1
|
Kliesch S, Schmidt S, Wilborn D, Aigner C, Albrecht W, Bedke J, Beintker M, Beyersdorff D, Bokemeyer C, Busch J, Classen J, de Wit M, Dieckmann KP, Diemer T, Dieing A, Gockel M, Göckel-Beining B, Hakenberg OW, Heidenreich A, Heinzelbecker J, Herkommer K, Hermanns T, Kaufmann S, Kornmann M, Kotzerke J, Krege S, Kristiansen G, Lorch A, Müller AC, Oechsle K, Ohloff T, Oing C, Otto U, Pfister D, Pichler R, Recken H, Rick O, Rudolph Y, Ruf C, Schirren J, Schmelz H, Schmidberger H, Schrader M, Schweyer S, Seeling S, Souchon R, Winter C, Wittekind C, Zengerling F, Zermann DH, Zillmann R, Albers P. Management of Germ Cell Tumours of the Testis in Adult Patients. German Clinical Practice Guideline Part I: Epidemiology, Classification, Diagnosis, Prognosis, Fertility Preservation, and Treatment Recommendations for Localized Stages. Urol Int 2021; 105:169-180. [PMID: 33412555 DOI: 10.1159/000510407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This is the first German evidence- and consensus-based clinical guideline on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up on germ cell tumours (GCTs) of the testis in adult patients. We present the guideline content in two publications. Part I covers the topic's background, methods, epidemiology, classification systems, diagnostics, prognosis, and treatment recommendations for the localized stages. METHODS An interdisciplinary panel of 42 experts including 1 patient representative developed the guideline content. Clinical recommendations and statements were based on scientific evidence and expert consensus. For this purpose, evidence tables for several review questions, which were based on systematic literature searches (last search was in March 2018) were provided. Thirty-one experts entitled to vote, rated the final clinical recommendations and statements. RESULTS We provide 161 clinical recommendations and statements. We present information on the quality of cancer care and epidemiology and give recommendations for staging and classification as well as for diagnostic procedures. The diagnostic recommendations encompass measures for assessing the primary tumour as well as procedures for the detection of metastases. One chapter addresses prognostic factors. In part I, we separately present the treatment recommendations for germ cell neoplasia in situ, and the organ-confined stages (clinical stage I) of both seminoma and nonseminoma. CONCLUSION Although GCT is a rare tumour entity with excellent survival rates for the localized stages, its management requires an interdisciplinary approach, including several clinical experts. Quality of care is highly related to institutional expertise and can be reassured by established online-based second-opinion boards. There are very few studies on diagnostics with good level of evidence. Treatment of metastatic GCTs must be tailored to the risk according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaboration Group classification after careful diagnostic evaluation. An interdisciplinary approach as well as the referral of selected patients to centres with proven experience can help achieve favourable clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Kliesch
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, Department of Clinical and Surgical Andrology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany,
| | | | - Doris Wilborn
- UroEvidence@Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Clemens Aigner
- Ruhrlandklinik at University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Walter Albrecht
- Department of Urology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Beyersdorff
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Busch
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Classen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radiological Oncology and Palliative Medicine, St. Vincentius-Kliniken, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Maike de Wit
- Clinic for Internal Medicine - Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Vivantes Clinic Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Diemer
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Anette Dieing
- Clinic for Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, Vivantes Clinics Am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Oliver W Hakenberg
- Urological Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Kathleen Herkommer
- Urological Clinic and Polyclinic of the Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sascha Kaufmann
- Department for Radiooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marko Kornmann
- Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- KEM, Protestant Hospital Essen-Mitte, Clinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urological Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Karin Oechsle
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Timur Ohloff
- Advisor, German Foundation for Young Adults with Cancer, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christoph Oing
- II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Otto
- Urological Competence Centre for Rehabilitation, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Heinrich Recken
- HFH, Hamburger Fern-Hochschule Studienzentrum Essen (Distance Learning University, Essen Study Centre), Essen, Germany
| | - Oliver Rick
- Klinik Reinhardshöhe GmbH, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | | | - Christian Ruf
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus (German Federal Armed Forces Hospital), Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Hans Schmelz
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus (German Federal Armed Forces Hospital), Koblenz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Rainer Souchon
- Department for Radiooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
There is a paucity of data regarding testicular cancer among Saudis as well as the nonexistent of published national data. Furthermore, a substantial increase of the incidence of testicular cancer among Saudis was lately noted. The aim of the study is to determine the trends and patterns of testicular cancer among adult Saudis using national data over a period of 20 years. The national database of the Saudi Cancer Registry (SCR) on testicular cancer over the last two decades was studied including epidemiological and histological patterns. The 1004 cases of testicular cancer among adult Saudis reported by the SCR will be the subject of this study. From 1994 to 2013, 1004 cases of testicular cancer among adult Saudis were reported to the SCR, with a steadily significant increase in incidence rate reaching an annual rate of 94 cases in 2013. Age of the patients ranged 15–93 years with a mean of 34.5 years. The most affected age group was 20–34 years, where 51% of all testicular cancer accumulated. Around 85% of testicular cancer is germ cell tumors, while paratesticular and gonadal stromal tumors represent 15%. Of all testicular cancer, seminomas were seen in 40.7%, nonseminomas in 44.6%. Notably, 70.4% of the cases in the first decade were seminomas, while in the second decade 65.9% of the cases were nonseminomas. The subtypes of the nonseminomas were a mixed tumor in 51.6%, embryonal carcinoma in 19.9%, yolk sac tumor in 12.3%, germinomas in 6.7%, teratomas in 6%, and choriocarcinomas in 3.6%. Lymphomas (34.7%) and rhabdomyosarcomas (23.6%) are on the top of the paratesticular tumor group. The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results summary stage of seminomas was localized in 61.6%, regional in 19.8%, and distant in 12.6%, while of nonseminomas was 48%, 15.5%, and 28.5%, respectively. Localized and distant status of seminomas improved over the studied period by 12% and 4% respectively, while this trend was not seen in nonseminomas. The incidence rate is on rising with doubling observed during the last decade. The most affected age group was 20–34 years. Noteworthy was the dominance of the seminomas in the first decade and of the nonseminomas in the second decade. Paratesticular tumors rate is high, third of which were lymphomas. Compared to data from Western countries, notably, there is a high rate of yolk sac tumors and germinomas and a low incidence of choriocarcinomas and embryonal carcinomas. In general, late presentation of all testicular cancer was noted, although a modest stage improvement over the studied period was observed in seminomas, not in nonseminomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Abomelha
- Advanced Medicine Center for Subspecialties, Urology Clinic, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|