Radiotherapy statements of the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference-a German expert perspective

PURPOSE

To summarize the radiotherapy-relevant statements of the 18th St. Gallen Breast Cancer Consensus Conference and interpret the findings in light of German guideline recommendations.

METHODS

Statements and voting results from the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference were collected and analyzed according to their relevance for the radiation oncology community. The voting results were discussed in two hybrid meetings among the authors of this manuscript on March 18 and 19, 2023, in light of the German S3 guideline and the 2023 version of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) guidelines.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

There was a high level of agreement between the radiotherapy-related statements of the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference and the German S3 and AGO guidelines. Discrepancies include the impact of number of lymph node metastases for the indication for postmastectomy radiotherapy.

Outcomes with ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Results from the German multicentre REALITY study

OBJECTIVES

To assess treatment adherence, effectiveness and safety outcomes of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) receiving ibrutinib in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in REALITY were ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of CLL and were receiving ibrutinib as a first-line (1L), 2L or ≥3L therapy. Treatment retention, adherence, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to next therapy were assessed at 1 and 2 years overall, by typology and by cytogenetic subgroups. PFS and OS were analysed using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Exactly 302 patients were enrolled across 57 sites in Germany, from January 2017 to July 2021. One-year retention rates were 69.9% overall (primary endpoint), 77.9% for 1L patients, and 77.6%/78.8% for high-risk patients with del17p/TP53. At 2 years, PFS/OS rates were 77.8%/90.7% overall (1L, 82.7%/90.4%), and were consistent across cytogenetic subgroups. PFS rates were higher for 1L versus ≥3L patients. Patients with the low-acceptance/low-control typology at baseline were less likely to retain treatment at 1 year versus the high-acceptance/high-control typology. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The REALITY study provides further evidence of the effectiveness and safety of ibrutinib in patients with CLL in a real-world setting, particularly in earlier treatment lines.

Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: The 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference against the Background of Current German Treatment Recommendations

This year's 18th St. Gallen (SG) consensus conference on the treatment of early breast cancer (SGBCC: St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference) focused on practice-oriented questions. The individual situation and risk-benefit assessment were discussed in great detail. As in previous years, a German working group of leading breast cancer experts presented the results of the international SGBCC 2023 against the background of German treatment recommendations - especially the updated treatment recommendations of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie e. V. (AGO) - for everyday clinical practice in Germany. The German treatment recommendations of AGO are based on the current evidence. The comparison with the clinical approach in Germany has proven useful, as the SGBCC panel consists of experts from different countries and disciplines. That is why country-specific characteristics can be incorporated into the SGBCC recommendations.

Update Breast Cancer 2023 Part 3 - Expert Opinions of Early Stage Breast Cancer Therapies

The St. Gallen (SG) International Breast Cancer Conference is held every two years, previously in St. Gallen and now in Vienna. This year (2023) marks the eighteenth edition of this conference, which focuses on the treatment of patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. A panel discussion will be held at the end of this four-day event, during which a panel of experts will give their opinions on current controversial issues relating to the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients. To this end, questions are generally formulated in such a way that clinically realistic cases are presented - often including poignant hypothetical modifications. This review reports on the outcome of these discussions and summarises the data associated with individual questions raised.

REFLECT: prospective multicenter non-interventional study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Sandoz rituximab (SDZ-RTX; Rixathon®) in combination with CHOP for the treatment of patients with previously untreated CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Background

REFLECT is the first prospective study of Sandoz biosimilar rituximab (SDZ-RTX) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Objective

To evaluate the 2-year effectiveness and safety of SDZ-RTX as first-line treatment for DLBCL.

Design

Real-world, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, non-interventional, post-approval study of SDZ-RTX in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in patients with treatment-naïve CD20‑positive DLBCL.

Methods

Treatment-naïve, CD20-positive adult patients (⩾18 years) with DLBCL eligible for therapy with R-CHOP were treated with SDZ-RTX-CHOP every 2 or 3 weeks for 6-8 cycles. The effectiveness of SDZ-RTX was measured by the complete response (CR) rate at the end of R-CHOP treatment, as assessed by the treating physician. Progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed at 24 months.

Results

A total of 169 patients [52.1% female, median (range) age 70 (24-94) years] with DLBCL were included in the full analysis set. At baseline, 19.5% and 24.3% of patients had Ann Arbor disease stage III or IV, respectively, and most patients (80.5%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1. A total of 100 (59.2%) patients completed the 24-month observation period. In total, 110 [65.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 57.4-72.3] patients achieved CR as best response and 50 (29.6%; 95% CI: 22.8-37.1) patients achieved partial response. Overall best response rate was 94.7% (95% CI: 90.1-97.5). One-year PFS was 84.9% (95% CI: 78.2-89.6), while 2-year PFS was 78.5% (95% CI: 70.9-84.4); median PFS was not reached within the observational period. A total of 143 (84.6%) patients experienced ⩾1 adverse event, 53 (31.4%) of which were suspected to be related to study drug.

Conclusion

This real-world, 2-year study reconfirms that first-line treatment of CD20-positive DLBCL with R-CHOP using SDZ-RTX is effective and well tolerated.

Registration

N/A.

Effectiveness, safety and quality of life of trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Real-world data from the noninterventional TACTIC study in Germany

The prospective, multicenter, noninterventional TACTIC study assessed effectiveness and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world setting in Germany, thus evaluating the external validity of the findings from the pivotal RECOURSE trial. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and quality of life (QoL). Subgroups comprised patients with good (<3 metastatic sites at inclusion, ≥18 months from diagnosis of first metastasis to inclusion) or poor (remaining patients) prognostic characteristics (GPC/PPC). GPC without liver metastases was considered best prognostic characteristics (BPC). In total, 307 eligible patients (pretreated or not suitable for other available therapies) were treated with FTD/TPI. Overall, median [95%-CI] OS was 7.4 months [6.4-8.6], median PFS was 2.9 months [2.8-3.3]. In BPC (n = 65) and GPC (n = 176) compared to PPC (n = 124) subgroup, median OS (13.3 [9.1-17.6] vs 8.9 [7.6-9.8] vs 5.1 [4.4-7.0] months) and median PFS (4.0 [3.3-5.3] vs 3.4 [3.0-3.7] vs 2.6 [2.4-2.8] months) were longer. Patient-reported QoL, assessed by validated questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L, PRO-CTCAE), was stable throughout FTD/TPI treatment. Predominant FTD/TPI-related adverse events of grades 3 or 4 were neutropenia (13.0%), leukopenia (7.5%), and anemia (5.2%). Altogether, palliative FTD/TPI therapy in patients with pretreated mCRC was associated with prolonged survival, delayed progression, maintained health-related QoL, and manageable toxicity. Low metastatic burden and indolent disease were favorable prognostic factors for survival. TACTIC confirms the effectiveness and safety of FTD/TPI, highlighting its value in routine clinical practice.

Update Breast Cancer 2023 Part 2 - Advanced-Stage Breast Cancer

In recent years, a number of new therapies have led to advances in the treatment of patients with advanced breast carcinoma. These substances are mainly CDK4/6 inhibitors and other substances that can overcome endocrine resistance, oral selective estrogen receptor degraders, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), and PARP inhibitors. This review summarizes and evaluates the latest study results that have been published in recent months. This includes the overall survival data of the Destiny-Breast03 study, the first analysis of the CAPItello-291 study, the comparison of CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment with chemotherapy in the first line of therapy (RIGHT Choice study), the first analysis of the Destiny-Breast02 study in the treatment setting after T-DM1 treatment, and the first analysis of the Serena-2 study. Most of these studies have the potential to significantly change the therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced breast carcinoma and show that the continued rapid development of new therapies is always producing new results.

Update Breast Cancer 2023 Part 1 - Early Stage Breast Cancer

With abemaciclib (monarchE study) and olaparib (OlympiA study) gaining approval in the adjuvant treatment setting, a significant change in the standard of care for patients with early stage breast cancer has been established for some time now. Accordingly, some diverse developments are slowly being transferred from the metastatic to the adjuvant treatment setting. Recently, there have also been positive reports of the NATALEE study. Other clinical studies are currently investigating substances that are already established in the metastatic setting. These include, for example, the DESTINY Breast05 study with trastuzumab deruxtecan and the SASCIA study with sacituzumab govitecan. In this review paper, we summarize and place in context the latest developments over the past months.

Assessing the impact of digital patient monitoring on health outcomes and healthcare resource usage in addition to the feasibility of its combination with at-home treatment, in participants receiving systemic anticancer treatment in clinical practice: protocol for an interventional, open-label, multicountry platform study (ORIGAMA)

INTRODUCTION

Digital patient monitoring (DPM) tools can enable more effective clinical care and improved patient outcomes in cancer. However, their broad adoption requires ease of use and demonstration of real-world clinical utility/impact. ORIGAMA (MO42720) is an interventional, open-label, multicountry platform study investigating the clinical utility of DPM tools and specific treatments. ORIGAMA will begin with two cohorts that aim to assess the impact of the atezolizumab-specific Roche DPM Module (hosted on the Kaiku Health DPM platform (Helsinki, Finland)) on health outcomes and healthcare resource usage, and its feasibility to support at-home treatment administration, in participants receiving systemic anticancer treatment. Other digital health solutions may be added to future cohorts.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In Cohort A, participants with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), extensive-stage SCLC or Child Pugh A unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma will be randomised to a locally approved anticancer regimen containing intravenous atezolizumab (TECENTRIQ, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech) and local standard-of-care support, with/without the Roche DPM Module. Cohort B will assess the feasibility of the Roche DPM Module in supporting administration of three cycles of subcutaneous atezolizumab (1875 mg; Day 1 of each 21-day cycle) in the hospital, followed by 13 cycles at home by a healthcare professional (ie, flexible care), in participants with programmed cell-death ligand 1-positive, early-stage NSCLC. The primary endpoints are the mean difference in change of the participant-reported Total Symptom Interference Score at Week 12 from baseline (Cohort A) and flexible care adoption rate at Cycle 6 (Cohort B).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study will be conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and/or the applicable laws and regulations of the country in which the research is conducted, whichever affords the greater protection to the individual. The study received its first Ethics Committee approval in Spain in October 2022. Participants will provide written informed consent in a face-to-face setting. The results of this study will be presented at national and/or international congresses and disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05694013.

Update Breast Cancer 2022 Part 5 - Early Stage Breast Cancer

The treatment of patients with early stage breast cancer has changed in recent years due to the introduction of pembrolizumab, olaparib, and abemaciclib. These and other drugs with the same class of active ingredient are currently in trial for various indications. This review article summarizes the latest results that have either been presented at major conferences such as the ESMO 2022 or published recently in international journals. This includes reports on newly discovered breast cancer genes, atezolizumab in neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive patients, long-term data from the APHINITY study, and on how preoperative peritumoral application of local anesthetics can influence the prognosis. We also present solid data on dynamic Ki-67 from the ADAPT studies.

Update Breast Cancer 2022 Part 6 - Advanced-Stage Breast Cancer

Large-scale study programs on CDK4/6 inhibitors, targeted therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates launched in recent years have yielded results from current studies which are now being published in journals and presented at international conferences. In this context, new results are available from the major CDK4/6 inhibitor studies. Also, an increasing amount of data is being published from large-scale genomic studies on efficacy and resistance mechanisms in patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. These results now form the basis for further research plans to investigate combination therapies and treatment sequencing. Based on the latest published results, sacituzumab govitecan is now available as a second antibody-drug conjugate; this brings an advantage in terms of overall survival for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HRpos)/HER2-negative (HER2neg) breast cancer. In this review article, we summarize the latest developments and place them in context according to the current status of research.

First-line nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Final results of the NEPTUN study

Real-world data on the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still limited. The NEPTUN study evaluated effectiveness and safety of first-line nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) plus carboplatin (nab-P/C) in patients with advanced NSCLC in routine clinical practice in Germany. Patients included in our study were aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and with decision for first-line nab-P/C in routine clinical practice. Primary objective was 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS6), secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. From 2016 to 2019, 408 patients from 75 sites were enrolled. PFS6 was 39.5% (95% CI: 34.2-44.8), median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI: 4.6-5.6), ORR was 42.9% (95% CI: 37.7-48.2). Median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 9.2-11.6). In subgroup analyses, median OS for squamous vs non-squamous histology was 11.5 months (95% CI: 9.2-13.8) vs 9.8 months (95% CI: 8.1-11.3) and for patients aged ≥70 vs <70 years median OS was 12.4 months (95% CI: 9.8-15.1) vs 9.6 months (95% CI: 7.7-11.1). Adverse events (AEs) related to nab-paclitaxel were reported in 247 (66.4%) patients, while carboplatin-related AEs were documented in 224 (60.2%) patients. Most frequently related AEs were leukopenia (22.3%) for nab-paclitaxel and anemia (20.2%) for carboplatin. Nab-P/C-related deaths were reported in 2 (0.5%) patients (sepsis and neutropenic sepsis). No new or unexpected safety signals emerged. These results support the effectiveness and safety of first-line nab-P/C in patients with advanced NSCLC reported in the pivotal trial and highlight the clinical value of this regimen in the real-world setting.

The Non-Interventional PAZOREAL Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Pazopanib in a Real-Life Setting: Reflecting a Changing mRCC Treatment Landscape

The approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors represented a remarkable progression in the therapeutic landscape for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Yet, in the ever-evolving landscape of mRCC treatment, real-world data on these agents, including pazopanib, are scarce. The non-interventional PAZOREAL study investigated the effectiveness and safety of pazopanib (first-line), nivolumab (second-line), and everolimus (second- and third-line) in a real-life setting. The multicentric study included 376 mRCC patients who received first-line treatment with pazopanib and assessed time on the drug (primary endpoint), overall survival, best responses, disease control rates, as well as safety signals and health-related quality of life. The median overall time on the drug was 10.0 months, with first-line pazopanib having a median time on drug of 6.3 months. The median overall survival was 35.9 months. The disease control rate for first-line pazopanib was 56.9%. No new safety signals were detected. PAZOREAL provides valuable real-world data for first-line treatment with pazopanib.

Real-world clinical effectiveness and safety of CT-P10 in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: An observational study in Europe

The rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 is approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Previous studies have demonstrated clinical similarity between CT-P10 and reference rituximab. However, real-world data relating to treatment in patients with DLBCL with rituximab biosimilars are limited. This study collected real-world data relating to the effectiveness and safety of CT-P10 treatment from the medical records of 389 patients with DLBCL (24 centers, five European countries). For the primary outcome (clinical effectiveness), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and best response (BR) were assessed. The percentage (95% confidence interval [95% CI]) of patients alive at 12-, 18-, and 30 months postindex (initiation of CT-P10) was 86% (82.4%-89.4%), 81% (76.9%-84.9%), and 76% (71.2%-80.1%), respectively. The PFS rate (percent, [95% CI]) at 12-, 18-, and 30 months postindex was 78% (74.2%-82.5%), 72% (67.9%-76.9%), and 67% (61.9%-71.7%), respectively. Median OS/PFS was not reached. For 82% (n = 312) of patients, the BR to CT-P10 was a complete response. Adverse events were consistent with known effects of chemotherapy. This international, multicenter study provides real-world data on the safety and effectiveness profile of CT-P10 for DLBCL treatment and supports the adoption of CT-P10 for the treatment of DLBCL.

Update Breast Cancer 2022 Part 4 - Advanced-Stage Breast Cancer

For the treatment of patients with advanced HER2-negative hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, several substances have been introduced into practice in recent years. In addition, other drugs are under development. A number of studies have been published over the past year which have shown either an advantage for progression-free survival or for overall survival. This review summarizes the latest results, which have been published at current congresses or in specialist journals, and classifies them in the clinical treatment context. In particular, the importance of therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors - trastuzumab deruxtecan, sacituzumab govitecan and capivasertib - is discussed. For trastuzumab deruxtecan, an overall survival benefit in HER2-negative breast cancer with low HER2 expression (HER2-low expression) was reported in the Destiny-Breast-04 study. Similarly, there was an overall survival benefit in the FAKTION study with capivasertib. The lack of overall survival benefit for palbociclib in the first line of therapy raises the question of clinical classification.

Update Breast Cancer 2022 Part 3 - Early-Stage Breast Cancer

This review summarizes recent developments in the prevention and treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer. The individual disease risk for different molecular subtypes was investigated in a large epidemiological study. With regard to treatment, new data are available from long-term follow-up of the Aphinity study, as well as new data on neoadjuvant therapy with atezolizumab in HER2-positive patients. Biomarkers, such as residual cancer burden, were investigated in the context of pembrolizumab therapy. A Genomic Grade Index study in elderly patients is one of a group of studies investigating the use of modern multigene tests to identify patients with an excellent prognosis in whom chemotherapy may be avoided. These and other aspects of the latest developments in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are described in this review.

Implementation of CDK4/6 Inhibitors and its Influence on the Treatment Landscape of Advanced Breast Cancer Patients - Data from the Real-World Registry PRAEGNANT

Background Comprehensive data from prospective clinical trials have led to a high level of evidence establishing CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine treatment (CDK4/6i + ET) as a standard for the treatment of HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive (HER2- HR+) breast cancer patients in the first-line advanced therapy setting. Data on patient populations that have been treated in the real-world setting may provide an insight into changes of patient characteristics and prognosis over time. Methods The data were extracted from the prospective real-world registry PRAEGNANT (NCT02338167). Patients had to have HER2- HR+ advanced breast cancer in the first-line metastatic setting. The chosen therapies were described as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relation to the given therapies and time periods during which they were indicated. Results CDK4/6 inhibitors have been rapidly implemented since their introduction in November 2016. In recent years (2018 - 2022), about 70 - 80% of the patient population have been treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, while endocrine monotherapy was given to about 10% and chemotherapy to about 15% of all patients. The prognosis was worst in patients treated with chemotherapy. Recently, mainly patients with a good prognosis are being treated with endocrine monotherapy, and patients who are treated with chemotherapy have an unfavorable prognosis. The PFS and OS of patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET have remained similar over time despite changes in patient characteristics. Conclusion A treatment with CDK4/6i + ET has rapidly become the therapy standard for patients in the first-line advanced breast cancer setting. After the implementation of CDK4/6i + ET, endocrine monotherapy is only given to patients with a very favorable prognosis, while chemotherapy is provided to patients with a rather unfavorable prognosis. These changes in patient characteristics did not seem to influence the prognosis of patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET.

Update Breast Cancer 2022 Part 1 – Early Stage Breast Cancer

Evidence relating to the treatment of breast cancer patients with early-stage disease has increased significantly in the past year. Abemaciclib, olaparib, and pembrolizumab are new drugs with good efficacy in the relevant patient groups. However, some questions remain unanswered. In particular, it remains unclear which premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer should be spared unnecessary treatment. The question of the degree to which chemotherapy exerts a direct cytotoxic effect on the tumor or reduces ovarian function through chemotherapy could be of key importance. This group of patients could potentially be spared chemotherapy. New, previously experimental biomarker analysis methods, such as spatial analysis of gene expression (spatial transcriptomics) are gradually finding their way into large randomized phase III trials, such as the NeoTRIP trial. This in turn leads to a better understanding of the predictive factors of new therapies, for example immunotherapy. This review summarizes the scientific innovations from recent congresses such as the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2021 but also from recent publications.

Update Breast Cancer 2022 Part 2 – Advanced Stage Breast Cancer

For patients with advanced breast cancer, several novel therapies have emerged in recent years, including CDK4/6 inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, alpelisib, tucatinib and trastuzumab-deruxtecan, and sacituzumab-govitecan, which have transformed and expanded the therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced breast cancer. Some of these substances have now been approved for use in the early stages of the disease, or are expected to be approved in the near future, so the therapeutic landscape will change once again. Therefore, current scientific efforts are focused on the introduction of new substances and understanding their mechanisms of progression and efficacy. This review summarizes recent developments with reference to recent publications and conferences. Findings on the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases are presented, as are a number of studies looking at biomarkers in patients with HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. In particular, the introduction of oral selective estrogen receptor degraders provides new opportunities to establish biomarker-based therapy. Molecular diagnostics is establishing itself as a diagnostic marker and parameter of progression.

Baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the BERING CRC study: A European real-world study in BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

e15584

Background: BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is characterized by a poor prognosis and limited clinical data. Based on results from the phase 3 BEACON CRC trial, targeted treatment with encorafenib plus cetuximab (E+C) represents a newly approved standard of care for these patients (pts) upon systemic therapy. As data from controlled clinical trials are based on a selected patient population, the non-interventional study (NIS) BERING CRC observes a broader patient population under real-world conditions. Methods: BERING CRC is the first NIS to investigate the real-world use of E+C in BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer upon systemic treatment in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. For the present baseline analysis, disease characteristics and treatment data of the initial 40 pts were documented prospectively in 27 sites across Germany and Austria between 09/2020 and 08/2021. As BERING-CRC is ongoing, the study aims to enroll up to 500 pts from 96 German, Austrian, and Swiss sites. The study observes pts treated according to the approval as given in the respective Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). The primary objective is to analyze the 1-year overall survival rate. Secondary endpoints include efficacy, quality of life and tolerability of E+C. Data are analyzed descriptively using standard summary statistics. Results: 40 pts were included in this baseline analysis. The median age was 68 years (range 34-88) and 38% were female. 26 pts (65%) were documented with right-sided tumors and for 63% stage IV disease was noted at initial diagnosis. In the metastatic setting, the main sites of metastasis were liver, peritoneum, and lung (55%, 40%, 33% of pts, respectively), with 20% of pts having ≥ 3 organs involved. For 38% of pts, an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 was documented at baseline assessment (60% ECOG PS 1 or 2). Adjuvant treatment was reported for 8 pts and 88% received chemotherapy alone in this setting. 3 pts (8%) were documented with E+C treatment directly following adjuvant therapy and half of all pts with documented first-line treatment received chemotherapy alone (CT), for 42% chemotherapy was combined with targeted therapy (CT+TT). In second-line, 74% of pts with documented treatment received E+C (9% CT, 17% CT+TT). Bi-weekly cetuximab dosing was reported for 11% of pts treated with E+C. Conclusions: While the high number of pts with right-sided tumors was in line with previous findings on BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC pts, considerably more pts were male in this initial real-world cohort and synchronous metastasis was reported markedly more often. As complementation to previous controlled clinical trial data, pts enrolled to date in BERING-CRC were notably older and presented with higher ECOG PS compared to the pivotal study. Clinical trial information: NCT04673955.

Impact of trial-eligibility as factor for clinical outcome of patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line pazopanib: Subgroup analysis from the prospective, non-interventional study PAZOREAL

e16511

Background: In a real-world setting, a substantial number of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) do not meet all eligibility criteria for a clinical trial. Thus, data on effectiveness and safety of 1st-line (1L) treatment with pazopanib (PAZO) as well as quality of life (QoL) is underrepresented for those pts and data on treatment sequences implementing PAZO as 1L are sparse. Methods: PAZOREAL is a prospective, multi-center, non-interventional study to evaluate effectiveness, safety and QoL in pts with mRCC treated with 1L PAZO, and nivolumab (NIVO) or everolimus in second and third line. In this subgroup analysis, the clinical outcome of trial-eligible (TE) and trial-ineligible (TIE) pts with mRCC was assessed by means of overall survival (OS), time on drug (ToD), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and QoL evaluated by EQ-5D-5L. Pts were rated TIE if they met at least one of the following three ‘TIE criteria’: (i) Karnofsky Performance Status < 70%, (ii) hemoglobin below the lower limit of normal, and (iii) non-clear cell carcinoma1. Results: Of 398 pts treated between December 2015 and February 2021, 376 pts received 1L treatment with PAZO. The median age was 69.7 years. 146 pts were categorized TE and 184 pts TIE, for 46 pts assessment was not applicable. Most of all pts were initially treated with PAZO 800 mg (TE: 71.9% vs TIE: 63.0%). Median ToD for PAZO was 7.7 months (95% CI 6.1-9.0) for TE and 6.0 months (95% CI 4.5-8.1) for TIE. A similar fraction of TE and TIE pts were treated with 2L NIVO (43.8% vs 44.0%). Median OS was 53.2 months (95% CI 38.9-NA) for TE and 26.0 months (95% CI 17.3-35.9) for TIE. The 12-month OS rate was 77.9% for TE and 67.1% for TIE. In patient reported outcome (PRO) measures, baseline QoL was estimated higher for TE than TIE, i.e., 63.2% TE vs 49.2% TIE pts had no limitations for mobility and 82.9% TE vs 61.7% TIE pts were independent in self-care. Frequency of related TEAEs grade 3/4 were comparable for TE and TIE (26.7% vs 25.0%), while TE tended to have less related serious TEAEs (13.0% vs 16.3%). Treatment was discontinued due to related TEAEs in 19.2% of TE and 13.0% of TIE pts. Conclusions: PAZOREAL provides real-world data for mRCC pts usually not represented in clinical trials during the study period. As it was to be expected, median OS and PRO were more favorable for TE than for the TIE pts, reflecting the difference in general condition between these groups. But more importantly, these data underline the tolerability of 1L PAZO treatment even for TIE pts, which is supported by comparable ToD for 1L PAZO and the comparable safety profile in both subgroups.1 Marschner, N. et al. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15(2):e209-215. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2016.08.022.

Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 4 – Prevention and Early Stages

This past year has seen new and effective options for further improving treatment outcome in many patients with early-stage breast cancer. Patients with hormone receptor-positive disease benefited significantly from the addition of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib to endocrine adjuvant therapy. In triple-negative disease, data were presented for two treatment regimens. Patients with advanced disease (stage 2 and 3) benefit from neoadjuvant treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in combination with standard chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 expression. When neoadjuvant therapy has failed to achieve the desired remission in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, the administration of the PARP inhibitor olaparib has demonstrated an impressive response. Other data address translational issues in HER2-positive breast cancer and neoadjuvant therapy approaches with the oral SERD giredestrant and the PARP inhibitor talazoparib. This review presents and analyses the findings of this yearʼ s most important study outcomes.

Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 5 – Advanced Breast Cancer

Despite the COVID 19 pandemic and mostly virtual congresses, innovation in the treatment of breast cancer patients continues at an unabated pace. This review summarises the current developments. Initial overall survival data for CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as the first advanced line of therapy in treatment-naive postmenopausal patients have been published. Similarly, a trial comparing trastuzumab-deruxtecan versus trastuzumab-emtansine revealed a clear benefit regarding progression-free survival. Understanding of biomarkers making checkpoint inhibitor therapy particularly effective is increasing, and new compounds such as oral selective estrogen receptor destabilisers (SERDs) are entering clinical development and completing the first phase III trials.

Romiplostim for Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) in Routine Clinical Practice: Results from a Multicentre Observational Study in Germany

Introduction

The effectiveness and safety of romiplostim were evaluated by immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) phase (newly diagnosed/persistent/chronic) at romiplostim initiation.

Methods

This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective, German, multicentre, observational study in adults with ITP who received ≥1 dose of romiplostim. Follow-up data were collected for ≤2 years. Outcomes included overall platelet response (≥1 platelet count ≥50 × 10⁹/L at 2–24 weeks after romiplostim initiation) or durable platelet response (≥75% of measurements ≥50 × 10⁹/L at 14–24 weeks) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs), evaluated by ITP phase.

Results

Data from 96 patients were analysed (newly diagnosed, n = 18; persistent, n = 25; chronic, n = 53). During the 2- to 24-week follow-up, overall platelet response was achieved in 100% (95% confidence interval: 81.5–100), 100% (86.3–100), and 96.2% (87.0–99.5) of patients with newly diagnosed, persistent, or chronic ITP, respectively, and platelet responses were durable in 88.2% (63.6–98.5), 65.0% (40.8–84.6), and 69.4% (54.6–81.7) of patients. During the 2-year follow-up, ADRs occurred in 24.0–35.8% of patients across phases. Two patients with chronic ITP experienced bone marrow ADRs; no thrombotic ADRs occurred.

Conclusion

Romiplostim was effective and well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed, persistent, or chronic ITP in routine clinical practice.

First-line nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results of the NEPTUN study

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based chemotherapy remains a first-line standard of care for approximately 30% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) not harboring a druggable alteration. Favorable efficacy and safety of the nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin (nab-P/C) combination was shown in the pivotal phase 3 trial. However, information on effectiveness of nab-P/C in a real-world setting in Germany is missing. The NEPTUN study prospectively investigated the effectiveness and safety of nab-P/C in patients with advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC received first-line nab-P/C according to clinical routine. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS6). Other endpoints included further effectiveness parameters, safety and quality of life. Data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

408 patients were enrolled. PFS6 was 40.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.3-46.2); median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.5-5.7). overall response rate was 41.5% (95% CI, 36.3-46.8). Median overall survival (OS) was 10.5 months (95% CI, 9.2-11.6). Subgroup analyses revealed median OS for squamous versus non-squamous histology (11.8 months [95% CI, 9.2-13.8] vs. 9.6 months [95% CI, 7.7-11.2]) and age ≥70 versus <70 years (11.7 months [95% CI, 9.4-14.3] vs. 9.6 months [95% CI, 7.5-11.2]). Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia (26.5%), leukopenia (25.7%), and thrombocytopenia (16.6%). Mostly reported grade 3/4 TEAEs were leukopenia (10.2%), anemia (8.6%), and pneumonia (5.1%). nab-paclitaxel-related deaths as reported by the investigator occurred in 0.8% of patients.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data support the effectiveness and safety of nab-P/C as first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC independent of tumor histology. The results are comparable with the pivotal phase 3 trial. No new safety signals emerged.

Pooled analysis of nivolumab treatment in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the United States and Germany

BACKGROUND

In the Phase-III clinical trial, CheckMate 141, nivolumab significantly improved survival versus standard of care in patients with platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).

METHODS

This pooled analysis investigated the real-world effectiveness of nivolumab, following prior platinum-based therapy, in patients with R/M SCCHN from the United States (US) Flatiron Health database and German HANNA prospective observational study.

RESULTS

Overall, 782 patients (56% US; 44% Germany) were included. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.71 months, and progression-free survival was 4.11 months. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0 or 1, platinum sensitivity, and older age were associated with longer OS, in which number of prior lines of therapy had no significant effect.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate survival benefits of nivolumab in patients with R/M SCCHN in the real-world setting. The observed real-world effectiveness of nivolumab aligns with the efficacy of nivolumab in CheckMate 141.

Polatuzumab vedotin as a salvage and bridging treatment in relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas

The antibody-drug conjugate polatuzumab vedotin (pola) has recently been approved in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (pola-BR) for patients with refractory or relapsed (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). To investigate the efficacy of pola-BR in a real-world setting, we retrospectively analyzed 105 patients with LBCL who were treated in 26 German centers under the national compassionate use program. Fifty-four patients received pola as a salvage treatment and 51 patients were treated with pola with the intention to bridge to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (n = 41) or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (n = 10). Notably, patients in the salvage and bridging cohort had received a median of 3 prior treatment lines. In the salvage cohort, the best overall response rate was 48.1%. The 6-month progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) was 27.7% and 49.6%, respectively. In the bridging cohort, 51.2% of patients could be successfully bridged with pola to the intended CAR T-cell therapy. The combination of pola bridging and successful CAR T-cell therapy resulted in a 6-month OS of 77.9% calculated from pola initiation. Pola vedotin-rituximab without a chemotherapy backbone demonstrated encouraging overall response rates up to 40%, highlighting both an appropriate alternative for patients unsuitable for chemotherapy and a new treatment option for bridging before leukapheresis in patients intended for CAR T-cell therapy. Furthermore, 7 of 12 patients with previous failure of CAR T-cell therapy responded to a pola-containing regimen. These findings suggest that pola may serve as effective salvage and bridging treatment of r/r LBCL patients.

Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 3 - Current Developments in the Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: Review and Assessment of Specialised Treatment Scenarios by an International Expert Panel

The continuous availability of findings from new studies repeatedly results in updated treatment recommendations and guidelines. In the case of breast carcinoma in particular, several studies have been published in the last few years that have transformed how early and advanced breast carcinoma is being treated. However, this by no means means implies that there is agreement among all experts on specific issues. It is precisely the diversity of interpretation of guidelines and study findings that reflects the constantly changing available data and its complexity, as well as the availability of new drugs. In recent years, new substances such as pertuzumab, T-DM1, neratinib and capecitabine have become available to treat patients with early stages of breast carcinoma. Furthermore, the first results on the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors for adjuvant treatment have now been published. Last but not least, the use of multigene tests to avoid the necessity of chemotherapy in certain patients is still under discussion. This review summarises the state of the data and publishes the results of the survey completed by experts at the 2021 St. Gallen Breast Cancer Conference on early-stage breast cancer.

Patient-reported quality of life data from patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil: Interim results of the TALLISUR study

3526

Background: Compared to placebo, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) significantly improved overall and progression-free survival in patients (pts) with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the phase III RECOURSE trial. Although time to deterioration of ECOG performance status (PS) from 0/1 to ≥ 2 was significantly longer in pts treated with FTD/TPI, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was not formally assessed by direct means. Therefore, a two-arm trial with best supportive care (BSC) as appropriate comparative treatment was designed to specifically address the effect of FTD/TPI on HRQoL. Methods: In this prospective, multi-center, German, open-label, phase IV study, pts with pre-treated mCRC could choose between BSC or oral FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 bid on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day cycle). EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires were employed to assess HRQoL. Primary endpoint was the rate of responders with stabilized ( > -10 and < 10 scores) or improved (≥ 10 scores) response (RR). Response was calculated as the mean score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/ QoL scale from the 2nd cycle until the end of treatment/ observation compared to the baseline score. Results: Of 194 eligible pts, 185 pts chose treatment with FTD/TPI (median 3 cycles), while 9 pts decided to receive BSC only. Questionnaires from 109 pts receiving FTD/TPI and from 6 pts with BSC were evaluable for RR. The primary endpoint (RR) was 59.6% (95% CI 49.8 – 68.9) in FTD/TPI-treated pts and 50.0% (95% CI 11.8 – 88.2) in pts receiving BSC. Analysis of the extended follow-up period, demonstrated that RR was 67.0% (95% CI 57.3 – 75.7) in FTD/TPI-treated pts. In the FTD/TPI-group, median time to deterioration of HRQoL was 121 days ( n = 61; 95% CI 87 – 151) according to EORTC QLQ-C30 and 119 days ( n = 63; 95% CI 85 – 138) according to EQ-5D-5L. Conclusions: If pts can choose between treatment and BSC in late-stage CRC, the vast majority opts for treatment. According to the present results, FTD/TPI-treatment induced prolonged stabilization of HRQoL, a highly desired attribute of therapies for pts with late-stage cancer. Clinical trial information: No 2017-000292-83.

Encorafenib plus Binimetinib in patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: First data of the multicenter, multinational, prospective, non-interventional longitudinal study BERINGMELANOMA

9555

Background: For the treatment of advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma, targeted therapy (BRAF/MEK-inhibition) is a standard of care. Encorafenib + binimetinib (EB) were approved in the EU in Sep 2018 and in Switzerland in Nov 2019, based on positive results from COLUMBUS (NCT01909453), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.9 mo (4-year PFS: 26%) and overall survival (OS) of 33.6 mo (4-year OS: 39%). As data from controlled trials are based on selected populations, BERINGMELANOMA investigates the use of EB under real-world conditions in a broader population. Methods: BERINGMELANOMA is an ongoing, multi-national, multi-center, prospective, longitudinal, non-interventional study. It analyzes the effectiveness, quality of life and tolerability of EB-treatment under real-world conditions (primary endpoint: 1-year PFS-rate), focusing on the first- (1L) and second-line setting and including an evaluation of the impact of prognostic factors. The project aims to enroll up to 750 patients (pts) in a total of 80 German, Austrian and Swiss sites with a study duration of 8 yrs. So far, from Oct 2019 to Jan 2021, 153 pts have been included. Pts with prior BRAF-/MEK-inhibition (except adjuvant use completed > 6 mo) and > 1 prior treatment line were excluded. Results: Here we present the first planned interim analysis based on the initial 100 enrolled pts (91 treated / 89 evaluable; median follow-up: 8.1 mo). This analysis set shows a median age of 63.0 yrs (range 29.0-88.0), 52% of pts were female. 81% presented with distant metastases (brain: 31%), with an involvement of ≥3 organ systems in 51% and an elevated LDH in 42%. 54% of pts underwent prior systemic therapy (adjuvant: 28%; 1L: 24%, with ipilimumab + nivolumab as main 1L-treatment: 52%). EB was mainly administered in the 1L-setting (65%). Main reasons for EB-selection were: physician's preference (37%), efficacy (34%), quality of life (21%). Median estimated EB treatment duration was 12.7 mo (95%CI 8.3-NE), median relative dose intensity was 100% for both drugs. Treatment adaptations were required in 34% of pts. Adverse events (AE) were reported in 76% of pts (grade 3/4: 26%). Main AE (≥10%, all grades) were: nausea (18%), diarrhea (17%), CK increase (15%), fatigue (11%), gamma-GT increase (11%). No fatal toxicities were observed. Conclusions: This first interim analysis of BERINGMELANOMA shows an investigation of EB in a real-world population with advanced disease. Despite the poorer prognosis configuration as compared to the pivotal study, the observed treatment duration and tolerability profile are largely consistent with data derived from COLUMBUS without any new safety signals. The second interim analysis will be performed after enrollment of 200 pts and will include an initial analysis of effectiveness data. Clinical trial information: NCT04045691.

Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 1 - Prevention and Early Stages

This review summarises not only the latest evidence on prevention, but also the current research on the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients. Recent years have seen a growing body of evidence on the risk of high- and moderate-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes. A large international consortium has now been able to further refine the answer to the question of the significance of the so-called panel genes. Moreover, the data on treatment selection regarding endocrine efficacy and the decision for or against chemotherapy have also been advanced markedly. There is also new data on adjuvant CDK4/6 (cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6) inhibitors, which are standard in first-line treatment in patients with metastatic HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. For other therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, which have successfully improved the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in neoadjuvant treatment settings for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), there is a growing understanding of the quality of life and side effects. This is especially important in situations where patients could possibly be cured without such a regimen.

Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 2 - Advanced Stages, Long-Term Consequences and Biomarkers

This review summarises and discusses significant aspects of recently published studies on patient treatment in advanced breast cancer and on biomarkers in breast cancer. In recent years, a large number of drugs for all molecular subtypes have been developed up to phase III trials. With regard to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastasised breast cancer, the recent discussion has centred on the best candidate for combined chemotherapy. The oral taxanes could become a new type of oral chemotherapies. There is a growing body of data on biomarkers for the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, which could also signify further development for other molecular subtypes. New substances have been developed for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer that still result in good remission even after massive prior treatment and/or cerebral metastasis. Similarly, knowledge is growing about targeted therapies with antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) against Trop-2, which could bolster our therapeutic armoury in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In addition, the clinical focus is on understanding how to maintain fertility after breast cancer treatment. Here, pooled analyses provide new insights.

Update Breast Cancer 2020 Part 5 - Moving Therapies From Advanced to Early Breast Cancer Patients

In recent years, significant progress has been made in new therapeutic approaches to breast cancer, particularly in patients with HER2-positive and HER2-negative/hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. In the case of HER2-positive tumours, these approaches have included, in particular, treatment with pertuzumab, T-DM1, neratinib and, soon, also tucatinib and trastuzumab deruxtecan (neither of which has yet been authorised in Europe). In patients with HER2-/HR+ breast cancer, CDK4/6 inhibitors and the PIK3CA inhibitor alpelisib are of particular importance. Further novel therapies, such as Akt kinase inhibitors and oral SERDs (selective estrogen receptor down regulators), are already being investigated in ongoing clinical trials. These therapeutic agents are not only being introduced into curative, (neo-)adjuvant therapeutic settings for HER2-positive tumours; a first favourable study on abemaciclib as an adjuvant therapy has now also been published. In patients with triple-negative breast cancer, after many years of negative study results with the Trop-2 antibody drug conjugate (ADC) sacituzumab govitecan, a randomised study has been published that may represent a significant therapeutic advance. This review describes the latest developments in breast cancer subsequent to the ESMO Congress 2020.

Update Breast Cancer 2020 Part 3 - Early Breast Cancer

The treatment of patients with early breast cancer has always been characterised by escalation by new therapies and de-escalation through identification of better treatment regimens or introduction of better tools to estimate prognosis. Efforts in some of these areas in the last few years have led to solid data. The results of the large studies of de-escalation through use of multi-gene tests are available, as are the results of some studies that investigated the new anti-HER2 substances T-DM1 and pertuzumab in the early treatment situation. Several large-scale studies examining the role of CDK4/6 inhibitors will soon be concluded so innovations can be anticipated in this area also. This review article will summarise and classify the results of the latest publications.

Update Breast Cancer 2020 Part 4 - Advanced Breast Cancer

Substances with good effectiveness that intervene in specific signalling pathways have been used increasingly in recent years in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer, and new therapies and approaches have now been added, which actually relate to quite specific changes, such as the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2 tumours with a PIK3CA mutation. The treatment of patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation has also been improved by the introduction of PARP inhibitors. Attempts are now being made increasingly to extend treatment indications based on molecular patterns, to identify other patients who could benefit from a treatment and to integrate the newly established treatment methods in existing therapy sequences. This review articles summarises the latest information in this connection.

Treatment response lowers tumor symptom burden in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer

Background

Head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) frequently causes severe symptoms that may be reduced, when the tumor is successfully treated. The SOCCER trial studied the association of treatment response with patient reported tumor symptom burden in first line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC.

Methods

In this prospective, multi-center, non-interventional trial patients were treated either with platinum-based chemotherapy and cetuximab or radiotherapy and cetuximab. Tumor symptom burden was assessed every four weeks with a questionnaire containing ten visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0–100), which were summarized to the overall VAS score.

Results

Fourhundred seventy patients were registered in 97 German centers. A total of 315 patients with at least the baseline and one subsequent questionnaire were available for analysis. Changes in the VAS score were rated as absolute differences from baseline. Negative values indicate improvement of symptoms. The overall VAS score improved significantly at the first post-baseline assessment in responders (− 2.13 vs. non-responders + 1.15, p = 0.048), and even more for the best post-baseline assessment (− 7.82 vs. non-responders − 1.97, p = 0.0005). The VAS for pain (− 16.37 vs. non-responders − 8.89, p = 0.001) and swallowing of solid food (− 16.67 vs. non-responders − 5.06, p = 0.002) improved significantly more in responders (best post-baseline assessment). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, worse overall VAS scores were associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio for death 1.12 per 10 points increment on the overall VAS scale, 95% CI 1.05–1.20, p = 0.0009).

Conclusion

In unselected patients beyond randomized controlled trials, treatment response lowers tumor symptom burden in recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00122460. Registered 22 Juli 2005,

First-line therapy with bendamustine/prednisone/bortezomib-A GMMG trial for non-transplant eligible symptomatic multiple myeloma patients

OBJECTIVES

The German-speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG) conducted this trial to investigate efficacy and safety of the three-drug combination bendamustine/prednisone/bortezomib (BPV) as first-line therapy for elderly patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

METHODS

Elderly MM patients requiring first-line therapy and not eligible for intensive treatment were enrolled in this phase IIb multicenter study. Patients were treated with BPV regimen for a maximum of nine cycles.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included in the trial with a median age of 76 years. Nineteen patients had renal impairment at baseline. The ORR was 78.8% for patients treated with 3 and more BPV cycles and 71.1% for all evaluable patients. The median progression-free survival was 25 months, and overall survival at 24 months was 83.3%. The clinical benefit rate including MR was 91.2%. In patients with renal impairment at baseline, a renal response was observed in 11 pts. with complete recovery of the renal function in six patients. The most frequent CTC grade 3/4 AEs experienced by patients were hematological (17.5%) and infectious (9.8%) complications. No new safety signals were observed for the study drugs under investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Bendamustine/prednisone/bortezomib may serve as a first-line regimen for transplant-ineligible elderly MM patients in particular for patients with renal impairment requiring a fast and durable renal response.

Sequential treatment with pazopanib followed by nivolumab in patients with renal cell carcinoma: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study PAZOREAL

e17075

Background: Real-world evidence is urgently needed to monitor the translation of new treatment approaches into routine clinical practice as well as to improve cancer treatment and survivorship care. Methods: PAZOREAL is a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study to evaluate effectiveness, tolerability, safety, and quality of life (QoL) in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with 1st-line pazopanib (PAZO) followed by 2nd-line nivolumab (NIVO). The primary variable was time on drug (TD) in the respective treatment (Tx) lines. Other endpoints include overall survival (OS), safety and QoL evaluated by EQ-5D-5L. Results: Between December 2015 and September 2017, 414 pts were enrolled and 388 pts started first-line PAZO Tx, 136 pts subsequently received NIVO as second-line Tx. At time of data-cut (30 Sep 2019) median TD was 6.5 months (95%CI 5.7-7.6) for 1st-line PAZO and 4.6 months (95%CI 3.3-6.0) for 2nd-line NIVO. 9.0% of 1st-line PAZO pts and 5.9% of 2nd-line NIVO pts achieved a complete response and disease control rate was 58.0% (95% CI 53.0-62.8) and 44.9% (95% CI 36.8-53.2) for PAZO or NIVO, respectively. Median OS was 32.6 months (95% CI 28.0-38.9) for all pts, 32.6 months (95%CI 28.2-NA) for pts with 2nd-line NIVO and 32.3 months (95%CI 18.8-NA) for pts with other 2nd-line Tx. The most commonly reported treatment emergent AEs were diarrhea (37.2%), nausea (21.7%) and fatigue (19.1%) for PAZO Tx and diarrhea (8.8%), peripheral edema (5.9%) and dyspnea, fatigue, nausea, rash, vomiting (5.1% each) for NIVO. 66 pts (17.1%) discontinued PAZO and 7 pts (5.1%) discontinued NIVO due to related TEAEs. During 1st-line PAZO Tx, mean EQ-5D-5L utility scores initially decreased slightly by time, returned to baseline level and remained stable afterwards. During 2nd-line NIVO Tx the utility scores initially increased by time and remained stable thereafter. Similar tendencies were reported for mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Conclusions: The interim results of the PAZOREAL study confirm favorable clinical trial outcomes, the good benefit-risk profile and the sustained QoL in pts with mRCC in a real-world setting. The sequential treatment with PAZO followed by NIVO is effective and well tolerated. Clinical trial information: NIS-Nr.: 6687.

Perioperative trastuzumab and pertuzumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone for HER2-positive resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: Final results of the PETRARCA multicenter randomized phase II trial of the AIO

4502

Background: Perioperative FLOT is a standard of care for resectable, esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA). This trial evaluates the addition of trastuzumab (tras) and pertuzumab (per) to FLOT for HER2-positive resectable patients (pts). Methods: PETRARCA is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, investigator initiated trial planned as a phase II/III investigation. We report the phase II part of this trial. Pts with HER2+ resectable EGA (≥ cT2 or cN+) were enrolled. Pts were randomized 1:1 to 4 pre- and post-operative cycles of FLOT (Docetaxel 50 mg/m²; Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m²; Leucovorin 200 mg/m²; 5-FU 2600 mg/m², q2w) (Arm A) or the same regimen with tras 8/6 mg/kg and per 840 mg q3w, followed by 9 cycles tras/per (arm B). Primary endpoint for the phase II part was the rate of pathological complete remission (pCR). Main secondary endpoints were DFS, OS and safety. Results: The trial closed prematurely and did not proceed to phase III. In total, 81 pts were randomized (A, 41; B, 40). Baseline characteristics were balanced (overall, male 79%; median age 60; cT3/T4 86%; cN+ 85%; GEJ 75%). 93% in arm A and 90% in arm B completed pre-OP treatment as planned. More pts had at least one dose modification in arm B (A, 44%; B, 70%). The pCR rate was significantly improved with tras/per (A, 12%; B, 35%; p = 0.02). Likewise, the rate of pathological lymph node negativity was higher with tras/per (A, 39%; B, 68%). R0-resection rate (A, 90%; B, 93%) and surgical morbidity (A: 43%; B, 44%) were comparable. Moreover, in-house mortality was equal in both arms (overall 2.5%). Median DFS was 26 months in arm A and not yet reached in arm B (HR 0.58, p = 0.14). After a median follow-up of 22 months median OS was not yet reached. DFS and OS rates [with 95% CI] at 24 months were 54% [38-71%] and 77% [63-90%] in arm A and 70% [55-85%] and 84% [72-96%] in arm B, respectively. In terms of toxicity more ≥ grade 3 adverse events were reported with tras/per (75% vs. 85%), especially diarrhea (5% vs. 41%) and leukopenia (13% vs 23%). Conclusions: The addition of tras/per to perioperative FLOT significantly improved pCR and nodal negativity rates in pts with Her2+ resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma at the price of higher rates of diarrhea and leukopenia. Clinical trial information: NCT02581462 .

REFLECT real-world evidence (RWE) prospective study update: Efficacy and safety results of Sandoz biosimilar rituximab (SDZ-RTX) for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)

8060

Background: SDZ-RTX (Rixathon) is approved in more than 20 countries and regions, including highly regulated markets e.g. Europe, Japan and Switzerland for all labeled indications of reference rituximab. REFLECT is the first prospective post-approval study to evaluate a rituximab biosimilar as a curative therapy in untreated pts with CD20+ DLBCL. This interim analysis adds up efficacy and additional safety results on the previously presented data (Welslau et al, ASCO and EHA 2019). Methods: Adult patients (pts) were treated with SDZ-RTX and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) according to the product label. The primary endpoint is to evaluate the effectiveness of Rixathon measured by complete response (CR) rate at the end of treatment. Secondary endpoints are overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival at 24 months and adverse events (AEs). Data were collected at baseline and all scheduled treatment and follow-up visits, which is still ongoing. No imputation was made for missing values, and endpoints are summarized descriptively. Results: As of Sep 30, 2019, 170 pts were enrolled, and R-CHOP treatment was close to completion. The median age of pts was 70 years, and 52% were women. Overall, 38% of pts completed the first 12-month observation period, 41% were ongoing, while 21% of pts discontinued. Most of the pts (~80%) had an ECOG score of 0 (35%) or 1 (46%). Early staging (I–II2), low to intermediate disease risk (IPI 0-2), and known B symptoms were reported for 55%, 50%, and 30% of pts, respectively. CR rate at the end of treatment was 57% (defined as the revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma by Cheson et al, 2007 that excludes complete remission/unconfirmed [CRu]). Summary of efficacy is reported in the Table. Overall, 83% of pts experienced AEs, the most common being anemia (23%), fatigue (21%), and polyneuropathy (15%). Treatment-related AEs were reported for 28% of pts. Rates of any serious AEs (SAEs) and treatment-related SAEs were 37% and 6.5%, respectively. On-treatment deaths and all deaths were reported in 2.4% and 4.7% of pts, respectively. Conclusions: REFLECT is the first prospective post-approval study to evaluate a rituximab biosimilar as a curative therapy in untreated pts with DLBCL. This interim analysis results re-confirms the expected safety and efficacy profile for DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP. [Table: see text]

HANNA: Real-world outcomes from an observational study with nivolumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in Germany

6532

Background: Nivolumab has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). As only limited real-world data are available, we describe the use of nivolumab and its outcomes in routine clinical practice. Methods: HANNA is a prospective, observational study of patients with R/M SCCHN treated with nivolumab in 56 hospitals and practices in Germany. In total, 385 patients will be followed for ≤ 5 years from treatment initiation until death, withdrawal of consent, loss of follow-up/record, or end of study. The primary objective is overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives include baseline characteristics, safety profiles, and quality of life (QOL) assessment. Results: By November 2019, data from 311 patients were available. Median follow-up was 3.5 months. Baseline characteristics were male, 81.7%; median age, 63 years; history of smoking, 73.3%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0/1, 60.8%; ECOG PS 2/3, 29.6%. Location of primary tumor was oropharynx, 38.3%; hypopharynx, 20.9%; oral cavity, 22.8%; larynx, 11.6%; others, 6.4%. 55.6% of R/M SCCHN patients progressed ≤ 6 months after platinum-based therapy, whereas 43.4% were platinum-sensitive (progressed > 6 months after platinum-based therapy). Nivolumab was received by 25.1% of patients as first therapy after platinum-based chemo- or radiochemotherapy, by 62.1% as second therapy, and by 12.9% as later line therapy. Median treatment duration was 4.6 months. OS at 1 year was 43.3%. 1-year OS for patients with ECOG PS 0 was 75.9%; ECOG PS 1, 41.2%; and ECOG PS 2, 27.3%. Platinum-sensitive patients had higher 1-year OS probability (51.6%). Drug-related adverse events (grade 1/2) and serious adverse events (grade 3/4) were observed in 28.9% and 10.0% of patients, respectively. Interim QOL data (per FACT-H&N and EQ-5D questionnaire) indicated a tendency toward stabilization or slight improvement. We will present an update of the data with longer follow-up (data cut March 2020). Conclusions: HANNA represents one of the largest real-world datasets for nivolumab in R/M SCCHN and comprises a more diverse set of patients than the phase 3 CheckMate 141 trial, including patients with higher ECOG PS, age, and platinum sensitivity. Outcomes from HANNA show that the improved OS, safety, and QOL seen with nivolumab in the real-world setting are consistent with the outcomes from CheckMate 141. Clinical trial information: NCT03114163 .

Update Breast Cancer 2020 Part 2 - Advanced Breast Cancer: New Treatments and Implementation of Therapies with Companion Diagnostics

For patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, new and effective therapies such as CDK4/6 inhibitors, PARP inhibitors and a PD-L1 inhibitor have been introduced in recent years. This review presents an update on the available studies with their data. In addition, two innovative anti-HER2 therapies are presented (trastuzumab-deruxtecan and tucatinib) for which the results from new studies have been reported. Molecular tests offer the possibility of defining patient populations or also monitoring courses of therapy. This can help identify patients with specific characteristics in order to provide them with individually targeted therapy within the framework of studies. In a large study, the benefit of such a biomarker study was able to be described for the first time.

Update Breast Cancer 2020 Part 1 - Early Breast Cancer: Consolidation of Knowledge About Known Therapies

This review is intended to present the latest developments in the prevention and treatment of early breast cancer. The risk of breast cancer can be increasingly better characterised with large epidemiological studies on genetic and non-genetic risk factors. Through new analyses, the evidence for high-penetrance genes as well as for low-penetrance genes was able to be improved. New data on denosumab and atezolizumab are available in the neoadjuvant situation as is a pooled appraisal of numerous studies on capecitabine in the curative situation. There is also an update to the overall survival data of pertuzumab in the adjuvant situation with a longer follow-up observation period. Finally, digital medicine is steadily finding its way into science. A recently conducted study on automated breast cancer detection using artificial intelligence establishes the basis for a future review in clinical studies.

A randomized phase II trial comparing switch to nivolumab with TKI continuation after 12 weeks of TKI induction therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients (NIVOSWITCH)

678

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and Nivolumab (NIVO) are standard treatment options for mRCC. We tested whether TKI followed by early switch to NIVO improved outcome in mRCC patients (pts). Methods: Main inclusion criteria: measurable advanced or metastatic clear cell RCC, ECOG PS 0-2, adequate organ function, PR or SD to induction therapy with sunitinib (50 mg, 4-2 regime) or pazopanib (800 mg OD). 1:1 randomization at 12 wks.: TKI continuation vs. switch to NIVO (240 or 480 mg IV q2-4wks). Strata were MSKCC risk, TKI used and response to TKI. Imaging was performed q12w. 49 of 244 planned pts were randomized between Dec 2016 and Aug 2018, which led to premature closure of the trial. We report the second interim analysis with data base lock on 31.07.19. ORR was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed in ITT and safety population, respectively. Log-Rank analyses were used for survival analyses. Results: 25 and 24 pts received NIVO or TKI, respectively. Median age was 65 y (range: 35-79), 82% were male and 4% had ECOG PS 2. Metastases occurred predominantly in lung (47%), lymph nodes (27%) and liver (24%). MSKCC risks were: favorable (31%), intermediate (65%), and poor (4%), which were balanced between arms. 55% received sunitinib. ORR for NIVO vs. TKI differed when assessed from start of induction therapy (64 vs. 70%, P=0.76) or from time of randomization (16 vs. 48%; P=0.032). Accordingly, PFS from randomization was 3.0 vs. 11.9 mo. (HR = 1.72 [95% CI: 1.19 – 2.48]; P=0.0026) in favor of TKI continuation. At a median follow-up of 12.9 mo. median OS was not reached, but HR = 1.86 (95% CI: 0.85 – 4.07) P=0.10 showed a trend for TKI continuation. All grades AE for NIVO vs. TKI occurred in 96% vs. 100%, grade 3-5 48% vs. 71% and serious AE 40% vs. 46%. Conclusions: In TKI-sensitive pts, continuation of TKI is more efficacious than early switch to NIVO. The major limitation of our trial is the premature closure and its limited sample size. Clinical trial information: NCT02959554.

Abstract P5-11-14: Palbociclib in combination with anastrozole or exemestane as first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced, inoperable or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Germany: Interim results of the INGE-B phase 2 study

Background: The pivotal PALOMA trials investigated the combination of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib with letrozole as first-line treatment or with fulvestrant after prior endocrine therapy in patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Based on these trials, extended European approval was granted for this patient population to receive palbociclib in combination with any aromatase inhibitor or with fulvestrant after prior endocrine therapy. Methods: The prospective, multicenter phase 2 INGE-B trial was designed for patients with locally advanced or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer to generate efficacy, safety and quality of life data on the combination of palbociclib with letrozole (first line) or fulvestrant (first and later line after prior endocrine therapy) in accordance with the PALOMA trials and to generate so far lacking trial data on the combination of palbociclib with letrozole (later line) and the combination of palbociclib with anastrozole or exemestane (first line) in Germany. This pre-planned interim analysis was conducted to evaluate data on patients receiving palbociclib plus anastrozole or exemestane as first-line therapy. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) in patients with measurable disease according to RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints included the overall response rate (ORR), the CBR for all patients, the disease control rate (DCR), quality of life (QoL) and safety. Data will be analyzed for each group separately with descriptive statistics. Results: At the cut-off date of the interim analysis (June 30, 2019), 66 patients (pts) have been enrolled to receive palbociclib plus anastrozole (palbo+ana) and 64 pts have been enrolled to receive palbociclib plus exemestane (palbo+exe). Thereof, 60 and 58 pts were evaluable, respectively. Median age was 63.5 years (palbo+ana) and 65.0 years (palbo+exe), 100% (n=60) and 94.8% (n=55) of pts had an ECOG performance score of 0 or 1, respectively. 35% (n=21, palbo+ana) and 22.4% (n=13, palbo+exe) of pts presented with non-measurable bone-only disease. The primary endpoint CBR in pts with measurable disease was 73% with palbo+ana (27 of 37 pts) and 70% with palbo+exe (31 of 44 pts).Selected outcome data are depicted in Table 1.

Grade 3/4 adverse events experienced by at least 10% of pts were neutropenia (n=20, 33.3%) and leukopenia (n=9, 15.0%) in pts treated with palbo+ana and neutropenia (n=23, 39.7%), leukopenia and infections (both n=6, 10.3%) in pts treated with palbo+exe. Conclusions: This interim analysis of the INGE-B study will provide so far lacking trial data on the treatment of palbociclib in combination with anastrozole or exemestane. The data will be discussed with respect to results of the PALOMA trials and already published interim analysis results of the INGE-B trial.

Palbociclib + anastrozolePalbociclib + exemestaneMeasurable disease (RECIST v1.1) All pts (investigator assessment)Measurable disease (RECIST v1.1) All pts (investigator assessment)(N=37)(N=60)(N=44)(N=58)n% (95% CI)n% (95% CI)n% (95% CI)n% (95% CI)Overall response rate (ORR)1849 (32-66)2033 (22-47)1841 (26-57)1933 (21-46)Clinical benefit rate (CBR)2773 (56-86)4880 (68-89)3170 (55-83)4171 (57-82)Disease control rate (DCR)3081 (65-92)5388 (77-95)3784 (70-93)4679 (67-89)ORR=CR+PR, CBR=CR+PR+SD ≥ 24 weeks, DCR=CR+PR+SD

Citation Format: Manfred Welslau, Norbert Marschner, Ulrike Söling, Cosima Brucker, Oliver J. Stoetzer, Johannes Meiler, Pauline Wimberger, Steffen Dörfel, Jörg Sahlmann, Leonora Houet, Corinne Vannier, Karin Potthoff. Palbociclib in combination with anastrozole or exemestane as first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced, inoperable or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Germany: Interim results of the INGE-B phase 2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-14.