Comparison of two different techniques used for the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue health: a pilot randomized clinical trial

Impact of different chemical debridement agents on early cellular responses to titanium dental implants: A transcriptome-based in vitro study on peri-implant tissue regeneration

BACKGROUND

Poor peri-implant health leads to biofilm accumulation, peri-implantitis, and bone loss. Chemical debridement may help maintain peri-implant health, but its effects on peri-implant cells remain unclear.

METHODS

Five cleaning agents-hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), Poloxamer, H2O2 +Poloxamer, Perisolv, and Paroex-were applied on titanium (Ti) surfaces. Mouse pre-osteoblasts (MC3T3-E1), human gingival fibroblasts (HGF), and human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSC) were cultured on agent-treated Ti surfaces for up to 120 minutes to assess morphology, cytotoxicity, adhesion, and proliferation. RNA sequencing was performed on hBMSC.

RESULTS

Except for Poloxamer, all treatments inhibited cellular spreading. Paroex increased cytotoxicity and inhibited proliferation. Perisolv impaired hBMSC adhesion and variably affected proliferation. H2O2, alone or with Poloxamer, elevated cytotoxicity and inhibited adhesion in hBMSCs but not MC3T3-E1 or HGF. In contrast, Poloxamer-treated Ti surfaces enhanced adhesion and proliferation across all cell types. RNA sequencing revealed that oxidant-based treatments (H2O2, H2O2 +Poloxamer, Perisolv) suppressed key genes for proliferation (HMGA2, JAG1, NOTCH1, YAP1, TBX3), anti-apoptosis (MCL1, BCL2L2), and adhesion (ITGA2, ITGB3, SPP1), while inhibiting MAPK, PI3K-Akt, and pluripotency pathways.

CONCLUSION

Commercial agents like Perisolv and Paroex impair hBMSC function, with Paroex demonstrating significant cytotoxicity. H2O2 exhibits toxicity, particularly to hBMSCs. Poloxamer improves cell attachment and growth. Given these findings, careful selection of debridement agents is critical to balance cleaning efficacy and cytocompatibility. The adverse effects on hBMSCs necessitate prompt removal postapplication. Further research on biomaterials supporting tissue regeneration postdebridement is needed to restore peri-implant health.

The effects of anodization and instrumentation on titanium abutment surface characteristics and biofilm formation

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of anodization and instrumentation on titanium abutment surface characteristics (surface roughness and wettability) and biofilm formation (viability and mass).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Titanium discs were obtained from pre-milled abutment blanks made of titanium-6aluminum-7niobium alloy. Polished samples were divided into three groups: un-anodized, gold-anodized, and pink-anodized. Instrumentation methods included no-instrumentation, air polishing, and titanium scaling treatment. Surface roughness was measured using an optical profilometer, and wettability was determined by measuring the contact angles using the sessile drop method with an optical tensiometer. Biofilm formation by Streptococcus sanguinis was evaluated based on the biofilm viability and mass. The biofilm viability was evaluated through colony-forming unit counting (CFU/mL), and biofilm mass was assessed with crystal violet staining (mean absorbance measured at 490 nm, in optical density values). Sample surfaces before and after biofilm formation were also examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Two-way ANOVA was performed to determine the group differences, and Spearman's correlation (ρ) was used to analyze the correlation among surface roughness, wettability, and CFU/mL (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Pink anodization significantly increased surface roughness (0.38 ± 0.07 µm, p < 0.001) compared to un-anodized samples (0.25 ± 0.01 µm), while gold anodization did not (0.24 ± 0.03 µm, p = 0.301). Among pink-anodized groups, air polishing resulted in significantly lower surface roughness (0.33 ± 0.08 µm) compared to titanium scaling (0.51 ± 0.11 µm, p < 0.001) and no instrument treatment (0.38 ± 0.07 µm, p = 0.050). Anodization significantly increased wettability (p < 0.001), while instrumentation with a titanium scaling decreased it (p < 0.001). The combination of un-anodized samples and titanium scaling treatment showed the lowest wettability with the highest contact angle (70.72 ± 2.63°). The biofilm viability, measured by CFU/mL, was significantly inhibited by anodization (p < 0.001) and air polishing (p < 0.001) while promoted by titanium scaling (p < 0.001). Gold-anodized titanium discs subjected to air polishing exhibited the lowest CFU/mL (279,420 ± 16,300), while un-anodized samples instrumented with a titanium scaler had the highest CFU/mL (945,580 ± 13,580). Biofilm mass, quantified by optical density values, was significantly inhibited by anodization (p < 0.001) as well as air polishing (p = 0.001). A moderate negative correlation was observed between CFU and wettability (ρ = -0.55, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Gold- and pink-anodized titanium surfaces were more hydrophilic, leading to less biofilm formation than un-anodized ones. Biofilm formation was inhibited by air polishing while promoted by titanium scaling. Gold anodization combined with air polishing had the least biofilm formation and can be considered the preferred abutment anodization/instrumentation combination.

The clinical efficacy of powder air-polishing in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implant diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Peri-implant diseases, characterized by inflammatory conditions affecting peri-implant tissues, encompass peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Peri-implant mucositis is an inflammatory lesion limited to the mucosa around an implant, while peri-implantitis extends from the mucosa to the supporting bone, causing a loss of osseointegration. For non-surgical treatments, we tested the null hypothesis that the presence or absence of air-polishing made no difference. The study focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing air-polishing with mechanical or ultrasonic debridement, evaluating outcomes such as bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), plaque index/plaque score (PI/PS), clinical attachment level (CAL), bone loss, and mucosal recession (MR). Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and quality assessments, considering short-term (<6 months) and long-term (≥6 months) follow-up periods. After screening, ten articles were included in the meta-analysis. In nonsurgical peri-implant disease management, air-polishing moderately mitigated short-term PI/PS for peri-implant mucositis and showed a similar improvement in long-term BOP and bone loss for peri-implantitis compared to the control group. The Egger test found no evidence of publication bias except for the long-term PI/PS of peri-implant mucositis. Leave-one-out analysis confirmed the stability of the results. The findings highlight the need for future research with longer-term follow-up and high-quality, multi-center, large-sample RCTs.

Long-term Implant Maintenance: A Systematic Review of Home and Professional Care Strategies in Supportive Implant Therapy

The aim of this study is review the efficacy of different techniques of home care and professional care for long-term implant maintenance, when compared with their respective standard procedures (regular brushing or mechanical debridement with curette), in changing clinical parameters, such as bleeding on probing, probing depth, plaque score and gingival index, as reported in randomized clinical trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search of randomized clinical trials was performed using the PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and Cochrane library databases. A qualitative review was conducted to compare all the different techniques of home care and professional care for long-term implant maintenance.

RESULTS

Initial search involved a total of 816 articles, 233 via Pubmed (Medline), 306 via the Cochrane Library, and 483 via EMBASE, while an additional 16 articles were collected through manual screening. A total of 29 articles were assessed by full-text read for eligibility and a final count of 13 studies were included in systematic review. The results of the risk of bias assessment for the included RCTs according to the 'RoB 2'. Results favored glycine powder air-polishing and ultrasonic devices over traditional mechanical debridement with curettes in improving clinical parameters. In at-home care, water flossers with chlorhexidine were able to reduce inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence points towards the use of glycine powder air-polishing and the use of ultrasonic devices for reduction of inflammation around implants, and for home care, many existing techniques seem to be able to control tissue inflammation, but the use of chlorhexidine in water-flossers seems to be a promising strategy.

Maintenance protocols for implant-supported dental prostheses: A scoping review

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Biological complications of implant-supported prostheses remain a concern. Therefore, standardizing hygiene protocols to promote their maintenance is important.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this scoping review was to identify available hygiene guidance for home care procedures, as well as periodicity and protocols for the professional maintenance of implant-supported prostheses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the study protocol was made available at: https://osf.io/5jdeh/. The search was last performed in the PubMed database on March 15, 2022 and was undertaken by 2 independent researchers. Clinical studies and reviews that evaluated home care and maintenance protocols for dental implant-supported prostheses (fixed or removable), without language restriction or year of publication, were included. A descriptive analysis was performed considering study characteristics (study design, restorative assembly, maintenance strategies, eligibility criteria, number of included studies, quality/level of evidence, and main findings).

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 3138 studies, of which 18 were included for descriptive analysis (6 critical reviews, 4 clinical trials, 3 systematic reviews, 2 guideline reports, 2 retrospective studies, and 1 transversal study). The main instrument recommended for home care was the use of a conventional toothbrush associated with triclosan-containing toothpaste in addition to interproximal aids (brushes or floss) for all types of restorations. The use of irrigation instruments was also frequently considered. For professional maintenance, almost all studies reported a positive effect of regular recalls every 3 months during the first year, followed by less regular recalls according to the motivation of the patient and home care efficacy. At each recall, the professional should evaluate the patient history, oral tissues, implant, abutments, and restorations, as well as perform professional cleaning of the prostheses with appropriate instruments so that the implants and abutments may be preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

Establishing an adequate hygiene protocol is indispensable for implant-supported restorations. To do so, the professional must guide and support the patient's home care by taking into account the patient's motivation and efficacy during the hygiene procedures. Also, for professional maintenance, the periodicity of recalls should be constant and include an evaluation of the condition of the restoration and adjacent tissues, followed by professional cleaning of prostheses, implants, and abutments, in addition to new instructions to improve patient home care.

Effect of Air Polishing on the Treatment of Peri-Implant Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Peri-implant diseases have become one of the notable biological complications of postrehabilitation with implant-supported restorations. Effective modalities for decontamination of biofilm deposits around implant surfaces are critical for resolution of the inflammation. Air polishing is one of the recommended clinical methods for treating peri-implant diseases. This systematic review assessed clinical evidence on efficacy of using air polishing technology for the management of peri-implant diseases, including peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Four electronic databases from January 1990 to December 2022 were searched to identify the relative human randomized clinical trials that applied air polishing for nonsurgical and surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Twelve articles were selected. For treating peri-implant mucositis, air polishing showed a comparable effect to ultrasonic scaling in the reduction of bleeding on probing (BOP) and probing pocket depth (PPD). The nonsurgical approach of air polishing in treating peri-implantitis varied in the reduction of BOP, PPD, and clinical attachment level (CAL) in evaluated studies. Air polishing in the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis was comparable to mechanical cleaning, implantoplasty, and the use of Ti-brush, in regards to the significant reduction of BOP, PPD, and CAL, as well as the improvement of the bone level between baseline and follow-ups. The standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval of the studied parameters was estimated using the random effect model; however, statistical differences were not detected between air polishing and comparative modalities in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Within the limitations of this review, the application of air polishing did not result in more favorable outcomes in the treatment of peri-implant diseases compared to other modalities.

A Review of Bacterial Colonization on Dental Implants With Various Hygiene Instruments

Peri-implant diseases can still develop despite oral hygiene practices being maintained. Consequently, regular debridement must be carried out to ensure the implant is sustained. This review evaluated bacterial colonization on implants following the use of different hygiene instruments. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases for articles published from 2012 to 2022. A total of 19 full-text papers were selected. The number of bacteria colonized was most commonly evaluated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) or by colony-forming unit (CFU) counts, crystal violet assays, plaque index, probing depth, bleeding on probing, turbidity test, and live-dead assays. Rubber cup polishing with an abrasive paste showed a significantly greater reduction in biofilm formation compared with air abrasion with glycine powder, while the air abrasion treatment was found to be more efficient than piezoelectric, carbon, and stainless steel scalers. Surface treatment with Er, Cr: YSGG laser, and Er: YAG laser resulted in statistically significant superior dental biofilm removal compared with titanium curettes and photodynamic therapy. Air abrasion, plastic curette, titanium curette, and ultrasonic scaler showed no significant differences in bacterial colonization, but air abrasion and plastic curette were safer for zirconia implant decontamination. Furthermore, the titanium brush showed better results in decontaminating the implant surface than the Er: YAG laser. Although no single instrument or method could be considered as offering a gold standard in treating peri-implant diseases, the use of air abrasion with glycine powder, laser therapies, rubber cup polishing with an abrasive paste, and a titanium brush had high levels of cleaning efficacy and acceptance by patients.

Effects of Nitric Oxide Supplementation on the Levels of Interleukin-6 in Saliva after Dental Implant Placement - A Prospective Study

Introduction

The purpose of the study was to evaluate and compare the levels of salivary Interleukin-6 (IL-6) before and after the placement of dental implants in patients who are supplemented with nitric oxide (NO).

Materials and Methods

The study comprised 34 patients, divided into control and study groups (17 in each group). The control group was given a placebo and in the study group, nitric oxide supplement was prescribed, whereas the control group received a placebo. Saliva samples were taken before placement of dental implants, first and third day after the implant placement. The levels of salivary IL-6 were assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test.

Results

Statistical analysis showed a significant P value (<0.05) with respect to IL-6 levels on first and third days after placement of dental implants. Salivary IL-6 levels in the study group declined significantly. On day three, the IL-6 values for the control and study groups were 0.0639 and 0.0443, respectively. Within the groups, it was observed that there was a significant decrease in IL-6 values from day one to day three.

Discussion

The levels of salivary IL-6 reduced from day one to day three more significantly and consistently in patients prescribed with NO supplements post-dental implant placement, suggesting better resolution of inflammation.

Efficacy of air polishing in comparison with hand instruments and/or power-driven instruments in supportive periodontal therapy and implant maintenance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) is the key for a stable periodontal health following active treatment. Likewise, implant maintenance is crucial following implant placement. This systematic review aimed to assess clinical outcomes, patients' perception, and cost-effectiveness of repeated periodontal therapy with air polishing devices (APDs) in comparison with hand instruments and/or power-driven instruments (conventional interventions) in SPT and implant maintenance.

METHODS

Electronic search for randomised controlled clinical trials with minimum 6 months follow-up for SPT and implant maintenance programme was conducted for data published from 01 January 2000 to 30 April 2020 using multiple databases and hand searching. Risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool (RoB 2).

RESULTS

A total of 823 articles were screened. 4 SPT and 2 implant maintenance studies were eligible for inclusion. For SPT, repeated APDs interventions revealed no statistically significant difference when compared to the conventional interventions (weighted mean difference [WMD] 0.11 mm, p = 0.08). Likewise, no statistical difference was noted in terms of percentage of bleeding on probing (BOP) and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain. APDs were associated with lower pain score (based on Visual Analogue Scale) and higher patient acceptance in SPT studies. For implant maintenance, APDs resulted in reduction in PPD and percentage of BOP. However, CAL gain was comparable between the two groups. In terms of patient reported outcomes, no implant maintenance studies recorded any forms of patient reported outcomes. In addition, no studies reported on economic evaluation of APDs in both SPT and implant maintenance.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this systematic review and meta-analysis, repeated subgingival debridement using APDs in SPT resulted in similar clinical outcomes but better patients' comfort when compared to the conventional interventions. For implant maintenance, there is limited evidence to show that repeated application of APDs leads to improved clinical outcomes when compared to conventional treatments.

Peri-implant health after supportive mucositis therapy is associated with increased levels of FGF-2

This study aimed to analyze Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 (FGF-2) levels in the peri-implant crevicular fluid throughout supportive mucositis therapy. Twenty-six participants with Branemark protocol prosthesis were divided into two groups: the control group, characterized by healthy peri-implants, and the mucositis group, presenting a diagnosis of peri-implant mucositis. All participants underwent clinical examination, radiographic analysis, prosthesis removal, and non-invasive peri-implant therapy (mechanical debridement associated with chlorhexidine 0.12%) during a period of 36 days divided into three intervals. Peri-implant crevicular fluid samples were collected at each interval in order to analyze FGF-2 levels by immuno-enzymatic assay. The control and mucositis groups showed difference in keratinized mucosa. The smaller the range of keratinized mucosa the higher susceptibility of peri-implant mucositis. Throughout the treatment intervals, participants were diagnosed in different groups indicating whether or not the non-invasive therapy was able to treat peri-implant mucositis. There was a significant difference of FGF-2 levels between groups, with the higher FGF-2 levels in the control group (p=0.01). After supportive therapy, the mucositis group showed significantly increased FGF-2 levels (p<0.01) compared to initial levels. After 36 days of supportive therapy, there was a reduction of peri-implant mucositis from 70% to 23%. Clinical and laboratory outcomes showed a clear correlation since FGF-2 levels increased after 36 days. It was concluded that the therapy protocol was effective and promoted a regenerative reaction and FGF-2 can be considered a future target for peri-implant mucositis understanding.

Novel Approach to Dental Biofilm Management through Guided Biofilm Therapy (GBT): A Review

Dental biofilm plays a very crucial role in the etiopathogenesis of periodontal andperi-implant diseases. Over the past decade, tremendous research has been carried outto know the structure of biofilm and the mechanism by which it causes the destruction of supporting tissues of tooth or implant. Periodontal or peri-implant therapy usually begins with primarily removing thebiofilm and is considered as non-surgical mechanical debridement. Although scaling and root planing (SRP) is regarded as a gold standard for mechanical plaque debridement, various other means of biofilm removal have constantly been evolving. These may vary from different scaling systems such as vector systems to decontamination of pockets with LASER therapy. Nowadays, a new concept has emerged known as “guided biofilm therapy” (GBT). It is beneficial in removing the biofilm around the tooth and implant structures, resulting in better or comparable clinical outcomes than SRP. These results were substantiated with the reduction in the microbial load as well as the reduction in the inflammatory cytokines. This review will highlight the various aspects of GBT used in periodontal and peri-implant disease.

Retrospective analysis of the long-term effect of subgingival air polishing in supportive periodontal therapy

AIM

Glycine powder air polishing (GPAP) procedure has become popular. Aim of the analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) of subgingival application of GPAP with those using sole conventional mechanical debridement (SC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Over a median SPT period of 5.3 years (re-evaluation through last observation), the GPAP cohort (n = 263) received supra- and subgingival biofilm removal with GPAP. Supragingival calculus was removed using curets and sonic scalers here. Patients in the SC cohort (n = 264) were treated with sonic scalers, curets and rubber cup polishing only. Changes in, that is pocket probing depth (PPD) and furcation involvement were assessed retrospectively. A bootstrapping equivalence testing method in line with the principle of the two one-sided tests (TOST) procedure was used to compare clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The GPAP procedure was statistically equivalent to SC regarding the number of sites with stable PPDs (83.3%; IQR 68.8%, 91.0% vs. 84.0%; IQR 77.8%, 90.0%). However, in the GPAP cohort, a trend towards deterioration in furcation status (no equivalence) was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

In periodontal maintenance, the use of GPAP instead of mechanical plaque removal does not improve the clinical outcome. It seems to be contraindicated to treat furcation defects with GPAP only.

The effects of decontamination methods of dental implant surface on cytokine expression analysis in the reconstructive surgical treatment of peri-implantitis

The aim of this trial was to analyze the effect of implant surface decontamination procedures combined with reconstructive surgical treatment (RST) of peri-implantitis on gene expression levels of selected biomarkers in peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF). Forty patients diagnosed with peri-implantitis were treated with RST + decontamination of the implant surface using sterile saline and ozone therapy (ozone group) or sterile saline alone (control group). The gene expression levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-17, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), sclerostin (SOST) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) were evaluated by qPCR analysis at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Changes in cytokine mRNA expression levels were analyzed and compared with clinical/radiographic parameters. Both decontamination methods lead to the downregulations of the selected gene expressions. Ozone group showed significantly higher clinical attachment level (CAL) and radiographic defect fill (DF) values at 6 months compared to the control group (p = 0.026 and p = 0.011). The downregulation of SOST levels was significantly associated with probing depth reduction and radiographic DF (p < 0.05). Implant surface decontamination procedures applied with the RST contribute to a notable reduction in immuno-inflammatory response. The additional use of ozone therapy could have favorable effects in anti-infective regimens of peri-implantitis therapy. SOST, which was found to have significant relationship with both clinical and radiographic outcomes, could be a valuable indicator for the progression of peri-implantitis and may aid the development of new therapeutic strategies for bone gain in the RST of peri-implantitis.

Maintenance of Implant Patients: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE

Patient-administered and professionally administered periimplant maintenance have been recommended to ensure long-term periimplant tissue health. In this narrative review, the effectiveness of patient and professionally administered interventions and the current level of evidence that periimplant maintenance therapy is effective in preventing the occurrence of periimplant disease were examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, for evidence-based articles in support of the above topics.

RESULTS

Twenty-six clinical trials were included and stratified into categories based on topics.

CONCLUSIONS

The following conclusions were reached: (a) mechanical plaque removal is the foundation of successful periimplant therapy; (b) patient- and professionally administered plaque control has been shown to reduce periimplant inflammation, although complete resolution of inflammation is not always evident; (c) the use of adjunctive chemical agents in maintaining periimplant health still remains to be determined; and (d) regular periimplant maintenance plays a significant role in maintaining periimplant soft and hard tissue health.