Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment

Esophageal pathology and the aerodigestive triple endoscopy for pediatric recurrent croup

Recurrent croup (RC) is characterized by recurrent episodes of stridor, barking cough, and hoarseness. While viral infections are the primary cause in croup, RC is thought to be caused by non-infectious etiologies such as structural airway abnormalities, allergic disorders, airway hyperresponsiveness and gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Recent studies have suggested a potential link between esophageal diseases, particularly GERD/reflux esophagitis and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and RC. This retrospective study aims to explore the association between esophageal disorders and RC through a multidisciplinary approach. A total of 68 patients with RC were identified in our aerodigestive center, 47 of whom underwent dual or triple endoscopy. Of these, 17 patients (36 %) were found to have esophageal disease, including EoE (15 %) and reflux esophagitis (19 %). Notably, food allergies were significantly more prevalent in the EoE group, and all patients with EoE had reported GI symptoms previously. While airway abnormalities were common across all groups, there were no significant differences between patients with and without esophageal disease. The study highlights the prevalence of esophageal diseases in patients with RC, particularly EoE, and a multidisciplinary aerodigestive evaluation may be beneficial for diagnosing concomitant esophageal conditions. Further studies are needed to determine the causal relationship between esophageal disorders and RC.

EndoFLIP distensibility index correlates with histologic findings in children with eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoEHSS) is useful for diagnosing and characterizing eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). A limitation of the EoEHSS is that lamina propria fibrosis scores are infrequently determined due to challenges in sampling lamina propria. Low distensibility index (DI) measured by endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) is associated with fibrostenotic severity in pediatric patients with EoE. We investigated the correlation between DI and the EoEHSS to understand whether EndoFLIP could be a useful complementary tool for evaluating EoE-associated remodeling in children.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients <21 years of age who underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsy and EndoFLIP between October 2017 and July 2023 with histologic diagnoses of normal/reactive, reflux, or EoE. EoEHSS scores and luminal parameters were compared between groups. DI measured at 30 mL inflation was compared with EoEHSS scores.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-six EGDs with biopsy and EndoFLIP were performed on 112 patients. There were 80 normal/reactive, 32 reflux, and 14 EoE biopsies. At 30 mL inflation, DI was lowest in the EoE group (p = 0.03). DI at 30 mL inflation negatively correlated with the EoEHSS overall grade score, as well as grade and stage scores for eosinophil abscesses, eosinophil surface layering, dilated intercellular spaces, and basal zone hyperplasia (all p < 0.05). DI at 30 mL inflation also negatively correlated with the eosinophilic inflammation stage score (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DI measured by EndoFLIP at 30 mL inflation shows a negative correlation with composite EoEHSS scores and subscores, suggestive of remodeling. EndoFLIP may complement the EoEHSS in evaluating EoE-associated esophageal remodeling.

Standardized biopsy protocols improve adherence to eosinophilic esophagitis and celiac disease endoscopic biopsy guidelines

Objectives

Optimal detection of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and celiac disease (CeD) requires appropriate sampling of the upper gastrointestinal tract during endoscopy. However, endoscopic biopsy guidelines are poorly followed in clinical practice. A quality improvement (QI) initiative was undertaken to improve adherence to published EoE and CeD biopsy guidelines by creating standardized biopsy protocols.

Methods

A biopsy form with disease-specific biopsy protocols was created and implemented. Endoscopists were initially asked to complete the form pre-procedure to indicate anticipated biopsies. After integration into the electronic health records (EHR), the form was completed by the primary treating clinician at the time endoscopy was requested. Data were collected through chart review of endoscopy and pathology reports. Statistical process control charts were used to analyze these metrics: adherence to biopsy guidelines (outcome measure), biopsy form utilization (process measure), and immediate and delayed procedural complications (balancing measures). Baseline adherence to biopsy guidelines was determined by retrospective chart review of upper endoscopies performed pre-intervention.

Results

Overall adherence to biopsy guidelines improved from an average of 45% to 78.9% with our interventions. Improvement was sustained during the 2-year study period. Adherence to biopsy guidelines improved from an average of 55% to 84% for EoE and from 13.3% to 69.5% for CeD. Decreased variability in biopsy practice was noted over time. The EHR-integrated form led to consistently high utilization (>90%). Both immediate and delayed complications remained zero.

Conclusions

Standardization of endoscopic biopsies using an EHR-integrated pre-procedure checklist leads to improved and sustained adherence to recommended EoE and CeD biopsy guidelines.

Adherence to clinical guidelines for the evaluation and management of eosinophilic esophagitis among gastroenterologists in the Arab countries

Background

The practice patterns of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) remain poorly characterized. Few studies investigated the variability of clinical patterns among gastroenterologists, mainly in the United States.

Objectives

We assessed the practice patterns of gastroenterologists in the Arab countries regarding the diagnosis and management of EoE, and their concordance with the European 2017 guidelines and the Proceedings of the AGREE Conference published in 2018.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey of practicing gastroenterologists in the Arab countries (April to December 2022). The survey consisted of 23 questions and was designed to assess the respondents' practice characteristics, knowledge and practice on diagnosis and treatment of EoE.

Results

A total of 190 participants responded to the survey (118 pediatric gastroenterologists and 72 adult gastroenterologists). Thirty-six percent and 31% saw ≥6 new patients with EoE annually, 55% were 'very familiar' with the most recent EoE guidelines, and 49% attended ≥3 E-E-related educational activities during the 3 years prior to the survey. The majority of the respondents (72%) did not require a trial of a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) prior to making the diagnosis of EoE and 66% obtain biopsies from multiple esophageal levels. While 90% of the respondents considered eosinophil-predominant inflammation on esophageal biopsies necessary for the diagnosis of EoE, only 27% felt that symptoms of esophageal dysfunction are necessary for the diagnosis, and only half of the participants considered exclusion of other etiologies of esophageal eosinophilia necessary for the diagnosis of EoE. For first-line treatment, only 16% used PPI monotherapy, 12.6% topical steroids, and 63.5% treat with a variable combination of PPIs, topical steroids, and dietary elimination. Sixty percent would repeat upper endoscopy to determine histologic improvement and 72% use maintenance therapy in responders. Compared to pediatric gastroenterologists, significantly fewer adult gastroenterologists reported taking biopsies from proximal and distal esophagus (34% vs. 66%) and gastric and duodenal biopsies (67% vs. 90%) when EoE was suspected (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

There is significant variability in adherence to EoE guidelines among gastroenterologists in the Arab countries. Our results highlight areas of need for continuous education and form the basis to assess implementation efforts in the future.

The Multiple Facets of Cow's Milk Allergy

Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is one of the most common food allergies in early childhood. CMA has varied presentations and multiple facets. A detailed clinical history is key for classification. In IgE-mediated CMA, skin prick testing and serum specific IgE testing are useful in the diagnosis, but an oral food challenge may still be necessary if there is doubt or to assess tolerance. Non-IgE-mediated CMA presentations include food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis, food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome, and eosinophilic esophagitis. The diagnosis of food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis and food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome is based on the clinical history. An esophageal biopsy is required for the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis. Atopy patch testing, IgG testing, or IgG4 testing is not helpful in any CMA evaluation. Children with CMA (except those with food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis) are at risk for poor growth, and a nutritional evaluation should be part of routine care. Extensively hydrolyzed formulas are the recommended first-choice alternative formula for CMA. For IgE-mediated CMA, alternative approaches to traditional strict avoidance include oral immunotherapy and omalizumab (both as monotherapy and as an adjunct to oral immunotherapy). Multiple international guidelines have addressed evaluation and management of CMA, providing key information, support, and guidance for clinicians in daily practice.

Comparison of histochemical methods for the analysis of eosinophils and mast cells using a porcine model of eosinophilic esophagitis

Introduction

Accurate identification of eosinophils in tissue sections is required for diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis in humans and the assessment of severity of disease in allergy models. The pig may be a good model for sensitization and allergy models due to anatomical, physiological, and immunological similarities to humans. However, comparative studies on histochemical detection of eosinophils in fixed porcine tissue are lacking.

Methods

Qualitative and quantitative comparisons were performed for six histochemical methods previously reported for eosinophil and mast cell detection in other species. Astra Blue/Vital New Red, Congo Red, Luna, Sirius Red, Toluidine Blue, and modified regressive Hematoxylin & Eosin were applied to formalin-fixed paraffin embedded full-thickness sections of porcine esophagus. Specimens were collected from young, crossbred pigs sensitized to ovalbumin with or without subsequent oral exposure to ovalbumin to produce eosinophilic esophagitis lesions for comparison to non-allergic controls.

Results

Ease of eosinophil quantitation was analyzed, and varied by histochemical stain, to determine whether stain selection increased accuracy and efficiency of evaluation. Noticeable differences in color contrast between intracytoplasmic granules, surrounding tissue, and cellular components aided detection and identification of eosinophils and mast cells with Astra Blue/New Vital Red and Toluidine Blue, respectively. For eosinophils, Congo Red and H&E were adequate, while Luna and Sirius Red presented challenges for quantitation.

Discussion

In this case, rapid and reliable characterization of porcine esophageal allergy models was made possible by using Astra Blue/New Vital Red for eosinophils and Toluidine Blue for mast cells.

The clinical impact of conventional therapies for adults and adolescents suffering from eosinophilic esophagitis, a type 2 inflammatory chronic disease, and their economic consequences in Italy: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Background

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disorder marked by eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. Despite advances in understanding and management, optimal therapeutic strategies remain unclear, with conflicting guidelines.

Objective

We sought to evaluate effectiveness and safety of topical corticosteroids (TCSs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in managing EoE and their economic implications in Italy.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to December 2023 and 78 publications were included, covering treatment outcomes and adverse events. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate treatment efficacy and safety across various patient populations and study designs.

Results

TCSs showed superior efficacy over PPIs in achieving histologic, endoscopic, and partial clinical responses. Older patients responded better to both treatments. Treatment outcomes varied by sex and presence of atopic conditions. TCSs discontinuation increased the risk of clinical relapse (0.70 cases per person-year), whereas continuous use was linked to a rise in nonserious adverse events (dilation, infections, upper respiratory tract infections, and skin disorders). Economic analysis indicated cost variations based on treatment regimens and follow-up protocols, with dilation and relapse being significant cost drivers in Italy.

Conclusions

This review provides insights into efficacy, safety, and economic impact of TCSs and PPIs in managing EoE. TCSs were more effective in achieving histologic and endoscopic responses, whereas PPIs were effective in reducing symptoms. Standardized treatment guidelines are needed because of varied treatment efficacy across studies. Future research and new therapies may enhance outcomes and reduce health care costs, improving patient quality of life.

The Dynamic Evolution of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory condition of the esophagus characterized by eosinophilic infiltration, and hallmark symptoms of esophageal dysfunction such as dysphagia and food impaction. Over the past three decades, EoE has been recognized as a distinct clinical entity, distinguished from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) through advancements in diagnostic techniques, particularly endoscopy with biopsy. The rising global prevalence of EoE reflects enhanced diagnostic awareness, evolving criteria, and environmental along with lifestyle changes. The etiology of EoE is multifactorial, involving genetic predispositions, immune dysregulation, the gut microbiome, and environmental triggers, including dietary allergens and aeroallergens. Key mechanisms include a type 2 helper T-cell (Th2)-driven immune response, epithelial barrier dysfunction, and genetic variants such as CAPN14 and TSLP. Chronic inflammation leads to tissue remodeling, fibrosis, and esophageal narrowing, contributing to disease progression and complications. Management strategies have evolved to include dietary elimination, proton pump inhibitors, topical corticosteroids, biologics, and endoscopic interventions for fibrostenotic complications. Emerging therapies targeting cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13, alongside novel diagnostic tools like the esophageal string test and Cytosponge, offer promising avenues for improved disease control and non-invasive monitoring. Long-term surveillance combining endoscopic and histological evaluations with biomarkers and non-invasive tools is critical to optimizing outcomes and preventing complications. Future research should address gaps in understanding the role of the esophageal microbiome, refine therapeutic approaches, and develop personalized strategies to improve disease management and patient quality of life.

Role of endoscopy in eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease involving inflammation of the esophagus. Endoscopy is essential in the diagnosis and treatment of EoE and shows typical findings, including esophageal edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and stenosis. However, studies involving pediatric and adult patients with EoE suggest that even a normally appearing esophagus can be diagnosed as EoE by endoscopic biopsy. Therefore, in patients with suspected EoE, biopsy samples should be obtained from the esophagus regardless of endoscopic appearance. Moreover, follow-up endoscopies with biopsy after therapy initiation are usually recommended to assess response. Although previous reports of endoscopic ultrasonography findings in patients with EoE have shown diffuse thickening of the esophageal wall, including lamina propria, submucosa, and muscularis propria, its role in EoE remains uncertain and requires further investigation. Endoscopic dilation or bougienage is a safe and effective procedure that can be used in combination with medical and/or dietary elimination therapy in patients with esophageal stricture for the management of dysphagia and to prevent its recurrence.

Diagnosing eosinophilic esophagitis in pediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly common disease that can present in children with the symptoms of feeding dysfunction, abdominal pain, vomiting, reflux-like symptoms, dysphagia, or food impaction. Diagnostically, children must have symptoms, dense esophageal eosinophilia, and other potential causes of these findings ruled out. Diagnostic recognition is critical to avoid food impactions and potential esophageal stricture development.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, a PubMed search using the search terms eosinophilic esophagitis, pediatric, and diagnosis were used to cover the last 10 years (2013-2023) of literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Early detection of EoE in children depends on increased recognition of diagnostic clues by many specialties. As increasing efforts to publicize the importance of EoE in children continues, our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of EoE is making rapid advances. Increasing growth of this knowledge base will provide more personalized diagnostic approaches, targeted interventions, and innovative treatments.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: Current concepts of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease characterized by the infiltration of eosinophils into the esophageal mucosa. It is the most frequent cause of dysphagia and food impaction in adults. Due to its similar pathophysiology to allergic rhinitis, asthma, and atopic dermatitis, it has been considered the esophageal manifestation of allergy. It is more frequently seen in the United States, Europe, and Australia. Incidence and prevalence have increased significantly in those countries over the past three decades, to such a degree that some consider it an epidemic. The disease is infrequently diagnosed in Mexico and Latin America, and so little information on this disease is produced in our region of the world. The precise factors explaining this low incidence are unknown. On the other hand, there has been intense research on EoE in other parts of the world in recent years. Its pathophysiology has been better understood and endoscopic and clinical procedures have been refined for making the diagnosis. In addition, new drugs and special formulations of existing ones have been introduced for treating the disease. Simpler and more effective dietary treatment strategies have also been evaluated. The aim of the present work was to review the current status of EoE globally and in Mexico, emphasizing the probable factors (environmental and technical) that intervene in the low incidence recorded in our country. In addition, we conducted a review of the advances in research on the different aspects of EoE carried out in recent years.

The Role of Transnasal Endoscopy in Diet Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

The diagnosis and monitoring of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) relies on clinical symptoms and histological examination of the esophageal mucosa. Currently, esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsy is the standard of care in the diagnosis and monitoring of EoE. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy (TNE) is a less invasive and less costly procedure that can be performed without general anesthesia. Here, we describe the first case of a 15-year-old adolescent girl who underwent TNE exclusively to identify all food triggers for EoE. She underwent 12 TNEs over a period of 4 years to identify food triggers for EoE to ultimately achieve the remission of her disease.

Reflux, eosinophilic esophagitis, and celiac disease - the blurred lines

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a commonly recognized cause of dysphagia. Conversely, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and celiac disease are rarer and often overlooked as dysphagia culprits. Overlap between these conditions complicates diagnosis and delays appropriate treatment. This review aims to clarify the distinctive dysphagia characteristics in each condition, explore potential overlaps, and offer guidance on differentiation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have advanced our understanding of dysphagia mechanisms in GERD, EoE, and celiac disease, particularly in characterizing disordered motility and dysphagia's natural history. While upper endoscopy, biopsies, and manometry remain crucial in dysphagia assessment, novel diagnostic tools are emerging. New insights highlight the significance of cytokine-induced mucosal injury in all three conditions, revealing potential connections where mucosal damage in one disorder may contribute to the development of others.

SUMMARY

GERD, EoE, and celiac disease can coexist and present with similar symptoms. Distinguishing between them often entails upper endoscopy, esophageal biopsies, pH testing, and celiac serologies. EoE should be considered when GERD patients fail proton pump inhibitor therapy or when celiac patients have persistent esophageal symptoms despite a gluten-free diet. Consider celiac disease if dysphagia accompanies iron deficiency anemia, malabsorptive diarrhea, or osteoporosis. Recognizing the potential overlap between these conditions is crucial for guiding clinical evaluation and therapy.

Proton pump inhibitor effect on esophageal protein signature of eosinophilic esophagitis, prediction, and evaluation of treatment response

BACKGROUND

Recently, we have identified a dysregulated protein signature in the esophageal epithelium of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) patients including proteins associated with inflammation and epithelial barrier function; however, the effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment on this signature is unknown. Herein, we used a proteomic approach to investigate: (1) whether PPI treatment alters the esophageal epithelium protein profile observed in EoE patients and (2) whether the protein signature at baseline predicts PPI response.

METHODS

We evaluated the protein signature of esophageal biopsies using a cohort of adult EoE (n = 25) patients and healthy controls (C) (n = 10). In EoE patients, esophageal biopsies were taken before (pre) and after (post) an 8-week PPI treatment, determining the histologic response. Eosinophil count PostPPI was used to classify the patients: ≥15 eosinophils/hpf as non-responders (non-responder) and < 15 eosinophils/hpf as responders (R). Protein signature was determined and differentially accumulated proteins were characterized to identify altered biological processes and signaling pathways.

RESULTS

Comparative analysis of differentially accumulated proteins between groups revealed common signatures between three groups of patients with inflammation (responder-PrePPI, non-responder-PrePPI, and non-responder-PostPPI) and without inflammation (controls and responder-PostPPI). PPI therapy almost reversed the EoE specific esophageal protein signature, which is enriched in pathways associated with inflammation and epithelial barrier function, in responder-PostPPI. Furthermore, we identified a set of candidate proteins to differentiate responder-PrePPI and non-responder-PrePPI EoE patients before treatment.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide evidence that PPI therapy reverses the alterations in esophageal inflammatory and epithelial proteins characterizing EoE, thereby providing new insights into the mechanism of PPI clinical response. Interestingly, our results also suggest that PPI response could be predicted at baseline in EoE.

A clinical predictive model identifies pediatric patients at risk for eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Identifying children needing endoscopic evaluation for suspected eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is crucial for prompt diagnosis and management.

AIMS

We aimed to develop a clinical prediction tool to distinguish children with EoE from children without the disease before endoscopy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study of children undergoing upper endoscopy at a tertiary care center. Clinical characteristics before endoscopy were extracted from 380 EoE cases and 380 controls without EoE. We built a predictive model for case-control status and performed age-stratified analyses.

RESULTS

After multivariable analysis, history of adaptive eating behaviors, food allergy, food impaction, male sex, and regurgitation were independently associated with EoE, and abdominal pain and failure to thrive with control status (AUC 0.81). Food allergy and male sex were predictors of EoE across all ages. Regurgitation and adaptive eating behaviors were specific to EoE in early (0-5 years) (AUC 0.74) and middle childhood (6-11 years) (AUC 0.82), while dysphagia and food impaction were specific to EoE in the adolescence (12-17 years) (AUC 0.87).

CONCLUSION

We determined age-specific clinical features that predict EoE with good discrimination in a pediatric population before endoscopy. Validation of this model in an independent population can confirm the utility of this tool.

Odynophagia and Retrosternal Pain Are Common in Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Associated with an Increased Overall Symptom Severity

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Dysphagia is the hallmark symptom in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, data are limited regarding the overall prevalence and potential implications of atypical symptoms like odynophagia and retrosternal pain.

METHODS

Patients enrolled into the Swiss EoE cohort study (SEECS) were analyzed regarding the presence of odynophagia and retrosternal pain. Demographics, other EoE-related symptoms, histologic and endoscopic activity were compared between EoE-patients with vs. without odynophagia and/or retrosternal pain.

RESULTS

474 patients (75.2% male) were analyzed. In their individual course of disease 110 (23.2%) patients stated to have ever experienced odynophagia and 64 (13.5%) retrosternal pain independent of food intake, 24 (5%) patients complained about both symptoms. Patients with odynophagia consistently scored higher in symptom severity (p < 0.001), EREFS score (median 3.0 vs. 2.0, p = 0.006), histologic activity and a lower quality of life (p = 0.001) compared to patients without odynophagia. Sex, age at diagnosis, EoE-specific treatment, complications such as candida or viral esophagitis and disease duration were similar in patients with vs. without odynophagia. Also patients with retrosternal pain scored higher in symptom severity (2.0 vs. 1.0, p = 0.001 and 2.0 vs. 1.0, p < 0.001 in physician and patient questionnaire assessment, respectively). However, there was neither a difference in endoscopic/histologic disease activity nor in quality of life according to presence or absence of retrosternal pain. Due to logistic reasons, a stratification regarding the presence of concomitant dysphagia was not possible.

CONCLUSION

Odynophagia and swallowing-independent retrosternal pain are common symptoms in patients with EoE, associate with an overall higher EoE-related symptom severity and for the case of odynophagia lower quality of life. However, the influence of concomitant dysphagia and its severity remains unclear and needs to be included in future analyses.

Two onset types of achalasia and the long-term course to diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Recently, the incidence of achalasia has been increasing, but its cause remains unknown. This study aimed to examine the initial symptoms and the course of symptoms and to find new insights into the cause and course of the disease.

METHODS

Altogether, 136 patients diagnosed with achalasia by high-resolution manometry (HRM) were enrolled. Questionnaires and chart reviews were conducted to investigate the initial symptoms, time from onset to diagnosis, and comorbidities, as well as the relationship between HRM results, time to diagnosis, and symptom severity.

RESULTS

In total, 67 of 136 patients responded to the questionnaire. The median ages of onset and diagnosis were 42 and 58 years, respectively. The median time from onset to diagnosis was 78.6 months, with 25 cases (37.3%) taking > 10 years to be diagnosed. The symptom onset was gradual and sudden in 52 (77.6%) and 11 (16.4%) patients, respectively. Of the 11 patients with acute onset, three (27.3%) developed anhidrosis at the same time. There was no correlation between the time from onset to diagnosis and esophageal dilatation, resting LES pressure, or mean integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). No correlation was also found between the degree of symptoms and resting LES pressure or IRP.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal achalasia can have acute or insidious onsets. This finding may help to elucidate the cause of achalasia.

A cost-of-illness study of eosinophilic esophagitis in Italy: assessing direct and indirect costs

Background

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic and progressive type 2 inflammatory disease affecting the esophagus. Its prevalence has increased in recent years due to increased awareness, evolving clinical guidelines, and heightened sensitivity among healthcare professionals managing the condition. The exact causes behind EoE’s development remain unknown, and its clinical presentation varies, often leading to significant diagnostic delays depending on the age at which symptoms manifest. Consequently, achieving long-term disease control through heightened awareness becomes imperative. EoE generates a significant clinical burden, resulting in substantial economic consequences for patients, healthcare systems, and society. This study aimed to assess the economic and social impacts on EoE patients within the Italian context.

Methods

A cost-of-illness analysis was conducted from two perspectives: the National Health System (NHS) and the societal perspective. This analysis encompassed direct healthcare, indirect healthcare, and non-healthcare costs. Data were collected and assessed through a survey administered to a panel of expert clinicians and EoE-affected patients.

Results

Managing EoE incurs a significant burden on healthcare systems, amounting to €6,852.28 per patient per year. The primary cost component appears to be direct costs, comprising 60.73% of the total cost per patient for this condition, while indirect costs contribute to 29.68% of the overall management expenses.

Conclusion

This analysis underscores a substantial financial burden on both the healthcare system and patients affected by eosinophilic esophagitis. It emphasizes the imperative need for a continuous and combined effort from clinicians, patients, and families to promptly recognize symptoms and adaptive behavior to mitigate diagnostic delays.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: What Are the Differences?

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, with EoE predominantly provoked by food and aeroallergens, whereas IBD is driven by a broader spectrum of immunopathological and environmental triggers. This review presents a comprehensive comparison of the pathophysiological and therapeutic strategies for EoE and IBD. We examine the current understanding of their underlying mechanisms, particularly the interplay between environmental factors and genetic susceptibility. A crucial element in both diseases is the integrity of the epithelial barrier, whose disruption plays a central role in their pathogenesis. The involvement of eosinophils, mast cells, B cells, T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and their associated cytokines is examined, highlighting the importance of targeting cytokine signaling pathways to modulate immune-epithelial interactions. We propose that advances in computation tools will uncover the significance of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) in connecting immune and epithelial cells, leading to novel therapies for EoE and IBD.

Clinical and molecular correlates of the Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

The Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE) is a new expert-defined clinical tool that classifies disease severity of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine whether I-SEE is associated with patient characteristics, molecular features of EoE, or both.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective cohort of patients with EoE from the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers (CEGIR). Associations between I-SEE and clinical and molecular features (assessed by an EoE diagnostic panel [EDP]) were assessed.

RESULTS

In 318 patients with chronic EoE (209 adults, 109 children), median total I-SEE score was 7.0, with a higher symptoms and complications score in children than adults (4.0 vs 1.0; P < .001) and higher inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores in adults than children (3.0 vs 1.0 and 3.0 vs 0, respectively; both P < .001). Total I-SEE score had a bimodal distribution with the inactive to moderate categories and severe category. EDP score correlated with total I-SEE score (r = -0.352, P < .001) and both inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores (r = -0.665, P < .001; r = -0.446, P < .001, respectively), but not with symptoms and complications scores (r = 0.047, P = .408). Molecular severity increased from inactive to mild and moderate, but not severe, categories. Longitudinal changes of modified I-SEE scores and inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores reflected histologic and molecular activity.

CONCLUSIONS

I-SEE score is associated with select clinical features across severity categories and with EoE molecular features for nonsevere categories, warranting further validation.

Impact of gender, race, and age of onset on the phenotype and comorbidities of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis

Objectives

To investigate differences in symptoms, allergy comorbidities, and eosinophilic inflammation at the time of diagnosis for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) based on gender, race, and age of onset.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at a multidisciplinary EoE clinic; the correlation between histological findings, previously identified symptoms, associated comorbidities, and demographics including gender, race, as well as age of onset was examined. Chi-squared and Student's T-tests were utilized for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 91 patients were enrolled in this study, with 70% being male and 67% identifying as White. Among the patients, 45% had an early onset of EoE (defined as ≤6 years old). We revealed that White patients and females were significantly more likely to report dysphagia, while non-White patients experienced significantly more vomiting symptoms and had a higher prevalence of asthma as a comorbidity. Early-onset patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of vomiting and had elevated eosinophilic counts compared to patients with EoE onset at a regular age. We also revealed that abdominal pain is associated with a lower average proximal eosinophilic counts.

Conclusions

Our study revealed the significant impact of gender, race, and age of onset on the phenotype and comorbidities of EoE, suggesting these factors should be considered when caring for these patients.

Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis in children: An update from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and histologically by predominantly eosinophilic infiltration of the squamous epithelium. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) published a guideline in 2014; however, the rapid evolution of knowledge about pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic options have made an update necessary.

METHODS

A consensus group of pediatric gastroenterologists from the ESPGHAN Working Group on Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases (ESPGHAN EGID WG) reviewed the recent literature and proposed statements and recommendations on 28 relevant questions about EoE. A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2014 to 2022. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 52 statements based on the available evidence and 44 consensus-based recommendations are available. A revision of the diagnostic protocol, options for initial drug treatment, and the new concept of simplified empiric elimination diets are now available. Biologics are becoming a part of the potential armamentarium for refractory EoE, and systemic steroids may be considered as the initial treatment for esophageal strictures before esophageal dilation. The importance and assessment of quality of life and a planned transition to adult medical care are new areas addressed in this guideline.

CONCLUSION

Research in recent years has led to a better understanding of childhood EoE. This guideline incorporates the new findings and provides a practical guide for clinicians treating children diagnosed with EoE.

Transnasal Endoscopy Acquires Esophageal Biopsies Adequate for Comprehensive Pathology Evaluation in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) does not require general anesthesia, an attractive characteristic for monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We evaluated the adequacy of TNE-obtained esophageal biopsies using the EoE Histology Scoring System (EoEHSS).

METHODS

The Cincinnati Center for Eosinophilic Disorders database was searched for esophageal biopsies obtained by the same endoscopist, using either TNE or conventional endoscopy (CE). Whole-slide biopsy images were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney test was used for median (interquartile range) values and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. P ≤ .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Median age (P = .82) or height (P = .83) did not differ between TNE (n = 17) and CE (n = 17) groups. Although median largest piece size (mm2) differed between the groups (TNE: 0.59 (0.45, 0.86), CE: 2.24 (1.09, 2.82), P < .001), all 8 EoEHSS features were evaluated in each group; only 1 feature (lamina propria fibrosis) was missing in both groups (TNE: 19/34, CE: 11/34, P = .09). The median peak eosinophil count/high-power field differed (TNE: 3 (0, 29), CE: 16 (1, 66), P = .03), but overall grade (TNE: 0.17 (0.10, 0.29), CE: 0.22 (0.14, 0.46), P = .12), stage (TNE: 0.14 (0.10, 0.24), CE: 0.20 (0.10, 0.43), P = .15), and non-eosinophil-related individual EoEHSS scores did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

TNE- and CE-obtained esophageal biopsies are similarly sufficient for evaluation of key pathological features in EoE.

Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have clinical benefits for treating several atopic diseases. However, consensus on its use for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is lacking. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of MAbs versus placebo for treating EoE.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes were changes in peak esophageal eosinophils count/high power field (HPF) and mean esophageal eosinophils count/HPF. The secondary outcomes were changes in the EoE-Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS), Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS), dysphagia score, and adverse events (AEs). We compared binary outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence interval (CI). Considering the diversity of mechanistic properties of MAbs, a pre-specified subgroup analysis by MAb mechanism of action was performed for all outcomes, provided that at least two studies were in each subgroup. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics.

RESULTS

6 RCTs were included (533 patients). Compared to placebo, MAbs led to a significant reduction in peak esophageal eosinophils count/HPF (MD -0.78; CI 95% -0.87, -0.6801) and mean esophageal eosinophils count/HPF (SMD -0.79; CI 95% -1.5, -0.08). Moreover, MAbs significantly reduced EoE-HSS scores (grade score: SMD -9.31; 95% CI -13.95, -4.6701; stage score: SMD -10.18; 95% CI -15.06, -5.31), EREFS (SMD -5.95; CI 95% -9.19, -2.71) and dysphagia score (SMD -1.79; CI 95% -3.36, -0.23) without increasing AEs compared to placebo. Among those MAbs whose mechanism of action includes the blockage of the receptor for IL-13 (Dupilumab, QAX576, and RPC4046), the scores of EoE-HSS grade, EoE-HSS stage, EREFS, and dysphagia were significantly reduced, and they presented a similar risk of overall and serious AEs compared to placebo.

CONCLUSION

MAbs seem effective and safe in reducing esophageal eosinophil infiltrate, EoE-HSS score, EREFS score, and dysphagia symptoms in patients with EoE. However, further evidence is needed to establish its place in EoE management.

Esophageal food bolus impaction in pediatric age

OBJECTIVES

Esophageal food impaction (EFI) is the sudden onset of dysphagia that occurs when a food bolus becomes lodged in the esophagus, requiring endoscopic removal. Scientific data on the prevalence and causes of EFI in children is lacking. The aim of this study was to provide further insights into EFI episodes in children.

METHODS

We have prospectively enrolled all children admitted for a first episode of EFI between March 2018 and March 2023. A fluoroscopic contrast study was performed in all patients to confirm the boluses and assess their position. Boluses were extracted by esophagogastroduodenoscopies, and esophageal biopsies were routinely obtained for histologic evaluation.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 41 children were admitted for a first episode of food impaction. Drooling was the most commonly reported symptom. Half children experiencing a first episode of food bolus were diagnosed with EoE (20/41, 48.8%). Almost a fourth of the episodes subtended a different condition, such as esophageal anastomotic, peptic or congenital strictures, stricturing caustic esophagitis, esophageal duplication, and achalasia. In the last fourth of patients the cause of EFI was not identified and thus probably related to quick eating and inadequate chewing of food.

DISCUSSION

Our study represents the largest known series of pediatric patients evaluated for food bolus impaction. Our main finding is the high frequency of EoE, which accounts for a half of EFI episodes in pediatric age, especially in older children. This finding highlights the importance of obtaining esophageal biopsies after the endoscopic bolus removal in children with EFI to provide a complete diagnostic evaluation.

The 1st EoETALY Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis - Definition, Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic type 2-mediated inflammatory disease of the esophagus that represents the most common eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease. Experts in the field of EoE across Italy (i.e., EoETALY Consensus Group) including gastroenterologists, endoscopists, allergologists/immunologists, and paediatricians conducted a Delphi process to develop updated consensus statements for the management of patients with EoE and update the previous position paper of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE) in light of recent evidence. Grading of the strength and quality of the evidence of the recommendations was performed using accepted GRADE criteria. The guideline is divided in two documents: Part 1 includes three chapters, namely 1) definition, epidemiology, and pathogenesis; 2) clinical presentation and natural history, and 3) diagnosis, while Part 2 includes two chapters: 4) treatment and 5) monitoring and follow-up. This document has received the endorsement of three Italian national societies including the SIGE, the Italian Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (SINGEM), and the Italian Society of Allergology, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC). With regards to patients' involvement, these guidelines involved the contribution of members of ESEO Italia, the Italian Association of Families Against EoE.

Histopathology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Microscopic examination of esophageal biopsies is essential to diagnose eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Eosinophil inflammation is the basis for the diagnosis, but additional abnormalities may contribute to persistent symptoms and epithelial barrier dysfunction. Both peak eosinophil count and assessments of additional features should be included in pre-therapy and post-therapy pathology reports. Pathologic abnormalities identified in esophageal biopsies of EoE are reversible in contrast to esophageal strictures.

Recognition and Management of Feeding Dysfunction in the Pediatric Patient with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Feeding is a complex skill requiring coordination of multiple body systems. Multiple factors are considered in feeding dysfunction in pediatric patients with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, including overall development, nutritional status, mealtime behaviors, and medical comorbidities. Symptoms of feeding dysfunction vary by age, with maladaptive learned feeding behaviors spanning all age ranges. Knowledge of the normal acquisition of feeding skills is critical to interpret the impact of the disease and plan appropriate intervention. Assessment and treatment from a feeding and swallowing disorders specialist can dramatically impact successful outcomes in nutrition, growth, mealtime dynamics and ultimatly quality of life for children and their caregivers in home and social settings.

Clinical Evaluation of the Adult with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) typically present with a history of dysphagia for solids, sometimes with additional reflux-like pain and a history of prior food impactions. In contrast to these alarming symptoms, the general appearance and physical examination of adult patients with EoE is in line with apparently healthy individuals. Therefore, the diagnosis is based on a history of solid-food dysphagia and eosinophilic tissue infiltration. Importantly, the increasing prevalence of EoE variants, that is, typical EoE symptoms in the absence of a relevant eosinophilia, and several studies with eosinophil-targeting drugs, call the pathogenic role of eosinophils into question.

Clinical Evaluation of the Child with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

The diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is based on clinical symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil predominant esophageal inflammation. Clinical symptoms in children with EoE vary based on age and may be nonspecific. EoE has a male predominance with the majority having comorbid atopic disorders. At present, treatment options include medications (proton pump inhibition, swallowed topical steroids), dietary therapy or biologic therapy (dupilumab, approved for those ≥12 years of age). Outside of EoE in the context of oral immunotherapy, EoE is typically chronic requiring lifelong therapy. Long-term complications including feeding difficulties, malnutrition, and fibrostenotic disease.

Endoscopic Features of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and strictures (EREFS) represent the major endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The Endoscopic Reference System (EREFS) grading system is easy to learn and apply during daily clinical practice in the diagnosis and follow-up of EoE patients. When endoscopy is performed by an EoE-experienced physician, the EREFS criteria will identify the majority of EoE patients. The EREFS score from the area of greatest involvement of the esophagus should be reported. The EREFS grading system was formally validated as an endoscopy score and several randomized placebo-controlled trials have shown responsiveness of the EREFS score to therapeutic interventions.

Pharmacologic Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), swallowed topical corticosteroids (STSs), and dupilumab are highly effective therapies for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Shared decision-making informs the choice of therapy and factors such as ease of use, safety, cost, and efficacy should be addressed. PPIs are the most common medication utilized early in the disease course; however, for nonresponders, STSs are an excellent alternative. Dupilumab is unlikely to replace PPIs or STSs as first-line therapy, except in highly specific circumstances. Identification of novel biologic pathways and the development of small molecules may lead to a wider range of treatment options in the future.

The Dual Lens of Endoscopy and Histology in the Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders-A Comprehensive Review

Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders (EGIDs) are a group of conditions characterized by abnormal eosinophil accumulation in the gastrointestinal tract. Among these EGIDs, Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) is the most well documented, while less is known about Eosinophilic Gastritis (EoG), Eosinophilic Enteritis (EoN), and Eosinophilic Colitis (EoC). The role of endoscopy in EGIDs is pivotal, with applications in diagnosis, disease monitoring, and therapeutic intervention. In EoE, the endoscopic reference score (EREFS) has been shown to be accurate in raising diagnostic suspicion and effective in monitoring therapeutic responses. Additionally, endoscopic dilation is the first-line treatment for esophageal strictures. For EoG and EoN, while the literature is more limited, common endoscopic findings include erythema, nodules, and ulcerations. Histology remains the gold standard for diagnosing EGIDs, as it quantifies eosinophilic infiltration. In recent years, there have been significant advancements in the histological understanding of EoE, leading to the development of diagnostic scores and the identification of specific microscopic features associated with the disease. However, for EoG, EoN, and EoC, precise eosinophil count thresholds for diagnosis have not yet been established. This review aims to elucidate the role of endoscopy and histology in the diagnosis and management of the three main EGIDs and to analyze their strengths and limitations, their interconnection, and future research directions.

Expression of Immunoglobulin G4 in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a disease that has been subcategorized into two endoscopic phenotypes: inflammatory and fibrostenotic. Moreover, studies have shown a link between EoE and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), a subclass of the immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between histologic IgG4 expression and endoscopic phenotypes in patients with EoE. Methods: This case-control study included patients diagnosed with EoE (n = 19) and patients with non-obstructive dysphagia without abnormal findings as controls (NOD; n = 12). The EoE group was further divided into three subgroups based on endoscopic phenotype: inflammatory, fibrostenotic, or combined. Retrospective examination of endoscopic findings and pathological slides was performed to analyze IgG4 staining. Results: Histological analysis revealed a significant difference in IgG4 cell count (15.00 vs. 0.58, p = 0.003) and eosinophil cell count (84.67 vs. 0.08, p < 0.001) between the EoE and NOD groups. Symptom manifestation and blood test results were similar across all three endoscopic EoE phenotypes. However, histological analysis revealed a significant difference in IgG4 cell count between the inflammatory, fibrostenotic, and combined phenotypes (4.13 vs. 17.6 vs. 59.7, p = 0.030). Conclusions: IgG4 expression was higher in EoE patients than in those with NOD, the highest being in the combined phenotype subgroup. These findings emphasize the important role of endoscopic and histological examination in diagnosing EoE and the need for further research in this area.

Proton-Pump Inhibitors in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Review Focused on the Role of Pharmacogenetics

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most administered first-line treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, only around half of EoE patients respond histologically to a double dosage of PPI. In addition, 70% of responders maintain EoE in remission after tapering the PPI dose. In order to avoid endoscopy with biopsies-the only accurate method of assessing PPI response-efforts have been made to identify PPI responder patients. The clinical or endoscopic features and biomarkers evaluated so far, however, have not proven to be sufficient in predicting PPI response. Although new approaches based on omics technologies have uncovered promising biomarkers, the specialized and complex procedures required are difficult to implement in clinical settings. Alternatively, PPI pharmacogenetics based on identifying variations in CYP2C19 and STAT6 genes have shown promising results in EoE, and could easily be performed in most laboratories. Other genetic variations have also been associated with PPI response and may explain those cases not related to CYP2C19 or STAT6. Here, we provide an overview of PPI treatment in EoE and evidence of how genetic variations in CYP2C19 and other genes could affect PPI effectiveness, and also discuss studies evaluating the role of pharmacogenetics in predicting PPI response in patients with EoE.

Monitoring pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis disease activity using an unsedated blind esophageal brushing model: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Recurrent upper endoscopies are essential for monitoring therapy response and disease activity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), leading to increased costs, procedural complications, and anesthesia exposure. The aim of this study was to examine an office-based model using serial sedation-free blind esophageal epithelial brushing (BEEB) to monitor therapy response through eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) levels and guide therapy plans in pediatric EoE patients.

METHODS

EoE patients (≤21 years of age) were enrolled in this prospective study. Subjects were placed on dietary, pharmacologic, or combination therapy with the goal of inducing or maintaining remission. To assess response to sequential interventions, subjects underwent sequential sedation-free BEEBs through nasogastric tubes to measure EDN levels. Based on serial brushings, an individual plan of diet, medications, or a combination of both was created for each subject, and a final endoscopy was then performed to validate the accuracy of the individual plans.

RESULTS

Twenty-four subjects completed the study. The average peak eosinophil count in patients with active EoE was 58.1 ± 30.8 eosinophils per high-power field and mean EDN level was 165.2 ± 191.3 μg/mL. A total of 42 BEEBs were completed. Individual therapy plans based on sequential BEEB were accurate in 19 out of the 24 patients (79%) and specifically nine out of 10 patients (90%) treated with elimination diets.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that office-based sedation-free BEEBs can be used to monitor therapy response and disease activity in pediatric EoE patients.

Improved Outcomes in Eosinophilic Esophagitis with Higher Medication Possession Ratio

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) disease activity can be caused by treatment non-adherence. Medication possession ratio (MPR) is an established metric of medication adherence. A higher MPR correlates with better outcomes in several chronic diseases, but MPR has not been investigated with respect to EoE. A retrospective cohort study was performed using an established EoE registry for the years 2005 to 2020. Treatment periods were identified, MPRs were calculated, and medical records were assessed for histologic remission (<15 eos/hpf), dysphagia, food impaction, stricture occurrence, and esophageal dilation that corresponded to each treatment period. In total, 275 treatment periods were included for analysis. The MPR in the histologic remission treatment period group was 0.91 (IQR 0.63-1) vs. 0.63 (IQR 0.31-0.95) for the non-remission treatment period group (p < 0.001). The optimal MPR cut-point for histologic remission was 0.7 (Sen 0.66, Spec 0.62, AUC 0.63). With MPRs ≥ 0.7, there were significantly increased odds of histologic remission (odds ratio 3.05, 95% confidence interval 1.79-5.30) and significantly decreased odds of dysphagia (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.45), food impaction (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.55), stricture occurrence (OR 0.52 95% CI 0.29-0.92), and esophageal dilation (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.15-0.54). Assessing MPR before repeating an esophagogastroduodenoscopy may decrease unnecessary procedures in the clinical management of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Evolving strategies: Enhancements in managing eosinophilic esophagitis in pediatric patients

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a newly recognized disease first described about 50 years ago. The definition, diagnosis, and management have evolved with new published consensus guidelines and newly approved treatment available to pediatricians, enabling a better understanding of this disease and more targeted treatment for patients. We describe the definition, presentation, and diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis including management, challenges, and future directions in children. The definition, diagnosis, and management of eosinophilic esophagitis have evolved over the last 50 years. Consensus guidelines and newly approved biologic treatment have enabled pediatricians to better understand this disease and allow for more targeted treatment for patients. We describe the definition, presentation, diagnosis, management, and treatment in addition to the challenges and future directions of eosinophilic esophagitis management in children.

Pediatric Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Their Parents Identify Symptoms as the Most Important Treatment Outcome

INTRODUCTION

Given the lack of data, we aimed to explore which therapeutic endpoints pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and their parents consider to be relevant.

METHODS

We created an educational brochure on EoE and a questionnaire, both of which were content-validated by pediatric patients and parents. Validated documents were sent to 112 patients and parents. They ranked the importance (5 levels) of short (during next 3 months) and long-term (≥1 year) treatment effect on symptoms, quality of life, endoscopic inflammation, stricture formation, histological inflammation, and fibrosis.

RESULTS

A total of 45 parents and 30 pediatric patients ≥11 years completed the questionnaires. Pediatric patients identified improvement in the following domains as most important in the short- and long-term, respectively: symptoms (73% vs. 77%), QoL (53% vs. 57%), histologic inflammation (47% vs. 50%), histologic fibrosis (40% vs. 33%), endoscopic inflammation (47% vs. 40%), and strictures (33% vs. 40%). Parents of children ≥11 years old classified improvement in the following domains as most important in the short- and long-term, respectively: symptoms (70% vs. 83%), QoL (63% vs. 80%), histologic inflammation (67% vs. 77%), histologic fibrosis (47% vs. 63%), endoscopic inflammation (77% vs. 80%), and strictures (40% vs. 53%). Agreement between caregiver and children on the short-term importance of treatment outcomes was as follows: symptoms (77%), QoL (40%), histologic inflammation and fibrosis (47% and 43%), endoscopic inflammation and strictures (50% and 40%).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients and parents attributed most importance to improvement in symptoms and QoL. Agreement between parents and patients regarding therapy goals is limited.

Epidemiology and the Growing Epidemic of Food Allergy in Children and Adults Across the Globe

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Food allergies are immune-mediated, complex disorders, which are the source of increasing health concern worldwide. The goal of this review is to present an updated summary of the food allergy (FA) burden among children and adults across different populations, focusing on research from the past 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

FAs impact a growing number of global residents-particularly those residing in higher-income, industrialized regions. Moreover, growing epidemiologic evidence suggests that the population health burden of non-IgE-mediated FAs, such as food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome, may also be higher than previously reported. FA is a complex trait that impacts infants, children, as well as adults across the globe. The population health burden of both IgE- and non-IgE-mediated FAs is likely to grow in the absence of rapid advances and widespread implementation of effective FA prevention and treatment interventions. Systematic epidemiological research initiatives are needed, both nationally and globally, to better understand and reduce the burden of these allergic diseases.

Review article: Emerging insights into the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of eosinophilic oesophagitis and other eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are chronic, immune-mediated disorders characterised clinically by gastrointestinal symptoms and histologically by a pathologic increase in eosinophil-predominant inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract, in the absence of secondary causes of eosinophilia.

AIMS

To highlight emerging insights and research efforts into the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE EGIDs, and discuss key remaining knowledge gaps.

METHODS

We selected and reviewed original research, retrospective studies, case series, randomised controlled trials, and meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Standardised nomenclature classifies EGIDs as EoE, eosinophilic gastritis (EoG), eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), and eosinophilic colitis (EoC). Incidence and prevalence of EoE are rising, emphasising the need to better understand how environmental risk factors and genetic features interact. Advances in understanding EoE pathophysiology have led to clinical trials of targeted therapy and the approval (in the United States) of dupilumab for EoE. Several therapies that are under investigation hope to satisfy both histologic and clinical targets. For non-EoE EGIDs, efforts are focused on better defining clinical and histopathologic disease determinants and natural history, as well as establishing new therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Unmet needs for research are dramatically different for EoE and non-EoE EGIDs. In EoE, non-invasive diagnostic tests, clinicopathologic models that determine the risk of disease progression and therapeutic failure, and novel biologic therapies are emerging. In contrast, in non-EoE EGIDs, epidemiologic trends, diagnostic histopathologic thresholds, and natural history models are still developing for these more rare disorders.

Clinical Features and Treatment Response to Topical Steroids in Ethnic and Racial Minority Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

INTRODUCTION

Differences in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) presentation and outcomes by ethnicity or race remain understudied. We aimed to determine whether EoE patients of Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity or non-White race have differences in presentation at diagnosis or response to topical corticosteroid (tCS) treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included subjects of any age with a new diagnosis of EoE and documentation of ethnicity or race. For those who had treatment with tCS and follow-up endoscopy/biopsy, we assessed histologic response (<15 eosinophils/hpf), global symptom response, and endoscopic response. Hispanic EoE patients were compared with non-Hispanics at baseline and before and after treatment. The same analyses were repeated for White vs non-Whites.

RESULTS

Of 1,026 EoE patients with ethnicity data, just 23 (2%) were Hispanic. Most clinical features at presentation were similar to non-Hispanic EoE patients but histologic response to tCS was numerically lower (38% vs 57%). Non-White EoE patients (13%) were younger at diagnosis and had less insurance, lower zip code-level income, shorter symptom duration, more vomiting, less dysphagia and food impaction, fewer typical endoscopic features, and less dilation. Of 475 patients with race data treated with tCS, non-Whites had a significantly lower histologic response rate (41% vs 59%; P = 0.01), and odds of histologic response remained lower after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence intervals: 0.19-0.87).

DISCUSSION

Few EoE patients at our center were Hispanic, and they had similar clinical presentations as non-Hispanics. The non-White EoE group was larger, and presentation was less dysphagia-specific. Non-White patients were also less than half as likely to respond to tCS.