1
|
Detollenaere J, Van Ingelghem I, Van den Heede K, Vlayen J. Systematic literature review on the effectiveness and safety of paediatric hospital-at-home care as a substitute for hospital care. Eur J Pediatr 2023:10.1007/s00431-023-04916-2. [PMID: 37010537 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-04916-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
The hospital landscape is shifting to new care models to meet current challenges in demand, technology, available budgets and staffing. These challenges also apply to the paediatric population, leading to a reduction in paediatric hospital beds and occupancy rates. Paediatric hospital-at-home (HAH) care is used to substitute hospital care in an attempt to bring hospital services closer to children's homes. In addition, these models attempt to avoid fragmentation of care between hospitals and the community. An important prerequisite for this paediatric HAH care is that it is safe and at least as effective as standard hospital care. The aim of this systematic review is to analyse the evidence on the impact of paediatric HAH care on hospital utilisation, patient outcomes and costs. Four bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, Cinahl and Cochrane Library) were systematically searched for RCTs and pseudo-RCTs that studied the effectiveness and safety of short-term paediatric HAH care with a focus on models as an alternative to acute hospital admissions. Pseudo-RCTs are defined as observational studies that mimic the design of an RCT, but without randomisation. Outcomes of interest were the length of stay, acute (re)admissions, adverse health outcomes, therapy adherence, parental satisfaction or experience and costs. Only articles written in English, Dutch and French conducted in upper-middle and high-income countries and published between 2000 and 2021 were included. Quality assessment was carried out by two assessors using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias. Reporting is done in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We identified 18 (pseudo) RCTs and 25 publications of low to very low quality. Most of the included RCTs focused on the neonatal population: phototherapy for neonatal jaundice, early discharge after birth combined with outpatient neonatal care. Other RCTs focused on chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, diabetes type 1 education, oxygen therapy for acute bronchiolitis, an outpatient service for children with infectious diseases and antibiotic treatment for low-risk febrile neutropenia, cellulitis and perforated appendicitis. The identified study results show that paediatric HAH care is not associated with more adverse events or hospital readmissions. The impact of paediatric HAH care on costs is less clear. Conclusions: This review suggests that paediatric HAH care is not associated with more adverse events or hospital readmissions for various clinical indications compared to a standard hospital. Because of the low to very low level of evidence, it is worthwhile to further investigate safety, efficacy and cost effects under strict and well-controlled conditions. This systematic review provides guidance on the essential elements that should be included in HAH care programmes for each type of indication and/or intervention. What is Known: • The hospital landscape is shifting new models of care to meet current challenges in demand, technology, staffing and models of care. Paediatric HAH care is one of these models. Previous literature reviews are inconclusive whether this is a safe and effective way of providing care. What is New: • New evidence suggests that paediatric HAH care for various clinical indications is not associated with adverse events or hospital readmissions compared to a standard hospital. Current evidence is characterised by a low level of quality. • The current review provides guidance on the essential elements that should be included in HAH care programmes for each type of indication and/or intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Detollenaere
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Boulevard du Jardin Botanique 55, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Ingrid Van Ingelghem
- AZ Klina, Augustijnslei 100, Brasschaat, Belgium
- UZ Antwerpen, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Koen Van den Heede
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Boulevard du Jardin Botanique 55, Brussels, Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy (KU Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 35, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Joan Vlayen
- Sint-Trudo Hospital, Diestersteenweg 100, Sint Truiden, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roze JF, Hoogendam JP, van de Wetering FT, Spijker R, Verleye L, Vlayen J, Veldhuis WB, Scholten RJPM, Zweemer RP. Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing tumour resectability in advanced epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 10:CD012567. [PMID: 30298516 PMCID: PMC6517226 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012567.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynaecological cancer in developed countries. Surgery and chemotherapy are considered its mainstay of treatment and the completeness of surgery is a major prognostic factor for survival in these women. Currently, computed tomography (CT) is used to preoperatively assess tumour resectability. If considered feasible, women will be scheduled for primary debulking surgery (i.e. surgical efforts to remove the bulk of tumour with the aim of leaving no visible (macroscopic) tumour). If primary debulking is not considered feasible (i.e. the tumour load is too extensive), women will receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy to reduce tumour load and subsequently undergo (interval) surgery. However, CT is imperfect in assessing tumour resectability, so additional imaging modalities can be considered to optimise treatment selection. OBJECTIVES To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose-18 (FDG) PET/CT, conventional and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI as replacement or add-on to abdominal CT, for assessing tumour resectability at primary debulking surgery in women with stage III to IV epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE and Embase (OVID) for potential eligible studies (1946 to 23 February 2017). Additionally, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO-ICTRP and the reference list of all relevant studies were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA Diagnostic accuracy studies addressing the accuracy of preoperative FDG-PET/CT, conventional or DW-MRI on assessing tumour resectability in women with advanced stage (III to IV) epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer who are scheduled to undergo primary debulking surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance and inclusion, extracted data and performed methodological quality assessment using QUADAS-2. The limited number of studies did not permit meta-analyses. MAIN RESULTS Five studies (544 participants) were included in the analysis. All studies performed the index test as replacement of abdominal CT. Two studies (366 participants) addressed the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for assessing incomplete debulking with residual disease of any size (> 0 cm) with sensitivities of 1.0 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.0) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.73) and specificities of 1.0 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.0) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.93), respectively (low- and moderate-certainty evidence). Three studies (178 participants) investigated MRI for different target conditions, of which two investigated DW-MRI and one conventional MRI. The first study showed that DW-MRI determines incomplete debulking with residual disease of any size with a sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.99) and a specificity of 0.98 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.00) (low- and moderate-certainty evidence). For abdominal CT, the sensitivity for assessing incomplete debulking was 0.66 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.78) and the specificity 0.77 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.87) (low- and low-certainty evidence). The second study reported a sensitivity of DW-MRI of 0.75 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.97) and a specificity of 0.96 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.00) (very low-certainty evidence) for assessing incomplete debulking with residual disease > 1 cm. In the last study, the sensitivity for assessing incomplete debulking with residual disease of > 2 cm on conventional MRI was 0.91 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.00) and the specificity 0.97 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.00) (very low-certainty evidence). Overall, the certainty of evidence was very low to moderate (according to GRADE), mainly due to small sample sizes and imprecision. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Studies suggested a high specificity and moderate sensitivity for FDG-PET/CT and MRI to assess macroscopic incomplete debulking. However, the certainty of the evidence was insufficient to advise routine addition of FDG-PET/CT or MRI to clinical practice..In a research setting, adding an alternative imaging method could be considered for women identified as suitable for primary debulking by abdominal CT, in an attempt to filter out false-negatives (i.e. debulking, feasible based on abdominal CT, unfeasible at actual surgery).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joline F Roze
- UMC Utrecht Cancer CenterDepartment of Gynaecological OncologyUtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Jacob P Hoogendam
- UMC Utrecht Cancer CenterDepartment of Gynaecological OncologyUtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Fleur T van de Wetering
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityCochrane NetherlandsPO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - René Spijker
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityCochrane NetherlandsPO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Leen Verleye
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge CentreKruidtuinlaan 55BrusselsBelgium1000
| | - Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge CentreKruidtuinlaan 55BrusselsBelgium1000
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- University Medical Center UtrechtDepartment of RadiologyRoom E01.132PO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht UniversityCochrane NetherlandsPO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer CenterDepartment of Gynaecological OncologyUtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vermandere M, Kuijpers T, Burgers JS, Kunnamo I, van Lieshout J, Wallace E, Vlayen J, Schoenfeld E, Siemieniuk RA, Trevena L, Zhu X, Verermen F, Neuschwander B, Dahm PH, Tikkinen KAO, Aubrey-Bassler K, Vernooij RWM, Aertgeerts B, Bekkering GE. α-Blockers for uncomplicated ureteric stones: a clinical practice guideline. BJU Int 2018; 122:924-931. [PMID: 29993174 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop an evidence-based recommendation concerning the use of α-blockers for uncomplicated ureteric stones based on an up-to-date Cochrane review, as the role of medical expulsive therapy for uncomplicated ureteric stones remains controversial in the light of new contradictory trial evidence. METHODS We applied the Rapid Recommendations approach to guideline development, which represents an innovative approach by an international collaborative network of clinicians, researchers, methodologists and patient representatives seeking to rapidly respond to new, potentially practice-changing evidence with recommendations developed according to standards for trustworthy guidelines. RESULTS The panel suggests the use of α-blockers in addition to standard care over standard care alone in patients with uncomplicated ureteric stones (weak recommendation based on low-quality evidence). The panel judged that the net benefit of α-blockers was small and that there was considerable uncertainty about patients' values and preferences. This means that the panel expects that most patients would choose treatment with α-blockers but that a substantial proportion would not. This recommendation applies to both patients in whom the presence of ureteric stones is confirmed by imaging, as well as patients in whom the diagnosis is made based on clinical grounds only. CONCLUSION The Rapid Recommendations panel suggests the use of α-blockers for patients with ureteric stones. Shared decision-making is emphasised in making the final choice between the treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mieke Vermandere
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for General Practice, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ton Kuijpers
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jako S Burgers
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ilkka Kunnamo
- Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd, Helsinki, Finland.,University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jan van Lieshout
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Emma Wallace
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research & Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Elizabeth Schoenfeld
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Institute of Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Reed A Siemieniuk
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Xiaoye Zhu
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Philipp H Dahm
- Department of Urology, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kari A O Tikkinen
- Departments of Urology and Public Health, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kris Aubrey-Bassler
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - Robin W M Vernooij
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bert Aertgeerts
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for General Practice, KU Leuven, Belgium.,Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Cochrane Belgium, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gertrude E Bekkering
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for General Practice, KU Leuven, Belgium.,Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Cochrane Belgium, KU Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Neyt M, Vlayen J, Devriese S, Camberlin C. First- and second-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer: A Belgian cost-utility analysis. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0195134. [PMID: 29630612 PMCID: PMC5891000 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 03/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Currently, in Belgium, bevacizumab is reimbursed for ovarian cancer patients, based on a contract between the Minister and the manufacturer including confidential agreements. This reimbursement will be re-evaluated in 2018. Objective To support the reimbursement reassessment by calculating the cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab: (1) in addition to first-line chemotherapy; (2) in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (platinum-sensitive or platinum-resistant). Methods A health economic model has been developed for the Belgian situation according to the Belgian guidelines for economic evaluations. The lifetime Markov model was set up from the perspective of the health care payer (government and patient), including direct healthcare related costs. Results are expressed as the extra costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Calculations were based on results of four international trials. Both probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Results Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of first-line bevacizumab are on average 158 000/QALY (GOG-0218 trial) and 443 000/QALY (ICON7 trial). The most favourable scenario is based on the stage IV subgroup of the GOG-0218 trial (€52 000/QALY). Since subgroup findings are often exploratory and require confirmatory studies, results of the economic evaluation based on this subgroup analysis should be considered with caution. For second-line bevacizumab, ICERs are on average €587 000/QALY (OCEANS trial) and €172 000/QALY (AURELIA trial). Sensitivity analysis shows that results are most sensitive to the price of bevacizumab. Conclusion From a health economic perspective, ICERs of bevacizumab are relatively high. The most favourable results are found for first-line treatment of stage IV ovarian cancer patients. Price reductions have a major impact on the estimated ICERs. It is recommended to take these findings into account when re-evaluating the reimbursement of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattias Neyt
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Brussels, Belgium
- * E-mail:
| | - Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fervers B, Remy-Stockinger M, Mazeau-Woynar V, Otter R, Liberati A, Littlejohns P, Qureshi S, Vlayen J, Characiejus D, Corbacho B, Garner S, Hamza-Mohamed F, Hermosilla T, Kersten S, Kulig M, Leshem B, Levine N, Ballini L, Middelton C, Mlika-Cabane N, Paquet L, Podmaniczki E, Ramaekers D, Robinson E, Sanchez E, Philip T. CoCanCPG. Coordination of Cancer Clinical Practice in Europe. Tumori 2018; 94:154-9. [DOI: 10.1177/030089160809400204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
All European countries are facing common challenges for delivering appropriate, evidence-based care to patients with cancer. Despite tangible improvements in diagnosis and treatment, marked differences in cancer survival exist throughout Europe. The reliable translation of new research evidence into consistent patient-oriented strategies is a key endeavour to overcome inequalities in healthcare. Clinical-practice guidelines are important tools for improving quality of care by informing professionals and patients about the most appropriate clinical practice. Guideline programmes in different countries use similar strategies to achieve similar goals. This results in unnecessary duplication of effort and inefficient use of resources. While different initiatives at the international level have attempted to improve the quality of guidelines, less investment has been made to overcome existing fragmentation and duplication of effort in cancer guideline development and research. To provide added value to existing initiatives and foster equitable access to evidence-based cancer care in Europe, CoCanCPG will establish cooperation between cancer guideline programmes. CoCanCPG is an ERA-Net coordinated by the French National Cancer Institute with 17 partners from 11 countries. The CoCanCPG partners will achieve their goal through an ambitious, step-wise approach with a long-term perspective, involving: 1. implementing a common framework for sharing knowledge and skills; 2. developing shared activities for guideline development; 3. assembling a critical mass for pertinent research into guideline methods; 4. implementing an appropriate framework for cooperation. Successful development of joint activities involves learning how to adopt common quality standards and how to share responsibilities, while taking into account the cultural and organisational diversity of the participating organisations. Languages barriers and different organisational settings add a level of complexity to setting up transnational collaboration. Through its activities, CoCanCPG will make an important contribution towards better access to evidence-based cancer practices and thus contribute to reducing inequalities and improving care for patients with cancer across Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bèatrice Fervers
- Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, SOR/Centre Léon Bérard, EA 4129 Santé-Individu-Société, Lyon, France
| | - Magali Remy-Stockinger
- Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, SOR/Centre Léon Bérard, EA 4129 Santé-Individu-Société, Lyon, France
| | | | - Renèe Otter
- Vereniging van Integrale Kankercentra, ACCC, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Liberati
- Agenzia Sanitaria Regionale, Regione Emilia-Romagna, ASR E-R, Bologna, Italy
| | - Peter Littlejohns
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, NICE, London, United Kingdom
| | - Safia Qureshi
- NHS, Quality Improvement Scotland, SIGN, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, KCE, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Belèn Corbacho
- Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment, AETSA, Seville, Spain
| | - Sarah Garner
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, NICE, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Teresa Hermosilla
- Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment, AETSA, Seville, Spain
| | - Sonja Kersten
- Vereniging van Integrale Kankercentra, ACCC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Kulig
- Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen, IQWiG, Köln, Germany
| | - Benny Leshem
- Israeli Ministry of Health, Office CSO-MOH, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Nava Levine
- Israeli Ministry of Health, Office CSO-MOH, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Luciana Ballini
- Agenzia Sanitaria Regionale, Regione Emilia-Romagna, ASR E-R, Bologna, Italy
| | - Clifford Middelton
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, NICE, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Louise Paquet
- Direction de Lutte Contre le Cancer, Ministère de la Santé du Québec, DLCC, Montréal, Canada
| | | | - Dirk Ramaekers
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, KCE, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Emilia Sanchez
- Agència d'Avaluació de Tecnologia i Recerca Mèdiques, AATRM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Thierry Philip
- Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, SOR/Centre Léon Bérard, EA 4129 Santé-Individu-Société, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Benahmed N, Briat G, Rondia K, Vlayen J. Routine preoperative testing in adults undergoing elective non-cardiothoracic surgery. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 39:101-107. [DOI: 10.30637/2018.17-038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
7
|
Hoogendam JP, Roze JF, van de Wetering FT, Spijker R, Verleye L, Vlayen J, Veldhuis WB, Scholten RJPM, Zweemer RP. Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing tumour resectability in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and/or primary peritoneal cancer. Hippokratia 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob P Hoogendam
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center; Department of Gynaecological Oncology; Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| | - Joline F Roze
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center; Department of Gynaecological Oncology; Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| | - Fleur T van de Wetering
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center Utrecht; Dutch Cochrane Centre; PO Box 85500 Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| | - René Spijker
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center Utrecht; Dutch Cochrane Centre; PO Box 85500 Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| | - Leen Verleye
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; Kruidtuinlaan 55 Brussels Belgium 1000
| | - Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; Kruidtuinlaan 55 Brussels Belgium 1000
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Radiology; Room E01.132 PO Box 85500 Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center Utrecht; Dutch Cochrane Centre; PO Box 85500 Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center; Department of Gynaecological Oncology; Utrecht Netherlands 3508 GA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van de Wetering FT, Verleye L, Andreyev HJN, Maher J, Vlayen J, Pieters BR, van Tienhoven G, Scholten RJPM. Non-surgical interventions for late rectal problems (proctopathy) of radiotherapy in people who have received radiotherapy to the pelvis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 4:CD003455. [PMID: 27111831 PMCID: PMC7173735 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003455.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2002, and previously updated in 2007. Late radiation rectal problems (proctopathy) include bleeding, pain, faecal urgency, and incontinence and may develop after pelvic radiotherapy treatment for cancer. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of non-surgical interventions for managing late radiation proctopathy. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2015); MEDLINE (Ovid); EMBASE (Ovid); CANCERCD; Science Citation Index; and CINAHL from inception to November 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-surgical interventions for the management of late radiation proctopathy in people with cancer who have undergone pelvic radiotherapy for cancer. Primary outcomes considered were: episodes of bowel activity, bleeding, pain, tenesmus, urgency, and sphincter dysfunction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Study selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment, and data extraction were performed in duplicate, and any disagreements were resolved by involving a third review author. MAIN RESULTS We identified 1221 unique references and 16 studies including 993 participants that met our inclusion criteria. One study found through the last update was moved to the 'Studies awaiting classification' section. We did not pool outcomes for a meta-analysis due to variation in study characteristics and endpoints across included studies.Since radiation proctopathy is a condition with various symptoms or combinations of symptoms, the studies were heterogeneous in their intended effect. Some studies investigated treatments targeted at bleeding only (group 1), some investigated treatments targeted at a combination of anorectal symptoms, but not a single treatment (group 2). The third group focused on the treatment of the collection of symptoms referred to as pelvic radiation disease. In order to enable some comparison of this heterogeneous collection of studies, we describe the effects in these three groups separately.Nine studies assessed treatments for rectal bleeding and were unclear or at high risk of bias. The only treatments that made a significant difference on primary outcomes were argon plasma coagulation (APC) followed by oral sucralfate versus APC with placebo (endoscopic score 6 to 9 in favour of APC with placebo, risk ratio (RR) 2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12 to 4.55; 1 study, 122 participants, low- to moderate-quality evidence); formalin dab treatment (4%) versus sucralfate steroid retention enema (symptom score after treatment graded by the Radiation Proctopathy System Assessments Scale (RPSAS) and sigmoidoscopic score in favour of formalin (P = 0.001, effect not quantified, 1 study, 102 participants, very low- to low-quality evidence), and colonic irrigation plus ciprofloxacin and metronidazole versus formalin application (4%) (bleeding (P = 0.007, effect not quantified), urgency (P = 0.0004, effect not quantified), and diarrhoea (P = 0.007, effect not quantified) in favour of colonic irrigation (1 study, 50 participants, low-quality evidence).Three studies, of unclear and high risk of bias, assessed treatments targeted at something very localised but not a single pathology. We identified no significant differences on our primary outcomes. We graded all studies as very low-quality evidence due to unclear risk of bias and very serious imprecision.Four studies, of unclear and high risk of bias, assessed treatments targeted at more than one symptom yet confined to the anorectal region. Studies that demonstrated an effect on symptoms included: gastroenterologist-led algorithm-based treatment versus usual care (detailed self help booklet) (significant difference in favour of gastroenterologist-led algorithm-based treatment on change in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire-Bowel (IBDQ-B) score at six months, mean difference (MD) 5.47, 95% CI 1.14 to 9.81) and nurse-led algorithm-based treatment versus usual care (significant difference in favour of the nurse-led algorithm-based treatment on change in IBDQ-B score at six months, MD 4.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 8.19) (1 study, 218 participants, low-quality evidence); hyperbaric oxygen therapy (at 2.0 atmospheres absolute) versus placebo (improvement of Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic - Late Effects of Normal Tissue (SOMA-LENT) score in favour of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), P = 0.0019) (1 study, 150 participants, moderate-quality evidence, retinol palmitate versus placebo (improvement in RPSAS in favour of retinol palmitate, P = 0.01) (1 study, 19 participants, low-quality evidence) and integrated Chinese traditional plus Western medicine versus Western medicine (grade 0 to 1 radio-proctopathy after treatment in favour of integrated Chinese traditional medicine, RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.02) (1 study, 58 participants, low-quality evidence).The level of evidence for the majority of outcomes was downgraded using GRADE to low or very low, mainly due to imprecision and study limitations. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although some interventions for late radiation proctopathy look promising (including rectal sucralfate, metronidazole added to an anti-inflammatory regimen, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy), single small studies provide limited evidence. Furthermore, outcomes important to people with cancer, including quality of life (QoL) and long-term effects, were not well recorded. The episodic and variable nature of late radiation proctopathy requires large multi-centre placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) to establish whether treatments are effective. Future studies should address the possibility of associated injury to other gastro-intestinal, urinary, or sexual organs, known as pelvic radiation disease. The interventions, as well as the outcome parameters, should be broader and include those important to people with cancer, such as QoL evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fleur T van de Wetering
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtDutch Cochrane CentrePO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Leen Verleye
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge CentreKruidtuinlaan 55BrusselsBelgium1000
| | | | - Jane Maher
- Mount Vernon HospitalDepartment of Radiotherapy and OncologyRickmansworth RoadNorthwoodMiddlesexUKHA6 2RN
| | - Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge CentreKruidtuinlaan 55BrusselsBelgium1000
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Academic Medical Center / University of AmsterdamDepartment of Radiation OncologyMeibergdreef 9AmsterdamNetherlands1105
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Academic Medical CenterRadiation Oncology and HyperthermiaP.O. Box 22700Meibergdreef 9AmsterdamNetherlands1100 DE
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtDutch Cochrane CentrePO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vlayen J, Belderbos J, Widder J. Meta‐analysis comparing higher and lower dose radiotherapy for palliation in locally advanced lung cancer. Cancer Sci 2015; 106:782. [PMID: 26054037 PMCID: PMC4471792 DOI: 10.1111/cas.12659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2015] [Accepted: 03/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Vlayen
- Medical Evaluation and Technology Assessment Rotselaar Belgium
| | - José Belderbos
- Department of Radiation Oncology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stordeur S, Vlayen J, Vrijens F, Camberlin C, De Gendt C, Van Eycken E, Lerut T. Quality indicators for oesophageal and gastric cancer: a population-based study in Belgium, 2004-2008. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2015; 24:376-86. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/13/2014] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Stordeur
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; Belgium
| | - J. Vlayen
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; Belgium
| | - F. Vrijens
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; Belgium
| | | | | | | | - T. Lerut
- Department of Thoracic Surgery; UZ Leuven; Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Neyt M, Van den Bruel A, Smit Y, De Jonge N, Vlayen J. The cost-utility of left ventricular assist devices for end-stage heart failure patients ineligible for cardiac transplantation: a systematic review and critical appraisal of economic evaluations. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 3:439-49. [PMID: 25452904 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319x.2014.09.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2014] [Accepted: 08/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A health technology assessment (HTA) of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as destination therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure was commissioned by the Dutch Health Care Insurance Board [College voor Zorgverzekeringen (CVZ)]. In this context, a systematic review of the economic literature was performed to assess the procedure's value for money. METHODS A systematic search (updated in December 2013) for economic evaluations was performed by consulting various databases: the HTA database produced by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD HTA), websites of HTA institutes, CRD's National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), Medline (OVID) and EMBASE. No time or language restrictions were imposed and pre-defined selection criteria were used. The two-step selection procedure was performed by two people. References of the selected studies were checked for additional relevant citations. RESULTS Six relevant studies were selected. Four economic evaluations relied on the results of the REMATCH trial to compare a pulsatile-flow LVAD with optimal medical therapy (OMT). These evaluations were performed before the publication of the HeartMate II (HM-II) Destination Therapy Trial which compared a pulsatile-flow with a continuous-flow LVAD. Two more recent economic evaluations combined the results of both trials to make an indirect comparison of a continuous-flow LVAD with OMT. In all studies, the largest part of the incremental cost was due to the reimplantation cost of an LVAD, with a device cost of €58,000-€75,000 and about €55,000 for the surgical procedure. The survival gain was highest with a continuous-flow LVAD, up to about three life-years gained (LYG) versus OMT in the most optimistic study. Quality of life (QoL) was improved but measures with a generic utility instrument were lacking, making estimates on quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained more uncertain. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the two most recent studies were on average €107,600 and $198,184 (ca.€145,800) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS Although LVAD destination therapy improves survival and QoL, it remains questionable as to whether it offers value for money. This conclusion may alter if the price of the device/procedure decreases sufficiently, in combination with further improved outcomes for mortality, adverse events and QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattias Neyt
- 1 ME-TA, Medical Evaluation and Technology Assessment, Belgium ; 2 Independent researcher, the Netherlands ; 3 Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ann Van den Bruel
- 1 ME-TA, Medical Evaluation and Technology Assessment, Belgium ; 2 Independent researcher, the Netherlands ; 3 Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yolba Smit
- 1 ME-TA, Medical Evaluation and Technology Assessment, Belgium ; 2 Independent researcher, the Netherlands ; 3 Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas De Jonge
- 1 ME-TA, Medical Evaluation and Technology Assessment, Belgium ; 2 Independent researcher, the Netherlands ; 3 Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joan Vlayen
- 1 ME-TA, Medical Evaluation and Technology Assessment, Belgium ; 2 Independent researcher, the Netherlands ; 3 Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smit Y, Vlayen J, Koppenaal H, Eefting F, Kappetein AP, Mariani MA. Percutaneous coronary invervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 149:831-8.e1-13. [PMID: 25467373 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2014] [Revised: 10/17/2014] [Accepted: 10/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched, and randomized controlled trials were included. Outcomes were assessed at maximum available follow-up. RESULTS This meta-analysis includes 31 trials with 15,004 patients. As regards death, more patients died after PCI compared with CABG across all types of patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.3; P = .05) as well as in patients with multivessel disease (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4; P = .02) or diabetes (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.1; P < .01). Myocardial infarction occurred as frequently after PCI (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5; P = .28). Repeat revascularization was more common after PCI (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 3.5-5.8; P < .01), with a progressive decline in ORs from the pre-stent era (OR, 7.0; 95% CI, 5.1-9.7; P < .01), to the bare metal stent era (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 3.6-5.5; P < .01), and to the drug-eluting stent era (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8-3.4; P < .01). Stroke was more common after CABG (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS Compared with PCI, CABG had a lower risk of death in multivessel disease or diabetes patients eligible for either intervention, a lower risk of repeat revascularization, but a higher risk of stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolba Smit
- Independent Researcher, Leuth, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Frank Eefting
- Department of Cardiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Arie Pieter Kappetein
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Massimo A Mariani
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Van den Bruel A, Francart J, Dubois C, Adam M, Vlayen J, De Schutter H, Stordeur S, Decallonne B. Regional variation in thyroid cancer incidence in Belgium is associated with variation in thyroid imaging and thyroid disease management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98:4063-71. [PMID: 23966243 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-1705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Increased thyroid cancer incidence is at least partially attributed to increased detection and shows considerable regional variation. OBJECTIVE We investigated whether regional variation in cancer incidence was associated with variations in thyroid disease management. DESIGN We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study that involved linking data from the Belgian Health Insurance database and the Belgian Cancer Registry to compare thyroid-related procedures between regions with high and low cancer incidence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measures were rates of TSH testing, imaging, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), and thyroid surgery. Secondary study outcomes were proportions of subjects with thyrotoxicosis and nodular disease treated with surgery, of subjects treated with surgery preceded by FNAC or with synchronous lymph node dissection, and of thyroid cancer diagnosis after surgery. RESULTS The rate of TSH testing was similar, but the rate of imaging was lower in the low incidence region. The rate of FNAC was similar, whereas the rate of surgery was lower in the low incidence region (34 [95% CI 33; 35 ] vs 80 [95% CI 79; 81 ] per 100,000 person years in the high incidence region; P < .05). In the low incidence region compared to the high incidence region, surgery represented a less chosen therapy for euthyroid nodular disease patients (47% [95% CI 46; 48] vs 69% [95% CI 68; 70]; P < .05), proportionally more surgery was preceded by FNAC, more cancer was diagnosed after total thyroidectomy, and thyroid cancer patients had more preoperative FNAC and synchronous lymph node dissection. CONCLUSION Regional variation in thyroid cancer incidence, most marked for low-risk disease, is associated with different usage of thyroid imaging and surgery, supporting variable detection as a key determinant in geographic variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annick Van den Bruel
- Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stordeur S, Vrijens F, Devriese S, Beirens K, Van Eycken E, Vlayen J. Developing and measuring a set of process and outcome indicators for breast cancer. Breast 2012; 21:253-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2011] [Revised: 10/05/2011] [Accepted: 10/12/2011] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
15
|
Vrijens F, Stordeur S, Beirens K, Devriese S, Van Eycken E, Vlayen J. Effect of hospital volume on processes of care and 5-year survival after breast cancer: a population-based study on 25000 women. Breast 2011; 21:261-6. [PMID: 22204930 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2011] [Revised: 11/29/2011] [Accepted: 12/04/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare processes of care and survival for breast cancer by hospital volume in Belgium, based on 11 validated process quality indicators. METHODS Three databases were linked at the patient level: the Cancer Registry, the population and the claims databases. All women with a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer between 2004 and 2006 were selected. Hospitals were classified according to their annual volume of treated patients: <50 (very low), 50-99 (low), 100-149 (medium) and ≥ 150 patients (high). Cox and logistic regression models were used to test differences in 5-year survival and in achievement of process indicators across volume categories, adjusting for age, tumor grade and stage. RESULTS A total of 25178 women with invasive breast cancer were treated in 111 hospitals. Half of the hospitals (N=57) treated <50 patients per year. Six of eleven process indicators showed higher rates in high-volume hospitals: multidisciplinary team meeting, cytological and/or histological assessment before surgery, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast-conserving surgery rate, adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery, and follow-up mammography. Higher volume was also associated with improved survival. The 5-year observed survival rates were 74.9%, 78.8%, 79.8% and 83.9% for patients treated in very-low-, low-, medium- and high-volume hospitals respectively. After case-mix adjustment, patients treated in very-low- or low-volume hospitals had a hazard ratio for death of 1.26 (95% CI 1.12, 1.42) and 1.15 (95% CI 1.01, 1.30) respectively compared with high-volume hospitals. CONCLUSION Survival benefits reported in high-volume hospitals suggest a better application of recommended processes of care, justifying the centralization of breast cancer care in such hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- France Vrijens
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Boulevard du Jardin Botanique, 55, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vlayen J, Vrijens F, Devriese S, Beirens K, Van Eycken E, Stordeur S. Quality indicators for testicular cancer: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 2011; 48:1133-40. [PMID: 22105018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2011] [Revised: 10/17/2011] [Accepted: 10/19/2011] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed at developing and measuring an indicator set to monitor the quality of testicular cancer care, to make comparisons over time and to support quality improvement for all practitioners and centres involved in the care of testicular cancer patients. METHODS Quality indicators were identified from a systematic literature search and from the 2010 Belgian evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. The selection process involved an expert panel evaluating reliability, relevance, interpretability and actionability of each indicator. The quality indicators were pilot tested using the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR) data linked with claims data for 1307 men with testicular cancer diagnosed between 2001 and 2006. The variability between centres was displayed using funnel plots. RESULTS Of the 12 finally selected indicators, 5 were fully and 1 was partly measurable, while 2 indicators were measurable using proxy information. Five-year relative survival was 97%, 95% and 76% for pStage I-III, respectively. Overall 5-year survival slightly improved from 91% in 2001 to 94% in 2004. Between 2004 and 2006, 14 of 97 centres performed ≥10 orchidectomies. Large variability was found between centres. The nine centres with a 5-year observed survival below the lower limit treated less than 20 patients between 2001 and 2006. CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrates the feasibility to develop a multidisciplinary set of quality indicators for testicular cancer. Using national cancer registry data linked to claims data, eight indicators were measurable, showing a mixed picture of the quality of care for testicular cancer patients in Belgium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, Boulevard du Botanique 55, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Deurenberg R, Vlayen J, Guillo S, Oliver TK, Fervers B, Burgers J. Standardization of search methods for guideline development: an international survey of evidence-based guideline development groups. Health Info Libr J 2008; 25:23-30. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00732.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
18
|
|
19
|
Abstract
AIMS AND BACKGROUND The term 'clinical pathway' is internationally accepted in all settings of healthcare management. The way in which clinical pathways have been developed in the United Kingdom differs from that in the USA. Besides the international differences in the purpose, many alternative names also can be found. These have led to confusion. There is no single, widely accepted definition of a clinical pathway. The aim of the study was to survey the definitions used in describing the concept and to derive key characteristics of clinical pathways. METHOD Using the PubMed, we conducted a review of literature published between January 2000 and December 2003 using the following terms: critical pathway, clinical pathway, integrated care pathway, care pathway and care map. All reports reviewed had to use the concept, as defined by the Medical Subject Headings term, to be considered. To assess all definitions, the concept analysis method was used. RESULTS In 82 of the 263 eligible articles, the definition of pathway was given. Totally, we found 84 different definitions. Each definition was rephrased by taking into consideration the following three features inherent to pathways: nouns, characteristics and aims and outcomes. Every feature was further divided into categories. CONCLUSIONS A clinical pathway is a method for the patient-care management of a well-defined group of patients during a well-defined period of time. A clinical pathway explicitly states the goals and key elements of care based on Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) guidelines, best practice and patient expectations by facilitating the communication, coordinating roles and sequencing the activities of the multidisciplinary care team, patients and their relatives; by documenting, monitoring and evaluating variances; and by providing the necessary resources and outcomes. The aim of a clinical pathway is to improve the quality of care, reduce risks, increase patient satisfaction and increase the efficiency in the use of resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leentje De Bleser
- Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vlayen J, Aertgeerts B, Hannes K, Sermeus W, Ramaekers D. A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit. Int J Qual Health Care 2005; 17:235-42. [PMID: 15743883 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 214] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify a critical appraisal tool for clinical practice guidelines that could serve as a basis for the development of an appraisal tool for clinical pathways. DESIGN Systematic review of the literature and personal contacts. Databases searched were: Medline, Embase, and Cinahl. Search terms were: practice guidelines, appraisal, and evaluation. The items of the identified appraisal tools were examined and thematically grouped into 10 guideline dimensions. Content analysis and scoring of these domains by the appraisal tools was evaluated. RESULTS Twenty-four different appraisal tools of practice guidelines were identified. None scored the evidence base of the clinical content of guidelines. Four tools scored all the guideline dimensions. The Cluzeau instrument is the only one of these four that has been validated. Of the three instruments based on the Cluzeau instrument, the AGREE instrument is the only validated instrument that uses a numerical scale. CONCLUSIONS Being a simplified version of the Cluzeau instrument, the AGREE instrument has the most potential to serve as a basis for the development of an appraisal tool for clinical pathways. However, important limitations will have to be dealt with when developing such a tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Federal Health Care Knowledge Centre, Brussels, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
De Bleser L, Vlayen J, Vanhaecht K, Sermeus W. Classifying clinical pathways. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 110:9-14. [PMID: 15853245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical pathways are commonly developed for homogenous patient groups. We were wondering if the traditional patient classification systems could be used for classifying clinical pathways. METHODOLOGY To examine the utility of patient classification systems for clinical pathways, a sample of 13 clinical pathways was analyzed, involving a total of 412 patients. Three classification systems were tested: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD9-CM), Clinical Coding System (CCS) data and All-Patient Redefined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG). RESULTS Categorization with ICD9-CM and CCS shows rather wide variation. However, when restricting for the principal codes, CCS classification shows an almost homogeneous relationship with clinical pathways. APR-DRG's are already corrected for secondary procedures and are difficult to assess. Categorization with the Risk Of Mortality (ROM) is more homogeneous than with the Severity Of Illness (SOI). CONCLUSION Patient groups in clinical pathways are rather heterogeneous. When restricting for the principal procedures, the strongest relationship seems to exist between clinical pathways and CCS. Further research is needed to refine this relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leentje De Bleser
- Center for health Services Research, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Boonen S, Bouillon R, Fagard K, Mullens A, Vlayen J, Vanderschueren D. Primary hyperparathyroidism: pathophysiology, diagnosis and indications for surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 2002; 55:119-27. [PMID: 11441470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Abstract
There is little debate about the primacy of surgery in the management of symptomatic or complicated primary hyperparathyroidism. Rather, the question has been what to do about the many patients with nonclassical disease. Recent prospective data have confirmed that patients with asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism who are not surgical candidates for parathyroidectomy appear to do well when they are managed conservatively. On average, these patients remain stable, with little progression to the more serious manifestations of hyperparathyroidism over 10 years. It would seem, therefore, that the overall population of older patients with mild asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism can be safely followed without intervention. A certain proportion of cases do progress, however, so surveillance is necessary. Individual patients can have worsening hypercalcemia or hypercalciuria, and in a small percentage of patients, bone density may decrease over time. In most patients, deferral of surgery is not a one-time decision, but rather one that is reviewed and reconsidered in conjunction with meticulous monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Boonen
- Leuven University Center for Metabolic Bone Diseases.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
The clinical features of inflammatory pseudotumour of lymph nodes, a distinct non-malignant histopathological entity firstly described in 1988, are summarized based upon a detailed analysis of 4 personal cases and 47 cases reported in the literature. The mean age of the patients is 38 years (range 8 to 82 years) and there is no gender predilection. One third present with asymptomatic lymphadenopathy and 47% present with fever, nearly all meeting the criteria of fever of unknown origin. Abdominal complaints are occasionally present. Intermittence of symptoms is common. Hepatosplenomegaly is unusual. All lymph node areas may be involved but abnormalities are mostly confined to one or two anatomic regions. No extranodal involvement has been reported although inflammatory pseudotumour may occur in several organs with similar morphological features and identical signs of inflammations. Routine blood tests are normal except for signs of inflammation. The lesions are Gallium-avid. Diagnosis is based upon typical histopathological features. The prognosis is favorable and surgical resection frequently leads to cure. Spontaneous resolution of symptoms has been reported and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may suppress the clinical manifestations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D C Knockaert
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, K.U. Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|