1
|
Predicting the Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9051582. [PMID: 32456008 PMCID: PMC7290951 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a commonly diagnosed condition and requires treatment with anticoagulation to reduce the risk of embolisation as well as recurrent venous thrombotic events. In many cases, cessation of anticoagulation is associated with an unacceptably high risk of recurrent VTE, precipitating the use of indefinite anticoagulation. In contrast, however, continuing anticoagulation is associated with increased major bleeding events. As a consequence, it is essential to accurately predict the subgroup of patients who have the highest probability of experiencing recurrent VTE, so that treatment can be appropriately tailored to each individual. To this end, the development of clinical prediction models has aided in calculating the risk of recurrent thrombotic events; however, there are several limitations with regards to routine use for all patients with acute VTE. More recently, focus has shifted towards the utility of novel biomarkers in the understanding of disease pathogenesis as well as their application in predicting recurrent VTE. Below, we review the current strategies used to predict the development of recurrent VTE, with emphasis on the application of several promising novel biomarkers in this field.
Collapse
|
2
|
Affiliation(s)
- Behnood Bikdeli
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 622 West 168th St, PH 3-347, New York, NY 10032, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tosetto A, Testa S, Martinelli I, Poli D, Cosmi B, Lodigiani C, Ageno W, De Stefano V, Falanga A, Nichele I, Paoletti O, Bucciarelli P, Antonucci E, Legnani C, Banfi E, Dentali F, Bartolomei F, Barcella L, Palareti G. External validation of the DASH prediction rule: a retrospective cohort study. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15:1963-1970. [PMID: 28762665 DOI: 10.1111/jth.13781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Essentials Predicting recurrences may guide therapy after unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). We evaluated the DASH score in 827 patients with unprovoked VTE to verify prediction accuracy. A DASH score ≤ 1 had a cumulative recurrence risk at 1 year of 3.6%, as predicted by the model. The DASH score performed better in younger (< 65 years old) subjects. SUMMARY Background The DASH prediction model has been proposed as a guide to identify patients at low risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but has never been validated in an independent cohort. Aims To validate the calibration and discrimination of the DASH prediction model, and to evaluate the DASH score in a predefined patient subgroup aged > 65 years. Methods Patients with a proximal unprovoked deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) who received a full course of vitamin K antagonist or direct oral anticoagulant (> 3 months) and had D-dimer measured after treatment withdrawal were eligible. The DASH score was computed on the basis of the D-dimer level after therapy withdrawal and personal characteristics at the time of the event. Recurrent VTE events were symptomatic proximal or distal DVT/PE, and were analyzed with a time-dependent analysis. Observed 12-month and 24-month recurrence rates were compared with recurrence rates predicted by the DASH model. Results We analyzed a total of 827 patients, of whom 100 (12.1%) had an objectively documented recurrence. As compared with the original DASH cohort, there was a greater proportion of subjects with a 'low-risk' (≤ 1) DASH score (66.3% versus 51.6%, P < 0.001). The slope of the observed versus expected cumulative incidence at 2 years was 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.51-1.45). The c-statistic was lower for subjects aged > 65 years (0.54) than for younger subjects (0.72). Conclusions These results confirm the validity of DASH prediction model, particularly in young subjects. The recurrence risk in elderly patients (> 65 years) was, however, > 5% even in those with the lowest DASH scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Tosetto
- Hematology Department, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - S Testa
- Hemostasis and Thrombosis Center, AO Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - I Martinelli
- Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Fondazione Angelo Bianchi Bonomi, IRCCS Ospedale Ca' Granda, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - D Poli
- Thrombosis Center, Dipartimento Oncologico AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - B Cosmi
- Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation, S. Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - C Lodigiani
- Thrombosis and Hemorragic Diseases Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - W Ageno
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - V De Stefano
- Institute of Hematology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - A Falanga
- Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center, Department of Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, Bergamo, Italy
| | - I Nichele
- Hematology Department, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - O Paoletti
- Hemostasis and Thrombosis Center, AO Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - P Bucciarelli
- Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Fondazione Angelo Bianchi Bonomi, IRCCS Ospedale Ca' Granda, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - E Antonucci
- Fondazione Arianna Anticoagulazione, Bologna, Italy
| | - C Legnani
- Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation, S. Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - E Banfi
- Thrombosis and Hemorragic Diseases Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - F Dentali
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - F Bartolomei
- Institute of Hematology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - L Barcella
- Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center, Department of Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, Bergamo, Italy
| | - G Palareti
- Fondazione Arianna Anticoagulazione, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|