[Patient perception and approval of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as an alternative treatment option for ulcerative colitis]

Xianglian Zhixie Tablet Antagonizes Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Ulcerative Colitis by Attenuating Systemic Inflammation and Modulating Gut Microbiota

Purpose

Xianglian Zhixie Tablet (XLZXT), a classical traditional Chinese medicine formulation, is commonly used to treat Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in China. However, the therapeutic mechanisms of XLZXT for UC have yet to be fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the curative benefits of XLZXT and its associated mechanisms for healing UC in mice.

Methods

In the present study, the 1% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) solution was used to establish the UC model in C57BL/6N mice. To investigate the therapeutic effects of XLZXT on DSS-induced UC mice, several parameters were measured, including DAI score, colon length, spleen index, pathological changes in colon tissue, and levels of inflammatory factors in plasma and colon tissue. By investigating the gut microbiota, assessing the levels of intestinal mucosal protein expression, and looking at the proteins involved in the TLR4/MyD88/NF-B p65 signaling pathway, the mechanisms of XLZXT impact on UC were investigated. Mouse feces were examined for patterns of gut microbiota expression using high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA.

Results

XLZXT effectively alleviated UC symptoms and colon pathological damage in DSS-induced UC mice. It improved body weight loss, stool consistency, and hematochezia, while also repairing colon damage. Moreover, it down-regulated pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6), and up-regulated anti-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-10). XLZXT also increased the expression of MUC-2, Occludin and ZO-1, while decreasing the expression of NF-κB, MyD88 and TLR4. Additionally, it regulated gut microbiota disorder by increasing the abundance of beneficial bacteria and reducing the adhesion of intestinal harmful bacteria.

Conclusion

XLZXT demonstrated therapeutic effects on DSS-induced UC mice. The mechanisms may be associated with repairing the intestinal mucosal barrier, regulating the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB p65 signaling pathway, and restoring the balance of gut microbiota.

Microbiome analysis and fecal microbiota transfer in pediatric gastroenterology - a structured online survey in German-speaking countries

PURPOSE

To assess the current attitude and the status quo towards the use of microbiome analysis and fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) in pediatric patients in German-speaking pediatric gastroenterology centers.

METHODS

A structured online survey among all certified facilities of the German-speaking society of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition (GPGE) was conducted from November 01, 2020, until March 30, 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 71 centers were included in the analysis. Twenty-two centers (31.0%) use diagnostic microbiome analysis, but only a few perform analysis frequently (2; 2.8%) or regularly (1; 1.4%). Eleven centers (15.5%) have performed FMT as a therapeutic approach. Most of these centers use individual in-house donor screening programs (61.5%). One-third (33.8%) of centers rate the therapeutic impact of FMT as high or moderate. More than two-thirds (69.0%) of all participants are willing to participate in studies assessing the therapeutic effect of FMT.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines for microbiome analyses and FMT in pediatric patients and clinical studies investigating their benefits are absolutely necessary to improve the patient-centered care in pediatric gastroenterology. The long-term and successful establishment of pediatric FMT centers with standardized procedures for patient selection, donor screening, application route, volume, and frequency of use is highly required to obtain a safe therapy.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation - evidence for clinical efficacy

BACKGROUND

Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and is being applied experimentally in other diseases. Encapsulated administration may be equivalent in efficacy to delivery through other routes.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken of studies using encapsulated FMT up to 26 October 2020. Data on indication, clinical outcomes, safety, treatment protocol and capsule preparation were collected and reported. Pooled rates of clinical efficacy in rCDI were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of single variables on clinical efficacy was evaluated using univariate meta-regression.

RESULTS

A total of 35 studies reporting the treatment of 960 patients with encapsulated FMT for eight different indications met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 18, 51%) and patients (n = 755, 79%) were from studies on rCDI. Cure rates after single and multiple courses of treatments with encapsulated FMT in rCDI were 85% (95% CI: 82%-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 88%-96%) respectively. The treatment outcome was not significantly affected by dose, number of delivered capsules, anaerobic/aerobic processing, single/multi-donor treatment, lyophilisation, or any other single factor in the production or delivery of encapsulated FMT. Promising but non-comparable results from the treatment of ulcerative colitis and multidrug-resistant organisms were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Encapsulated FMT is an effective and safe treatment of rCDI, with cure rates comparable to FMT delivered through other routes. The treatment is effective despite variations in donor screening, preparation and treatment protocol. For other indications, the role of FMT capsules is still not sufficiently examined, although some studies show promising results.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Transfer of faecal material through capsules in the treatment of various diseases. Evidence for clinical efficacy The bacteria and other microorganisms of the gut is different in patient with various diseases in comparison with healthy subjects.Therefore, ways to change the microorganisms of the gut in a beneficial direction has been the subject of various research projects within recent years.Faecal microbiota transplantation often referred as FMT is a method of transferring microorganisms from healthy donors to patients with various diseases and is seen as one way to change the microbial community of the gut in a beneficial direction.Faecal microbiota transplantation can be performed in different ways such as through endoscopy, enemas or capsules. The transfer through capsules is preferred by the patients and has advantages since it can be administered long-term and can be delivered to the patients in their home. In this paper, we evaluated all accessible research reporting treatment with encapsulated faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of various diseases. We report the following major findings:-Treatment with capsules is safe when guidelines for screening donors and testing faecal material is followed.-The treatment is highly effective in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, a disease with high mortality often caused by repeated antibiotic treatments. The treatment was effective in 596 of 723 patients following one course of capsule treatment.-Faecal microbiota transplantation delivered through capsules is as effective as treatment delivered through other routes in the treatment of C. difficile infection.-The treatment is effective in the treatment of C. difficile infection across studies and countries, despite great differences in the ways the capsules were prepared and delivered.-Increasing the amount of faecal material used in the production did not affect the efficacy of the treatment.-There are promising results in the treatment of other diseases such as liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease and the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacteria.

Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory C. difficile infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under "enforcement discretion" for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for "do-it-yourself" (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community's research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI-studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising-little is still known about the treatmen's mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact.