The sequelae of salvaged nondegenerative peripheral vertical medial meniscus tears with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions: An Arthroscopic Classification

Medial meniscus ramp lesions are commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. These lesions were defined previously as longitudinal tears around the meniscocapsular junction at the level of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. However, the recent interpretation of the ramp lesions, their causation, anatomical studies, and histologic studies has uncovered a different dimension to these lesions. With recent knowledge of anatomy and soft-tissue attachments around the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, the attachments of the articular capsule, posteromedial capsule, meniscocapsular ligament, meniscotibial ligament, and semimembranosus, there is a need to understand these injuries differently. Because the anatomical structures injured during the ramp lesion will decide the treatment strategy to repair it anatomically, a review of the classification and repair techniques is necessary. The existing classification is descriptive and does not suggest a repair strategy for each classification. Because the ramp lesion, by definition, does not affect the meniscus tissue, it is a peel-off injury of the posteromedial structures. Hence, injury to the meniscus without injury to the meniscocapsular ligament, or meniscotibial ligament, cannot be classified as a ramp lesion. This article proposes an arthroscopic and functional classification.

Meniscal Ramp Injury Diagnosis

Objective : This study compared diagnostic methods for meniscal ramp injury (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], arthrotomography, and arthroscopy) to determine the most sensitive and the agreement level between them. Method:  We studied 21 patients, all young athletes with suspected anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after trauma for at least 3 months and no evidence or history of other osteoarticular injuries in the knee. The patients underwent MRI and arthrotomography. Following ACL injury confirmation, they underwent arthroscopy for ligament reconstruction and evaluation of the medial meniscus to confirm or exclude a ramp injury. McNemar's agreement test compared the diagnostic methods. We also assessed specificity and sensitivity using arthroscopy as the gold standard with a 95% confidence interval and p < 0.005. Result : The results were consistent with the literature. MRI had 73.3% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity, with 76.2% agreement with the gold standard. Arthrotomography sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 66.7%, respectively, with 90.5% agreement with arthroscopy. Conclusion : In our study, arthrotomography was the most sensitive diagnostic method and had the highest agreement with the gold standard. We recommend its consideration for diagnosing ACL injuries.

Editorial Commentary: A Gap-Based Subclassification of Ramp Lesions Has the Potential to Enhance Treatment Precision and Patient Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knees Subtitle: Customizing Solutions for Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knees

Our evolving understanding of ramp lesions has significantly affected the field of anterior cruciate ligament injury and meniscal repair. Although these lesions have been linked consistently to increased anterior and rotational instability in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees, there remains a contentious debate regarding their optimal treatment. The current literature is divided, as some advocate for surgical repair of only arthroscopically unstable lesions. Others point to a substantial risk of complications, noting a 28.6% incidence in untreated stable lesions, and thus advocate for surgical repair of all lesions. Through the use of magnetic resonance imaging scans of flexed knees, a novel subclassification of ramp lesions based on gap distance at the tear site shows a correlation with posterior capsular displacement, anterior laxity, lesion size, and joint effusion. This nuanced classification offers new insights and promises to refine treatment decisions, potentially minimizing unnecessary surgeries and improving patient outcomes.

Clinical and MRI Outcomes of Repaired Peripheral Longitudinal Tears of the Posterior Horn of the Medial Meniscus With ACL Reconstruction: Results According to Tear Size

Background

Arthroscopic repair of longitudinal tears in the medial meniscal posterior horn (MMPH) has been reported to result in high rates of meniscal healing when performed alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, studies that have focused on longitudinal tears and their impact on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair are insufficient.

Purpose

To investigate the clinical outcome and healing status after concomitant arthroscopic ACLR and repair of MMPH peripheral longitudinal tears, with respect to the tear length.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 263 patients who underwent concurrent arthroscopic suture repair of longitudinal tears of the MMPH and ACLR were enrolled. All patients had 2-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations, and 61% of patients underwent a second-look arthroscopy. The exclusion criteria were partial meniscectomies and multiligament injuries. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively for clinical scores, amount of anterior translation, grade of pivot shift, and presence of meniscal tear extension. According to the length of longitudinal tears, patients were classified into 2 groups: (1) patients with tears that were located in the posterior compartment and (2) patients with tears that extended to the midbody of the meniscus. Binary stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for unhealed menisci as identified by MRI.

Results

A total of 83 patients were included in this study-52 patients (group 1) had MMPH tears without tear extension and 31 patients (group 2) had MMPH tears with tear extension. There were no differences in outcomes between the groups, including the healing rate after meniscal repair (P > .05). Based on postoperative MRI scans, 67 patients (80.7%) were categorized as completely healed and 16 patients (19.3%) as unhealed. There were no significant differences between the completely healed and unhealed groups in outcomes or the rate of preoperative midbody tear extension. Higher body mass index and lower preoperative Lysholm scores were identified as risk factors for unhealed menisci.

Conclusion

Overall, the rate of complete healing of MMPH tears repaired concomitantly with ACLR was 80.7% (67/83), and midbody tear extension did not affect the healing rate of the repaired meniscus. Results indicate that suture repair for unstable MMPH tears should be considered regardless of tear size.

Searching for the Best Treatment for Ramp Lesions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Ramp lesions are a common occurrence in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. These lesions can be difficult to diagnose due to their concealed nature, and their treatment is crucial due to the stabilizing function of the medial meniscocapsular region. The optimal treatment option for ramp lesions varies depending on the size and stability of the lesion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best treatment option for ramp lesions based on the stability of the lesion, including no treatment, biological treatment, and arthroscopic repair. We hypothesize that stable lesions have a favorable prognosis with techniques that do not require the use of meniscal sutures. In contrast, unstable lesions require appropriate fixation, either through an anterior or posteromedial portal. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis with a level of evidence IV. The study used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for a systematic review of clinical studies reporting outcomes of ramp lesion treatment. The PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched using Mesh and non-Mesh terms related to ramp lesions, medial meniscus ramp lesions, and meniscocapsular injuries. The inclusion criteria encompassed clinical studies in English or Spanish that reported the treatment of ramp meniscal lesions, with a follow-up of at least six months and inclusion of functional results, clinical stability tests, radiological evaluation, or arthroscopic second look. The analysis included 13 studies with 1614 patients. Five studies distinguished between stable and unstable ramp lesions using different criteria (displacement or size) for assessment. Of the stable lesions, 90 cases received no treatment, 64 cases were treated biologically (debridement, edge-curettage, or trephination), and 728 lesions were repaired. There were 221 repaired unstable lesions. All different methods of repair were registered. In stable lesions, three studies were included in a network meta-analysis. The best-estimated treatment for stable lesions was biological (SUCRA 0.9), followed by repair (SUCRA 0.6), and no treatment (SUCRA 0). In unstable lesions, seven studies using International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) and 10 studies using Lysholm for functional outcomes showed significant improvement from preoperative to postoperative scores after repair, with no differences between repairing methods. We recommend simplifying the classification of ramp lesions as stable or unstable to determine treatment. Biological treatment is preferred for stable lesions rather than leaving them in situ. Unstable lesions, on the other hand, require repair, which has been associated with excellent functional outcomes and healing rates.

Long-term Natural History of Unrepaired Stable Ramp Lesions: A Retrospective Analysis of 28 Patients With a Minimum Follow-up of 20 Years

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus about whether stable ramp lesions associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries need to be repaired.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate how many stable ramp lesions left in situ during ACL reconstruction (ACLR) have subsequently failed after >20 years of follow-up. We hypothesized that ACL-reconstructed knees with ramp lesions left in situ without repair have a high risk of meniscal failure over the long term.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

All patients who underwent arthroscopic ACLR by a single experienced surgeon between January 1998 and December 2000 were evaluated retrospectively. Included were all cases of longitudinal tears in the meniscocapsular junction or the red zone of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus that were left in situ and identified through the anterior portals. Successful anterior probing confirmed a meniscal tear of the posterior segment. A lesion was considered stable if it was ≤2 cm and did not extend beyond the lower pole of the femoral condyle. The following data were collected preoperatively and at the last follow-up: demographics, time to surgery, side-to-side laxity, pivot shift, Lysholm score, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner activity scale, and meniscal failure rate. We defined 2 groups based on our findings: medial meniscal failure versus no medial meniscal failure.

RESULTS

A total of 716 knees underwent primary ACLR during this period. The 39 (5.4%) stable unrepaired ramp lesions identified were included in the case series. Mean ± standard deviation follow-up was 262.1 ± 10.5 months. Eleven patients (28%) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining patients, 8 (28.6%) had a medial meniscal failure, of which 6 (21.4%) were bucket-handle tears. The average time elapsed before complications was 87.8 ± 52 months (range, 6-156 months). The medial meniscal survival rate was 93% at 5 years, 75% at 10 years, and 71% at 15 and 20 years. The failure event mainly happened between 96 and 120 months (8 and 10 years) after ACLR. No risk factors for failure were found, but some trends appeared, such as older age, higher body mass index, and preoperative rotational instability. All postoperative scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up (P < .0001); 16 patients (57%) returned to their sport of choice.

CONCLUSION

With nearly one-third of patients developing meniscal complications, including a large share of bucket-handle tears and mostly occurring 8 years after the ACLR, it may not be wise to leave stable ramp lesions unrepaired.

Meniscal Ramp Lesions and Root Tears: A Review of the Current Literature

The importance of the menisci in providing joint stability and their role in load transmission within the knee are well understood. A growing body of literature has emerged on 2 distinct injury patterns to these crucial anatomic structures, ramp lesions and root tears. Ramp lesions may be characterized as tears at the posterior meniscocapsular junction, while root tears involve bony or soft tissue avulsion of the meniscal insertions at the anterior or posterior intercondylar regions. In this 2-part review, we present an overview of the current available literature on ramp lesions and meniscal root tears, summarizing the unique anatomic considerations, etiology, biomechanics, management decisions, clinical outcomes pertinent to these very distinct injuries.

Ramp Lesion Subtypes: Prevalence, Imaging, and Arthroscopic Findings in 2156 Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

BACKGROUND

Ramp lesions are defined as a particular type of injury within the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and its meniscocapsular attachments. Five subtypes have been described: type 1, meniscocapsular lesion; type 2, partial superior lesion; type 3, partial inferior lesion or hidden type; type 4, complete tear in the red zone; and type 5, complete double tear.

PURPOSE

(1) To determine the prevalence of different subtypes of ramp lesions in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). (2) To describe the characteristics of ramp lesions based on imaging and diagnostic arthroscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

All patients who underwent arthroscopic ACLRs between November 2015 and November 2018 by 2 senior surgeons at 1 institution were evaluated retrospectively (1) to describe the subtypes of ramp lesions diagnosed intraoperatively using transnotch arthroscopic exploration of the posteromedial compartment and (2) to look for any factors significantly associated with these subtypes. The following parameters were studied: demographics; history and clinical findings including time between injury and surgery, side-to-side laxity, and pivot shift; lesions missed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and medial proximal tibial bone contusion visible on MRI scans; and arthroscopic confirmation of ramp lesion (ie, prevalence), associated lateral meniscal tear, or medial chondral tear.

RESULTS

Out of 2156 primary or revision arthroscopic reconstructions, 334 ramp lesions were confirmed, giving a prevalence of 15.5%. The subtype distribution was as follows: type 1, 47.9%; type 2, 4.8%; type 3, 11.4%; type 4, 28.7%; type 5, 7.2%. Multivariate analysis showed that gross pivot shift was significantly associated with complete ramp tears (odds ratio, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.7-17.2). Hidden lesions (type 3, inferior partial tear in the red zone) were the most likely to be missed on preoperative MRI (45.9%).

CONCLUSION

In a population undergoing ACLR, the prevalence of ramp lesions was 15.5%. Among the subtypes of ramp lesion, the most common was a meniscocapsular junction tear (type 1). Partial inferior tears (type 3) were the most likely to be missed on preoperative MRI scans. Gross pivot shift was significantly associated with complete ramp tears (types 1, 4, and 5).

Steep posterior slope of the medial tibial plateau is associated with ramp lesions of the medial meniscus and a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament injury

Background

Medial meniscus (MM) tears are associated with both acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency and can lead to degenerative changes in the knee. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) combined with the meniscal repair was reported to result in decreased anterior knee joint laxity with evidence of improved patient-reported outcomes in the long term. However, a subtle tear of the MM posterior segment, also known as a ramp lesion, is difficult to detect on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and is frequently missed in ACL-deficient knees. However, there are few studies about the associations between bone geometry and ramp lesion of the MM. This study aimed to compare sagittal medial tibial slope (MTS), medial tibial plateau depth (MTPD), and coronal tibial slope (CTS) between ACL-injured knees with and without ramp lesion of the MM. We hypothesised that patients with ramp lesion of the MM and a concomitant ACL injury have a steeper MTS and shallower MTPD than those without ramp lesion of the MM.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients who underwent ACLR (group A), and 15 patients with combined MM repair (group AM) were included in the study. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was measured under general anaesthesia just before surgery using a knee arthrometer. MRI was performed in the 10°-knee-flexed position. The MTS and MTPD were measured on sagittal view, and the CTS was measured on coronal view. These parameters were compared between the groups. Differences in MRI measurements or patient demographics between the groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

No significant difference was observed in demographic data and post-operative side-to-side difference in ATT between both groups. Pre-operative ATT was significantly higher in group AM than in group A (P < 0.05), whereas post-operative ATT was similar in both groups. Further, Pre-operative ATT was significantly higher in patients with MTS ≥5.0° than in those with MTS <5.0° (P < 0.05). In groups A and AM, the MTS were 3.6° ± 1.8° and 6.2° ± 2.9°, the MTPD were 2.0 ± 0.5 mm and 2.1 ± 0.6 mm, and the CTS were 2.5° ± 1.8° and 2.4° ± 1.6°, respectively. Patients in group AM had a significantly steeper MTS compared to those in group A (P < 0.01), whereas MTPD and CTS were nearly the same in both groups. When the MTS cut-off value was set at 5.0°, the sensitivity and specificity for ACL injury with concomitant ramp lesion of the MM were 0.73 and 0.76, respectively.

Conclusion

A steep posterior slope of the medial tibial plateau is a risk factor for ramp lesion of the MM associated with an ACL injury. Especially in patients with MTS ≥5.0°, an occult MM ramp lesion should be strongly suspected, and surgeons should prepare for MM repair in combination with ACLR.

Examining Techniques for Treatment of Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the clinical outcomes and adverse events among different techniques for treatment of medial meniscal ramp lesions performed in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Reviews, Web of Science, and Medline databases were searched for studies examining clinical outcomes after surgical treatment of ramp lesions. Studies were selected if they met the following criteria: (1) evaluation of the outcome of surgical repair of meniscal ramp lesions, (2) injuries associated with ACL tears, (3) minimum 6-month follow up, (4) publication in a peer-reviewed journal, and (5) English language or translation readily available.

RESULTS

Seven studies met inclusion criteria (485 patients; mean age 27.1 years [range 12 to 59]; mean follow-up 26.9 months [range 8 to 40]). Two all-inside techniques (suture-hook and an all-inside meniscus repair device) in addition to abrasion and trephination alone were analyzed. Each technique demonstrated significant increases in postoperative Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, reaching the established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each patient reported outcome. Incomplete healing was documented in 12.1% to 12.9% of cases in which the tear was not repaired at the time of ACL reconstruction, 2.3% to 11.7% in cases using the suture-hook for repair, and 10.8% to 15% in the all-inside meniscus repair device group.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrated that several approaches used to treat medial meniscal ramp lesions associated with ACL tears lead to positive clinical outcomes. Small, stable tears <2 cm in size may be managed with debridement alone. For larger, more unstable lesions, an all-inside approach has demonstrated positive clinical outcomes. Prospective trials are needed to determine the best management for meniscal ramp lesions. Additionally, further research is needed to better understand how to minimize the risk of technique-related complications (e.g., improper implant deployment).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of level II, III, and IV studies.

Ramp lesions: a systematic review of MRI diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy

Purpose

We conducted a systematic review of the published literature to assess the accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in establishing the presence of ramp lesions (RLs) in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) deficient knees and the clinical efficacy of the surgical repair of RLs.

Methods

A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus databases was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing MRI diagnostic accuracy for RLs or the clinical effect of RL repair in participants with ACL injuries were included. Diagnostic accuracy measures were pooled and plotted in forest plots. Preoperative and at last follow-up treatment efficacy outcome measures were extracted and plotted in forest plots, for graphical comprehension.

Results

Sixteen studies met the criteria and were included. The diagnostic analysis showed a pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of 65.1% (95% CI, 59.73 to 70.42), 91.6% (95% CI, 89.14 to 94.05), 2.91 (95% CI, 2.38–3.55) and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.44–0.64), respectively, with high heterogeneity (I² above 80%) for all measures. Treatment analysis showed improved Lysholm Knee Score, IKDC score and laxity difference between the knees in all studies after meniscal suture repair. A separate analysis showed no differences between repair of smaller, stable, RLs with meniscal sutures and repair with abrasion and trephination only.

Conclusion

Although the results present considerable heterogeneity, MRI seems to demonstrate moderate accuracy in the diagnosis of RLs in patients with ACL tear and the surgical repair of RLs can be associated with improved overall outcomes.

Healing Status of Meniscal Ramp Lesion Affects Anterior Knee Stability After ACL Reconstruction

Background

Although the biomechanical importance of the ramp lesion in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee has been demonstrated, there is no clear consensus on the appropriate treatment for ramp lesions during ACL reconstruction.

Purpose

To compare the postoperative outcomes for ramp lesions between patients treated with all-inside repair through the posteromedial portal and those whose ramp lesions were left in situ without repair during ACL reconstruction. We also determined whether ramp lesion healing status affected postoperative knee stability.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 57 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction between August 2011 and December 2017 had attendant ramp lesions. Of these, 25 ramp lesions that were considered stable were left in situ without repair (Nonrepaired group), and 25 ramp lesions, including 21 stable and 4 unstable lesions, were treated using all-inside repair through the posteromedial portal (Repaired group). We evaluated the side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior tibial translation on stress radiographs and rotational stability by using the pivot-shift test 2 years after surgery, and healing status of the ramp lesions was evaluated on 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans 1 year after surgery.

Results

The mean SSDs in anterior translation were 2.4 ± 1.6 mm for the Nonrepaired group and 1.9 ± 1.6 mm for the Repaired group, with no significant differences. The positive ratios on the pivot-shift test were not significantly different between groups. Healing rates of ramp lesions on MRI scans showed a significant difference between the Nonrepaired group (60%) and the Repaired group (100%) (P = .001). The mean SSDs for knees in which the ramp lesion had healed as shown on MRI scans and those in which it had not healed were 1.9 ± 1.6 mm and 3.2 ± 1.1 mm, respectively, which was a significant difference (P = .02).

Conclusion

Healing rates of ramp lesions were significantly better in the Repaired group than in the Nonrepaired group, although postoperative knee stability was not significantly different between groups. Anterior laxity in the knees in which the ramp lesion was unhealed was significantly greater compared with the knees in which the ramp lesion healed. All-inside repair through the posteromedial portal was a reliable surgical procedure to heal ramp lesions.

MRI appearance of the different meniscal ramp lesion types, with clinical and arthroscopic correlation

BACKGROUND

Meniscal ramp lesions have been defined as longitudinal vertical peripheral tears of the medial meniscus involving the posterior meniscocapsular ligament, meniscotibial ligament, and/or the red-red zone of the posterior horn. They are heavily associated with anterior cruciate ligament injuries, and because of their potentially important biomechanical role in knee stabilization, injuries to this region may require surgical repair. However, due to their location and lack of general knowledge regarding their different types and associated appearances on magnetic resonance imaging, ramp lesions are routinely underreported. This is compounded by the fact that ramp lesions are also often overlooked during conventional anterior portal arthroscopy when direct visualization is not achieved.

PURPOSE

To demonstrate MRI appearances and arthroscopic findings of the different types of meniscal ramp lesions, in the hopes of improving their detection on pre-operative imaging.

Different Techniques for the Management of Meniscal Ramp Lesions Using Standard Anterior Portals

There is strong association between meniscal lesions and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Recently, light was shown on a new entity: ramp lesions. The incidence of these lesions and their management is still unclear. Although some believe that some lesions, when stable, can be managed conservatively, most surgeons repair ramp tears. Accessibility of these tears is challenging; they are best accessed through posterior portals, which is time-consuming and poses potential risk to vital structures. Our technique allows access to and management of ramp lesions through safe standard anterior portals. Ramp lesions are searched for as a routine step during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by advancing the scope through the intercondylar notch just beside the medial femoral condyle. If a lesion is found, it is repaired; only very stable small tears are treated with needling to refresh the edges and induce a healing response. A simple suture, horizontal mattress suture, or a circumferential stitch is used.

Management of traumatic meniscus tears: the 2019 ESSKA meniscus consensus

PURPOSE

The importance of meniscus integrity in the prevention of early osteoarthritis is well known, and preservation is accepted as the primary goal. The purpose of the ESSKA (European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy) European consensus on traumatic meniscus tears was to provide recommendations for the treatment of meniscus tears based on both scientific evidence and the clinical experience of knee experts.

METHODS

Three groups of surgeons and scientists elaborated and ratified the so-called formal consensus process to define the recommendations for the management of traumatic meniscus tears. A traumatic meniscus tear was defined as a tear with an acute onset of symptoms caused by a sufficient trauma. The expert groups included a steering group of eight European surgeons and scientists, a rating group of another nineteen European surgeons, and a peer review group. The steering group prepared twenty-seven question and answer sets based on the scientific literature. The quality of the answers received grades of A (a high level of scientific support), B (scientific presumption), C (a low level of scientific support) or D (expert opinion). These question and answer sets were then submitted to and evaluated by the rating group. All answers were scored from 1 (= totally inappropriate) to 9 (= totally appropriate) points. Thereafter, the comments of the members of the rating group were incorporated by the steering group and the consensus was submitted to the rating group a second time. Once a general consensus was reached between the steering and rating groups, the finalized question and answer sets were submitted for final review by the peer review group composed of representatives of the ESSKA-affiliated national societies. Eighteen representatives replied.

RESULTS

The review of the literature revealed a rather low scientific quality of studies examining the treatment of traumatic meniscus tears. Of the 27 questions, only one question received a grade of A (a high level of scientific support), and another received a grade of B (scientific presumption). The remaining questions received grades of C and D. The mean rating of all questions by the rating group was 8.2 (95% confidence interval 8.1-8.4). A general agreement that MRI should be performed on a systematic basis was not achieved. However, MRI was recommended when arthroscopy would be considered to identify concomitant pathologies. In this case, the indication for MRI should be determined by a musculoskeletal specialist. Based on our data, stable left in situ lateral meniscus tears appear to show a better prognosis than medial tears. When repair is required, surgery should be performed as early as possible. Evidence that biological enhancement such as needling or the application of platelet-rich plasma would improve healing was not identified. Preservation of the meniscus should be considered as the first line of treatment because of an inferior clinical and radiological long-term outcome after partial meniscectomy compared to meniscus repair.

DISCUSSION

The consensus was generated to present the best possible recommendations for the treatment of traumatic meniscus tears and provides some groundwork for a clinical decision-making process regarding the treatment of meniscus tears. Preservation of the meniscus should be the first line of treatment when possible, because the clinical and radiological long-term outcomes are worse after partial meniscectomy than after meniscus preservation. The consensus clearly states that numerous meniscus tears that were considered irreparable should be repaired, e.g., older tears, tears in obese patients, long tears, etc. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Management of ramp lesions of the knee: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the current literature and to assess the clinical outcomes following meniscal ramp lesion treatment and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. A consensus of the treatment of this pattern of tears is still lacking.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed with a comprehensive search on Medline through PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase and Google Scholar databases. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were considered to edit the review. The included studies were evaluated based on indications, management, surgical technique and clinical results.

RESULTS

Seven studies (two level II and five level IV evidence) were identified that met inclusion criteria, including a total of 509 patients. The overall main follow-up was 23.6 months. Treatment failure occurred in 8.3% of patients receiving ACL repair and ramp lesion treatment. The repair of ramp lesion is the most used approach in the literature.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of literature focused on the management of ramp lesion and ACL injuries. The repair resulted in the most used approach with good clinical results and low failure rate. However, further high-quality studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of different surgical strategies are needed.

Effect of Delayed Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Medial Compartment Cartilage and Meniscal Health

BACKGROUND

The time required to develop a secondary cartilage or meniscal injury in the medial compartment after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is not well understood.

PURPOSE

To determine the association between time delay until ACL reconstruction and the presence of medial compartment Outerbridge grade 3 or 4 chondral injury or medial meniscal tear requiring treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 609 patients underwent primary ACL reconstruction at a single institution at a median 46 days between injury and surgery (61.4% male; mean age, 26.5 years [SD, 11.1]). Chondral status was graded according to Outerbridge criteria at the time of surgery. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between time delay until surgery and medial compartment chondral injury or meniscal injury requiring treatment. Adjustment was performed as needed for patient demographics, sporting activity, and prior knee injuries. Time until surgery had a nonlinear association with medial compartment health and was more effectively described in discrete intervals rather than as a continuous variable. The optimal time intervals to predict medial compartment health were determined by comparison of Bayes information criterion values between fully adjusted regression models.

RESULTS

After controlling for relevant confounders, delay of surgery >8 weeks had an increased likelihood of a medial meniscal tear requiring partial meniscectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.30; 95% CI, 1.04-5.12; P = .04) and a decreased likelihood of a meniscal tear requiring repair (aOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32-0.76; P = .001). Delay of surgery >5 months had an increased likelihood of a medial Outerbridge grade ≥3 chondral defect (aOR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.64-5.87; P = .001) or a grade 4 defect (aOR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.75-8.45; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

From the time of ACL injury, risk of an irreparable medial meniscal tear found at the time of ACL reconstruction is significantly increased by 8 weeks, and risk of high-grade medial chondral damage is increased by 5 months.

Epidemiological Evaluation of Meniscal Ramp Lesions in 3214 Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knees From the SANTI Study Group Database: A Risk Factor Analysis and Study of Secondary Meniscectomy Rates Following 769 Ramp Repairs

BACKGROUND

Ramp lesions are characterized by disruption of the peripheral meniscocapsular attachments of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Ramp repair performed at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been shown to improve knee biomechanics.

PURPOSE

The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for ramp lesions among a large series of patients undergoing ACLR. Secondary objectives were to determine the reoperation rate for failure of ramp repair, defined by subsequent reoperations for partial medial meniscectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

All patients underwent transnotch posteromedial compartment evaluation of the knee during ACLR. Ramp repair was performed if a lesion was detected. Potentially important risk factors were analyzed for their association with ramp lesions. A secondary analysis of all patients who underwent ramp repair and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years was undertaken to determine the secondary partial meniscectomy rate for failed ramp repair.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of ramp lesions in the study population was 23.9% (769 ramp lesions among 3214 patients). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of ramp lesions was significantly associated with the following risk factors: male sex, patients aged <30 years, revision ACLR, chronic injuries, preoperative side-to-side laxity >6 mm, and concomitant lateral meniscal tears. The secondary meniscectomy rate was 10.8% at a mean follow-up of 45.6 months (range, 24.2-66.2 months). Patients who underwent ACLR + anterolateral ligament reconstruction had a >2-fold reduction in the risk of reoperation for failure of ramp repair as compared with patients who underwent isolated ACLR (hazard ratio, 0.457; 95% CI, 0.226-0.864; P = .021).

CONCLUSION

There is a high incidence of ramp lesions among patients undergoing ACLR. The identification of important risk factors for ramp lesions should help raise an appropriate index of suspicion and prompt posteromedial compartment evaluation. The overall secondary partial meniscectomy rate after ramp repair is 10.8%. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction appears to confer a protective effect on the ramp repair performed at the time of ACLR and results in a significant reduction in secondary meniscectomy rates.

Is It Necessary to Repair Stable Ramp Lesions of the Medial Meniscus During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

A special type of meniscal lesion involving the peripheral attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (PHMM), termed a "ramp lesion," is commonly associated with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, its treatment is still controversial. Recently, stable ramp lesions treated with abrasion and trephination alone have been shown to have good clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

Stable ramp lesions treated with abrasion and trephination alone during ACL reconstruction will result in similar clinical outcomes compared with those treated with surgical repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled study was performed in 91 consecutive patients who had complete ACL injuries and concomitant stable ramp lesions of the medial meniscus. All patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups based on whether the stable ramp lesions were surgically repaired (study group; n = 50) or only abraded and trephined (control group; n = 41) during ACL reconstruction. All surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon who was blinded to the functional assessment findings of the patients. The Lysholm score, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and stability assessments (pivot-shift test, Lachman test, KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference, and KT-1000 arthrometer differences of <3, 3-5, and >5 mm) were evaluated preoperatively and at the last follow-up. Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate the healing status of the ramp lesions.

RESULTS

All consecutive patients who were screened for eligibility from August 2008 to April 2012 were enrolled and observed clinically. There were 40 patients in the study group and 33 patients in the control group who were observed for at least 2 years. At the final follow-up, there were no significant differences between the study group and the control group in terms of the mean Lysholm score (88.7 ± 4.8 vs 90.4 ± 5.8, respectively; P = .528), mean subjective IKDC score (83.6 ± 3.7 vs 82.2 ± 4.5, respectively; P = .594), pivot-shift test results ( P = .658), Lachman test results ( P = .525), KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference (1.6 ± 1.2 vs 1.5 ± 1.1, respectively; P = .853), or KT-1000 arthrometer grading ( P = .738). Overall, for both groups (n = 73), 67 patients showed completely healed (38 study, 29 control), 3 showed partially healed (1 study, 2 control), and 3 showed nonhealed (1 study, 2 control) signals on follow-up MRI when evaluating the healing status of the ramp lesions. There was no significant difference regarding the healing status of the ramp lesions between the 2 groups ( P = .543).

CONCLUSION

This prospective randomized controlled trial showed that, in terms of subjective scores, knee stability, and meniscal healing status, concomitant stable ramp lesions of the medial meniscus treated with abrasion and trephination alone during ACL reconstruction resulted in similar clinical outcomes compared with those treated with surgical repair.

Meniscal Ramp Lesions: Anatomy, Incidence, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Meniscal ramp lesions are more frequently associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries than previously recognized. Some authors suggest that this entity results from disruption of the meniscotibial ligaments of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, whereas others support the idea that it is created by a tear of the peripheral attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans have been reported to have a low sensitivity, and consequently, ramp lesions often go undiagnosed. Therefore, to rule out a ramp lesion, an arthroscopic evaluation with probing of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus should be performed. Several treatment options have been reported, including nonsurgical management, inside-out meniscal repair, or all-inside meniscal repair. In cases of isolated ramp lesions, a standard meniscal repair rehabilitation protocol should be followed. However, when a concomitant ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is performed, the rehabilitation should follow the designated ACLR postoperative protocol. The purpose of this article was to review the current literature regarding meniscal ramp lesions and summarize the pertinent anatomy, biomechanics, diagnostic strategies, recommended treatment options, and postoperative protocol.

Evaluation of Peripheral Vertical Nondegenerative Medial Meniscus Tears Treated With Trephination Alone at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To determine (1) subjective results and incidence of symptomatic medial meniscus tears (MMTs) in patients treated with trephination alone compared with a control group without meniscus tears and (2) if trephination treatment resulted in a higher incidence of knee arthritis compared with controls with intact menisci.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2010, 419 patients met the inclusion criteria of having an isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear, peripheral vertical nondegenerative MMT treated with trephination alone, no lateral meniscus tears, normal radiographs before surgery, and no bilateral knee involvement. A control group of 462 patients included patients who met the same criteria but without MMT. Objective data included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective evaluation. Subjective data included IKDC and Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS) scores.

RESULTS

Objective follow-up was obtained for 191 patients in the study group and 200 patients in the control group (mean, 5.6 and 5.9 years, respectively; range, 2 to 16 years). Subjective survey follow-up was obtained for 312 patients in the study group and 343 patients in the control group (mean, 7.0 and 7.1 years, respectively). The mean CKRS score was 91.8 ± 13.3 for the study group and 92.3 ± 10.9 for the control group (P = .27). The mean IKDC score was 86.5 ± 15.8 for the study group and 86.7 ± 16.3 for the control group (P = .81). Subsequent MMTs occurred in 51 patients (16.3%) in the study group and 20 patients (5.8%) in the control group (P < .0001). IKDC radiographic ratings were normal for 95% of the study group and 92% of the control group (P = .18).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with peripheral nondegenerative MMTs treated with trephination alone had a 16.3% rate of subsequent symptomatic MMTs compared with 6% in patients with intact menisci. However, no statistically significant differences were found between groups for radiographic and subjective results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic case control study.

The Fate of Meniscus Tears Left In Situ at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Study From the MOON Cohort

BACKGROUND

The management of meniscus tears identified at the time of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is highly variable and includes repair, meniscectomy, and nontreatment.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the reoperation rate for meniscus tears left untreated at the time of ACL reconstruction with a minimum follow-up of 6 years. The hypothesis was that small peripheral tears identified at the time of ACL reconstruction managed with "no treatment" would have successful clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients with meniscus tears left untreated at the time of primary ACL reconstruction were identified from a multicenter study group with a minimum 6-year follow-up. Patient, tear, and reoperation data were obtained for analysis. The need for reoperation was used as the primary endpoint, with analysis performed to determine patient and tear characteristics associated with reoperation.

RESULTS

There were 194 patients with 208 meniscus tears (71 medial, 137 lateral) left in situ without treatment with a complete follow-up for analysis. Of these, 97.8% of lateral and 94.4% of medial untreated tears required no reoperation. Sixteen tears (7.7%) left in situ without treatment underwent subsequent reoperation: 9 tears (4.3%) underwent reoperation in the setting of revision ACL reconstruction, and 7 tears (3.4%) underwent reoperation for an isolated meniscus injury. The patient age was significantly lower in patients requiring reoperation, while tears measuring ≥10 mm more frequently required reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Lateral and medial meniscus tears left in situ at the time of ACL reconstruction did not require reoperation at a minimum 6-year follow-up for 97.8% and 94.4% of tears, respectively. These findings re-emphasize the low reoperation rate after the nontreatment of small, peripheral lateral meniscus tears while noting less predictable results for medial meniscus tears left without treatment.

Meniscal repair possibilities using bone morphogenetic protein-7

This study analysed the influence of bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) on cells and meniscal structure. The effect of treatment with BMP-7 was assessed in vitro and in vivo in lesions in the avascular area of the meniscus. Cells were extracted from the outer and inner part of eight menisci of four 2-year-old merino sheep. The menisci were digested with a collagenase mix, and meniscus cells of the synovium, vascular area and avascular area were extracted. The expression of genes for collagen (Col1 and Col2A), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-13) and aggrecan was analysed by real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) at baseline and after incubation with BMP-7. Eight sheep aged 2 years and weighing 35-40 kg were used for the in vivo study. Surgery was performed in both knees of every animal. Two holes were made in the avascular area of the medial meniscus of both knees and filled using Putty(®) (control groups) or OP-1 Putty(®), which comprises BMP-7 mixed with a cellulose putty carrier (experimental groups). Animals were sacrificed at 6, 12 and 25 weeks. Adding BMP-7 to vascular cells of the meniscus was associated with a 15-fold increase in Col2A expression and a 78-fold increase in BMP-7 expression. BMP-7 inhibited MMP-2 and MMP-13 expression. Adding BMP-7 to synovial cells inhibited the expression of Col1, doubled the expression of Col2A and reduced the expression of BMP-7; the expression of MMP-2 was inhibited, while that of MMP-13 was increased three-fold. Incubation of cells from the avascular region with BMP-7 was associated with a 2.4-fold increase in Col1 expression, and a 4.4-fold increase in Col2A expression compared with the control. The expression of MMP-2 and BMP-7 was inhibited. In the in vivo study, treatment of the holes in the avascular area of the meniscus with BMP-7 was associated with an important cell presence inside the holes and the appearance of fibrous tissue after 12 weeks; these features were not seen in the control groups. BMP-7 may be a suitable growth factor for stimulation of meniscal cell and collagen formation.

Meniscal repair techniques required for the surgeon performing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are a common injury treated surgically by orthopedic specialists. There is a high incidence of concurrent meniscal injury that must be recognized and appropriately treated by the surgeon. The surgeon must be prepared to address the full spectrum of meniscal injuries with complex meniscal repair techniques when performing ACL reconstruction to decrease the likelihood of reoperation or postoperative symptoms for the patient.

Postoperative change in medial meniscal length in concurrent all-inside meniscus repair with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Meniscus repair can restore meniscal function that transfers the axial compressive force to circumferential tensile strain. However, few reports have investigated the relationship between concurrent meniscus repair with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and postoperative meniscal position. This study aimed to evaluate medial meniscal size and clinical results in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and concomitant all-inside medial meniscus repair.

METHODS

Twenty patients underwent ACL reconstruction and concurrent medial meniscus repair of a peripheral longitudinal tear using the FasT-Fix meniscal repair device. Medial tibial plateau length (MTPL) and width (MTPW) were determined by radiographic images. We evaluated the Lysholm score, anteroposterior instability, meniscal healing and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based medial meniscal length (MML) and width (MMW). Correlations between MRI-based meniscal size, radiographic measurement and height were investigated.

RESULTS

All patients showed complete healing of the repaired meniscus in arthroscopic evaluation. However, one patient needed a subsequent meniscus repair during the follow-up period. Lysholm score and anteroposterior instability improved significantly. A better correlation was observed between MMW and MTPW than between MML and MTPL. Concurrent all-inside medial meniscus repair with ACL reconstruction significantly increased MML percentage (%MML) (100 MML/MTPL) but did not affect MMW percentage (%MMW) (100 MMW/MTPW).

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent all-inside medial meniscus repair with ACL reconstruction had satisfactory clinical results. %MML was increased by concurrent medial meniscus repair without affecting %MMW. Our results suggest that medial meniscus repair associated with ACL reconstruction may restore meniscal function by adjusting the anteroposterior length of the torn medial meniscus.

Meniscus tears that can be left in situ, with or without trephination or synovial abrasion to stimulate healing

To determine which meniscus tears to leave in situ, the clinician must know whether the meniscus tear is degenerative or nondegenerative, stable or unstable, in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-stable or ACL-unstable knee, and whether it is in the medial or lateral compartment. Symptomatic medial meniscus tears in ACL-intact knees are almost always degenerative in nature and should be removed. Generally, the only type of medial meniscus that can be left in situ is a peripheral, vertical, nondegenerative tear, but these tears are not displaceable, are asymptomatic, and are usually seen in a patient with an ACL tear. In the lateral compartment, most tears can be left in situ and the only tears that need to be repaired are displaceable tears that extend anterior to the popliteus tendon. Although many meniscus repair techniques and fixation devices are available, all factors related to healing and stability should be considered to determine treatment.

Meniscal repair using the inside-out technique with cross stitch

The treatment of meniscal tears continues to evolve. A few years ago most tears were treated with total meniscectomy, which evolved to partial meniscectomy and then to meniscal repair. The purpose is to preserve as much of the menisci as possible, to maintain their potential biomechanical properties, and to preserve normal knee function. Different repair techniques have been used many of them involving both vertical and horizontal sutures. We are proposing an inside-out meniscal repair technique with cross-shaped stitches that provides a 4-point fixation construct.

Implantation of allogenic synovial stem cells promotes meniscal regeneration in a rabbit meniscal defect model

BACKGROUND

Indications for surgical meniscal repair are limited, and failure rates remain high. Thus, new ways to augment repair and stimulate meniscal regeneration are needed. Mesenchymal stem cells are multipotent cells present in mature individuals and accessible from peripheral connective tissue sites, including synovium. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the effect of implantation of synovial tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells on meniscal regeneration in a rabbit model of partial meniscectomy.

METHODS

Synovial mesenchymal stem cells were harvested from the knee of one New Zealand White rabbit, expanded in culture, and labeled with a fluorescent marker. A reproducible 1.5-mm cylindrical defect was created in the avascular portion of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus bilaterally in fifteen additional rabbits. Allogenic synovial mesenchymal stem cells suspended in phosphate-buffered saline solution were implanted into the right knees, and phosphate-buffered saline solution alone was placed in the left knees. Meniscal regeneration was evaluated histologically at four, twelve, and twenty-four weeks for (1) quantity and (2) quality (with use of an established three-component scoring system). A similar procedure was performed in four additional rabbits with use of green fluorescent protein-positive synovial mesenchymal stem cells for the purpose of tracking progeny following implantation.

RESULTS

The quantity of regenerated tissue in the group that had implantation of synovial mesenchymal stem cells was greater at all end points, reaching significance at four and twelve weeks (p < 0.05). Tissue quality scores were also superior in knees treated with mesenchymal stem cells compared with controls at all end points, achieving significance at twelve and twenty-four weeks (3.8 versus 2.8 at four weeks [p = 0.29], 5.7 versus 1.7 at twelve weeks [p = 0.008], and 6.0 versus 3.9 at twenty-four weeks [p = 0.021]). Implanted cells adhered to meniscal defects and were observed in the regenerated tissue, where they differentiated into type-I and II collagen-expressing cells, at up to twenty-four weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Synovial mesenchymal stem cells adhere to sites of meniscal injury, differentiate into cells resembling meniscal fibrochondrocytes, and enhance both quality and quantity of meniscal regeneration.

Longitudinal tear of the medial meniscus posterior horn in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee significantly influences anterior stability

BACKGROUND

Longitudinal tears of the medial meniscus posterior horn (MMPH) are commonly associated with a chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. Many studies have demonstrated the importance of the medial meniscus in terms of limiting the amount of anterior-posterior tibial translation in response to anterior tibial loads in ACL-deficient knees.

HYPOTHESIS

An MMPH tear in an ACL-deficient knee increases the anterior-posterior tibial translation and rotatory instability. In addition, MMPH repair will restore the tibial translation to the level before the tear.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten human cadaveric knees were tested sequentially using a custom testing system under 5 conditions: intact, ACL deficient, ACL deficient with an MMPH peripheral longitudinal tear, ACL deficient with an MMPH repair, and ACL deficient with a total medial meniscectomy. The knee kinematics were measured at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion in response to a 134-N anterior and 200-N axial compressive tibial load. The rotatory kinematics were also measured at 15° and 30° of flexion in a combined rotatory load of 5 N·m of internal tibial torque and 10 N·m of valgus torque.

RESULTS

Medial meniscus posterior horn longitudinal tears in ACL-deficient knees resulted in a significant increase in anterior-posterior tibial translation at all flexion angles except 90° (P < .05). An MMPH repair in an ACL-deficient knee showed a significant decrease in anterior-posterior tibial translation at all flexion angles except 60° compared with the ACL-deficient/MMPH tear state (P < .05). The total anterior-posterior translation of the ACL-deficient/MMPH repaired knee was not significantly increased compared with the ACL (only)-deficient knee but was increased compared with the ACL-intact knee (P > .05). A total medial meniscectomy in an ACL-deficient knee did not increase the anterior-posterior tibial translation significantly compared with MMPH tears in ACL-deficient knees at all flexion angles (P > .05). In a combined rotatory load, tibial rotation after MMPH tears or a total medial meniscectomy in an ACL-deficient knee were not affected significantly at all flexion angles.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that an MMPH longitudinal tear in an ACL-deficient knee alters the knee kinematics, particularly the anterior-posterior tibial translation. MMPH repair significantly improved anterior-posterior tibial translation in ACL-deficient knees.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings may help improve the treatment of patients with ACL and MMPH longitudinal tear by suggesting that the medial meniscal repairs should be performed for greater longevity when combined with an ACL reconstruction.

Meniscal repair in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term outcome study

PURPOSE

To study the long-term outcome of patients who have undergone inside-out, vertical stacked mattress suture repair of meniscal tears combined with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

From a database of ACL reconstructed patients, consecutive patients undergoing concomitant meniscal repair and ACL reconstruction between 1991 and 1999 were identified. Patients with previous ACL or meniscal pathology were excluded. Two age- and sex-matched cohorts who had undergone combined ACL reconstruction and menisectomy and who had undergone ACL reconstruction with normal menisci were identified for comparison. Outcome scoring included IKDC and Lysholm scores for the meniscal repair group. Two sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare the IKDC subjective scores, with a minimum level of significance set at 5% (P = 0.05).

RESULTS

Fourty-four patients were identified for analysis with a median follow-up of 10 years (7.7-12.6). Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction combined with meniscal repair had a mean IKDC of 84.2 compared with a mean score of 70.5 (P = 0.008) in patients who had undergone menisectomy and 88.2 (P = 0.005) in patients with intact menisci. 86.2% of patients with ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair had Lysholm score of between 80 and 100%. Sixty-nine percent follow-up was achieved. Survival analysis by life table method shows a best case of 89% 10-years survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that good long-term outcomes can be obtained in patients up to over 12 years after combined ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair. Improved functional scores can be achieved when compared with ACL reconstruction and menisectomy. The authors advocate repair of meniscal tears during ACL reconstruction unless there is complex tearing, radial tearing or plastic deformation of the remaining meniscus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Arthroscopic prevalence of ramp lesion in 868 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury

BACKGROUND

A special type of repairable meniscal lesion involving the peripheral attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus is commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency and is termed a "ramp lesion." However, there are no previously published articles reporting the epidemiologic characteristics of ramp lesions.

HYPOTHESIS

The ramp lesion is a special type of medial meniscal tear with high prevalence associated with anterior cruciate ligament rupture; the prevalence increases with time from anterior cruciate ligament injury. Age and gender are risk factors affecting the prevalence of the ramp lesion.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

From April 2002 to October 2007, 868 consecutive knees were diagnosed as having an anterior cruciate ligament injury and received arthroscopic surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. All the patients had verified tears of the ramp area under arthroscopy. The prevalence of the ramp lesion was evaluated retrospectively. Then, all cases were divided into different groups depending on the time interval from anterior cruciate ligament injury to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and other relevant risk factors such as age and gender. The effects of age, gender, and time from injury on the prevalence of ramp lesions were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 868 knees that underwent surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 144 knees were diagnosed as having a ramp lesion. The mean age was 24.7 years; there were 113 male and 31 female patients. The mean time from injury to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was 27.2 months. The prevalence of ramp lesions was 16.6%, which was analyzed as a logarithmic correlation with time from injury. Patients younger than 30 years of age and male patients had a significantly higher prevalence of ramp lesions.

CONCLUSION

The ramp lesion is a common meniscal injury that can occur at the time of anterior cruciate ligament rupture or as a result of knee laxity associated with anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. The prevalence of ramp lesion in this patient group was 16.6%, which increased with time until 24 months after initial injury. Patients younger than 30 years of age and male patients had a higher prevalence of ramp lesions.

Clinical and second-look arthroscopic evaluation of repaired medial meniscus in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees

BACKGROUND

Tears of the medial meniscus posterior horn (MMPH) are frequently found in knees with deficient anterior cruciate ligaments (ACLs). There are few studies that have evaluated healing of the menisci and the factors associated with healing.

HYPOTHESIS

The repaired menisci would show good healing in the knees with reconstructed ACLs, and the healing capacity of the menisci would differ according to the size, type, and location of the tear as well as the age and gender.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

From August 1997 to February 2007, 311 knees underwent MMPH repair using either a modified all-inside or inside-out technique with concomitant ACL reconstruction. Among these patients, a second-look arthroscopy was performed at a mean of 37.7 months postoperatively (range, 12-128 months) in 140 patients. Clinical parameters and outcomes were evaluated. The repaired menisci were divided into complete, incomplete, and failure-to-heal groups. The factors associated with meniscal healing were statistically assessed.

RESULTS

Among 140 patients, 118 (84.3%) showed complete healing, 17 (12.1%) had incomplete healing, and 5 (3.6%) failed to heal. The clinical success rate was 96.4% (135/140) because patients in the incomplete group showed no clinical symptoms associated with meniscal tears. Healing was associated with the tear location (P <.001) and type of tear (P =.0237) on the univariate analysis and the location (P =.0401) only on the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Repaired MMPH tears in knees with reconstructed ACLs healed without complications and had satisfactory clinical results. The tear location and type were factors associated with healing on the univariate analysis and location only on the multivariate analysis.

Meniscal repair

The meniscus plays an important role in preventing osteoarthritis of the knee. Repair of a meniscal lesion should be strongly considered if the tear is peripheral and longitudinal, with concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and in younger patients. The probability of healing is decreased in complex or degenerative tears, central tears, and tears in unstable knees. Age or extension of the tear into the avascular area are not exclusion criteria. Numerous repair techniques are available, and suture repair seems to provide superior biomechanical stability. However, the clinical success rate does not correlate well with the mechanical strength of the repair technique. Biologic factors might be of greater importance to the success of meniscal repair than the surgical technique. Therefore, the decision on the most appropriate repair technique should not rely on biomechanical parameters alone. Contemporary all-inside repair systems have decreased the operating time and the level of surgical skill required. Despite the ease of use, there is a potential for complications because of the close proximity of vessels, nerves, and tendons, of which the surgeon should be aware. There is no clear consensus on postoperative rehabilitation. Weight bearing in extension would most likely not be crucial in typical longitudinal lesions. However, higher degrees of flexion, particularly with weight bearing, give rise to large excursions of the menisci and to shear motions, and should therefore be advised carefully. Long-term studies show a decline in success rates with time. Further studies are needed to clarify the factors relevant to the healing of the menisci. Tissue engineering techniques to enhance the healing in situ are promising but have not yet evolved to a practicable level.

Selection of outcome measures for patients with hip fracture

In designing a study protocol relating to hip fracture treatment and outcomes, it is important to select appropriate outcome instruments. Before beginning the process of instrument selection, investigators must gain a comprehensive understanding of the condition of interest and have a thorough knowledge of the expected benefits and harms of the proposed intervention. Adequate evidence of an intervention's effectiveness includes indication of impact on the patient's health. We provide a brief discussion about different ways that health and health measurement have been defined, including the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health (ICF), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and cost-to-benefit analyses. We outline important properties (reliability, validity, sensitivity to change, and responsiveness) that a measurement instrument must demonstrate before being considered an acceptable means to measure outcome. Potential outcome measures relevant to patients with hip fracture are summarized, and important points to consider in the selection of outcome measures for a hypothetical research question in a hip fracture population are discussed.

Healing results of meniscal tears left in situ during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of clinical studies

The presence of peripheral meniscal tears is common at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Techniques to preserve the maximum amount of meniscal tissue include "non operative" management (tear left alone, without repair or removal), meniscus repair, partial meniscectomy. There is a lack of consensus guidelines about the management of peripheral stable meniscal tears. When to remove, let alone or repair? We performed an evidence-based review of the outcomes of stable meniscal tears left in situ during ACL surgery, in order to assess the effectiveness of this popular procedure. Clinical and anatomical results (arthrography or second look arthroscopy) were analyzed. Our literature search yielded ten relevant studies (9 level IV, 1 level III). The mean time of follow-up was 16 months. Pain or mechanical symptoms related to the medial tibiofemoral joint were reported in 0-66% of cases. Subsequent medial meniscectomy or repair were performed in 0-33% of cases. Pain or mechanical symptoms related to the lateral tibiofemoral joint were reported in 0-18% cases. Subsequent lateral meniscectomy or repair were performed in 0-22% cases. A complete healing occurred in 50-61% cases for the medial meniscus and in 55-74% cases for the lateral meniscus. No definite conclusion can be made with regard to these results. The conservative approach is more effective for lateral menisci. The rate of bad results for the medial meniscus remains high when a conservative treatment is used. For the medial meniscus, repair of stable peripheral tears may be always indicated to decrease the risk of postoperative pain or subsequent meniscectomy.

Evaluation of success of a meniscus repair device for vertical unstable medial meniscus tears in ACL-reconstructed knees

We retrospectively reviewed the success of meniscus repair with the FasT-Fix meniscus repair device for vertical unstable medial meniscus tears at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. A repair failure was defined as patients having medial knee symptoms leading to a subsequent arthroscopy confirming a tear at the repair site. Objective follow-up was obtained on 27 patients at a mean of 3.1 years postoperatively (range, 2-5 years). Two of 22 repairs (9%) in the red-red vascular zone and 4 of 5 repairs (80%) in the red-white vascular zone retore at the repair site at an average of 9 months postoperatively (range, 3-20 months). The results of this study showed a high failure rate (22%) of unstable vertical medial meniscus repairs with ACL reconstruction, especially for repairs done to tears in the red-white vascular zone.

The diagnostic accuracy of a clinical examination in determining intra-articular hip pain for potential hip arthroscopy candidates

PURPOSE

One purpose of this study was to determine whether signs and symptoms could identify when a majority of the hip pain was originating from intra-articular sources in potential arthroscopic surgery candidates. The second purpose was to quantify pain reduction after an anesthetic intra-articular injection in those with potential labral pathology.

METHODS

Subjects with hip pain being evaluated by an orthopaedic surgeon specializing in hip arthroscopy were prospectively enrolled in the study. Clinical examination results were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated to determine their accuracy in identifying those who would have greater than 50% pain relief from those with 50% pain relief or less.

RESULTS

We enrolled 105 subjects in this study. An anesthetic intra-articular injection was performed in 49 potential candidates for arthroscopic surgery (47%). The mean age in these 49 subjects was 42 years (SD, 15 years; range, 18 to 68 years), with 25 men (51%) and 24 women (49%). According to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) arthrogram, 18 individuals had a definite labral tear, 29 had a possible tear, and 2 had no labral tears. In those with definite tears or possible tears, 39% (n = 7) and 45% (n = 13), respectively, did not achieve a greater than 50% reduction of pain. Groin pain, clicking, pinching pain with sitting, lateral thigh pain, flexion abduction external rotation test, flexion-internal rotation-adduction test, and trochanteric tenderness were not useful in identifying those with greater than 50% pain relief from those with 50% relief or less.

CONCLUSIONS

The symptoms and signs investigated in this study did not accurately or consistently identify subjects with primary intra-articular pain sources. Furthermore, candidates for hip arthroscopy with a labral tear identified on MRI arthrogram had varied responses to anesthetic intra-articular injection. Therefore all labral tears identified on MRI arthrogram may not be a major contributor to patients' pain complaints, and medical personnel should look for other causes of pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study of nonconsecutive patients (without consistently applied gold standard).

[Analysis of meniscal lesions accompanying anterior cruciate ligament tears: A retrospective analysis of 156 patients]

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this retrospective study of a continuous series was to document preferential types and localizations of meniscal lesions accompanying anterior cruciate ligament tears and to demonstrate the relationships between meniscal lesions, patient age and time from trauma to surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred fifty-six patients with no history of meniscal lesions underwent ligamentoplasty in 2003. All procedures were performed by the same operator. The time from trauma to surgery was 31.6 months on average. This was a retrospective continuous series using data from detailed operative reports.

RESULTS

An isolated lesion of the medial meniscus was observed in 25.6% of cases. There was an isolated lesion of the lateral meniscus in 21.8% and lesions of both menisci in 9%. The most frequent injury was a longitudinal fissuration, for both menisci. Patient age and time from trauma to surgery were statistically correlated with presence of a medial lesion. There was no statistical relationship for the lateral meniscus nor for type of meniscal injury.

DISCUSSION

The proportion of lesions to the lateral meniscus appeared to be unaffected by age or time to surgery after trauma, suggesting that lateral meniscal lesions occurred at the time of the initial curciate injury. On the contrary, the incidence of medial lesions increased with time and patient age, confirming the important role of the medial meniscus to block anterior displacement of the knee. We thus recommend early repair of anterior cruciate ligament tears in order to avoid medial meniscectomy which would increase with increasing time from injury to surgery and thus affect the postoperative outcome.

Biomedical devices in meniscal repair

Preservation of the menisci is increasingly emphasized in orthopedic care of the knee. Techniques are rapidly emerging that allow easier accomplishment of this goal. In particular, the development of all-inside arthroscopic meniscal repair devices has facilitated more ready repair. A number of laboratory and clinical studies have examined these devices and comparisons with more traditional techniques have been made. Numerous reports of potential complications from these new technologies have also been described in the literature. This review covers the current options for treatment of meniscal repair, laboratory and clinical data, and also potential complications.

Meniscal repair compared with meniscectomy for bucket-handle medial meniscal tears in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees

BACKGROUND

Repair of meniscal tears is generally preferred over meniscectomy.

HYPOTHESIS

Repair of unstable bucket-handle tears of the medial meniscus leads to better outcomes than partial meniscectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 155 patients who had isolated bucket-handle medial meniscal tears and anterior cruciate ligament tears. Fifty-six menisci were repaired; 99 that were degenerative and crushed beyond repair were removed. Patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 6 to 8 years after surgery with the International Knee Documentation Committee examination and a modified Noyes questionnaire.

RESULTS

The mean subjective scores were similar for patients in both the repair (N = 51) and meniscectomy (N = 87) groups. However, in the repair group, the mean subjective score of 93.9 for nondegenerative menisci was significantly better than the 87.1 for degenerative menisci. Objective grades for 25 patients in the repair group were normal or nearly normal in 22 patients (88%) and for 51 of 56 patients (91%) in the removal group. Radiographic subscores for the repair group were normal or nearly normal in 23 patients in the repair group and 49 in the removal group.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes from meniscal repair were not superior to those from partial removal. Patients with repaired degenerative tears had significantly lower subjective scores than those with nondegenerative tears.