Serum noncholesterol sterols during inhibition of cholesterol synthesis by statins

Evaluation of plasma phytosterols in sitosterolemia, their kindreds and hyperlipidemia subjects

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from sitosterolemia with ABCG5/8 mutation typically present with early-onset or rapidly progressive atherosclerosis. Their kindreds with partial genetic deficiencies of ABCG5/8 are often considered healthy. However, discerning sitosterolemia from its familial kindreds and hyperlipidemia subjects has remained challenging.

METHODS

Here we retrospectively recruited 7 families including 8 individuals diagnosed with sitosterolemia subjects, and 14 kindreds carrying single gene mutations. Additionally, 17 individuals with hyperlipidemia and 130 healthy controls served as positive and negative controls, respectively. A total of 6 phytosterols combined with cholesterol absorption indices (including sitosterol, campesterol, stigmasterol, and cholestanol) and cholesterol synthesis markers (desmosterol and 7-dehydrocholesterol), was compared across the aforementioned 4 groups.

RESULTS

As expected, the sitosterolemia subjects with double mutations demonstrated significantly elevated levels of sitosterol and other cholesterol absorption indices. Meanwhile, sitosterolemia kindreds with single gene mutation showed a similar pattern of activated cholesterol-absorption ability to the hyperlipidemia group, but not as high as the double mutation group. Notably, the cholesterol-synthesis enzyme 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase displayed an increase in the hyperlipidemia group but a decrease in the sitosterolemia kindred group, suggesting a potential discriminative role of 7-dehydrocholesterol in distinguishing between these 2 groups. The combination of phytosterols was more valuable than clinical lipid index for sitosterolemia diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed mild disruptions of cholesterol absorption capacities in sitosterolemia kindreds with single mutations. Furthermore, the combination of 6 phytosterols proved effective in distinguishing between sitosterolemia, its single mutation carriers, and hyperlipidemia patients.

Association between Serum Oxysterols and Coronary Plaque Regression during Lipid-Lowering Therapy with Statin and Ezetimibe: Insights from the CuVIC Trial

AIM

Several clinical trials using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) evaluation have demonstrated that intensive lipid-lowering therapy by statin or a combination therapy with statin and ezetimibe results in significant regression of coronary plaque volume. However, it remains unclear whether adding ezetimibe to statin therapy affects coronary plaque composition and the molecular mechanisms of plaque regression. We conducted this prospective IVUS analysis in a subgroup from the CuVIC trial.

METHODS

The CuVIC trial was a prospective randomized, open, blinded-endpoint trial conducted among 11 cardiovascular centers, where 260 patients with coronary artery disease who received coronary stenting were randomly allocated into either the statin group (S) or the combined statin and ezetimibe group (S＋E). We enrolled 79 patients (S group, 39 patients; S＋E group, 40 patients) in this substudy, for whom serial IVUS images of nonculprit lesion were available at both baseline and after 6-8 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

After the treatment period, the S＋E group had significantly lower level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; 80.9±3.7 vs. 67.7±3.8 mg/dL, p=0.0143). Campesterol, a marker of cholesterol absorption, and oxysterols (β-epoxycholesterol, 4β-hydroxycholesterol, and 27-hydroxycholesterol) were also lower in the S＋E group. IVUS analyses revealed greater plaque regression in the S＋E group than in the S group (-6.14% vs. -1.18% for each group, p=0.042). It was noteworthy that the lowering of campesterol and 27-hydroxycholesterol, but not LDL-C, had a significant positive correlation with plaque regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with statin monotherapy, ezetimibe in combination with statin achieved significantly lower LDL-C, campesterol, and 27-hydroxycholesterol, which resulted in greater coronary plaque regression.

Molecular Biological and Clinical Understanding of the Statin Residual Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Agonists and Ezetimibe for Its Treatment

Several randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering by using statins, including high-doses of strong statins, reduced the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, among the eight RCTs which investigated the effect of statins vs. placebos on the development of CVD, 56-79% of patients had the residual CVD risk after the trials. In three RCTs which investigated the effect of a high dose vs. a usual dose of statins on the development of CVD, 78-87% of patients in the high-dose statin arms still had the CVD residual risk after the trials. An analysis of the characteristics of patients in the RCTs suggests that elevated triglyceride (TG) and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), the existence of obesity/insulin resistance, and diabetes may be important metabolic factors which determine the statin residual CVD risk. To understand the association between lipid abnormalities and the development of atherosclerosis, we show the profile of lipoproteins and their normal metabolism, and the molecular and biological mechanisms for the development of atherosclerosis by high TG and/or low HDL-C in insulin resistance. The molecular biological mechanisms for the statin residual CVD risk include an increase of atherogenic lipoproteins such as small dense LDL and remnants, vascular injury and remodeling by inflammatory cytokines, and disturbed reverse cholesterol transport. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) agonists improve atherogenic lipoproteins, reverse the cholesterol transport system, and also have vascular protective effects, such as an anti-inflammatory effect and the reduction of the oxidative state. Ezetimibe, an inhibitor of intestinal cholesterol absorption, also improves TG and HDL-C, and reduces intestinal cholesterol absorption and serum plant sterols, which are increased by statins and are atherogenic, possibly contributing to reduce the statin residual CVD risk.

Empagliflozin increases plasma levels of campesterol, a marker of cholesterol absorption, in patients with type 2 diabetes: Association with a slight increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors decrease plasma triglyceride levels and slightly increase low-density lipoprotein (LDL-c) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c). However, the mechanisms underlying such changes in the blood lipid profile remain to be determined. We investigated how empagliflozin affects plasma markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis, and evaluated the relationship between changes in these markers and blood lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a randomized, active-controlled, open-label trial, 51 patients were randomly allocated in 2:1 ratio to receive empagliflozin 10 mg/day (n = 32) or standard therapy (n = 19) for 12 weeks. We measured plasma levels of lathosterol as a marker of cholesterol synthesis, and campesterol and sitosterol as markers of cholesterol absorption, at baseline and 12 weeks after treatment. In the empagliflozin group, serum HDL-c, but not LDL-c, significantly increased between baseline and 12 weeks (54.4 ± 16.3 vs. 58.8 ± 19.6 mg/dl; p = 0.0006), whereas in the standard therapy group, HDL-c and LDL-c remained unchanged. In the empagliflozin group, plasma campesterol also increased significantly (4.14 ± 1.88 vs. 4.90 ± 2.26 μg/ml, p = 0.0008), whereas no change in plasma campesterol or sitosterol was found in the control group. Although plasma lathosterol showed no change in the whole empagliflozin group, it decreased significantly in patients who were not taking statins. In statin non-users, plasma lathosterol decreased significantly after treatment with empagliflozin (2.71 ± 0.99 vs. 1.91 ± 0.99 μg/ml, p < 0.05). In the empagliflozin group, changes in plasma campesterol correlated positively with changes in HDL-c.

CONCLUSION

Empagliflozin increases serum campesterol, a marker of cholesterol absorption, in patients with type 2 diabetes. This increase may be associated with SGLT2 inhibitor-induced increases in HDL cholesterol.

Baseline, delta, and achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and cardiovascular risk in patients on statin therapy: A post-hoc resampling mediation analysis of treating new targets [TNT] trial

Clinical guidelines for monitoring low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after statin therapy do not clearly define the clinical roles of baseline LDL-C, ΔLDL-C, and achieved LDL-C according to statin intensity. We performed post-hoc analysis of the Treating to New Target (TNT) study to evaluate individual LDL-C parameters after statin therapy. Primary outcome was the risk for total major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We use resampling multilevel mediation analysis to analyze complex relationships among LDL-C parameters based on similar statin intensities. Tertiles for resample A (matched baseline LDL-C; distinct achieved LDL), resample B (matched ΔLDL-C; distinct baseline LDL-C), and resample C (matched achieved LDL-C; distinct ΔLDL-C) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard ratios. In original data analysis, the incidence of MACE was reduced in those with lower achieved LDL-C in total, low, and high intensity statin users (hazard ratios [HRs] = 0.990, 0.992, 0.992; respectively; all P-values < .001). In mediation analysis, resample A showed consistently high incidence for MACE in the middle tertile (HR = 1.237; 95% confidential interval [CI] = 1.008-1.517; P-value = .041) and highest tertile (HR = 1.275; 95% CI = 1.021-1.592; P-value = .032) compared to the lowest tertile. However, resamples B and C did not show consistent differences. Similarly, no consistent statistical difference in MACE according to statin intensity. Lower achieved LDL-C decreased MACE in participants with a similar baseline LDL-C after statin therapy. However, the change in absolute values of ΔLDL-C and achieved LDL-C should be interpreted in an individualized manner due to their complex collinearity, and statin intensity should also be taken into consideration.

Meta-Analysis of Usefulness of Psyllium Fiber as Adjuvant Antilipid Therapy to Enhance Cholesterol Lowering Efficacy of Statins

Statins are usually well-tolerated drugs with a clear dose-dependent efficacy. However, manifestation of statin's side effects also bears a direct relation to higher doses necessary to achieve high impact cholesterol-lowering effects. Nevertheless, the reliance on statin efficacy alone has often left dietary intervention underutilized even though studies have shown a reduction in serum cholesterol levels when dietary fiber intake is increased. In this meta-analysis, we investigated whether the concomitant use of psyllium, a gel-forming viscous soluble fiber, would cause further overall cholesterol lowering in subjects already receiving statins. A systematic review of the medical literature was performed and identified three randomized, controlled clinical studies that evaluated the cholesterol lowering efficacy of statins when given concomitantly with psyllium as a fiber supplement. The duration of the studies ranged from 4 weeks to 12 weeks. The objective of the meta-analysis was to estimate the overall effect of psyllium plus statin versus statin alone. The results of the meta-analysis showed a clinically and statistically significant (p = 0.001) cholesterol lowering advantage for psyllium plus statin combination treatment over a statin alone. Adding psyllium fiber resulted in reductions in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol equivalent to doubling the statin dose. In conclusion, the data support that psyllium fiber takenbefore meals adds to the efficacy of statins, providing an easy to implement dietary intervention for those who cannot tolerate side effects associated with higher-dose statins.

Essential Dietary Bioactive Lipids in Neuroinflammatory Diseases

SIGNIFICANCE

Under physiological conditions, neurons and glia are in a healthy, redox-balanced environment; when injury perturbs this equilibrium, a neuroinflammatory state is established by activated microglia that triggers pro-inflammatory responses and alters the oxidant/antioxidant balance, thus leading to neuronal loss and neurodegeneration. In neurodegenerative diseases (such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, amyothrophic lateral sclerosis, and multiple sclerosis), the brain is in a constitutively self-sustaining cycle of inflammation and oxidative stress that prompts and amplifies brain damage. Recent Advances: Recently, an increasing amount of scientific data highlight the ability of specific nutrients to cross the blood-brain barrier, and to modulate inflammatory and oxidative pathways. Therefore, nutritional approaches may contribute to restore the lost equilibrium among factors accounting for neurodegeneration.

CRITICAL ISSUES

Herein, we critically examine how essential lipids (including fatty acids, liposoluble vitamins and phytosterols) might contribute to accelerate or prevent the onset and progression of such pathologies. In particular, we highlight that experimental and clinical findings, although promising, are still inadequate to draw definitive conclusions.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

More research is warranted in order to establish the real impact of lipid intake on brain health, especially when redox balance and inflammatory responses have been already compromised. In the future, it would be hoped to gain a detailed knowledge of chemical modifications and dynamic properties of such nutrients, before planning to exploit them as potential therapeutics. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 29, 37-60.

Lipid-Lowering Therapy With Ezetimibe Decreases Spontaneous Atherothrombotic Occlusions in a Rabbit Model of Plaque Erosion: A Role of Serum Oxysterols

OBJECTIVE

Plaque erosion is increasing its importance as one of the mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes in this statin era. However, the clinical efficacy of currently used lipid-lowering agents in the prevention of thrombotic complications associated with plaque erosion has not been clarified. Therefore, we examined the therapeutic effects of ezetimibe or rosuvastatin monotherapy on spontaneous atherothrombotic occlusion.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Femoral arteries of Japanese white rabbits, fed a high-cholesterol diet, were injured by balloon catheter, and then angiotensin II was continuously administrated. In 94% of these arteries, spontaneous thrombotic occlusions were observed after 5 weeks (median) of balloon injury. Histochemical analyses indicated that the injured arteries had similar pathological features to human plaque erosions; (1) spontaneous thrombotic occlusion, (2) lack of endothelial cells, and (3) tissue factor expression in vascular smooth muscle cells. Ezetimibe (1.0 mg/kg per day), but not rosuvastatin (0.6 mg/kg per day), significantly decreased thrombotic occlusion of arteries accompanied with accelerated re-endothelialization and the decreases of serum oxysterols despite the comparable on-treatment serum cholesterol levels. The 7-ketocholesterol inhibited the migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Both 7-ketocholesterol and 27-hydroxycholesterol increased tissue factor expression in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Tissue factor expression was also induced by serum from vehicle- or rosuvastatin-treated rabbits, but the induction was attenuated with serum from ezetimibe-treated rabbits.

CONCLUSIONS

We have established a novel rabbit model of spontaneous atherothromobotic occlusion without plaque rupture that is feasible to test the therapeutic effects of various pharmacotherapies. Ezetimibe may decrease atherothrombotic complications after superficial plaque erosion by reducing serum oxysterols.

Ezetimibe in Combination With Statins Ameliorates Endothelial Dysfunction in Coronary Arteries After Stenting

Objectives—

We sought to investigate whether treatment with ezetimibe in combination with statins improves coronary endothelial function in target vessels in coronary artery disease patients after coronary stenting.

Approach and Results—

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point trial among 11 cardiovascular treatment centers. From 2011 to 2013, 260 coronary artery disease patients who underwent coronary stenting were randomly allocated to 2 arms (statin monotherapy, S versus ezetimibe [10 mg/d]+statin combinational therapy, E+S). We defined target vessel dysfunction as the primary composite outcome, which comprised target vessel failure during treatment and at the 6- to 8-month follow-up coronary angiography and coronary endothelial dysfunction determined via intracoronary acetylcholine testing performed in cases without target vessel failure at the follow-up coronary angiography. Coadministration of ezetimibe with statins further lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (83±23 mg/dL in S versus 67±23 mg/dL in E+S; P <0.0001), with significant decreases in oxidized low-density lipoprotein and oxysterol levels. Among patients without target vessel failure, 46 out of 89 patients (52%) in the S arm and 34 out of 96 patients (35%) in the E+S arm were found to have coronary endothelial dysfunction ( P =0.0256), and the incidence of target vessel dysfunction at follow-up was significantly decreased in the E+S arm (69/112 (62%) in S versus 47/109 (43%) in E+S; P =0.0059). A post hoc analysis of post-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol–matched subgroups revealed that the incidence of both target vessel dysfunction and coronary endothelial dysfunction significantly decreased in the E+S arm, with significant reductions in oxysterol levels.

Conclusions—

The CuVIC trial (Effect of Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor Usage on Target Vessel Dysfunction after Coronary Stenting) has shown that ezetimibe with statins, compared with statin monotherapy, improves functional prognoses, ameliorating endothelial dysfunction in stented coronary arteries, and was associated with larger decreases in oxysterol levels.

Cholesterol metabolism as a prognostic marker in patients with mildly symptomatic nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Little is known about whether the alteration of cholesterol metabolism reflects abdominal organ impairments due to heart failure. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic value of cholesterol metabolism by evaluating serum campesterol and lathosterol levels in patients with early-stage nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM).

METHODS

We enrolled 64 patients with NIDCM (median age 57.5 years, 31% female) with New York Heart Association functional class I/II. Serum campesterol and lathosterol levels were measured in all patients. The patients were then divided into four subsets based on the median non-cholesterol sterol levels (campesterol 3.6μg/mL, lathosterol 1.4μg/mL): reference (R-subset), high-campesterol/high-lathosterol; absorption-reduced (A-subset), low-campesterol/high-lathosterol; synthesis-reduced (S-subset), high-campesterol/low-lathosterol; double-reduced (D-subset), low-campesterol/low-lathosterol. Endpoint was a composite of cardiac events, including cardiac-related death, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, and lethal arrhythmia.

RESULTS

Median brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level was 114pg/mL. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 31.4%. D-subset had the lowest total cholesterol level and cardiac index and the highest BNP level and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. D-subset also had the highest cardiac event rate during the mean 3.8 years of follow-up (log-rank p=0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that D-subset was an independent determinant of cardiac events. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that total cholesterol <153mg/dL was a best cut-off value for discrimination of the D-subset.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined reduction of campesterol and lathosterol that indicated intestinal cholesterol absorption and liver synthesis predicts future cardiac events in patients with mildly symptomatic NIDCM.

Enhanced Impact of Cholesterol Absorption Marker on New Atherosclerotic Lesion Progression After Coronary Intervention During Statin Therapy

Aim: Clinical trials suggest that residual risks remain for coronary artery disease (CAD) during low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapy. We aimed to investigate the role of exogenous lipids in the prognosis of CAD after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: A total of 145 patients with CAD, who underwent elective PCI, and 82 non-CAD (control) patients were enrolled in this study. CAD patients underwent follow-up coronary angiography 6–9 months after PCI, and were classified into three groups: 1) patients who showed in-stent restenosis (ISR) in the original stented segment, 2) patients with other non-target coronary atherosclerotic lesions (de novo), and 3) patients with neither ISR nor a de novo lesion. Biochemical analyses were performed on fasting serum samples at the time of follow-up coronary angiography.

Results: Despite the controlled serum LDL-C levels, CAD patients with statin showed elevated cholesterol absorption marker campesterol/total cholesterol (TC), synthesis marker lathosterol/TC, campesterol/lathosterol ratio, and apolipoprotein B48 (apoB48) concentration compared with non-CAD patients. The high campesterol/TC, campesterol/lathosterol ratio, and apoB48 concentration were associated with de novo lesion progression after PCI. In stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis, campesterol/TC and apoB48 concentrations were independent risk factors for de novo lesion progression in statin-treated CAD patients after PCI.

Conclusion: The increase of cholesterol absorption marker and apoB48 concentration may lead to the progression of de novo lesions, and these markers may represent a residual risk during statin treatment after PCI.

Revisiting Human Cholesterol Synthesis and Absorption: The Reciprocity Paradigm and its Key Regulators

Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Cholesterol homeostasis in the body is governed by the interplay between absorption, synthesis, and excretion or conversion of cholesterol into bile acids. A reciprocal relationship between cholesterol synthesis and absorption is known to regulate circulating cholesterol in response to dietary or therapeutic interventions. However, the degree to which these factors affect synthesis and absorption and the extent to which one vector shifts in response to the other are not thoroughly understood. Also, huge inter-individual variability exists in the manner in which the two systems act in response to any cholesterol-lowering treatment. Various factors are known to account for this variability and in light of recent experimental advances new players such as gene-gene interactions, gene-environmental effects, and gut microbiome hold immense potential in offering an explanation to the complex traits of inter-individual variability in human cholesterol metabolism. In this context, the objective of the present review is to provide an overview on cholesterol metabolism and discuss the role of potential factors such as genetics, epigenetics, epistasis, and gut microbiome, as well as other regulators in modulating cholesterol metabolism, especially emphasizing the reciprocal relationship between cholesterol synthesis and absorption. Furthermore, an evaluation of the implications of this push-pull mechanism on cholesterol-lowering strategies is presented.

Revisiting Human Cholesterol Synthesis and Absorption: The Reciprocity Paradigm and its Key Regulators

Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Cholesterol homeostasis in the body is governed by the interplay between absorption, synthesis, and excretion or conversion of cholesterol into bile acids. A reciprocal relationship between cholesterol synthesis and absorption is known to regulate circulating cholesterol in response to dietary or therapeutic interventions. However, the degree to which these factors affect synthesis and absorption and the extent to which one vector shifts in response to the other are not thoroughly understood. Also, huge inter-individual variability exists in the manner in which the two systems act in response to any cholesterol-lowering treatment. Various factors are known to account for this variability and in light of recent experimental advances new players such as gene-gene interactions, gene-environmental effects, and gut microbiome hold immense potential in offering an explanation to the complex traits of inter-individual variability in human cholesterol metabolism. In this context, the objective of the present review is to provide an overview on cholesterol metabolism and discuss the role of potential factors such as genetics, epigenetics, epistasis, and gut microbiome, as well as other regulators in modulating cholesterol metabolism, especially emphasizing the reciprocal relationship between cholesterol synthesis and absorption. Furthermore, an evaluation of the implications of this push-pull mechanism on cholesterol-lowering strategies is presented.

Effect of glycemic state on postprandial hyperlipidemia and hyperinsulinemia in patients with coronary artery disease

Both postprandial hyperlipidemia and hyperinsulinemia have been thought to play an important role in the development of atherosclerosis, and to be a potent risk factor for cardiovascular event. To examine effects of glycemic state on postprandial hyperlipidemia and hyperinsulinemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), a total of 112 consecutive male pati ents with angiographically confirmed CAD were loaded with a high-fat and high-glucose test meal. CAD patients were divided into three groups as “non-diabetic”, “prediabetic”, and “diabetic” CAD groups. The serum triglyceride (TG) and remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C) levels at the 6th hour in diabetic CAD group showed significantly higher than non-diabetic CAD group, and the incremental area under the curves (iAUCs) of these levels in diabetic CAD group were significantly greater than non-diabetic CAD group (TG, P = 0.0194; RLP-C, P = 0.0219). There were no significant differences in the iAUCs of TG or RLP-C between prediabetic and non-diabetic CAD group. The AUCs of plasma insulin levels or insulin resistance index (IRI): (AUCs of insulin) × (AUCs of glucose) as the insulin resistance marker were greater in diabetic CAD group than non-diabetic CAD group (insulin, P = 0.0373; IRI, P = 0.0228). The AUCs of serum TG or RLP-C levels showed a correlation with the AUCs of plasma insulin (AUC-TG, r = 0.5437, P < 0.0001; AUC-RLP-C, r = 0.6847, P < 0.0001), and they correlated well with the insulin resistance index (AUC-TG, r = 0.7724, P < 0.0001; AUC-RLP-C, r = 0.7645, P < 0.0001). We found that the insulin resistance showed a close relationship with postprandial hyperlipidemia in CAD patients. Diabetic, but not prediabetic state, may be a risk for postprandial impaired lipid metabolism in CAD patients.

Additive effects of plant sterols supplementation in addition to different lipid-lowering regimens

OBJECTIVE

Plant sterol (PS) supplementation has been widely used alone or combined with lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) to reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. The effects of PS added to high-intensity LLT are less reported, especially regarding the effects on cholesterol synthesis and absorption.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, open-label study, with parallel arms and blinded end points was designed to evaluate the effects of addition of PS to LLT on LDL cholesterol, markers of cholesterol synthesis, and absorption. Eighty-six patients of both genders were submitted to a 4-wk run-in period with atorvastatin 10 mg (baseline). Following, subjects received atorvastatin 40 mg, ezetimibe 10 mg, or combination of both drugs for another 4-wk period (phase I). In phase II, capsules containing 2.0 g of PSs were added to previous assigned treatments for 4 wk. Lipids, apolipoproteins, plasma campesterol, β-sitosterol, and desmosterol levels were assayed at all time points. Within and between-group analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, atorvastatin 40 mg reduced total and LDL cholesterol (3% and 22%, respectively, P < .05), increased β-sitosterol, campesterol/cholesterol, and β-sitosterol/cholesterol ratios (39%, 47%, and 32%, respectively, P < .05); ezetimibe 10 mg reduced campesterol and campesterol/cholesterol ratio (67% and 70%, respectively, P < .05), and the combined therapy decreased total and LDL cholesterol (22% and 38%, respectively, P < .05), campesterol, β-sitosterol, and campesterol/cholesterol ratio (54%, 40%, and 27%, P < .05). Addition of PS further reduced total and LDL cholesterol by ∼ 7.7 and 6.5%, respectively, in the atorvastatin therapy group and 5.0 and 4.0% in the combined therapy group (P < .05, for all), with no further effects in absorption or synthesis markers.

CONCLUSIONS

PS added to LLT can further improve lipid profile, without additional effects on intestinal sterol absorption or synthesis.

Lipid-lowering efficacy of atorvastatin

BACKGROUND

This represents the first update of this review, which was published in 2012. Atorvastatin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs and the most widely prescribed statin in the world. It is therefore important to know the dose-related magnitude of effect of atorvastatin on blood lipids.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To quantify the effects of various doses of atorvastatin on serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides in individuals with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease. The primary focus of this review was determination of the mean per cent change from baseline of LDL-cholesterol. Secondary objectives • To quantify the variability of effects of various doses of atorvastatin.• To quantify withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) in placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2013), MEDLINE (1966 to December Week 2 2013), EMBASE (1980 to December Week 2 2013), Web of Science (1899 to December Week 2 2013) and BIOSIS Previews (1969 to December Week 2 2013). We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of atorvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included and extracted data. We collected information on withdrawals due to adverse effects from placebo-controlled trials.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we found an additional 42 trials and added them to the original 254 studies. The update consists of 296 trials that evaluated dose-related efficacy of atorvastatin in 38,817 participants. Included are 242 before-and-after trials and 54 placebo-controlled RCTs. Log dose-response data from both trial designs revealed linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides. The Summary of findings table 1 documents the effect of atorvastatin on LDL-cholesterol over the dose range of 10 to 80 mg/d, which is the range for which this systematic review acquired the greatest quantity of data. Over this range, blood LDL-cholesterol is decreased by 37.1% to 51.7% (Summary of findings table 1). The slope of dose-related effects on cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol was similar for atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, but rosuvastatin is about three-fold more potent. Subgroup analyses suggested that the atorvastatin effect was greater in females than in males and was greater in non-familial than in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Risk of bias for the outcome of withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) was high, but the mostly unclear risk of bias was judged unlikely to affect lipid measurements. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were not statistically significantly different between atorvastatin and placebo groups in these short-term trials (risk ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.40).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This update resulted in no change to the main conclusions of the review but significantly increases the strength of the evidence. Studies show that atorvastatin decreases blood total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol in a linear dose-related manner over the commonly prescribed dose range. New findings include that atorvastatin is more than three-fold less potent than rosuvastatin, and that the cholesterol-lowering effects of atorvastatin are greater in females than in males and greater in non-familial than in familial hypercholesterolaemia. This review update does not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with atorvastatin because included trials were of short duration and adverse effects were not reported in 37% of placebo-controlled trials.

Cross-sectional survey to assess the status of lipid management in high-risk patients with dyslipidemia: clinical impact of combination therapy with ezetimibe

BACKGROUND

Previous retrospective surveys have shown that lipid management goals are well achieved in patients with dyslipidemia at relatively low risk for atherosclerotic diseases. However, more than half of patients in high-risk groups have not achieved the management goals. Since these surveys, newer medications, including rosuvastatin and ezetimibe, have emerged in clinical practice that may influence lipid management.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the current status of lipid management in high-risk patients, we conducted a cross-sectional study between January and March 2010.

METHODS

Eligible patients were those with dyslipidemia who were classified into the primary prevention high-risk or secondary prevention groups according to the Japan Atherosclerosis Society guideline for diagnosis and prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Patient data were collected from 300 randomly selected physicians at hospitals and clinics across Japan if patients had been receiving the same statin with or without other lipid-lowering agents for ≥3 months. The main outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved the serum LDL-C goal according to the guideline.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 1720 patients. The LDL-C goal was achieved in 56.5% of patients (447 of 791) in the primary prevention high-risk group and in 24.5% (103 of 420) in the secondary prevention group by statin monotherapy. For patients who had not reached the LDL-C goal with statin therapy alone, 53.8% (113 of 210) in the primary prevention high-risk group and 63.8% (111 of 174) in the secondary prevention group achieved their lipid management goal with the addition of ezetimibe. Ezetimibe significantly lowered mean serum LDL-C levels by 17.9% to 34.6% when added to various statins (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although strong statins are available, lipid management in high-risk patients remains unsatisfactory. More aggressive treatment is needed for these patients.

Clinical Efficacy and Tolerability of Ezetimibe in Combination With Atorvastatin in Japanese Patients With Hypercholesterolemia-Ezetimibe Phase IV Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy of ezetimibe and atorvastatin in patients with high LDL cholesterol that had not reached the lipid management target value with 10 mg atorvastatin monotherapy, against increasing the dose to 20 mg atorvastatin or switching to 2.5 mg rosuvastatin.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This was an open-label, randomized, multicenter, 3-parallel-group comparison trial at 23 community hospitals and clinics in Japan (enrollment period March 2009 to May 2010) in 125 patients with high LDL cholesterol.

INTERVENTIONS

A total of 125 Japanese patients with high LDL cholesterol level were randomized to 1 of the following 3 treatment groups: the ezetimibe (10 mg/d) and atorvastatin (10 mg/d) group, the atorvastatin (20 mg/d) group, or the rosuvastatin (2.5 mg/d) group for 12 weeks after treatment with 10 mg atorvastatin alone for 4 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Percent change in LDL cholesterol level from baseline (4 weeks after treatment with 10 mg atorvastatin alone) until study completion.

RESULTS

The percent change in LDL cholesterol level from baseline until study completion was statistically greater for the combination of 10 mg ezetimibe + 10 mg atorvastatin compared with increasing atorvastatin to 20 mg (-25.8% vs -15.1%; P < 0.0001). A similar result was observed for ezetimibe + atorvastatin compared with switching to 2.5 mgt rosuvastatin (-25.8% vs 0.8%; P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients who reached the target LDL cholesterol value with the combination of ezetimibe + atorvastatin was significantly higher than increasing atorvastatin and switching to rosuvastatin (78.7%, 41.3%, and 3.1%, respectively). Although 5 serious adverse experiences bearing no relation to the study medications were reported, there were no adverse reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of 10 mg ezetimibe +10 mg atorvastatin was more effective than increasing atorvastatin to 20 mg or switching to 2.5 mg rosuvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia whose LDL cholesterol levels had not reached the recommended target value with 10 mg atorvastatin monotherapy for 4 weeks. Ezetimibe coadministration with atorvastatin was well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00871351.

Methodological considerations for the harmonization of non-cholesterol sterol bio-analysis

Non-cholesterol sterols (NCS) are used as surrogate markers of cholesterol metabolism which can be measured from a single blood sample. Cholesterol precursors are used as markers of endogenous cholesterol synthesis and plant sterols are used as markers of cholesterol absorption. However, most aspects of NCS analysis show wide variability among researchers within the area of biomedical research. This variability in methodology is a significant contributor to variation between reported NCS values and hampers the confidence in comparing NCS values across different research groups, as well as the ability to conduct meta-analyses. This paper summarizes the considerations and conclusions of a workshop where academic and industrial experts met to discuss NCS measurement. Highlighted is why each step in the analysis of NCS merits critical consideration, with the hopes of moving toward more standardized and comparable NCS analysis methodologies. Alkaline hydrolysis and liquid-liquid extraction of NCS followed by parallel detection on GC-FID and GC-MS is proposed as an ideal methodology for the bio-analysis of NCS. Furthermore the importance of cross-comparison or round robin testing between various groups who measure NCS is critical to the standardization of NCS measurement.

Combination therapy with ezetimibe and simvastatin to achieve aggressive LDL reduction

A low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol goal of less than 100 mg/dl is recommended for patients at moderate to high risk of cardiovascular disease with an optional LDL goal of less than 70 mg/dl for patients at a very high risk of cardiovascular disease. Most patients will require reductions in LDL of more than 50% in order to achieve these more aggressive goals. Only a few agents will lower LDL by at least 50%. This review will focus on the efficacy and safety ezetimibe/simvastatin coadministered as a therapy with enhanced LDL-lowering efficacy, while minimizing the adverse effects of statins in a wide range of patients. Ezetimibe 10 mg/simvastatin 80 mg lowers LDL by approximately 60% and has been demonstrated to be superior to the highest doses of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin for lowering LDL and raising high-density lipoprotein.

Renal and vascular protective effects of ezetimibe in chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

Dyslipidemia is a risk factor for not only cardiovascular diseases (CVD), but also chronic kidney disease (CKD). Ezetimibe, a cholesterol absorption inhibitor, lowers cholesterol levels by inhibiting both extrinsic and intrinsic cholesterol absorption via the gastrointestinal duct. However, very few studies have examined its efficacy and safety for patients with dyslipidemia complicated with CKD.

METHODS

Thirty-seven dyslipidemic patients (low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥120 mg/dL) complicated with CKD were given ezetimibe (10 mg/day) for twenty-four weeks. The efficacy and safety of the therapy, including the anti-atherosclerotic and renal protective effects, were then examined.

RESULTS

Significant decreases were observed in the levels of LDL-C (158.9 ± 26.9 mg/dL→123.0 ± 31.8 mg/dL; p<0.0001), remnant-like lipoprotein cholesterol (9.3 ± 5.3 mg/dL→7.3 ± 3.8 mg/dL; p<0.05) and lipoprotein (a) (22.0 ± 16.1 mg/dL→16.4 ± 11.0 mg/dL; p<0.01). The estimated glomerular filtration rate did not change, but the urine protein to creatinine ratio decreased significantly (1,107.3 ± 1,454.2 mg/gCre→732.1 ± 1,237.8 mg/gCre; p<0.05). No changes were observed in the carotid intima media thickness, but the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity decreased significantly (1,770.4 ± 590.3 cm/sec→1,702.5 ± 519.9 cm/sec; p<0.05). No adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

Ezetimibe can be safely administered even to patients with CKD. The results of this study indicate that ezetimibe may provide some renal protection and suppress the complications of CVD in CKD patients.

Vitamin D3 effects on lipids differ in statin and non-statin-treated humans: superiority of free 25-OH D levels in detecting relationships

CONTEXT

Inverse associations between 25-OH vitamin D levels and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality have been reported.

OBJECTIVES

Our goals were to 1) investigate effects of correcting inadequate D status on lipids, 2) determine whether free 25-OH D is better correlated with lipids than total 25-OH D.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial was performed.

SETTING

Participants resided in the general community.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with inadequate D status were randomized to D3: 14 men, 12 women, age 60 ± 8 years (mean ± SD) or placebo: 12 men, 11 women: 59 ±12 years.

INTERVENTION

Responses to 12-week oral vitamin D3 titrated (1000-3000 IU/d) to achieve 25-OH D levels ≥25 ng/mL were compared to placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Measurements were 25-OH D (tandem mass spectometry), free 25-OH D (direct immunoassay), lipids (directly measured triglyceride, cholesterol, and subfractions; plant sterols and cholesterol synthesis precursors), and safety labs before and after 6 and 12 weeks D3 or placebo. Data were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA and linear regression.

RESULTS

Vitamin D3 was titrated to 1000 IU/d in 15/26 (58%), to 2000 IU/d in 10, and 3000 IU/d in one patient. D3 had no effect on cholesterol or cholesterol subfractions except for trends for decreases in atorvastatin-treated patients (cholesterol, P = .08; low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol, P = .05). Decreased campesterol concentrations (P = .05) were seen with D3 but not placebo in statin-treated patients. Relationships between total 25-OH D and lipids were not detected, but inverse linear relationships were detected between free 25-OH D and triglycerides (P = .03 for all participants [n = 49], P = .03 in all statin-treated [n = 19], and P = .0009 in atorvastatin-treated [n = 11]), and between free 25-OH D and LDL cholesterol (P = .08 overall, P = .02 in all statin-treated, and P = .03 for atorvastatin-treated), and total cholesterol (P = .09 overall; P = .04 for all statin-treated, and P = .05 for atorvastatin-treated).

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin D lipid-lowering effects appear limited to statin-treated patients and are likely due to decreased cholesterol absorption. Relationships between lipids and D metabolites were only detected when free 25-OH D was measured, suggesting the superiority of determining free 25-OH D levels compared to total 25-OH vitamin D levels when analyzing biologic responses.

Association between cholesterol synthesis/absorption markers and effects of cholesterol lowering by atorvastatin among patients with high risk of coronary heart disease

No indices are currently available to facilitate clinicians to identify patients who need either statin monotherapy or statin-ezetimibe combined treatment. We aimed to investigate whether cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers can predict the cholesterol-lowering response to statin. Total 306 statin-naïve patients with high risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) were treated with atorvastatin 20 mg/day for 1 month. Cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were measured before and after treatment. Atorvastatin decreased LDL-C by 36.8% (range: decrease of 74.5% to increase of 31.9%). Baseline cholesterol synthesis marker lathosterol and cholesterol absorption marker campesterol codetermined the effect of atorvastatin treatment. The effect of cholesterol lowering by atorvastatin was significantly associated with baseline lathosterol levels but modified bidirectionally by baseline campesterol levels. In patients with the highest baseline campesterol levels, atorvastatin treatment decreased cholesterol absorption by 46.1%, which enhanced the effect of LDL-C lowering. Atorvastatin treatment increased cholesterol absorption by 52.3% in those with the lowest baseline campesterol levels, which attenuated the effect of LDL-C reduction. Especially those with the highest lathosterol but the lowest campesterol levels at baseline had significantly less LDL-C reduction than those with the same baseline lathosterol levels but the highest campesterol levels (27.3% versus 42.4%, P = 0.002). These results suggest that combined patterns of cholesterol synthesis/absorption markers, rather than each single marker, are potential predictors of the LDL-C-lowering effects of atorvastatin in high-risk CHD patients.

Gas chromatography analysis of serum cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers used to predict the efficacy of simvastatin in patients with coronary heart disease

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the changes in cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers before and after simvastatin therapy in Chinese patients with coronary heart disease.

DESIGN AND METHOD

We developed a gas chromatography method to identify cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers and measured them in patients with coronary heart disease. We then tested their use in predicting the efficacy of simvastatin in lowering cholesterol. Serum samples from 45 patients and 38 healthy humans (controls) were analyzed in a gas chromatography-flame ionization detector.

RESULTS

Squalene and five non-cholesterol sterols--desmosterol and lathosterol (synthesis markers) and campesterol, stigmasterol, and sitosterol (absorption markers)--were detected. The recovery rates of the markers were 95-102%. After simvastatin treatment for four weeks, the total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels had significantly decreased from the baseline values (p<0.05). The baseline lathosterol level was significantly higher in good responders than in poor responders (p<0.05), and the stigmasterol level was significantly lower in good responders than in poor responders (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This method should be suitable for the detection of serum squalene and non-cholesterol markers and can be used to predict the efficacy of simvastatin in patients with coronary heart disease.

Changes in serum cholesterol levels determine future risk of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome in the Japanese Coronary Artery Disease (JCAD) Study

BACKGROUND

Although increased attention is given to assess absolute values of serum cholesterol profiles as optimal markers for preventing future cardiovascular (CV) events, changes in cholesterol profiles also have the potential to be associated with CV disease outcome in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

From the database of the Japanese Coronary Artery Disease (JCAD) study, 2664 patients with ACS who had serial measurements of serum cholesterol profile parameters were enrolled. These patients were followed-up for a mean period of 2.7 years. The endpoint was all CV events. Baseline clinical characteristics of patients with and without CV events were adjusted by the propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

None of the serum absolute cholesterol profiles at baseline and 6 months later was associated with CV events, except for baseline serum total cholesterol level. However, large improvements in cholesterol profiles correlated with better CV disease outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This subanalysis of JCAD demonstrated the importance of serial assessment of serum cholesterol profiles for secondary prevention of CV events in Japanese patients with ACS. Changes in serum cholesterol profiles, rather than their absolute values, correlated with future CV events.

Lipid lowering efficacy of atorvastatin

BACKGROUND

Atorvastatin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs and the most widely prescribed statin in the world. It is therefore important to know the dose-related magnitude of effect of atorvastatin on blood lipids.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the dose-related effects of atorvastatin on blood lipids and withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2011, MEDLINE (1966 to November 2011), EMBASE (1980 to November 2011), ISI Web of Science (1899 to November 2011) and BIOSIS Previews (1969 to November 2011). No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of atorvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of 3 to 12 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. WDAE information was collected from the placebo-controlled trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-four trials evaluated the dose-related efficacy of atorvastatin in 33,505 participants. Log dose-response data revealed linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides. Combining all the trials using the generic inverse variance fixed-effect model for doses of 10 to 80 mg/day resulted in decreases of 36% to 53% for LDL-cholesterol. There was no significant dose-related effects of atorvastatin on blood high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. WDAE were not statistically different between atorvastatin and placebo for these short-term trials (risk ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.45).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride lowering effect of atorvastatin was dependent on dose. Log dose-response data was linear over the commonly prescribed dose range. Manufacturer-recommended atorvastatin doses of 10 to 80 mg/day resulted in 36% to 53% decreases of LDL-cholesterol. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with atorvastatin because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 37% of the placebo-controlled trials.

Effects of ezetimibe added to statin therapy on markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis and LDL-C lowering in hyperlipidemic patients

OBJECTIVE

Statins inhibit cholesterol synthesis but can upregulate cholesterol absorption, with higher doses producing larger effects. Ezetimibe inhibits cholesterol absorption but also upregulates synthesis. We tested whether ezetimibe added to on-going statin therapy would be most effective in lowering LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) in subjects on high-potency statins and whether these effects would be related to alterations in cholesterol absorption (β-sitosterol) and synthesis (lathosterol) markers.

METHODS

Hypercholesterolemic subjects (n = 874) on statins received ezetimibe 10 mg/day. Plasma lipids, lathosterol, and β-sitosterol were measured at baseline and on treatment. Subjects were divided into low- (n = 133), medium- (n = 582), and high- (n = 159) statin potency groups defined by predicted LDL-C-lowering effects of each ongoing statin type and dose (reductions of ~20-30%, ~31-45%, or ~46-55%, respectively).

RESULTS

The high-potency group had significantly lower baseline lathosterol (1.93 vs. 2.58 vs. 3.17 μmol/l; p < 0.001) and higher baseline β-sitosterol values (6.21 vs. 4.58 vs. 4.51 μmol/l, p < 0.001) than medium-/low-potency groups. Ezetimibe treatment in the high-potency group produced significantly greater reductions from baseline in LDL-C than medium-/low-potency groups (-29.1% vs. -25.0% vs. -22.7%; p < 0.001) when evaluating unadjusted data. These effects and group differences were significantly (p < 0.05) related to greater β-sitosterol reductions and smaller lathosterol increases. However, LDL-C reduction differences between groups were no longer significant after controlling for placebo effects, due mainly to modest LDL-C lowering by placebo in the high-potency group.

CONCLUSION

Patients on high-potency statins have the lowest levels of cholesterol synthesis markers and the highest levels of cholesterol absorption markers at baseline, and the greatest reduction in absorption markers and the smallest increases in synthesis markers with ezetimibe addition. Therefore, such patients may be good candidates for ezetimibe therapy if additional LDL-C lowering is needed.

Double-dose pravastatin versus add-on ezetimibe with low-dose pravastatin - effects on LDL cholesterol, cholesterol absorption, and cholesterol synthesis in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia (PEAS study)

AIM

This study compared the effect of doubling the dose of pravastatin with that of adding ezetimibe to low-dose pravastatin on the LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) level and on cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers. The tolerability of the 2 regimens was also compared.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group trial. Subjects were aged from 20 to 74 years and had an LDL-C ≥ 120 mg/dL despite pravastatin therapy at 5-10 mg/day. They were randomly allocated to receive either add-on ezetimibe (10 mg/day) or double-dose pravastatin, and follow-up was performed for 12 weeks. The primary endpoints were the changes of LDL-C and apolipoprotein (apo) B levels after 12 weeks of treatment. Cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers were also determined.

RESULTS

LDL-C and apo B decreased by 16% and 14% in the ezetimibe add-on group versus 5.9% and 4.4%, respectively, in the pravastatin double-dose group. The between-group differences of these decreases were highly significant. Cholesterol absorption markers (sitosterol, campesterol, and cholestanol) were reduced by 48%, 36%, and 10%, respectively, in the ezetimibe add-on group, and were increased by 17%, 14%, and 6%, respectively, in the pravastatin double-dose group. Lathosterol (a cholesterol synthesis marker) increased by 76% in the ezetimibe add-on group and by 24% in the pravastatin double-dose group. The difference was statistically significant. No serious adverse effect was observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding ezetimibe to low-dose pravastatin achieves greater decreases in LDL-C, apo B, and cholesterol absorption markers than doubling the dose of pravastatin.

The role of soluble fiber intake in patients under highly effective lipid-lowering therapy

Background

It has been demonstrated that statins can increase intestinal sterol absorption. Augments in phytosterolemia seems related to cardiovascular disease.

Objective

We examined the role of soluble fiber intake in endogenous cholesterol synthesis and in sterol absorption among subjects under highly effective lipid-lowering therapy.

Design

In an open label, randomized, parallel-design study with blinded endpoints, subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia (n = 116) were assigned to receive during 12 weeks, a daily dose of 25 g of fiber (corresponding to 6 g of soluble fibers) plus rosuvastatin 40 mg (n = 28), rosuvastatin 40 mg alone (n = 30), sinvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg plus 25 g of fiber (n = 28), or sinvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg (n = 30) alone.

Results

The four assigned therapies produced similar changes in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides (p < 0.001 vs. baseline) and did not change HDL-cholesterol. Fiber intake decreased plasma campesterol (p < 0.001 vs. baseline), particularly among those patients receiving ezetimibe (p < 0.05 vs. other groups), and β-sitosterol (p = 0.03 vs. baseline), with a trend for lower levels in the group receiving fiber plus ezetimibe (p = 0.07). Treatment with rosuvastatin alone or combined with soluble fiber was associated with decreased levels of desmosterol (p = 0.003 vs. other groups). Compared to non-fiber supplemented individuals, those treated with fibers had weight loss (p = 0.04), reduced body mass index (p = 0.002) and blood glucose (p = 0.047).

Conclusion

Among subjects treated with highly effective lipid-lowering therapy, the intake of 25 g of fibers added favorable effects, mainly by reducing phytosterolemia. Additional benefits include improvement in blood glucose and anthropometric parameters.

Where does the interplay between cholesterol absorption and synthesis in the context of statin and/or ezetimibe treatment stand today?

The evidence of the different concepts underlying the interplay between cholesterol absorption and synthesis in the context of statin and ezetimibe treatment were reviewed in the light of the eight major trials where cholesterol absorption and synthesis were analyzed on a large scale using the plasma levels of precursors of cholesterol and plant sterols. The only concept supported in all studies is a significant and consistent increase of cholesterol absorption with statin (correlated with the inhibition of synthesis) and of cholesterol synthesis with ezetimibe, whereas in combination, statin and ezetimibe reduce both cholesterol synthesis and absorption. In contrast, most of the other concepts failed to be clearly proven. At baseline, the inverse relationship between cholesterol absorption and synthesis (only examined in two studies) was found to be weak. On statin treatment, four studies showed that the changes in cholesterol synthesis and absorption, contributed less than 9% to the variability in cholesterol response to statin therapy. It has not been consistently demonstrated that good absorbers/bad synthesizers are bad responders to statin (6 studies) and good responders for ezetimibe (3 studies). There is also no clear inverse correlation between LDL reduction on statin treatment and that on ezetimibe treatment. Finally, the original idea from the first pioneer study of Miettinen et al. that, the higher the baseline intestinal ability to absorb cholesterol, the lower the benefit on the clinical cardiovascular outcomes was not reproduced in the PROSPER study. In conclusion, with the exception of a reverse effect of statin and ezetimibe on absorption and synthesis, most ideas supporting the interplay between cholesterol absorption and synthesis lacked consistency between studies. At present, the use of the plasma levels of plant sterols and cholesterol precursors as markers of cholesterol absorption and synthesis is far too limited to definitively solve these questions.

Inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption might explain cholesterol-lowering effect of telmisartan

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Telmisartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB), acts as a partial agonist for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ, and thus improves abnormalities of glucose metabolism and hypertriglyceridaemia in addition to its documented blood pressure-lowering effects. Recently, it has been demonstrated that telmisartan also lowers the levels of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. This study was designed to investigate the mechanism of cholesterol reduction.

METHODS

We measured serum levels of cholestanol, a cholesterol absorption marker, and lathosterol, a cholesterol synthesis marker, in 20 patients with both hypercholesterolaemia and hypertension. Ten patients were treated with telmisartan and the remaining 10 with fluvastatin.

RESULTS

After 3 months of treatment, total and LDL cholesterol levels decreased in the telmisartan group (P<0.01 for both total and LDL cholesterol levels) and the fluvastatin group (P<0.001 for both total and LDL cholesterol levels). The change in cholestanol level after 3 months of treatment was positively correlated with the levels of total (R=0.72, P<0.05) and LDL cholesterol (R=0.81, P<0.01) in the telmisartan group. The change in lathosterol level was positively correlated with the levels of total (R=0.88, P=0.001) and LDL cholesterol (R=0.89, P=0.001) in the fluvastatin group.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the cholesterol-lowering effect of telmisartan might be caused by inhibition of cholesterol absorption, whereas that of statins is by inhibition of cholesterol synthesis. If confirmed, co-treatment with the two agents may be useful for synergistically lowering cholesterol in hypertensive patients.

Phytosterols and phytosterolemia: gene-diet interactions

Phytosterol intake is recommended as an adjunctive therapy for hypercholesterolemia, and plant sterols/stanols can reduce cholesterol absorption at the intestinal lumen through the Niemann-Pick C1 Like 1 (NPC1L1) transporter pathway by competitive solubilization in mixed micelles. Phytosterol absorption is of less magnitude than cholesterol and is preferably secreted in the intestinal lumen by ABCG5/G8 transporters. Therefore, plasma levels of plant sterols/stanols are negligible compared with cholesterol, under an ordinary diet. The mechanisms of cholesterol and plant sterols absorption and the whole-body pool of sterols are discussed in this chapter. There is controversy about treatment with statins inducing further increase in plasma non-cholesterol sterols raising concerns about the safety of supplementation of plant sterols to such drugs. In addition, increase in plant sterols has also been reported upon consumption of plant sterol-enriched foods, regardless of other treatments. Rare mutations on ABCG5/G8 transporters affecting cholesterol/non-cholesterol extrusion, causing sitosterolemia with xanthomas and premature atheroslerotic disease are now known, and cholesterol/plant sterols absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, emerges as the drug that reduces phytosterolemia and promotes xanthoma regression. On the other hand, common polymorphisms affecting the NPC1L1 transporter can interfere with the action of ezetimibe. Gene-diet interactions participate in this intricate network modulating the expression of genetic variants on specific phenotypes and can also affect the individual response to the hypolipidemic treatment. These very interesting aspects promoted a great deal of research in the field.

ABCG5/G8 polymorphisms and markers of cholesterol metabolism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Genetic variation at the ABCG5/G8 locus has been associated with markers of cholesterol homeostasis. As data originate from small-scale studies, we performed a meta-analysis to study these associations in a large dataset. We first investigated associations between five common ABCG5/G8 polymorphisms (p.Q604E, p.D19H, p.Y54C, p.T400K, and p.A632V) and plasma sterol levels in 245 hypercholesterolaemic individuals. No significant associations were found. Subsequently, our data were pooled into a meta-analysis that comprised 3,364 subjects from 16 studies (weighted mean age, 46.7 ± 10.5 years; BMI, 23.9 ± 3.5 kg/m(2)). Presence of the minor 632V allele correlated with reduced LDL-C concentrations (n = 367) compared with homozygosity for the 632A variant [n = 614; -0.11 mmol/l (95% CI, range: -0.20 to -0.02 mmol/l); P = 0.01]. The remaining polymorphisms were not associated with plasma lipid levels. Carriers of the 19H allele exhibited lower campesterol/TC (n = 83; P < 0.001), sitosterol/TC (P < 0.00001), and cholestanol/TC (P < 0.00001), and increased lathosterol/TC ratios (P = 0.001) compared with homozygous 19D allele carriers (n = 591). The ABCG8 632V variant was associated with a clinically irrelevant LDL-C reduction, whereas the 19H allele correlated with decreased cholesterol absorption and increased synthesis without affecting the lipid profile. Hence, associations between frequently studied missense ABCG5/G8 polymorphisms and markers of cholesterol homeostasis are modest at best.

Ezetimibe ameliorates metabolic disorders and microalbuminuria in patients with hypercholesterolemia

AIM

Ezetimibe, an inhibitor of Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 protein, has been shown to reduce the intestinal absorption of cholesterol. We investigated whether it also has beneficial effects on metabolic disorder and/or renal insufficiency in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS

Ezetimibe was administered to 38 Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia to obtain appropriate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-chol) levels. Age- and sex-matched patients with hypercholesterolemia (n=38) were the controls. We evaluated the effects of ezetimibe before and 4 to 8 weeks after ezetimibe treatment.

RESULTS

Ezetimibe significantly decreased LDL-chol levels and metabolic syndrome-related factors, including body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure; homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and urinary albumin excretion, were significantly reduced. In addition, it decreased the level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, the urinary excretion of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, a parameter of oxidative stress, and increased the urinary excretion of nitrate and nitrite (NOx). In the controls we observed no such changes. Excepting the decrease in the serum TNF-alpha level, the effects of ezetimibe were not correlated with decreased LDL-chol levels.

CONCLUSION

Ezetimibe ameliorated the status of metabolic syndrome and microalbuminuria, reduced inflammation and oxidative stress, and increased nitric oxide bioavailability in a LDL-chol reduction-dependent and -independent manner.

Indices of cholesterol metabolism and relative responsiveness to ezetimibe and simvastatin

CONTEXT

The level and duration of exposure to circulating low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) are major contributors to coronary atherosclerosis. Therefore, optimal prevention will require long-term LDL-C reduction, making it important to select the most effective agent for each individual.

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that individuals with high fractional absorption of cholesterol respond better to the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe than to simvastatin, whereas low absorbers, who have elevated rates of cholesterol synthesis, respond better to simvastatin.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial was performed in 215 African- and European-American men.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomized to placebo, ezetimibe (10 mg/d), simvastatin (10 mg/d), and both drugs for 6 wk each.

MAIN OUTCOME

Plasma levels of LDL-C, surrogate markers for cholesterol absorption (campesterol) and synthesis (lathosterol), and proprotein convertase subtilisin-like kexin type 9 were measured at baseline and after treatment.

RESULTS

LDL-C levels were reduced by 19% (ezetimibe), 25% (simvastatin), and 41% (ezetimibe+simvastatin) from a baseline of 146 +/- 20 mg/dl; results were similar between ethnic groups. Reduction in LDL-C correlated poorly with baseline levels of noncholesterol sterols and proprotein convertase subtilisin-like kexin type 9. Although individual responses varied widely, change in LDL-C on ezetimibe correlated with response to simvastatin (r = 0.46, P < 0.001). Combination therapy lowered LDL-C by 15% or greater in more than 95% of participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline cholesterol absorption and synthesis did not predict responsiveness to LDL-lowering drugs. Responsiveness to simvastatin and ezetimibe were highly correlated, suggesting that factors downstream of the primary sites of action of these drugs are a major determinant of response.