1
|
Ray CM, Panaccione R, Ma C. A practical guide to combination advanced therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2024; 40:251-257. [PMID: 38662117 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000001033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an overview of the current literature regarding the use of advanced combination therapy (ACT) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although the treatment of IBD has come a long way, many patients do not respond or will lose response to currently available treatments over time. ACT has been proposed as a model to create sustained remission in difficult-to-treat IBD patient populations. This review discusses the available literature supporting the use of ACT, followed by practical tips for applying this model of treatment to clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS Both observational and controlled evidence have demonstrated that there may be an increased benefit of ACT in specific IBD patient populations compared to advanced targeted immunomodulator (TIM) monotherapy. Additional data is required to understand how to best use combination TIMs and the long-term risks associated with this strategy. SUMMARY While the literature has demonstrated the potential for benefit in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, the use of ACT is currently off-label and long-term controlled data is needed. The successful application of ACT requires careful consideration of both patient and disease profiles as well as close monitoring of treatment response and adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine
| | - Christopher Ma
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chanchlani N, Lin S, Bewshea C, Hamilton B, Thomas A, Smith R, Roberts C, Bishara M, Nice R, Lees CW, Sebastian S, Irving PM, Russell RK, McDonald TJ, Goodhand JR, Ahmad T, Kennedy NA. Mechanisms and management of loss of response to anti-TNF therapy for patients with Crohn's disease: 3-year data from the prospective, multicentre PANTS cohort study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:521-538. [PMID: 38640937 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00044-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to report the effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab over the first 3 years of treatment and to define the factors that predict anti-TNF treatment failure and the strategies that prevent or mitigate loss of response. METHODS Personalised Anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease (PANTS) is a UK-wide, multicentre, prospective observational cohort study reporting the rates of effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab in anti-TNF-naive patients with active luminal Crohn's disease aged 6 years and older. At the end of the first year, sites were invited to enrol participants still receiving study drug into the 2-year PANTS-extension study. We estimated rates of remission across the whole cohort at the end of years 1, 2, and 3 of the study using a modified survival technique with permutation testing. Multivariable regression and survival analyses were used to identify factors associated with loss of response in patients who had initially responded to anti-TNF therapy and with immunogenicity. Loss of response was defined in patients who initially responded to anti-TNF therapy at the end of induction and who subsequently developed symptomatic activity that warranted an escalation of steroid, immunomodulatory, or anti-TNF therapy, resectional surgery, or exit from study due to treatment failure. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03088449, and is now complete. FINDINGS Between March 19, 2014, and Sept 21, 2017, 389 (41%) of 955 patients treated with infliximab and 209 (32%) of 655 treated with adalimumab in the PANTS study entered the PANTS-extension study (median age 32·5 years [IQR 22·1-46·8], 307 [51%] of 598 were female, and 291 [49%] were male). The estimated proportion of patients in remission at the end of years 1, 2, and 3 were, for infliximab 40·2% (95% CI 36·7-43·7), 34·4% (29·9-39·0), and 34·7% (29·8-39·5), and for adalimumab 35·9% (95% CI 31·2-40·5), 32·9% (26·8-39·2), and 28·9% (21·9-36·3), respectively. Optimal drug concentrations at week 14 to predict remission at any later timepoints were 6·1-10·0 mg/L for infliximab and 10·1-12·0 mg/L for adalimumab. After excluding patients who had primary non-response, the estimated proportions of patients who had loss of response by years 1, 2, and 3 were, for infliximab 34·4% (95% CI 30·4-38·2), 54·5% (49·4-59·0), and 60·0% (54·1-65·2), and for adalimumab 32·1% (26·7-37·1), 47·2% (40·2-53·4), and 68·4% (50·9-79·7), respectively. In multivariable analysis, loss of response at year 2 and 3 for patients treated with infliximab and adalimumab was predicted by low anti-TNF drug concentrations at week 14 (infliximab: hazard ratio [HR] for each ten-fold increase in drug concentration 0·45 [95% CI 0·30-0·67], adalimumab: 0·39 [0·22-0·70]). For patients treated with infliximab, loss of response was also associated with female sex (vs male sex; HR 1·47 [95% CI 1·11-1·95]), obesity (vs not obese 1·62 [1·08-2·42]), baseline white cell count (1·06 [1·02-1·11) per 1 × 109 increase in cells per L), and thiopurine dose quartile. Among patients treated with adalimumab, carriage of the HLA-DQA1*05 risk variant was associated with loss of response (HR 1·95 [95% CI 1·17-3·25]). By the end of year 3, the estimated proportion of patients who developed anti-drug antibodies associated with undetectable drug concentrations was 44·0% (95% CI 38·1-49·4) among patients treated with infliximab and 20·3% (13·8-26·2) among those treated with adalimumab. The development of anti-drug antibodies associated with undetectable drug concentrations was significantly associated with treatment without concomitant immunomodulator use for both groups (HR for immunomodulator use: infliximab 0·40 [95% CI 0·31-0·52], adalimumab 0·42 [95% CI 0·24-0·75]), and with carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 risk variant for infliximab (HR for carriage of risk variant: infliximab 1·46 [1·13-1·88]) but not for adalimumab (HR 1·60 [0·92-2·77]). Concomitant use of an immunomodulator before or on the day of starting infliximab was associated with increased time without the development of anti-drug antibodies associated with undetectable drug concentrations compared with use of infliximab alone (HR 2·87 [95% CI 2·20-3·74]) or introduction of an immunomodulator after anti-TNF initiation (1·70 [1·11-2·59]). In years 2 and 3, 16 (4%) of 389 patients treated with infliximab and 11 (5%) of 209 treated with adalimumab had adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal. Nine (2%) patients treated with infliximab and two (1%) of those treated with adalimumab had serious infections in years 2 and 3. INTERPRETATION Only around a third of patients with active luminal Crohn's disease treated with an anti-TNF drug were in remission at the end of 3 years of treatment. Low drug concentrations at the end of the induction period predict loss of response by year 3 of treatment, suggesting higher drug concentrations during the first year of treatment, particularly during induction, might lead to better long-term outcomes. Anti-drug antibodies associated with undetectable drug concentrations of infliximab, but not adalimumab, can be predicted by carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 and mitigated by concomitant immunomodulator use for both drugs. FUNDING Guts UK, Crohn's and Colitis UK, Cure Crohn's Colitis, AbbVie, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Napp Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Celltrion Healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Chanchlani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Simeng Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Claire Bewshea
- Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Benjamin Hamilton
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Amanda Thomas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rebecca Smith
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Christopher Roberts
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Maria Bishara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rachel Nice
- Department of Blood Science, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Charlie W Lees
- Department of Gastroenterology, Edinburgh IBD Unit, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK; Institute of Genetic and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK; Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Peter M Irving
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Richard K Russell
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Children & Young People, Edinburgh, UK; Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Royal Hospital for Children & Young People, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Timothy J McDonald
- Department of Blood Science, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - James R Goodhand
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK; Exeter IBD and Pharmacogenetics Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen L, Kang D, Fang L, Sun M, Li M, Zhou G, Xu C, Pang Z, Ye Y, Feng B, Wu H, Lin J, Ding B, Liu C, Shi Y, Liu Z. Development and validation of a novel therapeutic drug monitoring-based nomogram for prediction of primary endoscopic response to anti-TNF therapy in active Crohn's disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2024; 17:17562848241256237. [PMID: 38827646 PMCID: PMC11143805 DOI: 10.1177/17562848241256237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibodies, especially infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA), are considered the first-line treatment for active Crohn's disease (CD). However, the predictive role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of serum anti-TNF in monitoring the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains controversial. Objectives To explore the correlation between serum anti-TNF levels and early endoscopic response in active CD using a TDM-based nomogram. Design Cross-sectional study. Methods The simplified endoscopic activity score for CD (SES-CD), Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI), laboratory parameters, and the serum trough levels of IFX and ADA were assessed. Results The trough levels of IFX or ADA were significantly higher in patients with endoscopic response compared to non-responders in the development cohort (p < 0.001). The IFX and ADA levels showed a weak but significantly negative correlation with SES-CD (p < 0.001), CDAI (p < 0.001), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001) at week 14 post-IFX therapy in the development cohort. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that an optimal level of IFX (4.80 μg/mL) and ADA (8.80 μg/mL) exhibited the best performance in predicting endoscopic response. Concomitantly, we developed a novel nomogram prediction model based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis, which consisted of CRP, albumin (Alb), and anti-TNF trough levels at week 14. The nomogram showed significant discrimination and calibration for both IFX and ADA in the development cohort and performed well in the external validation cohort. Conclusion This study demonstrates a robust association between serum concentrations of IFX, ADA, Alb, and CRP and primary endoscopic response in active CD patients. Importantly, the TDM- and laboratory marker-based nomogram may be used to evaluate the primary endoscopic response to anti-TNF therapy, especially for optimizing treatment strategies and switching therapy in CD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dengfeng Kang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Leilei Fang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mingming Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mingsong Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guangxi Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College, Jining, China
| | - Chunjin Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, First People’s Hospital of Shangqiu City Affiliated to Xinxiang Medical University, Shangqiu, China
| | - Zhi Pang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yulan Ye
- Department of Gastroenterology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Baisui Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Huili Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jian Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China
| | - Baijing Ding
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhu First People’s Hospital, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Changqin Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
| | - Yanhong Shi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
| | - Zhanju Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Allegretti JR, Bordeianou LG, Damas OM, Eisenstein S, Greywoode R, Minar P, Singh S, Harmon S, Lisansky E, Malone-King M, Litwin NS, Weaver A, Heller CA, Moss AC, Adler J. Challenges in IBD Research 2024: Pragmatic Clinical Research. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; 30:S55-S66. [PMID: 38778623 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izae083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Pragmatic clinical research is 1 of the 5 focus areas of the Challenges in IBD Research 2024, a multidisciplinary effort by scientists, clinicians, patients, and funders to identify priorities for patient-centric research. This summary provides a comprehensive overview of current gaps in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinical research and actionable approaches to address them. This review is focused on identifying research that is needed to achieve the best outcomes for patients in clinical practice. Research gaps include understanding the needs of understudied patient groups and addressing barriers to care so all patients receive optimal care, validating and using biomarkers to enable early diagnosis and result in better outcomes for adults and children with IBD, and determining the optimal sequencing of treatments (medical, surgical, adjunct) in children and adults. Inclusive pragmatic research is needed to address these gaps and lead to improvements in patient care and outcomes for all populations of patients with IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica R Allegretti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liliana G Bordeianou
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Oriana M Damas
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Leonard Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Samuel Eisenstein
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ruby Greywoode
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Phillip Minar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Sabrina Harmon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Eugene Lisansky
- Patient representative for Crohn's & Colitis Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| | - Myisha Malone-King
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | - Alan C Moss
- Crohn's & Colitis Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeremy Adler
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center and Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rodríguez-Moranta F, Argüelles-Arias F, Hinojosa Del Val J, Iborra Colomino M, Martín-Arranz MD, Menchén Viso L, Muñoz Núñez F, Ricart Gómez E, Sánchez-Hernández JG, Valdés-Delgado T, Guardiola Capón J, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Mañosa Ciria M, Zabana Abdo Y, Gutiérrez Casbas A. Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases. Position statement of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2024; 47:522-552. [PMID: 38311005 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has undergone a significant transformation following the introduction of biologic drugs. Thanks to these drugs, treatment goals have evolved from clinical response and remission to more ambitious objectives, such as endoscopic or radiologic remission. However, even though biologics are highly effective, a significant percentage of patients will not achieve an initial response or may lose it over time. We know that there is a direct relationship between the trough concentrations of the biologic and its therapeutic efficacy, with more demanding therapeutic goals requiring higher drug levels, and inadequate exposure being common. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic medications, along with pharmacokinetic models, provides us with the possibility of offering a personalized approach to treatment for patients with IBD. Over the past few years, relevant information has accumulated regarding its utility during or after induction, as well as in the maintenance of biologic treatment, in reactive or proactive strategies, and prior to withdrawal or treatment de-escalation. The aim of this document is to establish recommendations regarding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, in different clinical practice scenarios, and to identify areas where its utility is evident, promising, or controversial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España.
| | - Federico Argüelles-Arias
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, España; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España
| | | | - Marisa Iborra Colomino
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico de La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - M Dolores Martín-Arranz
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Facultad de Medicina de la UAM, Fundación para la investigación del Hospital Universitario la Paz (IDIPAZ), Madrid, España
| | - Luis Menchén Viso
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón-IiSGM, Madrid, España; Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Fernando Muñoz Núñez
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, España
| | - Elena Ricart Gómez
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), H. Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, España
| | | | - Teresa Valdés-Delgado
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, España
| | - Jordi Guardiola Capón
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
| | - Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, A Coruña, España; Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), A Coruña, España
| | - Míriam Mañosa Ciria
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, España; Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España
| | - Yamile Zabana Abdo
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, España; Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Mútua de Terrassa (HMT), Terrassa, Barcelona, España
| | - Ana Gutiérrez Casbas
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, España; Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Alicante, España
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mould DR, Upton RN. "Getting the Dose Right"-Revisiting the Topic With Focus on Biologic Agents. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024. [PMID: 38680029 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Nearly two decades after the Peck and Cross article '"Getting the dose right: facts, a blueprint, and encouragements" was published, a review of dose recommendations for biologics shows that the success in getting the dose right appears to have improved given the relatively low incidence of drug withdrawals and dosing/label changes. However, the clinical experience with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) following approval has been less than perfect. In inflammatory diseases, the disease burden changes with time and high treatment failure rates have been reported. In addition, the use of concomitant steroids and immunosuppressant drugs with MAbs is common. These concomitant agents have their own safety issues and many immunosuppressant agents are not well-tolerated although they have been shown to reduce the incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). This same complexity is seen in MAbs used in oncology as well, although with these agents the doses appear to be higher than needed, which results in high treatment costs and incidence of adverse events. Given the complexity of MAb pharmacokinetics, which makes providing a detailed description of dose options difficult, product labeling should include the options for alternative dose strategies and potentially include the use of therapeutic drug monitoring with dose individualization which have been shown to improve clinical response and reduce the incidence of ADA. So, while the recommended dosing for biologics seems improved over the issues noted 17 years ago, we still have some work to do.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane R Mould
- Projections Research Inc, Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Richard N Upton
- Projections Research Inc, Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, USA
- Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Verstockt B, Pivorunas V, Al Mahi N, Smaoui N, Guay H, Kennedy NA, Goodhand JR, Lin S, Bai BYH, Hanauer SB, Ferrante M, Panés J, Vermeire S. Baseline TREM-1 Whole Blood Gene Expression Does Not Predict Response to Adalimumab Treatment in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's Disease in the SERENE Studies. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:493-505. [PMID: 37801628 PMCID: PMC11037103 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS This study assessed whether baseline triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells [TREM-1] whole blood gene expression predicts response to anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] or Crohn's disease [CD]. METHODS TREM-1 whole blood gene expression was analysed by RNA sequencing in patients with moderately to severely active UC or CD treated with adalimumab in the Phase 3 SERENE-UC and SERENE-CD clinical trials. The predictive value of baseline TREM-1 expression was evaluated and compared according to endoscopic and clinical response vs non-response, and remission vs non-remission, at Weeks 8 and 52 [SERENE-UC], and Weeks 12 and 56 [SERENE-CD]. RESULTS TREM-1 expression was analysed in 95 and 106 patients with UC and CD, respectively, receiving standard-dose adalimumab induction treatment. In SERENE-UC, baseline TREM-1 expression was not predictive of endoscopic response [p = 0.48], endoscopic remission [p = 0.53], clinical response [p = 0.58], or clinical remission [p = 0.79] at Week 8, or clinical response [p = 0.60] at Week 52. However, an association was observed with endoscopic response [p = 0.01], endoscopic remission [p = 0.048], and clinical remission [p = 0.04997] at Week 52. For SERENE-CD, baseline TREM-1 expression was not predictive of endoscopic response [p = 0.56], endoscopic remission [p = 0.33], clinical response [p = 0.07], or clinical remission [p = 0.65] at Week 12, or endoscopic response [p = 0.61], endoscopic remission [p = 0.51], clinical response [p = 0.62], or clinical remission [p = 0.97] at Week 56. CONCLUSIONS Baseline TREM-1 gene expression did not uniformly predict adalimumab response in SERENE clinical trials. Further research is needed to identify potential blood-based biomarkers predictive of response to anti-TNF therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIERS NCT02065622; NCT02065570.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Valerie Pivorunas
- Precision Medicine Immunology, AbbVie Bioresearch Centre, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Naim Al Mahi
- Genomic Research Center, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nizar Smaoui
- Genomic Research Center, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Heath Guay
- Precision Medicine Immunology, AbbVie Bioresearch Centre, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - James R Goodhand
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Simeng Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Benjamin Y H Bai
- Genomics of Inflammation and Immunity Group, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Stephen B Hanauer
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Julian Panés
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roblin X, Paul S. Adalimumab: A 'Maillon Faible' in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis? J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:337-338. [PMID: 37847799 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Roblin
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Stephane Paul
- Immunology laboratory, iBioThera reference center, CIC1408, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France; CIRI (Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM U1111, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS Lyon, Université Jean Monnet de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Harnik S, Abitbol CM, Haj Natour O, Yavzori M, Fudim E, Picard O, Naftali T, Broide E, Hirsch A, Selinger L, Shachar E, Yablecovitch D, Albshesh A, Coscas D, Kopylov U, Eliakim R, Ben-Horin S, Ungar B. Prospective Observational Evaluation of the Time-Dependency of Adalimumab Immunogenicity and Drug Concentration in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: the POETIC II Study. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:341-348. [PMID: 37691574 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Home self-injection of the human anti-tumour necrosis alpha [anti-TNFα] monoclonal adalimumab complicates prospective serial-sampling studies. Although a recent study examined adalimumab levels and immunogenicity in Crohn's disease [CD] patients, prospective real-world data from ulcerative colitis [UC] patients are lacking. METHODS A three-monthly home-visit programme from induction was established prospectively for UC patients. Clinical scores were determined at each visit, and sera were obtained for assessment of drug and anti-adalimumab antibody levels. Calprotectin was measured using a smartphone-based app. This cohort was compared to a parallel prospective cohort of adalimumab-treated CD patients [POETIC1]. RESULTS Fifty UC patients starting adalimumab [median follow-up 28 weeks] were compared to 98 adalimumab-treated CD patients [median follow-up 44 weeks]. Only 11/50 UC patients [22%] continued treatment to the end of the follow-up compared with 50/98 [51%] CD patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.27, p = 0.001). Loss of response was significantly more common in UC patients [OR = 3.2, p = 0.001]. Seventeen patients [34%] in the UC cohort developed anti-adalimumab antibodies, 9/17 [52.9%] as early as week 2. There was no difference between patient cohorts in the overall development of anti-adalimumab antibodies [34% vs 30.6%, respectively, OR = 1.67, p = 0.67], nor was there a difference in early immunogenicity [OR = 1.39, p = 0.35]. There was no difference in low drug levels [<3 µg/mL] between the two cohorts [OR = 0.87, p = 0.83]. CONCLUSIONS Loss of response to adalimumab therapy was significantly more common in the UC compared to the CD cohort and was driven by a higher rate of non-immunogenic, pharmacodynamic parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivan Harnik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Chaya M Abitbol
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ola Haj Natour
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Miri Yavzori
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ella Fudim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Orit Picard
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Timna Naftali
- Department of Gastroenterology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Efrat Broide
- The Kamila Gonczarowski Institute of Gastroenterology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ayal Hirsch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Limor Selinger
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eyal Shachar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Doron Yablecovitch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ahmad Albshesh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Daniel Coscas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Rami Eliakim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Shomron Ben-Horin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Bella Ungar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zheng FY, Yang KS, Min WC, Li XZ, Xing Y, Wang S, Zhang YS, Zhao QC. Is tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal therapy with proactive therapeutic drug monitoring optimized for inflammatory bowel disease? Network meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:571-584. [PMID: 38463352 PMCID: PMC10921189 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody therapy [adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX)] with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which has been proposed for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, are still controversial. AIM To determine the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody therapy with proactive TDM in patients with IBD and to determine which subtype of IBD patients is most suitable for proactive TDM interventions. METHODS As of July 2023, we searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to compare anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody therapy with proactive TDM with therapy with reactive TDM or empiric therapy. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were used to determine the IBD patient subtype that achieved clinical remission and to determine the need for surgery. RESULTS This systematic review and meta-analysis yielded 13 studies after exclusion, and the baseline indicators were balanced. We found a significant increase in the number of patients who achieved clinical remission in the ADA [odds ratio (OR) = 1.416, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.196-1.676] and RCT (OR = 1.393, 95%CI: 1.182-1.641) subgroups and a significant decrease in the number of patients who needed surgery in the proactive vs reactive (OR = 0.237, 95%CI: 0.101-0.558) and IFX + ADA (OR = 0.137, 95%CI: 0.032-0.588) subgroups, and the overall risk of adverse events was reduced (OR = 0.579, 95%CI: 0.391-0.858) according to the pairwise meta-analysis. Moreover, the network meta-analysis results suggested that patients with IBD treated with ADA (OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.19-1.63) were more likely to undergo TDM, especially in comparison with patients with reactive TDM (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.07-1.77). CONCLUSION Proactive TDM is more suitable for IBD patients treated with ADA and has obvious advantages over reactive TDM. We recommend proactive TDM in IBD patients who are treated with ADA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang-Yuan Zheng
- Teaching Hospital of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Kai-Si Yang
- Teaching Hospital of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Wen-Cheng Min
- Teaching Hospital of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Xin-Zhu Li
- Teaching Hospital of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yu Xing
- Teaching Hospital of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Shuai Wang
- Teaching Hospital of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Ying-Shi Zhang
- Teaching Hospital of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Qing-Chun Zhao
- Teaching Hospital of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Desai D. Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: A practical approach. Indian J Gastroenterol 2024; 43:93-102. [PMID: 38329599 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-024-01527-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
The global burden of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is estimated at 4.9 million and the global prevalence exceeds 0.3%. Multiple newer therapeutic agents have broadened the options for the therapy of IBD in the last three decades. Thiopurines, however, have retained their place as maintenance therapy in IBD, especially in resource-constrained setting. But thiopurines have narrow therapeutic range, often needing discontinuation due to side effects or lack of efficacy. Biologic agents revolutionized the treatment of IBD, but the efficacy is lost in 50% of patient after one year. These outcomes are often due to inadequate drug concentrations that may lead to the development of antibodies as well as pharmacodynamic failure. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was proposed to reduce loss of response and to optimize the therapy in patients on thiopurine and biologic therapy. TDM is based on exposure-response relationship, suggesting a positive correlation between elevated serum anti-TNF concentrations and favorable therapeutic outcomes. TDM has multiple facets. This article discusses the benefits, evidence and limitations of TDM. The practical use of TDM in clinical practice is highlighted. Newer developments in the field and their relevance in practice are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devendra Desai
- P D Hinduja Hospital, Veer Savarkar Marg, Mahim, Mumbai, 400 016, India.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chang S, Murphy M, Malter L. A Review of Available Medical Therapies to Treat Moderate-to-Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119:55-80. [PMID: 37615291 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
The treatment armamentarium for inflammatory bowel disease has expanded rapidly in the past several years with new biologic and small molecule-agents approved for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. This has made treatment selection more challenging with limited but evolving guidance as to where to position each medication. In this review, we discuss the efficacy data for each agent approved in the United States by reviewing their phase 3 trial data and other comparative effectiveness studies. In addition, safety considerations and use in special populations are summarized with proposed algorithms for positioning therapies. The aim is to provide a synopsis of high-impact data and aid in outpatient treatment decision-making for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kayal M, Posner H, Spencer E, Colombel JF, Stalgis C, Ungaro RC. Net Remission Rates with Biologic and Small Molecule Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis: A Reappraisal of the Clinical Trial Data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:3433-3436.e1. [PMID: 36640802 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Maia Kayal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| | - Hannah Posner
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Elizabeth Spencer
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Jean-Frederic Colombel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | | | - Ryan C Ungaro
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang D, Duan S, He Z, Zhu Z, Li Z, Yi Q, Cai T, Li J, Chen N, Guo S. Sijunzi Decoction Targets IL1B and TNF to Reduce Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) in Ulcerative Colitis: Evidence from Silicon Prediction and Experiment Validation. Drug Des Devel Ther 2023; 17:3103-3128. [PMID: 37868820 PMCID: PMC10590142 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s428814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study was conducted to explore the mechanism of Sijunzi Decoction (SJZ) in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods The study aimed to investigate the active components and targets of SJZ in the treatment of UC by screening databases such as TCMSP, GeneCards, OMIM, Distinct, TTD, and Drugbank. An online Venn tool, Cytoscape 3.7.2, and Autodock Tools were used to analyze the components and targets. The study also used a mouse model of UC to further investigate the effects of SJZ. HE staining, immunofluorescence, ELISA, qPCR, and Western blot were used to detect various indices. Results Eighty-three active components and 112 action targets were identified from SJZ, including 67 targets for treating UC-related NETs. The five core targets identified were AKT1, JUN, IL1B, PTGS2, and TNF, and molecular docking studies indicated that the five targets were well-docked with ginsenoside Rh2, isoflavones, and formononetin. Animal experiments demonstrated that SJZ could alleviate various parameters such as weight, colon length, spleen index, disease activity index, and intestinal pathology of the UC mice. Immunofluorescence and Western blot showed that SJZ could reduce the expression of IL1B and TNF in intestinal neutrophils while increasing the expression of Occludin. Cellular immunofluorescence suggests that SJZ can reduce the expression of TNF and IL1B in NETs. The qPCR results also suggested that SJZ could inhibit TNF signal. Furthermore, ELISA results suggested that SJZ could inhibit the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) while promoting the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-37, TGF-β). Conclusion SJZ treats UC by reducing the content of intestinal NETs, with primary targets on the NETs being IL1B and TNFand suppress TNF signal. The practical components of SJZ may be ginsenoside Rh2, isoflavones, and formononetin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Zhang
- Gastrointestinal Ward, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
- Gastrointestinal Ward, Shenzhen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Siwei Duan
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Science and Technology Innovation Center of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhangyou He
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zeming Zhu
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Science and Technology Innovation Center of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhiping Li
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Science and Technology Innovation Center of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qincheng Yi
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tiantian Cai
- Gastrointestinal Ward, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
- Gastrointestinal Ward, Shenzhen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Juanjuan Li
- Gastrointestinal Ward, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
- Gastrointestinal Ward, Shenzhen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Nan Chen
- Gastrointestinal Ward, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
- Gastrointestinal Ward, Shenzhen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shaoju Guo
- Gastrointestinal Ward, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
- Gastrointestinal Ward, Shenzhen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Imbrizi M, Magro F, Coy CSR. Pharmacological Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Narrative Review of the Past 90 Years. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:1272. [PMID: 37765080 PMCID: PMC10537095 DOI: 10.3390/ph16091272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases had their first peak in incidence in countries in North America, Europe, and Oceania and are currently experiencing a new acceleration in incidence, especially in Latin America and Asia. Despite technological advances, 90 years after the development of the first molecule for the treatment of IBD, we still do not have drugs that promote disease remission in a generalized way. We carried out a narrative review on therapeutic advances in the treatment of IBD, the mechanisms of action, and the challenges facing the therapeutic goals in the treatment of IBD. Salicylates are still used in the treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. Corticosteroids have an indication restricted to the period of therapeutic induction due to frequent adverse events, while technologies with less systemic action have been developed. Most immunomodulators showed a late onset of action, requiring a differentiated initial strategy to control the disease. New therapeutic perspectives emerged with biological therapy, initially with anti-TNF, followed by anti-integrins and anti-interleukins. Despite the different mechanisms of action, there are similarities between the general rates of effectiveness. These similar results were also evidenced in JAK inhibitors and S1p modulators, the last therapeutic classes approved for the treatment of IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Imbrizi
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz-Barão Geraldo, Campinas 13083-970, SP, Brazil
| | - Fernando Magro
- Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
| | - Claudio Saddy Rodrigues Coy
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz-Barão Geraldo, Campinas 13083-970, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Iacucci M, Jeffery L, Acharjee A, Grisan E, Buda A, Nardone OM, Smith SCL, Labarile N, Zardo D, Ungar B, Hunter S, Mao R, Cannatelli R, Shivaji UN, Parigi TL, Reynolds GM, Gkoutos GV, Ghosh S. Computer-Aided Imaging Analysis of Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy With Molecular Labeling and Gene Expression Identifies Markers of Response to Biological Therapy in IBD Patients: The Endo-Omics Study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29:1409-1420. [PMID: 36378498 PMCID: PMC10472745 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to predict response to biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) using computerized image analysis of probe confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) in vivo and assess the binding of fluorescent-labeled biologics ex vivo. Additionally, we investigated genes predictive of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) response. METHODS Twenty-nine patients (15 with Crohn's disease [CD], 14 with ulcerative colitis [UC]) underwent colonoscopy with pCLE before and 12 to 14 weeks after starting anti-TNF or anti-integrin α4β7 therapy. Biopsies were taken for fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled infliximab and vedolizumab staining and gene expression analysis. Computer-aided quantitative image analysis of pCLE was performed. Differentially expressed genes predictive of response were determined and validated in a public cohort. RESULTS In vivo, vessel tortuosity, crypt morphology, and fluorescein leakage predicted response in UC (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.93; accuracy 85%, positive predictive value [PPV] 89%; negative predictive value [NPV] 75%) and CD (AUROC, 0.79; accuracy 80%; PPV 75%; NPV 83%) patients. Ex vivo, increased binding of labeled biologic at baseline predicted response in UC (UC) (AUROC, 83%; accuracy 77%; PPV 89%; NPV 50%) but not in Crohn's disease (AUROC 58%). A total of 325 differentially expressed genes distinguished responders from nonresponders, 86 of which fell within the most enriched pathways. A panel including ACTN1, CXCL6, LAMA4, EMILIN1, CRIP2, CXCL13, and MAPKAPK2 showed good prediction of anti-TNF response (AUROC >0.7). CONCLUSIONS Higher mucosal binding of the drug target is associated with response to therapy in UC. In vivo, mucosal and microvascular changes detected by pCLE are associated with response to biologics in inflammatory bowel disease. Anti-TNF-responsive UC patients have a less inflamed and fibrotic state pretreatment. Chemotactic pathways involving CXCL6 or CXCL13 may be novel targets for therapy in nonresponders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marietta Iacucci
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Louisa Jeffery
- Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Animesh Acharjee
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Enrico Grisan
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- School of Engineering Computer Science and Informatics, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Andrea Buda
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncological Surgery, S. Maria del Prato Hospital, Feltre, Italy
| | - Olga M Nardone
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samuel C L Smith
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nunzia Labarile
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Davide Zardo
- Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bella Ungar
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stuart Hunter
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ren Mao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rosanna Cannatelli
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Uday N Shivaji
- Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Gary M Reynolds
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Georgios V Gkoutos
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Subrata Ghosh
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- APC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Herrlinger KR, Stange EF. Prioritization in inflammatory bowel disease therapy. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:753-767. [PMID: 37480322 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2240699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most guidelines for IBD still recommend step-by-step therapy with initially classic drugs such aminosalicylates (in ulcerative colitis) or steroids but avoid prioritizing certain biological drugs and JAK inhibitors in the complicated course. This review provides an aid to pending therapy decisions. AREAS COVERED In this review, we analyze the evidence for Crohn's disease as well as ulcerative colitis in order to optimize and 'personalize' the choice of therapy, especially in difficult cases. The relevant publications in Pubmed were identified in a continuous literature review with the key words 'Crohn´s disease' and 'ulcerative colitis.' EXPERT OPINION Based on this complex data set following standard therapies steroid-refractory Crohn´s disease should preferentially be treated with combined infliximab plus azathioprine or risankizumab, in second line after their failure with ustekinumab or 7adalimumab. In steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis infliximab plus azathioprine or upadacitinib should be preferred in first line, filgotinib, tofacitinib or ustekinumab in second line. A steroid-dependent course in both diseases requires azathioprine or vedolizumab, in second line infliximab or Janus kinase inhibitors. The conclusions drawn from these complex data may be helpful for individual decision making in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eduard F Stange
- Klinik Für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Desai DC, Dherai AJ, Strik A, Mould DR. Personalized Dosing of Infliximab in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using a Bayesian Approach: A Next Step in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 63:480-489. [PMID: 36458468 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Although biological agents have revolutionized the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), a significant proportion of patients show primary non-response or develop secondary loss of response. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advocated to maintain the efficacy of biologic agents. Reactive TDM can rationalize the management of primary non-response and secondary loss of response and has shown to be more cost-effective compared with empiric dose escalation. Proactive TDM is shown to increase clinical remission and the durability of the response to a biologic agent. However, the efficacy of proactive and reactive TDM has been questioned in recent studies and meta-analyses. Hence, we need a different approach to TDM, which addresses inflammatory burden, the individual patient, and disease factors. Bayesian approaches, which use population pharmacokinetic models, enable clinicians to make better use of TDM for dose adjustment. With rapid improvement in computer technology, these Bayesian model-based software packages are now available for clinical use. Bayesian dashboard systems allow clinicians to apply model-based dosing to understand an individual's pharmacokinetics and achieve a target serum drug concentration. The model is updated using previously measured drug concentrations and relevant patient factors, such as body weight, C-reactive protein, and serum albumin concentration, to maintain effective drug concentrations in the serum. Initial studies have found utility for the Bayesian approach in induction and maintenance, in adult and pediatric patients, in clinical trials, and in real-life situations for patients with IBD treated with infliximab. This needs confirmation in larger studies. This article reviews the Bayesian approach to therapeutic drug monitoring in IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devendra C Desai
- Division of Gastroenterology, PD Hinduja Hospital, Veer Savarkar Marg, Mahim, Mumbai, India
| | - Alpa J Dherai
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, PD Hinduja Hospital, Veer Savarkar Marg, Mahim, Mumbai, India
| | - Anne Strik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Diane R Mould
- Projections Research Inc., Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Olivera PA, Lasa JS, Zubiaurre I, Jairath V, Abreu MT, Rubin DT, Reinisch W, Magro F, Rahier JF, Danese S, Rabaud C, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Opportunistic Infections in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated with Advanced Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:199-210. [PMID: 36087107 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] could potentially lead to a state of immunosuppression with an increased risk of opportunistic infections [OIs]. We aimed to provide an update on the incidence of OIs among adult IBD patients in randomized controlled trials [RCTs] of approved biologics and small-molecule drugs [SMDs]. Also, we aimed to describe OI definitions utilized in RCTs, to ultimately propose a standardized definition. METHODS Electronic databases were searched from January 1, 1990, until April 16, 2022. Our primary outcome was incidence rate of overall OIs among IBD patients exposed and unexposed to biologics or SMDs. We also describe specific OIs reported in included trials, as well as definitions of OIs within studies when provided. RESULTS Ninety studies were included. The incidence rates of reported OIs were 0.42 and 0.21 per 100 person-years in patients exposed to advanced therapies and placebo, respectively. This was highest for anti-tumour necrosis factors [0.83 per 100 person-years] and Janus kinase inhibitors [0.55 per 100 person-years] and lowest for anti-integrins and ozanimod. On meta-analysis, no increased risk of OIs was observed. None of the studies provided a detailed definition of OIs, or a comprehensive list of infections considered as OIs. CONCLUSION Different mechanisms of action may have specific OI profiles. In the absence of a uniform definition of OIs, these estimates are less reliable. We propose a definition to be used in future studies to help provide standardized reporting. When using this definition, we saw significant differences in incidence rates of OIs across mechanisms of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo A Olivera
- IBD Unit, Gastroenterology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigación Clínica (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Juan S Lasa
- IBD Unit, Gastroenterology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigación Clínica (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ignacio Zubiaurre
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Alimentiv Inc., London, ON, Canada
| | - Maria T Abreu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Crohn's and Colitis Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Medicine, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Walter Reinisch
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Fernando Magro
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics; CINTESIS, Faculty of Medicine University of Porto, and Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Jean-François Rahier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHU UCL Namur, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Christian Rabaud
- Department of Infectious Disease, Nancy University Hospital, Lorraine University, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- INSERM NGERE and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Lorraine University, Vandoeuvre-lés-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Assessing the Impact of Immunogenicity and Improving Prediction of Trough Concentrations: Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Adalimumab in Patients with Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Pharmacokinet 2023; 62:623-634. [PMID: 36905528 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01221-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Predicting adalimumab pharmacokinetics (PK) for patients impacted by anti-drug antibodies (ADA) has been challenging. The present study assessed the performance of the adalimumab immunogenicity assays in predicting which patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) have low adalimumab trough concentrations; and aimed to improve predictive performance of adalimumab population PK (popPK) model in CD and UC patients whose PK was impacted by ADA. METHODS Adalimumab PK and immunogenicity data obtained from 1459 patients in SERENE CD (NCT02065570) and SERENE UC (NCT02065622) were analyzed. Adalimumab immunogenicity was assessed using electrochemiluminescence (ECL) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assays. From these assays, three analytical approaches (ELISA concentrations, titer, and signal-to-noise [S/N] measurements) were tested as predictors for classifying patients with/without low concentrations potentially affected by immunogenicity. The performance of different thresholds for these analytical procedures was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and precision-recall curves. Based on the results from the most sensitive immunogenicity analytical procedure, patients were classified into PK-not-ADA-impacted and PK-ADA-impacted subpopulations. Stepwise popPK modeling was implemented to fit the PK data to an empirical adalimumab two-compartment model with linear elimination and ADA delay compartments to account for the time delay to generate ADA. Model performance was assessed by visual predictive checks and goodness-of-fit plots. RESULTS The classical ELISA-based classification (with 20 ng/mL ADA as lower threshold) showed a good balance of precision and recall, to determine which patients had at least 30% adalimumab concentrations below 1 µg/mL. Titer-based classification with the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) as threshold showed higher sensitivity to classify these patients compared to the ELISA-based approach. Therefore, patients were classified as PK-ADA-impacted or PK-not-ADA impacted using the LLOQ titer threshold. In the stepwise modeling approach ADA-independent parameters were first fit using PK data from titer-PK-not-ADA-impacted population. The identified ADA-independent covariates included the effect of indication, weight, baseline fecal calprotectin, baseline C-reactive protein, baseline albumin on clearance; and sex and weight on volume of distribution of the central compartment. Pharmacokinetic-ADA-driven dynamics were characterized using PK data for the PK-ADA-impacted population. The categorical covariate based on the ELISA classification was the best at describing the additional effect of immunogenicity analytical approaches on ADA synthesis rate. The model was able to adequately describe the central tendency and variability for PK-ADA-impacted CD/UC patients. CONCLUSIONS The ELISA assay was found to be optimal for capturing impact of ADA on PK. The developed adalimumab popPK model is robust in predicting PK profiles for CD and UC patients whose PK was impacted by ADA.
Collapse
|
21
|
Burisch J, Zhao M, Odes S, De Cruz P, Vermeire S, Bernstein CN, Kaplan GG, Duricova D, Greenberg D, Melberg HO, Watanabe M, Ahn HS, Targownik L, Pittet VEH, Annese V, Park KT, Katsanos KH, Høivik ML, Krznaric Z, Chaparro M, Loftus EV, Lakatos PL, Gisbert JP, Bemelman W, Moum B, Gearry RB, Kappelman MD, Hart A, Pierik MJ, Andrews JM, Ng SC, D'Inca R, Munkholm P. The cost of inflammatory bowel disease in high-income settings: a Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 8:458-492. [PMID: 36871566 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00003-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
The cost of caring for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to increase worldwide. The cause is not only a steady increase in the prevalence of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in both developed and newly industrialised countries, but also the chronic nature of the diseases, the need for long-term, often expensive treatments, the use of more intensive disease monitoring strategies, and the effect of the diseases on economic productivity. This Commission draws together a wide range of expertise to discuss the current costs of IBD care, the drivers of increasing costs, and how to deliver affordable care for IBD in the future. The key conclusions are that (1) increases in health-care costs must be evaluated against improved disease management and reductions in indirect costs, and (2) that overarching systems for data interoperability, registries, and big data approaches must be established for continuous assessment of effectiveness, costs, and the cost-effectiveness of care. International collaborations should be sought out to evaluate novel models of care (eg, value-based health care, including integrated health care, and participatory health-care models), as well as to improve the education and training of clinicians, patients, and policy makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Burisch
- Gastro Unit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
| | - Mirabella Zhao
- Gastro Unit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Selwyn Odes
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Peter De Cruz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Severine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charles N Bernstein
- IBD Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Gilaad G Kaplan
- Department of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Dana Duricova
- IBD Clinical and Research Centre for IBD, ISCARE, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dan Greenberg
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Hans O Melberg
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mamoru Watanabe
- Advanced Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hyeong Sik Ahn
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Laura Targownik
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Valérie E H Pittet
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Vito Annese
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Fakeeh University Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - K T Park
- Stanford Health Care, Packard Health Alliance, Alameda, CA, USA; Genentech (Roche Group), South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Konstantinos H Katsanos
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina School of Health Sciences, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Marte L Høivik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Zeljko Krznaric
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University Hospital Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - María Chaparro
- Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Edward V Loftus
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Peter L Lakatos
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Willem Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bjorn Moum
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Richard B Gearry
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Michael D Kappelman
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ailsa Hart
- IBD Unit, St Mark's Hospital, Middlesex, UK
| | - Marieke J Pierik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jane M Andrews
- IBD Service, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Siew C Ng
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Renata D'Inca
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Pia Munkholm
- Department of Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
State M, Negreanu L. Defining the Failure of Medical Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Advanced Therapies: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11020544. [PMID: 36831079 PMCID: PMC9953124 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The expansion of advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease created a lag between the development of these new therapies and their incorporation and use in daily practice. At present, no clear definitions for treatment optimization, treatment failure or criteria to abandon therapy are available. We aimed to centralize criteria for a nonresponse to all available molecules and to summarize guideline principles for treatment optimization. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of studies that reported criteria for the treatment response to all advanced therapies (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab and tofacitinib) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. RESULTS Across trials, criteria for a response of both patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are heterogenous. Investigators use different definitions for clinical and endoscopic remission, and endoscopic response and outcomes are assessed at variable time points. Current society guidelines provide heterogenous recommendations on treatment optimization. Most available data on loss of response concern anti-TNF molecules, and newer therapies are not included in the guidelines. CONCLUSION The lack of clear definitions and formal recommendations provide the premise for empirical treatment strategies and premature abandonment of therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica State
- Department 5, Internal Medicine—Gastroenterology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Colentina Clinical Hospital, 020125 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Lucian Negreanu
- Department 5, Internal Medicine—Gastroenterology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Emergency University Hospital, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Megna BW, Vaughn BP. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Practice for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2022; 24:191-200. [PMID: 36459387 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-022-00854-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To outline the development, rationale, and practical use of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. RECENT FINDINGS Therapeutic drug monitoring is traditionally discussed in terms of a proactive or reactive approach. However, these terms are not always consistently defined and can be confusing when translating research to clinical practice. Personalized approaches incorporating clinical context and precision medicine are emerging. Personalized therapeutic drug monitoring combines a structured and proactive strategy for monitoring biologic concentrations as well as identification of antidrug antibody development or subtherapeutic dosing in the setting of loss of response. Optimizing biologic therapy can improve outcomes and avoid loss of response. Why, when, and how we measure drug troughs and anti-drug antibodies is a moving target, though what is known is that the appropriate and evidence-based use of this practice prevents adverse events and improves outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryant W Megna
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Byron P Vaughn
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wilson A, Kim RB. Failure to Achieve Target Drug Concentrations During Induction and Not HLADQA1∗05 Carriage Is Associated With Antidrug Antibody Formation in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Is HLADQA1∗05 Gone Before It's Here? Gastroenterology 2022; 163:1123-1124. [PMID: 35427575 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aze Wilson
- Divisions of Clinical Pharmacology and Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard B Kim
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bressler B, Steinhart AH. Has the Time Come to Say Goodbye to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring As We Know It? Gastroenterology 2022; 162:1831-1832. [PMID: 35364063 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Bressler
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - A Hillary Steinhart
- Mount Sinai Hospital Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hahn GD, Golovics PA, Wetwittayakhlang P, Al Khoury A, Bessissow T, Lakatos PL. Is There a Best First Line Biological/Small Molecule in IBD: Are We Ready for Sequencing? Biomedicines 2022; 10:749. [PMID: 35453498 PMCID: PMC9026422 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10040749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, life-long inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract. Treatment strategy depends on the severity of the disease course. IBD physicians need to be aware of the life-long treatment options available. The goal is not only to achieve clinical remission but to halt or stabilize the chronic inflammation in the intestines to prevent further structural damage. Therefore, the use of early biologic therapy is recommended in moderate-to-severe IBD patients. However, in the last decade, use of therapeutic drug monitoring has increased considerably, opening an opportunity for sequencing. This review summarizes the available evidence on biologic and small molecules therapy in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in different clinical scenarios, including perianal CD, the elderly, extra intestinal manifestations, and pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Drügg Hahn
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada; (P.A.G.); (P.W.); (T.B.)
- School of Medicine, Graduate Course Sciences in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90035-002, Brazil
| | - Petra Anna Golovics
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada; (P.A.G.); (P.W.); (T.B.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hungarian Defence Forces, Medical Centre, H-1062 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Panu Wetwittayakhlang
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada; (P.A.G.); (P.W.); (T.B.)
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
| | - Alex Al Khoury
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA;
| | - Talat Bessissow
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada; (P.A.G.); (P.W.); (T.B.)
| | - Peter Laszlo Lakatos
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada; (P.A.G.); (P.W.); (T.B.)
- 1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, H-1083 Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|