The regulatory element in the 3'-untranslated region of human papillomavirus 16 inhibits expression by binding CUG-binding protein 1

Identifying regulatory elements and their RNA-binding proteins in the 3' untranslated regions of papillomavirus late mRNAs

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) infect cutaneous and mucosal epithelia to cause benign (warts) and malignant lesions (e.g. cervical cancer). Bovine papillomaviruses (BPVs) infect fibroblasts to cause fibropapillomas but can also infect cutaneous epithelial cells. For HPV-1, -16, -31 and BPV-1, cis-acting RNA elements in the late 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) control expression of virus proteins by binding host cell proteins. The present study compared the effects on gene expression of the cis-acting elements of seven PV late 3'UTRs (HPV-6b, -11, -16, -31 and BPV-1, -3 and -4) representing a range of different genera and species and pathological properties. pSV-beta-galactosidase reporter plasmids containing the late 3'UTRs from seven PVs were transiently transfected into cervical adenocarcinoma HeLa cells, and reporter gene expression quantified by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and a beta-galactosidase assay. All elements inhibited gene expression in keratinocytes. Cancer-related types HPV-16 and -31, had the greatest inhibitory activity whereas the lowest inhibition was found in the non-cancer related types, BPV-3 and HPV-11. Using RBPmap version 1.1, bioinformatics predictions of factors binding the elements identified proteins which function mainly in mRNA splicing. Markedly, in terms of protein binding motifs, BPV late 3'UTR elements were similar to those of HPV-1a but not to other HPVs. Using HPV-1a as a model and siRNA depletion, the bioinformatics predictions were tested and it was found that PABPC4 was responsible for some of the 3'UTR repressive activity. The data revealed candidate proteins that could control PV late gene expression.

HPV and RNA Binding Proteins: What We Know and What Remains to Be Discovered

Papillomavirus gene regulation is largely post-transcriptional due to overlapping open reading frames and the use of alternative polyadenylation and alternative splicing to produce the full suite of viral mRNAs. These processes are controlled by a wide range of cellular RNA binding proteins (RPBs), including constitutive splicing factors and cleavage and polyadenylation machinery, but also factors that regulate these processes, for example, SR and hnRNP proteins. Like cellular RNAs, papillomavirus RNAs have been shown to bind many such proteins. The life cycle of papillomaviruses is intimately linked to differentiation of the epithelial tissues the virus infects. For example, viral late mRNAs and proteins are expressed only in the most differentiated epithelial layers to avoid recognition by the host immune response. Papillomavirus genome replication is linked to the DNA damage response and viral chromatin conformation, processes which also link to RNA processing. Challenges with respect to elucidating how RBPs regulate the viral life cycle include consideration of the orchestrated spatial aspect of viral gene expression in an infected epithelium and the epigenetic nature of the viral episomal genome. This review discusses RBPs that control viral gene expression, and how the connectivity of various nuclear processes might contribute to viral mRNA production.

The human papillomavirus late life cycle and links to keratinocyte differentiation

Regulation of human papillomavirus (HPV) gene expression is tightly linked to differentiation of the keratinocytes the virus infects. HPV late gene expression is confined to the cells in the upper layers of the epithelium where the virus capsid proteins are synthesized. As these proteins are highly immunogenic, and the upper epithelium is an immune-privileged site, this spatial restriction aids immune evasion. Many decades of work have contributed to the current understanding of how this restriction occurs at a molecular level. This review will examine what is known about late gene expression in HPV-infected lesions and will dissect the intricacies of late gene regulation. Future directions for novel antiviral approaches will be highlighted.

The role of RNA-binding proteins in the processing of mRNAs produced by carcinogenic papillomaviruses

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are epitheliotropic DNA tumor viruses that are prevalent in the human population. A subset of the HPVs termed high-risk HPVs (HR-HPVs) are causative agents of anogenital cancers and head-and-neck cancers. Cancer is the result of persistent high-risk HPV infections that have not been cleared by the immune system of the host. These infections are characterized by dysregulated HPV gene expression, in particular constitutive high expression of the HPV E6 and E7 oncogenes and absence of the highly immunogenic viral L1 and L2 capsid proteins. HPVs make extensive use of alternative mRNA splicing to express its genes and are therefore highly dependent on cellular RNA-binding proteins for proper gene expression. Levels of RNA-binding proteins are altered in HPV-containing premalignant cervical lesions and in cervical cancer. Here we review our current knowledge of RNA-binding proteins that control HPV gene expression. We focus on RNA-binding proteins that control expression of the E6 and E7 oncogenes since they initiate and drive development of cancer and on the immunogenic L1 and L2 proteins as there silencing may contribute to immune evasion during carcinogenesis. Furthermore, cellular RNA-binding proteins are essential for HPV gene expression and as such may be targets for therapy to HPV infections and HPV-driven cancers.

HPV16 and HPV18 Genome Structure, Expression, and Post-Transcriptional Regulation

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are a group of small non-enveloped DNA viruses whose infection causes benign tumors or cancers. HPV16 and HPV18, the two most common high-risk HPVs, are responsible for ~70% of all HPV-related cervical cancers and head and neck cancers. The expression of the HPV genome is highly dependent on cell differentiation and is strictly regulated at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Both HPV early and late transcripts differentially expressed in the infected cells are intron-containing bicistronic or polycistronic RNAs bearing more than one open reading frame (ORF), because of usage of alternative viral promoters and two alternative viral RNA polyadenylation signals. Papillomaviruses proficiently engage alternative RNA splicing to express individual ORFs from the bicistronic or polycistronic RNA transcripts. In this review, we discuss the genome structures and the updated transcription maps of HPV16 and HPV18, and the latest research advances in understanding RNA cis-elements, intron branch point sequences, and RNA-binding proteins in the regulation of viral RNA processing. Moreover, we briefly discuss the epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation and possible APOBEC-mediated genome editing in HPV infections and carcinogenesis.

Small molecule targeting CELF1 RNA-binding activity to control HSC activation and liver fibrosis

CUGBP Elav-like family member 1 (CELF1), an RNA-binding protein (RBP), plays important roles in the pathogenesis of diseases such as myotonic dystrophy, liver fibrosis and cancers. However, targeting CELF1 is still a challenge, as RBPs are considered largely undruggable. Here, we discovered that compound 27 disrupted CELF1-RNA binding via structure-based virtual screening and biochemical assays. Compound 27 binds directly to CELF1 and competes with RNA for binding to CELF1. Compound 27 promotes IFN-γ secretion and suppresses TGF-β1-induced hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation by inhibiting CELF1-mediated IFN-γ mRNA decay. In vivo, compound 27 attenuates CCl4-induced murine liver fibrosis. Furthermore, the structure-activity relationship analysis was performed and compound 841, a derivative of compound 27, was identified as a selective CELF1 inhibitor. In conclusion, targeting CELF1 RNA-binding activity with small molecules was achieved, which provides a novel strategy for treating liver fibrosis and other CELF1-mediated diseases.

Role of Viral Ribonucleoproteins in Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Gene Expression

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) depend on the cellular RNA-processing machineries including alternative RNA splicing and polyadenylation to coordinate HPV gene expression. HPV RNA processing is controlled by cis-regulatory RNA elements and trans-regulatory factors since the HPV splice sites are suboptimal. The definition of HPV exons and introns may differ between individual HPV mRNA species and is complicated by the fact that many HPV protein-coding sequences overlap. The formation of HPV ribonucleoproteins consisting of HPV pre-mRNAs and multiple cellular RNA-binding proteins may result in the different outcomes of HPV gene expression, which contributes to the HPV life cycle progression and HPV-associated cancer development. In this review, we summarize the regulation of HPV16 gene expression at the level of RNA processing with focus on the interactions between HPV16 pre-mRNAs and cellular RNA-binding factors.

Keratinocyte Differentiation-Dependent Human Papillomavirus Gene Regulation

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) cause diseases ranging from benign warts to invasive cancers. HPVs infect epithelial cells and their replication cycle is tightly linked with the differentiation process of the infected keratinocyte. The normal replication cycle involves an early and a late phase. The early phase encompasses viral entry and initial genome replication, stimulation of cell division and inhibition of apoptosis in the infected cell. Late events in the HPV life cycle include viral genome amplification, virion formation, and release into the environment from the surface of the epithelium. The main proteins required at the late stage of infection for viral genome amplification include E1, E2, E4 and E5. The late proteins L1 and L2 are structural proteins that form the viral capsid. Regulation of these late events involves both cellular and viral proteins. The late viral mRNAs are expressed from a specific late promoter but final late mRNA levels in the infected cell are controlled by splicing, polyadenylation, nuclear export and RNA stability. Viral late protein expression is also controlled at the level of translation. This review will discuss current knowledge of how HPV late gene expression is regulated.

Splicing and Polyadenylation of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 mRNAs

The human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) life cycle can be divided into an early stage in which the HPV16 genomic DNA is replicated, and a late stage in which the HPV16 structural proteins are synthesized and virions are produced. A strong coupling between the viral life cycle and the differentiation state of the infected cell is highly characteristic of all HPVs. The switch from the HPV16 early gene expression program to the late requires a promoter switch, a polyadenylation signal switch and a shift in alternative splicing. A number of cis-acting RNA elements on the HPV16 mRNAs and cellular and viral factors interacting with these elements are involved in the control of HPV16 gene expression. This review summarizes our knowledge of HPV16 cis-acting RNA elements and cellular and viral trans-acting factors that regulate HPV16 gene expression at the level of splicing and polyadenylation.

Identifying proteins that bind to specific RNAs - focus on simple repeat expansion diseases

RNA–protein complexes play a central role in the regulation of fundamental cellular processes, such as mRNA splicing, localization, translation and degradation. The misregulation of these interactions can cause a variety of human diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. Recently, many strategies have been developed to comprehensively analyze these complex and highly dynamic RNA–protein networks. Extensive efforts have been made to purify in vivo-assembled RNA–protein complexes. In this review, we focused on commonly used RNA-centric approaches that involve mass spectrometry, which are powerful tools for identifying proteins bound to a given RNA. We present various RNA capture strategies that primarily depend on whether the RNA of interest is modified. Moreover, we briefly discuss the advantages and limitations of in vitro and in vivo approaches. Furthermore, we describe recent advances in quantitative proteomics as well as the methods that are most commonly used to validate robust mass spectrometry data. Finally, we present approaches that have successfully identified expanded repeat-binding proteins, which present abnormal RNA–protein interactions that result in the development of many neurological diseases.

RNA Binding Proteins that Control Human Papillomavirus Gene Expression

The human papillomavirus (HPV) life cycle is strictly linked to the differentiation program of the infected mucosal epithelial cell. In the basal and lower levels of the epithelium, early genes coding for pro-mitotic proteins and viral replication factors are expressed, while terminal cell differentiation is required for activation of late gene expression and production of viral particles at the very top of the epithelium. Such productive infections are normally cleared within 18–24 months. In rare cases, the HPV infection is stuck in the early stage of the infection. Such infections may give rise to cervical lesions that can progress to cancer, primarily cancer of the uterine cervix. Since cancer progression is strictly linked to HPV gene expression, it is of interest to understand how HPV gene expression is regulated. Cis-acting HPV RNA elements and cellular RNA-binding proteins control HPV mRNA splicing and polyadenylation. These interactions are believed to play a particularly important role in the switch from early to late gene expression, thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of HPV. Indeed, it has been shown that the levels of various RNA binding proteins change in response to differentiation and in response to HPV induced cervical lesions and cancer. Here we have compiled published data on RNA binding proteins involved in the regulation of HPV gene expression.

Ribonomic approaches to study the RNA-binding proteome

Gene expression is controlled through a complex interplay among mRNAs, non-coding RNAs and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), which all assemble along with other RNA-associated factors in dynamic and functional ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs). To date, our understanding of RBPs is largely limited to proteins with known or predicted RNA-binding domains. However, various methods have been recently developed to capture an RNA of interest and comprehensively identify its associated RBPs. In this review, we discuss the RNA-affinity purification methods followed by mass spectrometry analysis (AP-MS); RBP screening within protein libraries and computational methods that can be used to study the RNA-binding proteome (RBPome).

Mass spectrometry-based identification of proteins interacting with nucleic acids

The identification of the regulatory proteins that control DNA transcription as well as RNA stability and translation represents a key step in the comprehension of gene expression regulation. Those proteins can be purified by DNA- or RNA-affinity chromatography, followed by identification by mass spectrometry. Although very simple in the concept, this represents a real technological challenge due to the low abundance of regulatory proteins compared to the highly abundant proteins binding to nucleic acids in a nonsequence-specific manner. Here we review the different strategies that have been set up to reach this purpose, discussing the key parameters that should be considered to increase the chances of success. Typically, two categories of biological questions can be distinguished: the identification of proteins that specifically interact with a precisely defined binding site, mostly addressed by quantitative mass spectrometry, and the identification in a non-comparative manner of the protein complexes recruited by a poorly characterized long regulatory region of nucleic acids. Finally, beside the numerous studies devoted to in vitro-assembled nucleic acid-protein complexes, the scarce data reported on proteomic analyses of in vivo-assembled complexes are described, with a special emphasis on the associated challenges.

Papillomavirus transcripts and posttranscriptional regulation

Papillomavirus gene expression is strictly linked to the differentiation state of the infected cell and is highly regulated at the level of transcription and RNA processing. All papillomaviruses make extensive use of alternative mRNA polyadenylation and splicing to control gene expression. This chapter contains a compilation of all known alternatively spliced papillomavirus mRNAs and it summarizes our current knowledge of viral RNA elements, and viral and cellular factors that control papillomavirus mRNA processing.

U1 snRNP-mediated poly(A) site suppression: beneficial and deleterious for mRNA fate

The spliceosomal component U1snRNP commits pre-mRNAs to the splicing pathway. Recently, a nuclear RNA surveillance function has been ascribed to U1, namely the suppression of intronic polyadenylation sites. This surveillance holds regulatory potential as it alters the 3' ends of certain receptor tyrosine kinase mRNAs. However, suppression of 3' end processing by U1 snRNP is also the cause of a severe genetic disorder. We described a 3'UTR point mutation creating a 5'SS leading to U1-mediated suppression of 3' end formation. Thus, the inhibitory function of U1 is both beneficial and deleterious where misled. The exact mechanism of how U1 interferes with 3' end processing remains unclear. According to our data, U1 snRNP already interferes with cleavage or poly(A) site selection instead of directly inhibiting poly(A) polymerase as previously assumed. Here, we present alternative models for U1-mediated poly(A) site suppression and discuss the implications for RNA quality control and disease-related mutations.

A complex immunodeficiency is based on U1 snRNP-mediated poly(A) site suppression

Biallelic mutations in the untranslated regions (UTRs) of mRNAs are rare causes for monogenetic diseases whose mechanisms remain poorly understood. We investigated a 3'UTR mutation resulting in a complex immunodeficiency syndrome caused by decreased mRNA levels of p14/robld3 by a previously unknown mechanism. Here, we show that the mutation creates a functional 5' splice site (SS) and that its recognition by the spliceosomal component U1 snRNP causes p14 mRNA suppression in the absence of splicing. Histone processing signals are able to rescue p14 expression. Therefore, the mutation interferes only with canonical poly(A)-site 3' end processing. Our data suggest that U1 snRNP inhibits cleavage or poly(A) site recognition. This is the first description of a 3'UTR mutation that creates a functional 5'SS causative of a monogenetic disease. Moreover, our data endorse the recently described role of U1 snRNP in suppression of intronic poly(A) sites, which is here deleterious for p14 mRNA biogenesis.

Productive Lifecycle of Human Papillomaviruses that Depends Upon Squamous Epithelial Differentiation

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) target the stratified epidermis, and can causes diseases ranging from benign condylomas to malignant tumors. Infections of HPVs in the genital tract are among the most common sexually transmitted diseases, and a major risk factor for cervical cancer. The virus targets epithelial cells in the basal layer of the epithelium, while progeny virions egress from terminally differentiated cells in the cornified layer, the surface layer of the epithelium. In infected basal cells, the virus maintains its genomic DNA at low-copy numbers, at which the viral productive lifecycle cannot proceed. Progression of the productive lifecycle requires differentiation of the host cell, indicating that there is tight crosstalk between viral replication and host differentiation programs. In this review, we discuss the regulation of the HPV lifecycle controlled by the differentiation program of the host cells.

Serine/arginine-rich protein 30c activates human papillomavirus type 16 L1 mRNA expression via a bimodal mechanism

Two splice sites on the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) genome are used exclusively by the late capsid protein L1 mRNAs: SD3632 and SA5639. These splice sites are suppressed in mitotic cells. This study showed that serine/arginine-rich protein 30c (SRp30c), also named SFRS9, activated both SD3632 and SA5639 and induced production of L1 mRNA. Activation of HPV-16 L1 mRNA splicing by SRp30c required an intact arginine/serine-repeat (RS) domain of SRp30c. In addition to this effect, SRp30c could enhance L1 mRNA production indirectly by inhibiting the early 3′-splice site SA3358, which competed with the late 3′-splice site SA5639. SRp30c bound directly to sequences downstream of SA3358, suggesting that SRp30c inhibited the enhancer at SA3358 and caused a redirection of splicing to the late 3′-splice site SA5639. This inhibitory effect of SRp30c was independent of its RS domain. These results suggest that SRp30c can activate HPV-16 L1 mRNA expression via a bimodal mechanism: directly by stimulating splicing to late splice sites and indirectly by inhibiting competing early splice sites.

Structural insights into RNA recognition by the alternate-splicing regulator CUG-binding protein 1

CUG-binding protein 1 (CUGBP1) regulates multiple aspects of nuclear and cytoplasmic mRNA processing, with implications for onset of myotonic dystrophy. CUGBP1 harbors three RRM domains and preferentially targets UGU-rich mRNA elements. We describe crystal structures of CUGBP1 RRM1 and tandem RRM1/2 domains bound to RNAs containing tandem UGU(U/G) elements. Both RRM1 in RRM1-RNA and RRM2 in RRM1/2-RNA complexes use similar principles to target UGU(U/G) elements, with recognition mediated by face-to-edge stacking and water-mediated hydrogen-bonding networks. The UG step adopts a left-handed Z-RNA conformation, with the syn guanine recognized through Hoogsteen edge-protein backbone hydrogen-bonding interactions. NMR studies on the RRM1/2-RNA complex establish that both RRM domains target tandem UGUU motifs in solution, whereas filter-binding assays identify a preference for recognition of GU over AU or GC steps. We discuss the implications of CUGBP1-mediated targeting and sequestration of UGU(U/G) elements on pre-mRNA alternative-splicing regulation, translational regulation, and mRNA decay.

iTriplet, a rule-based nucleic acid sequence motif finder

Background

With the advent of high throughput sequencing techniques, large amounts of sequencing data are readily available for analysis. Natural biological signals are intrinsically highly variable making their complete identification a computationally challenging problem. Many attempts in using statistical or combinatorial approaches have been made with great success in the past. However, identifying highly degenerate and long (>20 nucleotides) motifs still remains an unmet challenge as high degeneracy will diminish statistical significance of biological signals and increasing motif size will cause combinatorial explosion. In this report, we present a novel rule-based method that is focused on finding degenerate and long motifs. Our proposed method, named iTriplet, avoids costly enumeration present in existing combinatorial methods and is amenable to parallel processing.

Results

We have conducted a comprehensive assessment on the performance and sensitivity-specificity of iTriplet in analyzing artificial and real biological sequences in various genomic regions. The results show that iTriplet is able to solve challenging cases. Furthermore we have confirmed the utility of iTriplet by showing it accurately predicts polyA-site-related motifs using a dual Luciferase reporter assay.

Conclusion

iTriplet is a novel rule-based combinatorial or enumerative motif finding method that is able to process highly degenerate and long motifs that have resisted analysis by other methods. In addition, iTriplet is distinguished from other methods of the same family by its parallelizability, which allows it to leverage the power of today's readily available high-performance computing systems.

Analysis of transcripts from predicted open reading frames of Musca domestica salivary gland hypertrophy virus

The Musca domestica salivary gland hypertrophy virus (MdSGHV) is a large dsDNA virus that infects and sterilizes adult houseflies. The transcriptome of this newly described virus was analysed by rapid amplification of cDNA 3'-ends (3'-RACE) and RT-PCR. Direct sequencing of 3'-RACE products revealed 78 poly(A) transcripts containing 95 of the 108 putative ORFs. An additional six ORFs not amplified by 3'-RACE were detected by RT-PCR. Only seven of the 108 putative ORFs were not amplified by either 3'-RACE or RT-PCR. A series of 5'-RACE reactions were conducted on selected ORFs that were identified by 3'-RACE to be transcribed in tandem (tandem transcripts). In the majority of cases, the downstream ORFs were detected as single transcripts as well as components of the tandem transcripts, whereas the upstream ORFs were found only in tandem transcripts. The only exception was the upstream ORF MdSGHV084, which was differentially transcribed as a single transcript at 1 and 2 days post-infection (days p.i.) and as a tandem transcript (MdSGHV084/085) at 2 days p.i. Transcriptome analysis of MdSGHV detected splicing in the 3' untranslated region (3'-UTR) and extensive heterogeneity in the polyadenylation signals and cleavage sites. In addition, 23 overlapping antisense transcripts were found. In conclusion, sequencing the 3'-RACE products without cloning served as an alternative approach to detect both 3'-UTRs and transcript variants of this large DNA virus.

Gene silencing by synthetic U1 adaptors

We describe a gene silencing method that employs a mechanism of action distinct from those of antisense and RNA interference. U1 Adaptors are bifunctional oligonucleotides with a 'target domain' complementary to a site in the target gene's terminal exon and a 'U1 domain' that binds to the U1 small nuclear RNA component of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U1 snRNP) splicing factor. Tethering of U1 snRNP to the target pre-mRNA inhibits poly(A)-tail addition, causing degradation of that RNA species in the nucleus. U1 Adaptors can inhibit both endogenous and reporter genes in a sequence-specific manner. Comparison of U1 Adaptors with small interfering RNA (siRNA) using a genome-wide microarray analysis indicates that U1 Adaptors have limited off-target effects and no detectable adverse effects on splicing. Further, targeting the same gene either with multiple U1 Adaptors or with a U1 Adaptor and siRNA strongly enhances gene silencing.

The RNA stability regulator HuR regulates L1 protein expression in vivo in differentiating cervical epithelial cells

Human papillomavirus (HPV) L1 and L2 capsid protein expression is restricted to the granular layer of infected, stratified epithelia and is regulated at least partly at post-transcriptional levels. For HPV16, a 79 nt late regulatory element (LRE) is involved in this control. Using W12 cells as a model for HPV16-infected differentiating cervical epithelial cells we show that HuR, a key cellular protein that controls mRNA stability, binds the LRE most efficiently in nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts of differentiated cells. Further, HuR binds the 3' U-rich portion of the LRE directly in vitro. Overexpression of HuR in undifferentiated W12 cells results in an increase in L1 mRNA and protein levels while siRNA knock-down of HuR in differentiated W12 cells depletes L1 expression. In differentiated cervical epithelial cells HuR may bind and stabilise L1 mRNAs aiding translation of L1 protein.

Human papillomavirus type 16 E2 protein transcriptionally activates the promoter of a key cellular splicing factor, SF2/ASF

Human papillomavirus (HPV) gene expression is regulated in concert with the epithelial differentiation program. In particular, expression of the virus capsid proteins L1 and L2 is tightly restricted to differentiated epithelial cells. For HPV16, the capsid proteins are encoded by 13 structurally different mRNAs that are produced by extensive alternative splicing. Previously, we demonstrated that upon epithelial differentiation, HPV16 infection upregulates hnRNP A1 and SF2/ASF, both key factors in alternative splicing regulation. Here we cloned a 1-kb region upstream of and including the transcriptional start site of the SF2ASF gene and used it in in vivo transcription assays to demonstrate that the HPV16 E2 transcription factor transactivates the SF2/ASF promoter. The transactivation domain but not the DNA binding domain of the protein is necessary for this. Active E2 association with the promoter was demonstrated using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays indicated that E2 interacted with a region 482 to 684 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site in vitro. This is the first time that HPV16 E2 has been shown to regulate cellular gene expression and the first report of viral regulation of expression of an RNA processing factor. Such E2-mediated control during differentiation of infected epithelial cells may facilitate late capsid protein expression and completion of the virus life cycle.

Alternative polyadenylation: a twist on mRNA 3' end formation

Regulation of gene expression by RNA processing mechanisms is now understood to be an important level of control in mammalian cells. Regulation at the level of RNA transcription, splicing, polyadenylation, nucleo-cytoplasmic transport, and translation into polypeptides has been well-studied. Alternative RNA processing events, such as alternative splicing, also have been recognized as key contributors to the complexity of mammalian gene expression. Pre-messenger RNAs (pre-mRNAs) may be polyadenylated in several different ways due to more than one polyadenylation signal, allowing a single gene to encode multiple mRNA transcripts. However, alternative polyadenylation has only recently taken the field as a major player in gene regulation. This review summarizes what is currently known about alternative polyadenylation. It covers results from bioinformatics, as well as those from investigations of viral and tissue-specific studies and, importantly, will set the stage for what is yet to come.

Posttranscriptional regulation of gene networks by GU-rich elements and CELF proteins

GU-rich elements found in pre-mRNA and mRNA transcripts play diverse roles in the control of gene expression by regulating mRNA stability, translation and pre-mRNA processing. Regulatory GU-rich elements are highly conserved throughout evolution, and play major roles in development in diverse species from worms to mammals. The conservation of the GU-rich element allowed it to be identified as a sequence that was enriched in the 3' UTR of human transcripts that exhibited rapid mRNA decay. This element functions, at least in part, as a molecular target for members of the CELF family of RNA-binding proteins, which recruit other components of the cellular posttranscriptional gene regulatory machinery to the transcript. Depending on the context, binding to GU-rich sequences by CELF proteins direct a variety of posttranscriptional regulatory events, including deadenylation, mRNA decay, translation or pre-mRNA processing. Thus, GU-rich elements and CELF proteins serve multiple functions in gene expression regulation and define an important evolutionarily conserved posttranscriptional regulatory network.