Outcome after corrective osteotomy for malunited fractures of the distal end of the radius

Validation of an automatic three-dimensional method for distal radius measurements and malunion quantification

Preoperative CT measurements of distal radial inclination and volar tilt are useful for surgical planning, but current methods are time-consuming and user-dependent. This study validates an automated 3D measurement method for these measurements. We analysed 20 bilateral CT scans, including healthy and pathological sides with extra-articular malunions. Three senior observers performed manual measurements and an automated algorithm generated measurements based on the radiocarpal surface. Agreement between manual and automatic methods was evaluated using concordance correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis, with acceptable agreement set at 5° for the coefficient of repeatability. Correction quantification accuracy was assessed by comparing each method to a reference method. The mean difference in radial inclination between the automatic and manual methods was -6° and for volar tilt was -2.6°. The automated method showed closer correction agreement with the reference, enhancing reproducibility and saving time in preoperative planning.Level of evidence: III.

Preclinical paired noninferiority study comparing in-house and commercially available 3D planning for corrective osteotomy of the distal radius

3D surgical planning and patient-specific guide design are becoming an established approach in complex skeletal surgery. Traditionally, this is outsourced to commercial companies, but an alternative is to establish an in-house hospital team for the process. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of in-house design with a commercial company. Sixteen patients with extra-articular distal radius malunions requiring surgery were included. A hospital-based team and a surgeon working with an external company independently planned surgery and designed guides for each patient. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing simulated corrections with the planned corrections using 3D-printed bone models. The null hypothesis was that the in-house guides were inferior to the externally purchased ones. Noninferiority margins of 5° for volar tilt and 2 mm for ulnar variance were set. The mean volar tilt error difference between the two guides was 2.3°, and the mean ulnar variance error difference was 0.38 mm, both within the noninferiority limits. The dimensional accuracy of the printed guides before and after sterilization showed minimal variation (less than 0.3 mm). The results demonstrated that in-house surgical planning and guide design for distal radius corrective osteotomies can achieve comparable accuracy to external commercial companies.

Computer-Assisted Circular External Fixator in the Treatment of Wrist and Forearm Deformities: Functional and Radiological Outcomes

Objectives

Wrist and forearm deformities are usually due to congenital or post-traumatic causes. These deformities cause progressive pain and limitation of motion and impair quality of life. Acute correction with radius and/or ulna osteotomy and fixation with plate or wire can be applied in treatment, but complications such as vascular/nerve damage, malunion and inadequate correction may be encountered. Treatment with circular external fixators provides correction without residual deformity and is safer because it can provide deformity correction and gradual lengthening both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Computer-assisted circular external fixators (Ca-CEF) facilitate the correction of complex deformities by allowing postoperative deformity planning to be redone. In this study, we analyzed wrist or wrist deformities treated with Ca-CEF.

Methods

The hospital database was searched for patients who underwent surgery for wrist and forearm deformity between 2010 and 2020. Demographic data, radiographic and functional measurements of the patients were evaluated. Preoperative and postoperative forearm supination, pronation, wrist flexion and extension, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, Mayo Wrist Score and grip strength were measured. Radiological measurements of radius, ulna lengths, radial inclination and volar tilt were performed. Postoperative complications were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative data of the patients were analyzed statistically.

Results

A total of 14 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 17.1 years (11-34), 8 were female and 6 were male. The mean follow-up period was 18.4 months (6.8-32.9). The planned anatomical correction was achieved in all patients. The mean differences between preoperative functional and radiographic data and postoperative data were 7.8 (p=0.029) for forearm supination, 14.64 (p<0. 001), 6.17 kg for Grip Strength (p=0.001), 3.07 for VAS (p<0.001), 21 points for DASH Score (p=0.003), and 22.14 points for Mayo Wrist Score (p=0.004), which were statistically significantly better. No major complications were observed in any patient.

Conclusion

The study showed that Ca-CEF provides functional improvement and radiological improvement and is a safe treatment method with low complication rates. This method stands out as an effective option in the treatment of complex deformities.

A review of novel methods to assist digital planning and execution of osteotomy for upper limb deformities

Corrective osteotomy for upper limb deformities caused by fractures, trauma, or degeneration necessitates detailed preoperative planning to ensure accurate anatomical alignment, restore limb length, and correct angular deformities. This review evaluates the effectiveness of a three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning program and an image fusion system designed for intraoperative guidance during corrective osteotomy procedures. The application processes and clinical outcomes observed with these technologies in various surgical scenarios involving the upper extremities were summarized. The systems proved beneficial in allowing surgeons to visualize surgical steps and optimize implant placement. However, despite these technological advancements, we found no significant impact on clinical outcomes compared to conventional methods. This indicates a need for further enhancements in system efficiency and user-friendliness to significantly improve patient results. Future developments should focus on addressing these limitations to enhance the practical utility of such advanced systems.

Comparative Analysis of Radial Corrective Osteotomy and Sauvé-Kapandji Procedure for Malunited Distal Radius Fractures in Older Adults

PURPOSE

Malunited distal radius fractures frequently occur in the older population, posing a dilemma in selecting ideal management for symptomatic patients. Radial corrective osteotomy (RCO) and the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure (SK) have been used to treat this challenging condition. However, it remains unknown which approach is better for the older population. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of RCO with those of SK for the treatment of symptomatic distal radius malunion in older adults.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients aged ≥60 years, with malunited distal radius fractures, were randomized to be treated with either RCO or SK and followed for a minimum of 2 years. The primary evaluation parameter was grip strength, and secondary outcome parameters were surgical time, range of motion of the wrist, exercise-related wrist pain assessment using visual analog scale scores, radiographic results, patient-reported outcomes evaluated using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), and Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores.

RESULTS

The average follow-up duration was 36.7 ± 10.2 months. The grip strength was significantly higher in the RCO group. The surgical time was shorter in the SK group than in the RCO group. The postoperative wrist range of motion and visual analog scale scores for exercise-related pain alleviation were similar in both groups. The ulnar variance decreased in both groups and was similar when compared with the postoperative images. The DASH and PRWE scores were similar between the RCO and SK groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Radial corrective osteotomy and SK surgeries have similar clinical and functional outcomes in patients aged ≥60 years. Grip strength is higher in the RCO group than in the SK group. However, the operating time to accomplish SK is shorter than RCO.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

An exploratory study of the impact of CT slice thickness and inter-rater variability on anatomical accuracy of malunited distal radius models and surgical guides for corrective osteotomy

High-resolution CT images are essential in clinical practice to accurately replicate patient anatomy for 3D virtual surgical planning and designing patient-specific surgical guides. These technologies are commonly used in corrective osteotomy of the distal radius. This study evaluated how the virtual radius models and the surgical guides' surface that is in contact with the bone vary between experienced raters. Further, the discrepancies from the reference radius of surgical guides and radius models created from CT images with slice thicknesses larger than the reference standard of 0.625mm were assessed. Maximum overlap with radius model was measured for guides, and absolute average distance error was measured for radius models. The agreement between the lower-resolution guides surface and the raters' guide surface was evaluated. The average inter-rater guide surface overlap was -0.11mm [95% CI: -0.13-0.09]. The surface of surgical guides designed on CT images with a 1mm slice thickness deviated from the reference radius within the inter-rater range (0.03mm). For slice thicknesses of 1.25mm and 1.5mm, the average guide surface overlap was 0.12mm and 0.15mm, respectively. The average inter-rater radius surface variability was 0.03mm [95% CI: 0.025-0.035]. The discrepancy from the reference of all radius models created from CT images with a slice thickness larger than the reference slice thickness was notably larger than the inter-rater variability but, excluding one case, did not exceed 0.2mm. The results suggest that 1mm CT images are suitable for surgical guide design. While 1.25mm slices are commonly used for virtual planning in hand and forearm surgery, slices larger than 1mm may approach the limit of clinical acceptability. Discrepancies in radius models were below 1mm, likely below clinical relevance.

Validation of the Lift-Off Screw Technique in Patients Undergoing Corrective Osteotomy for Malunited Distal Radius Fractures

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to validate the clinical accuracy of the lift-off screw (LOS) technique for volar tilt correction (VTC) in patients undergoing corrective osteotomy for dorsally angulated distal radius fracture malunions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 23 patients with dorsally angulated distal radius fracture malunions treated with corrective osteotomy using the LOS technique. The LOS equation Ls = [tan(Tc) ∗ Lp + C]/[cos(⍬s)] and standardized intraoperative fluoroscopic images were used to determine and compare the calculated and clinical VTC and final volar tilt. Correlations between the LOS length and the clinical VTC were calculated, as well as between the desired VTC and the correction accuracy.

RESULTS

Preoperative volar tilt ranged from -6° to -50° (mean = -22.9° ± 10.6°). The calculated VTC was 32.7° ± 9.4°, and the clinical VTC achieved was 25.8° ± 9.3°. The difference between the clinical and calculated correction was -6.9°, with an average postoperative clinical volar tilt of 2.8° ± 5.7°, compared with a calculated volar tilt of 9.7° ± 4.4°. There was a moderately strong positive correlation between LOS screw length and clinical VTC achieved, and a moderately weak negative correlation between the desired amount of correction and the accuracy of the correction.

CONCLUSIONS

The LOS technique is a reproducible method to plan the amount of sagittal plane correction during corrective osteotomy surgery for dorsally angulated distal radius fracture malunions. We demonstrate that this technique underestimates the clinical correction achieved by an average of 7°, with larger deformities experiencing greater undercorrection. Undercorrection of volar tilt during corrective osteotomy should be anticipated by surgeons and considered in future implant and cutting guide designs.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Management of Extra-Articular and Intra-Articular Distal Radius Malunion

This article presents a comprehensive overview of managing extra-articular and intra-articular distal radius malunions (DRM), discussing the pathoanatomy, clinical, and radiologic evaluation, conservative treatment, and surgical strategies. Corrective osteotomy remains the primary surgical intervention for symptomatic DRM. Surgical planning should consider factors such as timing, approach, correction technique, implant, graft, and associated injuries. The correction of extra-articular malunion necessitates brachioradialis tenotomy, circumferential periosteum release, and intrafocal elevation with grafting to facilitate distal radius realignment following osteotomy. Computer-assisted planning with 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) could help execute extra-articular osteotomy with high precision. As for the management of intra-articular malunion, it may require wrist arthrotomy, arthroscopy, or PSI assistance for precise articular osteotomy and reduction of the joint surface. This review highlights the importance of early intervention, thorough preoperative planning, and appropriate surgical techniques to optimize outcomes and minimize complications. Future research should focus on large-scale randomized controlled trials to compare different surgical methods, particularly for intra-articular DRM.

A comparison of 3-D CT and 2-D plain radiograph measurements of the wrist in extra-articular malunited fractures of the distal radius

Two-dimensional (2-D) plain radiographs may be insufficient for the evaluation of distal radial malunion, as it is a three-dimensional (3-D) deformity. This study introduced a 3-D measuring method that outputs radial inclination, ulnar variance, palmar tilt and axial rotation. To this end, a standardized and clearly defined coordinate system was constructed that allowed 3-D measurements closely resembling the conventional 2-D method in 35 patients. Mean differences between 3-D and 2-D measurements in affected wrists were 1.8° for radial inclination, 0.8 mm for ulnar variance and 3.7° for palmar tilt. In addition, inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of all 3-D and 2-D measurements were good or excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.75), with 3-D reproducibility always better than 2-D. Axial rotation was present in all patients with a mean of 7.9° (SD 6.9). Although the differences between 2-D and 3-D measurements were small, 3-D evaluation enables the assessment of axial rotation and brings us closer to a routine 3-D evaluation of malunion.Level of evidence: III.

How Preoperative Closed Reduction and Time to Surgery Impact Postoperative Palmar Inclination in Distal Radius Fractures

Background: The anatomical reconstruction of the wrist is the aim when treating distal radius fractures. Current literature on the importance of preoperative reduction in fractures that are treated operatively is limited. Methods: This study investigated the effect of the preoperative closed reduction of distal radius fractures on the day of trauma and the time to surgery on postoperative palmar inclination. A total of eighty patients (48 females and 32 males, mean age 55.6 years) were studied retrospectively. All patients were treated with an open reduction and internal fixation. The palmar inclination angle was measured using X-rays by two investigators, and the interobservers and pre- and post-reduction parameters were compared. Results: When the surgical management of closed distal radius fractures is required, neither initial repositioning nor a delay of up to 14 days to the surgical treatment influences postoperative palmar inclination. Conclusions: The significance of preoperative reduction of distal radius fractures without neurovascular or extensive soft tissue damage is limited and is not leading to improved outcomes. When surgery is about to be performed, surgeons should carefully consider if reduction is really vital preoperatively. Level of evidence: III.

Three-Dimensionally Planned and Printed Patient-Tailored Plates for Corrective Osteotomies of the Distal Radius and Forearm

PURPOSE

We evaluated the 1-year postoperative clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients who had a 3-dimensional planned corrective osteotomy of their distal radius, radial shaft, or ulnar shaft using a printed, anatomical, patient-tailored plate to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of this methodology.

METHODS

Simulations in computer-assisted preoperative planning of corrective osteotomies resulted in 3-dimensionally printed surgical guides, surgical models, and anatomically customized plates for application at the distal radius and forearm. Patients with malunions of the distal radius or forearm who underwent fixation with the custom-made plates were documented in our registry. Grip strength and range of motion assessments were made before surgery (baseline), as well as at 6 weeks and 3 and 12 months. Additionally, patients rated their wrist-related pain and disability using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients underwent corrective surgery, and the 1-year follow-up data of 14 patients with a median age of 56 years (interquartile range, 24-64 years) were available for analysis. The median baseline Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score improved from 47 to 7 after 1 year. The flexion-extension arc of motion of the wrist increased from 90° at baseline to 130° at 1 year and the pronation-supination arc of motion of the wrist increased from 135° to 160° in the same time period. Differences in radiological measurements for palmar and radial inclinations, as well as for ulnar variance between the affected and contralateral wrists, were reduced with the osteotomy. In 1 case, the plate was removed 11 months after the osteotomy. No severe adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensionally planned and printed patient-tailored plates offer a reliable method for correcting even complex malunions of the distal radius and forearm.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Role of Three-Dimensional Guides in Management of Forearm and Wrist Malunions

Although its precise added value and cost-effectiveness need to be determined, three-dimensional (3D) planning and intraoperative guidance facilitate restoration of normal anatomy. The use of 3D computer planning and patient-specific intraoperative guides leads to more accurate and reproducible correction of forearm and wrist malunion. Its value augments with increasing complexity of deformities. Combined deformities and complex intra-articular malunions of the forearm and wrist benefit the most from the use of 3D techniques. New technical developments, including lower-dose scanning technology, software improvement, artificial intelligence, and in-hospital printing, may lower the associated costs and make its application more accessible.

Current Concepts: Corrective Osteotomy for Extra-Articular Deformity Following a Distal Radius Fracture

Fracture malunion alters wrist and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) biomechanics, resulting in incongruence and instability of the DRUJ. Selected patients with painful functional limitation and significant deformity of the radius, but without advanced degenerative joint disease, may benefit from corrective distal radial osteotomy. Non-union and complications arising from metalwork are the most common reasons for reoperation. Surgeons should have a good understanding of risks and complications in order to fully inform their patients and manage expectations. This article reviews the biomechanical effects of radial malunion and the current concepts for treatment. Distal radial osteotomy is suitable for symptomatic patients with angular radial deformity and shortening. Evidence supports a volar approach without bone grafts for modest corrections. Bone grafts or synthetic bone substitutes are appropriate for larger corrections. Functional improvements are reported regardless of technique. Despite a high complication rate, patient satisfaction with the corrective radial osteotomy is high.

Change in capitate shift after osteotomy for distal radial fracture malunion

Loss of anterior tilt after a distal radial fracture can lead to carpal malalignment, which may cause functional impairment. The aim of this study was to establish whether distal radial osteotomy for malunion, which primarily restores the dorsal tilt, will also improve carpal malalignment as measured by capitate shift. Radiographs of 67 patients who underwent osteotomy after malunion of a distal radial fracture were reviewed. Measurements of capitate shift and dorsal tilt were recorded. Linear regression modelling was used to assess the relationship between dorsal tilt and capitate shift. Change in capitate shift was strongly associated with change in dorsal tilt following osteotomy. This relationship was maintained on long-term radiographs. Capitate shift is strongly related to dorsal tilt following a distal radial fracture. Correcting the dorsal tilt during an osteotomy, therefore, will improve capitate shift and carpal malalignment. Capitate shift is unrelated to age, sex and is easy to visually assess.Level of evidence: IV.

[Carpal Malalignment in Malunited Fractures of the Distal Radius]

PURPOSE

To evaluate and classify carpal alignment in malunited fractures of the distal radius.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

On standardized lateral radiographs of the involved wrist of 72 patients with a symptomatic extra-articular malunion of the distal radius, 43 with a dorsal and 29 with a palmar angulation, radius tilt (RT), radiolunate (RL) and lunocapitate angle were measured. Malposition of the radius was defined as RT plus 11° in dorsal malunion and RT minus 11° in palmar malunion. A palmar tilt of the radius was marked with a minus sign. At the time of corrective osteotomy 9 dorsal malunions underwent for different reasons evaluation of the scapholunate ligament with 4 having a complete scapholunate ligament disruption.

RESULTS

With respect to the RL-angle, carpal malalignment was categorized as follows: type P with a RL-angle less than -12°, type K with a RL-angle between -12 and 10°, type A with a RL-angle more than 10°, but less than the malposition of the radius, type D with a RL-angle greater than the malposition of the radius. All types of carpal malalignment were found in both, dorsally and palmarly tilted malunion. Type A carpal alignment was identified as the leading type in dorsal malunion (25 out of 43 patients), whilst in palmar malunion colinear subluxation of the carpus (type C) was the dominant type (12 out of 29 patients). To return the hand to a neutral position the rotation of the lunate was compensated by a contrarotation of the capitate in the dorsal malunion. In the palmar malunion a dorsal extension of the capitate returned the hand to a neutral position. In 4 of the 5 patients with type D carpal alignment, who had scapholunate ligament evaluation, a complete ligament tear was found.

CONCLUSION

In this study four different types of carpal alignment in malunited extra-articular fractures of the distal radius were identified. Based on this data we suspect that type D carpal alignment in dorsal malunion may be associated with a scapholunate ligament tear. Therefore, we recommend wrist arthroscopy for this group of patients.

Surgical Management of Acute on Chronic Distal Radius Fractures: Correcting Malunion Deformities Through the Secondary Fracture Plane

It is challenging to restore the clinically acceptable alignment of the distal radius after an acute on chronic fracture or after a secondary fracture occurring after malunion of a primary distal radius fracture. In cases of insignificant primary deformity, restoration to the primary deformity may suffice to obtain a successful clinical result. A borderline acceptable primary radial deformity can be unacceptable after the second injury, resulting in functional disability. If surgery is indicated, the surgeon must contend with both primary and secondary deformities to restore proper distal radius anatomy. We present our technique to correct both primary and secondary distal radius deformities through the new or secondary fracture plane.

A comparison of early fixation of distal radius fractures versus late corrective osteotomy of distal radius malunion

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the distal radius are common. Closed reduction and moulded casting is often the first line treatment. Malunion after casting is not uncommon and can lead to discussion on acute surgical fixation versus delayed corrective osteotomy if symptomatic. However, it is unclear if late surgery will provide similar outcomes as early intervention.

METHODS

We performed a single centre, age matched, case series comparison study, comparing outcomes of patients who had undergone early fixation (ORIF) versus those who had undergone late corrective osteotomy (CO) following distal radius fracture.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were available for review, 13 in each group. Fracture patterns were similar. Reviewing CO versus ORIF; patients achieved a mean DASH; 22 versus 18 (P = 0.355), PRWE; 35 versus 26 (P = 0.237), and VAS 2 versus 2 (P = 0.490). Grip strength was significantly better in those who had undergone ORIF; 2% versus -22% (P ≤ 0.001). Range of motion was generally better with primary fixation but of doubtful clinical importance, reviewing CO versus ORIF; Flexion 46° versus 60° (P = 0.045), extension 55° versus 64° (P = 0.137), pronation 73° versus 85° (P = 0.078), supination 84° versus 84° (P = 0.747), flexion/extension arc 101 versus 124 (P = 0.017), ulnar/radial deviation arc 42° versus 59° (P = 0.01), pronation/supination arc 157° versus 168° (P = 0.118). Ulnar variance was significantly improved in the ORIF group; +0.5 mm versus +2 mm in the CO group (P = 0.023). Radial inclination, radial height and volar tilt were not significantly different between either group.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that patient measured outcome of corrective osteotomy is not inferior to early internal fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (Case Series Comparison).

Z-Corrective Osteotomy in Malunited Extra-Articular Fractures of Distal Radius

PURPOSE

We sought to assess clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes following treatment of extra-articular malunions of the distal radius using a multiplanar z-corrective osteotomy.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with extra-articular distal radius malunions (13 dorsal and 2 volar) underwent z-corrective osteotomy and volar plate fixation without bone grafting. Correction and maintenance of each deformity was evaluated in terms of various radiographic indices (radial height; volar and radial tilt); osteotomy union; pain (visual analog scale); grip strength; range of motion; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores; and Mayo wrist scores.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 16.4 months. The mean radial height was corrected from -1.3 mm to 4.9 mm. The mean ulnar variance improved from 4.3 mm to -0.4 mm. The sagittal radial tilt and radial inclination were restored from a mean of -17.9° (dorsal) to 3.3° (volar) and from 12.0° to 17.2°, respectively. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Mayo wrist scores improved from means of 36 and 56 preoperatively to 24.8 and 73.3, respectively, at 6 months and further to 20.6 and 77.6, respectively, at the last follow-up. There were no nonunions or tendon-related problems. The mean pain score decreased from 4.1 preoperatively to 1.0 at 6 months and 0.8 at the last follow-up. The mean grip strength improved from 5.6 kg preoperatively to 15.6 kg at 6 months and 19.7 kg at the last follow-up. There was a statistically significant improvement in range of motion at the wrist.

CONCLUSIONS

The z-osteotomy provides correction of deformity in all 3 planes, along with restoration of radial height. It also maintains a broad area of bone contact between the 2 osteotomized bone fragments, facilitating bony union and eliminating the need for bone grafting.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Temporary epiphysiodesis in adolescent patients with ulnocarpal impaction syndrome: a preliminary case series of seven wrists

Adolescents with ulnar positive variance can develop ulnocarpal symptoms due to ulnocarpal impaction syndrome. Common treatment methods are conservative therapy, distal ulna epiphysiodesis or eventually ulnar shortening osteotomy. The aim of this preliminary case series was to investigate a recently described, new therapeutic approach using a reversible, temporary epiphysiodesis technique, following the principles of guided growth. Seven cases with the diagnosis of a painful ulnar positive variance, which underwent a temporary epiphysiodesis, were retrospectively evaluated. These cases consisted of four individual patients who received an intraoperatively customized plate fixation to slow down growth. The following parameters were collected: diagnosis, age at surgery, age at explantation, growth plate status at explantation, ulnar variance before and after surgery, complications and any clinical and radiological abnormalities. The radiological measurements of ulnar variance were performed according to the Gelbermann method. The seven investigated cases (average age at surgery 12.4 years; average age at explantation 14.7 years), in which a temporary epiphysiodesis was performed, showed an average ulnar variance of +3.9 mm (range: from +1.9 mm to +6.1 mm) before the start of therapy. After explantation, an average ulnar variance of +0.1 mm (range: from -3.2 mm to +5.0 mm) was observed, which corresponds to an average reduction/improvement of -3.8 mm (range: from -0.5 mm to -9.3 mm). The ulnocarpal wrist complaints were significantly reduced after the intervention. One case needed a secondary ulnar shortening osteotomy. The described method of a temporary, reversible epiphysiodesis is an elegant, less invasive technique to correct the ulnar positive variance without irreversibly closing the growth plate. In case of therapy failure, a secondary ulna shortening osteotomy is still possible.

Patient-reported outcomes after corrective osteotomy for a symptomatic malunion of the distal radius

AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to describe patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following corrective osteotomy for a symptomatic malunion of the distal radius.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 122 adult patients from a single centre over an eight-year period who had undergone corrective osteotomy for a symptomatic malunion of the distal radius. The primary long-term outcome was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. Secondary outcomes included the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, the EQ-5D-5L score, complications, and the Net Promoter Score (NPS). Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with the PRWE score.

RESULTS

Long-term outcomes were available for 89 patients (72%). The mean age was 57 years (SD 15) and 68 were female (76%). The median time from injury to corrective osteotomy was nine months (interquartile range (IQR) 6 to 13). At a mean follow-up of six years (1 to 11) the median PRWE score was 22 (IQR 7 to 40), the median QuickDASH score was 11.4 (IQR 2.3 to 31.8), and the median EQ-5D-5L score was 0.84 (IQR 0.69 to 1). The NPS was 69. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the presence of an associated ulnar styloid fracture was the only significant independent factor associated with a worse PRWE score when adjusting for confounding variables (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

We found that corrective osteotomy for malunion of the distal radius can result in good functional outcomes and high levels of patient satisfaction. However, the presence of an ulnar styloid fracture may adversely affect function. Level of Evidence: III (cohort study). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1542-1548.

Three-Dimensional Versus Radiographic Measurements for Analyzing Extra-Articular Distal Radius Malunion

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of evaluating deformity in distal radius malunions using plain radiographic measurements compared with a 3-dimensional method involving 3-dimensional computer bone models.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who had an extra-articular distal radius malunion were included. Standard radiographs and computed tomography scans of both wrists were performed. Palmar tilt, radial tilt, and ulnar variance were measured on radiographs. The computed tomography scan data were sent to a workstation and 3-dimensional bone surface models of the radius were created. The 3-dimensional palmar tilt, 3-dimensional radial tilt, 3-dimensional ulnar variance, and axial rotational deformity were calculated.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients, mean age 40 years (range, 22-57 years) were included. The 3 3-dimensional values were positively correlated with their corresponding radiographic values. Nevertheless, the 3-dimesional palmar tilt and 3-dimensional radial tilt values were slightly smaller than the radiographic palmar tilt and radial tilt. The quantitative difference between the 3-dimensional method and plain radiographs was on average 2° for the dorsal deformity group and 3° for the palmar deformity group. The 3-dimensional ulnar variance was significantly higher than the radiographic ulnar variance by an average of +1.3 mm for malunions with dorsal tilt and +0.6 mm for malunions with palmar tilt. The 3-dimensional method allowed us to measure the extent of the axial rotational deformity, which was 9° on average (range, 2° to 21°).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite small differences, measurements made on both plain radiographs and 3-dimensional computer bone models are accurate for evaluating the deformity in extra-articular distal radius malunions. Our 3-dimensional method seems to provide a more accurate measurement of ulnar variance, particularly for dorsally angulated cases, and is helpful for measuring rotational malalignment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In this study, we found that either a 3-dimensional computer bone model or plain radiographs can be used as a benchmark to evaluate the deformity of extra-articular distal radius malunion. The 3-dimensional method can also be used to define axial rotational deformity.

Corrective osteotomy after malunited distal radius fractures

Posttraumatic malunion or secondary dislocation can cause wrist joint incongruency. Uncorrected malalignment increases the risk of secondary degenerative changes and chronic pain. Therefore, early correction using the available fixed-angle devices, cancellous bone grafting only becomes necessary in larger bony defects. Premounting the plate through a palmar approach with regard to the desired correction angles leads to predictable results by precise correction. In case of posttraumatic growth arrest with larger discrepancy of the radius and the ulna, a two-staged procedure is advisable.

Computer-assisted 3D preoperative planning of corrective osteotomy for extra-articular distal radius malunion: A 16-patient case series

The aim of this prospective study was to describe the surgical procedure and to report outcomes of computer-assisted 3D preoperative planning of corrective osteotomy for extra-articular distal radius malunions. Sixteen consecutive patients were enrolled. CT scans of both wrists were performed, and 3D bone surface models of the radii were created. Software was used to simulate the osteotomy and the reorientation of the distal radial articular surface. Patient-specific cutting and drilling guides for intraoperative guidance of the osteotomy as well as bone graft templates were also simulated. At a mean follow-up of 12 months (range 6-27) after surgery, pain was reduced from 3 to 0.3 at rest and 6.8 to 1.5 during effort according to a visual analog scale. The average wrist flexion-extension was 145° and pronation-supination was 155°. Grip strength was 91% of the contralateral side. All patients achieved primary bone union in a mean of 10 weeks (range, 7-18). Using our 3D analysis method, preoperative 3D values showed no significant difference with radiographic measurement. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the postoperative radiographic values in term of correction. This procedure provides satisfactory clinical and radiological results with minimal residual malalignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Complications of Corrective Osteotomies for Extra-Articular Distal Radius Malunion

PURPOSE

Osteotomy of the distal radius for a fracture malunion is a challenging procedure. The purpose of this study was to review a series of osteotomies to determine the type and risk of complications.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed, including all Kaiser Permanente Southern California patients who were aged 18 years or older between January 1, 2007, and September 25, 2015, and underwent osteotomy for an extra-articular distal radius fracture malunion. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, comorbidities, osteotomy type (hinged vs distraction), implant, and bone graft type. Complications including infection, nonunion, loss of reduction, implant failure, nerve injury, tendon injury, and complex regional pain syndrome were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 60 patients who underwent extra-articular osteotomy of the distal radius for malunion during the study period. The mean age was 54 years (range, 21-83 years). There were 24 distraction-type (intervening bone graft) and 36 hinge-type (volar cortical contact maintained) osteotomies. Twenty-five of 60 patients had complications related to the procedure requiring 13 subsequent procedures. There were 7 nonunions and 3 cases of delayed healing at the osteotomy site. One extensor carpi radialis longus tendon laceration resulted from the use of an osteotome. There were 3 delayed extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon ruptures after surgery. The distraction-type osteotomy was associated with a greater risk of major complications including nonunion and delayed union.

CONCLUSIONS

A complication rate of nearly 50% was observed in distal radius osteotomies. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of injury to, or delayed rupture of the EPL tendon associated with these procedures. The risk of nonunion or delayed union is higher in distraction-type compared with hinge-type osteotomies. Low surgeon volume with this procedure may be a contributing factor to the high rate of complications.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Three-Dimensional Corrective Osteotomy for Malunited Fractures of the Upper Extremity Using Patient-Matched Instruments: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial

BACKGROUND

Medical image processing has facilitated simulation of 3-dimensional (3-D) corrective osteotomy, and 3-D rapid prototyping technology has further enabled the manufacturing of patient-matched surgical guides and implants (patient-matched instruments, or PMIs). However, 3-D corrective osteotomy using these technologies has not been the standard procedure. We aimed to prospectively verify the efficacy and safety of PMIs in corrective osteotomy for deformities of the upper extremity.

METHODS

We enrolled 16 patients with a total of 17 bone deformities in the upper extremity. Eight patients had distal radial malunion; 5, distal humeral malunion; and 3, forearm diaphyseal malunion. All cases underwent 3-D corrective osteotomy with PMIs. The primary end point was the residual maximum deformity angle (MDA), which was calculated from 2 deformity angles-1 on the anteroposterior and 1 on the lateral postoperative radiograph. Secondary end points included the deformity angle on radiographs, 3-D error between the preoperative planning model and the postoperative result, range of motion, grip strength, pain measured with a visual analog scale (VAS), patient satisfaction, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.

RESULTS

The average MDA significantly improved from 25.5° preoperatively to 3.3° at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). The angular deformity was within 5° in all cases, except for 1 with distal radial malunion who had a higher angle on the anteroposterior radiograph. The error between the correction seen on the postoperative 3-D bone model and the planned correction was <1° and <1 mm. Flexion and extension of the wrist and pronation of the forearm of the patients treated for distal radial malunion improved significantly, and pronation improved for those treated for forearm diaphyseal malunion. The average VAS score, grip strength, and DASH score significantly improved as well. Of the 16 patients, 15 were very satisfied or satisfied with the outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Corrective osteotomy using PMIs achieved accurate correction and good functional recovery in the upper extremity. Although our study was limited to cases without any deformity on the contralateral side, 3-D corrective osteotomy using PMIs resolved treatment challenges for complex deformities in upper extremities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Simultaneous correction of radius and ulna for secondary ulnar impaction syndrome with radial physeal arrest in adolescent: A case report and review of literatures

•

Distal radius physeal fractures are common in pediatric patients.

•

Distal radius physeal fracture can lead to physeal arrest.

•

Forearm bone length discrepancy occurs, it is often asymptomatic.

•

Surgical correction of symptomatic forearm bone discrepancy can provide a satisfactory result.

Introduction

Distal radius physeal fractures are common in pediatric patients. Although most of these fractures heal without complication, some result in significant physeal arrest. If significant physeal arrest occurs, the various treatment methods can be applied depending on the severity of deformity and remaining growth of the patient.

Presentation of case

We present a 16-year old female with distal radial physeal arrest who presented four years after initial injury. Radiologically, forearm bone length discrepancy was 7 mm. But, she had a secondary ulnar impaction syndrome. She underwent open wedge corrective osteotomy of distal radius on volar side and ulnar shortening osteotomy, simultaneously. Early mobilization and rehabilitation were started soon after the surgery. At 18 months postoperatively, the ROM was assessed to be almost identical as the unaffected side and the patient presented with no significant symptoms.

Discussion

Distal radial fracture is one of the most common fractures in pediatric population. And distal radial physis is often involved in these fracture, which can lead to physeal arrest. However, even if forearm bone length discrepancy occurs, if the difference is within 1 cm, it is often asymptomatic. In this case, the forearm bone length discrepancy was mild, but due to symptom, we performed surgical treatment.

Conclusion

Distal radial physeal arrest due to distal radial fracture is relatively common in children, and long-term follow-up is needed. Moreover, relatively mild deformity caused by physeal arrest may also cause symptoms, so careful observation is needed.

Ulnar Shortening Versus Distal Radius Corrective Osteotomy in the Management of Ulnar Impaction After Distal Radius Malunion

BACKGROUND

Distal radius malunions lead to functional deficits. This study compares isolated ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) to distal radius osteotomy (DRO) for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome following distal radius malunion.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 11 patients with extra-articular distal radius malunions treated for ulnar impaction with isolated USO. This group was compared to a 1:1 age- and sex-matched cohort treated with isolated DRO for the same indication. Pain visual analog scale (VAS), wrist motion, grip strength, radiographic parameters, and perioperative complications were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 14.8 months.

RESULTS

VAS scores improved. Wrist range of motion improved in both cohorts with the exception of radial deviation, pronation, and supination in the USO cohort, which decreased from a mean of 17°-16°, 67°-57°, and 54°-52°, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in regard to change in pain or range of motion, with the exception of pronation and ulnar deviation. The mean tourniquet time was shorter in the USO group. The final ulnar variance was 1.8 mm negative in the USO group and 1.1 mm positive in the DRO group. There was 1 reoperation following USO for painful nonunion, while there were 2 reoperations following DRO for persistent ulnar impaction.

CONCLUSIONS

An improvement in range of motion, grip strength, and VAS with restoration of the radioulnar length relationship was observed in both cohorts. USO is a simpler procedure with a shorter tourniquet time that can be an attractive alternative to DRO for ulnar impaction syndrome after distal radius malunions.

A novel surgical approach for treating distal radial extraarticular malunion: Oblique osteotomy with buttress plate stabilization

PURPOSE

Distal radial extraarticular malunions are not uncommon. However, requirements of surgical correction depend on multiple conditions. Traditionally, surgical techniques include closing or opening wedge osteotomies. Each has unique advantages and disadvantages. An oblique osteotomy was developed to simplify the revision surgery.

METHODS

Forty-eight consecutive adult patients with 48 malunions were surgically treated. An oblique osteotomy of 45° vertical to the radial longitudinal axis was performed from medio-distally to latero-proximally. Consequently, the osteotomized fragments were compressed with a bone clamp. The proximal part of the distal fragment was pushed backward to correct the dorsal tilt. A 7-hole buttress plate was inserted volarly and cancellous bone graft was packed. Postoperatively, a short-arm splint or brace without restriction of all five metacarpophalangeal joints was applied for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were followed for an average of 2.8 years (range, 1.1-5.8 years). All malunions healed within 6 weeks. The union rate was 100% and no complications occurred. Radiographically, ulnar variance, volar tilt of radial articulation, and radial inclination restored to acceptable criteria in all patients. Patients with Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS) improved from 17% to 80% ( p < 0.001) and Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score improved from 0% to 80% ( p < 0.001). The relationship between MMWS and DASH Score was highly correlated (correlation coefficient = -0.90).

CONCLUSION

The described approach may be an excellent alternative for treating distal radial extraarticular malunions. The technique is not difficult but the satisfactory rate is high.

Accuracy and Early Clinical Outcome of 3-Dimensional Planned and Guided Single-Cut Osteotomies of Malunited Forearm Bones

PURPOSE

To investigate the reduction accuracy of 3-dimensional planned single-cut osteotomies (SCOTs) of the forearm that were performed using patient-specific guides.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of SCOTs performed between 2012 and 2014 was performed. Ten patients (age, 15-59 years) with 6 malunions of the ulna and 6 malunions of the radius were identified. The reduction accuracy was assessed by comparing the 3-dimensional preoperative plan of each osteotomy with the superimposed bone model extracted from postoperative computed tomography data. The difference was assessed by 3-dimensional angle and in all 6 degrees of freedom (3 translations, 3 rotations) with respect to an anatomical coordinate system. Wrist range of motion and grip strength was assessed after a mean of 16.7 months and compared with the preoperative measurements.

RESULTS

On average, the 12 SCOTs demonstrated excellent accuracy of the reduction with respect to rotation (ie, pronation/supination, 4.9°; flexion/extension, 1.7°; ulnar/radial angulation, 2.0°) and translation (ie, proximal/distal, 0.8 mm; radial/ulnar, 0.8 mm; dorsal/palmar, 0.8 mm). A mean residual 3-dimensional angle of 5.8° (SD, 3.6°) was measured after surgery. All 6 patients operated on for reasons of a reduced range of motion demonstrated improved symptoms and increased movement (from 20° to 80°). In the patients with unstable/painful distal radioulnar joint, 3 were totally free of complaints and 1 patient showed residual pain during sports.

CONCLUSIONS

A SCOT combined with patient-specific guides is an accurate and reliable technique to restore normal anatomy in multiplanar deformities of the forearm.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Three-dimensional virtual planning of corrective osteotomies of distal radius malunions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to summarize and evaluate results of three-dimensional (3D-) planned corrective osteotomies of malunited distal radius fractures. 3D-planning techniques provide the possibility to address 3D-deformity that conventional planning methods might not address. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library for studies that performed a 3D-planned corrective osteotomy on patients with a malunited distal radius fracture. Fifteen studies with a total of 68 patients were included in the analysis. In 96% of cases, the preoperatively present palmar tilt, radial inclination and ulnar variance showed statistically significant improvement postoperatively with restoration to within 5° or 2 mm of their normal values. Mean flexion–extension, pro-supination and grip strength showed statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05). Complications were reported in 11 out of 68 patients (16%). With the current advances in 3D printing technology, 3D-planned corrective osteotomies seem a promising technique in the treatment of complex distal radius malunions.

Level of evidence IV Systematic review of case series, Level IV.

Staged Reconstruction for Malunited Fractures of the Distal Radius

This prospective study assessed the outcomes of 26 symptomatic malunited distal radial fractures which were treated with an opening wedge corrective osteotomy and bone grafting with rigid fixation. An ulnar shortening osteotomy was subsequently required as a second-stage operation in five cases to restore normal ulnar variance. A wrist arthroscopy was indicated as a third stage procedure with persistent ulnar sided wrist pain in order to address central tears of the triangular fibrocartilage.

Satisfactory functional scores were achieved by 20 of the 26 patients after distal radial osteotomy alone and, 24 of the 26 after subsequent ulnar shortening osteotomies and arthroscopy when necessary. The one, two or three stage concept of reconstructing the malunited distal end radius could optimise the outcome rather than using a single-stage strategy.

A less invasive distal osteotomy of the radius for malunited dorsally displaced extra-articular fractures

A less invasive corrective osteotomy for symptomatic post-traumatic deformity of the distal radius was done in 12 patients. They were followed up for an average of 3.7 years. The indications for correction were based on the patients' level of activities, pain, functional limitations, loss of grip strength or deformity occurring with an extra-articular rotational malunion of the distal end of the radius. The procedure included a dorsal open wedge osteotomy through a dorsal incision in which the fulcrum of rotation, or hinge, was located at the palmar cortex, and stabilized with an extra- and intramedullary fixed angle device. The bone defect was replaced with autologous morsellized iliac bone graft. The final outcome was graded as very good in eight patients, good in two and fair in two. Level of evidence: IV.

Computer-assisted 3D planned corrective osteotomies in eight malunited radius fractures

In corrective osteotomy of the radius, detailed preoperative planning is essential to optimising functional outcome. However, complex malunions are not completely addressed with conventional preoperative planning. Computer-assisted preoperative planning may optimise the results of corrective osteotomy of the radius. We analysed the pre- and postoperative radiological result of computer-assisted 3D planned corrective osteotomy in a series of patients with a malunited radius and assessed postoperative function. We included eight patients aged 13–64 who underwent a computer-assisted 3D planned corrective osteotomy of the radius for the treatment of a symptomatic radius malunion. We evaluated pre- and postoperative residual malpositioning on 3D reconstructions as expressed in six positioning parameters (three displacements along and three rotations about the axes of a 3D anatomical coordinate system) and assessed postoperative wrist range of motion. In this small case series, dorsopalmar tilt was significantly improved (p = 0.05). Ulnoradial shift, however, increased by the correction osteotomy (6 of 8 cases, 75 %). Postoperative 3D evaluation revealed improved positioning parameters for patients in axial rotational alignment (62.5 %), radial inclination (75 %), proximodistal shift (83 %) and volodorsal shift (88 %), although the cohort was not large enough to confirm this by statistical significance. All but one patient experienced improved range of motion (88 %). Computer-assisted 3D planning ameliorates alignment of radial malunions and improves functional results in patients with a symptomatic malunion of the radius. Further development is required to improve transfer of the planned position to the intra-operative bone.

Level of evidence IV.

Is Bone Grafting Necessary in the Treatment of Malunited Distal Radius Fractures?

Background Open wedge osteotomy with bone grafting and plate fixation is the standard procedure for the correction of malunited distal radius fractures. Bone grafts are used to increase structural stability and to enhance new bone formation. However, bone grafts are also associated with donor site morbidity, delayed union at bone-graft interfaces, size mismatch between graft and osteotomy defect, and additional operation time. Purpose The goal of this study was to assess bone healing and secondary fracture displacement in the treatment of malunited distal radius fractures without the use of bone grafting. Methods Between January 1993 and December 2013, 132 corrective osteotomies and plate fixations without bone grafting were performed for malunited distal radius fractures. The minimum follow-up time was 12 months. Primary study outcomes were time to complete bone healing and secondary fracture displacement. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs during follow-up were compared with each other, as well as with radiographs of the uninjured side. Results All 132 osteotomies healed. In two cases (1.5%), healing took more than 4 months, but reinterventions were not necessary. No cases of secondary fracture displacement or hardware failure were observed. Significant improvements in all radiographic parameters were shown after corrective osteotomy and plate fixation. Conclusion This study shows that bone grafts are not required for bone healing and prevention of secondary fracture displacement after corrective osteotomy and plate fixation of malunited distal radius fractures. Level of evidence Therapeutic, level IV, case series with no comparison group.

Non-union in 3 of 15 osteotomies of the distal radius without bone graft

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Open-wedge osteotomies of the distal radius create a void that is usually filled with either iliac crest bone graft or bone substitute. Previous studies have suggested that this is unnecessary. We investigated the safety of omitting the filling procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 15 patients with a dorsal malunion of a distal radius fracture. A palmar approach and angle-stable plates were used. The patients were followed until there was radiographic and clinical healing.

RESULTS

Non-union occurred in 3 of the 15 patients. The study, which had been planned to include 25 patients, was then discontinued. 6 osteotomies created a trapezoid void (no cortical contact); 3 of these did not unite after the index procedure (p = 0.04), but did subsequently, after autogenous bone grafting. A trapezoid void was significantly associated with non-union (p = 0.04).

INTERPRETATION

When a trapezoid defect is created, one should consider bone substitute or autogenous bone graft. This has been shown to be safe in other studies.

Postoperative accuracy analysis of three-dimensional corrective osteotomy for cubitus varus deformity with a custom-made surgical guide based on computer simulation

BACKGROUND

For correction of cubitus varus deformity resulting from supracondylar fracture of the humerus, we developed an operative method with use of a custom-made surgical guide, designed on the basis of 3-dimensional (3D) computer simulation with computed tomography data. The purpose of this study was to investigate the postoperative accuracy of this system in clinical cases.

METHODS

Subjects included 17 consecutive patients (13 males and 4 females) with cubitus varus deformity after supracondylar fracture. Patients underwent 3D corrective osteotomy with use of a custom-made surgical guide. Postoperative computed tomography scan was performed after bone union diagnosis on plain radiographs, and postoperative 3D bone models were compared with preoperative simulation by surface registration technique. In addition, we evaluated radiographic parameters (humerus-elbow-wrist angle and tilting angle) and range of elbow motion at the most recent follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean errors in 3D corrective osteotomy were 0.6° ± 0.7° in varus-valgus rotation, 0.8° ± 1.3° in flexion-extension rotation, 2.9° ± 2.8° in internal-external rotation, 1.7 ± 1.8 mm in anterior-posterior translation, 1.3 ± 1.8 mm in lateral-medial translation, and 7.1 ± 6.3 mm in proximal-distal translation. The mean humerus-elbow-wrist angle on plain radiographs of the affected side was 15° in varus before surgery and improved to 6° in valgus after surgery. The mean tilting angle of the affected side was 31° before surgery and improved to 40° after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The 3D correction of cubitus varus deformity was performed accurately within the allowable error limits.

Reconstruction of malunited diaphyseal fractures of the forearm

The forearm is a complex anatomical and functional unit with unique osseous, soft tissue and articular relationships. Disruption of these important relations can have a significant impact, leading to pain, instability of the radio-ulnar articulation and reduced range of motion. The gold standard for treating forearm fractures in adults remains anatomic reduction, stable plate fixation and preservation of the surrounding blood supply. Failure to achieve these goals may lead to malunion, requiring reconstructive surgery, which can be technically challenging. In this review, we discuss the essential aspects of anatomy and pathomechanics, clinical and radiological assessment and the state of the art in pre-operative planning and deformity correction surgery.

Distal radial fractures in the superelderly: does malunion affect functional outcome?

Purpose. The management of unstable distal radial fractures in the superelderly (≥80 years old) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of super-elderly patients with and without malunion after a distal radial fracture. Methods. We identified 51 superelderly patients living independently with displaced fractures from a prospective database of 4024 patients with distal radial fractures. Activities of daily living, presence of wrist pain, whether the wrist had returned to its normal level function, grip strength and ROM were recorded. The dorsal angulation was measured radiographically. Results. There were 17 (33.3%) patients defined to have a malunion. The outcomes of the independent patients with and without malunion were compared at a mean follow-up of 15 months. No difference was observed in activities of daily living (P = 0.28), wrist pain (P = 0.14), whether the wrist had returned to its normal level function (P = 0.25), grip strength (P = 0.31), or ROM (P = 0.41). An increasing degree of dorsal angulation correlated with diminished ROM (P = 0.038), but did not correlate with activities of daily living (P = 0.10). Conclusions. Malunion of the distal radius does not influence the functional outcome of independent superelderly patients.

Accuracy of 3D Virtual Planning of Corrective Osteotomies of the Distal Radius

Corrective osteotomies of the distal radius for symptomatic malunion are time-tested procedures that rely on accurate corrections. Patients with combined intra- and extra-articular malunions present a challenging deformity. Virtual planning and patient-specific instruments (PSIs) to transfer the planning into the operating room have been used both to simplify the surgery and to make it more accurate. This report focuses on the clinically achieved accuracy in four patients treated between 2008 and 2012 with virtual planning and PSIs for a combined intra- and extraarticular malunion of the distal radius. The accuracy of the correction is quantified by comparing the virtual three-dimensional (3D) planning model with the postoperative 3D bone model. For the extraarticular malunion the 3D volar tilt, 3D radial inclination and 3D ulnar variance are measured. The volar tilt is undercorrected in all cases with an average of -6 ± 6°. The average difference between the postoperative and planned 3D radial inclination was -1 ± 5°. The average difference between the postoperative and planned 3D ulnar variances is 0 ± 1 mm. For the evaluation of the intraarticular malunion, both the arc method of measurement and distance map measurement are used. The average postoperative maximum gap is 2.1 ± 0.9 mm. The average maximum postoperative step-off is 1.3 ± 0.4 mm. The average distance between the postoperative and planned articular surfaces is 1.1 ± 0.6 mm as determined in the distance map measurement. There is a tendency to achieve higher accuracy as experience builds up, both on the surgeon's side and on the design engineering side. We believe this technology holds the potential to achieve consistent accuracy of very complex corrections.

Three-dimensional corrective osteotomy using a patient-specific osteotomy guide and bone plate based on a computer simulation system: accuracy analysis in a cadaver study

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of three-dimensional (3-D) corrective osteotomy using a patient-specific osteotomy guide and bone plate based on computer simulation was investigated.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen cadaver upper limbs were used. A patient-specific osteotomy guide designed to realize a preplanned osteotomy was set on the distal humerus and distal radius, and the error in the setting location was evaluated. After the osteotomy, the surgical site was fixed using a patient-specific bone plate designed to exactly fit the anatomical shape of the postoperative bone model. The postoperative results were compared with the preoperative simulation.

RESULTS

The errors in the guide location on the humerus and radius were <1.5° and 1.0 mm and <1.0° and 1.0 mm, respectively. The plate fixation errors of the humerus and radius were <2.0° and 1.5 mm and <1.0° and 1.0 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The system is sufficiently feasible to realize precise 3-D deformity correction of a limb.

Correction of extra-articular distal radius malunions using an anatomic radial plate

Malunion is a debilitating complication of a distal radius fracture. The malunion often requires a corrective osteotomy to restore the stability and joint congruity about the distal radius, a procedure which offers tremendous benefits in terms of pain, strength, and functionality. Here we describe a unique technique to address the malunion of an extra-articular distal radius fracture using a radial anatomic plate. This is a simple and reproducible method of fixation involving straightforward anatomy, which does not require excessive radiography, and which represents an excellent choice of fixation in the distal radius malunion.

Image-guided distal radius osteotomy using patient-specific instrument guides

In this article, we describe a method for computer-assisted distal radius osteotomies in which computer-generated, patient-specific plastic guides are used for intraoperative guidance. Before surgery, the correction and plate location are planned using computed tomography scans for both radii and ulnae, and the planned locations of the distal and proximal drill holes for the plate are saved. A plastic, patient-specific instrument guide is created using a rapid prototyping machine into which a mirror image of intraoperative, accessible bone structure of the distal radius is integrated. This allows for unique positioning of the guide during surgery. For each planned drill location, a guidance hole is incorporated into the guide. During surgery, a conventional incision is made, and the guide is positioned on the radius. The surgeon drills the holes for the plate screws into the intact radius and performs the osteotomy using the conventional technique. Using the predrilled holes, the surgeon affixes the plate to the radius fragments. The guides are easy to integrate into the surgical workflow and minimize the need for intraoperative fluoroscopy for guidance of the procedure.

Corrective osteotomy of the distal radius following failed internal fixation

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to quantify the clinical and radiographic outcomes after corrective osteotomy for malunions of the distal radius following failed internal fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Results of 18 patients (8 women, 10 men; mean age 41 years) are presented an average of 7 years after osteotomy of a malunited distal radius fracture. We assessed active range of motion, grip strength, radiographic alignment, pain and disability. Subjective and objective data were summarized using the modified Mayo Wrist Score and the point-score system of Fernandez.

RESULTS

Wrist motion, pain and deformity improved with the operation in all cases. The modified Mayo Wrist Score averaged 79 points. The scale of Fernandez indicated ten good, two fair and six poor results.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the operative correction of a distal radius malunion following an unsuccessful internal fixation can be achieved with outcomes comparable to those reported after initial nonoperative treatment.

Isolated ulnar shortening osteotomy for the treatment of extra-articular distal radius malunion

PURPOSE

To report the clinical outcomes and complications for a cohort of patients who had extra-articular distal radius malunions treated with isolated ulnar-shortening osteotomy (USO). A second purpose was to define the dorsal angulation limit that would still result in clinical and functional improvement after isolated USO for distal radius malunion. We postulated that patients with up to 20° dorsal or volar tilt could be successfully treated with isolated USO.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review for all patients who had an isolated USO for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome after distal radius malunion between January 1990 and December 2011. A total of 18 patients underwent isolated USO after distal radius malunion. The mean age of the patients was 53 years and the mean duration of follow-up was 34 months. We used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to compare preoperative and postoperative range of motion; pain; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores; and radiographic measurements.

RESULTS

Average intraoperative ulna shortening was 5.6 mm. Average flexion-extension arc improved from 79° preoperatively to 105° postoperatively. Average pronation-supination arc improved from 121° preoperatively to 162° postoperatively. Average visual analog scale pain score improved from 4.1 to 1.9. Average Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved from 43 to 11.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series demonstrated a significant improvement in pain score and range of motion after isolated USO for distal radius malunion. Patients with up to 20° dorsal tilt and radial inclination as low as 2° demonstrated improved clinical and functional outcomes after isolated USO. Given the comparable functional outcomes with shorter operative times and lower complication rate requiring fewer secondary surgeries, isolated USO is an attractive alternative to distal radius osteotomy for the management of distal radius malunion in patients with up to 20° dorsal tilt.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.