The effect of corticosteroids for acute optic neuritis on the subsequent development of multiple sclerosis. The Optic Neuritis Study Group

Clinical management of contrast-induced neurotoxicity: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) is an increasingly recognised complication following endovascular procedures utilising contrast. It remains poorly understood with heterogenous clinical management strategies. The aim of this review was to identify commonly employed treatments for CIN to enhance clinical decision making.

METHODS

A systematic search of Embase (1947-2022) and Medline (1946-2022) was conducted. Articles describing (i) patients with a clinical diagnosis of CIN, (ii) with radiological exclusion of other pathologies, (iii) detailed report of treatments, and (iv) discharge outcomes, were included. Data relating to demographics, procedure, symptoms, treatment and outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients were included, with a median age of 64 years. The most common procedures were cerebral angiography (42.5%) and coronary angiography (42.5%), and the median volume of contrast administered was 150 ml. The most common symptoms were cortical blindness (38.4%) and reduced consciousness (28.8%), and 84.9% of patients experienced complete resolution at the time of discharge. Management included intravenous fluids to dilute contrast in the cerebrovasculature (54.8%), corticosteroids to reduce blood-brain barrier damage (47.9%), antiseizure (16.4%) and sedative (16.4%) medications. Mannitol (13.7%) was also utilised to reduce cerebral oedema. Intensive care admission was required for 19.2% of patients. No statistically significant differences were observed between treatment and discharge outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical management of CIN should be considered on a patient-by-patient basis, but may consist of aggressive fluid therapy alongside corticosteroids, as well as other supportive therapy as required. Further examination of CIN management is required to define best practice.

Development of a predictive model for predicting disability after optic neuritis: a secondary analysis of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial

Objective

The present study aimed to develop a prediction model for predicting developing debilities after optic neuritis.

Methods

The data for this research was obtained from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT). The predictive model was built based on a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Model performance was assessed using Harrell's C-index for discrimination, calibration plots for calibration, and stratification of patients into low-risk and high-risk groups for utility evaluation.

Results

A total of 416 patients participated. Among them, 101 patients (24.3%) experienced disability, which was defined as achieving or surpassing a score of 3 on the expanded disability status scale. The median follow-up duration was 15.5 years (interquartile range, 7.0 to 16.8). Two predictors in the final predictive model included the classification of multiple sclerosis at baseline and the condition of the optic disk in the affected eye at baseline. Upon incorporating these two factors into the model, the model's C-index stood at 0.71 (95% CI, 0.66-0.76, with an optimism of 0.005) with a favorable alignment with the calibration curve. By utilizing this model, the ONTT cohort can be categorized into two risk categories, each having distinct rates of disability development within a 15-year timeframe (high-risk group, 41% [95% CI, 31-49%] and low-risk group, 13% [95% CI, 8.4-17%]; log-rank p-value of <0.001).

Conclusion

This predictive model has the potential to assist physicians in identifying individuals at a heightened risk of experiencing disability following optic neuritis, enabling timely intervention and treatment.

Evidence-based management of optic neuritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Optic neuritis can result from several distinct causes, including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD), when not idiopathic. This review discusses evidence-based treatment approaches contingent upon each specific cause of optic neuritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current evidence highlights the need for prompt plasmapheresis as adjunct to intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) in patients with NMOSD-associated optic neuritis. Recent advances have included a proliferation of novel disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for long-term management of NMOSD and an understanding of how existing therapeutic options can be leveraged to optimally treat MOGAD.

SUMMARY

In acute idiopathic or MS-associated optic neuritis, IVMP hastens visual recovery, though it does not substantially affect final visual outcomes. IVMP and adjunctive plasmapheresis are beneficial in the treatment of NMOSD-associated optic neuritis, with a shorter time-to-treatment associated with a higher likelihood of recovery. The natural history of untreated MOGAD-associated optic neuritis is unclear but treatment with IVMP is near-universal given phenotypic similarities with NMOSD. Long-term immunosuppressive therapy is warranted in patients with NMOSD as well as in patients with MOGAD with poor visual recovery or recurrent attacks.

When Sight and Cancer Collide: A Rare Case of Paraneoplastic Bilateral Optic Neuritis

Bilateral acute optic neuritis is a rare and challenging clinical presentation, often associated with conditions like multiple sclerosis or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. We present the case of a 40-year-old woman with a complex medical history, including poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (stage IIIC), who presented with a swift and profound bilateral vision loss. Despite initial treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone and therapeutic plasma exchange, her optic nerve enhancement on MRI and negative autoantibody results raised suspicion of paraneoplastic optic neuritis. This prompted consultation with oncology, and the patient initiated chemotherapy. The rapid onset and progression of bilateral optic neuritis in the context of cervical carcinoma emphasize the importance of considering paraneoplastic syndromes in such cases. A multidisciplinary approach involving neurology, ophthalmology, and oncology specialists is vital for the diagnosis and management of these complex presentations. This case underscores the need for heightened awareness of paraneoplastic etiologies in patients with malignancies and unexplained neurological symptoms.

Pathogenesis and management of multiple sclerosis revisited

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune chronic inflammatory disease characterized by selective destruction of myelin in the CNS neurons (including optic nerve). It was first described in the 19th century and remained elusive owing to the disease's unique relapsing and remitting course. The widespread and debilitating prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) has prompted the development of various treatment modalities for its effective management.

METHODS AND OBJECTIVES

A literature review was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed and Google Scholar. The main objective of the review was to compile the advances in pathogenesis, classifications, and evolving treatment modalities for MS.

RESULTS

The understanding of the pathogenesis of MS and the potential drug targets for its precise treatment has evolved significantly over the past decade. The experimental developments are also motivating and present a big change coming up in the next 5 years. Numerous disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have revolutionized the management of MS: interferon (IFN) preparations, monoclonal antibodies-natalizumab and ocrelizumab, immunomodulatory agents-glatiramer acetate, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) modulators (Siponimod) and teriflunomide. The traditional parenteral drugs are now available as oral formulations improving patient acceptability. Repurposing various agents used for related diseases may reinforce the drug reserve to manage MS and are under trials. Although at a nascent phase, strategies to enhance re-myelination by stimulating oligodendrocytes are fascinating and hold promise for better outcomes in patients with MS.

CONCLUSIONS

The recent past has seen staggering inclusions to the management of multiple sclerosis catalyzing a significant turnabout in our approach to diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Since the advent of DMTs various other oral and injectable agents have been approved. The advances in MS therapeutics and diagnostics have laid the ground for further research and development to enhance the quality of life of afflicted patients.

Next-generation nanomaterials: advancing ocular anti-inflammatory drug therapy

Ophthalmic inflammatory diseases, including conjunctivitis, keratitis, uveitis, scleritis, and related conditions, pose considerable challenges to effective management and treatment. This review article investigates the potential of advanced nanomaterials in revolutionizing ocular anti-inflammatory drug interventions. By conducting an exhaustive analysis of recent advancements and assessing the potential benefits and limitations, this review aims to identify promising avenues for future research and clinical applications. The review commences with a detailed exploration of various nanomaterial categories, such as liposomes, dendrimers, nanoparticles (NPs), and hydrogels, emphasizing their unique properties and capabilities for accurate drug delivery. Subsequently, we explore the etiology and pathophysiology of ophthalmic inflammatory disorders, highlighting the urgent necessity for innovative therapeutic strategies and examining recent preclinical and clinical investigations employing nanomaterial-based drug delivery systems. We discuss the advantages of these cutting-edge systems, such as biocompatibility, bioavailability, controlled release, and targeted delivery, alongside potential challenges, which encompass immunogenicity, toxicity, and regulatory hurdles. Furthermore, we emphasize the significance of interdisciplinary collaborations among material scientists, pharmacologists, and clinicians in expediting the translation of these breakthroughs from laboratory environments to clinical practice. In summary, this review accentuates the remarkable potential of advanced nanomaterials in redefining ocular anti-inflammatory drug therapy. We fervently support continued research and development in this rapidly evolving field to overcome existing barriers and improve patient outcomes for ophthalmic inflammatory disorders.

Safety of Intravenous Methylprednisolone in Refractory and Severe Pediatric Uveitis

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Development of a Prognostic Model for Predicting Multiple Sclerosis After Optic Neuritis: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial

BACKGROUND

Optic neuritis can be the initial manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS). The purpose of this study was to develop a prognostic model for predicting the risk of MS development among patients with optic neuritis.

METHODS

The data from 388 patients with optic neuritis were retrieved from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to develop a prognostic model. The performance of the model was assessed by using Harrell's C-index and calibration curves. The rates of MS development were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among the enrolled subjects, a total of 154 (39.7%) patients developed clinically definite MS during a median follow-up period of 15.8 years (interquartile range, 7.2-16.9 years). The factors associated with the development of MS were the presence of brain lesions as on baseline MRI, previous nonspecific neurologic symptoms, commencing low-dose corticosteroids treatment, ocular pain, and absence of optic disc/peripapillary hemorrhage. After incorporating these 5 factors into the prognostic model, a C-index of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.76) and good calibration curves were obtained. The C-index of the model was significantly higher than the C-indexes of any single factor (P < 0.001 in all cases). The model was able to stratify the ONTT patient cohort into 3 risk groups with significantly different intergroup rates of developing MS (rates for developing MS within a 15-year period: high-risk group, 75.7% [95% CI, 65.6%-82.9%], intermediate-risk group, 44.7% [95% CI, 31.4%-55.4%]; and low-risk group, 20.8% [95% CI, 14.2%-26.8%]; log-rank P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This prognostic model had a better prediction ability when compared with the standard practice that relies solely on using brain lesions on MRI. It can, therefore, help guide decision-making to initiate earlier disease-modifying therapy for patients with optic neuritis at risk of developing MS.

Early Pulse Glucocorticoid Therapy and Improved Hormonal Outcomes in Primary Hypophysitis

INTRODUCTION

The role of glucocorticoids in primary autoimmune hypophysitis (PAH) has been fraught with variability in regimens, leading to inconsistent outcomes in terms of anterior pituitary (AP) hormonal recovery. Hence, we aimed to compare the clinical, hormonal, and radiological outcomes of a standardized high-dose glucocorticoid therapy group (GTG) in PAH with a matched clinical observation group (COG).

METHODS

Thirty-nine retrospective patients with PAH evaluated and treated at a single center in western India from 1999 to 2019 with a median follow-up duration of 48 months were subdivided into the GTG (n = 18) and COG (n = 21) and compared for the outcomes.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic, hormonal, and radiological features matched between the groups, except pituitary height, which was significantly higher in GTG. Cortisol, thyroid, and gonadal axes were affected in 25 (64%), 22 (56%), and 21 (54%) patients, respectively, and central diabetes insipidus was seen in 7 (18%) patients. Panhypophysitis (PH) was the most common radiological subtype (n = 33, 84.6%). Resolution of mass effects was similar in both groups. Overall and complete AP hormonal recovery was significantly higher in the GTG than in the COG (12/14 [85.7%) vs. 6/14 [42.8%], p = 0.02; 10/14 [71.4%] vs. 1/14 [7.7%], p = 0.0007, respectively). Proportion of cases with empty sella were significantly higher in the COG (9/20 [45%] vs 1/17 [5.9%], p = 0.001). Among PH patients in the GTG (n = 17), we found duration from symptoms onset to treatment as the predictor of recovery.

CONCLUSION

In a PH subtype-predominant PAH cohort, a standardized high-dose glucocorticoid regimen resulted in higher overall and complete AP hormonal recovery than that in the COG. Initiation of glucocorticoids in the early disease course may have been contributory.

Comparison of the Structure and Function of the Retina and the Optic Nerve in Patients with a History of Multiple Sclerosis-Related Demyelinating Retrobulbar Optic Neuritis Treated and Not Treated with Systemic Steroid Therapy

Purpose

To compare the structure and function of the retina and the optic nerve in patients with a history of multiple sclerosis (MS)-related demyelinating retrobulbar optic neuritis treated and not treated with systemic steroid therapy.

Patients and Methods

Thirty-two eyes of 32 MS patients with a past single episode of MS-related demyelinating retrobulbar ON were divided into 2 groups: S(+) consisting of 16 patients treated with intravenous methylprednisolone at a dose of 1g/day for 3 days during the acute stage of ON and S(-) consisting of 16 patients who did not receive any treatment. The following examinations were performed: distance best-corrected visual acuity (DBCVA) (Snellen), slit-lamp examination of the anterior and posterior segment of the eye (90D Volk lens), visual field analysis (Carl Zeiss Humphrey 750 Visual Field Analyzer, 24-2, W-W), macular thickness in the foveal (RT1) and parafoveal region (RT2), as well as peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) in the temporal, superior, nasal and inferior quadrants (Carl Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT), assessment of the bioelectrical function of the visual pathway with an emphasis on the optic nerve - pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) and of macular ganglion cells and cone photoreceptors - pattern electroretinogram (PERG) (Roland Consult).

Results

No statistically significant differences were observed between the investigated groups in terms of DBCVA, mean deviation of visual field macular (RT1, RT2) and RNFL thickness in the temporal, superior, nasal and inferior quadrants, as well as of the bioelectrical function (PVEP, PERG).

Conclusion

The application of steroid therapy should be considered on an individual basis and not as a routine treatment for each patient.

Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging Detects Axonal Loss After Transient Dexamethasone Treatment in Optic Neuritis Mice

Optic neuritis is a frequent first symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS) for which corticosteroids are a widely employed treatment option. The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) reported that corticosteroid treatment does not improve long-term visual acuity, although the evolution of underlying pathologies is unclear. In this study, we employed non-invasive diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI)-derived fiber volume to quantify 11% axonal loss 2 months after corticosteroid treatment (vs. baseline) in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mouse optic nerves affected by optic neuritis. Longitudinal DBSI was performed at baseline (before immunization), after a 2-week corticosteroid treatment period, and 1 and 2 months after treatment, followed by histological validation of neuropathology. Pathological metrics employed to assess the optic nerve revealed axonal protection and anti-inflammatory effects of dexamethasone treatment that were transient. Two months after treatment, axonal injury and loss were indistinguishable between PBS- and dexamethasone-treated optic nerves, similar to results of the human ONTT. Our findings in mice further support that corticosteroid treatment alone is not sufficient to prevent eventual axonal loss in ON, and strongly support the potential of DBSI as an in vivo imaging outcome measure to assess optic nerve pathology.

Amnion-Derived Multipotent Progenitor Cells Suppress Experimental Optic Neuritis and Myelitis

The human amnion has been used for decades in wound healing, particularly burns. Amnion epithelial cells (AECs) have been the focus of extensive research based on their possible pluripotent differentiation ability. A novel, cultured cell population derived from AECs, termed human amnion-derived multipotent progenitor (AMP) cells, secrete numerous cytokines and growth factors that enhance tissue regeneration and reduce inflammation. This AMP cell secretome, termed ST266, is a unique biological solution that accumulates in eyes and optic nerves following intranasal delivery, resulting in selective suppression of optic neuritis in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of multiple sclerosis, but not myelitis at the administered dose. We tested the hypothesis that systemic AMP cell administration could suppress both optic neuritis and myelitis in EAE. Intravenous and intraperitoneal administration of AMP cells significantly reduced ascending paralysis and attenuated visual dysfunction in EAE mice. AMP cell treatment increased retinal ganglion cell (RGC) survival and decreased optic nerve inflammation, with variable improvement in optic nerve demyelination and spinal cord inflammation and demyelination. Results show systemic AMP cell administration inhibits RGC loss and visual dysfunction similar to previously demonstrated effects of intranasally delivered ST266. Importantly, AMP cells also promote neuroprotective effects in EAE spinal cords, marked by reduced paralysis. Protective effects of systemically administered AMP cells suggest they may serve as a potential novel treatment for multiple sclerosis.

Neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations of multiple sclerosis other than acute optic neuritis

Acute optic neuritis is the most common neuro-opthalmologic manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS). Treatment with high-dose intravenous corticosteroids accelerates visual recovery, although it has no long-term visual benefit. MS has several others, less common, neuro-ophthalmological manifestations, where corticotherapy may not be the best treatment option. Neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations of MS other than optic neuritis can be divided in afferent and efferent visual pathways, acute and chronic and may be associated with drugs that are employed in MS. The authors propose is to review the neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations of multiple sclerosis other than optic neuritis. Recognition of these leads to a more targeted treatment and may prevent visual deterioration.

Molecular Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis and Its Related Disorders: A Critical Review

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting the central nervous system (CNS) which can lead to severe disability. Several diseases can mimic the clinical manifestations of MS. This can often lead to a prolonged period that involves numerous tests and investigations before a definitive diagnosis is reached. As well as the possibility of misdiagnosis. Molecular biomarkers can play a unique role in this regard. Molecular biomarkers offer a unique view into the CNS disorders. They help us understand the pathophysiology of disease as well as guiding our diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic approaches in CNS disorders. This review highlights the most prominent molecular biomarkers found in the literature with respect to MS and its related disorders. Based on numerous recent clinical and experimental studies, we demonstrate that several molecular biomarkers could very well aid us in differentiating MS from its related disorders. The implications of this work will hopefully serve clinicians and researchers alike, who regularly deal with MS and its related disorders.

The safety of pulse corticosteroid therapy- Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To amass all available evidence from randomized controlled trials regarding the safety of pulse corticosteroids therapy, in order to establish its safety.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All electronic databases from 1/1966 up to 02/2019 were reviewed to find all randomized controlled trials comparing pulse corticosteroids to oral corticosteroids or to placebo/no treatment. Two reviewers independently extracted and recorded data regarding type of corticosteroid treatment, dosages, length of treatment and follow-up. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% (CI) for differences between pulse corticosteroids and comparator were pooled using a fixed effect meta-analysis. The primary outcome was occurrence of severe adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcomes included any adverse events (AEs), AEs requiring discontinuation, AEs per system involved and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 64 trials were included: 18 trials which compared pulse corticosteroids to oral corticosteroids and 46 trials which compared pulse corticosteroids to placebo/no intervention. Pulse corticosteroids was not associated with increased risk for SAEs for both comparators: RR 0.77 (95% CI 0.52-1.14), and RR 0.99 (95% CI 0.93-1.06), respectively. Sensitivity analysis based on adequate allocation concealment and use of a valid AE grading did not alter the results. Subgroup analysis revealed no increased risk of specific SAEs or AEs with pulse corticosteroids compared to oral corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

Pulse corticosteroids was not associated with an increase risk of SAEs and should be regarded as safe.

Optic Neuritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the clinical presentation, evaluation, and management of the patient with optic neuritis. Initial emphasis is placed on clinical history, examination, diagnostic testing, and medical decision making, while subsequent focus is placed on examining specific inflammatory optic neuropathies. Clinical clues, examination findings, neuroimaging, and laboratory testing that differentiate autoimmune, granulomatous, demyelinating, infectious, and paraneoplastic causes of optic neuritis are assessed, and current treatments are evaluated.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in technology and immunology have enhanced our understanding of the pathologies driving inflammatory optic nerve injury. Clinicians are now able to interrogate optic nerve structure and function during inflammatory injury, rapidly identify disease-relevant autoimmune targets, and deliver timely therapeutics to improve visual outcomes.

SUMMARY

Optic neuritis is a common clinical manifestation of central nervous system inflammation. Depending on the etiology, visual prognosis and the risk for recurrent injury may vary. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of optic neuritis may be critical for limiting vision loss, future neurologic disability, and organ damage. This article will aid neurologists in formulating a systematic approach to patients with optic neuritis.

Assessing the anterior visual pathway in optic neuritis: recent experimental and clinical aspects

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and related autoimmune disorders of the central nervous system such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are characterized by chronic disability resulting from autoimmune neuroinflammation, with demyelination, astrocyte damage, impaired axonal transmission and neuroaxonal loss. Novel therapeutics stopping or reversing the progression of disability are still urgently warranted. This review addresses research on optic neuritis in preclinical experimental models and their translation to clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Optic neuritis can be used as paradigm for an MS relapse which can serve to evaluate the efficacy of novel therapeutics in clinical trials with a reasonable duration and cohort size. The advantage is the linear structure of the visual pathway allowing the assessment of visual function and retinal structure as highly sensitive outcome parameters. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis is an inducible, inflammatory and demyelinating central nervous system disease extensively used as animal model of MS. Optic neuritis is part of the clinicopathological manifestations in a number of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis models. These have gained increasing interest for studies evaluating neuroprotective and/or remyelinating substances as longitudinal, visual and retinal readouts have become available.

SUMMARY

Translation of preclinical experiments, evaluating neuroprotective or remyelinating therapeutics to clinical studies is challenging. In-vivo readouts like optical coherence tomography, offers the possibility to transfer experimental study designs to clinical optic neuritis trials.

Change in visual acuity and retinal structures following Repository Corticotropin Injection (RCI) therapy in patients with acute demyelinating optic neuritis: Improvement in low contrast visual acuity in both affected and contralateral eyes in a single-armed open-label study

BACKGROUND

Current treatments after an episode of optic neuritis have limited success protecting the retinal nerves and restoring visual function.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of Repository Corticotropin Injection (RCI) after the onset of optic neuritis.

METHODS

Twenty-four adults were treated with RCI within 2 weeks of symptom onset. Seven exams over 400 days measured low- and high-contrast visual acuity (LCVA and HCVA) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography of the retinal structures. Differences between and among affected and contralateral eyes were assessed using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

HCVA improved in the affected eye over the study (36.2 letters to 52.5), and LCVA improved in both the affected eye (1.8 letters to 6.8) and the contralateral eye (8.3 letters to 11.7). These functional improvements occurred concurrent to a thinning in the papillomacular bundle and the ganglion cell, inner plexiform, and retinal nerve fiber layers, while the inner nuclear, outer plexiform, outer nuclear, and photoreceptor layers thickened.

CONCLUSION

The eyes affected by the ON and treated with RCI improved in both LCVA and HCVA, and unexpectedly LCVA improved in the contralateral eye as well. This functional improvement was mirrored by structural changes in the retina. This study lays the groundwork for future studies to explore potential neuro-protective and neuro-restorative effects of RCI.

Long term effects of corticosteroids in multiple sclerosis in terms of the "no evidence of disease activity" (NEDA) domains

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that usually is clinically characterized by multiple subacute relapses and remissions. The established therapeutic strategies include intravenous methylprednisolone (IV-MP) for treatment of relapses and immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatment to prevent new relapses and progression of disability. Despite not being one of the recommended immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatments, monthly IV-MP is frequently seen in clinical practice especially in the low income developing countries.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidences for the possible disease modifying potential of corticosteroids in the treatment of MS in terms of the NEDA 3 domains.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Available literature from PubMed search and personal experiences on corticosteroid treatment in multiple sclerosis were reviewed.

RESULTS

There is some evidence that pulsed treatment with methylprednisolone have beneficial long-term effects on relapse rate, MRI findings and disability progression.

CONCLUSION

More data is needed to determine long-term disease modifying effects of corticosteroids. The findings of this study suggest that, perhaps, regular pulse glucocorticoid treatment may have important long-term consequences (beneficial) for patients with MS and it may achieve the NEDA target. Certainly, the magnitude of the reported effects deserves further investigation in both relapsing and progressive MS populations.

Critical review: Typical and atypical optic neuritis

Typical optic neuritis is an idiopathic demyelinating condition that is often associated with multiple sclerosis. This has been well characterized and has an excellent prognosis. Atypical optic neuritis can result from an inflammatory, infectious, or autoimmune disorder. Differentiating the two types of optic neuritis is paramount and may be challenging early on in the clinical course. This review describes the recent literature describing the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, neuroimaging, and management of these disorders.

Adherence to Clinical Trial Supported Evaluation of Optic Neuritis

Purpose: The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial showed that an MRI of the brain is a powerful predictor of developing multiple sclerosis (MS). However, surveys of practitioners suggest that the recommended use of imaging is not consistently followed in practice. With this study, we aim to assess the rate at which newly diagnosed optic neuritis (ON) patients receive brain MRIs. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using administrative medical claims data from a large, national US insurer. All incident cases from 2000 to 2016 of ON in patients without MS were assessed. The primary outcome was a comparison of patterns of MRI scanning usage following diagnosis of ON. Secondary outcomes evaluated steroid treatment and progression to MS. Results: Of 2865 qualified ON patients, 1755 (61.3%) received a brain MRI. At 1 year follow-up, 629 (30.3%) patients had progressed to MS, a rate that increased slightly to 34.3% (366 patients) within a 3-year period of their initial ON diagnosis. A total of 520 (18.2%) patients received intravenous steroids, and 383 (13.4%) received oral steroids within 30 days of the ON diagnosis. Conclusion: Across the United States, a surprisingly low number of individuals obtain a brain MRI following onset of ON, suggesting that physicians may not be fully assessing the risk of MS.

Evaluating the Utility of a Postprocessing Algorithm for MRI Evaluation of Optic Neuritis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

MR imaging is useful for the detection and/or confirmation of optic neuritis. The objective of this study was to determine whether a postprocessing algorithm selectively increases the contrast-to-noise ratio of abnormal optic nerves in optic neuritis, facilitating this diagnosis on MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, coronal FLAIR images and coronal contrast-enhanced T1WI from 44 patients (31 eyes with clinically confirmed optic neuritis and 28 control eyes) underwent processing using a proprietary postprocessing algorithm designed to detect and visually highlight regions of contiguous increases in signal intensity by increasing the signal intensities of regions that exceed a predetermined threshold. For quantitative evaluation of the effect on image processing, the contrast-to-noise ratio of equivalent ROIs and the contrast-to-noise ratio between optic nerves and normal-appearing white matter were measured on baseline and processed images. The effect of image-processing on diagnostic performance was evaluated by masked reviews of baseline and processed images by 6 readers with varying experience levels.

RESULTS

In abnormal nerves, processing resulted in an increase in the median contrast-to-noise ratio from 17.8 to 85.0 (P < .001) on FLAIR and from 19.4 to 93.7 (P < .001) on contrast-enhanced images. The contrast-to-noise ratio for control optic nerves was not affected by processing (P = 0.13). Image processing had a beneficial effect on radiologists' diagnostic performance, with an improvement in sensitivities for 5/6 readers and relatively unchanged specificities. Interobserver agreement improved following processing.

CONCLUSIONS

Processing resulted in a selective increase in the contrast-to-noise ratio for diseased nerves and corresponding improvement in the detection of optic neuritis on MR imaging by radiologists.

Comparison between high-dose and low-dose intravenous methylprednisolone therapy in patients with brain necrosis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy is the standard radical treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and may cause radiation-induced brain necrosis (RN). Intravenous steroids have been considered as an effective treatment for RN. However, evidence concerning the efficacy of different doses of intravenous steroid therapy remains insufficient to establish the optimal regimen for NPC patients with RN.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of 169 patients who were diagnosed with RN after radiotherapy for NPC, treated with low-dose or high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) and followed up for 12 months. We collected the clinical data, including the Late Effects of Normal Tissue (LENT)/Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA) scales score and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed pre- and post-treatment to define the radiographic response.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the treatment response based on MRI, or changes in clinical symptoms and cognitive function between low and high-dose groups. Thirty of 93 low-dose patients (32.3%) and 21 of 76 high-dose patients (27.6%) presented effective response in MRI, with no significant differences between groups (P = 0.515). Neither group showed a significant difference in the effective rate based on the MoCA total score and LENT/SOMA score. The most commonly reported grade 3 adverse events in the high-dose group (n = 76) were infections and infestations (3 [3.9%] vs. none for low-dose group).

CONCLUSIONS

We found low-dose IVMP was not inferior to high-dose IVMP for NPC patients with RN. In addition, treatment-related infections and infestations were likewise more common with high-dose steroid than low-dose steroid.

Acute exudative polymorphous vitelliform maculopathy: To bolus or not to bolus?

Acute exudative polymorphous vitelliform maculopathy (AEPVM) is a rare bilateral maculopathy characterized by chronic and long-term course. We report a case of AEPVM with an unusual presentation and management in a middle-aged man. He presented with clinical features of bilateral AEPVM accompanied by multiple intraretinal cysts, with a sudden increase of intraretinal fluid and visual function deterioration over a span of few days. Therefore, we administered empirically an intravenous bolus injection of methylprednisolone. One week after, there was a full recovery of visual acuity and cystic intraretinal spaces completely disappeared.

Comparison of two high doses of oral methylprednisolone for multiple sclerosis relapses: a pilot, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Oral or intravenous methylprednisolone (≥500 mg/day for 5 days) is recommended for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses. Nonetheless, the optimal dose remains uncertain. We compared clinical and radiological effectiveness, safety and quality of life (QoL) of oral methylprednisolone [1250 mg/day (standard high dose)] versus 625 mg/day (lesser high dose), both for 3 days] in MS relapses.

METHODS

A total of 49 patients with moderate to severe MS relapse within the previous 15 days were randomized in a pilot, double-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01986998). The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of the lesser high dose by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score improvement on day 30 (non-inferiority margin, 1 point). The secondary endpoints were EDSS score change on days 7 and 90, changes in T1 gadolinium-enhanced and new/enlarged T2 lesions on days 7 and 30, and safety and QoL results.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was achieved [mean (95% confidence interval) EDSS score difference, -0.26 (-0.7 to 0.18) at 30 days (P = 0.246)]. The standard high dose yielded a superior EDSS score improvement on day 7 (P = 0.028). No differences were observed in EDSS score on day 90 (P = 0.352) or in the number of T1 gadolinium-enhanced or new/enlarged T2 lesions on day 7 (P = 0.401, 0.347) or day 30 (P = 0.349, 0.529). Safety and QoL were good at both doses.

CONCLUSIONS

A lesser high-dose oral methylprednisolone regimen may not be inferior to the standard high dose in terms of clinical and radiological response.

Steroid Treatment of Optic Neuropathies

The etiologies of optic neuropathy include inflammation, ischemia, toxic and metabolic injury, genetic disease, and trauma. There is little controversy over the practice of using steroids in the treatment of optic neuritis--it is well established that intravenous steroid treatment can speed visual recovery but does not alter final visual function. However, there is controversy surrounding the acceptable routes of administration, dosage, and course of treatment. Additionally, the typical patient with optic neuritis is young and otherwise healthy, and thus is likely to tolerate steroids well. In ischemic and traumatic causes of optic neuropathies, the initial injury is not inflammatory, but damage may be compounded by secondary injury due to resultant inflammation and swelling in the confined space of the optic canal. Steroids have been considered as a means of minimizing inflammation and swelling, and thus minimizing the secondary injury that results. However, the use of steroids in traumatic and ischemic optic neuropathies is highly controversial-the evidence for the efficacy of treatment with steroids is insufficient to show that there is significant benefit. Additionally, patients with these conditions are more likely to have comorbidities that make them vulnerable to significant adverse events with the use of steroids. In this article, we attempt to analyze the current state of the literature regarding the use of steroids in the treatment of optic neuropathies, specifically optic neuritis, nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, and traumatic optic neuropathy.

Frequent retinal ganglion cell damage after acute optic neuritis

BACKGROUND

To identify the extent of ganglion cell damage after first-time optic neuritis (ON) using the inter-ocular difference between affected and fellow eyes, and whether this approach is able to detect more patients suffering from ganglion cell damage than using absolute values.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with first-time unilateral ON were followed for a median 413 days. Patients underwent optical coherence tomography testing to determine ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer thickness (GCIP). Ganglion cell loss was quantified as GCIP difference between ON-affected and fellow eyes (inter-GCIP) and was compared against measurements from 93 healthy controls (HC). Visual function was assessed with high contrast visual acuity; and standard automated perimetry-derived measures of mean deviation and foveal threshold.

RESULTS

At clinical presentation after median 19 days from symptom onset, 47.1% of patients showed early GCIP thinning in the ON-affected eye based on inter-GCIP. At the last visit acute ON was associated with 16.1 ± 10.0 µm GCIP thinning compared to fellow eyes (p = 3.669e-06). Based on inter-GCIP, 84.9% of ON patients sustained GCIP thinning in their affected eye at the last visit, whereas using absolute values only 71.0% of patients suffered from GCIP thinning (p = 0.002076). Only 32.3% of these patients had abnormal visual function. The best predictor of GCIP thinning as a measure of ON severity at the last visit was worse visual field mean deviation at clinical presentation.

CONCLUSION

Inter-ocular GCIP identifies significantly more eyes suffering damage from ON than absolute GCIP, visual fields or visual acuity loss. Effective interventional options are needed to prevent ganglion cell loss.

Corticosteroids in the management of acute multiple sclerosis exacerbations

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system characterized in the majority of the patients by a relapsing-remitting disease course. For decades high-dosage corticosteroids (CS) are considered the cornerstone in the management of acute MS relapses. However, many unanswered questions remain when it comes to the exact modalities of CS administration. In this review on behalf of the Belgian Study Group for MS we define the efficacy of CS in reducing MS-related morbidity and examine whether the effect is different according to type of CS, route of administration, cumulative dosage, timing of initiation and disease course. We also review the use of CS in combination with other MS treatments and during pregnancy and lactation. Furthermore, we delineate the relevant adverse events due to a pulse CS regimen and present a decision tree that can be used when treating MS relapses in clinical practice.

Monthly methylprednisolone in combination with interferon beta or glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A multicentre, single-blind, prospective trial

OBJECTIVES

Multiple sclerosis is usually clinically characterized by repeated subacute relapses followed by remissions. Corticosteroids are used for relapses, and this treatment has been shown to increase the speed of recovery from these. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pulsed methylprednisolone given every month as an add-on therapy to interferon beta or glatiramer acetate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multi-center, examiner-blinded, prospective study. Absolute annualized relapse rates and Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were calculated.

RESULTS

103 patients were given intravenous methylprednisolone (1 dose of 1g IV) once a month for 12 months as add-on therapy and were assessed during this period. The decrease in the absolute annualized relapse rate was 0.69, and 72 patients were relapse-free at the end of the year. Sixty-nine of the 103 patients had the same Expanded Disability Status Scale scores at the end of one year, while 21 were less disabled, and 13 sustained disability progression. Health related quality of life measured using the MS Quality of Life scale improved significantly during the study period.

CONCLUSION

The addition of monthly pulsed methylprednisolone to subcutaneous interferon beta or glatiramer acetate therapy significantly reduced the relapse rate and may also be beneficial in terms of disease progression. These combinations were also safe, and most patients tolerated methylprednisolone as an add-on to interferon beta or glatiramer acetate.

The Ocular Manifestations of Drugs Used to Treat Multiple Sclerosis

Recent times have seen an increase in the number of options to treat multiple sclerosis. Ocular manifestations of multiple sclerosis are well known to treating physicians; however, the medications used to treat multiple sclerosis can also have ocular side effects. This review article focuses on the ocular manifestations of corticosteroids and disease-modifying agents such as interferon, fingolomod, natalizumab, alemtuzumab and mitoxantron used to treat the disease. The ocular manifestations of multiple sclerosis treatments can be varied depending on the drug used, and include retinopathy, chronic central serous chorioretinopathy, macular oedema, Graves' ophthalmopathy and cortical blindness. These effects may be specific to the drug or secondary to their immunosuppressive effect. The association of macular oedema with fingolomod is clear and merits ocular screening for toxicity. The immunosuppressive nature of the treatments makes patients prone to acquired infections. Hence, if a patient with multiple sclerosis presents with vision loss, infectious and drug-induced aetiology should be considered alongside relapses of multiple sclerosis itself as a cause.

The effect on choroidal changes of the route of systemic corticosteroids in acute Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease

PURPOSE

To determine whether route of corticosteroid administration during the acute stage of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease affects depigmentary change and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) during the convalescent stage.

METHODS

In this retrospective comparative study, VKH patients with the interval between diagnosis and final follow-up of ≥ 24 months were divided into two groups according to route of systemic corticosteroid; intravenous pulse therapy (IV pulse group) and oral administration (oral group). Sunset glow fundus (SGF) scores determined by ultra-wide field retinal imaging and SCT determined by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography were compared.

RESULTS

Forty eyes (20 patients) were included in the IV pulse group and 33 eyes (18 patients) in the oral group. At final follow-up, the IV pulse group showed significantly lower mean SGF score, indicating less advanced depigmentary change (3.7 ± 1.5 vs. 5.1 ± 1.2, P = 0.007) and greater mean SCT (239.7 ± 71.1 μm vs. 183.8 ± 72.6 μm, P = 0.012) than the oral group. However, visual acuities did not differ (P = 0.245). In a cross-sectional evaluation at multiple time points from disease onset, the IV pulse group showed significantly lower SGF scores from 1 to 6 years and greater SCTs from 2 to 5 years. Multivariable regression analysis showed that IV pulse therapy and less frequent and shorter duration of inflammation predicted a lower SGF score (R² = 0.291, P < 0.001), and young age, IV pulse therapy, and shorter duration of inflammation predicted greater SCT (R² = 0.27, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to oral administration, high dose IV pulse corticosteroids during the acute stage of VKH disease resulted in less choroidal change during the convalescent stage.

Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by loss of motor and sensory function that results from immune-mediated inflammation, demyelination, and subsequent axonal damage.

Clinically, most MS patients experience recurrent episodes (relapses) of neurological impairment, but in most cases (60–80%) the course of the disease eventually becomes chronic and progressive, leading to cumulative motor, sensory, and visual disability, and cognitive deficits.

The course of the disease is largely unpredictable and its clinical presentation is variable, but its predilection for certain parts of the CNS, which includes the optic nerves, the brain stem, cerebellum, and cervical spinal cord, provides a characteristic constellation of signs and symptoms. Several variants of MS have been nowadays defined with variable immunopathogenesis, course and prognosis. Many new treatments targeting the immune system have shown efficacy in preventing the relapses of MS and have been introduced to its management during the last decade.

Melatonin as a Therapeutic Resource for Inflammatory Visual Diseases

BACKGROUND

Uveitis and optic neuritis are prevalent ocular inflammatory diseases, and highly damaging ocular conditions. Both diseases are currently treated with corticosteroids, but they do not have adequate efficacy and are often associated with severe side effects. Thus, uveitis and optic neuritis remain a challenging field to ophthalmologists and a significant public health concern.

OBJECTIVE

This review summarizes findings showing the benefits of a treatment with melatonin in experimental models of these inflammatory ocular diseases.

RESULTS

Oxidative and nitrosative damage, tumor necrosis factor, and prostaglandin production have been involved in the pathogeny of uveitis and optic neuritis. Melatonin is an efficient antioxidant and antinitridergic, and has the ability to reduce prostaglandin and tumor necrosis factor levels both in the retina and optic nerve. Moreover, melatonin not only prevents functional and structural consequences of experimental uveitis and optic neuritis, but it is also capable of suppressing the actively ongoing ocular inflammatory response.

CONCLUSIONS

Since melatonin protects ocular tissues against inflammation, it could be a potentially useful anti-inflammatory therapy in ophthalmology.

Ischemic optic neuropathy as a model of neurodegenerative disorder: A review of pathogenic mechanism of axonal degeneration and the role of neuroprotection

Optic neuropathy is a neurodegenerative disease which involves optic nerve injury. It is caused by acute or intermittent insults leading to visual dysfunction. There are number of factors, responsible for optic neuropathy, and the optic nerve axon is affected in all type which causes the loss of retinal ganglion cells. In this review we will highlight various mechanisms involved in the cell loss cascades during axonal degeneration as well as ischemic optic neuropathy. These mechanisms include oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, angiogenesis, neuroinflammation and apoptosis following retinal ischemia. We will also discuss the effect of neuroprotective agents in attenuation of the negative effect of factors involve in the disease occurrence and progression.

Retinal ganglion cell and axonal loss in optic neuritis: risk factors and visual functions

PurposeThe peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and the macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) are important predictive factors for the prognosis of optic neuritis (ON). We investigated the risk factors for pRNFL and GCIPL thinning in ON and its relationship with visual function.Patients and methodsWe analyzed 33 eyes of 33 patients with a first attack of unilateral ON. Patients were divided into two groups according to pRNFL and GCIPL thinning, using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. We evaluated patients' age, sex, color vision, visual acuity (VA), optic nerve findings on MRI, elapsed period from onset of visual symptoms to steroid treatment, visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD), average pRNFL thickness, and GCIPL thickness.ResultsThere was no patient with residual VF defect in the groups without pRNFL or GCIPL thinning. Significant correlations were found between pRNFL (some sectors) and GCIPL (all sectors) thickness and BCVA and VF MD (P<0.03 for all). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that only worse initial VF MD was a significant risk factor of pRFNL and GCIPL thinning after ON (OR, 0.841; 95% CI, 0.730-0.970; P=0.017 and OR, 0.871; 95% CI, 0.761-0.998; P=0.046, respectively).ConclusionRetinal ganglion cell and axonal losses occurred in ON cases showing severe initial VF loss. Therefore, it is necessary to pay more attention to the degree of initial VF loss in ON while considering the possibility of residual VF loss accompanying pRNFL and GCIPL thinning.

Multiple Sclerosis: New Approaches to Immunotherapy

Until recently, the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) was restricted to symptomatic therapies. Advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of MS are now resulting in the rapid proliferation of treatment strategies to slow or stop the progression of this disease. Clearly, immunological therapies can improve outcomes in MS and offer hope that this crippling disease can be controlled before patients develop major neurological disabilities. Immunological therapies under investigation for the treatment of MS are taking advantage of dramatic improvements in our understanding of immunoregulation. In addition, immunological treatment of MS is becoming selective relative to myelin antigens, enhancing efficacy and reducing toxicity. The Neuroscientist 2:127-136, 1996

Topical ocular dexamethasone decreases intraocular pressure and body weight in rats

Background

Recently, topical dexamethasone-induced ocular hypertension and a consequent loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) have been described in mice. This has been proposed as a model of steroid-induced glaucoma. In this study, we set up and evaluated a similar model in rats.

Results

Ten-week old Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (N = 12) were used to evaluate the effect of topical 0.1 % dexamethasone (50 μl) administered 3 times daily for 4 weeks. Sodium chloride (0.9 %) was used in another group of rats (N = 12) that served as the controls. After 1 week, we observed a progressive decrease in body weight in the dexamethasone-treated rats compared both to the pre-treatment baseline and the vehicle-treated rats. In contrast to earlier work that showed elevated Intraocular pressure (IOP) following dexamethasone instillation in mice, IOP in the rats unexpectedly fell to 11.3 ± 1.3 mmHg in the treated eyes, compared to 14.8 ± 2.4 mmHg in the untreated eyes, after 3 weeks of topical dexamethasone (P = 0.032). Blood tests performed after 4 weeks of treatment showed a 3.3-fold increase in both plasma cholesterol (P < 0.001) and alanine transaminase (P = 0.019) in the dexamethasone-treated rats compared to the control rats. Meanwhile, topical steroid did not induce changes in either plasma blood glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). We also did not detect changes in the expression of RGC markers (with real-time PCR) following the treatment.

Conclusions

In contrast to mice, which previously showed increased IOP following the topical administration of dexamethasone, the rats displayed a paradoxical reduction in IOP following a similar treatment. This was accompanied by a loss of body weight without affecting the level of blood glucose.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12952-016-0048-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Corticosteroids for treating optic neuritis

BACKGROUND

Optic neuritis is an inflammatory disease of the optic nerve. It usually presents with an abrupt loss of vision and recovery of vision is almost never complete. It occurs more commonly in women than in men. Closely linked in pathogenesis, optic neuritis may be the initial manifestation for multiple sclerosis. In some people, no underlying cause can be found.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of corticosteroids on visual recovery in eyes with acute optic neuritis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2015, Issue 4), MEDLINE (January 1950 to April 2015), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2015), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) (January 1982 to April 2015), PubMed (January 1946 to April 2015), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. The metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) was last searched on 6 March 2014. The electronic databases were last searched on 7 April 2015. We also searched reference lists of identified trial reports for additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated systemic corticosteroids, in any form, dose or route of administration, in people with acute optic neuritis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six RCTs with a total of 750 participants. Each trial was conducted in a different country: Denmark, Germany, India, Japan, UK, and United States. Additionally, we identified two ongoing trials not due to be completed until 2016. Among the six trials included in this review, we judged one to be at high risk of bias. The remaining five trials were judged to be at either low or uncertain risk of biases.Five trials compared only two intervention groups and one trial had a three-arm comparison of oral corticosteroids or intravenous corticosteroids with placebo. Of the five trials with only two intervention groups, two trials compared oral corticosteroids versus placebo, two trials compared intravenous corticosteroids with placebo, and one trial compared intravenous dexamethasone with intravenous methylprednisolone plus oral prednisolone.Three trials evaluating oral corticosteroids used varying doses of corticosteroids versus placebo. In the meta-analyses to assess visual acuity, the risk ratio (RR) was 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 1.23; participants = 398) at one month; 0.92 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.11; participants = 355) at six months; and 0.93 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.24; participants = 368) at one year. In the meta-analyses of two trials evaluating corticosteroids with total dose greater than 3000 mg administered intravenously, the RR of normal visual acuity (defined as 20/20 Snellen fraction or equivalent) in the intravenous corticosteroids group compared with the placebo group was 1.05 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.26; participants = 346) at six months. The RR of contrast sensitivity in the normal range for the same comparison was 1.11 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.33; participants = 346) at six months follow-up. The RR of normal visual field for this comparison was 1.08 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.21; 346 participants) at six months; and 1.01 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.19; participants = 316) at one year. Four trials reported adverse events primarily related to gastrointestinal symptoms and sleep disturbance; one trial reported minor adverse event of acne.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no conclusive evidence of benefit in terms of recovery to normal visual acuity, visual field or contrast sensitivity six months after initiation with either intravenous or oral corticosteroids at the doses evaluated in trials included in this review.