1
|
Alganmi N, Bashanfar A, Alotaibi R, Banjar H, Karim S, Mirza Z, Abusamra H, Al-Attas M, Turkistany S, Abuzenadah A. Uncovering hidden genetic risk factors for breast and ovarian cancers in BRCA-negative women: a machine learning approach in the Saudi population. PeerJ Comput Sci 2024; 10:e1942. [PMID: 38660159 PMCID: PMC11042021 DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Breast and ovarian cancers are prevalent worldwide, with genetic factors such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations playing a significant role. However, not all patients carry these mutations, making it challenging to identify risk factors. Researchers have turned to whole exome sequencing (WES) as a tool to identify genetic risk factors in BRCA-negative women. WES allows the sequencing of all protein-coding regions of an individual's genome, providing a comprehensive analysis that surpasses traditional gene-by-gene sequencing methods. This technology offers efficiency, cost-effectiveness and the potential to identify new genetic variants contributing to the susceptibility to the diseases. Interpreting WES data for disease-causing variants is challenging due to its complex nature. Machine learning techniques can uncover hidden genetic-variant patterns associated with cancer susceptibility. In this study, we used the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and random forest (RF) algorithms to identify BRCA-related cancer high-risk genes specifically in the Saudi population. The experimental results exposed that the RF method scored superior performance with an accuracy of 88.16% and an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve of 0.95. Using bioinformatics analysis tools, we explored the top features of the high-accuracy machine learning model that we built to enhance our knowledge of genetic interactions and find complex genetic patterns connected to the development of BRCA-related cancers. We were able to identify the significance of HLA gene variations in these WES datasets for BRCA-related patients. We find that immune response mechanisms play a major role in the development of BRCA-related cancer. It specifically highlights genes associated with antigen processing and presentation, such as HLA-B, HLA-A and HLA-DRB1 and their possible effects on tumour progression and immune evasion. In summary, by utilizing machine learning approaches, we have the potential to aid in the development of precision medicine approaches for early detection and personalized treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nofe Alganmi
- Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Precision Medicines, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Arwa Bashanfar
- Information Technology, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reem Alotaibi
- Information Technology, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Haneen Banjar
- Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Centre of Artificial Intelligence in Precision Medicines, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sajjad Karim
- Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Medical Lab Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zeenat Mirza
- Department of Medical Lab Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Fahd Medical Research Center, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Heba Abusamra
- Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Manal Al-Attas
- Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shereen Turkistany
- Center of Innovation Personalized Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adel Abuzenadah
- Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Medical Lab Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McClellan JC, Li JL, Gao G, Huo D. Expression- and splicing-based multi-tissue transcriptome-wide association studies identified multiple genes for breast cancer by estrogen-receptor status. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:51. [PMID: 38515142 PMCID: PMC10958972 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01809-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although several transcriptome-wide association studies (TWASs) have been performed to identify genes associated with overall breast cancer (BC) risk, only a few TWAS have explored the differences in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancer. Additionally, these studies were based on gene expression prediction models trained primarily in breast tissue, and they did not account for alternative splicing of genes. METHODS In this study, we utilized two approaches to perform multi-tissue TWASs of breast cancer by ER subtype: (1) an expression-based TWAS that combined TWAS signals for each gene across multiple tissues and (2) a splicing-based TWAS that combined TWAS signals of all excised introns for each gene across tissues. To perform this TWAS, we utilized summary statistics for ER + BC from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) and for ER- BC from a meta-analysis of BCAC and the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (CIMBA). RESULTS In total, we identified 230 genes in 86 loci that were associated with ER + BC and 66 genes in 29 loci that were associated with ER- BC at a Bonferroni threshold of significance. Of these genes, 2 genes associated with ER + BC at the 1q21.1 locus were located at least 1 Mb from published GWAS hits. For several well-studied tumor suppressor genes such as TP53 and CHEK2 which have historically been thought to impact BC risk through rare, penetrant mutations, we discovered that common variants, which modulate gene expression, may additionally contribute to ER + or ER- etiology. CONCLUSIONS Our study comprehensively examined how differences in common variation contribute to molecular differences between ER + and ER- BC and introduces a novel, splicing-based framework that can be used in future TWAS studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian C McClellan
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - James L Li
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Guimin Gao
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| | - Dezheng Huo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
- Section of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chauhan S, Mathur R, Jha AK. The Impact of microRNA SNPS on Breast Cancer: Potential Biomarkers for Disease Detection. Mol Biotechnol 2024:10.1007/s12033-024-01113-w. [PMID: 38512426 DOI: 10.1007/s12033-024-01113-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer is considered a significant health concern worldwide, with genetic predisposition playing a critical role in its etiology. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), particularly those within the 3' untranslated regions (3'UTRs) of target genes, are emerging as key factors in breast cancer susceptibility. Specifically, miRNAs have been recognized as possible novel approach for biomarkers discovery for both prognosis and diagnosis due to their direct association with cancer progression. Regional disparities in breast cancer incidence underscore the need for precise interventions, considering socio-cultural and economic factors. This review explores into the differential effects of SNP-miRNA interactions on breast cancer risk, emphasizing both risk-enhancing and protective associations across diverse populations. Furthermore, it explores the clinical implications of these findings, highlighting the potential of personalized approaches in breast cancer management. Additionally, it reviews the evolving therapeutic prospect of microRNAs (miRNAs), extending beyond cancer therapeutics to encompass various diseases, indicative of their versatility as therapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakshi Chauhan
- Department of Biotechnology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Runjhun Mathur
- Department of Biotechnology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
- Dr APJ Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Abhimanyu Kumar Jha
- Department of Biotechnology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Torrisi C, Wareg NK, Anbari AB. Decision-making for bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy for an increased lifetime breast cancer risk: A qualitative metasynthesis. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6311. [PMID: 38429973 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previvor is a term applied to a person with an identified, elevated lifetime cancer risk but without an actual cancer diagnosis. Previvorship entails the selection of risk management strategies. For women with a genetic mutation that increases their predisposition for a breast cancer diagnosis, bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) is the most effective prevention strategy. However, BRRM can change a woman's breast appearance and function. The purpose of this qualitative metasynthesis (QMS) was to better understand the decision-making process for BRRM among previvors. METHODS A theory-generating QMS approach was used to analyze and synthesize qualitative findings. Research reports were considered for inclusion if: (1) women over 18 years of age possessed a genetic mutation increasing lifetime breast cancer risk or a strong family history of breast cancer; (2) the sample was considering, or had completed, BRRM; (3) the results reported qualitative findings. Exclusion criteria were male gender, personal history of breast cancer, and research reports which did not separate findings based on cancer diagnosis and/or risk-reduction surgery. RESULTS A theory and corresponding model emerged, comprised of seven themes addressing the decision-making process for or against BRRM. While some factors to decision-making were decisive for surgery, others were more indefinite and contributed to women changing, processing, or suspending their decision-making for a period of time. CONCLUSIONS Regardless of the decision previvors make about BRRM, physical and psychosocial well-being should be considered and promoted through shared decision-making in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa Torrisi
- Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Nuha K Wareg
- Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Allison Brandt Anbari
- Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alonso N, Menao S, Lastra R, Arruebo M, Bueso MP, Pérez E, Murillo ML, Álvarez M, Alonso A, Rebollar S, Cruellas M, Arribas D, Ramos M, Isla D, Galano-Frutos JJ, García-Cebollada H, Sancho J, Andrés R. Association between missense variants of uncertain significance in the CHEK2 gene and hereditary breast cancer: a cosegregation and bioinformatics analysis. Front Genet 2024; 14:1274108. [PMID: 38476463 PMCID: PMC10927753 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1274108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Inherited mutations in the CHEK2 gene have been associated with an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer (BC). We aim to identify in the study population the prevalence of mutations in the CHEK2 gene in diagnosed BC patients, evaluate the phenotypic characteristics of the tumor and family history, and predict the deleteriousness of the variants of uncertain significance (VUS). A genetic study was performed, from May 2016 to April 2020, in 396 patients diagnosed with BC at the University Hospital Lozano Blesa of Zaragoza, Spain. Patients with a genetic variant in the CHEK2 gene were selected for the study. We performed a descriptive analysis of the clinical variables, a bibliographic review of the variants, and a cosegregation study when possible. Moreover, an in-depth bioinformatics analysis of CHEK2 VUS was carried out. We identified nine genetic variants in the CHEK2 gene in 10 patients (two pathogenic variants and seven VUS). This supposes a prevalence of 0.75% and 1.77%, respectively. In all cases, there was a family history of BC in first- and/or second-degree relatives. We carried out a cosegregation study in two families, being positive in one of them. The bioinformatics analyses predicted the pathogenicity of six of the VUS. In conclusion, CHEK2 mutations have been associated with an increased risk for BC. This risk is well-established for foundation variants. However, the risk assessment for other variants is unclear. The incorporation of bioinformatics analysis provided supporting evidence of the pathogenicity of VUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Alonso
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño, Spain
| | - Sebastián Menao
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Biochemistry Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Rodrigo Lastra
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - María Arruebo
- Biochemistry Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - María P. Bueso
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Esther Pérez
- Breast Unit, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - M. Laura Murillo
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - María Álvarez
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Alba Alonso
- Biochemistry Department, University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - Soraya Rebollar
- Biochemistry Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Mara Cruellas
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Valld’Hebron, and Valld’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dolores Arribas
- General Surgery Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Mónica Ramos
- Biochemistry Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Dolores Isla
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Juan José Galano-Frutos
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
- Biocomputation and Complex Systems Physics Institute (BIFI), Joint Units BIFI-IQFR (CSIC) and GBs-CSIC, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Helena García-Cebollada
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
- Biocomputation and Complex Systems Physics Institute (BIFI), Joint Units BIFI-IQFR (CSIC) and GBs-CSIC, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Javier Sancho
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
- Biocomputation and Complex Systems Physics Institute (BIFI), Joint Units BIFI-IQFR (CSIC) and GBs-CSIC, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Raquel Andrés
- Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu YL, Gordhandas S, Arora K, Rios-Doria E, Cadoo KA, Catchings A, Maio A, Kemel Y, Sheehan M, Salo-Mullen E, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Carrot-Zhang J, Manning-Geist B, Sia TY, Selenica P, Vanderbilt C, Misyura M, Latham A, Bandlamudi C, Berger MF, Hamilton JG, Makker V, Abu-Rustum NR, Ellenson LH, Offit K, Mandelker DL, Stadler Z, Weigelt B, Aghajanian C, Brown C. Pathogenic germline variants in patients with endometrial cancer of diverse ancestry. Cancer 2024; 130:576-587. [PMID: 37886874 PMCID: PMC10922155 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial disparities in outcomes exist in endometrial cancer (EC). The contribution of ancestry-based variations in germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) is unknown. METHODS Germline assessment of ≥76 cancer predisposition genes was performed in patients with EC undergoing tumor-normal Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets sequencing from January 1, 2015 through June 30, 2021. Self-reported race/ethnicity and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry data classified patients into groups. Genetic ancestry was inferred from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets. Rates of gPV and genetic counseling were compared by ancestry. RESULTS Among 1625 patients with EC, 216 (13%) had gPVs; 15 had >1 gPV. Rates of gPV varied by self-reported ancestry (Ashkenazi Jewish, 40/202 [20%]; Asian, 15/124 [12%]; Black/African American (AA), 12/171 [7.0%]; Hispanic, 15/124 [12%]; non-Hispanic (NH) White, 129/927 [14%]; missing, 5/77 [6.5%]; p = .009], with similar findings by genetic ancestry (p < .001). We observed a lower likelihood of gPVs in patients of Black/AA (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.81) and African (AFR) ancestry (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.85) and a higher likelihood in patients of Ashkenazi Jewish genetic ancestry (OR, 1.62; 95% CI; 1.11-2.34) compared with patients of non-Hispanic White/European ancestry, even after adjustment for age and molecular subtype. Somatic landscape influenced gPVs with lower rates of microsatellite instability-high tumors in patients of Black/AA and AFR ancestry. Among those with newly identified gPVs (n = 114), 102 (89%) were seen for genetic counseling, with lowest rates among Black/AA (75%) and AFR patients (67%). CONCLUSIONS In those with EC, gPV and genetic counseling varied by ancestry, with lowest rates among Black/AA and AFR patients, potentially contributing to disparities in outcomes given implications for treatment and cancer prevention. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Black women with endometrial cancer do worse than White women, and there are many reasons for this disparity. Certain genetic changes from birth (mutations) can increase the risk of cancer, and it is unknown if rates of these changes are different between different ancestry groups. Genetic mutations in 1625 diverse women with endometrial cancer were studied and the lowest rates of mutations and genetic counseling were found in Black and African ancestry women. This could affect their treatment options as well as their families and may make disparities worse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying L Liu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sushmita Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kanika Arora
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric Rios-Doria
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Karen A Cadoo
- St. James's Hospital, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Amanda Catchings
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anna Maio
- Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yelena Kemel
- Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Margaret Sheehan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Erin Salo-Mullen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jian Carrot-Zhang
- Department of Computational Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Beryl Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tiffany Y Sia
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chad Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maksym Misyura
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alicia Latham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chaitanya Bandlamudi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jada G Hamilton
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lora H Ellenson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Diana L Mandelker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Zsofia Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carol Brown
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barili V, Ambrosini E, Bortesi B, Minari R, De Sensi E, Cannizzaro IR, Taiani A, Michiara M, Sikokis A, Boggiani D, Tommasi C, Serra O, Bonatti F, Adorni A, Luberto A, Caggiati P, Martorana D, Uliana V, Percesepe A, Musolino A, Pellegrino B. Genetic Basis of Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Approaches and Lessons Learnt from Three Decades of Inherited Predisposition Testing. Genes (Basel) 2024; 15:219. [PMID: 38397209 PMCID: PMC10888198 DOI: 10.3390/genes15020219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Germline variants occurring in BRCA1 and BRCA2 give rise to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome, predisposing to breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers marked by elevated incidences of genomic aberrations that correspond to poor prognoses. These genes are in fact involved in genetic integrity, particularly in the process of homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, a high-fidelity repair system for mending DNA double-strand breaks. In addition to its implication in HBOC pathogenesis, the impairment of HR has become a prime target for therapeutic intervention utilizing poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. In the present review, we introduce the molecular roles of HR orchestrated by BRCA1 and BRCA2 within the framework of sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. We examine the genetic architecture underneath breast and ovarian cancer ranging from high- and mid- to low-penetrant predisposing genes and taking into account both germline and somatic variations. Finally, we consider higher levels of complexity of the genomic landscape such as polygenic risk scores and other approaches aiming to optimize therapeutic and preventive strategies for breast and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Barili
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Enrico Ambrosini
- Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Beatrice Bortesi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Roberta Minari
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Erika De Sensi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | | | - Antonietta Taiani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Maria Michiara
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Angelica Sikokis
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Daniela Boggiani
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Chiara Tommasi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Olga Serra
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Francesco Bonatti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Alessia Adorni
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Anita Luberto
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | | | - Davide Martorana
- Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Vera Uliana
- Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Antonio Percesepe
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Antonino Musolino
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Benedetta Pellegrino
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bolze A, Cirulli ET, Hajek C, Schnell Blitstein JM, Grzymski JJ. The Potential of Genetics in Identifying Women at Lower Risk of Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:236-239. [PMID: 38153744 PMCID: PMC10870185 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Importance Genetic information is not being used to identify women at lower risk of breast cancer or other diseases in clinical practice. With the new US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines lowering the age for mammogram screening for all, there is a potential benefit in identifying women at lower risk of disease who may defer the start of mammographic screening. This genetic risk-based approach would help mitigate overscreening, associated costs, and anxiety. Objective To assess breast cancer incidence and age of onset among women at low genetic risk compared with women at average risk and evaluate the potential to delay mammography on the basis of genetic risk stratification. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective case-control study included 25 591 women from the Healthy Nevada Project sequenced by Helix between 2018 and 2022. Data extracted from electronic health records at the end of 2022 (mean length of electronic health record available was 12 years) were used for the analysis in 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Breast cancer diagnosis was identified from electronic health records. Classification to the low-risk genetic group required (1) the absence of pathogenic variants or a variant of uncertain significance in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, or CHEK2, and (2) a low polygenic risk score (bottom 10%) using a 313-single-nucleotide variant model. Results Of 25 591 women in the study (mean [SD] age was 53.8 [16.9] years), 2338 women (9.1%) were classified as having low risk for breast cancer; 410 women (1.6%) were classified as high risk; and 22 843 women (89.3%) as average risk. There was a significant reduction in breast cancer diagnosis among the low-risk group (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.29-0.52; P < .001). By 45 years of age, 0.69% of women in the average-risk group were diagnosed with breast cancer, whereas women in the low-risk group reached this rate at 51 years. By 50 years of age, 1.41% of those in the average-risk group were diagnosed with breast cancer, whereas those in the low-risk group reached this rate at age 58 years. These findings suggest that deferring mammogram screening by 5 to 10 years for women at low risk of breast cancer aligns with new draft recommendations. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this retrospective case-control study underscore the value of genetics in individualizing the onset of breast cancer screening. Improving breast cancer risk stratification by implementing both high-risk and low-risk strategies in screening can refine preventive measures and optimize health care resource allocation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee YH, Huang CY, Hsieh YH, Yang CH, Hung YL, Chen YA, Lin YC, Lin CH, Lee JH, Wang MY, Kuo WH, Lin YY, Lu YS. A novel computer-assisted tool for 3D imaging of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in immunofluorescence-stained and optically cleared breast cancer specimens. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:121. [PMID: 38267903 PMCID: PMC10807239 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11748-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are the two most common immune checkpoints targeted in triple-negative breast cancer (BC). Refining patient selection for immunotherapy is non-trivial and finding an appropriate digital pathology framework for spatial analysis of theranostic biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors remains an unmet clinical need. METHODS We describe a novel computer-assisted tool for three-dimensional (3D) imaging of PD-L1 expression in immunofluorescence-stained and optically cleared BC specimens (n = 20). The proposed 3D framework appeared to be feasible and showed a high overall agreement with traditional, clinical-grade two-dimensional (2D) staining techniques. Additionally, the results obtained for automated immune cell detection and analysis of PD-L1 expression were satisfactory. RESULTS The spatial distribution of PD-L1 expression was heterogeneous across various BC tissue layers in the 3D space. Notably, there were six cases (30%) wherein PD-L1 expression levels along different layers crossed the 1% threshold for admitting patients to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The average PD-L1 expression in 3D space was different from that of traditional immunohistochemistry (IHC) in eight cases (40%). Pending further standardization and optimization, we expect that our technology will become a valuable addition for assessing PD-L1 expression in patients with BC. CONCLUSION Via a single round of immunofluorescence imaging, our approach may provide a considerable improvement in patient stratification for cancer immunotherapy as compared with standard techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Hsuan Lee
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Yen Huang
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ching-Hung Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Branch, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jih-Hsiang Lee
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Yang Wang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center Branch, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hung Kuo
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Yen-Shen Lu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Chung Shan S. Rd., Zhongzheng Dist, Taipei, 100225, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fan X, Chen R, Huang H, Zhang G, Zhou S, Chen X, Zhao Y, Diao Y, Pan S, Zhang F, Sun Y, Zhou F. Classification and prognostic factors of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after surgical treatment: a cluster analysis. Sci Rep 2024; 14:99. [PMID: 38167939 PMCID: PMC10762243 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49477-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Identifying potential prognostic factors of CSM patients could improve doctors' clinical decision-making ability. The study retrospectively collected the baseline data of population characteristics, clinical symptoms, physical examination, neurological function and quality of life scores of patients with CSM based on the clinical big data research platform. The modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score and SF-36 score from the short-term follow-up data were entered into the cluster analysis to characterize postoperative residual symptoms and quality of life. Four clusters were yielded representing different patterns of residual symptoms and quality of patients' life. Patients in cluster 2 (mJOA RR 55.8%) and cluster 4 (mJOA RR 55.8%) were substantially improved and had better quality of life. The influencing factors for the better prognosis of patients in cluster 2 were young age (50.1 ± 11.8), low incidence of disabling claudication (5.0%) and pathological signs (63.0%), and good preoperative SF36-physiological function score (73.1 ± 24.0) and mJOA socre (13.7 ± 2.8); and in cluster 4 the main influencing factor was low incidence of neck and shoulder pain (11.7%). We preliminarily verified the reliability of the clustering results with the long-term follow-up data and identified the preoperative features that were helpful to predict the prognosis of the patients. This study provided reference and research basis for further study with a larger sample data, extracting more patient features, selecting more follow-up nodes, and improving clustering algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Fan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Rui Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Haoge Huang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Gangqiang Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Shuai Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Xin Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Yanbin Zhao
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Yinze Diao
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Shengfa Pan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Fengshan Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Yu Sun
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Feifei Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
- Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Record SM, Thomas SM, Ntowe K, Chiba A, Plichta JK. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers & risk reducing mastectomy: Who undergoes surgery and potential benefits. Am J Surg 2024; 227:146-152. [PMID: 37827871 PMCID: PMC10842097 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) is the most effective breast cancer risk-reduction strategy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. We examined factors associated with RRM and its relationship with overall survival (OS). METHODS Patients aged 18-80y at diagnosis of their BRCA1/2 mutation were selected from our institutional database and stratified by RRM receipt. Differences were tested; unadjusted OS was estimated. RESULTS Of the 306 patients, median age was 43y; median follow-up was 41.6mo. Patients undergoing RRM were more often married with a history of pregnancy (both p ≤ 0.05). Of female patients, 23.1% underwent RRM. Two patients had malignancy detected at RRM, and one developed breast cancer after RRM. Higher unadjusted OS was observed with RRM (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Our analyses suggest that family-structure may play a role in a patient's decision to undergo RRM. We also demonstrated RRM is likely associated with improved survival, potentially underscoring the importance of this option for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney M Record
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Samantha M Thomas
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Koumani Ntowe
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Akiko Chiba
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer K Plichta
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Incorvaia L, Badalamenti G, Novo G, Gori S, Cortesi L, Brando C, Cinieri S, Curigliano G, Ricciardi GR, Toss A, Chiari R, Berardi R, Ballatore Z, Bono M, Bazan Russo TD, Gristina V, Galvano A, Damerino G, Blasi L, Bazan V, Russo A. Anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer harboring mutational signature of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). ESMO Open 2024; 9:102196. [PMID: 38118367 PMCID: PMC10837774 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The BRCA proteins play a key role in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. Beyond BRCA1/2, other genes are involved in the HR repair (HRR). Due to the prominent role in the cellular repair process, pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) in HRR genes may cause inadequate DNA damage repair in cardiomyocytes. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study to investigate the heart toxicity from anthracycline-containing regimens (ACRs) in the adjuvant setting of breast cancer (BC) patients carrying germline BRCA PV/LPVs and no-BRCA HRR pathway genes. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed using cardiac ultrasound before starting ACR therapy and at subsequent time points according to clinical indications. RESULTS Five hundred and three BC patients were included in the study. We predefined three groups: (i) BRCA cohort; (ii) no-BRCA cohort; (iii) variant of uncertain significance (VUS)/wild-type (WT) cohort. When baseline (T0) and post-ACR (T1) LVEFs between the three cohorts were compared, pre-treatment LVEF values were not different (BRCA1/2 versus HRR-no-BRCA versus VUS/WT cohort). Notably, during monitoring (T1, median 3.4 months), patients carrying BRCA or HRR no-BRCA germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants showed a statistically significant reduction of LVEF compared to baseline (T0). To assess the relevance of HRR on the results, we included the analysis of the subgroup of 20 BC patients carrying PV/LPVs in other genes not involved in HRR, such as mismatch repair genes (MUTYH, PMS2, MSH6). Unlike HRR genes, no significant differences in T0-T1 were found in this subgroup of patients. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that deleterious variants in HRR genes, leading to impaired HR, could increase the sensitivity of cardiomyocytes to ACR in early BC patients. In this subgroup of patients, other measurements, such as the global longitudinal strain, and a more in-depth assessment of risk factors may be proposed in the future to optimize cardiovascular risk management and improve long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Incorvaia
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - G Badalamenti
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - G Novo
- Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Paolo Giaccone, Palermo; Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE) "G. D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - S Gori
- Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella
| | - L Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena
| | - C Brando
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - S Cinieri
- Complex Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Brindisi Senatore Antonio Perrino Hospital, Brindisi
| | - G Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan
| | - G R Ricciardi
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O. Papardo & Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina
| | - A Toss
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena
| | - R Chiari
- Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Padova Sud, Monselice
| | - R Berardi
- Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I-GM Lancisi-G Salesi, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona
| | - Z Ballatore
- Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I-GM Lancisi-G Salesi, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona
| | - M Bono
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - T D Bazan Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - V Gristina
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - A Galvano
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - G Damerino
- Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Paolo Giaccone, Palermo
| | - L Blasi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ARNAS Civico, Palermo
| | - V Bazan
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bind), Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - A Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Keskinkılıc M, Gökmen-Polar Y, Badve SS. Triple Negative Breast Cancers: An Obsolete Entity? Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:1-6. [PMID: 38016912 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer is defined on the basis of what it is not. It has served as a useful umbrella entity for management of patients with breast cancer for the last couple of decades. However, during this period a number of novel therapies have become available. These therapies have been documented to be useful in subsets of TNBCs that can be identified on the basis of distinct biologic alterations. Herein we revisit the categorization and usage of the TNBC as an entity to assess its utility in view of the currently available therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merve Keskinkılıc
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Yesim Gökmen-Polar
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Sunil S Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van der Meer DJ, van der Graaf WTA, van de Wal D, Karim-Kos HE, Husson O. Long-term second primary cancer risk in adolescent and young adult (15-39 years) cancer survivors: a population-based study in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2018. ESMO Open 2024; 9:102203. [PMID: 38171190 PMCID: PMC10837779 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have comprehensively investigated the long-term second cancer risk among adolescent and young adult (AYA, aged 15-39 years) cancer survivors. This study investigated the long-term second cancer risk by including the full range of first and second cancer combinations with at least 10 observations in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS First and second primary cancer data of all 6-month AYA cancer survivors were obtained from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Excess cancer risk compared to the general population was assessed with standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and absolute excess risk (AER) statistics up to 25 years after diagnosis. Cumulative incidences were estimated, using death as a competing risk factor. Analyses were carried out with and without applying multiple cancer rules. RESULTS The cohort included 99 502 AYA cancer survivors. Male survivors had a 2-fold higher risk of developing any cancer compared to the general population, whereas this was around 1.3-fold in females. AERs were 17.5 and 10.1 per 10 000 person-years for males and females. The long-term excess risk of cancer was significantly higher for most first and second primary cancer combinations, but comparable and lower risk estimates were also observed. Application of the multiple cancer rules resulted in a noticeable risk underestimation in melanoma, testicular, and breast cancer survivors. Risk outcomes remained similar in most cases otherwise. The cumulative incidence of second cancer overall increased over time up to 8.9% in males and 10.3% in females at 25 years' follow-up. Highest long-term cumulative incidences were observed among lymphoma survivors (13.3% males and 18.9% females). CONCLUSIONS AYA cancer survivors have a higher cancer risk compared to the general population for most cancers up to 25 years after their initial cancer diagnosis. Additional studies that investigate risk factors for the specific cancer type combinations are needed to develop personalized follow-up strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J van der Meer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam; Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam.
| | - W T A van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam
| | - D van de Wal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam
| | - H E Karim-Kos
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht
| | - O Husson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam; Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ndiaye R, Diop JPD, Dem A, Dieye A. Genetic contribution of breast cancer genes in women of black African origin. Front Genet 2023; 14:1302645. [PMID: 38192440 PMCID: PMC10773823 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1302645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is an increasing public health issue worldwide. BC incidence and mortality rates are rising in transitioning countries in Africa, with the most rapid increase occurring in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Female BC represents 25.8% of all cancer diagnosis in SSA. Early age at onset, high grade and triple negative tumors are hallmarks of BC in this region, associated with germline pathogenic variants in susceptibility genes. While several genes have been associated with genetic predisposition (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, TP53, PTEN, CDH1, STK11, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BARD1, BRIP1, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D, … ), most studies have reported contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. Genetic contribution of BRCA genes has been estimated at 27% in Caucasian women. Available data from population of African origin are scarce and have mainly focused on pathogenic variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Reports from main studies on large sample size highlighted that BRCA1 still the major gene associated with BC in SSA. In addition, BRCA2, PALB2, and P53, are also on the top major genes with high penetrance, associated with BC. Mutation spectrum of BC genes in black African women seems to be different from Caucasian with increasing number of founder mutations identified. We hypothesis that the genetic contribution of known BC genes may be different between women of black African origin compared to Caucasians. In this review we explore the genetic contribution of known breast cancer genes in women of African origin, and discuss perspectives for prevention and patients care strategies in the era of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rokhaya Ndiaye
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University Cheikh Anta DIOP, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Jean Pascal Demba Diop
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University Cheikh Anta DIOP, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Ahmadou Dem
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University Cheikh Anta DIOP, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Alioune Dieye
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University Cheikh Anta DIOP, Dakar, Senegal
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wei B, Zhao J, Li J, Feng J, Sun M, Wang Z, Shi C, Yang K, Qin Y, Zhang J, Ma J, Dong H. Pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 and TP53 increase lung cancer risk in Chinese. Cancer Med 2023; 12:21219-21228. [PMID: 37930190 PMCID: PMC10726856 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUD Multiple studies have identified pathogenic germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes (CSGs) in Chinese lung cancer patients; however, accurate assessment of these variants' contributions to cancer predisposition is always hampered by the absence of data on the prevalence of these variants in the general population. It is necessary to conduct a large-scale case-control study to identify CSGs that significantly increase the risk of lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed targeted sequencing of a CSGs panel in 1117 lung cancer patients and 16,327 controls from the general Chinese population. RESULTS In comparison to controls, lung cancer patients had a considerably higher prevalence of pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variations. Among lung cancer patients, 72% of P/LP variants carriers did not have a family cancer history, who would be ignored if germline testing was only provided for patients meeting family history-based criteria. Furthermore, compared to individuals with late-onset lung cancer, patients with early-onset lung cancer had a considerably higher prevalence of P/LP variations. With odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 4-fold (BRCA1: OR, 4.193; 95%CI, 1.382-10.768) to 29-fold (TP53: OR, 29.281; 95%CI, 1.523-1705.506), P/LP variants in the BRCA1 and TP53 genes were discovered to be strongly related to increased lung cancer risk. Additionally, with ORs ranging from 7.322-fold to infinity, we discovered 23 variations previously categorized as non-P/LP variants were highly enriched in lung cancer patients. CONCLUSION Our findings indicated that P/LP variants in BRCA1 and TP53 conferred increased risk of lung cancer in Chinese.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Wei
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular PathologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouHenanChina
| | - Jiadong Zhao
- Nanjing Shenyou Institute of Genome ResearchNanjingJiangsuChina
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular PathologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouHenanChina
| | - Junnan Feng
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular PathologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouHenanChina
| | - Manman Sun
- Nanjing Shenyou Institute of Genome ResearchNanjingJiangsuChina
| | - Zhizhong Wang
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular PathologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouHenanChina
| | - Chao Shi
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular PathologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouHenanChina
| | - Ke Yang
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular PathologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouHenanChina
| | - Yue Qin
- Nanjing Shenyou Institute of Genome ResearchNanjingJiangsuChina
| | - Jing Zhang
- Nanjing Shenyou Institute of Genome ResearchNanjingJiangsuChina
| | - Jie Ma
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular PathologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouHenanChina
| | - Hui Dong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Pancreatic DiseasesShanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bu R, Siraj AK, Al-Rasheed M, Iqbal K, Azam S, Qadri Z, Haqawi W, Tulbah A, Al-Dayel F, Almalik O, Al-Kuraya KS. Identification and characterization of ATM founder mutation in BRCA-negative breast cancer patients of Arab ethnicity. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20924. [PMID: 38017116 PMCID: PMC10684510 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48231-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy among women worldwide with germline pathogenic variants/likely pathogenic variants (PVs/LPVs) in BRCA1/2 accounting for a large portion of hereditary cases. Recently, heterozygous PVs/LPVs in the ATM serine/threonine kinase or Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated gene (ATM) has been identified as a moderate susceptibility factor for BC in diverse ethnicities. However, the prevalence of ATM PVs/LPVs in BC susceptibility in Arab populations remains largely unexplored. This study investigated the prevalence of ATM PVs/LPVs among BC patients from Saudi Arabia, employing capture-sequencing technology for ATM PVs/LPVs screening in a cohort of 715 unselected BC patients without BRCA1/2 PVs/LPVs. In addition, founder mutation analysis was conducted using the PHASE program. In our entire cohort, four unique PVs/LPVs in the ATM gene were identified in six cases (0.8%). Notably, one recurrent LPV, c.6115G > A:p.Glu2039Lys was identified in three cases, for which haplotype analysis confirmed as a novel putative founder mutation traced back to 13 generations on average. This founder mutation accounted for half of all identified mutant cases and 0.4% of total screened cases. This study further reveals a significant correlation between the presence of ATM mutation and family history of BC (p = 0.0127). These findings underscore an approximate 0.8% prevalence of ATM germline PVs/LPVs in Arab BC patients without BRCA1/2 PVs/LPVs and suggest a founder effect of specific recurrent ATM mutation. These insights can help in the design of a genetic testing strategy tailored to the local population in Saudi Arabia, thereby, enabling more accurate clinical management and risk prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Bu
- Human Cancer Genomic Research, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdul K Siraj
- Human Cancer Genomic Research, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maha Al-Rasheed
- Human Cancer Genomic Research, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kaleem Iqbal
- Human Cancer Genomic Research, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saud Azam
- Human Cancer Genomic Research, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zeeshan Qadri
- Human Cancer Genomic Research, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Wael Haqawi
- Human Cancer Genomic Research, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Asma Tulbah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fouad Al-Dayel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Osama Almalik
- Department of Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khawla S Al-Kuraya
- Human Cancer Genomic Research, Research Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- Research Centre at KFNCCC, Human Cancer Genomic Research, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, MBC#98-16, P.O. Box 3354, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maioru OV, Radoi VE, Coman MC, Hotinceanu IA, Dan A, Eftenoiu AE, Burtavel LM, Bohiltea LC, Severin EM. Developments in Genetics: Better Management of Ovarian Cancer Patients. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:15987. [PMID: 37958970 PMCID: PMC10647767 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242115987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to highlight the new advancements in molecular and diagnostic genetic testing and to properly classify all ovarian cancers. In this article, we address statistics, histopathological classification, molecular pathways implicated in ovarian cancer, genetic screening panels, details about the genes, and also candidate genes. We hope to bring new information to the medical field so as to better prevent and diagnose ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ovidiu-Virgil Maioru
- Department of Medical Genetics, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (O.-V.M.); (M.-C.C.); (A.D.); (A.-E.E.); (L.-M.B.); (L.-C.B.); (E.-M.S.)
| | - Viorica-Elena Radoi
- Department of Medical Genetics, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (O.-V.M.); (M.-C.C.); (A.D.); (A.-E.E.); (L.-M.B.); (L.-C.B.); (E.-M.S.)
- “Alessandrescu-Rusescu” National Institute for Maternal and Child Health, 20382 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Madalin-Codrut Coman
- Department of Medical Genetics, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (O.-V.M.); (M.-C.C.); (A.D.); (A.-E.E.); (L.-M.B.); (L.-C.B.); (E.-M.S.)
| | - Iulian-Andrei Hotinceanu
- Department of Medical Genetics, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (O.-V.M.); (M.-C.C.); (A.D.); (A.-E.E.); (L.-M.B.); (L.-C.B.); (E.-M.S.)
| | - Andra Dan
- Department of Medical Genetics, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (O.-V.M.); (M.-C.C.); (A.D.); (A.-E.E.); (L.-M.B.); (L.-C.B.); (E.-M.S.)
| | - Anca-Elena Eftenoiu
- Department of Medical Genetics, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (O.-V.M.); (M.-C.C.); (A.D.); (A.-E.E.); (L.-M.B.); (L.-C.B.); (E.-M.S.)
| | - Livia-Mălina Burtavel
- Department of Medical Genetics, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (O.-V.M.); (M.-C.C.); (A.D.); (A.-E.E.); (L.-M.B.); (L.-C.B.); (E.-M.S.)
| | - Laurentiu-Camil Bohiltea
- Department of Medical Genetics, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (O.-V.M.); (M.-C.C.); (A.D.); (A.-E.E.); (L.-M.B.); (L.-C.B.); (E.-M.S.)
- “Alessandrescu-Rusescu” National Institute for Maternal and Child Health, 20382 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Emilia-Maria Severin
- Department of Medical Genetics, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (O.-V.M.); (M.-C.C.); (A.D.); (A.-E.E.); (L.-M.B.); (L.-C.B.); (E.-M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhu QY, Li PC, Zhu YF, Pan JN, Wang R, Li XL, Ye WW, Ding XW, Wang XJ, Cao WM. A comprehensive analysis of Fanconi anemia genes in Chinese patients with high-risk hereditary breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:14303-14313. [PMID: 37566130 PMCID: PMC10590287 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05236-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Four Fanconi anemia (FA) genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and RAD51C) are defined as breast cancer (BC) susceptibility genes. Other FA genes have been inconsistently associated with BC. Thus, the role of other FA genes in BC should be explored in specific populations. METHODS Mutations in 16 FA genes were screened with a 98-gene panel sequencing assay in a cohort of 1481 Chinese patients with high-risk hereditary BC. The association between mutations and clinicopathological characteristics as well as prognosis was analyzed. The risk of BC in carriers of FA gene mutations was assessed in the Genome Aggregation Database and the Westlake Biobank for Chinese cohort. RESULTS A total of 2.57% (38/1481) BC patients were identified who had 12 other FA gene germline mutations. Among them, the most frequently mutated gene was FANCA (8/1481, 0.54%). These 38 patients carried 35 distinct pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, of which 21 were novel. We found one rare FANCB deleterious variant (c.1327-3dupT) in our cohort. There was a statistically significant difference in lymph node status between FA gene mutation carriers and non-carriers (p = 0.041). We observed a trend that mutation carriers had larger tumor sizes, lower estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positivity rates, and lower 3.5-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) rates than non-carriers (tumor size > 2 cm: 51.43% vs. 45.63%; ER positivity rates: 51.43% vs. 60.81%; PR positivity rates: 48.57% vs. 55.16%; 3.5-year iDFS rates: 58.8% vs. 66.7%; 3.5-year DRFS rates: 58.8% vs. 68.8%). The frequency of the mutations in FANCD2, FANCM and BRIP1 trended to be higher among BC cases than that in controls (p = 0.055, 0.08 and 0.08, respectively). CONCLUSION This study comprehensively estimated the prevalence, clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis and risk of BC associated with deleterious variants in FA genes in Chinese high-risk hereditary BC patients. It enriches our understanding of the role of FA genes with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiao-Yan Zhu
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, People's Republic of China
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang, Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, People's Republic of China
| | - Pu-Chun Li
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, People's Republic of China
- Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China
| | - Yi-Fan Zhu
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, People's Republic of China
- Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China
| | - Jia-Ni Pan
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, People's Republic of China
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang, Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, People's Republic of China
| | - Rong Wang
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Lin Li
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei-Wu Ye
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Wen Ding
- Department of Tumor Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Jia Wang
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen-Ming Cao
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, People's Republic of China.
- Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
He J, Wen W, Ping J, Li Q, Chen Z, Perera D, Shu X, Long J, Cai Q, Shu XO, Zheng W, Long Q, Guo X. Enhancing Disease Risk Gene Discovery by Integrating Transcription Factor-Linked Trans-located Variants into Transcriptome-Wide Association Analyses. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.10.10.23295443. [PMID: 37873299 PMCID: PMC10593059 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.10.23295443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) have been successful in identifying putative disease susceptibility genes by integrating gene expression predictions with genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data. However, current TWAS models only consider cis-located variants to predict gene expression. Here, we introduce transTF-TWAS, which includes transcription factor (TF)-linked trans-located variants for model building. Using data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression project, we predict alternative splicing and gene expression and applied these models to large GWAS datasets for breast, prostate, and lung cancers. Our analysis revealed 887 putative cancer susceptibility genes, including 465 in regions not yet reported by previous GWAS and 137 in known GWAS loci but not yet reported previously, at Bonferroni-corrected P < 0.05. We demonstrate that transTF-TWAS surpasses other approaches in both building gene prediction models and identifying disease-associated genes. These results have shed new light on several genetically driven key regulators and their associated regulatory networks underlying disease susceptibility.
Collapse
|
21
|
Yan H, Ren W, Jia M, Xue P, Li Z, Zhang S, He L, Qiao Y. Breast cancer risk factors and mammographic density among 12518 average-risk women in rural China. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:952. [PMID: 37814233 PMCID: PMC10561452 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11444-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mammographic density (MD) is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. We aimed to evaluate the association between MD and breast cancer related risk factors among average-risk women in rural China. METHODS This is a population-based screening study. 12518 women aged 45-64 years with complete MD data from three maternal and childcare hospitals in China were included in the final analysis. ORs and 95%CIs were estimated using generalized logit model by comparing each higher MD (BI-RADS b, c, d) to the lowest group (BI-RADS a). The cumulative logistic regression model was used to estimate the ORtrend (95%CI) and Ptrend by treating MD as an ordinal variable. RESULTS Older age (ORtrend = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.79-0.81, per 2-year increase), higher BMI (ORtrend = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.71-0.75, per 2 kg/m2), more births (ORtrend = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.41-0.54, 3 + vs. 0-1), postmenopausal status (ORtrend = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.38-0.46) were associated with lower MD. For parous women, longer duration of breastfeeding was found to be associated with higher MD when adjusting for study site, age, BMI, and age of first full-term birth (ORtrend = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.27-1.85, 25 + months vs. no breastfeeding; ORtrend = 1.45, 95%CI: 1.20-1.75, 19-24 months vs. no breastfeeding), however, the association became non-significant when adjusting all covariates. Associations between examined risk factors and MD were similar in premenopausal and postmenopausal women except for level of education and oral hormone drug usage. Higher education was only found to be associated with an increased proportion of dense breasts in postmenopausal women (ORtrend = 1.08, 95%CI: 1.02-1.15). Premenopausal women who ever used oral hormone drug were less likely to have dense breasts, though the difference was marginally significant (OR = 0.54, P = 0.045). In postmenopausal women, we also found the proportion of dense breasts increased with age at menopause (ORtrend = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.21-1.43). CONCLUSIONS In Chinese women with average risk for breast cancer, we found MD was associated with age, BMI, menopausal status, lactation, and age at menopausal. This finding may help to understand the etiology of breast cancer and have implications for breast cancer prevention in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huijiao Yan
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Wenhui Ren
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Mengmeng Jia
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Peng Xue
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Zhifang Li
- Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China
| | - Shaokai Zhang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Zhengzhou, 450008, China
| | - Lichun He
- Mianyang Maternal & Child Health Care Hospital, Mianyang Children's Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, China
| | - Youlin Qiao
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Narayan P, Ahsan MD, Webster EM, Perez L, Levi SR, Harvey B, Wolfe I, Beaumont S, Brewer JT, Siegel D, Thomas C, Christos P, Hickner A, Chapman-Davis E, Cantillo E, Holcomb K, Sharaf RN, Frey MK. Partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) pathogenic variants and ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 177:72-85. [PMID: 37651980 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Approximately 20% of ovarian cancers are due to an underlying germline pathogenic variant. While pathogenic variants in several genes have been well-established in the development of hereditary ovarian cancer (e.g. BRCA1/2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, mismatch repair genes), the role of partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) remains uncertain. We sought to utilize meta-analysis to evaluate the association between PALB2 germline pathogenic variants and ovarian cancer. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched key electronic databases to identify studies evaluating multigene panel testing in people with ovarian cancer. Eligible trials were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS Fifty-five studies met inclusion criteria, including 48,194 people with ovarian cancer and information available on germline PALB2 pathogenic variant status. Among people with ovarian cancer and available PALB2 sequencing data, 0.4% [95% CI 0.3-0.4] harbored a germline pathogenic variant in the PALB2 gene. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for carrying a PALB2 pathogenic variant among the ovarian cancer population of 20,474 individuals who underwent germline testing was 2.48 [95% CI 1.57-3.90] relative to 123,883 controls. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis demonstrates that the pooled OR for harboring a PALB2 germline pathogenic variant among people with ovarian cancer compared to the general population is 2.48 [95% CI 1.57-3.90]. Prospective studies evaluating the role of germline PALB2 pathogenic variants in the development of ovarian cancer are warranted.
Collapse
|
23
|
Tsarouchi MI, Hoxhaj A, Mann RM. New Approaches and Recommendations for Risk-Adapted Breast Cancer Screening. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 58:987-1010. [PMID: 37040474 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Population-based breast cancer screening using mammography as the gold standard imaging modality has been in clinical practice for over 40 years. However, the limitations of mammography in terms of sensitivity and high false-positive rates, particularly in high-risk women, challenge the indiscriminate nature of population-based screening. Additionally, in light of expanding research on new breast cancer risk factors, there is a growing consensus that breast cancer screening should move toward a risk-adapted approach. Recent advancements in breast imaging technology, including contrast material-enhanced mammography (CEM), ultrasound (US) (automated-breast US, Doppler, elastography US), and especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (abbreviated, ultrafast, and contrast-agent free), may provide new opportunities for risk-adapted personalized screening strategies. Moreover, the integration of artificial intelligence and radiomics techniques has the potential to enhance the performance of risk-adapted screening. This review article summarizes the current evidence and challenges in breast cancer screening and highlights potential future perspectives for various imaging techniques in a risk-adapted breast cancer screening approach. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marialena I Tsarouchi
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alma Hoxhaj
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jalil AT, Jehad MT, Al-Ameer LR, Khallawi AQ, Essa IM, Merza MS, Zabibah RS, Al-Hili F. Revolutionizing treatment for triple-negative breast cancer: Harnessing the power of exosomal miRNAs for targeted therapy. Pathol Res Pract 2023; 250:154825. [PMID: 37769396 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a challenging and aggressive form of breast cancer associated with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Although chemotherapy is a primary therapeutic approach, drug resistance often hinders treatment success. However, the expanding knowledge of TNBC subtypes and molecular biology has paved the way for targeted therapies. Notably, exosomes (extracellular vesicles) have emerged as crucial carriers of tumorigenic factors involved in oncogenesis and drug resistance, facilitating cell-to-cell communication and offering potential as self-delivery systems. Among the cargo carried by exosomes, microRNAs (miRNAs) have gained attention due to their ability to mediate epigenetic changes in recipient cells upon transfer. Research has confirmed dysregulation of exosomal miRNAs in breast cancer cells compared to healthy cells, establishing them as promising biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the latest research findings that underscore the diagnostic and prognostic significance of exosomal miRNAs in TNBC treatment. Furthermore, we explore contemporary therapeutic approaches utilizing these exosomal miRNAs for the benefit of TNBC patients, shedding light on potential breakthroughs in TNBC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Anwar Qasim Khallawi
- College of Health and Medical Technologies, Medical Laboratory Department, National University of Science and Technology, Dhi Qar, Iraq
| | - Israa M Essa
- University of Basrah, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Parasitology, Iraq
| | - Muna S Merza
- Prosthetic Dental Techniques Department, Al-Mustaqbal, University College, Hillah, Babylon, Iraq
| | - Rahman S Zabibah
- Medical Laboratory Technology Department, College of Medical Technology, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq
| | - Farah Al-Hili
- Medical technical college, Al-Farahidi University, Baghdad, Iraq
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Goetsch Weisman A, Weiss McQuaid S, Radtke HB, Stoll J, Brown B, Gomes A. Neurofibromatosis- and schwannomatosis-associated tumors: Approaches to genetic testing and counseling considerations. Am J Med Genet A 2023; 191:2467-2481. [PMID: 37485904 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis (NF) and schwannomatosis (SWN) are genetic conditions characterized by the risk of developing nervous system tumors. Recently revised diagnostic criteria include the addition of genetic testing to confirm a pathogenic variant, as well as to detect the presence of mosaicism. Therefore, the use and interpretation of both germline and tumor-based testing have increasing importance in the diagnostic approach, treatment decisions, and risk stratification of these conditions. This focused review discusses approaches to genetic testing of NF- and SWN-related tumor types, which are somewhat rare and perhaps lesser known to non-specialized clinicians. These include gastrointestinal stromal tumors, breast cancer, plexiform neurofibromas with or without transformation to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, gliomas, and schwannomas, and emphasizes the need for inclusion of genetic providers in patient care and appropriate pre- and post-test education, genetic counseling, and focused evaluation by a medical geneticist or other healthcare provider familiar with clinical manifestations of these disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Goetsch Weisman
- Division of Genetics, Genomics and Metabolism, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shelly Weiss McQuaid
- Division of Genetics, Genomics and Metabolism, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Division of Oncology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Heather B Radtke
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
- Children's Tumor Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Bryce Brown
- Medical Genomics Laboratory, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Alicia Gomes
- Medical Genomics Laboratory, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Usui Y, Momozawa Y. Personalized medicine with germline pathogenic variants: Importance of population- and region-wide evidence. Cancer Sci 2023; 114:3816-3824. [PMID: 37530079 PMCID: PMC10551596 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Rare germline pathogenic variants in cancer-predisposing genes have a high impact and potential for clinical utility. In the last 30 years, based on evidence of cancer risk associated with germline pathogenic variants, several measures have been suggested for personalized medicine, including the development of novel treatments, treatment stratification, risk reduction by surgical measures, chemoprevention, removal of environmental factors, and surveillance for early detection among specific high-risk individuals. However, this evidence is mainly based on evaluations of European populations. Our large-scale analyses of more than 100,000 individuals, including 14 disease cases and non-cancer controls in the Japanese population, suggest some discrepancies in the associations between cancer-predisposing genes and diseases, expansion of the targeted diseases of BRCA1 and BRCA2, and a potential novel risk-reduction measure for gastric cancer. They are likely to be explained by population and region variations; therefore, more population-wide and region-wide research could provide improved personalized medicine as well as a better understanding of disease mechanisms. This review summarizes current personalized medicine and discusses the potential use of germline pathogenic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiaki Usui
- Laboratory for Genotyping DevelopmentRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical SciencesYokohamaJapan
| | - Yukihide Momozawa
- Laboratory for Genotyping DevelopmentRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical SciencesYokohamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ahuja S, Aneja H, Yadav AK, Ranga S, Chintamani, Paul J. Evaluation of Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated IVS10 Mutation in Breast Cancer Along with Clinicopathological Parameters. J Midlife Health 2023; 14:272-279. [PMID: 38504739 PMCID: PMC10946688 DOI: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_71_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, with an estimated 2.26 million new cases diagnosed in 2020. The important genes associated include BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PTEN, TP53, and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM). ATM is responsible for repairing double-strand breaks in DNA making it a significant candidate in breast cancer predisposition. ATM variant, c.1066-6T>G, has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in some but not all studies. The Indian studies on the allele IVS10-6T>G are very limited. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the associations between c.1066-6T>G ATM gene variant and breast cancer incidence in Indian women and its correlation with histological grade, stage, and surrogate molecular classification. Materials and Methods Routine histopathological processing was done after adequate fixation of the specimen followed by staining with hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry for ER, PR, Her2neu, and Ki67. Single-nucleotide polymorphism for ATM allele IVS10-6T>G was studied after DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction amplification, and restriction enzyme digestion. Results All cases were found to be negative for ATM allele IVS10-6T>G mutation. Maximum number of patients (19 cases; 52.78%) had pT2 stage tumor followed by 11 patients (30.56%) with pT3. Majority of cases were luminal B (11; 30.56%) followed by triple negative (10; 27.78%). Conclusion Although the results obtained by mutational analysis in the present study are not in agreement with the previous study on Indian women it agrees with the numerous previous studies and meta-analyses done on women with breast carcinoma in the Western world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sana Ahuja
- Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Himani Aneja
- Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Amit Kumar Yadav
- Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sunil Ranga
- Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Chintamani
- Department of Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Jaishree Paul
- School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chakraborty N, Lawrence A, Campbell R, Yang R, Hammamieh R. Biomarker discovery process at binomial decision point (2BDP): Analytical pipeline to construct biomarker panel. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2023; 21:4729-4742. [PMID: 37822559 PMCID: PMC10562676 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
A clinical incident is typically manifested by several molecular events; therefore, it seems logical that a successful diagnosis, prognosis, or stratification of a clinical landmark require multiple biomarkers. In this report, we presented a machine learning pipeline, namely "Biomarker discovery process at binomial decision point" (2BDP) that took an integrative approach in systematically curating independent variables (e.g., multiple molecular markers) to explain an output variable (e.g., clinical landmark) of binary in nature. In a logical sequence, 2BDP includes feature selection, unsupervised model development and cross validation. In the present work, the efficiency of 2BDP was demonstrated by finding three biomarker panels that independently explained three stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) marked as Braak stages I, II and III, respectively. We designed three assortments from the entire cohort based on these Braak stages; subsequently, each assortment was split into two populations at Braak score I, II or III. 2BDP systematically integrated random forest and logistic regression fitting model to find biomarker panels with minimum features that explained these three assortments, e.g., significantly differentiated two populations segregated by Braak stage I, II or III, respectively. Thereafter, the efficacies of these panels were measured by the area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plot. The AUC-ROC was calculated by two cross-validation methods. Final set of gene markers was a mix of novel and a priori established AD signatures. These markers were weighted by unique coefficients and linearly connected in a group of 2-10 to explain Braak stage I, II or III by AUC ≥ 0.8. Small sample size and a lack of distinctly recruited Training and Test sets were the limitations of the present undertaking; yet 2BDP demonstrated its capability to curate a panel of optimum numbers of biomarkers to describe the outcome variable with high efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabarun Chakraborty
- Medical Readiness Systems Biology, Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience (CMPN), Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Alexander Lawrence
- Medical Readiness Systems Biology, Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience (CMPN), Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
- ORISE, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Ross Campbell
- Medical Readiness Systems Biology, Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience (CMPN), Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
- Geneva Foundation, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Ruoting Yang
- Medical Readiness Systems Biology, Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience (CMPN), Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Rasha Hammamieh
- Medical Readiness Systems Biology, Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience (CMPN), Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Xulu KR, Nweke EE, Augustine TN. Delineating intra-tumoral heterogeneity and tumor evolution in breast cancer using precision-based approaches. Front Genet 2023; 14:1087432. [PMID: 37662839 PMCID: PMC10469897 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1087432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The burden of breast cancer continues to increase worldwide as it remains the most diagnosed tumor in females and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease characterized by different subtypes which are driven by aberrations in key genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, and hormone receptors. However, even within each subtype, heterogeneity that is driven by underlying evolutionary mechanisms is suggested to underlie poor response to therapy, variance in disease progression, recurrence, and relapse. Intratumoral heterogeneity highlights that the evolvability of tumor cells depends on interactions with cells of the tumor microenvironment. The complexity of the tumor microenvironment is being unraveled by recent advances in screening technologies such as high throughput sequencing; however, there remain challenges that impede the practical use of these approaches, considering the underlying biology of the tumor microenvironment and the impact of selective pressures on the evolvability of tumor cells. In this review, we will highlight the advances made thus far in defining the molecular heterogeneity in breast cancer and the implications thereof in diagnosis, the design and application of targeted therapies for improved clinical outcomes. We describe the different precision-based approaches to diagnosis and treatment and their prospects. We further propose that effective cancer diagnosis and treatment are dependent on unpacking the tumor microenvironment and its role in driving intratumoral heterogeneity. Underwriting such heterogeneity are Darwinian concepts of natural selection that we suggest need to be taken into account to ensure evolutionarily informed therapeutic decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kutlwano Rekgopetswe Xulu
- School of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Ekene Emmanuel Nweke
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Tanya Nadine Augustine
- School of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Öfverholm A, Törngren T, Rosén A, Arver B, Einbeigi Z, Haraldsson K, Ståhlbom AK, Kuchinskaya E, Lindblom A, Melin B, Paulsson-Karlsson Y, Stenmark-Askmalm M, Tham E, von Wachenfeldt A, Kvist A, Borg Å, Ehrencrona H. Extended genetic analysis and tumor characteristics in over 4600 women with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:738. [PMID: 37563628 PMCID: PMC10413543 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11229-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic screening for pathogenic variants (PVs) in cancer predisposition genes can affect treatment strategies, risk prediction and preventive measures for patients and families. For decades, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) has been attributed to PVs in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, and more recently other rare alleles have been firmly established as associated with a high or moderate increased risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer. Here, we assess the genetic variation and tumor characteristics in a large cohort of women with suspected HBOC in a clinical oncogenetic setting. METHODS Women with suspected HBOC referred from all oncogenetic clinics in Sweden over a six-year inclusion period were screened for PVs in 13 clinically relevant genes. The genetic outcome was compared with tumor characteristics and other clinical data collected from national cancer registries and hospital records. RESULTS In 4622 women with breast and/or ovarian cancer the overall diagnostic yield (the proportion of women carrying at least one PV) was 16.6%. BRCA1/2 PVs were found in 8.9% of women (BRCA1 5.95% and BRCA2 2.94%) and PVs in the other breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes in 8.2%: ATM (1.58%), BARD1 (0.45%), BRIP1 (0.43%), CDH1 (0.11%), CHEK2 (3.46%), PALB2 (0.84%), PTEN (0.02%), RAD51C (0.54%), RAD51D (0.15%), STK11 (0) and TP53 (0.56%). Thus, inclusion of the 11 genes in addition to BRCA1/2 increased diagnostic yield by 7.7%. The yield was, as expected, significantly higher in certain subgroups such as younger patients, medullary breast cancer, higher Nottingham Histologic Grade, ER-negative breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer and high grade serous ovarian cancer. Age and tumor subtype distributions differed substantially depending on genetic finding. CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to understanding the clinical and genetic landscape of breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. Extending clinical genetic screening from BRCA1 and BRCA2 to 13 established cancer predisposition genes almost doubles the diagnostic yield, which has implications for genetic counseling and clinical guidelines. The very low yield in the syndrome genes CDH1, PTEN and STK11 questions the usefulness of including these genes on routine gene panels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Öfverholm
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Therese Törngren
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anna Rosén
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Brita Arver
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Zakaria Einbeigi
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
- Department of Medicine and Oncology, Southern Älvsborg Hospital, Borås, Sweden
| | - Karin Haraldsson
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Ekaterina Kuchinskaya
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Clinical Genetics, Department of Clinical Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Beatrice Melin
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Ylva Paulsson-Karlsson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Marie Stenmark-Askmalm
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Clinical Genetics, Department of Clinical Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
| | - Emma Tham
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna von Wachenfeldt
- Department of Clinical Science and Education at Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Kvist
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Åke Borg
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hans Ehrencrona
- Department of Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Stiller S, Drukewitz S, Lehmann K, Hentschel J, Strehlow V. Clinical Impact of Polygenic Risk Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in 382 Individuals with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3938. [PMID: 37568754 PMCID: PMC10417109 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Single nucleotide polymorphisms are currently not considered in breast cancer (BC) risk predictions used in daily practice of genetic counselling and clinical management of familial BC in Germany. This study aimed to assess the clinical value of incorporating a 313-variant-based polygenic risk score (PRS) into BC risk calculations in a cohort of German women with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Data from 382 individuals seeking counselling for HBOC were analysed. Risk calculations were performed using the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm with and without the inclusion of the PRS. Changes in risk predictions and their impact on clinical management were evaluated. The PRS led to changes in risk stratification based on 10-year risk calculations in 13.6% of individuals. Furthermore, the inclusion of the PRS in BC risk predictions resulted in clinically significant changes in 12.0% of cases, impacting the prevention recommendations established by the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. These findings support the implementation of the PRS in genetic counselling for personalized BC risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Stiller
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Stephan Drukewitz
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Core Unit for Molecular Tumor Diagnostics (CMTD), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Kathleen Lehmann
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Julia Hentschel
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Vincent Strehlow
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Henkel J, Laner A, Locher M, Wohlfrom T, Neitzel B, Becker K, Neuhann T, Abicht A, Steinke-Lange V, Holinski-Feder E. Diagnostic yield and clinical relevance of expanded germline genetic testing for nearly 7000 suspected HBOC patients. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:925-930. [PMID: 37188824 PMCID: PMC10400578 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01380-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Here we report the results of a retrospective germline analysis of 6941 individuals fulfilling the criteria necessary for genetic testing of hereditary breast- and ovarian cancer (HBOC) according to the German S3 or AGO Guidelines. Genetic testing was performed by next-generation sequencing using 123 cancer-associated genes based on the Illumina TruSight® Cancer Sequencing Panel. In 1431 of 6941 cases (20.6%) at least one variant was reported (ACMG/AMP classes 3-5). Of those 56.3% (n = 806) were class 4 or 5 and 43.7% (n = 625) were a class 3 (VUS). We defined a 14 gene HBOC core gene panel and compared this to a national and different internationally recommended gene panels (German Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Consortium HBOC Consortium, ClinGen expert Panel, Genomics England PanelsApp) in regard of diagnostic yield, revealing a diagnostic range of pathogenic variants (class 4/5) from 7.8 to 11.6% depending on the panel evaluated. With the 14 HBOC core gene panel having a diagnostic yield of pathogenic variants (class 4/5) of 10.8%. Additionally, 66 (1%) pathogenic variants (ACMG/AMP class 4 or 5) were found in genes outside the 14 HBOC core gene set (secondary findings) that would have been missed with the restriction to the analysis of HBOC genes. Furthermore, we evaluated a workflow for a periodic re-evaluation of variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) for the improvement of clinical validity of germline genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Henkel
- MGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, München, Germany
| | - Andreas Laner
- MGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, München, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Angela Abicht
- MGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, München, Germany
- Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Department of Neurology, Klinikum der Universität, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Verena Steinke-Lange
- MGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, München, Germany
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität, München, Germany
| | - Elke Holinski-Feder
- MGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, München, Germany.
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität, München, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pourzand P, Tabasi F, Fayazbakhsh F, Sarhadi S, Bahari G, Mohammadi M, Jomepour S, Nafeli M, Mosayebi F, Heravi M, Taheri M, Hashemi M, Ghavami S. The Reticulon-4 3-bp Deletion/Insertion Polymorphism Is Associated with Structural mRNA Changes and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Case-Control Study with Bioinformatics Analysis. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1549. [PMID: 37511924 PMCID: PMC10381770 DOI: 10.3390/life13071549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a complex disease caused by molecular events that disrupt cellular survival and death. Discovering novel biomarkers is still required to better understand and treat BC. The reticulon-4 (RTN4) gene, encoding Nogo proteins, plays a critical role in apoptosis and cancer development, with genetic variations affecting its function. We investigated the rs34917480 in RTN4 and its association with BC risk in an Iranian population sample. We also predicted the rs34917480 effect on RTN4 mRNA structure and explored the RTN4's protein-protein interaction network (PPIN) and related pathways. In this case-control study, 437 women (212 BC and 225 healthy) were recruited. The rs34917480 was genotyped using AS-PCR, mRNA secondary structure was predicted with RNAfold, and PPIN was constructed using the STRING database. Our findings revealed that this variant was associated with a decreased risk of BC in heterozygous (p = 0.012), dominant (p = 0.015), over-dominant (p = 0.017), and allelic (p = 0.035) models. Our prediction model showed that this variant could modify RTN4's mRNA thermodynamics and potentially its translation. RTN4's PPIN also revealed a strong association with apoptosis regulation and key signaling pathways highly implicated in BC. Consequently, our findings, for the first time, demonstrate that rs34917480 could be a protective factor against BC in our cohort, probably via preceding mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pouria Pourzand
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
| | - Farhad Tabasi
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 1411713116, Iran
| | - Fariba Fayazbakhsh
- School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Science, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
| | - Shamim Sarhadi
- Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Department of Medical Biotechnology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran
| | - Gholamreza Bahari
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
- Children and Adolescent Health Research Center, Resistant Tuberculosis Institute, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
| | - Mohsen Mohammadi
- School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Science, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
| | - Sahar Jomepour
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Center, School of Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Science, Bandar Abbas 7916613885, Iran
| | - Mohammad Nafeli
- School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Science, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Mosayebi
- Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran 1416634793, Iran
| | - Mehrdad Heravi
- School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Science, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
| | - Mohsen Taheri
- Genetics of Non-Communicable Disease Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hashemi
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
- Genetics of Non-Communicable Disease Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan 9816743463, Iran
| | - Saeid Ghavami
- Research Institute of Oncology and Hematology, Cancer Care Manitoba-University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
- Biology of Breathing Theme, Children Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine in Zabrze, University of Technology in Katowice, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
- Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Science, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Huang Y, Zheng D, Yang Q, Wu J, Tian H, Ji Z, Chen L, Cai J, Li Z, Chen Y. Global trends in BRCA-related breast cancer research from 2013 to 2022: A scientometric analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1197168. [PMID: 37476378 PMCID: PMC10354558 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1197168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Since the mid-2000s, breast cancer incidence among women has slowly increased at about 0.5% per year. In the last three decades, Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene (BRCA) has been proven to be the crucial gene in encouraging the incidence and development of breast cancer. However, scientometric analysis on BRCA-related breast cancer is in shortage. Thus, to have a clear understanding of the current status and catch up with the hotspots, a scientometric analysis was conducted on specific academic publications collected from the Web of Science (WoS). Methods We searched the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) to procure associated articles as our dataset. Bibliometric, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and HistCite software were then applied to conduct visual analyses of countries, institutions, journals, authors, landmark articles, and keywords in this research field. Results A total of 7,266 articles and 1,310 review articles published between 2013 to 2022 were retrieved eventually. The annual output steadily rose year by year and peaked in 2021. The USA led the way in the number of published works, total citations, and collaboration. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment was the most favoured journal in this research field. Narod SA from the University of Toronto produced the most publications. At last, the most prominent keywords were "breast cancer" (n=1,778), "women" (n=1,369), "brca1" (n=1,276), "ovarian cancer" (n=1,259), "risk" (n=1,181), and "mutations" (n=929), which exposed the hotspots within the BRCA domain of breast cancer study. Conclusion The tendency in the BRCA research field over the past decade was presented by the scientometric analysis. The current research focus is the clinical trials of poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) drugs and their resistance mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhiyang Li
- *Correspondence: Zhiyang Li, ; Yexi Chen,
| | - Yexi Chen
- *Correspondence: Zhiyang Li, ; Yexi Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Özdemir Z, Çevik E, Öksüzoğlu ÖBÇ, Doğan M, Ateş Ö, Esin E, Bilgetekin İ, Demirci U, Köseoğlu Ç, Topal A, Karadurmuş N, Erdem HB, Bahsi T. Uncommon variants detected via hereditary cancer panel and suggestions for genetic counseling. Mutat Res 2023; 827:111831. [PMID: 37453313 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2023.111831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hereditary cancer syndromes constitute 5-10% of all cancers. The development of next-generation sequencing technologies has made it possible to examine many hereditary cancer syndrome-causing genes in a single panel. This study's goal was to describe the prevalence and the variant spectrum using NGS in individuals who were thought to have a hereditary predisposition for cancer. MATERIAL AND METHOD Analysis was performed for 1254 who were thought to have a familial predisposition for cancer. We excluded 46 patients who were carrying BRCA1/2 variants in this study, for focusing on the rare gene mutations. Sequencing was performed using the Sophia Hereditary Cancer Solution v1.1 Panel and the Qiagen Large Hereditary Cancer Panel. The Illumina MiSeq system was used for the sequencing procedure. The software used for the data analyses was Sophia DDM and QIAGEN Clinical Insight (QCITM) Analyze. The resulting genomic changes were classified according to the current guidelines of ACMG/AMP. RESULTS Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were detected in 172 (13.7%) of 1254 patients. After excluding the 46 BRCA1/2-positive patients, among the remaining 126 patients; there were 60 (4.8%) breast cancer, 33 (2.6%) colorectal cancer, 9 (0.7%) ovarian cancer, 5 (0.4%) endometrium cancer, 5 (0.4%) stomach cancer, 3 (0.2%) prostate cancer patients. The most altered genes were MUTYH in 27 (2.1%) patients, MMR genes (MLH1, MSH6, MSH, MSH2, PMS2 and EPCAM) in 26 (2%) patients, and ATM in 25 (2%) patients. We also examined the genotype-phenotype correlation in rare variants. Additionally, we identified 11 novel variations. CONCLUSION This study provided significant information regarding rare variants observed in the Turkish population because it was carried out with a large patient group. Personalized treatment options and genetic counseling for the patients are therefore made facilitated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeynep Özdemir
- Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Department of Medical Genetics, Ankara, Turkiye.
| | - Ezgi Çevik
- Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Department of Medical Genetics, Ankara, Turkiye
| | | | - Mutlu Doğan
- University of Health Sciences, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkiye
| | - Öztürk Ateş
- University of Health Sciences, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkiye
| | - Ece Esin
- Bayındır Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkiye
| | - İrem Bilgetekin
- Lösante Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Umut Demirci
- Memorial Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkiye
| | - Çağlar Köseoğlu
- University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkiye
| | - Alper Topal
- University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkiye
| | - Nuri Karadurmuş
- University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkiye
| | - Haktan Bağış Erdem
- Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Department of Medical Genetics, Ankara, Turkiye
| | - Taha Bahsi
- Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Department of Medical Genetics, Ankara, Turkiye
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yoon JY, Roth JJ, Rushton CA, Morrissette JJD, Nathanson KL, Cohen RB, Rosenbaum JN. Homologous recombination pathway gene variants identified by tumor-only sequencing assays in lung carcinoma patients. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2023; 12:1236-1244. [PMID: 37425424 PMCID: PMC10326790 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-22-749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Background The homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway plays a key role in double-stranded DNA break repair, and germline HR pathway gene variants are associated with increased risk of several cancers, including breast and ovarian cancer. HR deficiency is also a therapeutically targetable phenotype. Methods Somatic (tumour-only) sequencing was performed on 1,109 cases of lung tumors, and the pathological data were reviewed to filter for lung primary carcinomas. Cases were filtered for variants (disease-associated or of uncertain significance) in 14 HR pathway genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM. The clinical, pathological and molecular data were reviewed. Results Sixty-one HR pathway gene variants in 56 patients with primary lung cancer were identified. Further filtering by variant allele fraction (VAF) of ≥30% identified 17 HR pathway gene variants in 17 patients. ATM gene variants were most the commonly identified (9/17), including two patients with c.7271T>G (p.V2424G), a variant in the germline that is associated with increased familial cancer risk. Four (4/17) patients had a family history of lung cancer, among which three patients had ATM gene variants suspected to be germline in origin. In three other patients with BRCA1/2 or PALB2 gene variants who had undergone germline testing, the variants were confirmed to be germline; lung cancer was the sentinel cancer in two of these patients with a BRCA1 or PALB2 variant. Conclusions Genomic variants in the HR repair pathway identified in tumor-only sequencing and occurring at higher VAFs (i.e., ≥30%) may suggest a germline origin. Correlating with personal and family history, a subset of these variants is also suggested to be associated with familial cancer risks. Patient age, smoking history and driver mutation status are expected to be a poor screening tool in identifying these patients. Finally, the relative enrichment for ATM variants in our cohort suggests a possible association between ATM mutation and lung cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju-Yoon Yoon
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jacquelyn J. Roth
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chase A. Rushton
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer J. D. Morrissette
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katherine L. Nathanson
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Roger B. Cohen
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jason N. Rosenbaum
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kartti S, Bouricha EM, Zarrik O, Aghlallou Y, Mounjid C, ELJaoudi R, Belyamani L, Ibrahimi A, EL khannoussi B. Targeted Gene Panel Sequencing Unveiled New Pathogenic Mutations in Patients With Breast Cancer. Bioinform Biol Insights 2023; 17:11779322231182054. [PMID: 37377792 PMCID: PMC10291397 DOI: 10.1177/11779322231182054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The increasing commercialization of new gene panels based on next-generation sequencing for clinical research has significantly improved our understanding of breast cancer genetics and has led to the discovery of new mutation variants. The study included 16 unselected Moroccan breast cancer patients tested with multi-gene panel (HEVA screen panel) using Illumina Miseq, followed by Sanger sequencing to validate the most relevant mutation. Mutational analysis revealed the presence of 13 mutations (11 single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] and 2 indels), and 6 of 11 identified SNPs were predicted as pathogenic. One of the 6 pathogenic mutations was c.7874G>C, a heterozygous SNP in HD-OB domain of BRCA2 gene, which led to the arginine to threonine change at codon 2625 of the protein. This work describes the first case of a patient with breast cancer harboring this pathogenic variant and analyzes its functional impact using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation. Further experimental investigations are needed to validate its pathogenicity and to verify its association with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Souad Kartti
- Biotechnology Lab (MedBiotech), Bioinova Research Center, Rabat Medical & Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
- Mohammed VI Center for Research and Innovation, Rabat, Morocco
| | - El Mehdi Bouricha
- Biotechnology Lab (MedBiotech), Bioinova Research Center, Rabat Medical & Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
- Mohammed VI Center for Research and Innovation, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Oumaima Zarrik
- Biotechnology Lab (MedBiotech), Bioinova Research Center, Rabat Medical & Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| | | | - Chaimaa Mounjid
- Pathology Department, Oncology National Institute, Rabat Medical and Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Rachid ELJaoudi
- Biotechnology Lab (MedBiotech), Bioinova Research Center, Rabat Medical & Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
- Mohammed VI Center for Research and Innovation, Rabat, Morocco
- Emergency Department, Military Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Lahcen Belyamani
- Mohammed VI Center for Research and Innovation, Rabat, Morocco
- Emergency Department, Military Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
- Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences, Casablanca, Morocco
| | - Azeddine Ibrahimi
- Biotechnology Lab (MedBiotech), Bioinova Research Center, Rabat Medical & Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
- Mohammed VI Center for Research and Innovation, Rabat, Morocco
- Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences, Casablanca, Morocco
| | - Basma EL khannoussi
- Pathology Department, Oncology National Institute, Rabat Medical and Pharmacy School, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gunawardena K, Sirisena ND, Anandagoda G, Neththikumara N, Dissanayake VHW. Germline variants of uncertain significance, their frequency, and clinico-pathological features in a cohort of Sri Lankan patients with hereditary breast cancer. BMC Res Notes 2023; 16:95. [PMID: 37277882 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06365-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based testing in cancer patients has led to increased detection of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). VUS are genetic variants whose impact on protein function is unknown. VUS pose a challenge to clinicians and patients due to uncertainty regarding their cancer predisposition risk. Paucity of data exists on the pattern of VUS in under-represented populations. This study describes the frequency of germline VUS and clinico-pathological features in Sri Lankan hereditary breast cancer patients. METHODS Data of 72 hereditary breast cancer patients who underwent NGS-based testing between January 2015 and December 2021 were maintained prospectively in a database and analyzed retrospectively. Data were subjected to bioinformatics analysis and variants were classified according to international guidelines. RESULTS Germline variants were detected in 33/72(45.8%) patients, comprising 16(48.5%) pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and 17(51.5%) VUS. Distribution of VUS in breast cancer predisposing genes were :APC:1(5.8%), ATM:2(11.7%), BRCA1:1(5.8%), BRCA2:5(29.4%), BRIP1:1(5.8%), CDKN2A:1(5.8%), CHEK2:2(11.7%), FANC1:1(5.8%), MET:1(5.8%), STK11:1(5.8%), NF2:1(5.8%). Mean age at cancer diagnosis in patients with VUS was 51.2 years. Most common tumour histopathology was ductal carcinoma 11(78.6%). 50% of tumours in patients having VUS in BRCA1/2 genes were hormone receptor negative. 73.3% patients had family history of breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS A significant portion of patients had a germline VUS. Highest frequency was in BRCA2 gene. Majority had family history of breast cancer. This highlights the need to undertake functional genomic studies to determine the biological effects of VUS and identify potentially clinically actionable variants that would be useful for decision-making and patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kawmadi Gunawardena
- Department of Anatomy, Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
| | - Nirmala D Sirisena
- Department of Anatomy, Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka.
| | - Gayani Anandagoda
- Department of Anatomy, Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
| | - Nilaksha Neththikumara
- Department of Anatomy, Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
| | - Vajira H W Dissanayake
- Department of Anatomy, Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gordhandas S, Rios-Doria E, Cadoo KA, Catchings A, Maio A, Kemel Y, Sheehan M, Ranganathan M, Green D, Aryamvally A, Arnold AG, Salo-Mullen E, Manning-Geist B, Sia T, Selenica P, Da Cruz Paula A, Vanderbilt C, Misyura M, Leitao MM, Mueller JJ, Makker V, Rubinstein M, Friedman CF, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Latham A, Carlo MI, Murciano-Goroff YR, Will M, Walsh MF, Issa Bhaloo S, Ellenson LH, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Berger MF, Robson ME, Abu-Rustum N, Aghajanian C, Offit K, Stadler Z, Weigelt B, Mandelker DL, Liu YL. Comprehensive analysis of germline drivers in endometrial cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:560-569. [PMID: 36744932 PMCID: PMC10165491 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to determine the prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in unselected patients with endometrial cancer (EC), define biallelic gPVs within tumors, and describe their associations with clinicopathologic features. METHODS Germline assessment of at least 76 cancer predisposition genes was performed in patients with EC undergoing clinical tumor-normal Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) sequencing from January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021. In patients with gPVs, biallelic alterations in ECs were identified through analysis of loss of heterozygosity and somatic PVs. Clinicopathologic variables were compared using nonparametric tests. RESULTS Of 1625 patients with EC, 216 (13%) had gPVs, and 15 patients had 2 gPVs. There were 231 gPVs in 35 genes (75 [32%] high penetrance; 39 [17%] moderate penetrance; and 117 [51%] low, recessive, or uncertain penetrance). Compared with those without gPVs, patients with gPVs were younger (P = .002), more often White (P = .009), and less obese (P = .025) and had differences in distribution of tumor histology (P = .017) and molecular subtype (P < .001). Among 231 gPVs, 74 (32%) exhibited biallelic inactivation within tumors. For high-penetrance gPVs, 63% (47 of 75) of ECs had biallelic alterations, primarily affecting mismatch repair (MMR) and homologous recombination related genes, including BRCA1,BRCA2, RAD51D, and PALB2. Biallelic inactivation varied across molecular subtypes with highest rates in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or copy-number (CN)-high subtypes (3 of 12 [25%] POLE, 30 of 77 [39%] MSI-H, 27 of 60 [45%] CN-high, 9 of 57 [16%] CN-low; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Of unselected patients with EC, 13% had gPVs, with 63% of gPVs in high-penetrance genes (MMR and homologous recombination) exhibiting biallelic inactivation, potentially driving cancer development. This supports germline assessment in EC given implications for treatment and cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushmita Gordhandas
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Rios-Doria
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karen A Cadoo
- St. James’s Hospital, Trinity St. James’s Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Amanda Catchings
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Maio
- Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Margaret Sheehan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megha Ranganathan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dina Green
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anjali Aryamvally
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Angela G Arnold
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin Salo-Mullen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Beryl Manning-Geist
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tiffany Sia
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnaud Da Cruz Paula
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chad Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maksym Misyura
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Rubinstein
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claire F Friedman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qin Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alicia Latham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria I Carlo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yonina R Murciano-Goroff
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marie Will
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Walsh
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shirin Issa Bhaloo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lora H Ellenson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark E Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diana L Mandelker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ying L Liu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Daly MB, Rosenthal E, Cummings S, Bernhisel R, Kidd J, Hughes E, Gutin A, Meek S, Slavin TP, Kurian AW. The association between age at breast cancer diagnosis and prevalence of pathogenic variants. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 199:617-626. [PMID: 37084156 PMCID: PMC10175307 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06946-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Young age at breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and family history of BC are strongly associated with high prevalence of pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. There is limited evidence for such associations with moderate/high penetrance BC-risk genes such as ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2. METHODS We analyzed multi-gene panel testing results (09/2013-12/2019) for women unaffected by any cancer (N = 371,594) and those affected with BC (N = 130,151) ascertained for suspicion of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test association between PV status and age at BC diagnosis (≤ 45 vs. > 45 years) or family history of BC after controlling for personal/family non-BC histories and self-reported ancestry. RESULTS An association between young age (≤ 45 years) at diagnosis and presence of PVs was strong for BRCA1 (OR 3.95, 95% CI 3.64-4.29) and moderate for BRCA2 (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.84-2.14). Modest associations were observed between PVs and young age at diagnosis for ATM (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08-1.37) and CHEK2 (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.21-1.47) genes, but not for PALB2 (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.98-1.27). For women with BC, earliest age of familial BC diagnosis followed a similar pattern. For unaffected women, earliest age of family cancer diagnosis was significantly associated with PV status only for BRCA1 (OR 2.34, 95% CI 2.13-2.56) and BRCA2 (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.16-1.35). CONCLUSIONS Young age at BC diagnosis is not a strong risk factor for carrying PVs in BC-associated genes ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary B Daly
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111-2497, USA.
| | | | | | | | - John Kidd
- Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
de Jong VMT, Pruntel R, Steenbruggen TG, Bleeker FE, Nederlof P, Hogervorst FBL, Linn SC. Identifying the BRCA1 c.-107A > T variant in Dutch patients with a tumor BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation. Fam Cancer 2023; 22:151-154. [PMID: 36112334 PMCID: PMC10020283 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-022-00314-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
An inherited single nucleotide variant (SNV) in the 5'UTR of the BRCA1 gene c.-107A > T was identified to be related to BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation and a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer phenotype in two UK families. We investigated whether this BRCA1 variant was also present in a Dutch cohort of breast and ovarian cancer patients with tumor BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation. We selected all breast and ovarian cancer cases that tested positive for tumor BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation at the Netherlands Cancer Institute and Sanger sequenced the specific mutation in the tumor DNA. In total, we identified 193 tumors with BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation in 178 unique patients. The wild-type allele was identified in 100% (193/193) of sequenced tumor samples. In a large cohort of 178 patients, none had tumors harboring the previously identified c.-107A > T SNV in BRCA1. We therefore can conclude that the germline SNV is not pervasive in patients with tumor BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent M T de Jong
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Roelof Pruntel
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Tessa G Steenbruggen
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fonnet E Bleeker
- Department of Clinical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Petra Nederlof
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frans B L Hogervorst
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lopes Cardozo JM, Andrulis IL, Bojesen SE, Dörk T, Eccles DM, Fasching PA, Hooning MJ, Keeman R, Nevanlinna H, Rutgers EJ, Easton DF, Hall P, Pharoah PD, van 't Veer LJ, Schmidt MK. Associations of a Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score With Tumor Characteristics and Survival. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1849-1863. [PMID: 36689693 PMCID: PMC10082287 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A polygenic risk score (PRS) consisting of 313 common genetic variants (PRS313) is associated with risk of breast cancer and contralateral breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the association of the PRS313 with clinicopathologic characteristics of, and survival following, breast cancer. METHODS Women with invasive breast cancer were included, 98,397 of European ancestry and 12,920 of Asian ancestry, from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), and 683 women from the European MINDACT trial. Associations between PRS313 and clinicopathologic characteristics, including the 70-gene signature for MINDACT, were evaluated using logistic regression analyses. Associations of PRS313 (continuous, per standard deviation) with overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated with Cox regression, adjusted for clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment. RESULTS The PRS313 was associated with more favorable tumor characteristics. In BCAC, increasing PRS313 was associated with lower grade, hormone receptor-positive status, and smaller tumor size. In MINDACT, PRS313 was associated with a low risk 70-gene signature. In European women from BCAC, higher PRS313 was associated with better OS and BCSS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.97) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.98), but the association disappeared after adjustment for clinicopathologic characteristics (and treatment): OS HR, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.05) and BCSS HR, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.07). The results in MINDACT and Asian women from BCAC were consistent. CONCLUSION An increased PRS313 is associated with favorable tumor characteristics, but is not independently associated with prognosis. Thus, PRS313 has no role in the clinical management of primary breast cancer at the time of diagnosis. Nevertheless, breast cancer mortality rates will be higher for women with higher PRS313 as increasing PRS313 is associated with an increased risk of disease. This information is crucial for modeling effective stratified screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine M.N. Lopes Cardozo
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Irene L. Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stig E. Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Diana M. Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetricss, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maartje J. Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renske Keeman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Emiel J.T. Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Laura J. van 't Veer
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Marjanka K. Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Allman R, Mu Y, Dite GS, Spaeth E, Hopper JL, Rosner BA. Validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model based on the key risk factors: family history, mammographic density and polygenic risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:335-347. [PMID: 36749458 PMCID: PMC10020257 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06834-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We compared a simple breast cancer risk prediction model, BRISK (which includes mammographic density, polygenic risk and clinical factors), against a similar model with more risk factors (simplified Rosner) and against two commonly used clinical models (Gail and IBIS). METHODS Using nested case-control data from the Nurses' Health Study, we compared the models' association, discrimination and calibration. Classification performance was compared between Gail and BRISK for 5-year risks and between IBIS and BRISK for remaining lifetime risk. RESULTS The odds ratio per standard deviation was 1.43 (95% CI 1.32, 1.55) for BRISK 5-year risk, 1.07 (95% CI 0.99, 1.14) for Gail 5-year risk, 1.72 (95% CI 1.59, 1.87) for simplified Rosner 10-year risk, 1.51 (95% CI 1.41, 1.62) for BRISK remaining lifetime risk and 1.26 (95% CI 1.16, 1.36) for IBIS remaining lifetime risk. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was improved for BRISK over Gail for 5-year risk (AUC = 0.636 versus 0.511, P < 0.0001) and for BRISK over IBIS for remaining lifetime risk (AUC = 0.647 versus 0.571, P < 0.0001). BRISK was well calibrated for the estimation of both 5-year risk (expected/observed [E/O] = 1.03; 95% CI 0.73, 1.46) and remaining lifetime risk (E/O = 1.01; 95% CI 0.86, 1.17). The Gail 5-year risk (E/O = 0.85; 95% CI 0.58, 1.24) and IBIS remaining lifetime risk (E/O = 0.73; 95% CI 0.60, 0.87) were not well calibrated, with both under-estimating risk. BRISK improves classification of risk compared to Gail 5-year risk (NRI = 0.31; standard error [SE] = 0.031) and IBIS remaining lifetime risk (NRI = 0.287; SE = 0.035). CONCLUSION BRISK performs better than two commonly used clinical risk models and no worse compared to a similar model with more risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Allman
- Genetic Technologies Limited, 60-66 Hanover St, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
| | - Yi Mu
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gillian S Dite
- Genetic Technologies Limited, 60-66 Hanover St, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia
| | | | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Bernard A Rosner
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Colombo M, Mondini P, Minenza E, Foglia C, Mosconi A, Molica C, Pistola L, Ludovini V, Radice P. A novel BRCA1 splicing variant detected in an early onset triple-negative breast cancer patient additionally carrying a pathogenic variant in ATM: A case report. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1102184. [PMID: 37025588 PMCID: PMC10072264 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1102184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The widespread adoption of gene panel testing for cancer predisposition is leading to the identification of an increasing number of individuals with clinically relevant allelic variants in two or more genes. The potential combined effect of these variants on cancer risks is mostly unknown, posing a serious problem for genetic counseling in these individuals and their relatives, in whom the variants may segregate singly or in combination. We report a female patient who developed triple-negative high grade carcinoma in the right breast at the age of 36 years. The patient underwent bilateral mastectomy followed by combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy (IMpassion030 clinical trial). Two years later she developed a skin recurrence on the right anterior chest wall. Despite intensive treatment, the patient died at 40-year-old due to disease progression. Gene panel testing of patient's DNA revealed the presence of a protein truncating variant in ATM [c.1672G>T; p.(Gly558Ter)] and of a not previously reported variant in the BRCA1 exon 22 donor splice site [c.5406+6T>C], whose clinical significance was unknown. The analysis of patient's RNA revealed the up-regulation of two alternative BRCA1 mRNA isoforms derived from skipping of exon 22 and of exons 22-23. The corresponding predicted protein products, p.(Asp1778GlyfsTer27) and p.(Asp1778_His1822del) are both expected to affect the BRCA1 C Terminus (BRCT) domain. The two variants were observed to co-occur also in the proband's brother who, in addition, was heterozygous for a common variant (c.4837A>G) mapped to BRCA1 exon 16. This allowed to ascertain, by transcript-specific amplification, the lack of functional mRNA isoforms expressed by the c.5406+6T>C allele and provided evidence to classify the BRCA1 variant as pathogenic, according to the guidelines of the Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) consortium. To our knowledge, excluding two cases detected following the screening of population specific recurrent variants, only one ATM/BRCA1 double heterozygote has been reported in the literature, being the case here described the one with the youngest age at cancer onset. The systematic collection of cases with pathogenic variants in more than one cancer predisposition gene is needed to verify if they deserve ad hoc counseling and clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Colombo
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Mondini
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Minenza
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Claudia Foglia
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Annamaria Mosconi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Carmen Molica
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Lorenza Pistola
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Vienna Ludovini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mishra S, Bhatt T, Kumar H, Jain R, Shilpi S, Jain V. Nanoconstructs for theranostic application in cancer: Challenges and strategies to enhance the delivery. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1101320. [PMID: 37007005 PMCID: PMC10050349 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1101320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Nanoconstructs are made up of nanoparticles and ligands, which can deliver the loaded cargo at the desired site of action. Various nanoparticulate platforms have been utilized for the preparation of nanoconstructs, which may serve both diagnostic as well as therapeutic purposes. Nanoconstructs are mostly used to overcome the limitations of cancer therapies, such as toxicity, nonspecific distribution of the drug, and uncontrolled release rate. The strategies employed during the design of nanoconstructs help improve the efficiency and specificity of loaded theranostic agents and make them a successful approach for cancer therapy. Nanoconstructs are designed with a sole purpose of targeting the requisite site, overcoming the barriers which hinders its right placement for desired benefit. Therefore, instead of classifying modes for delivery of nanoconstructs as actively or passively targeted systems, they are suitably classified as autonomous and nonautonomous types. At large, nanoconstructs offer numerous benefits, however they suffer from multiple challenges, too. Hence, to overcome such challenges computational modelling methods and artificial intelligence/machine learning processes are being explored. The current review provides an overview on attributes and applications offered by nanoconstructs as theranostic agent in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Mishra
- Department of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, India
| | - Tanvi Bhatt
- Department of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, India
| | - Hitesh Kumar
- Department of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, India
| | - Rupshee Jain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, India
| | - Satish Shilpi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical and Populations Health Informatics, DIT University, Dehradun, India
| | - Vikas Jain
- Department of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, India
- *Correspondence: Vikas Jain,
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Belcaid L, Bertelsen B, Wadt K, Tuxen I, Spanggaard I, Højgaard M, Benn Sørensen J, Ravn J, Lassen U, Cilius Nielsen F, Rohrberg K, Westmose Yde C. New pathogenic germline variants identified in mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 2023; 179:107172. [PMID: 36944283 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mesothelioma (MM) is associated with asbestos exposure, tumor heterogeneity and aggressive clinical behavior. Identification of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in mesothelioma is relevant for identifying potential actionable targets and genetic counseling. METHODS 44 patients underwent whole exome sequencing (WES) or whole genome sequencing (WGS). Germline variants were selected according to association with inherited cancer using a 168-gene in silico panel, and variants classified according to ACMG/AMP classification as pathogenic (class 5) or likely pathogenic (class 4). RESULTS In total, 16 patients (36%) were found to carry pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 13 cancer associated genes (ATM, BAP1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, FANCA, FANCC, FANCD2, FANCM, MUTYH, NBN, RAD51B, SDHA and XPC). The germline PVs occurred in DNA repair pathways, including homologous recombination repair (HRR) (75%), nucleotide excision repair (6%), cell cycle regulatory (7%), base excision repair (6%), and hypoxic pathway (6%). Five (31%) patients with a germline PV had a first or second degree relative with mesothelioma compared to none for patients without a germline PV. Previously undiagnosed BRCA2 germline PVs were identified in two patients. Potential actionable targets based on the germline PVs were found in four patients (9%). CONCLUSION This study revealed a high frequency of germline PVs in patients with mesothelioma. Furthermore, we identified germline PVs in two genes (NBN & RAD51B) not previously associated with mesothelioma. The data support germline testing in mesothelioma and provide a rationale for additional investigation of the HRR pathway as a potential actionable target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila Belcaid
- Dept. of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
| | - Birgitte Bertelsen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Karin Wadt
- Dept. of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Ida Tuxen
- Dept. of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Iben Spanggaard
- Dept. of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Martin Højgaard
- Dept. of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Jens Benn Sørensen
- Dept. of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Jesper Ravn
- Dept. of Thoracic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Ulrik Lassen
- Dept. of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Finn Cilius Nielsen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Morra A, Mavaddat N, Muranen TA, Ahearn TU, Allen J, Andrulis IL, Auvinen P, Becher H, Behrens S, Blomqvist C, Bojesen SE, Bolla MK, Brauch H, Camp NJ, Carvalho S, Castelao JE, Cessna MH, Chang-Claude J, Chenevix-Trench G, Czene K, Decker B, Dennis J, Dörk T, Dorling L, Dunning AM, Ekici AB, Eriksson M, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Figueroa JD, Flyger H, Gago-Dominguez M, García-Closas M, Geurts-Giele WRR, Giles GG, Guénel P, Gündert M, Hahnen E, Hall P, Hamann U, Harrington PA, He W, Heikkilä P, Hooning MJ, Hoppe R, Howell A, Humphreys K, Jakubowska A, Jung AY, Keeman R, Kristensen VN, Lubiński J, Mannermaa A, Manoochehri M, Manoukian S, Margolin S, Mavroudis D, Milne RL, Mulligan AM, Newman WG, Park-Simon TW, Peterlongo P, Pharoah PDP, Rhenius V, Saloustros E, Sawyer EJ, Schmutzler RK, Shah M, Spurdle AB, Tomlinson I, Truong T, van Veen EM, Vreeswijk MPG, Wang Q, Wendt C, Yang XR, Nevanlinna H, Devilee P, Easton DF, Schmidt MK. The impact of coding germline variants on contralateral breast cancer risk and survival. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:475-486. [PMID: 36827971 PMCID: PMC10027471 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Evidence linking coding germline variants in breast cancer (BC)-susceptibility genes other than BRCA1, BRCA2, and CHEK2 with contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the association of protein-truncating variants (PTVs) and rare missense variants (MSVs) in nine known (ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) and 25 suspected BC-susceptibility genes with CBC risk and BCSS. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with Cox regression models. Analyses included 34,401 women of European ancestry diagnosed with BC, including 676 CBCs and 3,449 BC deaths; the median follow-up was 10.9 years. Subtype analyses were based on estrogen receptor (ER) status of the first BC. Combined PTVs and pathogenic/likely pathogenic MSVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53 and PTVs in CHEK2 and PALB2 were associated with increased CBC risk [HRs (95% CIs): 2.88 (1.70-4.87), 2.31 (1.39-3.85), 8.29 (2.53-27.21), 2.25 (1.55-3.27), and 2.67 (1.33-5.35), respectively]. The strongest evidence of association with BCSS was for PTVs and pathogenic/likely pathogenic MSVs in BRCA2 (ER-positive BC) and TP53 and PTVs in CHEK2 [HRs (95% CIs): 1.53 (1.13-2.07), 2.08 (0.95-4.57), and 1.39 (1.13-1.72), respectively, after adjusting for tumor characteristics and treatment]. HRs were essentially unchanged when censoring for CBC, suggesting that these associations are not completely explained by increased CBC risk, tumor characteristics, or treatment. There was limited evidence of associations of PTVs and/or rare MSVs with CBC risk or BCSS for the 25 suspected BC genes. The CBC findings are relevant to treatment decisions, follow-up, and screening after BC diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Morra
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Molecular Pathology, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Nasim Mavaddat
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Taru A Muranen
- University of Helsinki, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Thomas U Ahearn
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jamie Allen
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto, Department of Molecular Genetics, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Päivi Auvinen
- University of Eastern Finland, Translational Cancer Research Area, Kuopio, Finland; University of Eastern Finland, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oncology, Kuopio, Finland; Kuopio University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Heiko Becher
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Behrens
- German Cancer Research Center, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carl Blomqvist
- University of Helsinki, Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Stig E Bojesen
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hiltrud Brauch
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany; University of Tübingen, iFIT-Cluster of Excellence, Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nicola J Camp
- University of Utah, Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sara Carvalho
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jose E Castelao
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Vigo-SERGAS, Oncology and Genetics Unit, Vigo, Spain
| | | | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- German Cancer Research Center, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | -
- Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; University of Oslo, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway; Vestre Viken Hospital, Department of Research, Drammen, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Department of Oncology, Division of Surgery, Cancer and Transplantation Medicine, Oslo, Norway; Akershus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Lørenskog, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo Breast Cancer Research Consortium, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo, Norway; The Arctic University of Norway, Department of Community Medicine, Tromsø, Norway; The Arctic University of Norway, Core Facility for Biobanking, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kamila Czene
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brennan Decker
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK; Foundation Medicine, Inc, Pathology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Joe Dennis
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Hannover Medical School, Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover, Germany
| | - Leila Dorling
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alison M Dunning
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Arif B Ekici
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute of Human Genetics, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Gareth Evans
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jonine D Figueroa
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA; The University of Edinburgh, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK; The University of Edinburgh, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Genomic Medicine Group, International Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology Group, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Division, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash University, Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Pascal Guénel
- INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Team Exposome and Heredity, Villejuif, France
| | - Melanie Gündert
- German Cancer Research Center, Molecular Epidemiology Group, C080, Heidelberg, Germany; University of Heidelberg, Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University Womens Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Diabetes Research, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Per Hall
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden; Södersjukhuset, Department of Oncology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ute Hamann
- German Cancer Research Center, Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patricia A Harrington
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Wei He
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Päivi Heikkilä
- University of Helsinki, Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Reiner Hoppe
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany; University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anthony Howell
- University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, UK
| | - Keith Humphreys
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | -
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Research Department, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Szczecin, Poland; Pomeranian Medical University, Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Audrey Y Jung
- German Cancer Research Center, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Renske Keeman
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Molecular Pathology, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- University of Oslo, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- University of Eastern Finland, Translational Cancer Research Area, Kuopio, Finland; University of Eastern Finland, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Kuopio, Finland; Kuopio University Hospital, Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mehdi Manoochehri
- German Cancer Research Center, Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Margolin
- Södersjukhuset, Department of Oncology, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- University Hospital of Heraklion, Department of Medical Oncology, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Epidemiology Division, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Monash University, Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- University of Toronto, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Toronto, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Laboratory Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William G Newman
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Paolo Peterlongo
- IFOM ETS - the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Genome Diagnostics Program, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK; University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Valerie Rhenius
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Elinor J Sawyer
- King's College London, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Guy's Campus, London, UK
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mitul Shah
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Program, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- University of Birmingham, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Birmingham, UK; University of Oxford, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Thérèse Truong
- INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Team Exposome and Heredity, Villejuif, France
| | - Elke M van Veen
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, UK
| | - Maaike P G Vreeswijk
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Qin Wang
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Camilla Wendt
- Södersjukhuset, Department of Oncology, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Xiaohong R Yang
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- University of Helsinki, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Peter Devilee
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Douglas F Easton
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK; University of Cambridge, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Molecular Pathology, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 Amsterdam, the Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kuzbari Z, Bandlamudi C, Loveday C, Garrett A, Mehine M, George A, Hanson H, Snape K, Kulkarni A, Allen S, Jezdic S, Ferrandino R, Westphalen CB, Castro E, Rodon J, Mateo J, Burghel GJ, Berger MF, Mandelker D, Turnbull C. Germline-focused analysis of tumour-detected variants in 49,264 cancer patients: ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group recommendations. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:215-227. [PMID: 36529447 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Society for Medical Oncology Precision Medicine Working Group (ESMO PMWG) was reconvened to update its 2018/19 recommendations on follow-up of putative germline variants detected on tumour-only sequencing, which were based on an analysis of 17 152 cancers. METHODS We analysed an expanded dataset including 49 264 paired tumour-normal samples. We applied filters to tumour-detected variants based on variant allele frequency, predicted pathogenicity and population variant frequency. For 58 cancer-susceptibility genes, we then examined the proportion of filtered tumour-detected variants of true germline origin [germline conversion rate (GCR)]. We conducted subanalyses based on the age of cancer diagnosis, specific tumour types and 'on-tumour' status (established tumour-gene association). RESULTS Analysis of 45 472 nonhypermutated solid malignancy tumour samples yielded 21 351 filtered tumour-detected variants of which 3515 were of true germline origin. 3.1% of true germline pathogenic variants were absent from the filtered tumour-detected variants. For genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2, the GCR in filtered tumour-detected variants was >80%; conversely for TP53, APC and STK11 this GCR was <2%. CONCLUSION Strategic germline-focused analysis can prioritise a subset of tumour-detected variants for which germline follow-up will produce the highest yield of most actionable true germline variants. We present updated recommendations around germline follow-up of tumour-only sequencing including (i) revision to 5% for the minimum per-gene GCR, (ii) inclusion of actionable intermediate penetrance genes ATM and CHEK2, (iii) definition of a set of seven 'most actionable' cancer-susceptibility genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and RET) in which germline follow-up is recommended regardless of tumour type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Kuzbari
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Bandlamudi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - C Loveday
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. https://twitter.com/LovedayChey
| | - A Garrett
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. https://twitter.com/DrAliceGarrett
| | - M Mehine
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - A George
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H Hanson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; South West Thames Regional Genetics Service, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Snape
- South West Thames Regional Genetics Service, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. https://twitter.com/genetikos
| | - A Kulkarni
- South East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. https://twitter.com/Anju__Kulkarni
| | - S Allen
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S Jezdic
- Scientific and Medical Division, European Society for Medical Oncology, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - R Ferrandino
- Scientific and Medical Division, European Society for Medical Oncology, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - C B Westphalen
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU) University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - E Castro
- Genitourinary Cancers Translational Research Group, Institute of Biomedical Research in Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain. https://twitter.com/Ecastromarcos
| | - J Rodon
- Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - J Mateo
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G J Burghel
- North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. https://twitter.com/BurghelG
| | - M F Berger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - D Mandelker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - C Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Zannini G, Facchini G, De Sio M, De Vita F, Ronchi A, Orditura M, Vietri MT, Ciardiello F, Franco R, Accardo M, Zito Marino F. Implementation of BRCA mutations testing in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of different cancer types. Pathol Res Pract 2023; 243:154336. [PMID: 36736144 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 are onco-suppressor genes involved in the DNA repair mechanism. The presence of BRCA1/2 mutations confers a higher risk of developing several cancer types. To date, the FDA approved various PARP inhibitors to treat selected BRCA1/2 mutated oncologic patients. At first, PARP inhibitors were approved for patients with ovarian and breast cancers, and subsequently for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after the treatment with chemotherapy. The current guidelines for BRCA testing are very heterogeneous between the different types of tumors regarding the diagnostic algorithm and the type of sample to analyze, such as the blood for the germline mutations and the tumoral tissue for the somatic mutations. Few data have currently been described regarding the detection of BRCA1/2 somatic mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. In this review, we propose an overview of the BRCA mutations in FFPE samples of several cancers, including breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. We summarize the types and the frequency of BRCA mutations, the guidelines approved for the test, the molecular assays used for the detection and the PARP inhibitors approved for each tumor type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppa Zannini
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. Armanni 5, Naples 80138, Italy.
| | - Gaetano Facchini
- Medical Oncology Unit, SM delle Grazie Hospital, Via Domitiana, Pozzuoli 80078, Italy.
| | - Marco De Sio
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Pansini 5, Naples 80131, Italy.
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Pansini 5, Naples 80131, Italy.
| | - Andrea Ronchi
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. Armanni 5, Naples 80138, Italy.
| | - Michele Orditura
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Pansini 5, Naples 80131, Italy.
| | - Maria Teresa Vietri
- U.O.C. Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. De Crecchio 7, Naples 80138, Italy.
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Pansini 5, Naples 80131, Italy.
| | - Renato Franco
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. Armanni 5, Naples 80138, Italy.
| | - Marina Accardo
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. Armanni 5, Naples 80138, Italy.
| | - Federica Zito Marino
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. Armanni 5, Naples 80138, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Cine N, Ugurtas C, Gokbayrak M, Aydin D, Demir G, Kuru S, Sunnetci-Akkoyunlu D, Eren-Keskin S, Simsek T, Cabuk D, Aksu MG, Canturk NZ, Savli H. The role of next-generation sequencing in the examination of signaling genes in Brca1/2-negative breast cancer cases. Ann Hum Genet 2023; 87:28-49. [PMID: 36479692 DOI: 10.1111/ahg.12488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in women worldwide. Although pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes are responsible for the majority of hereditary breast cancer cases, a substantial proportion of patients are negative for pathogenic variations in these genes. In cancers, the signal transduction pathways of the cell are usually affected first. Therefore, this study aimed to detect and classified genetic variations in non-BRCA signaling genes and investigate the underlying genetic causes of susceptibility to breast cancer. METHODS Ninety-six patients without pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study, and 34 genes were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) for genetic analysis. RESULTS Based on the ClinVar database or American College of Medical Genetics criteria, a total of 55 variants of 16 genes were detected in 43 (44.8%) of the 96 patients included in the study. The pathogenic variants were found in the TP53, CHEK2, and RET genes, whereas the likely pathogenic variants were found in the FGFR1, FGFR3, EGFR, and NOTCH1 genes. CONCLUSION The examination of signaling genes in patients who met the established criteria for hereditary breast cancer but were negative for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants provided additional information for approximately 8% of the families. The results of the present study suggest that NGS is a powerful tool for investigating the underlying genetic causes of occurrence and progression of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naci Cine
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey.,Department of Medical Genetics and Molecular Biology, Kocaeli University Institute of Health Sciences, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Cansu Ugurtas
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Merve Gokbayrak
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Duygu Aydin
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Gulhan Demir
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Seda Kuru
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | | | - Seda Eren-Keskin
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Turgay Simsek
- Department of General Surgery, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Devrim Cabuk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Maksut Gorkem Aksu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Nuh Zafer Canturk
- Department of General Surgery, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Hakan Savli
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|