Non-clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and early clinical studies supporting development of a novel subcutaneous formulation for the monoclonal antibody rituximab

An industry perspective on hyaluronidase co-formulated biopharmaceutics

To deliver biopharmaceutics, subcutaneous (SC) route surpasses intravenous (IV) route unequivocally in time and cost savings, but it has been limited by the injection volume of no greater than 2 mL for a long time. Recently, the adoption of hyaluronidase has become a plausible method to realize high-dose high-volume biopharmaceutical products for SC injection. Among the hyaluronidase family, the recombinant human PH20 appears to be the most reliable candidate with excellent efficacy and safety for co-formulation development. As of 2024, a total of eight hyaluronidase co-formulated biological products have been approved by regulatory authorities. This review article systematically summarized the commercial hyaluronidase co-formulated biopharmaceutics and highlighted the critical aspects of the development of future products regarding selection of hyaluronidase, formulation and process development, non-clinical evaluation, and clinical investigation. Of note, considering the uniqueness of each therapeutic agent, early and effective communication with regulatory authorities is of vital importance to successful development. Discussions were further Expanded to cover the combination of hyaluronidase co-formulations with large-volume handheld autoinjectors. The ultimate goal of this review is to provide a practical and comprehensive reference that will substantially contribute to the development of hyaluronidase co-formulated biopharmaceuticals, thereby advancing the field and benefiting patients worldwide.

Infective complications in cancer patients treated with subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab and rituximab: An individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Investigation of infection risk with subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab and rituximab administration in an individual patient data (IPD) and published data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Databases were searched to September 2021. Primary outcomes were serious and high-grade infection. Relative-risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

IPD meta-analysis (6 RCTs, 2971 participants, 2320 infections) demonstrated higher infection incidence with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration, without reaching statistical significance (serious: 12.2% versus 9.3%, RR 1.28, 95%CI 0.93to1.77, P = 0.13; high-grade: 12.2% versus 9.9%, RR 1.32, 95%CI 0.98to1.77, P = 0.07). With exclusion of an outlying study in post-hoc analysis, increased risks were statistically significant (serious: 13.1% versus 8.4%, RR 1.53, 95%CI 1.14to2.06, P = 0.01; high-grade: 13.2% versus 9.3%, RR 1.56, 95%CI 1.16to2.11, P < 0.01). Published data meta-analysis (8 RCTs, 3745 participants, 648 infections) demonstrated higher incidence of serious (HR 1.31, 95%CI 1.02to1.68, P = 0.04) and high-grade (HR 1.52, 95%CI 1.17to1.98, P < 0.01) infection with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest increased infection risk with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration, although IPD findings are sensitive to exclusion of one trial with inconsistent results and identified risk-of-bias. Ongoing trials may confirm findings. Clinical surveillance should be considered when switching to subcutaneous administration. PROSPERO registration CRD42020221866/CRD42020125376.

Advancing Subcutaneous Dosing Regimens for Biotherapeutics: Clinical Strategies for Expedited Market Access

In recent years, subcutaneous administration of biotherapeutics has made significant progress. The self-administration market for rheumatoid arthritis has witnessed the introduction of additional follow-on biologics, while the first subcutaneous dosing options for monoclonal antibodies have become available for multiple sclerosis. Oncology has also seen advancements with the authorization of high-volume subcutaneous formulations, facilitated by the development of high-concentration formulations and innovative delivery systems. Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment bodies increasingly consider preference data in filing dossiers, particularly in evaluating novel drug delivery methods. The adoption of a pharmacokinetic-based clinical bridging approach has become standard for transitioning from intravenous to subcutaneous administration. Non-inferiority studies with pharmacokinetics as the only primary endpoint have started deviating from traditional randomization schemes, favoring the subcutaneous route and comparing with historical intravenous data. While nonclinical and computational models made progress in predicting safety and immunogenicity for subcutaneously dosed antibodies, clinical trial evidence remains essential due to inter-individual variations and the impact of formulation parameters on anti-drug antibody formation. Ongoing technological advancements and the expanding knowledge base on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlation across specialty areas are expected to further accelerate clinical development of subcutaneous biologics.

Development of Therapeutic Proteins for a New Subcutaneous Route of Administration after the Establishment of Intravenous Dosages: A Systematic Review

Therapeutic proteins may first be developed as intravenous (i.v.) therapies with new subcutaneous (s.c.) dosage forms being subsequently developed to provide an alternative route of administration. As of August 2022, there have been 9 therapeutic proteins which were developed as a new s.c. dosage form after the approval of the corresponding i.v. product. This article provides a systematic review of prior experiences in the i.v. to s.c. switch development programs. We describe what types of clinical studies were conducted to support the i.v. to s.c. switch for these nine therapeutic proteins. Publicly available scientific advice from health authorities is summarized, particularly regarding recommendations on overall development strategy, dose selection, immunogenicity assessment, and indication extrapolation. The clinical data from these i.v. to s.c. development programs demonstrate that: (1) when switching from i.v. dosing to s.c. dosing, trough drug concentration (C_trough ) from s.c. dosing should not be inferior to i.v. dosing with average drug concentration (C_avg ; equivalent to AUC, area under the curve after correcting for dosing intervals between i.v. and s.c. administration) being matched or non-inferior to i.v. dosing; and (2) with appropriate s.c. dose regimens, treatment with s.c. therapeutic proteins can generally achieve similar efficacy and safety as the corresponding i.v. products, suggesting that the much higher maximum concentration (C_max ) after i.v. infusion as compared with that from s.c. injection is often not relevant to the treatment effect.

Mechanistic Modeling of the Effect of Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) on Subcutaneous Delivery of Cetuximab in Rats

PURPOSE

To evaluate the duration of effect of rHuPH20 on SC absorption of cetuximab and to develop a mechanistic pharmacokinetic model linking the kinetics of rHuPH20 action with hyaluronan (HA) homeostasis and absorption of cetuximab from the SC space.

METHODS

Serum pharmacokinetics of cetuximab was evaluated after IV and SC dosing at 0.4 and 10 mg/kg (control groups). In test groups, SC cetuximab was administered simultaneously with rHuPH20 (Co-Injection) or 12 h after injection of rHuPH20 (Pre-Injection). Mechanistic pharmacokinetic model was developed to simultaneously capture cetuximab kinetics in all groups.

RESULTS

Administration of rHuPH20 resulted in a faster absorption of cetuximab; the difference between co-injection and pre-injection groups appeared to be dependent on the dose level. The model combined three major components: kinetics of rHuPH20 at SC site; HA homeostasis and its disruption by rHuPH20; and cetuximab systemic disposition and the effect of HA disruption on cetuximab SC absorption. The model provided good description of experimental data obtained in this study and collected previously.

CONCLUSIONS

Proposed model can serve as a potential translational framework for capturing the effect of rHuPH20 across multiple preclinical species and in human studies and can be used for optimization of SC delivery of biotherapeutics.

Results of a Dose-Finding Phase 1b Study of Subcutaneous Atezolizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Intravenous (IV) atezolizumab is approved for non-small cell lung and other cancers. Subcutaneous (SC) atezolizumab coformulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase, a permeation enhancer for SC dispersion and absorption, is being developed to improve treatment options, reduce burden, and increase efficiency for patients and practitioners. IMscin001 (NCT03735121), a 2-part, open-label, global, multicenter, phase 1b/3 study, is evaluating the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of SC atezolizumab. The part 1 (phase 1b) objective was determination of an SC atezolizumab dose yielding a serum trough concentration (C_trough ) comparable with IV. Patients enrolled in 3 cohorts received SC atezolizumab 1800 mg (thigh) once (cohort 1), 1200 mg (thigh) every 2 weeks for 3 cycles (cohort 2), or 1800 mg (abdomen) every 3 weeks cycle 1, then cycles 2 and 3 (thigh) every 3 weeks (cohort 3). In subsequent cycles, IV atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks was administered until loss of clinical benefit. SC atezolizumab 1800 mg every 3 weeks and 1200 mg every 2 weeks provided similar C_trough and area under the curve values in cycle 1 to the corresponding IV atezolizumab reference, was well tolerated, and exhibited a safety profile consistent with the established IV formulation. Exposure following SC injection in the abdomen was lower (20%, 28%, and 27% for C_trough , maximum concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to day 21, respectively) than in the thigh. Part 1 SC and IV PK data were analyzed using a population PK modeling approach, followed by simulations. Part 2 (phase 3) will now be initiated to demonstrate that SC atezolizumab PK exposure is not lower than that of IV.

Predicting bioavailability of monoclonal antibodies after subcutaneous administration: Open innovation challenge

Despite the increasing trend towards subcutaneous delivery of monoclonal antibodies, factors influencing the subcutaneous bioavailability of these molecules remain poorly understood. To address critical knowledge gaps and issues during development of subcutaneous dosage forms for monoclonal antibodies, the Subcutaneous Drug Delivery and Development Consortium was convened in 2018 as a pre-competitive collaboration of recognized industry experts. One of the Consortium's eight problem statements highlights the challenges of predicting human bioavailability of subcutaneously administered monoclonal antibodies due to a lack of reliable in vitro and preclinical in vivo predictive models. In this paper, we assess the current landscape in subcutaneous bioavailability prediction for monoclonal antibodies and discuss the gaps and opportunities associated with bioavailability models for biotherapeutics. We also issue an open challenge to industry and academia, encouraging the development of reliable models to enable subcutaneous bioavailability prediction of therapeutic large molecules in humans and improve translation from preclinical species.

Use of computed tomography to assess subcutaneous drug dispersion with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 in a swine model

INTRODUCTION

Subcutaneous (SC) formulations of therapeutics with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) are currently approved across various disease indications. The rHuPH20-mediated enzymatic degradation of SC hyaluronan (HA) facilitates bulk fluid flow and dispersion of co-administered therapeutics. However, current methods of quantifying dispersion in the SC space are limited. Here, a novel method is outlined to quantify and follow rapid SC volumetric dispersion of a representative therapeutic fluid in the presence of rHuPH20 using computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Ten Yucatan miniature swine were randomized to three groups. Animals received simultaneous infusions of contrast agent (CA) alone (left side of the animal) or in combination with rHuPH20 (right side) at infusion rates of 2.5, 5, or 10 mL/min. Spiral CT scans (1.5 mm thickness) were conducted before and after the infusion and at regular time intervals throughout. Scans were used to create three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the fluid pockets and analyze surface area, volume, and sphericity.

RESULTS

3D reconstruction showed increased dispersion of CA with rHuPH20 compared with CA alone, with fenestration and increased dispersion in the craniocaudal and lateromedial directions. The CA with rHuPH20 fluid pockets showed an average increase of 46% in surface area (p = 0.001), a 35% increase in volume (p = 0.001) and a 17% decrease in sphericity post-infusion compared with CA alone at 30 min post-infusion.

DISCUSSION

This exploratory study confirms the value of CT imaging as a non-invasive method of assessing real-time spatial and temporal behavior of SC-administered fluids. This technique could help to assess the dispersion pattern of novel rHuPH20 SC co-formulations.

The Influence of Different Disease States on Rituximab Pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, which promotes the selective depletion of CD20 positive B cells, was the first targeted therapy that was approved for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, and it is now widely prescribed in both malignant and non-malignant, immune-related diseases. However, the cause of its various clinical responses in certain diseases, have not been clearly elucidated. The variabilities in inter-individual pharmacokinetic and the emerging evidence of the relationships between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic may provide a better understanding of this drug.

METHODS

We searched and summarized the latest published articles on rituximab pharmacokinetic profiles and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models in different patient populations, including B-cell malignancies, rheumatoid arthritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, and glomerular kidney diseases.

RESULTS

Most pharmacokinetic data are drawn from clinical studies in oncology clinical practice. Body weight, gender, and antigen-related factors are proven to be the key factors affecting rituximab pharmacokinetics. In addition, the positive exposure-response relations were reported, which provide encouraging evidence for individualized therapies. While in immune disorders, especially in the off-labeled indications, pharmacokinetic studies are quite limited. Compared with that in B-cell malignancies, the differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters may be attributed to the different pathogeneses of diseases, mechanisms of action and dosing strategies. However, the correlation between drug exposure and clinical outcomes remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

Here, we provide an overview of the complexities associated with rituximab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in different diseases. Although many influencing factors need to be verified in future studies, a better understanding of the relationships between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic may assist in optimizing rituximab clinical practice.

A Preclinical Investigation into the Effects of Aging on Dermal Hyaluronan Properties and Reconstitution Following Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase PH20 Administration

INTRODUCTION

There is currently no consensus in the literature concerning the impact of aging on the properties of hyaluronan (HA) in the subcutaneous (SC) space. Recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) facilitates SC administration of injected therapeutics by depolymerizing SC HA, facilitating bulk fluid flow, dispersion and absorption. This study assessed the impact of intrinsic aging on HA in the SC space and thus the ability of rHuPH20 to enhance delivery of co-administered therapeutics.

METHODS

Histologic evaluations of HA levels and degradation were performed on human skin samples from six age groups, aged from 20 to 100 years. HA levels were evaluated by HA staining and degradation by staining samples for HA following incubation with rHuPH20. HA was extracted from samples and HA size determined by gel electrophoresis. Dermal reconstitution was assessed in young (aged 1.5 months) and elderly (aged > 16 months) mice. Baseline dye dispersion was measured at 5 and 20 min post-intradermal dye injection. Following treatment with rHuPH20, dye dispersion was measured again at 2, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h.

RESULTS

Distribution of HA was confined to the interstitial space between adipocytes, with similar pericellular presence and levels of HA found across all age groups. Substantial levels of high-molecular-weight HA were observed in all age groups at baseline. Incubation with a clinically relevant dose of rHuPH20 resulted in degradation of all SC HA and similar degradation profiles independent of age. No difference in dye dispersion time was observed between young and elderly mice across the range of time points assessed, with dye dispersion returning to baseline levels by 24 h after rHuPH20 treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous delivery of approved therapeutics facilitated by co-administration with rHuPH20 should not be impacted by intrinsic aging, with this study providing no evidence for an effect of aging on HA distribution, structure or a loss of rHuPH20 efficacy.

Understanding Inter-Individual Variability in Monoclonal Antibody Disposition

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are currently the largest and most dominant class of therapeutic proteins. Inter-individual variability has been observed for several mAbs; however, an understanding of the underlying mechanisms and factors contributing to inter-subject differences in mAb disposition is still lacking. In this review, we analyze the mechanisms of antibody disposition and the putative mechanistic determinants of inter-individual variability. Results from in vitro, preclinical, and clinical studies were reviewed evaluate the role of the neonatal Fc receptor and Fc gamma receptors (expression and polymorphism), target properties (expression, shedding, turnover, internalization, heterogeneity, polymorphism), and the influence of anti-drug antibodies. Particular attention is given to the influence of co-administered drugs and disease, and to the physiological relevance of covariates identified by population pharmacokinetic modeling, as determinants of variability in mAb pharmacokinetics.

mRNA as novel technology for passive immunotherapy

While active immunization elicits a lasting immune response by the body, passive immunotherapy transiently equips the body with exogenously generated immunological effectors in the form of either target-specific antibodies or lymphocytes functionalized with target-specific receptors. In either case, administration or expression of recombinant proteins plays a fundamental role. mRNA prepared by in vitro transcription (IVT) is increasingly appreciated as a drug substance for delivery of recombinant proteins. With its biological role as transient carrier of genetic information translated into protein in the cytoplasm, therapeutic application of mRNA combines several advantages. For example, compared to transfected DNA, mRNA harbors inherent safety features. It is not associated with the risk of inducing genomic changes and potential adverse effects are only temporary due to its transient nature. Compared to the administration of recombinant proteins produced in bioreactors, mRNA allows supplying proteins that are difficult to manufacture and offers extended pharmacokinetics for short-lived proteins. Based on great progress in understanding and manipulating mRNA properties, efficacy data in various models have now demonstrated that IVT mRNA constitutes a potent and flexible platform technology. Starting with an introduction into passive immunotherapy, this review summarizes the current status of IVT mRNA technology and its application to such immunological interventions.

Subcutaneous Administration of Biotherapeutics: An Overview of Current Challenges and Opportunities

Subcutaneous delivery of biotherapeutics has become a valuable alternative to intravenous administration across many disease areas. Although the pharmacokinetic profiles of subcutaneous and intravenous formulations differ, subcutaneous administration has proven effective, safe, well-tolerated, generally preferred by patients and healthcare providers and to result in reduced drug delivery-related healthcare costs and resource use. The aim of this article is to discuss the differences between subcutaneous and intravenous dosing from both health-economic and scientific perspectives. The article covers different indications, treatment settings, administration volumes, and injection devices. We focus on biotherapeutics in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), immunoglobulin-replacement therapy in primary immunodeficiency (PI), beta interferons in multiple sclerosis (MS), and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in oncology. While most subcutaneous biotherapeutics in RA, PI, and MS are self-administered at home, mAbs for oncology are still only approved for administration in a healthcare setting. Beside concerns around the safety of biotherapeutics in oncology, a key challenge for self-administration in this area is that doses and dosing volumes can be comparatively large; however, this difficulty has recently been overcome to some extent by the development of high-concentration solutions, the use of infusion pumps, and the coadministration of the dispersion enhancer hyaluronidase. Furthermore, given the increasing number of biotherapeutics being considered for combination therapy and the high dosing complexity associated with these, especially when administered intravenously, subcutaneous delivery of fixed-dose combinations might be an alternative that will diminish these burdens on healthcare systems.

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies: reviewing a revolution

Since the inception of rituximab in the 1990s, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have revolutionised the treatment of B cell hematological malignancies and have become a cornerstone of modern gold-standard practice. Additionally, the potent efficacy of these agents in depleting the B cell compartment has been used in the management of a broad array of autoimmune diseases. Multiple iterations of these agents have been investigated and are routinely used in clinical practice. In this review, we will discuss the physiology of CD20 and its attractiveness as a therapeutic target, as well as the pharmacology, pre-clinical and clinical data for the major anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies: rituximab, obinutuzumab and ofatumumab.

Subcutaneous rituximab with recombinant human hyaluronidase in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia

The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (MabThera^®/Rituxan^®) has been proven to improve outcomes in a range of B-cell malignancies. Initially developed as a formulation for intravenous infusion, administration times for rituximab can be prolonged and associated with infusion-related reactions, prompting a combined clinical development program investigating subcutaneous delivery in combination with recombinant human hyaluronidase. As this program comes to fruition, this article reviews the evidence demonstrating subcutaneous rituximab to have noninferior pharmacokinetics when delivered at a fixed-dose as well as equivalent clinical outcomes in the treatment of follicular lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This mode of delivery is more preferable to patients and healthcare professionals and is associated with time and cost savings.

Subcutaneous Rituximab for the Treatment of B-Cell Hematologic Malignancies: A Review of the Scientific Rationale and Clinical Development

Rituximab (MabThera®/Rituxan®), a chimeric murine/human monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the transmembrane antigen CD20, was the first therapeutic antibody to enter clinical practice for the treatment of cancer. As monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, rituximab has been shown to prolong progression-free survival and, in some indications overall survival, in patients with various B-cell malignancies, while having a well-established and manageable safety profile and a wide therapeutic window. As a result, rituximab is considered to have revolutionized treatment practices for patients with B-cell malignancies. A subcutaneous (SC) formulation of rituximab has been developed, comprising the same monoclonal antibody as the originally marketed formulation [rituximab concentrate for solution for intravenous (IV) infusion], and has undergone a detailed, sequential clinical development program. This program demonstrated that, at fixed doses, rituximab SC achieves non-inferior serum trough concentrations in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, with comparable efficacy and safety relative to the IV formulation. The added benefit of rituximab SC was demonstrated in dedicated studies showing that rituximab SC allows for simplified and shortened drug preparation and administration times resulting in a reduced treatment burden for patients as well as improved resource utilization (efficiency) at the treatment facility. The improved efficiency of delivering rituximab's benefit to patients may broaden patient access to rituximab therapy in areas with low levels of healthcare resources, including IV-chair capacity constraints. This article is a companion paper to G. Salles, et al., which is also published in this issue.

FUNDING

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Perspectives on Subcutaneous Route of Administration as an Immunogenicity Risk Factor for Therapeutic Proteins

An increasing number of therapeutic proteins are being developed for delivery through the subcutaneous (SC) route of administration. Relative to intravenous (IV) administration, the SC route offers more convenience to patients, flexibility in dosing, and potential to reduce health care costs. There is a perception that SC administration can pose a higher immunogenicity risk than IV administration for a given protein. To evaluate whether there is a difference in therapeutic protein immunogenicity associated with administration routes, a more detailed understanding of the interactions with the immune system by each route is needed. Few approved therapeutic proteins have available clinical immunogenicity data sets in the public domain that represent both IV and SC administration routes. This has prevented a direct comparison of the 2 routes of administration across a large sample size. Of the 6 marketed products where SC and IV route-related incidences of anti-drug antibody (ADA) were available, 4 were associated with higher immunogenicity incidence with SC. In other cases, there was no apparent difference between the SC and IV routes. Overall, the ADA incidence was low (<15%) with no impact on safety or efficacy. The challenges associated with identifying specific risk factors unique to SC administration are discussed.

Non-clinical Safety Evaluation of Biotherapeutics - Challenges, Opportunities and new Insights

New challenges and opportunities in nonclinical safety testing of biotherapeutics were presented and discussed at the 5th European BioSafe Annual General Membership meeting in November 2015 in Ludwigshafen. This article summarizes the presentations and discussions from both the main and the breakout sessions. The following topics were covered in six main sessions: The following questions were discussed across 4 breakout sessions (i-iv) and a case-study based general discussion (v).

Rituximab for subcutaneous delivery: Clinical management principles from a nursing perspective

Nurses play an integral role in administering treatments to patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Intravenous (IV) rituximab was approved by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration in 1998, and a novel subcutaneous (SC) formulation was approved in 2014. Fixed-dose SC rituximab is highly concentrated; co-formulation with a fully human recombinant vorhyaluronidase alfa enzyme helps overcome the physiological barriers of the SC space, facilitating drug dispersion. Despite a different pharmacokinetic profile to the IV preparation, SC rituximab demonstrates a comparable efficacy/safety profile. Most frequently occurring rituximab-related adverse events include neutropenia, nausea and constipation, and administration-related reactions are more frequent with the SC preparation. Compared with IV, SC delivery reduces treatment times and nurse workload, and patients report greater comfort and convenience. This article sets out nursing considerations for optimal administration of SC rituximab, including premedication, drug handling/preparation, injection technique, after-care and management of adverse events, particularly administration-related reactions.

Time Savings with Rituximab Subcutaneous Injection versus Rituximab Intravenous Infusion: A Time and Motion Study in Eight Countries

Background

Rituximab is a standard treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The SABRINA trial (NCT01200758) showed that a subcutaneous (SC) rituximab formulation did not compromise efficacy or safety compared with intravenous (IV) infusion. We aimed to quantify active healthcare professional (HCP) time and patient chair time for rituximab SC and IV, including potential time savings.

Methods

This non-interventional time and motion study was run in eight countries and 30 day oncology units. Rituximab SC data were collected alongside the MabCute trial (NCT01461928); IV data were collected per routine real-world practice. Trained observers recorded active HCP time for pre-specified tasks (stopwatch) and chair time (time of day). A random intercept model was used to analyze active HCP time (by task and for all tasks combined) in the treatment room and drug preparation area, drug administration duration, chair time and patient treatment room time by country and/or across countries. Active HCP and chair time were extrapolated to a patient’s first year of treatment (11 rituximab sessions).

Results

Mean active HCP time was 35.0 and 23.7 minutes for IV and SC process, respectively (-32%, p <0.0001). By country, relative reduction in time was 27–58%. Absolute reduction in extrapolated active HCP time (first year of treatment) was 1.1–5.2 hours. Mean chair time was 262.1 minutes for IV, including 180.9 minutes infusion duration, vs. 67.3 minutes for SC, including 8.3 minutes SC injection administration (-74%, p <0.0001). By country, relative reduction was 53–91%. Absolute reduction in extrapolated chair time for the first year of treatment was 3.1–5.5 eight-hour days.

Conclusions

Compared with rituximab IV, rituximab SC was associated with reduced chair time and active HCP time. The latter could be invested in other activities, whereas the former may lead to more available appointments, reducing waiting lists and increasing the efficiency of day oncology units.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01200758

Rituximab by subcutaneous route

Rituximab has become a keystone of the treatment of B-cell lymphoproliferation. The standard administration route is intravenous infusion with risks of infusion-related reactions. In order to make administration easier, increase convenience for the patient and improve cost effectiveness, a subcutaneous (sc.) form has recently been developed. Early phase clinical studies in patients with follicular lymphoma have shown that a fixed dose of 1400 mg by sc. route yielded at least non-inferior pharmacokinetics that are at least as good as those of intravenous rituximab, as measured by Ctrough levels. The safety profile was also comparable. Preliminary analyses of clinical efficacy showed at least non-inferior response rates. Although additional information is required, these results suggest that sc. rituximab may become a useful option for treating patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.