Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radical resection with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT): improved treatment for gastric adenocarcinoma

Clinical feasibility of combining intraoperative electron radiation therapy with minimally invasive surgery: a potential for electron-FLASH clinical development

BACKGROUND

Local cancer therapy by combining real-time surgical exploration and resection with delivery of a single dose of high-energy electron irradiation entails a very precise and effective local therapeutic approach. Integrating the benefits from minimally invasive surgical techniques with the very precise delivery of intraoperative electron irradiation results in an efficient combined modality therapy.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced disease, who are candidates for laparoscopic and/or thoracoscopic surgery, received an integrated multimodal management. Preoperative treatment included induction chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation, followed by laparoscopic surgery and intraoperative electron radiation therapy.

RESULTS

In a period of 5 consecutive years, 125 rectal cancer patients were treated, of which 35% underwent a laparoscopic approach. We found no differences in cancer outcomes and tolerance between the open and laparoscopic groups. Two esophageal cancer patients were treated with IOeRT during thoracoscopic resection, with the resection specimens showing intense downstaging effects. Two oligo-recurrent prostatic cancer patients (isolated nodal progression) had a robotic-assisted surgical resection and post-lymphadenectomy electron boost on the vascular and lateral pelvic wall.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive and robotic-assisted surgery is feasible to combine with intraoperative electron radiation therapy and offers a new model explored with electron-FLASH beams.

Intraoperative radiotherapy: review of techniques and results

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a technique that involves precise delivery of a large dose of ionising radiation to the tumour or tumour bed during surgery. Direct visualisation of the tumour bed and ability to space out the normal tissues from the tumour bed allows maximisation of the dose to the tumour while minimising the dose to normal tissues. This results in an improved therapeutic ratio with IORT. Although it was introduced in the 1960s, it has seen a resurgence of popularity with the introduction of self-shielding mobile linear accelerators and low-kV IORT devices, which by eliminating the logistical issues of transport of the patient during surgery for radiotherapy or building a shielded operating room, has enabled its wider use in the community.

Electrons, low-kV X-rays and HDR brachytherapy are all different methods of IORT in current clinical use. Each method has its own unique set of advantages and disadvantages, its own set of indications where one may be better suited than the other, and each requires a specific kind of expertise.

IORT has demonstrated its efficacy in a wide variety of intra-abdominal tumours, recurrent colorectal cancers, recurrent gynaecological cancers, and soft-tissue tumours. Recently, it has emerged as an attractive treatment option for selected, early-stage breast cancer, owing to the ability to complete the entire course of radiotherapy during surgery. IORT has been used in a multitude of roles across these sites, for dose escalation (retroperitoneal sarcoma), EBRT dose de-escalation (paediatric tumours), as sole radiation modality (early breast cancers) and as a re-irradiation modality (recurrent rectal and gynaecological cancers).

This article aims to provide a review of the rationale, techniques, and outcomes for IORT across different sites relevant to current clinical practice.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for the treatment of resectable locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: topography of locoregional recurrences and long-term outcomes

INTRODUCTION

To report feasibility, tolerance, anatomical sites of upper abdominal locoregional recurrence and long-term outcome of gastric cancer patients treated with surgery and a component of intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IORT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1995 to December 2010, 32 patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma treated with curative resection (R0) [total gastrectomy (n = 9; 28 %), subtotal (n = 23; 72 %) and D2 lymphadenectomy in all patients] and apparent disease confined to locoregional area [Stage: II (n = 15; 47 %), III (n = 17; 53 %)] were treated with a component of IORT (IORT applicator size 5-9 cm in diameter, dose 10-15 Gy, beam energy 6-5 MeV) over the celiac axis and peripancreatic nodal areas. Sixteen (50 %) patients also received adjuvant treatment (external beam radiotherapy n = 6, chemoradiation n = 9, chemotherapy alone n = 1).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 40 months (range, 2-60), locoregional recurrence was observed in five (16 %) patients (4 nodal in hepatic hilum and 1 anastomotic). Only pN1 patients developed locoregional relapse. No recurrence was observed in the IORT-treated target volume (celiac trunk and peripancreatic nodes). Overall survival at 5 years was 54.6 % (95 % CI: 48.57-60.58). Postoperative mortality was 6 % (n = 2) and postoperative complications 19 % (n = 6).

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to integrate IORT as a component of radiotherapy in combined modality therapy of gastric cancer. Local control is high in the radiation boosted area, but marginal regional extension (in particular, involving the hepatic hilum) might be considered as part of the anatomic IORT target volume at risk in pN+ patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX: improved outcomes in Chinese patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Although the role of peri-operative chemotherapy is established in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer, the optimal regime remains to be determined. FOLFOX has been used in palliative setting with good response rates but its role in a neoadjuvant setting is not well established.

METHODS

This is a prospective non-randomized study comparing peri-operative FOLFOX versus adjuvant FOLFOX in patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer. Response to chemotherapy was assessed according to WHO criteria and pathological changes. Kaplan-Meier log rank test was used to calculate and compare survival differences.

RESULTS

There were 73 patients (neoadjuvant = 36). Complete and partial response was observed in 2 (6%) and 21 (64%) patients, respectively. Four-year overall survival (OS) in the neoadjuvant arm was 78% versus 51% in the adjuvant arm (P = 0.031). Subgroup analysis found R0 resection (86% vs. 55%, P = 0.011) and patients with proximal cancers (87% vs. 14%, P < 0.001) to have improved OS. The most common side effect was grade 1-2 leukopenia. There were no grade 3 neuropathies, grade 4 cytopaenias, or treatment related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Peri-operative treatment with FOLFOX shows promise in patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer. It warrants further evaluation and should be considered an alternative to peri-operative ECF.

Long-term results after intraoperative radiation therapy for gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We retrospectively analyzed the impact of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) on long-term survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1991 to 2001, a total of 84 patients with gastric neoplasms underwent gastectomy or subtotal resection with IORT (23 Gy, 6-15 MeV; IORT-positive [IORT(+)] group). Patients with a history of additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy, histologically confirmed R1 or R2 resection, or reoperation with curative intention after local recurrence were excluded from further analysis. The remaining 61 patients were retrospectively matched with 61 patients without IORT (IORT-negative [IORT(-)] group) for Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stage, patient age, histologic grading, extent of surgery, and level of lymph node dissection. Subgroups included postoperative UICC Stages I (n = 31), II (n = 11), III (n = 14), and IV (n = 5).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 4.8 years in the IORT(+) group and 5.0 years in the IORT(-) group. The overall 5-year patient survival rate was 58% in the IORT(+) group vs. 59% in the IORT(-) group (p = 0.99). Subgroup analysis showed no impact of IORT on 5-year patient survival for those with UICC Stages I/II (76% vs. 80%; p = 0.87) and III/IV (21% vs. 14%, IORT(+) vs. IORT(-) group; p = 0.30). Perioperative mortality rates were 4.9% and 4.9% in the IORT(+) vs. IORT(-) group. Total surgical complications were more common in the IORT(+) than IORT(-) group (44.3% vs. 19.7%; p < 0.05). The locoregional tumor recurrence rate was 9.8% in the IORT(+) group.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of IORT was associated with low locoregional tumor recurrence, but had no benefit on long-term survival while significantly increasing surgical morbidity in patients with curable gastric cancer.

intraoperative radiation therapy part 2. Clinical results

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been used for over 30 years in Asia, Europe and America as a supplementary activity in the treatment of cancer patients with promising results. Modern IORT is carried out with electron beams (IOERT) produced by a linear accelerator generally used for external beam irradiation (EBRT) or a specialized mobile electron accelerator. HDR brachytherapy (HDR-IORT) has also been applied on selected locations. Retrospective analysis of clinical experiences in cancer sites such as operable pancreatic tumour, locally advanced/recurrent rectal cancer, head and neck carcinomas, sarcomas and cervical cancer are consistent with local tumour control promotion compared to similar clinical experiences without IORT. New emerging indications such as the treatment of breast cancer are presented. The IORT component of the therapeutical approach allows intensification of the total radiation dose without additional exposure of healthy tissues and improves dose-deposit homogeneity and precision. Results of the application of IORT on selected disease sites are presented with an analysis on future possibilities. To improve the methodology, clinical trials are required with multivariate analysis including patient, tumour and treatment characteristics, prospective evaluation of early and late toxicity, patterns of tumour recurrence and overall patient outcome.

Perioperative adjunctive treatment in the management of operable gastric cancer

Outcome in the management of clinically resectable gastric carcinoma has been disappointing, at least in Western populations, despite increasingly radical surgery and extensive experience with adjunctive perioperative treatment with innumerable single and combined modality regimens. The United States Intergroup Study, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of adjuvant chemoradiation, demonstrated significant improvement in disease-free and overall survival. Consequently, this regimen of postoperative fluoruracil plus leucovorin and locoregional radiation has been incorporated into current clinical practice. In hopes of further improving cure rates, many other regimens are under investigation, including the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy alone, combined neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, and adjuvant therapy alone. In these clinical trials, therapeutic agents are prescribed alone or in multimodal regimens and include systemic chemotherapy, intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy with or without hyperthermia, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), and postoperative external beam irradiation. Several molecular markers have been identified, which seem to predict that a given tumor may be effective or resistant to a drug, raising the possibility of customized chemotherapy regimens. Preclinical studies suggest potential efficacy of angiogenesis inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and antisense agents.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

Primary radical tumor debulking followed by platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy is considered standard for advanced stage ovarian carcinomas. The extent of postoperative residual disease is the most important prognostic factor. However, complete tumor resection is achieved in only 40-50% of advanced ovarian cancers. For the remaining patients, who have an unfavorable prognosis, the concept of neoadjuvant or primary chemotherapy followed by interval laparotomy has emerged. Two different strategies are pursued. One is to administer several courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in order to downstage the tumor prior to primary debulking surgery. The other is to administer chemotherapy after suboptimal debulking surgery to optimize cytoreduction during interval laparotomy. Numerous retrospective studies demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by primary debulking surgery is a feasible and safe approach. It is becoming increasingly evident that the selection of appropriate patients is crucial. Some studies demonstrated that the volume of ascites proved to be an easily measurable biomarker that allowed prediction of tumor resectability. However, further investigations are needed to better define patients who will benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Despite promising results, neoadjuvant chemotherapy must still be considered experimental. Therefore, the potential advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy need to be confirmed in prospective randomized studies.

A phase II study of G17DT in gastric carcinoma

PURPOSE

G17DT is a gastrin immunogen, raising antibodies that blockade gastrin-stimulated growth. The aim of the study was to characterise antibody response and assess safety and tolerability of G17DT given to patients with gastric cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

G17DT was administered to 52 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma at weeks 0, 2 and 6 by intramuscular injection at doses of 10, 100 and 250 microg. Antibody levels were measured by an ELISA assay. A radioligand displacement assay determined the ability of G17DT-immunised patients' sera to inhibit binding of 125IG17 to cholecystokinin (CCK)-2 receptors.

RESULTS

By week 12 of the study, 6/12 evaluable stage I-III patients achieved an antibody response in the 10 microg group, 7/11 in the 100 microg group, and 11/12 in the 250 microg group. Stage IV patients dosed at 250 microg achieved a similar response rate to stage I-III patients dosed at 10 or 100 microg. G17DT was well tolerated in 47/52 patients. Two patients suffered significant adverse reactions including injection site pain and abscess. G17DT antibodies displaced iodinated gastrin from CCK-2 receptors, with the level of displacement correlating with antibody titre.

CONCLUSIONS

G17DT immunisation is a well-tolerated method of raising functional antibodies to 17 amino acid gastrin forms in patients with gastric carcinomas.

Expression of GLUT-1 glucose transfer, cellular proliferation activity and grade of tumor correlate with [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography in epithelial tumors of the ovary

We evaluated whether tracer FDG uptake, quantified as an SUV by PET in ovarian epithelial tumors, correlates with clinical stage, tumor grade, cell proliferation and glucose metabolism, all of which are biomarkers for response to chemotherapy, prognosis and overall survival in ovarian cancer patients. Seventeen patients suspected of having ovarian cancer by physical examination, tumor marker analysis and anatomic imaging (such as sonography, CT and/or MRI) underwent whole-body FDG-PET within the 2 weeks prior to surgery. Seventeen epithelial ovarian tumor specimens (13 malignant tumors, 5 at stage I, 2 at stage II, 6 at stage III; 2 borderline tumors; and 2 benign lesions) were available for pathologic evaluation. They were graded histopathologically, and immunohistochemistry for MIB-1 (proliferation index marker) and GLUT-1 was performed. Correlation between FDG uptake and clinical stage, GLUT-1 expression, MIB-1 LI and histologic grading score was determined. No positive correlation was observed between FDG uptake and clinical stage (p=0.14). Intensity of GLUT-1 expression (r=0.76, p=0.001), MIB-1 LI (r=0.457, p=0.014) and histologic grading score (r=0.692, p=0.005) showed statistically significant positive correlations with FDG uptake. Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that expression of GLUT-1 transporters was the strongest parameter (r=0.760, p=0.0004) by which to predict positive FDG uptake. Therefore, glucose consumption, as determined by analysis of SUVs in FDG-PET, may be a noninvasive biomarker for ovarian epithelial tumors.

Randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after resection for gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled if they underwent resection of gastric cancer but had lymph node or serosal involvement or both. Surgical resection was either total or partial gastrectomy according to the site of the tumor, and surgeons were allowed to perform either D1 or D2 gastrectomy. The subjects were random assigned in two treatment groups as follows: surgery alone as the control group, or surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Nine cycles of 5 days protocol every 4 weeks was proposed to the patients of the chemotherapy group. The protocol included a daily administration of 200 mg/m(2) of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (375 mg/m(2) during the first session increasing 25 mg by session until reaching 500 mg/m(2)) and CDDP 15 mg/m(2). Two hundred patients were required. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared according to the log-rank and the Mantel-Haenszel methods.

RESULTS

In all, 205 patients were enrolled in the study; 104 had surgery alone and 101 had surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients' characteristics were similar except for the mean age, which was 4 years less in the control group. Because of toxicity, 54% of the patients stopped the protocol before the end of the nine courses, and 46% of the patients received the nine courses including 32% with a decreased dose and 14% with a full dose. The 5-year survival rate was 39% in the control group and 39% in the chemotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

This protocol of adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve the 5-year survival after resection for gastric cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for FIGO stage III or IV ovarian cancer: Survival benefit and prognostic factors

The survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was assessed in patients with FIGO stage III or IV ovarian cancer, and the prognostic value of various therapeutic factors was determined. In patients treated for stage III or IV ovarian malignancies at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Nagoya University or related institutions between 1987 and 1996, 119 had a histologic diagnosis of serous cystadenocarcinoma. For this group, the long-term outcome was compared between 96 patients receiving conventional adjuvant chemotherapy following standard surgery and 23 patients treated with NAC, both followed by a second cytoreductive surgery. In a total of 29 patients with all histologic types of malignancy, the tumor response to NAC and survival were analyzed on the basis of histology, chemotherapy regimen, residual tumor size after the second cytoreductive operation, and the dose intensity of cisplatin. The long-term outcome (5-year survival rate) was better in patients treated with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy than in patients receiving NAC, although the difference was not significant. Overall survival did not differ significantly in relation to tumor histology or chemotherapy regimen. With respect to residual tumor size after the second surgery, patients with a residual tumor < or = 2 cm in diameter had a significantly better prognosis than those with a residual tumor >2 cm. A better prognosis was also associated with a higher dose intensity of cisplatin, and patients treated at >or = 18 mg/m(2)/week survived significantly longer than those receiving <18 mg/m(2)/week.

Incremental Benefits of FDG Positron Emission Tomography over CT Alone for the Preoperative Staging of Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of positron emission tomography (PET) with the radiotracer FDG to cross-sectional imaging, such as CT, increases accuracy in the detection of tumor spread. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifteen patients who were thought to have ovarian cancer on the basis of the results of physical examination, sonography findings, and level of serum cancer antigen 125 were enrolled over an 11-month period. After screening, patients underwent two imaging examinations-abdominopelvic CT and whole-body FDG PET- within 2 weeks before surgery. Also before surgery, staging accuracy was assessed separately using CT with or without FDG PET (which was based on modifications of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] criteria). The results of the histology and surgery findings were used to assess the accuracy of the scanning findings.

RESULTS

Staging revealed stage III disease in seven patients (IIIC, n = 6; IIIB, n = 1), stage II in three (IIC, n = 2; IIB, n = 1), and stage I in five (IC, n = 3; IA, n = 2), according to the FIGO criteria. Although CT staging correlated with postoperative staging in eight (53%) of 15 patients, consensus evaluation of CT with FDG PET staging improved correlation with postoperative staging in 13 (87%) of 15 patients.

CONCLUSION

The addition of FDG PET to CT increases accuracy in staging of ovarian cancer.

Complications of gastrectomy following CPT-11-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Potential benefits of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer include tumor downstaging and an increased R0 resection rate. Potential disadvantages include increased surgical complications. This study assesses postoperative morbidity and mortality by comparing patients undergoing gastrectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. From October 1998 to July 2002, a total of 34 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer were placed on a phase II neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocol consisting of two cycles of CPT-11 (75 mg/m(2)) with cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)). Demographic, clinical, morbidity, and mortality data were compared for these patients (CHEMO) versus 85 patients undergoing gastrectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SURG). The CHEMO patients were more likely to be less than 70 years of age (P< or =0.01), have proximal tumors (P< or =0.01), and undergo proximal gastrectomy (P< or =0.025). Fifty-two percent of SURG patients had T3/T4 tumors compared to 19% of CHEMO patients, consistent with tumor downstaging. The R0 resection rate was similar (80%). Morbidity was 41% in CHEMO patients and 39% in SURG patients. There were five postoperative deaths (4.4%), two in the CHEMO group and three in the SURG group (P=NS). It was concluded that neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CPT-11 and cisplatin is not associated with increased postoperative morbidity compared to surgery alone. CPT-11-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be tested further in combined-modality treatment of gastric cancer.

Curative treatment of gastric cancer: towards a multidisciplinary approach?

Despite marked decreases in incidence over the last century, particularly in developed countries, gastric cancer is still the second-most common tumor worldwide. Surgery remains the gold standard for the cure of locoregional disease. However, in most countries, the diagnosis is made at an advanced stage, and the 5-year survival for surgically resectable disease stays far below 50%. The efficacy of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in addition to surgery has been actively studied over the last 30 years. Unfortunately, with few exceptions, most studies of adjuvant therapy in gastric cancer have given deceiving results. The purpose of this review is to address the reasons for our failure to objectivate an improvement in the cure of gastric cancer with adjuvant treatment in most trials, and to consider potential solutions. The low efficacy of chemotherapy regimens available up to now may have hampered our progress. In addition, many previous studies suffered limitations of design or methodology (e.g. low accrual, inadequate disease stage selection, inadequate surgical treatment) that may have obscured a treatment effect. Furthermore, the reduced treatment tolerance of post-gastrectomy patients, perhaps due to their poor nutritional status, results in decreased or delayed adjuvant systemic therapy, with potential adverse consequences in its efficacy. Among potential solutions, the arrival of new drugs, taxanes and topoisomerase I inhibitors in particular, which have shown encouraging results in metastatic disease, may increase the impact of chemotherapy in a multidisciplinary treatment approach. Pre-treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy prior to surgery may also be advantageous, averting the problems associated with post-surgical treatment. Such an approach has been shown to be feasible in phase II studies, and is relatively well tolerated by patients. Several carefully designed randomized phase III trials are underway to answer this question.

Recent advances in the treatment of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. The prognosis of the disease is poor, with only 40% of patients eligible to undergo potentially curative surgery. Even for those patients who undergo a complete resection, the rate of recurrence is very high. Extensive studies of multidisciplinary adjuvant treatment have been conducted seeking to improve the cure rates in the past two decades. The benefit of D2 dissection is still controversial and is undergoing prospective evaluation. Preliminary results from the United States Gastrointestinal Intergroup study, a well designed trial, have shown overall survival benefit of postoperative chemoradiation therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation is under active study in order to increase the number of patients to undergo potential curative surgery. Although many chemotherapy regimens have been developed recently, only modest clinical efficacy has been demonstrated for advanced metastatic disease. So far, there is no single regimen considered to be standard.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by tumor debulking prolongs survival for patients with poor prognosis in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIIC ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage IIIC should be treated by radical surgical tumor debulking with the goal of complete tumor resection. Prolonged median survival can be achieved in those patients entirely free of tumor after surgery by the administration of postsurgical platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy regimens. However, residual tumor is present in the majority of patients, which limits survival prognosis. Different therapy approaches should be utilized to improve prognosis in these patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could induce "downstaging" of the tumor and thus improve operability. Here, evidence of large ascites volume (>500 mL) can be used to identify those patients who could benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

In a prospective, nonrandomized Phase II study, 31 patients with advanced FIGO Stage IIIC ovarian carcinoma and large ascites volume (>500 mL) received 3 cycles of platinum/taxane-based combination chemotherapy, followed by tumor debulking surgery and 3 additional cycles of platinum/taxane-based combination chemotherapy. During the same period, 32 patients with advanced FIGO Stage IIIC ovarian carcinoma and large ascites volume (>500 mL) received conventional therapy (tumor debulking surgery followed by 6 cycles of platinum/taxane-based combination chemotherapy). The two groups were investigated and compared with respect to tumor resection rates, blood transfusion requirements, morbidity, and mortality during surgery, duration of surgery, and median survival.

RESULTS

The tumor resection rate in the patient group receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly higher (P = 0.04) than that of the conventionally treated group; the median survival time of 42 months versus 23 months also was significantly longer (P = 0.007). Time spent in surgery, blood transfusion requirements, morbidity, and mortality during surgery were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma of FIGO Stage IIIC who will benefit only marginally from conventional therapy can be identified by evidence of large ascites volume. Higher tumor resection rates and longer median survival can be achieved in these patients by the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A prospective randomized multicenter study currently is being performed by the Society for Gynecological Oncology in Germany to confirm these findings.

Gastric surgery

Significant advances in the role of gastric surgery in the management of disease in the past year have focused on three broad areas: morbid obesity, gastric cancer, and peptic ulcer disease. Although vertical banded gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are the two procedures most commonly used in the United States to induce weight loss in the morbidly obese patient, long-term follow-up continues to support the durability of the gastric bypass in maintaining a sustainable outcome with a minimum of complications. It is not surprising, therefore, that increasing interest has accrued in simplifying this operation and decreasing potential complications even further by employing laparoscopic technology. In the area of gastric cancer, several reports have provided important new information regarding its pathogenesis, factors influencing long-term survival, and strategies for management when diagnosed early. Finally, in patients developing the complications of peptic ulcer disease (eg, obstruction and perforation), conservative management has been emphasized over more radical traditional approaches. This review highlights these advances.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer

Local recurrence following potentially curative tumor resection is a major problem in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. To augment surgical excision and to avoid the disadvantages of external beam irradiation, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has been applied to primary and recurrent gastrointestinal cancer, both with curative intent and for palliation. There is ample evidence that the combination of radical surgery and IORT can improve local control. Whether this eventually can translate into improved overall survival has not yet been studied in adequately powered randomized and controlled trials.