Reassessing the role of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy in the management of cutaneous malignant melanoma

Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: Report of a Single-centre Experience

Aims and Background

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy provide important prognostic data in patients with early stage melanoma and are crucial in guiding the management of the tumor. We report our experience with lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in a group of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma and discuss recent concepts and controversies on its use.

Patients and Methods

A total of 111 patients with stage I-II AJCC primary cutaneous melanoma underwent lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy from December 1999 through December 2004 using a standardized technique of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and biopsy guided by blue dye injection in addition to a hand-held gamma probe. After removal, sentinel lymph nodes were submitted to serial sectioning and permanent preparations for histological and immunohistochemical examination. Complete lymph node dissection was performed only in patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph nodes.

Results

Sentinel lymph nodes were identified and removed in all patients (detection rate of 100%), and metastases were found in 17 cases (15.3%). The incidence of metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes was 2.1%, 15.9%, 35.2%, and 41.6% for melanomas < or 1.0, 1.01-2.0, 2.01-4.0, and > 4.0 mm in thickness, respectively. Complete lymph node dissection was performed in 15 of 17 patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes, and metastases in non-sentinel lymph nodes were detected in only 2 cases (11.7%). Recurrences were more frequently observed in patients with a positive than in those with negative sentinel lymph node (41.1% vs 5.3% at a median follow-up of 31.5 months, P<0.001). The false-negative rate was 2.1%.

Conclusions

Our study confirms that lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy allow accurate staging and yield relevant prognostic information in patients with early stage melanoma.

Sentinel Lymph Node Status is a Main Prognostic Parameter Needful for the Correct Staging of Patients with Melanoma Thicker than 4 mm: Single-Institution Experience and Literature Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The usefulness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thick melanomas is debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in T4 melanoma patients and to verify whether this was a homogeneous group of patients with similar poor behavior.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed. Data were extracted from the Tuscan Regional Referral Center database. The outcome of sentinel lymph node-negative and sentinel lymph node-positive T4 melanomas were compared. A systematic review of published series on this issue and a meta-analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Among 125 T4 melanoma patients, 53 patients (42.4%) were sentinel lymph node-positive and 72 (57.6%) patients were sentinel lymph node-negative. The 5-year and the 10-year melanoma specific survival were 81.9% and 72.3% for sentinel lymph node-negative patients and 42.4% and 17.9% (P < 0.001) for sentinel lymph node-positive patients. A positive sentinel lymph node showed an HR of 3.08. The meta-analysis confirmed that there was a significantly greater risk of death for patients with thick melanoma and positive sentinel lymph node (RR 1.75).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study point out that the sentinel lymph node biopsy is required for the correct staging of patients with melanoma thicker than 4 mm and that the status of sentinel lymph node is a significant predictor of melanoma specific survival. This knowledge allows early surgical and adjuvant treatment as well as appropriate trial enrollment and tailored follow-up.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Provides Prognostic Value in Thick Head and Neck Melanoma

Objectives

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is standard practice for intermediate-thickness head and neck melanoma (HNM) but remains controversial for melanomas more than 4 mm in thickness. The objectives of this study were to evaluate (1) the diagnostic accuracy and (2) the prognostic value of SLNB in patients with thick HNM.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

Large cancer center between June 2000 and December 2012.

Subjects

77 patients undergoing SLNB for T4 HNM without in-transit, regional, or distant metastatic disease at presentation.

Methods

Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors were performed.

Results

77 patients underwent attempted SLNB for T4 HNM without in-transit, regional, or distant metastatic disease at presentation. The mean patient age was 62 years (range, 4-87 years) and there was a male predominance (80%). Mean Breslow thickness was 6.1 mm (range, 4-21 mm). Of the 77 patients undergoing attempted SLNB, 7 had no identifiable sentinel lymph node (9%). For the remaining 91% with 1 or more identifiable sentinel lymph nodes, the mean number of nodes identified was 3.3 (range, 1-13). The sentinel lymph node positivity rate was 24%. A false-negative SLNB occurred in 2 patients (3.8%). With a median follow-up of 36 months, the estimated 5-year disease-free, disease-specific, and overall survival rates were 47%, 74%, and 69%, respectively. A positive sentinel lymph node was significantly linked to shortened disease-free survival (74 vs 36 months, P = .026) and disease-specific survival (121 vs 59 months, P = .035).

Conclusion

SLNB provides accurate staging of the regional node basin and important prognostic information for patients with thick HNM.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma: controversies and current guidelines

ABSTRACT: 

Melanoma is a global health problem and the incidence of this disease is rising. While localized melanoma has an excellent prognosis, regional and distant disease is associated with much poorer outcomes. Optimal treatment for clinically localized melanoma requires surgical control of the primary site and accurate staging of the regional nodal basin with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). While further data are required to determine if SLNB is associated with a survival advantage, currently available data supports the use of SLNB for staging of appropriate patients and the procedure may offer benefits beyond staging. This article reviews current data that shapes guidelines regarding patient selection for SLNB in melanoma and highlights areas where performing this procedure remains controversial.

Undertreatment of thick head and neck melanomas: an age-based analysis

PURPOSE

To determine U.S. treatment patterns for pathologic staging practices in patients with thick head and neck melanomas (HNM).

METHODS

Patients with thick HNM without clinical evidence of in-transit, regional, or distant metastatic spread at presentation were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. Treatment trends for patients were summarized, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations between varying practice patterns.

RESULTS

A total of 1,230 patients with HNM meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Surgical staging procedures were utilized in 53.5 %, including both sentinel lymph node biopsy (37 %) and elective neck dissection (16 %). Patients undergoing a surgical staging procedure were younger (64 vs. 77 years, p < 0.001) with smaller tumors (6.3 vs. 6.6 mm, p = 0.008). The rate of occult nodal disease was 22 % in patients undergoing a surgical staging procedure. The presence of a positive regional node in this subgroup of patients was associated with a significant reduction in disease-specific (44 vs. 59 months, p < 0.001) and overall survival (40 vs. 53 months, p < 0.001) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, the presence of a positive node was the most significant factor for reduced overall survival (hazard ratio 2.36, 95 % confidence interval 1.71-3.23) and disease-specific survival (hazard ratio 2.84, 95 % confidence interval 1.99-4.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologic staging procedures provide independent prognostic information for patients with thick HNM. Despite this, current practice patterns demonstrate underutilization, particularly in elderly patients. Further work is needed to address the barriers to pathologic staging implementation in patients with thick HNM.

Sentinel node biopsy in thin and thick melanoma

BACKGROUND

Although sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has become standard of care in patients with melanoma, its use in patients with thin or thick melanomas remains a matter of debate.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with thin (≤1 mm) or thick (≥4 mm) melanomas who underwent SNB at two Italian centers between 1998 and 2011. The associations of clinicopathologic features with sentinel lymph node positive status and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 492 patients with thin melanoma, sentinel node was positive for metastatic melanoma in 24 (4.9 %) patients. No sentinel node positivity was detected in patients with primary tumor thickness <0.3 mm. Mitotic rate was the only factor significantly associated with sentinel node positivity (p = 0.0001). Five-year OS was 81 % for patients with positive sentinel node and 93 % for negative sentinel node (p = 0.001). In 298 patients with thick melanoma, 39 % of patients had positive sentinel lymph nodes (median Breslow thickness 5 mm). In patients with positive sentinel node, 93 % had mitotic rate >1/mm(2). Five-year OS was 49 % for patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes and 56 % for patients with negative sentinel nodes (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of sentinel node positivity in patients with thin melanoma was 4.9 %. The only clinicopathologic factor related to node positivity was mitotic rate. Given its prognostic importance, SNB should be considered in such patients. SNB should also be the standard method for melanoma ≥4 mm, not only for staging, but also for guiding therapeutic decisions.

Current controversies in the management of patients with early-stage vulvar cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to outline current controversies in management of early-stage vulvar cancer. The main focus will be on the procedures for assessing the sentinel node and the treatment of those with evidence of metastatic involvement.

RECENT FINDINGS

Assessment of the sentinel node has recently been introduced into the standard treatment of early-stage squamous cell vulvar cancer. The combination of a radioactive tracer and blue dye is the most accurate technique for sentinel node detection. Preoperative imaging is recommended to rule out gross nodal involvement and ultrasound with fine needle aspiration cytology by an experienced radiologist appears to have the highest sensitivity/specificity for detecting metastases, although large comparative studies are not available. All patients with sentinel node metastases require additional treatment to the groin, independent of the size of metastasis in the sentinel node and currently this involves inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Further research is ongoing to investigate the role of radiotherapy instead of lymphadenectomy. The little experience there is of sentinel node biopsy in vulvar melanoma suggests that the procedure is feasible and inclusion criteria should follow those of cutaneous melanoma.

SUMMARY

Sentinel node biopsy is safe in treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer. Ongoing studies are investigating the optimal additional treatment for patients with a positive sentinel node in terms of efficacy and morbidity.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma: Facts and controversies

Three decades after its introduction in the 1990s, the sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with localized cutaneous melanoma is still the subject of great debate in dermatology. Many questions remain unanswered, and studies currently in progress may or may not bring us any closer to determining the truth about sentinel lymph node biopsy and melanoma. We discuss the effect of sentinel lymph node biopsy on overall survival, the clinical and therapeutic implications of sentinel lymph node biopsy, and the melanoma patients who might be candidates for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy and melanoma: 2010 update Part II

This article will discuss the evidence for and against the therapeutic efficacy of early removal of potentially affected lymph nodes, morbidity associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymphadenectomy, current guidelines regarding patient selection for sentinel lymph node biopsy, and the remaining questions that ongoing clinical trials are attempting to answer. The Sunbelt Melanoma Trial and the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trials I and II will be discussed in detail.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

At the completion of this learning activity, participants should be able to discuss the data regarding early surgical removal of lymph nodes and its effect on the overall survival of melanoma patients, be able to discuss the potential benefits and morbidity associated with complete lymph node dissection, and to summarize the ongoing trials aimed at addressing the question of therapeutic value of early surgical treatment of regional lymph nodes that may contain micrometastases.

Is there a benefit to sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with T4 melanoma?

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists as to whether patients with thick (Breslow depth>4 mm), clinically lymph node-negative melanoma require sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. The authors examined the impact of SLN biopsy on prognosis and outcome in this patient population.

METHODS

A review of the authors' institutional review board-approved melanoma database identified 293 patients with T4 melanoma who underwent surgical excision between 1998 and 2007. Patient demographics, histologic features, and outcome were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 227 T4 patients who had an SLN biopsy, 107 (47%) were positive. The strongest predictors of a positive SLN included angiolymphatic invasion, satellitosis, or ulceration of the primary tumor. Patients with a T4 melanoma and a negative SLN had a significantly better 5-year distant disease-free survival (DDFS) (85.3% vs 47.8%; P<.0001) and overall survival (OS) (80% vs 47%; P<.0001) compared with those with metastases to the SLN. For SLN-positive patients, only angiolymphatic invasion was a significant predictor of DDFS, with a hazard ratio of 2.29 (P=.007). Ulceration was not significant when examining SLN-positive patients but the most significant factor among SLN-negative patients, with a hazard ratio of 5.78 (P=.02). Increasing Breslow thickness and mitotic rate were also significantly associated with poorer outcome. Patients without ulceration or SLN metastases had an extremely good prognosis, with a 5-year OS>90% and a 5-year DDFS of 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically lymph node-negative T4 melanoma cases should be strongly considered for SLN biopsy, regardless of Breslow depth. SLN lymph node status is the most significant prognostic sign among these patients. T4 patients with a negative SLN have an excellent prognosis in the absence of ulceration and should not be considered candidates for adjuvant high-dose interferon.

A comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology

The concept of radioguided surgery, which was first developed some 60 years ago, involves the use of a radiation detection probe system for the intraoperative detection of radionuclides. The use of gamma detection probe technology in radioguided surgery has tremendously expanded and has evolved into what is now considered an established discipline within the practice of surgery, revolutionizing the surgical management of many malignancies, including breast cancer, melanoma, and colorectal cancer, as well as the surgical management of parathyroid disease. The impact of radioguided surgery on the surgical management of cancer patients includes providing vital and real-time information to the surgeon regarding the location and extent of disease, as well as regarding the assessment of surgical resection margins. Additionally, it has allowed the surgeon to minimize the surgical invasiveness of many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, while still maintaining maximum benefit to the cancer patient. In the current review, we have attempted to comprehensively evaluate the history, technical aspects, and clinical applications of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology.

The role of sentinel node biopsy in patients with cutaneous melanoma

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a prognostic indicator in melanoma patients has been controversial in the fields of surgical oncology and dermatology for decades. This minimally invasive surgical technique was introduced in 1990 for diagnosing melanoma lymphatic metastases and has been deemed the standard of surgical care of cutaneous malignant melanoma by the World Health Organization and the Sunbelt Melanoma Clinical Trial. Its usefulness as a prognostic indicator of metastases led to expanded applications for breast, colon, gastric, esophageal, head and neck, thyroid, and lung cancers. This article first provides an overview of cutaneous melanoma and staging methods and treatment modalities. A brief study of the lymphatic system and the SLNB procedure are reviewed, followed by a discussion of its usefulness in patients who have melanoma, including risks and benefits. This article also discusses nursing considerations for patients undergoing the procedure, and patient education tips. Lastly, future indications for SLNB and new prognostic indicators for melanoma are discussed.

Improvement of overall survival of patients with cutaneous melanoma in Germany, 1976-2001: which factors contributed?

BACKGROUND

A hypothesis generated a retrospective analysis of the improvement of survival over time in patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM) in order to identify factors contributing to this progress.

METHODS

A cohort of 4791 patients diagnosed with primary CM in southern Germany between 1976 and 2001 was analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to estimate and to compare overall survival (OS) and survival after first recurrence (SAR). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the effect of multiple variables on OS and SAR.

RESULTS

Diagnosis of primary CM during 1990-2001 compared with 1976-1989 was associated with more favorable 10-year OS (88.6% vs 80.0%, P < .0001). The median tumor thickness at primary diagnosis was significantly lower during the second period (0.75 mm vs 1.07 mm, P < .0001). In the multivariate analysis, adjusted for tumor thickness, ulceration, age, gender, and anatomical site, the period of diagnosis retained its significance as a predictor of OS (P = .002). The SAR was more favorable during the second period in patients who developed their first metastasis in the regional lymph nodes (45.2% vs 32.9%, P = .017) or in distant sites (13.4% vs 2.0%, P = .0002) and this finding persisted in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement of survival of CM patients diagnosed 1990-2001 as compared with 1976-1989 may not be entirely attributable to factors associated with early diagnosis and more favorable primary tumors. Therefore, factors of melanoma management, which changed between the 2 time periods, such as sentinel node biopsy, adjuvant treatment, structured follow-up, and surgical interventions in distant metastasis, may have to be taken into account.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thick (= 4 mm) melanoma: a single-centre experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Lymphatic mapping/sentinel lymph node biopsy (LM/SLNB) have become routine techniques for staging the regional lymph nodes in early stage melanoma, yet their role in the management of thick (= 4 mm) melanoma is debated. The aim of the present study is to review our experience with LM/SLNB in a series of patients with thick primary melanoma, to evaluate its utility in this melanoma subset.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients (18 men and 12 women; mean age 70.6 years; median 75 years) with thick primary melanoma underwent LM/SLNB, using both radioisotope and blue dye. The statistical tests were performed by using SAS software for Windows, version 8.2.

RESULTS

The primary tumour sites were head/neck (n = 5; 16.6%), trunk (n = 10; 33.3%), and extremities (n = 15; 50%). Tumour thickness ranged from 4 to 17 mm (mean 5.14 mm; median 4.5 mm). Ulceration was observed in 23 (76.6%) tumours. Eleven patients (36.6%) had at least a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN). The mean follow-up was 27.3 months (median 26 months; range 5-63 months). Patients without SLN metastases had a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 78.9%, vs. 18.2% for patients with SLN metastases (P = 0.0121 by log rank test). The 5-year overall survival rate for patients without SLN metastases was 89.5%, whereas patients with SLN metastases had a 5-year overall survival rate of 36.4% (P = 0.0272 by log rank test).

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective analysis indicates that the SLN status is predictive of recurrence and survival in patients with thick melanoma, and LM/SLNB should be routinely performed in this subset of melanoma patients.

[Feasibility and technical problems of sentinel node analysis in melanoma]

BACKGROUND

Development of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy the last 10 years has changed surgical approach of solid tumor treatment and particularly of melanoma. The aim of our study was to analyze in our hospital, the feasibility of the SLN biopsy technique in order to define a better prognostic classification of melanomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 1999 and October 2003, 97 patients were included in this study in our center. Criteria for inclusion were cutaneo-mucosal melanoma of Breslow >or=1,5 mm, and/or Clarck >or=IV, and/or ulceration, and/or signs of regression, before any surgical margins.

RESULTS

Lymphoscintigraphy (LS) identified at least 1 SLN in 94 cases/97 (97%), thus permitting intraoperative SLN mapping and sentinel node biopsy of at least 1 lymph node in 88 cases/94 (94%). Failure of the SLN procedure was noted in 9 cases: in 3 cases, no lymph node was individualized by LS, in 1 patient, intraoperative SLN mapping failed to find the previously identified SLN and in 5 cases, a SLN was identified by LS and intraoperative mapping but could not be removed because of its deep location and difficulty of dissection. In 17 patients, removal of one or two "non sentinel lymph node(s)" was (were) made by the surgeon because of its (their) suspected aspect (black or large). Among the 88 patients who had dissection of at least 1 SLN, a micrometastasis was detected by standard histological evaluation and/or immunohistochemical stains in 14 cases (16%) and into a "non SLN" in 2 cases (2,3%). The median follow up of patients was 16 months (1- 48 months). Among the 14 patients with positive SLN, 6 (43%) relapsed. The other eight were in complete remission of their melanoma with a mean follow up of 11,44 months . Among the 74 patients with negative SLN, 7 (9,5%) developed a recurrence. Among the 9 patients in whom any sentinel lymph node have been removed, 3 had a relapse (one in transit than on lymph nodes, and two on lymph nodes).

CONCLUSION

Our results are in accordance with the literature, and confirm the feasibility of SLN mapping and of SLN histological analysis in our center. We described in this study technical problems we encountered. Our study also show the prognostic value of this technique. However, advantage in global survey of sentinel node dissection and regional lymph node dissection in cases of micrometastases has still to be demonstrated.

[Intraoperative labeling of sentinel lymph nodes with a combination of vital dye and radionuclide tracer--results in sentinel lymph node-positive patients]

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy enhances the accuracy of tumor staging in patients with malignant melanoma and can help select candidates for regional lymphadenectomy. There are two techniques for identifying the sentinel lymph node: intradermal injection of a radionuclide tracer or of a blue dye. We evaluated both methods to determine how they can be best utilized to locate a sentinel lymph node.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective study, 323 patients with melanoma (tumor thickness > or = 0.75 mm) who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy after both radionuclide and blue dye injection were evaluated. The labeling of lymph nodes showing micrometastasis by histopathological examination was determined.

RESULTS

63 patients showed sentinel lymph nodes with micrometastasis. All of these nodes (100 %) were labeled with radionuclide tracer, but only 90 % with blue dye. In 5 patients, only radionuclide labeling identified the histopathologically-positive lymph node. In 36 patients, several sentinel lymph nodes were identified, with the histopathologically-positive nodes usually showing a higher radioactive signal intensity than the negative ones.

CONCLUSION

Since in some patients histopathologically-positive lymph nodes are only labeled by radionuclide tracer, radionuclide labeling is indispensable for locating sentinel lymph nodes. In contrast, labeling with blue dye represents a supplementary method, which can simplify the recognition of the sentinel lymph node during surgery.

Molecular diagnostics in melanoma

Molecular pathology is rapidly evolving, featuring continuous technologic improvements that offer novel clinical opportunities for the recognition of disease predisposition, for identifying sub-clinical disease, for more accurate diagnosis, for selecting efficacious and non-toxic therapy, and for monitoring of disease outcome. Currently, the identification and prognosis of primary cutaneous melanoma is based on histologic factors (tumor depth and ulceration) and clinical factors (number of lymph node and/or distant metastases). However, metastasis can occur in patients with thin melanomas, and sentinel lymph node biopsy does not identify all patients at risk for distant metastasis. New markers exist that correlate with melanoma progression, which may aid in melanoma identification, prognostication, and detection of minimal residual disease/early recurrence. Moreover, not many therapeutic options exist for melanoma as no regimen prolongs survival. Emerging data with investigational therapies suggest that certain markers might play a crucial role in identifying patients who will respond to therapy or show utility in the monitoring the response to therapy. Herein, molecular diagnostics that can potentially benefit the individual melanoma patient will be discussed.

Single-Institution Experience in the Management of Patients with Clinical Stage I and II Cutaneous Melanoma: Results of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in 240 Cases

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been developed as a minimally invasive technique to determine the pathologic status of regional lymph nodes in patients without clinically palpable disease and incorporated in the latest version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the results of SLNB and the prognostic value of the micrometastases and the pattern of early recurrences in patients according to sentinel lymph node (SLN) status.

METHOD

Patients with cutaneous melanoma in stages I and II (AJCC 2002) who underwent lymphatic mapping and SLNB from 1997 to 2003 were included in a prospective database for analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of identification of the SLN was 100%. Micrometastases to SLN were found in 20.8% of patients. The rate of SLN micrometastases increased according to Breslow thickness and clinical stage. Breslow thickness of 0.99 mm was the optimal cutpoint for predicting the SLNB result. Twenty-four patients (12.3%) developed a locoregional or distant recurrence at a median follow-up of 31 months. Recurrences were more frequent in patients with a positive SLN. Among patients who had a recurrence, those with a positive SLN were more likely to have distant metastases than those with negative SLN. Nodal recurrences were more frequent in patients with a negative SLN compared with those with a positive SLN.

CONCLUSIONS

The status of the SLN provides accurate staging for identifying patients who may benefit from further therapy and is the most important prognostic factor of relapse-free survival.

Staging patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma by same-day lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy: A single-institutional experience with emphasis on recurrence

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Different techniques have been employed in mapping sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in patients with malignant melanoma (MM). We present a single-institutional experience.

METHODS

Sentinel lymph node biopsies were performed in a consecutive series of 278 patients with 279 cutaneous MMs in clinical stage I. All underwent dynamic lymphoscintigraphy with 15-20 MBq 99mTc-rhenium-colloid followed on the same day by radioprobe-guided surgery completed approximately 4 hr after injection of radiopharmaceutical.

RESULTS

In 274 (98.2%) cases, a median of two SLNs (range 1-7) were removed. In five patients, no SLN was removed. Seventy-nine patients (28%) had metastatic SLNs. Median Breslow thickness in this group was 2.3 mm. Nodal dissection of the positive basin was done in 75 of these 79 patients and revealed further positive lymph nodes in 10 (13%). Eighteen of the 79 (23%) patients died after a median of 17.5 months post-operatively from metastatic disease. In 195 cases (194 patients) (70%), removed SLNs were negative. The median Breslow thickness in this group was 1.6 mm. Four patients (2%) had regional lymph node recurrence ("false negative SLN procedures"). Eight of the 194 patients (4.1%) died after a median of 24.5 months post-operatively from metastatic disease. One of these was one of the four patients with a false negative SLN procedure, and in all eight, histological re-evaluation of SLNs was negative. Local recurrence occurred in 6 of the 195 cases. The rate of recurrence at any site among the SLN-negative cases was 8.8%. The complication rate was 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Same-day lymphoscintigraphy and radioprobe-guided surgery identified, with a high sensitivity and a low false negative rate, MM patients with microscopic nodal disease. Our results do at least equal other comparable studies.

Relationship between sentinel lymph node status and regression of primary malignant melanoma

The prognostic significance of spontaneous regression of primary melanoma is a controversial issue. Studies on sentinel lymph node status and circulating tumour cells may represent a step towards a better understanding. The clinical details of 269 melanoma patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy were analysed. Correlation was sought between the parameters of the primary tumour, particularly tumours showing a partial intermediate level of regression, and sentinel lymph node status. The presence of circulating tumour cells was studied by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for tyrosinase messenger RNA preoperatively in 94 patients. Of the examined tumours, 27.8% showed histological features of a partial intermediate level of regression. Regressive tumours were localized predominantly on the trunk (P=0.006), were significantly thinner (P<0.0000) and were less frequently ulcerated (P=0.003) than tumours without regression. Moreover, the majority of regressive melanomas were of the superficial spreading type (P<0.0000) and their sentinel node status was more favourable (P=0.026). We demonstrated the presence of circulating tumour cells in five of 26 (19.2%) regressive and 19 of 68 (29.4%) non-regressive tumours. The difference was not significant (P=0.32). By multivariate analysis, however, the Breslow thickness and ulceration of the primary tumour were predictors of the sentinel lymph node status, in agreement with literature data. A partial intermediate level of regression of the primary tumour did not affect unfavourably the sentinel lymph node status in our study. We failed to demonstrate a significant relationship between the presence of circulating tumour cells and either primary tumour regression or the sentinel lymph node status.

Sentinel node biopsy in melanoma delays recurrence but does not change melanoma-related survival: a retrospective analysis of 673 patients

BACKGROUND

The status of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is an important parameter to predict the prognosis of melanoma patients but it is a matter of debate if removal of micrometastases by SLN biopsy (SLNB) influences the prognosis of melanoma patients.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the impact of SLNB in melanoma patients with regard to recurrence-free survival, overall survival and metastatic pathways.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied, retrospectively, 673 melanoma patients with a primary melanoma (tumour thickness > or = 1 mm) and without clinical evidence of metastases at the time of melanoma diagnosis. In 377 patients the melanoma was removed without SLNB between January 1995 and March 2000 (pre-SLNB group). In 296 patients the melanoma was removed with SLNB between April 2000 and March 2003 (SLNB group). Otherwise, both groups received identical surgical treatment of the primary melanoma and initial staging procedures performed by the same team of physicians. Follow-up recommendations were also identical in both groups.

RESULTS

Both groups showed no significant differences with regard to characteristics of the primary melanoma, sex and age. By Kaplan-Meier analyses, melanoma-related overall survival was comparable in both groups. However, recurrence-free survival was increased in pre-SLNB patients due to significantly fewer regional lymph node metastases, whereas frequencies of locoregional cutaneous and distant metastases were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB advances the detection of regional lymph node metastases and therefore avoids nodal recurrences but does not influence metastatic behaviour of melanoma cells and does not protect patients from melanoma-related death caused by distant metastases. Thus, our retrospective data favour the marker hypothesis for melanoma metastasation. To elucidate further if subgroups of patients benefit from SLNB, prospective randomized studies with long-term follow-up are needed.

Dupla drenagem para cadeias linfonodais distintas, detectada por técnica de biópsia de linfonodo sentinela em pacientes com melanoma cutâneo: relato de dois casos

Os principais méritos da biópsia de linfonodo sentinela em pacientes com melanoma cutâneo residem na possibilidade de serem evitadas linfadenectomias radicais desnecessárias e de permitir a correta identificação da cadeia de drenagem linfática, principalmente quando o tumor se localiza em áreas de drenagem ambígua. Atualmente já foi incorporada como fator prognóstico, sendo importante dado para o correto estadiamento do paciente. No presente relato são apresentados dois casos em que a utilização desta técnica foi extremamente útil, sobretudo por ter identificado a presença de drenagem linfática para duas cadeias linfáticas distintas. é importante que o dermatologista esteja consciente da correta indicação da técnica, para poder orientar da melhor forma possível seus pacientes.

MMP-21 is upregulated at early stages of melanoma progression but disappears with more aggressive phenotype

The expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) is frequently altered during malignant transformation. We examined the profile of three recently cloned MMPs, MMP-21, MMP-26, and MMP-28, in melanomas in vivo and in culture. Immunohistochemistry for MMPs-21, -26, -28, and -13 in melanoma specimens (27 nonmetastatic, 26 with nodal micrometastases, and 10 in situ melanomas) from 63 patients was performed. MMP-21 was expressed in melanoma cells in 29/53 cases, being more frequent in melanoma samples without micrometastases. Six out of ten in situ melanomas were positive, while five nevus samples were negative. MMP-26 and -28 were not generally expressed in melanoma cells. MMP-13 was detected in melanoma cells in 36/53 samples. MMP-21 was not found in sentinel nodes with metastases, while MMP-13 was seen in all of them. MMP-21 messenger RNA was variably expressed in all five melanoma cell lines investigated using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Our results suggest that expression of MMP-21 may serve as a marker of malignant transformation of melanocytes and does not associate with the presence of micrometastases.

Sentinel-Node-Biopsie

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is increasingly being used as a minimally invasive staging procedure in patients with malignant melanoma. For decades elective lymph node dissection (ELND) was performed in many centers on patients at risk for lymph node metastasis but without clinically detectable lymph node involvement. Today, selective lymph node dissection (SLND) is offered only to patients with histologically proven metastasis in a SN (10-29%). A positive SN is one of the most important prognostic parameters. Ten years after the introduction of the technique, the role of SNB in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma still remains controversial. Issues include the usefulness of highly sensitive evaluation of SN using molecular biology or cytology techniques, as well as the therapeutic impact of the SNB per se and the associated combined surgical or medical adjuvant therapies.

La recherche du ganglion sentinelle dans le mélanome malin cutané de bas stade est-elle réellement peu invasive ?

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze outcome in patients enrolled in sentinel node biopsy procedure in early-staged cutaneous melanoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Therefore a prospective study was conducted enrolling patients presenting with early-staged cutaneous melanoma. Our study focused on age and sex, duration from diagnosis to treatment, duration of hospitalization, dressing care and work inability in current follows. Duration from scintigraphy to surgery was analyzed and compared to sensibility of the procedure. What is more we observed rate and kind of complications and economical consequences, increasing duration of dressing care and work inability. The authors aimed at evaluating costs of SLN procedure including hospitalization, lymphoscintigraphy, general anaesthesia, costs of dressings, inability and overcosts of complications.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled in our study (sex-ratio 1/2) mean aged 60 years old. Duration from diagnosis to treatment was mean 36 days. Sensibility of the procedure was excellent in trunk and limbs cases, lower in head and neck. In current cases patients were mean hospitalized three days, underwent 20 days of dressings and work inability depended on further interferon treatment. Complications occurred in 25% as seroma or local infections requiring antibiotherapy. Duration to healing was then 45 days increasing inability. Global costs of SLN procedure were significantly higher than previous wait and watch policy.

CONCLUSION

SLN biopsy is an expensive and invasive procedure with a high rate of complications. It defers melanoma treatment, only way to gain survival.

Is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy of Therapeutic Relevance for Melanoma?

INTRODUCTION

It is still unclear whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has an effect on the survival or recurrence-free survival of patients. It would be necessary to compare patients with SLNB (or with selective lymph node dissection in the case of positive SLNB) and patients without SLNB who received only a close clinical and sonographic follow-up. To date, no results from prospective, randomized studies of SLNB are available.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with SLNB (n = 283) and patients in clinical stage I and II with close follow-up examinations only (n = 3,514) were studied retrospectively in this investigation with regard to prognostic factors established in the literature: sex, age, tumor thickness, histological tumor type, ulceration and localization.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis did not show an independent significant advantage with regard to survival when SLNB had been performed (p = 0.37). Compared with patients in clinical stage I and II with close follow-up only (n = 2,617),patients in stage I and II with negative SLNB (n = 238) had no significantly lower melanoma-related mortality (p =0.36) but significantly fewer recurrences in the regional lymph node area (p = 0.0015). With regard to survival without distant metastases and disease-specific survival, patients with positive SLNB (n = 33) did not significantly benefit by comparison with patients who developed lymph node metastasis identified clinically or sonographically later during follow-up examinations (n = 246; p =0.89 and p = 0.38, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the relatively short follow-up period after SLNB, patients for whom SLNB had been performed did not have - on the whole - a prognostic advantage over patients who were subject only to close follow-up monitoring. Patients for whom subclinical lymph node metastases had been removed as the result of a positive SLNB did not have a better prognosis than patients without SLNB who had developed lymph node metastases within the follow-up period [corrected]

The evolving role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of bladder cancer

Regional lymphadenectomy is integral to the surgical management of high-grade invasive bladder cancer. A growing body of evidence suggests that a lymph node dissection may provide not only improved prognostic information, but also a clinically significant therapeutic benefit for both lymph node positive and negative patients undergoing radical cystectomy. While the inclusion of lymph node resection in conjunction with radical cystectomy for patients with clinically negative nodes is well accepted, the extent of the nodal dissection remains highly contentious. Similarly, the benefit of node dissection for patients with advanced disease and gross adenopathy or for those with superficial disease (Ta, T1 or TIS) remains a topic of heated debate. This review describes the historical evolution of lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of bladder cancer and provides a comprehensive review of the current literature addressing the role of lymph node dissection in the treatment of bladder cancer.

Plastic Surgery

The range of casualties treated by the Defence Medical Services in the recent Gulf conflict has reaffirmed the important role of plastic surgery within the military. This review seeks to highlight some areas of recent innovation and improvement within the realms of plastic surgery generally, of which some, such as the introduction of Flammacerium and the availability of skin substitutes, have direct military relevance.