Subdural electrodes in the evaluation for epilepsy surgery in children and adults

The Stereoelectroencephalography Methodology Applied to Epilepsies with a Visible Lesion

Resective epilepsy surgery relies on accurate preoperative localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), so presurgical evaluation is necessary to obtain the most accurate information from clinical, anatomic, and neurophysiologic aspects, with the ultimate goal of performing an individualized surgical treatment. The noninvasive methods of seizure localization are complementary and results must be interpreted in conjunction, in an attempt to compose localization hypotheses of the anatomic location of the EZ. Stereoelectroencephalography is an extraoperative invasive method that is applied in patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy in order to anatomically define the EZ and the related functional cortical areas.

Utility and lower limits of frequency detection in surface electrode stimulation for somatosensory brain-computer interface in humans

OBJECTIVE

Stimulation of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) has been successful in evoking artificial somatosensation in both humans and animals, but much is unknown about the optimal stimulation parameters needed to generate robust percepts of somatosensation. In this study, the authors investigated frequency as an adjustable stimulation parameter for artificial somatosensation in a closed-loop brain-computer interface (BCI) system.

METHODS

Three epilepsy patients with subdural mini-electrocorticography grids over the hand area of S1 were asked to compare the percepts elicited with different stimulation frequencies. Amplitude, pulse width, and duration were held constant across all trials. In each trial, subjects experienced 2 stimuli and reported which they thought was given at a higher stimulation frequency. Two paradigms were used: first, 50 versus 100 Hz to establish the utility of comparing frequencies, and then 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, or 100 Hz were pseudorandomly compared.

RESULTS

As the magnitude of the stimulation frequency was increased, subjects described percepts that were "more intense" or "faster." Cumulatively, the participants achieved 98.0% accuracy when comparing stimulation at 50 and 100 Hz. In the second paradigm, the corresponding overall accuracy was 73.3%. If both tested frequencies were less than or equal to 10 Hz, accuracy was 41.7% and increased to 79.4% when one frequency was greater than 10 Hz (p = 0.01). When both stimulation frequencies were 20 Hz or less, accuracy was 40.7% compared with 91.7% when one frequency was greater than 20 Hz (p < 0.001). Accuracy was 85% in trials in which 50 Hz was the higher stimulation frequency. Therefore, the lower limit of detection occurred at 20 Hz, and accuracy decreased significantly when lower frequencies were tested. In trials testing 10 Hz versus 20 Hz, accuracy was 16.7% compared with 85.7% in trials testing 20 Hz versus 50 Hz (p < 0.05). Accuracy was greater than chance at frequency differences greater than or equal to 30 Hz.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequencies greater than 20 Hz may be used as an adjustable parameter to elicit distinguishable percepts. These findings may be useful in informing the settings and the degrees of freedom achievable in future BCI systems.

[Pre-surgical Diagnosties in Patients with Intractable epilepsy]

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic assessment of scientific publications devoted to pre-surgical examination of patients with intactable epilepsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We found, using PubMed and available Internet search tools, and analyzed 1.414 articles on pre-surgical diagnostics in patients with intractable epilepsy.

RESULTS

Epilepsy is a chronic disorder caused by brain injury, which manifests as repeated epileptic seizures and is accompanied by a variety of personality changes. Mortality risks in the population of patients with uncontrolled intractable epilepsy significantly exceed those in the general population. Early onset of comprehensive treatment prevents pathological personality changes and reduces the risks of mortality. However, complete seizure control is not achieved in 30% of patients, and they develop pharmacoresistance later, which is the reason for considering these patients as candidates for surgical treatment. In the literature, many approaches to pre-surgical examination are described as each clinic has its own concept of pre-surgical diagnostics and its own approaches to surgical management. Based on the conducted analysis, we tried to summarize the received information and describe current ideas about pre-surgical examination of patients with intactable epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of analyzed literature, we performed a systematic assessment and the evaluated effectiveness of various approaches in the pre-surgical diagnostics of patients with intactable epilepsy.

Preoperative evaluation and surgical management of infants and toddlers with drug-resistant epilepsy

OBJECTIVE Despite perioperative risks, epilepsy surgery represents a legitimate curative or palliative treatment approach for children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Several factors characterizing infants and toddlers with DRE create unique challenges regarding optimal evaluation and management. Epilepsy surgery within children < 3 years of age has received moderate attention in the literature, including mainly case series and retrospective studies. This article presents a systematic literature review and explores multidisciplinary considerations for the preoperative evaluation and surgical management of infants and toddlers with DRE. METHODS The study team conducted a systematic literature review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, targeting studies that investigated children < 3 years of age undergoing surgical treatment of DRE. Using the PubMed database, investigators selected peer-reviewed articles that reported seizure outcomes with or without developmental outcomes and/or perioperative complications. Studies were eliminated based on the following exclusion criteria: sample size < 5 patients; and inclusion of patients > 3 years of age, when demographic and outcomes data could not be separated from the cohort of patients < 3 years of age. RESULTS The study team identified 20 studies published between January 1990 and May 2017 that satisfied eligibility criteria. All selected studies represented retrospective reviews, observational studies, and uncontrolled case series. The compiled group of studies incorporated 465 patients who underwent resective or disconnective surgery (18 studies, 444 patients) or vagus nerve stimulator insertion (2 studies, 21 patients). Patient age at surgery ranged between 28 days and 36 months, with a mean of 16.8 months (1.4 years). DISCUSSION The study team provided a detailed summary of the literature review, focusing on the etiologies, preoperative evaluation, surgical treatments, seizure and developmental outcomes, and potential for functional recovery of infants and toddlers with DRE. Additionally, the authors discussed special considerations in this vulnerable age group from the perspective of multiple disciplines. CONCLUSIONS While presenting notable challenges, pediatric epilepsy surgery within infants and toddlers (children < 3 years of age) offers significant opportunities for improved seizure frequency, neuro-cognitive development, and quality of life. Successful evaluation and treatment of young children with DRE requires special consideration of multiple aspects related to neurological and physiological immaturity and surgical morbidity.

Cortical naming sites and increasing age in adults with refractory epilepsy: More might be less

OBJECTIVE

Critical decisions regarding resection boundaries for epilepsy surgery are often based on results of electrical stimulation mapping (ESM). Despite the potentially serious implications for postoperative functioning, age-referenced data that might facilitate the procedure are lacking. Age might be particularly relevant, as pediatric ESM studies have shown a paucity of language sites in young children followed by a rapid increase at approximately 8-10 years. Beyond adolescence, it has generally been assumed that the language system remains stable, and therefore, potential age-related changes across the adult age span have not been examined. However, increasing age during adulthood is associated with both positive and negative language-related changes, such as a broadening vocabulary and increased word finding difficulty. Because most patients who undergo ESM are adults, we aimed to determine the potential impact of age on the incidence of ESM-identified naming sites across the adult age span in patients with refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

We analyzed clinical language ESM results from 47 patients, ages 17-64 years, with refractory dominant-hemisphere epilepsy. Patients had comparable location and number of cortical sites tested. The incidence of naming sites was examined as a function of age, and compared between younger and older adults.

RESULTS

Significantly more naming sites were found in older than younger adults, and age was found to be a significant predictor of number of naming sites identified.

SIGNIFICANCE

Unlike the developmental changes that coincide with increased naming sites in children, increased naming sites in older adults might signify greater vulnerability of the language system to disruption. Because preservation of language sites can limit the extent of the resection, and thereby reduce the likelihood of seizure freedom, further work should aim to determine the clinical relevance of increased naming sites in older adults.

Electrocorticographic changes in field potentials following natural somatosensory percepts in humans

OBJECTIVE

Restoration of somatosensory deficits in humans requires a clear understanding of the neural representations of percepts. To characterize the cortical response to naturalistic somatosensation, we examined field potentials in the primary somatosensory cortex of humans.

METHODS

Four patients with intractable epilepsy were implanted with subdural electrocorticography (ECoG) electrodes over the hand area of S1. Three types of stimuli were applied, soft-repetitive touch, light touch, and deep touch. Power in the alpha (8-15 Hz), beta (15-30 Hz), low-gamma (30-50 Hz), and high-gamma (50-125 Hz) frequency bands were evaluated for significance.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven percent of electrodes over the hand area of somatosensory cortex exhibited changes in these bands. High-gamma band power increased for all stimuli, with concurrent alpha and beta band power decreases. Earlier activity was seen in these bands in deep touch and light touch compared to soft touch.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are consistent with prior literature and suggest a widespread response to focal touch, and a different encoding of deeper pressure touch than soft touch.

Technical considerations for generating somatosensation via cortical stimulation in a closed-loop sensory/motor brain-computer interface system in humans

Somatosensory feedback is the next step in brain computer interface (BCI). Here, we compare three cortical stimulating array modalities for generating somatosensory percepts in BCI. We compared human subjects with either a 64-channel "mini"-electrocorticography grid (mECoG; 1.2-mm diameter exposed contacts with 3-mm spacing, N = 1) over the hand area of primary somatosensory cortex (S1), or a standard grid (sECoG; 1.5-mm diameter exposed contacts with 1-cm spacing, N = 1), to generate artificial somatosensation through direct electrical cortical stimulation. Finally, we reference data in the literature from a patient implanted with microelectrode arrays (MEA) placed in the S1 hand area. We compare stimulation results to assess coverage and specificity of the artificial percepts in the hand. Using the mECoG array, hand mapping revealed coverage of 41.7% of the hand area versus 100% for the sECoG array, and 18.8% for the MEA. On average, stimulation of a single electrode corresponded to sensation reported in 4.42 boxes (range 1-11 boxes) for the mECoG array, 19.11 boxes (range 4-48 boxes) for the sECoG grid, and 2.3 boxes (range 1-5 boxes) for the MEA. Sensation in any box, on average, corresponded to stimulation from 2.65 electrodes (range 1-5 electrodes) for the mECoG grid, 3.58 electrodes for the sECoG grid (range 2-4 electrodes), and 11.22 electrodes (range 2-17 electrodes) for the MEA. Based on these findings, we conclude that mECoG grids provide an excellent balance between spatial cortical coverage of the hand area of S1 and high-density resolution.

Presurgical intracranial investigations in epilepsy surgery

Identification and localization of the "epileptogenic process" in the brain of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy for surgical cure is the goal of presurgical investigations. Intracranial recordings are required when conflicting data between seizure clinical semiology and EEG prevent precise localization within one hemisphere or lateralization, when a visible lesion on MRI seems unrelated to the electroclinical data, or in MRI-negative cases. Two methods are currently used. The objective of the subdural grid electrocorticography with or without depth electrodes (SDG/DE) is the best possible identification of the area of onset of spontaneous seizures and localization of the eloquent cortex. The objective of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is to define the epileptogenic zone (configured as a network) and its relation to an unmasked lesion. Two-dimensional (SDG) and three-dimensional (SEEG) brain sampling dictate different strategies for noninvasive presurgical phase I goals as well as for data analysis. SEEG must resolve several potential localization hypotheses in a manner that cannot be achieved with SDG. SDG operates through brain surface coverage, unlike SEEG, which samples networks. SDG estimates the extent of cortical resection through a lobar or sublobar localization of ictal onset and constraints from functional mapping. SEEG defines a tailored resection according to the results of anatomo-electro-clinical correlations in stereotaxic space that will guide the ablation of the epileptogenic zone. SEEG is currently expanding faster than SDG. The prerequisites (especially in the preimplantation hypothetical strategy) and technical tools (especially stimulation and functional mapping) in the two methods are very different. This chapter presents a comparative review of the rationale, indications, electrode implantation strategies, interpretation, and surgical decision making of these two approaches of presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery.

Stereoelectroencephalography Versus Subdural Electrodes for Localization of the Epileptogenic Zone: What Is the Evidence?

Accurate and safe localization of epileptic foci is the crux of surgical therapy for focal epilepsy. As an initial evaluation, patients with drug-resistant epilepsy often undergo evaluation by noninvasive methods to identify the epileptic focus (i.e., the epileptogenic zone (EZ)). When there is incongruence of noninvasive neuroimaging, electroencephalographic, and clinical data, direct intracranial recordings of the brain are often necessary to delineate the EZ and determine the best course of treatment. Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural electrodes (SDEs) are the 2 most common methods for recording directly from the cortex to delineate the EZ. For the past several decades, SEEG and SDEs have been used almost exclusively in specific geographic regions (i.e., France and Italy for stereo-EEG and elsewhere for SDEs) for virtually the same indications. In the last decade, however, stereo-EEG has started to spread from select centers in Europe to many locations worldwide. Nevertheless, it is still not the preferred method for invasive localization of the EZ at many centers that continue to employ SDEs exclusively. Despite the increased dissemination of the SEEG method throughout the globe, important questions remain unanswered. Which method (SEEG or SDEs) is superior for identification of the EZ and does it depend on the etiology of epilepsy? Which technique is safer and does this hold for all patient populations? Should these 2 methods have equivalent indications or be used selectively for different focal epilepsies? In this review, we seek to address these questions using current invasive monitoring literature. Available meta-analyses of observational data suggest that SEEG is safer than SDEs, but it is less clear from available data which method is more accurate at delineating the EZ.

Cortical Electrical Stimulation Mapping: Special Considerations in Children

Cortical electrical stimulation mapping is often required to accurately delineate eloquent function before resective surgery for tumors or epilepsy. Although the technique is well established in adults, mapping poses special challenges in children that are addressed in this article. The concept of what constitutes a critical cortex is more difficult to assess, given the implications of plasticity and impact of deficits. Developmental factors affect the underlying neurophysiologic bases of responses to electrical stimulation, and evolving maturation requires adaptation of methodology. Furthermore, malformative substrates are the commonest substrate and often lead to aberrant representations of eloquent function.

Engineering Artificial Somatosensation Through Cortical Stimulation in Humans

Sensory feedback is a critical aspect of motor control rehabilitation following paralysis or amputation. Current human studies have demonstrated the ability to deliver some of this sensory information via brain-machine interfaces, although further testing is needed to understand the stimulation parameters effect on sensation. Here, we report a systematic evaluation of somatosensory restoration in humans, using cortical stimulation with subdural mini-electrocorticography (mini-ECoG) grids. Nine epilepsy patients undergoing implantation of cortical electrodes for seizure localization were also implanted with a subdural 64-channel mini-ECoG grid over the hand area of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). We mapped the somatotopic location and size of receptive fields evoked by stimulation of individual channels of the mini-ECoG grid. We determined the effects on perception by varying stimulus parameters of pulse width, current amplitude, and frequency. Finally, a target localization task was used to demonstrate the use of artificial sensation in a behavioral task. We found a replicable somatotopic representation of the hand on the mini-ECoG grid across most subjects during electrical stimulation. The stimulus-evoked sensations were usually of artificial quality, but in some cases were more natural and of a cutaneous or proprioceptive nature. Increases in pulse width, current strength and frequency generally produced similar quality sensations at the same somatotopic location, but with a perception of increased intensity. The subjects produced near perfect performance when using the evoked sensory information in target acquisition tasks. These findings indicate that electrical stimulation of somatosensory cortex through mini-ECoG grids has considerable potential for restoring useful sensation to patients with paralysis and amputation.

The Stereo-Electroencephalography: The Epileptogenic Zone

The stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) methodology and technique was developed almost 60 years ago in Europe and it has proven its efficacy and safety over the last 55 years. The main advantage of the SEEG method is the possibility to study the epileptogenic neuronal network in its dynamic and tri-dimensional aspect, with an optimal time and space correlation with the clinical semiology. In this manuscript, the technical and methodological aspects of the SEEG will be discussed focusing on the planning of SEEG implantations, technical nuances, conceptualization of the epileptogenic zone, and the different methods of SEEG-guided surgical resections and ablations.

Diagnostic utility of invasive EEG for epilepsy surgery: Indications, modalities, and techniques

Many patients with medically refractory epilepsy now undergo successful surgery based on noninvasive diagnostic information, but intracranial electroencephalography (IEEG) continues to be used as increasingly complex cases are considered surgical candidates. The indications for IEEG and the modalities employed vary across epilepsy surgical centers; each modality has its advantages and limitations. IEEG can be performed in the same intraoperative setting, that is, intraoperative electrocorticography, or through an independent implantation procedure with chronic extraoperative recordings; the latter are not only resource intensive but also carry risk. A lack of understanding of IEEG limitations predisposes to data misinterpretation that can lead to denying surgery when indicated or, worse yet, incorrect resection with adverse outcomes. Given the lack of class 1 or 2 evidence on IEEG, a consensus-based expert recommendation on the diagnostic utility of IEEG is presented, with emphasis on the application of various modalities in specific substrates or locations, taking into account their relative efficacy, safety, ease, and incremental cost-benefit. These recommendations aim to curtail outlying indications that risk the over- or underutilization of IEEG, while retaining substantial flexibility in keeping with most standard practices at epilepsy centers and addressing some of the needs of resource-poor regions around the world.

The Stereo-Electroencephalography Methodology

The stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) methodology and technique was developed almost 60 years ago in Europe. The efficacy and safety of SEEG has been proven. The main advantage is the possibility to study the epileptogenic neuronal network in its dynamic and 3-dimensional aspect, with optimal time and space correlation, with the clinical semiology of the patient's seizures. The main clinical challenge for the near future remains in the further refinement of specific selection criteria for the different methods of invasive monitoring, with the ultimate goal of comparing and validating the results (long-term seizure-free outcome) obtained from different methods of invasive monitoring.

Technique, Results, and Complications Related to Robot-Assisted Stereoelectroencephalography

BACKGROUND:

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) may represent a simplified, precise, and safe alternative to the more traditional SEEG techniques.

OBJECTIVE:

To report our clinical experience with robotic SEEG implantation and to define its utility in the management of patients with medically refractory epilepsy.

METHODS:

The prospective observational analyses included all patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy who underwent robot-assisted stereotactic placement of depth electrodes for extraoperative brain monitoring between November 2009 and May 2013. Technical nuances of the robotic implantation technique are presented, as well as an analysis of demographics, time of planning and procedure, seizure outcome, in vivo accuracy, and procedure-related complications.

RESULTS:

One hundred patients underwent 101 robot-assisted SEEG procedures. Their mean age was 33.2 years. In total, 1245 depth electrodes were implanted. On average, 12.5 electrodes were implanted per patient. The time of implantation planning was 30 minutes on average (range, 15-60 minutes). The average operative time was 130 minutes (range, 45-160 minutes). In vivo accuracy (calculated in 500 trajectories) demonstrated a median entry point error of 1.2 mm (interquartile range, 0.78-1.83 mm) and a median target point error of 1.7 mm (interquartile range, 1.20-2.30 mm). Of the group of patients who underwent resective surgery (68 patients), 45 (66.2%) gained seizure freedom status. Mean follow-up was 18 months. The total complication rate was 4%.

CONCLUSION:

The robotic SEEG technique and method were demonstrated to be safe, accurate, and efficient in anatomically defining the epileptogenic zone and subsequently promoting sustained seizure freedom status in patients with difficult-to-localize seizures.

Invasive EEG explorations

The Wada test was adapted from the procedure described by Wada in 1964. It still has a role in the prognostic evaluation of memory disorders after mesial temporal lobectomy. The test consists of injecting a short-acting anesthetic into one hemisphere, under continuous EEG monitoring and during carotid catheterization, to verify the function of contralateral structures. Intracranial EEG recordings deliver signals with few artifacts, and which are quite specific of the zone explored. Three types of electrodes are in common use: (a) foramen ovale (FO) electrodes: electrodes can be inserted directly, without any stereotactic procedure, to provide easy and comparative EEG recordings of the lower and middle portions of the temporal lobe close to the hippocampus. These allow validation of the temporal lobe origin of seizures using FO electrodes recording coupled with scalp EEG; (b): subdural strip or grip electrodes. This relatively aggressive technique carries infectious and hemorrhagic risks and does not allow the exploration of deep cortical structures. However, it permits precise functional cortical mapping via electrical stimulation because of dense and regular positioning of electrodes over the cortical convexity; (c) stereotactically implanted depth electrodes (stereo-electroencephalography [SEEG]). Electrodes are individually planned and inserted within the brain parenchyma through small burr holes. This technique is less aggressive than subdural grid exploration. However it offers relatively limited spatial sampling that may be less well adapted to precise functional evaluation. It allows recording from deep cortical structures and can be argued to be the gold standard of presurgical EEG exploration.

[French guidelines on electroencephalogram]

Electroencephalography allows the functional analysis of electrical brain cortical activity and is the gold standard for analyzing electrophysiological processes involved in epilepsy but also in several other dysfunctions of the central nervous system. Morphological imaging yields complementary data, yet it cannot replace the essential functional analysis tool that is EEG. Furthermore, EEG has the great advantage of being non-invasive, easy to perform and allows control tests when follow-up is necessary, even at the patient's bedside. Faced with the advances in knowledge, techniques and indications, the Société de Neurophysiologie Clinique de Langue Française (SNCLF) and the Ligue Française Contre l'Épilepsie (LFCE) found it necessary to provide an update on EEG recommendations. This article will review the methodology applied to this work, refine the various topics detailed in the following chapters. It will go over the summary of recommendations for each of these chapters and underline proposals for writing an EEG report. Some questions could not be answered by the review of the literature; in those cases, an expert advice was given by the working and reading groups in addition to the guidelines.

Placement of subdural grids in pediatric patients: technique and results

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to describe common indications and technique for the application of chronic invasive electrodes in the pediatric patient suffering from medically intractable epilepsy.

METHODS

This chapter was prepared based on a retrospective review of the literature and personal experience based from a large tertiary epilepsy center.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasive subdural recordings are a safe and efficacious tool to identify the epileptogenic zone and its relationship to functional cortex in highly selected patients with medically refractory epilepsy. The ability to localize the EZ approaches 90 to 100 %, but seizure-free outcome is more complex depending greatly on the experience of the surgical team and the extent of resection.

Intracranial electroencephalography with subdural and/or depth electrodes in children with epilepsy: techniques, complications, and outcomes

Intracranial electroencephalographic monitoring with subdural and/or depth electrodes is widely used for the surgical localization of epileptic foci in patients with intractable partial epilepsy; however, data on safety and surgical outcome with this technique are still inadequate. The aims of this study were to assess the morbidity of intracranial recordings and the surgical outcomes in epileptic children. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data for 137 children with epilepsy (mean age at implantation: 12.6 ± 3.8 years) who underwent intracranial monitoring with the implantation of strip or grid subdural electrodes and/or intracerebral depth electrodes from September 2004 to September 2011 at a tertiary epilepsy center in China. Complications were classified using five grades of severity (including mortality) and were further classified as either minor or severe. Outcome was classified according to Engel's classification. Regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for complications. The mean duration of implantation was 5.3 ± 1.3 days. Among the 133 patients who underwent resection, 65 (48.9%) were seizure free (Engel Class I) at last known follow-up, which was >2 years after surgery for all patients. Also, 31 (23.3%) patients had a significant reduction in seizures (Engel Class II). Complications of any type were documented in 29 (21.7%) patients; 15 of these patients had intracranial hematoma. The results of multivariate analysis showed that the only independent risk factor for intracranial hematoma was number of electrode contacts. The most common pathologic diagnosis was focal cortical dysplasia (n=58). Our results showed that intracranial electroencephalographic monitoring in children provides good surgical outcomes and the level of risk is acceptable. When using this technique strategies such as using as few electrode contacts as possible should be adopted to minimize the risk of intracranial hematoma.

Interhemispheric subdural electrodes: technique, utility, and safety

BACKGROUND

Invasive monitoring using subdural electrodes is often valuable for characterizing the anatomic source of seizures in intractable epilepsy. Covering the interhemispheric surface with subdural electrodes represents a particular challenge, with a potentially higher risk of complications than covering the dorsolateral cortex.

OBJECTIVE

To better understand the safety and utility of interhemispheric subdural electrodes (IHSE).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 24 patients who underwent implantation of IHSE by a single neurosurgeon from 2003 to 2010. Generous midline exposure, meticulous preservation of veins, and sharp microdissection were used to facilitate safe interhemispheric grid placement under direct visualization.

RESULTS

The number of IHSE contacts implanted ranged from 10 to 106 (mean = 39.8) per patient. Monitoring lasted for 5.5 days on average (range, 2-24 days), with an adequate sample of seizures captured in all patients before explantation, and with a low complication rate similar to that reported for grid implantation of the dorsolateral cortex. One patient (of 24) experienced symptomatic mass effect. No other complications clearly related to grid implantation and monitoring, such as clinically evident neurological deficits, infection, hematoma, or infarction, were noted. Among patients implanted with IHSE, monitoring led to a paramedian cortical resection in 67%, a resection in a region not covered by IHSE in 17%, and explantation without resection in 17%.

CONCLUSION

When clinical factors suggest the possibility of an epileptic focus at or near the midline, invasive monitoring of the paramedian cortex with interhemispheric grids can be safely used to define the epileptogenic zone and map local cortical function.

Chronic unlimited recording electrocorticography–guided resective epilepsy surgery: technology-enabled enhanced fidelity in seizure focus localization with improved surgical efficacy

Object

Epilepsy surgery is at the cusp of a transformation due to the convergence of advancements in multiple technologies. Emerging neuromodulatory therapies offer the promise of functionally correcting neural instability and obviating the need for resective or ablative surgery in select cases. Chronic implanted neurological monitoring technology, delivered as part of a neuromodulatory therapeutic device or as a stand-alone monitoring system, offers the potential to monitor patients chronically in their normal ambulatory setting with outpatient medication regimens. This overcomes significant temporal limitations, pharmacological perturbations, and infection risks inherent in the present technology comprising subacute percutaneous inpatient monitoring of presurgical candidates in an epilepsy monitoring unit.

Methods

As part of the pivotal study for the NeuroPace Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) System, the authors assessed the efficacy of the RNS System to control seizures in a group of patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Prior to RNS System implantation, these patients were not candidates for further resective surgery because they had temporal lobe epilepsy with bilateral temporal sources, frontal lobe reflex epilepsy with involvement of primary motor cortex, and occipital lobe epilepsy with substantial involvement of eloquent visual cortex. Without interfering with and beyond the scope of the therapeutic aspect of the RNS System study, the authors were able to monitor seizure and epileptiform activity from chronically implanted subdural and depth electrodes in these patients, and, in doing so, they were able to more accurately localize the seizure source. In 5 of these study patients, in whom the RNS System was not effective, the notion of resective surgery was revisited and considered in light of the additional information gleaned from the chronic intracranial recordings obtained from various permutations of electrodes monitoring sources in the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes.

Results

Through long-term analysis of chronic unlimited recording electrocorticography (CURE) from chronically implanted electrodes, the authors were able to further refine seizure source localization and sufficiently increase the expected likelihood of seizure control to the extent that 4 patients who had previously been considered not to be candidates for surgery did undergo resective surgery, and all have achieved seizure freedom. A fifth patient, who had a double-band heterotopia, underwent surgery but did not achieve significant seizure reduction.

Conclusions

Chronic unlimited recording electrocorticography–guided resective epilepsy surgery employs new monitoring technology in a novel way, which in this small series was felt to improve seizure localization and consequently the potential efficacy of resective surgery. This suggests that the CURE modality could improve outcomes in patients who undergo resective surgery, and it may expand the set of patients in whom resective surgery may be expected to be efficacious and therefore the potential number of patients who may achieve seizure freedom. The authors report 4 cases of patients in which this technique and technology had a direct role in guiding surgery that provided seizure freedom and that suggest this new approach warrants further study to characterize its value in presurgical evaluation. Clinical trial no.: NCT00572195 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Adverse events related to extraoperative invasive EEG monitoring with subdural grid electrodes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Implantation of subdural grids and invasive electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring is important to define the ictal-onset zone and eloquent cortex in selected patients with medically refractory epilepsy. The objective of this systematic review is to summarize data about adverse events related to this procedure.

METHODS

English-language studies published up to July 2012, reporting such adverse events were reviewed. Outcome measures included demographic variables; surgical protocol including number of subdural electrodes implanted per patient, duration of monitoring, antibiotic, and steroid prophylaxis; and adverse events.

KEY FINDINGS

Twenty-one studies were identified including a total of 2,542 patients. The reported mean number of electrodes per patient and duration of monitoring varied from 52 to 95 and 5 to 17 days, respectively. There is a trend toward more uniform use of antibiotics and steroids in the perioperative period. Neurologic infections (pooled prevalence 2.3%, 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.1), superficial infections (3.0%, 1.9-4.1), intracranial hemorrhage (4.0%, 3.2-4.8), and elevated intracranial pressure (2.4%, 1.5-3.3) were found to be the most common adverse events. Up to 3.5% of patients required additional surgical procedure(s) for management of these adverse events. Increased number of electrodes (≥67) was found to be independently associated with increased incidence of adverse events.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although providing critical information for patients with medically refractory epilepsy, subdural grids implantation and invasive EEG monitoring entails risks of infection, hemorrhage, and elevated intracranial pressure. The prevalence estimates, likely to be conservative due to selective reporting, are expected to be helpful in counseling patients.

Paediatric intractable epilepsy syndromes: changing concepts in diagnosis and management

Epilepsy surgery for drug-resistant childhood epilepsy is not new. However, brain imaging, surgical and anaesthetic techniques have improved to the extent that they are now as much safer and realistic option than they were in the past. Further, the range of surgical candidates is wide, and previous concepts about likely surgical candidates are now challenged as children with previously thought widespread or apparent multifocal disease are evaluated. Outcomes for seizure freedom range from 40 to 80 % depending on the underlying aetiology and the extent of resection. However, the aims of surgery may include seizure reduction in some and improvement in neurodevelopment and behaviour in others, which are less -predictable. Epilepsy surgery in children is no longer a last resort. Children thought to be likely candidates should be evaluated early in their natural history to optimise outcomes in the long term.

Outcome of no resection after long-term subdural electroencephalography evaluation in children with epilepsy

OBJECT

The aim of this study was to identify the reasons for and predictors of no resection of the epileptogenic zone in children with epilepsy who had undergone long-term invasive subdural grid electroencephalography (SDG-EEG) evaluation.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the consecutive medical records of children (< 19 years of age) who had undergone SDG-EEG evaluation over a 7-year period (1997-2004). To determine the predictors of no resection, the authors obtained the clinical characteristics and imaging and EEG findings of children who had no resection after long-term invasive SDG-EEG evaluation and compared these data with those in a group of children who did undergo resection. They describe the indications for SDG-EEG evaluation and the reasons for no resection in these patients.

RESULTS

Of 66 children who underwent SDG-EEG evaluation, 9 (13.6%) did not undergo subsequent resection (no-resection group; 6 males). Of these 9 patients, 6 (66.7%) had normal neurological examinations and 5 (55.6%) had normal findings on brain MR imaging. Scalp video EEG localized epilepsy to the left hemisphere in 6 of the 9 patients and to the right hemisphere in 2; it was nonlocalizable in 1 of the 9 patients. Indications for SDG-EEG in the no-resection group were ictal onset zone (IOZ) localization (9 of 9 patients), motor cortex localization (5 of 9 patients), and language area localization (4 of 9 patients). Reasons for no resection after SDG-EEG evaluation were the lack of a well-defined IOZ in 5 of 9 patients (4 multifocal IOZs and 1 nonlocalizable IOZ) and anticipated new permanent postoperative neurological deficits in 7 of 9 patients (3 motor, 2 language, and 2 motor and language deficits). Comparison with the resection group (57 patients) demonstrated that postictal Todd paralysis in the dominant hand was the only variable seen more commonly (χ(2) = 4.781, p = 0.029) in the no-resection group (2 [22.2%] of 9 vs 2 [3.5%] of 57 patients). The no-resection group had a larger number of SDG electrode contacts (mean 126. 5 ± 26.98) as compared with the resection group (100.56 ± 25.52; p = 0.010). There were no significant differences in the demographic data, seizure characteristics, scalp and invasive EEG findings, and imaging variables between the resection and no-resection groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Children who did not undergo resection of the epileptogenic zone after SDG-EEG evaluation were likely to have normal neurological examinations without preexisting neurological deficits, a high probability of a new unacceptable permanent neurological deficit following resection, or multifocal or nonlocalizable IOZs. In comparison with the group that underwent resection after SDG-EEG, a history of Todd paralysis in the dominant hand and arm was the only predictor of no resection following SDG-EEG evaluation. Data in this study will help to better select pediatric patients for SDG-EEG and to counsel families prior to epilepsy surgery.

Safety and utility of supplemental depth electrodes for localizing the ictal onset zone in pediatric neocortical epilepsy

OBJECT

Depth electrodes provide a better sampling of sulci and regions of cortex that lie tangential to the plane of subdural electrodes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of supplemental depth electrodes in the surgical treatment of pediatric patients with neocortical epilepsy.

METHODS

Cases involving 12 consecutive pediatric patients (mean age [SD] 10.9 ± 4.4 years) were reviewed. Focal resective surgery (in 9 cases) or functional hemispherectomy (in 3 cases) was performed after intracranial monitoring. The mean total number of electrodes was 118 ± 29; the mean numbers of grid, strip, and depth electrodes were 95 ± 27, 10 ± 6, and 13 ± 5, respectively The most common pathological condition was focal cortical dysplasia.

RESULTS

In 4 cases, depth electrodes demonstrated the ictal onset zone in an area not easily accessible by grids or strips (in the basal temporal region in 3 cases and the upper opercular region in 1 case). In 3 of these 4 cases, the ictal onset zone was defined exclusively by the depth electrodes. In each of these 3 cases, the surface electrodes (on grids or strips) demonstrated early propagation but not ictal onset. In 9 cases, the depth electrodes also demonstrated the early propagation zone. The information about the ictal onset zone and the early propagation zone helped to provide additional information that affected the extent (in 7 cases) or depth (in 3 cases) of the resection. The proportion of the electrodes involved in resection relative to the total number of implanted electrodes was low (mean ± SD, 0.26 ± 0.09). Nine patients (75.0%) became seizure free (Engel class IA outcome) after surgery (mean duration of follow-up 25.7 ± 4.29 months). There were no surgical complications related to intracranial electroencephalography monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients (75.0%) became seizure free after extensive monitoring and more limited resection of seizure-onset regions. Supplemental depth electrodes contribute to improved outcome by providing information about the ictal onset zone that is not accessible by grid or strip electrodes in some cases. The supplemental depth electrodes conferred an extra dimension of depth to the analysis, which allowed for successful outcome with more limited resection.

Intraoperative neurophysiology of the motor system in children: a tailored approach

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative neurophysiology has moved giant steps forward over the past 15 years thanks to the advent of techniques aimed to reliably assess the functional integrity of motor areas and pathways.

INTRAOPERATIVE NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES

Motor evoked potentials recorded from the muscles and/or the spinal cord (D-wave) after transcranial electrical stimulation allow to preserve the integrity of descending pathways, especially the corticospinal tract (CT), during brain and spinal cord surgery. Mapping techniques allow to identify the motor cortex through direct cortical stimulation and to localize the CT at subcortical levels during brain and brainstem surgery. These techniques are extensively used in adult neurosurgery and, in their principles, can be applied to children. However, especially in younger children, the motor system is still under development, making both mapping and monitoring techniques more challenging. In this paper, we review intraoperative neurophysiological techniques commonly used in adult neurosurgery and discuss their application to pediatric neurosurgery, in the light of preliminary experience from our and other centers. The principles of development and maturation of the motor system, and especially of the CT, are reviewed focusing on clinical studies with transcranial magnetical stimulation.

Intraoperative electrocorticography and cortical stimulation in children

Intraoperative electrocorticography has been used in the surgical management of children with medically refractory epilepsy to localize anatomic areas of focal seizure onset, guide the extent, and completeness of resective epilepsy surgery, aid in functional mapping of cortical anatomy, and predict epilepsy surgical outcome. Evidence to support its utility for these purposes is somewhat controversial, particularly in children where the literature is substantially lacking. Usefulness is often dependent on the underlying pathology, and type of resective surgery. It seems to be valuable in the following circumstances: (1) tailoring the extent of hippocampal resection during temporal lobectomies, (2) guiding resection of cortical brain malformations, low-grade tumors, and other neocortical lesions, especially those involving eloquent cortex, and (3) monitoring for afterdischarges during functional cortical mapping. Most literature on this topic is not purely pediatric, and in most circumstances, is the result of combination of both children and adults cases. Cortical stimulation has been shown to be a useful, reliable and safe technique to assess motor, sensory, and speech function in children. As compared with adults, children manifest the following: (1) they need higher Amperage thresholds to elicit responses. In children younger than 10 years, cortical stimulation identifies language cortex at a lower rate than in children older than 10 years or in adults. (2) They have variability within the same individual in the stimulation threshold depending on the cortical site. This often results in the need to maximize stimulation of currents at each cortical site regardless of adjacent afterdischarge threshold. (3) They demonstrate more difficultly to evoke motor responses particularly with certain pathologies such as retrorolandic low-grade tumors. Often also the effective current intensity decreases after lesion removal. As a consequence of the above, the pulse width used for cortical stimulation in children often varies between 0.14 and 200 ms, the frequency ranges between 20 and 50 Hz, the current intensity between 0.5 and 20 mA, and the train between 3 and 25 seconds. Cortical stimulation can identify cortex with reorganized function secondary to congenital lesions and cerebral plasticity. These lesions include brain tumors, cortical dysplasia resulting in intractable epilepsy, and cavernous angioma causing epilepsy. When compared with other presurgical tests, cortical stimulation was shown to have results consistent with those of functional magnetic resonance imaging and Wada testing. It has the disadvantage of being invasive but the advantage of being highly accurate allowing for surgical tailored resections. Although the evidence for the utility of electrocorticography and cortical stimulation is exclusively level IV evidence, it is unlikely that randomized studies are going to be performed due to practical, ethical, and other reasons. The weight of the uncontrolled data at this stage is such that in children electrocorticography remains to be a useful test in some cases of cortical resection and that cortical stimulation is usually indicated when resection in or near eloquent cortex is needed.

Epilepsy surgery: a critical review

The objective of surgical treatment of epilepsy is seizure control and improvement of quality-of-life of patients with medically intractable epilepsy. Confirmation of the diagnosis of epilepsy and its medical intractability is the essential prerequisite for epilepsy surgery. After excluding nonepileptic events such as psychogenic pseudoseizures, the clinician must establish that adequate drug trials, including verification of compliance, have been performed. A careful diagnostic evaluation is mandatory to localize the epileptogenic zone. In this review we discuss the role of different diagnostic methods with respect to patient selection and surgical outcome. Furthermore, experimental approaches are mentioned and the reasons for failures of epilepsy surgery are critically discussed.

Cortical hyperexcitability and epileptogenesis: Understanding the mechanisms of epilepsy - part 2

Epilepsy encompasses a diverse group of seizure disorders caused by a variety of structural, cellular and molecular alterations of the brain primarily affecting the cerebral cortex, leading to recurrent unprovoked epileptic seizures. In this two-part review we examine the mechanisms underlying normal neuronal function and those predisposing to recurrent epileptic seizures starting at the most basic cellular derangements (Part 1, Volume 16, Issue 3) and working up to the highly complex epileptic networks and factors that modulate the predisposition to seizures (Part 2). We attempt to show that multiple factors can modify the epileptic process and that different mechanisms underlie different types of epilepsy, and in most situations there is an interplay between multiple genetic and environmental factors.

Chronic subdural electrodes in the management of epilepsy

Subdural electrodes play a very important role in the evaluation of a percentage of patients being considered for epilepsy surgery. Electrical activity at very low and very high frequencies, beyond the practical range of scalp EEG, can be recorded subdurally and may contain considerable information not available non-invasively. The recording and stimulating procedures for using chronically implanted subdural electrodes to localize the epileptogenic zone and map eloquent functions of the human cortex are well established, and complication rates are low. Complications include infections, CSF leak, and focal neurologic deficits, all of which tend to be increased with a higher number of electrodes and longer duration of recordings. Careful consideration of the risks and benefits should be coupled with a firm hypothesis about the epileptogenic zone derived from the non-invasive components of the epilepsy workup to guide the decision about whether and where to implant subdural electrodes. When they are employed to answer a specific question in an individual patient, subdural electrodes can optimize the clinical outcome of a candidate for epilepsy surgery.

Subdural Electrode-Associated Complications: A 20-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Implantation of subdural strip and grid electrodes is a common methodology in the invasive evaluation of patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Although their implantation is safe, the occurrence of implantation-associated complications can occasionally be troublesome.

METHODS

In our current retrospective study, 185 patients undergoing subdural grid/strip implantation for invasive monitoring were examined. Their ages ranged between 16 and 48 years (mean 23.6). AdTech (Racine, Wisc., USA) strip and grid electrodes were implanted under general endotracheal anesthesia in all our cases. Duration of electroencephalographic monitoring ranged from 2 to 25 days (mean 10.8). The follow-up period ranged from 24 to 60 months (mean 44.6 months).

RESULTS

The most common complication in our series was the development of postoperative epidural hematoma in 3 patients (1.6%), while 2 patients (1.1%) suffered a subdural hematoma. Two patients (1.1%) developed significant brain edema postoperatively, 2 others (1.1%) developed an infection, while 2 patients (1.1%) experienced transient aphasia. Two patients (1.1%) had fatal outcomes in our series. Interestingly, in 5 patients (2.7%) nonhabitual seizures were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Thorough understanding, early identification and prompt management of potential complications can minimize the risks associated with the implantation of subdural electrodes.

Complications of invasive subdural electrode monitoring at St. Louis Children's Hospital, 1994-2005

OBJECT

The purpose of this study was to better define the incidence of complications associated with placement of subdural electrodes for localization of seizure foci and functional mapping in children.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 112 consecutive patients (53 boys, 59 girls; mean age 10.9 years, range 10 months-21.7 years) with medically intractable epilepsy who underwent invasive monitoring at the Pediatric Epilepsy Center at St. Louis Children's Hospital between January 1994 and July 2005. There were 122 implantation procedures (85 grids and strips, 32 strips only, five grids only, four with additional depth electrodes), with a mean monitoring period of 7.1 days (range 2-21 days). Operative complications included the need for repeated surgery for additional electrode placement (5.7%); wound infection (2.4%); cerebrospinal fluid leak (1.6%); and subdural hematoma, symptomatic pneumocephalus, bone flap osteomyelitis, and strip electrode fracture requiring operative retrieval (one patient [0.8%] each). There were four cases of transient neurological deficit (3.3%) and no permanent deficit or death associated with invasive monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of subdural grid and strip electrodes for invasive video electroencephalographic monitoring is generally well tolerated in the pediatric population. The authors found that aggressive initial electrode coverage was not associated with higher rates of blood transfusion or perioperative complications, and reduced the frequency of repeated operations for placement of supplemental electrodes.

Pediatric Language Mapping: Sensitivity of Neurostimulation and Wada Testing in Epilepsy Surgery

PURPOSE

Functional mapping of eloquent cortex with electrical neurostimulation is used both intra- and extraoperatively to tailor resections. In pediatric patients, however, functional mapping studies frequently fail to localize language. Wada testing has also been reported to be less sensitive in children.

METHODS

Thirty children (4.7 - 14.9 years) and 18 adult controls (18-59 years) who underwent extraoperative language mapping via implanted subdural electrodes at the NYU Comprehensive Epilepsy Center were included in the study. Ten children and 14 adults underwent preoperative Wada testing. Success of the procedures was defined as the identification of at least one language site by neurostimulation mapping and determination of hemispheric language dominance on the Wada test.

RESULTS

In children younger than 10.2 years, cortical stimulation identified language cortex at a lower rate than was seen in children older than 10.2 years and in adults (p<0.05). This threshold, demonstrated by survival and chi2 analysis, was sharply defined in our data set. Additionally, Wada testing was more likely to be successful than was extraoperative mapping in this younger age group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of our series demonstrates that language cortex is less likely to be identified in children younger than 10 years, suggesting that alternatives to the current methods of cortical electrical stimulation, particularly the use of preoperative language lateralization, may be required in this age group.

Locating chronically implanted subdural electrodes using surface reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of locating subdural electrodes by means of 3-D surface rendering of CT scans.

METHODS

Open source software has been developed and posted on the web which segments the electrodes into 3-D surfaces and allows their 3-D locations to be exported to other EEG analysis programs. The accuracy of the technique was determined by studying 410 subdural electrodes implanted in four epilepsy patients. Accuracy was determined by comparing the locations from the rendering analysis to the locations of the same electrodes determined by conventional analysis of their appearance on individual CT slices.

RESULTS

The average accuracy of a study of 410 electrodes imaged in four patients repeated two times by three observers was 0.91 (+/- 0.41) mm, with a maximum error of 3.3 mm, about half of the diameter of an electrode.

CONCLUSIONS

The location of subdural electrodes can easily and quickly be determined within high-resolution CT scans through the use of 3-D rendering.

SIGNIFICANCE

This relatively fast and easy method for determining the location of subdural electrodes should facilitate their use in both clinical and research investigations.

Neurophysiologic findings of neuronal migration disorders: intrinsic epileptogenicity of focal cortical dysplasia on electroencephalography, electrocorticography, and magnetoencephalography

We define specific neurophysiologic characteristics for focal cortical dysplasia, a neuronal migration disorder. We reviewed data from published reports and our patients with focal cortical dysplasia. Our patients underwent preoperative scalp video-electroencephalography (EEG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetoencephalography, and intraoperative or extraoperative electrocorticography monitoring. Scalp EEG showed trains of rhythmic epileptiform spike or sharp waves. Positive spikes correlated with early seizure onset, MRI lesion around the rolandic fissure, hemiparesis, and a less favorable outcome. Interictal electrocorticography showed continuous epileptogenic discharges: repetitive electrographic seizures and bursting discharges or continuous or quasicontinuous rhythmic spiking. Ictal electrocorticography showed paroxysmal fast and/or repetitive spiking. Magnetoencephalography showed clustered spike sources within and extending from the lesion. Cortical stimulation gave more frequent, lower-threshold afterdischarges and higher-threshold primary motor function. Focal cortical dysplasias are highly and intrinsically epileptogenic. For surgical seizure control, EEG, electrocorticography, and magnetoencephalography must delineate the intrinsic epileptogenic zone within and extending from the focal cortical dysplasia identified by MRI.

Multistage Epilepsy Surgery: Safety, Efficacy, and Utility of a Novel Approach in Pediatric Extratemporal Epilepsy

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and utility of a novel surgical strategy consisting of multiple (more than two) operative stages performed during the same hospital admission with subdural grid and strip electrodes in selected pediatric extratemporal epilepsy.

METHODS:

Subdural grid and strip electrodes were used for multistage chronic electroencephalographic monitoring in 15 pediatric patients (age, &lt;19 yr) with refractory localization-related epilepsy and poor surgical prognostic factors. Initial resective surgery and/or multiple subpial transections were performed, followed by further monitoring and additional resection and/or multiple subpial transections.

RESULTS:

Mean patient age was 9.7 years. Mean duration of total invasive monitoring was 10.5 days (range, 8–14 d). The first monitoring period averaged 6.5 days, and the second averaged 3.9 days. Additional surgery was performed in 13 of 15 patients. Two patients who did not undergo additional surgery had a Class I outcome. Rationales for reinvestigation included incomplete localization, multifocality, and proximity to eloquent cortex. Complications were minimal, including two transfusions. There were no cases of wound infection, cerebral edema, hemorrhage, or major permanent neurological deficit. Minimum duration of follow-up was 31 months. Outcomes were 60% Engel Class I (9 of 15 patients), 27% Class III (4 of 15 patients), and 13% Class IV (2 of 15 patients).

CONCLUSION:

In a very select group of pediatric patients with poor surgical prognostic factors, the multistage approach can be beneficial. After failed epilepsy surgery, subsequent reoperation with additional intracranial investigation traditionally is used when a single residual focus is suspected. Our results, however, support the contention that multistage epilepsy surgery is safe, effective, and useful in a challenging and select pediatric population with extratemporal medically refractory epilepsy.

Nonhabitual Seizures in Patients with Implanted Subdural Electrodes

The implantation of subdural electrodes has been widely employed in the invasive monitoring of patients with medically refractory epilepsy. The use of subdural electrodes, though, has been associated with rare but occasionally troublesome complications. We report the occurrence of nonhabitual seizures after implanting subdural grid electrodes. Among 57 patients diagnosed with medically refractory epilepsy who were evaluated in our department over a 12-month period, 21 patients underwent craniotomy for subdural grid/strip electrode implantation. Subdural grids and strips (AdTech, Racine, Wisc., USA) were used for continuous video EEG monitoring. In 3 patients, during subdural monitoring, consistent nonhabitual seizure activity was recorded. This was both clinically and electrographically different than the patients' habitual seizures. The patients' nonhabitual seizures disappeared postoperatively after removing the implanted electrodes. The occurrence of nonhabitual seizures, though quite rare, could lead to mislocalization of an epileptogenic focus. This complication might be the result of direct mechanical cortical irritation or chemical irritation caused by blood breakdown products. The occurrence of nonhabitual seizures comes to add itself to the existing list of complications associated with employment of subdural electrodes for invasive monitoring.

Characteristics of prolonged afterdischarges in children with malformations of cortical development

We investigated aberrant cortical excitability in malformations of cortical development From subdural electrodes, we recorded afterdischarges lasting > or = 6 seconds in 12 of 13 patients with malformations of cortical development and 6 of 10 pediatric patients with nonmalformations of cortical development and reviewed amperage thresholds, distribution of afterdischarges, and motor responses. In patients with malformation of cortical development, motor response thresholds were high; afterdischarge and motor response thresholds, which essentially overlapped, inversely correlated with age (P < .01); afterdischarge thresholds declined with age; and 8 patients showed afterdischarges in remote sites. In nonmalformation of cortical development, afterdischarge thresholds did not significantly correlate with age; motor response thresholds tended to decline with age; and 2 patients had remote afterdischarges. Adolescent patients with malformations of cortical development had lower afterdischarge thresholds than adolescents with nonmalformation of cortical development (P < .05). From their high afterdischarge (and motor response) thresholds, we concluded that preadolescent patients with malformation of cortical development have less excitable, immature cortices, whereas adolescent patients with malformation of cortical development with low afterdischarge thresholds have hyperexcitable cortices. Remote afterdischarges over focal dysplastic cortex suggest aberrant cortical excitability and neural circuits.

Epilepsy surgery in childhood

Epilepsy surgery in childhood can now be more readily considered as a result of enhanced presurgical investigative techniques and safer neurosurgical practice. As in adults, surgery available may be resective (focal resection or hemispherectomy) or functional. The most common procedures are temporal lobectomy and hemispherectomy, with malformative lesions and developmental tumours the next common pathology. The timing of surgery requires careful consideration, and the definition of drug resistance given specific thought in the young child. Presurgical evaluation should be noninvasive where possible, and should include optimised MRI, including 3D data set and video EEG telemetry to document seizures. Detection of temporal lobe abnormalities in temporal lobe epilepsy with MR may be enhanced using quantitative and semiquantitative techniques. Ictal and interictal SPECT may be useful in providing information about the seizure onset zone, if reviewed in conjunction with MR data and video-EEG. Interictal PET is more likely to demonstrate abnormalities relating to structural defects, but may be particularly useful in infants where incomplete myelination may restrict structural information provided by MRI. Neuropsychology testing plays a major role by the determination of verbal and nonverbal function in older children, and in the determination of cerebral dominance. Functional MRI for determination of language or motor cortex may enhance such evaluation, although it is limited to older unsedated children at present. Although the aims of the presurgical evaluation remain similar to adult practice, the range of children presenting is wide, and the aims and likely outcome of surgery require careful evaluation with the family. This aside, the benefits of seizure elimination or reduction in drug-resistant focal epilepsy prior to adolescence, as well as in certain early catastrophic epilepsies of childhood, remain self apparent.