1
|
Zaghloul M, Rehman H, Sansone S, Argyriou K, Parra-Blanco A. Endoscopic treatment of scarred polyps with a non-thermal device (Endorotor): A review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:1706-1713. [PMID: 38617738 PMCID: PMC11008378 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i12.1706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic resection (ER) of colorectal polyps has become a daily practice in most endoscopic units providing a colorectal cancer screening program and requires the availability of local experts and high-end endoscopic devices. ER procedures have evolved over the past few years from endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to more advanced techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and endo-scopic full-thickness resection. Complete resection and disease eradication are the ultimate goals of ER-based techniques, and novel devices have been developed to achieve these goals. The EndoRotor® Endoscopic Powered Resection System (Interscope Medical, Inc., Northbridge, Massachusetts, United States) is one such device. The EndoRotor is a powered resection tool for the removal of alimentary tract mucosa, including post-EMR persistent lesions with scarring, and has both CE Mark and FDA clearance. This review covers available published evidence documenting the usefulness of EndoRotor for the management of recurrent colorectal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Zaghloul
- Department of Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases, Kafrelsheikh Universit, Kafr-Elshikh 33516, Egypt
| | - Hameed Rehman
- Department of Gastroenterology Service, Nottingham City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, United Kingdom
| | - Stefano Sansone
- Department of Gastroenterology Service, Nottingham City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, United Kingdom
| | - Konstantinos Argyriou
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41334, Greece
| | - Adolfo Parra-Blanco
- Department of Gastroenterology Service, Nottingham City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, United Kingdom
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG72UH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schifferdecker KE, Ramesh NP, Walter LC, Calderwood AH. Multi-level Factors Influencing Decisions About Stopping Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults: a Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:2761-2767. [PMID: 37225959 PMCID: PMC10506966 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08225-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about patient or provider experience and perceptions of stopping surveillance among older adults with a history of colon polyps. While guidelines recommend ceasing routine colorectal cancer screening in adults > 75 years and those with limited life expectancy, guidance for ceasing surveillance colonoscopy in those with prior colon polyps suggests individualizing recommendations. OBJECTIVE Identify processes, experiences, and gaps around individualizing decisions to stop or continue surveillance colonoscopy for older adults and areas for improvement. DESIGN Phenomenological qualitative study design using recorded semi-structured interviews from May 2020 through March 2021. PARTICIPANTS 15 patients aged ≥ 65 in polyp surveillance, 12 primary care providers (PCPs), and 13 gastroenterologists (GIs). APPROACH Data were analyzed using a mixed deductive (directed content analysis) and inductive (grounded theory) approach to identify themes related to stopping or continuing surveillance colonoscopies. KEY RESULTS Analysis resulted in 24 themes and were clustered into three main categories: health and clinical considerations; communication and roles; and system-level processes or structures. Overall, the study found support for discussions around age 75-80 on stopping surveillance colonoscopy with considerations for health and life expectancy and that PCPs should take a primary role. However, systems and processes for scheduling surveillance colonoscopies largely bypass PCPs which reduces opportunities to both individualize recommendations and facilitate patients' decision-making. CONCLUSIONS This study identified gaps in processes to implement current guidelines for individualizing surveillance colonoscopy as adults grow older, including opportunities to discuss stopping. Increasing the role of PCPs in polyp surveillance as patients grow older provides more opportunities for individualized recommendations, so patients can consider their own preferences, ask questions, and make a more informed choice for themselves. Changing existing systems and processes and creating supportive tools for shared decision-making specific to older adults with polyps would improve how surveillance colonoscopy is individualized in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen E Schifferdecker
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice at Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA.
- Center for Program Design and Evaluation at Dartmouth, NH, Lebanon, USA.
| | - Nithya Puttige Ramesh
- Center for Program Design and Evaluation at Dartmouth, NH, Lebanon, USA
- School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Louise C Walter
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Audrey H Calderwood
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice at Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Section of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Cancer, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koïvogui A, Vincelet C, Abihsera G, Ait-Hadad H, Delattre H, Le Trung T, Bernoux A, Carroll R, Nicolet J. Supply and quality of colonoscopy according to the characteristics of gastroenterologists in the French population-based colorectal-cancer screening program. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:1492-1508. [PMID: 36998423 PMCID: PMC10044857 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i9.1492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since its complete roll-out in 2009, the French colorectal cancer screening program (CRCSP) experienced 3 major constraints [use of a less efficient Guaiac-test (gFOBT), stopping the supply of Fecal-Immunochemical-Test kits (FIT), and suspension of the program due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)] affecting its effectiveness.
AIM To describe the impact of the constraints in terms of changes in the quality of screening-colonoscopy (Quali-Colo).
METHODS This retrospective cohort study included screening-colonoscopies performed by gastroenterologists between Jan-2010 and Dec-2020 in people aged 50-74 living in Ile-de-France (France). The changes in Quali-colo (Proportion of colonoscopies performed beyond 7 mo (Colo_7 mo), Frequency of serious adverse events (SAE) and Colonoscopy detection rate) were described in a cohort of Gastroenterologists who performed at least one colonoscopy over each of the four periods defined according to the chronology of the constraints [gFOBT: Normal progress of the CRCSP using gFOBT (2010-2014); FIT: Normal progress of the CRCSP using FIT (2015-2018); STOP-FIT: Year (2019) during which the CRCSP experienced the cessation of the supply of test kits; COVID: Program suspension due to the COVID-19 health crisis (2020)]. The link between each dependent variable (Colo_7 mo; SAE occurrence, neoplasm detection rate) and the predictive factors was analyzed in a two-level multivariate hierarchical model.
RESULTS The 533 gastroenterologists (cohort) achieved 21509 screening colonoscopies over gFOBT period, 38352 over FIT, 7342 over STOP-FIT and 7995 over COVID period. The frequency of SAE did not change between periods (gFOBT: 0.3%; FIT: 0.3%; STOP-FIT: 0.3%; and COVID: 0.2%; P = 0.10). The risk of Colo_7 mo doubled between FIT [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.2 (1.1; 1.2)] and STOP-FIT [aOR: 2.4 (2.1; 2.6)]; then, decreased by 40% between STOP-FIT and COVID [aOR: 2.0 (1.8; 2.2)]. Regardless of the period, this Colo_7 mo’s risk was twice as high for screening colonoscopy performed in a public hospital [aOR: 2.1 (1.3; 3.6)] compared to screening-colonoscopy performed in a private clinic. The neoplasm detection, which increased by 60% between gFOBT and FIT [aOR: 1.6 (1.5; 1.7)], decreased by 40% between FIT and COVID [aOR: 1.1 (1.0; 1.3)].
CONCLUSION The constraints likely affected the time-to-colonoscopy as well as the colonoscopy detection rate without impacting the SAE’s occurrence, highlighting the need for a respectable reference time-to-colonoscopy in CRCSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akoï Koïvogui
- Site de Seine-Saint-Denis, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Ile-de-France (CRCDC-IDF), Bondy 93146, France
| | - Catherine Vincelet
- Site des Yvelines, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Ile-de-France (CRCDC-IDF), Le Chesnay Cedex 78153, France
| | - Gaëlle Abihsera
- Site du Val-de-Marne, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Ile-de-France (CRCDC-IDF), Joinville-le-Pont 94340, France
| | - Hamou Ait-Hadad
- Site de Seine-et-Marne, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Ile-de-France (CRCDC-IDF), Lieusaint 77763, France
| | - Hélène Delattre
- Site des Hauts-de-Seine, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Ile-de-France (CRCDC-IDF), Nanterre 92000, France
| | - Tu Le Trung
- site du Val-d’Oise, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Ile-de-France (CRCDC-IDF), Cergy Saint-Christophe 95800, France
| | - Agnès Bernoux
- Site de l’Essonne, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Ile-de-France (CRCDC-IDF), Fontenay-Les-Briis 91640, France
| | - Rachel Carroll
- Site du Val-de-Marne, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Ile-de-France (CRCDC-IDF), Joinville-le-Pont 94340, France
| | - Jérôme Nicolet
- Siège Paris, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Ile-de-France (CRCDC-IDF), Paris 75015, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maes‐Carballo M, García‐García M, Gómez‐Fandiño Y, Estrada‐López CR, Iglesias‐Álvarez A, Bueno‐Cavanillas A, Khan KS. Systematic review of shared decision-making in guidelines about colorectal cancer screening. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13738. [PMID: 36254840 PMCID: PMC9786598 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to systematically evaluate quality of shared decision-making (SDM) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and consensus statements (CSs). METHODS Search for CRC screening guidances was from 2010 to November 2021 in EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus and CDSR, and the World Wide Web. Three independent reviewers and an arbitrator rated the quality of each guidance using a SDM quality assessment tool (maximum score: 31). Reviewer agreement was 0.88. RESULTS SDM appeared in 41/83 (49.4%) CPGs and 9/19 (47.4%) CSs. None met all the quality criteria, and 51.0% (52/102) failed to meet any quality items. Overall compliance was low (mean 1.63, IQR 0-2). Quality was better in guidances published after 2015 (mean 1, IQR 0-3 vs. mean 0.5, IQR 0-1.5; p = 0.048) and when the term SDM was specifically reported (mean 4.5, IQR 2.5-4.5 vs. mean 0.5, IQR 0-1.5; p < 0.001). CPGs underpinned by systematic reviews showed better SDM quality than consensus (mean 1, IQR 0-3 vs. mean 0, IQR 0-2, p = 0.040). CONCLUSION SDM quality was suboptimal and mentioned in less than half of the guidances, and recommendations were scarce. Guideline developers should incorporate evidence-based SDM recommendations in guidances to underpin the translation of evidence into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Maes‐Carballo
- Department of General Surgery, Breast Cancer UnitComplexo Hospitalario de OurenseOurenseSpain
- Department of General SurgeryHospital Público de VerínOurenseSpain
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
| | - Manuel García‐García
- Department of General Surgery, Breast Cancer UnitComplexo Hospitalario de OurenseOurenseSpain
| | - Yolanda Gómez‐Fandiño
- Department of General Surgery, Breast Cancer UnitComplexo Hospitalario de OurenseOurenseSpain
| | | | - Andrés Iglesias‐Álvarez
- Department of General SurgeryUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
| | - Aurora Bueno‐Cavanillas
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria IBSGranadaSpain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
| | - Khalid Saeed Khan
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria IBSGranadaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Selvamani TY, Shoukrie SI, Malla J, Venugopal S, Selvaraj R, Dhanoa RK, Zahra A, Hamouda RK, Raman A, Mostafa J. Predictors That Identify Complications Such As Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e28894. [PMID: 36105895 PMCID: PMC9451042 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Leakage of the anastomotic site is considered to be one of the most serious complications after colon and rectal surgery. It is associated with increased mortality, morbidity, and longer hospital stays. This systematic review examines the need for blood markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), albumin, and various other molecular markers that assist in their propensity to diagnose anastomotic leakage (AL) early after surgery. Utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar as resources and including the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for the articles, and studies over the last five years were included. A total of 12 studies have been discussed, and most articles suggest CRP as an excellent indicator. CRP compared to Dutch leakage scores (DLS) and PCT studies suggest that the three combinations improve the predictable outcome of AL. In addition, CRP and PCT have been shown to diagnose AL early in the postoperative period. Other studies include the role of markers of oxidative stress markers, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-10, and other molecular markers in the peritoneal drain which are predictive for identifying AL after three days postoperatively (POD-3). Overall, CRP has proven to be a reliable standard indicator of diagnosis. This is because the postoperative elevation of this protein indicates a problem of leakage with clinical symptoms. Other blood parameters are useful for diagnosis as well, but the limitations are the lack of appropriate studies and the number of randomized controlled trials in this area of study.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bozdağ E, Somuncu E, Ozcan A, Devecioğlu EG, Gülmez S, Bozkurt MA. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on colonoscopy results – an overview. POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 2022; 94:15-19. [DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.7299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
<b>Aim:</b> Colorectal cancers are common cancers. Colonoscopy procedure, which is applied in the early diagnosis and treatment of this disease, has a very important role. In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of the COVİD-19 pandemic period on our colonoscopic procedures. </br></br> <b> Material and methods:</b> In this observational study, the data of the patients who underwent colonoscopy in our General Surgery Endoscopy Unit, between March 11, 2019 and March 12, 2021 were scanned retrospectively. Patients under 18 years of age were excluded. The patients were divided into 2 groups. 1. Group patients between 11 March 2019–11 March 2020; patients in the pre-COVID-19 period, Group 2, on March 12, 2020–March 12, 2021; Grouped as the COVID-19 era. </br></br> <b>Results:</b> Data of 8285 patients were analyzed. A total of 4889 patients in Group 1 and 3396 patients in Group 2 were included in the study. The detection of precancerous polyps between the groups was found to be significantly higher in group 1 (p < 0.05) (4.3% vs 2.1). Similarly, the presence of precancerous polyps over the age of 65 was found to be significantly higher in the pre-covid group. In group 1, no significant difference was found in the evaluation of cancer patients according to gender (p > 0.05) (F/M: 1.2%/1.6%). In group 2, cancer patients were found to be significantly higher in males. </br></br> <b>Conclusions:</b> The COVİD-19 pandemic has had negative effects in many areas, as well as on our colonoscopic procedures. Experienced centers continue to work to minimize these negative effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Bozdağ
- Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Erkan Somuncu
- Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Adem Ozcan
- Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Elif Gökçe Devecioğlu
- Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selçuk Gülmez
- Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Abdussamet Bozkurt
- Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ibáñez-Sanz G, Milà N, Vidal C, Rocamora J, Moreno V, Sanz-Pamplona R, Garcia M. Positive impact of a faecal-based screening programme on colorectal cancer mortality risk. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0253369. [PMID: 34191813 PMCID: PMC8244848 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs is directly related to participation and the number of interval CRCs. The objective was to analyse specific-mortality in a cohort of individuals invited to a CRC screening program according to type of CRC diagnosis (screen-detected cancers, interval cancers, and cancers among the non-uptake group). MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective cohort that included invitees aged 50-69 years of a CRC screening program (target population of 85,000 people) in Catalonia (Spain) from 2000-2015 with mortality follow-up until 2020. A screen-detected CRC was a cancer diagnosed after a positive faecal occult blood test (guaiac or immunochemical); an interval cancer was a cancer diagnosed after a negative test result and before the next invitation to the program (≤24 months); a non-uptake cancer was a cancer in subjects who declined screening. RESULTS A total of 624 people were diagnosed with CRC (n = 265 screen-detected, n = 103 interval cancers, n = 256 non-uptake). In the multivariate analysis, we observed a 74% increase in mortality rate in the group with interval CRC compared to screen-detected CRC adjusted for age, sex, location and stage (HR: 1.74%, 95% CI:1.08-2.82, P = 0.02). These differences were found even when we restricted for advanced-cancers participants. In the stratified analysis for type of faecal occult blood test, a lower mortality rate was only observed among FIT screen-detected CRCs. CONCLUSION CRC screening with the FIT was associated with a significant reduction in CRC mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Ibáñez-Sanz
- Oncology Data Analytics Program (ODAP), Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Gastroenterology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital -IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Colorectal Cancer research group, ONCOBELL Programme, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Núria Milà
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Cancer Screening Unit, Prevention and Control Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Early Detection of Cancer Research Group, EPIBELL Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Vidal
- Cancer Screening Unit, Prevention and Control Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Early Detection of Cancer Research Group, EPIBELL Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Judith Rocamora
- Oncology Data Analytics Program (ODAP), Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Víctor Moreno
- Oncology Data Analytics Program (ODAP), Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Colorectal Cancer research group, ONCOBELL Programme, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rebeca Sanz-Pamplona
- Oncology Data Analytics Program (ODAP), Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Colorectal Cancer research group, ONCOBELL Programme, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Montse Garcia
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Cancer Screening Unit, Prevention and Control Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Early Detection of Cancer Research Group, EPIBELL Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kumar R, Harilal S, Carradori S, Mathew B. A Comprehensive Overview of Colon Cancer- A Grim Reaper of the 21st Century. Curr Med Chem 2021; 28:2657-2696. [PMID: 33106132 DOI: 10.2174/0929867327666201026143757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
A few decades ago, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) was low and is now the fourth in the list of deadly cancers producing nearly a million deaths annually. A population that is aging along with risk factors such as smoking, obesity, sedentary lifestyle with little or no physical activity, and non-healthy food habits of developed countries can increase the risk of colorectal cancer. The balance in gut microbiota and the metabolites produced during bacterial fermentation within the host plays a significant role in regulating intestinal diseases as well as colorectal cancer development. Recent progress in the understanding of illness resulted in multiple treatment options such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, including targeted therapy and multitherapies. The treatment plan for CRC depends on the location, stage and grade of cancer as well as genomic biomarker tests. Despite all the advancements made in the genetic and molecular aspects of the disease, the knowledge seems inadequate as the drug action as well as the wide variation in drug response did not appear strongly correlated with the individual molecular and genetic characteristics, which suggests the requirement of comprehensive molecular understanding of this complex heterogeneous disease. Furthermore, multitherapies or a broad spectrum approach, which is an amalgamation of the various promising as well as effective therapeutic strategies that can tackle heterogeneity and act on several targets of the disease, need to be validated in clinical studies. The latest treatment options have significantly increased the survival of up to three years in the case of advanced disease. The fact that colorectal cancer is developed from a polypoid precursor, as well as the symptoms of the disease that occur at an advanced stage, underlines how screening programs can help early detection and decrease mortality as well as morbidity from CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh Kumar
- Department of Pharmacy, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| | - Seetha Harilal
- Department of Pharmacy, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| | - Simone Carradori
- Department of Pharmacy, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Bijo Mathew
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Amrita School of Pharmacy, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, AIMS Health Sciences Campus, Kochi-682 041, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Guacho JAL, Moura DTHD, Ribeiro IB, Moura BFBHD, Gallegos MMM, McCarty T, Toma RK, Moura EGHD. Insufflation of Carbon Dioxide versus Air During Colonoscopy Among Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Endosc 2021; 54:242-249. [PMID: 33765373 PMCID: PMC8039749 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2020.275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims: Carbon dioxide is increasingly used in insufflation during colonoscopy in adult patients; however, air insufflation remains the primary practice among pediatric gastroenterologists. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate insufflation using CO2 versus air in colonoscopies in pediatric patients.
Methods: Individualized search strategies were performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and LILACS databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Cochrane working methodology. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were selected for the present meta-analysis. Pooled proportions were calculated for outcomes including procedure time and abdominal pain immediately and 24 hours post-procedure.
Results: The initial search yielded 644 records, of which five RCTs with a total of 358 patients (CO2: n=178 versus air: n=180) were included in the final analysis. The procedure time was not different between the CO2 and air insufflation groups (mean difference, 10.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.55 to 24.22; p=0.11). Abdominal pain immediately post-procedure was significantly lower in the CO2 group (risk difference [RD], -0.15; 95% CI; -0.26 to -0.03; p=0.01) while abdominal pain at 24 hours post-procedure was similar (RD, -0.05; 95% CI; -0.11 to 0.01; p=0.11).
Conclusions: Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data, CO2 insufflation reduced abdominal pain immediately following the procedure, while pain was similar at 24 hours post-procedure. These results suggest that CO2 is a preferred insufflation technique when performing colonoscopy in pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Alexander Lata Guacho
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Igor Braga Ribeiro
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Thomas McCarty
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ricardo Katsuya Toma
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pediatric Unit, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Electrochemical biosensors for measurement of colorectal cancer biomarkers. Anal Bioanal Chem 2021; 413:2407-2428. [PMID: 33666711 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03197-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with one of the highest rates of mortality among cancers worldwide. The early detection and management of CRC is imperative. Biomarkers play an important role in CRC screening tests, CRC treatment, and prognosis and clinical management; thus rapid and sensitive detection of biomarkers is helpful for early detection of CRC. In recent years, electrochemical biosensors for detecting CRC biomarkers have been widely investigated. In this review, different electrochemical detection methods for CRC biomarkers including immunosensors, aptasensors, and genosensors are summarized. Further, representative examples are provided that demonstrate the advantages of electrochemical sensors modified by various nanomaterials. Finally, the limitations and prospects of biomarkers and electrochemical sensors in detection are also discussed. Graphical abstract.
Collapse
|
11
|
Carot L, Navarro G, Naranjo-Hans D, Iglesias-Coma M, Dalmases A, Fernández L, Seoane A, Buron A, Bellosillo B, Bessa X, Andreu M, Alvarez-Urturi C. Predictors of Metachronous Risk Polyps After Index Colonoscopy. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2021; 12:e00304. [PMID: 33605613 PMCID: PMC7899856 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Guidelines for surveillance after polypectomy are lacking in strong evidence. Our aim was to identify some precursors of colorectal cancer lesions at 3 years after polypectomy to improve stratification and surveillance programs. METHODS We included patients with high-risk lesions (HRLs), defined as advanced adenoma (AA), large serrated polyps (SPs), and multiplicity (≥3 of any adenomas/SPs). Data on age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, pharmacological treatment, and the histological characteristics in each individual, and mutations in genes involved in the most advanced index polyp, were collected. Parameters independently associated with a metachronous HRL diagnosis were evaluated through univariate and multivariate analyses. The results are reported as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals along with P values. RESULTS A total of 537 cases (median age: 60.7 years; 66% male) were included. Dyslipidemia and smoking correlated with metachronous HRLs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of multiplicity with ≥3 polyps on the index colonoscopy was significantly associated with metachronous HRL, AA, proximal AA, and ≥3 polyps at 3 years. In addition, independent predictors of metachronous proximal AA were increasing age, female sex, and the loss of expression of the MLH1 protein. DISCUSSION Multiplicity was a strong predictor of HRLs at 3 years, although the inclusion of other clinical variables (age, sex, smoking status, and dyslipidemia) improves surveillance recommendations. Without these risk factors, the surveillance could be extended to 5 years; we propose examining the somatic expression of MHL1 in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Carot
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Medicine Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Colorectal Neoplasms Clinical and Translational Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Navarro
- Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dolores Naranjo-Hans
- Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mar Iglesias-Coma
- Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alba Dalmases
- Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lierni Fernández
- Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Agustín Seoane
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Colorectal Neoplasms Clinical and Translational Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Buron
- Colorectal Neoplasms Clinical and Translational Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beatriz Bellosillo
- Medicine Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Bessa
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Medicine Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Colorectal Neoplasms Clinical and Translational Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montserrat Andreu
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Colorectal Neoplasms Clinical and Translational Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Alvarez-Urturi
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Colorectal Neoplasms Clinical and Translational Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dossa F, Megetto O, Yakubu M, Zhang DDQ, Baxter NN. Sedation practices for routine gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review of recommendations. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21:22. [PMID: 33413147 PMCID: PMC7792218 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01561-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sedation is commonly used in gastrointestinal endoscopy; however, considerable variability in sedation practices has been reported. The objective of this review was to identify and synthesize existing recommendations on sedation practices for routine gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures. METHODS We systematically reviewed guidelines and position statements identified through a search of PubMed, guidelines databases, and websites of relevant professional associations from January 1, 2005 to May 10, 2019. We included English-language guidelines/position statements with recommendations relating to sedation for adults undergoing routine gastrointestinal endoscopy. Documents with guidance only for complex endoscopic procedures were excluded. We extracted and synthesized recommendations relating to: 1) choice of sedatives, 2) sedation administration, 3) personnel responsible for monitoring sedated patients, 4) skills and training of individuals involved in sedation, and 5) equipment required for monitoring sedated patients. We assessed the quality of included documents using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II tool. RESULTS We identified 19 guidelines and 7 position statements meeting inclusion criteria. Documents generally agreed that a single, trained registered nurse can administer moderate sedation, monitor the patient, and assist with brief, interruptible tasks. Documents also agreed on the routine use of pulse oximetry and blood pressure monitoring during endoscopy. However, recommendations relating to the drugs to be used for sedation, the healthcare personnel capable of administering propofol and monitoring patients sedated with propofol, and the need for capnography when monitoring sedated patients varied. Only 9 documents provided a grade or level of evidence in support of their recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Recommendations for sedation practices in routine gastrointestinal endoscopy differ across guidelines/position statements and often lack supporting evidence with potential implications for patient safety and procedural efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahima Dossa
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Olivia Megetto
- Ontario Health, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mafo Yakubu
- Ontario Health, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David D Q Zhang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Oh HH, Joo YE. Novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer. Intest Res 2020; 18:168-183. [PMID: 31766836 PMCID: PMC7206347 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2019.00080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most common malignancies and remains a major cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite recent advances in surgical and multimodal therapies, the overall survival of advanced CRC patients remains very low. Cancer progression, including invasion and metastasis, is a major cause of death among CRC patients. The underlying mechanisms of action resulting in cancer progression are beginning to unravel. The reported molecular and biochemical mechanisms that might contribute to the phenotypic changes in favor of carcinogenesis include apoptosis inhibition, enhanced tumor cell proliferation, increased invasiveness, cell adhesion perturbations, angiogenesis promotion, and immune surveillance inhibition. These events may contribute to the development and progression of cancer. A biomarker is a molecule that can be detected in tissue, blood, or stool samples to allow the identification of pathological conditions such as cancer. Thus, it would be beneficial to identify reliable and practical molecular biomarkers that aid in the diagnostic and therapeutic processes of CRC. Recent research has targeted the development of biomarkers that aid in the early diagnosis and prognostic stratification of CRC. Despite that, the identification of diagnostic, prognostic, and/or predictive biomarkers remains challenging, and previously identified biomarkers might be insufficient to be clinically applicable or offer high patient acceptability. Here, we discuss recent advances in the development of molecular biomarkers for their potential usefulness in early and less-invasive diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung-Hoon Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, 3rd Fleet Medical Corps, Republic of Korea Navy, Yeongam, Korea
| | - Young-Eun Joo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Anderson J, Lockett M. Training in therapeutic endoscopy: meeting present and future challenges. Frontline Gastroenterol 2019; 10:135-140. [PMID: 31205653 PMCID: PMC6540612 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Revised: 12/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Medical endoscopy trainees face numerous, often conflicting demands on their time. This can result in suboptimal endoscopy training and in difficulty achieving certification in basic endoscopy within the existing 5-year training programme. Endoscopic management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding and basic polypectomy are integral to basic service provision. Competence in these and other therapeutic procedures, including dealing with complications, is currently acquired opportunistically, or through experiential independent practice. This article proposes several potential solutions that may help with endotherapy training in the current UK training programmes. It also addresses issues relating to speciality training when reduced to 4 years in 2022. Advanced endotherapy training needs to be optimised by understanding how to select individuals with the appropriate skills and how to accelerate therapeutic training at the appropriate time. Training programmes will need to adapt and can learn from countries where the pathway is more developed and established. Future training will include a dedicated subspeciality training programme for advanced therapy with competitive entry. Advanced therapy training will be matched to service needs. Scoring systems for case complexity integrated with regional and supraregional networks, would allow referral of selected cases to the most appropriate specialised units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Anderson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - Melanie Lockett
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jin D, Cao H, Shah BK, Chen D, Zhang Y, Liu T, Dong W, Wang S, Qi Y, Wang B. Low detection rate of advanced neoplasia within 5 years after polypectomy of small serrated adenoma. Postgrad Med J 2019; 95:187-192. [PMID: 30926717 PMCID: PMC6585282 DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-136285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Patients with small serrated adenomas (SAs) (<10 mm) often undergo surveillance colonoscopy before the routine recommended time. We aimed to determine the appropriate surveillance intervals following polypectomy of small SAs for symptomatic patients. METHOD We retrospectively reviewed the data of 638 patients, including 122 cases and 516 controls. Subjects in the case group had small SAs at baseline colonoscopy, including sessile SA/polyps and traditional SAs, while subjects in the control group had negative findings. All patients underwent at least one surveillance colonoscopy during the following 5 years. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of advanced neoplasia between the two groups over a 5-year duration (3.6% vs 2.6%, p=0.455). Moreover, both groups also showed a low prevalence of SA formation over 1-5 years (3.6% vs 1.0%, p=0.145). Patients with baseline SA tended to undergo the first surveillance colonoscopy earlier than those without adenoma (≤1 year vs 1 to ≤3 years). Seventy-one (11.1%) of the total included subjects underwent inadequate initial colonoscopy, and 30 (42.3%) underwent early surveillance of adenoma formation within 1 year. Patients with a family history of colorectal cancer (OR 4.69, 95% CI 1.48 to 14.71, p=0.017) or inadequate baseline colonoscopy (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.202 to 8.409, p=0.035) were at a higher risk of metachronous adenoma formation during the surveillance period. CONCLUSION Patients with small SAs at baseline gain little benefit from follow-up of colonoscopy within 5 years after complete polypectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duochen Jin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Hailong Cao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Bikash Kumar Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Danfeng Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yujie Zhang
- Department of Pathology, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Tianyu Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Wenxiao Dong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Sinan Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yanrong Qi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Binhai People's Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Bangmao Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Quality indicators in colonoscopy. The colonoscopy procedure. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2018; 110:316-326. [PMID: 29658767 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5408/2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the project this paper is part of was to propose quality and safety procedures and indicators to facilitate quality improvement in digestive endoscopy units. In this second issue, procedures and indicators are suggested regarding colonoscopy. First, a diagram charting the previous and subsequent steps of colonoscopy was designed. A group of experts in health care quality and/or endoscopy, under the auspices of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), performed a qualitative review of the literature regarding colonoscopy-related quality indicators. Subsequently, using a paired-analysis method, the aforementioned literature was selected and analyzed. A total of 13 specific indicators were found aside of the common markers elsewhere described, ten of which are process-related (one pre-procedure, seven procedure, and two post-procedure markers) while the remaining three are outcome-related. Quality of evidence was assessed for each one of them using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) classification.
Collapse
|
17
|
Valori R, Cortas G, de Lange T, Salem Balfaqih O, de Pater M, Eisendrath P, Falt P, Koruk I, Ono A, Rustemović N, Schoon E, Veitch A, Senore C, Bellisario C, Minozzi S, Bennett C, Bretthauer M, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Domagk D, Hassan C, Kaminski MF, Rees CJ, Spada C, Bisschops R, Rutter M. Performance measures for endoscopy services: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterol J 2018; 7:21-44. [PMID: 30788114 DOI: 10.1177/2050640618810242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 10/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology present a list of key performance measures for endoscopy services. We recommend that these performance measures be adopted by all endoscopy services across Europe. The measures include those related to the leadership, organization, and delivery of the service, as well as those associated with the patient journey. Each measure includes a recommendation for a minimum and target standard for endoscopy services to achieve. We recommend that all stakeholders in endoscopy take note of these ESGE endoscopy services performance measures to accelerate their adoption and implementation. Stakeholders include patients and their advocacy groups; service leaders; staff, including endoscopists; professional societies; payers; and regulators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Valori
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - George Cortas
- University of Balamand Faculty of Medicine, St. George Hospital University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Department of Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Omer Salem Balfaqih
- Thamar University, Medical College, Dhamar; and Hadramout University, Medical College, Mukalla, Yemen
| | - Marjon de Pater
- Dept. of Gastroenterology Endoscopy, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pierre Eisendrath
- Hepato-Gastroenterology department, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Premysl Falt
- University Hospital Olomouc, and Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic; and Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Irfan Koruk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Istanbul Bilim University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Akiko Ono
- Unidad de Endoscopia Digestiva, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Nadan Rustemović
- GI Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Erik Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew Veitch
- Department of Gastroenterology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Carlo Senore
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Minozzi
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Cathy Bennett
- Office of Research and Innovation, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Servicio de Gastroenterologia, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal
| | - Dirk Domagk
- Department of Medicine I, Josephs-Hospital Warendorf, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Muenster, Warendorf, Germany
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education and Department of Gastroenterological Oncology; and Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; and Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Colin J Rees
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Poliambulanza Foundation, Brescia; and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli - IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mathew Rutter
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nikolouzakis TK, Vassilopoulou L, Fragkiadaki P, Sapsakos TM, Papadakis GZ, Spandidos DA, Tsatsakis AM, Tsiaoussis J. Improving diagnosis, prognosis and prediction by using biomarkers in CRC patients (Review). Oncol Rep 2018; 39:2455-2472. [PMID: 29565457 PMCID: PMC5983921 DOI: 10.3892/or.2018.6330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most common cancers. In fact, it is placed in the third place among the most diagnosed cancer in men, after lung and prostate cancer, and in the second one for the most diagnosed cancer in women, following breast cancer. Moreover, its high mortality rates classifies it among the leading causes of cancer‑related death worldwide. Thus, in order to help clinicians to optimize their practice, it is crucial to introduce more effective tools that will improve not only early diagnosis, but also prediction of the most likely progression of the disease and response to chemotherapy. In that way, they will be able to decrease both morbidity and mortality of their patients. In accordance with that, colon cancer research has described numerous biomarkers for diagnostic, prognostic and predictive purposes that either alone or as part of a panel would help improve patient's clinical management. This review aims to describe the most accepted biomarkers among those proposed for use in CRC divided based on the clinical specimen that is examined (tissue, faeces or blood) along with their restrictions. Lastly, new insight in CRC monitoring will be discussed presenting promising emerging biomarkers (telomerase activity, telomere length and micronuclei frequency).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Loukia Vassilopoulou
- Laboratory of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71409 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Persefoni Fragkiadaki
- Laboratory of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71409 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Theodoros Mariolis Sapsakos
- Laboratory of Anatomy and Histology, Nursing School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Z. Papadakis
- Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Institute of Computer Sciences (ICS), Computational Biomedicine Laboratory (CBML), 71003 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Demetrios A. Spandidos
- Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Aristides M. Tsatsakis
- Laboratory of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71409 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - John Tsiaoussis
- Laboratory of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Neumann H, Neumann Sen H, Vieth M, Bisschops R, Thieringer F, Rahman KF, Gamstätter T, Tontini GE, Galle PR. Leaving colorectal polyps in place can be achieved with high accuracy using blue light imaging (BLI). United European Gastroenterol J 2018; 6:1099-1105. [PMID: 30228899 DOI: 10.1177/2050640618769731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives A negative predictive value of more than 90% is proposed by the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations (PIVI) statement for a new technology in order to leave distal diminutive colorectal polyps in place without resection. To our knowledge, no prior prospective study has yet evaluated the feasibility of the most recently introduced blue light imaging (BLI) system for real-time endoscopic prediction of polyp histology for the specific endpoint of leaving hyperplastic polyps in place. Aims Prospective assessment of real-time prediction of colorectal polyps by using BLI. Material and methods In total, 177 consecutive patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy were included. Colorectal polyps were evaluated in real-time by using high-definition endoscopy and the BLI technology without optical magnification. Before resection, the endoscopist described each polyp according to size, shape and surface characteristics (pit and vascular pattern, colour and depression), and histology was predicted with a level of confidence (high or low). Results Histology was predicted with high confidence in 92.5% of polyps. Sensitivity of BLI for prediction of adenomatous histology was 92.68%, with a specificity and accuracy of 94.87 and 93.75%, respectively. Following the recommendation of the PIVI statement, positive and negative predictive values were calculated with values of 95 and 92.5%, respectively. Prediction of surveillance based on both US and European guidelines was correctly predicted in 91% of patients. Conclusion The most recently introduced BLI technology is accurate enough to leave distal colorectal polyps in place without resection. BLI also allowed for assignment of postpolypectomy surveillance intervals. This approach therefore has the potential to reduce costs and risks associated with the redundant removal of diminutive colorectal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helmut Neumann
- First Medical Department, Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Florian Thieringer
- First Medical Department, Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Khan F Rahman
- First Medical Department, Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Gamstätter
- First Medical Department, Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Gian Eugenio Tontini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Peter R Galle
- First Medical Department, Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Maida M, Camilleri S, Manganaro M, Garufi S, Scarpulla G. New endoscopy advances to refine adenoma detection rate for colorectal cancer screening: None is the winner. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 9:402-406. [PMID: 29085566 PMCID: PMC5648983 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i10.402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2017] [Revised: 07/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in males and second in females, and globally the fourth cause for cancer death worldwide. Oncological screening of CRC has a major role in the management of the disease and it is mostly performed by colonoscopy. Anyway, effectiveness of endoscopic screening for CRC strictly depends on adequate detection and removal of potentially precancerous lesions, and accuracy of colonoscopy in detection of adenomas is still suboptimal. For this reason, several technological advances have been implemented in order to improve the diagnostic sensitivity of colonoscopy in adenoma detection. Among these: (1) Visual technologies such as chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging; (2) optical innovation as high definition endoscopy, full-spectrum endoscopy or Third Eye Retroscope; and (3) mechanical advances as Cap assisted colonoscopy, Endocuff, Endoring and G-Eye endoscope. All these technologies advances have been tested over time by clinical studies with mixed results. Which of them is more likely to be successful in the next future?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Maida
- Section of Gastroenterology, S. Elia - M. Raimondi Hospital, 93100 Caltanissetta, Italy
| | - Salvatore Camilleri
- Section of Gastroenterology, S. Elia - M. Raimondi Hospital, 93100 Caltanissetta, Italy
| | - Michele Manganaro
- Section of Gastroenterology, S. Elia - M. Raimondi Hospital, 93100 Caltanissetta, Italy
| | - Serena Garufi
- Section of Gastroenterology, S. Elia - M. Raimondi Hospital, 93100 Caltanissetta, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Scarpulla
- Section of Gastroenterology, S. Elia - M. Raimondi Hospital, 93100 Caltanissetta, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
The Diagnostic Yield of Colonoscopy Stratified by Indications. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 2017:4910143. [PMID: 28819357 PMCID: PMC5551535 DOI: 10.1155/2017/4910143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Revised: 06/08/2017] [Accepted: 06/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Danish centers reserve longer time for screening colonoscopies and allocate the most experienced endoscopists to these cases. The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic yield in colonoscopies for different indications to improve planning of colonoscopy activity and allocation of the highly skilled endoscopists. Methods Nine hundred and ninety-nine randomly collected patients from a prospectively maintained database were grouped in defined referral indication groups. Five groups were compared in respect of the detection rate of adenomas and cancers. Results Two hundred and eighty-nine of 1098 colonoscopies in 999 patients showed significant neoplastic findings, resulting in 591 adenoma resections. Eighty-five percent were treated with a snare resection, and 15% with endoscopic mucosa resection (EMR). Positive findings in the indication groups were (1) symptoms, 25%; (2) positive screening, 17%; (3) previous resection of adenomas, 45%; (4) previous resection of colorectal cancer, 15%; and (5) surveillance of patients with high-risk family history of cancer, 35%. Conclusion The majority of adenomas found during colonoscopy can be treated with simple techniques. If individualized time slots are considered, the adenoma follow-up colonoscopies are likely to be the most time-consuming group with more than twice the number of adenomas detected as compared to other indications.
Collapse
|
22
|
Corley DA, Jensen CD, Quinn VP, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, Lee JK, Schottinger JE, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Ghai NR, Lee AT, Contreras R, Quesenberry CP, Fireman BH, Levin TR. Association Between Time to Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Test Result and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis. JAMA 2017; 317:1631-1641. [PMID: 28444278 PMCID: PMC6343838 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.3634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 189] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is commonly used for colorectal cancer screening and positive test results require follow-up colonoscopy. However, follow-up intervals vary, which may result in neoplastic progression. OBJECTIVE To evaluate time to colonoscopy after a positive FIT result and its association with risk of colorectal cancer and advanced-stage disease at diagnosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cohort study (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2014) within Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California. Participants were 70 124 patients aged 50 through 70 years eligible for colorectal cancer screening with a positive FIT result who had a follow-up colonoscopy. EXPOSURES Time (days) to colonoscopy after a positive FIT result. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Risk of any colorectal cancer and advanced-stage disease (defined as stage III and IV cancer). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were adjusted for patient demographics and baseline risk factors. RESULTS Of the 70 124 patients with positive FIT results (median age, 61 years [IQR, 55-67 years]; men, 52.7%), there were 2191 cases of any colorectal cancer and 601 cases of advanced-stage disease diagnosed. Compared with colonoscopy follow-up within 8 to 30 days (n = 27 176), there were no significant differences between follow-up at 2 months (n = 24 644), 3 months (n = 8666), 4 to 6 months (n = 5251), or 7 to 9 months (n = 1335) for risk of any colorectal cancer (cases per 1000 patients: 8-30 days, 30; 2 months, 28; 3 months, 31; 4-6 months, 31; and 7-9 months, 43) or advanced-stage disease (cases per 1000 patients: 8-30 days, 8; 2 months, 7; 3 months, 7; 4-6 months, 9; and 7-9 months, 13). Risks were significantly higher for examinations at 10 to 12 months (n = 748) for any colorectal cancer (OR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.05-2.08]; 49 cases per 1000 patients) and advanced-stage disease (OR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.14-3.42]; 19 cases per 1000 patients) and more than 12 months (n = 747) for any colorectal cancer (OR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.89-2.68]; 76 cases per 1000 patients) and advanced-stage disease (OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 2.44-4.25]; 31 cases per 1000 patients). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test result, compared with follow-up colonoscopy at 8 to 30 days, follow-up after 10 months was associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer and more advanced-stage disease at the time of diagnosis. Further research is needed to assess whether this relationship is causal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas A. Corley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | | | - Virginia P. Quinn
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Chyke A. Doubeni
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ann G. Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey K. Lee
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Joanne E. Schottinger
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Amy R. Marks
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Wei K. Zhao
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Nirupa R. Ghai
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Alexander T. Lee
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Richard Contreras
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | | | - Bruce H. Fireman
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Theodore R. Levin
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, Bretthauer M, Rees CJ, Dekker E, Hoff G, Jover R, Suchanek S, Ferlitsch M, Anderson J, Roesch T, Hultcranz R, Racz I, Kuipers EJ, Garborg K, East JE, Rupinski M, Seip B, Bennett C, Senore C, Minozzi S, Bisschops R, Domagk D, Valori R, Spada C, Hassan C, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rutter MD. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 5:309-334. [PMID: 28507745 PMCID: PMC5415221 DOI: 10.1177/2050640617700014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level: 1 rate of adequate bowel preparation (minimum standard 90%); 2 cecal intubation rate (minimum standard 90%); 3 adenoma detection rate (minimum standard 25%); 4 appropriate polypectomy technique (minimum standard 80%); 5 complication rate (minimum standard not set); 6 patient experience (minimum standard not set); 7 appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations (minimum standard not set). Other identified performance measures have been listed as less relevant based on an assessment of their importance, scientific acceptability, feasibility, usability, and comparison to competing measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal F Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
- Departments of Gastroenterological Oncology and Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, and Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Marek Bugajski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
- Departments of Gastroenterological Oncology and Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Colin J Rees
- South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust, South Tyneside, UK
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geir Hoff
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Unidad de Gastroenterologia, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Stepan Suchanek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Monika Ferlitsch
- Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - John Anderson
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Thomas Roesch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Hultcranz
- Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Istvan Racz
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Petz Aladar County and Teaching Hospital, Györ, Hungary
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kjetil Garborg
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Maciej Rupinski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
- Departments of Gastroenterological Oncology and Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Birgitte Seip
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Cathy Bennett
- Centre for Technology Enabled Research, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - Carlo Senore
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Silvia Minozzi
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Domagk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Joseph’s Hospital, Warendorf, Germany
| | - Roland Valori
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Servicio de Gastroenterologia, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal
| | - Matthew D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
- School of Medicine, Durham University, Durham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lund O, Andersen B, Christensen MK. Old habits die hard: a case study on how new ways of teaching colonoscopy affect the habitus of experienced clinicians. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 2016; 7:297-308. [PMID: 27643986 PMCID: PMC5056026 DOI: 10.5116/ijme.57d5.5693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Accepted: 09/11/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to explore the habitual constraints and opportunities that affect how experienced clinicians learn new skills and, in particular, how new ways of teaching can influence these. METHODS We conducted a case study based on a specialized training program for colonoscopy services in Denmark. Data was obtained from a short-term ethnographic fieldwork and in-depth interviews during this program. Participants were 12 experienced colonoscopists and three expert colonoscopy trainers from Denmark and UK. The analysis of data involved categorization, inductive coding, and theoretical reading inspired by sociological theory. RESULTS The experienced clinicians' responsiveness to training was shaped by an underlying logic of colonoscopy practice that was characterized by tacit skills, routine work, lower status, skepticism and self-protectiveness. In order to overcome these habitual constraints, the trainers applied a pedagogical approach based on four methods: 1) intellectualization: 'academization' of skills and competencies, 2) sensing and scaffolding: hands-on experiences and learning by doing, 3) asymmetry: accentuating the authority and respect of the trainer, and 4) relation-building: building relationship and engagement between trainer and clinician. This multi-dimensional approach to teaching enabled the trainers to affect the clinicians' logic of practice and to create buy-in (so-called illusio). CONCLUSIONS Clinical skills include socially constructed behaviors and unconscious competences which affect experienced clinicians' responsiveness to continuing medical education. This study suggests four educational strategies that may help trainers to establish new logics of practice in experienced clinicians and to improve the clinicians' conscious competence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ole Lund
- Centre for Health Sciences Education, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Regional Hospital of Randers, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Choung BS, Kim SH, Yoo KB, Seo SY, Kim IH, Lee SO, Lee ST, Kim SW. Should Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level? Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61:731-6. [PMID: 26576553 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3954-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Accepted: 10/28/2015] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The purpose of this research was to evaluate if withdrawal time is a useful index in spite of differences in gastroenterologists' ability and if there are other quality indicators of colonoscopy. METHODS A total of 665 consecutive, asymptomatic individuals of average risk between 50 and 75 years of age who underwent screening colonoscopies performed by 12 gastroenterologists were included in this study. The endoscopists were classified to either the experienced group (group A, N = 6) or the under-experienced group (group B, N = 6). The endoscopists were unaware that they were being studied during the two-month study period. RESULTS In group A, adenoma detection rate was 0.56, while in group B it was 0.43 (P = 0.048). The mean withdrawal time ranged widely from 4.2 to 10.3 min per patient with a mean value of 6.83 for group A and 6.54 for group B. There was a significantly positive relationship between the number of adenomas detected and the withdrawal time for group B (r = 0.827, P = 0.005), but not for group A (r = -0.152, P = 0.584). In the case of group A, the ratio of cecal intubation time to withdrawal time (I/E ratio) less than 1 showed significantly correlated adenoma detection rate compared to I/E ratio greater than 1 (r = -0.308, P = 0.036). In the case of group B, mean I/E ratio was 1.7 and all endoscopists' I/E ratios were greater than 1. CONCLUSIONS For experienced endoscopists, a useful supplementary quality indicator of colonoscopy is to keep intubation/withdrawal time ratio less than 1 and it is necessary for under-experienced endoscopists to try to keep enough withdrawal time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bum Su Choung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonju Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea
| | - Seong Hun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 634-18 Keumam-dong, Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, 561-712, South Korea
| | - Kyung Bo Yoo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 634-18 Keumam-dong, Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, 561-712, South Korea
| | - Seung Young Seo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 634-18 Keumam-dong, Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, 561-712, South Korea
| | - In Hee Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 634-18 Keumam-dong, Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, 561-712, South Korea
| | - Seung Ok Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 634-18 Keumam-dong, Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, 561-712, South Korea
| | - Soo Teik Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 634-18 Keumam-dong, Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, 561-712, South Korea
| | - Sang Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 634-18 Keumam-dong, Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, 561-712, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The verbalisation of quality standards and parameters by medical societies are relevant for qualitative improvement but may also be an instrument to demand more resources for health care or be a unique characteristic. Within the health care system 3 different quality levels can be defined: structure, process and result quality. METHODS The current S2k guideline of the German Society for Gastroenterology (quality requirements for gastrointestinal endoscopy) AWMF registry no. 021-022 provides recommendations based on the available evidence for the structure quality (requirements for equipment, human resources) as well as for the process quality (patient preparation, conduct, documentation) and result quality (follow-up of specific endoscopic procedures). RESULTS Based on these recommendations, measurable quality indicators/parameters for the endoscopy have been selected and formulated. General quality parameters for endoscopic examinations are given as well as quality parameters for specific procedures for the preparation, conduct, and follow-up of specific endoscopic interventions. CONCLUSION Only the regular review of processes and courses by means of defined measurement parameters builds up the basis for corrections based on facts. In addition, the implementation of recommended standards may be an instrument in demanding more resources from the health care system and, therefore, should be embedded as routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike W. Denzer
- Clinic for Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Clinic Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Xiaoling X, Haihang Z, Di C, Langui F, Ting L, Qin S, Chaowu C, Denghao D. Carbon dioxide insufflation or warm-water infusion for unsedated colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic constipation in China. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:18-24. [PMID: 26831602 PMCID: PMC4763523 DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.173754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The effect of carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation and warm-water infusion during colonoscopy on patients with chronic constipation remains unknown. We evaluated CO 2 insufflation and warm-water irrigation versus air insufflation in unsedated patients with chronic constipation in China. PATIENTS AND METHODS This randomized, single-center, controlled trial enrolled 287 consecutive patients, from January 2014 to January 2015, who underwent colonoscopy for chronic constipation. Patients were randomized to CO2 insufflation, warm-water irrigation and air insufflation colonoscopy insertion phase groups. Pain scores were assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS). The primary outcome was real-time maximum insertion pain, recorded by an unblinded nurse assistant. At discharge, the recalled maximum insertion pain was recorded. Meanwhile, patients were requested to select the VAS at 0, 10, 30, and 60 min after the procedure. In addition, cecal intubation and withdrawal time, total procedure time, and adjunct measures were recorded. RESULTS A total of 287 patients were randomized. The correlation between real-time and recalled maximum insertion pain ((Pearson coefficient r = 0.929; P < 0.0001) confirmed internal validation of the primary outcome. The mean real-time maximum pain scores during insertion 2.9 ± 2.1 for CO2, 2.7 ± 1.9 for water achieved a significantly lower pain score compared with air (5.7 ± 2.5) group (air vs CO2 P < 0.001; air vs water P < 0.001). However, no significant pain score differences were found between the patients in the CO2 and water groups (CO2 vs water, P = 0.0535). P values in painless colonoscopy and only discomfort colonoscopy (pain 1-2) were, respectively, 6 (6.4%) and 8 (8.5%) for air; 17 (17.7%) and 29 (30.2%) for CO2; 16 (16.5%) and 31 (31.9%) for water. At 0, 10, 30, and 60 min postprocedure, pain scores showed in the CO2 and water groups had significantly reduced than in air group. Insertion time was significantly different between air (10.6 ± 2.5) and CO2 ( 7.2 ± 1.4) (air vs CO2 P < 0.001), air and water (6.9 ± 1.3) (air vs water P < 0.001). However, CO2 and was not significantly different in cecum-intubated time (CO2 vs water, P = 0.404). CO2 and water group in extubation time were significantly different, respectively, CO2 (7.9 ± 1.1) and water (8.0 ± 1.1) (CO2 vs water, P = 0.707). CO2 or water group required less implementation of adjunct measures and more willingness to repeat the procedure. CONCLUSIONS Compared with air, the CO2 or water-aided method reduced real-time maximum pain and cecum-intubated time for chronic constipated patients in unsedated colonoscopy. The CO2 insufflation or warm-water irrigation may be a simple and inexpensive way to reduce discomfort in unsedated patients with constipation. This study demonstrated an advantage of using CO2 insufflation and warm-water irrigation during colonoscopy in unsedated constipated patients in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Xiaoling
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital, Clinical Medical School, Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhu Haihang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital, Clinical Medical School, Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chen Di
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital, Clinical Medical School, Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fan Langui
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital, Clinical Medical School, Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lu Ting
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital, Clinical Medical School, Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, Jiangsu, China
| | - Shen Qin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital, Clinical Medical School, Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chen Chaowu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital, Clinical Medical School, Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, Jiangsu, China
| | - Deng Denghao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital, Clinical Medical School, Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, Jiangsu, China,Address for correspondence: Prof. Deng Denghao, No. 98 West Nantong Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kuipers EJ, Grady WM, Lieberman D, Seufferlein T, Sung JJ, Boelens PG, van de Velde CJH, Watanabe T. Colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2015; 1:15065. [PMID: 27189416 PMCID: PMC4874655 DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 984] [Impact Index Per Article: 109.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer had a low incidence several decades ago. However, it has become a predominant cancer and now accounts for approximately 10% of cancer-related mortality in western countries. The 'rise' of colorectal cancer in developed countries can be attributed to the increasingly ageing population, unfavourable modern dietary habits and an increase in risk factors, such as smoking, low physical exercise and obesity. New treatments for primary and metastatic colorectal cancer have emerged, providing additional options for patients; these treatments include laparoscopic surgery for primary disease, more-aggressive resection of metastatic disease (such as liver and pulmonary metastases), radiotherapy for rectal cancer, and neoadjuvant and palliative chemotherapies. However, these new treatment options have had limited impact on cure rates and long-term survival. For these reasons, and the recognition that colorectal cancer is long preceded by a polypoid precursor, screening programmes have gained momentum. This Primer provides an overview of the current state of the art of knowledge on the epidemiology and mechanisms of colorectal cancer, as well as on diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernst J. Kuipers
- Erasmus MC University Medical Center, s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William M. Grady
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David Lieberman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Joseph J. Sung
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Petra G. Boelens
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Toshiaki Watanabe
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Vascular Surgery, University of Tokyo, and the University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Taguchi A, Rho JH, Yan Q, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Xu H, Tripathi SC, Wang H, Brenner DE, Kucherlapati M, Kucherlapati R, Boutin AT, Wang YA, DePinho RA, Feng Z, Lampe PD, Hanash SM. MAPRE1 as a plasma biomarker for early-stage colorectal cancer and adenomas. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2015; 8:1112-9. [PMID: 26342024 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-15-0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2015] [Accepted: 08/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer could complement current approaches to colorectal cancer screening. We previously identified the APC-binding protein MAPRE1 as a potential colorectal cancer biomarker. Here, we undertook a case-control validation study to determine the performance of MAPRE1 in detecting early colorectal cancer and colon adenoma and to assess the potential relevance of additional biomarker candidates. We analyzed plasma samples from 60 patients with adenomas, 30 with early colorectal cancer, 30 with advanced colorectal cancer, and 60 healthy controls. MAPRE1 and a set of 21 proteins with potential biomarker utility were assayed using high-density antibody arrays, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was assayed using ELISA. The biologic significance of the candidate biomarkers was also assessed in colorectal cancer mouse models. Plasma MAPRE1 levels were significantly elevated in both patients with adenomas and patients with colorectal cancer compared with controls (P < 0.0001). MAPRE1 and CEA together yielded an area under the curve of 0.793 and a sensitivity of 0.400 at 95% specificity for differentiating early colorectal cancer from controls. Three other biomarkers (AK1, CLIC1, and SOD1) were significantly increased in both adenoma and early colorectal cancer patient plasma samples and in plasma from colorectal cancer mouse models at preclinical stages compared with controls. The combination of MAPRE1, CEA, and AK1 yielded sensitivities of 0.483 and 0.533 at 90% specificity and sensitivities of 0.350 and 0.467 at 95% specificity for differentiating adenoma and early colorectal cancer, respectively, from healthy controls. These findings suggest that MAPRE1 can contribute to the detection of early-stage colorectal cancer and adenomas together with other biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayumu Taguchi
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Jung-Hyun Rho
- Translational Research Program, Human Biology and Public Health Sciences Divisions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Qingxiang Yan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yuzheng Zhang
- Translational Research Program, Human Biology and Public Health Sciences Divisions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Yang Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hanwen Xu
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Satyendra Chandra Tripathi
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hong Wang
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dean E Brenner
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan. VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Raju Kucherlapati
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam T Boutin
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Y Alan Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ronald A DePinho
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ziding Feng
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul D Lampe
- Translational Research Program, Human Biology and Public Health Sciences Divisions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Samir M Hanash
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
The first evidence that screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) could effectively reduce mortality dates back 20 years. However, actual population screening has, in many countries, halted at the level of individual testing and discussions on differences between screening tests. With a wealth of new evidence from various community-based studies looking at test uptake, screening-programme organization and the importance of quality assurance, population screening for CRC is now moving into a new realm, promising better results in terms of reducing CRC-specific morbidity and mortality. Such a shift in the paradigm requires a change from opportunistic, individual testing towards organized population screening with comprehensive monitoring and full-programme quality assurance. To achieve this, a combination of factors--including test characteristics, uptake, screenee autonomy, costs and capacity--must be considered. Thus, evidence from randomized trials comparing different tests must be supplemented by studies of acceptance and uptake to obtain the full picture of the effectiveness (in terms of morbidity, mortality and cost) the different strategies have. In this Review, we discuss a range of screening modalities and describe the factors to be considered to achieve a truly effective population CRC screening programme.
Collapse
|