Medicare and erythropoietin

Medical costs and associated racial/ethnic and sex disparities in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use: anemia management under the Medicare reimbursement policy

BACKGROUND: Before 2007, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were the highest-expenditure drug in the Medicare system. In 2007, CMS issued a reimbursement policy change for ESAs used by cancer patients. However, empirical evidence is currently lacking to evaluate medical costs after the policy change, especially by sex and racial/ethnic groups. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of the Medicare reimbursement policy change and associated racial/ethnic and sex disparities on medical costs for cancer patients who were new users of ESAs. METHODS: This study was an exploratory retrospective treatment effectiveness study, which used SEER-Medicare linked data. A difference-in-difference design was used that incorporated a control group of patients with chronic kidney disease. A generalized linear model, with a log link and a gamma distribution, was used to examine medical costs. RESULTS: The Medicare reimbursement policy change was statistically significantly associated with an 11% (95% CI = 2%-20%) reduction in anemia-related costs, including a 10% (95% CI = 1%-19%) reduction in Medicare payment and an 18% (95% CI = 10%-26%) reduction in patient cost sharing. For total medical costs, the policy change was statistically significantly associated with a 12% (95% CI = 6%-18%) reduction, including an 11% (95% CI = 5%-18%) reduction in Medicare payment and a 14% (95% CI = 7%-20%) reduction in patient cost sharing. Medical costs were reduced in patients who were male and those who were White but remained the same for patients who were female and those who were Black, Hispanic, and other races or ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: Anemia-related and total medical costs associated with ESAs used by cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia were reduced after the Medicare reimbursement policy change. However, the policy change was only effective for patients who were male and those who were White. The policy change had no effect on patients who were female and those of racial/ethnic minorities. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the SPARC Research Grant. The funder had no role in any part of this study. This study used the linked SEER-Medicare database. The interpretation and reporting of the data are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Erythropoietin treatment and the risk of hip fractures in hemodialysis patients

Erythropoietin (EPO) is the primary regulator of bone marrow erythropoiesis. Mouse models have provided evidence that EPO also promotes bone remodeling and that EPO-stimulated erythropoiesis is accompanied by bone loss independent of increased red blood cell production. EPO has been used clinically for three decades to treat anemia in end-stage renal disease, and notably, although the incidence of hip fractures decreased in the United States generally after 1990, it rose among hemodialysis patients coincident with the introduction and subsequent dose escalation of EPO treatment. Given this clinical paradox and findings from studies in mice that elevated EPO affects bone health, we examined EPO treatment as a risk factor for fractures in hemodialysis patients. Relationships between EPO treatment and hip fractures were analyzed using United States Renal Data System (USRDS) datasets from 1997 to 2013 and Consolidated Renal Operations in a Web-enabled Network (CROWNWeb) datasets for 2013. Fracture risks for patients treated with <50 units of EPO/kg/week were compared to those receiving higher doses by multivariable Cox regression. Hip fracture rates for 747,832 patients in USRDS datasets (1997-2013) increased from 12.0 per 1000 patient years in 1997 to 18.9 in 2004, then decreased to 13.1 by 2013. Concomitantly, average EPO doses increased from 11,900 units/week in 1997 to 18,300 in 2004, then decreased to 8,800 by 2013. During this time, adjusted hazard ratios for hip fractures with EPO doses of 50-149, 150-299, and ≥ 300 units/kg/week compared to <50 units/kg/week were 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.15), 1.22 (95% CI, 1.14-1.31), and 1.41 (95% CI, 1.31-1.52), respectively. Multivariable analyses of 128,941 patients in CROWNWeb datasets (2013) replicated these findings. This study implicates EPO treatment as an independent risk factor for hip fractures in hemodialysis patients and supports the conclusion that EPO treatment may have contributed to changing trends in fracture incidence for these patients during recent decades. Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

The Role of Big Data in the Development and Evaluation of US Dialysis Care

Rapid growth in electronic communications and digitalization, combined with advances in data management, analysis, and storage, have led to an era of "Big Data." The Social Security Amendments of 1972 turned end-stage renal disease (ESRD) care into a single-payer system for most patients requiring dialysis in the United States. As a result, there are few areas of medicine that have been as influenced by Big Data as dialysis care, for which Medicare's large administrative data sets have had a central role in the evaluation and development of public policy for several decades. In the 1970/1980s, Medicare data helped identify concerning trends in costs, access to dialysis care, and quality of care delivered. As the research community and policymakers made Medicare's administrative data increasingly accessible for investigation, analyses of Medicare claims have had a large role in facilitating policy synthesis and refinement. Efforts to address the skyrocketing cost of injectable drugs in the 1990s and 2000s exemplify this expanded role of Big Data. Although there are opportunities for large government and nongovernmental administrative data sets to continue serving a critical role in the evaluation and development of ESRD policies, it is important to understand challenges and limitations associated with their use.

Use of Hematopoietic Growth Factors in Elderly Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: A SEER-Medicare-based Study

OBJECTIVES

Hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) are essential for successful completion of chemotherapy in lung cancer patients. However, because of their adverse effects, clinical guidelines recommend their use in only selective clinical scenarios. This study, for the first time, explores patient characteristics and temporal trends associated with HGF utilization among elderly lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked data containing 80,940 patients, aged 65 years and older, diagnosed with stage I to IV lung cancer between 1992 and 2009, and who received chemotherapy. Descriptive statistics and logistic regressions were used to examine the characteristics associated with 2 types of HGFs-colony stimulating factors (CSFs) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).

RESULTS

Twenty-five percent of the patients received CSFs and 42% received ESAs. Temporal variations were most predictive of HGF utilization, with an increase from 2.6% in 1992 to 47.3% in 2009 for CSFs and 1.3% to 30.5% for ESAs. Higher chemotherapy-based risk profiles increased the odds of HGF receipt 2 to 3 times (P<0.0001). Even after controlling for relevant clinical characteristics, unexplained sociodemographic associations persisted, suggesting lack of compliance with HGF guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a significant increase in the use of HGFs over time. Although chemotherapy-based risk profiles were significant predictors of HGF receipt, the study results suggest possible lack of compliance with treatment guidelines, which should be investigated. Given the high cost of HGFs, future studies are also needed to determine cost-effectiveness of these drugs among lung cancer patients.

What can we learn from the U.S. expanded end-stage renal disease bundle?

Episode-based payment, commonly referred to as bundled payment, has emerged as a key component of U.S. health care payment reform. Bundled payments are appealing as they share the financial risk of treating patients between payers and providers, encouraging the delivery of cost-effective care. A closely watched example is the U.S. End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Prospective Payment System, known as the 'expanded ESRD bundle.' In this paper we consider the expanded ESRD bundle 2 years after its implementation. First, we discuss emerging lessons, including how implementation has changed dialysis care with respect to the use of erythropoietin stimulating agents, how implementation has led to an increase in the use of home-based peritoneal dialysis, and how it may have contributed to the market consolidation of dialysis providers. Second, we use the expanded ESRD bundle to illustrate the importance of accounting for stakeholder input and staging policy implementation. Third, we highlight the need to consider system-wide consequences of implementing bundled payment policies. Fourth, we suggest how bundled payments may create research opportunities. Bundled payment policies offer opportunities and challenges. Their success will be determined not only by impacts on cost containment, but also to the extent they encourage high quality care.

Comparing mandated health care reforms: the Affordable Care Act, accountable care organizations, and the Medicare ESRD program

In addition to extending health insurance coverage, the Affordable Care Act of 2010 aims to improve quality of care and contain costs. To this end, the act allowed introduction of bundled payments for a range of services, proposed the creation of accountable care organizations (ACOs), and established the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation to test new care delivery and payment models. The ACO program began April 1, 2012, along with demonstration projects for bundled payments for episodes of care in Medicaid. Yet even before many components of the Affordable Care Act are fully in place, the Medicare ESRD Program has instituted legislatively mandated changes for dialysis services that resemble many of these care delivery reform proposals. The ESRD program now operates under a fully bundled, case-mix adjusted prospective payment system and has implemented Medicare's first-ever mandatory pay-for-performance program: the ESRD Quality Incentive Program. As ACOs are developed, they may benefit from the nephrology community's experience with these relatively novel models of health care payment and delivery reform. Nephrologists are in a position to assure that the ACO development will benefit from the ESRD experience. This article reviews the new ESRD payment system and the Quality Incentive Program, comparing and contrasting them with ACOs. Better understanding of similarities and differences between the ESRD program and the ACO program will allow the nephrology community to have a more influential voice in shaping the future of health care delivery in the United States.

Erythropoietin use and abuse

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) is arguably the most successful therapeutic application of recombinant DNA technology till date. It was isolated in 1977 and the gene decoded in 1985. Since then, it has found varied applications, especially in stimulating erythropoiesis in anemia due to chronic conditions like renal failure, myelodysplasia, infections like HIV, in prematurity, and in reducing peri-operative blood transfusions. The discovery of erythropoietin receptor (EPO-R) and its presence in non-erythroid cells has led to several areas of research. Various types of rhEPO are commercially available today with different dosage schedules and modes of delivery. Their efficacy in stimulating erythropoiesis is dose dependent and differs according to the patient's disease and nutritional status. EPO should be used carefully according to guidelines as unsolicited use can result in serious adverse effects. Because of its capacity to improve oxygenation, it has been abused by athletes participating in endurance sports and detecting this has proved to be a challenge.

International trends in erythropoietin use and hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients

Hemoglobin levels and the dose of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have risen over time in hemodialysis patients within the United States. There are concerns that these trends may be driven by reimbursement policies that provide potential incentives to increase this use. To determine this we studied trends in the use of ESA and hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients and the relationship of these trends to the mode of reimbursement. Using the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) database of hemodialysis we analyzed facility practices in over 300 randomly selected dialysis units in 12 countries. At each of three phases (years 1996-2001, 2002-2004, and 2005-present), we randomly selected over 7500 prevalent hemodialysis, hemofiltration, or hemodiafiltration patients. ESA usage rose significantly in every country studied except Belgium. All but Sweden demonstrated a substantial increase in hemoglobin levels. In 2005 more than 40% of patients had hemoglobin levels above the KDOQI upper target limit of 120 g/l in all but Japan. These trends appeared to be independent of the manner of reimbursement even though the United States is the only country with significant financial incentives promoting increased use of these agents. Thus, our study found that prescribing higher doses of ESAs and achieving higher hemoglobin levels by physicians reflects a broad trend across DOPPS countries regardless of the reimbursement policies.

Hemoglobin and hematocrit at the end of hemodialysis: a better way to adjust erythropoietin dose?

A severe disadvantage of administration of recombinant human erythropoietin to hemodialysis patients has been reported. A significant correlation has been shown with hemoglobin values determined online by use of the blood volume monitor (BVM) and by laboratory measurement. Online hemoglobin and hematocrit were measured by use of the BVM during hemodialysis session. Data were analyzed by t test and statistical significance was defined as a P of <0.05. Increases in the mean values of hemoglobin and hematocrit from 11.6 +/- 1.9 to 13.9 +/- 2.4 g/dL (17.4 +/- 7.1%, P = 0.02) and from 34.4 +/- 6.8 to 42 +/- 8.3% (20.6 +/- 8.8%, P = 0.022), respectively, were observed from the beginning to the end of dialysis. We hypothesize that a new strategy for adjusting erythropoietin dose may be based on hemoglobin and hematocrit values evaluated at the end of hemodialysis, when patients are no longer hypervolemic. Inadvertent high levels of hemoglobin could be one explanation why patients present higher rates of cardiovascular and access-related events, especially when monitored online by use of the BVM to achieve the dry weight.

Patterns of use and risks associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents among Medicare patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (erythropoietin and darbepoietin) have been approved to reduce the number of blood transfusions required during chemotherapy; however, concerns about the risks of venous thromboembolism and mortality exist.

METHODS

We identified patients who were aged 65 years or older in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database; who were diagnosed with colon, non-small cell lung, or breast cancer or with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from January 1, 1991, through December 31, 2002; and who received chemotherapy. The main outcome measures were claims for use of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, blood transfusion, venous thromboembolism (ie, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), and overall survival. We used multivariable logistic regression models to analyze the association of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use with clinical and demographic variables. We used time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the association of time to receipt of first erythropoiesis-stimulating agent with venous thromboembolism and overall survival. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Among 56,210 patients treated with chemotherapy from 1991 through 2002, 15,346 (27%) received an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent. The proportion of patients receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents increased from 4.8% in 1991 to 45.9% in 2002 (P < .001). Use was associated with more recent diagnosis, younger age, urban residence, comorbidities, receipt of radiation therapy, female sex, and metastatic or recurrent cancer. The rate of blood transfusion per year during 1991-2002 remained constant at 22%. Venous thromboembolism developed in 1796 (14.3%) of the 12,522 patients who received erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and 3400 (9.8%) of the 34,820 patients who did not (hazard ratio = 1.93, 95% confidence interval = 1.79 to 2.07). Overall survival was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent increased rapidly after its approval in 1991, but the blood transfusion rate did not change. Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents was associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism but not of mortality.

Meeting New Challenges in the Management of Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease Through Collaborative Care with Pharmacists

Objective:

To evaluate chronic kidney disease (CKD)–associated anemia management challenges and limitations and discuss strategies to improve treatment rates and patient response to therapy, monitoring of patient response to therapy, and education of prescribing providers and patients.

Data Sources:

Multiple MEDLINE searches were performed using a comprehensive search term list to identify studies for inclusion, including, but not limited to, anemia, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), epoetin, darbepoetin, CERA, hemoglobin, CKD, dialysis, end-stage renal disease, quality of life, and pharmacist. Annual data reports and clinical practice guidelines published by the National Kidney Foundation and US Renal Data System were included. Information provided within product package inserts for recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa; Epogen, Procrit) and darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp) were also included.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Only articles that were published in English and were relevant for this review were included.

Data Synthesis:

Anemia is a common complication of CKD, with significant impact on patients' quality of life. Anemia of CKD represents a significant burden on the healthcare system, with ESA use resulting in substantial financial costs. As new therapies, formularies, and dosing regimens evolve, the collaborative role of the clinical pharmacist is integral to a multidisciplinary treatment strategy, both in the inpatient and outpatient settings, such as hospitals or dialysis centers, respectively. This review focuses on initial and target hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations, as well as patient characteristics, treatment preferences, and dosing schedules, which are important considerations in managing CKD-associated anemia. To ensure effective therapeutic strategies, a patient-centered approach is required. Pharmacists are ideally positioned to help select ESA therapy, influence formulary use, educate healthcare professionals and patients, develop and implement dosing and monitoring protocols, and possibly promote quality improvement.

Conclusions:

An approach to CKD-associated anemia management that involves collaboration with pharmacists is essential to achieve patient-specific, cost-effective ESA therapy.

HIV/AIDS: AIDS Drug Assistance Programs in the era of routine HIV testing

AIDS [Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome] Drug Assistance Programs, operating within the larger Ryan White Program, are state-based, discretionary programs that provide a drug "safety net" for low-income and uninsured individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Although the AIDS Drug Assistance Programs and the primary care system that provides care for patients with HIV infection are already financially stressed, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently issued guidelines recommending universal HIV testing to help identify the estimated 300,000 individuals in the United States who are unaware that they are infected with HIV. As the number of people living with HIV/AIDS who are coinfected with hepatitis C virus has grown and the cost and complexity of care have increased, the sustainability of the current HIV care system requires a reevaluation in light of the new testing guidelines. We examine the current state of the AIDS Drug Assistance Programs, discuss the implications of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for the already overstretched Ryan White Program, and consider a federally supported national program to ensure high-quality, efficient HIV care for low-income HIV-infected Americans.

Predictors of hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Identification of predictors of hyporesponsiveness to erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) in hemodialysis (HD) patients may help improve anemia management and reduce hemoglobin level variability.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted repeated-measure and logistic regression analyses in a retrospective cohort of long-term HD patients to examine the association of iron markers and measures of renal osteodystrophy with ESA responsiveness. The ESA response coefficient at the individual level, ie, the least confounded dose-response association, was separated from the population level, assumed to represent confounding by medical indication.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

The national database of a large dialysis organization (DaVita Inc, El Segundo, CA) with 38,328 surviving prevalent HD patients during 12 months who received ESA for at least 3 consecutive calendar quarters was examined.

PREDICTORS

Serum levels of ferritin, iron saturation ratio, intact parathyroid hormone, and alkaline phosphatase. OUTCOMES/OTHER MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome was case-mix-adjusted hemoglobin response to quarterly averaged ESA dose at the individual level. The odds ratio (OR) of the greatest versus poorest ESA-response quartile at the patient level was calculated. OR less than 1.0 indicated ESA hyporesponsiveness, and OR greater than 1.0, enhanced responsiveness.

RESULTS

Mean ESA-response coefficients of the least to most responsive quartiles were 0.301 +/- 0.033 (SD), 0.344 +/- 0.004, 0.357 +/- 0.004, and 0.389 +/- 0.026 g/dL greater hemoglobin level per 1,000 U/wk greater ESA dose in each quarter, respectively. The ORs of greatest versus poorest ESA responsiveness at the patient level were serum ferritin level less than 200 ng/mL (0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 0.86; reference, 200 to 500 ng/mL), iron saturation ratio less than 20% (0.54; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.59; reference, 20% to 30%), intact parathyroid hormone level of 600 pg/mL or greater (0.54; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.60; reference, 150 to 300 pg/mL), and alkaline phosphatase level of 160 IU/L or greater (0.64; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.70; reference, 80 to 120 IU/L). Lower estimated dietary protein intake and serum levels of nutritional markers were also associated with greater risk of ESA hyporesponsiveness.

LIMITATIONS

Our results may incorporate uncontrolled confounding. Achieved hemoglobin level may have different associations than targeted hemoglobin level.

CONCLUSIONS

In long-term HD patients, low iron stores, hyperparathyroidism, and high-turnover bone disease are associated with significant ESA hyporesponsiveness. Prospective studies are needed to verify these associations.

Intravenous iron versus erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: friends or foes in treating chronic kidney disease anemia?

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially those requiring maintenance hemodialysis treatments, may lose up to 3 g of iron each year because of frequent blood losses. Higher doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) may worsen iron depletion and lead to an increased platelet count (thrombocytosis), ESA hyporesponsiveness, and hemoglobin variability. Hence, ESA therapy requires concurrent iron supplementation. Traditional iron markers such as serum ferritin and transferrin saturation ratio (TSAT) (ie, serum iron divided by total iron-binding capacity [TIBC]), may be confounded by non-iron-related conditions. Whereas serum ferritin <200 ng/mL suggests iron deficiency in CKD patients, ferritin levels between 200 and 1,200 ng/mL may be related to inflammation, latent infections, malignancies, or liver disease. Protein-energy wasting may lower TIBC, leading to a TSAT within the normal range, even when iron deficiency is present. Iron and anemia indices have different mortality predictabilities, in that high serum ferritin but low iron, TIBC, and TSAT levels are associated with increased mortality, whereas hemoglobin exhibits a U-shaped risk for death. The increased mortality associated with targeting hemoglobin above 13 g/dL may result from iron depletion-associated thrombocytosis. Intravenous (IV) iron administration may not only decrease hemoglobin variability and ESA hyporesponsiveness, it may also reduce the greater mortality associated with the much higher ESA doses that have been used in some patients when targeting higher hemoglobin levels.

Treatment and costs associated with anemic chronic kidney disease patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the current therapeutic options afforded to anemic chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and the costs of these interventions.

METHODOLOGY

Literature search of articles within Ovid MEDLINE between 1996 and 2007 that pertained to the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease patients.

RESULTS

Early detection and treatment of anemia associated with CKD has proven to provide positive cognitive and physical effects. Treatment options that increase iron storage and availability within the body and production of erythropoietin can assist in anemic CKD patients in achieving recommended levels of hemoglobin. Acknowledgement of the potential side effects associated with the medications selected to treat anemia can help in avoiding additional injury to the patient and thus reduce healthcare expenditure. A limitation of this review is that the search was performed within a single database.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care providers can play an active role in detecting anemia early and optimizing available treatment options. Future research on the effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) on patients before they need dialysis, and a cost analysis between epoetin and darbepoetin alpha, would be beneficial.

Reducing versus discontinuing erythropoietin at high hemoglobin levels

A 2006 change in Medicare policy allowed reimbursement for erythropoietin (EPO) in dialysis patients whose most recent hemoglobin exceeded 13 g/dl. We investigated the effects of a change in dosing algorithm implemented in response to this policy, in which EPO dosages were reduced instead of temporarily discontinued for hemoglobin levels > or =13 g/dl. Among 1688 individuals in 18 hemodialysis units, the reduction protocol resulted in more hemoglobin levels > or =13 g/dl (P < 0.0001), fewer levels between 11 and 12.9 g/dl (P < or = 0.004), no difference in the proportion of levels <11 g/dl, and more EPO administered per session (P < 0.0001) than the discontinuation protocol. In view of the expense of erythropoiesis stimulating agents and the uncertainty of the safety of using EPO to achieve high hemoglobin targets, this study suggests that discontinuation, rather than reduction, of EPO treatment is appropriate when hemoglobin reaches 13 g/dl in hemodialysis patients.

Undertreatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease in the United States: analysis of national outpatient survey data

BACKGROUND

Understanding anemia treatment patterns in national outpatient settings may assist evidence-based policy making by identifying the variations in physician prescriptions for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and reasons for such variations.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine anemia management patterns of CKD in outpatient settings in the United States.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used data from the US National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 1996 to 2002. Patients aged 18 years with CKD were included in the study sample. Office visits were considered CKD-related if relevant International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were recorded and if CKD was reported as a reason for the visit. Similarly, visits were considered anemia related if relevant ICD-9-CM codes were recorded and if anemia was reported as a reason for the visit or if anemia-related laboratory testing (eg, hematocrit) was ordered. Anemia medications (ie, erythropoietic-stimulating agents or iron replacement) were retrieved using the NDC drug codes. All analyses were statistically weighted using the NAMCS sampling weights to make national estimates.

RESULTS

From 1996 to 2003, there were 2234 unweighted CKD-related patient visits in the outpatient setting, representing approximately 92 million weighted outpatient visits. The majority of these visits were made by women (63%) and patients aged > or =65 years (54%). Of these visits, 18% were to a nephrologist. Anemia-management issues were also recorded at nearly half (48%) of all CKD outpatient visits. Ten percent of visits for anemia management resulted in an anemia medication prescription. Patients on Medicare (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.74) were less likely and those assessed previously (OR, 4.25; 95% CI, 1.66-10.88) were more likely to receive an anemia medication prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that approximately 10% of CKD-related visits addressing anemia management are receiving anemia medications in US out-patient settings. Most CKD-patient visits were to primary care physicians (PCPs) and physicians other than nephrologists. PCPs were most likely to diagnose anemia but were less likely to prescribe anemia medications.