Developing and Validating a Renal Nutrition Screening Tool to Effectively Identify Undernutrition Risk Among Renal Inpatients

[New nutritional screening tool for hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease: translation, cross-cultural adaptation of Renal iNUT into Spanish and comparison with classic questionnaires]

Introduction

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by its high prevalence of malnutrition, difficult to detect as it is underestimated by the usual tools. There is no valid or hospital-level nutritional screening tool in Spanish to identify patients with CKD at risk of malnutrition. Objective: to translate and accomplish the transcultural adaptation of Jackson's questionnaire (Renal Inpatient Nutrition Screening Tool [Renal iNUT]) to Spanish, which detects the risk of malnutrition in CKD inpatients and compares it with other nutritional tools. Methods: phase 1: translation, back-translation and transcultural adaptation of the questionnaire from the English to the Spanish version. A pilot test was carried out by nursing staff together with a satisfaction questionnaire. Phase 2: comparison of Renal iNUT with Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Results: phase 1: the nursing staff's perception was highly favorable. They found it easy or very easy to use and 90 % of them did it in a maximum of ten minutes. Phase 2: from 48 patients included, Renal iNUT detected 44 % at low risk of malnutrition, 28 % at intermediate risk and 28 % at high risk. Increased sensitivity of Renal iNUT (p < 0.007) vs MUST (62.5 vs 33.3 %) and similar specificity (87.1 vs 90.6 %) were found, together with an acceptable correlation compared to SGA (r = 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.67 to 0.83). Conclusions: the Spanish version of Renal iNUT is a useful and easy-to-understand tool for health professionals. We also confirm its good correlation with SGA, with greater sensitivity than MUST for the risk of malnutrition detection in CKD inpatients.

Association of Malnutrition with Risk of Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complex clinical syndrome of hospitalization that may be affected by undernutrition and metabolic changes. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically assess the association between malnutrition and the risk of prevalent AKI.

Materials and Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Chinese databases (WANFANG, VIP, and CKI) from database inception until May 1, 2023, for studies evaluating the association of malnutrition with the risk of AKI. Summary odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using a random-effects model.

Results

We identified 17 observational studies, which included 273,315 individuals. Compared with patients with normal nutritional status, those with malnutrition had a 125% increased risk of prevalent AKI (pooled ORs, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.82). Malnutrition was also significantly associated with prevalent AKI across all subgroups when subgroup analyses were performed on covariates such as region, study design, age, sample size, malnutrition assessment method, patient characteristics, covariate adjustment degree, and risk of bias. Meta-regression models demonstrated no significant differences in AKI risk between patients with malnutrition and without malnutrition.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that malnutrition may be a potential target for AKI prevention. However, well-designed studies with ethnically or geographically diverse populations are needed to evaluate strategies and interventions to prevent or slow the development and progression of AKI in malnourished individuals.

Enhancing nutrition screening in patients with kidney disease

Malnutrition is common in patients with kidney disease, and can exacerbate the individual and economic burden of the condition. The identification of malnutrition is essential to inform management interventions and improve patient outcomes, and nutrition screening can be considered the first stage in this process. The development of simple nutrition screening tools has assisted nurses in undertaking widespread, rapid assessments of patients' malnutrition risk. However, generic tools may not be appropriate or accurate in patients with kidney disease. This article explains some of the challenges of identifying malnutrition in this patient group and outlines some disease-specific tools that nurses can use to enhance nutrition screening.

Association of the nutritional risk index for Japanese hemodialysis with mortality and dietary nutritional intake in patients undergoing hemodialysis during long-term hospitalization

AIM

The nutritional risk index for Japanese hemodialysis (NRI-JH) is a nutritional screening tool for predicting mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis; however, its utility in patients undergoing hemodialysis during long-term hospitalization who have a high risk of protein-energy wasting, is unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed hospitalized patients undergoing hemodialysis during long-term care at a single hospital. The NRI-JH was calculated using body mass index, serum albumin level, total cholesterol level, and serum creatinine level. The patients were categorized into three risk groups-low, medium, and high. Dietary energy and protein intake were evaluated by dietitians. The association of NRI-JH risk with nutritional intake and mortality were examined.

RESULTS

In total, 133 patients were analyzed. The NRI-JH risk was low in 24%, medium in 26%, and high in 50% of the patients. The patients in the high-risk group were older and had lower energy and protein intakes than those in the low- and medium-risk groups. High-risk patients showed shorter survival times than low- and medium-risk patients, and a high NRI-JH risk was associated with a high mortality rate (hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-4.77; p < 0.05). The association weakened when protein intake and C-reactive protein level were added as covariates (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 0.95-4.28, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

High NRI-JH risk was associated with low dietary nutritional intake and poor survival in patients undergoing hemodialysis during long-term hospitalization. Nutritional status evaluation and nutritional interventions may improve prognosis in this population.

Consensus on the standard terminology used in the nutrition care of adult patients with chronic kidney disease

This nutrition consensus document is the first to coordinate the efforts of three professional organizations - the Brazilian Association of Nutrition (Asbran), the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (SBN), and the Brazilian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (Braspen/SBNPE) - to select terminology and international standardized tools used in nutrition care. Its purpose is to improve the training delivered to nutritionists working with adult patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Eleven questions were developed concerning patient screening, care, and nutrition outcome management. The recommendations set out in this document were developed based on international guidelines and papers published in electronic databases such as PubMed, EMBASE(tm), CINHAL, Web of Science, and Cochrane. From a list of internationally standardized terms, twenty nutritionists selected the ones they deemed relevant in clinical practice involving outpatients with CKD. The content validity index (CVI) was calculated with 80% agreement in the answers. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess the strength of evidence and recommendations. A total of 107 terms related to Nutrition Assessment and Reassessment, 28 to Diagnosis, nine to Intervention, and 94 to Monitoring and Evaluation were selected. The list of selected terms and identified tools will be used in the development of training programs and the implementation of standardized nutrition terminology for nutritionists working with patients with chronic kidney disease in Brazil.

The effect of an arteriovenous fistula and haemodialysis on anthropometric measurements of the upper arm

Haemodialysis (HD) patients are at increased risk of sarcopenia. Measurements of triceps skinfold thickness (TSFT) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) are used to estimate muscle mass. An arteriovenous fistula is the preferred vascular access for HD patients, and we wished to determine whether anthropometric measurements were affected by the fistula and HD treatment. One hundred and forty-four HD patients, 90 (62.5%) males, mean age 63.1 ± 15.4 years, had measurements pre- and post-HD. TSFT was similar in the arms, whereas MUAC and corrected mid-upper arm muscle circumference (CMUAMC) were greater in the fistula compared with the non-fistula arm (MUAC pre-HD 30.0 ± 5.2 vs 29.2 ± 4.7 and post-HD 29.6 ± 5.1 vs 28.5 ± 4.7, p < 0.001; MUAMC 23.5 ± 4.0 vs 22.5 ± 4.1, and post-HD 22.9 ± 4.0, and 22.0 ± 3.7 cm p < 0.01). Following HD; TSFT did not change, but MUAC and CMUAMC fell significantly in both arms (p < 0.01). When screening for sarcopenia in HD patients, anthropometric measurements should be taken post-HD in the non-fistula arm.

Validated screening tools for the assessment of cachexia, sarcopenia, and malnutrition: a systematic review

Background

There is great overlap between the presentation of cachexia, sarcopenia, and malnutrition. Distinguishing between these conditions would allow for better targeted treatment for patients.

Objectives

The aim was to systematically review validated screening tools for cachexia, sarcopenia, and malnutrition in adults and, if a combined tool is absent, make suggestions for the generation of a novel screening tool.

Design

A systematic search was performed in Ovid Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Two reviewers performed data extraction independently. Each tool was judged for validity against a reference method. Psychometric evaluation was performed as was appraisal of the tools' ability to assess the patient against consensus definitions.

Results

Thirty-eight studies described 22 validated screening tools. The Cachexia score (CASCO) was the only validated screening tool for cachexia and performed well against the consensus definition. Two tools assessed sarcopenia [the Short Portable Sarcopenia Measure (SPSM) and the SARC-F (Strength, Assistance with walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls)] and scored well against the 1998 Baumgartner definition. The SPSM required large amounts of equipment, and the SARC-F had a low sensitivity. Nineteen tools screened for malnutrition. The 3-Minute Nutrition Score performed best, meeting consensus definition criteria (European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism) and having a sensitivity and specificity of >80%. No tool contained all of the currently accepted components to screen for all 3 conditions. Only 3 tools were validated against cross-sectional imaging, a clinical tool that is gaining wider interest in body-composition analysis.

Conclusions

No single validated screening tool can be implemented for the simultaneous assessment of cachexia, sarcopenia, and malnutrition. The development of a tool that encompasses consensus definition criteria and directs clinicians toward the underlying diagnosis would be optimal to target treatment and improve outcomes. We propose that tool should incorporate a stepwise assessment of nutritional status, oral intake, disease status, age, muscle mass and function, and metabolic derangement.