Expression of CD3-associated antigen-binding receptors on suppressor T cells

Special regulatory T-cell review: A rose by any other name: from suppressor T cells to Tregs, approbation to unbridled enthusiasm

In the early 1970s a spate of papers by research groups around the world provided evidence for a negative regulatory role of thymus-derived lymphocytes (T cells). In 1971, Gershon and Kondo published a seminal paper in Immunology entitled 'Infectious Immunological Tolerance' indicating that such negative regulation could be a dominant effect that prevented otherwise 'helpful' T cells from mediating their function. Over the next decade, suppressor T cells, as these negative regulatory cells became known, were intensively investigated and a complex set of interacting cells and soluble factors were described as mediators in this process of immune regulation. In the early 1980s, however, biochemical and molecular experiments raised questions about the interpretation of the earlier studies, and within a few years, the term 'suppressor T cell' had all but disappeared from prominence and research on this phenomenon was held in poor esteem. While this was happening, new studies appeared suggesting that a subset of T cells played a critical role in preventing autoimmunity. These T cells, eventually dubbed 'regulatory T cells', have become a major focus of modern cellular immunological investigation, with a predominance that perhaps eclipses even that seen in the earlier period of suppressor T cell ascendancy. This brief review summarizes the rise and fall of 'suppressorology' and the possibility that Tregs are a modern rediscovery of suppressor T cells made convincing by more robust models for their study and better reagents for their identification and analysis.

Antigen-specific suppressor factor: missing pieces in the puzzle

Few areas of immunologic research have endured such strident criticism or engendered such fainthearted support as the study of antigen-specific suppression of the immune response. Although enjoying a modest resurgence as a means of promoting or maintaining peripheral tolerance to autoantigens, the study of antigen-specific suppression is not mainstream immunology. The field of immune regulation has, in fact, shifted focus toward explaining the data in terms of the Th1/Th2 paradigm. Indeed, the term suppression has been coopted, by those willing to use it, to describe the bioactivity of conventional cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-10 or TGF beta, which can be inhibitory in certain experimental models. In a very real sense, those who performed much of the early work in the field bear responsibility for the outcast status of suppression. With the increasing number of soluble mediators and cascades of interacting T cells, which populated reviews of the subject in the 1980s, the concept of antigen-specific suppression and suppressor factors simply became too complicated and was dismissed as artifact. Several laboratories have in the past few years made significant advances in the molecular characterization of antigen-specific TsF. Their work, as well as that of our own laboratory have established certain minimal molecular requirements for the expression of TsF bioactivity.

T-cell receptor alpha chain plays a critical role in antigen-specific suppressor cell function

Antigen-specific suppressor T-cell hybridomas release soluble suppressor factors (TsF) in the supernatant that modulate both in vivo delayed-type hypersensitivity and in vitro plaque-forming cell responses in an antigen-specific manner. To study the relationship between the T-cell receptor (TcR) and TsF, we developed a series of TcR alpha- or TcR beta- expression variants from suppressor T-cell hybridomas that expressed the CD3-TcR alpha/beta complex. We demonstrate that loss of TcR alpha but not TcR beta mRNA was accompanied by the concomitant loss of suppressor bioactivity. Homologous transfection of TcR alpha cDNA into a TcR alpha- beta+ clone reconstituted both CD3-TcR expression and suppressor function. Furthermore, suppressor activity from TcR beta- variants was specifically absorbed by antigen and anti-TcR alpha antibodies, but not by anti-CD3 or anti-TcR beta affinity columns. These data directly establish a role for the TcR alpha chain in suppressor T-cell function and suggest that the TcR alpha chain is part of the antigen-specific TsF molecule.

Expression of T-cell receptor (TCR)alpha chain on normal human tonsils and T-cell lymphomas

We analyzed immunohistologically the expression of T-cell receptor (TCR)alpha chain on human tonsils and on T-cell lymphoma (T-ML) tissues using the avidin-biotin-peroxidase method. A murine monoclonal antibody alpha F1, specific for the constant region of the TCR alpha chain, was employed. On normal tonsil, alpha F1-positive cells were observed mainly in T-zones and germinal centers. In T-zones, the staining intensities varied markedly, with heavy staining evident in less than one fourth. In germinal centers, a proportion of stained cells showed a histiocytic pattern with small cytoplasmic projections. All the T-ML tissues expressed TCR alpha, whereas the staining intensities varied among cases and among lymphoma cells. No correlations were observed in the expressions of TCR alpha chain and other T-cell markers including CD3, CD4 and CD8.

Phenotypic and functional characterization of human suppressor T-cell clones: II. Activation by Mycobacterium leprae presented by HLA-DR molecules to alpha beta T-cell receptors

We have been studying human T-cell clones that suppress anti-mycobacterial T-cell responses but not T-cell responses to an unrelated antigen or mitogen. In the present paper we report our studies on the activation requirements of these suppressor-T-cell clones. The suppressor-T-cell clones could proliferate and produce interferon-gamma upon stimulation with Mycobacterium leprae and other mycobacteria but not with unrelated antigens or autologous T cells. Both suppressor and nonsuppressor clones react to a 36-kDa antigen of M. leprae. Thus far, we have not been able to demonstrate whether they see the same or different epitopes. The antigen-driven proliferation of suppressor-T-cell clones was, however, significantly lower than that observed for T-cell clones that did not mediate suppression. The proliferation of suppressor-T-cell clones to M. leprae antigens could be blocked by monoclonal antibodies to HLA-DR, alpha beta T-cell receptor, interleukin-2 receptor, and, in the case of CD4-positive suppressor-T-cell clones, anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies. DR restriction of the antigen presentation to these suppressor-T-cell clones was shown in mixing experiments using antigen-presenting cells as mononuclear cells from family members and unrelated individuals. These experiments also indicated that apart from regular DR-restriction a hitherto unknown factor may be required for presentation to or activation of suppressor-T-cell clones that is present in the family members and unrelated individuals with the same ethnic and geographic background but absent in DR/Dw-matched healthy Dutch individuals.

Specific inhibition of cell-surface T-cell receptor expression by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides and its effect on the production of an antigen-specific regulatory T-cell factor

We have used antisense oligodeoxynucleotides corresponding to genes encoding the variable (V) region of the T-cell receptor (TCR) alpha and beta chains (V alpha and V beta) to control TCR expression in T-cell hybridomas. Two hybridomas, A1.1 and B1.1, recognize a synthetic polypeptide antigen designated poly 18 (poly[Glu-Tyr-Lys-(Glu-Tyr-Ala)5]) together with I-Ad. We have found that TCR function (production of lymphokines in response to antigen) and T3 expression were removed after protease treatment of the cells and were fully recovered 48 hr later. However, when antisense oligodeoxynucleotides corresponding to the appropriate TCR V genes were present after protease treatment, little or no recovery of TCR function or T3 expression was observed. This effect was specific for the TCR V genes utilized by the T cell: antisense oligodeoxynucleotides corresponding to the TCR V regions of A1.1 had no effect on TCR expression in B1.1 and vice versa. Thus, antisense oligodeoxynucleotides can be used to temporarily block expression of a TCR gene in a T-cell hybridoma. This technique was then applied to a paradoxical phenomenon in A1.1 cells. We had observed previously that A1.1 releases an antigen-specific immunoregulatory activity that shows the same antigenic fine specificity as is displayed by the TCR of A1.1. We now report that antisense oligodeoxynucleotides corresponding to the A1.1 V alpha gene blocked the production of this soluble antigen-specific activity by the cell. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides corresponding to A1.1 V beta, on the other hand, had no effect on the production of this antigen-specific activity. We discuss these observations in the context of recent findings on the nature of T cell-derived antigen-specific regulatory factors.