Crossreactivity Studies between Sera of Patients with Heparin Associated Thrombocytopenia and a New Low Molecular Weight Heparin, Reviparin

Performance evaluation of heparin-induced platelet aggregation vs serotonin release assay

OBJECTIVES

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but life-threatening condition that requires rapid diagnosis for proper management. Laboratory testing should only be performed on patients with intermediate- or high-risk pretest probability. The platelet factor 4 (PF4) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the screening test that should be confirmed by higher specificity testing such as the heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) or the serotonin release assay (SRA). This study aims to evaluate the performance of the HIPA in comparison to the SRA, establish cutoffs of the PF4 ELISA to predict positivity for HIPA/SRA, and study the mortality rate between patients with suspected HIT confirmed as HIT positive vs negative.

METHODS

All positive PF4 ELISA cases with confirmatory HIPA and SRA testing were included. As the SRA was considered the gold standard, the HIPA performance was evaluated in comparison to SRA before and after the implementation of a new standardized interpretation guide in 2022. The mortality of these cases was also documented by chart reviews.

RESULTS

In total, 232 cases with positive or indeterminate anti-PF4 IgG ELISA had confirmatory testing with HIPA and SRA. The sensitivity of the HIPA improved from 55.4% in 2018 to 2021 to 73.8% in 2022. The specificity remained similarly high in 2018 to 2021 vs 2022 (94.9% vs 87.5%). The negative predictive value (NPV) improved in 2022. The PF4 optical density cutoff to predict the positivity of SRA was 0.85 vs 1.47 to predict the positivity of HIPA but decreased to 0.83 when combining HIPA and/or SRA. There was no significant difference in mortality between patients with suspected HIT confirmed positive vs negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the HIPA has a lower sensitivity than the SRA, the new standardized interpretation guide improved its sensitivity and NPV in 2022. Future improvements are needed to use the HIPA as a stand-alone confirmatory test with the goal to shorten hospital length of stay and expedite proper anticoagulation management.

An international external quality assessment for laboratory diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Essentials A pilot study for External Quality Assessment for testing of HIT is described. The qualitative accordance for the PF4/heparin IgG test was 97.6%. The qualitative accordance for functional HIT tests was considerably lower. External Quality Assessment for functional HIT tests is required. SUMMARY: Objective Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially life-threatening complication of heparin exposure. Diagnosis is most reliable using a combination of an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) that detects antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes ("antigen" assay) and a "functional" assay that detects platelet-activating properties of the pathogenic HIT antibodies. No External Quality Assessment (EQA) is available for a combination of the tests. Here we report on the results of the first international EQA. Methods The pilot EQA was organized by the Department of Transfusion Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Germany. Six serum samples of patients, which were referred to Greifswald for HIT diagnosis, and one negative control sample were distributed to seven participants in Germany, Canada, and Singapore. Participants were asked to report the optical density (OD) values of their local EIA test for IgG-specific antibodies against the PF4/heparin complexes and the results for a functional assay (HIPA or SRA). Consensus was defined as a minimum 70% agreement, i.e., agreement among at least five of the seven participating laboratories. Results and conclusion Six out of seven participants reported results for EIA, with a high quantitative accordance (97.6%). For the functional assay, consensus was reached for all samples except the negative control, for which some participants reported nonspecific reactivity. All HIT-negative samples were correctly diagnosed by all participants; for HIT-positive samples, consensus of 70% was reached. Although the limited availability of sample material is an obstacle to overcome, an EQA combining both EIA and functional testing is feasible.

Fibronectin modulates formation of PF4/heparin complexes and is a potential factor for reducing risk of developing HIT

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies. Platelet activation assays that use "washed" platelets are more sensitive for detecting HIT antibodies than platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-based assays. Moreover, heparin-exposed patients vary considerably with respect to the risk of PF4/heparin immunization and, among antibody-positive patients, the risk of subsequent "breakthrough" of clinical HIT with manifestation of thrombocytopenia. We used washed platelets and PRP, standard laboratory HIT tests, and physicochemical methods to identify a plasma factor interfering with PF4/heparin complexes and anti-PF4/heparin antibody-platelet interaction, thus explaining differences in functional assays. To investigate a modulating risk for PF4/heparin immunization and breakthrough of HIT, we also tested 89 plasmas from 2 serosurveillance trials. Fibronectin levels were measured in 4 patient groups exhibiting different degrees of heparin-dependent immunization and expression of HIT. The heat-labile plasma protein, fibronectin, inhibited PF4 binding to platelets in a dose-dependent fashion, particularly in washed (vs PRP) systems. Fibronectin also inhibited PF4/heparin binding to platelets, anti-PF4/heparin antibody binding to PF4/heparin complexes, and anti-PF4/heparin antibody-induced platelet activation as a result of PF4/heparin complex disruption. In addition, plasma fibronectin levels increased progressively among the following 4 patient groups: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)+/serotonin-release assay (SRA)+/HIT+ < ELISA+/SRA+/HIT- ∼ ELISA+/SRA-/HIT- < ELISA-/SRA-/HIT-. Altogether, these findings suggest that fibronectin interferes with PF4/heparin complex formation and anti-PF4/heparin antibody-induced platelet activation. Reduced fibronectin levels in washed platelet assays help to explain the greater sensitivity of washed platelet (vs PRP) assays for HIT. More importantly, lower plasma fibronectin levels could represent a risk factor for PF4/heparin immunization and clinical breakthrough of HIT.

Identifying patients at high risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-associated thrombosis with a platelet activation assay using flow cytometry

To diagnose heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), detection of platelet-activating antibodies (HIT antibodies) is crucial. However, serum platelet activation profiles vary across patients and depend on test conditions. We evaluated the association between clinical outcomes and platelet-activating profiles assessed by a platelet microparticle assay (PMA), which detects activation of washed platelets induced by HIT antibodies, in 401 consecutive patients clinically suspected of having HIT. We made modifications to the assay, such as donor selection for washed platelets that increased sensitivity. Serum that activated platelets at a therapeutic (but not high) heparin concentration was defined as positive. Of these, serum that activated platelets within 30 minutes or in the absence of heparin was defined as strongly positive. The remaining samples were considered weakly positive. As a result, 97 % and 93 % of patients who tested strongly and weakly positive had clinical profiles consistent with HIT, respectively. The incidence of thromboembolic events (TEEs) after heparin exposure in patients who tested strongly positive, weakly positive, and negative was 61 %, 40 %, and 29 %, respectively. Among patients who did not experience a TEE on the day HIT was suspected, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of subsequent TEEs between patients who tested strongly and weakly positive when argatroban was initiated on the same day (19.0 % vs 7.1 %, p=0.313), but there was a significant difference when argatroban therapy was delayed by one or more days (61.1 % vs 17.6 %, p=0.007). The modified PMA is effective in diagnosing HIT and identifying patients at high risk for HIT-associated TEEs.

Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Functional Assays in the Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Review

A rapid and accurate diagnosis in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is essential for patient management but remains challenging. Current HIT diagnosis ideally relies on a combination of clinical information, immunoassay and functional assay results. Platelet activation assays or functional assays detect HIT antibodies that are more clinically significant. Several functional assays have been developed and evaluated in the literature. They differ in the activation endpoint studied; the technique or technology used; the platelet donor selection; the platelet suspension (washed platelets, platelet rich plasma or whole blood); the patient sample (serum or plasma); and the heparin used (type and concentrations). Inconsistencies in controls performed and associated results interpretation are common. Thresholds and performances are determined differently among papers. Functional assays suffer from interlaboratory variability. This lack of standardization limits the evaluation and the accessibility of functional assays in laboratories. In the present article, we review all the current activation endpoints, techniques and methodologies of functional assays developed for HIT diagnosis.

Management of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis Syndrome

Summary: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune mediated response to heparin in which antibody driven thrombosis can have a dramatic life-threatening expression. There is much interest on this subject including studies on the pathophysiologic mechanism, the clinical managements of the initial stages of HIT versus the HIT-positive patient requiring continued anticoagulation versus the HIT patient with thrombosis, the pros and cons of available alterr~aci~~ anticoagulants, and the laboratory assays to aid in the diagnosis of HIT with particular reference to the sensitivity/specificity of the new heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody titer assay. A comprehensive account of these timely issues is given in this article.

Lack of In Vitro Cross-Reactivity Predicts Safety of Low-Molecular Weight Heparins in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Alternative anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is often problematic. The relatively high cross-reactivity rate reported for the low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) has discouraged their use in this setting. This study has investigated the safety of using the LMWH Fragmin, based on a negative heparin-dependent platelet aggregation test using the latter, in patients with proven HIT. Fifty-three evaluable patients with clinical and laboratory evidence of HIT were evaluated for cross-reactivity with Fragmin using a Fragmin-dependent platelet aggregation test. In 20 of 38 patients who showed no in vitro cross-reactivity. Fragmin was substituted for unfractionated heparin. The outcome of these 20 patients was evaluated and compared to that of the remaining 33 patients, in whom anticoagulates were ceased or warfarin or Orgaran was used. Eighteen of 20 patients treated with Fragmin increased their platelet count by ≥50 x 109/l from a mean nadir of 57.9 ± 4.7 x 109/l within 2.8 ± 0.29 days following substitution of Fragmin for unfractionated heparin. Twenty-eight of the 33 remaining patients who did not receive Fragmin increased their platelet count by ≥50 x 109/l from a mean nadir of 53.0 ± 4.8 x 109/l within 3.0 ± 0.29 days. In seven patients (two treated with Fragmin), response could not be evaluated due to death within 36 h of cessation of heparin or discharge from hospital. The results indicate that in vitro cross-reactivity testing employing a heparin-dependent platelet aggregation assay can be safely used to select patients with HIT for further anticoagulation with LMWH. Key Words: Fragmin—Crossreactivity—Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: in vitro studies on the interaction of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and low-sulfated heparin, with platelet factor 4 and anti-PF4/heparin antibodies

Heparin is a widely used anticoagulant. Because of its negative charge, it forms complexes with positively charged platelet factor 4 (PF4). This can induce anti-PF4/heparin IgG Abs. Resulting immune complexes activate platelets, leading to the prothrombotic adverse drug reaction heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT requires treatment with alternative anticoagulants. Approved for HIT are 2 direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI; lepirudin, argatroban) and danaparoid. They are niche products with limitations. We assessed the effects of the DTI dabigatran, the direct factor Xa-inhibitor rivaroxaban, and of 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin (ODSH; a partially desulfated heparin with minimal anticoagulant effects) on PF4/heparin complexes and the interaction of anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. Neither dabigatran nor rivaroxaban had any effect on the interaction of PF4 or anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. In contrast, ODSH inhibited PF4 binding to gel-filtered platelets, displaced PF4 from a PF4-transfected cell line, displaced PF4/heparin complexes from platelet surfaces, and inhibited anti-PF4/heparin Ab binding to PF4/heparin complexes and subsequent platelet activation. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban seem to be options for alternative anticoagulation in patients with a history of HIT. ODSH prevents formation of immunogenic PF4/heparin complexes, and, when given together with heparin, may have the potential to reduce the risk for HIT during treatment with heparin.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a stoichiometry-based model to explain the differing immunogenicities of unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and fondaparinux in different clinical settings

INTRODUCTION

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. The frequency of HIT is highly variable in different clinical settings, and is more frequent with unfractionated heparin (UFH) than with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), despite the in vitro observation that HIT antibodies activate platelets similarly well with LMWH as with UFH. An important difference between UFH, LMWH, and fondaparinux is their widely differing plasma concentrations. We aimed to provide a model that included anticoagulant concentrations and PF4 availability as risk factors influencing the anti-PF4/heparin immune response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

By photon correlation spectroscopy we determined the concentrations at which UFH, LMWH, and fondaparinux form complexes optimally with PF4. Plasma concentrations of UFH and LMWH were calculated based on ex vivo pharmacokinetic data, with information on fondaparinux and PF4 concentrations taken from the literature.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The main features of our model are: optimal complex formation occurs at prophylactic-dose UFH and high PF4 levels, whereas therapeutic-dose LMWH concentrations are too high for optimal complex formation; in contrast, concentrations of fondaparinux are usually below the optimal stoichiometric range. Thus, immunization should occur more often in situations with major rather than minor platelet activation, and--for a given degree of platelet activation (PF4 availability)--as: prophylactic-dose UFH>therapeutic-dose UFH>prophylactic-dose LMWH, fondaparinux>therapeutic-dose LMWH. Our model provides a framework for explaining empirical observations that LMWH induces less anti-PF4/heparin antibodies than does UFH, and that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies are more often found in patients undergoing major surgery than in medical patients.

On the mechanism of inhibition of tissue factor pathway by the synthetic pentasaccharide during coagulation of human plasma

The tissue factor (TF) pathway is preponderant in the initiation of blood coagulation in normal haemostasis and in thrombotic states. In the present study we investigated the mechanisms by which the synthetic pentasaccharide may influence the regulation of the TF pathway during clotting of human platelet poor plasma (PPP). Clotting of normal PPP or plasmas immuno-depleted of a single clotting factor (factor VII, factor XII, factor XI, factor IX, factor VIII, factor X, factor V, factor II) was initiated by triggering the TF pathway in the presence of fondaparinux (0.5 microg/ml). Activated factor VII (FVIIa) levels were measured in serum obtained at several time intervals after re-calcification of PPP. A clotting assay highly specific for FVIIa was used. The synthetic pentasaccharide inhibited the generation of FVIIa by 66%. The inhibitory effect of fondaparinux on FVIIa was completely abolished when antithrombin activity of plasma was inhibited by a specific antibody. Following the activation of TF pathway in plasmas depleted of factor X or factor IX, the inhibitory effect of fondaparinux on FVIIa generation was completely abolished, whereas it was not significantly modified when the other clotting factor-depleted plasmas were clotted. When fondaparinux was added in the serum, after the maximal generation of FVIIa, it inhibited by 20-30% the activity of the FVIIa-TF complex. These data suggest that fondaparinux enhances the antithrombin-dependent downregulation of the TF pathway by decreasing the generation of FVIIa via the inhibition of the generation and the activity of activated factor IX and activated factor X, and by inhibiting the activity of the FVIIa-TF complex.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, paradoxical thromboembolism, and other adverse effects of heparin-type therapy

This article discusses the common and uncommon side effects of heparin and heparin-like therapy. Most attention is devoted to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, as it is the most clinically aggressive adverse reaction. Additionally, less common and several newly reported side effects are discussed.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, paradoxical thromboembolism, and other side effects of heparin therapy

Although several new anticoagulant drugs are in development, heparin remains the drug of choice for most anticoagulation needs. The clinical effects of heparin are meritorious, but side effects do exist. Important untoward effects of heparin therapy including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, heparin-associated osteoporosis, eosinophilia, skin reactions, allergic reactions other than thrombocytopenia and alopecia will be discussed in this article.