Sucralfate enema (SUC)--effective in IBD?

Sucralfate enemas reduce the oxidative tissue damage and preserves the contents of E-cadherin and ?-catenin in colonic mucosa without fecal stream

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of sucralfate enemas in tissue contents of E-cadherin and ?-catenin in an experimental diversion colitis.

METHODS

Thirty-six male Wistar rats were submitted to a proximal colostomy and a distal mucous fistula. They were allocated into three groups: first group received daily saline enemas (2 mL/day) and the two other groups daily enemas with sucralfate at dosage of 1 or 2 g/kg/day, respectively. Six animals of each group were euthanized after two weeks and six animals after four weeks. The inflammation of the excluded mucosa was evaluated by histological analysis. The oxidative damage was quantified by measurement of malondialdehyde tissue levels. The expression of E-cadherin and ?-catenin was identified by immunohistochemistry, and its contents were quantified by computer-assisted image analysis.

RESULTS

Sucralfate enemas reduced inflammation in animals subjected to treatment with 2 g/kg/day by four weeks, and the levels of oxidative damage in mucosa without fecal stream irrespective of concentration and time of intervention. E-cadherin and ?-catenin content increased in segments without fecal stream in those animals subjected to treatment with sucralfate.

CONCLUSIONS

Sucralfate reduces the inflammation and oxidative stress and increases the tissue content of E-cadherin and ?-catenin in colonic mucosa devoid to the fecal stream.

ENEMA DE SULCRALFATO PODE PREVENIR COLITE EM SEGMENTOS COLÔNICOS SEM TRÂNSITO FECAL?

RESUMO - RACIONAL: O estresse oxidativo é um dos principais mecanismos associados à ruptura dos mecanismos de defesa que formam a barreira epitelial cólica e reduz o conteúdo tecidual das proteínas claudina-3 e ocludina principais constituintes das junções de oclusão intercelulares. O sucralfato, possui atividade antioxidante e tem sido usado para tratar diferentes formas de colite. OBJETIVO: Mensurar o conteúdo tecidual de claudina-3 e ocludina da mucosa do cólon sem trânsito fecal, submetido à intervenção com sucralfato. MÉTODO: Trinta e seis ratos foram submetidos à colostomia do cólon esquerdo e fístula mucosa distal. Os animais foram divididos em dois grupos de acordo com a eutanásia ser realizada duas ou quatro semanas após a intervenção. Cada grupo foi dividido em três subgrupos de acordo com o tipo de intervenção realizada diariamente: solução salina isolada; sucralfato a 1 g/kg/dia ou sucralfato a 2g/kg/dia. A colite foi diagnosticada por análise histológica adotando escala de validação prévia. A expressão tecidual de ambas as proteínas foi identificada por imunoistoquímica. O conteúdo das proteínas foi quantificado por análise de imagem assistida por computador. RESULTADOS: O escore inflamatório foi maior nos segmentos cólicos sem trânsito fecal e os enemas com sucralfato reduziram o escore inflamatório nesses segmentos, principalmente nos animais submetidos à intervenção com sucralfato em maior concentração e por período mais longo de intervenção. Houve aumento no conteúdo tecidual das proteínas claudina-3 e ocludina, relacionado com a concentração de sucralfato. O conteúdo tecidual de ambas as proteínas não se modificou com a duração da intervenção. CONCLUSÃO: Enemas com sucralfato reduzem a inflamação e aumentam o conteúdo tecidual de claudina-3 e ocludina na mucosa cólica sem trânsito intestinal.

Non-surgical interventions for late rectal problems (proctopathy) of radiotherapy in people who have received radiotherapy to the pelvis

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2002, and previously updated in 2007. Late radiation rectal problems (proctopathy) include bleeding, pain, faecal urgency, and incontinence and may develop after pelvic radiotherapy treatment for cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of non-surgical interventions for managing late radiation proctopathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2015); MEDLINE (Ovid); EMBASE (Ovid); CANCERCD; Science Citation Index; and CINAHL from inception to November 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-surgical interventions for the management of late radiation proctopathy in people with cancer who have undergone pelvic radiotherapy for cancer. Primary outcomes considered were: episodes of bowel activity, bleeding, pain, tenesmus, urgency, and sphincter dysfunction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment, and data extraction were performed in duplicate, and any disagreements were resolved by involving a third review author.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 1221 unique references and 16 studies including 993 participants that met our inclusion criteria. One study found through the last update was moved to the 'Studies awaiting classification' section. We did not pool outcomes for a meta-analysis due to variation in study characteristics and endpoints across included studies.Since radiation proctopathy is a condition with various symptoms or combinations of symptoms, the studies were heterogeneous in their intended effect. Some studies investigated treatments targeted at bleeding only (group 1), some investigated treatments targeted at a combination of anorectal symptoms, but not a single treatment (group 2). The third group focused on the treatment of the collection of symptoms referred to as pelvic radiation disease. In order to enable some comparison of this heterogeneous collection of studies, we describe the effects in these three groups separately.Nine studies assessed treatments for rectal bleeding and were unclear or at high risk of bias. The only treatments that made a significant difference on primary outcomes were argon plasma coagulation (APC) followed by oral sucralfate versus APC with placebo (endoscopic score 6 to 9 in favour of APC with placebo, risk ratio (RR) 2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12 to 4.55; 1 study, 122 participants, low- to moderate-quality evidence); formalin dab treatment (4%) versus sucralfate steroid retention enema (symptom score after treatment graded by the Radiation Proctopathy System Assessments Scale (RPSAS) and sigmoidoscopic score in favour of formalin (P = 0.001, effect not quantified, 1 study, 102 participants, very low- to low-quality evidence), and colonic irrigation plus ciprofloxacin and metronidazole versus formalin application (4%) (bleeding (P = 0.007, effect not quantified), urgency (P = 0.0004, effect not quantified), and diarrhoea (P = 0.007, effect not quantified) in favour of colonic irrigation (1 study, 50 participants, low-quality evidence).Three studies, of unclear and high risk of bias, assessed treatments targeted at something very localised but not a single pathology. We identified no significant differences on our primary outcomes. We graded all studies as very low-quality evidence due to unclear risk of bias and very serious imprecision.Four studies, of unclear and high risk of bias, assessed treatments targeted at more than one symptom yet confined to the anorectal region. Studies that demonstrated an effect on symptoms included: gastroenterologist-led algorithm-based treatment versus usual care (detailed self help booklet) (significant difference in favour of gastroenterologist-led algorithm-based treatment on change in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire-Bowel (IBDQ-B) score at six months, mean difference (MD) 5.47, 95% CI 1.14 to 9.81) and nurse-led algorithm-based treatment versus usual care (significant difference in favour of the nurse-led algorithm-based treatment on change in IBDQ-B score at six months, MD 4.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 8.19) (1 study, 218 participants, low-quality evidence); hyperbaric oxygen therapy (at 2.0 atmospheres absolute) versus placebo (improvement of Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic - Late Effects of Normal Tissue (SOMA-LENT) score in favour of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), P = 0.0019) (1 study, 150 participants, moderate-quality evidence, retinol palmitate versus placebo (improvement in RPSAS in favour of retinol palmitate, P = 0.01) (1 study, 19 participants, low-quality evidence) and integrated Chinese traditional plus Western medicine versus Western medicine (grade 0 to 1 radio-proctopathy after treatment in favour of integrated Chinese traditional medicine, RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.02) (1 study, 58 participants, low-quality evidence).The level of evidence for the majority of outcomes was downgraded using GRADE to low or very low, mainly due to imprecision and study limitations. 

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although some interventions for late radiation proctopathy look promising (including rectal sucralfate, metronidazole added to an anti-inflammatory regimen, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy), single small studies provide limited evidence. Furthermore, outcomes important to people with cancer, including quality of life (QoL) and long-term effects, were not well recorded. The episodic and variable nature of late radiation proctopathy requires large multi-centre placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) to establish whether treatments are effective. Future studies should address the possibility of associated injury to other gastro-intestinal, urinary, or sexual organs, known as pelvic radiation disease. The interventions, as well as the outcome parameters, should be broader and include those important to people with cancer, such as QoL evaluations.

Nonsurgical Therapy for Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome

The treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) remains problematic and is less than ideal. Prospective, well-designed studies assessing the efficacy of treatment for SRUS are few; most of the knowledge imparted for treating SRUS is experiential. As such, firm treatment recommendations can not be made. Rather, a conservative, stepwise, individualized approach must be employed. Diagnostic modalities should be incorporated in the management scheme to direct treatment when indicated. Management must include patient reassurance that the underlying lesion is benign, because complete "cures" are uncommon in those with SRUS. The goals of therapy should be discussed with the patient prior to initiating treatment. Although the ultimate goal is macroscopic and microscopic healing, a realistic goal is cessation or minimization of symptoms. We outline a reasonable approach to the management of SRUS. Histologic confirmation of SRUS should prompt a discussion of the presumed pathogenic mechanisms with the patient. Conservative therapy with dietary fiber, bowel retraining, and bulk laxatives should be employed. If symptoms persist, the patient should receive a trial of sucralfate enemas for 6 weeks. Individuals who respond should continue conservative therapy. However, if symptoms persist, defecography can be done to assess for inappropriate puborectalis contraction and occult rectal mucosal prolapse. Patients with inappropriate contraction of the puborectalis can be offered biofeedback. Patients with occult rectal mucosal prolapse can be considered for surgery. However, the risks, benefits, and success rates of surgery should be discussed at length, prior to any procedure being performed. Rectopexy or Delorme's procedure offer the best success rates to date; however, the choice of surgical procedure must take into account the experience of the surgeon and wishes of the patient.

Effect of ecabet sodium enema on mildly to moderately active ulcerative proctosigmoiditis: an open-label study

OBJECTIVES

Ecabet sodium (ES), a nonabsorbable antigastric ulcer agent, has been shown to adhere to the region of an ulcer. It topically enhances gastric mucosal defensive factors such as the endogenous prostaglandins, capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves, nitric oxide, and mucin. All of these mucosal defensive factors play an important role in maintaining the mucosal integrity of the colon and rectum. Therefore, we investigated the effect of ES in patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative proctosigmoiditis.

METHODS

In an open-label study, seven patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC) who had an inflamed mucosa in the rectum and/or sigmoid and were resistant to 4-wk topical and systemic standard treatment were treated with an ES enema b.i.d. for 14 days. The enema consisted of ES (1 g) and tepid water (20 or 50 ml). These patients were assessed by the Clinical Activity Index, colonoscopically, and histologically before and after the ES therapy. The ES therapy was started after obtaining informed consent from the patients.

RESULTS

Six of the seven patients responded to therapy and achieved clinical, endoscopic, and histological remissions. One patient was withdrawn because of increased stool frequency. All six patients who completed the study showed a significant change in the mean Clinical Activity Index score from 5.3+/-1.4 (mean +/- SD) to 0.5+/-0.8 (p < 0.05), in the colonoscopic score from 3.0+/-0.9 to 0.8+/-0.4 (p < 0.05), and in the histological score from 2.7+/-0.5 to 0.5+/-0.6 (p < 0.05), and achieved remission at the end of the study. There were no side effects attributable to the ES therapy. Five of the six patients are still in clinical remission after a median follow-up period of 5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The ES enemas proved to be a safe and potentially useful adjuvant therapy currently available for treating patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. A controlled study is necessary to confirm our results.

New therapeutic agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Despite intense investigation, the etiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unknown. Recent studies with new therapeutic agents provide insight into the pathogenesis of IBD through analysis of the clinical response to pharmacologic agents whose mechanism of action is understood. Until new agents are established, IBD will be treated with conventional drugs directed toward modifying the inflammatory responses responsible for gastrointestinal mucosal damage. Sulfasalazine, mesalamine (5-aminosalicylic acid), and corticosteroids will continue to be the mainstay of therapy for the foreseeable future. Antibiotics such as metronidazole and immunosuppressants such as 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate are useful in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in selected cases. Many new exciting agents are being investigated and show encouraging results in the treatment of IBD. This article reviews the agents used in IBD with an emphasis on new therapeutic agents.

Prevention and therapy of radiation-induced bowel discomfort

In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study, including 70 patients treated with radiotherapy of localized malignancies in the pelvis, the effects of prophylactic sucralfate in preventing bowel discomfort were evaluated. Radiotherapy was delivered in a conventional manner with high-energy photons in a total dose of 62-66 Gy (target dose, 1.8-2.2 Gy) during 6.5 weeks. Dose granules of sucralfate or placebo were given 2 weeks after irradiation started and continued for 6 weeks. All analyses were performed blindly. The patients in the sucralfate group had significantly less problems with acute (5 weeks) and chronic (66 weeks) bowel discomfort. The consumption of loperamide was also reduced in the sucralfate group, and the weight decrease was less pronounced. No adverse effects were seen. Thus, sucralfate seems to be beneficial in minimizing the problems of bowel discomfort during and after irradiation of malignancies in the pelvis. These results are discussed in relation to other related observations.

Radiation-induced proctosigmoiditis. Prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of oral sulfasalazine plus rectal steroids versus rectal sucralfate

In a prospective study, 37 consecutive patients with radiation-induced proctosigmoiditis were randomized to receive a four-week course of either 3.0 g oral sulfasalazine plus 20 mg twice daily rectal prednisolone enemas (group I, N = 18) or 2.0 g twice daily rectal sucralfate enemas plus oral placebo (group II, N = 19). The two groups were comparable with respect to demographic features, duration of symptoms, and clinical and endoscopic staging of the disease. Fifteen patients in group I and 17 in group II completed the trial. At four weeks, both groups showed significant clinical improvement (P less than 0.01 for group I and P less than 0.001 for group II) and endoscopic healing (P less than 0.01 for group I and P less than 0.001 for group II). When the two groups were compared, sucralfate enemas showed a significantly better response as assessed clinically (P less than 0.05), although endoscopically the response was not statistically different (P greater than 0.05). We conclude that both treatment regimens are effective in the management of radiation proctitis. Sucralfate enemas give a better clinical response, are tolerated better, and because of the lower cost should be the preferred mode of short-term treatment.

Sucralfate enema in ulcerative rectosigmoid lesions

To assess the efficacy of sucralfate enemas in distal colonic ulcerative lesions, 22 patients with radiation proctitis (n = 8), idiopathic ulcerative proctitis (n = 5), and solitary rectal ulcer (n = 5) unresponsive to conventional medical therapy, and those with ulcerated and bleeding rectal polyps awaiting polypectomy (n = 4) were studied. Enemas of sucralfate suspension (2 gm in 20 ml water) were administered twice daily for a period of three weeks. Clinical and sigmoidoscopic improvements were observed in 19 and 18 of the 22 patients, respectively (86 and 82 percent, respectively). No side effects were seen. The authors conclude that sucralfate enemas are useful in the treatment of ulcerative lesions of the rectosigmoid.

Future potential applicability of sucralfate in gastroenterology

Sucralfate plays an important role in peptic ulcer disease, reflux esophagitis, stress erosions and bleeding, and as adjunctive therapy in variceal sclerosis. In accordance with its pharmacologic characteristics, however, one may readily envisage disease states worth investigating, such as irradiation-induced mucosal damage of the esophagus. Especially the combination of external and intraluminal radiotherapy via the after-load technique may cause substantial and occasionally long-standing ulceration of the esophageal lining and discomfort. Several conditions of the stomach deserve further study. Increasingly common is gastric mucosal damage induced by aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. On the basis of its various pharmacologic principles sucralfate should theoretically offer protection against such lesions, and, in fact, there are human pharmacologic and clinical studies available supporting this idea. Another disease entity in which sucralfate should be studied in more depth is that of biliary alkaline reflux gastropathy as often seen after gastric surgery. Sucralfate should also be evaluated in those difficult clinical conditions known to be resistant to any therapeutic attempt with currently available drugs, such as erosive varioliform gastritis and hypertrophic gastropathy with heavy inflammation of the mucosa and giant coarsening of the gastric rugae. The results obtained with sucralfate in variceal sclerosis are indeed intriguing, even though the mechanism is not understood. It has been shown that sucralfate has some efficacy in patients with hemorrhagic gastritis. In many patients receiving chemotherapy, mucosal damage may occur both in the mouth and throughout the gastrointestinal tract, including the small bowel.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Newer pharmacologic agents for the therapy of inflammatory bowel disease

Topical 5-ASA Agents. Observations that 5-ASA may be the clinically active component of sulfasalazine have stimulated extensive pharmaceutical efforts to develop a new class of agents for the treatment of the inflammatory bowel diseases. Both oral and rectal forms of 5-ASA have been designed, tested, and released for use in Europe and Canada. Only one rectal 5-ASA formulation is now commercially available in the United States. Studies with topical 5-ASA have demonstrated that this formulation is safe and effective for distal colitis, even in patients with disease refractory to standard therapy. Adverse effects of topical 5-ASA are minimal. However, optimal treatment doses have not been defined, relapse is common after withdrawal of therapy, and issues regarding maintenance regimens are not yet resolved. Other disadvantages include the expense and inconvenience of enema therapy. However, rectally administered 5-ASA is an appropriate initial therapy for the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis, or as a therapeutic option for refractory distal colitis. Data are insufficient to make recommendations regarding the use of topical 5-ASA in Crohn's disease. Whether this class of agents will be of benefit for Crohn's proctitis or for perineal disease must await further clinical trials. Oral 5-ASA Agents. There appears to be a well-substantiated benefit equivalent to that of sulfasalazine achieved by the new oral formulations of 5-ASA when used for the treatment of acute mild to moderate ulcerative colitis, and as maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis in remission. Adverse reactions to these agents are uncommon, usually mild, and infrequently require withdrawal of therapy. The major problem reported with these agents is watery diarrhea, most commonly associated with olsalazine, but the practical importance of this adverse effect is disputed. Rare occurrences of reversible pericarditis and acute pancreatitis have been encountered during clinical application of these agents. As more experience is obtained, these agents may become the initial therapy of choice for the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis and for maintenance in inactive disease. Currently available data have defined a role for these agents as an important alternative for the treatment of patients intolerant or allergic to sulfasalazine. As with sulfasalazine, these agents should not be used as the sole treatment for severely active ulcerative colitis. Many unanswered questions remain regarding therapy with these agents for ulcerative colitis. Still undefined are optimal drug dosages, appropriate dosing intervals, and the necessary duration of therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A comparison of sucralfate and prednisolone enemas in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis

Sucralfate is well established in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal inflammation and ulceration, and preliminary evidence suggests it may be of benefit in active colitis. We have therefore undertaken a clinical trial to compare enemas of sucralfate (4 g) and prednisolone metasulphobenzoate (20 mg) in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis. Forty-four patients were entered into a 4-week study. Two patients were withdrawn because of non-compliance, and five were unable to complete the study: two developed constipation (both allocated to sucralfate) and three were unable to retain the enemas (two prednisolone and one sucralfate). Intention-to-treat analysis showed significant within-treatment improvement in rectal bleeding, sigmoidoscopic grade, and histologic grade in the prednisolone-treated group, and in stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and sigmoidoscopic grade in the sucralfate-treated group. Between-treatment comparisons, however, showed greater resolution of rectal bleeding and more marked improvements in histologic grade in patients treated with prednisolone metasulphobenzoate enemas. Further studies using higher doses of sucralfate would be useful.