1
|
Xue C, Lu X, Sun G, Wang N, He G, Xu W, Xi Z, Xie L. Opportunistic prediction of osteoporosis in patients with degenerative lumbar diseases: a simplified T12 vertebral bone quality approach. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19:296. [PMID: 38750513 PMCID: PMC11094894 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04782-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoporosis is one of the risk factors for screw loosening after lumbar fusion. However, the probability of preoperative osteoporosis screening in patients with lumbar degenerative disease is low. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether a simplified vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score based on T12 T1-MRI could opportunistically predict osteoporosis in patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed cases treated for lumbar degenerative diseases at a single institution between August 2021 and June 2022. The patients were divided into three groups by the lowest T-score: osteoporosis group, osteopenia group, and normal bone mineral density (BMD) group. The signal intensity based on the T12 vertebral body divided by the signal intensity of the cerebrospinal fluid was calculated to obtain the simplified VBQ score, as well as the CT-based T12HU value and the traditional L1-4VBQ score. Various statistical analyses were used to compare VBQ, HU and DEXA, and the optimal T12VBQ threshold for predicting osteoporosis was obtained by plotting the receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. RESULTS Total of 166 patients were included in this study. There was a statistically significant difference in T12VBQ scores between the three groups (p < 0.001). Pearson correlation showed that there was a moderate correlation between T12VBQ and T-score (r=-0.406, p < 0.001). The AUC value of T12VBQ, which distinguishes between normal and low BMD, was 0.756, and the optimal diagnostic threshold was 2.94. The AUC value of T12VBQ, which distinguishes osteoporosis from non-osteoporosis, was 0.634, and the optimal diagnostic threshold was 3.18. CONCLUSION T12VBQ can be used as an effective opportunistic screening method for osteoporosis in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. It can be used as a supplement to the evaluation of DEXA and preoperative evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION retrospectively registered number:1502-009-644; retrospectively registered number date:27 oct 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Congyang Xue
- Department of Orthopedic, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 100th. Shizi Street, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210028, P.R. China
- Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210023, China
| | - Xiaopei Lu
- Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210023, China
| | - Guangda Sun
- Department of Orthopedic, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 100th. Shizi Street, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210028, P.R. China
- Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210023, China
| | - Nan Wang
- Department of Orthopedic, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 100th. Shizi Street, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210028, P.R. China
- Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210023, China
| | - Ganshen He
- Department of Orthopedic, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 100th. Shizi Street, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210028, P.R. China
- Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210023, China
| | - Wenqiang Xu
- Department of Orthopedic, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 100th. Shizi Street, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210028, P.R. China
| | - Zhipeng Xi
- Department of Orthopedic, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 100th. Shizi Street, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210028, P.R. China
| | - Lin Xie
- Department of Orthopedic, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 100th. Shizi Street, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210028, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mani K, Kleinbart E, Goldman SN, Golding R, Gelfand Y, Murthy S, Eleswarapu A, Yassari R, Fourman MS, Krystal J. Projections of Single-level and Multilevel Spinal Instrumentation Procedure Volume and Associated Costs for Medicare Patients to 2050. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2024; 8:01979360-202405000-00011. [PMID: 38743853 PMCID: PMC11095963 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-24-00053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Instrumented spinal fusions can be used in the treatment of vertebral fractures, spinal instability, and scoliosis or kyphosis. Construct-level selection has notable implications on postoperative recovery, alignment, and mobility. This study sought to project future trends in the implementation rates and associated costs of single-level versus multilevel instrumentation procedures in US Medicare patients aged older than 65 years in the United States. METHODS Data were acquired from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019. Procedure costs and counts were abstracted using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify spinal level involvement. The Prophet machine learning algorithm was used, using a Bayesian Inference framework, to generate point forecasts for 2020 to 2050 and 95% forecast intervals (FIs). Sensitivity analyses were done by comparing projections from linear, log-linear, Poisson and negative-binomial, and autoregressive integrated moving average models. Costs were adjusted for inflation using the 2019 US Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index. RESULTS Between 2000 and 2019, the annual spinal instrumentation volume increased by 776% (from 7,342 to 64,350 cases) for single level, by 329% (from 20,319 to 87,253 cases) for two-four levels, by 1049% (from 1,218 to 14,000 cases) for five-seven levels, and by 739% (from 193 to 1,620 cases) for eight-twelve levels (P < 0.0001). The inflation-adjusted reimbursement for single-level instrumentation procedures decreased 45.6% from $1,148.15 to $788.62 between 2000 and 2019, which is markedly lower than for other prevalent orthopaedic procedures: total shoulder arthroplasty (-23.1%), total hip arthroplasty (-39.2%), and total knee arthroplasty (-42.4%). By 2050, the number of single-level spinal instrumentation procedures performed yearly is projected to be 124,061 (95% FI, 87,027 to 142,907), with associated costs of $93,900,672 (95% FI, $80,281,788 to $108,220,932). CONCLUSIONS The number of single-level instrumentation procedures is projected to double by 2050, while the number of two-four level procedures will double by 2040. These projections offer a measurable basis for resource allocation and procedural distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Mani
- From the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Mr. Mani, Ms. Kleinbart, Mr. Goldman, Ms. Golding); the Department of Neurological Surgery (Dr. Gelfand, Dr. Murthy, Dr. Yassari) and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Eleswarapu, Dr. Fourman, Dr. Krystal), Montefiore Einstein, Bronx, NY
| | - Emily Kleinbart
- From the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Mr. Mani, Ms. Kleinbart, Mr. Goldman, Ms. Golding); the Department of Neurological Surgery (Dr. Gelfand, Dr. Murthy, Dr. Yassari) and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Eleswarapu, Dr. Fourman, Dr. Krystal), Montefiore Einstein, Bronx, NY
| | - Samuel N. Goldman
- From the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Mr. Mani, Ms. Kleinbart, Mr. Goldman, Ms. Golding); the Department of Neurological Surgery (Dr. Gelfand, Dr. Murthy, Dr. Yassari) and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Eleswarapu, Dr. Fourman, Dr. Krystal), Montefiore Einstein, Bronx, NY
| | - Regina Golding
- From the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Mr. Mani, Ms. Kleinbart, Mr. Goldman, Ms. Golding); the Department of Neurological Surgery (Dr. Gelfand, Dr. Murthy, Dr. Yassari) and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Eleswarapu, Dr. Fourman, Dr. Krystal), Montefiore Einstein, Bronx, NY
| | - Yaroslav Gelfand
- From the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Mr. Mani, Ms. Kleinbart, Mr. Goldman, Ms. Golding); the Department of Neurological Surgery (Dr. Gelfand, Dr. Murthy, Dr. Yassari) and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Eleswarapu, Dr. Fourman, Dr. Krystal), Montefiore Einstein, Bronx, NY
| | - Saikiran Murthy
- From the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Mr. Mani, Ms. Kleinbart, Mr. Goldman, Ms. Golding); the Department of Neurological Surgery (Dr. Gelfand, Dr. Murthy, Dr. Yassari) and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Eleswarapu, Dr. Fourman, Dr. Krystal), Montefiore Einstein, Bronx, NY
| | - Ananth Eleswarapu
- From the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Mr. Mani, Ms. Kleinbart, Mr. Goldman, Ms. Golding); the Department of Neurological Surgery (Dr. Gelfand, Dr. Murthy, Dr. Yassari) and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Eleswarapu, Dr. Fourman, Dr. Krystal), Montefiore Einstein, Bronx, NY
| | - Reza Yassari
- From the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Mr. Mani, Ms. Kleinbart, Mr. Goldman, Ms. Golding); the Department of Neurological Surgery (Dr. Gelfand, Dr. Murthy, Dr. Yassari) and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Eleswarapu, Dr. Fourman, Dr. Krystal), Montefiore Einstein, Bronx, NY
| | - Mitchell S. Fourman
- From the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Mr. Mani, Ms. Kleinbart, Mr. Goldman, Ms. Golding); the Department of Neurological Surgery (Dr. Gelfand, Dr. Murthy, Dr. Yassari) and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Eleswarapu, Dr. Fourman, Dr. Krystal), Montefiore Einstein, Bronx, NY
| | - Jonathan Krystal
- From the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Mr. Mani, Ms. Kleinbart, Mr. Goldman, Ms. Golding); the Department of Neurological Surgery (Dr. Gelfand, Dr. Murthy, Dr. Yassari) and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Eleswarapu, Dr. Fourman, Dr. Krystal), Montefiore Einstein, Bronx, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jia H, Zhang Z, Qin J, Bao L, Ao J, Qian H. Management for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a network meta-analysis and systematic review basing on randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 2024; 110:3050-3059. [PMID: 38446872 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consensus on the various interventions for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and major scientific websites until 01 November 2023, to screen eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the treatment of DLS. The seven most common DLS interventions [nonsurgical (NS), decompression only (DO), decompression plus fusion without internal fixation (DF), decompression plus fusion with internal fixation (DFI), endoscopic decompression plus fusion (EDF), endoscopic decompression (ED), and circumferential fusion (360F)] were compared. The primary (pain and disability) and secondary (complications, reoperation rate, operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and satisfaction) outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Data involving 3273 patients in 16 RCTs comparing the efficacy of different interventions for DLS were reported. In terms of improving patient pain and dysfunction, there was a significant difference between surgical and NS. EDF showed the greatest improvement in short-term and long-term dysfunction (probability, 7.1 and 21.0%). Moreover, EDF had a higher complication rate (probability 70.8%), lower reoperation rate (probability, 20.2%), and caused greater blood loss (probability, 82.5%) than other surgical interventions. Endoscopic surgery had the shortest hospitalization time (EDF: probability, 42.6%; ED: probability, 3.9%). DF and DFI had the highest satisfaction scores. CONCLUSIONS Despite the high complication rate of EDF, its advantages include improvement in pain, lower reoperation rate, and shorter hospitalization duration. Therefore, EDF may be a good option for patients with DLS as a less invasive surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Jia
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lenga P, Dao Trong P, Papakonstantinou V, Unterberg AW, Ishak B. A Comprehensive Prospective Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Adverse Events in Spinal Procedures Among Octogenarians: A Detailed Analysis From a German Tertiary Center. Global Spine J 2024:21925682241250328. [PMID: 38679888 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241250328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Prospective case series. OBJECTIVES Drawing from prospective data, this study delves into the frequency and nature of adverse events (AEs) following spinal surgery specifically in octogenarians, shedding light on the challenges and implications of treating this specific cohort as well as on risk factors for their occurrence. METHODS Octogenarians who received spinal surgery and were discharged between January 2019 and December 2022 were proactively included in our study. An AE was characterized as any incident transpiring within the initial 30 days after surgery that led to an unfavorable outcome. RESULTS From January 2020 to December 2022, 184 octogenarian patients (average age: 83.1 ± 2.8 years) underwent spinal surgeries. Of these, 81.5% were elective and 18.5% were emergencies, with 69.0% addressing degenerative pathologies. Using the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the mean score was 8.1 ± 2.2, highlighting cardiac diseases as predominant. Surgical details show 71.2% had decompression, with 28.8% receiving instrumentation. AEs included wound infections 3.1% for degenerative, 13.3% for tumor and dural leaks. The overall incidence of dural leaks was found to be 2.7% (5/184 cases), and each case underwent surgical revision. Pulmonary embolism resulted in two fatalities post-trauma. Wound infections (26.7%) were prevalent in infected spine cases. Significant AE risk factors were comorbidities, extended surgery durations, and instrumentation procedures. CONCLUSIONS In octogenarian spinal surgeries, AEs occurred in 15.8% of cases, influenced by comorbidities and surgical complexities. The 2.2% mortality rate wasn't linked to surgeries. Accurate documentation remains crucial for assessing outcomes in this age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavlina Lenga
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philip Dao Trong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Andreas W Unterberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Basem Ishak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu R, He T, Wu X, Tan W, Yan Z, Deng Y. Biomechanical response of decompression alone in lower grade lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis--A finite element analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19:209. [PMID: 38561837 PMCID: PMC10983632 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04681-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of decompression alone in lower-grade spondylolisthesis. A higher rate of surgical revision and a lower rate of back pain relief was also observed. However, there is a lack of relevant biomechanical evidence after decompression alone for lower-grade spondylolisthesis. PURPOSE Evaluating the biomechanical characteristics of total laminectomy, hemilaminectomy, and facetectomy for lower-grade spondylolisthesis by analyzing the range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), annulus fibrosus stress (AFS), facet joints contact force (FJCF), and isthmus stress (IS). METHODS Firstly, we utilized finite element tools to develop a normal lumbar model and subsequently constructed a spondylolisthesis model based on the normal model. We then performed total laminectomy, hemilaminectomy, and one-third facetectomy in the normal model and spondylolisthesis model, respectively. Finally, we analyzed parameters, such as ROM, IDP, AFS, FJCF, and IS, for all the models under the same concentrate force and moment. RESULTS The intact spondylolisthesis model showed a significant increase in the relative parameters, including ROM, AFS, FJCF, and IS, compared to the intact normal lumbar model. Hemilaminectomy and one-third facetectomy in both spondylolisthesis and normal lumbar models did not result in an obvious change in ROM, IDP, AFS, FJCF, and IS compared to the pre-operative state. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the degree of parameter changes between the spondylolisthesis and normal lumbar models after undergoing the same surgical procedures. However, total laminectomy significantly increased ROM, AFS, and IS and decreased the FJCF in both normal lumbar models and spondylolisthesis models. CONCLUSION Hemilaminectomy and one-third facetectomy did not have a significant impact on the segment stability of lower-grade spondylolisthesis; however, patients with LDS undergoing hemilaminectomy and one-third facetectomy may experience higher isthmus stress on the surgical side during rotation. In addition, total laminectomy changes the biomechanics in both normal lumbar models and spondylolisthesis models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renfeng Liu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Central South University Third Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Tao He
- Department of Spine Surgery, Central South University Third Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Xin Wu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Central South University Third Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Wei Tan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Central South University Third Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Zuyun Yan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Central South University Third Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Youwen Deng
- Department of Spine Surgery, Central South University Third Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Banitalebi H, Hermansen E, Hellum C, Espeland A, Storheim K, Myklebust TÅ, Indrekvam K, Brisby H, Weber C, Anvar M, Aaen J, Negård A. Preoperative fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscles assessed by MRI is associated with less improvement of leg pain 2 years after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2024:10.1007/s00586-024-08210-z. [PMID: 38528161 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08210-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fatty infiltration (FI) of the paraspinal muscles may associate with pain and surgical complications in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). We evaluated the prognostic influence of MRI-assessed paraspinal muscles' FI on pain or disability 2 years after surgery for LSS. METHODS A muscle fat index (MFI) was calculated (by dividing signal intensity of psoas to multifidus and erector spinae) on preoperative axial T2-weighted MRI of patients with LSS. Pain and disability 2 years after surgery were assessed using the Oswestry disability index, the Zurich claudication questionnaire and numeric rating scales for leg and back pain. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses (adjusted for preoperative outcome scores, age, body mass index, sex, smoking status, grade of spinal stenosis, disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis) were used to assess the associations between MFI and patient-reported clinical outcomes. In the logistic regression models, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for associations between the MFI and ≥ 30% improvement of the outcomes (dichotomised into yes/no). RESULTS A total of 243 patients were evaluated (mean age 66.6 ± 8.5 years), 49% females (119). Preoperative MFI and postoperative leg pain were significantly associated, both with leg pain as continuous (coefficient - 3.20, 95% CI - 5.61, - 0.80) and dichotomised (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.17, 1.95) scores. Associations between the MFI and the other outcome measures were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Preoperative FI of the paraspinal muscles on MRI showed statistically significant association with postoperative NRS leg pain but not with ODI or ZCQ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan Banitalebi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Erland Hermansen
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik. Orthopaedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Hellum
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Ulleval, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ansgar Espeland
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kjersti Storheim
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tor Åge Myklebust
- Department of Research and Innovation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
- Department of Registration, Cancer Registry Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kari Indrekvam
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik. Orthopaedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Helena Brisby
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Clemens Weber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Quality and Health Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | | | - Jørn Aaen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anne Negård
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Akosman I, Shafi K, Subramanian T, Kazarian GS, Kaidi AC, Cunningham M, Kim HJ, Lovecchio F. Left-digit bias in surgical decision-making for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 2024:S1529-9430(24)00116-5. [PMID: 38499062 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Left-digit bias is a behavioral heuristic or cognitive "shortcut" in which the leftmost digit of a number, such as patient age, disproportionately influences surgical decisions. PURPOSE To determine if left-digit bias in patient age influences the decision to perform arthrodesis with instrumentation vs decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). DESIGN Retrospective cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of lumbar stenosis or spondylolisthesis identified in the 2017-2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the percent of patients who underwent arthrodesis with instrumentation (AwI). Matched age group comparisons without left-digit differences (ie, 76/77 vs 78/79, 80/81 vs 82/83, etc.) were performed to isolate the effect of the heuristic. Secondary outcomes including peri-operative events and complications were also compared within AwI and decompression cohorts. METHODS Using CPT codes, procedures were classified as either AwI or decompression. Patients were grouped into 6 cohorts based on 2-year age windows (74/75, 76/77, 78/79, 80/81, 82/83, 84/85). The cohorts were propensity matched with neighboring age groups based on the presence of spondylolisthesis, demographics, and comorbidities. The primary comparison was between those aged 78/79 vs 80/81. RESULTS After matching, the primary cohort consisted of two groups of 1,550 patients (aged 78/79 and 80/81). Patients aged 80/81 were less likely to undergo AwI than patients aged 78/79 (23.5% vs 27.2%, p=.021). AwI procedures occurred at similar rates between age groups with the same left digit. Within the decompression and AwI cohorts, there were no differences in secondary outcomes between patients aged 78/79 and 80/81. CONCLUSIONS LSS patients aged 80/81 are less likely to undergo AwI than patients aged 78/79, regardless of comorbidities. This was not seen when comparing patients with similar left digits in age. Until objective measures of physiologic capacity are established, left-digit bias may influence clinical decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izzet Akosman
- Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA; Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Karim Shafi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA; Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Gregory S Kazarian
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Austin C Kaidi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Matthew Cunningham
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Francis Lovecchio
- Weill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA; Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lenga P, Gülec G, Bajwa AA, Issa M, Oskouian RJ, Chapman JR, Kiening K, Unterberg AW, Ishak B. Lumbar Decompression versus Decompression and Fusion in Octogenarians: Complications and Clinical Course With 3-Year Follow-Up. Global Spine J 2024; 14:687-696. [PMID: 36148681 PMCID: PMC10802554 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221121099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess and compare the clinical course and complications between surgical decompression and decompression with fusion in lumbar spine patients aged ≥80 years. METHODS A retrospective review of electronic medical records at a single institution was conducted between September 2005 and December 2021. Logistic regression was used to identify potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications. RESULTS Over a 16-year period, 327 patients were allocated to the decompression only group and 89 patients were allocated to the decompression and instrumented fusion group. The study had a mean follow-up duration of 36.7 ± 12.4 months. When assessing the CCI, patients of the instrumentation group had fewer comorbidities (8.9 ± .5 points vs 6.2 ± 1.5 points; P < .001), significantly longer surgical duration (290 ± 106 minutes vs 145 ±50.2 minutes; P < .001), significantly higher volume of intraoperative blood loss (791 ± 319.3 ml vs 336.1 ± 150.8 ml; P < .001), more frequent intraoperative blood transfusion (7 ± 2.1% vs 16± 18.0%; P < .001), and extended stays in the intensive care unit and hospitalization rates. Logistic regression analysis revealed that surgical duration and extent of surgery were unique risk factors for the occurrence of complications. CONCLUSIONS Lumbar decompression and additional fusion in octogenarians are considerable treatment techniques; albeit associated with increased complication risks. Prolonged operative time and extent of surgery are critical confounding factors associated with higher rates of postoperative complications. Surgery should only be performed after careful outweighing of potential benefits and risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavlina Lenga
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gelo Gülec
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Awais A. Bajwa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammed Issa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Karl Kiening
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Basem Ishak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mannion AF, Mariaux F, Werth PM, Pearson AM, Lurie JD, Fekete TF, Kohler M, Haschtmann D, Kleinstueck FS, Jeszenszky D, Loibl M, Otten P, Norberg M, Porchet F. Evaluation of "appropriate use criteria" for surgical decision-making in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. A controlled, multicentre, prospective observational study. Eur Spine J 2024:10.1007/s00586-024-08157-1. [PMID: 38416192 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08157-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Selecting patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) for surgery is difficult. Appropriate use criteria (AUC) have been developed to clarify the indications for LDS surgery but have not been evaluated in controlled studies. METHODS This prospective, controlled, multicentre study involved 908 patients (561 surgical and 347 non-surgical controls; 69.5 ± 9.7y; 69% female), treated as per normal clinical practice. Their appropriateness for surgery was afterwards determined using the AUC. They completed the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) at baseline and 12 months' follow-up. Multiple regression adjusting for confounders evaluated the influence of appropriateness designation and treatment received on the 12-month COMI and achievement of MCIC (≥ 2.2-point-reduction). RESULTS As per convention, appropriate (A) and uncertain (U) groups were combined for comparison with the inappropriate (I) group. For the adjusted 12-month COMI, the benefit of surgery relative to non-surgical care was not significantly greater for the A/U than the I group (p = 0.189). There was, however, a greater treatment effect of surgery for those with higher baseline COMI (p = 0.035). The groups' adjusted probabilities of achieving MCIC were: 83% (A/U, receiving surgery), 71% (I, receiving surgery), 50% (A/U, receiving non-surgical care), and 32% (I, receiving non-surgical care). CONCLUSIONS A/U patients receiving surgery had the highest chances of achieving MCIC, but the AUC were not able to identify which patients had a greater treatment effect of surgery relative to non-surgical care. The identification of other characteristics that predict a greater treatment effect of surgery, in addition to baseline COMI, is required to improve decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne F Mannion
- Spine Centre Division, Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Francine Mariaux
- Spine Centre Division, Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Paul M Werth
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | - Jon D Lurie
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Markus Loibl
- Spine Centre, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Michael Norberg
- Centre Médical de Lavey-les-Bains, Lavey-les-Bains, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ikeda N, Yokoyama K, Ito Y, Tanaka H, Yamada M, Sugie A, Takami T, Wanibuchi M, Kawanishi M. Factors influencing slippage after microsurgical single level lumbar spinal decompression surgery - Are the psoas and multifidus muscles involved? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2024; 166:26. [PMID: 38252278 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-05924-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) require microsurgical decompression (MSD) surgery; however, MSD is often associated with postoperative instability at the operated level. Paraspinal muscles support the spinal column; lately, paraspinal volume has been used as a good indicator of sarcopenia. This study aimed to determine preoperative radiological factors, including paraspinal muscle volume, associated with postoperative slippage progression after MSD in LSS patients. METHODS Patients undergoing single-level (L3/4 or L4/5) MSD for symptomatic LSS and followed-up for ≥ 5 years in our institute were reviewed retrospectively to measure preoperative imaging parameters focused on the operated level. Paraspinal muscle volumes (psoas muscle index [PMI] and multifidus muscle index [MFMI]) defined using the total cross-sectional area of each muscle/L3 vertebral body area in the preoperative lumbar axial CT) were calculated. Postoperative slippage in the form of static translation (ST) ≥ 2 mm was assessed on the last follow-up X-ray. RESULTS We included 95 patients with average age and follow-up periods of 69 ± 8.2 years and 7.51 ± 2.58 years, respectively. PMI and MFMI were significantly correlated with age and significantly larger in male patients. Female sex, preoperative ST, dynamic translation, sagittal rotation angle, facet angle, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and PMI were correlated with long-term postoperative worsening of ST. However, as per multivariate analysis, no independent factor was associated with postoperative slippage progression. CONCLUSION Lower preoperative psoas muscle volume in LSS patients is an important predictive factor of postoperative slippage progression at the operated level after MSD. The predictors for postoperative slippage progression are multifactorial; however, a well-structured postoperative exercise regimen involving psoas muscle strengthening may be beneficial in LSS patients after MSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naokado Ikeda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroendoscope Center, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Ishidamoriminamichou, Fushimi, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan.
| | - Kunio Yokoyama
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroendoscope Center, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Ishidamoriminamichou, Fushimi, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ito
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroendoscope Center, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Ishidamoriminamichou, Fushimi, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Tanaka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroendoscope Center, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Ishidamoriminamichou, Fushimi, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan
| | - Makoto Yamada
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroendoscope Center, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Ishidamoriminamichou, Fushimi, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan
| | - Akira Sugie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroendoscope Center, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Ishidamoriminamichou, Fushimi, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Takami
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuroendovascular Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Masahiko Wanibuchi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuroendovascular Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kawanishi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroendoscope Center, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, 28-1 Ishidamoriminamichou, Fushimi, Kyoto, 601-1495, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eneqvist T, Persson L, Kojer E, Gunnarsson L, Gerdhem P. Spinal surgery and the risk of reoperation after total hip arthroplasty: a cohort study based on Swedish spine and hip arthroplasty registers. Acta Orthop 2024; 95:25-31. [PMID: 38240741 PMCID: PMC10798353 DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.35228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Studies suggest increased revision risk of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in individuals with lumbar spinal fusion, but studies including non-fused individuals are lacking. We aimed to investigate whether individuals undergoing lumbar spinal stenosis surgery with or without fusion are at an increased risk of reoperation before or after THA. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Swedish Spine Register and the Swedish arthroplasty register were searched from 2000 through 2021. Chi-square, Kaplan-Meier and binary multivariate logistic regression were used to compare reoperation rates up to 10 years after THA surgery. RESULTS 7,908 individuals had undergone lumbar spinal stenosis surgery (LSSS) (fusion n = 1,281) and THA. LSSS before THA compared with THA-only controls was associated with a higher risk of THA reoperations: 87 (2%) out of 3,892 vs. 123 (1%) out of 11,662 (P < 0.001). LSSS after THA compared with THA-only controls was not associated with a higher risk of reoperation, confirmed by Kaplan- Meier analyses and binary multivariate logistic regression. Mortality was lower in individuals undergoing both LSSS and THA, regardless of procedure order. There was no difference in THA reoperations in individuals who had undergone LSSS before THA without fusion or with fusion. The individuals who had undergone LSSS after THA with fusion had an increased risk of THA reoperation compared with those without fusion. CONCLUSION LSSS with or without fusion before THA is associated with an increased risk of THA reoperation. Spinal fusion increased the risk of reoperation of THA when performed after THA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ted Eneqvist
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Department of Orthopaedics, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm
| | - Louise Persson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Department of Orthopaedics, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm
| | - Emma Kojer
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | - Linus Gunnarsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | - Paul Gerdhem
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Department of Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Försth P. Letter to the Editor Regarding the Paper of Shukla and Colleagues on Laminectomy With Fusion is Associated With Greater Functional Improvement Compared With Laminectomy Alone for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:E17. [PMID: 37589286 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ivar Magne Austevoll
- Orthopedic Department, Haukeland University Hospital, Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Hellum
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter Försth
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kosterhon M, Müller A, Rockenfeller R, Aiyangar AK, Gruber K, Ringel F, Kantelhardt SR. Invasiveness of decompression surgery affects modeled lumbar spine kinetics in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2024; 11:1281119. [PMID: 38260753 PMCID: PMC10801739 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1281119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with accompanying spinal stenosis focuses mainly on decompression of the spinal canal with or without additional fusion by means of a dorsal spondylodesis. Currently, one main decision criterion for additional fusion is the presence of instability in flexion and extension X-rays. In cases of mild and stable spondylolisthesis, the optimal treatment remains a subject of ongoing debate. There exist different opinions on whether performing a fusion directly together with decompression has a potential benefit for patients or constitutes overtreatment. As X-ray images do not provide any information about internal biomechanical forces, computer simulation of individual patients might be a tool to gain a set of new decision criteria for those cases. Methods: To evaluate the biomechanical effects resulting from different decompression techniques, we developed a lumbar spine model using forward dynamic-based multibody simulation (FD_MBS). Preoperative CT data of 15 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis at the level L4/L5 who underwent spinal decompression were identified retrospectively. Based on the segmented vertebrae, 15 individualized models were built. To establish a reference for comparison, we simulated a standardized flexion movement (intact) for each model. Subsequently, we performed virtual unilateral and bilateral interlaminar fenestration (uILF, bILF) and laminectomy (LAM) by removing the respective ligaments in each model. Afterward, the standardized flexion movement was simulated again for each case and decompression method, allowing us to compare the outcomes with the reference. This comprehensive approach enables us to assess the biomechanical implications of different surgical approaches and gain valuable insights into their effects on lumbar spine functionality. Results: Our findings reveal significant changes in the biomechanics of vertebrae and intervertebral discs (IVDs) as a result of different decompression techniques. As the invasiveness of decompression increases, the moment transmitted on the vertebrae significantly rises, following the sequence intact ➝ uILF ➝ bILF ➝ LAM. Conversely, we observed a reduction in anterior-posterior shear forces within the IVDs at the levels L3/L4 and L4/L5 following LAM. Conclusion: Our findings showed that it was feasible to forecast lumbar spine kinematics after three distinct decompression methods, which might be helpful in future clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Kosterhon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg–University, Mainz, Germany
| | - A. Müller
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Information Processing (MTI Mittelrhein), University Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
- Mechanical Systems Engineering, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (EMPA), Dübendorf, Switzerland
- Department of Mathematics and Natural Science, Institute of Sports Science, University Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - R. Rockenfeller
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Information Processing (MTI Mittelrhein), University Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
- Department of Mathematics and Natural Science, Mathematical Institute, University Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - A. K. Aiyangar
- Mechanical Systems Engineering, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (EMPA), Dübendorf, Switzerland
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- Faculty of Engineering and Sciences, University of Adolfo Ibanez, Vina del Mar, Chile
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - K. Gruber
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Information Processing (MTI Mittelrhein), University Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - F. Ringel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg–University, Mainz, Germany
| | - S. R. Kantelhardt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg–University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Şimşek AT, Baysal B, Adam BE, Çalış F, Topçam A, Demirkol M, Doğan MB, Binguler AHE, Karaarslan N, Balak N. Morphological changes after open lumbar microdiscectomy at 2-year follow-up. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2024; 37:75-87. [PMID: 37599519 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-220371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is known that a possible decrease in disc height (DH) and foraminal size after open lumbar microdiscectomy (OLM) may cause pain in the long term. However, there is still insufficient information about the short- or long-term pathoanatomical and morphological effects of microdiscectomy. For example, the exact temporal course of the change in DH is not well known. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine morphological changes in DH and foramen dimensions after OLM. METHODS In patients who underwent OLM for single-level lumbar disc herniation, MRI scans were obtained before surgery, and at an average of two years after surgery. In addition to DH measurements, foraminal area (FA), foraminal height (FH), superior foraminal width (SFW), and inferior foraminal width (IFW), were measured bilaterally. RESULTS A postoperative increase in DH was observed at all vertebral levels, with an average of 5.5%. The mean right FHs were 15.3 mm and 15.7 mm before and after surgery, respectively (p= 0.062), while the left FHs were 14.8 mm and 15.8 mm before and after surgery (p= 0.271). The mean right SFW was 5.4 mm before surgery and 5.7 mm after surgery, while the mean right IFW ranged from 3.6 mm to 3.9 mm. The mean left SFW was 4.8 mm before surgery and 5.2 mm after surgery, while the mean left IFW ranged from 3.5 mm to 3.9 mm. Before surgery, the FAs were, on average, 77.1 mm2 and 75.6 mm2 on the right and left sides, respectively. At the 2-year follow-up, the mean FAs were 84.0 mm2 and 80.2 mm2 on the right and left sides, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Contrary to prevalent belief, in patients who underwent single-level unilateral OLM, we observed that there may be an increase rather than a decrease in DH or foramen size at the 2-year follow-up. Our findings need to be confirmed by studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Talha Şimşek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Begümhan Baysal
- Department of Radiology, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Baha Eldin Adam
- Department of Neurosurgery, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fatih Çalış
- Department of Neurosurgery, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Arda Topçam
- Department of Neurosurgery, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Demirkol
- Department of Neurosurgery, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Bilal Doğan
- Department of Radiology, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ayse Hande Erol Binguler
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Numan Karaarslan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul Haliç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Naci Balak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hermansen E, Indrekvam K, Weber C, Brisby H. Postoperative Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area as an Association for Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Radiologic Results From the NORDSTEN-Spinal Stenosis Trial (Spine, May 15, 2023). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:E10. [PMID: 37823287 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Erland Hermansen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Norway
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kari Indrekvam
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Clemens Weber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Norway
- Department of Quality and Health Technology, University of Stavanger, Norway
| | - Helena Brisby
- Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang D, Wang W, Han D, Muthu S, Cabrera JP, Hamouda W, Ambrosio L, Cheung JPY, Le HV, Vadalà G, Buser Z, Wang JC, Cho S, Yoon ST, Lu S, Chen X, Diwan AD. Clinical effectiveness of reduction and fusion versus in situ fusion in the management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2023:10.1007/s00586-023-08041-4. [PMID: 38043128 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08041-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the clinical effectiveness of reduction and fusion with in situ fusion in the management of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). METHODS The systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were identified from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria were: (1) comparative studies of reduction and fusion versus in situ fusion for DLS patients, (2) outcomes reported as VAS/NRS, ODI, JOA score, operating time, blood loss, complication rate, fusion rate, or reoperation rate, (3) randomized controlled trials and observational studies published in English from the inception of the databases to January 2023. The exclusion criteria included: (1) reviews, case series, case reports, letters, and conference reports, (2) in vitro biomechanical studies and computational modeling studies, (3) no report on study outcomes. The risk of bias 2 (RoB2) tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was conducted to assess the risk of bias of RCTs and observational studies, respectively. RESULTS Five studies with a total of 704 patients were included (375 reduction and fusion, 329 in situ fusion). Operating time was significantly longer in the reduction and fusion group compared to in situ fusion group (weighted mean difference 7.20; 95% confidence interval 0.19, 14.21; P = 0.04). No additional significant intergroup differences were noted in terms of other outcomes analyzed. CONCLUSION While the reduction and fusion group demonstrated a statistically longer operating time compared to the in situ fusion group, the clinical significance of this difference was minimal. The findings suggest no substantial superiority of lumbar fusion with reduction over without reduction for the management of DLS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongfan Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
- National Center for Clinical Research on Geriatric Diseases, No.45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
- National Center for Clinical Research on Geriatric Diseases, No.45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Di Han
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
- National Center for Clinical Research on Geriatric Diseases, No.45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Sathish Muthu
- Orthopaedic Research Group, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
- Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Karur, Tamil Nadu, India
- Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Engineering, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Juan P Cabrera
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Clínico Regional de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile
| | - Waeel Hamouda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Research and Teaching Hospitals, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Neurological & Spinal Surgery Service, Security Forces Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Luca Ambrosio
- Operative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Jason P Y Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Hai V Le
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Gianluca Vadalà
- Operative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Zorica Buser
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey C Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Samuel Cho
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - S Tim Yoon
- Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shibao Lu
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
- National Center for Clinical Research on Geriatric Diseases, No.45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
- Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, No.45 Changchun Street, Beijing, 100053, China.
| | - Xiaolong Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
- National Center for Clinical Research on Geriatric Diseases, No.45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
- Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, No.45 Changchun Street, Beijing, 100053, China.
| | - Ashish D Diwan
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. George Hospital Campus, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- St. George & Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Level 3, WR Pitney Building, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, 2217, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kim DC, Laskay N, Alcala C, Schwender J. Minimally Invasive Decompression With Noninstrumented Facet Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Stenosis Associated With Grade 1 Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:E416-E422. [PMID: 37348064 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective matched cohort study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA With a growing interest in minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS), the question of which technique is the most advantageous for patients with low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) still remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To compare patient-reported outcomes, perioperative morbidity, and rates of reoperation between MIS decompression with either unilateral noninstrumented facet fusion (MIS-F) or with transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-T) for grade 1 DLS. METHODS Twenty patients who underwent MIS-T and 20 patients with MIS-F were matched based on age, sex, and preoperative ODI, VAS back, and VAS leg. All patients had DLS with at least 4 millimeters of translation on standing radiographs. Exclusion criteria included prior level surgery, multilevel instability, disk impinging on the exiting nerve root, spondylolisthesis from significant facet arthropathy, or foraminal compromise from disk collapse. ODI, VAS back, VAS leg, and patient satisfaction measured by the North American Spine Society questionnaire were tracked at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Minimum clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits were calculated. RESULTS MIS-F and MIS-T resulted in decreased ODI at 3, 6, and 12 months following the index procedure. Sixty percent of MIS-F and 83% of MIS-T patients reached minimum clinically important difference at 1 year postoperatively; however, using the threshold of 30% ODI reduction from baseline, 67% of MIS-F and 83% MIS-T ( P = 0.25) achieved this goal. Forty-three percent of MIS-F and 59% of MIS-T patients met substantial clinical benefits. Satisfaction at 1 year, measured by a score of 1 or 2 on the North American Spine Society questionnaire, was 64% for MIS-F and 83% for MIS-T. CONCLUSIONS MIS-F and MIS-T are effective treatment options for spinal stenosis associated with low-grade DLS. Both techniques result in comparable patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction up to 2 years and have similar long-term reoperation rates. More evidence is required to delineate optimal selection characteristics for MIS-F versus MIS-T.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicholas Laskay
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kanchiku T, Taguchi T, Sekiguchi M, Toda N, Hosono N, Matsumoto M, Tanaka N, Akeda K, Hashizume H, Kanayama M, Orita S, Takeuchi D, Kawakami M, Fukui M, Kanamori M, Wada E, Kato S, Hongo M, Ando K, Iizuka Y, Ikegami S, Kawamura N, Takami M, Yamato Y, Takahashi S, Watanabe K, Takahashi J, Konno S, Chikuda H. Preoperative factors affecting the two-year postoperative patient-reported outcome in single-level lumbar grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Am Spine Soc J 2023; 16:100269. [PMID: 37731461 PMCID: PMC10507637 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Background The choice of operative method for lumbar spinal stenosis with Meyerding grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify the preoperative factors affecting the 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcome in Meyerding grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods Seventy-two consecutive patients who had minimally invasive decompression alone (D group; 28) or with fusion (DF group; 44) were enrolled. The parameters investigated were the Japanese Orthopaedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire as patient-reported assessment, and L4 slippage (L4S), lumbar lordosis (LL), and lumbar axis sacral distance (LASD) as an index of sagittal alignment for radiological evaluation. Data collected prospectively at 2 years postoperatively were examined by statistical analysis. Results Sixty-two cases (D group; 25, DF group; 37) were finally evaluated. In multiple logistic regression analysis, preoperative L4S and LASD were extracted as significant preoperative factors affecting the 2-year postoperative outcome. Patients with preoperative L4S of 6 mm or more have a lower rate of improvement in lumbar spine dysfunction due to low back pain (risk ratio=0.188, p=.043). Patients with a preoperative LASD of 30 mm or more have a higher rate of improvement in lumbar dysfunction due to low back pain (risk ratio=11.48, p=.021). The results of multiple logistic analysis by operative method showed that there was a higher rate of improvement in lumbar spine dysfunction due to low back pain in patients with preoperative LASD of 30 mm or more in DF group (risk ratio=172.028, p=.01). Conclusions Preoperative L4S and LASD were extracted as significant preoperative factors affecting patient-reported outcomes at 2 years postoperatively. Multiple logistic analyses by the operative method suggested that DF may be advantageous in improving lumbar dysfunction due to low back pain in patients with preoperative LASD of 30 mm or more.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsukasa Kanchiku
- Department of Spine and Spinal Cord Surgery, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, 1315-4 Onoda, Sanyo-Onoda City, Yamaguchi Prefecture 756-0095, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube City, Yamaguchi Prefecture 755-8505, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Taguchi
- Department of Spine and Spinal Cord Surgery, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, 1315-4 Onoda, Sanyo-Onoda City, Yamaguchi Prefecture 756-0095, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube City, Yamaguchi Prefecture 755-8505, Japan
| | - Miho Sekiguchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikariga-oka, Fukushima City, Fukushima Prefecture 960-1295, Japan
| | - Naofumi Toda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma Spine Center (Harunaso Hospital), 828-1 Kamitoyooka-cho, Takasaki City, Gunma Prefecture 370-0871, Japan
| | - Noboru Hosono
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization Osaka Hospital, 4-2-78 Fukusima, Fukushima-ku, Osaka City, Osaka Prefecture 553-0003, Japan
| | - Morio Matsumoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo Prefecture 160-8582, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Tanaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, JR Hiroshima Hospital, 1-36 Niyonosato, Hiroshimahigasi-ku, Hiroshima Prefecture 732-0057, Japan
| | - Koji Akeda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie Prefecture 514-8507, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Hashizume
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama City, Wakayama Prefecture 641-8509, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kanayama
- The Spine Center, Hakodate Central General Hospital, 33-2 Motomachi, Hakodate City, Hokkaido Prefecture 040-8585, Japan
| | - Sumihisa Orita
- Chiba University Center for Frontier Medical Engineering, Chiba, Japan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohara, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba Prefecture 260-8677, Japan
| | - Daisaku Takeuchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nasu Red-Cross Hospital, 1081-4 Nakatahara, Otahara City, Tochigi Prefecture 324-0062, Japan
| | - Mamoru Kawakami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saiseikai Wakayama Hospital, 45 Junibancho, Wakayama City, Wakayama Prefecture 640-8158, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Fukui
- Laboratory of Statistics, Osaka Metropolitan University Faculty of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abeno-ku, Osaka City, Osaka Prefecture 545-8585, Japan
| | - Masahiko Kanamori
- Department of Human Science 1, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama City, Toyama Prefecture 930-0194, Japan
| | - Eiji Wada
- Spine and Spinal Cord Center, Osaka Police Hospital, 10-31 Kitayamacho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka City, Osaka Prefecture 543-0035, Japan
| | - So Kato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo Prefecture 113-8655, Japan
| | - Michio Hongo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 44-2 Hasunuma Hiroomote, Akita City, Akita Prefecture 010-8543, Japan
| | - Kei Ando
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, 2-9 Myokencho, Syowa-ku, Nagoya City, Aichi Prefecture 466-8650, Japan
| | - Yoichi Iizuka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-15 Showacho, Maebashi City, Gunma Prefecture, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Shota Ikegami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto City, Nagano Prefecture 390-8621, Japan
| | - Naohiro Kawamura
- Department of Spine and Orthopedic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, 4-1-22 Hiroo, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo Prefecture 150-8935, Japan
| | - Masanari Takami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama City, Wakayama Prefecture 641-8509, Japan
| | - Yu Yamato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka Prefecture 431-3192, Japan
| | - Shinji Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abeno-ku, Osaka City, Osaka Prefecture 545-8585, Japan
| | - Kei Watanabe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Niigata University Medical and Dental General Hospital, 754 Asahimachidoriichibancho, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata Prefecture 951-5820, Japan
| | - Jun Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto City, Nagano Prefecture 390-8621, Japan
| | - Shinichi Konno
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikariga-oka, Fukushima City, Fukushima Prefecture 960-1295, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Chikuda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-15 Showacho, Maebashi City, Gunma Prefecture, 371-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Indrekvam K, Bånerud IF, Hermansen E, Austevoll IM, Rekeland F, Guddal MH, Solberg TK, Brox JI, Hellum C, Storheim K. The Norwegian degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis (NORDSTEN) study: study overview, organization structure and study population. Eur Spine J 2023; 32:4162-4173. [PMID: 37395780 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07827-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide an overview of the The Norwegian Degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis (NORDSTEN)-study and the organizational structure, and to evaluate the study population. METHODS The NORDSTEN is a multicentre study with 10 year follow-up, conducted at 18 public hospitals. NORDSTEN includes three studies: (1) The randomized spinal stenosis trial comparing the impact of three different decompression techniques; (2) the randomized degenerative spondylolisthesis trial investigating whether decompression surgery alone is as good as decompression with instrumented fusion; (3) the observational cohort tracking the natural course of LSS in patients without planned surgical treatment. A range of clinical and radiological data are collected at defined time points. To administer, guide, monitor and assist the surgical units and the researchers involved, the NORDSTEN national project organization was established. Corresponding clinical data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine) were used to assess if the randomized NORDSTEN-population at baseline was representative for LSS patients treated in routine surgical practice. RESULTS A total of 988 LSS patients with or without spondylolistheses were included from 2014 to 2018. The clinical trials did not find any difference in the efficacy of the surgical methods evaluated. The NORDSTEN patients were similar to those being consecutively operated at the same hospitals and reported to the NORspine during the same time period. CONCLUSION The NORDSTEN study provides opportunity to investigate clinical course of LSS with or without surgical interventions. The NORDSTEN-study population were similar to LSS patients treated in routine surgical practice, supporting the external validity of previously published results. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02007083 10/12/2013, NCT02051374 31/01/2014 and NCT03562936 20/06/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari Indrekvam
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Ingrid Fjeldheim Bånerud
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Erland Hermansen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Ivar Magne Austevoll
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Frode Rekeland
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Maren Hjelle Guddal
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tore K Solberg
- Department of Neurosurgery and the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine), University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway (UiT), Tromsø, Norway
| | - Jens Ivar Brox
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christian Hellum
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjersti Storheim
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hellum C, Rekeland F, Småstuen MC, Solberg T, Hermansen E, Storheim K, Brox JI, Furunes H, Franssen E, Weber C, Brisby H, Grundnes O, Algaard KRH, Böker T, Banitalebi H, Indrekvam K, Austevoll IM. Surgery in degenerative spondylolisthesis: does fusion improve outcome in subgroups? A secondary analysis from a randomized trial (NORDSTEN trial). Spine J 2023; 23:1613-1622. [PMID: 37355044 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis are treated surgically with decompression alone or decompression with fusion. However, there is debate regarding which subgroups of patients may benefit from additional fusion. PURPOSE To investigate possible treatment effect modifiers and prognostic variables among patients operated for spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. DESIGN A secondary exploratory study using data from the Norwegian Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis (NORDSTEN-DS) trial. Patients were randomized to decompression alone or decompression with instrumented fusion. PATIENT SAMPLE The sample in this study consists of 267 patients from a randomized multicenter trial involving 16 hospitals in Norway. Patients were enrolled from February 12, 2014, to December 18, 2017. The study did not include patients with degenerative scoliosis, severe foraminal stenosis, multilevel spondylolisthesis, or previous surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was an improvement of ≥ 30% on the Oswestry Disability Index score (ODI) from baseline to 2-year follow-up. METHODS When investigating possible variables that could modify the treatment effect, we analyzed the treatment arms separately. When testing for prognostic factors we analyzed the whole cohort (both treatment groups). We used univariate and multiple regression analyses. The selection of variables was done a priori, according to the published trial protocol. RESULTS Of the 267 patients included in the trial (183 female [67%]; mean [SD] age, 66 [7.6] years), complete baseline data for the variables required for the present analysis were available for 205 of the 267 individuals. We did not find any clinical or radiological variables at baseline that modified the treatment effect. Thus, none of the commonly used criteria for selecting patients for fusion surgery influenced the chosen primary outcome in the two treatment arms. For the whole cohort, less comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification [ASA], OR = 4.35; 95% confidence interval (CI [1.16-16.67]) and more preoperative leg pain (OR = 1.23; CI [1.02-1.50]) were significantly associated with an improved primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS In this study on patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis, neither previously defined instability criteria nor other pre-specified baseline variables were associated with better clinical outcome if fusion surgery was performed. None of the analyzed variables can be applied to guide the decision for fusion surgery in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. For both treatment groups, less comorbidity and more leg pain were associated with improved outcome 2 years after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NORDSTEN-DS ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02051374.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Hellum
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Fallanveien 6c, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Frode Rekeland
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Department, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Milada Cvancarova Småstuen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tore Solberg
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway (UiT), Tromsø, Norway; The Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine), University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Erland Hermansen
- Orthopedic Department, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund Hospital, Norway
| | - Kjersti Storheim
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jens Ivar Brox
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Håvard Furunes
- Gjøvik Hospital, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway; Institute of Health and Society Studies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eric Franssen
- Department of Orthopedic, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Clemens Weber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Helena Brisby
- Spine Surgery Team, Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Oliver Grundnes
- Department of Orthopedic, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Tordis Böker
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hasan Banitalebi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway
| | - Kari Indrekvam
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Department, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ivar Magne Austevoll
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Department, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aimar E, Iess G, Labiad I, Mezza F, Bona A, Ciuffi A, Grassia F, Isidori A, Zekaj E, Bonomo G. Degenerative L4-L5 spondylolisthesis and stenosis surgery: does over-level flavectomy technique influence clinical outcomes and rates of cranial adjacent segment disease? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:3107-3117. [PMID: 37632571 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05761-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the most dreaded long-term complications related to L4-L5 lumbar arthrodesis is the onset of adjacent segment disease, which most frequently occurs at the cranial level. Few studies have compared the rates of cranial adjacent segment disease (CASD) in patients undergoing lumbar fusion associated with total laminectomy at the same level with those undergoing partial laminectomy. No study has examined the role of selective over-level flavectomy (OLF; i.e., L3-L4). METHODS A total of 299 patients undergoing posterolateral arthrodesis (PLA) for L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis were retrospectively analyzed with a 5-year follow-up. 148 patients underwent PLA + L4-L5 flavectomy + L4 partial laminectomy (control group), while 151 underwent PLA + L4-L5 flavectomy + total L4 laminectomy + L3-L4 flavectomy (OLF group). Rates of reoperations due to CASD were examined utilizing Cox proportional hazard models, while clinical improvement at follow-up (measured in ODI) was analyzed using generalized linear models (GLMs). Adjustments for potential confounders were made (grade of lumbar lordosis, age, sex, BMI, intervertebral disc degeneration, and presurgical cranial spinal stenosis). RESULTS At 5 years from the operation, 16 patients (10.8%) in the control group had undergone revision surgery for CASD compared to 5 patients (3.3%) in the OLF group (p = 0.013). Survival analysis and GLM demonstrated that the OLF group had a significantly lower incidence of CASD and presented more favorable clinical outcome. There were no differences in the rate of discal degeneration or the onset of Meyerding's grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis at the adjacent segment. BMI was the only other significant predictor of ODI improvement and of the incidence of CASD. CONCLUSIONS In patients with L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis, the OLF technique may lower rates of CASD and improve clinical outcomes by preventing cranial spinal stenosis without increasing iatrogenic instability or accelerating intervertebral disc degenerative changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Aimar
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Lumbardy, Milan, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Iess
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Lumbardy, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Lumbardy, Milan, Italy.
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Lumbardy, Milan, Italy.
| | - Ikrame Labiad
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Lumbardy, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Mezza
- Department of Economics, Bocconi University, Lumbardy, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Bona
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Lumbardy, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Ciuffi
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Lumbardy, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Grassia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Anschutz medical campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alessandra Isidori
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Lumbardy, Milan, Italy
| | - Edvin Zekaj
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Lumbardy, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulio Bonomo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Lumbardy, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Lumbardy, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Haider G, Varshneya K, Rodrigues A, Marianayagam N, Stienen MN, Veeravagu A. Progression to fusion after lumbar laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: Rate and risk-factors. A national database study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2023; 233:107919. [PMID: 37536253 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lumbar laminectomy is often utilized in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Risk factors that contribute to reoperation rates, in particular to progression to fusion, are poorly understood. We aimed to identify rate and risk factors of lumbar fusion surgery following lumbar laminectomy for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal spondylolisthesis. METHODS Our sample was obtained from the national MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. We reviewed patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy for stable degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Grade-1) at one or two levels between January 2007 and December 2016. RESULTS A total of 33,681 patients were included. By 2 years after the index operation, 2.48 % of patients had required lumbar fusion surgery. Female sex was associated with lower odds (OR 0.8, 95 %CI 0.7-0.9) of reoperation for fusion. Diabetes (OR 1.2, 95 %CI 1.1-1.4), rheumatoid arthritis (OR 1.5, 95 %CI 1.2-1.7) and clinical presentation with LBP (OR 2.1, 95 %CI 1.6-2.9), lower extremity weakness (OR 1.4, 95 %CI 1.1-1.5), as well as occurrence of a postoperative neurological complications (OR 2.0, 95 %CI 1.1-3.4) increased the odds ratio for requiring fusion surgery within two years after lumbar laminectomy. CONCLUSION In this large cross-sectional sample of a national claims database consisting of lumbar laminectomy patients for the treatment of spondylolisthesis, approximately 2.5 % required subsequent lumbar fusion. Several modifiable risk factors for fusion progression were identified, which may guide clinicians in shared decision-making and to help identify patients with elevated post-operative risk providing potential leverage point for prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghani Haider
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Kunal Varshneya
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Adrian Rodrigues
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Neelan Marianayagam
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Martin N Stienen
- Department of Neurosurgery & Spine Center of Eastern Switzerland, Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen, Rorschacher Str. 95, CH-9007 St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Anand Veeravagu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Beyer F, Yagdiran A, Eysel P, Bredow J. Quality of Life with Respect to Surgically Treated Vertebral Osteomyelitis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Z Orthop Unfall 2023. [PMID: 37739013 DOI: 10.1055/a-2151-5022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) and degenerative spondylolisthesis (SL) are 2 commonly treated spinal conditions. Therefore, in the presented work, the quality of life after surgical therapy of these 2 entities is compared using established scores.In a monocentric study, all patients with VO and SL were prospectively enrolled using the Spine Tango Registry. Surgical procedures included one- or two-stage fusion of the affected segments. Quality of life was assessed using the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at time points t0 (0 months), t1 (12 months), and t2 (24 months). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. The level of significance was set at 5%.52 patients with VO and 48 patients with SL were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in age and gender distribution. The length of stay in the SL group was significantly shorter (p < 0.001). ODI at time t0 was significantly higher in the VO group (p < 0.001), whereas COMI scores did not differ significantly (p = 0.155). At time points t1 and t2, the differences between the VO and SL groups were not significantly different for either the ODI score (p = 0.176; p = 0.250) or the COMI score (p = 0.682; p = 0.640).Postoperative quality of life scores after lumbar fusion surgery in SL and VO are comparable despite different indications and medical conditions. In both groups, similar quality of life with in patient with chronic back pain was achieved. This should be considered for the preoperative assessment, as well as for the indication for surgery in SL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Beyer
- Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein gGmbH, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Ayla Yagdiran
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Peer Eysel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Jan Bredow
- Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein gGmbH, Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Han J, Ha CM, Yuh WT, Ko YS, Kim JH, Kim TS, Lee CH, Lee S, Lee SH, Khan A, Chung CK, Kim CH. Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis by oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transpedicular screw fixation: Comparison between conventional double position versus navigation-assisted single lateral position. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0291114. [PMID: 37708151 PMCID: PMC10501584 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) procedures involve anterior insertion of interbody cage in lateral position. Following OLIF, insertion of pedicle screws and rod system is performed in a prone position (OLIF-con). The location of the cage is important for restoration of lumbar lordosis and indirect decompression. However, inserting the cage at the desired location is difficult without reduction of spondylolisthesis, and reduction after insertion of interbody cage may limit the amount of reduction. Recent introduction of spinal navigation enabled both surgical procedures in one lateral position (OLIF-one). Therefore, reduction of spondylolisthesis can be performed prior to insertion of interbody cage. The objective of this study was to compare the reduction of spondylolisthesis and the placement of cage between OLIF-one and OLIF-con. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 72 consecutive patients with spondylolisthesis for this study; 30 patients underwent OLIF-one and 42 underwent OLIF-con. Spinal navigation system was used for OLIF-one. In OLIF-one, the interbody cage was inserted after reducing spondylolisthesis, whereas in OLIF-con, the cage was inserted before reduction. The following parameters were measured on X-rays: pre- and postoperative spondylolisthesis slippage, reduction degree, and the location of the cage in the disc space. RESULTS Both groups showed significant improvement in back and leg pains (p < .05). Transient motor or sensory changes occurred in three patients after OLIF-con and in two patients after OLIF-one. Pre- and postoperative slips were 26.3±7.7% and 6.6±6.2% in OLIF-one, and 23.1±7.0% and 7.4±5.8% in OLIF-con. The reduction of slippage was 74.4±6.3% after OLIF-one and 65.4±5.7% after OLIF-con, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = .04). The cage was located at 34.2±8.9% after OLIF-one and at 42.8±10.3% after OLIF-con, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = .004). CONCLUSION Switching the sequence of surgical procedures with OLIF-one facilitated both the reduction of spondylolisthesis and the placement of the cage at the desired location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junghoon Han
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Min Ha
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woon Tak Yuh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Young San Ko
- Department of Neurosurgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun-Hoe Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae-Shin Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Hyun Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sungjoon Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun-Ho Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Asfandyar Khan
- School of Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Chun Kee Chung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chi Heon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Medical Device Development, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Andresen AK, Wickstrøm LA, Holm RB, Carreon LY, Andersen MØ. Instrumented Versus Uninstrumented Posterolateral Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105:1309-1317. [PMID: 37347830 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Scandinavia, spinal fusion is frequently performed without instrumentation, as use of instrumentation in the elderly can be complicated by poor bone quality and the risk of screw pull-out. However, uninstrumented fusion carries the risk of nonunion. We performed a randomized controlled trial in an attempt to determine if use of instrumentation leads to better outcomes and fusion rates when spinal fusion is performed for degenerative spondylolisthesis in the elderly. METHODS This was a randomized, single-center, open-label trial of patients with symptomatic single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis who were assigned 1:1 to decompression and fusion with or without instrumentation after at least 12 weeks of nonoperative treatment had failed. The primary outcome was the change in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and secondary outcomes included fusion rates within 1 year, reoperation rates within 2 years, and changes in the EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Level (EQ-5D) score. RESULTS Fifty-four subjects were randomized to each of the 2 groups, which had similar preoperative demographic and surgical characteristics. We found similar improvements in the ODI (p = 0.791), back pain, leg pain, and quality of life between groups at 1 and 2 years of follow-up. Solid fusion on computed tomography (CT) scans was noted in 94% of the patients in the instrumented group and 31% in the uninstrumented group (p < 0.001). One patient (2%) in the instrumented group and 7 (13%) in the uninstrumented group (p = 0.031) had a reoperation within 2 years after the index surgery. CONCLUSIONS We found no difference in patient-reported outcomes when we compared instrumented with uninstrumented fusion in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. The uninstrumented group had a significantly higher rate of nonunion and reoperations at 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas K Andresen
- Center for Spine Surgery and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Middelfart, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Line A Wickstrøm
- Center for Spine Surgery and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Middelfart, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Randi B Holm
- Center for Spine Surgery and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Middelfart, Denmark
- Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Leah Y Carreon
- Center for Spine Surgery and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Middelfart, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østerheden Andersen
- Center for Spine Surgery and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Middelfart, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Middelfart, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Beresford-Cleary NJA, Silman A, Thakar C, Gardner A, Harding I, Cooper C, Cook J, Rothenfluh DA. Findings from a pilot randomized trial of spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion. Bone Jt Open 2023; 4:573-579. [PMID: 37549931 PMCID: PMC10493898 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.48.bjo-2023-0049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims Symptomatic spinal stenosis is a very common problem, and decompression surgery has been shown to be superior to nonoperative treatment in selected patient groups. However, performing an instrumented fusion in addition to decompression may avoid revision and improve outcomes. The aim of the SpInOuT feasibility study was to establish whether a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) that accounted for the spectrum of pathology contributing to spinal stenosis, including pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and mobile spondylolisthesis, could be conducted. Methods As part of the SpInOuT-F study, a pilot randomized trial was carried out across five NHS hospitals. Patients were randomized to either spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected at baseline and three months. The intended sample size was 60 patients. Results Of the 90 patients screened, 77 passed the initial screening criteria. A total of 27 patients had a PI-LL mismatch and 23 had a dynamic spondylolisthesis. Following secondary inclusion and exclusion criteria, 31 patients were eligible for the study. Six patients were randomized and one underwent surgery during the study period. Given the low number of patients recruited and randomized, it was not possible to assess completion rates, quality of life, imaging, or health economic outcomes as intended. Conclusion This study provides a unique insight into the prevalence of dynamic spondylolisthesis and PI-LL mismatch in patients with symptomatic spinal stenosis, and demonstrates that there is a need for a definitive RCT which stratifies for these groups in order to inform surgical decision-making. Nonetheless a definitive study would need further refinement in design and implementation in order to be feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alan Silman
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | - Cushla Cooper
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jonathan Cook
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dominique A. Rothenfluh
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- CHUV University Hospital Lausanne and the University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Adogwa O, Reid MC, Chilakapati S, Makris UE. Clin-STAR corner: 2021 update in musculoskeletal pain in older adults with a focus on osteoarthritis-related pain. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:2373-2380. [PMID: 37186060 PMCID: PMC10524733 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain remains a leading cause of disability and functional impairment among older adults and is associated with substantial societal and personal costs. Chronic pain is particularly challenging to manage in older adults because of multimorbidity, concerns about treatment-related harm, as well as older adults' beliefs about pain and its management. This narrative review presents data on nine high-quality, peer-reviewed clinical trials published primarily over the past two years that focus on MSK pain management in older adults, of which four were comprehensively reviewed. These studies address contributors to knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain (insomnia), provide evidence for digital delivery or artificial intelligence driven behavioral interventions and potentially more efficient/equally effective modes of delivering glucocorticoids for OA; each of the selected studies have potential for scalability and meaningful impact in the care of older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owoicho Adogwa
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - M. Cary Reid
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weil Cornell Medicine, NY, NY
| | - Sai Chilakapati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, TX
| | - Una E. Makris
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, TX
- Medical Service, Veterans Administration North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kaiser R, Kantorová L, Langaufová A, Slezáková S, Tučková D, Klugar M, Klézl Z, Barsa P, Cienciala J, Hajdúk R, Hrabálek L, Kučera R, Netuka D, Prýmek M, Repko M, Smrčka M, Štulík J. Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2023; 94:657-666. [PMID: 36849239 PMCID: PMC10359551 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-330158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy of adding instrumented spinal fusion to decompression to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). DESIGN Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to May 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing decompression with instrumented fusion to decompression alone in patients with DS. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. We provide the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment of the certainty of evidence (COE). RESULTS We identified 4514 records and included four trials with 523 participants. At a 2-year follow-up, adding fusion to decompression likely results in trivial difference in the Oswestry Disability Index (range 0-100, with higher values indicating greater impairment) with mean difference (MD) 0.86 (95% CI -4.53 to 6.26; moderate COE). Similar results were observed for back and leg pain measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher values indicating more severe pain. There was a slightly increased improvement in back pain (2-year follow-up) in the group without fusion shown by MD -5·92 points (95% CI -11.00 to -0.84; moderate COE). There was a trivial difference in leg pain between the groups, slightly favouring the one without fusion, with MD -1.25 points (95% CI -6.71 to 4.21; moderate COE). Our findings at 2-year follow-up suggest that omitting fusion may increase the reoperation rate slightly (OR 1.23; 0.70 to 2.17; low COE). CONCLUSIONS Evidence suggests no benefits of adding instrumented fusion to decompression for treating DS. Isolated decompression seems sufficient for most patients. Further RCTs assessing spondylolisthesis stability are needed to determine which patients would benefit from fusion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022308267.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radek Kaiser
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Military University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lucia Kantorová
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
- Czech Health Research Council, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alena Langaufová
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Simona Slezáková
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dagmar Tučková
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
- Czech Health Research Council, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Miloslav Klugar
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Zdeněk Klézl
- Department of Spinal Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Barsa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Regional Hospital Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Cienciala
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Richard Hajdúk
- Department of Spinal Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lumír Hrabálek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Roman Kučera
- Department of Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - David Netuka
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Military University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Prýmek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Repko
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Smrčka
- University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Štulík
- Department of Spinal Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Aaen J, Banitalebi H, Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Storheim K, Myklebust TÅ, Anvar M, Weber C, Solberg T, Grundnes O, Brisby H, Indrekvam K, Hermansen E. Is the presence of foraminal stenosis associated with outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with posterior microsurgical decompression. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:2121-2129. [PMID: 37407851 PMCID: PMC10409656 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05693-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aim to investigate associations between preoperative radiological findings of lumbar foraminal stenosis with clinical outcomes after posterior microsurgical decompression in patients with predominantly central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). METHODS The study was an additional analysis in the NORDSTEN Spinal Stenosis Trial. In total, 230 men and 207 women (mean age 66.8 (SD 8.3)) were included. All patients underwent an MRI including T1- and T2-weighted sequences. Grade of foraminal stenosis was dichotomized into none to moderate (0-1) and severe (2-3) category using Lee's classification system. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for back and leg pain were collected at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. Primary outcome was a reduction of 30% or more on the ODI score. Secondary outcomes included the mean improvement on the ODI, ZCQ, and NRS scores. We performed multivariable regression analyses with the radiological variates foraminal stenosis, Pfirrmann grade, Schizas score, dural sac cross-sectional area, and the possible plausible confounders: patients' gender, age, smoking status, and BMI. RESULTS The cohort of 437 patients presented a high degree of degenerative changes at baseline. Of 414 patients with adequate imaging of potential foraminal stenosis, 402 were labeled in the none to moderate category and 12 in the severe category. Of the patients with none to moderate foraminal stenosis, 71% achieved at least 30% improvement in ODI. Among the patients with severe foraminal stenosis, 36% achieved at least 30% improvement in ODI. A significant association between severe foraminal stenosis and less chance of reaching the target of 30% improvement in the ODI score after surgery was detected: OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.06, 0.83), p=0.03. When investigating outcome as continuous variables, a similar association between severe foraminal stenosis and less improved ODI with a mean difference of 9.28 points (95%CI 0.47, 18.09; p=0.04) was found. Significant association between severe foraminal stenosis and less improved NRS pain in the lumbar region was also detected with a mean difference of 1.89 (95% CI 0.30, 3.49; p=0.02). No significant association was suggested between severe foraminal stenosis and ZCQ or NRS leg pain. CONCLUSION In patients operated with posterior microsurgical decompression for LSS, a preoperative severe lumbar foraminal stenosis was associated with higher proportion of patients with less than 30% improvement in ODI. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (22.11.2013) under the identifier NCT02007083.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jørn Aaen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway.
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Hasan Banitalebi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ivar Magne Austevoll
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Hellum
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjersti Storheim
- Communication and Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tor Åge Myklebust
- Department of Research and Innovation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | | | - Clemens Weber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Dept. of Quality and Health Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Tore Solberg
- Department of Neurosurgery and the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine), University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Oliver Grundnes
- Department of Orthopedics, Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway
| | - Helena Brisby
- Dept of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Dept. of Orthopaedics, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kari Indrekvam
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Erland Hermansen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
- Kysthospitalet in Hagevik, Orthopedic Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sastry RA, Chen JS, Shao B, Weil RJ, Chang KE, Maynard K, Syed SH, Zadnik Sullivan PL, Camara JQ, Niu T, Sampath P, Telfeian AE, Oyelese AA, Fridley JS, Gokaslan ZL. Patterns in Decompression and Fusion Procedures for Patients With Lumbar Stenosis After Major Clinical Trial Results, 2016 to 2019. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2326357. [PMID: 37523184 PMCID: PMC10391306 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Use of lumbar fusion has increased substantially over the last 2 decades. For patients with lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis, 2 landmark prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2016 did not find clear evidence in favor of decompression with fusion over decompression alone in this population. Objective To assess the national use of decompression with fusion vs decompression alone for the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis from 2016 to 2019. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included 121 745 hospitalized adult patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing 1-level decompression alone or decompression with fusion for the management of lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. All data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Analyses were conducted, reviewed, or updated on June 9, 2023. Main Outcome and Measure The primary outcome of this study was the use of decompression with fusion vs decompression alone. For the secondary outcome, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with the decision to perform decompression with fusion vs decompression alone. Results Among 121 745 eligible hospitalized patients (mean age, 65.2 years [95% CI, 65.0-65.4 years]; 96 645 of 117 640 [82.2%] non-Hispanic White) with lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis, 21 230 (17.4%) underwent decompression alone, and 100 515 (82.6%) underwent decompression with fusion. The proportion of patients undergoing decompression alone decreased from 2016 (7625 of 23 405 [32.6%]) to 2019 (3560 of 37 215 [9.6%]), whereas the proportion of patients undergoing decompression with fusion increased over the same period (from 15 780 of 23 405 [67.4%] in 2016 to 33 655 of 37 215 [90.4%] in 2019). In univariable analysis, patients undergoing decompression alone differed significantly from those undergoing decompression with fusion with regard to age (mean, 68.6 years [95% CI, 68.2-68.9 years] vs 64.5 years [95% CI, 64.3-64.7 years]; P < .001), insurance status (eg, Medicare: 13 725 of 21 205 [64.7%] vs 53 320 of 100 420 [53.1%]; P < .001), All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group risk of death (eg, minor risk: 16 900 [79.6%] vs 83 730 [83.3%]; P < .001), and hospital region of the country (eg, South: 7030 [33.1%] vs 38 905 [38.7%]; Midwest: 4470 [21.1%] vs 23 360 [23.2%]; P < .001 for both comparisons). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.96 per year; 95% CI, 0.95-0.96 per year), year after 2016 (AOR, 1.76 per year; 95% CI, 1.69-1.85 per year), self-pay insurance status (AOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.95), medium hospital size (AOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.89), large hospital size (AOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67-0.86), and highest median income quartile by patient residence zip code (AOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.89) were associated with lower odds of undergoing decompression with fusion. Conversely, hospital region in the Midwest (AOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14-1.57) or South (AOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.54) was associated with higher odds of undergoing decompression with fusion. Decompression with fusion vs decompression alone was associated with longer length of stay (mean, 2.96 days [95% CI, 2.92-3.01 days] vs 2.55 days [95% CI, 2.49-2.62 days]; P < .001), higher total admission costs (mean, $30 288 [95% CI, $29 386-$31 189] vs $16 190 [95% CI, $15 189-$17 191]; P < .001), and higher total admission charges (mean, $121 892 [95% CI, $119 566-$124 219] vs $82 197 [95% CI, $79 745-$84 648]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, despite 2 prospective RCTs that demonstrated the noninferiority of decompression alone compared with decompression with fusion, use of decompression with fusion relative to decompression alone increased from 2016 to 2019. A variety of patient- and hospital-level factors were associated with surgical procedure choice. These results suggest the findings of 2 major RCTs have not yet produced changes in surgical practice patterns and deserve renewed focus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul A Sastry
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Jia-Shu Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Belinda Shao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Robert J Weil
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain and Spine, Southcoast Health, Dartmouth, Massachusetts
| | - Ki-Eun Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Ken Maynard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Sohail H Syed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Patricia L Zadnik Sullivan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Joaquin Q Camara
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Tianyi Niu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Prakash Sampath
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Albert E Telfeian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Adetokunbo A Oyelese
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Jared S Fridley
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Ziya L Gokaslan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tang AR, Chanbour H, Steinle AM, Jonzzon S, Roth SG, Gardocki RJ, Stephens BF, Abtahi AM, Zuckerman SL. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion Alone in the Treatment of Grade 1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:186-197. [PMID: 36848669 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterolateral fusion (PLF) alone are two operations performed to treat degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. To date, it is unclear which operation leads to better outcomes. OBJECTIVE To compare TLIF vs PLF alone regarding long-term reoperation rates, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with degenerative grade 1 spondylolisthesis. METHODS A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data between October 2010 and May 2021 was undertaken. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years or older with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing elective, single-level, open posterior lumbar decompression and instrumented fusion with ≥1-year follow-up. The primary exposure was presence of TLIF vs PLF without interbody fusion. The primary outcome was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included complications, readmission, discharge disposition, return to work, and PROMs at 3 and 12 months postoperatively, including Numeric Rating Scale-Back/Leg and Oswestry Disability Index. Minimum clinically important difference of PROMs was set at 30% improvement from baseline. RESULTS Of 546 patients, 373 (68.3%) underwent TLIF and 173 underwent (31.7%) PLF. Median follow-up was 6.1 years (IQR = 3.6-9.0), with 339 (62.1%) >5-year follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients undergoing TLIF had a lower odds of reoperation compared with PLF alone (odds ratio = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.54-0.99, P = .048). Among patients with >5-year follow-up, the same trend was seen (odds ratio = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03-0.95, P = .045). No differences were observed in 90-day complications ( P = .487) and readmission rates ( P = .230) or minimum clinically important difference PROMs. CONCLUSION In a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively maintained registry, patients with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing TLIF had significantly lower long-term reoperation rates than those undergoing PLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan R Tang
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Hani Chanbour
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Anthony M Steinle
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Soren Jonzzon
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Steven G Roth
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Raymond J Gardocki
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Byron F Stephens
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Amir M Abtahi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Scott L Zuckerman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kesornsak W, Kuansongtham V, Lwin KMM, Pongpirul K. Pain improvement and reoperation rate after full-endoscopic decompression for lateral recess stenosis: a 10-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2023:10.1007/s00586-023-07801-6. [PMID: 37322219 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07801-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To share long-term clinical outcomes and our experience with full-endoscopic interlaminar decompression (FEI) for lateral recess stenosis (LRS). METHODS We included all patients who underwent FEI for LRS from 2009 to 2013. VAS for leg pain, ODI, neurological findings, radiographic findings, and complications were analyzed at one week, one month, three months, and one year postoperation. The telephone interview for local patients with simple questions was done approximately ten years after the operation. International patients receive an email with the same questionnaire as local patients during the same follow-up period. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-nine patients underwent FEI for LRS with complete data during 2009-2013. Most of the patients (70.54%) had LRS radiculopathy for less than one year, mainly L4-5 (89.92%), followed by L5-S1 (17.83%). Early outcomes three months after surgery showed that most patients (93.02%) reported significant pain relief, and 70.54% reported no pain at their ODI scores were significantly reduced from 34.35 to 20.32% (p = 0.0052). In contrast, the mean VAS for leg pain decreased substantially by 3.77 points (p < 0.0001). There were no severe complications. At ten years of follow-up, 62 patients responded to the phone call or email. 69.35% of the patients reported having little or no back or leg pain, did not receive any further lumbar surgery, and were still satisfied with the result of the surgery. There were six patients (8.06%) who underwent reoperation. CONCLUSION FEI for LRS was satisfactory at 93.02%, with a low complication rate during the early follow-up period. Its effect seems to decline slightly in the long term at a 10-year follow-up. 8.06% of the patients subsequently underwent reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Withawin Kesornsak
- Bumrungrad Spine Institute, Bumrungrad International Hospital, 33 Sukhumvit Soi 3, Wattana, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand.
| | - Verapan Kuansongtham
- Bumrungrad Spine Institute, Bumrungrad International Hospital, 33 Sukhumvit Soi 3, Wattana, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand
| | - Khin Myat Myat Lwin
- Bumrungrad Spine Institute, Bumrungrad International Hospital, 33 Sukhumvit Soi 3, Wattana, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand
| | - Krit Pongpirul
- Bumrungrad Spine Institute, Bumrungrad International Hospital, 33 Sukhumvit Soi 3, Wattana, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Shukla GG, Chilakapati SS, Matur AV, Palmisciano P, Conteh F, Onyewadume L, Duah H, Griffith A, Tao X, Vorster P, Gupta S, Cheng J, Motley B, Adogwa O. Laminectomy With Fusion is Associated With Greater Functional Improvement Compared With Laminectomy Alone for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:874-884. [PMID: 37026781 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes and complications profile of laminectomy alone versus laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common cause of back pain and functional impairment. DLS is associated with high monetary (up to $100 billion annually in the US) and nonmonetary societal and personal costs. While nonoperative management remains the first-line treatment for DLS, decompressive laminectomy with or without fusion is indicated for the treatment-resistant disease. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE for RCTs and cohort studies from inception through April 14, 2022. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute risk of bias tool. We generated odds ratio and standard mean difference estimates for select parameters. RESULTS A total of 23 manuscripts were included (n=90,996 patients). Complication rates were higher in patients undergoing laminectomy and fusion compared with laminectomy alone (OR: 1.55, P <0.001). Rates of reoperation were similar between both groups (OR: 0.67, P =0.10). Laminectomy with fusion was associated with a longer duration of surgery (Standard Mean Difference: 2.60, P =0.04) and a longer hospital stay (2.16, P =0.01). Compared with laminectomy alone, the extent of functional improvement in pain and disability was superior in the laminectomy and fusion cohort. Laminectomy with fusion had a greater mean change in ODI (-0.38, P <0.01) compared with laminectomy alone. Laminectomy with fusion was associated with a greater mean change in NRS leg score (-0.11, P =0.04) and NRS back score (-0.45, P <0.01). CONCLUSION Compared with laminectomy alone, laminectomy with fusion is associated with greater postoperative improvement in pain and disability, albeit with a longer duration of surgery and hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geet G Shukla
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | | | - Abhijith V Matur
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Paolo Palmisciano
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Fatu Conteh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Louisa Onyewadume
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Henry Duah
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Azante Griffith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Xu Tao
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Phillip Vorster
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Sahil Gupta
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Joseph Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Benjamin Motley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Owoicho Adogwa
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Burkhard MD, Calek AK, Fasser MR, Cornaz F, Widmer J, Spirig JM, Wanivenhaus F, Farshad M. Biomechanics after spinal decompression and posterior instrumentation. Eur Spine J 2023; 32:1876-1886. [PMID: 37093262 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07694-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to elucidate segmental range of motion (ROM) before and after common decompression and fusion procedures on the lumbar spine. METHODS ROM of fourteen fresh-frozen human cadaver lumbar segments (L1/2: 4, L3/4: 5, L5/S1: 5) was evaluated in six loading directions: flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), lateral shear (LS), anterior shear (AS), axial rotation (AR), and axial compression/distraction (AC). ROM was tested with and without posterior instrumentation under the following conditions: 1) native 2) after unilateral laminotomy, 3) after midline decompression, and 4) after nucleotomy. RESULTS Median native ROM was FE 6.8°, LB 5.6°, and AR 1.7°, AS 1.8 mm, LS 1.4 mm, AC 0.3 mm. Unilateral laminotomy significantly increased ROM by 6% (FE), 3% (LB), 12% (AR), 11% (AS), and 8% (LS). Midline decompression significantly increased these numbers to 15%, 5%, 21%, 20%, and 19%, respectively. Nucleotomy further increased ROM in all directions, most substantially in AC of 153%. Pedicle screw fixation led to ROM decreases of 82% in FE, 72% in LB, 42% in AR, 31% in AS, and 17% in LS. In instrumented segments, decompression only irrelevantly affected ROM. CONCLUSIONS The amount of posterior decompression significantly impacts ROM of the lumbar spine. The here performed biomechanical study allows creation of a simplified rule of thumb: Increases in segmental ROM of approximately 10%, 20%, and 50% can be expected after unilateral laminotomy, midline decompression, and nucleotomy, respectively. Instrumentation decreases ROM by approximately 80% in bending moments and accompanied decompression procedures only minorly destabilize the instrumentation construct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco D Burkhard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Center Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Anna-Katharina Calek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Center Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marie-Rosa Fasser
- Institute for Biomechanics, Balgrist Campus, ETH Zurich, Lengghalde 5, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland
- Spine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Frédéric Cornaz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Center Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jonas Widmer
- Institute for Biomechanics, Balgrist Campus, ETH Zurich, Lengghalde 5, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland
- Spine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - José Miguel Spirig
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Center Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Florian Wanivenhaus
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Center Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mazda Farshad
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Center Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Beucler N. Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF): we should not compare two procedures that serve different purposes. Neurosurg Rev 2023; 46:111. [PMID: 37155078 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02024-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Beucler
- Neurosurgery Department, Sainte-Anne Military Teaching Hospital, 2 boulevard Sainte-Anne, 83800 Cedex 9, Toulon, France.
- French Military Health Service Academy, Ecole du Val-de-Grâce, 1 place Alphonse Laveran, 75230 Cedex 5, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dimitriou D, Winkler E, Weber S, Haupt S, Betz M, Farshad M. A Simple Preoperative Score Predicting Failure Following Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:610-616. [PMID: 36728033 PMCID: PMC10364961 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Proper patient selection is crucial for the outcome of surgically treated degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). Nevertheless, there is still not a clear consensus regarding the optimal treatment option for patients with DLSS. PURPOSE To investigate the treatment failure rate and introduce a simple, preoperative score to aid surgical decision-making. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE Four hundred forty-five patients who underwent surgical decompression for DLSS. OUTCOME MEASURES Treatment failure (defined as conversion to a fusion of a previously decompressed level) of lumbar decompression. MATERIALS AND METHODS Several risk factors associated with worse outcomes and treatment failures, such as age, body mass index, smoking status, previous surgery, low back pain (LBP), facet joint effusion, disk degeneration, fatty infiltration of the paraspinal muscles, the presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis and the facet angulation, were investigated. RESULTS At a mean follow-up of 44±31 months, 6.5% (29/445) of the patients underwent revision surgery with spinal fusion at an average of 3±9 months following the lumbar decompression due to low back or leg pain. The baseline LBP (≥7) [odds ratio (OR)=5.4, P <0.001], the presence of facet joint effusion (>2 mm) in magnetic resonance imaging (OR=4.2, P <0.001), and disk degeneration (Pfirrmann >4) (OR=3.2, P =0.03) were associated with an increased risk for treatment failure following decompression for DLSS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that a score≥6 points yielded a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 64% for predicting a treatment failure following lumbar decompression for DLSS in the present cohort. CONCLUSIONS The newly introduced score quantifying amounts of LBP, facet effusions, and disk degeneration, could predict treatment failure and the need for revision surgery for DLSS patients undergoing lumbar decompression without fusion. Patients with scores >6 have a high chance of needing fusion following decompression surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Retrospective observational study, Level III.
Collapse
|
37
|
Singh S, Shahi P, Asada T, Kaidi A, Subramanian T, Zhao E, Kim AYE, Maayan O, Araghi K, Singh N, Tuma O, Korsun M, Kamil R, Sheha E, Dowdell J, Qureshi S, Iyer S. Poor Muscle Health and Low Preoperative ODI are Independent Predictors for Slower Achievement of MCID After Minimally Invasive Decompression. Spine J 2023:S1529-9430(23)00157-2. [PMID: 37059307 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Although some previous studies have analyzed predictors of non-improvement, most of these have focused on demographic and clinical variables and have not accounted for radiological predictors. In addition, while several studies have examined the degree of improvement after decompression, there is less data on the rate of improvement. PURPOSE To identify the risk factors and predictors (both radiological and non-radiological) for slower as well as non-achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after minimally invasive decompression. DESIGN Retrospective cohort PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent minimally invasive decompression for degenerative lumbar spine conditions and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Patients with preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) <20 were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURE MCID achievement in ODI (cut off 12.8). METHODS Patients were stratified into two groups (achieved MCID, did not achieve MCID) at two timepoints (early ≤3 months, late ≥6 months). Non-radiological (age, gender, BMI, comorbidities, anxiety, depression, number of levels operated, preoperative ODI, preoperative back pain) and radiological (MRI - Schizas grading for stenosis, dural sac cross-sectional area, Pfirrmann grading for disc degeneration, psoas cross-sectional area and Goutallier grading, facet cyst/effusion; X-ray - spondylolisthesis, lumbar lordosis, spinopelvic parameters) variables were assessed with comparative analysis to identify risk factors and with multiple regression models to identify predictors for slower achievement of MCID (MCID not achieved by ≤3 months) and non-achievement of MCID (MCID not achieved at ≥6 months). RESULTS 338 patients were included. At ≤3 months, patients who did not achieve MCID had significantly lower preoperative ODI (40.1 vs. 48.1, p<0.001) and worse psoas Goutallier grading (p=0.048). At ≥6 months, patients who did not achieve MCID had significantly lower preoperative ODI (38 vs. 47.5, p<0.001), higher age (68 vs. 63 years, p=0.007), worse average L1-S1 Pfirrmann grading (3.5 vs. 3.2, p=0.035), and higher rate of pre-existing spondylolisthesis at the operated level (p=0.047). When these and other probable risk factors were put into a regression model, low preoperative ODI (p=0.002) and poor Goutallier grading (p=0.042) at the early timepoint and low preoperative ODI (p<0.001) at the late timepoint came out as independent predictors for MCID non-achievement. CONCLUSION After minimally invasive decompression, low preoperative ODI and poor muscle health are risk factors and predictors for slower achievement of MCID. For non-achievement of MCID, low preoperative ODI, higher age, greater disc degeneration, and spondylolisthesis are risk factors and low preoperative ODI is the only independent predictor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumedha Singh
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Pratyush Shahi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Tomoyuki Asada
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Austin Kaidi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Eric Zhao
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Ashley Yeo Eun Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Omri Maayan
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Nishtha Singh
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Olivia Tuma
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Maximilian Korsun
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Robert Kamil
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Evan Sheha
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - James Dowdell
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Sheeraz Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Li Y, Cheng X, Chen B. Comparison of 270-degree percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of geriatric lateral recess stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:183. [PMID: 36895012 PMCID: PMC9996849 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03676-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Various lumbar decompression techniques have been used for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). Few studies have compared the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in the treatment of lateral recess stenosis associated with DLS (LRS-DLS) in geriatric patients. The objective of the study was to compare the safety and short-term clinical efficacy of 270-degree PTED under local anesthesia and MIS-TLIF in the treatment of LRS-DLS in Chinese geriatric patients over 60 years old. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2017 to August 2019, the data of 90 consecutive geriatric patients with single-level L4-5 LRS-DLS were retrospectively reviewed, including those in the PTED group (n = 44) and MIS-TLIF group (n = 46). The patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were reviewed before and after surgery. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) for leg pain, and modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. X-ray examinations were performed 1 year after surgery to assess the progression of spondylolisthesis in the PTED group and bone fusion in the MIS-TLIF group. RESULTS The mean patient ages in the PTED and MIS-TLIF groups were 70.3 years and 68.6 years, respectively. Both the PTED and MIS-TLIF groups demonstrated significant improvements in the VAS score for leg pain and ODI score, and no significant differences were found between the groups at any time point (P > 0.05). Although the good-to-excellent rate of the modified MacNab criteria in the PTED group was similar to that in the MIS-TLIF group (90.9% vs. 91.3%, P > 0.05), PTED was advantageous in terms of the operative time, estimated blood loss, incision length, drainage time, drainage volume, length of hospital stay, and complications. CONCLUSIONS Both PTED and MIS-TLIF led to favorable outcomes in geriatric patients with LRS-DLS. In addition, PTED caused less severe trauma and fewer complications. In terms of perioperative quality-of-life and clinical outcomes, PTED could supplement MIS-TLIF in geriatric patients with LRS-DLS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yubo Li
- Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, 067000, Hebei, China
| | - Xiaokang Cheng
- Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, 067000, Hebei, China.,Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Bin Chen
- Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, 067000, Hebei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lan Z, Yan J, Yang Y, Xu Q, Jin Q. A Review of the Main Classifications of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. World Neurosurg 2023; 171:94-102. [PMID: 36584893 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.12.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to review the main classifications and to present author's recommendations. METHODS Review of English language medical literature. RESULTS In recent decades, classification systems of lumbar spondylolisthesis have been proposed based on many factors, from essential causes to combinations of imaging features and clinical manifestations; the latter type of system is more clinically practical. We have systematically listed the main types of classification systems in chronological order to make it easier for clinicians to find the type of diagnosis and treatment suitable for their patients and develop an appropriate treatment plan. CONCLUSIONS Classification systems for lumbar spondylolisthesis have been proposed that have been based on the study of the essential causes or the combination of imaging features and clinical manifestations; the latter type of system is more clinically practical. We still have much work to do in exploring a more applicable classification of lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhibin Lan
- Ningxia Medical University, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China; Orthopedics Ward 3, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Jiangbo Yan
- Ningxia Medical University, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Ningxia Medical University, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Qu Xu
- Ningxia Medical University, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Qunhua Jin
- Ningxia Medical University, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China; Orthopedics Ward 3, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Meade SM, Salas-Vega S, Nowacki AS, Habboub G. Optimization of Randomized Controlled Trial Design in Neurosurgery Using Simulation. World Neurosurg 2023:S1878-8750(23)00394-7. [PMID: 37061397 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
|
41
|
Gadjradj PS, Basilious M, Goldberg JL, Sommer F, Navarro-Ramirez R, Mykolajtchuk C, Ng AZ, Medary B, Hussain I, Härtl R. Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2023; 32:1054-67. [PMID: 36609887 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07507-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical decompression is standard care in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis, but there remains controversy over the benefits of adding fusion. The persistent lack of consensus on this matter and the availability of new data warrants a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. METHODS Multiple online databases were systematically searched up to October 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies comparing outcomes of decompression alone versus decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes included leg and back pain, surgical outcomes, and radiological outcomes. Pooled effect estimates were calculated and presented as mean differences (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) at two-year follow-up. RESULTS Of the identified 2403 studies, eventually five RCTs and two prospective studies were included. Overall, most studies had a low or unclear risk of selection bias and most studies were focused on low grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. All patient-reported outcomes showed low statistical heterogeneity. Overall, there was high-quality evidence suggesting no difference in functionality at two years of follow-up (MD - 0.31, 95% CI - 3.81 to 3.19). Furthermore, there was high-quality evidence of no difference in leg pain (MD - 1.79, 95% CI - 5.08 to 1.50) or back pain (MD - 2.54, 95% CI - 6.76 to 1.67) between patients undergoing decompression vs. decompression with fusion. Pooled surgical outcomes showed less blood loss after decompression only, shorter length of hospital stay, and a similar reoperation rate compared to decompression with fusion. CONCLUSION Based on the current literature, there is high-quality evidence of no difference in functionality after decompression alone compared to decompression with fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis at 2 years of follow-up. Further studies should focus on long-term comparative outcomes, health economic evaluations, and identifying those patients that may benefit more from decompression with fusion instead of decompression alone. This review was registered at Prospero (CRD42021291603).
Collapse
|
42
|
Agarwal N, Aabedi AA, Chan AK, Letchuman V, Shabani S, Bisson EF, Bydon M, Glassman SD, Foley KT, Shaffrey CI, Potts EA, Shaffrey ME, Coric D, Knightly JJ, Park P, Wang MY, Fu KM, Slotkin JR, Asher AL, Virk MS, Haid RW, Chou D, Mummaneni PV. Leveraging machine learning to ascertain the implications of preoperative body mass index on surgical outcomes for 282 patients with preoperative obesity and lumbar spondylolisthesis in the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 38:182-191. [PMID: 36208428 DOI: 10.3171/2022.8.spine22365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prior studies have revealed that a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 is associated with worse outcomes following surgical intervention in grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis. Using a machine learning approach, this study aimed to leverage the prospective Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) to identify a BMI threshold for patients undergoing surgical intervention for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis and thus reliably identify optimal surgical candidates among obese patients. METHODS Patients with grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis and preoperative BMI ≥ 30 from the prospectively collected QOD lumbar spondylolisthesis module were included in this study. A 12-month composite outcome was generated by performing principal components analysis and k-means clustering on four validated measures of surgical outcomes in patients with spondylolisthesis. Random forests were generated to determine the most important preoperative patient characteristics in predicting the composite outcome. Recursive partitioning was used to extract a BMI threshold associated with optimal outcomes. RESULTS The average BMI was 35.7, with 282 (46.4%) of the 608 patients from the QOD data set having a BMI ≥ 30. Principal components analysis revealed that the first principal component accounted for 99.2% of the variance in the four outcome measures. Two clusters were identified corresponding to patients with suboptimal outcomes (severe back pain, increased disability, impaired quality of life, and low satisfaction) and to those with optimal outcomes. Recursive partitioning established a BMI threshold of 37.5 after pruning via cross-validation. CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter study, the authors found that a BMI ≤ 37.5 was associated with improved patient outcomes following surgical intervention. These findings may help augment predictive analytics to deliver precision medicine and improve prehabilitation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin Agarwal
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Alexander A Aabedi
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Andrew K Chan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Vijay Letchuman
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Saman Shabani
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Erica F Bisson
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- 3Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Kevin T Foley
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Semmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- Departments of6Neurosurgery and
- 7Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eric A Potts
- 8Department of Neurological Surgery, Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Mark E Shaffrey
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Domagoj Coric
- 10Neuroscience Institute, Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - John J Knightly
- 11Atlantic Neurosurgical Specialists, Morristown, New Jersey
| | - Paul Park
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Michael Y Wang
- 13Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Florida
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- 14Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Anthony L Asher
- 10Neuroscience Institute, Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Michael S Virk
- 14Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Regis W Haid
- 16Atlanta Brain and Spine Care, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Dean Chou
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Caelers IJMH, Mannion AF, Haschtmann D, Rijkers K, van Hemert WLW, de Bie RA, van Santbrink H. Factors associated with an increased risk of developing postoperative symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis after decompression surgery: an explorative two-centre international cohort study. Eur Spine J 2023; 32:462-74. [PMID: 36308544 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07403-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis can be treated with decompression surgery. A recent review reported that, after decompression surgery, 1.6-32.0% of patients develop postoperative symptomatic spondylolisthesis and may therefore be indicated for lumbar fusion surgery. The latter can be more challenging due to the altered anatomy and scar tissue. It remains unclear why some patients get recurrent neurological complaints due to postoperative symptomatic spondylolisthesis, though some associations have been suggested. This study explores the association between key demographic, biological and radiological factors and postoperative symptomatic spondylolisthesis after lumbar decompression. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients who had undergone lumbar spinal decompression surgery between January 2014 and December 2016 at one of two Spine Centres in the Netherlands or Switzerland and had a follow-up of two years. Patient characteristics, details of the surgical procedure and recurrent neurological complaints were retrieved from patient files. Preoperative MRI scans and conventional radiograms (CRs) of the lumbar spine were evaluated for multiple morphological characteristics. Postoperative spondylolisthesis was evaluated on postoperative MRI scans. For variables assessed on a whole patient basis, patients with and without postoperative symptomatic spondylolisthesis were compared. For variables assessed on the basis of the operated segment(s), surgical levels that did or did not develop postoperative spondylolisthesis were compared. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify associations with postoperative symptomatic spondylolisthesis. RESULTS Seven hundred and sixteen patients with 1094 surgical levels were included in the analyses. (In total, 300 patients had undergone multilevel surgery.) ICCs for intraobserver and interobserver reliability of CR and MRI variables ranged between 0.81 and 0.99 and 0.67 and 0.97, respectively. In total, 66 of 716 included patients suffered from postoperative symptomatic spondylolisthesis (9.2%). Multivariable regression analyses of patient-basis variables showed that being female [odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95%CI 1.07-3.09] was associated with postoperative symptomatic spondylolisthesis. Higher BMI (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.88-0.99) was associated with a lower probability of having postoperative symptomatic spondylolisthesis. Multivariable regression analyses of surgical level-basis variables showed that levels with preoperative spondylolisthesis (OR 17.30, 95%CI 10.27-29.07) and the level of surgery, most importantly level L4L5 compared with levels L1L3 (OR 2.80, 95%CI 0.78-10.08), were associated with postoperative symptomatic spondylolisthesis; greater facet joint angles (i.e. less sagittal-oriented facets) were associated with a lower probability of postoperative symptomatic spondylolisthesis (OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.95-0.99). CONCLUSION Being female was associated with a higher probability of having postoperative symptomatic spondylolisthesis, while having a higher BMI was associated with a lower probability. When looking at factors related to postoperative symptomatic spondylolisthesis at the surgical level, preoperative spondylolisthesis, more sagittal orientated facet angles and surgical level (most significantly level L4L5 compared to levels L1L3) showed significant associations. These associations could be used as a basis for devising patient selection criteria, stratifying patients or performing subgroup analyses in future studies regarding decompression surgery with or without fusion.
Collapse
|
44
|
Evans L, O'Donohoe T, Morokoff A, Drummond K. The role of spinal surgery in the treatment of low back pain. Med J Aust 2023; 218:40-45. [PMID: 36502448 PMCID: PMC10107811 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is common and a leading cause of disability and lost productivity worldwide. Acute LBP is frequently self-resolving, but recurrence is common, and a significant proportion of patients will develop chronic pain. This transition is perpetuated by anatomical, biological, psychological and social factors. Chronic LBP should be managed with a holistic biopsychosocial approach of generally non-surgical measures. Spinal surgery has a role in alleviating radicular pain and disability resulting from neural compression, or where back pain relates to cancer, infection, or gross instability. Spinal surgery for all other forms of back pain is unsupported by clinical data, and the broader evidence base for spinal surgery in the management of LBP is poor and suggests it is ineffective. Emerging areas of interest include selection of a minority of patients who may benefit from surgery based on spinal sagittal alignment and/or nuclear medicine scans, but an evidence base is absent. Spinal surgery for back pain has increased substantially over recent decades, and disproportionately among privately insured patients, thus the contribution of industry and third-party payers to this increase, and their involvement in published research, requires careful consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrew Morokoff
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Katharine Drummond
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nie JW, Hartman TJ, Oyetayo OO, Zheng E, MacGregor KR, Singh K. Impact of Sleep Disturbance on Clinical Outcomes in Lumbar Decompression. World Neurosurg 2023; 172:e304-e311. [PMID: 36632896 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the impact of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance (PROMIS-SD) on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar decompression. METHODS Patients undergoing lumbar decompression with preoperative PROMIS-SD scores were retrospectively included. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts: none to slight sleep disturbance (PROMIS-SD <55) and mild to severe sleep disturbance (PROMIS-SD ≥55). Patient-reported outcome measures including PROMIS Physical Function, PROMIS Anxiety, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS SD, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, visual analog scale back/leg, and Oswestry Disability Index were collected preoperatively and up to 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS Of 87 patients identified, 48 patients had PROMIS-SD scores ≥55. Regardless of preoperative PROMIS-SD score, patients reported significant improvement in physical function, anxiety, pain interference, depression, pain, and disability outcomes in at least 1 time point. Patients in the PROMIS-SD ≥55 cohort reported postoperative improvement in sleep disturbance. Patients in the PROMIS-SD <55 cohort reported superior preoperative patient-reported outcome measures in all domains and superior postoperative improvement in pain interference and sleep disturbance. Minimum clinically important difference attainment rates were higher in the PROMIS-SD ≥55 cohort in physical function, anxiety, pain interference, sleep disturbance, and pain. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing lumbar decompression demonstrated significant postoperative improvement in most clinical outcomes regardless of preoperative sleep disturbance. Patients with mild to severe sleep disturbance had higher minimum clinically important difference attainment rates for physical function, mental function, and pain. Patients undergoing lumbar decompression with greater preoperative sleep disturbance may experience more clinically noticeable improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W Nie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Timothy J Hartman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Omolabake O Oyetayo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Eileen Zheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Keith R MacGregor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Fan G, Li Y, Yang S, Qin J, Huang L, Liu H, He S, Liao X. Research topics and hotspot trends of lumbar spondylolisthesis: A text-mining study with machine learning. Front Surg 2023; 9:1037978. [PMID: 36684199 PMCID: PMC9852633 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1037978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of publications concerning lumbar spondylolisthesis, as well as summarize its research topics and hotspot trends with machine-learning based text mining. Methods The data were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database and then analyzed in Rstudio1.3.1 and CiteSpace5.8. Annual publication production and the top-20 productive authors over time were obtained. Additionally, top-20 productive journals and top-20 influential journals were compared by spine-subspecialty or not. Similarly, top-20 productive countries/regions and top-20 influential countries/regions were compared by they were developed countries/regions or not. The collaborative relationship among countries and institutions were presented. The main topics of lumbar spondylolisthesis were classified by Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) analysis, and the hotspot trends were indicated by keywords with strongest citation bursts. Results Up to 2021, a total number of 4,245 articles concerning lumbar spondylolisthesis were finally included for bibliometric analysis. Spine-subspecialty journals were found to be dominant in the productivity and the impact of the field, and SPINE, EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL and JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE were the top-3 productive and the top-3 influential journals in this field. USA, Japan and China have contributed to over half of the publication productivity, but European countries seemed to publish more influential articles. It seemed that developed countries/regions tended to produce more articles and more influential articles, and international collaborations mainly occurred among USA, Europe and eastern Asia. Publications concerning surgical management was the major topic, followed by radiographic assessment and epidemiology for this field. Surgical management especially minimally invasive technique for lumbar spondylolisthesis were the recent hotspots over the past 5 years. Conclusions The study successfully summarized the productivity and impact of different entities, which should benefit the journal selection and pursuit of international collaboration for researcher who were interested in the field of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Additionally, the current study may encourage more researchers joining in the field and somewhat inform their research direction in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guoxin Fan
- Department of Pain Medicine, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China,Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China,Department of Spine Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yufeng Li
- Department of Sports Medicine, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Sheng Yang
- Spinal Pain Research Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China,Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiaqi Qin
- Artificial Intelligence Innovation Center, Research Institute of Tsinghua, Pearl River Delta, Guangzhou, China
| | - Longfei Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, Nanchang Hongdu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China
| | - Huaqing Liu
- Artificial Intelligence Innovation Center, Research Institute of Tsinghua, Pearl River Delta, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shisheng He
- Spinal Pain Research Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China,Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China,Correspondence: Shisheng He Xiang Liao
| | - Xiang Liao
- Department of Pain Medicine, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China,Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China,Correspondence: Shisheng He Xiang Liao
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Alhaug OK, Dolatowski F, Austevoll I, Mjønes S, Lønne G. Incidental dural tears associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients operated for lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:99-106. [PMID: 36399189 PMCID: PMC9840573 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05421-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE Incidental dural (ID) tear is a common complication of spine surgery with a prevalence of 4-10%. The association between ID and clinical outcome is uncertain. Former studies found only minor differences in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). We aimed to examine the association of ID with treatment failure after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). METHODS Between 2007 and 2017, 11,873 LSS patients reported to the national Norwegian spine registry (NORspine), and 8,919 (75.1%) completed the 12-month follow-up. We used multivariate logistic regression to study the association between ID and failure after surgery, defined as no effect or any degrees of worsening; we also compared mean ODI between those who suffered a perioperative ID and those who did not. RESULTS The mean (95% CI) age was 66.6 (66.4-66.9) years, and 52% were females. The mean (95% CI) preoperative ODI score (95% CI) was 39.8 (39.4-40.1); all patients were operated on with decompression, and 1125 (12.6%) had an additional fusion procedure. The prevalence of ID was 4.9% (439/8919), and the prevalence of failure was 20.6% (1829/8919). Unadjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) for failure for ID was 1.51 (1.22-1.88); p < 0.001, adjusted OR (95% CI) was 1.44 (1.11-1.86); p = 0.002. Mean postoperative ODI 12 months after surgery was 27.9 for ID vs. 23.6 for no ID. CONCLUSION We demonstrated a significant association between ID and increased odds for patient-reported failure 12 months after surgery. However, the magnitude of the detrimental effect of ID on the clinical outcome was small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ole Kristian Alhaug
- Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.
- Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway.
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Filip Dolatowski
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Greger Lønne
- Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mohanty S, Barchick S, Kadiyala M, Lad M, Rouhi AD, Vadali C, Albayar A, Ozturk AK, Khalsa A, Saifi C, Casper DS. Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system. Spine J 2023; 23:92-104. [PMID: 36064091 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is one of the most common pathologies addressed by surgeons. Recently, data demonstrated improved outcomes with fusion in conjunction with laminectomy compared to laminectomy alone. However, given not all degenerative spondylolistheses are clinically comparable, the best treatment option may depend on multiple parameters. Specifically, the impact of spinopelvic alignment on patient reported and clinical outcomes following fusion versus decompression for grade I spondylolisthesis has yet to be explored. PURPOSE This study assessed two-year clinical outcomes and one-year patient reported outcomes following laminectomy with concomitant fusion versus laminectomy alone for management of grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis. The present study is the first to examine the effect of spinopelvic alignment on patient-reported and clinical outcomes following decompression alone versus decompression with fusion. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective sub-group analysis of observational, prospectively collected cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE 679 patients treated with laminectomy with fusion or laminectomy alone for grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis and comorbid spinal stenosis performed by orthopaedic and neurosurgeons at three medical centers affiliated with a single, tertiary care center. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Global Physical Health (GPH), and Global Mental Health (GMH) scores at baseline and post-operatively at 4-6 and 10-12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included operative parameters (estimated blood loss and operative time), and two-year clinical outcomes including reoperations, duration of postoperative physical therapy, and discharge disposition. METHODS Radiographs/MRIs assessed stenosis, spondylolisthesis, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt; from this data, two cohorts were created based on pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PILL), denoted as "high" and "low" mismatch. Patients underwent either decompression or decompression with fusion; propensity score matching (PSM) and coarsened exact matching (CEM) were used to create matched cohorts of "cases" (fusion) and "controls" (decompression). Binary comparisons used McNemar test; continuous outcomes used Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Between-group comparisons of changes in PROMIS GPH and GMH scores were analyzed using mixed-effects models; analyses were conducted separately for patients with high and low pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PILL) mismatch. RESULTS 49.9% of patients (339) underwent lumbar decompression with fusion, while 50.1% (340) received decompression. In the high PLL mismatch cohort at 10-12 months postoperatively, fusion-treated patients reported improved PROs, including GMH (26.61 vs. 20.75, p<0.0001) and GPH (23.61 vs. 18.13, p<0.0001). They also required fewer months of outpatient physical therapy (1.61 vs. 3.65, p<0.0001) and had lower 2-year reoperation rates (12.63% vs. 17.89%, p=0.0442) compared to decompression-only patients. In contrast, in the low PLL mismatch cohort, fusion-treated patients demonstrated worse endpoint PROs (GMH: 18.67 vs. 21.52, p<0.0001; GPH: 16.08 vs. 20.74, p<0.0001). They were also more likely to require skilled nursing/rehabilitation centers (6.86% vs. 0.98%, p=0.0412) and extended outpatient physical therapy (2.47 vs. 1.34 months, p<0.0001) and had higher 2-year reoperation rates (25.49% vs. 14.71%,p=0.0152). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar laminectomy with fusion was superior to laminectomy in health-related quality of life and reoperation rate at two years postoperatively only for patients with sagittal malalignment, represented by high PILL mismatch. In contrast, the addition of fusion for patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, and spinopelvic harmony (low PILL mismatch) resulted in worse quality of life outcomes and reoperation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarthak Mohanty
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Stephen Barchick
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Orthopaedics; 3737 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Manasa Kadiyala
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Meeki Lad
- New Jersey Medical School; Rutgers University; 185 W S Orange Ave, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA
| | - Armaun D Rouhi
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Chetan Vadali
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Orthopaedics; 3737 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ahmed Albayar
- University of Pennsylvania Department of Neurosurgery; 3737 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ali K Ozturk
- University of Pennsylvania Department of Neurosurgery; 3737 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Amrit Khalsa
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Orthopaedics; 3737 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Comron Saifi
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine; 6445 Main St. 2500, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - David S Casper
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Orthopaedics; 3737 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pereira L, Pinto V, Reinas R, Kitumba D, Alves OL. Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Low-Grade Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Stabilization with Rigid Percutaneous Pedicle Screws. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2023; 135:417-423. [PMID: 38153503 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
The armamentarium of surgical treatment options for lumbar spondylolisthesis (LS) includes decompression alone, stabilization with interlaminar devices, or instrumented fusion, through open or minimally invasive approaches. Despite its safe profuse use in distinctive lumbar spine disorders, using percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) alone to stabilize LS has never been described before. We performed a retrospective study of prospectively collected data, enrolling 24 patients with LS and scrutinizing clinical and radiological outcomes. A statistically significant decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) scores (p < 0.001) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (p < 0.001) was observed, as was a reduction in the intake of acetaminophen after surgery (p = 0.022). In the long-term, PPS effectively reduced the index-level range of motion (p < 0.001), reduced preoperative slippage (p = 0.03), and maintained foraminal height, thus accounting for the positive clinical outcomes. It induced a significant segmental kyphotic effect (p < 0.001) that was compensated for by a favorable increase in the pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) index (0.028).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Pereira
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Center of Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| | - V Pinto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Center of Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| | - R Reinas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Center of Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
| | - D Kitumba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Center of Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Américo Boavida, Angola, Portugal
| | - O L Alves
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Center of Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Lusíadas Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Coric D, Nassr A, Kim PK, Welch WC, Robbins S, DeLuca S, Whiting D, Chahlavi A, Pirris SM, Groff MW, Chi JH, Huang JH, Kent R, Whitmore RG, Meyer SA, Arnold PM, Patel AI, Orr RD, Krishnaney A, Boltes P, Anekstein Y, Steinmetz MP. Prospective, randomized controlled multicenter study of posterior lumbar facet arthroplasty for the treatment of spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 38:115-125. [PMID: 36152329 DOI: 10.3171/2022.7.spine22536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a posterior facet replacement device, the Total Posterior Spine (TOPS) System, for the treatment of one-level symptomatic lumbar stenosis with grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. Posterior lumbar arthroplasty with facet replacement is a motion-preserving alternative to lumbar decompression and fusion. The authors report the preliminary results from the TOPS FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) trial. METHODS The study was a prospective, randomized controlled FDA IDE trial comparing the investigational TOPS device with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and pedicle screw fixation. The minimum follow-up duration was 24 months. Validated patient-reported outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain. The primary outcome was a composite measure of clinical success: 1) no reoperations, 2) no device breakage, 3) ODI reduction of ≥ 15 points, and 4) no new or worsening neurological deficit. Patients were considered a clinical success only if they met all four measures. Radiographic assessments were made by an independent core laboratory. RESULTS A total of 249 patients were evaluated (n = 170 in the TOPS group and n = 79 in the TLIF group). There were no statistically significant differences between implanted levels (L4-5: TOPS, 95% and TLIF, 95%) or blood loss. The overall composite measure for clinical success was statistically significantly higher in the TOPS group (85%) compared with the TLIF group (64%) (p = 0.0138). The percentage of patients reporting a minimum 15-point improvement in ODI showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.037) favoring TOPS (93%) over TLIF (81%). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the percentage of patients reporting a minimum 20-point improvement on VAS back pain (TOPS, 87%; TLIF, 64%) and leg pain (TOPS, 90%; TLIF, 88%) scores. The rate of surgical reintervention for facet replacement in the TOPS group (5.9%) was lower than the TLIF group (8.8%). The TOPS cohort demonstrated maintenance of flexion/extension range of motion from preoperatively (3.85°) to 24 months (3.86°). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that posterior lumbar decompression and dynamic stabilization with the TOPS device is safe and efficacious in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Additionally, decompression and dynamic stabilization with the TOPS device maintains segmental motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domagoj Coric
- 1Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, SpineFirst, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Ahmad Nassr
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Paul K Kim
- 1Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, SpineFirst, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - William C Welch
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Steven DeLuca
- 6Orthopedic Institute of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
| | - Donald Whiting
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ali Chahlavi
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Ascension St. Vincent, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Stephen M Pirris
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Ascension St. Vincent, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Michael W Groff
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John H Chi
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason H Huang
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, Texas
| | | | - Robert G Whitmore
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Scott A Meyer
- 13Department of Neurosurgery, Altair Health Spine, Morristown, New Jersey
| | | | | | - R Douglas Orr
- 16Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and
| | - Ajit Krishnaney
- 16Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and
| | - Peggy Boltes
- 1Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, SpineFirst, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Yoram Anekstein
- 17Department of Orthopaedics, Sackler School of Medical of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Michael P Steinmetz
- 16Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and
| |
Collapse
|