A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the combination of capecitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours

Prolonged Low-Dose Administration of FDA-Approved Drugs for Non-Cancer Conditions: A Review of Potential Targets in Cancer Cells

Though not specifically designed for cancer therapy, several FDA-approved drugs such as metformin, aspirin, and simvastatin have an effect in lowering the incidence of cancer. However, there is a great discrepancy between in vitro concentrations needed to eliminate cancer cells and the plasma concentration normally tolerated within the body. At present, there is no universal explanation for this discrepancy and several mechanisms have been proposed including targeting cancer stem cells (CSCs) or cellular senescence. CSCs are cells with the ability of self-renewal and differentiation known to be resistant to chemotherapy. Senescence is a response to damage and stress, characterized by permanent cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic resistance. Although, for both situations, there are few examples where low concentrations of the FDA-approved drugs were the most effective, there is no satisfactory data to support that either CSCs or cellular senescence are the target of these drugs. In this review, we concisely summarize the most used FDA-approved drugs for non-cancer conditions as well as their potential mechanisms of action in lowering cancer incidence. In addition, we propose that prolonged low-dose administration (PLDA) of specific FDA-approved drugs can be useful for effectively preventing metastasis formation in selected patients.

Insight into Mantle Cell Lymphoma Pathobiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment Using Network-Based and Drug-Repurposing Approaches

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, incurable, and aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Early MCL diagnosis and treatment is critical and puzzling due to inter/intra-tumoral heterogeneity and limited understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms. We developed and applied a multifaceted analysis of selected publicly available transcriptomic data of well-defined MCL stages, integrating network-based methods for pathway enrichment analysis, co-expression module alignment, drug repurposing, and prediction of effective drug combinations. We demonstrate the "butterfly effect" emerging from a small set of initially differentially expressed genes, rapidly expanding into numerous deregulated cellular processes, signaling pathways, and core machineries as MCL becomes aggressive. We explore pathogenicity-related signaling circuits by detecting common co-expression modules in MCL stages, pointing out, among others, the role of VEGFA and SPARC proteins in MCL progression and recommend further study of precise drug combinations. Our findings highlight the benefit that can be leveraged by such an approach for better understanding pathobiology and identifying high-priority novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, drug targets, and efficacious combination therapies against MCL that should be further validated for their clinical impact.

Utility of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Investigate the Impact of Physiological Changes of Pregnancy and Cancer on Oncology Drug Pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

The treatment of cancer during pregnancy remains challenging with knowledge gaps in drug dosage, safety, and efficacy due to the under-representation of this population in clinical trials. Our aim was to investigate physiological changes reported in both pregnancy and cancer populations into a PBPK modeling framework that allows for a more accurate estimation of PK changes in pregnant patients with cancer.

METHODS

Paclitaxel and docetaxel were selected to validate a population model using clinical data from pregnant patients with cancer. The validated population model was subsequently used to predict the PK of acalabrutinib in pregnant patients with cancer.

RESULTS

The Simcyp pregnancy population model reasonably predicted the PK of docetaxel in pregnant patients with cancer, while a modified model that included a 2.5-fold increase in CYP2C8 abundance, consistent with the increased expression during pregnancy, was needed to reasonably predict the PK of paclitaxel in pregnant patients with cancer. Changes in protein binding levels of patients with cancer had a minimal impact on the predicted clearance of paclitaxel and docetaxel. PBPK modeling predicted approximately 60% lower AUC and Cmax for acalabrutinib in pregnant versus non-pregnant patients with cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that PBPK modeling is a promising approach to investigate the effects of pregnancy and cancer on the PK of oncology drugs and potentially inform dosing for pregnant patients with cancer. Further evaluation and refinement of the population model are needed for pregnant patients with cancer with additional compounds and clinical PK data.

Drug-Drug Interactions in Prostate Cancer Treatment

Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which can cause serious and debilitating drug-induced adverse events. With a steadily aging population and associated increasing multimorbidity and polypharmacy, the potential for DDIs becomes considerably important. Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men and occurs mostly in elderly men in the Western world. Therefore, the aim of this review is to give an overview of DDIs in PCa therapy to better understand pharmacodynamic and pharm kinetic side effects as well as their interactions with other medications. Last, we explore potential future strategies, which might help to optimize treatment and reduce adverse events patients with polypharmacy and PCa.

Phase Ib trial combining capecitabine, erlotinib and bevacizumab in pancreatic adenocarcinoma - REBECA trial

Background Purpose of this phase Ib trial was to establish the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of capecitabine and to escalate the dosages of erlotinib and bevacizumab to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma not pretreated for metastatic disease. Methods Starting doses were capecitabine 500 mg/m² bid orally continuously, erlotinib 100 mg orally daily, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg intravenously q 2 weeks. Dose escalation was performed according to a 3 + 3 design for capecitabine until MTD, for erlotinib and bevacizumab until the maximum doses registered by applying a substance-related, toxicity-based scheme accompanied by pharmacokinetic analysis. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were determined pretherapeutically by immunohistochemical identification after enrichment with immunomagnetic separation. Results Thirty patients were evaluable at six dose levels. 900 mg/m² bid were determined as MTD for capecitabine based on dose-limiting toxicities: cutaneous in two patients and vascular in another. The most severe (Grade (G)3/4) drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (toxicities) belonged to the categories gastrointestinal, vascular, cutaneous, cardiovascular, metabolic/nutritional or hematological. G3 toxicities occurred in 14 (47%), G3 + G4 in a single (3%) patient. 2 out of 28 patients (7%) exerted partial response, 17 (61%) stable disease. Pharmacokinetic evaluation revealed lack of drug-drug interaction between capecitabine and erlotinib and their metabolites. Presence of CTCs was associated with shorter progression-free survival (p = 0.009). Conclusions The study met the primary objective. RP2D was capecitabine 800 mg/m² bid continuously, erlotinib 150 mg daily, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg q 2 weeks. The regimen could be applied safely, but demonstrated limited efficacy.

Acute Cardiotoxicity during Capecitabine Treatment: A Case Report

Capecitabine (Xeloda®, Roche, Monza), a fluoropyrimidine carbamate, is an orally administered drug that delivers fluorouracil (5-FU) selectively to the tumor. The drug has demonstrated activity in metastatic breast cancer, pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer.

In this case report the authors describe an unusually and reversible cardiac side effect which occurs to 39-year-old patient treated with capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day for advanced gastric cancer.

It is important to note that the safety data from clinical trials indicate that capecitabine has a toxicity profile typical of infused fluoropyrimidines. However, none of the studies described cardiac side effects.

Capecitabine: Indications and Future Perspectives in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal and Breast Cancer

Fluoropyrimidines remain the most important drugs in the treatment of breast and colorectal carcinoma, but response rates and survival time have been disappointing. Optimal administration is by continuous intravenous infusion, which makes it cumbersome to use and compromises patient independence. Recently, a number of new agents, including fluorouracil prodrugs and selective dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitors, have been studied, with promising results. Capecitabine is the first in a new class of fluoropyrimidines. It is an oral, tumor-activated anticancer drug whose activity mimics that of continuously infused 5-fluorouracil. Capecitabine circumvents dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase catabolism and appears to be at least as active against metastatic colorectal and breast cancer as conventionally administered intravenous 5-fluorouracil, with significantly less toxicity, an improved quality of life, and lesser cost. Capecitabine may ultimately provide enhanced antitumor activity to fluorouracil-containing regimes for advanced colorectal and breast cancer.

Capecitabine in Combination with Docetaxel in First Line in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: an Observational Study

Due to the limited experience with capecitabine plus docetaxel (XT) combination in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in Hungary, the main objective of the study was to analyze the effectiveness and tolerability of XT therapy. A prospective, open-label, non-randomized, single-arm, multicenter, observational study was designed. All female patients were eligible whose metastatic breast cancer could be treated with the XT protocol according to the summary of product characteristics of the drugs. The median progression free survival was 9.9 ± 3.0 months. Time to treatment failure was 4.6 ± 5.1 months on average. The overall response rate was 28.9 %, the clinical benefit rate was 73.3 %. The treatment was discontinued in 35.6 % of patients due to disease progression and in 20.0 % due to adverse events (AE). 33 patients with a total of 73 AEs have been reported, and 13 of them had serious adverse events (SAE). The efficacy and the safety profile of XT chemotherapy proven in the study are consistent with the results demonstrated in randomized trials. First-line XT chemotherapy effectively improves the PFS in metastatic breast cancer.

Capecitabine: a novel, orally administered, tumour-activated treatment for breast cancer

Objective. To provide a comprehensive review of the preclinical and clinical pharmacology and toxicology of the fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine, with particular reference to its use in metastatic breast cancer.

Data Sources. A MEDLINE search was conducted using the term ‘capecitabine’ for the period 1995 -2001. The reference lists from retrieved articles were reviewed and other relevant papers identified. The abstract books from the annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical and Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology were also reviewed.

Data Extraction. The aim of the review was to be comprehensive and descriptive. All studies containing information deemed to be of interest were reviewed by the author; none was excluded on grounds of quality.

Data Summary. Capecitabine is a prodrug of the widely used cytotoxic agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Unlike 5-FU, it is extensively and reliably absorbed after oral administration and does not require folinate (FA) potentiation. The activation of capecitabine is a three-step enzymatic process. The final activating enzyme - thymidine phosphorylase - is found in unusually high concentrations in many solid tumours including breast cancers, resulting in preferential delivery of 5-FU to tumour tissues, and suggesting a greater potential for selective cytotoxicity than is seen with 5-FU.

Capecitabine has been examined both alone and in combination with a variety of cytotoxic drugs in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. To date, clinical evidence supports the use of capecitabine monotherapy in patients relapsing after prior treatment with anthracyclines and taxanes and in combination with docetaxel in patients failing anthracycline treatment.

Data from phase II studies indicate that in the first of these situations, capecitabine elicits a response in about one-fifth of patients and that responses are associated with symptomatic relief and extended survival. In the latter situation, a phase III study has shown that the combination of docetaxel and capecitabine elicits superior response rates, remission durations, and overall survival compared with the taxane alone and with no clinically important increase in toxicity.

Used alone or in combination, the most notable adverse effect associated with capecitabine is palmar-plantar erythrodysasthesia (hand -foot syndrome), a characteristic complex of reddening, dryness, and soreness of the palms of the hands and soles of the feet, which is rarely disabling and readily managed by treatment interruption and dose reduction.

Inter-patient variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetics: A review

Docetaxel is a frequently used chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of solid cancers. Because of the large inter-individual variability (IIV) in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of docetaxel, it is challenging to determine the optimal dose in individual patients in order to achieve optimal efficacy and acceptable toxicity. Despite the established correlation between systemic docetaxel exposure and efficacy, the precise factors influencing docetaxel PK are not yet completely understood. This review article highlights currently known factors that influence docetaxel PK, and focusses on those that are clinically relevant. For example, liver impairment should be taken into account when calculating docetaxel dosages as this may decrease docetaxel clearance. In addition, drug-drug interactions may be of distinct clinical importance when using docetaxel. Particularly, drugs strongly inhibiting CYP3A4 such as ketoconazole should not be concurrently administered without dose modification, as they may decrease the clearance of docetaxel. Gender, castration status, and menopausal status might be of importance as potential factors influencing docetaxel PK. The role of pharmacogenetics in predicting docetaxel PK is still limited, since no polymorphisms of clinical importance have yet been established.

Capecitabine maintenance therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

Our objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine maintenance therapy (CMT) after capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The clinical data of 139 metastatic breast cancer patients treated from March 2008 to May 2012 with capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. When initial disease control was achieved by the combination chemotherapy, we used CMT for 50 patients, while 37 patients were treated with a different (non-CMT) maintenance therapy. We compared time to progression (TTP), objective response rate, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, and safety of the two groups, and a sub-group analysis was performed according to pathological characteristics. Sixty-four percent of the patients received a median of six cycles of a docetaxel+capecitabine combination chemotherapy regimen (range 1-45); the median TTP (MTTP) for the complete treatment was 9.43 months (95%CI=8.38-10.48 months) for the CMT group and 4.5 months (95%CI=4.22-4.78 months; P=0.004) for the non-CMT group. The MTTPs for the maintenance therapies administered after the initial capecitabine combined chemotherapy were 4.11 months (95%CI=3.34-4.87 months) for the CMT group and 2.0 months (95%CI=1.63-2.38 months) for the non-CMT group. Gastrointestinal side effects, decreased white blood cells and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were the main adverse reactions experienced with the combination chemotherapies, CMT and non-CMT treatments. No significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions were detected in the CMT and non-CMT patients. After initial disease control was achieved with the capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy, CMT can significantly prolong TTP rates with a favorable safety profile.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of capecitabine in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Capecitabine , an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), is adsorbed in its intact form through the intestine and metabolized to 5-FU in tumour cells. In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), capecitabine is an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option both in monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapeutic or molecular-targeted agents.

AREAS COVERED

We summarized data on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of capecitabine. We also produced a general review of the most relevant clinical studies of capecitabine in MBC. A literature search was performed using PubMed database including selected articles published in English language up to October 2012.

EXPERT OPINION

The unique pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic features represent the bases of the reduced toxicity and the activity of capecitabine in several tumours. Although during the past 10 years there has been an increasing use of this drug in MBC both as single agent and in combination, encouraging results of well tolerated and active combinations with novel agents will lead to a more extensive and protracted use of capecitabine. In view of this, some aspects should be further clarified such as the optimal starting dose and the introduction of alternative schedules of treatment.

Cabazitaxel: more than a new taxane for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer?

The taxanes are recognized as a major class of chemotherapeutic agents; however, mechanisms of innate and acquired resistance can limit their usefulness. Cabazitaxel, a novel taxane with microtubule-stabilizing potency similar to docetaxel, exhibits activity against tumor cell lines resistant to paclitaxel and docetaxel. Cabazitaxel showed linear pharmacokinetics and a terminal elimination half-life comparable with that of docetaxel, findings which support dosing as a single infusion in three-week treatment cycles. Dose-ranging studies recommended doses of 20 or 25 mg/m(2) every three weeks. Antitumor activity was shown in patients with advanced cancer and chemotherapy failure (including taxane failure). Other early studies investigated the efficacy of cabazitaxel in pretreated metastatic breast cancer, either as a single agent or in combination with capecitabine. Objective antitumor response rates of up to 24% and sustained tumor stabilizations were also observed. The TROPIC phase III study, conducted in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel, established cabazitaxel as the first chemotherapeutic agent to offer a survival advantage in this patient population. Across these studies, the dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (including febrile neutropenia), usually controllable with colony-stimulating factor/granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support.

A multicenter phase II trial of docetaxel and capecitabine as salvage treatment in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus capecitabine (DC) combination as salvage treatment in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND TREATMENT

Patients with MBC who had disease progression after initial chemotherapy with anthracyclines (n = 29; 100 %) and taxanes (n = 11; 37.9 %) were treated with oral capecitabine 950 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3 weeks. Nineteen (65.5 %) patients received this regimen as second line and 10 (34.5 %) as ≥3rd line of therapy. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity.

RESULTS

Complete response occurred in two (6.9 %) patients and partial response in eleven (37.9 %) for an overall response rate of 44.8 % (95 % CI 26.7-62.9 %). Eleven women (37.9 %) had stable disease and five (17.2 %) progressive disease. Of the eleven patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, five (45.5 %) responded to DC combination. The median duration of response was 5.7 months (range 3.4-64.2), the median time to disease progression 9.3 months (range 1.2-58), and the median overall survival 25.5 months. No toxic death occurred. Neutropenia grade 4 occurred in 58.6 % of patients and three of them (10.3 %) developed neutropenic fever. Non-hematological toxicities were manageable with grade 3 hand-foot syndrome occurring in 6.9 % of the patients, fatigue in 3.4 %, and neurotoxicity in 3.4 %.

CONCLUSION

The DC combination is a valuable regimen as salvage treatment in anthracycline- or anthracycline and taxane-pretreated patients with MBC.

Phase I trial of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (DOC) in untreated gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

A combination of docetaxel (D), oxaliplatin (O), and capecitabine (C) (DOC) was studied in this dose-escalation phase Ib trial in patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) included any grade 4 hematological or any grade 3 non-hematological toxicity, besides alopecia and nausea or vomiting. Cohorts of three patients, expanded to six if one DLT occurred, were studied. Two DLTs out of three patients, or ≥3 out of six patients defined the toxic level. The preceding level, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), was further expanded to nine patients. The primary objective was to establish the MTD of the DOC regimen.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients entered four dose levels. Levels I, II, and IIb were considered safe and included 3, 6, and 6 patients, respectively. Level III defined our toxic level with three analyzed patients. Therefore, level IIB was expanded to 9 patients. No other DLTs were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Fractionation of doses and the use of less toxic and more convenient derivatives are the rationales for this new combination. The MTD (mg/m(2)) was: D, 30 and O, 70, both on days 1 and 8, i.v.; C 1000 per day, days 2-15, p.o.; all given every 3 weeks. A cooperative phase II study has been opened.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of capecitabine and cisplatin in combination with trastuzumab in Japanese patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of capecitabine and cisplatin, administered in combination with or without trastuzumab, in Japanese patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Patients eligible for this PK study (study JP19959), which was carried out during treatment Cycle 1 of the ToGA study, received either capecitabine and cisplatin (XP arm) or trastuzumab plus capecitabine and cisplatin (HXP arm). All patients received capecitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) orally, twice daily for 14 days) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion on Day 1). Patients in the HXP arm also received trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenous infusion on Day 1), concurrently with capecitabine. No further study medication was administered during study JP19959. Serial plasma samples for PK analysis were obtained at intervals before and after the administration of capecitabine and cisplatin on Day 1.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled in this PK study: eight in the HXP arm and 14 in the XP arm. All blood samples were available for PK analysis. Co-administration of trastuzumab resulted in no statistically or clinically significant changes in the PK profiles of capecitabine or its metabolites, or of cisplatin (total or unbound platinum).

CONCLUSIONS

Variability in the AUC(last) and C (max) values for the capecitabine was consistent with the known PK profile of capecitabine and fell within established limits. Concurrent trastuzumab therapy is unlikely to alter the PK or safety profile of capecitabine or cisplatin in Japanese patients with HER2-positive AGC.

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of capecitabine in head and neck cancer and normal cells

The interaction between a chemical and a cell may strongly depend on whether this cell is normal or pathological. Side effects of anticancer drugs may sometimes overcome their benefit action, so it is important to investigate their effect in both the target and normal cells. Capecitabine (Xeloda, CAP), a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, is mainly used in colon cancer, but little is known about its action in head and neck cancer. We compared the cyto- and genotoxicity of CAP in head and neck HTB-43 cells and normal human lymphocytes by comet assay and flow cytometry. CAP at concentration up to 50 μM significantly decreased the viability of the cancer cells, whereas it did not affect normal lymphocytes. The drug did not interact with isolated plasmid DNA, but it damaged DNA in both cancer and normal cells. However, the extent of the damage in the former was much higher than in the latter. CAP induced apoptosis in the cancer cells, but not in normal lymphocytes. Pre-treatment of the cells with the nitrone spin traps α-(4-pyridil-1-oxide)-N-tert-butylnitrone and N-tert-butyl-α-phenylnitrone decreased the extent of CAP induced DNA damage, suggesting that free radicals may be involved in the formation of DNA lesions induced by CAP. The drug evoked an increase in the G0/G1 cell population accompanied by a decrease in the S cell population. CAP may evoke a pronounced cyto- and genotoxic effects in head and neck cancer cells, whereas it may or may not induce such effects in normal cells to far lesser extent.

A multicentre dose-escalating study of cabazitaxel (XRP6258) in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing after anthracycline and taxane treatment: a phase I/II study

BACKGROUND

Most patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progress after chemotherapy. Cabazitaxel (XRP6258) is a new taxoid that is active in chemotherapy-resistant tumour cell lines. The objectives of this phase I/II study were to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety profile, pharmacokinetics, and activity of cabazitaxel plus capecitabine in patients with MBC who had been previously treated with taxanes and anthracyclines.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In part I, we used a 3+3 dose-escalation scheme to assess the MTD of intravenous cabazitaxel (day 1) with oral capecitabine twice daily (days 1-14) every 3 weeks. In part II, we evaluated the objective response rate (ORR) at the MTD.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled and treated (15 in part I; 18 in part II). Cabazitaxel 20mg/m(2) plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) was the MTD. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed no apparent drug-drug interaction. In all patients, the main grade 3-4 toxicities were asthenia (n=5), hand-foot syndrome (n=5), neutropenia (n=21), neutropenic infection (n=1), and neutropenic colitis (n=1). One patient had febrile neutropenia. Antitumour activity was observed at all dose-levels with two complete responses, five partial responses (PRs), and 20 disease stabilisations (seven unconfirmed PR). At the MTD, 21 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR was 23.8% (95% CI: 8.2-47.2%). The median response duration was 3.1 months (95% CI: 2.1-8.4 months), with four of five lasting for more than 3 months. Median time to progression was 4.9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Cabazitaxel combined with capecitabine is active, has a safety profile consistent with a taxane plus capecitabine combination and warrants further investigation in patients with MBC.

Effects on quality of life of weekly docetaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: results of a single-centre randomized phase 3 trial

Background

To evaluate whether weekly schedules of docetaxel-based chemotherapy were superior to 3-weekly ones in terms of quality of life in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, aged ≤ 70 years, performance status 0-2, chemotherapy-naive for metastatic disease, were eligible. They were randomized to weekly or 3-weekly combination of docetaxel and epirubicin, if they were not treated with adjuvant anthracyclines, or docetaxel and capecitabine, if treated with adjuvant anthracyclines. Primary end-point was global quality of life change at 6-weeks, measured by EORTC QLQ-C30. With two-sided alpha 0.05 and 80% power for 35% effect size, 130 patients per arm were needed.

Results

From February 2004 to March 2008, 139 patients were randomized, 70 to weekly and 69 to 3-weekly arm; 129 and 89 patients filled baseline and 6-week questionnaires, respectively. Global quality of life was better in the 3-weekly arm (p = 0.03); patients treated with weekly schedules presented a significantly worsening in role functioning and financial scores (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001). Neutropenia and stomatitis were worse in the 3-weekly arm, where two toxic deaths were observed. Overall response rate was 39.1% and 33.3% in 3-weekly and weekly arms; hazard ratio of progression was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.84-1.97) and hazard ratio of death was 1.38 (95% CI: 0.82-2.30) in the weekly arm.

Conclusions

In this trial, the weekly schedules of docetaxel-based chemotherapy appear to be inferior to the 3-weekly one in terms of quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00540800.

Efficacy and safety of capecitabine in combination with docetaxel and mitomycin C in patients with pre-treated pancreatic, gallbladder, and bile duct carcinoma

PURPOSE

Preclinical data indicate the improvement of the antitumor activity of capecitabine by mitomycin C and docetaxel through upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase activity. Therefore, we have established a combination regimen of these drugs (DocMitoCape), which demonstrated preliminary activity especially in bile duct and pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

Here we report the safety and efficacy of the DocMitoCape regimen in pre-treated patients with gallbladder, bile duct, or pancreatic carcinoma. Treatment consisted of capecitabine (2,000 mg/m(2) days 1-14) in combination with docetaxel (40 mg/m(2) day 1) and mitomycin C (4 mg/m(2) day 1). Cycles were repeated on day 22. Toxicity was graded according to NCI-CTC criteria, and the antitumor activity was assessed by RECIST criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight pre-treated patients with a median age of 59 suffering from pancreatic, gallbladder, intra- (IHCCC) or extrahepatic (EHCCC) bile duct carcinoma were included. Eleven patients had received ≥2 lines of prior chemotherapy. A total of 183 and a median of six cycles were administered (range 1-21). The mean dose intensity was as follows (cycles 1-2/3-4; %): capecitabine 97/92, docetaxel 100/100, mitomycin C 99/100. Main adverse events grades 2/3/4 were (n): leukocytopenia 3/2/2, anemia 13/4/0, thrombocytopenia 3/1/0, nausea/vomiting 2/1/0, diarrhea 5/1/0, hand-foot-skin reaction 7/0/0. Six patients achieved partial and seven patients minor remissions, while six patients had stable disease adding to a tumor control rate of 68%. Median progression-free and overall survival was 4.5 (range 1.0-44.9) and 6.8 months (range 1.5-44.9), respectively, calculated from the start of treatment.

CONCLUSION

In all, the DocMitoCape regimen exhibited a favorable safety profile and a high rate of tumor stabilizations in patients with pre-treated gallbladder, bile duct and pancreatic carcinoma. It might be considered after failure of standard regimens in these types of cancer.

Phase I study of docetaxel, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (TEX) as first line therapy to patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin, 5-FU) has been a standard first-line regimen in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer (GEC). If cisplatin is substituted by oxaliplatin (Eloxatin®) - E) and 5-FU by capecitabine (X - Xeloda®) this regimen is easily administered with at least comparable efficacy and lower toxicity. Recent studies indicate that efficacy can be improved by adding docetaxel (Taxotere® - T) to CF. We initiated a phase I trial of T, short-time infusion of E and continuously X (TEX) as first-line therapy in GEC to establish the recommended dose (RD) for further therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were enrolled in cohorts of three at five dose levels. Patients had histologically confirmed GEC adenocarcinoma. Therapy was administered day 1 with escalating doses of docetaxel (60 mg/m² to 75 mg/m² iv as a 60 minutes infusion), oxaliplatin (85 to 130 mg/m² iv as a 30 minutes infusion) and oral capecitabine (1 000 to 1 250 mg/m²/day). TEX was repeated every third week for a maximum of eight cycles. Toxicity was evaluated according to CTCAE v3.0 and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was evaluated after the first course of TEX.

RESULTS

From June 2007 to April 2009, 23 consecutive patients received TEX. At dose level V, two of four patients experienced DLT and therefore we included additional seven patients at dose level IV. Only one of seven experienced DLT but dose-intensity was reduced to 75% in four of seven patients after three courses of TEX. Therefore we defined dose level III as RD. Efficacy was promising with response rate 38%, PFS 9.4 months and OS 12.5 months.

CONCLUSION

The recommended dose of TEX (docetaxel 60 mg/m² iv day 1, oxaliplatin 115 mg/m² iv day 1 and oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m²/day continuously) every three weeks is easily administered in an out-patient setting. Efficacy is promising and will be evaluated in a phase II study.

The frequency and severity of capecitabine-induced hypertriglyceridaemia in routine clinical practice: a prospective study

Background:

Capecitabine is known to rarely cause raised serum triglycerides (TG). In our centre, several patients receiving capecitabine developed raised TG levels corresponding to the ‘very high risk’ category for potentially serious acute pancreatitis.

Methods:

A fasting blood lipid screening protocol was introduced into clinical practice for patients receiving capecitabine. Patients with TGs >5 mmol l⁻¹ were treated and followed up. An 18-month prospective audit was performed to establish the incidence and severity of capecitabine-induced hypertriglyceridaemia (CIHT).

Results:

A total of 304 patients received capecitabine for colorectal cancer between January 2008 and June 2009. Of these, 212 patients (70%) were screened and 8 (3.7%) developed clinically significant hypertriglyceridaemia requiring lipid-lowering therapy. Two of the eight patients had diabetes and one had pre-existing dyslipidaemia. One suffered cerebral infarction during chemotherapy. There were no cases of acute pancreatitis. Follow-up showed that serum TGs safely and rapidly returned to normal with appropriate treatment without discontinuation of capecitabine.

Conclusions:

This is the first prospective study evaluating CIHT. These results suggest that it should be classed as a ‘common’ undesired effect of capecitabine. Despite this, the incidence does not justify routine screening in all patients. Targeted screening in those with diabetes or pre-existing hyperlipidaemia is recommended, together with adoption of a clear management policy.

Second-line chemotherapy with capecitabine (Xeloda) and docetaxel (Taxotere) in previously treated, unresectable adenocarcinoma of pancreas: the final results of a phase II trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of the docetaxel and capecitabine combination in patients with previously treated, unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, pre-treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, were treated with capecitabine (800 mg/m(2) orally, twice a day for 14 days) and docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) i.v, on day 1), every 3 weeks. The primary end-point was overall response rate (RR).

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the study; 93.6% of them had a performance status (PS) of 0-1 and 96.8% had stage IV disease. Patients received a median of 4 cycles/patient, and the main reason for treatment discontinuation was disease progression. Partial response was observed in three (9.7%) patients, stable disease in seven (22.6%) (disease control rate: 32.3%, 95% CI: 15.80-48.71%) and disease progression in 21 (67.6%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.6-3.13) and the median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months (95% CI: 3.38-9.23); the estimated 1-year survival rate was 14.7%. Grade III/IV neutropenia occurred in 10 (32.2%) patients and febrile neutropenia in one patient. Other severe non-hematologic toxicities were mild and manageable. After 2 chemotherapy cycles, pain control occurred in 20% of patients and stabilization of body weight in 40%.

CONCLUSION

The combination of docetaxel/capecitabine may confer good disease control associated with improvement of quality of life as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) enhancer region genotype-directed phase II trial of oral capecitabine for 2nd line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to characterize the 6-month overall survival and toxicity associated with second-line capecitabine treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer patients harboring the TYMS *2/*2 allele. The secondary aim was to analyze the response rate and pharmacokinetics of capecitabine-based therapy in this patient population. Lastly, TYMS, ATM and RecQ1 single nucleotide polymorphism were analyzed relative to overall survival in patients screened for study participation.

METHODS

Eighty patients with stage IV pancreatic cancer were screened for the *2/*2 TYMS allele. Patients with the *2/*2 TYMS polymorphism were treated with capecitabine, 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 consecutive days of a 21 day cycle. Screened patients not possessing TYMS *2/*2 were monitored for survival. Pharmacokinetic analysis was done during Cycle 1 of the therapy.

RESULTS

Sixteen of the 80 screened patients tested positive for *2/*2 TYMS variant. Four out of the 16 eligible patients were treated on study. The study was terminated early due to poor accrual and increased toxicity. Three patients experienced grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities of palmer-plantar erythrodysesthesia, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. Grade 2 toxicities were similar and occurred in all patients. Only one patient was evaluable for response after completion of three cycles of therapy. The presence of the *2/*2 TYMS genotype in all of the screened patients trended toward a decreased overall survival.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this study represents the first genotype-directed clinical trial for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Although the study was closed early, it appears capecitabine therapy in pancreatic cancer patients harboring the TYMS *2/*2 variant may be associated with increased non-hematologic toxicity. This study also demonstrates the challenges performing a genotype-directed study in the second-line setting for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

A dose escalation study of docetaxel plus capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

OBJECTIVES

Capecitabine (CAP), Oxaliplatin (OX) and Docetaxel (DOC) have shown considerable activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled. The patient's median age was 68 years, 15 were male, and 12 were chemo-naïve. DOC was administered on day 1 as an 1-hour (iv) infusion at a standard dose of 50 mg/m(2). OX was administered on day 1 as a 2-hour (iv) infusion at escalating doses ranging from 70-80 mg/m(2). CAP was administered orally on days 1 to 7 at escalating doses ranging from 2,000-2,750 mg/m(2) given as two daily divided doses. Treatment was repeated every two weeks.

RESULTS

Six different dose-levels were examined. At dose-level VI, two of three enrolled patients presented DLTs (one patient diarrhea and asthenia grade 3 and another grade 3 diarrhea), and thus, the recommended MTD for future phase II studies is CAP 2,750 mg/m(2) , DOC 50 mg/m(2) and OX 75 mg/m(2). A total of 121 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in six (5%) treatment cycles and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in one (1%). There was no febrile episode. Grade 3 asthenia was observed in three (14%) patients, grade 3 diarrhea in four (19%), grade 3 neuropathy in one (5%), and grade 1/2 hand-foot syndrome in three (14%). Other toxicities were uncommon. There was no treatment related death. Four (29%) PRs and seven (50%) SD were observed among 14 evaluable patients. Responses were seen in patients with renal (n = 1), gastric (n = 2) and pancreatic (n = 1) cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that CAP, DOC and OX can be safely combined at clinically relevant doses and this regimen merits further evaluation.

Sequential administration of dose-dense epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel/capecitabine for patients with HER2-negative and locally advanced or node-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

Capecitabine is effective against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We hypothesized that sequential treatment with dose-dense epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel/capecitabine would be active and tolerable in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting.

METHODS

In this prospective phase II clinical trial patients with HER2-negative and node-positive or locally advanced tumors were eligible to receive four cycles of EC (100/600 mg/m2) every 2 weeks with G-CSF on days 3-10, followed by four cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine (75/1,000 mg/m2 b.i.d., days 1-14) every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were enrolled with median age of 49, and 80% had hormone receptor-positive disease. The median tumor size was 2.5 cm, with a median of two axillary nodes involved. Seventy-five percent of the first 20 patients had grade 2/3 hand-foot syndrome (HFS). Dose reduction of capecitabine to 800 mg/m2 reduced the grade 2/3 HFS incidence to 31% in the remaining patients. No grade 4/5 toxicities were observed. All 20 patients treated preoperatively responded, with 5 (25%) pathologic complete responses and 3 additional pT0N1 tumors. At a median follow-up of 48 (range 28-60) months, the event-free and overall survival rates are 91 and 98%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential treatment with dose-dense EC followed by docetaxel/capecitabine, using a lower capecitabine dose than that approved for MBC, has an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging activity when used as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Phase II trial of capecitabine and weekly docetaxel for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Synergy is observed with the combination of capecitabine and docetaxel due to docetaxel mediated up-regulation of thymidine phosphorylase. A phase II trial was performed with the combination for metastatic, castrate resistant prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had metastatic, castrate resistant prostate cancer, no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease and normal organ function. Docetaxel (36 mg/m(2) per week intravenously) on days 1, 8 and 15, and capecitabine (1,250 mg/m(2) per day in 2 divided doses) on days 5 to 18 were administered in 28-day cycles. The response was assessed every 2 cycles. Biomarker correlative studies were performed on blood dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, and the thymidine phosphorylase-to-dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine synthase-to-dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase ratios in available prostate tumor tissue.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients with a median age of 69 years were enrolled in the study. We noted bone pain in 21 patients (70%), Gleason score 8 or higher in 18 (60%), measurable disease progression in 9, bone scan progression in 18 and prostate specific antigen progression in 22. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was seen in 3 patients and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome was found in 2. No treatment related deaths occurred. A prostate specific antigen response of 50% or greater decrease was observed in 22 patients (73%), of whom 9 (30%) had 90% or greater decrease. A partial response was noted in 5 of 9 patients (56%) with measurable disease. Median time to progression was 6.7 months (90% CI 4.2-7.7) and median overall survival was 22.0 months (90% CI 18.4-25.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination was well tolerated and it demonstrated favorable response rates with durable remission and survival outcomes.

Dose-finding phase I and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine (Xeloda) in combination with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (CEX) in patients with inoperable or metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to identify the recommended dose (RD) of capecitabine, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (CEX) combination treatment for inoperable or metastatic breast cancer and to assess response rate, tolerability and pharmacokinetics in Japanese patients.

METHODS

Patients received 3-week cycles of fixed-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2), day 1), intravenous epirubicin (75-100 mg/m(2), day 1) and oral capecitabine (628-900 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14). Dose escalation/deescalation decisions for consecutive cohorts were made using the continual reassessment method (CRM). RD was defined as dose level closest to that causing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in 33% of patients.

RESULTS

Among the 17 patients enrolled, 3 experienced DLT (hand-foot syndrome, anorexia, mucositis; all grade 3) and 3 (18%) febrile neutropenia. Based on CRM calculation, mean DLT occurrence probabilities (90% confidence intervals in parentheses) for levels 2, 3 and 4 were 21% (8-42%), 35% (17-56%) and 56% (38-71%), respectively. Level 3 was thus chosen as the RD. Combination treatment did not affect pharmacokinetic parameters of capecitabine, epirubicin or their metabolites. Objective responses were achieved by 7 patients (41%), including partial responses in 4 of 6 patients (67%) receiving the RD.

CONCLUSION

CEX represents a well-tolerated regimen, and RD for Japanese patients was determined to be capecitabine 900 mg/m(2) twice daily in combination with epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) using the CRM.

Capecitabine in combination with docetaxel and mitomycin C in patients with pre-treated tumours: results of an extended phase-I trial

Preclinical data suggest that the anti-tumour activity of capecitabine is enhanced by taxanes and mitomycin C through up-regulation of thymidine phosphorylase (TP). Here, we studied safety and efficacy of the combination of capecitabine with docetaxel and mitomycin C. Two dose levels (DL) were investigated: capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) b.i.d. on days 1-14, docetaxel 40 mg m(-2) i.v. day 1, mitomycin C 4 or 6 mg m(-2) i.v. day 1 (DL I or II). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. The primary aim was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during the first two treatment cycles and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). A total of 46 patients (pts) refractory to standard therapies were enrolled, of whom the majority had gastrointestinal tumours (n=40). 14 pts had received >/=3 lines of prior chemotherapy. At DL I, one out of six pts experienced DLT. At DL II, two out of six pts had DLT (mucositis grade 3). Thus, DL I was determined as MTD. Among a total of 37 pts treated on DL I the following toxicities were observed during cycles 1 and 2 (number of patients with grade 1/2/3/4 toxicity; NCI-CTC v. 3.0): anaemia 10/8/3/0, leucocytopenia 4/11/1/2, thrombocytopenia 0/1/2/0, diarrhoea 8/1/2/0, stomatitis/mucositis 3/3/1/0, nausea/vomiting 10/2/0/0, and hand-foot skin reaction 5/1/1/0. Of 30 pts who received at least two treatment cycles nine achieved complete or partial remissions, six pts achieved minor remissions, and seven pts had stable disease (tumour control rate 73%). Of note, four out of 10 patients with pancreatic cancer had partial remissions. In conclusion, capecitabine can safely be combined with docetaxel (40 mg m(-2)) and mitomycin C (4 mg m(-2)). The established regimen was well tolerated and the preliminary efficacy data in this heavily pre-treated patients population appears to be promising.

Reduced dose intensity of docetaxel plus capecitabine as second-line palliative chemotherapy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of a reduced dose intensity of docetaxel (Taxotere) plus capecitabine in pretreated patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with documented progression on or within 3 months of a cisplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled between April 2004 and November 2006. Docetaxel (60 mg/m2 on day 1) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14) were given every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

All patients were assessable for safety and 25 (89%) for tumor response. Median age was 63 years, and median follow-up was 13.3 months. Overall response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval 11% to 46%), while an additional 36% had stable disease. The median time to progression and median overall survival was 4 and 6 months, respectively. The most common clinical adverse events (all grades) were neutropenia (78%), hand foot syndrome (HFS) (53%), fatigue and alopecia (50%) and diarrhea (43%). However, with the exception of grade 3-4 neutropenia, which was seen in 36% of patients, other severe adverse events were rare. There were no treatment-related deaths. Treatment delays or dose reductions were necessary in 18 out of 104 cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

A reduced dose intensity of docetaxel plus capecitabine is a valuable regimen for second-line treatment in this setting of patients. This approach warrants further investigation as a promising chemotherapy option for chemonaive patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Detailed analysis of a randomized phase III trial: can the tolerability of capecitabine plus docetaxel be improved without compromising its survival advantage?

BACKGROUND

In a phase III trial, 3-weekly capecitabine (1250 mg/m(2) twice daily days 1-14) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) day 1) demonstrated significantly superior overall survival to 3-weekly docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) day 1). We report a retrospective analysis of the impact of capecitabine/docetaxel dose reduction on safety and efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Safety and efficacy data were analyzed retrospectively according to the actual doses of capecitabine and docetaxel administered.

RESULTS

More patients receiving capecitabine/docetaxel (65%) had dose reductions for adverse events than docetaxel alone (35%). In most patients requiring dose reduction with the combination (80%), capecitabine and docetaxel were simultaneously reduced to 950 mg/m(2) and 55 mg/m(2), respectively. Subsequently, there were fewer cycles (17%) with grade 3/4 adverse events than with the full doses (34%). Time to progression and overall survival appeared to be similar in patients starting the second cycle with reduced doses of capecitabine/docetaxel and those who continued to receive full doses of capecitabine/docetaxel for at least the first four cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Capecitabine/docetaxel dosing flexibility allows management of side-effects without compromising efficacy. This retrospective analysis, as well as multiple phase II studies of taxanes with reduced-dose capecitabine, shows that reducing the starting dose of capecitabine with docetaxel is a reasonable strategy for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. In addition, reducing the dose of both agents may be appropriate.

Capecitabine for the oral treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Women with metastatic breast cancer require tailored chemotherapy that improves outcomes without compromising quality of life. Capecitabine, a pro-drug of 5-fluorouracil, is an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate that is sequentially activated in a three-step process. This results in the preferential production of 5-fluorouracil in tumors rather than in normal surrounding tissue, improving the tolerability and efficacy of 5-fluorouracil. In combination with docetaxel, capecitabine is the first agent that has shown superior activity to single-agent docetaxel, and it is a particularly appropriate option for younger, fitter patients with rapidly progressing disease and/or visceral metastases. However, for older patients and those with comorbidities and/or after progression to taxanes, single-agent capecitabine may be the best option. Its role in earlier disease stages (adjuvant therapy) is being investigated.

A phase II trial of docetaxel plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A combination of docetaxel (T) and capecitabine (X) showed synergistic effects in preclinical studies and phase III randomized trials of metastatic breast cancer. We conducted this phase II study to examine its efficacy in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

Patient eligibility required advanced NSCLC with measurable lesion(s), at least one prior regimen failure and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2. Treatment consisted of T 36 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 plus X 1000 mg/m(2) p.o. b.i.d. on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle (level I) or T 30 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 plus X 625 mg/m(2) p.o. b.i.d. on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle (level II).

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients (M/F=24/11) were enrolled; 29 had received one prior regimen and 19 had received platinum-based regimens. Significant non-hematologic toxicities were observed after the treatment given at level I, including one treatment-related death. Subsequently 29 patients were treated at level II. The treatment at level II was well tolerated with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia only in 10%, grade 3 asthenia in 21% and stomatitis in 14% of patients. Four (15%) of 27 evaluable patients had partial response (PR) at level II and eight (30%) had stable disease (SD).

CONCLUSIONS

The TX regimen showed modest antitumor effects in patients with previously treated NSCLC. For further studies, we recommend T 30 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 plus X 625 mg/m(2) p.o. b.i.d. on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle.

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

This phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of weekly docetaxel and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with metastatic breast cancer received 30 mg/m2 of docetaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with capecitabine 800 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-21, repeated every 28 days.

RESULTS

The median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range, 1-20 cycles). Grade 3 toxicities per patient were asthenia (n = 7; 18%), diarrhea (n = 7; 18%), nausea/vomiting (n = 5; 13%), stomatitis (n = 5; 13%), neutropenia (n = 5; 13%), and hand-foot syndrome (n = 4; 10%). There were only 2 grade 4 toxicities, febrile neutropenia and pulmonary embolism. The overall response rate was 44% (95% confidence interval (CI), 28%-60%), median duration of response was 9.1 months (95% CI, 6.2-12 months), and median time to progression was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-7.3 months).

CONCLUSION

Weekly docetaxel with capecitabine was active with acceptable toxicities. Additional trials to define the optimal schedule of docetaxel and capecitabine are justified.

Palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia due to docetaxel–capecitabine therapy is treated with vitamin E without dose reduction

Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) is a distinctive and relatively frequent toxic reaction related to some chemotherapeutic agents. Doxorubicin, cytarabine, docetaxel, fluorouracil, and capecitabine are the most frequently implicated agents. Recently, taxanes, especially docetaxel, have been widely used in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A high percentage of PPE has been seen in patients undergoing this combination therapy. PPE seems to be dose dependent and both peak drug concentration and total cumulative dose determine its occurrence. Withdrawal or dose reduction of the implicated drug usually gives rise to amelioration of the symptoms. Supportive treatments such as topical wound care, elevation, and cold compresses may help to relieve the pain. Use of systemic corticosteroids, pyridoxine (vitamin B6), blood flow reduction, and, recently, topical 99% dimethyl-sulfoxide have been used with variable outcomes. Vitamin E treatment has not been published before, especially without dose reduction of docetaxel-capecitabine therapy. Here we present five MBC patients treated with docetaxel-capecitabine combination therapy in whom PPE was observed during the clinical follow-up period. In all patients grade 2-3 PPE was observed. Vitamin E therapy was started at 300 mg/day p.o. without dose reduction of therapy and after 1 week of treatment PPE began to disappear. We suggest that it could be of interest to consider vitamin E as a preventive drug when drugs with a strong association with PPE are going to be administered.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of docetaxel : recent developments

Docetaxel belongs to the class of taxane antineoplastic agents that act by inducing microtubular stability and disrupting the dynamics of the microtubular network. The drug has shown a broad spectrum of antitumour activity in preclinical models as well as clinically, with responses observed in various disease types, including advanced breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of docetaxel are extremely complex and have been the subject of intensive investigation in recent years. Docetaxel is subject to extensive metabolic conversion by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isoenzymes, which results in several pharmacologically inactive oxidation products. Elimination routes of docetaxel are also dependent on the presence of drug-transporting proteins, notably P-glycoprotein, present on the bile canalicular membrane. The various processes mediating drug elimination, either through metabolic breakdown or excretion, impact substantially on interindividual variability in drug handling. Strategies to individualise docetaxel administration schedules based on phenotypic or genotype-dependent differences in CYP3A expression are underway and may ultimately lead to more selective chemotherapeutic use of this agent.

Capecitabine/Taxane Combination Therapy: Evolving Clinical Utility in Breast Cancer

Capecitabine is approved as a single agent and in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Preclinical and clinical research suggests that the activity of capecitabine is enhanced in combination with taxanes and several biochemical mechanisms of synergy have been described. Recent data suggest that novel doses and schedules os capecitabine can improve safety without compromising efficacy. More than 50 publications and abstracts describing capecitabine/taxane combination therapy studies were reviewed to evaluate the available data on efficacy, safety, and quality of life for patients with breast cancer. Several ongoing randomized adjuvant and neoadjuvant clinical trials are assessing the clinical utility of capecitabine/taxane combinations in early-stage and locally advanced breast cancer.

Dose-finding study of weekly docetaxel, anthracyclines plus fluoropyrimidines as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of prolonged fluoropyrimidines, either intravenously or orally, prompted their integration with taxanes and anthracyclines in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC). We conducted three subsequent dose-finding studies on first-line chemotherapy in ABC with anthracyclines, either epirubicin (E) or doxorubicin (A), and docetaxel (T), both given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, plus continuous infusion (CI) 5-fluorouracil (F) or capecitabine (X).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients (37% dominant visceral disease, 48% locally advanced disease, 45% two or more sites involved), received different doses of T (60--80 mg/m(2)), A (40--50 mg/m(2)) or E (60--90 mg/m(2)) and X (1,650 and 2,000 mg/m(2)), or CI F at a fixed daily dose of 200 mg/m(2). Cardiac function was monitored at baseline and then every four cycles by echocardiography.

RESULTS

The median number of cycles per patient with all regimens was four (range one to eight). Haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity defined the maximum tolerated doses, at T-80/E-90 mg/m(2) with TEF, T-70/A50/X-2,000 mg/m(2) with TAX and T-70/E-80/X-1,650 mg/m(2) with TEX. Two patients treated with TEF developed transient cardiac toxicity (dilatative cardiomyopathy and coronary subtotal stenosis requiring stenting) after cumulative E doses of 400 mg and 1,100 mg/m(2), respectively. Fifty-nine patients were evaluable for response; the overall response rates (ORR) were comparable between regimens (54% with TEF, 71% with TAX and 86% with TEX), with an 81% ORR in 31 patients with locally advanced disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of fluoropyrimidines to weekly, intermittent ET is well tolerated and active in ABC.

Preclinical experience with docetaxel in gastrointestinal cancers

Docetaxel is a semisynthetic taxane that acts primarily by promoting microtubule assembly and preventing the depolymerization of assembled microtubules, thereby inducing mitotic block and inhibition of cell proliferation. This agent also induces apoptosis and appears to prevent angiogenesis. Although docetaxel has shown efficacy in a wide variety of tumors, it has only recently been evaluated in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers. Data from preclinical studies have shown that docetaxel has substantial in vitro and in vivo activity against gastric, esophageal, and pancreatic tumors. The cytotoxic activity of docetaxel is generally time- and dose-dependent, and greater than that produced by other chemotherapeutic agents, including paclitaxel and anthracyclines. Studies evaluating combination regimens suggest that docetaxel has additive-to-synergistic antitumor activity against gastrointestinal cancers over that produced by the individual agents, and the increased antitumor activity appears to be schedule-dependent. These data suggest that docetaxel has promising therapeutic activity in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers and provides a rationale for its inclusion in therapeutic protocols either as a single agent or in combination regimens. In addition to combination regimens with conventional chemotherapeutic agents, early studies with a number of novel molecularly targeted therapies in combination with docetaxel have shown encouraging results. These studies provide a basis for pursuing future clinical trials with docetaxel-based combinations of novel therapies for improving response rates in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.

A phase I/II and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine, to identify a recommended dose and to determine the response rate and time to disease progression. In addition, we aimed to explore the pharmacokinetic parameters of irinotecan and capecitabine when used in different sequences of administration, with irinotecan infusion either prior to or after the first intake of capecitabine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred patients were included: 43 patients were recruited into an extended phase I trial of alternating escalation in dose of both drugs where irinotecan was administered intravenously (i.v) on day 1 after first intake of capecitabine taken from days 1-14 twice daily, with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. After the determination of recommended dose a further 57 patients were treated in a phase II evaluation with the reverse sequence of drugs on day 1. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in patients treated at the recommended dose in two cohorts of patients in which the sequence of the first administration of each drug was reversed.

RESULTS

The MTD of the combination was determined as irinotecan 300 mg/m2, with capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day. Dose limiting toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhoea. The recommended dose is irinotecan intravenous (i.v.) 250 mg/m2 day 1 and capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day days 1-14, every 3 weeks. Treatment was well tolerated, with diarrhoea the most common serious toxicity. Response rate in the phase II cohort was 42% [95% confidence interval (CI) 29% to 56%]. Median duration of response was 7.7 months (95% CI 7.5-8.9). Median time to progression was 8.3 months (95% CI 5.8-10). No significant effect on irinotecan pharmacokinetics was observed whatever the intake of capecitabine before or after irinotecan infusion. An effect of irinotecan on capecitabine and some capecitabine metabolites was observed, but irinotecan did not effect 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

Irinotecan in combination with capecitabine is a well tolerated regimen with an activity comparable to, but more convenient than, irinotecan-5-FU i.v. combinations in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer. The pharmacokinetic data suggest that the sequence of administration does not impact significantly on the metabolism of the two drugs.

Hand-foot syndrome in patients treated with capecitabine-containing combination chemotherapy

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of hand-foot syndrome were investigated in patients who received capecitabine-containing chemotherapy. Toxicity data were analyzed from 179 patients in 4 prospective clinical trials testing docetaxel/capecitabine/cisplatin in stomach cancer, capecitabine/cisplatin in biliary or stomach cancer, and vinorelbine/capecitabine in breast cancer. Hand-foot syndrome was reported in 116/179 (64.8%) of patients, with grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in 8/179 (4.5%). Hand-foot syndrome first developed within the first 3 chemotherapy cycles in 100/116 (86.2%) patients, with the median onset for all 3 treatment regimens occurring during cycle 2. Because severe reactions were rare, hand-foot syndrome was not a major factor influencing treatment schedule. Risk factor analyses showed that combined use of docetaxel and preceding chemotherapy-related stomatitis were significant risk factors for the development of hand-foot syndrome. Our results suggest that a combined treatment agent and a patient's susceptibility to chemotherapy-related toxicity may increase the risk of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome.

Capecitabine with weekly paclitaxel for advanced breast cancer: a phase I dose-finding trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity and activity of combined weekly paclitaxel and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with metastatic breast cancer, of whom 15 were evaluable for toxicity and response, were enrolled in 7 Swiss centers. Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 was given intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15. Capecitabine was administered orally on days 1 through 14 using five different dose levels. Both drugs were given in a 21-day schedule.

RESULTS

Capecitabine could be administered at doses commonly used for the drug as a single agent, i.e. 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily in combination with weekly paclitaxel. Hematological and other toxicities did not appear to be dose-limiting; however, significant skin and nail toxicities were observed. A response or stable disease was observed in 87% of patients [13/15; exact 95% confidence interval (CI) 60-98%], with 2 complete responses, 4 partial responses (overall response rate 40%, exact 95% CI 16-68%) and 7 patients with stable disease for at least 9 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The phase I evaluation of capecitabine in combination with fixed-dose weekly paclitaxel did not allow the definition of an MTD of capecitabine based on the predefined criteria. Instead, the dose for the phase II evaluation was determined based on the occurrence of toxicity in later courses and on experience with other regimens containing capecitabine. Capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-14, every 3 weeks) with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 weekly) is a promising combination for advanced breast cancer now being investigated in a phase II trial.

Capecitabine plus docetaxel combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Doxifluridine(5'-DFUR)is converted to its metabolite 5-FU by the enzyme thymidine phosphorylase(TP). TP is expressed significantly higher in tumor tissue than in normal tissue. Capecitabine(N4-pentoxylcarbonyl -5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine)is a pro-drug of 5'-DFUR and a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate that is converted to 5-FU preferentially in tumor tissue through a three-step enzymatic cascade. Expression of TP in tumor tissue may clinically predict efficacy of capecitabine. Induction of TP activity has brought about enhancement of capecitabine efficacy by taxanes in human cancer xenografts. In addition, a phase III study directly comparison docetaxel monotherapy and docetaxel plus capecitabine has been conducted for metastatic breast cancer patients who had received anthracyclines. The overall response rate of the combination group was 42%(n=255), and that of the monotherapy group was 30%(n=256)(p=0.006). The primary endpoints were time to disease progression, and time to treatment failure, and these parameters were superior in the combination arm than in the single arm, suggesting that capecitabine sensitization by docetaxel might be a new approach to breast cancer treatment.

Phase I study of weekly (day 1 and 8) docetaxel in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid malignancies

PURPOSE

Capecitabine in combination with docetaxel given every 3 weeks has shown a high degree of activity in a number of tumor types, but at the expense of significant toxicity. To improve the therapeutic index, we evaluated a weekly regimen of docetaxel in combination with capecitabine, and determined the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities and pharmacokinetics of this combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with docetaxel on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine, twice daily on days 1-14, of an every-21-day cycle. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were assessed on days 1 and 8 of the first cycle of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Enrolled in the study were 25 patients. The most frequent toxicities were asthenia, hand-foot syndrome and mucositis. Inability to deliver at least 75% of the planned doses of both drugs during the first two cycles of chemotherapy was noted at dose levels 2, 3 and 4. Dose level 1 (docetaxel 30 mg/m2 and capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily) is the recommended dose for phase II studies. Five patients experienced a partial response, and eight patients had stabilization of disease. Coadministration of capecitabine did not alter the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel.

CONCLUSION

The regimen consisting of docetaxel 30 mg/m2 (days 1, 8) and capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily (days 1-14) was well tolerated. Capecitabine did not alter pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Further testing of this regimen in tumor-specific trials, especially gastric, lung and breast cancer, is warranted.

Factors affecting pharmacokinetic variability following doxorubicin and docetaxel-based therapy

Current dosing strategies for anticancer drugs result in wide interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. Here, we explored the influence of age, body size, concomitant drugs, dose, infusion duration, and sex on the clearance for doxorubicin and docetaxel in 243 individual patients. Patients received doxorubicin (n=110) or docetaxel (n=152) as monotherapy or in combination chemotherapy regimens. The mean (+/-S.D.) clearance was 63.6+/-22.7 L/h for doxorubicin and 42.8+/-14.9 L/h for docetaxel. Normalisation for body surface area (BSA) reduced the interindividual variability by only <1.7%. Doxorubicin clearance was significantly reduced when administered at doses >50 mg/m(2) or in combination with cyclophosphamide. Upper extremes of body size were associated with increased clearance for both drugs, whereas no consistent effect of age on clearance was discerned. Overall, these findings suggest that incorporation of variables in addition to BSA should be considered in routine dosing strategies for doxorubicin and docetaxel.