Pathologic N1 non-small cell lung cancer: correlation between pattern of lymphatic spread and prognosis

Survival difference between patients with single versus multiple metastatic lymph nodes and the role of histology in pathological stage II-N1 non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Previous studies investigating whether metastatic lymph node count is a relevant prognostic factor in pathological N1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), showed conflicting results. Hypothesizing that outcome may also be related to histological features, we determined the prognostic impact of single versus multiple metastatic lymph nodes in different histological subtypes for patients with stage II-N1 NSCLC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, including patients treated with a surgical resection for stage II-N1 NSCLC (TNM 7th edition) in 2010-2016. Overall survival (OS) was assessed for patients with single (pN1a) and multiple (pN1b) metastatic nodes. Using multivariable analysis, we compared OS between pN1a and pN1b in different histological subtypes.

RESULTS

After complete resection of histologically proven stage II-N1 NSCLC, 1309 patients were analyzed, comprising 871 patients with pN1a and 438 with pN1b. The median number of pathologically examined nodes (N1 + N2) was 9 (interquartile range 6-13). Five-year OS was 53% for pN1a versus 51% for pN1b. In multivariable analysis, OS was significantly different between pN1a and pN1b (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.40). When stratifying for histology, the prognostic impact of pN1a/b was only observed in adenocarcinoma patients (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.15-1.81).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with stage II-N1 adenocarcinoma, the presence of multiple metastatic nodes had a significant impact on survival, which was not observed for other histological subtypes. If further refinement as to lymph node count will be considered for incorporation into a new staging system, evaluation of the role of histology is recommended.

Factors influencing postoperative recurrence of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This study aims to explain the factors that may influence recurrence after surgical resection for early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was made of 302 patients who underwent lung resection for stage I-IIA NSCLC in our clinic between January 2014 and August 2021.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate was higher in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) than in those with adenocarcinoma (AC) (p = 0.004). Disease-free survival (DFS) was shorter in SCC (p = 0.004). According to histopathological subtypes, the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), vascular invasion (VI), visceral pleural invasion (VPI) and tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) caused an increased risk of recurrence ((p = 0.004), (p = 0.001), (p = 0.047), (p = < 0.001)) and shorter DFS ((p = 0.002), (p = < 0.001), (p = 0.038), (p = < 0.001)). LVI and VI was more common in patients with distant recurrence (p = 0.020, p = 0.002), while the STAS was more common with locoregional recurrence (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The presence of LVI, VI, VPI, and STAS are negative risk factors for recurrence and DFS in all patients and in patients with AC. In patients with SCC, the diagnosis of SCC itself and the presence of STAS were risk factors for recurrence and DFS. Moreover, the risk of distant recurrence is higher in the presence of LVI or VI, and the risk of locoregional recurrence in the presence of STAS is higher.

Resectable non-stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer: the surgical perspective

Surgery remains an essential element of the multimodality radical treatment of patients with early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer. In addition, thoracic surgery is one of the key specialties involved in the lung cancer tumour board. The importance of the surgeon in the setting of a multidisciplinary panel is ever-increasing in light of the crucial concept of resectability, which is at the base of patient selection for neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments within trials and in real-world practice. This review covers some of the topics which are relevant in the daily practice of a thoracic oncological surgeon and should also be known by the nonsurgical members of the tumour board. It covers the following topics: the pre-operative selection of the surgical candidate in terms of fitness in light of the ever-improving nonsurgical treatment alternatives unfit patients may benefit from; the definition of resectability, which is so important to include patients into trials and to select the most appropriate radical treatment; the impact of surgical access and surgical extension with the evolving role of minimally invasive surgery, sublobar resections and parenchymal-sparing sleeve resections to avoid pneumonectomy.

Risk factors of lobar lymph node metastases in non-primary tumor-bearing lobes among the patients of non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

Lobar lymph node metastases in non-primary tumor-bearing lobes (NTBL) are rarely reported. This study examined the risk factors of lobar lymph node metastasis in NTBL.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 301 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent surgical pulmonary resection with systematic lymph node dissection plus extended lobar lymph node dissection of NTBL. Patients were classified into positive and negative NTBL groups. Unconditional logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for lobar lymph node metastasis in NTBL.

Results

NTBL lobar lymph nodes were identified in 38 patients (12.6%). A higher proportion of adenocarcinomas occurred in the positive NTBL group compared to the negative NTBL group (73.7% vs. 46.4%, P = 0.01). Risk of NTBL lobar lymph node metastases was significantly elevated in the lower lobe of primary site compared to the upper lobe (OR = 2.61, 95% CI = 1.26–5.75, P = 0.01), and with adenocarcinomas compared to squamous cell carcinomas (OR = 2.75, 95% CI = 1.09–7.65, P = 0.04). No differences were observed when comparing left and right lobes. NTBL lobar lymph node metastasis was most often observed among patients with larger tumor size, N1/N2 nodal involvement, with lymph vascular invasion (LVI), and visceral pleural invasion (VPI).

Conclusion

NTBL lobar lymph node metastases occurred more often in patients with a primary NSCLC tumor in the lower lobe, with adenocarcinomas, larger tumor size, N1/N2 nodal involvement, LVI or VPI. Extended lymphadenectomy including NTBL nodes may be clinically advantageous when these risk factors are present.

Surgical Results in Pathological N1 Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study investigated the prognosis of patients with pathological N1 (pN1) nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We included patients with pN1 NSCLC who underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection and achieved complete resection (R0) between January 2000 and December 2012. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients were included. The mean age was 63.2 years, and 172 patients were males. Of the 249 patients, 200, 20, and 29 underwent lobectomy, bilobectomy, and pneumonectomy, respectively. The median observation period was 5.5 years. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 64.6% (95% confidence interval: 58.3-70.4). Five-year OS rates were 79.8% for positive lymph nodes at station 13 or 14 (n = 57), 59.6% at station 12 (n = 72), 62.7% at station 11 (n = 69), and 56.9% at station 10 (n = 51) (log-rank test; p = 0.016); furthermore, the 5-year OS rate was 75.2% for patients with positive lymph nodes at a single station (n = 160) and 45.4% for patients with positive lymph nodes at multiple stations (n = 89) (log-rank test; p < 0.001). Five-year cumulative incidences of recurrence were equivalent between patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and patients who did not (45.9 vs. 55.1%; Gray's test; p = 0.366). Distant recurrence was the most frequent mode of recurrence in both groups (70.8 and 67.3%).

CONCLUSION

The locations and the number of stations of the positive lymph nodes were identified as prognostic factors in patients with pN1 NSCLC. The primary mode of recurrence was distant recurrence irrespective of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Prognostic relevance of regional lymph-node distribution in patients with N1-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective single-center analysis

OBJECTIVE

Lymph node (LN) metastases predict survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with curative surgery. Nevertheless, prognostic differences within the same nodal (N) status have been reported. Consequently, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) proposed to stratify patients with limited nodal disease (pN1) from low (pN1a) to high (pN1b) nodal tumor burden. This study aimed to validate the IASLC proposal in a large single-center surgical cohort of patients with pN1 NSCLC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from 317 patients with pN1 NSCLC treated between January 2012 and December 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. Associations between distribution of LN metastases and survival were analyzed for different classification models-toward nodal extension (pN1a: one station involved; pN1b: multiple stations involved) and toward location (pN1 in the hilar [LN#10/11] or peripheral zone [LN#12-14]).

RESULTS

Tumor-specific survival (TSS) in the entire pN1 cohort was 67.1% at five years. Five-year TSS rates for pN1a and pN1b patients were comparable (67.6% vs. 66.5%, p = 0.623). Significant survival differences from pN1a to pN1b were observed only in patients with adenocarcinoma histology and completed adjuvant chemotherapy (5-year TSS: pN1a, 80.4% vs. pN1b, 49.6%; p = 0.005). TSS for LN metastases in the hilar zone/peripheral zone or in both zones was 68.2% and 59.9%, respectively (p = 0.068). In multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy, squamous cell histology, and nodal disease limited to one zone nodal disease were identified as independent beneficial prognostic factors (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

pN1 in only one region (hilar or lobar) was associated with better outcome than metastatic affection of both regions after surgery and adjuvant therapy. A stratification towards single (pN1a) and multiple (pN1b) N1-metastases was found of prognostic relevance only in adenocarcinoma. Prospective multicenter analysis of prognostic subgroups in N1 NSCLC is required to evaluate its clinical impact for consideration in future TNM classification.

Prognostic significance of the pattern of pathological N1 lymph node metastases for non-small cell lung cancer

Background

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the pathologic lymph node status N1 is a heterogeneous entity, and different forms of lymph node involvement may represent different prognoses. For methodological reasons, the 8th edition of the TNM staging system for NSCLC makes no official changes to the N descriptor. However, there is evidence that different subforms of N1 disease are associated with different prognoses, and it is now recommended that clinicians record the number of affected lymph nodes and nodal stations for further analyses. In this investigation we sought to determine whether patients with different levels and types of N1 lymph node involvement had significantly different 5-year survival rates.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 90 patients with NSCLC (61 men, 29 women), who were treated between 2008 and 2012 and found to have pathologic N1 lymph node involvement and tumor sizes corresponding to T1 or T2. All patients were treated in curative intent with surgical lung resection and systematic mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection.

Results

The overall 5-year survival rate was 56.3%. In the univariate analysis, lower tumor stage and tumor histology other than large-cell carcinoma were significantly associated with better long-term survival. Patients with solitary lymph node metastases also had longer disease-free survival than those with multiple nodal metastases. In the multivariate analysis, large-cell carcinoma and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage IIB were independently associated with worse survival, while pneumonectomy, compared to lobar or sublobar resection, was independently associated with better survival.

Conclusions

Although we did not observe significant prognostic differences between N1 subcategories within our patient population, other analyses may yield different results. Therefore, these data highlight the need for large, well-designed multicenter studies to confirm the clinical significance of N1 subcategories.

Postneoadjuvant adjuvant chemotherapy in resected N1 non-small cell lung cancer with residual nodal disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Nodal positivity following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is considered a poor prognostic sign, but little data are available on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in these cases. This analysis sought to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with increased survival in NSCLC patients with residual N1 disease at resection.

METHODS

Patients from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) with cN1T1-2M0 NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and definitive resection between 2006 and 2012 were identified. Treatment groups were defined as those receiving no additional therapy or adjuvant chemotherapy ± radiation after resection. Five-year overall survival (OS) was estimated for each group. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate hazard ratios adjusting for demographic, clinical, and facility characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 90 eligible patients, 5-year OS was 43% and 56% for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and no additional treatment, respectively (P < 0.56). With multivariable analysis, the estimated hazard ratio was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.61-2.64, P = 0.51) for adjuvant chemotherapy compared to no additional therapy.

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with increased survival in NSCLC patients with pathologic N1 NSCLC following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection.

Temporal and regional distribution of initial recurrence site in completely resected N1-stage II lung adenocarcinoma: The effect of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Understanding the timing and pattern of cancer recurrence is essential to explain the causes of treatment failure. We investigated the recurrence pattern and rate over time in patients with completely resected N1-stage II lung adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 333 patients who underwent complete surgical resection for N1-stage II lung adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 38.8 months and the 5-year RFS rate was 39.6%. Left-sided tumors, large tumor size, and lymph node (LN) ratio higher than 0.15 were significantly correlated with a worse RFS, whereas female sex, direct LN involvement, and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly correlated with a better RFS. Among the 182 patients who experienced recurrences, 46 (25.3%) had only loco-regional recurrences and 136 (74.7%) had distant metastases. The organs most commonly involved in initial recurrence were the lungs (n = 89, 48.9%), followed by bone (n = 41, 22.5%) and the brain (n = 38, 20.9%). The recurrence hazard curve for the entire study population demonstrated a similarly shaped and sized initial and second peak at 15 and 23 months, and a third smaller peak during the fourth year. The recurrence hazard curve of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a more delayed and smaller first peak than those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had a lower rate of distant metastasis (p = 0.037); adjuvant chemotherapy had no effect on brain metastasis (p = 0.640).

CONCLUSION

In the present cohort, the hazard curves suggested that bone and brain recurrences exhibited an earlier first peak, while lung recurrences presented later. Adjuvant chemotherapy not only reduced the recurrence hazard but also delayed the recurrence and altered the pattern of recurrence. However, these results need to be confirmed in a prospective study.

Predictors for hilar/intrapulmonary lymph node metastasis in discrete type of clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Accurate preoperative evaluation of lymph nodes can provide optimal treatment for patients. However, in patients with clinical N1 disease (cN1) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), no suitable predictor has been identified for hilar/intrapulmonary lymph node metastasis (pathological N1 disease; pN1). The purpose of this study was to identify pN1 in cN1 NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinicoradiological features of 109 patients with a discrete type of cN1 NSCLC who had undergone complete resection at our institution from 2004 to 2015. The association between clinicoradiological variables and nodal status was analyzed to identify predictors for pN1.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 77 males and 32 females, ranging in age from 39 to 84 years. The breakdown by pathological N category was 40 (37%) pN0, 41 (38%) pN1, and 28 (25%) pN2 patients. Maximum lymph node diameter was identified as a significant predictor for pN1, with an odds ratio of 1.25 (P = 0.010). When limited to 63 patients who underwent positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) at our institution, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) of the lymph node was an independent predictor, with an odds ratio of 1.91 with logistic regression analysis (P = 0.004). The size of lymph node and the SUV_max were significant factors for pN1, with optimal cut-off values of 13 mm and 4.28, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the patients with cN1, maximum lymph node size and SUV_max of the FDG-PET were significant predictors for pN1.

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with pathological N1 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with N1 disease have variable outcomes, and additional prognostic factors are needed. The number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) has been proposed as a prognostic indicator. However, the number of positive LNs depends on the number of LNs examined from the resection specimen. The lymph node ratio (LNR) can circumvent this limitation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate LNR as a predictor of survival and recurrence in patients with pathologic N1 NSCLC.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed studies published before March 17, 2016, on the prognostic value of LNR in patients with pathologic N1 NSCLC. The hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to combine the data. We also evaluated heterogeneity and publication bias.

RESULTS

Five studies published between 2010 and 2014 were eligible for this systematic review with meta-analysis. The total number of patients included was 6,130 ranging from 75 to 4,004 patients per study. The combined HR for all eligible studies evaluating the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of N1 LNR in patients with pathologic N1 NSCLC was 1.53 (95% CI: 1.22-1.85) and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.19-2.09), respectively. We found no heterogeneity and publication bias between the reports.

CONCLUSIONS

LNR is a worthy predictor of survival and cancer recurrence in patients with pathological N1 NSCLC.

Staging of lung cancer: the role of noninvasive, minimally invasive and invasive techniques

Accurate staging and restaging of primary tumour and mediastinal nodes in patients with lung cancer is of significant importance. For primary tumours, computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest are recommended. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging should be used in patients with curative intent treatment to evaluate metastatic disease. Diagnosis of the primary tumour should be performed using bronchoscopy or CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration. In patients with enlarged mediastinal nodes and no distant metastasis, invasive staging of the mediastinum is required. For suspicious N2 or N3 disease, endoscopic needle techniques, such as endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspiration, oesophageal ultrasound and fine needle aspiration, or a combination of both, are preferred to any surgical staging technique. In cases of suspicious nodes and negative results using needle aspiration techniques, invasive surgical staging using mediastinoscopy or video-assisted thoracic surgery should be performed. In central tumours or N1 nodes, preoperative invasive staging is indicated.Restaging after induction therapy remains a controversial topic. Today, neither CT, PET nor PET/CT scans are accurate enough to make final further therapeutic decisions for mediastinal nodal involvement. An invasive technique providing cytohistological information is still recommended.

Prognostic value of metastatic N1 lymph node ratio and angiolymphatic invasion in patients with pathologic stage IIA non-small cell lung cancer

With regard to pathologic stage IIA (pIIA) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is a paucity of literature evaluating the risk factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic factors of DFS and OS in patients with NSCLC pIIA.We performed a retrospective review of 98 stage II patients (7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer) who underwent lung resection from January 2005 to February 2011. Of these, 23 patients were excluded for this study because of loss of follow-up or different substage, and 75 patients with pIIA were included for further univariate and multivariate analysis. Risk factors for DFS and OS were analyzed, including age, gender, smoking history, operation method, histology, differential grade, visceral pleural invasion, angiolymphatic invasion, and metastatic N1 lymph node ratio (LNR).Of the 75 patients with pIIA NSCLC who were examined, 29 were female and 46 were male, with a mean age of 61.8 years (range: 34-83 years). The average tumor size was 3.188 cm (range: 1.10-6.0 cm). Under univariate analysis, angiolymphatic invasion and metastatic N1 LNR were risk factors for DFS (P = 0.011, P = 0.007). Under multivariate analysis, angiolymphatic invasion and metastatic N1 LNR were all independent risk factors for DFS, while adjuvant chemotherapy and higher metastatic N1 LNR were independent prognostic factors for OS.For patients with pIIA, higher metastatic N1 LNR and angiolymphatic invasion were related to poor DFS. In addition to DFS, higher metastatic N1 LNR was also a poor prognostic factor for OS rates and adjuvant therapy effectiveness. Clinical physicians should devise different postsurgical follow-up programs depending on these factors, especially for patients with high risk.

Prognostic significance of the extent of lymph node involvement in stage II-N1 non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) staging system (published in 2009 in the seventh edition of the cancer staging manuals of the Union for International Cancer Control and American Joint Commission on Cancer) did not include any changes to current N descriptors for NSCLC. However, the prognostic significance of the extent of lymph node (LN) involvement (including the LN zones involved [hilar/interlobar or peripheral], cancer-involved LN ratios [LNRs], and the number of involved LNs) remains unknown. The aim of this report is to evaluate the extent of LN involvement and other prognostic factors in predicting outcome after definitive surgery among Chinese patients with stage II-N1 NSCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathologic characteristics of 206 patients with stage II (T1a-T2bN1M0) NSCLC who had undergone complete surgical resection at Shanghai Chest Hospital from June 1999 to June 2009. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis. Stratified and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between the LN involvement and survival.

RESULTS

Peripheral zone LN involvement, cancer-involved LNR, smaller tumor size, and squamous cell carcinoma were shown to be statistically significant indicators of higher OS and DFS by univariate analyses. Visceral pleural involvement was also shown to share a statistically significant relationship with DFS by univariate analyses. Multivariate analyses showed that tumor size and zone of LN involvement were significant predictors of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Zone of N1 LN, LN ratios, and tumor size were found to provide independent prognostic information in patients with stage II NSCLC. This information may be used to stratify patients into groups by risk for recurrence.

Differential prognostic significance of extralobar and intralobar nodal metastases in patients with surgically resected stage II non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the prognostic significance of extralobar nodal metastases versus intralobar nodal metastases in patients with lung cancer and pathologic stage N1 disease.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained lung resection database identified 230 patients with pathologic stage II, N1 non-small cell lung cancer from 1997 to 2011. The surgical pathology reports were reviewed to identify the involved N1 stations. The outcome variables included recurrence and death. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the R statistical software package.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients had extralobar nodal metastases (level 10 or 11); 108 patients were identified with intralobar nodal disease (levels 12-14). The median follow-up was 111 months. The baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. No significant differences were noted in the surgical approach, anatomic resections performed, or adjuvant therapy rates between the 2 groups. Overall, 80 patients developed recurrence during follow-up: 33 (30%) of 108 in the intralobar and 47 (38%) of 122 in the extralobar cohort. The median overall survival was 46.9 months for the intralobar cohort and 24.4 months for the extralobar cohort (P < .001). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model that included the presence of extralobar nodal disease, age, tumor size, tumor histologic type, and number of positive lymph nodes, extralobar nodal disease independently predicted both recurrence-free and overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.81; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who underwent surgical resection for stage II non-small cell lung cancer, the presence of extralobar nodal metastases at level 10 or 11 predicted significantly poorer outcomes than did nodal metastases at stations 12 to 14. This finding has prognostic importance and implications for adjuvant therapy and surveillance strategies for patients within the heterogeneous stage II (N1) category.

Diagnostic imaging in the preoperative management of lung cancer

Surgical resection is the accepted standard of care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several imaging modalities play central roles in the detection and staging of the disease. The aim of this review is to evaluate the utility of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT for NSCLC staging. Radiographic staging refers to the use of CT as a non-invasive diagnostic technique. However, while the vast majority of patients undergo only CT, CT is a notoriously inaccurate means of tumor and nodal staging in many situations. PET/CT clearly improves the staging, particularly nodal staging, compared to CT or PET alone. In addition, as a result of the increased soft-tissue contrast, MRI is superior to CT for distinguishing between tissue characteristics. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), which is a minimally invasive technique, also has pathological diagnostic potential. Extensive research and the resultant improvements in the understanding of genetics, histology, molecular biology and oncology are transforming our understanding of lung cancer, and it is clear that imaging modalities such as CT, MRI, PET and PET/CT will have an important role in its preoperative management. However, thoracic surgeons should also be aware of the limitations of these techniques.

Prognostic factors of resected node-positive lung cancer: location, extent of nodal metastases, and multimodal treatment

Objective: To investigate the prognostic significance of location and extent of lymph node metastasis in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to weigh up the influence of treatment modalities on survival.

Patients and method: On exploratory analysis, patients were grouped according to location and time of diagnosis of nodal metastasis: group I, pN2-disease in the aortopulmonary region (N=14); group II, pN2-disease at other level (N=30); group III, cN2-disease with response to induction treatment (ypN0; N=21); group IV, cN2-disease without response to induction treatment (ypN1-2; N=27); group V, pN1-disease (N=66).

Results: From 1999 to 2005, 158 patients (median age: 64 years) with node-positive NSCLC were treated at our institution either by neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy plus surgery or by surgery plus adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both). Operative mortality and major morbidity rates were 2% and 15%. Five-year survival rates were 19% for group I, 12% for group II, 66% for group III, 15% for group IV, and 29% for group V (P<.05). On multivariate analysis, time of N+-diagnosis, extent of nodal involvement and therapy approach were significantly linked to prognosis.

Conclusion: The survival of patients with node-positive NSCLC does not depend on anatomical location of nodal disease, but strongly correlates to extent of nodal metastases and treatment modality. Combined therapy approaches including chemotherapy and surgery may improve long-term survival.

Extent of lung resection in non-small lung cancer with interlobar lymph node involvement

BACKGROUND

Optimal resection type for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with interlobar lymph node involvement (ILNI) has seldom been reported. To completely resect a NSCLC with ILNI, some surgeons believe that a pneumonectomy is needed.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 151 patients (147 men, 4 women; mean age 58 ± 8 years, range 34-79) with non-small lung cancer without mediastinal or hilar lymph node metastasis who underwent an anatomic lung resection with systematic lymph node dissection between January 1995 and November 2006. All patients had involvement of the surgical-pathologic interlobar (#11) lymph node: 8 patients had a T1 tumor; 95, T2; 39, T3; and 9, T4. We evaluated the effect of resection type (pneumonectomy in 90 patients versus lobectomy in 61) on their prognosis by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate of patients was 61% for the lobectomy and 35% for the pneumonectomy (p = 0.04). We did not find statistically significant differences in sex, median age, distributions of tumor site, histology and differentiation, complete resection rate, N1 involvement status, morbidity and mortality. Patients who underwent the pneumonectomy had larger tumors and more T3 tumors. The T status, multiple levels N1 involvement and histology did not affect survival in the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed resection type as a significant prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumonectomy was not necessary in patients with NSCLC and interlobar lymph node involvement that we had discovered intraoperatively.

Validation of the lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in patients with N1 nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) has been proposed as a prognostic indicator in N1 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the number of positive LNs is confounded by the number of LNs resected during surgery. The lymph node ratio (LNR) (the ratio of the number of positive LNs divided by the number of LNs resected) can circumvent this limitation. The prognostic significance of the LNR has been demonstrated in elderly patients with NSCLC. The objective of the current study was to evaluate whether a higher LNR is a marker of worse survival in patients with NSCLC aged ≤65 years who have N1 disease.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify 4004 patients who underwent resection for N1 NSCLC. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to LNR (≤0.15, 0.16-0.5, and >0.5). Associations of the LNR with lung cancer-specific and overall mortality were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Stratified and Cox regression analyses were used to assess correlations between the LNR and survival after adjusting for other prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Unadjusted analysis indicated that a higher LNR was associated with worse lung cancer-specific survival (P < .0001) and overall survival (P < .0001). Stratified and multivariate analyses also indicated that the LNR was an independent predictor of survival after controlling for potential confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results confirmed that the LNR is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with N1 NSCLC. This information may be used to identify patients who are at greater risk of cancer recurrence.

N1 non-small-cell lung cancer. A 20-year surgical experience

N1 non-small-cell lung cancer has heterogeneous prognosis in relation to node descriptors. There is no agreement on the ideal type of resection. A new classification of N1 descriptors was proposed in the 7th edition of the TNM staging system. A retrospective study was conducted on 384 patients with T1-T3N1 non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent complete pulmonary resection. The prognostic role of N1 descriptors according to the current and new staging systems and type of resection was investigated. The 5-year survival rate was 46%. Involvement of hilar node stations, multiple stations, and multiple nodes were poor prognostic factors (5-year survival, 33%, 21%, and 30%, respectively), as well as involvement of the hilar zone and multiple zones (5-year survival, 27% and 23%, respectively). Pneumonectomy showed significantly better survival rates compared to lobectomy or bilobectomy (5-year survival, 60% vs. 29%). Multivariate analysis showed that the number of N1 zones and type of resection were independent prognostic factors. Patients with hilar nodal, multiple-level, or multiple-zone involvement had poor prognosis. Standard lobectomy remains the procedure of choice, but in cases of fixed nodes in the hilar zone, sleeve resection or even pneumonectomy should be considered.

The number of lymph node metastases as a prognostic factor in patients with N1 non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) status is an important component of staging; it provides valuable prognostic information and influences treatment decisions. However, the prognostic significance of the number of positive LNs in N1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. In this study we evaluated whether a higher number of positive LNs results in worse survival among patients with N1 disease.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify 3,399 patients who underwent resection for N1 NSCLC. Subjects were categorized into groups based on the number of positive nodes: one, two to three, four to eight, and more than eight positive LNs. The prognostic significance of the number of positive LNs in relation to survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Stratified and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between the number of positive LNs and survival after adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Unadjusted survival analysis showed that a greater number of N1 LNs was associated with worse lung cancer-specific (P < .0001) and overall (P < .0001) survival. Mean lung cancer-specific survival was 8.8, 8.2, 6.0, and 3.9 years for patients with one, two to three, four to eight, and more than eight positive LNs, respectively. Stratified and adjusted analysis also showed the number of N1 LNs was an independent predictor of survival after controlling for potential confounders.

CONCLUSION

The number of positive LNs is an independent prognostic factor of survival in patients with N1 NSCLC. This information may be used to further stratify patients with respect to risk of recurrence in order to determine postoperative management.

Prognostic impact of node involvement pattern in pN1 non-small cell lung cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

We previously showed that squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients with directly involved N1 nodes resulted in outcomes significantly better than those with separately involved N1 nodes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic effect of node involvement patterns in pN1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, with special attention given to any differences between SCC and adenocarcinoma (AD).

METHODS

We reviewed 324 consecutive patients with completely resected pN1 NSCLC and classified them into two groups based on their node involvement patterns: directly or separately involved N1 groups. To compare survival rates, 1545 pN0 patients and 330 pN2 patients were also investigated.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the node involvement pattern was significantly associated with pN1 NSCLC patient outcome. The directly involved N1 group had a much better 5-year overall survival rate of 60.1% compared with 45.0% for the separately involved N1 group. In SCC patients, the directly involved N1 group showed an overall survival similar to pN0 patients, whereas overall survival of the separately involved N1 group was identical to that of pN2 patients, and their survival rates were significantly different. In AD patients, however, the survival rates were marginally different between the directly and separately involved N1 groups, and they were intermediate between pN0 and pN2 patient survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Node involvement patterns had significant prognostic effect in pN1 NSCLC patients. This effect was different between SCC and AD cases. The subclassification of N1 based on node involvement pattern is of significance for SCC patients but not for AD patients.

Lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in elderly patients with pathological N1 non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is an important predictor of survival for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognostic significance of the extent of LN involvement among patients with N1 disease remains unknown. A study was undertaken to evaluate whether involvement of a higher number of N1 LNs is associated with worse survival independent of known prognostic factors.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database, 1682 resected patients with N1 NSCLC diagnosed between 1992 and 2005 were identified. As the number of positive LNs is confounded by the total number of LNs sampled, the cases were classified into three groups according to the ratio of positive to total number of LNs removed (LN ratio (LNR)): ≤0.15, 0.16-0.5 and >0.5. Lung cancer-specific and overall survival was compared between these groups using Kaplan-Meier curves. Stratified and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between the LNR and survival after adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Lung cancer-specific and overall survival was lower among patients with a high LNR (p<0.0001 for both comparisons). Median lung cancer-specific survival was 47 months, 37 months and 21 months for patients in the ≤0.15, 0.16-0.5 and >0.5 LNR groups, respectively. In stratified and adjusted analyses, a higher LNR was also associated with worse lung cancer-specific and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of LN involvement provides independent prognostic information in patients with N1 NSCLC. This information may be used to identify patients at high risk of recurrence who may benefit from aggressive postoperative therapy.

Prognostic significance of surgical-pathologic N1 lymph node involvement in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with N1 non-small cell lung cancer represent a heterogeneous population with varying long-term survival. To better define the importance of N1 disease and its subgroups in non-small cell lung cancer staging, we analyzed patients with N1 disease using the sixth edition and proposed seventh edition TNM classifications.

METHODS

From January 1995 to November 2006, 540 patients with N1 non-small cell lung cancer who had at least lobectomy with systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

For completely resected patients, the median survival rate and 5-year survival rate were 63 months and 50.3%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates for patients with hilar N1 (station 10), interlobar (station 11), and peripheral N1 (stations 12 to 14) involvement were 39%, 51%, and 53%, respectively. Patients with hilar lymph node metastasis showed a shorter survival period than patients with peripheral lymph node involvement (p = 0.02). Patients with hilar zone N1 (stations 10 and 11) involvement tended to show poorer survival than patients with peripheral zone N1 (12 to 14) metastasis (p = 0.08). Multiple-station lymph node metastasis indicated a poorer prognosis than single-station involvement (5-year survival 39% versus 51%, respectively, p = 0.01). Patients with multiple-zone N1 involvement showed poorer survival than patients with single-zone N1 metastasis (p = 0.04). A significant survival difference was observed between N1 patients with T1a versus T1b tumors (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that only multiple-station lymph node metastasis was predictive of poor prognosis (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple-station versus single-station N1 disease and multiple-zone versus single-zone N1 involvement indicate poorer survival rate. Patients with hilar lymph node involvement had lower survival rates than patients with peripheral N1. The impact of T factor seemed to be veiled by the heterogenous nature of N1 disease. Further studies of adjusted postoperative strategies for different N1 subgroups are warranted.

Prognostic Variability in Completely Resected pN1 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

We used the Tuscan Cancer Registry archives to retrieve records of 2,896 patients with a histological diagnosis of lung tumor from January 1996 to December 2000. Of 2,410 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, 767 (31.8%) underwent complete resection. The following variables were analyzed for their influence on survival in the 157 patients with pathologic N1 status: sex, age, cell type, pathologic tumor status, number and level of involved lymph nodes, tumor grade, and type of surgery. Overall 5-year survival rates were 43.9% for 417 patients with pN0 disease, 10.8% for 176 with pN2 disease, and 31.6% for those with pN1 disease. In pN1 disease, the overall 5-year survival rates for patients with hilar and non-hilar lymph node involvement were 27.4% and 39.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that pathological T status and level of N1 involvement weresignificant prognostic factors. Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that hilar lymph node involvement was an independent prognostic factor. N1 lymph node status was identified as an independent prognostic factor in a combination of subgroups with different prognoses.

The prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen in T1N1M0 and T2N1M0 non-small cell carcinoma of the lung

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the significance of preoperative clinicopathological factors, including serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), as well as postoperative clinicopathological factors in T1-2N1M0 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent curative pulmonary resection.

METHODS

Twenty T1N1M0 disease patients and 25 T2N1M0 patients underwent standard surgical procedures between September 1996 and December 2005, and were found to have non-small lung cancer. As prognostic factors, we retrospectively investigated age, sex, Brinkman index, histologic type, primary site, tumor diameter, clinical T factor, clinical N factor, pathological T factor, preoperative serum CEA levels, surgical procedure, visceral pleural involvement, and the status of lymph node involvement (level and number).

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rate of all patients was 59.6%. In univariate analysis, survival was related to age (<70/>or=70 years, p=0.0079), site (peripheral/central, p=0.043), and CEA level (<5.0/>or=5.0 ng/ml, p=0.0015). However, in multivariate analysis, CEA (<5.0/>or=5.0 ng/ml) was the only independent prognostic factor; the 5-year survival of the patients with an elevated serum CEA level (>or=5.0 ng/ml) was only 33.2% compared to 79.9% in patients with a lower serum CEA level (<5.0 ng/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

An elevated serum CEA level (>or=5.0 ng/ml) was an independent predictor of survival in pN1 patients except for T3 and T4 cases. Therefore, even in completely resected pN1 non-small cell lung cancer, patients with a high CEA level might be candidates for multimodal therapy.

The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Seventh Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Accurate staging of lymph node involvement is a critical aspect of the initial management of nonmetastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to determine whether the current N descriptors should be maintained or revised for the next edition of the international lung cancer staging system.

METHODS

A retrospective international lung cancer database was developed and analyzed. Anatomical location of lymph node involvement was defined by the Naruke (for Japanese data) and American Thoracic Society (for non-Japanese data) nodal maps. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic groups were assessed by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Current N0 to N3 descriptors defined distinct prognostic groups for both clinical and pathologic staging. Exploratory analyses indicated that lymph node stations could be grouped together into six "zones": peripheral or hilar for N1, and upper or lower mediastinal, aortopulmonary, and subcarinal for N2 nodes. Among patients undergoing resection without induction therapy, there were three distinct prognostic groups: single-zone N1, multiple-zone N1 or single N2, and multiple-zone N2 disease. Nevertheless, there were insufficient data to determine whether the N descriptors should be subdivided (e.g., N1a, N1b, N2a, N2b).

CONCLUSIONS

Current N descriptors should be maintained in the NSCLC staging system. Prospective studies are needed to validate amalgamating lymph node stations into zones and subdividing N descriptors.

Significance of extranodal extension of regional lymph nodes in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Regional lymph node (LN) involvement affects the prognosis of patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The significance of extranodal extension in these groups of patients was prospectively studied to determine its clinicopathologic relationships and its influence on patient survival.

METHODS

A total of 199 NSCLC patients who were proved to have regional LN involvement after resection were included. Histologic examinations including tumor cell type, grade of differentiation, vascular invasion, regional LN metastasis emphasizing the number and station of LN involvement, the presence or absence of extranodal extension, and the immunohistochemistry of p53 expression were obtained. The relationships between extranodal extension and histologic type, grade of differentiation, vascular invasion, tumor size, pathologic stage, p53 expression, or patient survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Extranodal extension was significantly higher in women, adenocarcinoma, advanced stage, tumors with vascular invasion, or p53 overexpression. The total number and positive rate of resected LNs with extranodal extension were significantly correlated with advanced stage, tumors with vascular invasion, or p53 overexpression. By multivariate analysis of survival, the presence or total number of LNs with extranodal extension, tumor stage, and p53 expression were significant prognostic factors. The 5-year survival rate of stage IIIA patients without extranodal extension (30.4%) was significantly better than that of stage II patients with extranodal extension (16.8%). No survival difference between extranodal positive stage II and IIIA patients was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Extranodal extension of regional LNs is an important prognostic factor in patients with surgically resected NSCLC.

Completely resected N1 non–small cell lung cancer: Factors affecting recurrence and long-term survival

OBJECTIVE

N1 disease in non-small cell lung cancer represents a heterogeneous patient subgroup with a 5-year survival of approximately 40%. Few reports have evaluated the correlation between N1 disease and tumor recurrence or which subgroup of patients would most benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

From 1997 through 2002, all patients with pathologic T1-4 N1 M0 non-small cell lung cancer who had a complete resection with systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy were retrospectively analyzed and evaluated for factors associated with recurrence and long-term survival.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty patients with N1 disease were evaluated. Sixty-six (37%) patients had either locoregional recurrence (n = 39 [22%]), distant metastasis (n = 41 [23%]), or both during follow-up. Univariate analysis demonstrated that visceral pleural invasion and age were associated with locoregional recurrence, whereas visceral pleural invasion, distinct N1 metastasis (as opposed to direct N1 invasion by the primary tumor), and multistation lymph node involvement were associated with distant metastasis (P < .05). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that visceral pleural invasion, multistation N1 involvement, and distinct N1 metastasis were the only independent predisposing factors for locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis. Overall 5-year survival was 42.5%. Survival was significantly decreased by advanced pathologic T classification (P = .015), visceral pleural invasion (P < .0001), and higher tumor grade (P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with N1-positive non-small cell lung cancer, visceral pleural invasion, multistation N1 disease, and distinct N1 metastasis are independent predictors of subsequent locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis. Advanced T classification, visceral pleural invasion, and higher tumor grade were predictors of poor survival. These patients represent a subgroup of patients with N1 disease who might benefit from additional therapy, including adjuvant chemotherapy.

[Lung cancer and lymph drainage]

Lung cancer is lymphophile and may involve lymph nodes (LN) belonging to lung lymph drainage. LN metastases are figured within stations numbered 1 to 14. These stations are located along lymph vessels. The lymph vessels and the LN are forming together anatomical chains. Lymph vessels are valved and pulsatile and travel to the cervical venous confluence where they pour the lung lymph into the blood circulation. They may be totally or partly nodeless along their travel, anastomose with each other around the trachea, and connect with the thoracic duct within the mediastinum. Within the anatomical LN chains, LN are variable in number and in size from one individual to another. They may be absent from one or several stations of the international mapping. Stations are located along the anatomical chains: pulmonary ligament (9), tracheal bifurcation(8 and 7), right paratracheal (4R, 2R and 1), preaortic (5 and 6), left paratracheal (4L, 2L and 1). Station 3 is located on 2 differents chains (phrenic and right esophagotracheal). Station 10 are located at the beginning of the mediastinal lymph nodes chains. Each chain connects with the blood circulation, anastomoses with he neighbouring chains and behave as an own entity whatever the number of its LN. International station mapping misknowns this anatomy and occults the true pronostic value of lung lymph drainage.

Sleeve Lobectomy Versus Pneumonectomy: Tumor Characteristics and Comparative Analysis of Feasibility and Results

BACKGROUND

Sleeve lobectomy (SL) seems to have better results than pneumonectomy. Some authors propose to extend its indications. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative results, locoregional recurrence, and survival after sleeve lobectomy and pneumonectomy in focusing on right upper lobe cancer.

METHODS

From 1984 to 2002, 973 lung resections were performed for T1, T2, and bronchial T3 right upper lobe non-small cell lung cancer. There were 756 lobectomies (L group), 151 pneumonectomies (RP group), and 66 sleeve lobectomies (SL group). The RP group was further divided with regard to intrapulmonary lymph node involvement. Pneumonectomy 1 (RP1) was a group of N0, intralobar N1, and skip metastasis involvement (N0-N2). Pneumonectomy 2 (RP2) was a group of extralobar N1 and nonskip metastasis involvement (N1-N2). Postoperative results were compared among SL, L, and RP groups. Survival was compared between the two homogeneous groups for oncologic characteristics (SL, RP1).

RESULTS

Statistical comparison of 5-year actuarial survival showed a significant difference favoring SL (SL: 72.5%/ RP1: 53.2%; p = 0.0025). Postoperative mortality was higher after RP (L: 2.9% / SL: 4.5%/ RP: 12.6 %). Significant factors limiting SL were tumor size, extralobar N1, and main bronchus involvement (p = 0.000026, 0.0002, and 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate and long-term survival appears better after sleeve lobectomy than right pneumonectomy for comparable stages of right upper lobe cancer. For frequency to increase by systematic attempt at SL, limited by large tumors and extralobar N1 involvement, the only way should be after favorable response to induction chemotherapy.

[T2N1M0 non-small cell lung cancer: surgery and prognostic factors]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prognostic factors for the survival in a group of patients operated on for a non-small cell lung cancer classified as T2N1M0.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred sixteen patients treated exclusively with surgery were studied. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox multivariable regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate was 39.8% at 5 years and 29.9% at 10 years. Sex, age, presence or absence of symptoms, type of resection, number, and location of affected lymph nodes had no effect on survival. Tumor size (P=.04) and histologic type (P=.03) did significantly affect prognosis. Both variables entered into the Cox multivariable regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients operated on for non-small cell lung cancer classified as T2N1M0 have an overall probability of 5-year survival of approximately 40%. However, the prognosis for this group of patients is heterogeneous: in our study it was affected by the histologic type (45.5% for squamous cell and 25% for non-squamous cell cancers) and tumor size (53% for tumors with a diameter of <or=3 cm, 45% for tumors between 3.1 and 5 cm, and 29% for a tumor diameter >5 cm).

Lung cancer and its operable brain metastasis: survival rate and staging problems

BACKGROUND

We assessed the survival rates regarding different stages of operable lung cancers causing operable brain metastasis in patients with or without cancer-related symptoms. The correlation between survival rates and the disease-free interval between lung surgery and metastasectomy was studied.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients were operated on for lung cancer and brain metastases. The disease-free interval was divided into 5 subgroups: 0-2 months, 3-5 months, 6-11 months, 12-23 months, and 24 months and beyond. The study group comprised of patients with lung cancer in the following stages: 17 patients in stage I (1 patient in stage IA, 16 patients in stage IB), 16 patients in stage II (2 patients in stage IIA, 14 patients in stage IIB), 9 patients in stage IIIA, 4 patients in stage IIIB, and 19 patients in stage IV. Forty-four patients were symptom-free for lung cancer and 21 patients manifested lung cancer related symptoms.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rates were as follows: stage I = 22%, stage II = 20%, stage IIIA = 22%, stage IIIB = 0%, and stage IV = 23% after lung resections. There were no significant differences in the 5-year survival rates regarding the disease-free interval subgroups after brain metastasectomies (p = 0.19): disease-free interval 0-2 months = 22% and disease-free interval 24 months and beyond = 23%. The 5-year survival rate after metastasectomy was significantly greater (26% vs 5%) in patients without lung cancer related symptoms (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year survival rate in stage I, II, IIIA, and IV lung cancer with operable hematogenous brain metastases corresponds to that in the customary stage IIIA (23%). The disease-free interval exhibited no significant impact on the survival rate. The complaint-free status exhibits a significantly greater impact on the survival rate in hematogenic metastasis.

Prognosis of Stage II non-small cell lung cancer according to tumor and nodal status at diagnosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic significance of tumor and node status among patients with Stage II non-small cell lung cancer using a population-based national database.

METHODS

We identified all primary cases of Stage II non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed prior to autopsy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry. Lung cancer-specific survival curves were obtained for the 5254 patients who had curative surgical resection, stratifying for tumor and node status (T1-2N1M0, T3N0M0). The 12.5-year Kaplan-Meier estimator of survival was used as a measure of lung cancer cure rate. The influence of gender, age, cell type, pathologic tumor status, nodal metastasis, surgical method, and post-operative radiation therapy were evaluated using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Survival was better for T1N1 cases during the first 3--4 years after diagnosis. Five-year survival for T1N1 and T3N0 cases however, was not significantly different (46% versus 48%, p=0.4) and the cure rate was somewhat higher for T3N0 cases (33% versus to 27%, p=0.10). T2N1 cases had the worst overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that gender, age, tumor and nodal status, and histology were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Among Stage II cancers, T3N0 cases have the highest cure rate and an overall survival pattern that more closely resembles T1N1 tumors. Several clinico-pathologic characteristics are significantly associated with survival and may explain some of the heterogeneity in outcomes among Stage II patients. These results suggest that T3N0 cases may be better classified as Stage IIA disease.