Resistance to levofloxacin and failure of treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia

Comparative mutant prevention concentration and antibacterial activity of fluoroquinolones against Escherichia coli in diarrheic buffalo calves

Owing to emerging threat of antimicrobial resistance, mutant prevention concentration (MPC) is considered as an important parameter to evaluate the antimicrobials for their capacity to restrict/allow the emergence of resistant mutants. Therefore, MPCs of ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and norfloxacin were determined against Escherichia coli isolates of diarrheic buffalo calves. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were also established. The MICs of ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and norfloxacin were 0·009, 0·022, 0·024, 0·028, and 0·036 μg/ml, respectively. The MBCs obtained were very close to the MICs of respective drugs that suggested a bactericidal mode of action of antimicrobials. The MPCs (μg/ml) of ciprofloxacin (4·2×MIC), moxifloxacin (4·8×MIC), and norfloxacin (5·1×MIC) were approximately equal but slightly lower than enrofloxacin (7·6×MIC) and levofloxacin (8·5×MIC) against clinical isolates of E. coli. The MPC data suggested that enrofloxacin has the potential for restricting the selection of E. coli mutants during treatment at appropriate dosing.

In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of garenoxacin against quinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

The bactericidal activity and resistance selectivity of garenoxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae with mutations in ParC (S79F) or both GyrA (S81F) and ParC (D83Y and K137N) were investigated using in vitro pharmacokinetic models simulating plasma concentrations for a standard clinical regimen [400mg once daily (q.d.)]. The efficacy of garenoxacin was compared with that of levofloxacin (500 mg q.d.) and moxifloxacin (400mg q.d.). Garenoxacin showed excellent bactericidal activity against S. pneumoniae, including quinolone-resistant S. pneumoniae (QRSP), achieving ratios of area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24h to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC(0-24)/MIC) ≥ 26.3, without emerging resistant subpopulations. The area above the killing curves was greater and the time to achieve 99.9% killing was shorter for garenoxacin than the corresponding values for levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. No resistant subpopulations and no additional substitution of amino acids in GyrA or ParC emerged following treatment with garenoxacin. On the other hand, in the parC mutant strain, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin treatment caused an increase in the frequency of the resistant population and an additional substitution of amino acids in GyrA (levofloxacin, S81Y/F/C; moxifloxacin, S81Y or E85K). In QRSP with mutations in GyrA and ParC, levofloxacin had no bactericidal activity, whilst the bactericidal activity of moxifloxacin was less than that of garenoxacin; moreover, an additional substitution of amino acids in ParC (S79Y) was noted. In conclusion, garenoxacin corresponding to an oral dose of 400mg showed excellent bactericidal activity against S. pneumoniae, including QRSP, without the emergence of resistant mutants.

Assessment of bacterial antibiotic resistance transfer in the gut

We assessed horizontal gene transfer between bacteria in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. During the last decades, the emergence of antibiotic resistant strains and treatment failures of bacterial infections have increased the public awareness of antibiotic usage. The use of broad spectrum antibiotics creates a selective pressure on the bacterial flora, thus increasing the emergence of multiresistant bacteria, which results in a vicious circle of treatments and emergence of new antibiotic resistant bacteria. The human gastrointestinal tract is a massive reservoir of bacteria with a potential for both receiving and transferring antibiotic resistance genes. The increased use of fermented food products and probiotics, as food supplements and health promoting products containing massive amounts of bacteria acting as either donors and/or recipients of antibiotic resistance genes in the human GI tract, also contributes to the emergence of antibiotic resistant strains. This paper deals with the assessment of antibiotic resistance gene transfer occurring in the gut.

The etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in Australia: why penicillin plus doxycycline or a macrolide is the most appropriate therapy

BACKGROUND

Available data on the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Australia are very limited. Local treatment guidelines promote the use of combination therapy with agents such as penicillin or amoxycillin combined with either doxycycline or a macrolide.

METHODS

The Australian CAP Study (ACAPS) was a prospective, multicenter study of 885 episodes of CAP in which all patients underwent detailed assessment for bacterial and viral pathogens (cultures, urinary antigen testing, serological methods, and polymerase chain reaction). Antibiotic agents and relevant clinical outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The etiology was identified in 404 (45.6%) of 885 episodes, with the most frequent causes being Streptococcus pneumoniae (14%), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (9%), and respiratory viruses (15%; influenza, picornavirus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, and adenovirus). Antibiotic-resistant pathogens were rare: only 5.4% of patients had an infection for which therapy with penicillin plus doxycycline would potentially fail. Concordance with local antibiotic recommendations was high (82.4%), with the most commonly prescribed regimens being a penicillin plus either doxycycline or a macrolide (55.8%) or ceftriaxone plus either doxycycline or a macrolide (36.8%). The 30-day mortality rate was 5.6% (50 of 885 episodes), and mechanical ventilation or vasopressor support were required in 94 episodes (10.6%). Outcomes were not compromised by receipt of narrower-spectrum beta-lactams, and they did not differ on the basis of whether a pathogen was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of patients with CAP can be treated successfully with narrow-spectrum beta-lactam treatment, such as penicillin combined with doxycycline or a macrolide. Greater use of such therapy could potentially reduce the emergence of antibiotic resistance among common bacterial pathogens.

Oral garenoxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis: a Phase II, multicenter, noncomparative, open-label study in adult patients undergoing sinus aspiration

BACKGROUND

Garenoxacin is a des-F(6)-quinolone with in vitro activity against key respiratory pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Hemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Limited data are available regarding the effect of garenoxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of garenoxacin in adults with acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis undergoing a pre-treatment diagnostic sinus aspirate.

METHODS

This Phase II, multicenter, noncomparative, open-label study was conducted at 30 centers in the United States, Mexico, Argentina, and Europe. Male and female patients aged 18 to 80 years with clinical signs and symptoms lasting >or=5 but <or=28 days and radiologic signs (air-fluid level, opacification, mucosal thickening) of acute maxillary sinusitis were eligible. The entry criteria for the 5-day treatment regimen did not include mucosal thickening of >or=5 mm because it was believed that improvement in mucosal thickening might not be reliably measurable at the 5-day time point. All patients received garenoxacin 400 mg QD for 5 or 10 days. Maxillary sinus needle aspiration for Gram stain, routine culture, and susceptibility testing were performed before treatment, and, if clinically indicated, during and after treatment. Bacteriologic eradication (negative culture on repeat sinus aspiration) and cure rates (complete resolution of all signs and symptoms) were assessed at a test-of-cure visit 5 to 18 days after the end of treatment. The occurrence of adverse events was recorded by the investigators up to 30 days after the last administration of garenoxacin by questioning patients.

RESULTS

A total of 546 patients were enrolled and 543 were randomized (5-day cohort: mean age, 40 years; mean weight, 76 kg; 56% women; 10-day cohort: mean age, 41 years; mean weight, 77 kg; 58% women). Clinically evaluable patients included 253 in the 5-day cohort and 266 in the 10-day cohort. Cure rates were 93% (236/253; 95% CI, 89%-96%) and 91% (243/266; 95% CI, 87%-94%) for evaluable patients in the 5- and 10-day cohorts, respectively. Bacteriologic eradication rates in microbiologically evaluable patients were 94% in both cohorts (5 days, 204/217; 10 days, 182/193). Eradication rates in the 5- and 10-day cohorts were as follows: S pneumoniae, 94% (62/66) and 93% (39/42); H influenzae, 100% (30/30) and 93% (26/28); S aureus, 96% (23/24) and 91% (31/34); and M catarrhalis, 89% (8/9) and 86% (12/14). Of the 9 patients with acute bacterial sinusitis due to multidrug-resistant S pneumoniae, 8 achieved clinical cure with garenoxacin treatment. Adverse events (AEs) most frequently reported were diarrhea (<or=2%), nausea (2%-6%), headache (2%-6%), and dizziness (<or=2%). Two percent of patients withdrew because of an AE (allergic reaction, adverse gastrointestinal effects, dyspnea, dizziness, headache, or elevation in liver enzymes).

CONCLUSION

In this population of patients with signs and symptoms of acute maxillary sinusitis, oral garenoxacin 400 mg QD for 5 or 10 days eradicated 94% of bacterial pathogens associated with acute bacterial sinusitis in this population and appeared to be well tolerated in adults.

[Antibiotherapy for acute CAP in adults]

Community acquired pneumonia is one of the most frequent infections. With time, bacterial epidemiology and bacterial resistance evolve and new antibiotics become available. So an up-date on adequate antibiotic use is necessary. We reviewed the epidemiology of pneumonia and the evolution of bacterial resistance. We also collected data on new antibiotics which can be used for this infection such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, telithromycin, and pristinamycin. All these drugs are effective on bacteria involved in pneumonia. At this time, only few Streptococcus pneumoniae strains have developed resistance to these drugs. However, resistance to fluoroquinolones is not easily detected with common laboratory techniques. There is no effectiveness difference between the 2 new fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) in clinical studies. However, in bacteriological and pharmacological studies, moxifloxacin seems to be more effective than levofloxacin (500 mg/day). For the treatment of pneumonia due to Legionella pneumophila, fluoroquinolones are now widely recommended. For Streptococcus pneumonia, amoxicillin remain the drug of choice, even for bacteria with a decreased susceptibility to penicillin. The importance of treating atypical pathogens remains to be documented.

Comment évaluer, orienter et suivre un patient ayant une pneumonie aiguë communautaire ? Une exacerbation de bronchopneumopathie chronique obstructive ?

L'objectif de cette revue est de présenter une analyse bibliographique de la littérature de ces cinq dernières années concernant les pneumonies aiguës communautaires (PAC) et les exacerbations aiguës de bronchopneumopathies chroniques obstructives (EABPCO). La PAC et l'EABPCO sont des pathologies fréquentes grevées d'une mortalité et/ou morbidité encore élevée de nos jours. La connaissance des facteurs de risque d'évolution compliquée et l'identification des signes de gravité souvent liés au risque de mortalité permettent d'orienter le patient pour un traitement ambulatoire, en hospitalisation conventionnelle ou en secteur de réanimation ; des règles prédictives ont été établies dans ce sens. La littérature concernant les critères de sortie d'hospitalisation et le suivi des patients est plus pauvre.

Antibiothérapie des pneumonies aiguës communautaires à Streptococcus pneumoniae : impact clinique de la résistance bactérienne

The emergence of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains with reduced susceptibility to beta-lactams and with multiple drug resistance has not led to major changes in recommendations for antibiotic therapy in patients with acute community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia. Numerous factors explain the limited clinical impact of this major microbiological change. The frequency of intermediate strains is high but the frequency of resistant strains to beta-lactams is very low. There is a complex relation between the acquisition of resistance to beta-lactams and the decreased virulence of S. pneumoniae strains. The only finding in studies of humanized experimental animal models of lethal bacteremic pneumonia caused by resistance and tolerant strains was a slowing in the kinetics of beta-lactams bactericidal activity, especially for amoxicillin. Taken together, this preclinical data shows that microbiological resistance of pneumococci to beta-lactams has very little influence on a possible failure of recommanded treatment regimens for pneumococcal pneumonia. The high rate of multiple drug resistance, particularly among beta-lactam resistant strains, rules out the probabilistic use of macrolides. Conversely, fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance remains low, inferior to 3%, and the same is true for ketolides (<1%). Only a global strategy of patient management in the use of these new drugs could ensure their long-term activity. The high mortality rate of hospitalized S. pneumoniae pneumonia will only be improved with a better understanding of the complex host-bacteria interactions.

The quinolones: past, present, and future

The quinolone class of antimicrobial agents has generated considerable interest since its discovery >40 years ago. Substantial progress has been made in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the action of quinolones against pathogenic bacteria, the induction of resistance to quinolones in these organisms, and the potential of each quinolone compound to induce toxicity in treated patients. Here, these key discoveries are reviewed; the present indications approved by regulatory agencies are described in detail, with comments on adverse events caused by quinolones in treated patients; and speculation about the future of the quinolones is proffered, even though their future is difficult to predict, because many factors may affect their clinical usefulness. However, the emergence of bacterial resistance to the quinolones is a major factor that will determine the future clinical effectiveness of these agents, so that intense investigation of mechanisms to either prevent or curtail resistance to quinolones is of prime importance to their future.

Drug-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia: clinical relevance and approach to management

Community-acquired pneumonia is the most common infectious disease that causes death, with Streptococcus pneumoniae remaining the leading causative pathogen. The worldwide incidence of infections caused by pneumococci resistant to penicillin, macrolides, and other antimicrobial agents has increased at an alarming rate during the past 2 decades. Yet, these agents are still used as first-line empirical therapy in the outpatient setting. There are several reasons for this, including the infrequency of making a pathogen-specific diagnosis, the failure of studies to demonstrate the relevance of resistance, and the infrequency with which clinicians recognize clinical failures. Despite this, there is mounting evidence that supports the practice of using high doses of some antimicrobial agents, a more active antimicrobial agent within a class, or switching to another class of antimicrobial agents when a patient is identified as being at an increased risk of infection with a resistant pneumococcus. There is now information that will allow the physician to identify not only the patient at risk for infection with a resistant pneumococcus but also the antimicrobial class and, in some cases, the agent within the class to which the organism is more likely to be resistant. This will allow clinicians to better define optimal therapy for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Nonmolecular test for detection of low-level resistance to fluoroquinolones in Streptococcus pneumoniae

With respect to pneumococci, there is a need to detect first-step mutants with reduced fluoroquinolone (FQ) susceptibility from which second-step, resistant mutants are likely to be selected in the presence of antipneumococcal FQs. Here, we describe an interpretative disk diffusion test, of which three options are presented, that allows the distinction between first- and second-step mutants. Using five FQ disks (pefloxacin, norfloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and sparfloxacin, option 1), all known mechanisms of altered FQ susceptibility found in first-step mutants (ParC, ParE, GyrA, or efflux) and in second-step mutants (ParC and GyrA or ParE and GyrA) can be accurately detected, making this option a useful epidemiological tool. Using three FQ disks (pefloxacin, norfloxacin, and levofloxacin, option 2), the most prevalent FQ-resistant mutants, but not the first-step GyrA mutants, can be detected. With only two FQ disks (norfloxacin and levofloxacin) in the third and simplest option, first-step mutants can be distinguished from second-step mutants, however, without differentiation of ParC, ParE, or efflux alterations.

Penicillins for Treatment of Pneumococcal Pneumonia: Does In Vitro Resistance Really Matter?

BACKGROUND

The rate of in vitro bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents is escalating among pathogens that cause the most serious respiratory tract infections. Many reports published during the past few years suggest that this has direct clinical implications. In particular, resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to beta-lactam antibiotic therapy has assumed a prominent role in the evolution of guidelines for the initial treatment of respiratory tract infection.

METHODS

I conducted a critical review of the published medical literature.

RESULTS

There is only a single report of documented microbiologic failure of parenteral penicillin-class antibiotics in the treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia in patients with or without bacteremia, whereas there are numerous well-documented reports of treatment failure with quinolone-class (n > or = 21) and macrolide-class (n > or = 33) antibiotics in the treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

The recommended optimal in-hospital therapy for community-acquired pneumonia should continue to be a beta-lactam antibiotic (penicillin, aminopenicillin, cefotaxime, or ceftriaxone) administered with a macrolide or a fluoroquinolone agent for adjunctive treatment of infection with potential atypical pathogens.

Clinical implications and treatment of multiresistant Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading bacterial cause of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Prior to the 1970s this pathogen was uniformly susceptible to penicillin and most other antimicrobials. However, since the 1990s there has been a significant increase in drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (DRSP) due, in large part, to increased use of antimicrobials. The clinical significance of this resistance is not definitely established, but appears to be most relevant to specific MICs for specific antimicrobials. Certain beta-lactams (amoxicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone), the respiratory fluoroquinolones, and telithromycin are among several agents that remain effective against DRSP. Continued surveillance studies, appropriate antimicrobial usage campaigns, stratification of patients based on known risk factors for resistance, and vaccination programmes are needed to appropriately manage DRSP and limit its spread.

[Failure of levofloxacin therapy in two cases of community-acquired pneumonia caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and complicated with empyema]

BACKGROUND

Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to Streptococcus pneumoniae is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. We communicate two cases of CAP with complications. In both cases levofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae was isolated in pleural effusion. Patient 1: A 51-year-old man who had not received previous treatment with quinolones was admitted to the hospital for CAP and initially treated with levofloxacin (500 mg/24h iv). Four days later pleural effusion developed and fluid culture isolated levofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae (MIC > 32 .g/ml). The outcome was favorable following chest tube placement and treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics. Patient 2: A 73-year-old man with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was admitted due to CAP and was initially treated with levofloxacin (500 mg/24 h iv). He was transferred to our hospital after 10 days of treatment with this antibiotic, following the development of pleural effusion with isolation of levofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae (MIC = 12 .g/ml). The patient was treated with chest tube placement and beta-lactam antibiotics with a favorable outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CAP treated empirically must be closely followed, both clinically and radiologically, to facilitate early detection of complications due to bacterial resistance to the prescribed antibiotic. Patients with CAP who have received quinolones in the weeks before the development of pneumonia should not been treated empirically with these antibiotics because of the risk of resistance development.

A review of Streptococcus pneumoniae infection treatment failures associated with fluoroquinolone resistance

We reviewed all of the published reports of cases of fluoroquinolone treatment failures for respiratory tract infection due to fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. There were 20 ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin treatment failures reported. Physicians should be aware, when treating pneumococcal respiratory tract infections in older patients with a fluoroquinolone, that clinical failures might occur, especially for patients with comorbid illnesses and a history of recent fluoroquinolone use.

[Guidelines for the management of community pneumonia in adult who needs hospitalization]

Community acquired pneumonia is still an important health problem. In Spain the year incidence is 162 cases per 100,000 inhabitants with 53,000 hospital admission costing 115 millions of euros per year. In the last years there have been significant advances in the knowledge of: aetiology, diagnostic tools, treatment alternatives and antibiotic resistance. The Spanish Societies of Intensive and Critical Care (SEMICYUC), Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) have produced these evidence-based Guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in Adults. The main objective is to help physicians to make decisions about this disease. The different points that have been developed are: aetiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention.

Relationship between increased levofloxacin use and decreased susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States

Increasing reports of fluoroquinolone-non-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae are of clinical concern. We examined the relationship between outpatient fluoroquinolone use and susceptibility of community-acquired S. pneumoniae isolates. Using multivariable general linear modeling, US SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program and Intercontinental Medical Statistics data (1997-2002) were analyzed to determine the influence of selected patient-, institution-, and geographic region-specific factors, including local fluoroquinolone usage, on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of levofloxacin against S. pneumoniae. Levofloxacin MIC50, MIC90, and MIC range (n = 384 from 26 hospitals) were 1, 1, and < or =0.5 to >4 microg/mL, respectively. Variables associated with changes in geometric mean MIC included geographical region (P < 0.0001), medical service (P = 0.0002), study year (P = 0.0006), primary diagnosis group (P = 0.02), and 2 interactions (duration of hospital stay before isolate collection by bed capacity, P = 0.06, and levofloxacin use by geographical region, P = 0.08; P < 0.001 when study year was removed from the model). MIC increased with levofloxacin use across all geographical regions, with increases of 54% and 126% in the southwest and west, respectively. In contrast to other fluoroquinolones, increased levofloxacin use, along with other variables, was associated with decreased pneumococcal susceptibility. Given the US environment of increasing pneumococcal resistance, these data may be useful in better understanding factors related to emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance.

Guide to selection of fluoroquinolones in patients with lower respiratory tract infections

Newer fluoroquinolones such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and gemifloxacin have several attributes that make them excellent choices for the therapy of lower respiratory tract infections. In particular, they have excellent intrinsic activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and the atypical respiratory pathogens. Fluoroquinolones may be used as monotherapy to treat high-risk patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and for patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation, but not admission to intensive care. Overall, the newer fluoroquinolones often achieve clinical cure rates in > or =90% of these patients. However, rates may be lower in hospital-acquired pneumonia, and this infection should be treated on the basis of anticipated organisms and evaluation of risk factors for specific pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this setting, an antipseudomonal fluoroquinolone may be used in combination with an antipseudomonalbeta-lactam. Concerns are now being raised about the widespread use, and possibly misuse, of fluoroquinolones and the emergence of resistance among S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. A number of pharmacokinetic parameters such as the peak concentration of the antibacterial after a dose (C(max)), and the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) and their relationship to pharmacodynamic parameters such as the minimum inhibitory and the mutant prevention concentrations (MIC and MPC, respectively) have been proposed to predict the effect of fluoroquinolones on bacterial killing and the emergence of resistance. Higher C(max)/MIC or AUC24/MIC and C(max)/MPC or AUC24/MPC ratios, either as a result of dose administration or the susceptibility of the organism, may lead to a better clinical outcome and decrease the emergence of resistance, respectively. Pharmacokinetic profiles that are optimised to target low-level resistant minor subpopulations of bacteria that often exist in infections may help preserve fluoroquinolones as a class. To this end, optimising the AUC24/MPC or C(max)/MPC ratios is important, particularly against S. pneumoniae, in the setting of lower respiratory tract infections. Agents such as moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin with high ratios against this organism are preferred, and agents such as ciprofloxacin with low ratios should be avoided. For agents such as levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, with intermediate ratios against S. pneumoniae, it may be worthwhile considering alternative dose administration strategies, such as using higher dosages, to eradicate low-level resistant variants. This must, of course, be balanced against the potential of toxicity. Innovative approaches to the use of fluoroquinolones are worth testing in further in vitro experiments as well as in clinical trials.

Ciprofloxacin treatment failure in a patient with resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae infection following prior ciprofloxacin therapy

Reported here is the case of a patient with underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in whom ciprofloxacin treatment of a lower respiratory tract infection failed subsequent to ciprofloxacin treatment of an exacerbation of COPD several weeks earlier. During the second course of ciprofloxacin therapy, the patient's condition continued to deteriorate, and she was admitted to the intensive care unit. Bilateral pneumonia was diagnosed. Streptococcus pneumoniae, serotype 11A, resistant to ciprofloxacin was isolated from the sputum. Sequencing revealed a S79F mutation in parC and there was evidence of an efflux pump. The patient improved rapidly after administration of azithromycin and ampicillin/sulbactam. This report of treatment failure due to ciprofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae shows that fluoroquinolones should be avoided when treating patients who have recently received this class of antibiotics.

Community-acquired pneumonia: new management strategies for evolving pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibilities

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is still one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. The most common bacterial cause of CAP is Streptococcus pneumoniae. The increase in antimicrobial resistance has raised concerns about the efficacy of available therapies, and a call for the reassessment of both existing and newer therapeutic agents. Although microbiological breakpoints are useful for monitoring the emergence of resistance, the current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines make no distinction between clinical and microbiological breakpoints. Recent changes in NCCLS breakpoints for extended spectrum cephalosporins have provided a more meaningful approach to susceptibility testing and to consideration of the site of infection. Further controversy surrounds the clinical guidelines relating to CAP in terms of which antimicrobial agents should be given empirically to which types of patients. Within this review, the role of monotherapy versus the need for combination antimicrobial therapy, which often includes a macrolide and an extended spectrum cephalosporin such as ceftriaxone, is discussed. This review also discusses the various aspects of antimicrobial susceptibilities of S. pneumoniae, the drivers and influences of increasing resistance, the clinical relevance of this resistance and possible therapeutic options in the face of changing susceptibilities and mixed bacterial aetiologies. New guidelines from the IDSA attempt to embrace these changes.

The newer fluoroquinolones

This article discusses the newer fluoroquinolones in detail with respect to their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and spectrum of in vitro activity. The newer agents are compared and contrasted with the older ones, particularly ciprofloxacin. Efficacy of the newer fluoroquinolones when compared with antimicrobial agents in other classes is also presented in detail. Appropriate use of the newer fluoroquinolones is addressed, including their ever expanding role in the treatment of both upper and lower respiratory tract infections and skin and soft tissue infection. Available data on the use of the newer fluoroquinolones in the management of genitourinary tract infections, gastrointestinal infections, and osteomyelitis are also discussed.

An ex-vivo pharmacodynamic study comparing bactericidal activity of amoxicillin/sulbactam, azithromycin, doxycycline and levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae

We designed a 4-way crossover, ex-vivo pharmacodynamic study to compare the bactericidal rate of amoxicillin/sulbactam (AMX-SUL), azithromycin (AZM), doxycycline (DOX) and levofloxacin (LVX) against Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619. Six volunteers were randomized to receive alternatively a single tablet of the above drugs. Venous blood samples were obtained immediately before and at 2, 4 and 6 h after dose to perform time-kill studies and to determine antibiotic levels in serum. AMX-SUL was the only drug showing bactericidal activity with the sera obtained at every time after dose, as defined by a > or = 3-log10 cfu/ml decrease in the viable cell counts compared to the original inoculum after a 24-h incubation. AZM was only inhibitory at 2h after dose (i.e. a 1.3-log10 cfu/ml decrease in the viable cell counts) and proved bactericidal at 4 and 6 h post-dose. LVX proved bactericidal with the 2-h serum, was only inhibitory with the 4-h serum (e.g. a 1.5-log10 cfu/ml decrease) and was unable to avoid bacterial growth at 6 h post-dose. Bacterial growth was observed with DOX at every time after dose. This study may shed light on the understanding of breakthrough pneumococcal bacteremia during the course of oral therapy with AZM in patients with community-acquired nia (CAP), as well as the increasing treatment failures observed with LVX, and the selection of bacterial resistance during therapy reported with both drugs. It also provides the basis for a "warning signal" on the use of oral DOX and confirms the efficacy of AMX-SUL.

Streptococcus pneumoniae and community-acquired pneumonia: a cause for concern

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the sixth most common cause of death in the United States and the leading cause of death from infectious diseases. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and poses a major economic burden to the healthcare system. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of CAP. Other common bacterial causes include Haemophilus influenzae as well as atypical bacteria (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Legionella species). Increasing resistance to a variety of antimicrobial agents has been documented in S. pneumoniae and is common in H. influenzae as well. Successful empiric therapy is paramount to the management of CAP to avoid treatment failure and subsequent associated costs. Given that resistance is increasing among respiratory pathogens, and S. pneumoniae is the most common etiologic agent identified in CAP, strategies for antimicrobial therapy should be based on the likely causative pathogen, the presence of risk factors for infection with resistant bacteria, and local resistance patterns.

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Mexico

The susceptibility to 14 beta-lactam and non-beta-lactam antimicrobial agents was evaluated for Streptococcus pneumoniae from patients with community-acquired respiratory infections in a Mexican medical center. Three hundred fifteen pneumococcal isolates obtained from patients between 1995 and 2001 were tested by the broth microdilution test. Fifty-two percent of the isolates were nonsusceptible to penicillin (minimal inhibitory concentration, >0.06 microg/mL). Penicillin-nonsusceptible isolates were more likely to exhibit resistance to cephalosporins, macrolides, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline when compared to penicillin-susceptible isolates. Ninety-three percent of the penicillin-nonsusceptible isolates were resistant to at least one other class of antimicrobials, in contrast to only 47% of the penicillin-susceptible strains (p < 0.0001). More than 90% of the tested isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate, ceftriaxone, levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin. Reduced susceptibility to penicillin was considered to be a reliable marker for the higher probability of multidrug resistance, thus requiring in vitro tests to guide chemotherapy or the choices of parenteral extended spectrum cephalosporins or newer respiratory quinolones.

Mutant selection window in levofloxacin and moxifloxacin treatments of experimental pneumococcal pneumonia in a rabbit model of human therapy

For some pneumococci the fluoroquinolone MICs are low but the mutant prevention concentrations (MPCs) are high; this difference defines in vitro the mutant selection window (MSW). We investigated in vivo the bacterial reduction and the occurrence of resistant mutants with moxifloxacin (MFX; 400 mg once daily) or levofloxacin (LVX; 500 mg twice daily) in treatments similar to those in humans with experimental pneumonia due to pneumococci (expPP) exhibiting various MICs and MPCs. The MIC/MPC for MFX and LVX and genotypes were as follows: strain 16089, 0.125/0.125 and 0.5/0.5 (wild type); strain MS1A, 0.25/0.25 and 1/2 (efflux); strain MS2A, 0.25/4 and 1.75/28 (parC79); strain MR3B4, 0.25/4 and 2/32 (parC79); strain M16, 0.5/2 and 8/32 (parC83); strain Gyr-1207, 1.5/3 and 8/16 (gyrA); and strain MQ3A, 4/4 and 16/64 (parC and gyrA). Both drugs were efficient with wild type-expPP, but only MFX was efficient with efflux-expPP. No bacterial reduction was observed for parC-expPPs due to mutants observed in 18 to 100% of animals, depending on the strain and the drug tested. These mutants showed unbound area under the concentration-time curve and MICs of from 50 to 164 for MFX. The in vivo pharmacodynamic boundaries of the MSW were different for MFX and LVX. We conclude that, after LVX or MFX treatment, mutants occur in vivo if there is a preexisting parC mutation, since the drug concentrations fall below the MPCs of these strains. Since the MPC determination cannot be routinely determined, these phenotypes or genotypes should be detected by simple tests to guide the therapeutic options.

Quinolone Resistance among Pneumococci: Therapeutic and Diagnostic Implications

Fluoroquinolones are widely recommended as empirical monotherapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Since 1999, case reports of failure of levofloxacin therapy due to levofloxacin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae have started to appear. Most worrying is that, in some cases, levofloxacin resistance has been acquired by pneumococci within days of the initiation of therapy. Because use of current clinical antimicrobial resistance breakpoints fail to identify the majority of S. pneumoniae isolates with only first-step mutations, current treatment guidelines not only may have implications with regard to the ability of surveillance programs to detect emerging resistance but may have therapeutic implications as well.

Pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin at simulated epithelial lining fluid drug concentrations against Streptococcus pneumoniae

Recent clinical failures associated with levofloxacin treatment for Streptococcus pneumoniae infections and growing evidence of frequent mutations in the isolate population have led to increased concerns regarding fluoroquinolone resistance. Our objective was to characterize the efficacies of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin against various genotypes of S. pneumoniae after simulated bronchopulmonary exposures. An in vitro model was used to simulate a levofloxacin concentration of 500 mg and a moxifloxacin concentration of 400 mg, which were previously determined to be the concentrations in the epithelial lining fluid of older adults receiving once-daily dosing. The effects of the drugs were tested against six S. pneumoniae containing various mutations. Bacterial density and resistance were quantitatively assessed over 48 h. The S. pneumoniae isolate with no mutation displayed a 4-log reduction in CFU after treatment with both agents and did not develop resistance. Isolates containing the parC or parE mutation or both mutations regrew and developed resistance when they were exposed to levofloxacin, despite an unbound area under the concentration-time curve (AUC):MIC ratio of approximately 100. When the isolate containing the parC and gyrA mutations was exposed to levofloxacin, there was a half-log reduction in the number of CFU compared to that for the control, but the isolate subsequently regrew. Likewise, levofloxacin did not kill the isolate containing the parC, gyrA, and parE mutations. Moxifloxacin sustained the killing of all bacterial isolates tested without the development of resistance. Levofloxacin did not sustain bacterial killing and did not prevent the emergence of further resistance in mutants with the parC or parE mutation or both mutations, even though an unbound AUC:MIC ratio for exposure well above the breakpoint of 30 to 40 established in the literature for S. pneumoniae was maintained. Moxifloxacin was effective against all isolates tested, despite the presence of isolates with two- and three-step mutations, for which the MICs were increased.

Antimicrobial treatment guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis

Treatment guidelines developed by the Sinus and Allergy Health Partnership for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) were originally published in 2000. These guidelines were designed to: (1) educate clinicians and patients (or patients’ families) about the differences between viral and bacterial rhinosinusitis; (2) reduce the use of antibiotics for nonbacterial nasal/sinus disease; (3) provide recommendations for the diagnosis and optimal treatment of ABRS; (4) promote the use of appropriate antibiotic therapy when bacterial infection is likely; and (5) describe the current understanding of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics and how they relate to the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy. The original guidelines are updated here to include the most recent information on management principles, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and therapeutic options.

Burden of disease

An estimated 20 million cases of ABRS occur annually in the United States. According to National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data, sinusitis is the fifth most common diagnosis for which an antibiotic is prescribed. Sinusitis accounted for 9% and 21% of all pediatric and adult antibiotic prescriptions, respectively, written in 2002. The primary diagnosis of sinusitis results in expenditures of approximately $3.5 billion per year in the United States.

Definition and diagnosis of ABRS

ABRS is most often preceded by a viral upper respiratory tract infection (URI). Allergy, trauma, dental infection, or other factors that lead to inflammation of the nose and paranasal sinuses may also predispose individuals to developing ABRS.

Patients with a “common cold” (viral URI) usually report some combination of the following symptoms: sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, hyposmia/anosmia, facial pressure, postnasal drip, sore throat, cough, ear fullness, fever, and myalgia. A change in the color or the characteristic of the nasal discharge is not a specific sign of a bacterial infection. Bacterial superinfection may occur at any time during the course of a viral URI. The risk that bacterial superinfection has occurred is greater if the illness is still present after 10 days. Because there may be cases that fall out of the “norm” of this typical progression, practicing clinicians need to rely on their clinical judgment when using these guidelines. In general, however, a diagnosis of ABRS may be made in adults or children with symptoms of a viral URI that have not improved after 10 days or worsen after 5 to 7 days. There may be some or all of the following signs and symptoms: nasal drainage, nasal congestion, facial pressure/pain (especially when unilateral and focused in the region of a particular sinus), postnasal drainage, hyposmia/anosmia, fever, cough, fatigue, maxillary dental pain, and ear pressure/fullness.

Physical examination provides limited information in the diagnosis of ABRS.

While sometimes helpful, plain film radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging scans are not necessary for cases of ABRS.

Microbiology of ABRS

The most common bacterial species isolated from the maxillary sinuses of patients with ABRS are Streptococcus pneumoniae , Haemophilus influenzae , and Moraxella catarrhalis , the latter being more common in children. Other streptococcal species, anaerobic bacteria and Staphylococcus aureus cause a small percentage of cases.

Bacterial resistance in ABRS

The increasing prevalence of penicillin nonsusceptibility and resistance to other drug classes among S pneumoniae has been a problem in the United States, with 15% being penicillin-intermediate and 25% being penicillin-resistant in recent studies. Resistance to macrolides and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) is also common in S pneumoniae . The prevalence of β-lactamase-producing isolates of H influenzae is approximately 30%, while essentially all M catarrhalis isolates produce β-lactamases. Resistance of H influenzae to TMP/SMX is also common.

Antimicrobial treatment guidelines for ABRS

These guidelines apply to both adults and children. When selecting antibiotic therapy for ABRS, the clinician should consider the severity of the disease, the rate of progression of the disease, and recent antibiotic exposure. The guidelines now divide patients with ABRS into two general categories: (1) those with mild symptoms who have not received antibiotics within the past 4 to 6 weeks, and (2) those with mild disease who have received antibiotics within the past 4 to 6 weeks or those with moderate disease regardless of recent antibiotic exposure. The difference in severity of disease does not imply infection with a resistant pathogen. Rather, this terminology indicates the relative degree of acceptance of possible treatment failure and the likelihood of spontaneous resolution of symptoms—patients with more severe symptoms are less likely to resolve their disease spontaneously. The primary goal of antibiotic therapy is to eradicate bacteria from the site of infection, which, in turn, helps (1) return the sinuses back to health; (2) decrease the duration of symptoms to allow patients to resume daily activities more quickly; (3) prevent severe complications such as meningitis and brain abscess; and (4) decrease the development of chronic disease. Severe or life-threatening infections with or without complications are rare, and are not addressed in these guidelines.

Prior antibiotic use is a major risk factor associated with the development of infection with antimicrobial-resistant strains. Because recent antimicrobial exposure increases the risk of carriage of and infection due to resistant organisms, antimicrobial therapy should be based upon the patient’s history of recent antibiotic use. The panel’s guidelines, therefore, stratify patients according to antibiotic exposure in the previous 4 to 6 weeks.

Lack of response to therapy at ≥72 hours is an arbitrary time established to define treatment failures. Clinicians should monitor the response to antibiotic therapy, which may include instructing the patient to call the office or clinic if symptoms persist or worsen over the next few days.

The predicted bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of antibiotics in adults and children has been determined according to mathematical modeling of ABRS developed by Michael Poole, MD, PhD, based on pathogen distribution, resolution rates without treatment, and in vitro microbiologic activity.

Antibiotics can be placed into the following relative rank order of predicted clinical efficacy for adults: 90% to 92% = respiratory fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin), ceftriaxone, high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate (4 g/250 mg/day), and amoxicillin/clavulanate (1.75 g/250 mg/day); 83% to 88% = high-dose amoxicillin (4 g/day), amoxicillin (1.5 g/day), cefpodoxime proxetil, cefixime (based on H influenzae and M catarrhalis coverage), cefuroxime axetil, cefdinir, and TMP/SMX; 77% to 81% = doxycycline, clindamycin (based on gram-positive coverage only), azithromycin, clarithromycin and erythromycin, and telithromycin; 65% to 66% = cefaclor and loracarbef. The predicted spontaneous resolution rate in patients with a clinical diagnosis of ABRS is 62%.

Antibiotics can be placed into the following relative rank order of predicted clinical efficacy in children with ABRS: 91% to 92% = ceftriaxone, high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate (90 mg/6.4 mg per kg per day) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (45 mg/6.4 mg per kg per day); 82% to 87% = high-dose amoxicillin (90 mg/kg per day), amoxicillin (45 mg/kg per day), cefpodoxime proxetil, cefixime (based on H influenzae and M catarrhalis coverage only), cefuroxime axetil, cefdinir, and TMP/SMX; and 78% to 80% = clindamycin (based on gram-positive coverage only), cefprozil, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin; 67% to 68% = cefaclor and loracarbef. The predicted spontaneous resolution rate in untreated children with a presumed diagnosis of ABRS is 63%.

Recommendations for initial therapy for adult patients with mild disease (who have not received antibiotics in the previous 4 to 6 weeks) include the following choices: amoxicillin/clavulanate (1.75 to 4 g/250 mg per day), amoxicillin (1.5 to 4 g/day), cefpodoxime proxetil, cefuroxime axetil, or cefdinir. While TMP/SMX, doxycycline, azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, or telithromycin may be considered for patients with β-lactam allergies, bacteriologic failure rates of 20% to 25% are possible. Failure to respond to antimicrobial therapy after 72 hours should prompt either a switch to alternate antimicrobial therapy or reevaluation of the patient (see Table 4).When a change in antibiotic therapy is made, the clinician should consider the limitations in coverage of the initial agent.

Recommendations for initial therapy for adults with mild disease who have received antibiotics in the previous 4 to 6 weeks or adults with moderate disease include the following choices: respiratory fluoroquinolone (eg, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) or high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate (4 g/250 mg per day). The widespread use of respiratory fluoroquinolones for patients with milder disease may promote resistance of a wide spectrum of organisms to this class of agents. Ceftriaxone (parenteral, 1 to 2 g/day for 5 days) or combination therapy with adequate gram-positive and negative coverage may also be considered. Examples of appropriate regimens of combination therapy include high-dose amoxicillin or clindamycin plus cefixime, or high-dose amoxicillin or clindamycin plus rifampin. While the clinical effectiveness of ceftriaxone and these combinations for ABRS is unproven; the panel considers these reasonable therapeutic options based on the spectrum of activity of these agents and on data extrapolated from acute otitis media studies. Rifampin should not be used as monotherapy, casually, or for longer than 10 to 14 days, as resistance quickly develops to this agent. Rifampin is also a well-known inducer of several cytochrome p450 isoenzymes and therefore has a high potential for drug interactions. Failure of a patient to respond to antimicrobial therapy after 72 hours of therapy should prompt either a switch to alternate antimicrobial therapy or reevaluation of the patient (see Table 4). When a change in antibiotic therapy is made, the clinician should consider the limitations in coverage of the initial agent. Patients who have received effective antibiotic therapy and continue to be symptomatic may need further evaluation. A CT scan, fiberoptic endoscopy or sinus aspiration and culture may be necessary.

Recommendations for initial therapy for children with mild disease and who have not received antibiotics in the previous 4 to 6 weeks include the following: high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate (90 mg/6.4 mg per kg per day), amoxicillin (90 mg/kg per day), cefpodoxime proxetil, cefuroxime axetil, or cefdinir. TMP/SMX, azithromycin, clarithromycin, or erythromycin is recommended if the patient has a history of immediate Type I hypersensitivity reaction to β-lactams. These antibiotics have limited effectiveness against the major pathogens of ABRS and bacterial failure of 20% to 25% is possible. The clinician should differentiate an immediate hypersensitivity reaction from other less dangerous side effects. Children with immediate hypersensitivity reactions to β-lactams may need: desensitization, sinus cultures, or other ancillary procedures and studies. Children with other types of reactions and side effects may tolerate one specific β-lactam, but not another. Failure to respond to antimicrobial therapy after 72 hours should prompt either a switch to alternate antimicrobial therapy or reevaluation of the patient (see Table 5).When a change in antibiotic therapy is made, the clinician should consider the limitations in coverage of the initial agent.

The recommended initial therapy for children with mild disease who have received antibiotics in the previous 4 to 6 weeks or children with moderate disease is high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate (90 mg/6.4 mg per kg per day). Cefpodoxime proxetil, cefuroxime axetil, or cefdinir may be used if there is a penicillin allergy (eg, penicillin rash); in such instances, cefdinir is preferred because of high patient acceptance. TMP/SMX, azithromycin, clarithromycin, or erythromycin is recommended if the patient is β-lactam allergic, but these do not provide optimal coverage. Clindamycin is appropriate if S pneumoniae is identified as a pathogen. Ceftriaxone (parenteral, 50 mg/kg per day for 5 days) or combination therapy with adequate gram-positive and -negative coverage may also be considered. Examples of appropriate regimens of combination therapy include high-dose amoxicillin or clindamycin plus cefixime, or high-dose amoxicillin or clindamycin plus rifampin. The clinical effectiveness of ceftriaxone and these combinations for ABRS is unproven; the panel considers these reasonable therapeutic options based on spectrum of activity and on data extrapolated from acute otitis media studies. Rifampin should not be used as monotherapy, casually, or for longer than 10 to 14 days as resistance quickly develops to this agent. Failure to respond to antimicrobial therapy after 72 hours of therapy should prompt either a switch to alternate antimicrobial therapy or reevaluation of the patient (see Table 5). When a change in antibiotic therapy is made, the clinician should consider the limitations in coverage of the initial agent. Patients who have received effective antibiotic therapy and continue to be symptomatic may need further evaluation. A CT scan, fiberoptic endoscopy or sinus aspiration and culture may be necessary.

Drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Community-acquired Pneumonia

The emergence of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates resistant to not only penicillin, but to other antipneumococcal agents as well, has major public health implications. Drug-resistant S. pneumoniae are distributed worldwide, and resistance has become increasingly prevalent in the United States within the past decade. The relevance of resistance, particularly to the beta-lactams, to treatment outcome has been subject to debate. Pneumonia due to intermediate-level-resistant penicillin-resistant isolates of S. pneumoniae appears to be adequately treated by beta-lactam agents. Interpretation of resistance reports, which may be based on achievable cerebrospinal fluid levels of drug, may depend on the clinical setting, and efforts are underway to adjust breakpoints so that reports are more easily applicable to clinical practice. Infectious Diseases Society of America and American Thoracic Society guidelines, as well as others, for community-acquired pneumonia have addressed the impact of drug-resistant S. pneumoniae on antimicrobial selection.

The era of antimicrobial resistance-implications for the clinical laboratory

The emergence of resistance to antimicrobial drugs in a range of bacterial pathogens of the respiratory tract creates a challenge for the clinical diagnostic laboratory. Resistance to macrolides among strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae has reached high levels in many countries. There are two main types of resistance mechanisms, one (MLSB phenotype) leading to high-level resistance and the other (M phenotype) resulting in a lower level of resistance. As there are indications that high-level resistance may have clinical relevance, it is important to be able to detect such strains. This is now possible with the erythromycin/clindamycin double disc diffusion test. Although resistance to beta-lactams has also increased, there is now evidence that some beta-lactams are still effective against isolates that have low-level resistance. In response to these observations, new breakpoints have now been introduced by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) for amoxicillin, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, which increase the percentage of pneumococcal isolates that can still be treated effectively with these agents. As a consequence of the increasing use of fluoroquinolones, resistance has now emerged to this group of compounds and this has been associated with clinical failures. Although standard minimum inhibitory concentration tests can detect strains with high levels of resistance (double step mutants) they are not reliable in detecting strains with a single mutation. This is important as there is increasing evidence that strains with a single mutation in the target topoisomerase are even more likely to develop a second mutation, leading to higher levels of resistance and thus probably, therapeutic failure. Because resistance to fluoroquinolones is currently low in the US, the NCCLS does not recommend that susceptibility testing with the newer respiratory fluoroquinolones be carried out routinely. However, since the respiratory fluoroquinolones have in fact become the first line of therapy for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, it may now be time to institute routine testing of clinical isolates of pneumococci to these agents. Simple techniques for the clinical diagnostic laboratory to enable these first-step mutants to be detected are urgently required.

Maintaining fluoroquinolone class efficacy: review of influencing factors

Previous experience with antimicrobial resistance has emphasized the importance of appropriate stewardship of these pharmacotherapeutic agents. The introduction of fluoroquinolones provided potent new drugs directed primarily against gram-negative pathogens, while the newer members of this class demonstrate more activity against gram-positive species, including Streptococcus pneumoniae. Although these agents are clinically effective against a broad range of infectious agents, emergence of resistance and associated clinical failures have prompted reexamination of their use. Appropriate use revolves around two key objectives: 1) only prescribing antimicrobial therapy when it is beneficial and 2) using the agents with optimal activity against the expected pathogens. Pharmacodynamic principles and properties can be applied to achieve the latter objective when prescribing agents belonging to the fluoroquinolone class. A focused approach emphasizing "correct-spectrum" coverage may reduce development of antimicrobial resistance and maintain class efficacy.