Desmosomal proteins in cultured and intact human periodontal ligament fibroblasts

Are Cementoblasts a Subpopulation of Osteoblasts or a Unique Phenotype?

Experimental studies have shown a great potential for periodontal regeneration. The limitations of periodontal regeneration largely depend on the regenerative potential at the root surface. Cellular intrinsic fiber cementum (CIFC), so-called bone-like tissue, may form instead of the desired acellular extrinsic fiber cementum (AEFC), and the interfacial tissue bonding may be weak. The periodontal ligament harbors progenitor cells that can differentiate into periodontal ligament fibroblasts, osteoblasts, and cementoblasts, but their precise location is unknown. It is also not known whether osteoblasts and cementoblasts arise from a common precursor cell line, or whether distinct precursor cell lines exist. Thus, there is limited knowledge about how cell diversity evolves in the space between the developing root and the alveolar bone. This review supports the hypothesis that AEFC is a unique tissue, while CIFC and bone share some similarities. Morphologically, functionally, and biochemically, however, CIFC is distinctly different from any bone type. There are several lines of evidence to propose that cementoblasts that produce both AEFC and CIFC are unique phenotypes that are unrelated to osteoblasts. Cementum attachment protein appears to be cementum-specific, and the expression of two proteoglycans, fibromodulin and lumican, appears to be stronger in CIFC than in bone. A theory is presented that may help explain how cell diversity evolves in the periodontal ligament. It proposes that Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath and cells derived from it play an essential role in the development and maintenance of the periodontium. The role of enamel matrix proteins in cementoblast and osteoblast differentiation and their potential use for tissue engineering are discussed.

Variant Carvajal syndrome with additional dental anomalies

BACKGROUND

This paper aims to review the case of a girl who presented with a number of dental anomalies, in addition to unusual skin, nail and hair conditions. Tragically an undiagnosed cardiomyopathy caused unexpected sudden death. The case is discussed with reference to a number of dermatological and oral conditions which were considered as possible diagnoses.

CASE REPORT

AW had been under long term dental care for prepubertal periodontitis, premature root resorption of primary teeth, soft tissue and dental anomalies, and angular cheilitis. Separately she had also been seen by several dermatologists with respect to palmar plantar keratosis, striae keratoderma, wiry hair and abnormal finger nails. Tragically the patient suffered a sudden unexpected death and the subsequent post mortem identified an undiagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy.

CONCLUSION

The most likely diagnosis is that this case is a variant of Carvajal Syndrome with additional dental anomalies. To date we have been unable to identify mutations in the desoplakin gene. We aim to emphasise the importance of recognising these dental and dermatological signs when they present together as a potential risk factor for cardiac abnormalities.

Profiling microdissected epithelium and stroma to model genomic signatures for cervical carcinogenesis accommodating for covariates

This study is the first comprehensive, integrated approach to examine grade-specific changes in gene expression along the entire neoplastic spectrum of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in the process of cervical carcinogenesis. This was accomplished by identifying gene expression signatures of disease progression using cDNA microarrays to analyze RNA from laser-captured microdissected epithelium and underlying stroma from normal cervix, graded CINs, cancer, and patient-matched normal cervical tissues. A separate set of samples were subsequently validated using a linear mixed model that is ideal to control for interpatient gene expression profile variation, such as age and race. These validated genes were ultimately used to propose a genomically based model of the early events in cervical neoplastic transformation. In this model, the CIN 1 transition coincides with a proproliferative/immunosuppression gene signature in the epithelium that probably represents the epithelial response to human papillomavirus infection. The CIN 2 transition coincides with a proangiogenic signature, suggesting a cooperative signaling interaction between stroma and tumor cells. Finally, the CIN 3 and squamous cell carcinoma antigen transition coincide with a proinvasive gene signature that may be a response to epithelial tumor cell overcrowding. This work strongly suggests that premalignant cells experience a series of microenvironmental stresses at the epithelium/stroma cell interface that must be overcome to progress into a transformed phenotype and identifies the order of these events in vivo and their association with specific CIN transitions.

Intracellular Distribution of Desmoplakin in Human Odontoblasts

Coexpression of desmosomal proteins and vimentin has been reported in a specific mesenchymal phenotype. This study investigated the expression of vimentin-binding desmosomal proteins in human dental pulp fibroblasts (DPF) and odontoblasts. The dental pulp has no cells expressing desmocollin (DSC) 1–3, desmoglein (DSG) 1–3, junction plakoglobin (JUP), or desmoplakin (DPK) 1 and 2 except for odontoblasts expressing DPK. A confocal image by laser-scanning microscopy demonstrated the diffuse distribution of DPK in the cytoplasm throughout the odontoblast processes. In culture, the mRNA expression of JUP and DPK1, but not DSC1–3 and DSG1–3, was detected in all DPF clones tested and also in odontoblast-like cells (OB) expressing osteocalcin and dentin sialophosphoprotein mRNAs established in the differentiation medium. The DPF having the potential to differentiate into OB expressed vimentin, but not DPK before culturing in the differentiation medium, whereas OB expressed vimentin-binding DPK1. These results suggest that DPF usually expresses DPK1 mRNA, and that the DPK1 production and the bonding of vimentin to DPK1 occur in DPF with the differentiation into odontoblasts.

Identification of genes differentially expressed in cultured human periodontal ligament fibroblasts vs. human gingival fibroblasts by DNA microarray analysis

Despite their similar spindle-shaped appearance, periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF) and gingival fibroblasts (GF) appear to display distinct functional activities in the maintenance of tissue integrity and during inflammatory/immune responses. We postulated that different characteristics of PDLF and GF are defined by the differential expression of specific genes. To test this, we investigated the possible variance of gene expression profile between cultured PDLF and GF, using DNA microarray technology. One hundred sixty-three genes were found differentially expressed by at least three-fold between PDLF and GF. Genes encoding transmembrane proteins and cytoskeleton-related proteins tended to be up-regulated in PDLF, whereas genes encoding cell-cycle regulation proteins and metabolism-related proteins tended to be up-regulated in GF. We concluded that PDLF and GF appear to display different gene expression patterns that may reflect intrinsic functional differences of the two cell populations and may well coordinate with their tissue-specific activities.

Double expressions of connexin 43 and 32 in human periodontal ligament fibroblasts

The expressions of connexin 43 and 32 in cultured and intact human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLFs) were examined using immunohistochemical methods, and western blot analysis was conducted with anti-connexin 43 and 32 in cultured PDLFs. The PDLFs both in cultured cells and tissue sections reacted with anti-connexin 43 and 32, and western blot analysis showed bands of approximately 43 kD and 27 kD reacted with anti-connexin 43 and 32 respectively, suggesting the existence of gap junctions in human PDLFs. In cultured PDLFs there were no reaction products of connexin 43 when the cells were not in contact with adjacent cells, but reaction products were increasingly observed with increases in cell-cell contacts. Different from connexin 43, the reaction products of connexin 32 were found in the cytoplasm, regardless of whether the cells were or were not in contact with adjacent cells. Further, the reaction activity of connexin 32 varied among PDLFs; some were strong, some moderate, and some weak. The expressions of connexin 43 and 32 in human PDLFs are suggested to be related to the regulation of two different functions of the PDLFs.