The GABAA receptor alpha 1 subunit Pro174-Asp191 segment is involved in GABA binding and channel gating

Molecular mechanisms of the GABA type A receptor function

The GABA type A receptor (GABAAR) belongs to the family of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels and plays a key role in inhibition in adult mammalian brains. Dysfunction of this macromolecule may lead to epilepsy, anxiety disorders, autism, depression, and schizophrenia. GABAAR is also a target for multiple physiologically and clinically relevant modulators, such as benzodiazepines (BDZs), general anesthetics, and neurosteroids. The first GABAAR structure appeared in 2014, but the past years have brought a particularly abundant surge in structural data for these receptors with various ligands and modulators. Although the open conformation remains elusive, this novel information has pushed the structure-function studies to an unprecedented level. Electrophysiology, mutagenesis, photolabeling, and in silico simulations, guided by novel structural information, shed new light on the molecular mechanisms of receptor functioning. The main goal of this review is to present the current knowledge of GABAAR functional and structural properties. The review begins with an outline of the functional and structural studies of GABAAR, accompanied by some methodological considerations, especially biophysical methods, enabling the reader to follow how major breakthroughs in characterizing GABAAR features have been achieved. The main section provides a comprehensive analysis of the functional significance of specific structural elements in GABAARs. We additionally summarize the current knowledge on the binding sites for major GABAAR modulators, referring to the molecular underpinnings of their action. The final chapter of the review moves beyond examining GABAAR as an isolated macromolecule and describes the interactions of the receptor with other proteins in a broader context of inhibitory plasticity. In the final section, we propose a general conclusion that agonist binding to the orthosteric binding sites appears to rely on local interactions, whereas conformational transitions of bound macromolecule (gating) and allosteric modulation seem to reflect more global phenomena involving vast portions of the macromolecule.

Structure-function Studies of GABA (A) Receptors and Related computer-aided Studies

The γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABA (A) receptor) is a membrane protein activated by the neurotransmitter GABA. Structurally, this major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptor in the human central nervous system is a pentamer that can be built from a selection of 19 subunits consisting of α(1,2,3,4,5 or 6), β (1,2 or 3), γ (1,2 or 3), ρ (1,2 or 3), and δ, π, θ, and ε. This creates several possible pentameric arrangements, which also influence the pharmacological and physiological properties of the receptor. The complexity and heterogeneity of the receptors are further increased by the addition of short and long splice variants in several subunits and the existence of multiple allosteric binding sites and expansive ligands that can bind to the receptors. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the structure and function of the receptors is required to gain novel insights into the consequences of receptor dysfunction and subsequent drug development studies. Notably, advancements in computational-aided studies have facilitated the elucidation of residual interactions and exploring energy binding, which may otherwise be challenging to investigate. In this review, we aim to summarize the current understanding of the structure and function of GABA (A) receptors obtained from advancements in computational-aided applications.

Structural mechanisms of GABAA receptor autoimmune encephalitis

Autoantibodies targeting neuronal membrane proteins can cause encephalitis, seizures, and severe behavioral abnormalities. While antibodies for several neuronal targets have been identified, structural details on how they regulate function are unknown. Here we determined cryo-electron microscopy structures of antibodies derived from an encephalitis patient bound to the γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A) receptor. These antibodies induced severe encephalitis by directly inhibiting GABA_A function, resulting in nervous-system hyperexcitability. The structures reveal mechanisms of GABA_A inhibition and pathology. One antibody directly competes with a neurotransmitter and locks the receptor in a resting-like state. The second antibody targets the subunit interface involved in binding benzodiazepines and antagonizes diazepam potentiation. We identify key residues in these antibodies involved in specificity and affinity and confirm structure-based hypotheses for functional effects using electrophysiology. Together these studies define mechanisms of direct functional antagonism of neurotransmission underlying autoimmune encephalitis in a human patient.

Structural insights into the interaction between gabazine (SR-95531) and Laodelphax striatellus GABA receptors

γ-Aminobutyric acid receptors (GABARs) mediate fast inhibitory neurotransmission and are targets for insecticides. GABARs are composed of five subunits, the composition of which dictates the pharmacological characteristics of GABARs. Both competitive and noncompetitive GABAR antagonists can be used as insecticides. Gabazine is a potent competitive antagonist of mammalian α1β2γ2 GABARs; however, it is less potent against insect GABARs. To explore how gabazine interacts with GABARs, we examined whether the sensitivity of the small brown planthopper (Laodelphax striatellus) RDL GABAR (LsRDLR) to gabazine is increased when its amino acid residues are substituted with α1β2γ2 GABAR residues. In the results, two of the generated mutants showed enhanced gabazine sensitivity. Docking simulations of gabazine using LsRDLR homology models and an α1β2γ2 GABAR cryo-EM structure revealed that the accommodation of gabazine into the "aromatic box" in the orthosteric site lowered the binding energy. This information may help in designing GABAR-targeting insecticides with novel modes of action.

Delta-containing GABAA receptors in pain management: Promising targets for novel analgesics

Communication between nerve cells depends on the balance between excitatory and inhibitory circuits. GABA, the major inhibitory neurotransmitter, regulates this balance and insufficient GABAergic activity is associated with numerous neuropathological disorders including pain. Of the various GABA_A receptor subtypes, the δ-containing receptors are particularly interesting drug targets in management of chronic pain. These receptors are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels composed of α, β and δ subunits and can be activated by ambient levels of GABA to generate tonic conductance. However, only a few ligands preferentially targeting δ-containing GABA_A receptors have so far been identified, limiting both pharmacological understanding and drug-discovery efforts, and more importantly, understanding of how they affect pain pathways. Here, we systemically review and discuss the known drugs and ligands with analgesic potential targeting δ-containing GABA_A receptors and further integrate the biochemical nature of the receptors with clinical perspectives in pain that might generate interest among researchers and clinical physicians to encourage analgesic discovery efforts leading to more efficient therapies.

Dravet syndrome-associated mutations in GABRA1, GABRB2 and GABRG2 define the genetic landscape of defects of GABAA receptors

Dravet syndrome is a rare, catastrophic epileptic encephalopathy that begins in the first year of life, usually with febrile or afebrile hemiclonic or generalized tonic-clonic seizures followed by status epilepticus. De novo variants in genes that mediate synaptic transmission such as SCN1A and PCDH19 are often associated with Dravet syndrome. Recently, GABAA receptor subunit genes (GABRs) encoding α1 (GABRA1), β3 (GABRB3) and γ2 (GABRG2), but not β2 (GABRB2) or β1 (GABRB1), subunits are frequently associated with Dravet syndrome or Dravet syndrome-like phenotype. We performed next generation sequencing on 870 patients with Dravet syndrome and identified nine variants in three different GABRs. Interestingly, the variants were all in genes encoding the most common GABAA receptor, the α1β2γ2 receptor. Mutations in GABRA1 (c.644T>C, p. L215P; c.640C>T, p. R214C; c.859G>A; V287I; c.641G>A, p. R214H) and GABRG2 (c.269C>G, p. T90R; c.1025C>T, p. P342L) presented as de novo cases, while in GABRB2 two variants were de novo (c.992T>C, p. F331S; c.542A>T, p. Y181F) and one was autosomal dominant and inherited from the maternal side (c.990_992del, p.330_331del). We characterized the effects of these GABR variants on GABAA receptor biogenesis and channel function. We found that defects in receptor gating were the common deficiency of GABRA1 and GABRB2 Dravet syndrome variants, while mainly trafficking defects were found with the GABRG2 (c.269C>G, p. T90R) variant. It seems that variants in α1 and β2 subunits are less tolerated than in γ2 subunits, since variant α1 and β2 subunits express well but were functionally deficient. This suggests that all of these GABR variants are all targeting GABR genes that encode the assembled α1β2γ2 receptor, and regardless of which of the three subunits are mutated, variants in genes coding for α1, β2 and γ2 receptor subunits make them candidate causative genes in the pathogenesis of Dravet syndrome.

GABAA Receptor β2E155 Residue Located at the Agonist-Binding Site Is Involved in the Receptor Gating

GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs) play a crucial role in mediating inhibition in the adult brain. In spite of progress in describing (mainly) the static structures of this receptor, the molecular mechanisms underlying its activation remain unclear. It is known that in the α₁β₂γ_2L receptors, the mutation of the β₂E155 residue, at the orthosteric binding site, strongly impairs the receptor activation, but the molecular and kinetic mechanisms of this effect remain elusive. Herein, we investigated the impact of the β₂E155C mutation on binding and gating of the α₁β₂γ_2L receptor. To this end, we combined the macroscopic and single-channel analysis, the use of different agonists [GABA and muscimol (MSC)] and flurazepam (FLU) as a modulator. As expected, the β₂E155C mutation caused a vast right shift of the dose–response (for GABA and MSC) and, additionally, dramatic changes in the time course of current responses, indicative of alterations in gating. Mutated receptors showed reduced maximum open probability and enhanced receptor spontaneous activity. Model simulations for macroscopic currents revealed that the primary effect of the mutation was the downregulation of the preactivation (flipping) rate. Experiments with MSC and FLU further confirmed a reduction in the preactivation rate. Our single-channel analysis revealed the mutation impact mainly on the second component in the shut times distributions. Based on model simulations, this finding further confirms that this mutation affects mostly the preactivation transition, supporting thus the macroscopic data. Altogether, we provide new evidence that the β₂E155 residue is involved in both binding and gating (primarily preactivation).

A General Mechanism for Signal Propagation in the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Family

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) modulate synaptic activity in the central nervous system. The α7 subtype, in particular, has attracted considerable interest in drug discovery as a target for several conditions, including Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. Identifying agonist-induced structural changes underlying nAChR activation is fundamentally important for understanding biological function and rational drug design. Here, extensive equilibrium and nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations, enabled by cloud-based high-performance computing, reveal the molecular mechanism by which structural changes induced by agonist unbinding are transmitted within the human α7 nAChR. The simulations reveal the sequence of coupled structural changes involved in driving conformational change responsible for biological function. Comparison with simulations of the α4β2 nAChR subtype identifies features of the dynamical architecture common to both receptors, suggesting a general structural mechanism for signal propagation in this important family of receptors.

Identification of the Initial Steps in Signal Transduction in the α4β2 Nicotinic Receptor: Insights from Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Simulations

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) modulate synaptic transmission in the nervous system. These receptors have emerged as therapeutic targets in drug discovery for treating several conditions, including Alzheimer's disease, pain, and nicotine addiction. In this in silico study, we use a combination of equilibrium and nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations to map dynamic and structural changes induced by nicotine in the human α4β2 nAChR. They reveal a striking pattern of communication between the extracellular binding pockets and the transmembrane domains (TMDs) and show the sequence of conformational changes associated with the initial steps in this process. We propose a general mechanism for signal transduction for Cys-loop receptors: the mechanistic steps for communication proceed firstly through loop C in the principal subunit, and are subsequently transmitted, gradually and cumulatively, to loop F of the complementary subunit, and then to the TMDs through the M2-M3 linker.

Orthosteric and benzodiazepine cavities of the α1β2γ2 GABAA receptor: insights from experimentally validated in silico methods

γ-aminobutyric acid-type A (GABA_A) receptors mediate fast synaptic inhibition in the central nervous system of mammals. They are modulated via several sites by numerous compounds, which include GABA, benzodiazepines, ethanol, neurosteroids and anaesthetics among others. Due to their potential as targets of novel drugs, a detailed knowledge of their structure-function relationships is needed. Here, we present the model of the α₁β₂γ₂ subtype GABA_A receptor in the APO state and in complex with selected ligands, including agonists, antagonists and allosteric modulators. The model is based on the crystallographic structure of the human β₃ homopentamer GABA_A receptor. The complexes were refined using atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. This allowed a broad description of the binding modes and the detection of important interactions in agreement with experimental information. From the best of our knowledge, this is the only model of the α₁β₂γ₂ GABA_A receptor that represents altogether the desensitized state of the channel and comprehensively describes the interactions of ligands of the orthosteric and benzodiazepines binding sites in agreement with the available experimental data. Furthermore, it is able to explain small differences regarding the binding of a variety of chemically divergent ligands. Finally, this new model may pave the way for the design of focused experimental studies that will allow a deeper description of the receptor.

Molecular cloning, spatiotemporal and functional expression of GABA receptor subunits RDL1 and RDL2 of the rice stem borer Chilo suppressalis

Insect γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor (GABAR) is one of the major targets of insecticides. In the present study, cDNAs (CsRDL1A and CsRDL2S) encoding the two isoforms of RDL subunits were cloned from the rice stem borer Chilo suppressalis. Transcripts of both genes demonstrated similar expression patterns in different tissues and developmental stages, although CsRDL2S was ∼2-fold more abundant than CsRDL1A throughout all development stages. To investigate the function of channels formed by CsRDL subunits, both genes were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes singly or in combination in different ratios. Electrophysiological results using a two-electrode voltage clamp demonstrated that GABA activated currents in oocytes injected with both cRNAs. The EC₅₀ value of GABA in activating currents was smaller in oocytes co-injected with CsRDL1A and CsRDL2S than in oocytes injected singly. The IC₅₀ value of the insecticide fluralaner in inhibiting GABA responses was smaller in oocytes co-injected with different cRNAs than in oocytes injected singly. Co-injection also changed the potency of the insecticide dieldrin in oocytes injected singly. These findings suggested that heteromeric GABARs were formed by the co-injections of CsRDL1A and CsRDL2S in oocytes. Although the presence of Ser at the 2'-position in the second transmembrane segment was responsible for the insensitivity of GABARs to dieldrin, this amino acid did not affect the potencies of the insecticides fipronil and fluralaner. These results lead us to hypothesize that C. suppressalis may adapt to insecticide pressure by regulating the expression levels of CsRDL1A and CsRDL2S and the composition of both subunits in GABARs.

A Single Amino Acid Residue at Transmembrane Domain 4 of the α Subunit Influences Carisoprodol Direct Gating Efficacy at GABAA Receptors

The muscle relaxant carisoprodol has recently been controlled at the federal level as a Schedule IV drug due to its high abuse potential and consequences of misuse, such as withdrawal syndrome, delusions, seizures, and even death. Recent work has shown that carisoprodol can directly gate and allosterically modulate the type A GABA (GABAA) receptor. These actions are subunit-dependent; compared with other GABAA receptors, carisoprodol has nominal direct gating effects in α3β2γ2 receptors. Here, using site-directed mutagenesis and whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology in transiently transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells, we examined the role of GABAA receptor α subunit transmembrane domain 4 (TM4) amino acids in direct gating and allosteric modulatory actions of carisoprodol. Mutation of α3 valine at position 440 to leucine (present in the equivalent position in the α1 subunit) significantly increased the direct gating effects of carisoprodol without affecting its allosteric modulatory effects. The corresponding reverse mutation, α1(L415V), decreased carisoprodol direct gating potency and efficacy. Analysis of a series of amino acid mutations at the 415 position demonstrated that amino acid volume correlated positively with carisoprodol efficacy, whereas polarity inversely correlated with carisoprodol efficacy. We conclude that α1(415) of TM4 is involved in the direct gating, but not allosteric modulatory, actions of carisoprodol. In addition, the orientation of alkyl or hydroxyl groups at this position influences direct gating effects. These findings support the likelihood that the direct gating and allosteric modulatory effects of carisoprodol are mediated via distinct binding sites.

Methylene blue inhibits GABAA receptors by interaction with GABA binding site

Methylene blue (MB) is commonly used in diagnostic procedures and is also used to treat various medical conditions. Neurological effects of MB have been reported in clinical observations and experimental studies. Thus the modulation of GABA_A receptor function by MB was investigated. Whole-cell GABA-activated currents were recorded from HEK293 cells expressing various GABA_A receptor subunit configurations. MB inhibition of GABA currents was apparent at 3 μM, and it had an IC₅₀ of 31 μM in human α1β2γ2 receptors. The MB action was rapid and reversible. MB inhibition was not mediated via the picrotoxin site, as a mutation (T6'F of the β2 subunit) known to confer resistance to picrotoxin had no effect on MB-induced inhibition. Blockade of GABA_A receptors by MB was demonstrated across a range of receptors expressing varying subunits, including those expressed at extrasynaptic sites. The sensitivity of α1β2 receptors to MB was similar to that observed in α1β2γ2 receptors, indicating that MB's action via the benzodiazepine or Zn²⁺ site is unlikely. MB-induced inhibition of GABA response was competitive with respect to GABA. Furthermore, mutation of α1 F64 to A and β2 Y205 to F in the extracellular N-terminus, both residues which are known to comprise GABA binding pocket, remarkably diminished MB inhibition of GABA currents. These data suggest that MB inhibits GABA_A receptor function by direct or allosteric interaction with the GABA binding site. Finally, in mouse hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons, MB inhibited GABA-activated currents as well as GABAergic IPSCs. We demonstrate that MB directly inhibits GABA_A receptor function, which may underlie some of the effects of MB on the CNS.

Loop G in the GABAA receptor α1 subunit influences gating efficacy

KEY POINTS

The functional importance of residues in loop G of the GABA_A receptor has not been investigated. D43 and T47 in the α1 subunit are of particular significance as their structural modification inhibits activation by GABA. While the T47C substitution had no significant effect, non-conservative substitution of either residue (D43C or T47R) reduced the apparent potency of GABA. Propofol potentiated maximal GABA-evoked currents mediated by α1(D43C)β2γ2 and α1(T47R)β2γ2 receptors. Non-stationary variance analysis revealed a reduction in maximal GABA-evoked P_open , suggesting impaired agonist efficacy. Further analysis of α1(T47R)β2γ2 receptors revealed that the efficacy of the partial agonist THIP (4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridine-3-ol) relative to GABA was impaired. GABA-, THIP- and propofol-evoked currents mediated by α1(T47R)β2γ2 receptors deactivated faster than those mediated by α1β2γ2 receptors, indicating that the mutation impairs agonist-evoked gating. Spontaneous gating caused by the β2(L285R) mutation was also reduced in α1(T47R)β2(L285R)γ2 compared to α1β2(L285R)γ2 receptors, confirming that α1(T47R) impairs gating independently of agonist activation.

ABSTRACT

The modification of cysteine residues (substituted for D43 and T47) by 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate in the GABA_A α1 subunit loop G is known to impair activation of α1β2γ2 receptors by GABA and propofol. While the T47C substitution had no significant effect, non-conservative substitution of either residue (D43C or T47R) reduced the apparent potency of GABA. Propofol (1 μm), which potentiates sub-maximal but not maximal GABA-evoked currents mediated by α1β2γ2 receptors, also potentiated maximal currents mediated by α1(D43C)β2γ2 and α1(T47R)β2γ2 receptors. Furthermore, the peak open probabilities of α1(D43C)β2γ2 and α1(T47R)β2γ2 receptors were reduced. The kinetics of macroscopic currents mediated by α1(D43C)β2γ2 and α1(T47R)β2γ2 receptors were characterised by slower desensitisation and faster deactivation. Similar changes in macroscopic current kinetics, together with a slower activation rate, were observed with the loop D α1(F64C) substitution, known to impair both efficacy and agonist binding, and when the partial agonist THIP (4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridine-3-ol) was used to activate WT or α1(T47R)β2γ2 receptors. Propofol-evoked currents mediated by α1(T47R)β2γ2 and α1(F64C)β2γ2 receptors also exhibited faster deactivation than their WT counterparts, revealing that these substitutions impair gating through a mechanism independent of orthosteric binding. Spontaneous gating caused by the introduction of the β2(L285R) mutation was also reduced in α1(T47R)β2(L285R)γ2 compared to α1β2(L285R)γ2 receptors, confirming that α1(T47R) impairs gating independently of activation by any agonist. These findings implicate movement of the GABA_A receptor α1 subunit's β1 strand during agonist-dependent and spontaneous gating. Immobilisation of the β1 strand may provide a mechanism for the inhibition of gating by inverse agonists such as bicuculline.

A role for loop G in the β1 strand in GABAA receptor activation

KEY POINTS

The role of the β1 strand in GABAA receptor function is unclear. It lies anti-parallel to the β2 strand, which is known to participate in receptor activation. Molecular dynamics simulation revealed solvent accessible residues within the β1 strand of the GABAA β3 homopentamer that might be amenable to analysis using the substituted Cys accessibility method. Cys substitutions from Asp43 to Thr47 in the GABAA α1 subunit showed that D43C and T47C reduced the apparent potency of GABA. F45C caused a biphasic GABA concentration-response relationship and increased spontaneous gating. Cys43 and Cys47 were accessible to 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulphonate (MTSEA) modification, whereas Cys45 was not. Both GABA and the allosteric agonist propofol reduced MTSEA modification of Cys43 and Cys47. By contrast, modification of Cys64 in the β2 strand loop D was impeded by GABA but unaffected by propofol. These data reveal movement of β1 strand loop G residues during agonist activation of the GABAA receptor.

ABSTRACT

The GABAA receptor α subunit β1 strand runs anti-parallel to the β2 strand, which contains loop D, known to participate in receptor activation and agonist binding. However, a role for the β1 strand has yet to be established. We used molecular dynamics simulation to quantify the solvent accessible surface area (SASA) of β1 strand residues in the GABAA β3 homopentamer structure. Residues in the complementary interface equivalent to those between Asp43 and Thr47 in the α1 subunit have an alternating pattern of high and low SASA consistent with a β strand structure. We investigated the functional role of these β1 strand residues in the α1 subunit by individually replacing them with Cys residues. D43C and T47C substitutions reduced the apparent potency of GABA at α1β2γ2 receptors by 50-fold and eight-fold, respectively, whereas the F45C substitution caused a biphasic GABA concentration-response relationship and increased spontaneous gating. Receptors with D43C or T47C substitutions were sensitive to 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulphonate (MTSEA) modification. However, GABA-evoked currents mediated by α1(F45C)β2γ2 receptors were unaffected by MTSEA, suggesting that this residue is inaccessible. Both GABA and the allosteric agonist propofol reduced MTSEA modification of α1(D43C)β2γ2 and α1(T47C)β2γ2 receptors, indicating movement of the β1 strand even during allosteric activation. This is in contrast to α1(F64C)β2γ2 receptors, where only GABA, but not propofol, reduced MTSEA modification. These findings provide the first functional evidence for movement of the β1 strand during gating of the receptor and identify residues that are critical for maintaining GABAA receptor function.

Competitive antagonists facilitate the recovery from desensitization of α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes

AIM

The continuous presence of an agonist drives its receptor into a refractory state, termed desensitization. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that a competitive antagonist, SR95531, could facilitate the recovery of α1β2γ2 GABAA receptor from functional desensitization.

METHODS

α1β2γ2 GABAA receptors were expressed in Xenopus oocytes. GABA-evoked currents were recorded using two-electrode voltage-clamp technique. Drugs were applied through perfusion.

RESULTS

Long application of GABA (100 μmol/L) evoked a large peak current followed by a small amplitude steady-state current (desensitization). Co-application of SR95531 during the desensitization caused a larger rebound of GABA current after removal of SR95531. Furthermore, application of SR95531 after removal of GABA increased the rate of receptor recovery from desensitization, and the recovery time constant was decreased from 59±3.2 s to 33±1.6 s. SR95531-facilitated receptor recovery from desensitization was dependent on the perfusion duration of SR95531. It was also dependent on the concentration of SR95531, and the curve fitting with Hill equation revealed two potency components, which were similar to the two potency components in inhibition of the steady-state current by SR95531. Bicuculline caused similar facilitation of desensitization recovery.

CONCLUSION

SR95531 facilitates α1β2γ2 GABAA receptor recovery from desensitization, possibly through two mechanisms: binding to the desensitized receptor and converting it to the non-desensitized state, and binding to the resting state receptor and preventing re-desensitization.

Conformational gating dynamics in the GluCl anion-selective chloride channel

Cys-loop receptors are central to propagation of signals in the nervous system. The gating of the membrane-spanning pore is triggered by structural rearrangements in the agonist-binding site, located some 50 Å away from the pore. A sequential conformational change, propagating from the ligand-binding site to the pore, has been proposed to govern gating in all Cys-loop receptors. Here, we identify structural and dynamic components of the conformational gating in the eukaryotic glutamate-gated chloride channel (GluCl) by means of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with and without the l-glutamate agonist bound. A significant increase in pore opening and accompanying hydration is observed in the presence of glutamate. Potential of mean force calculations reveal that the barrier for ion passage drops from 15 kcal/mol to 5-10 kcal/mol with the agonist bound. This appears to be explained by agonist binding that leads to significant changes in the intersubunit hydrogen-bonding pattern, which induce a slight tilt of the extracellular domain relative to the transmembrane domain in the simulations. This rearrangement is subtle, but correspond to the direction of the quaternary twist observed as a key difference between open and closed X-ray structures. While the full reversible gating is still a much slower process, the observed structural dynamics sheds new light on the early stages of how the agonist influences the extracellular domain, how the extracellular domain interacts with the transmembrane domain, and how changes in the transmembrane domain alter the free energy of ion passage.

Photo-antagonism of the GABAA receptor

Neurotransmitter receptor trafficking is fundamentally important for synaptic transmission and neural network activity. GABAA receptors and inhibitory synapses are vital components of brain function, yet much of our knowledge regarding receptor mobility and function at inhibitory synapses is derived indirectly from using recombinant receptors, antibody-tagged native receptors and pharmacological treatments. Here we describe the use of a set of research tools that can irreversibly bind to and affect the function of recombinant and neuronal GABAA receptors following ultraviolet photoactivation. These compounds are based on the competitive antagonist gabazine and incorporate a variety of photoactive groups. By using site-directed mutagenesis and ligand-docking studies, they reveal new areas of the GABA binding site at the interface between receptor β and α subunits. These compounds enable the selected inactivation of native GABAA receptor populations providing new insight into the function of inhibitory synapses and extrasynaptic receptors in controlling neuronal excitation.

Principles of agonist recognition in Cys-loop receptors

Cys-loop receptors are ligand-gated ion channels that are activated by a structurally diverse array of neurotransmitters, including acetylcholine, serotonin, glycine, and GABA. After the term "chemoreceptor" emerged over 100 years ago, there was some wait until affinity labeling, molecular cloning, functional studies, and X-ray crystallography experiments identified the extracellular interface of adjacent subunits as the principal site of agonist binding. The question of how subtle differences at and around agonist-binding sites of different Cys-loop receptors can accommodate transmitters as chemically diverse as glycine and serotonin has been subject to intense research over the last three decades. This review outlines the functional diversity and current structural understanding of agonist-binding sites, including those of invertebrate Cys-loop receptors. Together, this provides a framework to understand the atomic determinants involved in how these valuable therapeutic targets recognize and bind their ligands.

Site-directed spin labeling reveals pentameric ligand-gated ion channel gating motions

Pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) are neurotransmitter-activated receptors that mediate fast synaptic transmission. In pLGICs, binding of agonist to the extracellular domain triggers a structural rearrangement that leads to the opening of an ion-conducting pore in the transmembrane domain and, in the continued presence of neurotransmitter, the channels desensitize (close). The flexible loops in each subunit that connect the extracellular binding domain (loops 2, 7, and 9) to the transmembrane channel domain (M2–M3 loop) are essential for coupling ligand binding to channel gating. Comparing the crystal structures of two bacterial pLGIC homologues, ELIC and the proton-activated GLIC, suggests channel gating is associated with rearrangements in these loops, but whether these motions accurately predict the motions in functional lipid-embedded pLGICs is unknown. Here, using site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and functional GLIC channels reconstituted into liposomes, we examined if, and how far, the loops at the ECD/TMD gating interface move during proton-dependent gating transitions from the resting to desensitized state. Loop 9 moves ∼9 Å inward toward the channel lumen in response to proton-induced desensitization. Loop 9 motions were not observed when GLIC was in detergent micelles, suggesting detergent solubilization traps the protein in a nonactivatable state and lipids are required for functional gating transitions. Proton-induced desensitization immobilizes loop 2 with little change in position. Proton-induced motion of the M2–M3 loop was not observed, suggesting its conformation is nearly identical in closed and desensitized states. Our experimentally derived distance measurements of spin-labeled GLIC suggest ELIC is not a good model for the functional resting state of GLIC, and that the crystal structure of GLIC does not correspond to a desensitized state. These findings advance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying pLGIC gating.

Ligand-gated ion channels reside in the membranes of nerve and muscle cells. These proteins form channels that span the membrane, where they transduce chemical signals into changes in electrical excitability. Neurotransmitters bind to the extracellular surface of these proteins to trigger global structural rearrangements that open the channel, allowing ions to flow across the cell membrane. In the continued presence of neurotransmitters, the channels desensitize and close. Channel opening and closing regulate muscle contraction and signaling in the brain, and defects in these channels lead to a variety of diseases. While crystal structures have provided frozen snapshots of these proteins in presumed closed and open channel states, little is known about how the channels desensitize and move during actual signaling events. Here, we applied a technique to investigate the structure and local dynamics of proteins known as site-directed spin labeling to a prototypical ligand-gated channel, GLIC. We directly quantified ligand-induced motions in regions at the boundary between the binding domain (loops 2 and 9) and the channel domain (M2–M3 loop). We show that a large movement of loop 9 and an immobilization of loop 2, which rearranges the interface between the binding and channel domains, accompanies GLIC channel gating transitions into a desensitized state. These data provide new insights into the protein movements that underlie electrochemical transmission of signals between cells.

GABA binding to an insect GABA receptor: a molecular dynamics and mutagenesis study

RDL receptors are GABA-activated inhibitory Cys-loop receptors found throughout the insect CNS. They are a key target for insecticides. Here, we characterize the GABA binding site in RDL receptors using computational and electrophysiological techniques. A homology model of the extracellular domain of RDL was generated and GABA docked into the binding site. Molecular dynamics simulations predicted critical GABA binding interactions with aromatic residues F206, Y254, and Y109 and hydrophilic residues E204, S176, R111, R166, S176, and T251. These residues were mutated, expressed in Xenopus oocytes, and their functions assessed using electrophysiology. The data support the binding mechanism provided by the simulations, which predict that GABA forms many interactions with binding site residues, the most significant of which are cation-π interactions with F206 and Y254, H-bonds with E204, S205, R111, S176, T251, and ionic interactions with R111 and E204. These findings clarify the roles of a range of residues in binding GABA in the RDL receptor, and also show that molecular dynamics simulations are a useful tool to identify specific interactions in Cys-loop receptors.

Pharmacophore models for GABA(A) modulators: implications in CNS drug discovery

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

GABA(A) ion channel is a validated drug target, implicated in the pathophysiology of various neurological and psychiatric disorders. Structural investigations on GABA(A) are currently precluded in the absence of experimentally resolved structure. Pharmacophore modeling circumvents such issues and proves to be a powerful and successful method in drug discovery.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The present reviews encompass pharmacophoric models available in the literature for the orthosteric GABA and the allosteric benzodiazepine binding site. Success stories from these simplistic pharmacophore models in scaffold hopping and strategic lead optimization have been highlighted. Recent advances in pharmacophore modeling that can leverage CNS drug discovery programs and deliver astounding results have been reviewed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Readers are bound to gain a comprehensive insight on different computational techniques used by different groups to arrive at simple, yet sophisticated pharmacophore models. In the absence of experimentally unresolved active site geometry of GABA(A), these models will provide the reader an opportunity to translate these pharmacophoric features to the microscopic phenomenon of supramolecular ligand interaction.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Pharmacophore modeling has now evolved as a mainstay approach for lead generation and optimization in drug discovery programs. Of late, many advances in pharmacophore perception have emerged. Such advancements should be used to confront activity profiling and early stage risk assessment in a high-throughput fashion. Extending such technologies has the potential not only to reduce time and cost, but also to prevent late stage attrition in drug discovery.

Competitive antagonism of insect GABA receptors by iminopyridazine derivatives of GABA

A series of 4-(6-imino-3-aryl/heteroarylpyridazin-1-yl)butanoic acids were synthesized and examined for antagonism of GABA receptors from three insect species. When tested against small brown planthopper GABA receptors, the 3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl and the 2-naphthyl analogues showed complete inhibition of GABA-induced fluorescence changes at 100 μM in assays using a membrane potential probe. Against common cutworm GABA receptors, these analogues displayed approximately 86% and complete inhibition of GABA-induced fluorescence changes at 100 μM, respectively. The 4-biphenyl and 4-phenoxyphenyl analogues showed moderate inhibition at 10 μM in these receptors, although the inhibition at 100 μM was not complete. Against American cockroach GABA receptors, the 4-biphenyl analogue exhibited the greatest inhibition (approximately 92%) of GABA-induced currents, when tested at 500 μM using a patch-clamp technique. The second most active analogue was the 2-naphthyl analogue with approximately 85% inhibition. The 3-thienyl analogue demonstrated competitive inhibition of cockroach GABA receptors. Homology modeling and ligand docking studies predicted that hydrophobic 3-substituents could interact with an accessory binding site at the orthosteric binding site.

A role for loop F in modulating GABA binding affinity in the GABA(A) receptor

The brain's major inhibitory neuroreceptor is the ligand-gated ion channel γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptor (GABAR). GABARs exist in a variety of different subunit combinations that act to modulate the physiological behavior of GABAR by altering its pharmacological profile, as well as its affinity for GABA. While the α(1)β(2)γ(2) subtype is one of the most prevalent GABARs, the less populous α(6)β(3)δ subtype has much higher GABA sensitivity. Previous studies identified residues crucial for GABA binding; however, the specific molecular differences responsible for this diverse sensitivity are not known. Furthermore, the role of loop F is a divisive subject, with conflicting evidence for ligand binding function. Using homology modeling, ligand docking, and molecular dynamics simulations, we investigated the GABA binding sites of the two receptor subtypes. Simulations identified seven residues that consistently interacted with GABA in both subtypes: αF65, αR132, βL99, βE155, βR/K196, βY205, and βR207. Residue substitution at position β196 (arginine in α(6)β(3)δ, lysine in α(1)β(2)γ(2)) resulted in a shift in GABA binding. However, the major difference between the two binding sites was the magnitude of loop F involvement, with a greater contribution in the α(6)β(3)δ receptor. Free energy calculations confirm that the α(6)β(3)δ binding pocket has an increased affinity for GABA. Thus, the possible role for loop F across the GABAR family is to modulate GABA affinity.

Synaptic neurotransmitter-gated receptors

Since the discovery of the major excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters and their receptors in the brain, many have deliberated over their likely structures and how these may relate to function. This was initially satisfied by the determination of the first amino acid sequences of the Cys-loop receptors that recognized acetylcholine, serotonin, GABA, and glycine, followed later by similar determinations for the glutamate receptors, comprising non-NMDA and NMDA subtypes. The last decade has seen a rapid advance resulting in the first structures of Cys-loop receptors, related bacterial and molluscan homologs, and glutamate receptors, determined down to atomic resolution. This now provides a basis for determining not just the complete structures of these important receptor classes, but also for understanding how various domains and residues interact during agonist binding, receptor activation, and channel opening, including allosteric modulation. This article reviews our current understanding of these mechanisms for the Cys-loop and glutamate receptor families.

Structural link between γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor agonist binding site and inner β-sheet governs channel activation and allosteric drug modulation

Rapid opening and closing of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGICs) regulate information flow throughout the brain. For pLGICs, it is postulated that neurotransmitter-induced movements in the extracellular inner β-sheet trigger channel activation. Homology modeling reveals that the β4-β5 linker physically connects the neurotransmitter binding site to the inner β-sheet. Inserting 1, 2, 4, and 8 glycines in this region of the GABA(A) receptor β-subunit progressively decreases GABA activation and converts the competitive antagonist SR-95531 into a partial agonist, demonstrating that this linker is a key element whose length and flexibility are optimized for efficient signal propagation. Insertions in the α- and γ-subunits have little effect on GABA or SR-95531 actions, suggesting that asymmetric motions in the extracellular domain power pLGIC gating. The effects of insertions on allosteric modulator actions, pentobarbital, and benzodiazepines, have different subunit dependences, indicating that modulator-induced signaling is distinct from agonist gating.

The energetic consequences of loop 9 gating motions in acetylcholine receptor-channels

Acetylcholine receptor-channels (AChRs) mediate fast synaptic transmission between nerve and muscle. In order to better-understand the mechanism by which this protein assembles and isomerizes between closed- and open-channel conformations we measured changes in the diliganded gating equilibrium constant (E(2)) consequent to mutations of residues at the C-terminus of loop 9 (L9) in the α and ε subunits of mouse neuromuscular AChRs. These amino acids are close to two interesting interfaces, between the extracellular and transmembrane domain within a subunit (E–T interface) and between primary and complementary subunits (P–C interface). Most α subunit mutations modestly decreased E(2) (mainly by slowing the channel-opening rate constant) and sometimes produced AChRs that had heterogeneous gating kinetic properties. Mutations in the ε subunit had a larger effect and could either increase or decrease E(2), but did not induce kinetic heterogeneity. There are broad-but-weak energetic interactions between αL9 residues and others at the αE–T interface, as well as between the εL9 residue and others at the P–C interface (in particular, the M2–M3 linker). These interactions serve, in part, to maintain the structural integrity of the AChR assembly at the E–T interface. Overall, the energy changes of L9 residues are significant but smaller than in other regions of the protein.

Three arginines in the GABAA receptor binding pocket have distinct roles in the formation and stability of agonist- versus antagonist-bound complexes

Binding of the agonist GABA to the GABA(A) receptor causes channel gating, whereas competitive antagonists that bind at the same site do not. The details of ligand binding are not well understood, including which residues interact directly with ligands, maintain the structure of the binding pocket, or transduce the action of binding into opening of the ion channel gate. Recent work suggests that the amine group of the GABA molecule may form a cation-π bond with residues in a highly conserved "aromatic box" within the binding pocket. Although interactions with the carboxyl group of GABA remain unknown, three positively charged arginines (α(1)Arg67, α(1)Arg132, and β(2)Arg207) just outside of the aromatic box are likely candidates. To explore their roles in ligand binding, we individually mutated these arginines to alanine and measured the effects on microscopic ligand binding/unbinding rates and channel gating. The mutations α(1)R67A or β(2)R207A slowed agonist binding and sped unbinding with little effect on gating, demonstrating that these arginines are critical for both formation and stability of the agonist-bound complex. In addition, α(1)R67A sped binding of the antagonist 2-(3-carboxypropyl)-3-amino-6-(4 methoxyphenyl)pyridazinium bromide (SR-95531), indicating that this arginine poses a barrier to formation of the antagonist-bound complex. In contrast, β(2)R207A and α(1)R132A sped antagonist unbinding, indicating that these arginines stabilize the antagonist-bound state. α(1)R132A also conferred a new long-lived open state, indicating that this arginine influences the channel gate. Thus, each of these arginines plays a unique role in determining interactions with agonists versus antagonists and with the channel gate.

New insights into the GABA(A) receptor structure and orthosteric ligand binding: receptor modeling guided by experimental data

GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) are ligand gated chloride ion channels that mediate overall inhibitory signaling in the CNS. A detailed understanding of their structure is important to gain insights in, e.g., ligand binding and functional properties of this pharmaceutically important target. Homology modeling is a necessary tool in this regard because experimentally determined structures are lacking. Here we present an exhaustive approach for creating a high quality model of the α(1)β(2)γ(2) subtype of the GABA(A)R ligand binding domain, and we demonstrate its usefulness in understanding details of orthosteric ligand binding. The model was constructed by using multiple templates and by incorporation of knowledge from biochemical/pharmacological experiments. It was validated on the basis of objective energy functions, its ability to account for available residue specific information, and its stability in molecular dynamics (MD) compared with that of the two homologous crystal structures. We then combined the model with extensive structure-activity relationships available from two homologous series of orthosteric GABA(A)R antagonists to create a detailed hypothesis for their binding modes. Excellent agreement with key experimental data was found, including the ability of the model to accommodate and explain a previously developed pharmacophore model. A coupling to agonist binding was thereby established and discussed in relation to activation mechanisms. Our results highlight the importance of critical evaluation and optimization of each step in the homology modeling process. The approach taken here can greatly aid in increasing the understanding of GABA(A)Rs and related receptors where structural insight is limited and reliable models are difficult to obtain.

The Haemonchus contortus UNC-49B subunit possesses the residues required for GABA sensitivity in homomeric and heteromeric channels

Hco-UNC-49 is a GABA receptor from the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus that has a relatively low overall sequence similarity to vertebrate GABA receptors but is very similar to the UNC-49 receptor found in the free living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. While the nematode receptors do share >80% sequence similarity they exhibit different sensitivities to GABA. In addition, the UNC-49C subunit appears to be a positive modulator of GABA sensitivity in the H. contortus heteromeric channel, but is a negative modulator in the C. elegans heteromeric channel. The cause(s) of these differences is currently unknown since the structural elements essential for GABA sensitivity in nematode receptors have been largely unexplored. Thus, the overall aim of this study was to investigate the residues that are important for UNC-49 receptor sensitivity through the use of homology modeling, site-directed mutagenesis, and two-electrode voltage clamp. This study revealed that Met(170) in Loop B of the GABA binding-site may partially account for the observed differences in GABA receptor sensitivity between the nematode species. Residues in Loops A-D that have been reported to form the GABA binding pocket in mammalian receptors, including those forming the conserved 'aromatic box', also appear to play analogous roles in Hco-UNC-49. In addition, the two mutations that produced the most significant reduction in GABA sensitivity were R66S and Y166S. Homology modeling indicates that these two residues share a hydrogen bond and are positioned close to the carboxyl end of the GABA molecule. However, of residues examined in this study, only those on the Hco-UNC-49B subunit and not its subunit partner, Hco-UNC-49C, appear important for GABA sensitivity. Overall, results from this study suggest that the binding site of the UNC-49 heteromeric GABA receptor exhibits some differences compared to classical vertebrate GABA(A) receptors.

A transmembrane amino acid in the GABAA receptor β2 subunit critical for the actions of alcohols and anesthetics

Alcohols and inhaled anesthetics enhance the function of GABA(A) receptors containing α, β, and γ subunits. Molecular analysis has focused on the role of the α subunits; however, there is evidence that the β subunits may also be important. The goal of our study was to determine whether Asn265, which is homologous to the site implicated in the α subunit (Ser270), contributes to an alcohol and volatile anesthetic binding site in the GABA(A) receptor β(2) subunit. We substituted cysteine for Asn265 and exposed the mutant to the sulfhydryl-specific reagent octyl methanethiosulfonate (OMTS). We used two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology in Xenopus laevis oocytes and found that, after OMTS application, GABA-induced currents were irreversibly potentiated in mutant α(1)β(2)(N265C)γ(2S) receptors [but not α(1)β(2)(I264C)γ(2S)], presumably because of the covalent linking of octanethiol to the thiol group in the substituted cysteine. It is noteworthy that this effect was blocked when OMTS was applied in the presence of octanol. We found that potentiation by butanol, octanol, or isoflurane in the N265C mutant was nearly abolished after the application of OMTS, suggesting that an alcohol and volatile anesthetic binding site at position 265 of the β(2) subunit was irreversibly occupied by octanethiol and consequently prevented butanol or isoflurane from binding and producing their effects. OMTS did not affect modulation or direct activation by pentobarbital, but there was a partial reduction of allosteric modulation by flunitrazepam and alphaxalone in mutant α(1)β(2)(N265C)γ(2S) receptors after OMTS was applied. Our findings provide evidence that Asn265 may contribute to an alcohol and anesthetic binding site.

The role of Loop F in the activation of the GABA receptor

Functional studies of the ligand gated ion channel family (nicotinic acetylcholine, serotonin Type 3, glycine and GABA receptors) along with the crystal structure of the acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP) and molecular dynamics simulations of the nAChR structure have resulted in a structural model in which the agonist-binding pocket comprises six loops (A-F) contributed by adjacent subunits. It is presumed that the binding of agonist results in a local structural rearrangement that is then transduced to the gate, causing the pore to open. Efforts are underway to better define the specific roles of the six binding loops. Several studies have suggested Loop F may play a direct role in linking the structural rearrangement within the binding pocket to the gate, although other investigations have indicated Loop F may be crucial for locking the agonist molecule into the binding site. This review will focus on the controversy surrounding the role of Loop F during GABA receptor activation.

Structural rearrangements in loop F of the GABA receptor signal ligand binding, not channel activation

Structure-function studies of the Cys loop family of ionotropic neurotransmitter receptors (GABA, nACh, 5-HT(3), and glycine receptors) have resulted in a six-loop (A-F) model of the agonist-binding site. Key amino acids have been identified in these loops that associate with, and stabilize, bound ligand. The next step is to identify the structural rearrangements that couple agonist binding to channel opening. Loop F has been proposed to move upon receptor activation, although it is not known whether this movement is along the conformational pathway for channel opening. We test this hypothesis in the GABA receptor using simultaneous electrophysiology and site-directed fluorescence spectroscopy. The latter method reveals structural rearrangements by reporting changes in hydrophobicity around an environmentally sensitive fluorophore attached to defined positions of loop F. Using a series of ligands that span the range from full activation to full antagonism, we show there is no correlation between the rearrangements in loop F and channel opening. Based on these data and agonist docking simulations into a structural model of the GABA binding site, we propose that loop F is not along the pathway for channel opening, but rather is a component of the structural machinery that locks ligand into the agonist-binding site.

Binding, activation and modulation of Cys-loop receptors

It is over forty years since the major neurotransmitters and their protein receptors were identified, and over twenty years since determination of the first amino-acid sequences of the Cys-loop receptors that recognize acetylcholine, serotonin, GABA and glycine. The last decade has seen the first structures of these proteins (and related bacterial and molluscan homologues) determined to atomic resolution. Hopefully over the next decade, more detailed molecular structures of entire Cys-loop receptors in drug-bound and drug-free conformations will become available. These, together with functional studies, will provide a clear picture of how these receptors participate in neurotransmission and how structural variations between receptor subtypes impart their unique characteristics. This insight should facilitate the design of novel and improved therapeutics to treat neurological disorders. This review considers our current understanding about the processes of agonist binding, receptor activation and channel opening, as well as allosteric modulation of the Cys-loop receptor family.

Locating GABA in GABA receptor binding sites

The Cys-loop family of ligand-gated ion channels contains both vertebrate and invertebrate members that are activated by GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid). Many of the residues that are critical for ligand binding have been identified in vertebrate GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors, and specific interactions between GABA and some of these residues have been determined. In the present paper, I show how a cation-pi interaction for one of the binding site residues has allowed the production of models of GABA docked into the binding site, and these orientations are supported by mutagenesis and functional data. Surprisingly, however, the residue that forms the cation-pi interaction is not conserved, suggesting that GABA occupies subtly different locations even in such closely related receptors.

A residue in loop 9 of the beta2-subunit stabilizes the closed state of the GABAA receptor

In gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptors, the structural elements that couple ligand binding to channel opening remain poorly defined. Here, site-directed mutagenesis was used to determine if Loop 9 on the non-GABA binding site interface of the beta2-subunit may be involved in GABA(A) receptor activation. Specifically, residues Gly(170)-Gln(185) of the beta2-subunit were mutated to alanine, co-expressed with wild-type alpha1- and gamma2S-subunits in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells and assayed for their activation by GABA, the intravenous anesthetic propofol and the endogenous neurosteroid pregnanolone using whole cell macroscopic recordings. Three mutants, G170A, V175A, and G177A, produced 2.5-, 6.7-, and 5.6-fold increases in GABA EC(50) whereas one mutant, Q185A, produced a 5.2-fold decrease in GABA EC(50). None of the mutations affected the ability of propofol or pregnanolone to potentiate a submaximal GABA response, but the Q185A mutant exhibited 8.3- and 3.5-fold increases in the percent direct activation by propofol and pregnanolone, respectively. Mutant Q185A receptors also had an increased leak current that was sensitive to picrotoxin, indicating an increased gating efficiency. Further Q185E, Q185L, and Q185W substitutions revealed a strong correlation between the hydropathy of the amino acid at this position and the GABA EC(50). Taken together, these results indicate that beta2 Loop 9 is involved in receptor activation by GABA, propofol, and pregnanolone and that beta2(Q185) participates in hydrophilic interactions that are important for stabilizing the closed state of the GABA(A) receptor.

Inverse effects on gating and modulation caused by a mutation in the M2-M3 Linker of the GABA(A) receptor gamma subunit

M2-M3 linkers are receptor subunit domains known to be critical for the normal function of cysteine-loop ligand-gated ion channels. Previous studies of alpha and beta subunits of type "A" GABA receptors suggest that these linkers couple extracellular elements involved in GABA binding to the transmembrane segments that control the opening of the ion channel. To study the importance of the gamma subunit M2-M3 linker, we examined the macroscopic and single-channel effects of an engineered gamma2(L287A) mutation on GABA activation and propofol modulation. In the macroscopic analysis, we found that the gamma2(L287A) mutation decreased GABA potency but increased the ability of propofol to enhance both GABA potency and efficacy compared with wild-type receptors. Indeed, although propofol had significant effects on GABA potency in wild-type receptors, we found that propofol produced no corresponding increase in GABA efficacy. At the single-channel level, mutant receptors showed a loss in the longest of three open-time components compared with wild-type receptors under GABA activation. Furthermore, propofol reduced the duration of one closed-time component, increased the duration of two open-time components, and generated a third open component with a longer lifetime in mutant compared with wild-type receptors. Taken together, we conclude that although the gamma subunit is not required for the binding of GABA or propofol, the M2-M3 linker of this subunit plays a critical role in channel gating by GABA and allosteric modulation by propofol. Our results also suggest that in wild-type receptors, propofol exerts its enhancing effects by mechanisms extrinsic to channel gating.

Ligand-specific conformational changes in the alpha1 glycine receptor ligand-binding domain

Understanding the activation mechanism of Cys loop ion channel receptors is key to understanding their physiological and pharmacological properties under normal and pathological conditions. The ligand-binding domains of these receptors comprise inner and outer beta-sheets and structural studies indicate that channel opening is accompanied by conformational rearrangements in both beta-sheets. In an attempt to resolve ligand-dependent movements in the ligand-binding domain, we employed voltage-clamp fluorometry on alpha1 glycine receptors to compare changes mediated by the agonist, glycine, and by the antagonist, strychnine. Voltage-clamp fluorometry involves labeling introduced cysteines with environmentally sensitive fluorophores and inferring structural rearrangements from ligand-induced fluorescence changes. In the inner beta-sheet, we labeled residues in loop 2 and in binding domain loops D and E. At each position, strychnine and glycine induced distinct maximal fluorescence responses. The pre-M1 domain responded similarly; at each of four labeled positions glycine produced a strong fluorescence signal, whereas strychnine did not. This suggests that glycine induces conformational changes in the inner beta-sheet and pre-M1 domain that may be important for activation, desensitization, or both. In contrast, most labeled residues in loops C and F yielded fluorescence changes identical in magnitude for glycine and strychnine. A notable exception was H201C in loop C. This labeled residue responded differently to glycine and strychnine, thus underlining the importance of loop C in ligand discrimination. These results provide an important step toward mapping the domains crucial for ligand discrimination in the ligand-binding domain of glycine receptors and possibly other Cys loop receptors.

Agonist- and antagonist-induced conformational changes of loop F and their contributions to the rho1 GABA receptor function

Binding of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) to its receptor initiates a conformational change to open the channel, but the mechanism of the channel activation is not well understood. To this end, we scanned loop F (K210-F227) in the N-terminal domain of the rho1 GABA receptor expressed in Xenopus oocytes using a site-specific fluorescence technique. We detected GABA-induced fluorescence changes at six positions (K210, K211, L216, K217, T218 and I222). At these positions the fluorescence changes were dose dependent and highly correlated to the current dose-response, but with lower Hill coefficients. The competitive antagonist 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acid (3-APMPA) induced fluorescence changes in the same direction at the four middle or lower positions. The non-competitive antagonist picrotoxin blocked nearly 50% of GABA-induced fluorescence changes at T218 and I222, but only <20% at K210 and K217 and 0% at K211 and L216 positions. Interestingly, the picrotoxin-blocked fraction of the GABA-induced fluorescence changes was highly correlated to the Hill coefficient of the GABA-induced dose-dependent fluorescence change. The PTX-insensitive mutant L216C exhibited the lowest Hill coefficient, similar to that in binding. Thus, the PTX-sensitive fraction reflects the conformational change related to channel gating, whereas the PTX-insensitive fraction represents a binding effect. The binding effect is further supported by the picrotoxin resistance of a competitive antagonist-induced fluorescence change. A cysteine accessibility test further confirmed that L216C and K217C partially line the binding pocket, and I222C became more exposed by GABA. Our results are consistent with a mechanism that an outward movement of the lower part of loop F is coupled to the channel activation.

Distinct structural changes in the GABAA receptor elicited by pentobarbital and GABA

The barbiturate pentobarbital binds to gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptors, and this interaction plays an important role in the anesthetic action of this drug. Depending on its concentration, pentobarbital can potentiate (approximately 10-100 microM), activate (approximately 100-800 microM), or block (approximately 1-10 mM) the channel, but the mechanisms underlying these three distinct actions are poorly understood. To investigate the drug-induced structural rearrangements in the GABA(A) receptor, we labeled cysteine mutant receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes with the sulfhydryl-reactive, environmentally sensitive fluorescent probe tetramethylrhodamine-6-maleimide (TMRM). We then used combined voltage clamp and fluorometry to monitor pentobarbital-induced channel activity and local protein movements simultaneously in real time. High concentrations of pentobarbital induced a decrease in TMRM fluorescence (F(TMRM)) of labels tethered to two residues in the extracellular domain (alpha(1)L127C and beta(2)L125C) that have been shown previously to produce an increase in F(TMRM) in response to GABA. Label at beta(2)K274C in the extracellular end of the M2 transmembrane helix reported a small but significant F(TMRM) increase during application of low modulating pentobarbital concentrations, and it showed a much greater F(TMRM) increase at higher concentrations. In contrast, GABA decreased F(TMRM) at this site. These results indicate that GABA and pentobarbital induce different structural rearrangements in the receptor, and thus activate the receptor by different mechanisms. Labels at alpha(1)L127C and beta(2)K274C change their fluorescence by substantial amounts during channel blockade by pentobarbital. In contrast, picrotoxin blockade produces no change in F(TMRM) at these sites, and the pattern of F(TMRM) signals elicited by the antagonist SR95531 differs from that produced by other antagonists. Thus, with either channel block by antagonists or activation by agonists, the structural changes in the GABA(A) receptor protein differ during transitions that are functionally equivalent.

Structural determinants for antagonist pharmacology that distinguish the rho1 GABAC receptor from GABAA receptors

GABA receptor (GABAR) types C (GABACR) and A (GABAAR) are both GABA-gated chloride channels that are distinguished by their distinct competitive antagonist properties. The structural mechanism underlying these distinct properties is not well understood. In this study, using previously identified binding residues as a guide, we made individual or combined mutations of nine binding residues in the rho1 GABACR subunit to their counterparts in the alpha1beta2gamma2 GABAAR or reverse mutations in alpha1 or beta2 subunits. The mutants were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and tested for sensitivities of GABA-induced currents to the GABAA and GABAC receptor antagonists. The results revealed that bicuculline insensitivity of the rho1 GABACR was mainly determined by Tyr106, Phe138 and Phe240 residues. Gabazine insensitivity of the rho1 GABACR was highly dependent on Tyr102, Tyr106, and Phe138. The sensitivity of the rho1 GABACR to 3-aminopropyl-phosphonic acid and its analog 3-aminopropyl-(methyl)phosphinic acid mainly depended on residues Tyr102, Val140, FYS240-242, and Phe138. Thus, the residues Tyr102, Tyr106, Phe138, and Phe240 in the rho1 GABACR are major determinants for its antagonist properties distinct from those in the GABAAR. In addition, Val140 in the GABACR contributes to 3-APA binding. In conclusion, we have identified the key structural elements underlying distinct antagonist properties for the GABACR. The mechanistic insights were further extended and discussed in the context of antagonists docking to the homology models of GABAA or GABAC receptors.

Estimating the efficiency of benzodiazepines on GABA(A) receptors comprising gamma1 or gamma2 subunits

Background and purpose:

Heterologous expression of α1, β2 and γ2S(γ1) subunits produces a mixed population of GABA_A receptors containing α1β2 or α1β2γ2S(γ1) subunits. GABA sensitivity (lower in receptors containing γ1 or γ2S subunits) and the potentiation of GABA-activated chloride currents (I_GABA) by benzodiazepines (BZDs) are dependent on γ2S(γ1) incorporation. A variable γ subunit incorporation may affect the estimation of I_GABA potentiation by BZDs. We propose an approach for estimation of BZD efficiency that accounts for mixed population of α1β2 and α1β2γ2S(γ1) receptors.

Experimental approach:

We investigated the relation between GABA sensitivity (EC₅₀) and BZD modulation by analysing triazolam-, clotiazepam- and midazolam-induced potentiation of I_GABA in Xenopus oocytes under two-microelectrode voltage clamp.

Key results:

Plotting EC₅₀ versus BZD-induced shifts of GABA concentration-response curves (ΔEC₅₀(BZD)) of oocytes injected with different amounts of α1, β2 and γ2S(γ1) cRNA (1:1:1–1:1:10) revealed a linear regression between γ2S(γ1)-mediated reduction of GABA sensitivity (EC₅₀) and ΔEC₅₀(BZD). The slope factors of the regression were always higher for oocytes expressing α1β2γ1 subunit receptors (1.8±0.1 (triazolam), 1.6±0.1 (clotiazepam), 2.3±0.2 (midazolam)) than for oocytes expressing α1β2γ2S receptors (1.4±0.1 (triazolam), 1.4±0.1 (clotiazepam), 1.3±0.1 (midazolam)). Mutant GABA_A receptors (α1β2-R207Cγ2S) with lower GABA sensitivity showed higher drug efficiencies (slope factors=1.1±0.1 (triazolam), 1.1±0.1 (clotiazepam), 1.2±0.1 (midazolam)).

Conclusions and implications:

Regression analysis enabled the estimation of BZD efficiency when variable mixtures of α1β2 and α1β2γ2S(γ1) receptors are expressed and provided new insights into the γ2S(γ1) dependency of BZD action.

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and pentobarbital induce different conformational rearrangements in the GABA A receptor alpha1 and beta2 pre-M1 regions

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) binding to GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) triggers conformational movements in the alpha(1) and beta(2) pre-M1 regions that are associated with channel gating. At high concentrations, the barbiturate pentobarbital opens GABA(A)R channels with similar conductances as GABA, suggesting that their open state structures are alike. Little, however, is known about the structural rearrangements induced by barbiturates. Here, we examined whether pentobarbital activation triggers movements in the GABA(A)R pre-M1 regions. Alpha(1)beta(2) GABA(A)Rs containing cysteine substitutions in the pre-M1 alpha(1) (K219C, K221C) and beta(2) (K213C, K215C) subunits were expressed in Xenopus oocytes and analyzed using two-electrode voltage clamp. The cysteine substitutions had little to no effect on GABA and pentobarbital EC(50) values. Tethering chemically diverse thiol-reactive methanethiosulfonate reagents onto alpha(1)K219C and alpha(1)K221C affected GABA- and pentobarbital-activated currents differently, suggesting that the pre-M1 structural elements important for GABA and pentobarbital current activation are distinct. Moreover, pentobarbital altered the rates of cysteine modification by methanethiosulfonate reagents differently than GABA. For alpha(1)K221Cbeta(2) receptors, pentobarbital decreased the rate of cysteine modification whereas GABA had no effect. For alpha(1)beta(2)K215C receptors, pentobarbital had no effect whereas GABA increased the modification rate. The competitive GABA antagonist SR-95531 and a low, non-activating concentration of pentobarbital did not alter their modification rates, suggesting that the GABA- and pentobarbital-mediated changes in rates reflect gating movements. Overall, the data indicate that the pre-M1 region is involved in both GABA- and pentobarbital-mediated gating transitions. Pentobarbital, however, triggers different movements in this region than GABA, suggesting their activation mechanisms differ.

Structural mechanisms underlying benzodiazepine modulation of the GABA(A) receptor

Many clinically important drugs target ligand-gated ion channels; however, the mechanisms by which these drugs modulate channel function remain elusive. Benzodiazepines (BZDs), anesthetics, and barbiturates exert their CNS actions by binding to GABA(A) receptors and modulating their function. The structural mechanisms by which BZD binding is transduced to potentiation or inhibition of GABA-induced current (I(GABA)) are essentially unknown. Here, we explored the role of the gamma(2)Q182-R197 region (Loop F/9) in the modulation of I(GABA) by positive (flurazepam, zolpidem) and negative [3-carbomethoxy-4-ethyl-6,7-dimethoxy-beta-carboline (DMCM)] BZD ligands. Each residue was individually mutated to cysteine, coexpressed with wild-type alpha(1) and beta(2) subunits in Xenopus oocytes, and analyzed using two-electrode voltage clamp. Individual mutations differentially affected BZD modulation of I(GABA). Mutations affecting positive modulation span the length of this region, whereas gamma(2)W183C at the beginning of Loop F was the only mutation that adversely affected DMCM inhibition. Radioligand binding experiments demonstrate that mutations in this region do not alter BZD binding, indicating that the observed changes in modulation result from changes in BZD efficacy. Flurazepam and zolpidem significantly slowed covalent modification of gamma(2)R197C, whereas DMCM, GABA, and the allosteric modulator pentobarbital had no effects, demonstrating that gamma(2)Loop F is a specific transducer of positive BZD modulator binding. Therefore, gamma(2)Loop F plays a key role in defining BZD efficacy and is part of the allosteric pathway allowing positive BZD modulator-induced structural changes at the BZD binding site to propagate through the protein to the channel domain.

The F-loop of the GABA A receptor gamma2 subunit contributes to benzodiazepine modulation

GABA(A) receptors can be modulated by benzodiazepines, although these compounds do not directly activate or inhibit the receptors. The prototypic benzodiazepine, diazepam, potentiates responses to GABA in GABA(A) receptors that contain a gamma subunit. Here we have used mutagenesis, radioligand binding, voltage clamp electrophysiology, and homology modeling to probe the role of the F-loop residues Asp(192)-Arg(197) in the GABA(A) receptor gamma(2) subunit in diazepam potentiation of the GABA response. Substitution of all of these residues with Ala and/or a residue with similar chemical properties to the wild type residue decreased the level of diazepam potentiation, and one mutation (D192A) resulted in its complete ablation. None of the mutations changed the GABA EC(50) or the [(3)H]flumazenil binding affinity, suggesting they do not affect GABA or benzodiazepine binding characteristics; we therefore propose that they are involved in the diazepam-mediated conformational change that results in an increased response to GABA. Homology models of the receptor binding pocket in agonist-bound and unbound states suggest that the F-loop is flexible and has different orientations in the two states. Considering our data in relation to these models, we find that the F-loop residues could contribute to hydrogen bond networks and hydrophobic interactions with neighboring residues that change during receptor activation.

Exploring ligand recognition and ion flow in comparative models of the human GABA type A receptor

We present two comparative models of the GABA(A) receptor. Model 1 is based on the 4-A resolution structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata and represents the unliganded receptor. Two agonists, GABA and muscimol, two benzodiazepines, flunitrazepam and alprazolam, together with the general anaesthetic halothane, have been docked to this model. The ion flow is also explored in model 1 by evaluating the interaction energy of a chloride ion as it traverses the extracellular, transmembrane and intracellular domains of the protein. Model 2 differs from model 1 only in the extracellular domain and represents the liganded receptor. Comparison between the two models not only allows us to explore commonalities and differences with comparative models of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, but also suggests possible protein sub-domain interactions with the GABA(A) receptor not previously addressed.