 426 patients who underwent reflux monitoring, the proportions with total AET (P = .02), and upright AET (P < .001) increased among BMI categories, supine AET trended strongly (P = .06), in combination with increasing DSI and GSS (P ≤ .001 for each comparison). BMI correlated with symptom burden, higher AET, and positive symptom association probability (P < .01 for each analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased symptom burden in obese individuals correlates with esophageal acid burden but not with motor disorders.

Modern Esophageal Function Testing and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Morbidly Obese Patients

BACKGROUND

The implementation of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and the Lyon Consensus statement facilitate evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and motility disorders in morbidly obese patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate prevalence and phenotype of (borderline) GERD and esophageal motility disorders in this population.

METHODS

Consecutive morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²) patients were offered evaluation by means of HRM, ambulatory 24-h pH impedance monitoring, endoscopy, and a clinical examination at our tertiary academic center. Data were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Out of 448 eligible individuals, 147 patients (females = 75, 51%) with a median age of 41.6 (33.4; 52.3) years and a BMI of 44 (40.9; 49.4) kg/m² were included during the study period. The Chicago Classification revealed motility disorders in 50 (34%) patients, dominated by outflow obstruction (18.4%, n = 27) and a novel disorder (7.5%, n = 11), nicknamed jackhammer esophagus (JE). According to the Lyon Consensus, 52 (35.4%) patients had evidence of true GERD, whereas borderline GERD was noted in another 60 (40.8%). Hypersensitive esophagus was observed in 6.8% (n = 10). Sensitivity and specificity of symptoms for GERD were 53.8% and 68.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current gold standard of assessment revealed that the prevalence of esophageal motility disorders and (borderline) GERD is high in the morbidly obese population. Further longitudinal data are needed to delineate the natural course of novel motility disorders like JE in obesity and to identify risk factors for adverse outcomes following bariatric surgery.

Modified Sleeve Gastrectomy Combined with Laparoscopic Rossetti Fundoplication and Vascularization Assessment with Indocyanine Green

AIM

Morbid obesity is a key risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux; the aim of this study is to describe the technique of modified laparoscopic Rossetti fundoplication to treat morbid obesity related to GERD.

METHODS

This is a video/dynamic manuscript on operative technique. We present the case of a 38-year-old patient referred to our institution for morbid obesity (BMI 43 kg/m2) related to GERD symptoms with grade A esophagitis at the preoperative upper gastro intestinal endoscopy and in daily therapy with PPI since years. The patient was scheduled for a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with Rossetti fundoplication.

RESULTS

Intraoperative and postoperative course were uneventful. One year later, the BMI is 27.9 kg/m² and at clinical and endoscopic follow-up demonstrates absence of esophagitis and any PPI therapy is needed.

CONCLUSION

The modified sleeve gastrectomy combined with laparoscopic Rossetti fundoplication seems to be a safe, effective procedure and a suitable alternative to gastric bypass in obese patients with GERD.

Temporal Relationship Between Night-Time Gastroesophageal Reflux Events and Arousals From Sleep

INTRODUCTION

Night-time gastroesophageal reflux (nGER) symptoms are commonly associated with interrupted sleep. Most studies attempting to understand the relationship between sleep, arousal, and nGER events have been performed so using accelerometry; however, this technology is limited in its ability to precisely determine the temporal association between sleep and reflux events. We aimed to examine the temporal relationships between nGER events and arousal/awakening from sleep using high resolution, in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG).

METHODS

Individuals between 18 and 70 years who had undergone a gastroscopy within 12 months underwent simultaneous 24-hour pH/impedance monitoring and in-laboratory PSG. The temporal relationship between each nGER event and sleep/arousals/awakenings was determined for each participant. Analyses were limited to the sleep period (between "lights out" and time of final waking).

RESULTS

Analyses were conducted on the data from 25 individuals, 64% of whom had nGER episodes (5 ± 5 events per person, range 1-18) and 64% of whom had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA, mean apnea-hypopnea index 20 ± 11 events/hr, range 6-44). There were no differences in PSG-determined sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep architecture, arousals/awakenings, or sleep apnea severity between those with nGER and those without. Most nGER events (82%) occurred during a PSG epoch that had been classified as wake. Arousals/awakenings preceded almost all events (73/76), whereas fewer had an arousal/awakening after the event (15/76).

DISCUSSION

As opposed to what is typically assumed, nGER does not seem to cause arousal from sleep, but rather arousal from sleep predisposes to nGER.

Impact of Body Mass Index on Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Cross-sectional Study in a Pakistani Population

Background: The prevalence of obesity is on the rise globally. Pakistan ranks ninth out of 188 countries in terms of obesity. Literature regarding any potential role of obesity in gastrointestinal manifestations is limited. Besides, scarce information is available on possible connection between obesity and gastrointestinal pathology. This research, therefore, explores the impact of body mass index (BMI) on gastrointestinal symptoms and endoscopic discoveries.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Darul Sehat Hospital, Zubaida Medical Centre, and Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan from 1^st July 2017 to 30^th November 2018. Patients scheduled to undergo endoscopy were surveyed before the procedure in which they were asked about demographics, comorbid, and gastrointestinal manifestations. The association between BMI and endoscopic findings and related gastrointestinal symptoms was assessed using Pearson chi square test and binary logistic regression. The significance level was set at 0.05.

Results: A total of 2148 subjects were included in the study out of which 20.2% were overweight (BMI 23-24.9) and 20.9% subjects were obese (BMI >25). Both the gastrointestinal symptoms and endoscopic findings were found to be significantly associated with the BMI (p<0.05 for both). Moreover, binary logistic regression revealed obesity to be a significant contributor of abnormal endoscopic findings (adjusted odds ratio, AOR, 2.93; 95% confidence interval, CI, 2.35-3.65).

Conclusion: Based on the study results, obesity was identified as a risk factor associated with gastrointestinal symptoms like gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and other related gastrointestinal conditions such as erosive gastritis, duodenal ulcers, reflux esophagitis, and large hiatal hernia.

The Effects of Bariatric Surgery and Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies on GERD: An Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bariatric surgery and endoluminal bariatric therapies (EBTs) form an increasingly utilized therapeutic approach to treat obese patients but may worsen gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In this updated article, we review the evidence on the effects of bariatric procedures on GERD.

FINDINGS

Recent evidence implicates sleeve gastrectomy with the highest rates of de novo GERD and Barrett's esophagus (BE), whereas malabsorptive-restrictive procedures such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) were shown to have significantly lower reported rates. The intragastric balloon (IGB) has been associated with increased likelihood of GERD, whereas insufficient evidence exists linking endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) to GERD.

SUMMARY

Gastroesophageal reflux disease may be treated with some bariatric procedures but is often developed de novo as a result of the change in anatomy. Patients set to undergo bariatric surgery may benefit from pre-procedural endoscopy to choose the more suitable therapy. Further studies with objective measurements of GERD post procedure may provide more insight into the effects of bariatric therapies on reflux, especially more novel ones such as ESG.

[Investigation of laryngopharyngeal reflux prevalence and risk factors in otolaryngology]

Objective:To investigate the prevalence and related risk factors of laryngopharyngeal reflux in otolaryngology. Method:During January 2019 to March 2019, the inpatients in otolaryngology were investigated by the questionnaire of reflux symptom index scale and the laryngopharyngeal reflux related risk factors were analyzed. Result:Among the 227 patients, 33 patients with suspected LPR contained 19 patients（20.7%） of 92 patients in the laryngopharyngeal group, 10 patients（16.1%） of 62 patients in the nasal group, and 4 patients（5.5%） of 73 patients in the ear group. LPR prevalence in the laryngopharyngeal group was statistically different from that in the ear group（P<0.05）. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, gender, smoking, drinking and BMI were risk factors of LPR（P<0.01）. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that BMI was an independent risk factor of LPR（P<0.01）. Conclusion:LPR had a high prevalence rate in otolaryngology related diseases, and appropriate synergistic anti-LPR treatment could be carried out while treating otolaryngology related diseases.

Surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the obese patient

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects two thirds of the American population. Obesity is also a disease that affects two thirds of the population. The pathophysiology of reflux disease is reasonably understood, however, the degree to which obesity affects this disease remains poorly defined. Therefore the approach to GERD in the obese patient requires special attention and its own algorithm.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to consolidate the current available literature on GERD and its management in the obese. In addition, the authors reviewed the literature and present expert opinion on controversial topics.

RESULTS

It is well established that GERD is increased in obesity and the pathophysiology is reviewed. Management options for GERD are discussed, with a focus on the obese population. Management strategies including fundoplication and gastric bypass are discussed. In addition, bariatric surgery in the setting of GERD is also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently this is an extremely controversial topic and this white paper presents a strong review of the literature to help guide the management of this challenging disease in this population. Expert recommendations are given throughout the paper based upon the current available data.

Histopathological Findings in Morbid Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Does H. pylori Infection Effective on Pathological Changes?

AıM: To determine the prevalence of histopathological findings requiring clinical follow-up in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and evaluate the relationship between these findings and Helicobacter pylori as well as to add more data to the published literature in this regard. MATERıAL AND METHODS: Overall, 161 morbidly obese patients with body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m² who underwent LSG between May 1, 2014 and May 31, 2017 were retrospectively included in the study. The findings of the histopathological evaluation of the resected gastric material and the relationship between these findings and histopathologically detected H. pylori infection were investigated.

RESULTS

The study included 114 women (70.8%) and 47 men (29.2%). The mean age of the patients was 36.82 ± 10.41 years, and the mean BMI was 46.05 ± 3.76 kg/m². H. pylori infection was detected in 103 (64%), chronic gastritis in 156, chronic active gastritis in 47, intestinal metaplasia in eight, and atrophy in seven patients. The rate of H. pylori-associated chronic gastritis was 64%, that of chronic active gastritis was 24.2%, that of lymphoid aggregation was 62.2%, and that of intestinal metaplasia and atrophy was 3.1%. There was a significant relationship between H. pylori infection and chronic gastritis, chronic active gastritis, and lymphoid aggregation; however, no significant relationship was found between intestinal metaplasia and atrophy. CONCLUSıON: Clinicians should be aware of the histopathological findings requiring clinical follow-up for LSG-treated patients. Given the complications of H. pylori infection such as lymphoma and malignancy, periodic follow-up of patients and eradication therapy may be a suitable approach for treating intestinal metaplasia and atrophic changes.