1
|
Behrens A, Fasching PA, Schwenke E, Gass P, Häberle L, Heindl F, Heusinger K, Lotz L, Lubrich H, Preuß C, Schneider MO, Schulz-Wendtland R, Stumpfe FM, Uder M, Wunderle M, Zahn AL, Hack CC, Beckmann MW, Emons J. Predicting mammographic density with linear ultrasound transducers. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:384. [PMID: 37770952 PMCID: PMC10537934 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01327-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High mammographic density (MD) is a risk factor for the development of breast cancer (BC). Changes in MD are influenced by multiple factors such as age, BMI, number of full-term pregnancies and lactating periods. To learn more about MD, it is important to establish non-radiation-based, alternative examination methods to mammography such as ultrasound assessments. METHODS We analyzed data from 168 patients who underwent standard-of-care mammography and performed additional ultrasound assessment of the breast using a high-frequency (12 MHz) linear probe of the VOLUSON® 730 Expert system (GE Medical Systems Kretztechnik GmbH & Co OHG, Austria). Gray level bins were calculated from ultrasound images to characterize mammographic density. Percentage mammographic density (PMD) was predicted by gray level bins using various regression models. RESULTS Gray level bins and PMD correlated to a certain extent. Spearman's ρ ranged from - 0.18 to 0.32. The random forest model turned out to be the most accurate prediction model (cross-validated R2, 0.255). Overall, ultrasound images from the VOLUSON® 730 Expert device in this study showed limited predictive power for PMD when correlated with the corresponding mammograms. CONCLUSIONS In our present work, no reliable prediction of PMD using ultrasound imaging could be observed. As previous studies showed a reasonable correlation, predictive power seems to be highly dependent on the device used. Identifying feasible non-radiation imaging methods of the breast and their predictive power remains an important topic and warrants further evaluation. Trial registration 325-19 B (Ethics Committee of the medical faculty at Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Behrens
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Eva Schwenke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Felix Heindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Katharina Heusinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura Lotz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hannah Lubrich
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Caroline Preuß
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael O Schneider
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florian M Stumpfe
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marius Wunderle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anna L Zahn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center for Franconia, Comprehensive Cancer Center European Metropolitan Area Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fehm TN, Welslau M, Müller V, Lüftner D, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Janni W, Thomssen C, Witzel I, Belleville E, Untch M, Thill M, Tesch H, Ditsch N, Lux MP, Aktas B, Banys-Paluchowski M, Schneeweiss A, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Hartkopf AD, Wöckel A, Kolberg HC, Harbeck N, Stickeler E. Update Breast Cancer 2022 Part 3 - Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:912-921. [PMID: 36110894 PMCID: PMC9470293 DOI: 10.1055/a-1912-7105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
This review summarizes recent developments in the prevention and treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer. The individual disease risk for different molecular subtypes was investigated in a large epidemiological study. With regard to treatment, new data are available from long-term follow-up of the Aphinity study, as well as new data on neoadjuvant therapy with atezolizumab in HER2-positive patients. Biomarkers, such as residual cancer burden, were investigated in the context of pembrolizumab therapy. A Genomic Grade Index study in elderly patients is one of a group of studies investigating the use of modern multigene tests to identify patients with an excellent prognosis in whom chemotherapy may be avoided. These and other aspects of the latest developments in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are described in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz & Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Brandenburg, Buckow, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany,Correspondence/Korrespondenzadresse Peter A. Fasching, MD Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsComprehensive Cancer
Center Erlangen EMNFriedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-NurembergUniversitätsstraße 21 – 2391054
ErlangenGermany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krawczyk N, Röwer R, Anlauf M, Muntanjohl C, Baldus SE, Neumann M, Banys-Paluchowski M, Otten S, Luczak K, Ruckhäberle E, Mohrmann S, Hoffmann J, Kaleta T, Jaeger B, Esposito I, Fehm T. Invasive Breast Carcinoma with Neuroendocrine Differentiation: A Single-Center Analysis of Clinical Features and Prognosis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:68-84. [PMID: 35027862 PMCID: PMC8747900 DOI: 10.1055/a-1557-1280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction
Invasive breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation is a rare subtype of breast malignancy. Due to frequent changes in the definition of these lesions, the correct diagnosis, estimation of exact prevalence, and clinical behaviour of this entity may be challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, clinical features, and outcomes in a large cohort of patients with breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation.
Patients
Twenty-seven cases of breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation have been included in this analysis. Twenty-one cases were identified by systematic immunohistochemical re-evaluation of 465 breast cancer specimens using the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin, resulting in a prevalence of 4.5%. A further six cases were identified by a review of clinical records.
Results
Median age at the time of diagnosis was 61 years. 70% of patients had T2 – 4 tumors and 37% were node-positive. The most common immunohistochemical subtype was HR-positive/HER2-negative (85%). 93% were positive for synaptophysin and 48% for chromogranin A. Somatostatin receptor type 2A status was positive in 12 of 24 analyzed tumors (50%). Neuroendocrine-specific treatment with somatostatin analogues was administered in two patients. The 5-year survival rate was 70%.
Conclusions
Breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation is mostly HR-positive/HER2-negative and the diagnosis is made at a higher TNM stage than in patients with conventional invasive breast carcinoma. Moreover, breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation was found to be associated with impaired prognosis in several retrospective trials. Due to somatostatin receptor 2A expression, somatostatin receptor-based imaging can be used and somatostatin receptor-targeted therapy can be offered in selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Krawczyk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Rowena Röwer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Anlauf
- Institute of Pathology, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Cytology and Molecular Pathology, St. Vincenz Hospital, Limburg, Germany
| | - Caja Muntanjohl
- Institute of Pathology, Cytology and Molecular Pathology, St. Vincenz Hospital, Limburg, Germany
| | - Stephan Ernst Baldus
- Institute of Pathology, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Cytology and Molecular Pathology, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
| | - Monika Neumann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Sabine Otten
- Institute of Pathology, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Katharina Luczak
- Institute of Pathology, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Eugen Ruckhäberle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Svjetlana Mohrmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jürgen Hoffmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Thomas Kaleta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernadette Jaeger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Irene Esposito
- Institute of Pathology, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu C, Yang Z, Liu M, Wang X, Song S, Xu X, Yang Z. Gallium-68 Labeling of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors as Positron Emission Tomography Radiotracers for Tumor Imaging. ACS OMEGA 2021; 6:32253-32261. [PMID: 34870045 PMCID: PMC8638300 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) have emerged as interesting therapeutic drug targets with many potential applications in anti-tumors, especially in breast cancer. A novel CDK4/6 kinase-derived positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agent was designed based on palbociclib modified with a chelator DOTA. This new compound with a chelator DOTA-palbociclib was radiolabeled with gallium 68 (68Ga). After labeling, the purity and stability were evaluated, and the blood pharmacokinetics were carried out in normal healthy mice. Human breast cancer MCF-7 (ER+/HER2-) cells were used for in vitro cell uptake tests. PET imaging and ex vivo biodistribution were conducted in MCF-7 tumor-bearing mice. Specific binding of tumors was evaluated by the blocking assay. Furthermore, the uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-palbociclib in tumors was studied by autoradiography of tissue sections followed by immunofluorescence evaluation of CDK4 and CDK6. 68Ga-DOTA-palbociclib was synthesized very simply in a high labeling rate and radiochemical purity in 10 min. The labeling compound showed excellent stability both in vitro and in vivo and exhibited good pharmacokinetics, making it suitable for in vivo imaging. Cell uptake studies display that co-incubation with palbociclib can inhibit cellular uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-palbociclib. In vivo imaging and ex vivo biodistribution in mice bearing MCF-7 tumors both showed obvious radioactive uptake in the tumor and higher tumor-to-muscle ratios, while the tumor radioactivity accumulation was significantly decreased when prior administered with an excess of cold palbociclib, confirming CDK4/6 specific binding of 68Ga-DOTA-palbociclib in vivo. Autoradiography of the avid tumor section showed a high correlation between immunofluorescence with the CDK4/6 positive areas of the tumor, further demonstrating that 68Ga-DOTA-palbociclib specifically targeted CDK4/6 positive tumors. We synthesized 68Ga-DOTA-palbociclib, a new CDK4/6 kinase PET imaging agent, and validated its excellent stability, pharmacokinetics, and specific tumor binding. Based on our primary results, 68Ga-DOTA-palbociclib is a promising imaging agent with the potential to tailor a precise treatment program for CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Liu
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai
Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department
of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan
University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai
Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai
Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging Probes, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201315, China
| | - Ziyi Yang
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai
Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department
of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan
University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai
Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging Probes, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Mingyu Liu
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai
Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department
of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan
University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai
Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging Probes, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201315, China
| | - Xiangwei Wang
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai
Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department
of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan
University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai
Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging Probes, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Shaoli Song
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai
Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department
of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan
University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai
Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai
Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging Probes, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201315, China
| | - Xiaoping Xu
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai
Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department
of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan
University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai
Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging Probes, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Zhongyi Yang
- Department
of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai
Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department
of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan
University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai
Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging Probes, Shanghai 200032, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nabieva N, Fasching PA. Endocrine Treatment for Breast Cancer Patients Revisited-History, Standard of Care, and Possibilities of Improvement. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5643. [PMID: 34830800 PMCID: PMC8616153 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Due to the findings of current studies and the approval of novel substances for the therapy of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer patients, the established standards of endocrine treatment are changing. The purpose of this review is to give an overview of the history of endocrine treatment, to clarify its role in the present standard of care, and to discuss the possibilities of improvement. RECENT FINDINGS Tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, and fulvestrant are the main drugs that have been used for decades in the therapy of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer patients. However, since a relevant number of women suffer at some point from disease recurrence or progression, several novel substances are being investigated to overcome resistance mechanisms by interfering with certain signaling pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT/mTOR or the CDK4/6 pathways. mTOR and CDK4/6 inhibitors were the first drugs approved for this purpose and many more are in development. SUMMARY Endocrine treatment is one of the best tolerable cancer therapies available. Continuous investigation serves to improve patients' outcomes and modernize the current standard of care. Considering the resistance mechanisms and substances analyzed against these, endocrine treatment of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer is on the brink of a new era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naiba Nabieva
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
- Novartis Oncology, Novartis Pharma GmbH, 90429 Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Heindl F, Fasching PA, Hein A, Hack CC, Heusinger K, Gass P, Pöschke P, Stübs FA, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hartmann A, Erber R, Beckmann MW, Meyer J, Häberle L, Jud SM, Emons J. Mammographic density and prognosis in primary breast cancer patients. Breast 2021; 59:51-57. [PMID: 34157655 PMCID: PMC8237359 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer (BC). However, the influence of MD on the BC prognosis is unclear. The objective of this study was therefore to investigate whether percentage MD (PMD) is associated with a difference in disease-free or overall survival in primary BC patients. METHODS A total of 2525 patients with primary, metastasis-free BC were followed up retrospectively for this analysis. For all patients, PMD was evaluated by two readers using a semi-automated method. The association between PMD and prognosis was evaluated using Cox regression models with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as the outcome, and the following adjustments: age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, body mass index, tumor stage, grading, lymph node status, hormone receptor and HER2 status. RESULTS After median observation periods of 9.5 and 10.0 years, no influence of PMD on DFS (p = 0.46, likelihood ratio test (LRT)) or OS (p = 0.22, LRT), respectively, was found. In the initial unadjusted analysis higher PMD was associated with longer DFS and OS. The effect of PMD on DFS and OS disappeared after adjustment for age and was caused by the underlying age effect. CONCLUSIONS Although MD is one of the strongest independent risk factors for BC, in our collective PMD is not associated with disease-free and overall survival in patients with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Heindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Katharina Heusinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Patrik Pöschke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Frederik A Stübs
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julia Meyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, European Metropolitan Area Erlangen-Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stickeler E, Aktas B, Behrens A, Belleville E, Ditsch N, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Hartkopf AD, Jackisch C, Janni W, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kolberg HC, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Müller V, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Schulmeyer CE, Tesch H, Thomssen C, Uleer C, Untch M, Welslau M, Wöckel A, Wurmthaler LA, Würstlein R, Thill M. Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 1 - Prevention and Early Stages. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:526-538. [PMID: 34035547 PMCID: PMC8137274 DOI: 10.1055/a-1464-0953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This review summarises not only the latest evidence on prevention, but also the current research on the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients. Recent years have seen a growing body of evidence on the risk of high- and moderate-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes. A large international consortium has now been able to further refine the answer to the question of the significance of the so-called panel genes. Moreover, the data on treatment selection regarding endocrine efficacy and the decision for or against chemotherapy have also been advanced markedly. There is also new data on adjuvant CDK4/6 (cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6) inhibitors, which are standard in first-line treatment in patients with metastatic HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. For other therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, which have successfully improved the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in neoadjuvant treatment settings for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), there is a growing understanding of the quality of life and side effects. This is especially important in situations where patients could possibly be cured without such a regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Annika Behrens
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Carla E. Schulmeyer
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Christoph Uleer
- Praxisgemeinschaft Frauenärzte am Bahnhofsplatz, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Genecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Lena A. Wurmthaler
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ditsch N, Stickeler E, Behrens A, Belleville E, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Hartkopf AD, Jackisch C, Janni W, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kolberg HC, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Müller V, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Schulmeyer CE, Tesch H, Thomssen C, Uleer C, Untch M, Welslau M, Wöckel A, Wurmthaler LA, Würstlein R, Thill M, Aktas B. Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 2 - Advanced Stages, Long-Term Consequences and Biomarkers. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:539-548. [PMID: 34035548 PMCID: PMC8137275 DOI: 10.1055/a-1464-1221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
This review summarises and discusses significant aspects of recently published studies on patient treatment in advanced breast cancer and on biomarkers in breast cancer. In recent years, a large number of drugs for all molecular subtypes have been developed up to phase III trials. With regard to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastasised breast cancer, the recent discussion has centred on the best candidate for combined chemotherapy. The oral taxanes could become a new type of oral chemotherapies. There is a growing body of data on biomarkers for the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, which could also signify further development for other molecular subtypes. New substances have been developed for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer that still result in good remission even after massive prior treatment and/or cerebral metastasis. Similarly, knowledge is growing about targeted therapies with antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) against Trop-2, which could bolster our therapeutic armoury in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In addition, the clinical focus is on understanding how to maintain fertility after breast cancer treatment. Here, pooled analyses provide new insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Annika Behrens
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Carla E. Schulmeyer
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Christoph Uleer
- Praxisgemeinschaft Frauenärzte am Bahnhofsplatz, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Genecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Lena A. Wurmthaler
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich Ludwig Maximilians University, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|