The chicken beta/epsilon-globin enhancer directs autonomously regulated, high-level expression of the chicken epsilon-globin gene in transgenic mice

Disparate expression specificities coded by a shared Hox-C enhancer

Can a single regulatory sequence be shared by two genes undergoing functional divergence? Here we describe a single promiscuous enhancer within the Drosophila Antennapedia Complex, EO053, that directs aspects of the expression of two adjacent genes, pb (a Hox2 ortholog) and zen2 (a divergent Hox3 paralog), with disparate spatial and temporal expression patterns. We were unable to separate the pb-like and zen2-like specificities within EO053, and we identify sequences affecting both expression patterns. Importantly, genomic deletion experiments demonstrate that EO053 cooperates with additional pb- and zen2-specific enhancers to regulate the mRNA expression of both genes. We examine sequence conservation of EO053 within the Schizophora, and show that patterns of synteny between the Hox2 and Hox3 orthologs in Arthropods are consistent with a shared regulatory relationship extending prior to the Hox3/zen divergence. Thus, EO053 represents an example of two genes having evolved disparate outputs while utilizing this shared regulatory region.

Editorial note: This article has been through an editorial process in which the authors decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer review. The Reviewing Editor's assessment is that all the issues have been addressed (see decision letter).

Developmental regulation of the vertebrate globin multigene family

"Hemoglobin switching," or the sequential expression of globin genes in erythroid cells during development, has provided an important paradigm for tissue- and stage-specific gene regulation. Over the past decade, regulatory DNA sequences and transcription factors involved in controlling the expression of individual globin genes in erythroid cells have been identified. The picture that has emerged indicates that gene proximal control elements collaborate with a "locus control region" located far upstream - probably via a DNA looping mechanism - to ensure that each gene is turned on only in erythroid cells and at the appropriate time during development. Interactions among the various regulatory sequences are thought to be mediated and stabilized by an array of tissue-specific and ubiquitous proteins. Chromatin structure plays a critical but still poorly understood role in this process.

Enhancers: holding out for the right promoter

Some transcriptional enhancers work best with one type of promoter, while ignoring others. How widespread is such specificity across the genome? A new study finds that, in a fair fight, most enhancers prefer to activate promoters resembling those of their parent genes.

Identification of functional CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein and Ets protein binding sites in the human chorionic somatomammotropin enhancer sequences

The human chorionic somatomammotropin (CS) A and B genes (listed as CSH1 and CSH2 in the HUGO database) are highly expressed in placenta. A 241 bp potent enhancer, nucleotides (nts) 1-241, located at the 3' end of the CS-B gene (CS-Benh) stimulates promoter activity specifically in placental trophoblast cells in vitro. Strong activity is exerted by a 23 bp element within the CS-Benh (nts 117-139), shown to interact with transcription enhancer factor (TEF) members of the transcription enhancer activator (TEA) DNA-binding domain-containing family. An identical TEF element is present in the homologous (97.5%) CS-Aenh; however, a few nucleotide differences suppress its activity. Previously, we identified regulatory sequences distinct from the TEF element within an 80 bp modulatory domain (nts 1-80) in the CS-Benh. Using structural and functional assays we now show that CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) binding sites exist in the 80 bp modulatory domains of both enhancers, and an Elk-1 binding site exists in the modulatory domain of the CS-Aenh. C/EBPα or C/EBPβ strongly repressed CSp.CAT activity but stimulated CSp.CAT.CS-Benh activity. In contrast, the equivalent CS-A enhancer sequences were unable to relieve promoter repression. Elk-1 overexpression also resulted in differential effects on the CS-Aenh versus CS-Benh. Finally, we provide evidence for the association of C/EBPβ with the CS-A and CS-B genes in human placental chromatin, including differential involvement of C/EBPβ with the CS-Aenh versus the CS-Benh, and therefore consistent with the notion that these are regions of regulatory significance in vivo. We conclude that members of the C/EBP and Ets families can differentially modulate CS-Benh and CS-Aenh activity.

Identification, characterization, and expression pattern of the chicken EKLF gene

EKLF/KLF1 was the first of the Krüppel-like factors (KLFs) to be identified in mammals and plays an important role in primitive and definitive erythropoiesis. Here, we identify and characterize EKLF in the chicken (cEKLF). The predicted amino acid sequence of the zinc finger region of cEKLF is at least 87.7% similar to mammalian EKLF proteins and is 98.8% and 95% similar to the EKLF orthologues in Xenopus and zebrafish, respectively. During early embryonic development, cEKLF expression is seen in the posterior primitive streak, which gives rise to hematopoietic cells, and then in the blood islands and in circulating blood cells. cEKLF mRNA is expressed in blood cells but not in brain later in chicken embryonic development. cEKLF mRNA is increased in definitive compared with primitive erythropoiesis. The conserved sequence and expression pattern of cEKLF suggests that its function is similar to its orthologues in mammals, Xenopus, and zebrafish.

Targeted deletion of the chicken beta-globin regulatory elements reveals a cooperative gene silencing activity

The chicken beta-globin locus represents a well characterized system to study the role of both proximal and distal regulatory elements in a eukaryotic multigene domain. The function of the chicken beta(A)/epsilon-intergenic enhancer and upstream regulatory elements 5'-HS1 and 5'-HS2 were studied using a gene targeting approach in chicken DT40 cells followed by microcell-mediated chromosome transfer into human erythroleukemia cells (K562). These regulatory elements all repressed expression of the rho- and beta(H)-chicken globin genes in the chromosome transfer assay. No rho- or beta(H)-globin gene expression was detected in K562 cells containing the chicken chromosome without deletions, whereas rho- and beta(H)-mRNA was activated in K562 cells containing chicken chromosomes with deletions of the intergenic enhancers, 5'-HS1 and 5'-HS2. Transcriptional activation of the rho- and beta(H)-globin genes correlated with hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4, loss of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation, and binding of RNA polymerase II to the gene promoters. Surprisingly, the status of CpG dinucleotide methylation at the promoters did not correlate with the transcriptional status of the genes. Our results using a chromosomal transfer assay demonstrate an identical silencing function for these regulatory elements, which suggests they function as part of a common silencing pathway or complex.

Genomic domains and regulatory elements operating at the domain level

The sequencing of the complete genomes of several organisms, including humans, has so far not contributed much to our understanding of the mechanisms regulating gene expression in the course of realization of developmental programs. In this so-called "postgenomic" era, we still do not understand how (if at all) the long-range organization of the genome is related to its function. The domain hypothesis of the eukaryotic genome organization postulates that the genome is subdivided into a number of semiindependent functional units (domains) that may include one or several functionally related genes, with these domains having well-defined borders, and operate under the control of special (domain-level) regulatory systems. This hypothesis was extensively discussed in the literature over the past 15 years. Yet it is still unclear whether the hypothesis is valid or not. There is evidence both supporting and questioning this hypothesis. The most conclusive data supporting the domain hypothesis come from studies of avian and mammalian beta-globin domains. In this review we will critically discuss the present state of the studies on these and other genomic domains, paying special attention to the domain-level regulatory systems known as locus control regions (LCRs). Based on this discussion, we will try to reevaluate the domain hypothesis of the organization of the eukaryotic genome.

Human beta-globin locus control region HS5 contains CTCF- and developmental stage-dependent enhancer-blocking activity in erythroid cells

The human beta-globin locus contains five developmentally regulated beta-type globin genes. All five genes depend on the locus control region (LCR), located at the 5' end of the locus, for abundant globin gene transcription. The LCR is composed of five DNase I-hypersensitive sites (HSs), at least a subset of which appear to cooperate to form a holocomplex in activating genes within the locus. We previously tested the requirement for proper LCR polarity by inverting it in human beta-globin yeast artificial chromosome transgenic mice and observed reduced expression of all the beta-type globin genes regardless of developmental stage. This phenotype clearly demonstrated an orientation-dependent activity of the LCR, although the mechanistic basis for the observed activity was obscure. Here, we describe genetic evidence demonstrating that human HS5 includes enhancer-blocking (insulator) activity that is both CTCF and developmental stage dependent. Curiously, we also observed an attenuating activity in HS5 that was specific to the epsilon-globin gene at the primitive stage and was independent of the HS5 CTCF binding site. These observations demonstrate that the phenotype observed in the LCR-inverted locus was in part attributable to placing the HS5 insulator between the LCR HS enhancers (HS1 to HS4) and the promoter of the beta-globin gene.

Different core promoters possess distinct regulatory activities in the Drosophila embryo

There are numerous examples of shared enhancers interacting with just a subset of target promoters. In some cases, specific enhancer-promoter interactions depend on promoter competition, whereby the activation of a preferred target promoter precludes expression of linked genes. Here, we employ a transgenic embryo assay to obtain evidence that promoter selection is influenced by the TATA element. Both the AE1 enhancer from the Drosophila Antennapedia gene complex (ANT-C) and the IAB5 enhancer from the Bithorax complex (BX-C) preferentially activate TATA-containing promoters when challenged with linked TATA-less promoters. In contrast, the rho neuroectoderm enhancer (NEE) does not discriminate between these two classes of promoters. Thus, certain upstream activators, such as Ftz, prefer TATA-containing promoters, whereas other activators, including Dorsal, work equally well on both classes of promoters. These results provide in vivo evidence that different core promoters possess distinct regulatory activities. We discuss the possibility that an invariant TFIID complex can adopt different conformations on the core promoter.

Function of the upstream hypersensitive sites of the chicken beta-globin gene cluster in mice

We have shown previously that the chicken beta A-globin gene, with its 3' enhancer, is expressed in a copy number-dependent manner in transgenic mice. The expression level was low but increased approximately 6-fold upon inclusion of 11 kb of upstream DNA containing four DNase I hypersensitive sites. To study the effect of the individual upstream hypersensitive sites on transgene expression, we produced lines of mice in which the individual upstream sites were linked to the beta A gene and enhancer. RNA levels were measured in blood from adult animals. With each of these four constructs, the level of transgene RNA per DNA copy varied over a > 20-fold range. These data suggest that addition of a hypersensitive site to the beta A-globin/enhancer region abrogates its position independent expression. The average beta A-globin expression per copy in the lines carrying an upstream site was comparable with that in lines without an upstream site. Thus, no single upstream hypersensitive site accounts for the higher level of beta A-globin expression seen in mice containing the complete upstream region. We had shown previously that control of the chicken beta-globin cluster is distributed between at least two regions, the beta A/epsilon enhancer and the upstream region. Our current results suggest that the control mediated by the upstream DNA is itself distributed and is not due to a single hypersensitive site.

Expression of the chicken beta-globin gene cluster in mice: correct developmental expression and distributed control

To investigate the regulation of gene clusters, we introduced the entire chicken beta-globin cluster into mice. This 35-kb region includes the four globin genes (rho-beta H-beta A-epsilon), the four upstream hypersensitive sites, and the intergenic beta A/epsilon enhancer. The chicken globins are not arranged in order of developmental expression, which is unlike the case for the human beta-globin cluster, in which gene order plays a role in the regulation of globin expression. Mice carrying the chicken cluster expressed the transgenes with the same developmental patterns as seen in the chicken. Therefore, stage-specific erythroid transcriptional milieus existed before the divergence of birds and mammals and have been conserved since then. Mice bearing the complete cluster except for a deletion removing the beta A/epsilon enhancer displayed markedly reduced expression of the beta H, beta A, and epsilon genes with efficient (but variable) rho expression. Mice carrying the four genes and beta A/epsilon enhancer but without the upstream hypersensitive sites showed reduced expression of rho, beta H, and beta A, with variable expression of epsilon. We conclude that (i) all of the genes (except possibly rho) are under the control of both the upstream hypersensitive sites and the enhancer, (ii) the influence of the control elements can extend beyond the nearest active gene, (iii) a single element (the enhancer) can influence more than one gene in a single developmental stage, (iv) the enhancer can work bidirectionally, and (v) neither the upstream sites (as a group) nor the enhancer showed developmental stage specificity. Thus, the regulation of this cluster is achieved by interaction of two distinct control regions with each of the globin genes.