A Conserved Ectodomain-Transmembrane Domain Linker Motif Tunes the Allosteric Regulation of Cell Surface Receptors

Structure of the CD33 Receptor and Implications for the Siglec Family

In the innate immune system, the CD33 receptor modulates microglial activity. Its downregulation promises to slow Alzheimer's disease, and it is already targeted in blood cancers. The mechanism underlying CD33 signaling is unresolved. Starting from the available crystal structure of its extracellular IgV-IgC1 domains, we have assembled a model of the human CD33 receptor by characterizing the oligomerization and structure of IgC1, transmembrane, and cytosolic domains in solution. IgC1 homodimerizes via intermolecular β-strand pairing and packing. In contrast, the 21-residue transmembrane helix of CD33 appears monomeric and straight, with a conserved thin neck and thick belly appearance followed by a positively charged cytosolic patch. The cytosolic domain is dynamically unstructured. Sequence alignment and AlphaFold models indicate that IgC domains in the family of human Siglecs, to which CD33 belongs, are surprisingly variable. Only Siglec-6 is identified to analogously dimerize via IgC1. Our CD33 structural model suggests that the receptor is not signaling via a monomer-dimer shift. Rather, we propose that, aided but also constrained by dimerization, multivalent ligands may concentrate the receptor transmembrane and cytosolic domains sufficiently to trigger colocalization with an activating kinase.

Comparison of Integrin αIIbβ3 Transmembrane Association in Vesicles and Bicelles

Membrane proteins are commonly reconstituted in membrane mimics exhibiting discontinuous lipid bilayers. In contrast, the continuous membranes of cells are conceptually best represented by large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs). Here, we compared the thermodynamic stability of the integrin αIIbβ3 transmembrane (TM) complex between vesicles and bicelles to assess the consequence of this simplification. In LUVs, we further evaluated the strength of the αIIb(G972S)-β3(V700T) interaction that corresponds to the hydrogen bond interaction postulated for β2 integrins. An upper limit of 0.9 kcal/mol was estimated for superior TM complex stabilization in LUVs relative to bicelles. Compared to the αIIbβ3 TM complex stability in LUVs of 5.6 ± 0.2 kcal/mol, this limit is modest, indicating that bicelles performed well relative to LUVs. The implementation of β3(V700T) alleviated αIIb(G972S) destabilization by 0.4 ± 0.2 kcal/mol in confirmation of relatively weak hydrogen bonding. Interestingly, the hydrogen bond adjusts the TM complex stability to a level that is not achievable by merely varying the residue corresponding to αIIb(Gly972).

Insight Into Pathological Integrin αIIbβ3 Activation From Safeguarding The Inactive State

The inhibition of physiological activation pathways of the platelet adhesion receptor integrin αIIbβ3 may fail to prevent fatal thrombosis, suggesting that the receptor is at risk of activation by yet an unidentified pathway. Here, we report the discovery and characterization of a structural motif that safeguards the receptor by selectively destabilizing its inactive state. At the extracellular membrane border, an overpacked αIIb(W968)-β3(I693) contact prevents αIIb(Gly972) from optimally assembling the αIIbβ3 transmembrane complex, which maintains the inactive state. This destabilization of approximately 1.0 kcal/mol could be mitigated by hydrodynamic forces but not physiological agonists, thereby identifying hydrodynamic forces as pathological activation stimulus. As reproductive life spans are not generally limited by cardiovascular disease, it appears that the evolution of the safeguard was driven by fatal, hydrodynamic force-mediated integrin αIIbβ3 activation in the healthy cardiovascular system. The triggering of the safeguard solely by pathological stimuli achieves an effective increase of the free energy barrier between inactive and active receptor states without incurring an increased risk of bleeding. Thus, integrin αIIbβ3 has evolved an effective way to protect receptor functional states that indicates the availability of a mechanical activation pathway when hydrodynamic forces exceed physiological margins.

Orchestration of signaling by structural disorder in class 1 cytokine receptors

BACKGROUND

Class 1 cytokine receptors (C1CRs) are single-pass transmembrane proteins responsible for transmitting signals between the outside and the inside of cells. Remarkably, they orchestrate key biological processes such as proliferation, differentiation, immunity and growth through long disordered intracellular domains (ICDs), but without having intrinsic kinase activity. Despite these key roles, their characteristics remain rudimentarily understood.

METHODS

The current paper asks the question of why disorder has evolved to govern signaling of C1CRs by reviewing the literature in combination with new sequence and biophysical analyses of chain properties across the family.

RESULTS

We uncover that the C1CR-ICDs are fully disordered and brimming with SLiMs. Many of these short linear motifs (SLiMs) are overlapping, jointly signifying a complex regulation of interactions, including network rewiring by isoforms. The C1CR-ICDs have unique properties that distinguish them from most IDPs and we forward the perception that the C1CR-ICDs are far from simple strings with constitutively bound kinases. Rather, they carry both organizational and operational features left uncovered within their disorder, including mechanisms and complexities of regulatory functions.

CONCLUSIONS

Critically, the understanding of the fascinating ability of these long, completely disordered chains to orchestrate complex cellular signaling pathways is still in its infancy, and we urge a perceptional shift away from the current simplistic view towards uncovering their full functionalities and potential. Video abstract.

Structural Understanding of Interleukin 6 Family Cytokine Signaling and Targeted Therapies: Focus on Interleukin 11

Cytokines are small signaling proteins that have central roles in inflammation and cell survival. In the half-century since the discovery of the first cytokines, the interferons, over fifty cytokines have been identified. Amongst these is interleukin (IL)-6, the first and prototypical member of the IL-6 family of cytokines, nearly all of which utilize the common signaling receptor, gp130. In the last decade, there have been numerous advances in our understanding of the structural mechanisms of IL-6 family signaling, particularly for IL-6 itself. However, our understanding of the detailed structural mechanisms underlying signaling by most IL-6 family members remains limited. With the emergence of new roles for IL-6 family cytokines in disease and, in particular, roles of IL-11 in cardiovascular disease, lung disease, and cancer, there is an emerging need to develop therapeutics that can progress to clinical use. Here we outline our current knowledge of the structural mechanism of signaling by the IL-6 family of cytokines. We discuss how this knowledge allows us to understand the mechanism of action of currently available inhibitors targeting IL-6 family cytokine signaling, and most importantly how it allows for improved opportunities to pharmacologically disrupt cytokine signaling. We focus specifically on the need to develop and understand inhibitors that disrupt IL-11 signaling.

Universal principles of membrane protein assembly, composition and evolution

Structural diversity in α-helical membrane proteins (MP) arises from variations in helix-helix crossings and contacts that may bias amino acid usage. Here, we reveal systematic changes in transmembrane amino acid frequencies (f) as a function of the number of helices (n). For eukarya, breaks in f(n) trends of packing (Ala, Gly and Pro), polar, and hydrophobic residues identify different MP assembly principles for 2≤n≤7, 8≤n≤12 and n≥13. In bacteria, the first f break already occurs after n = 6 in correlation to an earlier n peak in MP size distribution and dominance of packing over polar interactions. In contrast to the later n brackets, the integration levels of helix bundles continuously increased in the first, most populous brackets indicating the formation of single structural units (domains). The larger first bracket of eukarya relates to a balance of polar and packing interactions that enlarges helix-helix combinatorial possibilities (MP diversity). Between the evolutionary old, packing and new, polar residues f anti-correlations extend over all biological taxa, broadly ordering them according to evolutionary history and allowing f estimates for the earliest forms of life. Next to evolutionary history, the amino acid composition of MP is determined by size (n), proteome diversity, and effective amino acid cost.

On the contributing role of the transmembrane domain for subunit-specific sensitivity of integrin activation

Integrins are α/β heterodimeric transmembrane adhesion receptors. Evidence exists that their transmembrane domain (TMD) separates upon activation. Subunit-specific differences in activation sensitivity of integrins were reported. However, whether sequence variations in the TMD lead to differential TMD association has remained elusive. Here, we show by molecular dynamics simulations and association free energy calculations on TMDs of integrin αIIbβ3, αvβ3, and α5β1 that αIIbβ3 TMD is most stably associated; this difference is related to interaction differences across the TMDs. The order of TMD association stability is paralleled by the basal activity of these integrins, which suggests that TMD differences can have a decisive effect on integrin conformational free energies. We also identified a specific order of clasp disintegration upon TMD dissociation, which suggests that the closed state of integrins may comprise several microstates. Our results provide unprecedented insights into a possibly contributing role of TMD towards subunit-specific sensitivity of integrin activation.

Membrane Anchoring of α-Helical Proteins: Role of Tryptophan

The function of membrane proteins relies on a defined orientation of protein relative to lipid. In apparent correlation to protein anchoring, tryptophan residues are enriched in the lipid headgroup region. To characterize the thermodynamic and structural basis of this relationship in α-helical membrane proteins, we examined the role of three conserved tryptophans in the folding of the heterodimeric integrin αIIbβ3 transmembrane (TM) complex in phospholipid bicelles and mammalian membranes. In the homogenous lipid environment of bicelles, tryptophan was replaceable by residues of distinct polarities. The appropriate polarity was guided by the electrostatic potential of the tryptophan surrounding, suggesting that tryptophan can complement diverse environments by adjusting the orientation of its anisotropic side chain to achieve site-specific anchoring. As a sole membrane anchor, tryptophan made a contribution of 0.4 kcal/mol to TM complex stability in bicelles. In membranes, it proved more difficult to replace tryptophan even by tyrosine, indicating a superior capacity to interact with heterogeneous lipids of biological membranes. Interestingly, at intracellular TM helix ends, where integrin activation is initiated, sequence motifs that interact with lipids via opposing polarity patterns were found to restrict TM helix orientations beyond tryptophan anchoring. In contrast to bicelles, phenylalanine became the least accepted substitute in membranes, demonstrating an increased role of the hydrophobic effect. Altogether, our study implicates a wide amphiphilic range of tryptophan, membrane complexity, and the hydrophobic effect to be important factors in tryptophan membrane anchoring.

Energy landscape differences among integrins establish the framework for understanding activation

Li and Springer demonstrate differences between integrins α₄β₁ and α₅β₁ in intrinsic affinities and relative free energies of three conformational states. Integrin conformational equilibria are both subunit and cell type specific. The energy landscapes of intact receptors on the cell surface provide a framework for understanding regulation of integrin adhesiveness.

Why do integrins differ in basal activity, and how does affinity for soluble ligand correlate with cellular adhesiveness? We show that basal conformational equilibrium set points for integrin α₄β₁ are cell type specific and differ from integrin α₅β₁ when the two integrins are coexpressed on the same cell. Although α₄β₁ is easier to activate, its high-affinity state binds vascular cell adhesion molecule and fibronectin 100- to 1,000-fold more weakly than α₅β₁ binds fibronectin. Furthermore, the difference in affinity between the high- and low-affinity states is more compressed in α₄β₁ (600- to 800-fold) than in α₅β₁ (4,000- to 6,000-fold). α₄β₁ basal conformational equilibria differ among three cell types, define affinity for soluble ligand and readiness for priming, and may reflect differences in interactions with intracellular adaptors but do not predict cellular adhesiveness for immobilized ligand. The measurements here provide a necessary framework for understanding integrin activation in intact cells, including activation of integrin adhesiveness by application of tensile force by the cytoskeleton, across ligand–integrin–adaptor complexes.

Application of Solution NMR to Structural Studies on α-Helical Integral Membrane Proteins

A large portion of proteins in living organisms are membrane proteins which play critical roles in the biology of the cell, from maintenance of the biological membrane integrity to communication of cells with their surroundings. To understand their mechanism of action, structural information is essential. Nevertheless, structure determination of transmembrane proteins is still a challenging area, even though recently the number of deposited structures of membrane proteins in the PDB has rapidly increased thanks to the efforts using X-ray crystallography, electron microscopy, and solid and solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology. Among these technologies, solution NMR is a powerful tool for studying protein-protein, protein-ligand interactions and protein dynamics at a wide range of time scales as well as structure determination of membrane proteins. This review provides general and useful guideline for membrane protein sample preparation and the choice of membrane-mimetic media, which are the key step for successful structural analysis. Furthermore, this review provides an opportunity to look at recent applications of solution NMR to structural studies on α-helical membrane proteins through some success stories.

Direct Evaluation of Protein-Lipid Contacts Reveals Protein Membrane Immersion and Isotropic Bicelle Structure

The solvation of membrane proteins by both lipids and water makes their membrane immersion difficult to predict and the choice of a membrane mimic challenging. To characterize protein-lipid contacts and bicelle membrane mimics, we examined protein-lipid cross-relaxation of integrin αIIb and β3(A711P) transmembrane helices in isotropic phospholipid bicelles (q = 0.5 and 0.7). Long-chain bicelle lipids dominated contacts with central helix segments, whereas both short- and long-chain lipids contacted the terminal turns of each helix in corroboration of the mixed bicelle model. The saturation transfer profiles from long-chain lipids directly established helix midpoints in the lipid bilayer. Lipid headgroups and water molecules engaged the side chains of buried serine and threonine in competition with intrahelical hydrogen bonding, illustrating that polar side chains seek the most favorable electrostatic contacts.