Long nerve allografts in sheep with Cyclosporin A immunosuppression

Decellularized Graft for Repairing Severe Peripheral Nerve Injuries in Sheep

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Peripheral nerve injuries resulting in a nerve defect require surgical repair. The gold standard of autograft (AG) has several limitations, and therefore, new alternatives must be developed. The main objective of this study was to assess nerve regeneration through a long gap nerve injury (50 mm) in the peroneal nerve of sheep with a decellularized nerve allograft (DCA).

METHODS

A 5-cm long nerve gap was made in the peroneal nerve of sheep and repaired using an AG or using a DCA. Functional tests were performed once a month and electrophysiology and echography evaluations at 6.5 and 9 months postsurgery. Nerve grafts were harvested at 9 months for immunohistochemical and morphological analyses.

RESULTS

The decellularization protocol completely eliminated the cells while preserving the extracellular matrix of the nerve. No significant differences were observed in functional tests of locomotion and pain response. Reinnervation of the tibialis anterior muscles occurred in all animals, with some delay in the DCA group compared with the AG group. Histology showed a preserved fascicular structure in both AG and DCA; however, the number of axons distal to the nerve graft was higher in AG than in DCA.

CONCLUSION

The decellularized graft assayed supported effective axonal regeneration when used to repair a 5-cm long gap in the sheep. As expected, a delay in functional recovery was observed compared with the AG because of the lack of Schwann cells.

Regenerative Strategies in Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Injuries in Different Animal Models

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve damage mainly resulted from traumatic or infectious causes; the main signs of a damaged nerve are the loss of sensory and/or motor functions. The injured nerve has limited regenerative capacity and is recovered by the body itself, the recovery process depends on the severity of damage to the nerve, nowadays the use of stem cells is one of the new and advanced methods for treatment of these problems.

METHOD

Following our review, data are collected from different databases "Google scholar, Springer, Elsevier, Egyptian Knowledge Bank, and PubMed" using different keywords such as Peripheral nerve damage, Radial Nerve, Sciatic Nerve, Animals, Nerve regeneration, and Stem cell to investigate the different methods taken in consideration for regeneration of PNI.

RESULT

This review contains tables illustrating all forms and types of regenerative medicine used in treatment of peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) including different types of stem cells " adipose-derived stem cells, bone marrow stem cells, Human umbilical cord stem cells, embryonic stem cells" and their effect on re-constitution and functional recovery of the damaged nerve which evaluated by physical, histological, Immuno-histochemical, biochemical evaluation, and the review illuminated the best regenerative strategies help in rapid peripheral nerve regeneration in different animal models included horse, dog, cat, sheep, monkey, pig, mice and rat.

CONCLUSION

Old surgical attempts such as neurorrhaphy, autogenic nerve transplantation, and Schwann cell implantation have a limited power of recovery in cases of large nerve defects. Stem cell therapy including mesenchymal stromal cells has a high potential differentiation capacity to renew and form a new nerve and also restore its function.

Repair of Long Peripheral Nerve Defects in Sheep: A Translational Model for Nerve Regeneration

Despite advances in microsurgery, full functional recovery of severe peripheral nerve injuries is not commonly attained. The sheep appears as a good preclinical model since it presents nerves with similar characteristics to humans. In this study, we induced 5 or 7 cm resection in the peroneal nerve and repaired with an autograft. Functional evaluation was performed monthly. Electromyographic and ultrasound tests were performed at 6.5 and 9 months postoperation (mpo). No significant differences were found between groups with respect to functional tests, although slow improvements were seen from 5 mpo. Electrophysiological tests showed compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) of small amplitude at 6.5 mpo that increased at 9 mpo, although they were significantly lower than the contralateral side. Ultrasound tests showed significantly reduced size of tibialis anterior (TA) muscle at 6.5 mpo and partially recovered size at 9 mpo. Histological evaluation of the grafts showed good axonal regeneration in all except one sheep from autograft 7 cm (AG7) group, while distal to the graft there was a higher number of axons than in control nerves. The results indicate that sheep nerve repair is a useful model for investigating long-gap peripheral nerve injuries.

Repair of Long Nerve Defects with a New Decellularized Nerve Graft in Rats and in Sheep

Decellularized nerve allografts (DC) are an alternative to autografts (AG) for repairing severe peripheral nerve injuries. We have assessed a new DC provided by VERIGRAFT. The decellularization procedure completely removed cellularity while preserving the extracellular matrix. We first assessed the DC in a 15 mm gap in the sciatic nerve of rats, showing slightly delayed but effective regeneration. Then, we assayed the DC in a 70 mm gap in the peroneal nerve of sheep compared with AG. Evaluation of nerve regeneration and functional recovery was performed by clinical, electrophysiology and ultrasound tests. No significant differences were found in functional recovery between groups of sheep. Histology showed a preserved fascicular structure in the AG while in the DC grafts regenerated axons were grouped in small units. In conclusion, the DC was permissive for axonal regeneration and allowed to repair a 70 mm long gap in the sheep nerve.

Typical and atypical properties of peripheral nerve allografts enable novel strategies to repair segmental-loss injuries

We review data showing that peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) that involve the loss of a nerve segment are the most common type of traumatic injury to nervous systems. Segmental-loss PNIs have a poor prognosis compared to other injuries, especially when one or more mixed motor/sensory nerves are involved and are typically the major source of disability associated with extremities that have sustained other injuries. Relatively little progress has been made, since the treatment of segmental loss PNIs with cable autografts that are currently the gold standard for repair has slow and incomplete (often non-existent) functional recovery. Viable peripheral nerve allografts (PNAs) to repair segmental-loss PNIs have not been experimentally or clinically useful due to their immunological rejection, Wallerian degeneration (WD) of anucleate donor graft and distal host axons, and slow regeneration of host axons, leading to delayed re-innervation and producing atrophy or degeneration of distal target tissues. However, two significant advances have recently been made using viable PNAs to repair segmental-loss PNIs: (1) hydrogel release of Treg cells that reduce the immunological response and (2) PEG-fusion of donor PNAs that reduce the immune response, reduce and/or suppress much WD, immediately restore axonal conduction across the donor graft and re-innervate many target tissues, and restore much voluntary behavioral functions within weeks, sometimes to levels approaching that of uninjured nerves. We review the rather sparse cellular/biochemical data for rejection of conventional PNAs and their acceptance following Treg hydrogel and PEG-fusion of PNAs, as well as cellular and systemic data for their acceptance and remarkable behavioral recovery in the absence of tissue matching or immune suppression. We also review typical and atypical characteristics of PNAs compared with other types of tissue or organ allografts, problems and potential solutions for PNA use and storage, clinical implications and commercial availability of PNAs, and future possibilities for PNAs to repair segmental-loss PNIs.

Nerve gaps repaired with acellular nerve allografts recellularized with Schwann-like cells: Preclinical trial

BACKGROUND

Acellular nerve allografts (ANA) recellularized with mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) or Schwann cells (SC) are, at present, a therapeutic option for peripheral nerve injuries (PNI). This study aimed to evaluate the regenerative and functional capacity of a recellularized allograft (RA) compared with autograft nerve reconstruction in PNI.

METHODS

Fourteen ovines were randomly included in two groups (n=7). A peroneal nerve gap 30 mm in length was excised, and nerve repair was performed by the transplantation of either an autograft or a recellularized allograft with SC-like cells. Evaluations included a histomorphological analysis of the ANA, MSC pre differentiated into SC-like cells, at one year follow-up functional limb recovery (support and gait), and nerve regeneration using neurophysiological tests and histomorphometric analysis. All evaluations were compared with the contralateral hindlimb as the control.

RESULTS

The nerve allograft was successfully decellularized and more than 70% of MSC were pre differentiated into SC-like cells. Functional assessment in both treated groups improved similarly over time (p <0.05). Neurophysiological results (latency, amplitude, and conduction velocity) also improved in both treated groups at twelve months. Histological results demonstrated a less organized arrangement of nerve fibers (p <0.05) with an active remyelination process (p <0.05) in both treated groups compared with controls at twelve months.

CONCLUSIONS

ANA recellularized with SC-like cells proved to be a successful treatment for nerve gaps. Motor recovery and nerve regeneration were satisfactorily achieved in both graft groups compared with their contralateral nontreated nerves. This approach could be useful for the clinical therapy of PNI.

In vitro, In vivo and Ex vivo Models for Peripheral Nerve Injury and Regeneration

Peripheral Nerve Injuries (PNI) frequently occur secondary to traumatic injuries. Recovery from these injuries can be expectedly poor, especially in proximal injuries. In order to study and improve peripheral nerve regeneration, scientists rely on peripheral nerve models to identify and test therapeutic interventions. In this review, we discuss the best described and most commonly used peripheral nerve models that scientists have and continue to use to study peripheral nerve physiology and function.

Reconstruction of Critical Nerve Defects Using Allogenic Nerve Tissue: A Review of Current Approaches

Regardless of the nerve defect length, nerve injury is a debilitating condition for the affected patient that results in loss of sensory and motor function. These functional impairments can have a profound impact on the patient’s quality of life. Surgical approaches for the treatment of short segment nerve defects are well-established. Autologous nerve transplantation, considered the gold standard, and the use of artificial nerve grafts are safe and successful procedures for short segment nerve defect reconstruction. Long segment nerve defects which extend 3.0 cm or more are more problematic for repair. Methods for reconstruction of long defects are limited. Artificial nerve grafts often fail to regenerate and autologous nerve grafts are limited in length and number. Cadaveric processed/unprocessed nerve allografts are a promising alternative in nerve surgery. This review gives a systematic overview on pre-clinical and clinical approaches in nerve allograft transplantation.

Local FK506 drug delivery enhances nerve regeneration through fresh, unprocessed peripheral nerve allografts

OBJECTIVE

Nerve allografts offer many advantages in the reconstruction of peripheral nerve gaps: they retain their native microstructure, contain pro-regenerative Schwann cells, are widely available, and avoid donor site morbidity. Unfortunately, clinical use of nerve allografts is limited by the need for systemic immunosuppression and its adverse effects. To eliminate the toxicity of the systemic immunosuppressant FK506, we developed a local FK506 drug delivery system (DDS) to provide drug release over 28 days. The study objective was to investigate if the local FK506 DDS enhances nerve regeneration in a rodent model of nerve gap defect reconstruction with immunologically-disparate nerve allografts.

METHODS

In male Lewis rats, a common peroneal nerve gap defect was reconstructed with either a 20 mm nerve isograft from a donor Lewis rat or a 20 mm fresh, unprocessed nerve allograft from an immunologically incompatible donor ACI rat. After 4 weeks of survival, nerve regeneration was evaluated using retrograde neuronal labelling, quantitative histomorphometry, and serum cytokine profile.

RESULTS

Treatment with both systemic FK506 and the local FK506 DDS significantly improved motor and sensory neuronal regeneration, as well as histomorphometric indices including myelinated axon number. Rats with nerve allografts treated with either systemic or local FK506 had significantly reduced serum concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-12 compared to untreated vehicle control rats with nerve allografts. Serum FK506 levels were undetectable in rats with local FK506 DDS.

INTERPRETATION

The local FK506 DDS improved motor and sensory nerve regeneration through fresh nerve allografts to a level equal to that of either systemic FK506 or nerve isografting. This treatment may be clinically translatable in peripheral nerve reconstruction or vascularized composite allotransplantation.

Large Animal Models in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering: To Do or Not to Do

Rapid developments in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering has witnessed an increasing drive toward clinical translation of breakthrough technologies. However, the progression of promising preclinical data to achieve successful clinical market authorisation remains a bottleneck. One hurdle for progress to the clinic is the transition from small animal research to advanced preclinical studies in large animals to test safety and efficacy of products. Notwithstanding this, to draw meaningful and reliable conclusions from animal experiments it is critical that the species and disease model of choice is relevant to answer the research question as well as the clinical problem. Selecting the most appropriate animal model requires in-depth knowledge of specific species and breeds to ascertain the adequacy of the model and outcome measures that closely mirror the clinical situation. Traditional reductionist approaches in animal experiments, which often do not sufficiently reflect the studied disease, are still the norm and can result in a disconnect in outcomes observed between animal studies and clinical trials. To address these concerns a reconsideration in approach will be required. This should include a stepwise approach using in vitro and ex vivo experiments as well as in silico modeling to minimize the need for in vivo studies for screening and early development studies, followed by large animal models which more closely resemble human disease. Naturally occurring, or spontaneous diseases in large animals remain a largely untapped resource, and given the similarities in pathophysiology to humans they not only allow for studying new treatment strategies but also disease etiology and prevention. Naturally occurring disease models, particularly for longer lived large animal species, allow for studying disorders at an age when the disease is most prevalent. As these diseases are usually also a concern in the chosen veterinary species they would be beneficiaries of newly developed therapies. Improved awareness of the progress in animal models is mutually beneficial for animals, researchers, human and veterinary patients. In this overview we describe advantages and disadvantages of various animal models including domesticated and companion animals used in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering to provide an informed choice of disease-relevant animal models.

The Median Nerve Injury Model in Pre-clinical Research - A Critical Review on Benefits and Limitations

The successful introduction of innovative treatment strategies into clinical practise strongly depends on the availability of effective experimental models and their reliable pre-clinical assessment. Considering pre-clinical research for peripheral nerve repair and reconstruction, the far most used nerve regeneration model in the last decades is the sciatic nerve injury and repair model. More recently, the use of the median nerve injury and repair model has gained increasing attention due to some significant advantages it provides compared to sciatic nerve injury. Outstanding advantages are the availability of reliable behavioural tests for assessing posttraumatic voluntary motor recovery and a much lower impact on the animal wellbeing. In this article, the potential application of the median nerve injury and repair model in pre-clinical research is reviewed. In addition, we provide a synthetic overview of a variety of methods that can be applied in this model for nerve regeneration assessment. This article is aimed at helping researchers in adequately adopting this in vivo model for pre-clinical evaluation of peripheral nerve reconstruction as well as for interpreting the results in a translational perspective.

Nerve grafting for peripheral nerve injuries with extended defect sizes

Artificial and non-artificial nerve grafts are the gold standard in peripheral nerve reconstruction in cases with extensive loss of nerve tissue, particularly where a direct end-to-end suture or an autologous nerve graft is inauspicious. Different materials are marketed and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for peripheral nerve graft reconstruction. The most frequently used materials are collagen and poly(DL-lactide-ε-caprolactone). Only one human nerve allograft is listed for peripheral nerve reconstruction by the FDA. All marketed nerve grafts are able to demonstrate sufficient nerve regeneration over small distances not exceeding 3.0 cm. A key question in the field is whether nerve reconstruction on large defect lengths extending 4.0 cm or more is possible. This review gives a summary of current clinical and experimental approaches in peripheral nerve surgery using artificial and non-artificial nerve grafts in short and long distance nerve defects. Strategies to extend nerve graft lengths for long nerve defects, such as enhancing axonal regeneration, include the additional application of Schwann cells, mesenchymal stem cells or supporting co-factors like growth factors on defect sizes between 4.0 and 8.0 cm.

Matching of motor-sensory modality in the rodent femoral nerve model shows no enhanced effect on peripheral nerve regeneration

The treatment of peripheral nerve injuries with nerve gaps largely consists of autologous nerve grafting utilizing sensory nerve donors. Underlying this clinical practice is the assumption that sensory autografts provide a suitable substrate for motoneuron regeneration, thereby facilitating motor endplate reinnervation and functional recovery. This study examined the role of nerve graft modality on axonal regeneration, comparing motor nerve regeneration through motor, sensory, and mixed nerve isografts in the Lewis rat. A total of 100 rats underwent grafting of the motor or sensory branch of the femoral nerve with histomorphometric analysis performed after 5, 6, or 7 weeks. Analysis demonstrated similar nerve regeneration in motor, sensory, and mixed nerve grafts at all three time points. These data indicate that matching of motor-sensory modality in the rat femoral nerve does not confer improved axonal regeneration through nerve isografts.

Peripheral nerve: what's new in basic science laboratories

Peripheral nerve regeneration research has unfolded a wealth of basic science knowledge in the last century. Today, that knowledge has become the fundamental groundwork for evolving clinical applications to treat peripheral nerve defects. This article discusses two clinical applications that have been investigated thoroughly in the laboratory setting for decades and recently tested in the clinical setting: nerve allotransplantation to graft nerve defects, and brief electrical stimulation to promote nerve regeneration. It also discusses the generation of Thy-1-XFP transgenic mice, which express fluorescent proteins in the nervous system and provide new avenues for investigating peripheral nerve regeneration.

Short-Term Anti-CD40 Ligand Costimulatory Blockade Induces Tolerance to Peripheral Nerve Allografts, Resulting in Improved Skeletal Muscle Function

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of long or multiple peripheral nerve defects with peripheral nerve autografts may not be possible due to insufficient quantities of donor nerve. There are promising preliminary data that nerve allografting has the potential to improve functional outcome and quality of life after devastating nerve injuries or large tumor resections. The authors previously demonstrated that blockade of the CD40/CD40 ligand costimulatory pathway, via anti-CD40 ligand monoclonal antibody (MR1) therapy, induces tolerance to peripheral nerve allografts in mice. In this study, the authors sought to correlate the immunomodulatory effects of MR1 treatment with functional muscle recovery after peripheral nerve allografting in the murine model.

METHODS

In the mouse hindlimb model, peroneal nerve isografts (C57BL/6 into C57BL/6) and allografts (BALB/c into C57BL/6) were utilized to reconstruct 0.8-cm peroneal nerve gaps. MR1 versus vehicle was administered on days 0, 1, and 2. At 60 days after transplantation, splenocyte production of interferon-gamma and interleukins 2, 4, and 5 were quantified using ELISPOT analysis, and in vitro maximum tetanic isometric force of the extensor digitorum longus muscle was measured.

RESULTS

At 60 days after transplantation, immunomodulation persisted in MR1-treated, allografted animals, as evidenced by significantly muted interferon-gamma, interleukin 4, and interleukin 2 splenocyte production. Functional extensor digitorum longus muscle recovery after nerve allografting and MR1 administration was improved due to the tolerance induced by MR1 compared with untreated allograft recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-day inductive therapy with MR1 produces 60-day immunologic tolerance to peripheral nerve allografts, as evidenced by dramatic decreases in interferon-gamma, interleukin 4, and interleukin 2 production, and results in increased muscle force recovery. This work emphasizes the potential promise of CD40-CD40 ligand costimulatory blockade in reducing or eliminating peripheral nerve allograft rejection.

A review of research endeavors to optimize peripheral nerve reconstruction

This manuscript reviews studies relating to peripheral nerve allografts, neuroregenerative agents and end-to-side neurorrhaphy. With respect to peripheral nerve allografts, animal studies with the agents cyclosporin A, FK506 and rapamycin are reviewed and related to recent clinical experience. FK506 distinguishes itself as an agent capable of reversing acute rejection of a peripheral nerve allograft and an agent with some neuroregenerative properties. In addition to systemic immunosuppression, experience with agents purported to initiate a state of donor specific tolerance are discussed. Specifically, experimental studies with administration of ultraviolet B treated donor splenocytes, antibodies to cellular adhesion molecules and antibodies to components of the costimulatory pathway of immunosuppression are reviewed. The neuroregenerative properties of FK506 and related compounds are examined in animal models. Finally, the experimental finding that reinnervation following end-to-side neurorrhaphy is mostly sensory and related to the degree of axonal damage at the level of an epineurotomy or perineurotomy is discussed.