1
|
Waite TD, Telisinghe L, Gobin M, Ronveaux O, Fernandez AK, Stuart JM, Scholten RJPM. Rapid diagnostic tests for bacterial meningitis applicable in sub-Saharan Africa. Hippokratia 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011634.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas D Waite
- Public Health England; Field Epidemiology Services; 2 Rivergate Bristol UK BS1 6EH
| | - Lilanganee Telisinghe
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases; Keppel Street London UK WC1E 7HT
| | - Maya Gobin
- Public Health England; Field Epidemiology Services; 2 Rivergate Bristol UK BS1 6EH
| | - Olivier Ronveaux
- World Health Organization; Control of Epidemic Diseases; 20 Avenue Appia Geneva Switzerland 1211
| | - Ana-Katya Fernandez
- World Health Organization; Pandemic and Epidemic Diseases (PED); 20 Avenue Appia Geneva Switzerland 1211
| | - James M Stuart
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department; Keppel Street London UK WC1E 7HT
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University; Cochrane Netherlands; Room Str. 6.126 P.O. Box 85500 Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ian Shrier
- Jewish General Hospital, Lady Davis Institute, McGill University; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology; 3755 Cote Ste-Catherine Road Montreal QC Canada H3T 1E2
| | - Georgia Salanti
- University of Bern; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM); Finkenhubelweg 11 Bern Switzerland 3005
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University; Cochrane Netherlands; Room Str. 6.126 P.O. Box 85500 Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roze JF, Hoogendam JP, van de Wetering FT, Spijker R, Verleye L, Vlayen J, Veldhuis WB, Scholten RJPM, Zweemer RP. Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing tumour resectability in advanced epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 10:CD012567. [PMID: 30298516 PMCID: PMC6517226 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012567.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynaecological cancer in developed countries. Surgery and chemotherapy are considered its mainstay of treatment and the completeness of surgery is a major prognostic factor for survival in these women. Currently, computed tomography (CT) is used to preoperatively assess tumour resectability. If considered feasible, women will be scheduled for primary debulking surgery (i.e. surgical efforts to remove the bulk of tumour with the aim of leaving no visible (macroscopic) tumour). If primary debulking is not considered feasible (i.e. the tumour load is too extensive), women will receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy to reduce tumour load and subsequently undergo (interval) surgery. However, CT is imperfect in assessing tumour resectability, so additional imaging modalities can be considered to optimise treatment selection. OBJECTIVES To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose-18 (FDG) PET/CT, conventional and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI as replacement or add-on to abdominal CT, for assessing tumour resectability at primary debulking surgery in women with stage III to IV epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE and Embase (OVID) for potential eligible studies (1946 to 23 February 2017). Additionally, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO-ICTRP and the reference list of all relevant studies were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA Diagnostic accuracy studies addressing the accuracy of preoperative FDG-PET/CT, conventional or DW-MRI on assessing tumour resectability in women with advanced stage (III to IV) epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer who are scheduled to undergo primary debulking surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance and inclusion, extracted data and performed methodological quality assessment using QUADAS-2. The limited number of studies did not permit meta-analyses. MAIN RESULTS Five studies (544 participants) were included in the analysis. All studies performed the index test as replacement of abdominal CT. Two studies (366 participants) addressed the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for assessing incomplete debulking with residual disease of any size (> 0 cm) with sensitivities of 1.0 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.0) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.73) and specificities of 1.0 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.0) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.93), respectively (low- and moderate-certainty evidence). Three studies (178 participants) investigated MRI for different target conditions, of which two investigated DW-MRI and one conventional MRI. The first study showed that DW-MRI determines incomplete debulking with residual disease of any size with a sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.99) and a specificity of 0.98 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.00) (low- and moderate-certainty evidence). For abdominal CT, the sensitivity for assessing incomplete debulking was 0.66 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.78) and the specificity 0.77 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.87) (low- and low-certainty evidence). The second study reported a sensitivity of DW-MRI of 0.75 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.97) and a specificity of 0.96 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.00) (very low-certainty evidence) for assessing incomplete debulking with residual disease > 1 cm. In the last study, the sensitivity for assessing incomplete debulking with residual disease of > 2 cm on conventional MRI was 0.91 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.00) and the specificity 0.97 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.00) (very low-certainty evidence). Overall, the certainty of evidence was very low to moderate (according to GRADE), mainly due to small sample sizes and imprecision. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Studies suggested a high specificity and moderate sensitivity for FDG-PET/CT and MRI to assess macroscopic incomplete debulking. However, the certainty of the evidence was insufficient to advise routine addition of FDG-PET/CT or MRI to clinical practice..In a research setting, adding an alternative imaging method could be considered for women identified as suitable for primary debulking by abdominal CT, in an attempt to filter out false-negatives (i.e. debulking, feasible based on abdominal CT, unfeasible at actual surgery).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joline F Roze
- UMC Utrecht Cancer CenterDepartment of Gynaecological OncologyUtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Jacob P Hoogendam
- UMC Utrecht Cancer CenterDepartment of Gynaecological OncologyUtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Fleur T van de Wetering
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityCochrane NetherlandsPO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - René Spijker
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityCochrane NetherlandsPO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Leen Verleye
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge CentreKruidtuinlaan 55BrusselsBelgium1000
| | - Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge CentreKruidtuinlaan 55BrusselsBelgium1000
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- University Medical Center UtrechtDepartment of RadiologyRoom E01.132PO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityCochrane NetherlandsPO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer CenterDepartment of Gynaecological OncologyUtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wei D, Heus P, van de Wetering FT, van Tienhoven G, Verleye L, Scholten RJPM. Probiotics for the prevention or treatment of chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-related diarrhoea in people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 8:CD008831. [PMID: 30168576 PMCID: PMC6513393 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008831.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treament-related diarrhoea is one of the most common and troublesome adverse effects related to chemotherapy or radiotherapy in people with cancer. Its reported incidence has been as high as 50% to 80%. Severe treatment-related diarrhoea can lead to fluid and electrolyte losses and nutritional deficiencies and could adversely affect quality of life (QoL). It is also associated with increased risk of infection in people with neutropenia due to anticancer therapy and often leads to treatment delays, dose reductions, or treatment discontinuation. Probiotics may be effective in preventing or treating chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-induced diarrhoea. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and side effects of probiotics used alone or combined with other agents for prevention or treatment of chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-related diarrhoea in people with cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1946 to July week 2, 2017), and Embase (1980 to 2017, week 30). We also searched prospective clinical trial registers and the reference lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of probiotics for prevention or treatment of chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-related diarrhoea in people with cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We used random-effects models for all meta-analyses. If meta-analysis was not possible, we summarised the results narratively. MAIN RESULTS We included 12 studies involving 1554 participants. Eleven studies were prevention studies, of which seven compared probiotics with placebo (887 participants), one compared two doses of probiotics with each other and with placebo (246 participants), and three compared probiotics with another active agent (216 participants).The remaining study assessed the effectiveness of probiotics compared with placebo for treatment of radiotherapy-related diarrhoea (205 participants).For prevention of radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy)-induced diarrhoea, review authors identified five heterogeneous placebo-controlled studies (with 926 participants analysed). Owing to heterogeneity, we could not carry out a meta-analysis, except for two outcomes. For occurrence of any diarrhoea, risk ratios (RRs) ranged from 0.35 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 0.47) to 1.0 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.06) (three studies; low-certainty evidence). A beneficial effect of probiotics on quality of life could neither be demonstrated nor refuted (two studies; low-certainty evidence). For occurrence of grade 2 or higher diarrhoea, the pooled RR was 0.75 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.03; four studies; 420 participants; low-certainty evidence), and for grade 3 or higher diarrhoea, RRs ranged from 0.11 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.23) to 1.24 (95% CI 0.74 to 2.08) (three studies; low-certainty evidence). For probiotic users, time to rescue medication was 36 hours longer in one study (95% CI 34.7 to 37.3), but another study reported no difference (moderate-certainty evidence). For the need for rescue medication, the pooled RR was 0.50 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.66; three studies; 194 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No study reported major differences between groups with respect to adverse effects. Although not mentioned explicitly, no studies reported deaths, except one in which one participant in the probiotics group died of myocardial infarction after three sessions of radiotherapy.Three placebo-controlled studies, with 128 analysed participants, addressed prevention of chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea. For occurrence of any diarrhoea, the pooled RR was 0.59 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.96; two studies; 106 participants; low-certainty evidence). For all other outcomes, a beneficial effect of probiotics could be neither demonstrated nor refuted (one to two studies; 46 to 106 participants; all low-certainty evidence). Studies did not address quality of life nor time to rescue medication.Three studies compared probiotics with another intervention in 213 participants treated with radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy). One very small study (21 participants) reported less diarrhoea six weeks after treatment when dietary counselling was provided (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.81; very low-certainty evidence). In another study (148 participants), grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea occurred less often in the probiotics group than in the control group (guar gum containing nutritional supplement) (odds ratio (OR) 0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.89; low-certainty evidence), and two studies (63 participants) found less need for rescue medication of probiotics versus another active treatment (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.86; very low-certainty evidence). Studies did not address quality of life nor time to rescue medication.One placebo-controlled study with 205 participants addressed treatment for radiotherapy-induced diarrhoea and could not demonstrate or refute a beneficial effect of probiotics on average diarrhoea grade, time to rescue medication for diarrhoea (13 hours longer in the probiotics group; 95% CI -0.9 to 26.9 hours), or need for rescue medication (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.03; moderate-certainty evidence). This study did not address quality of life.No studies reported serious adverse events or diarrhoea-related deaths. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review presents limited low- or very low-certainty evidence supporting the effects of probiotics for prevention and treatment of diarrhoea related to radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) or chemotherapy alone, need for rescue medication, or occurrence of adverse events. All studies were underpowered and heterogeneous. Severe side effects were absent from all studies.Robust evidence on this topic must be provided by future methodologically well-designed trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dang Wei
- Karolinska InstitutetDepartment of Public Health SciencesSolnavägen 1EStockholmSweden11365, Solna
| | - Pauline Heus
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityCochrane NetherlandsRoom Str. 6.131PO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Fleur T van de Wetering
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityCochrane NetherlandsRoom Str. 6.131PO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Academic Medical CenterRadiation Oncology and HyperthermiaP.O. Box 22700Meibergdreef 9AmsterdamNetherlands1100 DE
| | - Leen Verleye
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge CentreKruidtuinlaan 55BrusselsBelgium1000
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityCochrane NetherlandsRoom Str. 6.131PO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Randall M, Egberts KJ, Samtani A, Scholten RJPM, Hooft L, Livingstone N, Sterling‐Levis K, Woolfenden S, Williams K. Diagnostic tests for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in preschool children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 7:CD009044. [PMID: 30075057 PMCID: PMC6513463 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009044.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a behaviourally diagnosed condition. It is defined by impairments in social communication or the presence of restricted or repetitive behaviours, or both. Diagnosis is made according to existing classification systems. In recent years, especially following publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fifth Edition (DSM-5; APA 2013), children are given the diagnosis of ASD, rather than subclassifications of the spectrum such as autistic disorder, Asperger syndrome, or pervasive developmental disorder - not otherwise specified. Tests to diagnose ASD have been developed using parent or carer interview, child observation, or a combination of both. OBJECTIVES Primary objectives1. To identify which diagnostic tools, including updated versions, most accurately diagnose ASD in preschool children when compared with multi-disciplinary team clinical judgement.2. To identify how the best of the interview tools compare with CARS, then how CARS compares with ADOS.a. Which ASD diagnostic tool - among ADOS, ADI-R, CARS, DISCO, GARS, and 3di - has the best diagnostic test accuracy?b. Is the diagnostic test accuracy of any one test sufficient for that test to be suitable as a sole assessment tool for preschool children?c. Is there any combination of tests that, if offered in sequence, would provide suitable diagnostic test accuracy and enhance test efficiency?d. If data are available, does the combination of an interview tool with a structured observation test have better diagnostic test accuracy (i.e. fewer false-positives and fewer false-negatives) than either test alone?As only one interview tool was identified, we modified the first three aims to a single aim (Differences between protocol and review): This Review evaluated diagnostic tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Specificity is the most important factor for diagnosis; however, both sensitivity and specificity are of interest in this Review because there is an inherent trade-off between these two factors.Secondary objectives1. To determine whether any diagnostic test has greater diagnostic test accuracy for age-specific subgroups within the preschool age range. SEARCH METHODS In July 2016, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, 10 other databases, and the reference lists of all included publications. SELECTION CRITERIA Publications had to: 1. report diagnostic test accuracy for any of the following six included diagnostic tools: Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised (ADI-R), Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS), Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorder (DISCO), Developmental, Dimensional, and Diagnostic Interview (3di), Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule - Generic (ADOS), and Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS); 2. include children of preschool age (under six years of age) suspected of having an ASD; and 3. have a multi-disciplinary assessment, or similar, as the reference standard.Eligible studies included cohort, cross-sectional, randomised test accuracy, and case-control studies. The target condition was ASD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed all studies for inclusion and extracted data using standardised forms. A third review author settled disagreements. We assessed methodological quality using the QUADAS-2 instrument (Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy - Revised). We conducted separate univariate random-effects logistical regressions for sensitivity and specificity for CARS and ADI-R. We conducted meta-analyses of pairs of sensitivity and specificity using bivariate random-effects methods for ADOS. MAIN RESULTS In this Review, we included 21 sets of analyses reporting different tools or cohorts of children from 13 publications, many with high risk of bias or potential conflicts of interest or a combination of both. Overall, the prevalence of ASD for children in the included analyses was 74%.For versions and modules of ADOS, there were 12 analyses with 1625 children. Sensitivity of ADOS ranged from 0.76 to 0.98, and specificity ranged from 0.20 to 1.00. The summary sensitivity was 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 0.97), and the summary specificity was 0.80 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.88).For CARS, there were four analyses with 641 children. Sensitivity of CARS ranged from 0.66 to 0.89, and specificity ranged from 0.21 to 1.00. The summary sensitivity for CARS was 0.80 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.91), and the summary specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.96).For ADI-R, there were five analyses with 634 children. Sensitivity for ADI-R ranged from 0.19 to 0.75, and specificity ranged from 0.63 to 1.00. The summary sensitivity for the ADI-R was 0.52 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.71), and the summary specificity was 0.84 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.95).Studies that compared tests were few and too small to allow clear conclusions.In two studies that included analyses for both ADI-R and ADOS, tests scored similarly for sensitivity, but ADOS scored higher for specificity. In two studies that included analyses for ADI-R, ADOS, and CARS, ADOS had the highest sensitivity and CARS the highest specificity.In one study that explored individual and additive sensitivity and specificity of ADOS and ADI-R, combining the two tests did not increase the sensitivity nor the specificity of ADOS used alone.Performance for all tests was lower when we excluded studies at high risk of bias. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We observed substantial variation in sensitivity and specificity of all tests, which was likely attributable to methodological differences and variations in the clinical characteristics of populations recruited.When we compared summary statistics for ADOS, CARS, and ADI-R, we found that ADOS was most sensitive. All tools performed similarly for specificity. In lower prevalence populations, the risk of falsely identifying children who do not have ASD would be higher.Now available are new versions of tools that require diagnostic test accuracy assessment, ideally in clinically relevant situations, with methods at low risk of bias and in children of varying abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda Randall
- The Royal Children's HospitalDepartment of Occupational Therapy50 Flemington RoadParkvilleVictoriaAustralia3052
- The University of MelbourneDepartment of PaediatricsParkvilleAustralia
| | | | - Aarti Samtani
- UNSW SydneyUNSW MedicineHigh StreetKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia2052
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtCochrane NetherlandsRoom Str. 6.126P.O. Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Lotty Hooft
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtCochrane NetherlandsRoom Str. 6.126P.O. Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Nuala Livingstone
- CochraneEditorial & Methods DepartmentSt Albans House57‐59 HaymarketLondonUKSW1Y 4QX
| | - Katy Sterling‐Levis
- University of New South Wales & Sydney Children's HospitalSchool of Women's and Children's HealthRandwickNSWAustralia
| | - Susan Woolfenden
- Sydney Children's Hospital NetworkHigh StreetRandwickNSWAustralia2031
- UNSW SydneySchool of Women's & Children's Health, UNSW MedicineHigh StreetKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia2052
| | - Katrina Williams
- The University of MelbourneDepartment of PaediatricsParkvilleAustralia
- The Royal Children's HospitalDepartment of Neurodevelopment and Disability50 Flemington RdParkvilleVictoriaAustralia3052
- Murdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia is a clinical syndrome with a number of different causes which is characterised by deterioration in cognitive, behavioural, social and emotional functions. Pharmacological interventions are available but have limited effect to treat many of the syndrome's features. Less research has been directed towards non-pharmacological treatments. In this review, we examined the evidence for effects of music-based interventions. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of music-based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia on emotional well-being including quality of life, mood disturbance or negative affect, behavioural problems, social behaviour and cognition at the end of therapy and four or more weeks after the end of treatment. SEARCH METHODS We searched ALOIS, the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (CDCIG) on 19 June 2017 using the terms: music therapy, music, singing, sing, auditory stimulation. Additional searches were carried out on 19 June 2017 in the major healthcare databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and LILACS; and in trial registers and grey literature sources. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials of music-based therapeutic interventions (at least five sessions) for people with dementia that measured any of our outcomes of interest. Control groups either received usual care or other activities with or without music. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors worked independently to screen the retrieved studies against the inclusion criteria and then to extract data and assess methodological quality of the included studies. If necessary, we contacted trial authors to ask for additional data, including relevant subscales, or for other missing information. We pooled data using random-effects models. MAIN RESULTS We included 22 studies with 1097 randomised participants. Twenty-one studies with 890 participants contributed data to meta-analyses. Participants in the studies had dementia of varying degrees of severity, and all were resident in institutions. Seven studies delivered an individual music intervention; the other studies delivered the intervention to groups of participants. Most interventions involved both active and receptive musical elements. The methodological quality of the studies varied. All were at high risk of performance bias and some were at high risk of detection or other bias.At the end of treatment, we found low-quality evidence that the interventions may improve emotional well-being and quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.62; 9 studies, 348 participants) and reduce anxiety (SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.14; 13 studies, 478 participants). We found low-quality evidence that music-based therapeutic interventions may have little or no effect on cognition (SMD 0.15, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.36; 7 studies, 350 participants). There was moderate-quality evidence that the interventions reduce depressive symptoms (SMD -0.27, 95% CI -0.45 to -0.09; 11 studies, 503 participants) and overall behaviour problems (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.01; 10 studies, 442 participants), but do not decrease agitation or aggression (SMD -0.07, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.10; 14 studies, 626 participants). The quality of the evidence on social behaviour was very low, so effects were very uncertain.The evidence for long-term outcomes measured four or more weeks after the end of treatment was of very low quality for anxiety and social behaviour, and for the other outcomes, it was of low quality for little or no effect (with small SMDs, between 0.03 and 0.34). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Providing people with dementia who are in institutional care with at least five sessions of a music-based therapeutic intervention probably reduces depressive symptoms and improves overall behavioural problems at the end of treatment. It may also improve emotional well-being and quality of life and reduce anxiety, but may have little or no effect on agitation or aggression or on cognition. We are uncertain about effects on social behaviour and about long-term effects. Future studies should examine the duration of effects in relation to the overall duration of treatment and the number of sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny T van der Steen
- Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Public Health and Primary CareHippocratespad 21, Gebouw 3PO Box 9600LeidenNetherlands2300RC
| | - Hanneke JA Smaling
- VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVan der Boechorststraat 7AmsterdamNetherlands1081 BT
| | - Johannes C van der Wouden
- VU University Medical CenterDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstitutePO Box 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
| | - Manon S Bruinsma
- Muzis, Praktijk voor MuziektherapieGrote Beer 3DAmersfoortNetherlands3813VT
- Music and Memory160 First StreetMineolaNYUSA11501
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtCochrane NetherlandsRoom Str. 6.126P.O. Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Annemiek C Vink
- ArtEZ School of MusicMusic Therapy DepartmentVan Essengaarde 10EnschedeNetherlands7511 PN
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly lethal disease with few effective treatment options. Over the past few decades, many anti-cancer therapies have been tested in the locally advanced and metastatic setting, with mixed results. This review attempts to synthesise all the randomised data available to help better inform patient and clinician decision-making when dealing with this difficult disease. OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or both for first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Our primary outcome was overall survival, while secondary outcomes include progression-free survival, grade 3/4 adverse events, therapy response and quality of life. SEARCH METHODS We searched for published and unpublished studies in CENTRAL (searched 14 June 2017), Embase (1980 to 14 June 2017), MEDLINE (1946 to 14 June 2017) and CANCERLIT (1999 to 2002) databases. We also handsearched all relevant conference abstracts published up until 14 June 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised studies assessing overall survival outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy, alone or in combination, were the eligible treatments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently analysed studies, and a third settled any disputes. We extracted data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rates, adverse events (AEs) and quality of life (QoL), and we assessed risk of bias for each study. MAIN RESULTS We included 42 studies addressing chemotherapy in 9463 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We did not identify any eligible studies on radiotherapy.We did not find any benefit for chemotherapy over best supportive care. However, two identified studies did not have sufficient data to be included in the analysis, and many of the chemotherapy regimens studied were outdated.Compared to gemcitabine alone, participants receiving 5FU had worse OS (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.27, moderate-quality evidence), PFS (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.92) and QoL. On the other hand, two studies showed FOLFIRINOX was better than gemcitabine for OS (HR 0.51 95% CI 0.43 to 0.60, moderate-quality evidence), PFS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.57) and response rates (RR 3.38, 95% CI 2.01 to 5.65), but it increased the rate of side effects. The studies evaluating CO-101, ZD9331 and exatecan did not show benefit or harm when compared with gemcitabine alone.Giving gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate improved OS (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.94, high-quality evidence) but increased the rate of side effects when compared with bolus dosing.When comparing gemcitabine combinations to gemcitabine alone, gemcitabine plus platinum improved PFS (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.95) and response rates (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.98) but not OS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.08, low-quality evidence). The rate of side effects increased. Gemcitabine plus fluoropyrimidine improved OS (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.95), PFS (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.87) and response rates (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.47, high-quality evidence), but it also increased side effects. Gemcitabine plus topoisomerase inhibitor did not improve survival outcomes but did increase toxicity. One study demonstrated that gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel improved OS (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.84, high-quality evidence), PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.82) and response rates (RR 3.29, 95% CI 2.24 to 4.84) but increased side effects. Gemcitabine-containing multi-drug combinations (GEMOXEL or cisplatin/epirubicin/5FU/gemcitabine) improved OS (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.79, low-quality evidence), PFS (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.62) and QOL.We did not find any survival advantages when comparing 5FU combinations to 5FU alone. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Combination chemotherapy has recently overtaken the long-standing gemcitabine as the standard of care. FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel are highly efficacious, but our analysis shows that other combination regimens also offer a benefit. Selection of the most appropriate chemotherapy for individual patients still remains difficult, with clinicopathological stratification remaining elusive. Biomarker development is essential to help rationalise treatment selection for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venessa Chin
- Garvan Institute of Medical ResearchThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre384 Victoria Street DarlinghurstSydneyNSWAustralia2010
- St Vincent's HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Adnan Nagrial
- Garvan Institute of Medical ResearchThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre384 Victoria Street DarlinghurstSydneyNSWAustralia2010
- The Crown Princess Mary Cancer CentreDarcy RoadWestmeadNSWAustralia2145
| | - Katrin Sjoquist
- University of SydneyNHMRC Clinical Trials CentreK25 ‐ Medical Foundation BuildingSydneyNSWAustralia2006
- Cancer Care Centre, St George HospitalMedical OncologySt George Hospital, Gray StKogarahAustraliaNSW 2217
| | - Chelsie A O'Connor
- St Vincent's HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
- Genesis Cancer CareSydneyNSWAustralia
- Macquarie University HospitalSydneyAustralia
| | - Lorraine Chantrill
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical ResearchDepartment of Pancreatic Cancer382 Victoria Street DarlinghurstSydneyNSWAustralia2010
| | - Andrew V Biankin
- University of GlasgowInstitute of Cancer SciencesWolfson Wohl Cancer Research CentreGarscube Estate, Switchback RoadGlasgowUKG61 1QH
- University of New South WalesSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of MedicineLiverpoolNSWAustralia2170
- West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit and Glasgow Royal InfirmaryGlasgowUK
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtCochrane NetherlandsRoom Str. 6.126P.O. Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Desmond Yip
- The Canberra HospitalDepartment of Medical OncologyYamba DriveGarranACTAustralia2605
- Australian National UniversityANU Medical SchoolActonACTAustralia0200
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chew BH, Vos RC, Metzendorf M, Scholten RJPM, Rutten GEHM. Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 9:CD011469. [PMID: 28954185 PMCID: PMC6483710 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011469.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) experience a psychosocial burden and mental health problems associated with the disease. Diabetes-related distress (DRD) has distinct effects on self-care behaviours and disease control. Improving DRD in adults with T2DM could enhance psychological well-being, health-related quality of life, self-care abilities and disease control, also reducing depressive symptoms. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with T2DM. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, BASE, WHO ICTRP Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the last search was December 2014 for BASE and 21 September 2016 for all other databases. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of psychological interventions for DRD in adults (18 years and older) with T2DM. We included trials if they compared different psychological interventions or compared a psychological intervention with usual care. Primary outcomes were DRD, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were self-efficacy, glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood pressure, diabetes-related complications, all-cause mortality and socioeconomic effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently identified publications for inclusion and extracted data. We classified interventions according to their focus on emotion, cognition or emotion-cognition. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to compute overall estimates. MAIN RESULTS We identified 30 RCTs with 9177 participants. Sixteen trials were parallel two-arm RCTs, and seven were three-arm parallel trials. There were also seven cluster-randomised trials: two had four arms, and the remaining five had two arms. The median duration of the intervention was six months (range 1 week to 24 months), and the median follow-up period was 12 months (range 0 to 12 months). The trials included a wide spectrum of interventions and were both individual- and group-based.A meta-analysis of all psychological interventions combined versus usual care showed no firm effect on DRD (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.07; 95% CI -0.16 to 0.03; P = 0.17; 3315 participants; 12 trials; low-quality evidence), HRQoL (SMD 0.01; 95% CI -0.09 to 0.11; P = 0.87; 1932 participants; 5 trials; low-quality evidence), all-cause mortality (11 per 1000 versus 11 per 1000; risk ratio (RR) 1.01; 95% CI 0.17 to 6.03; P = 0.99; 1376 participants; 3 trials; low-quality evidence) or adverse events (17 per 1000 versus 41 per 1000; RR 2.40; 95% CI 0.78 to 7.39; P = 0.13; 438 participants; 3 trials; low-quality evidence). We saw small beneficial effects on self-efficacy and HbA1c at medium-term follow-up (6 to 12 months): on self-efficacy the SMD was 0.15 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.30; P = 0.05; 2675 participants; 6 trials; low-quality evidence) in favour of psychological interventions; on HbA1c there was a mean difference (MD) of -0.14% (95% CI -0.27 to 0.00; P = 0.05; 3165 participants; 11 trials; low-quality evidence) in favour of psychological interventions. Our included trials did not report diabetes-related complications or socioeconomic effects.Many trials were small and were at high risk of bias for incomplete outcome data as well as possible performance and detection biases in the subjective questionnaire-based outcomes assessment, and some appeared to be at risk of selective reporting. There are four trials awaiting further classification. These are parallel RCTs with cognition-focused and emotion-cognition focused interventions. There are another 18 ongoing trials, likely focusing on emotion-cognition or cognition, assessing interventions such as diabetes self-management support, telephone-based cognitive behavioural therapy, stress management and a web application for problem solving in diabetes management. Most of these trials have a community setting and are based in the USA. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Low-quality evidence showed that none of the psychological interventions would improve DRD more than usual care. Low-quality evidence is available for improved self-efficacy and HbA1c after psychological interventions. This means that we are uncertain about the effects of psychological interventions on these outcomes. However, psychological interventions probably have no substantial adverse events compared to usual care. More high-quality research with emotion-focused programmes, in non-US and non-European settings and in low- and middle-income countries, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boon How Chew
- University Medical Center UtrechtJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary CareUniversiteitsweg 100UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra MalaysiaDepartment of Family MedicineSerdangSelangorMalaysia43400 UPM
| | - Rimke C Vos
- University Medical Center UtrechtJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary CareUniversiteitsweg 100UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Maria‐Inti Metzendorf
- Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfCochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders GroupMoorenstr. 5DüsseldorfGermany40225
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtCochrane NetherlandsRoom Str. 6.126P.O. Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Guy EHM Rutten
- University Medical Center UtrechtJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary CareUniversiteitsweg 100UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia is a clinical syndrome with a number of different causes which is characterised by deterioration in cognitive, behavioural, social and emotional functions. Pharmacological interventions are available but have limited effect to treat many of the syndrome's features. Less research has been directed towards non-pharmacological treatments. In this review, we examined the evidence for effects of music-based interventions as a treatment. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of music-based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia on emotional well-being including quality of life, mood disturbance or negative affect, behavioural problems, social behaviour, and cognition at the end of therapy and four or more weeks after the end of treatment. SEARCH METHODS We searched ALOIS, the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (CDCIG) on 14 April 2010 using the terms: music therapy, music, singing, sing, auditory stimulation. Additional searches were also carried out on 3 July 2015 in the major healthcare databases MEDLINE, Embase, psycINFO, CINAHL and LILACS; and in trial registers and grey literature sources. On 12 April 2016, we searched the major databases for new studies for future evaluation. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials of music-based therapeutic interventions (at least five sessions) for people with dementia that measured any of our outcomes of interest. Control groups either received usual care or other activities. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers worked independently to screen the retrieved studies against the inclusion criteria and then to extract data and assess methodological quality of the included studies. If necessary, we contacted trial authors to ask for additional data, including relevant subscales, or for other missing information. We pooled data using random-effects models. MAIN RESULTS We included 17 studies. Sixteen studies with a total of 620 participants contributed data to meta-analyses. Participants in the studies had dementia of varying degrees of severity, but all were resident in institutions. Five studies delivered an individual music intervention; in the others, the intervention was delivered to groups of participants. Most interventions involved both active and receptive musical elements. The methodological quality of the studies varied. All were at high risk of performance bias and some were at high risk of detection or other bias. At the end of treatment, we found low-quality evidence that music-based therapeutic interventions may have little or no effect on emotional well-being and quality of life (standardized mean difference, SMD 0.32, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.71; 6 studies, 181 participants), overall behaviour problems (SMD -0.20, 95% CI -0.56 to 0.17; 6 studies, 209 participants) and cognition (SMD 0.21, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.45; 6 studies, 257 participants). We found moderate-quality evidence that they reduce depressive symptoms (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.07; 9 studies, 376 participants), but do not decrease agitation or aggression (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.14; 12 studies, 515 participants). The quality of the evidence on anxiety and social behaviour was very low, so effects were very uncertain. The evidence for all long-term outcomes was also of very low quality. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Providing people with dementia with at least five sessions of a music-based therapeutic intervention probably reduces depressive symptoms but has little or no effect on agitation or aggression. There may also be little or no effect on emotional well-being or quality of life, overall behavioural problems and cognition. We are uncertain about effects on anxiety or social behaviour, and about any long-term effects. Future studies should employ larger sample sizes, and include all important outcomes, in particular 'positive' outcomes such as emotional well-being and social outcomes. Future studies should also examine the duration of effects in relation to the overall duration of treatment and the number of sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny T van der Steen
- Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Public Health and Primary CareHippocratespad 21, Gebouw 3PO Box 9600LeidenNetherlands2300RC
| | | | - Johannes C van der Wouden
- VU University Medical CenterDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstitutePO Box 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
| | | | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtCochrane NetherlandsRoom Str. 6.126P.O. Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Annemiek C Vink
- ArtEZ School of MusicMusic Therapy Dept.Van Essengaarde 10EnschedeNetherlands7511 PN
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hoogendam JP, Roze JF, van de Wetering FT, Spijker R, Verleye L, Vlayen J, Veldhuis WB, Scholten RJPM, Zweemer RP. Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing tumour resectability in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and/or primary peritoneal cancer. Hippokratia 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob P Hoogendam
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center; Department of Gynaecological Oncology; Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| | - Joline F Roze
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center; Department of Gynaecological Oncology; Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| | - Fleur T van de Wetering
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center Utrecht; Dutch Cochrane Centre; PO Box 85500 Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| | - René Spijker
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center Utrecht; Dutch Cochrane Centre; PO Box 85500 Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| | - Leen Verleye
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; Kruidtuinlaan 55 Brussels Belgium 1000
| | - Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; Kruidtuinlaan 55 Brussels Belgium 1000
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Radiology; Room E01.132 PO Box 85500 Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center Utrecht; Dutch Cochrane Centre; PO Box 85500 Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center; Department of Gynaecological Oncology; Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van de Wetering FT, Verleye L, Andreyev HJN, Maher J, Vlayen J, Pieters BR, van Tienhoven G, Scholten RJPM. Non-surgical interventions for late rectal problems (proctopathy) of radiotherapy in people who have received radiotherapy to the pelvis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 4:CD003455. [PMID: 27111831 PMCID: PMC7173735 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003455.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2002, and previously updated in 2007. Late radiation rectal problems (proctopathy) include bleeding, pain, faecal urgency, and incontinence and may develop after pelvic radiotherapy treatment for cancer. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of non-surgical interventions for managing late radiation proctopathy. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2015); MEDLINE (Ovid); EMBASE (Ovid); CANCERCD; Science Citation Index; and CINAHL from inception to November 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-surgical interventions for the management of late radiation proctopathy in people with cancer who have undergone pelvic radiotherapy for cancer. Primary outcomes considered were: episodes of bowel activity, bleeding, pain, tenesmus, urgency, and sphincter dysfunction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Study selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment, and data extraction were performed in duplicate, and any disagreements were resolved by involving a third review author. MAIN RESULTS We identified 1221 unique references and 16 studies including 993 participants that met our inclusion criteria. One study found through the last update was moved to the 'Studies awaiting classification' section. We did not pool outcomes for a meta-analysis due to variation in study characteristics and endpoints across included studies.Since radiation proctopathy is a condition with various symptoms or combinations of symptoms, the studies were heterogeneous in their intended effect. Some studies investigated treatments targeted at bleeding only (group 1), some investigated treatments targeted at a combination of anorectal symptoms, but not a single treatment (group 2). The third group focused on the treatment of the collection of symptoms referred to as pelvic radiation disease. In order to enable some comparison of this heterogeneous collection of studies, we describe the effects in these three groups separately.Nine studies assessed treatments for rectal bleeding and were unclear or at high risk of bias. The only treatments that made a significant difference on primary outcomes were argon plasma coagulation (APC) followed by oral sucralfate versus APC with placebo (endoscopic score 6 to 9 in favour of APC with placebo, risk ratio (RR) 2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12 to 4.55; 1 study, 122 participants, low- to moderate-quality evidence); formalin dab treatment (4%) versus sucralfate steroid retention enema (symptom score after treatment graded by the Radiation Proctopathy System Assessments Scale (RPSAS) and sigmoidoscopic score in favour of formalin (P = 0.001, effect not quantified, 1 study, 102 participants, very low- to low-quality evidence), and colonic irrigation plus ciprofloxacin and metronidazole versus formalin application (4%) (bleeding (P = 0.007, effect not quantified), urgency (P = 0.0004, effect not quantified), and diarrhoea (P = 0.007, effect not quantified) in favour of colonic irrigation (1 study, 50 participants, low-quality evidence).Three studies, of unclear and high risk of bias, assessed treatments targeted at something very localised but not a single pathology. We identified no significant differences on our primary outcomes. We graded all studies as very low-quality evidence due to unclear risk of bias and very serious imprecision.Four studies, of unclear and high risk of bias, assessed treatments targeted at more than one symptom yet confined to the anorectal region. Studies that demonstrated an effect on symptoms included: gastroenterologist-led algorithm-based treatment versus usual care (detailed self help booklet) (significant difference in favour of gastroenterologist-led algorithm-based treatment on change in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire-Bowel (IBDQ-B) score at six months, mean difference (MD) 5.47, 95% CI 1.14 to 9.81) and nurse-led algorithm-based treatment versus usual care (significant difference in favour of the nurse-led algorithm-based treatment on change in IBDQ-B score at six months, MD 4.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 8.19) (1 study, 218 participants, low-quality evidence); hyperbaric oxygen therapy (at 2.0 atmospheres absolute) versus placebo (improvement of Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic - Late Effects of Normal Tissue (SOMA-LENT) score in favour of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), P = 0.0019) (1 study, 150 participants, moderate-quality evidence, retinol palmitate versus placebo (improvement in RPSAS in favour of retinol palmitate, P = 0.01) (1 study, 19 participants, low-quality evidence) and integrated Chinese traditional plus Western medicine versus Western medicine (grade 0 to 1 radio-proctopathy after treatment in favour of integrated Chinese traditional medicine, RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.02) (1 study, 58 participants, low-quality evidence).The level of evidence for the majority of outcomes was downgraded using GRADE to low or very low, mainly due to imprecision and study limitations. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although some interventions for late radiation proctopathy look promising (including rectal sucralfate, metronidazole added to an anti-inflammatory regimen, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy), single small studies provide limited evidence. Furthermore, outcomes important to people with cancer, including quality of life (QoL) and long-term effects, were not well recorded. The episodic and variable nature of late radiation proctopathy requires large multi-centre placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) to establish whether treatments are effective. Future studies should address the possibility of associated injury to other gastro-intestinal, urinary, or sexual organs, known as pelvic radiation disease. The interventions, as well as the outcome parameters, should be broader and include those important to people with cancer, such as QoL evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fleur T van de Wetering
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtDutch Cochrane CentrePO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Leen Verleye
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge CentreKruidtuinlaan 55BrusselsBelgium1000
| | | | - Jane Maher
- Mount Vernon HospitalDepartment of Radiotherapy and OncologyRickmansworth RoadNorthwoodMiddlesexUKHA6 2RN
| | - Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge CentreKruidtuinlaan 55BrusselsBelgium1000
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Academic Medical Center / University of AmsterdamDepartment of Radiation OncologyMeibergdreef 9AmsterdamNetherlands1105
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Academic Medical CenterRadiation Oncology and HyperthermiaP.O. Box 22700Meibergdreef 9AmsterdamNetherlands1100 DE
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtDutch Cochrane CentrePO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ratnavelu NDG, Brown AP, Mallett S, Scholten RJPM, Patel A, Founta C, Galaal K, Cross P, Naik R. Intraoperative frozen section analysis for the diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer in suspicious pelvic masses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 3:CD010360. [PMID: 26930463 PMCID: PMC6457848 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010360.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with suspected early-stage ovarian cancer need surgical staging which involves taking samples from areas within the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal lymph nodes in order to inform further treatment. One potential strategy is to surgically stage all women with suspicious ovarian masses, without any histological information during surgery. This avoids incomplete staging, but puts more women at risk of potential surgical over-treatment.A second strategy is to perform a two-stage procedure to remove the pelvic mass and subject it to paraffin sectioning, which involves formal tissue fixing with formalin and paraffin embedding, prior to ultrathin sectioning and multiple site sampling of the tumour. Surgeons may then base further surgical staging on this histology, reducing the rate of over-treatment, but conferring additional surgical and anaesthetic morbidity.A third strategy is to perform a rapid histological analysis on the ovarian mass during surgery, known as 'frozen section'. Tissues are snap frozen to allow fine tissue sections to be cut and basic histochemical staining to be performed. Surgeons can perform or avoid the full surgical staging procedure depending on the results. However, this is a relatively crude test compared to paraffin sections, which take many hours to perform. With frozen section there is therefore a risk of misdiagnosing malignancy and understaging women subsequently found to have a presumed early-stage malignancy (false negative), or overstaging women without a malignancy (false positive). Therefore it is important to evaluate the accuracy and usefulness of adding frozen section to the clinical decision-making process. OBJECTIVES To assess the diagnostic test accuracy of frozen section (index test) to diagnose histopathological ovarian cancer in women with suspicious pelvic masses as verified by paraffin section (reference standard). SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE (January 1946 to January 2015), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2015) and relevant Cochrane registers. SELECTION CRITERIA Studies that used frozen section for intraoperative diagnosis of ovarian masses suspicious of malignancy, provided there was sufficient data to construct 2 x 2 tables. We excluded articles without an available English translation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Authors independently assessed the methodological quality of included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2) domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, flow and timing. Data extraction converted 3 x 3 tables of per patient results presented in articles into 2 x 2 tables, for two index test thresholds. MAIN RESULTS All studies were retrospective, and the majority reported consecutive sampling of cases. Sensitivity and specificity results were available from 38 studies involving 11,181 participants (3200 with invasive cancer, 1055 with borderline tumours and 6926 with benign tumours, determined by paraffin section as the reference standard). The median prevalence of malignancy was 29% (interquartile range (IQR) 23% to 36%, range 11% to 63%). We assessed test performance using two thresholds for the frozen section test. Firstly, we used a test threshold for frozen sections, defining positive test results as invasive cancer and negative test results as borderline and benign tumours. The average sensitivity was 90.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 87.6% to 92.0%; with most studies typically reporting range of 71% to 100%), and average specificity was 99.5% (95% CI 99.2% to 99.7%; range 96% to 100%).Similarly, we analysed sensitivity and specificity using a second threshold for frozen section, where both invasive cancer and borderline tumours were considered test positive and benign cases were classified as negative. Average sensitivity was 96.5% (95% CI 95.5% to 97.3%; typical range 83% to 100%), and average specificity was 89.5% (95% CI 86.6% to 91.9%; typical range 58% to 99%).Results were available from the same 38 studies, including the subset of 3953 participants with a frozen section result of either borderline or invasive cancer, based on final diagnosis of malignancy. Studies with small numbers of disease-negative cases (borderline cases) had more variation in estimates of specificity. Average sensitivity was 94.0% (95% CI 92.0% to 95.5%; range 73% to 100%), and average specificity was 95.8% (95% CI 92.4% to 97.8%; typical range 81% to 100%).Our additional analyses showed that, if the frozen section showed a benign or invasive cancer, the final diagnosis would remain the same in, on average, 94% and 99% of cases, respectively.In cases where the frozen section diagnosis was a borderline tumour, on average 21% of the final diagnoses would turn out to be invasive cancer.In three studies, the same pathologist interpreted the index and reference standard tests, potentially causing bias. No studies reported blinding pathologists to index test results when reporting paraffin sections.In heterogeneity analyses, there were no statistically significant differences between studies with pathologists of different levels of expertise. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In a hypothetical population of 1000 patients (290 with cancer and 80 with a borderline tumour), if a frozen section positive test result for invasive cancer alone was used to diagnose cancer, on average 261 women would have a correct diagnosis of a cancer, and 706 women would be correctly diagnosed without a cancer. However, 4 women would be incorrectly diagnosed with a cancer (false positive), and 29 with a cancer would be missed (false negative).If a frozen section result of either an invasive cancer or a borderline tumour was used as a positive test to diagnose cancer, on average 280 women would be correctly diagnosed with a cancer and 635 would be correctly diagnosed without. However, 75 women would be incorrectly diagnosed with a cancer and 10 women with a cancer would be missed.The largest discordance is within the reporting of frozen section borderline tumours. Investigation into factors leading to discordance within centres and standardisation of criteria for reporting borderline tumours may help improve accuracy. Some centres may choose to perform surgical staging in women with frozen section diagnosis of a borderline ovarian tumour to reduce the number of false positives. In their interpretation of this review, readers should evaluate results from studies most typical of their population of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nithya DG Ratnavelu
- Northern Gynaecological Oncology CentreGynaecological OncologyQueen Elizabeth HospitalSheriff HillGatesheadTyne and WearUKNE9 6SX
| | - Andrew P Brown
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustObstetrics & GynaecologyWansbeck General HospitalWoodhorn LaneAshingtonUKNE63 9JJ
| | - Susan Mallett
- University of BirminghamPublic Health, Epidemiology and BiostatisticsEdgbastonBirminghamUKB15 2TT
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtDutch Cochrane CentreRoom Str. 6.126P.O. Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Amit Patel
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation TrustGynaecological OncologySt Michaels HospitalSouthwell StreetBristolUKBS2 8EG
| | - Christina Founta
- Musgrove Park HospitalGynaecological Oncology, GRACE CentreTauntonUKTA1 5DA
| | - Khadra Galaal
- Princess Alexandra Wing, Royal Cornwall HospitalGynaecological OncologyTruroUKTR1 3LJ
| | - Paul Cross
- Queen Elizabeth HospitalDepartment of PathologySheriff HillGatesheadUKNE9 6SX
| | - Raj Naik
- Northern Gynaecological Oncology CentreQueen Elizabeth HospitalGatesheadTyne and WearUKNE9 6SX
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Leeflang MMG, Debets‐Ossenkopp YJ, Wang J, Visser CE, Scholten RJPM, Hooft L, Bijlmer HA, Reitsma JB, Zhang M, Bossuyt PMM, Vandenbroucke‐Grauls CM. Galactomannan detection for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD007394. [PMID: 26716951 PMCID: PMC6483812 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007394.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive aspergillosis is the most common life-threatening opportunistic invasive mycosis in immunocompromised patients. A test for invasive aspergillosis should neither be too invasive nor too great a burden for the already weakened patient. The serum galactomannan enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) seems to have the potential to meet both requirements. OBJECTIVES To obtain summary estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of galactomannan detection in serum for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science with both MeSH terms and text words for both aspergillosis and the sandwich ELISA. We checked the reference lists of included studies and review articles for additional studies. We conducted the searches in February 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA We included cross-sectional studies, case-control designs and consecutive series of patients assessing the diagnostic accuracy of galactomannan detection for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in patients with neutropenia or patients whose neutrophils are functionally compromised. The reference standard was composed of the criteria given by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Mycoses Study Group (MSG). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed quality and extracted data. We carried out meta-analysis using the bivariate method. We investigated sources of heterogeneity by adding potential sources of heterogeneity to the model as covariates. MAIN RESULTS We included 54 studies in the review (50 in the meta-analyses), containing 5660 patients, of whom 586 had proven or probable invasive aspergillosis. When using an optical density index (ODI) of 0.5 as a cut-off value, the sensitivity of the test was 82% (73% to 90%) and the specificity was 81% (72% to 90%). At a cut-off value of 1.0 ODI, the sensitivity was 72% (65% to 80%) and the specificity was 88% (84% to 92%). At a cut-off value of 1.5 ODI, the sensitivity was 61% (47% to 75%) and the specificity was 93% (89% to 97%). None of the potential sources of heterogeneity had a statistically significant effect on either sensitivity or specificity. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS If we used the test at a cut-off value of 0.5 ODI in a population of 100 patients with a disease prevalence of 9% (overall median prevalence), two patients who have invasive aspergillosis would be missed (sensitivity 82%, 18% false negatives), and 17 patients would be treated unnecessarily or referred unnecessarily for further testing (specificity 81%, 19% false negatives). If we used the test at a cut-off value of 1.5 in the same population, that would mean that four invasive aspergillosis patients would be missed (sensitivity 61%, 39% false negatives), and six patients would be treated or referred for further testing unnecessarily (specificity 93%, 7% false negatives). These numbers should, however, be interpreted with caution because the results were very heterogeneous.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariska MG Leeflang
- Academic Medical Center, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and BioinformaticsP.O. Box 22700AmsterdamNetherlands1100 DE
| | - Yvette J Debets‐Ossenkopp
- VU University Medical CenterDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection ControlPO Box 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
| | - Junfeng Wang
- Academic Medical CenterDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and BioinformaticsMeibergdreef 9AmsterdamNetherlands1105 AZ
| | - Caroline E Visser
- Academic Medical CentreDepartment of Medical MicrobiologyAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtCochrane NetherlandsRoom Str. 6.126P.O. Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Lotty Hooft
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtCochrane NetherlandsRoom Str. 6.126P.O. Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Henk A Bijlmer
- Bronovo HospitalDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infection ControlThe HagueNetherlands
| | - Johannes B Reitsma
- University Medical Center UtrechtJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary CarePO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA Utrecht
| | - Mingming Zhang
- West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChinese Cochrane Centre, Chinese Evidence‐Based Medicine CentreNo. 37, Guo Xue XiangChengduSichuanChina610041
| | - Patrick MM Bossuyt
- Academic Medical Center, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and BioinformaticsP.O. Box 22700AmsterdamNetherlands1100 DE
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Waite TD, Telisinghe L, Gobin M, Ronveaux O, Fernandez AK, Stuart JM, Scholten RJPM. Rapid diagnostic tests for bacterial meningitis applicable in sub-Saharan Africa. Hippokratia 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas D Waite
- Public Health England; Field Epidemiology Services; 2 Rivergate Bristol UK BS1 6EH
| | | | - Maya Gobin
- Public Health England; Field Epidemiology Services; 2 Rivergate Bristol UK BS1 6EH
| | - Olivier Ronveaux
- World Health Organization; Control of Epidemic Diseases; 20 Avenue Appia Geneva Switzerland 1211
| | - Ana-Katya Fernandez
- World Health Organization; Pandemic and Epidemic Diseases (PED); 20 Avenue Appia Geneva Switzerland 1211
| | - James M Stuart
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department; Keppel Street London UK WC1E 7HT
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center Utrecht; Dutch Cochrane Centre; Room Str. 6.126 P.O. Box 85500 Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chew BH, Vos R, Heijmans M, Metzendorf MI, Scholten RJPM, Rutten GEHM. Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
16
|
Vrinten C, van der Zwaag AM, Weinreich SS, Scholten RJPM, Verschuuren JJGM. Ephedrine for myasthenia gravis, neonatal myasthenia and the congenital myasthenic syndromes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD010028. [PMID: 25515947 PMCID: PMC7387729 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010028.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myasthenia is a condition in which neuromuscular transmission is affected by antibodies against neuromuscular junction components (autoimmune myasthenia gravis, MG; and neonatal myasthenia gravis, NMG) or by defects in genes for neuromuscular junction proteins (congenital myasthenic syndromes, CMSs). Clinically, some individuals seem to benefit from treatment with ephedrine, but its effects and adverse effects have not been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects and adverse effects of ephedrine in people with autoimmune MG, transient neonatal MG, and the congenital myasthenic syndromes. SEARCH METHODS On 17 November 2014, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE. We also searched reference lists of articles, conference proceedings of relevant conferences, and prospective trial registers. In addition, we contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing ephedrine as a single or add-on treatment with any other active treatment, placebo, or no treatment in adults or children with autoimmune MG, NMG, or CMSs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed study design and quality, and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected information on adverse effects from included articles, and contacted authors. MAIN RESULTS We found no RCTs or quasi-RCTs, and therefore could not establish the effect of ephedrine on MG, NMG and CMSs. We describe the results of 53 non-randomised studies narratively in the Discussion section, including observations of endurance, muscle strength and quality of life. Effects may differ depending on the type of myasthenia. Thirty-seven studies were in participants with CMS, five in participants with MG, and in 11 the precise form of myasthenia was unknown. We found no studies for NMG. Reported adverse effects included tachycardia, sleep disturbances, nervousness, and withdrawal symptoms. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There was no evidence available from RCTs or quasi-RCTs, but some observations from non-randomised studies are available. There is a need for more evidence from suitable forms of prospective RCTs, such as series of n-of-one RCTs, that use appropriate and validated outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Vrinten
- VU University Medical CenterCommunity Genetics Section, Clinical GeneticsBS7, D450PO Box 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
| | - Angeli M van der Zwaag
- VU University Medical CenterCommunity Genetics Section, Clinical GeneticsBS7, D450PO Box 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
| | - Stephanie S Weinreich
- VU University Medical CenterCommunity Genetics Section, Clinical GeneticsBS7, D450PO Box 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtDutch Cochrane CentreRoom Str. 6.126P.O. Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Jan JGM Verschuuren
- Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of NeurologyPO Box 9600LeidenNetherlands2300 RC
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most frequently performed orthopaedic procedures. The most common technical cause of reconstruction failure is graft malpositioning. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) aims to improve the accuracy of graft placement. Although posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury and reconstruction are far less common, PCL reconstruction has comparable difficulties relating to graft placement. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2011. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of computer-assisted reconstruction surgery versus conventional operating techniques for ACL or PCL injuries in adults. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (from 2010 to July 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 5, 2013), MEDLINE (from 2010 to July 2013), EMBASE (from 2010 to July 2013), CINAHL (from 2010 to July 2013), article references and prospective trial registers. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared CAS for ACL or PCL reconstruction versus conventional operating techniques not involving CAS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened search results, assessed the risk of bias in the studies and extracted data. Where appropriate, we pooled data using risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS The updated search resulted in the inclusion of one new study. This review now includes five RCTs with 366 participants. There were more female than male participants (70% were female); their ages ranged from 14 to 53 years. All trials involved ACL reconstructions performed by experienced surgeons.Assessing the studies' risk of bias was hampered by poor reporting of trial methods, and consequently several studies were judged to be 'unclear' for several types of bias. One trial presenting primary outcome data was at high risk of detection bias from lack of clinician blinding and attrition bias from an unaccounted loss to follow-up at two years.We found moderate quality evidence (three trials, 193 participants) of no clinically relevant difference between CAS and conventional surgery in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores (self-reported measure of knee function; scale of 0 to 100 where 100 was best function). Pooled data from two of these trials (120 participants) showed a small, but clinically irrelevant difference favouring CAS (MD 2.05, 95% CI -2.16 to 6.25). A third trial (73 participants) also found minimal difference in IKDC subjective scores (reported MD 0.2).We found low quality evidence (two trials, 120 participants) showing no difference between the two groups in Lysholm scores, also measured on a scale 0 to 100 where 100 is best function (MD 0.25, 95% CI -3.75 to 4.25). We found very low quality evidence (one trial, 40 participants) showing no difference between the two groups in Tegner scores. We found low quality evidence (three trials, 173 participants) showing the majority of participants in both groups were assessed as having normal or nearly normal knee function (86/87 with CAS versus 84/86 with no CAS; RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.06).Similarly, no differences were found for our secondary outcome measures of knee stability, loss in range of motion and tunnel placement. None of the trials reported on re-operation.No adverse post-surgical events were reported in two trials (133 participants); this outcome was not reported by the other three trials.CAS use was associated with longer operating times compared with conventional operating techniques: the mean difference in operating times reported in the studies ranged between 9 and 27 minutes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS From the available evidence, we are unable to demonstrate or refute a favourable effect of CAS for cruciate ligament reconstructions of the knee compared with conventional reconstructions. However, the currently available evidence does not indicate that CAS in knee ligament reconstruction improves outcome. There is a need for improved reporting of future studies of this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Eggerding
- Erasmus MC, University Medical CenterDepartment of Orthopaedics's Gravendijkwal 230RotterdamNetherlands3000 CA
| | - Max Reijman
- Erasmus MC, University Medical CenterDepartment of Orthopaedics's Gravendijkwal 230RotterdamNetherlands3000 CA
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- University Medical Center UtrechtJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary CareRoom Str. 6.126P.O. Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Jan AN Verhaar
- Erasmus MC, University Medical CenterDepartment of Orthopaedics's Gravendijkwal 230RotterdamNetherlands3000 CA
| | - Duncan E Meuffels
- Erasmus MC, University Medical CenterDepartment of Orthopaedics's Gravendijkwal 230RotterdamNetherlands3000 CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- Haris S Vasiliadis
- University of Ioannina; Department of Orthopaedics; Ioannina Greece
- Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Molecular Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine; Gothenburg Sweden SE-413 45
| | | | - Ian Shrier
- Jewish General Hospital, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology; 3755 Cote Ste-Catherine Road Montreal Quebec Canada H3T 1E2
| | - Georgia Salanti
- University of Ioannina School of Medicine; Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology; Medical School Campus University of Ioannina Ioannina Greece 45110
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- University Medical Center Utrecht; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care; Room Str. 6.126 P.O. Box 85500 Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. It is caused by increased pressure on the median nerve between the transverse carpal ligament and the carpal bones. Surgical treatment consists of the release of the nerve by cutting the transverse carpal ligament. This can be done either with an open approach or endoscopically. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of the endoscopic techniques of carpal tunnel release compared to any other surgical intervention for the treatment of CTS. More specifically, to evaluate the relative impact of endoscopic techniques in relieving symptoms, producing functional recovery (return to work and return to daily activities) and reducing complication rates. SEARCH METHODS This review fully incorporates the results of searches conducted up to 5 November 2012, when we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE. There were no language restrictions. We reviewed the reference lists of relevant articles and contacted trial authors. We also searched trial registers for ongoing trials. We performed a preliminary screen of searches to November 2013 to identify any additional recent publications. SELECTION CRITERIA We included any randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) with any other surgical intervention for the treatment of CTS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS Twenty-eight studies (2586 hands) were included. Twenty-three studies compared ECTR to standard open carpal tunnel release (OCTR), five studies compared ECTR with OCTR using a modified incision, and two studies used a three-arm design to compare ECTR, standard OCTR and modified OCTR.At short-term follow-up (three months or less), only one study provided data for overall improvement. We found no differences on the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) (scale zero to five) (five studies, standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.13, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.21) or on the Functional Status Scale (FSS) (scale zero to five) (five studies, SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.60 to 0.14) within three months postoperatively between ECTR and OCTR. Pain scores favoured ECTR over conventional OCTR (two studies, SMD -0.41, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.18). No difference was found between ECTR and OCTR (standard and modified) when pain was assessed on non-continuous dichotomous scales (five studies, RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.45). Also, no difference was found in numbness (five studies, RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.71). Grip strength was increased after ECTR when compared with OCTR (six studies, SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.63). This corresponds to a mean difference (MD) of 4 kg (95% CI 1 to 6.9 kg) when compared with OCTR, which is probably not clinically significant.In the long term (more than three months postoperatively) there was no significant difference in overall improvement between ECTR and OCTR (four studies, RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.14). SSS and FSS were also similar in both treatment groups (two studies, MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.22 for SSS and MD 0.01, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.16 for FSS). ECTR and OCTR did not differ in the long term in pain (six studies, RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.38) or in numbness (four studies, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.35). Results from grip strength testing favoured ECTR (two studies, SMD 1.13, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.71), corresponding to an MD of 11 kg (95% CI 6.2 to 18.81). Participants treated with ECTR returned to work or daily activities eight days earlier than participants treated with OCTR (four studies, MD -8.10 days, 95% CI -14.28 to -1.92 days).Both treatments were equally safe with only a few reports of major complications (mainly with complex regional pain syndrome) (15 studies, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.64).ECTR resulted in a significantly lower rate of minor complications (18 studies, RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.81), corresponding to a 45% relative drop in the probability of complications (95% CI 62% to 19%). ECTR more frequently resulted in transient nerve problems (ie, neurapraxia, numbness, and paraesthesiae), while OCTR had more wound problems (ie, infection, hypertrophic scarring, and scar tenderness). ECTR was safer than OCTR when the total number of complications were assessed (20 studies, RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40 to 90) representing a relative drop in the probability by 40% (95% CI 60% to 10%).Rates of recurrence of symptoms and the need for repeated surgery were comparable between ECTR and OCTR groups.The overall risk of bias in studies that contribute data to these results is rather high; fewer than 25% of the included studies had adequate allocation concealment, generation of allocation sequence or blinding of the outcome assessor.The quality of evidence in this review may be considered as generally low. Five of the studies were presented only as abstracts, with insufficient information to judge their risk of bias. In selection bias, attrition bias or other bias (baseline differences and financial conflict of interest) we could not reach a safe judgement regarding a high or low risk of bias. Blinding of participants is impossible due to the nature of interventions.We identified three further potentially eligible studies upon updating searches just prior to publication. These compared ECTR with OCTR (two studies) or mini-open carpal tunnel release (one study) and will be fully assessed when we update the review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In this review, with support from low quality evidence only, OCTR and ECTR for carpal tunnel release are about as effective as each other in relieving symptoms and improving functional status, although there may be a functionally significant benefit of ECTR over OCTR in improvement in grip strength. ECTR appears to be associated with fewer minor complications compared to OCTR, but we found no difference in the rates of major complications. Return to work is faster after endoscopic release, by eight days on average. Conclusions from this review are limited by the high risk of bias, statistical imprecision and inconsistency in the included studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haris S Vasiliadis
- University of IoanninaDepartment of OrthopaedicsIoanninaGreece
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg UniversityMolecular Cell Biology and Regenerative MedicineGothenburgSwedenSE‐413 45
| | | | - Ian Shrier
- Jewish General Hospital, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill UniversityCentre for Clinical Epidemiology3755 Cote Ste‐Catherine RoadMontrealQuebecCanadaH3T 1E2
| | - Georgia Salanti
- University of Ioannina School of MedicineDepartment of Hygiene and EpidemiologyMedical School CampusUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece45110
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- University Medical Center UtrechtJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary CareRoom Str. 6.126P.O. Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vrinten C, Weinreich SS, Scholten RJPM, Verschuuren JJGM. 3,4-Diaminopyridine for myasthenia gravis. Hippokratia 2012. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Vrinten
- VU University Medical Center; Community Genetics Section, Clinical Genetics; BS7, D420 PO Box 7057 1007 MB Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Stephanie S. Weinreich
- VU University Medical Center; Community Genetics Section, Clinical Genetics; BS7, D420 PO Box 7057 1007 MB Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Academic Medical Center; Dutch Cochrane Centre; Room J1B - 211 P.O. Box 22700 Amsterdam Netherlands 1100 DE
| | - Jan JGM Verschuuren
- Leiden University Medical Center; Department of Neurology; PO Box 9600 Leiden Netherlands 2300 RC
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Weinreich SS, Vrinten C, Verschuuren JJGM, Uyl-de Groot CA, Kuijpers MR, Sterrenburg E, Scholten RJPM, van Bezooijen CFRM, Timmen MFTH, van Weely S, Cornel MC. From rationing to rationality: an n-of-one trial service for off-label medicines for rare (neuromuscular) diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012. [PMCID: PMC3504541 DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-s2-a29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
22
|
Samtani A, Sterling-Levis K, Scholten RJPM, Woolfenden S, Hooft L, Williams K. Diagnostic tests for Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) in preschool children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aarti Samtani
- University of New South Wales; Medical Faculty; No 10 Lorong Kemaris 5, Bukit Bandaraya, Bangsar Kuala Lumpur Wilayah Persekutuan Malaysia 59100
| | - Katy Sterling-Levis
- University of New South Wales & Sydney Children's Hospital; School of Women's and Children's Health; High Street Randwick Sydney NSW Australia 2031
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Academic Medical Center; Dutch Cochrane Centre; Room J1B - 108 - 1 P.O. Box 22700 Amsterdam Netherlands 1100 DE
| | - Susan Woolfenden
- Liverpool Hospital; Department of Community Paediatrics; HSB level 3, PO Box 7103 Liverpool Sydney NSW Australia BC 1871
| | - Lotty Hooft
- Academic Medical Center; Dutch Cochrane Centre; Room J1B - 108 - 1 P.O. Box 22700 Amsterdam Netherlands 1100 DE
| | - Katrina Williams
- Royal Children's Hospital; Developmental Medicine; Flemington Rd Melbourne Victoria Australia 3052
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vasiliadis HS, Shrier I, Salanti G, Scholten RJPM. Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2010. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
24
|
Langendam MW, Hooft L, De Vries H, Wentholt IM, Mudde AH, Burt AL, Scholten RJPM. Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2009. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
25
|
Ruh�� H, Huyser J, Scholten RJPM, Swinkels J, Schene A. Initial high dose versus standard dose of antidepressants for depression. Hippokratia 2007. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004041.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
26
|
Ruh�� H, Huyser J, Scholten RJPM, Swinkels J, Schene A. Antidepressant dose-increase for non-responders to a standard dose for depression. Hippokratia 2007. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004045.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
27
|
de Winter AF, Heemskerk MAMB, Terwee CB, Jans MP, Devillé W, van Schaardenburg DJ, Scholten RJPM, Bouter LM. Inter-observer reproducibility of measurements of range of motion in patients with shoulder pain using a digital inclinometer. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004; 5:18. [PMID: 15196309 PMCID: PMC434511 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-5-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2003] [Accepted: 06/14/2004] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Reproducible measurements of the range of motion are an important prerequisite for the interpretation of study results. The digital inclinometer is considered to be a useful instrument because it is inexpensive and easy to use. No previous study assessed inter-observer reproducibility of range of motion measurements with a digital inclinometer by physical therapists in a large sample of patients. Methods Two physical therapists independently measured the passive range of motion of the glenohumeral abduction and the external rotation in 155 patients with shoulder pain. Agreement was quantified by calculation of the mean differences between the observers and the standard deviation (SD) of this difference and the limits of agreement, defined as the mean difference ± 1.96*SD of this difference. Reliability was quantified by means of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results The limits of agreement were 0.8 ± 19.6 for glenohumeral abduction and -4.6 ± 18.8 for external rotation (affected side) and quite similar for the contralateral side and the differences between sides. The percentage agreement within 10° for these measurements were 72% and 70% respectively. The ICC ranged from 0.28 to 0.90 (0.83 and 0.90 for the affected side). Conclusions The inter-observer agreement was found to be poor. If individual patients are assessed by two different observers, differences in range of motion of less than 20–25 degrees can not be distuinguished from measurement error. In contrast, acceptable reliability was found for the inclinometric measurements of the affected side and the differences between the sides, indicating that the inclimeter can be used in studies in which groups are compared.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea F de Winter
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Social Psychiatry, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Monique AMB Heemskerk
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Dutch National Institute for Allied Health Professions, P.O. Box 1161, 3800 BD Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marielle P Jans
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- TNO Work and Employment, P.O. Box 718, 2130 AS Hoofddorp, the Netherlands
| | - Walter Devillé
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk-Jan van Schaardenburg
- Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Dutch Cochrane Centre, J2-229, Academic Medical Center, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lex M Bouter
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Scholten RJ, Kremer LC. [Systemic reviews as a basis for guidelines]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2004; 148:262-4. [PMID: 15004951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
In the Netherlands, evidence-based medicine is advocated as a basis for the preparation of clinical guidelines. A systematic review should be the cornerstone of every aspect of a guideline for which a recommendation is required. To reduce the necessary effort, continuation of national and international collaboration is needed in the preparation and maintenance of high-quality systematic reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Scholten
- Academisch Medisch Centrum, Dutch Cochrane Centre, Postbus 22.660, 1100 DD Amsterdam.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Boluyt N, Scholten RJ, Offringa M. [The practice of systematic reviews. XI. The Cochrane Library]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2003; 147:2572-7. [PMID: 14723024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
Systematic reviews of the literature provide a summary of the current status of medical scientific research. They are important for the solution of medical questions by doctors active in clinical practice, may serve to support practice guidelines, and are used in health care to take policy decisions and to determine the research agenda. The Cochrane Library is the most important source of information on the efficacy of interventions in health care and comprises eight databases. The most relevant for doctors active in clinical practice are the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. At present, the first two databases contain over 5000 systematic reviews of the literature. The third database listed above is the largest database in the world with references to (randomised) controlled studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Boluyt
- Academisch Medisch Centrum, Dutch Cochrane Centre, J2-270, Postbus 22.660, 1100 DD Amsterdam.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gerritsen AAM, Scholten RJPM, Assendelft WJJ, Kuiper H, de Vet HCW, Bouter LM. Splinting or surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome? Design of a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN18853827]. BMC Neurol 2001; 1:8. [PMID: 11801195 PMCID: PMC64540 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-1-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2001] [Accepted: 12/18/2001] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common disorder, which can be treated with surgery or conservative options. However, there is insufficient evidence and no consensus among physicians with regard to the preferred treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Therefore, a randomized controlled trial is conducted to compare the short- and long-term efficacy of surgery and splinting in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. An attempt is also made to avoid the (methodological) limitations encountered in earlier trials on the efficacy of various treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS Patients of 18 years and older, with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome, are recruited by neurologists in 13 hospitals. Patients included in the study are randomly allocated to either open carpal tunnel release or wrist splinting during the night for at least 6 weeks. The primary outcomes are general improvement, waking up at night and severity of symptoms (main complaint, night and daytime pain, paraesthesia and hypoesthesia). Outcomes are assessed up to 18 months after randomization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette AM Gerritsen
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Dutch Cochrane Center/Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Herman Kuiper
- Department of Neurology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Henrica CW de Vet
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lex M Bouter
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Scholten RJ, Devillé WL, Opstelten W, Bijl D, van der Plas CG, Bouter LM. The accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing meniscal lesions of the knee: a meta-analysis. J Fam Pract 2001; 50:938-944. [PMID: 11711009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our systematic review summarizes the evidence about the accuracy of those tests. SEARCH STRATEGY We performed a literature search of MEDLINE (1966-1999) and EMBASE (1988-1999) with additional reference tracking. SELECTION CRITERIA Articles written in English, French, German, or Dutch, that addressed the accuracy of at least one physical diagnostic test for meniscus injury with arthrotomy, arthroscopy, or magnetic resonance imaging as the gold standard were included. We excluded studies if no reference group or only test-positives had been included, if the study pertained to cadavers only, or if only physical examination under anesthesia was considered. DATA COLLECTION/ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently selected studies, assessed the methodologic quality, and abstracted data using a standardized protocol. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for each test, and summary estimates when appropriate and possible. MAIN RESULTS Of 402 identified studies, 13 met the inclusion criteria. The results of the index and reference tests were assessed independently (blindly) of each other in only 2 studies, and in all studies verification bias seemed to be present. The study results were highly heterogeneous The summary receiver operating characteristic curves of the assessment of joint effusion, the McMurray test and joint line tenderness indicated little discriminative power for these tests. Only the predictive value of a positive McMurray test was favorable. CONCLUSIONS The methodologic quality of studies addressing the diagnostic accuracy of meniscal tests was poor, and the results were highly heterogeneous. The poor characteristics indicate that these tests are of little value for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Scholten
- Dutch Cochrane Centre, J2-229, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gerritsen AA, Uitdehaag BM, van Geldere D, Scholten RJ, de Vet HC, Bouter LM. Systematic review of randomized clinical trials of surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Br J Surg 2001; 88:1285-95. [PMID: 11578281 DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01858.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common disorder for which several surgical treatment options are available. However, there is no consensus on the most effective method of treatment. The object of this systematic review is to compare the efficacy of the various surgical techniques in relieving the symptoms of CTS and promoting return to work and/or activities of daily living. METHODS Computer-aided searches of Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were conducted, together with reference checking. A rating system, based on the number of studies and their methodological quality and findings, was used to determine the strength of the available evidence for the efficacy of the treatment. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included in the review. None of the alternatives to standard open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) seems to offer better relief of symptoms. There is conflicting evidence about whether endoscopic carpal tunnel release results in earlier return to work and/or activities of daily living. CONCLUSION Standard OCTR is still the preferred method of treatment for CTS. It is just as effective as the alternatives, but is technically less demanding, so incurs a lower risk of complications and of added costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Gerritsen
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
van Es SM, Nagelkerke AF, Colland VT, Scholten RJ, Bouter LM. An intervention programme using the ASE-model aimed at enhancing adherence in adolescents with asthma. Patient Educ Couns 2001; 44:193-203. [PMID: 11553420 DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00195-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
A randomised controlled trial, involving 112 adolescents with asthma, and a 2-year follow-up was conducted to assess the impact of an intervention programme aimed at enhancing adherence to asthma medication. This programme had a duration of 1 year and consisted of an experimental group which received usual care from a paediatrician, but additionally attended individual and group sessions with an asthma nurse, and a control group which received usual care only. The programme aimed at enhancing adherence by stimulating a positive attitude, increasing feelings of social support, and enhancing self-efficacy. At baseline, and after 12-month (T1) and 24-month (T2) follow-up, the participants filled in questionnaires which were based on the concepts of the ASE-model. Adherence was assessed by self-report (range: 1-10) at the same points in time. After 12 months, 97 adolescents (87%) were available for follow-up, decreasing to 86 adolescents (77%) after 24 months. No statistically significant differences were found between the control and the experimental group, except for one. At T2, self-reported adherence appeared to be statistically significantly higher in the experimental group. In conclusion, there seems to have been no substantial effect of the intervention programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M van Es
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This paper presents the method we used in programming research on the efficacy of therapeutic interventions for nine chronic benign pain disorders. METHODS We started with an inventory to identify commonly applied interventions. For these interventions we searched the literature to identify gaps in evidence. First, we searched for recent reviews, of which we assessed the methodologic quality. If only reviews of poor or moderate quality were found, a new systematic review was recommended. When we found no recent reviews, we searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). If there was insufficient or inconsistent evidence, the performance of a new RCT was advised. This structured procedure resulted in a list with topics for which new systematic reviews were recommended and topics for which new RCTs were needed. These lists were the starting points for priority setting by four Centers for Pain Management and Research. All members of the centers were asked to state the priority of each topic. The resulting hierarchy of topics for their own center was discussed in a meeting in each center, giving participants the opportunity to elucidate their views and considerations. RESULTS The final result was a robust priority list for the need of research (systematic reviews and RCTs) on chronic benign pain syndromes. DISCUSSION The strength and weaknesses of this approach are discussed. This method of priority setting is by no means restricted to treatments for chronic pain; it is also a useful approach for programming research to enable evidence-based medicine in other fields of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H C de Vet
- Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre and Maastricht University
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Assendelft WJ, Scholten RJ, Hoving JL, Offringa M, Bouter LM. [Systematic reviews in practice. VIII. Searching and assessing systematic reviews]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001; 145:1625-31. [PMID: 11552363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
In a systematic review (SR) the information from the original studies is searched, selected, extracted, appraised and summarised in a transparent, valid and reproducible manner. SRs are therefore an efficient and reliable source of information for the clinician, health policy maker and researcher. SRs can be identified in various sources. The search strategy is determined by the desired comprehensiveness, the availability of various sources and the need for additional comments on the SR by a referee. In Medline a sensitive filter is available for searching SRs. An SR should be based on a carefully formulated clinical question that can be answered on the basis of data from the original studies. SRs should be thoroughly assessed as they can differ substantially in terms of quality. In such an appraisal the following aspects should be considered: question, search strategy, selection of studies, quality assessment, data extraction and data presentation, (statistical) summary of the data, statistical and clinical heterogeneity, results and conclusion. Various assessment lists are available. Differences in conclusions between SRs on the same subject can be analysed in a systematic manner and can often be resolved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W J Assendelft
- Academisch Medisch Centrum/Universiteit van Amsterdam, Dutch Cochrane Centre, Postbus 22.660, 1100 DD Amsterdam.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Tulder MW, Scholten RJ, Koes BW, Deyo RA. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25:2501-13. [PMID: 11013503 DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200010010-00013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A systematic review of randomized and double-blind controlled trials was performed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most frequently prescribed medications worldwide and are widely used for patients with low back pain. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of nonspecific low back pain with or without radiation, and to assess which type of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug is most effective. METHODS For this study, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline and Embase, and reference lists of articles were searched. Two reviewers blinded with respect to authors, institution, and journal independently extracted data and assessed the methodologic quality of the studies. If data were considered clinically homogeneous, a meta-analysis was performed. If data were considered clinically heterogeneous, a qualitative analysis was performed using a rating system with four levels of evidence: strong, moderate, limited, and no evidence. RESULTS This review involved 51 trials and 6057 patients. Of these trials, 16 (31%) were of high quality. The pooled relative risk for global improvement after 1 week was 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10-1.41), and for additional analgesic use was 1.29 (95% CI = 1.05-1.57), indicating a statistically significant but small effect in favor of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as compared with a placebo. The results of the qualitative analysis showed that there is conflicting evidence (Level 3) that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are more effective than paracetamol for acute low back pain, and that there is moderate evidence (Level 2) that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are not more effective than other drugs for acute low back pain. There is strong evidence (Level 1) that various types of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are equally effective for acute low back pain. CONCLUSIONS The evidence from the 51 trials included in this review suggests that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are effective for short-term symptomatic relief in patients with acute low back pain. Furthermore, there does not seem to be a specific type of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that is clearly more effective than others. Sufficient evidence on chronic low back pain still is lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M W van Tulder
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Zeegers MP, Heisterkamp SH, Kostense PJ, van der Windt DA, Scholten RJ. [Practice of systematic reviews. VII. Pooling of results from observational studies]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2000; 144:1393-7. [PMID: 10923147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Knowledge concerning aetiologic hypotheses can be obtained through systematic reviews of observational studies. In observational studies, heterogeneity between studies is expected, because of differences in study design and analysis. Data from observational studies have to be made comparable before pooling of results from component studies is possible. In this, definition of exposure and disease and adjustment for confounding have to be taken into account. Three methods to deal with heterogeneity are presented: ignoring (fixed effects model), modelling (random effects model) and exploring (meta regression). Any combination of data in meta-analysis of observational studies has to be based on statistical, methodological and clinical considerations. The same considerations are applied for the choice which method is used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Zeegers
- Universiteit Maastricht, Faculteit der Gezondheidswetenschappen, capaciteitsgroep Epidemiologie.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
van der Windt DA, Zeegers MP, Kemper HC, Assendelft WJ, Scholten RJ. [Practice of systematic reviews. VI. Searching, selection and methodological evaluation of etiological research]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2000; 144:1210-4. [PMID: 10897300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Optimal search strategies for the identification of publications on aetiological research are currently not available. The definition of adequate selection criteria is necessary to limit the harvest to a relevant and homogeneous set of publications. Yet, the harvest should be high in order to prevent many relevant papers being missed. The methodological assessment of aetiological research should be aimed at the estimation of the presence of selection bias, information bias, and confounding. Important items of the methodological assessment are independent and standardised assessment of exposure and outcome, high response rate, no selective dropout, and adjustment for confounding in the analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A van der Windt
- Vrije Universiteit, Faculteit der Geneeskunde, Instituut voor Extramuraal Geneeskundig Onderzoek, Amsterdam.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequently prescribed medications worldwide and are widely used for patients with low back pain. OBJECTIVES The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of NSAIDs in the treatment of non-specific low back pain and to assess which type of NSAID is most effective. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Medline and Embase databases and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR) up to and including September 1998 if reported in English, Dutch or German. We also screened references given in relevant reviews and identified trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials and double-blind controlled trials of NSAIDs in non-specific low back pain with or without radiation were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers blinded with respect to authors, institution and journal independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality. A methodological quality score was applied, and studies meeting at least six of 11 specified criteria were considered high quality studies. If data were considered clinically homogeneous, a meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects model for statistically homogeneous subgroups and a random effects model for statistically heterogeneous subgroups. If data were considered clinically heterogeneous, a qualitative analysis was performed using a rating system with four levels of evidence (strong, moderate, limited, no). MAIN RESULTS A total of 51 trials (total number of patients = 6057) were included in this review, of which 46 were published in English and five in German. Sixteen trials (31%) were of high quality. The pooled Relative Risk for global improvement after one week was 1.24 (95% CI 1.10, 1.41) and for additional analgesic use 1.29 (95% CI 1.05, 1.57), indicating a statistically significant effect in favour of NSAIDs compared to placebo. The results of the qualitative analysis showed that there is conflicting evidence (level 3) that NSAIDs are more effective than paracetamol for acute low back pain, and that there is moderate evidence (level 2) that NSAIDs are not more effective than other drugs for acute low back pain. There is strong evidence (level 1) that various types of NSAIDs are equally effective for acute low back pain. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the evidence from the 51 trials included in this review suggests that NSAIDs are effective for short-term symptomatic relief in patients with acute low back pain. Furthermore, there does not seem to be a specific type of NSAID which is clearly more effective than others. Sufficient evidence on chronic low back pain is still lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M W van Tulder
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 BT.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
de Winter AF, Jans MP, Scholten RJ, Devillé W, van Schaardenburg D, Bouter LM. Diagnostic classification of shoulder disorders: interobserver agreement and determinants of disagreement. Ann Rheum Dis 1999; 58:272-7. [PMID: 10225810 PMCID: PMC1752887 DOI: 10.1136/ard.58.5.272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the interobserver agreement on the diagnostic classification of shoulder disorders, based on history taking and physical examination, and to identify the determinants of diagnostic disagreement. METHODS Consecutive eligible patients with shoulder pain were recruited in various health care settings in the Netherlands. After history taking, two physiotherapists independently performed a physical examination and subsequently the shoulder complaints were classified into one of six diagnostic categories: capsular syndrome (for example, capsulitis, arthritis), acute bursitis, acromioclavicular syndrome, subacromial syndrome (for example, tendinitis, chronic bursitis), rest group (for example, unclear clinical picture, extrinsic causes) and mixed clinical picture. To quantify the interobserver agreement Cohen's kappa was calculated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to determine which clinical characteristics were determinants of diagnostic disagreement. RESULTS The study population consisted of 201 patients with varying severity and duration of complaints. The kappa for the classification of shoulder disorders was 0.45 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.37, 0.54). Diagnostic disagreement was associated with bilateral involvement (odds ratio (OR) 1.9; 95% CI 1.0, 3.7), chronic complaints (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1, 3.7), and severe pain (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.3, 5.3). CONCLUSIONS Only moderate agreement was found on the classification of shoulder disorders, which implies that differentiation between the various categories of shoulder disorders is complicated. Especially patients with high pain severity, chronic complaints and bilateral involvement represent a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. As diagnostic classification is a guide for treatment decisions, unsatisfactory reproducibility might affect treatment outcome. To improve the reproducibility, more insight into the reproducibility of clinical findings and the value of additional diagnostic procedures is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A F de Winter
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
|
42
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a meta-analysis of current literature concerning the validation of thoracic impedance cardiography (TIC) and to explain the variations in the reported results from the differences in the studies. DATA SOURCES A computer-assisted search of English-language, German, and Dutch literature was performed for the period January 1966 to April 1997. Moreover, references from review articles were obtained. STUDY SELECTION A total of 154 studies comparing measurements of cardiac output or related variables obtained from TIC and a reference method were analyzed. DATA EXTRACTION Articles were classified by differences in TIC methodology, reference method, and subject characteristics. Fisher's Zf transformed correlation coefficients were used to compare results. Data were pooled using the random-effects method. DATA SYNTHESIS An overall pooled r2 value of .67 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.71) was found. However, the correlation was higher in repeated-measurement designs than in single-measurement designs (r2 = .53; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.62). Further research using analysis of variance revealed a significant influence of the reference method and the subject characteristics on the correlation coefficient. The correlation was significantly better in animals than in cardiac patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that TIC correlated significantly better to the indirect Fick method than to echocardiography in healthy subjects. No significant influence of the applied TIC methodology was found. DISCUSSION The overall r2 value of .67 indicates that TIC might be useful for trend analysis of different groups of patients. However, for diagnostic interpretation, a r2 value of .53 might not meet the required accuracy of the study. Great care should be taken when TIC is applied to the cardiac patient. However, because the applied reference method was of significant influence, differences between TIC and the reference method are incorrectly attributed to errors in TIC alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Raaijmakers
- Department of Medical Physics and Informatics, Institute of Cardiovascular Research, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Raaijmakers E, Faes TJ, Scholten RJ, Goovaerts HG, Heethaar RM. A meta-analysis of published studies concerning the validity of thoracic impedance cardiography. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 873:121-7. [PMID: 10372159 DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09458.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Our aim was to provide a meta-analysis of the literature concerning the validation of thoracic impedance cardiography (TIC) and to explain variations in reported results from differences in the studies. One hundred fifty-four studies (164 Fisher's Z-transformed correlation coefficients) comparing measurements of cardiac output or related parameters from TIC and a reference method were analyzed. Papers were classified according to differences in TIC methodology, reference method, and subject characteristics. Pooling using the random-effects method yielded an overall correlation of r = 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.80-0.84). ANOVA revealed a significant influence of the reference method and the subject characteristics on the correlation coefficient. In cardiac patients, the correlation was significantly decreased. No influence of the applied TIC methodology was found. CONCLUSION TIC might be useful for trend analysis of different groups of patients. However, since the reference method was of significant influence, differences between TIC and the reference method are incorrectly attributed to TIC alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Raaijmakers
- Dr. B. Verbeeten Institute, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Scholten RJ, Assendelft WJ, Kostense PJ, Bouter LM. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143:843-8. [PMID: 10347653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
Meta-analysis comprises the analysis of the data of similar studies gathered in a systematic review. If the results of the studies differ (strongly), this is called heterogeneity. Possible causes of heterogeneity are: a wrong choice of type of measure of treatment effect, differences of methodological quality between studies, or real differences between studies. Heterogeneity between studies can be assessed by thorough examination of the differences between study characteristics in combination with a visual inspection of the degree of overlap of the confidence intervals of the estimates of effect of the different studies. By applying the random effects model for pooling, (non-systematic) heterogeneity between studies can be addressed. In case of heterogeneity between studies, sources of heterogeneity should be explored by means of subgroup analysis according to strict, present criteria. Subgroup analysis should address subgroups of patients within studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Scholten
- Vrije Universiteit, Faculteit der Geneeskunde, Instituut voor Extramuraal Geneeskundig Onderzoek, Amsterdam.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Scholten RJ, Kostense PJ, Assendelft WJ, Bouter LM. [The practice of systematic reviews. IV. Pooling results from separate studies]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143:786-91. [PMID: 10347641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
Meta-analysis comprises the analysis of the data gathered in a systematic review. Meta-analysis can be defined as the combination of pooling results of similar studies into one overall estimate of the effect on the one hand and the exploration of sources of heterogeneity between studies on the other. A general statistical model is available for pooling the estimates of various types of effect parameters. Pooling enables the estimation of the effect of an intervention or exposure as precisely as possible (with narrow confidence intervals) which allows detection of minor effects. The Mantel-Haenszel method is also an excellent method for pooling effect parameters of dichotomous outcomes. Pooling provides an efficient means of summarizing the available knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Scholten
- Vrije Universiteit, Faculteit der Geneeskunde, Amsterdam.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Assendelft WJ, Scholten RJ, van Eijk JT, Bouter LM. [The practice of systematic reviews. III. Evaluation of methodological quality of research studies]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143:714-9. [PMID: 10347625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
The methodological quality of the primary studies included in a systematic review may influence its results and final conclusions. Methodological quality may be defined in various ways. Partially because of this there are many different assessment lists. The most important dimension of quality is internal validity, defined as the confidence that the design, performance and report of a trial prevent or reduce systematic errors (bias) in the outcomes. For only a limited number of internal validity items a relationship with bias has been proven in empirical studies: concealment of randomisation and blinding of patients and outcome assessors. Preferably, quality should be assessed by at least 2 assessors independently. There is no consensus whether assessment should be done blinded for authors, journal, results and conclusions. Internal validity can be incorporated into statistical pooling in various ways: as a selection criterion, to be used as weight or to hierarchically order studies in a presentation. Well-designed comparative studies are needed to provide clearer guidelines for methodological assessment in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W J Assendelft
- Vrije Universiteit, Faculteit der Geneeskunde, Instituut voor Extramuraal Geneeskundig Onderzoek, Amsterdam.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Assendelft WJ, van Tulder MW, Scholten RJ, Bouter LM. [The practice of systematic reviews. II. Searching and selection of studies]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143:656-61. [PMID: 10321296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
Structured searching and selection of studies is an important component of a systematic review. It is recommended to record the various steps in a protocol in advance. The thoroughness of the searching and selection will partially depend on the available resources, like manpower and funds. A search action should be based on an unequivocally formulated research or clinical question, that is operationalized into clear inclusion and exclusion criteria. The actual start of a search strategy is a search in preferably multiple databases like Medline and EMBASE-Excerpta Medica. Additional search actions can be performed in trial registers and printed indexes and by correspondence with experts and hand searching of journals. Storage of the search results in a bibliographic database is recommended. Various methodological problems may play a role in searching and selecting studies for a review: studies may selectively not be published, results are only partially presented in the publication, studies are selectively included in reference lists, and reviewers themselves may make systematic errors in the selection process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W J Assendelft
- Vrije Universiteit, Faculteit der Geneeskunde, Instituut voor Extramuraal Geneeskundig Onderzoek, Amsterdam.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Scholten RJ. [Roaming through methodology. XI. 'Odds' and so forth]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1998; 142:2452-4. [PMID: 10028324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
The odds for the occurrence of an event (e.g. a particular disease) is the ratio of the probability that the event will occur and the probability that the event will not occur. The odds ratio for an event is the ratio of two odds for the occurrence of that event (e.g. for persons who have been exposed to a particular risk factor versus persons who have not been exposed). The odds ratio is a frequently applied measure of association in case control research. However, the odds ratio is not readily understandable. In case of a rare event (e.g. a rare disease) the odds ratio can be interpreted as a relative risk which is easier to understand (i.e. the factor with which the risk of disease increases in people exposed to a certain condition).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Scholten
- Vrije Universiteit, faculteit der Geneeskunde, Instituut voor Extramuraal Geneeskundig Onderzoek (EMGO-Instituut, Amsterdam
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
|
50
|
Koes BW, Scholten RJ, Mens JM, Bouter LM. Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 1997; 56:214-23. [PMID: 9165992 PMCID: PMC1752367 DOI: 10.1136/ard.56.4.214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for low back pain. DATA SOURCES Computer aided search of published randomised clinical trials and assessment of the methods of the studies. STUDY SELECTION 26 randomised clinical trials evaluating NSAIDs for low back pain were identified. DATA EXTRACTION Score for quality (maximum = 100 points) of the methods based on four categories: study population; interventions; effect measurement; data presentation and analysis. Determination of success rate per study group and evaluation of different contrasts. Statistical pooling of placebo controlled trials in similar patient groups and using similar outcome measures. RESULTS The methods scores of the trials ranged from 27 to 83 points. NSAIDs were compared with placebo treatment in 10 studies. The pooled odds ratio in four trials comparing NSAIDs with placebo after one week was 0.53 (95% confidence intervals 0.32 to 0.89) using the fixed effect model, indicating a significant effect in favour of NSAIDs compared with placebo. In nine studies NSAIDs were compared with other (drug) therapies. Of these, only two studies reported better results of NSAIDs compared with paracetamol with and without dextropropoxyphene. In the other trials NSAIDs were not better than the reference treatment. In 11 studies different NSAIDs were compared, of which seven studies reported no differences in effect. CONCLUSIONS There are flaws in the design of most studies. The pooled odds ratio must be interpreted with caution because the trials at issue, including the high quality trials, did not use identical outcome measures. The results of the 26 randomised trials that have been carried out to date, suggest that NSAIDs might be effective for short-term symptomatic relief in patients with uncomplicated low back pain, but are less effective or ineffective in patients with low back pain with sciatica and patients with sciatica with nerve root symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B W Koes
- Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|